Smart Grid Applications for a Practical Implementation of IP over Narrowband Power Line Communications
Abstract
:1. Introduction
2. Review of Applications for Smart Grids
2.1. Distributed Energy Resources and Microgrids
- On-demand metering: SMs are read when needed, e.g., when the utility needs to backfill missing information or during a decision-making process;
- Scheduled metering: provides the data collection from a meter on a regular basis, e.g., several times per day. Usually, the readings are stored automatically at the meter and then retrieved by the control center or the utility;
- Bulk transfer: this action is performed to collect data from all the requested meters. The communication requirements highly depend on the number of involved meters.
2.2. Prosumers
- Individual integration: in which there is a direct energy sharing between the prosumers and utility grid;
- Simple-group integration: the prosumer groups contain different prosumers with diverse behaviors and the prosumers collectively increase the amount of power to be auctioned to the grid. These groups can be also found as Virtual Power Plants (VPPs);
- A novel approach (goal-oriented virtual prosumer-communities), which connects the prosumers to the grid in the form of goal-oriented virtual communities [17].
- Incentive-based DR programs: customers get payments or preferential prices for non-DR periods from reducing electricity usage during periods of system need or stress. On one hand, in some programs the grid operator gets total access to the customer premises (direct load control). The utility sends commands to a load controller that turns on/off selected devices at the customer premises. Typical devices under these programs are domestic appliances such as central air conditioning systems, heat pumps, electric water heaters, and pool pumps. On the other hand, other measures (energy demand, interruptible rates, demand bidding, and capacity market programs) require customer involvement, which decides whether they will participate or not according to the prices and their needs.
- Time-based DR programs: customers vary their demand according to the received price signals. The oldest and the most prevalent DR program is the time-of-use (TOU), in which customers shift their electricity usage to off-peak hours to lower their bills. Implementation experience of TOU rates shows that they can partially influence patterns of electricity demand [19].
- A variation of TOU is critical peak pricing (CPP), which relies on very high critical peak prices, as opposed to the ordinary peak prices in TOU rates. If the utility needs to limit the loads, it sends CPP messages to enrolled customers for a radical load reduction. Finally, real-time pricing (RTP) offers short-term, time-varying pricing information, reflecting the wholesale price of electricity.
2.3. Electrical Vehicles (EVs)
- Vehicle to grid (V2G) operation, which is the supply of the power flow stored in the car to the power grid. Basically, in this operation the EV acts as a portable battery. Hence, it can be considered also as a DER. During this operation, it is necessary to monitor both the states of the grid and the EV and measure the transferred power.
- Charging state is a derived application of EVs. Ideally, charging operations should be done according to external parameters such as the grid state, renewable energy production, or even electricity prices. Therefore, different tasks of monitoring and measuring are required.
2.4. Other Applications
3. Opportunities for NB-PLC beyond Smart Metering
3.1. The Role of PLC in the Smart Grid
3.2. The Role of IP
- Flexibility: it is widely accepted that the future SG will be a heterogeneous scenario of multiple communication technologies, since there is no unique solution that can address all the functionalities expected from the SG. Not surprisingly, the integration and operation of multiple technologies and vendor solutions was found to be the top concern about communications for grid operators [45]. In this sense, IP can run over any link layer network (e.g., Ethernet, wireless radio networks, and serial lines) providing a common and flexible way to use and manage the SG. Then, SG applications become independent of the physical media and data link communication technologies, which greatly reduces the complexity for developing upper-layer applications and enables interoperability [46].
- Resilience: the SG has to be able to evolve together with the new technologies, applications, and devices, and so the communication systems must do. In this sense, one of the principal benefits of IP is its ability to add a capability (e.g., a new application or service) without having to change IP itself.
- Scalability: the SG architecture must enable communication and handle data for millions of devices connected to the grid (substations, transformers, smart meters, DERs, and other equipment) and growing annually. The last version of IP, IPv6, offers addressing and routing for a huge network such as the expected SG [47].
- Stability and reliability: the SG data network must be reliable so that it can guarantee uninterrupted and high quality electrical service. After more than 30 years of existence, it has been demonstrated that IP is a workable solution considering its large and well-established knowledge base [47].
- Security: ensuring a high degree of security is a crucial requirement for the success of SGs, as commented on in the previous section. Despite the fact that IP was designed to be open and flexible, over the years more and more tools have been built to provide security in the communications that make use of IP networks. In fact, IP is the communication protocol with the biggest number of tools for securing and managing the transport of data. Many applications, such as energy metering in the SG, have emerged from a decade of research in wireless sensor networks. However, the lack of an IP-based network architecture precluded sensor networks from interoperating with the Internet, limiting their real-world impact [23]. But that is now changing and IP is increasingly being used in supervision and control applications in the energy field, such as demand response, DG control, and consumer integration [48]. As pointed out in [23], IP has to be implemented up until the last node of the communication network in order to be the reference protocol. Therefore, it is essential to reach the LV section.
3.3. IP Data Transmission over NB-PLC: Practical Implementation
- Portable Base Node (PBN): acts as a communication PLC node and includes IP capabilities. Three PBNs were used, whose roles were configured as follows:
- ○
- PBN-BN: one of the PBNs was configured as the subnet manager node (base node).
- ○
- PBN-SNA and PBN-SNB: the other two PBNs were configured as service nodes (SN). These PBNs will be registered in the subnetwork governed by the PBN-BN.
- SMs: all the SMs within the considered subnetwork are part of the measurements as they will be registered in the PBN-BN as well. The SMs are responsible for generating different types of traffic, which were also considered for the measurements since the implementation of IP should not affect the normal metering tasks of the microgrid:
- ○
- Control data (C): it is automatically generated for the maintenance and operation of the subnetwork, and consists mainly of signaling data and topological information. Control traffic is always present in the subnetwork;
- ○
- Basic instantaneous metering data values (I): these are request tasks configured in the data concentrator, which interrogates each minute to all the SMs within the subnetwork regarding their instantaneous measurement data, whether of consumption or generation. This traffic is added to the control traffic;
- ○
- Load profile metering data values (P): these are also request tasks configured in the data concentrator, which interrogates a specific SM regarding its measurement data stored between a start date and an end date via web service.
4. Discussion of Potential Applications of the Implementation of IP over PLC-PRIME
- Focusing on the analysis on the management of the DERs of the microgrid, the requirements for their monitoring and control range from 9.6 to 56 kbps [6], which is beyond the reach of the implementation. Additionally, the features of the presented system would not be applicable to complex management systems [54]. However, it would be possible to implement some less strict tasks in terms of requirements for DER management. The management of resources can be approached as a system, in turn, consisting of a monitoring system and several control actions. The monitoring system, located at the grid operator premises, would be responsible for reporting the situation of the system by evaluating the state of each of the DERs. This task could be implemented through simple information signals from each resource, taking advantage of its associated SM. The response signals would return to the grid operator, which together with additional supplementary information (e.g., metering data from the SMs themselves via PLC, task planning, and meteorological forecast) will generate actions to be carried out. At this point, SCADA systems are usually employed. The implementation of a SCADA system with the presented implementation could be made just for low performance versions due to the required data rate (see Table 1). However, those actions can be also implemented as simple signals with P/Q commands. P/Q commanding for assets control are a widely used technique to keep the voltage values within the desired range while minimizing system losses [55]. These control parameters would be then encapsulated in packets that would travel as data frames within the PLC-PRIME subnetwork. Once they reach the target node, the signals would be conveniently extracted and executed by actuators. Additionally, connection/disconnection commands and payment tasks could also be introduced within the available data rate. Connection/disconnection commands allow to switch on/off different assets remotely, according to prefixed set-points, while payment tasks are useful for dynamic pricing and resources savings for the system operator. Figure 3 shows a schematic representation of this management proposal, specifying the communications at each point as well as the energy flow according to the resource. In addition, the specific traffic flow for some applications is also included. The advantage of implementing IP (or an alternative service) over a PLC-PRIME deployment is that the implementation benefits from the features of the standard (e.g., network auto configuration, robustness, and topological information, among others), as well as having direct access to the assets (distributed resources and loads) through the SMs installed as part of the deployment. In addition, since two SNs can communicate between them without the need of passing through the BN, the data flow does not necessarily need to start always from the BN, which is interesting from the point of view of networking optimization. In a subnetwork as the proposed microgrid, with up to three repetition levels (see Figure 1), all nodes would be accessible with this implementation and could perform the applications discussed above.
- Communications in home networks: some applications in domestic premises can be addressed with the presented implementation, e.g., pricing signals and control commands operating within a HEM system. There are numerous NB-PLC deployments in which end users already count with a SM. Hence, these deployments are setting the basis for making use of the existing infrastructure for additional applications. Furthermore, there is a progressive increase of domestic devices that include some type of communication. Despite the fact that households have been an environment with multiple protocols and different vendors [8], IP continues to play a very important role, which makes the implementation of IP over PLC of relevance. The possible applications would be related with pricing services and remote control.
- Applications in wide area networks: in this context the Smart City concept arises and by extension a wide range of applications that require data rates of the order of bps or kbps, such as lighting, irrigation, signaling, monitoring, remote control, and even the management of different assets of the city such as energy resources, if applicable. As occurs in the domestic premises, cities begin to be a field with multiple vendors and different solutions in which IP could act as a seamless communication enabler. In metropolitan scenarios with highly urbanized areas, a great advantage of PLC against wireless options is that attenuation losses to wireless communications are high due to interferences with physical objects, and signal strength is low. Then, the assets might not always be accessible in all locations or at all times [10].
- Applications for utilities and grid operators: the scenario presented can be useful for some important tasks for grid operators such as signaling and management of connections and disconnections. These tasks do not have very strict data rate requirements and the needed data sample can be performed with the presented implementation. As commented above, other services such as SCADA could be included just for very low performance versions.
- Secure association between the application and the PLC node (“end-to-end”). For this purpose, an uninterrupted safety tunnel is established between both ends of the communication;
- Secure transmission in the PLC section and at the application level, separately. In this case, the tunnel is established in two different domains: from the PLC network to the gateway, and from the gateway to the final application.
- No specific safety tunnel. In this scenario, the security techniques included in the communications protocols are used. In the specific case of the technology used for the implementation, PLC-PRIME v.1.3.6, it includes secure connection methods, authentication, and privacy. Version 1.4 of the standard also includes encryption mechanisms.
5. Conclusions
Acknowledgments
Author Contributions
Conflicts of Interest
References
- Bülo, T.; Mende, D.; Bettenwort, G.; Geibel, D.; Degner, T.; Seibel, A.; da Costa, J.P.; Kruschel, W.; Boldt, K.; Sutter, F.; et al. Voltage control in active, intelligent distribution network. In Proceedings of the 27th European Photovoltaic Solar Energy Conference, Frankfurt, Germany, 24–28 September 2012; pp. 4076–4082. [Google Scholar]
- McFetridge, B.; Stephens, B. Can a grid be smart without communications? A look at IVVC implementation. In Proceedings of the IEEE Rural Electric Power Conference (REPC), Columbus, OH, USA, 23–26 April 2013; pp. A2-1–A2-21. [Google Scholar]
- Portelinha Júnior, F.M.; Zambroni de Souza, A.C.; Castilla, M.; Queiroz Oliveira, D.; Ribeiro, P.F. Control Strategies for Improving Energy Efficiency and Reliability in Autonomous Microgrids with Communication Constraints. Energies 2017, 10, 1443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Zaballos, A.; Vallejo, A.; Selga, J.M. Heterogeneous communication architecture for the smart grid. IEEE Netw. 2011, 25. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yan, Y.; Qian, Y.; Sharif, H.; Tipper, D. A survey on smart grid communication infrastructures: Motivations, requirements and challenges. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutor. 2013, 15, 5–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- U.S. Department of Energy (DOE). Communications Requirements of Smart Grid Technologies. 2010. Available online: https://energy.gov/sites/prod/files/gcprod/documents/Smart_Grid_Communications_Requirements_Report_10-05-2010.pdf (accessed on 2 November 2017).
- Kuzlu, M.; Pipattanasomporn, M.; Rahman, S. Communication network requirements for major smart grid applications in HAN, NAN and WAN. Comput. Netw. 2014, 67, 74–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Galli, S.; Scaglione, A.; Wang, Z. For the grid and through the grid: The role of power line communications in the smart grid. Proc. IEEE 2011, 99, 998–1027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sendin, A.; Arzuaga, T.; Urrutia, I.; Berganza, I.; Fernandez, A.; Marron, L.; Llano, A.; Arzuaga, L. Adaptation of Powerline Communications Based Smart Metering Deployments to the Requirements of Smart Grids. Energies 2015, 8, 13481–13507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Amarsingh, A.A.; Latchman, H.A.; Yang, D. Narrowband Power Line Communications: Enabling the Smart Grid. IEEE Potentials 2014, 33, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Uribe-Pérez, N.; Hernández, L.; de la Vega, D.; Angulo, I. State of the art and trends review of smart metering in electricity grids. Appl. Sci. 2016, 6, 68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Haidine, A.; Adebisi, B.; Treytl, A.; Pille, H.; Honary, B.; Portnoy, A. Highspeed narrowband PLC in Smart Grid landscape—State-of-the-art. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications, Udine, Italy, 3–6 April 2011; pp. 468–473. [Google Scholar]
- Tonello, A.M.; Pittolo, A. Considerations on narrowband and broadband power line communication for smart grids. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Conference on Smart Grid Communications (SmartGridComm), Miami, FL, USA, 2–5 November 2015; pp. 13–18. [Google Scholar]
- Adebisi, B.; Treytl, A.; Haidine, A.; Portnoy, A.; Shan, R.U.; Lund, D.; Pille, H.; Honary, B. IP-centric high rate narrowband PLC for smart grid applications. IEEE Commun. Mag. 2011, 49, 46–54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Gungor, V.; Sahin, D.; Kocak, T.; Ergüt, S.; Buccella, C.; Cecati, C.; Hancke, G.P. A Survey on Smart Grid Potential Applications and Communication Requirements. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2013, 9, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ho, Q.D.; Gao, Y.; Rajalingham, G.; Le-Ngoc, T. Wireless Communications Networks for the Smart Grid; Springer: Berlin, Germany, 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Rathnayaka, A.J.D.; Potdar, V.M.; Kuruppu, S.J. An innovative approach to manage prosumers in Smart Grid. In Proceedings of the World Congress on Sustainable Technologies (WCST), Cambridge, UK, 11–14 November 2011; pp. 141–146. [Google Scholar]
- Palensky, P.; Dietrich, D. Demand Side Management: Demand Response, Intelligent Energy Systems, and Smart Loads. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2011, 7, 381–388. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Han, J.; Piette, M. Solutions for summer electric power shortages: Demand response and its applications in air conditioning and refrigerating systems. Refrig. Air Cond. Electr. Power Mach. 2008, 29, 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Tuan, D. The Energy Web: Concept and challenges to overcome to make large scale renewable and distributed energy resources a true reality. In Proceedings of the 7th IEEE International Conference on Industrial Informatics, Wales, UK, 23–26 June 2009; pp. 384–389. [Google Scholar]
- Bouhafs, F.; Mackay, M.; Merabti, M. Links to the future: Communication requirements and challenges in the smart grid. IEEE Power Energy Mag. 2012, 10, 24–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Nunn, C.; Moore, P.M.; Williams, P.N. Remote meter reading and control using high-performance PLC communications over the low voltage and medium voltage distribution networks. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Metering Apparatus and Tariffs for Electricity Supply, Glasgow, UK, 17–19 November 1992; pp. 304–308. [Google Scholar]
- Hosemann, A. PLC Applications in Low Voltage Distribution Networks; ISPLC: Essen, Germany, 1997; pp. 134–139. [Google Scholar]
- Melike, Y.; Gungor, V.C.; Tuna, G.; Rangoussi, M.; Fadel, E. Power line communication technologies for smart grid applications: A review of advances and challenges. Comput. Netw. 2014, 70, 366–383. [Google Scholar]
- Papadopoulos, T.A.; Kaloudas, C.G.; Chrysochos, A.I.; Papagiannis, G.K. Application of Narrowband Power-Line Communication in Medium-Voltage Smart Distribution Grids. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2013, 28, 981–988. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Della Giustina, D.; Ferrari, P.; Flammini, A.; Rinaldi, S.; Sisinni, E. Automation of Distribution Grids with IEC 61850: A First Approach Using Broadband Power Line Communication. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 2013, 62, 2372–2383. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuang, H.; Wang, B.; He, X. Application of AMR Based on Powerline Communication in Outage Management System. In Proceedings of the Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference, Chengdu, China, 28–31 March 2010; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- Baxevanos, I.S.; Labridis, D.P. Implementing multiagent systems technology for power distribution network control and protection management. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2017, 22, 433–443. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Ramseier, S.; Arzberger, M.; Hauser, A. MV and LV powerline communications: New proposed IEC standards. In Proceedings of the IEEE Transmission and Distribution Conference, New Orleans, LA, USA, 11–16 April 1999; pp. 235–239. [Google Scholar]
- Cataliotti, A.; Cara, A.; Fiorelli, R.; Tine, G. Power-line communication in medium-voltage system: Simulation model and on field experimental tests. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2012, 27, 62–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Park, B.S.; Hyun, D.H.; Cho, S.K. Implementation of AMR system using power line communication. In Proceedings of the IEEE/PES Transmission and Distribution Conference and Exhibition: Asia Pacific, Yokohama, Japan, 6–10 October 2002; Volume 1, pp. 18–21. [Google Scholar]
- Bmiller, G. Evaluation and integrated diagnostic of high speed narrow band power-line chipset. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 6–8 April 2005; pp. 371–375. [Google Scholar]
- Mohagheghi, S.; Tournier, J.C.; Stoupis, J.; Guise, L.; Coste, T.; Andersen, C.A.; Dall, J. Applications of IEC 61850 in distribution automation. In Proceedings of the 2011 IEEE/PES Power Systems Conference and Exposition, Phoenix, AZ, USA, 20–23 March 2011; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar]
- Ropp, M.; Aaker, K.; Haigh, J.; Sabbah, N. Using power line carrier communications to prevent islanding of PV power systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference, Anchorage, AK, USA, 15–22 September 2000. [Google Scholar]
- Benato, R.; Caldon, R. Application of PLC for the control and the protection of future distribution networks. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and Its Applications, (ISPLC’07), Pisa, Italy, 26–28 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
- Parikh, P.P.; Kanabar, M.G.; Sidhu, T.S. Opportunities and challenges of wireless communication technologies for smart grid applications. In Proceedings of the IEEE Power and Energy Society General Meeting, Providence, RI, USA, 25–29 July 2010; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar]
- Botte, B.; Cannatelli, V.; Rogai, S. The Telegestore project in ENEL’s metering system. In Proceedings of the 18th International Conference and Exhibition on Electricity Distribution (CIRED 2005), Turin, Italy, 6–9 June 2005; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
- D4.1 & D4.2 Guidelines for Standards Implementation, v1.0; GRID4EU—Innovation for Energy Networks. GRID4EU Project. October 2012. Available online: http://grid4eu.blob.core.windows.net/media-prod/29375/grid4eu-final-report_normal-res.pdf (accessed on 31 October 2017).
- Smart Distribution System Operation for Maximizing the Integration of Renewable Generation—SUSTAINABLE Project Description. Available online: http://www.sustainableproject.eu/ (accessed on 18 April 2017).
- Deliverable (D) No: 6.1, Identification of the Scenarios and Distributed Intelligence Solutions. Distributed Intelligence for Cost-Effective and Reliable Distribution Network Operation, DISCERN Project. 2014. Available online: https://www.discern.eu/datas/DISCERN_WP6_D6.1_Identification_of_the_scenarios_and_distributed_intelligence.pdf (accessed on 31 October 2017).
- White Paper: Smart City Malaga—A Model of Sustainable Energy Management for Cities of the Future, Dirección General de Distribución de Endesa. Available online: http://www.endesa.com/EN/SALADEPRENSA/CENTRODOCUMENTAL/Publicaciones/Smartcity-Malaga_ENG.pdf (accessed on 13 April 2017).
- Michiorri, A.; Robin, G.; Georges, K.; Lebossé, C.; Albou, S. A local energy management system for solar integration and improved security of supply: The Nice Grid project. In Proceedings of the 3rd IEEE PES International Conference and Exhibition Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT Europe), Berlin, Germany, 14–17 October 2012; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar]
- Cisco Systems. Why IP Is the Right Foundation for the Smart Grid. Whitepaper. 2010. Available online: https://www.cisco.com/web/strategy/docs/energy/c11-581079_wp.pdf (accessed on 20 July 2017).
- Gungor, V.C.; Sahin, D.; Kocak, T.; Ergut, S.; Buccella, C.; Cecati, C.; Hancke, G.P. Smart grid technologies: Communication technologies and standards. IEEE Trans. Ind. Inform. 2011, 7, 529–539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- GTM. Trends in Utility Smart Grid Communications Management. Research Whitepaper. Available online: https://www.ericsson.com/assets/local/news/2013/9/trends-in-utility-smart-grid-communications-management.pdf (accessed on 15 September 2017).
- Sato, T.; Kammen, D.M.; Duan, B.; Macuha, M.; Zhou, Z.; Wu, J.; Tariq, M.; Asfaw, S.A. Smart Grid Standards: Specifications, Requirements, and Technologies; Willey: New York, NY, USA, 2015. [Google Scholar]
- Cisco Systems. A Standardized and Flexible IPv6 Architecture for Field Area Networks. Whitepaper. Available online: https://www.cisco.com/c/dam/en_us/solutions/industries/docs/energy/ip_arch_sg_wp.pdf (accessed on 21 September 2017).
- Baker, F.; Meyer, D. Internet Protocols for the Smart Grid. Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF), 2011. Available online: https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6272 (accessed on 10 June 2017).
- Sendin, A.; Urrutia, I.; Garai, M.; Arzuaga, T.; Uribe-Pérez, N. Narrowband PLC for LV Smart Grid Services, beyond Smart Metering. In Proceedings of the 18th IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communcations and Its Applications, Glasgow, UK, 30 March–2 April 2014. [Google Scholar]
- Uribe-Pérez, N.; Angulo, I.; de la Vega, D.; Arrinda, A.; Arzuaga, T.; Marrón, L.; Martínez, S.; Sendín, A.; Urrutia, I. TCP/IP capabilities over NB-PLC for Smart Grid applications: Field validation. In Proceedings of the IEEE International Symposium on Power Line Communications and its Applications (ISPLC), Madrid, Spain, 3–5 April 2017; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
- Uribe-Pérez, N.; Hernández, L.; Gómez, R.; Soria, S.; de la Vega, D.; Angulo, I.; Arzuaga, T.; Gutiérrez, L. Smart management of a distributed generation microgrid through PLC PRIME technology. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Smart Electric Distribution Systems and Technologies (EDST), Vienna, Austria, 8–11 September 2015; pp. 374–379. [Google Scholar]
- IPERF Tool. JPERF, Graphical Frontend for IPERF—Network Performance Measurement Graphical Tool (Version jperf-2.0.2). Available online: https://github.com/AgilData/jperf (accessed on 23 June 2016).
- Uribe-Pérez, N.; Angulo, I.; de la Vega, D.; Arzuaga, T.; Arrinda, A.; González, I. On-field Evaluation of the Performance of IP-based Data Transmission over Narrowband PLC for Smart Grid Applications. Int. J. Electr. Power Energy Syst. 2017. submitted. [Google Scholar]
- Yazdanian, M.; Mehrizi-Sani, A. Distributed control techniques in microgrids. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2014, 5, 2901–2909. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rahimi, S.; Marinelli, M.; Silvestro, F. Evaluation of requirements for Volt/Var control and optimization function in distribution management systems. In Proceedings of the 2012 IEEE International Energy Conference and Exhibition (ENERGYCON), Florence, Italy, 9–12 September 2012; pp. 331–336. [Google Scholar]
Data Rate Range | Latency Range | Application | Approximated Specific Data Rate | Approximated Specific Latency | Tasks | Typical Data Size | Indicative Data Sampling | Reliability |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
bps | ms–s | Remote control | ~bps | 100–500 ms | Connections/disconnections | 100–500 B | Occasional | >99% |
Pricing | ~bps | 10 s | Prepayment services | 100–200 B | Regular (per month) | >99% | ||
Lighting, traffic control | ~bps | 100–300 s | Signaling and commands | 10–50 B | Occasional | >99% | ||
<10 kbps | ms–s | SCADA | ~kbps | 300–3000 ms | Monitoring and control commands | 100–500 B | “Polling” | >99% |
Domestic applications | ~kbps/device | 2–15 s | Customer information requests and responses | 100–500 B | Regular and under demand | >99% | ||
Premises network administration | 25 B | As needed | >99% | |||||
10–100 kbps | <200 ms | Substation automation (SA) | 9.6–56 kbps | 15–200 ms | Monitoring and control commands | 150–250 B | Several times per day and under demand | >99.99% |
Overhead transmission line monitoring | 9.6–56 kbps | 15–200 ms | Monitoring and data maintenance | 100–1000 B | Several times per day and under demand | 99.0–99.99% | ||
Distribution automation (DA) | 9.6–56 kbps | 20–200 ms | Monitoring and data maintenance | 100–1000 B | 1 device per hour | >99.99% | ||
Control commands | 150–250 B | 1 device per hour (minimum) | >99.99% | |||||
Fault detection, clearing, isolation and restoration | 25 B | 1 device per 5 s (minimum) | >99.99% | |||||
200 ms–5 s | Distribution management | 9.6–100 kbps | 100 ms–2 s | Monitoring, data maintenance and control commands | 100–1000 B | 1 device per hour (minimum) | 99.0–99.99% | |
Home Energy Managemnt (HEM) | 9.6–56 kbps | 200 ms–2 s | Signaling and commands | 100–500 B | Regular and under demand | 99.0–99.99% | ||
Distributed Energy Resources management | 9.6–56 kbps | 200 ms–2 s | Operation commands | 25 B | Several times per day | 99.0–99.99% | ||
Demand-side management (SM) | 14–100 kbps/node | 500 ms–5 s | RTP programs | 100 B | 1 per device per price, several times per day | >99% | ||
<2 s | Outage management | 56 kbps | 2 s | Outage and restoration management | 25 B | 1 per power lost | >99% | |
AMI (per node) | 10–100 kbps | ≥2 s | Meter reading–on demand | 100 B | As needed | >99% | ||
Meter reading–scheduled | 1600–2400 B | Several times per day | >99% | |||||
2 s–5 min | EVs—vehicle to grid (V2G) | 9.6–56 kbps | 2 s–5 min | Pricing signals and commands | 255 B | 1 per EV per day | 99.0–99.99% | |
EVs—charging | 9.6–56 kbps | 2 s–5 min | Charge status signals and commands | 100 B | 2–4 per EV per day | 99.0–99.99% | ||
Demand-side management (DSM) | 14–100 kbps/node | 2 s–5 min | TOU programs | 100 B | 1 per device per price, several times per year | >99% | ||
CPP programs | 100 B | 1 per device per price, several times per year | >99% | |||||
Service switch operation | 25 B | 1–2 per group of meters per day | >99% | |||||
100–1000 kbps | 20 ms–2 s | Wide area awareness | 600–1500 kbps | 20–200 ms | Synchrophasor, command controls | 50–100 B | Regular and under demand | >99.99% |
Surveillance | 500–1500 kbps | ~s | Monitoring and response | 100–500 B | Regular and event-driven | >99.99% | ||
AMI (backhaul) | 500 kbps | ≥2 s | Meter reading–bulk transfer | ~MB | Several times per day | >99% | ||
Mbps | ms | Automated Distribution automation (ADA) | ~Mbps | 25–100 ms | Monitoring: power oscillations, voltage stability, states estimation | >55 B | Once every 0.1 s (minimum) | >99.99% |
Control: voltages, cascade failures, transients, power oscillations | 4–160 B | Once every 0.1 s (minimum) | >99.99% | |||||
Protection: adaptative islanding and predictive behaviour | 4–160 B | Once every 0.1 s | >99.99% |
Measurement Configurations | ||
---|---|---|
Transmission size (kB) | 100 | |
Number of nodes in the subnetwork | 21 | |
Type of metering traffic in the subnetwork | Control (C) | |
Control + instantaneous (I) | ||
Control + profiles (P) | ||
Considered transport protocols | TCP and UDP | |
Type of IP communication and switching level (i) | Between BN and SN | BN–SNB(0) |
BN–SNB(1) | ||
BN–SNB(2) | ||
BN–SNB(3) | ||
Between SN and SN | SNA(0)–SNB(0) | |
SNA(0)–SNB(1) | ||
SNA(0)–SNB(2) | ||
SNA(0)–SNB(3) |
© 2017 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
Share and Cite
Uribe-Pérez, N.; Angulo, I.; De la Vega, D.; Arzuaga, T.; Fernández, I.; Arrinda, A. Smart Grid Applications for a Practical Implementation of IP over Narrowband Power Line Communications. Energies 2017, 10, 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111782
Uribe-Pérez N, Angulo I, De la Vega D, Arzuaga T, Fernández I, Arrinda A. Smart Grid Applications for a Practical Implementation of IP over Narrowband Power Line Communications. Energies. 2017; 10(11):1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111782
Chicago/Turabian StyleUribe-Pérez, Noelia, Itziar Angulo, David De la Vega, Txetxu Arzuaga, Igor Fernández, and Amaia Arrinda. 2017. "Smart Grid Applications for a Practical Implementation of IP over Narrowband Power Line Communications" Energies 10, no. 11: 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111782
APA StyleUribe-Pérez, N., Angulo, I., De la Vega, D., Arzuaga, T., Fernández, I., & Arrinda, A. (2017). Smart Grid Applications for a Practical Implementation of IP over Narrowband Power Line Communications. Energies, 10(11), 1782. https://doi.org/10.3390/en10111782