Next Article in Journal
A Customized 3D-Printed Bolus for High-Risk Breast Cancer with Skin Infiltration: A Pilot Study
Previous Article in Journal
Can Cytoreductive Nephrectomy Improve Outcomes of Nivolumab Treatment in Patients with Metastatic Clear-Cell Renal Carcinoma?
Previous Article in Special Issue
Adult Pancreatoblastoma: Clinical Insights and Outcomes Compared to Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma (PDAC)
 
 
Review
Peer-Review Record

Systemic Therapy for Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer—Current Landscape and Future Directions

Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(9), 5206-5223; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31090385
by Daniel Netto 1,*, Melissa Frizziero 1, Victoria Foy 1, Mairéad G. McNamara 1,2, Alison Backen 1,2 and Richard A. Hubner 1,2,*
Reviewer 1:
Reviewer 2:
Curr. Oncol. 2024, 31(9), 5206-5223; https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol31090385
Submission received: 3 July 2024 / Revised: 22 August 2024 / Accepted: 25 August 2024 / Published: 4 September 2024
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Treatments in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

Excellent review - please consider adding the following reference in the kRAS subsection:

A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Adjuvant Trial of GI-4000, a Recombinant Yeast Expressing Mutated RAS Proteins in Patients with Resected Pancreas Cancer.

Muscarella P, Bekaii-Saab T, McIntyre K, Rosemurgy A, Ross SB, Richards DA, Fisher WE, Flynn PJ, Mattson A, Coeshott C, Roder H, Roder J, Harrell FE, Cohn A, Rodell TC, Apelian D.J Pancreat Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;7(1):8-19. doi: 10.1089/pancan.2020.0021. eCollection 2021.PMID: 33786412

Author Response

Reviewer 1:
Excellent review - please consider adding the following reference in the kRAS subsection:

A Phase 2 Randomized Placebo-Controlled Adjuvant Trial of GI-4000, a Recombinant Yeast Expressing Mutated RAS Proteins in Patients with Resected Pancreas Cancer.

Muscarella P, Bekaii-Saab T, McIntyre K, Rosemurgy A, Ross SB, Richards DA, Fisher WE, Flynn PJ, Mattson A, Coeshott C, Roder H, Roder J, Harrell FE, Cohn A, Rodell TC, Apelian D.J Pancreat Cancer. 2021 Mar 23;7(1):8-19. doi: 10.1089/pancan.2020.0021. eCollection 2021.PMID: 33786412

Response to reviewer 1:

Dear Reviewer, thank you for your response and suggestion to include the above phase 2 trial. As the trial assessed patients with resected pancreatic cancer and treated them in the adjuvant setting, we felt it beyond the scope of this article to include, whereby we focus our attention on the landscape of metastatic pancreatic cancer.

 

Reviewer 2 Report

Comments and Suggestions for Authors

In this review entitled “Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer -  current landscape and future directions” by Daniel Netto et al discussed the up-to-date therapeutic management of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in numerous clinical trials with focus on potential breakthrough compared to the current standard of care which are FOLFOX or Gemcitabine (Gem). The authors divided the therapeutic development into multiple categories, such as cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted treatment, immune therapy etc and discussed them in great detail. Overall, the review is well written. 

  

However, I suggest expanding the content (5.5) of targeting desmoplastic stroma. PDAC is well known for its desmoplastic stroma nature when compared to other common cancer types. The thick fibroblasts barrier has been known for contributing to chem- and radio- therapy resistance, immune desert and drug delivery, which were the key factors contributing to the clinical trial failure mentioned in this review. At the beginning, people tried Hedgehog inhibitors and the failure of trials led to targeting the stromal components, which are Hyaluronic acid etc. Providing such content will help readers understand the unique challenges of PDAC and the endless efforts our researchers have made.

Author Response

Reviewer 2:
In this review entitled “Systemic therapy for metastatic pancreatic cancer -  current landscape and future directions” by Daniel Netto et al discussed the up-to-date therapeutic management of advanced pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) in numerous clinical trials with focus on potential breakthrough compared to the current standard of care which are FOLFOX or Gemcitabine (Gem). The authors divided the therapeutic development into multiple categories, such as cytotoxic chemotherapy, targeted treatment, immune therapy etc and discussed them in great detail. Overall, the review is well written. 

  

However, I suggest expanding the content (5.5) of targeting desmoplastic stroma. PDAC is well known for its desmoplastic stroma nature when compared to other common cancer types. The thick fibroblasts barrier has been known for contributing to chem- and radio- therapy resistance, immune desert and drug delivery, which were the key factors contributing to the clinical trial failure mentioned in this review. At the beginning, people tried Hedgehog inhibitors and the failure of trials led to targeting the stromal components, which are Hyaluronic acid etc. Providing such content will help readers understand the unique challenges of PDAC and the endless efforts our researchers have made.

Response to reviewer 2:

Dear Reviewer, thank you for your response and insights highlighting the importance of the desmoplastic stroma in tumourigensis and drug resistance. We agree that this important section should be further expanded and reflect some of the scientific challenges posed in treating pancreatic cancer.
We have therefore added further summaries of the difficulty in targeting CAF’s, particularly highlighting the lack of translational benefit from hedgehog inhibitors. We have also re-structured this section so that it reads more chronologically. We have also included ongoing clinical trials investigating novel ways of targeting the desmoplastic stroma.

Back to TopTop