Next Article in Journal
Energy and Environmental Analysis of Membrane-Based CH4-CO2 Replacement Processes in Natural Gas Hydrates
Next Article in Special Issue
Implementation of Processing Functions for Autonomous Power Quality Measurement Equipment: A Performance Evaluation of CPU and FPGA-Based Embedded System
Previous Article in Journal
Data-Driven EV Load Profiles Generation Using a Variational Auto-Encoder
Previous Article in Special Issue
Application of Spectral Kurtosis to Characterize Amplitude Variability in Power Systems’ Harmonics
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Power Quality in DC Distribution Networks †

Department of Computer Science and Electronics, University of Cantabria, 39005 Santander, Spain
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
This paper is a technically extended version of a conference paper entitled “Definition and measurement of power quality indices in low voltage DC networks”, by the same authors, presented at IEEE AMPS 2018, Bologna, Italy, September 2018.
Energies 2019, 12(5), 848; https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050848
Submission received: 31 January 2019 / Revised: 26 February 2019 / Accepted: 27 February 2019 / Published: 5 March 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Analysis for Power Quality Monitoring)

Abstract

:
This paper presents an overview of power quality in low-voltage DC distribution networks. We study which of the power quality disturbances in AC networks are also relevant in DC networks, as well as other disturbances specific to DC networks. The paper reviews the current status of international regulations in this topic and proposes different indices for the detection and characterization of the main types of power quality disturbances, presenting some results obtained in different laboratory tests in DC networks using different DC voltage shapes delivered by different DC power source types.

1. Introduction

The use of distributed generation with the increasing number of renewable energy systems that directly deliver DC power such as PV systems, wind generation, or battery storage, combined with the advance in DC technology enables a direct, more efficient and sustainable use of the energy, eliminating losses associated with energy conversion. The growing use of DC distribution systems in data centers, residential buildings, lighting, transportation, and other applications [1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8], has prompted the need for definition and standardization of the supplied voltage and the power quality requirements to enable the reliable operation of equipment in DC networks, as well as in AC public distribution systems.
Low-voltage DC distribution networks (LVDCs) are regulated in the European Union by the Directive 2006/95/EC [9]. This directive enables DC voltage to be used in electricity distribution systems up to 1500 V. Table 1 shows some of the most common DC nominal voltages used and examples of their main applications [10].
During recent years, a number of IEC international standards have been developed for LVDC systems, including electricity generation, transmission, distribution, storage and applications such as lighting, household appliances, and electric equipment for transportation, among others. The most comprehensive overview of the IEC related work in LVDC can be seen in [10].
In spite of being power quality an important issue in the design of DC distribution networks, at present there is no standard norm for power quality in this type of distribution network.
Independent of the future development of LVDC systems, there is a need for definition and measurement of power quality indices in LVDC networks. In this sense, the international committees in charge of maintenance of European Standard EN 50160 “Voltage characteristics of electricity supplied by public electricity networks” [11] and of the IEC 61000-4-30 “Power quality measurement methods” [12] have started some preliminary studies in order to extend the scope of these two standards to low-voltage and medium-voltage DC public distribution networks in their future revisions.
At present, there are only a few proposals in the technical literature for definition and measurement of indices for relevant power quality disturbances in DC networks. Some of the first attempts in this subject have defined indices for harmonic/interharmonic distortion and for ripple evaluation [13,14]. Power quality indices in the time and frequency domains, such as average, median, and percentile variations of DC components, as well as peak-to-peak and r.m.s. variations, and low frequency distortion indices, have been defined for assessing power quality in DC microgrids [15]. Finally, other important power quality concerns in DC networks, such as fault currents, inrush currents and grounding, are considered in [3].
This paper presents an overview of power quality in LVDC distribution networks, studying the power quality phenomena in AC distribution networks that also apply to DC networks, as well as disturbances specific to DC networks, proposing some indices for their characterization. Section 2 reviews the different types of DC generation and DC voltage shapes and their characterization method. Voltage dips, voltage supply interruptions, rapid voltage changes, and voltage ripple in DC voltage are considered in Section 3 as some of the main types of power quality disturbances in LVDC networks, defining indices for their assessment. Section 4 reports some results obtained in different laboratory tests in the detection and assessment of these power quality disturbances, using different DC voltage shapes delivered by different DC power source types. Section 5 presents a summary of the power quality indices defined, and finally, Section 6 presents the conclusions.

2. DC Voltage Characteristics

There are two main types of DC generation: DC sources that produce ideal or quasi-ideal DC voltage, such as PV, DC generators, and battery storage; or AC/DC conversion (single-phase or multi-phase rectifying) that produces DC voltage with a ripple content caused by feed-through from the AC input section to the DC output. Figure 1 shows some examples of different voltage waveforms produced by different DC power sources [16].
As can be seen in Figure 1, DC voltage shapes can be very different, requiring precise definitions of DC voltage characteristics as well as methods for their measurements, both under steady state and non-steady state conditions. It is necessary to clearly define the expected characteristics of the electricity supplied in DC distribution systems under normal operating conditions.

3. Power Quality Disturbances in DC Networks

The key question concerning power quality in DC networks is whether power quality is relevant for DC networks. If so, which disturbances should be considered to define DC power quality and which indices should be defined for its accurate characterization?
As is the case with low-voltage and medium-voltage AC distribution networks, power quality is an important factor to ensure the correct performance of DC distribution networks, as well as a key factor for the correct and efficient integration of the new distributed energy resources into the network. A poor power quality in DC voltage supply can produce a malfunction or damage electrical and electronic equipment, affecting process operations with important economic and technical impacts.
Most of the power quality disturbances in AC power distribution networks apply to DC networks too. According to the preliminary work developed by the international standardization committees in charge of standards EN 50160 and IEC 61000-4-30, the power quality phenomena that should be assessed for LVDC distribution networks are:
  • Supply voltage deviations
  • Voltage unbalance
  • Ripple/harmonics
  • Voltage swells and voltage dips
  • Voltage supply interruptions
  • Rapid voltage changes and flicker
This section defines indices for the assessment of most of these power quality disturbances, that is, voltage swells and voltage dips, voltage supply interruptions, rapid voltage changes, and ripple/harmonics, taking as reference those previously defined in AC networks.

3.1. Voltage Dips, Voltage Swells and Voltage Supply Interruptions

As in the case of AC networks, voltage dips, voltage swells, and voltage supply interruptions are basically caused in LVDC networks by faults, sudden load changes, or by load switching. It is important to point out that these types of voltage event can be more detrimental in DC networks than in AC ones because of the lack of the reactive part of the impedance, which in the case of AC grids smooths these voltage events.
There are no standard requirements defined for tolerance of equipment to voltage dips, voltage supply interruptions, or voltage swells in LVDC networks, with the exception of the electrical and electronic equipment used in railway, aircraft and telecommunication applications [17,18,19].
According to European Standard EN 50155 electrical and electronic equipment is expected to operate reliably in the range 0.7–1.25 UN (UN: Nominal voltage) during a time t < 1 s, in the range 0.6–1.4 UN during a time t < 0.1 s, and up to 10 milliseconds during a voltage interruption [17]. This time-dependent characteristic is shown in the voltage tolerance curve in Figure 2. No voltages within the compliant zone produce malfunctions of equipment.
Other standards, such as IEC 61000-4-29 [20], define test methods for immunity to voltage dips, short interruptions, and voltage variations on the DC input power port of electrical or electronic equipment. This standard is applicable to low voltage DC power ports of equipment supplied by external DC networks.
Voltage dips/swells and voltage supply interruptions are characterized by two parameters in IEC 61000-4-30 for AC public distribution networks [12]: The residual voltage or the depth (or the maximum voltage in the case of a voltage swell) and the duration. The magnitude and duration of these voltage events can be computed in a similar way in LVDC networks, simply replacing the Urms(1/2) value defined in IEC 61000-4-30 (r.m.s. voltage computed over one cycle and refreshed each half-cycle) for their detection and evaluation by an equivalent DC magnitude. To this end, and solely for the purpose of detection and characterization of these voltage events, we propose the use of a DC voltage computed as the arithmetic mean value of the instantaneous DC voltages in a 20 millisecond sliding window (UDC,20ms), computing a new DC mean value with each new voltage sample acquired. When this DC voltage magnitude is below/above a defined detection threshold, a voltage dip/swell is detected.

3.2. Rapid Voltage Changes

A rapid voltage change (RVC) is defined in AC networks as “an abrupt transition between two r.m.s. steady-state voltages and during which the r.m.s. voltage does not exceed the dip/swell thresholds” [12]. RVCs are a type of power quality disturbance that is also prevalent in DC networks.
RVCs can be produced in DC networks by switching operations in equipment, such as motor starting, generation units, fluctuating loads or load shedding, and they can affect the performance of electrical and electronic equipment, potentially even producing flicker. In the case of PV generation, and as previously reported [21], fast changes in solar irradiance could cause instantaneous variations in PV power output resulting in rapid voltage changes.
In AC public distribution networks and according to previous work [12], an RVC event begins when Urms(1/2) values corresponding to the previous 100/120 values (1 s) are over the RVC threshold of the arithmetic mean of these values, and ends when the Urms(1/2) values return to a new stationary-state condition. The RVC threshold should be set by the user, typically in the range from 1% to 6% of the nominal or declared voltage.
Two indices have been defined [12] for RVC characterization in AC networks: Magnitude and duration. The RVC magnitude ΔUmax is defined as the maximum voltage variation of the Urms(1/2) value during the event, and ΔUSS is the absolute difference between the Urms(1/2) values between the two steady-states. In order to classify an event as a RVC, its magnitude ΔUmax should be less than ±10% of the nominal voltage or the declared input voltage; otherwise, the event should be classified as a voltage dip or as a voltage swell.
In the case of DC networks, two equivalent indices can be used for RVC event detection and characterization: Magnitude and duration. An RVC event is detected when the UDC,20ms value corresponding to the last second is over the RVC threshold and ends when the UDC,20ms value returns to a new stationary-state condition. The RVC magnitude in a DC network, ΔUDC, can be defined as the maximum voltage variation of the UDC,20ms value during the event. Similar to the case of AC networks, if the magnitude of ΔUDC is less than ±10% of the nominal voltage, the event should be classified as a voltage dip or as a voltage swell.

3.3. Voltage Ripple

Voltage ripple is a superimposed alternating voltage on a DC voltage that is defined in IEV 161-02-25 [22] as “the quantity derived by removing the direct component from a pulsating quantity.”
The main sources of voltage ripple in DC networks are ripple produced by AC/DC conversion, ripple produced by battery charging, and ripple generated from equipment absorbing pulsating currents [16]. In the case of the ripple generated by AC/DC conversion, voltage ripple can be considered a continuous phenomenon with its magnitude decreasing and its frequency increasing with the number of rectifier units, as is shown in Figure 1. According to Standard IEC 61000-4-17 [16] “the frequency of the ripple is the power frequency or its multiple 2, 3 or 6,” but other types of AC/DC converters produce different and more complex ripple spectra [14].
The ripple in a DC voltage should be estimated and limited in order to prevent malfunctions of electrical and electronic equipment connected to the networks. Voltage ripple can produce additional heating and increase losses and audible noise in audio circuits because its frequency and its harmonics are within the audio band; it can also interfere with TV displays.
Up to now, there are no clear limits for ripple magnitude, with up to ±15% of the nominal voltage in railway applications [17], or up to ±10% in DC power systems on ships [23], and no limits defined for the ripple frequency distortion. Standard IEC 61000-4-17 defines “test methods for immunity to voltage ripple at the DC input port of electrical and electronic equipment” [16].
Two main parameters are used in international standards for ripple characterization: Magnitude and frequency. In the case of ripple magnitude, two indices are used for its assessment: The “peak-ripple factor” and the “r.m.s.-ripple factor”.
The “peak-ripple factor” is defined as “the ratio of the peak-to-valley value of the ripple content to the absolute value of the direct component of a pulsating quantity” [24]:
peak - ripple   factor ( % ) = V peak - to - valley V dc 100 %
On the other hand, the “r.m.s.-ripple factor” is defined as “the ratio of the r.m.s. value of the ripple content to the absolute value of the direct component of a pulsating quantity” [25]:
r . m . s . - ripple   factor ( % ) = V ripple ( rms ) V dc 100 %
An index similar to the total harmonic distortion (THD), used for harmonic distortion characterization in AC power system networks [26], can be defined in order to characterize the spectral components of the voltage ripple of a DC signal, the “ripple distortion factor” (RDF).
We define the RDF index as the square root of the sum of the ratio of the squares of all of the harmonic components of the ripple content Gn obtained using DFT analysis, up to a specific order in the range 2–3.6 kHz (to cover the frequency range defined by harmonic distortion related standards), with respect to the DC component G0 as:
RDF = n ( G n G 0 ) 2
Other distortion factors, such as the “low-frequency sinusoidal distortion index” [11], can also be used, considering in this case all the frequency components provided by the DFT analysis with the selected frequency resolution, instead of using only the fundamental and the predominant harmonic components of the ripple content.
Another possible alternative is the use of different frequency ranges depending on the type and switching frequency of the power converters used for AC/DC generation, for a more accurate evaluation of the ripple, as has been proposed previously [13].

4. Experimental Results

This section presents some of the results obtained in the laboratory set-up developed for DC power quality analysis. The laboratory was made up by two different DC power sources: A regulated AC/DC three-phase rectifying power source with high ripple content and a quasi-ideal programmable DC power source with very low ripple content; and DC loads (resistive loads and DC motors) and a data acquisition system. Figure 3a shows the block diagram and Figure 3b the laboratory set-up when using the AC/DC three-phase rectifying programmable power source as the DC voltage source and a DC motor as the DC load.
The data acquisition system used for data acquisition and signal processing consisted of an LEM LV 25-P Hall effect voltage transducer with a frequency range from DC to 150 kHz; an NI CompactDAQ 9172 with a NI 9215, 4 input channels, 16-bit resolution, 100-kS/s/ch maximum sampling rate, and ±10 Volt maximum input range data acquisition board; and a laptop computer (see Figure 3a).
The sampling frequency used was 6.4 kS/s, high enough for the accurate characterization of the spectrum of the voltage ripple superimposed on the DC voltage. In each test a 10 s record of the DC voltage signal was taken, computing the DC voltage magnitude and different power quality indices depending on the test performed. The software was implemented using the LabVIEW 15 graphic programming environment.
Up to now, there is no standard measurement method for estimation of DC voltage in LVDC distribution grids. In the case of aircraft electric power systems, standard MIL-STD-704F [18] defines the steady-state voltage as “the time average of the instantaneous DC voltage over a period not to exceed one second,” the same criteria as the standard used for shipboard electric installations [27]. In all the tests conducted in this paper, we have used a 200 millisecond period for estimation of the steady-state DC voltage (UDC), the same time interval as the one used for the measurement of r.m.s. voltage in AC grids.

4.1. Voltage Dips and Short Interruptions

This section presents some results obtained in the detection and assessment of voltage dips and short interruptions in DC voltage supply using the sliding arithmetic mean value of the DC voltage previously defined in Section 3.1.
Figure 4 shows an example of a voltage supply interruption produced by the switching on/off of a 230 V, 0.69 kW, DC voltage source in our laboratory. The voltage event is detected when the DC voltage is below the voltage dip detection threshold. The detection threshold selected, as in AC networks, is 90% of the nominal voltage, considering the event as a voltage supply interruption when the DC voltage magnitude during the event is less than 5% of the nominal value, as previously proposed [11].
As can be seen in Figure 4, the voltage supply interruption starts at instant 1.24 s and ends at instant 2.60 s of the record, with a duration of 1.36 s. According to the voltage tolerance of equipment in Figure 2, the duration of this voltage supply interruption could cause the malfunction or the trip of equipment.

4.2. Rapid Voltage Changes

One type of RVC event that can appear in a DC distribution grid is associated with motor start-ups. In these voltage events and after a sudden transition, the voltage gradually recovers to a new value. A 230 V, 0.44 kW, 1500 rpm, DC motor, with different starting resistors connected to a 230 V, 0.69 kW, DC power source was used in our laboratory to produce RVCs of different magnitude and duration.
Figure 5 shows two different examples of RVC events. Different starting resistors were used to limit the starting current to safe values, producing RVCs of different magnitude and duration. The DC arithmetic mean voltage value corresponding to the last second, and recalculated with each new DC voltage sample acquired, as defined in Section 3.2, was used for RVC detection and characterization. A magnitude of 1% of the nominal voltage was selected as the RVC detection threshold (2.3 V in this case). The two RVC events in Figure 5 are 20.126 and 8.098 V magnitude (9.148% and 3.361% of the nominal voltage), with 0.18 s and 0.10 s duration, respectively.

4.3. Voltage Ripple

In this section, the results obtained in the assessment of the ripple produced by two different DC power sources in our laboratory are presented. In each case a 10 s record in the DC voltage was recorded, computing the peak-ripple factor, the r.m.s. ripple factor and the ripple distortion factor.
Figure 6 shows an example of the ripple produced by a 230 V, 0.69 kW, AC/DC three-phase rectifying programmable DC power source. Figure 6a presents 200 milliseconds of the DC voltage waveform, the ripple content is shown in Figure 6b, and its spectral analysis is presented in Figure 6c. The DC voltage (computed as the mean value during the 200 milliseconds period in the record), the peak-to-valley, and the r.m.s. values were 237 V, 50.478 V, and 14.735 V, respectively, whereas the peak-ripple factor and the r.m.s.-ripple factor (as defined in the previous section) were 21.299 % and 6.217%, respectively, of the DC voltage.
Table 2 and Figure 6c show the magnitude of the frequency components of the ripple content computed in the 200 millisecond window in Figure 6a, applying the DFT analysis with 5 Hz resolution. As can be seen from the results reported, the DC voltage component is 237 V, the fundamental component of the ripple content is 300 Hz, as expected in a three-phase AD/DC conversion voltage source when using 50 Hz AC input voltage with a magnitude of 14.46 V (6.1% of the DC voltage), and predominant harmonic components at 600 Hz, 900 Hz, 1200 Hz and 1500 Hz, with magnitudes of 1.99 (0.84% of the DC voltage), 1.06 (0.45%), 0.60 (0.25%), and 0.38 V (0.16%), respectively. The ripple distortion factor (RDF) of the signal in Figure 6a is 6.18% of the DC voltage.
Finally, Figure 7 shows the DC voltage shape and the ripple content as produced, in this case, by a 600 V, 3 kW, programmable ideal DC power source. Figure 7a shows 200 milliseconds of a 400.06 DC voltage waveform produced by the power source, Figure 7b shows the ripple content and Figure 7c shows its spectral components. As can be seen, the DC voltage is quasi-ideal, with deviations from the output voltage of less than 1.5% of the selected voltage magnitude and very low ripple magnitude. The peak-ripple factor and the r.m.s.-ripple factor were 0.621% and 0.104%, respectively, of the DC voltage, and the ripple distortion factor (RDF) was only 0.022% of the DC voltage, with spectral components less than 0.1 V magnitude (0.25% of the DC voltage).

5. Summary

Table 3 summarizes the indices used for characterization of power quality disturbances in LVDC distribution networks and their corresponding indices in AC networks.

6. Conclusions

This paper presents an overview of power quality in DC low-voltage distribution networks. The paper studies the definition and measurement of power quality indices in low-voltage DC networks. Voltage supply interruptions, rapid voltage changes, and voltage ripple content are considered in the paper. We reported the results obtained in different laboratory tests in the detection and measurement of these power quality disturbances using different DC voltage shapes delivered by different DC power source types, and proposed different indices for their characterization. From the results obtained, it can be concluded that the different power quality indices defined enable the correct detection and evaluation of the different DC power quality disturbances considered.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.B. and R.I.D.; methodology, M.d.A., J.B. and R.I.D.; software, M.d.A.; validation, M.d.A., J.B. and R.I.D.; investigation, J.B.; writing—original draft preparation, J.B.; writing—review and editing, J.B., M.d.A, and R.I.D.; project administration, J.B. and R.I.D.

Funding

This research was funded by Comisión Interministerial de Ciencia y Tecnología (CICYT) of the Spanish Government, grant number ENE-2014-54039-R.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. EPRI. DC Power Production, Delivery and Utilization; EPRI: Palo alto, CA, USA, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  2. Baran, M.E.; Mahajan, N.R. DC distribution for industrial systems: opportunities and challenges. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2003, 39, 1596–1601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Whaite, S.; Grainger, B.; Kwasinski, A. Power quality in DC power distribution systems and microgrids. Energies 2015, 8, 4378–4399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Sanino, A.; Postiglione, G.; Bollen, M.H.J. Feasibility of a DC network for commercial facilities. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2003, 39, 1499–1507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Wunder, B.; Ott, L.; Szpek, M.; Boeke, U.; Weiβ, R. Energy efficient DC-grids for commercial buildings. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE INTELEC, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 28 September–2 October 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Waffenschmidt, E. Low voltage DC grids. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE INTELEC, Hamburg, Germany, 13–17 October 2013. [Google Scholar]
  7. Parhizi, S.; Lofti, H.; Khodaei, A.; Bahramirad, S. State of the art in research on microgrids: a review. IEEE Access 2015, 5, 890–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Kumar, D.; Zare, F.; Ghosh, A. DC microgrid technology: System architectures, AC grid interfaces, grounding schemes, power quality, communication networks, applications, and standardization aspects. IEEE Access 2017, 5, 12230–12256. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. European Commission. Low Voltage Directive, LVD 2006/95/EC European Union Directive, Brussels. Available online: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUriServ/LexUriServ.do?uri=OJ:L:2006:374:0010:0019:EN:PDF (accessed on 31 January 2019).
  10. International Electrotechnical Commision, LVDC: The Better Way. Available online: http://www.iech.ch/about/brocures/pdf/energy/iec_lvdc_the_better_way_en_lr.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2019).
  11. European Standard EN 50160: 2015. Voltage Characteristics of Electricity Supplied by Public Electricity Networks; CENELEC: Brussels, Belgium, 2015.
  12. International Electrotechnical Commission. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)—Part 4–30: Testing and Measurement Techniques. Power Quality Measurement Methods, IEC 61000-4-30, Ed. 3; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2015. [Google Scholar]
  13. Caserza Magro, M.; Mariscotti, A.; Pinceti, P. Definition of Power Quality Indices for DC Low Voltage Distribution Networks. In Proceedings of the 2006 I2MTC, Sorrento, Italy, 24–27 April 2006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Mariscotti, A. Methods for ripple index evaluation in DC low voltage distribution networks. In Proceedings of the 2007 I2MTC, Warsaw, Poland, 1–3 May 2007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ciornei, I.; Albu, M.; Sanduleac, M.; Hadjidemetriou, L. Analytical derivation of PQ indicators compatible with control strategies for DC microgrids. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE PowerTech, Manchester, UK, 18–22 June 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. International Electrotechnical Commission. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)—Part 4–17: Ripple on d.c. Input Power Port Immunity Test, IEC 61000-4-17; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  17. CENELEC. European Standard EN 50155, Railway Applications. Electronic Equipment Used on Rolling Stock; CENELEC: Brussels, Belgium, 2017. [Google Scholar]
  18. Department of Defense. Interface Standard. MIL-STD-704F, Aircraft Electric Power Characteristics. Available online: https://prod.nais.nasa.gov/eps/eps_data/137899-SOL-001-015.pdf (accessed on 31 January 2019).
  19. European Telecommunications Standard Institute. ETSI EN 300 132-3-1, Power Supply Interface at the Input to Telecommunications and Datacom Equipment; Part 3: Operated by Rectified Current Source, Alternating Current Source or Direct Current Source Up to 400 V; Sub-Part 1: Direct Current Source Up to 400 V; European Telecommunications Standard Institute: Valbonne, France, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  20. International Electrotechnical Commission. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)—Part 4–29: Testing and Measurement Techniques. Voltage Dips, Short Interruptions and Voltage Variations on d.c. Input Power Port Immunity Tests, IEC 61000-4-29; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2000. [Google Scholar]
  21. Trindade, F.C.L.; Ferreira, T.S.D.; Lopes, M.G.; Freitas, W. Mitigation of fast voltage variation during cloud transients in distribution systems with PV solar farms. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2017, 32, 921–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60050—International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV 161-02-25); nternational Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  23. International Association of Classification Societies. Unified requirement UR E5—Voltage and frequency variations. Rev. 1; International Association of Classification Societies: Hamburg, Germany, 2005. [Google Scholar]
  24. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60050—International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV 161-02-26); International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  25. International Electrotechnical Commission. IEC 60050—International Electrotechnical Vocabulary (IEV 161-02-27); International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  26. International Electrotechnical Commission. Electromagnetic Compatibility (EMC)—Part 4–7: Testing and Measurement Techniques—General Guide on Harmonics and Interharmonics Measurement, for Power Supply Systems and Equipment Connected Thereto, IEC 61000-4-7; International Electrotechnical Commission: Geneva, Switzerland, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  27. IEEE Std 45.1—2017. IEEE Recommended Practice for Electrical Installations on Shipboard; IEEE: New York, NY, USA, 2017. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. DC voltage shapes produced by different DC power sources: (a) Ideal DC voltage, (b) single-phase AC/DC conversion, and (c) three-phase AC/DC conversion.
Figure 1. DC voltage shapes produced by different DC power sources: (a) Ideal DC voltage, (b) single-phase AC/DC conversion, and (c) three-phase AC/DC conversion.
Energies 12 00848 g001
Figure 2. Voltage tolerance of equipment as defined in [17] for railway applications.
Figure 2. Voltage tolerance of equipment as defined in [17] for railway applications.
Energies 12 00848 g002
Figure 3. (a) Block diagram, and (b) laboratory set-up developed for DC power quality analysis.
Figure 3. (a) Block diagram, and (b) laboratory set-up developed for DC power quality analysis.
Energies 12 00848 g003
Figure 4. An example of a short interruption in a DC power source.
Figure 4. An example of a short interruption in a DC power source.
Energies 12 00848 g004
Figure 5. Examples of rapid voltage changes produced by DC motor starting.
Figure 5. Examples of rapid voltage changes produced by DC motor starting.
Energies 12 00848 g005
Figure 6. (a) DC voltage shape of an AC/DC three-phase rectifying DC power source, (b) ripple content, and (c) spectral components in voltage ripple excluding the DC component.
Figure 6. (a) DC voltage shape of an AC/DC three-phase rectifying DC power source, (b) ripple content, and (c) spectral components in voltage ripple excluding the DC component.
Energies 12 00848 g006
Figure 7. (a) DC voltage shape of quasi-ideal programmable DC power source, (b) ripple content, and (c) spectral components in voltage ripple excluding the DC component.
Figure 7. (a) DC voltage shape of quasi-ideal programmable DC power source, (b) ripple content, and (c) spectral components in voltage ripple excluding the DC component.
Energies 12 00848 g007
Table 1. Low-voltage DC distribution network (LVDC) voltages and applications [10].
Table 1. Low-voltage DC distribution network (LVDC) voltages and applications [10].
LVDC VoltagesApplication
3.6–5 VMobile phone charging
9 VBattery
12 VCar battery, lighting
24–36 VElectric bikes, high-power cordless, truck battery
48 VTelecom power
400 VData centers, office buildings, hospitals, electric vehicles fast charging
Up to 1500 VUrban railways
Table 2. Spectral analysis of the ripple content of the signal in Figure 6a.
Table 2. Spectral analysis of the ripple content of the signal in Figure 6a.
Magnitude (V)Magnitude (%)Frequency (Hz)
237.00-DC
14.466.10%300
1.990.84%600
1.060.45%900
0.600.25%1200
0.380.16%1500
Table 3. Power quality indices in LVDC distribution networks and their corresponding indices in AC networks.
Table 3. Power quality indices in LVDC distribution networks and their corresponding indices in AC networks.
MagnitudeACDC
VoltageUrmsUDC
Voltage dips/swells/interruptionsUrms(1/2)
Magnitude; duration
UDC-20ms
Magnitude; duration
RVCsUrms(1/2)
Magnitude (ΔUmax); Duration
UDC-20ms
Magnitude (ΔUDC); duration
Harmonic distortion/rippleHarmonic component (Gn)
THD (Total Harmonic Distortion)
Harmonic component (Gn)
RDF (Ripple Distortion Factor)
Peak-ripple factor
rms-ripple factor

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Barros, J.; de Apráiz, M.; Diego, R.I. Power Quality in DC Distribution Networks. Energies 2019, 12, 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050848

AMA Style

Barros J, de Apráiz M, Diego RI. Power Quality in DC Distribution Networks. Energies. 2019; 12(5):848. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050848

Chicago/Turabian Style

Barros, Julio, Matilde de Apráiz, and Ramón I. Diego. 2019. "Power Quality in DC Distribution Networks" Energies 12, no. 5: 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050848

APA Style

Barros, J., de Apráiz, M., & Diego, R. I. (2019). Power Quality in DC Distribution Networks. Energies, 12(5), 848. https://doi.org/10.3390/en12050848

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop