Next Article in Journal
Asymmetric Split-Gate 4H-SiC MOSFET with Embedded Schottky Barrier Diode for High-Frequency Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Energy Poverty and Sustainable Economic Development: An Exploration of Correlations and Interdependencies in European Countries
Previous Article in Journal
Use of Energy Storage to Reduce Transmission Losses in Meshed Power Distribution Networks
Previous Article in Special Issue
Revisiting the Role of Fiscal Policy, Financial Development, and Foreign Direct Investment in Reducing Environmental Pollution during Globalization Mode: Evidence from Linear and Nonlinear Panel Data Approaches
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism

1
Korea Maritime Institute, Pusan 4911, Korea
2
Graduate School of Arts and Science, New York University, New York, NY 10016, USA
3
Department of International Trade, Sunchon National University, Sunchon 57922, Korea
4
Korea Maritime Institute, Busan 4911, Korea
5
Department of International Trade, Inha University, Incheon 22212, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(21), 7303; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303
Submission received: 15 October 2021 / Revised: 26 October 2021 / Accepted: 27 October 2021 / Published: 4 November 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy Policy for a Sustainable Economic Growth)

Abstract

The European Union (EU), which has led international discussions on global warming, officially announced its plan for the Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism (CBAM) in July 2021. Many existing studies have indicated the CBAM will curtail greenhouse gases, and will subsequently be positive in terms of reducing global warming. However, serious legal issues and trade disputes are expected in terms of the compatibility of the CBAM with the trade rules of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (GATT). Contrary to the EU’s explanation, the international community has a strong view of CBAM as a new trade barrier under the guise of preventing global warming. Above all, this is because it is an arbitrary measure by the EU and not the one that has been internationally agreed upon. Therefore, this paper tries to identify the pitfalls and estimate the global cost of CBAM, arguing that the mechanism is not in line with international trade rules, and that many countries will not sit back and suffer from it. The world economy will inevitably face a vicious cycle of trade retaliation. The CBAM will drive up trade costs and cause another trade distortion. While the goal of preventing climate change is good, the CBAM scheme is too costly for the world economy.
Keywords: carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM); general agreement on tariffs and trade (GATT); carbon border tax; carbon emissions; carbon pricingfi carbon border adjustment mechanism (CBAM); general agreement on tariffs and trade (GATT); carbon border tax; carbon emissions; carbon pricingfi

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lim, B.; Hong, K.; Yoon, J.; Chang, J.-I.; Cheong, I. Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energies 2021, 14, 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303

AMA Style

Lim B, Hong K, Yoon J, Chang J-I, Cheong I. Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energies. 2021; 14(21):7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lim, Byeongho, Kyoungseo Hong, Jooyoung Yoon, Jeong-In Chang, and Inkyo Cheong. 2021. "Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism" Energies 14, no. 21: 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303

APA Style

Lim, B., Hong, K., Yoon, J., Chang, J.-I., & Cheong, I. (2021). Pitfalls of the EU’s Carbon Border Adjustment Mechanism. Energies, 14(21), 7303. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14217303

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop