Next Article in Journal
Exploring Avoided Environmental Impacts as Well as Energy and Resource Recovery from Microbial Desalination Cell Treatment of Brine
Next Article in Special Issue
Results-Based Financing (RBF) for Modern Energy Cooking Solutions: An Effective Driver for Innovation and Scale?
Previous Article in Journal
Robust Multi-Layer Energy Management and Control Methodologies for Reefer Container Park in Port Terminal
Previous Article in Special Issue
Transforming Access to Clean Energy Technologies in the Global South: Learning from Lighting Africa in Kenya
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia

by
Martin Price
1,*,
Melinda Barnard-Tallier
1,2 and
Karin Troncoso
3
1
Gamos, Reading RG1 4LS, UK
2
Department of Anthropology, University of the Witwatersrand, Johannesburg 2000, South Africa
3
Geography and Environment, School of Social Sciences and Humanities, Loughborough University, Loughborough LE11 3TU, UK
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(15), 4457; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154457
Submission received: 25 May 2021 / Revised: 8 July 2021 / Accepted: 21 July 2021 / Published: 23 July 2021

Abstract

It remains unclear whether the decision to cook with both polluting and cleaner-burning fuels (‘fuel stacking’) serves as a transition phase towards the full adoption of clean-cooking practices, or whether stacking allows households to enhance fuel security and choose from a variety of cooking technologies and processes. This paper offers a unique contribution to the debate by positioning fuel stacking as the central research question in the exploration of existing household survey data. This research analyses the World Bank’s Multi-Tier Framework survey data concerning energy access and cooking practices in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia. Its novel approach uses fuel expenditure data to group urban households according to the intensity of biomass consumption (wood, charcoal) relative to modern fuel consumption (electricity, gas). The research explores how different fuel-stacking contexts are associated with factors related to household finances, composition, experiences of electricity, and attitudes towards modern fuels. This study shows the diversity of characteristics and behaviours associated with fuel stacking in urban contexts, thus demonstrating the need for fuel stacking to feature prominently in future data collection activities. The paper ends with five key recommendations for further research into fuel stacking and its role in clean-cooking transitions.
Keywords: fuel stacking; clean cooking; electric cooking; urban; culture; perceptions; Cambodia; Myanmar; Zambia fuel stacking; clean cooking; electric cooking; urban; culture; perceptions; Cambodia; Myanmar; Zambia

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Price, M.; Barnard-Tallier, M.; Troncoso, K. Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia. Energies 2021, 14, 4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154457

AMA Style

Price M, Barnard-Tallier M, Troncoso K. Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia. Energies. 2021; 14(15):4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154457

Chicago/Turabian Style

Price, Martin, Melinda Barnard-Tallier, and Karin Troncoso. 2021. "Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia" Energies 14, no. 15: 4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154457

APA Style

Price, M., Barnard-Tallier, M., & Troncoso, K. (2021). Stacked: In Their Favour? The Complexities of Fuel Stacking and Cooking Transitions in Cambodia, Myanmar, and Zambia. Energies, 14(15), 4457. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14154457

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop