Next Article in Journal
A Generalized Unit Commitment and Economic Dispatch Approach for Analysing the Polish Power System under High Renewable Penetration
Next Article in Special Issue
Effects of Forces, Particle Sizes, and Moisture Contents on Mechanical Behaviour of Densified Briquettes from Ground Sunflower Stalks and Hazelnut Husks
Previous Article in Journal
Electric Vehicle Charging and Discharging Algorithm Based on Reinforcement Learning with Data-Driven Approach in Dynamic Pricing Scheme
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characteristic Properties of Alternative Biomass Fuels
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Evaluating the Potential for Combustion of Biofuels in Grate Furnaces

by
Małgorzata Wzorek
Department of Process Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Opole University of Technology, ul. Prószkowska 76, 45-758 Opole, Poland
Energies 2020, 13(8), 1951; https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081951
Submission received: 11 March 2020 / Revised: 9 April 2020 / Accepted: 10 April 2020 / Published: 15 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biomass for Energy Application)

Abstract

:
The paper assesses the impact of combustion of biofuels produced based on municipal sewage sludge in stoker-fired boilers on the amount of pollutant emissions and examines the tendency of ash deposition of biofuels formed during the combustion process. The combustion tests were performed in a laboratory system enabling simulation of a combustion process present in stoker-fired boilers. The study was conducted for three types of biofuels; i.e., fuel from sewage sludge and coal slime (PBS fuel), sewage sludge and meat and bone meal (PBM fuel) and fuel based on sewage sludge and sawdust (PBT) with particle size of 35 mm and 15 mm. This paper describes and compares the combustion process of biofuels with different granulation and composition and presents the results of changes in emission values of NOx, SO2, CO, and CO2. The emission results were compared with the corresponding results obtained during combustion of hard coal. The results showed that biofuels with lower particle sizes were ignited faster and the shortest ignition time is achieved for fuel based on sewage sludge and coal slime-PBS fuel. Also, the highest NO and SO2 emissions were obtained for PBS fuel. During the combustion of fuel based on sewage sludge and meat and bone meal (PBM), on the other hand, the highest CO2 emissions were observed for both granulations. Biofuels from sludge show a combustion process that is different compared to the one for hard coal. The problems of ash fouling, slagging, and deposition during biofuels combustion were also identified. The tendency for ash slagging and fouling is observed, especially for fuel from sewage sludge and meat and bone meal (PBM) and fuel based on sewage sludge and sawdust (PBT) ashes which consist of meat and bone meal and sawdust which is typical for biomass combustion.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Municipal sewage sludge is a product of the water-cleaning process in wastewater treatment plants. The amount of generated sewage sludge depends on many factors, mainly on the content of pollutants in the sludge and on the technology of its treatment. An amount of sewage sludge cannot be prevented and is reduced in line with the requirements regarding the quality of treated sewage.
The problem of sewage sludge disposal has two aspects: quantitative and qualitative aspect, which results from the specific properties of the waste and the legal aspect.
The problem with the disposal of municipal sewage sludge also results from the introduction of new, increasingly stringent legal regulations concerning sewage sludge management, limiting the use of the sludge for agricultural and natural purposes and prohibiting its storage [1,2].
In this situation, processes that are becoming increasingly important are thermal use processes which are among the most radical methods in terms the possibility of a significant reduction in the mass and volume of sewage sludge. They also allow use of the energy contained in the sludge and to reduce CO2 emissions in accordance with the principles of sustainable development.
The parameter that is very important for the use of waste to generate energy is the stability of the properties which determines the efficiency of the combustion process, and in the case of sewage sludge it is difficult to talk about stability, since the properties of the sludge vary widely and are dependent on many factors.
Another problem in the thermal use of municipal sludge is its high water content. With a dry matter content of 20%–30%, municipal sewage sludge can be incinerated only with the help of additional fuel, and only after partial drying up to 50% can they be burnt autothermally [3]. The total drying of sludge, up to about 10%, allows their use in co-combustion with coal in industrial processes [4,5]. Another way to use sludge for energy purpose is to use it as an ingredient in the production of fuel with fixed composition and properties [6].
Research on the thermal degradation of sludge combustion and co-combustion with coal and other fuels are conducted both on a laboratory and industrial scale.
Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) is a technique that is most widely and commonly used for this purpose. Many authors emphasize the specificity of behavior of sewage sludge in combustion process. For example, Lin et al. [7] showed that the co-combustion of sewage sludge and oil shale with a proportion of 10% of the sludge gave the best promoter effect. It was observed that the ignition temperature shifted to an earlier temperature when sewage sludge was added.
Chen et al. [8] had studied co-combustion characteristics of sewage sludge and coffee grounds mixtures (mixing ratios of 9:1, 8:2, 7:3 and 6:4) using thermogravimetric analysis coupled to artificial neural networks modeling. The results showed interactions between the components, and with the addition of coffee grounds ignition temperature, maximum mass loss rate, and the reactivity of sewage sludge increased while charring was reduced.
The authors also presented testes of co-combustion sewage sludge with straw [9], olive and animal waste [10], shiitake substrate [11], rice husk [12] and also with water hyacinth in CO2/O2 atmosphere [13]. All the above research was carried out for mixtures of fuels in the form of powder, for samples of 10 mg.
Investigations of co-combustion of sewage sludge in a pelletized form, on a small laboratory scale, were conducted, among others by Akdağ et al. [14], who studied co-combustion of sewage sludge with coal (3%, 5%, 10%, 20% and 30%) in a laboratory batch reactor. Kijo-Kleczkowska et al. [15] tested the co-combustion of pelletized (10 mm) sewage sludge with coal and willow Salix viminalis. Junga et al. [16] studied the combustion of sewage sludge-based pellets and agriculture waste in 10 kW understocker boiler.
The literature also reports on the large-scale combustion and co-combustion of coal and sewage sludge in grate furnaces [17,18]. This process is mainly carried out in fluidized and pulverized-fuel boilers [19,20].
The impact of co-combustion of sewage sludge on boiler efficiency, the amount of pollutant emissions and its impact on the environment is widely discussed in the literature.
The grate boiler furnaces are used for co-combustion of hard coal with biomass and waste fuels, including sewage sludge [5,21,22]. Werle [23] presented, among others, an analysis of the possibility of co-combustion of sewage sludge with coal (blends of 0%–20%) in a WR-25 power station. It was found that an increase in the mass of the sewage sludge in the fuel blend causes a significant reduction in CO2 emissions to the atmosphere.
Nadziakiewicz et al. [18] investigated the changes in emissions of CO, NOx, and SO2 during co-combustion of dried sewage sludge with coal in the laboratory stoker-fired boiler. The tests show that the emissions of air pollutants increase with the increase in sludge ratio in the fuel mixture. Houshfar et al. [24], on the other hand, conducted an experimental investigation on the NOx formation and reduction, among others, for sewage sludge mixtures with straw and wood pellets.
The main issue in burning waste fuels and biomass in power boilers is a different, than that of coal, chemical, and mineral composition of ash. The presence of components with low melting point in the ash from those fuels poses the risk of slag formation and problem of powdered material (pollutants) sedimentation of heated surfaces of heat exchangers.
Ashes in the temperature range between softening and melting point tend to stick (adhere). The transformations of minerals contained in the fuel, taking place under the furnace chamber conditions, often also lead to the formation of compounds (or their combinations) characterized by particularly low melting points [25].
To assess the propensity of fuel to slag and contaminate the heating surface, several different value indicators based on ash oxide analysis [25,26,27] have been developed, which include:
  • B/A ratio—the ratio of the alkaline to acidic oxides in the ash base-to-acid ratio:
    B / A = F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O + N a 2 O + K 2 O S i O 2 + A l 2 O 3 + T i O 2
    for biomass it also includes P2O5 content—B/A+P index
  • Slagging index Rs
    R s = ( B A ) · A d
    where: Ad is the percentage of ash in dry fuel.
  • Fouling index Fu—index of the probability of heated surfaces fouling
    F u = ( B A ) · ( N a 2 O + K 2 O )
  • Slag viscosity index SR
        S R = S i O 2 S i O 2 + F e 2 O 3 + C a O + M g O
  • Fe2O3/CaO ratio informing about the emergence of slag-promoting eutectic.
Numerous studies have been. devoted to the mechanism of ash formation and the behavior of mineral matter in the processes of co-combustion of coal with other fuels with low caloric value, in particular biomass, among others with biomass [28,29,30,31] and sewage sludge [25,32,33] in large and small scale.
Furthermore, an important issue, while using fuels from waste and biomass is also sufficient mixing of the fuel on the grate, which is expected to prevent from such detrimental effects as local material overheating, leading to slag formation, furnace chamber damage, and grate overburning.
An important parameter of the fuel combusted on a grate is its grain composition. Improper choice of the fuel grain size composition may lead to considerable loss of unburnt carbon in the slag and fly ash, since the content of combustibles in the slag may be even 25–30% of its weight, and in the fly ash 15–20% [34].
In stoker-fired boilers, fuels with grain sizes 0–25 mm are usually burnt, with less than 25% 0–2 mm fractions.
Most of the stoker-fired boilers in use are not equipped in any flue gas treatment systems, except for the simplest dedusting equipment. The need to upgrade the flue gas treatment system, in order to comply with the emission standards and to adjust the flue system to the requirements of waste co-combustion process (conditions related to the minimum flue gas presence and minimum temperature in the furnace chamber) is the main subject of numerous discussions.
The aim of the study is to evaluate the potential of the combustion of biofuels made of municipal sewage sludge and other materials in grate furnaces. Three types of biofuels were tested; i.e., fuel based on sewage sludge and coal slime (PBS), sewage sludge and meat and bone meal (PBM) and sewage sludge and sawdust (PBT) with particle size of 35 mm and 15 mm. The impact of the fuel pellet size on the combustion process and on the emission of pollutants was taken into account. Additionally, the objective of this paper is the evaluation of ash deposits formed during the tests to establish the deposition behavior of biofuel pellets.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The combustion tests were performed on fuels made of municipal sewage sludge and other materials such as coal sludge, meat and bone meal, and sawdust. The technology of the sewage sludge fuel production consists of the initial mixing of the components and the subsequent proportions and simultaneous granulation and drying in the purpose made drum granulator. The drum is equipped with a feeder system ensuring the granulate diameter in the range from 15 to 35 mm [10,35,36]. The combustion tests were performed on biofuels made of:
  • 60 wt.% of sewage sludge, 34 wt.% coal sludge and 6 wt.% of quicklime-PBS fuel,
  • 75 wt.% of sewage sludge, 24 wt.% of meat and bone meal, 1 wt.% of quicklime-PBM fuel,
  • 80 wt.% of sewage sludge, 19 wt.% of sawdust and 1wt.% of quicklime-PBT fuel.
The purpose of mixing sewage sludge with other components is, among others, to reduce its initial moisture of sewage sludge. The mixtures-following mixing and granulation-present a moisture content ranging from 40 to 60%. They are subsequently dried to content of moisture about 10% in a solar drier using solar energy. The method has been patented [37] and recommended because of much lower production costs compared with conventional methods of high-temperature drying.
Energy properties of the fuels are listed in Table 1.
Fuels with pellet sizes 35 mm and 15 mm were tested in order to evaluate the effect of grain size on the combustion process and emission of pollutants.
The argument confirming the implementation of the research is the fact that most of the standards and techniques used to determine fuel parameters are based on the use of fuels in a powder form. Conducting research on combustion of sludge fuels under primary grain size analysis and under conditions simulating the real facility in which these fuels can be used, may give a picture of the combustion process that is more accurately resembling the process in industrial installations.

2.2. Combustion Testes

The combustion tests were performed on a laboratory scale at the Silesian University of Technology, Department of Technologies and Installations for Waste Management. This system is used for testing combustion of various types of waste and waste fuels.
The main component of the test stand is a boiler with special construction that enables simulation combustion processes present in water boilers with a stationary and mechanical grate. The boiler comprises two main parts: the bottom one with adjustable heating temperature (up to 1200 °C), and the top one with water jacket.
The test stand is schematically shown in Figure 1. In the tests, the type of fuel fired was adopted as the input value (variable), and based on a series of initial tests and literature data, the following constant values were adopted as the system operating parameters:
  • thickness of the bed of fuel being burnt -ca. 75 mm (each time 2.5 kg sample was burnt);
  • process duration −3600 s from starting air feeding to the combustion chamber;
  • air excess ratio in the furnace chamber λ = 1.8;
  • secondary air stream–5 Nm3/h;
  • initial temperature in the combustion chamber −900 °C ± 10K;
  • minimum temperature during the combustion process −800 °C.
The measurement method which was used based on placing samples in a chamber preheated to the required temperature of 900 °C. To expedite loading the fuel sample into the oven chamber and arranging it on the grate as needed, the grate was mounted on a movable bed which, having been heated to the required temperature, was then slid inside.
While the sample was being heated, but prior to the ignition point, secondary air was supplied to the combustion chamber at a constant rate of 5m3.
The secondary air was supplied after one of the below listed parameters had reached the limit value:
  • CO concentration at the measuring point −6000 ppm,
  • CO2 concentration higher than 1%.
Two different streams of air fed to the process took place during measurements (one for the ignition phase and another one for the combustion phase).
Table 2 also shows the times the primary air was first fed to the combustion chamber (the starting point of the combustion process after the sample had been placed in the combustion chamber).
During the tests, MGA 5 MRU flue gas analyzer was used, with a heated probe and internal flue gas conditioner. The analyzer allows measuring of flue gas composition with reference methods (measuring CO2, CO, NO, NO2, SO2-NDIR sensor; O2-electrochemical sensor). During the tests, the concentration of measured gases: CO2 (0%–21%), CO (0%–5%), NO (0–10000 ppm), NO2 (0–500 ppm), SO2 (0–10000 ppm) in the flue gas was continuously measured.
Since the systems with fixed grates operate mainly in quasi-steady state at the most, to determine fuel behavior on the grate, gaseous pollutants were measured from feeding the fuel to the combustion chamber to the process end. Presentation of results for the entire combustion time enables forecasting of system operation in steady conditions (average value) and is a source of knowledge allowing forecasting the degree of emission variations in unstable operating conditions.

2.3. Anlayses of Ash and Slag

The chemical composition of ashes was analyzed by using the ICP method, and the remaining component levels-using the PANalitical XRF method.
Ash behavior and deposition tendencies were predicted through the use of empirical indices according to equations 1 to 4.
The residues after combustion process were analyzed for the presence of combustible matter in the slag and ash according to PN-90-G-04512.
Additionally, slag and ash were tested for leaching hazardous compounds. For that reason, water extracts were created according to PN-EN 12457-4:2006, and in the water eluates, among others, chlorides (according to PN-ISO 9297), sulfides (PN-74/C-04566) and the heavy metal ions were determined with Perkin-Elmer Plasma 400 ICP Emission Spectrometer.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Combustion Process of Fuels from Sewage Sludge

The combustion process of fuels from sewage sludge, along with the variations of CO2, CO, NO, SO2 emissions, is graphically shown in Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4 and Figure 5.
As the ’0’ moment, the start of air feeding to the combustion process was assumed. The earlier time is marked with negative values. Fuels were introduced into the combustion chamber in the time marked as −1800 s.
Emissions measured while burning fuels from sewage sludge were compared to the average values for hard coal combustion (particle diameter 15 to 30 mm) [38]. Biofuels were feed to chamber at time marks such as (1800 s). Changes of CO2 emissions shown in Figure 2 best reflect the variations of combustion intensity. Analyzing the variations of CO2 emission while combustion of biofuels with the same composition, but different particle size, great similarity can be noted. The most intense burning process was observed between 250 and 1800 s; after that the CO2 decreased slowly.
Maximum values of CO2 emission were observed while burning the PBM fuel with both particle sizes. It contains meat and bone meal, and animal derived waste, as proved by the research of [34], burn faster than other fuels e.g., lignite. This can explain different behavior of PBM while combustion, as compared to other sludge fuels.
Analyzing Figure 2, it can be noted that for sewage sludge fuels, the fuels with lower particle sizes were ignited faster. The shortest ignition time is achieved for the PBS with particle size 15 mm. Since the ignition time of a fuel depends mainly on the moisture content and the time of thermal decomposition of the organic matter, it can be concluded that the cause for a faster ignition of PBS is the lower moisture content than in other sludge fuels.
Figure 3 presents CO emissions achieved while combustion of the sewage sludge fuels.
Since the CO emission was observed to rise at point 0, primary air was supplied. As a result, after a momentary increase, the CO emission would drop to 0. The lower CO emissions were the result of a higher efficiency of the combustion process (and de facto reduced losses from incomplete combustion). Between 500 and 1500 s, after reaching the maximum values for individual fuels, CO emissions to values dropped close to 0. After that, the CO emission values increased, not exceeding 60 mg/s. According to Kozioł [39], such emission drops and increments are typical for burning fuels in grate furnaces. Naturally, adding some oxidizer to intensify the combustion process resulted in afterburning CO to CO2, as demonstrated by higher CO2 emissions (Figure 2). The delays observed in peaks (i.e., a large peak appearing after more than ten seconds following addition of the air) may result from the system inertia, reaction delay times, and the delay of the emission analyzer measurement path.
The combustion intensity was due to introducing air into the combustion chamber which in turn led to combustion of the flammable compounds of the fuel. For example, PBS fuel with 15 mm (Figure 3) produced high CO emissions beginning at −600s time which continued until approximately 300s after the air was fed at point “0”, only to drop suddenly (almost to 0 mg/s) within roughly 300 s. It means adding the air intensified the fuel combustion process, a fact attested to by the rapid increase of CO2 emission, i.e., the combustion product. Following this phase, CO2 emissions stabilized (starting at about 600s to 800s) owing to the complete combustion. CO oxidation occurs most likely in the CO + OH = CO2 + H reaction, and thus it is the amount of hydroxyl radicals OH in the emissions that most likely determines the chances of overreacting. At the same time, the OH concentration drops rapidly in sync with the temperature drop while the CO concentration remains higher than an equivalent one by an order of magnitude.
The so-called CO freeze effect may be explained by the higher emission levels of the substance in the latter phase of the combustion process. On the other hand, however, the CO2 emission reduction results primarily from the fuel being entirely used up (reduced combustion intensity) and, on the other hand, from a higher degree of incomplete combustion, even though its share in this case is rather marginal. One must also keep in mind the primary reasons for the CO emissions is the insufficient time the fuel substance remains inside the grate or its excessive cooling. The above described phenomenon may also be observed with other types of fuel and the time delay difference is attributable to the oxidant penetrating fuel particles, or the ratio of volatile matter to fix carbon in a given particle volume.
While measuring the NO2 concentration, in neither of the tests performed was it found in the flue gas. It may be due to the stabilization of temperature in the combustion chamber during the tests at the temperature level 900 °C. NO2 is formed mainly as a result of reactions in temperatures lower than 750 °C [40]. The NO emission changes during combustion are shown in Figure 4. For all sludge fuels, very rapid increase of NO emission was observed in the time interval between 350 and 1500 s.
For particle size 15 mm, this value at 530 s was almost 9 mg/s, and for 35 mm, in the interval (790–830 s) – 7.8 mg/s.
A probable cause of higher NO values, achieved while combustion of sludge fuels than for coal is the higher content of elementary nitrogen in the sludge fuels, which-by the subject literature including Boardman & Smooth [41], Habi et al. [42] and Williams et al. [43]-is referred to as the fuel mechanism, one of three major causes for NOx formation.
In relation to SO2 momentary emissions (Figure 5), it can be noted that the highest values were noted while combustion of the PBS fuel (grain size 35 mm), reaching 10 mg/s at 510 s, and for the PBM fuel (grain size 35 mm), for which the maximum was almost 9.90 mg/s at the 1020–1050 s interval. All curves, up to 1200 s, are characterized by rapid fluctuations. The exception is the emission of the PBT fuel (grain size 35 mm), for which the stabilization of SO2 emission changes occurs only at 2200 s.
The results of measurements carried out on an industrial system of the stoker-fired boiler type ORS-16, in which hard coal was co-combusted with sewage sludge (mass content in the mixture being burnt 10%–30%) presented in publication [44] prove that during combustion an increase of NOx emission by 10%–60%, and SO2 by 10%–40% (compared to combustion of pure coal) was observed, depending on the amount of sludge added to coal. Increased emission of those compounds was accompanied by an increased share of sewage sludge in the mixture being burnt.
Similar relationship is also described by Werther & Ogada [3] for fluidized bed boilers, based, among others, on the tests performed by van Doorn et al. [45] as well as research carried out by Vamvuka et al. [46] in which the co-combustion of the sewage sludge was tested with hard coal, lignite, and other biomass materials. In all cases, as the mass content of sludge in the burnt mixture increased, also the NOx emission was increasing.
However, Morgan & van de Kamp [47] based on their own research, concluded that for mass content of sludge above 50%, the NOx emission reached its maximum, and after that, reduced with the increased share of sludge in the mixture being burnt.
As the practice shows, co-combustion of dried sludge with coal (with 1% share) does not increase the NOx concentrations, and the SO2 concentrations noted are even lower by 12% [44].

3.2. Analysis of Ash and Slag and from Combustion of Sewage Sludge Fuels

Chemical analyses of ashes from sewage sludge fuels compared to hard coal and biomass ashes are presented in Table 3.
In biomass ash, there is usually a higher content of such components as CaO, MgO, Na2O, K2O, P2O5 and, at the same time, a lower content of SiO2, Al2O3, TiO2 in comparison to the ash from coal combustion. Vassilew et al. [50] ranged the oxide composition of fly ash from biomass combustion according to the following rule: SiO2 > CaO >K2O > P2O5 > Al2O3 > MgO > Fe2O3 > SO3 > Na2O > MnO > TiO2. In sludge fuels, due to the addition of quicklime serving as a binder, the content of CaO in ashes is high. Particular attention should be paid to the content of approx. 21% of P2O5 in ash from fuel produced from sewage sludge and meat and bone meal (PBM). According to Febrero et al. [51] and other authors [52,53] high content of P2O5 will have effect on melting phases. Pronobis [25] stated that when ash fraction consists of pentoxide, hemispherical temperature (HT) is 569 °C which enhances of low-melting-point phases in the fly ash. Tests carried out by Li et at. [52] have shown that SiO2 and Al2O3 are all favorable to increase the ash fusion temperature but Al2O3 is more effective than SiO2 in reducing the slagging tendency. The SiO2 content in fuel ashes is higher than that of Al2O3.
Table 4 shows the selected ash deposition indexes calculated according to formulas 1–4 in comparison to the criteria reported in the literature [25,53].
Base-to-acid ratio (B/A) ratio indicates the potential tendencies for slagging and fouling. The highest B/A index of the tested ashes is the one for PBM fuel and PBT fuel ash, which classifies them as extremally high prone to slagging and fouling (according to the criteria specified by Pronobis [25]). PBS fuel shows high tendency to be subject to those phenomena. For the base-to-acid ratios, B/A+P which including P2O5 and is more closely to approach for biomass application a similar trend is clearly visible. According to research conducted by García-Maraver et al. [48] B/A ratio values for wood and woody biomass may range from 2.16–64.46, and even as high as 192.62 and 339.69 for paulownia wood and black poplar chips, respectively. For meat and bone meal (MBM), on the other hand, B/A ratio is 38.90, for sewage sludge it is 1.08, and 1.50 according to [25].
Additionally, for PBM ash the fouling index FU revealed that it had a strong tendency to fouling.
Slag viscosity index SR corresponds to high viscosity and therefore to low slagging inclination [25]. Values obtained for sewage fuel ashes demonstrate a high predisposition to slagging inclination similar to RDF fuel and agriculture biomass [48].
Ash from sludge fuels contains small amounts of chlorine, within 0.02%–0.06%, which may indicate a low susceptibility to chloride corrosion of certain metal elements in combustion installation.
The residues after combustion process were analyzed for the presence of combustible matter in the ash and slag. The results are shown in Table 5. In the slag and ash after combustion process of sludge fuels less than 5% of combustible matter content was determined (condition specified by [54] for slags and ashes from co-combustion installations).
Unburnt carbon can also be found in the ashes. For example, grate boilers often produce fly ash with 50% or more of unburnt carbon. As Demirbas [55] claims, the fly ash from biomass-fired grate boilers contains also high levels of unburnt carbon. The presence of this carbon indicates inefficient fuel use and can reduce ash stabilization (chemical hardening) and significantly increases ash volume.
The problem of storage of the residue after burning the sewage sludge fuels was also analyzed. One of the criteria determining the possibility to refer the waste to landfill, other than for hazardous waste, are the acceptable values of leaching the pollutants, as defined by [56], which acknowledges the correct choice of the combustion process parameters and its proper performance.
Therefore, the residue after combustion sewage sludge fuels was tested for leaching hazardous compounds. The results of analyses were compared with water extracts from biomass ashes and the criteria for approving waste for deposition on a neutral waste landfill, according to the regulation are listed in Table 6.
The data in Table 5 prove that the leaching of pollutants, in the extracts from sludge fuels residues after their combustion was, in each case, lower or equal (for mercury) the level determined by the regulation, so the ash and slag can be deposited on neutral waste landfill.
It is also possible that the ashes from sewage sludge fuels could be used in different ways. Ashes from combustion of conventional solid fuels have been used in production of building materials for many years and are used predominantly by the cement industry for cement and concrete production [57,58,59,60,61]. Their popularity in the construction engineering results, first and foremost, from its high fineness (close to cement), chemical and phase composition (close to mineral loam resources) and reactivity. The existing standard [62] defines the criteria of application of ashes as an additive to concrete and determines the maximum content of the fly ash from co-combustion materials to be 30%.
As has already been mentioned, the chemical composition of biomass ashes includes mostly oxides, such as: SiO2, CaO, K2O. High phosphorus content (phosphate ions) can cause significant inhibition of hydration and postponement of the commencement and end of the cement curing time as well as a decline in its early strengths [60].
A prerequisite for use of ashes from new fuels in civil engineering, underground mines and other industries is fulfilment of legal requirements, including preparation of the relevant standards for new applications.

4. Conclusions

Despite the existence of many methods for the disposal of municipal sewage sludge, the problem of its management still exists. The use of sludge as a component of a biofuel with a fixed composition and properties allows the energetic use of sludge with lower calorific values and adjusting the quality of fuels to the requirements of a specific combustion installation.
While combustion of the sewage sludge transformed into pelletized biofuel, typical problems of co-combustion of dried sludge with coal can be avoided. Grain size composition of the sludge fuels is close to that of pea coal and adjusted to the grate firing process.
To sum up, it can be concluded that the tests performed showed some difference of the process of burning sewage sludge fuels as compared to hard coal. Momentary emission of CO2, NO, and SO2 while combustion of fuels with the same composition, differing as to the grain size is similar. A noticeable difference between both particle sizes was the reduced ignition time and reduced emission of CO for fuels with smaller particles (15 mm).
Unfortunately, as in the case of co-combustion of dried sludge, the problem of NOx emission still remains. However, while burning sludge fuels with coal, reducing the emission of nitrogen compounds can be expected, and the NOx emission (due to the fuel origin of nitrogen in the process discussed) will limit the share of sewage sludge fuels in the mixture being burnt.
The tendency for ash slagging and fouling is also observed, especially for PBM and PBT ashes which consist of MBM and sawdust which is typical for biomass combustion. Relatively high slagging and fouling indices of sludge limits its use in combustion.
It can be concluded that the test performed proved the potential of using sewage sludge fuels in co-combustion processes with coal in grate furnaces.

Funding

This research was funded by the POLISH MINISTRY OF SCIENCE AND HIGHER EDUCATION, project No. R1401601.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Council Directive 86/278/EEC of 12 June 1986 on the Protection of the Environment, and in Particular of the Soil, when Sewage Sludge is Used in Agriculture; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
  2. Council Directive 99/31/EC of April 1999 on the Landfill of Waste; European Union: Brussels, Belgium, 2018.
  3. Werther, J.; Ogada, T. Sewage sludge combustion. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 1999, 25, 55–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Stasta, P.; Boráň, J.; Bébar, L.; Stehlik, P.; Oral, J. Thermal processing of sewage sludge. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2006, 26, 1420–1426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sahu, S.; Chakraborty, N.; Sarkar, P. Coal–biomass co-combustion: An overview. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2014, 39, 575–586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wzorek, M.; Troniewski, L. Application of sewage sludge as a component of alternative fuel. In Environmental Engineering; Dudzińska, M., Pawłowski, L., Eds.; Taylor & Francis Group: New York, NY, USA, 2007; pp. 311–316. [Google Scholar]
  7. Lin, Y.; Liao, Y.; Yu, Z.; Fang, S.; Ma, X. The investigation of co-combustion of sewage sludge and oil shale using thermogravimetric analysis. Thermochim. Acta 2017, 653, 71–78. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, J.; Liu, J.; He, Y.; Huang, L.; Sun, S.; Sun, J.; Chang, K.; Kuo, J.; Huang, S.; Ning, X. Investigation of co-combustion characteristics of sewage sludge and coffee grounds mixtures using thermogravimetric analysis coupled to artificial neural networks modeling. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 225, 234–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Xiao, H.; Ma, X.-Q.; Lai, Z. Isoconversional kinetic analysis of co-combustion of sewage sludge with straw and coal. Appl. Energy 2009, 86, 1741–1745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Yilmaz, E.; Wzorek, M.; Akçay, S. Co-pelletization of sewage sludge and agricultural wastes. J. Environ. Manag. 2018, 216, 169–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chen, G.-B.; Chatelier, S.; Lin, H.-T.; Wu, F.-H.; Lin, T.-H. A Study of Sewage Sludge Co-Combustion with Australian Black Coal and Shiitake Substrate. Energies 2018, 11, 3436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Rong, H.; Wang, T.; Zhou, M.; Wang, H.; Hou, H.; Xue, Y. Combustion Characteristics and Slagging during Co-Combustion of Rice Husk and Sewage Sludge Blends. Energies 2017, 10, 438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Huang, L.; Liu, J.; He, Y.; Sun, S.; Chen, J.; Sun, J.; Chang, K.; Kuo, J.; Ning, X. Thermodynamics and kinetics parameters of co-combustion between sewage sludge and water hyacinth in CO2/O2 atmosphere as biomass to solid biofuel. Bioresour. Technol. 2016, 218, 631–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Akdağ, A.S.; Atak, O.; Atimtay, A.T.; Sanin, F.D. Co-combustion of sewage sludge from different treatment processes and a lignite coal in a laboratory scale combustor. Energy 2018, 158, 417–426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kijo-Kleczkowska, A.; Środa, K.; Kosowska-Golachowska, M.; Musiał, T.; Wolski, K. Experimental research of sewage sludge with coal and biomass co-combustion, in pellet form. Waste Manag. 2016, 53, 165–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Junga, R.; Kaszubska, M.; Wzorek, M. Technical and environmental performance of 10 kW understocker boiler during combustion of biomass and conventional fuels. E3S Web Conf. 2017, 19, 1009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Fleck, E.; Scholz, S. Co-combustion of sewage sludge in grate-based combustion plants. In Waste Management; Thome-Kozminski, K.J., Pelloni, L., Eds.; TK Verlag Karl-Kozminsky: Neuruppin, Gremany, 2011; pp. 779–798. [Google Scholar]
  18. Nadziakiewicz, J.; Kozioł, M. Co-combustion of sludge with coal as a possible methods of its utilization in Poland. Appl. Energy 2003, 75, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Hroncová, E.; Ladomerský, J.; Musil, J. Problematic issues of air protection during thermal processes related to the energetic uses of sewage sludge and other waste. Case study: Co-combustion in peaking power plant. Waste Manag. 2018, 73, 574–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Jang, H.-N.; Kim, J.-H.; Back, S.-K.; Sung, J.-H.; Yoo, H.-M.; Choi, H.S.; Seo, Y.-C. Combustion characteristics of waste sludge at air and oxy-fuel combustion conditions in a circulating fluidized bed reactor. Fuel 2016, 170, 92–99. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Beckmann, M.; Pohl, M.; Bernhardt, D.; Gebauer, K. Criteria for solid recovered fuels as a substitute for fossil fuels—A review. Waste Manag Res. 2012, 30, 354–369. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Yina, C.; Li, S. Advancing grate-firing for greater environmental impacts and efficiency for decentralized biomass/wastes combustion. Energy Procedia 2017, 120, 373–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Werle, S. Multivariate analysis of possibility of co-combustion of sewage sludge in coal fired power boilers. Arch. Waste Manag. Environ. Prot. 2011, 13, 21–38. [Google Scholar]
  24. Houshfar, E.; Løvås, T. Skreiberg, Øyvind Experimental Investigation on NOx Reduction by Primary Measures in Biomass Combustion: Straw, Peat, Sewage Sludge, Forest Residues and Wood Pellets. Energies 2012, 5, 270–290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Pronobis, M. The influence of biomass co-combustion on boiler fouling and efficiency. Fuel 2006, 85, 474–480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Masiá, A.T.; Buhre, B.; Gupta, R.; Wall, T. Characterising ash of biomass and waste. Fuel Process. Technol. 2007, 88, 1071–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Baxter, L.L. Ash deposition during biomass and coal combustion: A mechanistic approach. Biomass- Bioenergy 1993, 4, 85–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Theis, M.; Skrifvars, B.-J.; Hupa, M.; Tran, H. Fouling tendency of ash resulting from burning mixtures of biofuels. Part 1: Deposition rates. Fuel 2006, 85, 1125–1130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jeong, T.-Y.; Sh, L.; Kim, J.-H.; Lee, B.-H.; Jeon, C.-H. Experimental Investigation of Ash Deposit Behavior during Co-Combustion of Bituminous Coal with Wood Pellets and Empty Fruit Bunches. Energies 2019, 12, 2087. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Lee, J.M.; Kim, D.-W.; Kim, J.-S.; Na, J.-G.; Lee, S.-H. Co-combustion of refuse derived fuel with Korean anthracite in a commercial circulating fluidized bed boiler. Energy 2010, 35, 2814–2818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dunnu, G.; Maier, J.; Scheffknecht, G. Ash fusibility and compositional data of solid recovered fuels. Fuel 2010, 89, 1534–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kupka, T.; Mancini, M.; Irmer, M.; Weber, R. Investigation of ash deposit formation during co-firing of coal with sewage sludge, saw-dust and refuse derived fuel. Fuel 2008, 87, 2824–2837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Kanchanapiya, P.; Sakano, T.; Kanaoka, C.; Mikuni, T.; Ninomiya, Y.; Zhang, L.; Masui, M.; Masami, F. Characteristics of slag, fly ash and deposited particles during melting of dewatered sewage sludge in a pilot plant. J. Environ. Manag. 2006, 79, 163–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Karcz, H.; Kozakiewicz, A.; Kantorek, M.; Dziugan, P.; Wierzbicki, K. Czy spalanie odpadów komunalnych w kotłach rusztowych jest właściwe. Instal 2011, 10, 24–30. [Google Scholar]
  35. Wzorek, M. Characterization of the properties of alternative fuels contain sewage sludge. Fuel Process Technol. 2012, 104, 80–89. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Wzorek, M. Physical and chemical properties of fuel containing animal waste. In Waste Management and the Environment IV; Zamorano, M., Ed.; WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment: Southampton, UK, 2008; Volume 109, pp. 69–77. [Google Scholar]
  37. Wzorek, M.; Głowacki, T. A device for mixing, especially sewage sludge. Utility model PL W.121829. 31 July 2014. [Google Scholar]
  38. Wzorek, M.; Kozioł, M.; Scierski, W. Emission characteristics of granulated fuel produced from sewage sludge and coal slime. J. Air Waste Manag. Assoc. 2010, 60, 1487–1493. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  39. Kozioł, M. Ecological and technical aspects of co-combustion of coal with substantial fraction of sludge in the grate-type boilers. Arch. Comb. 2010, 30, 409–426. [Google Scholar]
  40. Wilk, K. Podstawy Niskoemisyjnego Spalania. Wydawnictwo Gnome PAN: Katowice, Poland, 2000; pp. 100–120. [Google Scholar]
  41. Boardman, R.D.; Smoot, L.D. Pollutant formation and control. In Fundamentals of Coal Combustion for Clean and Efficient Use; Boardman, R.D., Smoot, L.D., Eds.; Elsevier Science Ltd.: Ansterdam, The Netherlands, 1993; pp. 433–506. [Google Scholar]
  42. Habib, M.; Elshafei, M.; Dajani, M. Influence of combustion parameters on NOx production in an industrial boiler. Comput. Fluids 2008, 37, 12–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Williams, A.; Pourkashanian, M.; Jones, J.M.; Rowlands, L. A review of NOx formation and reduction mechanisms in combustion systems with particular reference to coal. J. Energy Inst. 1997, 70, 102–113. [Google Scholar]
  44. Wandrasz, J.W.; Kozioł, M.; Landrat, M.; Ścierski, W.; Wandrasz, A.J. Możliwości współspalania osadów z oczyszczalni ścieków z węglem w kotłach rusztowych. Gospod. Paliwami Energia 2000, 8, 10–15. [Google Scholar]
  45. van Doorn, J.; Bruyn, P.; Kos, B.; Hanse, J. Combined combustion of biomass, municipal sewage sludge and coal in a atmospheric fluidised bed installation. In Proceedings of the 9th European Biomass Conference for Energy and the Environment; Pergamon: Oxford, UK, 1996; pp. 199–210. [Google Scholar]
  46. Vamvuka, D.; Alexandrakis, S.; Galetakis, M. Combustion Performance of Sludge from a Wastewater Treatment Plant in Fluidized Bed. Factorial Modeling and Optimization of Emissions. Front. Energy Res. 2019, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Morgan, D.J.; van de Kamp, W.L. The co-firing of biomass and municipal sewage sludge with pulverised coals in utility boilers. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference Combustion and Emissions Control, London, UK, 4–5 December 1995; pp. 159–168. [Google Scholar]
  48. Garcia-Maraver, A.; Mata-Sanchez, J.; Carpio, M.; Perez, J.A. Critical review of predictive coefficients for biomass ash deposition tendency. J. Energy Inst. 2017, 90, 214–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Jarosiński, A. Mineral and chemical composition of fly ashes deriving from co-combustion of biomass with coal and its application. J. Pol. Min. Eng. Soc. 2013, 14, 141–148. [Google Scholar]
  50. Vassilev, S.V.; Baxter, D.; Andersen, L.K.; Vassileva, C.G. An overview of the composition and application of biomass ash. Fuel 2013, 105, 19–39. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Febrero, L.; Granada-Álvarez, E.; Regueiro, A.; Míguez, J.L. Influence of Combustion Parameters on Fouling Composition after Wood Pellet Burning in a Lab-Scale Low-Power Boiler. Energies 2015, 8, 9794–9816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  52. Li, Q.; Zhang, Y.; Meng, A.; Li, L.; Li, G. Study on ash fusion temperature using original and simulated biomass ashes. Fuel Process. Technol. 2013, 107, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Viana, H.; Vega-Nieva, D.; Torres, L.O.; Lousada, J.; Aranha, J. Fuel characterization and biomass combustion properties of selected native woody shrub species from central Portugal and NW Spain. Fuel 2012, 102, 737–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Ordinance of the Polish Minister of Economy and Labour on the requirements to the process of thermal conversion of waste for slag and ash from co-combustion of waste. J. Laws 2002, 37, 339.
  55. Demirbas, A. Potential applications of renewable energy sources, biomass combustion problems in boiler power systems and combustion related environmental issues. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2005, 31, 171–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Ordinance of the Polish Minister of Economy and Labour on the criteria and procedures for the acceptance of waste for land filling. J. Laws 2005, 186, 1553.
  57. Maresca, A.; Hyks, J.; Astrup, T. Recirculation of biomass ashes onto forest soils: Ash composition, mineralogy and leaching properties. Waste Manag. 2017, 70, 127–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  58. Kurama, H.; Kaya, M. Usage of coal combustion bottom ash in concrete mixture. Constr. Build. Mater. 2008, 22, 1922–1928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Król, A. The role of the silica fly ash in sustainable waste management. 1st International Conference on the Sustainable Energy and Environment Development (SEED). E3S Web Conf. 2016, 10, 00049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Kuterasińska, J.; Król, A. Mechanical properties of alkali-acivated binders based on copper slag. Arch. Civil Eng. Environ. 2015, 8, 61–67. [Google Scholar]
  61. Król, A. Binding chromium ions during hydratation of mineral binders. Przem. Chem. 2007, 86, 971–973. [Google Scholar]
  62. PN-EN 450-1: 2012 Fly Ash for Concrete—Part 1: Definitions, Specifications and Compliance Criteria; Polish Committee for Standardization: Warsaw, Poland, 2012.
Figure 1. Test stand diagram [38]: A-flue gas analyzer, S-furnace control system, R-recorder, W-ventilator, 1-rotameter, 2-valve, 3-reciprocal bed with a grate, 4-grate, 5-plenum system (ash pit), 6-rail, 7-air nozzle, 8-heating element (electrical), 9-water jacket, 10-stack, 11-measuring probe, 12-probe head, 13-heated hose, 14-thermo elements with compensating cables, 15-cooling water circuit, 16-water/air heat exchanger (cooler), 17-circulation pump, 18 – ambience.
Figure 1. Test stand diagram [38]: A-flue gas analyzer, S-furnace control system, R-recorder, W-ventilator, 1-rotameter, 2-valve, 3-reciprocal bed with a grate, 4-grate, 5-plenum system (ash pit), 6-rail, 7-air nozzle, 8-heating element (electrical), 9-water jacket, 10-stack, 11-measuring probe, 12-probe head, 13-heated hose, 14-thermo elements with compensating cables, 15-cooling water circuit, 16-water/air heat exchanger (cooler), 17-circulation pump, 18 – ambience.
Energies 13 01951 g001
Figure 2. Variations of CO2 emissions during combustion of fuels.
Figure 2. Variations of CO2 emissions during combustion of fuels.
Energies 13 01951 g002
Figure 3. Variations of CO emissions during combustion of fuels.
Figure 3. Variations of CO emissions during combustion of fuels.
Energies 13 01951 g003
Figure 4. Variations of NO emissions during combustion of fuels.
Figure 4. Variations of NO emissions during combustion of fuels.
Energies 13 01951 g004
Figure 5. Variations of SO2 emissions during combustion of fuels.
Figure 5. Variations of SO2 emissions during combustion of fuels.
Energies 13 01951 g005
Table 1. Energy properties of fuels from sewage sludge.
Table 1. Energy properties of fuels from sewage sludge.
ParameterUnitPBSPBMPBT
Lower Heating Value, LHVMJ/kg19.3014.5913.23
Moisture%8.588.6710.37
Voltaire matter% d.m.34.4455.2959.87
Ash% d.m.27.2633.7220.36
Elementary analysis
Carbon% d.m.50.2836.6431.42
Hydrogen3.914.124.43
Oxygen15.0117.9540.50
Nitrogen1.726.672.61
Sulphur1.160.680.65
Chlorine0.060.020.03
d.m.—dry mass.
Table 2. Starting time of the combustion process.
Table 2. Starting time of the combustion process.
Kind of BiofuelsPBSPBMPBT
35 mm15 mm35 mm15 mm35 mm15 mm
Starting Time of the Combustion Process, s60042018001500330480
Table 3. Chemical composition of ashes.
Table 3. Chemical composition of ashes.
Parameter *, %PBSPBMPBTBiomass
[48]
Hard Coal
[49]
SiO229.20 ± 1.4617.88 ± 0.8921.78 ± 1.090.12–15.1250–57
Al2O317.07 ± 0.854.04 ± 0.204.92 ± 0.250.04–68.1825–30
Fe2O38.41 ± 427.08 ± 0.3511.80 ± 0.590.13–8.403.5–8.0
CaO25.84 ± 1.2940.35 + 2.0238.33 ± 1.924.39–83.462–4
MgO0.01 ± 0.000.95 ± 0.051.15 ± 0.061.10–15.121.5–3.0
P2O54.10 + 0.2121.06 ± 1.0510.24 ± 0.510.45–18.24n.d.
SO312.10 ± 0.610.50 ± 0.277.37 ± 0.370.36–45.890.5–1.2
Mn3O40.14 ± 0.010.16 ± 0.010.25 ± 0.52n.d.n.d.
TiO20.80 + 0.040.36 ± 0.020.52 ± 0.030.05–28.000–1
SrO0.10 ± 0.010.11 ± 0.010.15 ± 0.01n.d.n.d.
Na2O0.70 ± 0.041.11 ± 0.060.36 ± 0.020.14–29.820.2–2.0
K2O1.94 ± 0.101.25 ± 0.061.03 ± 0.052.19–37.702.5–3.0
* extended uncertainty—0.95.
Table 4. Ash deposition indexes and associated criteria.
Table 4. Ash deposition indexes and associated criteria.
ParameterPBSPBMPBTCoal
[24]
Biomass
[24]
Criteria [25,53]
LowMediumHighExtremely High
B/A, -0.7812.2771.9350.5560.950<0.5
<0.4
0.5–0.70.7–1
>0.7
>1.0
B/A+P, -0.8683.2222.3110.5570.980
Rb, %36.46052.74052.67035.7148.0035–55
SR, -46.24126.98529.81162.5576.34>7265–72≤65
Rs, -0.2110.7670.3940.7420.106<0.60.6–2.02–2.6>2.6
Fu, -2.0635.3752.6891.97530.891<0.6 0.6–40 >40
Fe2O3/CaO,-0.330.170.310.8100.0250.3–3.0 *
SiO2, %29.2017.8821.7853.7350<2020–25>25>0.5
Clr, %0.060.020.030.50.5<0.20.2–0.30.3–0.5 >0.5 a
* eutectics enhancing slag formation. a—limit values for substance leaching according to Annex 3 of the Regulation of the Minister of Economy and Labor on the criteria and procedures for referring waste deposition on neutral waste landfill.
Table 5. Combustible matter content in slag and ash from sewage sludge fuels.
Table 5. Combustible matter content in slag and ash from sewage sludge fuels.
Fuel TypeCombustible Matter Content, %
PBS35 mm2.61
15 mm1.60
PBM35 mm2.80
15 mm1.30
PBT35 mm1.43
15 mm1.49
Table 6. Analysis of water extracts from the residues after combustion of sewage sludge fuels and biomass.
Table 6. Analysis of water extracts from the residues after combustion of sewage sludge fuels and biomass.
ParameterUnitPBSPBMPBTBiomass
[56]
Limit Value a
pH-9.609.809.0012.9–13.3-
Phosphatesmg PO4/L<0.03<0.03<0.03n.d.-
Chloridesmg Cl/L699.5216585n.d.800
Sulfidesmg SO4/L960553994n.d.1000
Asmg/L0.100.100.10<0.022–0.0240.5
Cr 0.430.280.320.065–2.850.5
Zn 0.100.100.10<0.03154.0
Cd 0.010.010.01<0.00070.04
Cu 0.100.100.100.05652.0
Pb 0.100.100.10<0.00065–0.0070.5
Hg 0.010.010.01n.d.0.01
Se 0.300.300.300.007–0.1350.1
Fe 0.010.140.47<0.012-
Mn 0.100.100.100.0055–0.0325-
Ba 0.3310.014.0n.d.20
B 0.300.300.30n.d.-
a—limit values for substance leaching according to Annex 3 of the Regulation of the Minister of Economy and Labor on the criteria and procedures for referring waste deposition on neutral waste landfill; n.d.—no data

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wzorek, M. Evaluating the Potential for Combustion of Biofuels in Grate Furnaces. Energies 2020, 13, 1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081951

AMA Style

Wzorek M. Evaluating the Potential for Combustion of Biofuels in Grate Furnaces. Energies. 2020; 13(8):1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081951

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wzorek, Małgorzata. 2020. "Evaluating the Potential for Combustion of Biofuels in Grate Furnaces" Energies 13, no. 8: 1951. https://doi.org/10.3390/en13081951

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop