Next Article in Journal
The Synthesis, Characterization, and Protein-Release Properties of Hydrogels Composed of Chitosan-Zingiber offcinale Polysaccharide
Next Article in Special Issue
Food-Borne Chemical Carcinogens and the Evidence for Human Cancer Risk
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Cobalamin (Vit B12) in Ripened Cheese by Ultra-High-Performance Liquid Chromatography Coupled with Mass Spectrometry
Previous Article in Special Issue
Myristicin and Elemicin: Potentially Toxic Alkenylbenzenes in Food
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Health Benefits and Risks of Consuming Spices on the Example of Black Pepper and Cinnamon

by
Joanna Newerli-Guz
* and
Maria Śmiechowska
Department of Quality Management, Gdynia Maritime University, Morska 83, 81-225 Gdynia, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Foods 2022, 11(18), 2746; https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182746
Submission received: 5 August 2022 / Revised: 31 August 2022 / Accepted: 2 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Natural Compounds in Plant-Based Food)

Abstract

:
The aim of this study is to present the benefits and risks associated with the consumption of black pepper and cinnamon, which are very popular spices in Poland. The article presents the current state of knowledge about health properties and possible dangers, such as liver damage, associated with their consumption. The experimental part presents the results of the research on the antioxidant properties against the DPPH radical, which was 80.85 ± 3.84–85.42 ± 2.34% for black pepper, and 55.52 ± 7.56–91.87 ± 2.93% for cinnamon. The total content of polyphenols in black pepper was 10.67 ± 1.30–32.13 ± 0.24 mg GAE/g, and in cinnamon 52.34 ± 0.96–94.71 ± 3.34 mg GAE/g. In addition, the content of piperine and pepper oil in black pepper was determined, as well as the content of coumarin in cinnamon. The content of piperine in the black pepper samples was in the range of 3.92 ± 0.35–9.23 ± 0.05%. The tested black pepper samples contained 0.89 ± 0.08–2.19 ± 0.15 mL/100 g d.m. of essential oil. The coumarin content in the cinnamon samples remained in the range of 1027.67 ± 50.36–4012.00 ± 79.57 mg/kg. Taking into account the content of coumarin in the tested cinnamon samples, it should be assumed that the majority of cinnamon available in Polish retail is Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J. Presl.

1. Introduction

Herbs and spices are very important in food technology, gastronomy and home cooking. Spices are most often defined as products of plant origin [1]. Initially their use was mainly combined with flavoring and improving the appearance of food. Then, it was pointed out that spices have preservative, antioxidant and antimicrobial properties, which significantly affect the shelf life and value of food [2]. Although the preservative properties of spices have been known to mankind since ancient times, nowadays, thanks to highly advanced analytical methods, we are learning about the compounds that are responsible for this action [3]. Health-protective properties are another benefit of the use of spices. Herbs and spices are carriers of numerous chemical compounds with health-improving properties that can provide potential protection against cardiovascular diseases, neurodegenerative diseases, diabetes type 2, and cancer [4]. However, we must remember the differences in terminology and we want to pay special attention to the difference between medicinal herbs, which are classified as medicinal products, and herbs, which are in turn food products.
Black pepper [Piper nigrum L.] and cinnamon [Cinnamomum spp.] are very popular spices in Poland. In 2020, imports of black pepper to Europe amounted to 80,000 tons, of which 6% was imported to Poland, and it was the 6th largest importer of black pepper in Europe. Over 75% of Polish pepper imports are whole grains. Part of the imported pepper is re-exported, and the estimated domestic consumption in 2020 was 5400 tons [5]. Among European countries, Poland ranks 6th when it comes to cinnamon imports (other than cinnamon Cinnamomum zeylanicum Blume neither crushed nor ground) and it accounts for 0.74% of total world imports. When it comes to cinnamon Cinnamomum zeylanicum B. neither crushed nor ground, Poland ranks 8th among the European countries with imports amounting to 0.32% [6]. Those two spices are one of the most consumed spices in Europe and Poland with a wide range of uses [7,8]. The aim of this work was to make a commodity characterization of these spices in the context of their potential importance for the consumer. In the above-mentioned spices, the main bioactive substances were determined and compared with the results of other authors’ research. Specifically, the antioxidant properties of the spices were determined as these are most often mentioned in the discussion of health-promoting properties of spices. Additionally, piperine and coumarine were chosen as representative biomarkers of the quality of black pepper and cinnamon, respectively. Piperine is the most important bioactive compound of black pepper, while coumarin due to its hepatotoxic activity should be closely monitored in any products with the addition of cinnamon.
An attempt was also made to determine the significance of the addition of a given spice to food on its health-promoting impact.

2. Characteristics of Selected Spices and Its Relevance to the Consumer

2.1. Black Pepper [Piper nigrum L.]—Origin, Types and Properties

Black pepper [Piper nigrum L.] is one of the most popular and one of the oldest spices [9]. It comes from the Malabar Coast of south-western India from where its journey around the world began. It is grown in many countries, including India, China, Indonesia, Malaysia, Brazil, Sri Lanka, and Vietnam. The great career of pepper began in the fifteenth and sixteenth centuries with the era of geographical discoveries. The spice is the dried seeds of this tropical evergreen plant. It occurs in several stages of harvesting as white, green and black pepper and differs in the degree of maturity and method of treatment.
Black pepper is obtained from unripe fruits by drying, most often in the sun, until the skin acquires a very dark color, almost black. Many factors influence the quality of black pepper (Figure 1). One of the factors affecting the quality of this spice is the variety of the plant. The Indian Spice Research Institute in India maintains the world’s largest collection of over 2000 varieties [9]. Other factors shaping the quality of black pepper are details of production including, inter alia, conditions of growing, harvesting, threshing, drying, cleaning, storage and standardization. The quality of black pepper depends largely on the size of the corns, color, the content of light, damaged peppercorns, humidity, the presence of foreign bodies such as animal excrement, and the presence of insects. These factors are fundamentally determined by the practices of harvesting, processing and the treatment of peppercorns on plantations and the classification and storage procedures adopted by exporters. Another aspect of quality is the level of microbial contamination, which should not exceed the permissible limits [10]. The commercial quality of black pepper is determined by pre-treatment and treatment of grains after harvest. Most often, peppercorn is blanched and intensively dried, as a result of which it usually contains less than 10% water.
However, pepper drying is not always carried out in mechanical dryers. In India, a very popular method is the solarization of pepper, which involves drying pepper in the sun after blanching in hot water [11]. Pepper is grown in tropical conditions characterized by high temperature, high precipitation and humidity. Such conditions are favorable to the development of fungi, which leads to an increased occurrence of mycotoxins, especially in the absence of Good Agricultural Practices (GAP), Good Manufacturing Practices (GMP) and Good Hygiene Practices (GHP) [12]. For additional protection of black pepper against mycotoxins, as well as for decontamination, gamma irradiation is used [13]. Increasingly, however, consumers are looking for organic or bio-based products. Such alternative cultivation methods include, for example, the combined use of Rhizosphere bacteria with endophytic bacteria, which inhibits root diseases and increases the productivity of black pepper. Organic cultivation, on the other hand, provides pepper without pesticide and herbicide residues [14,15,16]. Additional factors affecting the quality of pepper are climate change and economic and social factors. Research conducted by Karamawati et al. [17] shows that Indonesian farmers are switching from pepper to oil palms farming for this reason, which brings higher profits and requires less work. The growing conditions and commercial quality of black pepper affect the sensory characteristics, which gives satisfaction to consumers. Unfortunately, the consumers are often disappointed with the quality of the spice when they discern the lack of information about the origin of the spice or the content does not correspond to the name of the product. To identify and study the authenticity of black pepper, very advanced research methods such as infrared spectroscopy with Fourier-transform using chemometry or metabolomic studies using ultra-high-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high-resolution mass spectrometry must be used [18,19]. These methods are very expensive, time-consuming and require a huge commitment of forces and resources and very well-equipped research laboratories. Therefore, the study of authenticity and traceability seeks fast, non-destructive methods based on the analysis of various data using chemometry, which will shorten and accelerate the research at least at the initial stage of identification [20,21]. The sensory and health properties of black pepper arise from its composition. Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) contains compounds that can be classified into three groups. The first group consists of compounds that determine the sharpness of black pepper, the second includes substances that determine its aroma, and the third group consists of other compounds such as: fiber, starch, polyphenols, mineral salts, lipids [22]. The compound, which determines the pungent aroma of black pepper is piperine, together with its analogues.
From its detection by Hans Christian Ørsted in 1819, 55 piperine analogues were identified in black pepper [23]. The essential oil of black pepper also has very rich composition. It contains terpene and sesquiterpene hydrocarbons and their oxidized forms in the amount of 1–3%. Its composition is influenced by geographical origin and respective production process. A very important ingredient of black pepper is oleoresin, derived by extraction in the amount of 6–13%. It consists of 15–20% of essential oil and 35–55% piperine [24,25,26]. For the consumer, the quality of spice is determined by its seasoning properties (the smell and taste giving and improving in different dishes). The health properties of black pepper and piperine are presented on Figure 2 and in Table 1.

2.2. Cinnamon (Cinnamomum spp.)—Characteristics, Properties, Use

Cinnamon, next to pepper, is one of the most widely used spices in the world. Cinnamon (Cinnamomum Scheffer) belongs to the Lauracae family, which includes more than 200 species. Cinnamon trees are evergreen trees growing in tropical climates in countries such as India, Indonesia, Philippines, Sri Lanka, Myanmar, Vietnam and China. However, of these, only a few have a unique significance in medicine, cosmetology and as a spice (Table 2).
Species of cinnamon trees differ in the morphological features of the leaves, such as shape, color, size and veining. Other distinguishing features of cinnamon trees are the morphological features of flowers, fruits and bark. The properties of cinnamon are mainly due to flowers, fruits, leaves and bark composition. The most valued part of cinnamon due to its unique healing properties is the bark of C. verum J. Presl (synonym of C. zeylanicum Blume) [76]. The bark of C. verum J. Presl is thin, softer than other cinnamon trees bark, paper and curls inwards on both sides, while the bark of C. cassia L. is hard, thicker and curls only on one side, see Figure 3. Individual species of cinnamon bark also have a different color, aroma, tenderness and taste.
The medicinal and spicy properties of C. verum J. Presl cinnamon bark result mainly from its composition. In addition, Ceylon cinnamon is more expensive due to its chemical composition, high quality, health benefits, and trace amounts of coumarin, which is found in higher concentrations in Cassia cinnamon. Table 3 shows the bark composition of two popular cinnamon trees.
A number of compounds contained in cinnamon such as aldehydes, alcohols, acids, esters, terpenes and others cause that it is used as a flavoring agent in seasonings, sauces, pastries and sweets, drinks, meat dishes, cereals, chewing gums and fruit preserves. The cinnamaldehyde in cinnamon is responsible for its sweet taste, and the addition of sugar in food products further enhances this effect. Cinnamon oil obtained from bark is also a flavoring agent in perfumes and toilet waters, lotions, shampoos, soaps and other cosmetics [82].
In the food trade, cinnamon occurs in the form of bark fragments of various sizes, but more often in the form of ground powder. Ground cinnamon is sometimes falsified and instead of C. verum contains C. cassia or powder of other cinnamon trees, and on the labels of food products containing cinnamon there is no information about the origin of the raw material [83]. For this purpose, very specialized and advanced analytical methods are used to detect adulteration, which allow the identification of the raw material [51,84,85,86,87].
The identification of geographical origin is also important due to the presence of coumarin in cinnamon. Coumarin compounds with a benzopyrone structure are found in plants of the families Leguminosae (Legumes), Rutaceae (Ruthaceae), Umbellifereae (Apiaceae) (Umbellate), Compositae (Complex), Gramineae (Grassy), forming connections of a glycosidic nature. However, in 1954, when the FDA report on the hepatotoxic effects of coumarin was published, the European Commission directive 88/388/EEC (Annex II) recommended that the intake of coumarin from natural sources, used as a food additive, should not exceed 2 mg/kg of food.
In 2005, Chemisches and Veterinäruntersuchungsamt in Münster, Germany, determined a coumarin content of 22 mg/kg in a sample of Christmas cinnamon cookies, which led to a discussion on increasing the supervision of food products containing coumarin, as well as on compliance with the limits by food producers [88]. As a result of these studies and discussions, the EFSA (European Food Safety Authority) has set the Acceptable Daily Intake (ADI for animals at 0.1 mg/kg body weight based on the maximum non-harmful dose (NOAEL). In 2008, the EFSA established the same TDI for humans [89].
C. verum is mainly used for medicinal purposes, due to the fact that only this species of cinnamon contains small amounts of coumarin. Cinnamon for medicinal purposes has been used since ancient times [90] and the medicinal properties of cinnamon have been confirmed in numerous studies (Figure 4 and Table 4).

3. Materials and Method

Samples (25) of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) were obtained from the polish market. The test samples were representative of the entire Polish market. They came from a network of super and hyper stores present throughout the country, i.e., Auchan, Carrefour, Biedronka Jeronimo Martens, Kaufland, Lidl, Netto, Dino. These included both branded products and own brands of retail chains. All samples were encoded and analyzed. The piperine, essential oil content and antioxidant activity against DPPHꞏ radical and total polyphenols were investigated.
Material for the study consisted of 12 samples of ground cinnamon (Cinnamomum spp.) purchased in Poland. The coumarin content and antioxidant activity against DPPHꞏ radical and total polyphenols were investigated.

3.1. Used Chemicals

2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl (DPPH), Folin–Ciocalteu reagent, gallic acid, standard coumarin (purity ≥ 99%) were purchased from Sigma Aldrich GmbH (Steinheim, Germany), HPLC grade methanol and ethanol were obtained from POCH S.A. (Gliwice, Poland).
Five packages of each spice sample were taken from the market according to PN-ISO 948 [112], then milled in case of black pepper and cinnamon according to PN-ISO 2825 [113], and then 1% aqueous extracts were prepared.

3.2. Total Phenolic Content

The total phenolic content (TP) in water crude extracts was determined by the Folin–Ciocialteau method with modifications [114] 2.5 mL of 0.2 N FC reagent was added to tested solutions and mixed. After 5 min, 2 mL 75 g/L Na2CO3 solution was added. After 120 min incubation, the absorbance relative to that of a prepared blank was read at 760 nm using a spectrophotometer (Unicam UV2, Varian). The TP content is expressed in mg of gallic acid equivalents (mg GAE/g of product).

3.3. DPPH Free Radical Scavenging

Antioxidant activity was determined using the DPPH reagent and showed as DPPH radical scavenging percent. Free radical scavenging effect was determined using the free radical DPPH (2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl) reagent. 1 mL of the extract was added to 2 mL DPPH. The samples were gently mixed and left to stand in the darkness for 60 min. Absorbance was read at 517 nm using spectrophotometer. A control sample was prepared by mixing DPPH with distilled water. The ability of extracts to scavenge DPPH free radicals was calculated according to the following equation:
Radical   scavenging   activity   [ % ]   AA % = Abs contr Abs sample Abs contr × 100
The values are presented as the means of triplicate analyses.

3.4. Piperine Assay

Crushed black pepper was extracted with ethanol (97% or absolute), and the obtained extracts were determined spectrophotometrically at a wavelength λ = 342 nm using UV-VIS spectrophotometer Unicam. The determination was made in three repetitions [115].

3.5. Essential Oil Content

The determination of essential oil content in crushed black pepper was made by steam distillation in a Dering apparatus [116]. The essential oil content was expressed as mL/100 g d.m. Determinations were performed in triplicate.

3.6. Coumarin Content

The separation of coumarin was obtained in ground cinnamon by the HPLC method using RP-Nova Pack C18 (240 × 4.6 mm, 5 µm) column. A mobile phase was composed of acetonitrile water with a gradient elution at a flow rate of 1 mL/min. The identification of coumarin in the cinnamon samples was conducted based on their retention time compared with the retention time of the standard. The HPLC method was validated in term of linearity, limit of detection, limit of quantification, precision and accuracy.

3.7. Statistical ANALYSIS

Results were presented as the mean and standard deviation. The experimental designs and calculations were conducted using the Software Package Statistica 10.0 (StatSoft Inc., Tulsa, OK, USA).
The experiments were evaluated using analysis of variance (ANOVA) to find the impact of the type and quantity of spices on the evaluated parameters. Statistical hypotheses were verified at a significance level of p values < 0.05.

4. Results and Discussion

The analyses of selected bioactive compounds content and antioxidant activity were carried out in samples of black pepper and cinnamon available on the Polish retail market. These studies will allow to assess the amounts of bioactive substances which Polish consumers will find in these spices. The obtained results were compared with the other authors’ studies.

4.1. Analysis of Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.)

Black pepper samples (25) were encoded, the total content of polyphenols, antioxidant activity, the content of essential oil and piperine were determined. The analyses were performed in three repetitions and the results are presented in Table 5.

4.1.1. Antioxidant Properties of Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.)

The research showed different antioxidant activity of the tested black pepper samples available on the Polish market. The content of total polyphenols ranged from 9.75 to 32.13 mg GAE/g. The results of the statistical analysis confirmed that the pepper origin (brand) significantly influences the total content of polyphenols (KW-H(24) = 114.126, (p = 0.000)). The antiradical activity of the tested samples was at a high level, ranging from 63.93% to 85.42%. Statistical analysis showed that the brand of pepper influences the ability to scavenge DPPH free radicals (KW-H(24) = 114.63, p = 0.001).
The obtained results of our own research showed that the content of essential oils in pepper significantly influences the antioxidant activity measured with the use of DPPH radicals. A statistically significant, positive weak correlation between these parameters was found r = 0.251 (p = 0.045). It means that as the content of essential oil increases, the ability of the spice to scavenge DPPH radicals also increases. It should also be noted that pepper oil has a moderate ability to scavenge free radicals compared to other oils [117]. Gülçin points to the strong antioxidant properties of water and ethanolic black pepper extracts. The total content of polyphenols was determined at the level of 54.3 mg GAE in aqueous extracts [118]. The total content of polyphenols determined by Andradea and Ferreira, depending on the modification in the extraction, ranged from 14 to 27 mg GAE/g [119]. Ahmad determined the total content of polyphenols in the methanol extracts of black pepper purchased in Delhi, at the level of 172.8 mg GAE/100 g [120]. Nagy et al., determined the content of polyphenols in black pepper at the level of 338 ± 1.41 mg GAE/100 g, and the scavenging capacity of DPPH free radicals in methanolic solutions of pepper at the level of 13.28% [121].
The ability to scavenge free radicals of aqueous pepper extracts in the studies by Nahak and Sahu was for cubeb pepper (Piper cubeba) from 35.38 to 45.84% and for black pepper from 28.15 to 39.92%. In ethanol solutions it increased to 77.61% for cubeb pepper and 74.61% for black pepper [122]. The DPPH scavenging capacity of 35.20% was determined for an aqueous solution of black pepper by Gupta [123].
The polyphenol content of various pepper extracts was determined by Sruthi and Zachariah. Pepper extracts in chloroform and methanol showed the highest content of polyphenols compared to those in which n-hexane and water were used. In the case of black pepper, the total content of polyphenols in the aqueous solution was at the level of 3.84 µg GAE/g, and in the case of P. longum pepper, 2.16 µg GAE/g [124].
The high total polyphenol content in black pepper grown in Korea was determined by Lee et al., at the level of 1421.95 ± 22.35 mg GAE/100 g [125]. In another study, Lee et al., determined the total content of polyphenols in ethanol extracts of whole Korean peppercorns and after debarking, and it was 1046 ± 22 and 797 ± 28 mg GAE/100 g, respectively [26]. One of the lowest total polyphenols contents in black pepper from Bhubaneswar, India was shown by Mallick et al., and it was at the level of 11.9 ± 0.1 mg GAE/100 g [126].
In this context, the results obtained by Trifan et al., in different extracts are very interesting. The scavenging capacity of DPPH extracts with hexane, dichloromethane, 50% aqueous methanol and methanol was 18.77 ± 0.24, 19.56 ± 0.59, 45.41 ± 0.03, and 32.41 ± 0.07 mg Trolox equivalents (TE)/g, respectively. The presented research results indicate the importance of the analytical technique used in the extraction of the research material, and specifically in the type of polar and non-polar solvent used for the extraction of the spice [127].
In their research, Suchaj et al., showed a statistically significant effect of black pepper irradiation on the increase in antioxidant activity determined with the use of DPPH radicals after 2 months of storage. After 4 months of storage, these changes ranged from 4 to 9% [128].

4.1.2. Piperine Content in Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.)

The content of piperine in the studied samples of pepper varies. Three samples of pepper did not meet the requirements of the PN-A-86965:1997, the piperine content in them being less than the required 4%, but they met the requirements of Codex Alimentarius. A piperine content of 3.5% in black pepper is mandatory according to ESA 2015 and Codex Alimentarius FAO/WHO [129,130]. The content of piperine of four manufacturers was at the limit of the requirements of the standard and ranged from 3.92 to 3.98%. The remaining samples met the requirements of the standard, with the highest average piperine content equal 6.61%. The results of the statistical analysis confirmed that the brand of pepper affected the content of piperine. The calculated statistic was KW-H(24) = 620.83431 (p = 0.000).
The content of piperine at a similar level (2–7.4%) was determined by Ravidran [131]. Hamrapurkar et al., determined the piperine content of black pepper by the HPLC method. The piperine content was 8.13% in P. nigrum and 4.32% in P. longum, and these levels were slightly higher when extracted with CO2 gas (supercritical fluid) and methanol as a cosolvent and amounted to 8.76% and 4.96%, respectively [132]. A similar method was used by Rajopadhye et al., to determine the piperine content of various types of pepper purchased in Indian supermarkets. They obtained mixed results: 4.52% for P. nigrum, 3.71% for P. longum, and 1.19% for P. cubeba [133].
Zachariah et al., determined the piperine content at a much lower level from 2.8 to 3.8%. In a later study, the same authors determined piperine in black pepper from different locations in India: the lowest contents were found in pepper from Thevam (1.6%) and Neelamundi (2.0%), and the highest in samples from Perumkodi (9.5%) and Kuthiravally (8.7%) [134]. In addition to the type, the place of cultivation also affects the content of bioactive compounds in pepper. Sruthi et al., in the genus Panniyur-1, depending on the place of cultivation, determined the piperine content at the level of 2.13 to 4.49% [135].
The geographical origin also affects the varying levels of piperine content in black pepper. The high content of piperine in pepper from Malaysia (Malacca) was determined by HPLC by Rezvanian et al., and amounted to 5.85% [136]. Piperine in Indian and Malaysian pepper as determined by Jansz et al., was at the level of 2–7%, while in pepper from Sri Lanka above 7% [137]. Shango et al., found that the piperine content in black pepper depends on climatic factors such as air temperature, humidity, water availability and the amount of precipitation. In addition, they showed that the piperine content was influenced by the height at which the crop is located. Black pepper grown in Indonesia at an altitude of 650, 450 and 190 m above sea level contained 4.52%, 4.47% and 3.38% piperine, respectively [138]. The lowest piperine content in black pepper so far was determined by Ajaml [139]. The used reversed-phase liquid chromatography (RP-HPLC) method for the determination of piperine content in samples of pepper grown in various districts in Kerala, India, and it was in the range of 1.53 ± 0.002 to 1.78 ± 0.002 % w/w.
In turn, Lee et al. [125] determined piperine in samples of Korean pepper at the level of 2352.19 ± 68.88 mg/100 g. A similar content of piperine was determined by Shrestha et al. [140] in black pepper samples taken from various areas of Kathmandu in Nepal, and it ranged from 2.33% to 3.34% with an average of 2.75% and a standard deviation of 0.31%. In another study by Lee et al. [26] in Korean pepper samples, they determined piperine in the whole black pepper grain and in the grain with the peel stripped off, at 3728 ± 0.180 and 4035 ± 0.108%, respectively. It turned out that when the peel was removed, the piperine content was 8.2% higher, and the removal of the outer skin led to a softer taste and greater bioactivity of the black pepper.

4.1.3. Essential Oil Content in Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.)

While the content of piperine affects the sensory properties of pepper and determines its sharpness, the essential oil has a decisive influence on the aromatic properties. However, it should be remembered that both the content of piperine and essential oil are important factors influencing the health properties of black pepper, which is widely discussed in the theoretical part of this study. Moreover, the essential oil not only influences the aromatizing properties but also inhibits the growth of many microorganisms, including pathogenic microorganisms. The research of Nikoloć et al., showed that P. niger essential oil has a preservative effect on food [141].
The essential oil content of the 25 tested samples of black peppercorns was diversified. On average, it ranged from 0.89 to 2.19 mL/100 g of dry product. According to the requirements of the PN-A-86965 standard [117], the oil content should not be lower than 1.5 mL/100 g for black peppercorns and 1 mL/100 g for ground black pepper. The average content of essential oil in 50% of the tested samples did not meet the requirements of the above-mentioned standards, and was below 1.5 mL/100 g. According to Codex Alimentarius, the content of essential oil in black pepper should not be less than 2% of the dry weight [129,142].
The Kruskal–Wallis test showed the existence of differences in the essential oil content between the tested samples (KW-H(25) = 62.547, p = 0.001).
Published works on the content of essential oil in black pepper are rare and concern various aspects related to it. The content of essential oil, apart from factors related to the product, depends on the extraction conditions. The amount of essential oil increases as the extraction temperature increases. The efficiency of the process increases for black peppercorns from 0.4% after 40 min at 100 °C to 2.6% at a temperature of 250 °C [143]. These amounts are similar to those presented by Pino et al., who determined them at the level of 1 to 3% [144]. Rezvanian found the content of essential oil in peppercorns from Malaysia also at a relatively low level, ranging from 0.76% for Jahor pepper to 1.06% for Malacca pepper [138]. A more varied amount of essential oil is given by Zachariach et al. It ranges from 0.6% for the genus Perunkodi to 6.0% for the genus Subhakara [145].
Kurian et al., observed the variability in the essential oil content in the range from 2.7 to 5.1%, they also believe that the classical hydrodistillation method is the best method of obtaining volatile oils compared to other techniques [146]. On the other hand, other researchers publish results showing significantly lower levels of essential oil, also obtained by hydrodistillation. Rmili et al., confirmed that the hydrodistillation method is one of the best methods for obtaining essential oil from black pepper, however, the amount of essential oil obtained by them from black pepper remained at a low level of 1.24% [147]. A slightly higher content of essential oil in the range of 1.60–2.80% was obtained by hydrodistillation from black pepper by Hussain et al. [148].
The results of other authors’ studies confirm that the location of crops also significantly affects the content of essential oil in the same type of pepper. Sruthi determined the content of an oil of the Panniur-1 genus depending on the cultivation location, the determined amounts of the oil varied, and their content ranged from 1.6 to 3.2% [135]. Additionally, the studies carried by Chen et al., showed that the content of essential oil in pepper is influenced by the place of cultivation. They tested 25 samples of black and white pepper from different growing regions. The Investigated black pepper from the Yunnan Province in China contained 4.12%, and white pepper contained 3.01% of essential oil. On the other hand, the content of essential oil obtained from pepper originating in Indonesia and Vietnam was at the level of approximately 2% [25].

4.2. Analysis of Cinnamon (Cinnamonum sp.)

Table 6 presents the results of the determination of the content of bioactive substances and antioxidant properties in cinnamon samples purchased on the Polish retail market. They are referred to the other authors studies.

4.2.1. Antioxidant Properties of Cinnamon (Cinnamonum sp.)

Among the analyzed samples, the highest total content of phenolic compounds was found in the sample 11 at 97.17 mg GAE/g, and the lowest in the sample 9 at 52.345 mg GAE/g (Table 6). The highest capacity of scavenging DPPH radicals was observed in the samples of producer 11 (91.87% on average), and the lowest in sample number 5, for which it amounted to 55.52%. The performed statistical analysis confirmed that the origin (brand) of cinnamon significantly influences the total phenolic content (K-W, H(15) = 59.025, p = 0.001), and the ability to scavenge free radicals (K-W, H(15) = 69.582, p = 0.000).
The total content of polyphenols in cinnamon bark determined by Abraham was 289.0 ± 2.2 mg GAE/g of plant [149].
The highest content of polyphenols was found in cassia bark ethanol extracts (9.534 g GAE/100 g d.m.), in leaves (8.854 g GAE/100 g d.m.) and the lowest in buds (6.313 g GAE/100 g d.m.). Extracts obtained from extraction with a CO2 supercritical fluid with metanol were characterized by a lower content of total polyphenols [150]. In addition, they confirmed the high DPPH radical scavenging capacity (over 80%) of Cinnamomum cassia ethanolic extracts. They obtained the highest values for cinnamon leaves.
Mathew and Abraham found a statistically significant decrease in the concentration of the DPPH radical along with an increase in the concentration of cinnamon bark extract from about 60% for a 3.125 µg/mL solution to about 5% for a 50 µg/mL solution [151]. Dragland found very high concentrations of antioxidants (>75 mmol/100 g) in the Cinnamomi cortex [152]. Additionally, other studies confirm the ability of plants from the Cinnamomum family to scavenge free radicals [153,154,155].
Prasad found a difference in the DPPH free radical scavenging ability between different grades of cinnamon. They decrease as follows: C. zeylanica > C. cassia > BHT > C. pasiflorum > C. burmannii > C. tamala [156]. The aqueous and alcoholic extracts of cinnamon (1:1) showed a significant ability to inhibit lipid oxidation in the in vitro lipid oxidation test [157].
Cinnamon has a higher oxidation inhibitory capacity than BHA, BHT and propyl gallate tested in the lipid peroxidation test [158]. Prakash et al. [159] found a high free radical scavenging capacity in solutions from cinnamon bark of C. zeylanicum, similar to the characteristics obtained by ascorbic acid.
Lin et al., assessed the antioxidant activity (using the DPPH radical) of 42 types of essential oils, including cinnamon oil. They showed the highest DPPH radical scavenging activity among the studied essential oils at the level of 91.4 ± 0.002% [160]. In another test, this spice was recognized as the best natural antioxidant, stronger than its synthetic counterparts (BHA, BHT). This is important to extend the shelf life of foodstuffs as oxidation is one of the most common chemical reactions responsible for food spoilage. It is likely that the high content of flavonoids is an essential basis for such a strong antioxidant activity [161].
Interesting, especially related to its use in cooking, is the fact that cinnamon’s antioxidant properties increase with the extraction temperature. Shobana and Akhilender Naidu subjected that the extract in a temperature of 100 °C for 30 min, not only did not lose its antioxidant properties, but rather showed a significant increase in them. “Cold” cinnamon extract had an antioxidant activity equal to 21%, while when cooked it increased by as much as 35% [157].
Trifan et al., showed that the antioxidant properties of cinnamon depend on the extraction method. They extracted the cinnamon bark with hexane, dichloromethane, 50% aqueous methanol and methanol. The result was a total polyphenol content of 18.46 ± 0.27, 14.00 ± 0.15, 92.90 ± 0.46, and 63.68 ± 1.48 mg GAE/g, respectively. In the same study, the antioxidant activity (using the DPPH radical) was as follows: 6.96 ± 0.41, 9.39 ± 0.57, 473.74 ± 1.45, 178.42 ± 0.81%. These results clearly indicate a high relationship between antioxidant activity and the extraction technique, i.e., the polarity of the solvent, which influences the extraction of cinnamon essential oil [127].

4.2.2. Coumarin Content in Cinnamon (Cinnamonum spp.)

In 16 samples of cinnamon purchased on the Polish market, the varied content of coumarin was determined and ranged from 1027.67 ± 50.36 to 4012.00 ± 79.57 mg/kg. The performed statistical analysis allowed us to establish the existence of a relationship between the origin (brand) of cinnamon and the content of coumarin (K-W, H(15) = 35.325, p = 0.0003). The conducted research allows us to assume due to the high content of coumarin, but also a strong aroma and slightly sweet taste that we are dealing with cassia.
These results are also confirmed by other authors [162,163,164]. Authors examining the content of coumarin in cinnamon found that it is directly related to the species of cinnamon and the degree of processing (it differs for the bark of cinnamon and ground cinnamon). Woehrlin et al., report the coumarin content in cinnamon bark at the level of 1740 to 7670 mg/kg [165]. Its content in the bark found in Chinese studies was even over 12,000 mg/kg [166]. In ground cinnamon, Blahova and Svobodova [164] gave it at the level from 2650 to 7017 mg/kg in samples from the Czech market. A high level of coumarin was also determined by Ho et al.—29,400 mg/kg DS [167]. On the other hand, Lungarini found very low contents (<100 mg/kg) in ground C. verum, and up to 3094 mg/kg in cassia [168].
The higher content of coumarin in cassia than in Ceylon cinnamon is also confirmed by studies by other authors. Sproll et al. [163] found in the tested samples from the German market the absence of coumarin in Ceylon cinnamon, while in cassia, it was determined at the level of 2880–4820 mg/kg. In the samples of cinnamon of undefined origin, these amounts reached even 8790 mg/kg, and 85% of the 20 samples contained coumarin, so it can be presumed that 15% were samples of Ceylon cinnamon.
Among the food products containing cinnamon, an important source of coumarin were cinnamon cookies with up to 88 mg of coumarin/kg, and bread and breakfast cereals (up to 32 mg of coumarin/kg). This results in an amount exceeding the TDI by a child consuming just three to four cinnamon cookies weighing 5 g, and for an adult it is about ten pieces. Coumarin was present in small amounts in dairy products (up to 2 mg/k) and alcohols (up to 8 mg/kg) [163].
Research conducted in India has shown that cinnamon sourced directly from plantations has a low to moderate coumarin content, ranging from 12.3 to 143 mg/kg. On the other hand, a high content of coumarin was found in samples of ground cinnamon purchased in retail stores and it ranged from 819 to 3462 mg/kg. Only one market sample of cinnamon purchased from an authentic spice vendor showed low coumarin content (19.6 mg/kg). The authors of the study suggest that market cinnamon is very often adulterated with cheaper substitutes such as C. cassia and C. burmanii, because market cinnamon containing the least coumarin was three times more expensive than other market products [169].
In spice mixtures containing cinnamon, the coumarin content reaches 4308 mg/kg [170], and in plants from the Lamiaceace family it ranges from 14,300 to 276,900 mg/kg DS, Lavandula-lavender and Salvia-sage show its highest content [171].
Authors including Sproll [163] and Abraham [149] consider that regulations on the content of coumarin in food should be established, which was reflected in the Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EC) No. 1334/2008 of 16 December 2008 [172].
Ground cinnamon and spice blends purchased in retail stores have led food regulatory authorities in many countries to increase the frequency of inspections [173,174]. The Norwegian Scientific Committee for Food Safety (Vitenskapskomiteen for mattrygghet, VKM), at the request of the Norwegian Food Safety Authority (Mattilsynet), conducted a risk assessment of coumarin consumption in the Norwegian population. As a result of these studies, it was found that a small or occasional exceeding of the TDI is not considered to increase the risk of adverse health effects. The consumption of coumarin may in some cases exceed the TDI seven to twenty times. Liver toxicity may occur soon after the initiation of coumarin exposure. Such large daily exceedances of TDI, even within a limited period of 1–2 weeks, raise concerns about adverse health effects [175].

5. Conclusions

The principal role of spices is to raise the quality of food to a higher level. Hence, spices are used primarily to provide consumers with a sensory experience and pleasure from consuming food [176]. Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) and cinnamon (Cinnamomum spp.) are frequently consumed spices in Poland. The research discussed in this paper shows that these spices, apart from influencing the sensory value of food, may have a positive effect on the human body. The research carried out in this study shows that the quality of black pepper available to consumers in retail trade was at a good level, as measured by the results of the content of piperine and pepper oil. The content of piperine in the black pepper samples was in the range of 3.92 ± 0.35–9.23 ± 0.05%. The tested black pepper samples contained 0.89 ± 0.08–2.19 ± 0.15 mL/100 g d.m. essential oil. The coumarin content in the cinnamon samples remained in the range of 1027.67 ± 50.36–4012.00 ± 79.57 mg/kg. Taking into account the coumarin content, we suppose that the majority of cinnamon available in the Polish retail trade is Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J. Presl.
In the wider context of the research carried out, the question is what are the benefits of consuming spices for consumers? These benefits appear to depend primarily on the amount of spices consumed and their quality, measured by the content of the important bioactive substances. Therefore, the inspection services face a major task of ensuring that the quality of spices available on the market is as high as possible, because only then will these spices will have a high sensory value and will have an impact on human health. Consequently, there is still a need for more research into how spices affect the specific organs of the human body [177,178].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing, visualization, J.N.-G. and M.Ś.; methodology, investigation, J.N.-G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

The data are available from the corresponding author on request.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Embuscado, M.E. Spices and herbs: Natural sources of antioxidants—A mini review. J. Funct. Foods 2015, 18, 811–819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Yashin, A.; Yashin, Y.; Xia, X.; Nemzer, B. Antioxidant Activity of Spices and Their Impact on Human Health: A Review. Antioxidants 2017, 6, 70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Abdel-Aziz, S.M.; Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Alagawany, M.; Abdel-Moneim, A.-M.E.; Mohammed, N.G.; Khafaga, A.F.; Bin-Jumah Aeron, A.; Kahil, T.A. Health Benefits and Possible Risks off Herbal Medicine. In Microbes in Food and Health; Garg, N., Abdel-Aziz, S.M., Aeron, A., Eds.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switzerland, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  4. Vázquez-Fresno, R.; Rosana, A.R.R.; Sajed, T.; Onookome-Okome, T.; Wishart, N.A.; Wishart, D.S. Herbs and Spices—Biomarkers of Intake Based on Human Intervention Studies—A Systematic Review. Genes Nutr. 2019, 14, 18. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Directive 2004/24/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004. “Herbal Substances Are: All, Mainly Whole, Divided or Cut Plants, Parts of Plants, Algae, Fungi, Lichen in Un-Processed Form, Usually Dried, Sometimes Fresh”. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/ALL/?uri=CELEX:32004L0024 (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  6. Śmiechowska, M.; Newerli-Guz, J.; Skotnicka, M. Spices and seasoning mixes in European Union-innovations and ensuring safety. Foods 2021, 10, 2289. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Chironi, S.; Bacarella, S.; Altamore, L.; Columba, P.; Ingrassia, M. Consumption of spices and ethnic contamination in the daily diet of Italians -consumers’ preferences and modification of eating habits. J. Ethn. Foods 2021, 8, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Bortnowska, G.; Kałużna-Zajączkowska, J. Preferencje wyboru przypraw sypkich do potraw przez osoby pracujące zawodowo z uwzględnieniem innowacyjnych zmian w ich produkcji. Rocz. Państw. Zakł. Hig. 2011, 62, 445–452. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  9. Krishnamoorthy, B.; Parthasarathy, V.A. Improvement of Black Pepper. CAB Rev. 2009, 4, 85. Available online: https://cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/10.1079/PAVSNNR20105003 (accessed on 4 May 2022). [CrossRef]
  10. Korikanthimath, V.S.; Dhas, P.H.A. Processing and quality of black pepper—A review. J. Spices Aromat. Crops 2003, 12, 1–13. [Google Scholar]
  11. Ganapathi, T.; Patil, S.V.; Rajakumar, G.R. Processing of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) through solarisation. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2018, 14, 211–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Pickova, D.; Ostry, V.; Malir, J.; Toman, J.; Malir, F. A Review on Mycotoxins and Microfungi in Spices in the Light of the Last Five Years. Toxins 2020, 12, 789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Jalili, M.; Jinap, S.; Noranizam, M.A. Aflatoxins and ochratoxins a reduction in black and white pepper by gamma radiation. Radiat. Phys. Chem. 2012, 81, 1786–1788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Ee, K.P.; Shang, C.Y. Novel Farming Innovation for High Production of Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.) Planting Materials. J. Agric. Sci. Technol. B 2017, 7, 301–308. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sulok, K.M.T.; Ahmed, O.H.; Khew, C.Y.; Zehnder, J.A.M. Introducing Natural Farming in Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.) Cultivation. Int. J. Agron. 2018, 2018, 9312537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Nguyen, S.D.; Trinh, T.H.T.; Tra, T.D.; Nguyen, T.V.; Chuyen, H.V.; Ngo, V.A.; Nguyen, A.D. Combined Application of Rhizosphere Bacteria with Endophytic Bacteria Suppresses Root Diseases and Increases Productivity of Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Agriculture 2021, 11, 15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Karmawati, E.; Ardana, I.K.; Siswanto; Soetopo, D. Factors effecting pepper production and quality in several production center. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2020, 418, 012051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Hu, L.; Yin, C.; Ma, S.; Liu, Z. Assessing the authenticity of black pepper using diffuse reflectance midinfrared Fourier transform spectroscopy coupled with chemometrics. Comput. Electron. Agric. 2018, 154, 491–500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rivera-Pérez, A.; Romero-González, R.; Frenich, A.G. Application of an innovative metabolomics approach to discriminate geographical origin and processing of black pepper by untargeted UHPLC-Q-Orbitrap-HRMS analysis and mid-level data Fusion. Food Res. Int. 2021, 150, 110722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Cantarelli, M.Á.; Moldes, C.A.; Marchevsky, E.J.; Azcarate, S.M.; Camiña, J.M. Low-cost analytic method for the identification of Cinnamon adulteration. Microchem. J. 2020, 159, 1055132020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Modupalli, N.; Naik, M.; Sunil, C.K.; Natarajan, V. Emerging non-destructive methods for quality and safety monitoring of spices. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 108, 133–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Milenković, A.N.; Stanojević, L.P. Black pepper—Chemical composition and biological activities. Adv. Technol. 2021, 10, 40–50. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hammouti, B.; Dahmani, M.; Yahyi, A.; Ettouhami, A.; Messali, M.; Asehraou, A.; Bouyanzer, A.; Warad, I.; Touzani, R. Black Pepper, the “King of Spices”: Chemical composition to applications. Arab. J. Chem. Environ. Res. 2019, 6, 12–56. [Google Scholar]
  24. Bermawie, N.; Wahyuni, S.; Heryanto, R.; Darwati, I. Morphological characteristics, yield and quality of black pepper Ciinten variety in three agro ecological conditions. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2019, 292, 012065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, S.-A.; Yang, K.; Xiang, J.-Y.; Kwaku, O.R.; Han, J.-X.; Zhu, X.-A.; Huang, Y.-T.; Liu, L.-J.; Shen, S.-B.; Li, H.-Z.; et al. Comparison of Chemical Compositions of the Pepper EOs from Different Cultivars and Their AChE Inhibitory Activity. Nat. Prod. Commun. 2020, 15, 1934578X20971469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lee, J.-G.; Kim, D.-W.; Shin, Y.; Kim, Y.-J. Comparative study of the bioactive compounds, Lee flavours and minerals present in black pepper before and after removing the outer skin. LW-Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 125, 109356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Aswar, U.; Shintre, S.; Chepurwar, S.; Aswar, M. Antiallergic effect of piperine on ovalbumin-induced allergic rhinitis in mice. Pharm. Biol. 2015, 53, 1358–1366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Kim, S.-H.; Lee, Y.-C. Piperine inhibits eosinophil infiltration and airway hyperresponsiveness by suppressing T cell activity and Th2 cytokine production in the ovalbumin-induced asthma model. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2009, 61, 353–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Bukhari, I.A.; Alhumayyd, M.S.; Mahesar, A.L.; Gilani, A.H. The analgesic and anticonvulsant effects of piperine in mice. J. Physiol. Pharmacol. 2013, 64, 789–794. [Google Scholar]
  30. Jeena, K.; Liju, V.B.; Umadevi, N.P.; Kuttan, R. Antioxidant, anti-inflammatory and antinociceptive properties of black pepper essential oil (Piper nigrum L.). J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2014, 17, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tasleem, F.; Ashar, I.; Ali, S.N.; Perveen, S.; Mahmood, Z.A. Analgesic and anti-inflammatory activities of Piper nigrum L. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Med. 2014, 7 (Suppl. S1), 461–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Bang, J.S.; Oh, D.H.; Choi, H.M.; Sur, B.-J.; Lim, S.-J.; Kim, J.Y.; Yang, H.-I.; Yoo, M.C.; Hahm, D.-H.; Kim, K.S. Anti-inflammatory and antiarthritic effects of piperine in human interleukin 1β-stimulated fibroblast-like synoviocytes and in rat arthritis models. Arthritis Res. Ther. 2009, 11, R49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Umar, S.; Sarwar, A.H.M.G.; Umar, K.; Ahmad, N.; Sajad, M.M.; Ahmad, S.; Katiyar, C.K.; Khan, H.A. Piperine ameliorates oxidative stress, inflammation and histological out-come in collagen induced arthritis. Cell. Immunol. 2013, 284, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Banerjee, S.; Katiyar, P.; Kumar, V.; Saini, S.S.; Varshney, R.; Krishnan, V.; Sircar, D.; Roy, P. Black pepper and piperine induce anticancer effects on leukemia cell line. Toxicol. Res. 2021, 10, 232–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Greenshields, A.L.; Doucette, C.D.; Sutton, K.M.; Madera, L.; Annan, H.; Yaffe, P.B.; Knickle, A.F.; Dong, Z.; Hoskin, D.W. Piperine inhibits the growth and motility of triple-negative breast cancer cells. Cancer Lett. 2015, 357, 129–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Morsy, F.N.S.; Abd El-Salam, E.A. Antimicrobial and Antiproliferative Activities of Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.) Essential Oil and Oleoresin. J. Essent. Oil Bear. Plants 2017, 20, 779–790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Prashant, A.; Rangaswamy, C.; Yadav, A.K.; Reddy, V.; Sowmya, M.N.; Madhunapantula, S. In vitro anticancer activity of ethanolic extracts of Piper nigrum against colorectal carcinoma cell lines. Int. J. Appl. Basic Med. Res. 2017, 7, 67–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Atal, S.; Atal, S.; Vyas, S.; Phadnis, P. Bio-enhancing Effect of Piperine with Metformin on Lowering Blood Glucose Level in Alloxan Induced Diabetic Mice. Pharmacogn. Res. 2016, 8, 56–60. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Kharbanda, C.; Alam, M.S.; Hamid, H.; Javed, K.; Bano, S.; Ali, Y.; Dhulap, A.; Alam, P.; Pasha, M.A.Q. Novel piperine derivatives with antidiabetic effect as PPAR-γ agonists. Chem. Biol. Drug Des. 2016, 88, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Oboh, G.; Ademosun, A.O.; Odubanjo, O.V.; Akinbola, I.A. Antioxidative Properties and Inhibition of Key Enzymes Relevant to Type-2 Diabetes and Hypertension by Essential Oils from Black Pepper. Adv. Pharmacol. Sci. 2013, 2013, 926047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Sarfraz, M.; Khaliq, T.; Hafizur, R.M.; Raza, S.A.; Ullah, H. Effect of black pepper, turmeric and ajwa date on the endocrine pancreas of the experimentally induced diabetes in wister albino rats: A histological and immunohistochemical study. Endocr. Metab. Sci. 2021, 4, 100098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Emon, N.U.; Alam, S.; Rudra, S.; Riya, S.R.; Paul, A.; Hossen, S.M.M.; Kulsum, U.; Ganguly, A. Antide-pressant, anxiolytic, antipyretic, and thrombolytic profiling of methanol extract of the aerial part of Piper nigrum: In vivo, in vitro, and in silico approaches. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 9, 833–846. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Ghosh, S.; Kumar, A.; Sachan, N.; Chandra, P. Anxiolytic and antidepressant-like effects of essential oil from the fruits of Piper nigrum Linn. (Black pepper) in mice: Involvement of serotonergic but not GABAergic transmission system. Heliyon 2021, 7, e06884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Hritcu, L.; Noumedem, J.A.; Cioanca, O.; Hancianu, M.; Postu, P.; Mihasan, M. Anxiolytic and antidepressant profile of the methanolic extract of Piper nigrum fruits in beta-amyloid (1–42) rat model of Alzheimer’s disease. Behav. Brain Funct. 2015, 11, 13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Mao, Q.-Q.; Huang, Z.; Zhong, X.-M.; Xian, Y.-F.; Ip, S.-P. Piperine reverses the effects of corti-costerone on behawior and hippocampal BDNF expression in mice. Neurochem. Int. 2014, 74, 36–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  46. Hlavačková, L.; Janegová, A.; Uličná, O.; Janega, P.; Černá, A.; Babál, P. Spice up the hypertension diet—curcumin and piperine prevent remodeling of aorta in experimental L-NAME induced hypertension. Nutr. Metab. 2011, 8, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  47. Lee, K.P.; Lee, K.; Park, H.-W.; Kim, H.; Hong, H. Piperine inhibits platelet-derived growth factor-BB-induced proliferation and migration in vascular smooth muscle cells. J. Med. Food 2015, 18, 208–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Taqvi, S.I.H.; Shah, A.J.; Gilani, A.H. Blood pressure lowering and vasomodulator effects of piperine. J. Cardiovasc. Pharmacol. 2008, 52, 452–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Yu, S.; Liu, X.; Yu, D.C.E.; Yang, J. Piperine protects LPS-induced mastitis by inhibiting inflammatory response. Int. Immunopharmacol. 2020, 87, 106804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Bawazeer, S.; Khan, I.; Rauf, A.; Aljohani, A.S.M.; Alhumaydhi, F.A.; Khalil, A.A.; Qureshi, M.N.; Ahmad, L.; Khan, S.A. Black pepper (Piper nigrum) fruit-based gold nanoparticles (BP-AuNPs): Synthesis, characterization, biological activities, and catalytic applications—A green approach. Green Process. Synth. 2022, 11, 11–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Chen, P.; Sun, J.; Ford, P. Differentiation of the Four Major Species of Cinnamons (C. burmannii, C. verum, C. cassia, and C. loureiroi) Using a Flow Injection Mass Spectrometric (FIMS) Fingerprinting Method. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2014, 62, 2516–2521. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  52. Daigham, G.E.; Mahfouz, A.Y. Assessment of Antibacterial, Antifungal, Antioxidant and Antiviral Activities of Black pepper Aqueous Seed Extract. Al-Azhar Univ. J. Res. Stud. 2020, 2, 1–12. [Google Scholar]
  53. Hien, L.T.M.; Dao, D.T.A. Antibacterial Activity of Black Pepper Essential Oil Nanoemulsion Formulated by Emulsion Phase Inversion Method. Curr. Res. Nutr. Food Sci. 2022, 10, 311–320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Martinelli, L.; Rosa, J.M.; Fereira, C.S.B.; Nascimento, G.M.L.; Freitas, M.S.; Pizato, L.C.; Santos, W.O.; Pires, R.F.; Okura, M.H.; Malpass, G.R.P.; et al. Antimicrobial activity and chemical constituents of essential oils and oleoresins extracted from eight pepper species. Ciênc. Rural 2017, 47, e20160899. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Zhang, J.; Ye, K.-P.; Zhang, X.; Pan, D.-D.; Sun, Y.-Y.; Cao, Y.-X. Antibacterial Activity and Mechanism of Action of Black Pepper Essential Oil on Meat-Borne Escherichia coli. Front. Microbiol. 2017, 7, 2094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zou, L.; Hu, Y.-Y.; Chen, W.-X. Antibacterial mechanism and activities of black pepper chloroform extract. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 8196–8203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  57. Chopathompikunrt, P.; Wattanathorn, J.; Muchimapura, S. Piperine, the main alkaloid of Thai black pepper, protects against neurodegeneration and cognitive impairment in animal model of cognitive deficit like condition of Alzheimer’s disease. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2010, 48, 798–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Elnaggar, Y.S.R.; Etman, S.M.; Abdelmonsif, D.A.; Abdallah, O.Y. Novel piperine-loaded Tween-integrated monoolein cubosomes as brain-targeted oral nanomedicine in Alzheimer’s disease: Pharmaceutical, biological, and toxicological studies. Int. J. Nanomed. 2015, 10, 5459–5473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Etman, S.M.; Elnaggar, Y.S.R.; Abdelmonsif, D.A.; Abdallah, O.Y. Oral brain-targeted microemulsion for enhanced piperine delivery in Alzheimer’s disease therapy: In vitro appraisal, in vivo activity, and nanotoxicity. AAPS PharmSciTech 2018, 19, 3698–3711. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  60. Du, Y.; Chen, Y.; Fu, X.; Gu, J.; Sun, Y.; Zhang, Z.; Xu, J.; Qin, L. Effects of piperine on lipid metabolism in high-fat diet induced obese mice. J. Funct. Foods 2020, 71, 104011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Lailiyah, N.N.; Ibrahim, M.D.; Fitriani, C.A.; Hermanto, F.E. Anti-Obesity Properties of Black Pepper (Piper nigrum L.): Completing Puzzle using Computational Analysis. J. Smart Bioprospect. Technol. 2021, 2, 101–106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Meriga, B.; Parim, B.; Chunduri, V.R.; Naik, R.R.; Nemani, H.; Suresh, P.; Ganapathy, S.; Wu, S.B. Antiobesity potential of Piperonal: Promising modulation of body composition, lipid profiles and obesogenic marker expression in HFD-induced obese rats. Nutr. Metab. 2017, 14, 72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Shah, S.S.; Shah, G.B.; Singh, S.D.; Gohil, P.V.; Chauhan, K.; Shah, K.A.; Chorawala, M. Effect of piperine in the regulation of obesity-induced dyslipidemia in high-fat diet rats. Indian J. Pharmacol. 2011, 43, 296–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Srinivasan, K. Black Pepper and its Pungent Principle-Piperine: A Review of Diverse Physiological Effects. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 47, 735–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  65. Vijayakumar, R.S.; Nalini, N. Efficacy of piperine, an alkaloidal constituent from Piper nigrum on erythrocyte antioxidant status in high fat diet and antithyroid drug induced hyperlipidemic rats. Cell Biochem. Funct. 2006, 24, 491–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Dutta, M.; Ghosh, A.K.; Mishra, P.; Jain, G.; Rangari, V.; Chattopadhyay, A.; Das, T.; Bhowmick, D.; Bandyopadhyay, D. Protective effects of piperine against copper ascorbate induced toxic injury to goat cardiac mitochondria in vitro. Food Funct. 2014, 5, 2252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Wang, D.; Zhang, L.; Huang, J.; Himabindu, K.; Tewari, D.; Horbańczuk, J.O.; Xu, S.; Chen, Z.; Atanasov, A.G. Cardiovascular protective effect of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) and its major bioactive constituent piperine. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2021, 117, 34–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Mehmood, M.H.; Gilani, A.H. Pharmacological Basis for the Medicinal Use of Balck Pepper and Piperine in Gastrointestinal Disorders. J. Med. Food 2010, 13, 1086–1096. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Shamkuwar, P.B.; Shahi, S.R.; Jadhav, S.T. Evaluation of antidiarrhoeal effect of Black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Asian J. Plant Sci. Res. 2012, 2, 48–53. [Google Scholar]
  70. Shamkuwar, P.B. Mechanisms of Antidiarrhoeal Effect of Piper nigrum. Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2013, 5, 1138–1141. [Google Scholar]
  71. Bae, G.-S.; Kim, M.-S.; Jeong, J.; Lee, H.-Y.; Park, K.-C.; Koo, B.C.; Kim, B.-J.; Kim, T.-H.; Lee, S.H.; Hwang, S.-Y.; et al. Piperine ameliorates the severity of cerulein-induced acute pancrea-titis by inhibiting the activation of mitogen activated protein kinases. Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun. 2011, 410, 382–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Christina, A.J.M.; Saraswathy, G.R.; Heison, R.S.J.; Kothai, R.; Chidambaranatha, N.; Nalini, G.; Therasal, R.L. Inhibition of CCl4-induced liver fibrosis by Piper longum. Phytomedicine 2006, 13, 196–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  73. Gurumurthy, P.; Vijayalatha, S.; Sumathy, A.; Asokan, M.; Naseema, M. Hepatoprotective effect of aqueous extract of Piper longum and piperine when administered with anti-tubercular drugs. Bioscan 2012, 7, 661–663. [Google Scholar]
  74. Matsuda, H.; Ninomiya, K.; Morikawa, T.; Yasuda, D.; Yamaguchi, I. Protective effects of amide constit-uents from the fruit of Piper chaba on D-galactosamine/TNF-alpha-induced cell death in mouse hepatocytes. Bioorg. Med. Chem. Lett. 2008, 18, 2038–2042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  75. Nirwane, A.M.; Bapat, A.R. Effect of methanolic extract of Piper nigrum fruits in Ethanol-CCl4 induced hepatotoxicity in Wistar rats. Pharm. Lett. 2012, 4, 795–802. [Google Scholar]
  76. Weerasekera, A.C.; Samarasinghe, K.; Sameera de Zoysa, H.K.; Bamunuarachchige, T.C.; Waisundara, V.Y. Cinnamomum zeylanicum: Morphology. In Antioxidant Properties and Bioactive Compounds: Antioxidants; Intech Open: London, UK, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  77. Al-Dhubiab, B.E. Pharmaceutical applications and phytochemical profile of Cinnamomum burmannii. Pharmacogn. Rev. 2012, 6, 125–131. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  78. Tiwari, S.; Talreja, S. Importance of Cinnamomum Tamala in the Treatment of Various Diseases. Pharmacogn. J. 2020, 12, 1792–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kumar, S.; Kumari, R.; Mishra, S. Pharmacological properties and their medicinal uses of Cinnamomum: A review. J. Pharm. Pharmacol. 2019, 71, 1735–1761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Anonymous. Information Cassia and Cinnamon. Available online: https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/similar?doi=10.1.1.409.6671&type=ab (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  81. Suriyagoda, L.; Mohotti, A.J.; Vidanarachchi, J.K.; Kodithuwakku, S.P.; Chathurika, M.; Bandaranayake, P.C.G.; Hetherington, A.M.; Beneragama, C.K. Ceylon cinnamon: Much more than just a spice. Plants People Planet 2021, 3, 319–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Gunia-Krzyżak, A.; Słoczyńska, K.; Popiół, J.; Marona, H.; Pękala, E. Cinnamic acid derivatives in cosmetics: Current use and future prospects. Int. J. Cosmet. Sci. 2018, 40, 356–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. De Silva, D.A.M.; Jeewanthi, R.K.C.; Rajapaksha, R.H.N.; Weddagala, W.M.T.B.; Hirotsu, N.; Shimizu, B.-I.; Munasinghe, M.A.J.P. Clean vs. dirty labels: Transparency and authenticity of the labels of Ceylon cinnamon. PLoS ONE 2021, 16, e0260474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  84. Avula, B.; Smillie, T.J.; Wang, J.-H.; Zweigenbaum, J.; Khan, I.A. Authentication of true cinnamon (Cinnamon verum) utilising direct analysis in real time (DART)-QToF-MS. Food Addit. Contam. Part A 2015, 32, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Rana, P.; Liaw, S.-Y.; Lee, M.-S.; Sheu, S.-C. Discrimination of Four Cinnamomum Species with Physico-Functional Properties and Chemometric Techniques: Application of PCA and MDA Models. Foods 2021, 10, 2871. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  86. Zhou, W.; Liang, Z.; Li, P.; Zhao, Z.; Chen, J. Tissue-specific chemical profiling and quantitative analysis of bioactive components of Cinnamomum cassia by combining laser-microdissection with UPLC-Q/TOF–MS. Chem. Cent. J. 2018, 12, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Lixourgioti, P.; Goggin, K.A.; Zhao, X.; Murphy, D.J.; Van Ruth, S.; Koidis, A. Authentication of cinnamon spice samples using FT-IR spectroscopy and chemometric classification. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2022, 154, 112760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Lacy, A.; O’Kennedy, R. Studies on Coumarins and Coumarin-Related Compounds to Determine their Therapeutic Role in the Treatment of Cancer. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2004, 10, 3797–3811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  89. European Food Safety Authority (EFSA). Scientific Opinion of the Panel on Food Additives, Flavourings, Processing Aids and Materials in Contact with Food on a Request from the European Commission on Coumarinin Flavourings and Other Food Ingredients with Flavouring Properties. EFSA J. 2008, 793, 1–15. [Google Scholar]
  90. Ribeiro-Santos, R.; Andrade, M.; Madella, D.; Martinazzo, A.P.; Moura, L.A.G.; Melo, N.R.; Sanches-Silva, A. Revisiting an ancient spice with medicinal purposes: Cinnamon. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2017, 62, 154–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Pandey, M.; Chandra, D.R. Evaluation of Ethanol and Aqueous extracts of Cinnamomum verum Leaf Galls for Potential Antioxidant and Analgesic activity. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2015, 77, 243–247. [Google Scholar]
  92. Dutta, A.; Chakraborty, A. Cinnamon in Anticancer Armamentarium: A Molecular Approach. J. Toxicol. 2018, 2018, 8978731. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Thompson, M.; Schmelz, E.M.; Bickford, L. Anti-Cancer Properties of Cinnamon Oil and its Active Component, TransCinnamaldehyde. J. Nutr. Food Sci. 2019, 9, 1000750. [Google Scholar]
  94. Anderson, R.A.; Zhan, Z.; Luo, R.; Guo, X.; Guo, Q.; Zhou, J.; Kong, J.; Davis, P.A.; Stoecker, B.J. Cinnamon extract lowers glucose, insulin and cholesterol in people with elevated serum glucose. J. Tradit. Complement. Med. 2015, 6, 332–336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Zare, R.; Nadjarzadech, A.; Zarshenas, M.M.; Shams, M.; Heydari, M. Efficacy of cinnamon in patients with type II diabetes mellitus: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Clin. Nutr. 2019, 38, 549–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Shinjyo, N.; Waddell, G.; Green, J. A tale of two cinnamons: A comparative review of the clinical evidence of Cinnamomum verum and C. cassia as diabetes interventions. J. Herb. Med. 2020, 21, 00342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  97. Han, X.; Parker, T.L. Antiinflammatory Activity of Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) Bark Essential Oil in a Human Skin Disease Model. Phytother. Res. 2017, 31, 1034–1038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Schink, A.; Naumoska, K.; Kitanovski, Z.; Kampf, C.J.; Nowoisky, J.F.; Thines, F.; Pöschl, U.; Schuppan, D.; Lucas, K. Anti-inflammatory effects of cinnamon extract and identification of active compounds influencing the TLR2 and TLR4 signaling pathways. Food Funct. 2018, 9, 5950–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Shishehbor, F.; Safar, M.R.; Rajaei, E.; Haghighizadeh, M.H. Cinnamon Consumption Improves Clinical Symptoms and Inflammatory Markers in Women with Rheumatoid Arthritis. J. Am. Coll. Nutr. 2018, 37, 685–690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Abd El-Hack, M.E.; Alagawany, M.; Abdel-Moneim, A.-M.E.; Mohammed, N.G.; Khafaga, A.F.; Bin-Jumah, M.; Othman, S.I.; Allam, A.A.; Elnesr, S.S. Cinnamon (Cinnamomum zeylanicum) Oil as a Potential Alternative to Antibiotics in Poultry. Antibiotics 2020, 9, 210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Arancibia, M.; Giménez, B.; López-Caballero, M.E.; Gómez-Guillén, M.C.; Montero, P. Release of Cinnamon Essential Oil from Polysaccharide Bilayer Films and Its Use for Microbial Growth Inhibition in Chilled Shrimps. LWT-Food Sci. Technol. 2014, 59, 989–995. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Atki, Y.E.; Aouam, I.; Kamari, F.E.; Taroq, A.; Nayme, K.; Timinouni, M.; Lyoussi, B.; Abdellaoui, A. Antibacterial activity of cinnamon essential oils and their synergistic potential with antibiotics. J. Adv. Pharm. Technol. Res. 2019, 10, 63–67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Mnafgui, K.; Derbali, A.; Sayadi, S.; Gharsallah, N.; Alfeki, A.; Allouche, N. Anti-obesity and cardioprotective effects of cinnamic acid in high fat diet- induced obese rats. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 4369–4377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Gulcin, I.; Kaya, R.; Goren, A.C.; Akincioglu, H.; Topal, M.; Bingol, Z.; Çakmak, K.C.; Sarikaya, S.B.O.; Durmaz, L.; Alwasel, S. Anticholinergic, antidiabetic and antioxidant activities of cinnamon (cinnamomum verum) bark extracts: Polyphenol contents analysis by LC-MS/MS. Int. J. Food Prop. 2019, 22, 1511–1526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Jain, S.G.; Puri, S.; Misra, A.; Gulati, S.; Mani, K. Effect of oral cinnamon intervention on metabolic profile and body composition of Asian Indians with metabolic syndrome: A randomized double -blind control trial. Lipids Health Dis. 2017, 16, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  106. Mousavi, M.S.; Karimi, E.; Hajishafiee, M.; Milajerdi, A.; Amini, M.R.; Esmaillzadeh, A. Anti-hypertensive effects of cinnamon supplementation in adults: A systematic review and dose-response Meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2020, 60, 3144–3154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Tarkhan, M.M.; Balamsh, K.S.; El-Bassossy, H.M. Cinnamaldehyde protects from methylglyoxal-induced vascular damage: Effect on nitric oxide and advanced glycation end products. J. Food Biochem. 2019, 43, e12907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Khan, A.U.; Khan, A.U.; Khanal, S.; Gyawali, S. Insect pests and diseases of cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum Presi.) and their management in agroforestry system: A review. Acta Entomol. Zool. 2020, 1, 51–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Attia, R.G.; Rizk, S.A.; Hussein, M.A.; Fatah, H.M.A.; Khalil, M.M.A.; Ma’moun, S.A.M. Effect of cinnamon oil encapsulated with silica nanoparticles on some biological and biochemical aspects of the rice moth, Corcyra cephalonica (Staint.) (Lepidoptera: Pyralidae). Ann. Agric. Sci. 2020, 65, 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Kang, Y.J.; Seo, D.G.; Park, S.Y. Phenylpropanoids from cinnamon bark reduced beta-amyloid production by the inhibition of beta-secretase in Chinese hamster ovarian cells stably expressing amyloid precursor protein. Nutr. Res. 2016, 36, 1277–1284. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  111. Khasnavis, S.; Pahan, K. Cinnamon treatment upregulates neuroprotective proteins Parkin and DJ-1 and protects dopaminergic neurons in a mouse model of Parkinson’s disease. J. Neuroimmune Pharmacol. 2014, 9, 569–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. PN-ISO 948; Spices Sampling. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1980.
  113. PN-ISO 2825; Herbs and Spices, Preparation of the Ground Sample for Analysis. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1981.
  114. Amin, I.; Norazaidah, Y.; Hainida, E.K.I. Antioxidant activity and phenolic content of raw and blanched Amaranthus species. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. PN-A-86965:1997; Herbal Spices—Black Pepper. Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 1997.
  116. PN-EN ISO 6571:2009/A1; Spices and Herbs. Determination of Essential Oil Content (Hydrodistillation Method). Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2009.
  117. Misharina, T.A.; Terenina, M.B.; Krikunova, N.I. Antioxidant properties of essential oils. Appl. Biochem. Microbiol. 2009, 45, 642–647. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Gülçin, I. The antioxidant and radical scavenging activities of black pepper (Piper nigrum) seeds. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2005, 56, 491–499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Andradea, K.S.; Ferreira, K.S. Antioxidant activity of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) oil obtained by supercritical CO2. In Proceedings of the III Iberoamerican Conference on Supercritical Fluids, Cartagena de Indias, Colombia, 1–5 April 2013. [Google Scholar]
  120. Ahmad, A.; Husain, A.; Mujeeb, M.; Khan, S.A.; Alhadrami, H.A.A.; Bhandari, A. Quantification of total phenol, flavonoid content and pharmacognostical evaluation including HPTLC fingerprinting for the standardization of Piper nigrum Linn fruits. Asian Pac. J. Trop. Biomed. 2015, 5, 101–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Nagy, M.; Socaci, S.A.; Tofana, M.; Pop, C.; Muresan, C.; Pop, A.V.; Salanta, L.; Rotar, A.M. Determination of total phenolics, antioxidant capacity and antimicrobial activity of selected aromatic spices. Bull. UASVM Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 72, 82–85. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  122. Nahak, G.; Sahu, R.K. Phytochemical evaluation and antioxidant activity of Piper cubeba and Piper nigrum. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 1, 153–157. [Google Scholar]
  123. Gupta, R.K.; Chawla, P.; Tripathi, M.; Shukla, A.K.; Pandey, A. Synergistic antioxidant activity of tea with ginger, black pepper and tulusi. Int. J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 6, 477–479. [Google Scholar]
  124. Sruthi, D.; Zachariah, T.J. In vitro antioxidant activity and cytotoxicity of sequential extracts from selected black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) varieties and Piper species. Int. Food Res. J. 2017, 24, 75–85. [Google Scholar]
  125. Lee, J.-G.; Chae, Y.; Shin, Y.; Kim, Y.-J. Chemical composition and antioxidant capacity of black pepper pericarp. Appl. Biol. Chem. 2020, 63, 35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Mallick, M.; Bose, A.; Mukhi, S. Comparative Evaluation of the Antioxidant Activity of Some commonly used Spices. Int. J. PharmTech Res. 2016, 9, 1–8. [Google Scholar]
  127. Trifan, A.; Zengin, G.; Brebu, M.; Skalicka-Woźniak, K.; Luca, S.V. Phytochemical Characteriza-tion and Evaluation of the Antioxidant and Anti-Enzymatic Activity of Five Common Spices: Focus on Their Essential Oils and Spent Material Extractives. Plants 2021, 210, 2692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Suhaj, M.; Rácová, J.; Polovka, M.; Brezová, V. Effect of c-irradiation on antioxidant activity of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.). Food Chem. 2006, 97, 696–704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Codex Alimentarius Standard for Black, White and Green Peppers. CXS 326-2017. Available online: https://www.fao.org/fao-who-codexalimentarius/sh-proxy/en/?lnk=1&url=https%253A%252F%252Fworkspace.fao.org%252Fsites%252Fcodex%252FStandards%252FCXS%2B326-2017%252FCXS_326e.pdf (accessed on 4 May 2022).
  130. European Spice Association (ESA). Quality Minima Document; European Spice Association (ESA): Bonn, Germany, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  131. Ravindran, P.N. Black Pepper, Piper nigrum, Medicinal and Aromatic Plants—Industrial Profiles. Phytochemistry 2001, 58, 827–829. [Google Scholar]
  132. Hamrapurkar, P.D.; Jadhav, K.; Zine, S. Quantitative Estimation of Piperine in Piper nigrum and Piper longum Using High Performance Thin Layer Chromatography. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. 2011, 1, 117–120. [Google Scholar]
  133. Rajopadhye, A.A.; Upadhye, A.S.; Mujumdar, A.M. HPTLC Method for Analysis of Piperine in Fruits of Piper Species. J. Planar Chromatogr. 2011, 24, 57–59. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Zachariah, T.J.; Mathew, P.A.; Gobinath, P. Chemical quality of berries from black pepper varieties grafted on Piper colubrinum. J. Med. Aromat. Plant Sci. 2005, 27, 39–42. [Google Scholar]
  135. Sruthi, D.; Zachariah, T.J.; Leela, N.K.; Jayarajan, K. Correlation between chemical profiles of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) var. Panniyur-1 collected from different locations. J. Med. Plants Res. 2013, 7, 2349–2357. [Google Scholar]
  136. Rezvanian, M.; Ooi, Z.T.; Jamal, J.A.; Husain, K.; Jalil, J.; Yaacob, Z.; Ghani, A.A. Pharmacognostical and Chromatographic Analysis of Malaysian Piper nigrum Linn. Fruits. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2016, 78, 334–343. [Google Scholar]
  137. Jansz, E.R.; Pathirana, I.C.; Packiyasothy, E.V. Determination of piperine in pepper (Piper nigrum L.). J. Natl. Sci. Counc. Sri Lanka 1983, 11, 129–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Shango, A.J.; Mkojera, B.T.; Majubwa, R.O.; Mamiro, D.P.; Maerere, A.P. Pre- and postharvest factors affecting quality and safety of Pepper (Piper nigrum L.). CABI Rev. 2021, 16, 031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Ajmal, H. Isolation, identification and quantitative analysis of piperine from Piper nigrum Linn. of various regions of kerala by rp-hplc method. World J. Pharm. Pharm. Sci. 2018, 7, 1023–1049. [Google Scholar]
  140. Shrestha, S.; Chaudhary, N.; Sah, R.; Malakar, N. Analysis of Piperine in Black Pepper by High Performance Liquid Chromatography. J. Nepal Chem. Soc. 2020, 41, 80–86. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Nikolić, M.; Stojković, D.; Glamočlija, J.; Ćirić, A.; Marković, T.; Smiljković, M.; Soković, M. Could essential oils of green and black pepper be used as food preservatives? J. Food Sci. Technol. 2015, 52, 6565–6573. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Codex Alimentarius. CODEX STAN 192-1995—Codex General Standard for Food Additives. Adopted in 1995; Revision 1997, 1999, 2001, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013; FAO: Rome, Italy; WHO: Geneva, Switzerland, 1995. [Google Scholar]
  143. Rouatbi, M.; Duquenoy, A.; Giampaoli, P. Extraction of the essential oil of thyme and black pepper by superheated steam. J. Food Eng. 2007, 78, 708–714. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Pino, J.; Rodriguez-Feo, G.; Borges, P.; Rosado, A. Chemical and sensory properties of black pepper oil. Nahrung 1990, 34, 555–560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Zachariah, T.J.; Safeer, A.L.; Jayarajan, K.; Leela, N.K. Correlation of metabolites in the leaf and berries of selected black pepper varieties. Sci. Hortic. 2010, 123, 418–422. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Kurian, P.S.; Backiyarani, S.; Josephrajkumar, A.; Murugan, M. Varietal evaluation of black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) for yield, quality and anthracnose disease resistance in Idukki District, Kerala. J. Spices Aromat. Crops 2002, 11, 22–24. [Google Scholar]
  147. Rmili, R.; Ramdani, M.; Ghazi, Z.; Saidi, N.; El Mahi, B. Composition comparison of essential oils extracted by hydrodistillation and microwave-assisted hydrodistillation from Piper nigrum L. J. Mater. Environ. Sci. 2014, 5, 1560–1567. [Google Scholar]
  148. Hussain, M.D.S.; Hegde, L.; Goudar, S.A.; Hegde, N.K.; Shantappa, T.; Gurumurthy, S.B.; Manju, M.J.; Shivakumar, K.M. Evaluation of local black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) genotypes for yield and quality under arecanut based cropping system. Int. J. Pure Appl. Biosci. 2017, 5, 1396–1400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Abraham, K. Cinnamon and coumarin—Clarification from the scientific and administrative angle. Dtsch. Lebensm. Rundsch. 2007, 103, 480–487. [Google Scholar]
  150. Yang, C.C.H.; Li, R.X.; Chuang, L.Y. Antioxidant activity of various parts of Cinnamomum cassia extracted with different extraction methods. Molecules 2012, 17, 7294–7304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  151. Mathew, S.; Abraham, T. Studies on the antioxidant activities of cinnamon (Cinnamomum verum) bark extracts, through various in vitro models. Food Chem. 2006, 94, 520–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Dragland, S.; Senoo, H.; Wake, K.; Holte, K.; Blomhoff, R. Several culinary and medicinal herbs are important sources of dietary antioxidants. J. Nutr. 2003, 133, 1286–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Foti, M.; Piattelli, M.; Baratta, M.T.; Ruberto, G. Flavonoids, coumarins, and cinnamic acids as antioxidants in a micellar system structure-activity relationship. J. Agric. Food Chem. 1996, 44, 497–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Lin, C.C.; Wu, S.J.; Chang, C.H.; Ng, L.K. Antioxidant activity of Cinnamomum cassia. Phytother. Res. 2003, 17, 726–730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  155. Lee, H.S.; Kim, B.S.; Kim, M.K. Suppression effect of Cinnamomum barks-derived component on nitric oxide synthase. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2002, 50, 7700–7703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  156. Prasad, K.N.; Yang, B.; Dong, X.; Jiang, G.; Zhang, H.; Xie, H.; Jiang, Y. Flavonoid contents and antioxidant activities from Cinnamomum species. Innov. Food Sci. Emerg. Technol. 2009, 10, 627–632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Shobana, S.; Naidu, K.A. Antioxidant activity of selected Indian spices. Prostaglandins Leukot. Essent. Fat. Acids 2000, 62, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Murcia, M.A.; Egea, I.; Romojaro, F.; Parras, P.; Jimenez, A.M.; Martinez-Tom, M. Antioxidant evaluation in dessert spices compared with common food additives. Influence of irradiation procedure. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2004, 52, 1872–1881. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  159. Prakash, D.; Suri, S.; Upadhyay, G.; Singh, B.N. Total phenol, antioxidant and free radical scavenging activities of some medicinal plants. Int. J. Food Sci. Nutr. 2007, 58, 18–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  160. Lin, C.C.; Yu, C.; Wu, S.J.; Yih, K. DPPH free-radical scavenging activity, total phenolic contents and chemical composition analysis of forty-two kinds of essential oils. J. Food Drug Anal. 2009, 17, 386–395. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Lee, R.; Balic, M.J. Sweet wood—Cinnamon and its importance as a spice and medicine. Ethnomedicine 2005, 1, 61–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Jayatilaka, A.; Poole, S.K.; Poole, C.F.; Chichila, T.M.P. Simultaneous micro steam distillation/solvent extraction for the isolation of semivolatile flavor compounds from cinnamon and their separation by series coupled-column gas chromatography. Anal. Chim. Acta 1995, 302, 147–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Sproll, C.; Ruge, W.; Andlauer, C.; Godelmann, R.; Lachenmeier, D.W. HPLC analysis and safety assessment of coumarin in foods. Food Chem. 2008, 109, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  164. Blahova, J.; Svobodova, Z. Assessment of coumarin levels in ground cinnamon available in the Czech retail market. Sci. World J. 2012, 2012, 263851. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  165. Woehrlin, F.; Fry, H.; Abraham, K.; Preiss-Weigert, A. Quantificion of Flavoring Constituents in Cinnamon High Variation of Coumarin in Cassia Bark from the German Retail Market and in Authentic Samples from Indonesia. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2010, 58, 10568–10575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  166. He, Z.D.; Qiao, C.F.; Han, Q.B.; Cheng, C.L.; Xu, H.X.; Jiang, R.W.; But, P.P.H.; Shaw, P.C. Authentication and quantitative analysis on the chemical profile of cassia bark (cortex. cinnamomum) by high pressure liquid chromatography. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2005, 53, 2424–2428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Ho, S.-C.; Hang, K.-S.; Hang, P.-W. Inhibition of neuroinflammation by cinnamon and its main componenets. Food Chem. 2013, 138, 2275–2282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Lungarini, S.; Aureli, F.; Coni, E. Coumarin and cinnamaldehyde in cinnamon marketed in Italy: A natural chemical hazard? Food Addit. Contam. Part A Chem. Anal. Control. Expo. Risk Assess. 2008, 25, 1297–1305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Ananthakrishnan, R.; Chandra, P.; Kumar, B.; Rameshkumar, K.B. Quantification of coumarin and related phenolics in cinnamon samples from south India using UHPLC-ESI-QqQLIT-MS/MS method. Int. J. Food Prop. 2018, 21, 50–57. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Raters, M.; Matissek, R. Analysis of coumarin in various foods using liquid chromatography with tandem mass spectrometric detection. Eur. Food Res. Technol. J. 2008, 227, 637–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Lee, C.J.; Chen, L.G.; Chang, T.L.; Ke, W.M.; Lo, Y.F.; Wang, C.C. The correlation between skin-care effects and phytochemical contents in Lamiaceae plants. Food Chem. 2011, 124, 833–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council (EC) No. 1334/2008 of 16 December 2008 on Flavourings and Certain Food Ingredients with Flavouring Properties for Use in and on Foods and Amending Council Regulation (EEC) no 1601/91, Regulations (EC) no 2232/96 and (EC) no 110/2008 and Directive 2000/13/EC. Off. J. Eur. Communities 2008, 12, 34–50.
  173. French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety. Opinion of the French Agency for Food, Environmental and Occupational Health & Safety—Assessment of the Risk of Hepatotoxicity Associated with the Coumarin Content of Certain Plants That Can Be Consumed in Food Supplements or in Other Foodstuffs; ANSES Opinion Request No. 2018-SA-0180; ANSES: Maisons-Alfort, France, 2021. [Google Scholar]
  174. Balin, N.Z.; Sørensen, A.T. Coumarin content in cinnamon containing food products on the Danish market. Food Control 2014, 38, 198–203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Steffensen, I.L.; Alexander, J.; Binderup, M.-L.; Helkåas, K.; Dahl Granum, B.; Hetland, R.B.; Husøy, T.; Paulsen, J.E.; Sanner, T.; Thrane, V. Risk Assessment of Coumarin Intake in the Norwegian Population. Eur. J. Nutr. Food Saf. 2019, 11, 72–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Schifferstein, H.N.J.; Kudrowitz, B.M.; Breuer, C. Food Perception and Aesthetics—Linking Sensory Science to Culinary Practice. J. Culin. Sci. Technol. 2020, 20, 293–335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Embuscado, M.E. Bioactives from culinary spices and herbs: A review. J. Food Bioact. 2019, 6, 68–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Almatroodi, S.A.; Alashi, M.A.; Almatroodi, A.; Anwar, S.; Verma, A.K.; Dev, K.; Rahmani, A.H. Cinnamon and its active compounds: A potential candidate in disease and tumour management through modulating various genes activity. Gene Rep. 2020, 21, 100966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Factors influencing the black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) quality. Source: own study.
Figure 1. Factors influencing the black pepper (Piper nigrum L.) quality. Source: own study.
Foods 11 02746 g001
Figure 2. Health properties of black pepper and piperine. Source: own study.
Figure 2. Health properties of black pepper and piperine. Source: own study.
Foods 11 02746 g002
Figure 3. Cinnamon bark (a) C. verum J. Presl and (b) C. cassia L. Source: [80].
Figure 3. Cinnamon bark (a) C. verum J. Presl and (b) C. cassia L. Source: [80].
Foods 11 02746 g003
Figure 4. Health properties of cinnamon C. verum. Source: own study.
Figure 4. Health properties of cinnamon C. verum. Source: own study.
Foods 11 02746 g004
Table 1. Health properties of black pepper and piperine based on other authors’ studies.
Table 1. Health properties of black pepper and piperine based on other authors’ studies.
Health EffectsSource
Antiallergic effectAswar et al., 2015; Kim & Lee 2009 [27,28]
Analgetic activityBukhari et al., 2013; Jeena et al., 2014; Tasleem et al., 2014 [29,30,31]
Antiarthritic activityBang et al., 2009; Umar et al., 2013 [32,33]
Anticancer activityBanerjee et al., 2021; Greenshields et al., 2015; Morsy & Abd El-Salam 2017; Prashant et al., 2017 [34,35,36,37]
Antidiabetic activityAtal et al., 2016; Kharbanda et al., 2016; Oboh et al., 2013; Sarfraz et al., 2021 [38,39,40,41]
Antidepressant activityEmon et al., 2020; Ghosh et al., 2021; Hritcu et al., 2015; Mao et al., 2014 [42,43,44,45]
Antihypertensive activityHlavačková et al., 2011; Lee et al., 2015; Taqvi et al., 2008; [46,47,48]
Antiinflammatory activityBang et al., 2009; Jeena et al., 2014; Tasleem et al., 2014; Yu et al., 2020 [30,31,32,49]
Antimicrobial activityBawazeer et al., 2022; Chen et al., 2019; Daigham & Mahfouz 2020; Hien & Dao 2022; Martinelli et al., 2017; Morsy & Abd El-Salam 2017; Zhang et al., 2017; Zou et al., 2015 [36,50,51,52,53,54,55,56]
Antineurodegenerative activityChonpathompikunlert 2010; Elnaggar et al., 2015; Etman et al., 2018 [57,58,59]
Antiobesity activityDu et al., 2020; Lailiyah et al., 2021; Meriga et al., 2017; Shah et al., 2011 [60,61,62,63]
Antioxidant activityJeena et al., 2014; Srinivasan 2007; Vijayakumar & Nalini 2006 [30,64,65]
Cardiovascular protectionDutta et al., 2014; Taqvi et al., 2008; Wang et al., 2021 [48,66,67]
Gastrointestinal and antidiarrheal activityMehmood & Gilani 2010; Srinivasan 2007; Shamkuwar et al., 2012; Shamkuwar 2013 [64,68,69,70]
Hepatoprotective and pancreatitis activityBae et al., 2011; Christina et al., 2006; Gurumurthy et al., 2012; Matsuda et al., 2008; Nirwane & Bapat 2011 [71,72,73,74,75]
Source: own study.
Table 2. Main varieties of cinnamon for medicinal and seasoning purposes.
Table 2. Main varieties of cinnamon for medicinal and seasoning purposes.
Systematic TermSynonymCommon TermOccurrenceSource
Cinnamomum verum J. PreslCinnamomum zeylanicum BlumeCeylon cinnamon
True cinnamon
Sri LancaWeerasekera et al., 2021 [76]
Cinnamomum cassia (L.) J.PreslCinnamomum aromaticum NessChinese
cinnamon
China, North-east asiaZhang et al., 2017 [55]
Cinnamomum burmannii (Nees & T.Nees) BlumeIndonesian
cinnamon
Java cinnamon
Indonesia, Wietnam, FilipinesAl-Dhubiab 2012 [77]
Cinnamomum tamala (Buch.-Ham.) T.Ness & C.H. Eberm.Cinnamomum albiflorum Ness
Cinnamomum lindleyi Lukman
Laurus tamala Buch.-Ham.
Indian cassia
Indian bay leaf
Tejpatta
India, Nepal, Bhutan, ChinaTiwari & Talreja 2020 [78]
Cinnamomum loureiroi NessSaigon cinnamon
Vietnamese cinnamon
WietnamKumar et al., 2019 [79]
Source: own study.
Table 3. Basic composition of the bark of Cinnamomum verum J. Presl and Cinnamomum cassia L.
Table 3. Basic composition of the bark of Cinnamomum verum J. Presl and Cinnamomum cassia L.
CinnamonComposition
Cinnamomum verumcinnamaldehyde 1.99% (1.49–3.20%), cinnamylacetate, cinnamon alcohol 0.043% (nd–0.083%), eugenol, coumarin (nd–0.004%)
Cinnamomum cassiacinnamaldehyde (0.005–9.383%), cinnamic acid (0.001–0.191%), cinnamyl alcohol (0.001–0.177%) cinnamamyl acetate, cinnamon alcohol, eugenol, coumarin 0.001–1.218% (up to 5%)
Source: [81].
Table 4. Health properties of cinnamon based on other authors’ studies.
Table 4. Health properties of cinnamon based on other authors’ studies.
Health PropertiesSource
Analgetic activityPandey & Chandra 2015 [91]
Anticancer activityDutta & Chakraborty 2018; Thompson et al., 2019 [92,93]
Antidiabetes activityAnderson et al., 2015; Zare et al., 2019; Shinjyo et al., 2020 [94,95,96]
Antiinflammatory activityHan & Parker 2017; Schink et al., 2018; Shishehbor et al., 2018 [97,98,99]
Antimicrobial activityAbd El-Hack et al., 2020; Arancibia et al., 2014; Atki et al., 2019 [100,101,102]
Antiobesity activityMnafgui et al., 2015 [103]
Antioxidant activityGulcin et al., 2019; Weerasekera et al., 2021 [76,104]
Cardiovascular protectionJain et al., 2017; Mnafgui et al., 2015; Mousavi et al., 2020; Tarkhan et al., 2019 [103,105,106,107]
Insecticidal effectKhan et al., 2020; Attia et al., 2020 [108,109]
Neurological disordersKang et al., 2016; Khasnavis & Pahan 2014 [110,111]
Source: own study.
Table 5. Antioxidant activity (TP, AA), piperine and essential oil content in black pepper.
Table 5. Antioxidant activity (TP, AA), piperine and essential oil content in black pepper.
nTP
M ± SD
[mg GAE/g]
AADPPH
M
[%]
Piperine
M ± SD
[%]
Essential Oil
M ± SD
[mL/100 g d.m.]
1313.02 ± 1.5684.42 ± 2.326.49 ± 0.071.09 ± 0.09
2332.13 ± 0.2484.51 ± 3.925.26 ± 0.031.29 ± 0.01
3311.52 ± 0.3083.93 ± 1.297.11 ± 0.051.77 ± 0.08
4313.18 ± 0.3585.42 ± 2.349.23 ± 0.052.05 ± 0.17
5311.72 ± 0.8584.86 ± 3.796.19 ± 0.051.12 ± 0.01
6311.90 ± 0.2982.67 ± 3.995.77 ± 0.041.48 ± 0.08
7310.67 ± 1.3085.32 ± 4.716.40 ± 0.051.31 ± 0.08
8314.41 ± 0.7381.49 ± 2.225.91 ± 0.002.08 ± 0.08
9311.37 ± 0.1882.01 ± 6.486.17 ± 0.041.43 ± 0.00
10311.80 ± 1.1380.64 ± 3.216.61 ± 0.021.03 ± 0.16
11312.29 ± 0.7884.27 ± 4.437.19 ± 0.052.18 ± 0.08
12311.18 ± 0.0680.85 ± 3.845.77 ± 0.041.75 ± 0.08
13310.88 ± 0.3785.13 ± 2.937.19 ± 0.051.55 ± 0.14
14313.31 ± 0.1281.73 ± 5.115.90 ± 0.061.32 ± 0.17
15312.38 ± 0.5478.07 ± 3.276.44 ± 0.031.86 ± 0.14
16312.85 ± 1.0284.45 ± 4.123.92 ± 0.351.61 ± 0.16
17311.59 ± 0.2771.29 ± 3.844.87 ± 0.021.48 ± 0.08
18312.03 ± 0.3281.83 ± 4.015.55 ± 0.021.42 ± 0.07
19311.65 ± 0.7084.60 ± 5.823.98 ± 0.062.17 ± 0.14
20314.02 ± 1.0885.34 ± 4.175.78 ± 0.641.47 ± 0.08
21312.85 ± 1.0284.43 ± 2.224.61 ± 0.121.76 ± 0.08
22311.24 ± 0.5384.59 ± 2.814.95 ± 0.171.28 ± 0.14
2339.75 ± 0.9673.88 ± 3.234.87 ± 0.020.89 ± 0.08
24314.53 ± 0.6181.48 ± 1.115.58 ± 0.011.48 ± 0.08
25311.28 ± 0.7463.93 ± 0.864.51 ± 0.222.19 ± 0.15
Source: own study.
Table 6. Antioxidant activity (TP, AA) and coumarine content in cinnamon Cinamomum sp.
Table 6. Antioxidant activity (TP, AA) and coumarine content in cinnamon Cinamomum sp.
nTP
M ± SD
[mgGAE/g]
AADPPH
M
[%]
Coumarine
M ± SD
[mg/kg]
1394.71 ± 3.3490.48 ± 4.131027.67 ± 50.36
2392.32 ± 2.0169.39 ± 2.883120.67 ± 81.25
3385.77± 1.2988.285 ± 1.492107.33 ± 103.24
4374.58 ± 5.7187.57 ± 2.113157.67 ± 59.77
5373.38 ± 3.8255.52 ± 7.562240.67 ± 57.01
6372.33 ± 5.5385.50 ± 2.653383.67 ± 57.07
7371.22 ± 1.1682.53 ± 1.992368.33 ± 37.58
8377.575 ± 1.5972.03 ± 3.473111.12 ± 34.28
9352.345 ± 0.9668.19 ± 3.473564.67 ± 42.12
10369.16 ± 1.2476.12 ± 2.813066.33 ± 60.12
11397.17 ± 2.1891.87 ± 2.932725.32 ± 41.29
12394.64 ± 2.3672.64 ± 3.024012.00 ± 79.57
13364.38 ± 1.6790.48 ± 3.333198.71 ± 81.82
14388.27 ± 1.1179.94 ± 4.613798.00 ± 90.04
15379.25 ± 2.1391.11 ± 2,633812.24 ± 61.29
16369.91 ± 1.1887.51 ± 1.852603.77 ± 83.64
Source: own study
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Newerli-Guz, J.; Śmiechowska, M. Health Benefits and Risks of Consuming Spices on the Example of Black Pepper and Cinnamon. Foods 2022, 11, 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182746

AMA Style

Newerli-Guz J, Śmiechowska M. Health Benefits and Risks of Consuming Spices on the Example of Black Pepper and Cinnamon. Foods. 2022; 11(18):2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182746

Chicago/Turabian Style

Newerli-Guz, Joanna, and Maria Śmiechowska. 2022. "Health Benefits and Risks of Consuming Spices on the Example of Black Pepper and Cinnamon" Foods 11, no. 18: 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182746

APA Style

Newerli-Guz, J., & Śmiechowska, M. (2022). Health Benefits and Risks of Consuming Spices on the Example of Black Pepper and Cinnamon. Foods, 11(18), 2746. https://doi.org/10.3390/foods11182746

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop