Next Article in Journal
Waste Heat Recovery by Air-to-Water Heat Pump from Exhausted Ventilating Air for Heating of Multi-Family Residential Buildings
Previous Article in Journal
Density Functional Theory Calculations of Pinus brutia Derivatives and Its Response to Light in a Au/n-Si Device
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Transport Performance of a Steeply Situated Belt Conveyor

1
Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Institute of Transport, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Poruba, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
2
Department of Machine and Industrial Design, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, VSB-Technical University of Ostrava, Poruba, 708 00 Ostrava, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(23), 7984; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237984
Submission received: 21 October 2021 / Revised: 16 November 2021 / Accepted: 25 November 2021 / Published: 29 November 2021

Abstract

:
The paper presents a methodology for determining the volume of a batch of conveyed material located before a transverse partition of a certain height and the distance over which the batch of material extends on the working surface of the conveyor belt along its longitudinal axis. Knowing the geometric dimensions of the transported batch of material makes it possible to appropriately set the spacing of the belt cleats and thereby to optimally determine the conveying performance of the inclined belt conveyor. When the angle of inclination of a conveyor with a straight idler frame is equal to the angle of surcharge of the conveyed material, then no layer of material is carried on the surface of the belt. If the conveyor belt is guided along a trough idler frame, only the lower cross-section of the filling of material is used. An increase in the cross-section of the belt load of a conveyor inclined at an angle, which exceeds the angle of repose of the conveyed material, can be achieved by installing regularly spaced belt cleats around the circumference of the working surface of the endless loop of the conveyor belt. The volume of the batch of material retained by the belt cleat depends on the height and width of the cleat and whether or not the conveyor belt is provided with corrugated side edges. The paper presents theoretically determined relationships that can be used to determine the size of the transverse and longitudinal area and the volume of the batch of material spread on the surface of the conveyor belt in front of the cleat. The experiments performed provide the distances of the material distribution on the surface of the conveyor belt depending on the height of the cleat and the angle of inclination of the conveyor belt.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Classic belt conveyors [1,2] are continuously operating machines widely used in industry [3], designed for moving bulk and piece materials up to distances of thousands of meters [4,5,6]. The endless loop of the conveyor belt [7] is composed of sections mutually interconnected by vulcanization or mechanical means [8].
Current standards relating to calculations for a belt conveyor of classic construction, define how to determine the amount of transported material per unit of time. The amount of material transported per unit of time [9,10] by continuously operating conveyor equipment, which includes the belt conveyor, is the so-called transport capacity by mass Qm (t·h−1) or volume Qv (m3·h−1) and can be regulated with the conveying speed v (m·s−1), the width of the conveyor belt B [m], and the type of idler frame (roller stand).
The size of the cross-section of the conveyor belt load S (m2) [9] depends on the shape of the conveyor belt loading profile (flat or trough idler frame) [11], the belt loading width b [m], and the angle of repose Θ (deg) of the transported materials.
On a flat loading profile of a horizontally placed conveyor belt (i.e., the angle of inclination of the conveyor δ = 0 deg) of the belt conveyor, the total cross-sectional area S (m2) of the load of the transported material is determined according to [9,12,13]. If the conveyed mass is fed onto the inclined part of the belt (δ > 0), the reduction of the part of the cross-section S1 is determined by the inclination factor k (-) (1) [9,10], where k1 (-) is the correction factor for the belt filling canopy.
k = 1     S 1 S ( 1     k 1 )   ( - ) ,   k 1 = cos 2 δ     cos 2 Θ 1     cos 2 Θ   ( - ) ,
In practice, transport of finely lumpy or fine-grained materials on the surface of the conveyor belt is required at the highest possible angle of inclination of the conveyor; for example, to reduce the built-up area of the conveyor and to shorten the length of the endless loop of the conveyor belt.
The article [12] discusses the advantages of belt conveyors with a high angle of inclination in the application of the mines.
One of the numerous possible ways [13,14] to achieve efficient transport of grains of a conveyed mass transported at an angle of inclination of the conveyor which exceeds the limiting angle of inclination of a smooth conveyor belt δm (deg) of a belt conveyor of conventional construction, is to use a conveyor belt with belt cleats [15,16], Figure 1.
In order to ensure ecological transport without failure requirements for the transport of bulk materials by continuous conveyor systems [17], careful attention should be given to the proper shape of the conveyor belt [18].
McTurk, J.R. discussed in [19] the development of specialized belt conveyors. The most common failures encountered during their operation are mainly those directly related to the conveyor belt itself [20].
In order to achieve the high standards of safety and operational reliability required for belt conveyors, there is a requirement for systematic testing of conveyor belts and their joints [21,22].
Krol, R. et al. state in [23] that the key elements of a belt conveyor, the energy-efficient conveyor belt, and optimized carrying idlers have been developed for the new generation of underground conveyors.
Sandwich belt high angle conveyor technology [24] provides an economic solution for high volume steep and vertical conveying.
Reliable operation of the pipe conveyors requires continuous monitoring and evaluation of their selected indicators. Asymmetrical tensioning of the conveyor belt is the serious negative and undesirable operational situations [25].
In [26], Fedorko G. et al. deal with the implementation of the Finite Element Method (FEM) model in the concept of digital twins designed to measure key properties and characteristics of the rubber-textile conveyor belts of tube conveyors.
Wozniak D. et al. [9,27] present that in steel cord conveyor belts, rubber penetrates the steel ropes during vulcanization.
In [11,28], Marasova D. et al. state that rubber-textile conveyor belts, in particular, are an essential element of a belt conveyor.
Authors Gierz Ł. et al. describe [29] the problems of transporting bulk material at different speeds and angles of inclination of the conveyor belt. Results of tests into the energy-efficiency of belt conveyor transportation systems indicate that the energy consumption of their drive mechanisms can be limited by lowering the main resistances in the conveyor described in [30] Bajda M. et al.
It is now known that the maximal cross-section surface of the lose material filling at the conveyor with a smooth belt can be (for conveyor belts modified based on the shape of the trough) expressed as the sum of the cap cross-section surface and the surface of the bottom part of the belt filling.
Various industrial fields require an increased inclination angle of the belt conveyor transport [31], or the use of belt conveyors of special designs [13,14]. The permitted inclination angle of the transport by belt conveyors of a standard design [9] is particularly determined by the friction coefficient between the contact surface of the material grains (incapable of rotation) and the surface of the given conveyor belt. Material grains that are capable of rotation (grains of a spherical or cylindrical shape) must be prevented from rolling along the surface under any angle of the given inclined conveyor belt. For horizontally carried conveyor belts, we also need to prevent rotation of the spherical grains, which can occur due to the effects of the forces along the contact surface of the grains with the conveyor belt and the inertia forces. In order to increase the permitted angle of the belt conveyor transport, we need to:
(a)
Increase the friction coefficient along the work surface of the conveyor belt [15,32],
(b)
Structurally modify the surface of the conveyor belt [33,34], making sure that movement of the transported material grains along the belt is prevented (against the transport direction for the uphill transport and in the transport direction for downhill transport) [13,35],
(c)
Increase the pressure of the transported material to the conveyor belt [36].
The paper presents a methodology for determining the volume of a batch of conveyed material located before a transverse partition of a certain height and the distance over which the batch of material extends on the working surface of the conveyor belt along its longitudinal axis. The experiments performed provide the distances of the material distribution on the surface of the conveyor belt depending on the height of the cleat and the angle of inclination of the conveyor belt. The paper presents a mathematical expression of the sizes of the transverse and longitudinal cross-section surfaces and of the volume of the loose material spread on the surface of the conveyor belt before the transverse partition of the belt conveyor, inclination angle of which exceeds the limit transport angle permitted for the belt conveyor of a classic design.

2. Materials and Methods

One of the series of conveying machines used for conveying bulk materials at an angle of inclination exceeding the critical angle of inclination of a conveyor belt of conventional construction is a belt conveyor with a specifically modified working surface of the conveyor belt (Figure 1). A specific construction modification of the conveyor belt consists in the installation (mechanical or by vulcanization) of belt cleats (Figure 2b), which are spaced at regular intervals along the entire length of the closed loop of the working surface of the conveyor belt.
Belt cleats of suitable height create supports for grains of material, thereby preventing their slippage or rotation along the surface of the belt, counter to the transport direction during their conveyance by the conveyor belt of a steeply inclined conveyor.

2.1. Experimental Testing Equipment and Measured Parameters

The test equipment (Figure 3) consists of two basic parts, which are the trough I (simulating a section of the conveyor belt) and a tilting mechanism II. The front part of the trough I is fitted with a sliding plate slide 1, which represents a belt cleat of a given height. To accurately determine the angle of inclination of the trough, additional parts are installed on the test device: a digital inclinometer 2 [6] and a digital protractor 3 [7]. To determine the distance z(x) of the material spread along the length of the trough I, a steel ruler 4 is attached to the upper surface of the trough I.
The measured parameters behind the test equipment are the length of the distribution z(x) and the width bp of the transported material in the plane yz and xy. The surface of the trough I is inclined at the beginning of the measurement with respect to the horizontal plane by an angle δ–Θ = 10 deg using the screw of the tilting mechanism II. For experimental tests, the upper edge of the plate slide 1 is gradually extended to a height of 10, 15, and 20 mm above the upper surface of the trough I. A batch of conveyed material is poured onto the surface of the trough I in such a way that the material is distributed on the trough. For these conditions, the distance z(x) from the distribution of the batch of material on the trough at the level xy corresponds to the value bp Equation (7). For these conditions, the distance z(x) from the distribution of the batch of material on the trough surface is measured. The volume V1(δ–Θ) of the batch of material distributed on the surface of the trough in front of the belt cleat is then transferred into a measuring cylinder, in which its size is determined.
The theoretically determined volume V1 of conveyed material for a conveyor where the inclination angle δ (deg), the dynamic angle of repose Θ (deg) and the conveyor belt width B (m) is given in Table 1.
The volume V1(δ–Θ) of the material batch (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) was redistributed on the upper surface of the trough I and subsequently the angle of inclination of the trough δ was gradually increased by 5 deg.
The volume V2(δ–Θ) of the poured batch of material over the upper edge of the transverse partition was transferred to a measuring cylinder, in which its size was determined. The distribution of the batch of bulk material in the zy plane was read on the ruler 4 and noted in tables (see Section 4. Discussion).

2.2. Properties of the Conveyed Material

Experimental tests performed on the testing device to measure the volumes V1(δ–Θ) to V3(δ–Θ) of the respective batches of material spread on the conveyor belt were performed at known values of the height H (or H1) of the belt cleat and at a given angle of inclination of the conveyor belt δ. The material used in the laboratory tests was buckwheat with a natural angle of repose ψ = 27 deg (Figure 4a) and a dynamic angle of repose Θ = 16 deg and barley groats with a natural angle of repose ψ = 29 deg (Figure 4b) and a dynamic angle of repose Θ = 19 deg.
The results obtained from the performed experimental measurements (Table 5 and Table 6) on a special testing device (Figure 3) allowed us to express the true distribution of bulk material on the surface of the upwardly inclined trough with a front slide that simulates a steeply inclined conveyor belt with a belt cleat. The placement of the batch V1 of bulk material on the surface of the trough at the start of the measurement was performed in a static state of the trough, i.e., when the conveyor belt was at rest. After pouring a predetermined volume V1 of bulk material onto the surface of the trough, which at this moment was inclined at an angle δi, the surface of the trough was tilted by an angle δi+j and then subjected to vibrations. The vibrations were induced by repeatedly tapping the bottom surface of the trough five times. The tangent of the slope of the initial delivered batch of bulk material [30], which rested against the belt cleat with its front surface, to the longitudinal axis of the conveyor belt in the horizontal plane is determined according to theoretical relations, Equations (2), (4) and (5), by the difference of angles δ–Θ (deg).

3. Result

The paper [30,34] presents an expression that defines the relation for the analytical calculation of the size of the canopy cross-sectional area of the conveyed mass S1 in the xy plane. Conveyor belts with belt cleats (Figure 2a) and a straight or trough-shaped loading profile [2,3,13,14] are used for the transport of bulk and piece materials at angles of inclination of up to 60 deg. For the vertical transport of bulk materials, conveyor belts with a flat loading profile with belt cleats and corrugated side edges [4,5,36,37] are used (Figure 2c).

3.1. Transverse, Longitudinal Cross-Section and Batch Volume of Transported Material

The transverse, longitudinal cross-section of the transported material Syz (m2), see Figure 5a, between two neighboring cleats of sufficient height H ≥ hmax and mutual spacing of L ≥ z(x), is shown by the relationship Equation (2),
S yz = 1 2 y ( x ) z ( x ) = y ( x ) 2 2 tan ( δ - Θ )   [ m 2 ] ,
where y(x) [m] is the vertical distance of the point of the curve (parabola) from the x-axis.
From the equation of a parabola (see [31,35]), the vertex of which is located at a distance hmax (m) from the x-axis, written in canonical form, the expression Equation (3) follows for y(x). According to [38] it is possible to express the relation for the calculation of the parabola parameter p [m]. If the expression for the parameter of the parabola p is substituted into the relation Equation (3), the vertical distance y(x) of the point of the parabola with respect to the position on the x-axis can be expressed according to Equation (3),
y ( x ) = h max     x 2 2 p = h max     x 2 tan Θ b   [ m ] ,
z(x) [m] is the distance over which the conveyed material extends on the surface of the conveyor belt in the axial direction z [31].
The volume of transported material V1 (m3) supplied to the conveyor belt of a belt conveyor inclined at an angle δ, spread on the surface of the conveyor belt between two belt cleats (according to Figure 5a), can be determined according to relation Equation (4).
V 1 = b / 2 b / 2 S yz dx = 2 0 b / 2 S yz dx = 0 b / 2 y ( x ) 2 tan ( δ - Θ ) dx   [ m 3 ] ,
where Syz is the area of the batch of material on the yz plane of the conveyor belt [31].
The volume V1 (m3) of the batch of conveyed material located between two adjacent cleats is shown in Figure 5a. The theoretically determined volume V1 of conveyed material for a conveyor where the inclination angle δ = 30 ÷ 60 deg, the dynamic angle of repose Θ = 10 deg and the conveyor belt width B = 0.4, 0.5 per 0.65 m is given in Table 1. The volume V1 is calculated for the operating condition of the belt conveyor, when the conveyed material is delivered to the working surface of the conveyor belt with belt cleats of a height H ≥ hmax, which is inclined at the angle δ.
Table 1. Lengthwise distance, surface, and volume of a batch of loose material.
Table 1. Lengthwise distance, surface, and volume of a batch of loose material.
δ (deg)30354045505560
δ–Θ (deg)20253035404550
B/b/y(x) (mm)400/310/13.7
z(x) (mm)37.629.323.719.516.313.711.5
Syz (mm2)256.5200.2161.7133.4111.393.478.4
V1 (mm3)42.433.126.722.118.415.413.0
B/b/y(x) (mm)500/400/17.6
z(x) (mm)48.537.830.525.221.017.614.8
Syz (mm2)427.1333.4269.3222.0185.3155.5130.4
V1 (mm3)91.171.157.447.439.533.227.8
B/b/y(x) (mm)650/535/23.6
z(x) (mm)64.850.640.933.728.123.619.8
Syz (mm2)764.1596.4481.7397.2331.4278.1233.4
V1 (cm3)218.0170.2137.4113.394.679.466.6
If the material is fed to the working surface of the conveyor belt, which is inclined at a known angle (δmin < δ) at the filling point and the inclination angle of the conveyor belt (already carrying material) gradually increases, the original volume V1(δ–Θ) of the material batch gradually decreases as the conveying angle increases (see Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 and Figure 6, Figure 7 and Figure 8) in front of the belt cleat (volume V2(δ–Θ) spills over the transverse partition).
The volume of the batch of material V2(δ–Θ), which overflows over the upper edge of the belt cleat at a given angle of inclination of the conveyor belt, is given in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4 for belt width B, dynamic angle of repose and belt cleat height y(x). The volumes V2(δ–Θ) and V3(δ–Θ) (Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) of batches (remaining in front of the belt cleat and overflowing across the belt cleat) of the transported mass were determined from the models created in the 3D CAD environment of SolidWorks, see Figure 6 (and also Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9).
If the height of the transverse belt cleat H1 is less than the maximum height hmax of the canopy of the cross-sectional area of the conveyed mass S1 on the xy plane, the volume of conveyed material V3(δ–Θ) [m3] spread on the surface of the conveyor belt surface between two belt cleats (see Figure 5b) can be determined according to the relationship Equation (5),
V 2 ( δ Θ ) = V 1 ( δ Θ )     V 3 ( δ Θ ) = V 1 ( δ Θ )     2 0 c / 2 S 1 yz dx = = V 1 ( δ Θ )     0 c / 2 y 1 ( x ) 2 tan ( δ - Θ ) dx = V 1 ( δ Θ )     0 c / 2 ( h 1 c     x 2 tan Θ ) 2 c 2 tan ( δ - Θ ) dx   [ m 3 ] ,
where S1yz [m2] is the longitudinal cross-section of a batch of conveyed material of volume V3(δ–Θ), which has spilled over the belt cleat of height H1, (Figure 5b and Figure 6), c/2 [m] Equation (6) is the horizontal distance of the intersection of the curve (= parabola) of the layer of conveyed material with the upper edge of the belt cleat of height H1 in the xy plane, see Figure 5b,
h 1 = h max     H 1   [ m ] ,   c = 8 p h 1 = 2 b h 1 tan Θ = 2 b ( h max     H 1 ) tan Θ   [ m ] ,
The volume of the batch of conveyed material V3(δ–Θ), which is located between two adjacent cleats spaced apart by the value L ≥ z(x) (Figure 5b) is shown in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9.
The experimentally obtained values on the test equipment were created in the Laboratory Research and Testing of Institute of Transport, Faculty mechanical Engineering, VSB - Technical University Ostrava.
If the height of the belt cleat H1 is known, it is possible to calculate the required used loading width bp of the conveyor belt, according to Relation (7),
b p = 4 · H 1 tan Θ   [ m ] ,
The volume V1 = V1(δ–Θ) of the bulk material spread on the surface of the trough in front of the belt cleat can be expressed by the relation Equation (4) for the angle of inclination of the belt conveyor, provided that the belt cleat reaches a height of at least H1.
Table 2. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 10 mm belt cleat.
Table 2. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 10 mm belt cleat.
H1 (mm)/bp (mm)10/149.3
δ–Θ (deg)1015202530
z(x)(δ–Θ) (mm)56.737.327.521.517.3
V1(δ–Θ) (cm3)22.6 1,214.910.98.56.9
-V3(δ–Θ) (cm3)18.1 1,212.89.87.8
-V2(δ–Θ) (cm3)4.5 1,22.11.10.7
---14.3 210.79.1
---3.8 1,22.15.8
----11.5 29.0
----2.7 21.7
-----9.5 2
-----2.0 2
1 see Figure 6, 2 see Figure 7.
Table 3. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 15 mm belt cleat.
Table 3. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 15 mm belt cleat.
H1 (mm)/bp (mm)15/224.0
δ–Θ (deg)1015202530
z(x)(δ–Θ) (mm)85.156.041.232.226.0
V1(δ–Θ) (cm3)76.250.1 336.928.823.3
-V2(δ–Θ) (cm3)61.043.4 333.126.4
-V3(δ–Θ) (cm3)15.26.8 33.82.4
---48.036.3 328.9
---13.07.1 34.2
----38.830.9 3
----9.25.4 3
-----32.5
------6.3
3 see Figure 8.
Table 4. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 20 mm belt cleat.
Table 4. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 20 mm belt cleat.
H1 (mm)/bp (mm)20/298.6
δ–Θ (deg)1015202530
z(x)(δ–Θ) (mm)113.474.655.042.934.6
V1(δ–Θ) (cm3)180.6118.987.5 468.355.2
-V3(δ–Θ) (cm3)144.5102.878.5 462.5
-V2(δ–Θ) (cm3)36.116.19.0 45.8
---113.885.967.9 4
---30.716.910.6 4
----92.172.3
----21.713.6
-----76.1
-----16.0
4 see Figure 9.
The theoretically calculated volumes Vi(δ–Θ) of the respective batches of transported material (according to relation Equation (4) and relation Equation (5), depending on the inclination of the conveyor belt δ (resp. (δ–Θ)) are given in Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) are determined in Figure 7, Figure 8 and Figure 9 (to check the accuracy of the calculation) according to the models created in the 3D CAD environment of the SolidWorks system.
Figure 10 shows the volumes V3(δ–Θ) of partial batches of the transported material captured by a belt cleat with a height of H1 for inclination angle (δ–Θ).
Figure 10 shows the volumes V2(δ–Θ) of the transported material, which spilled over the upper edge of the belt cleat of a height H1 for inclination angle (δ–Θ) (deg).

3.2. Experimentally Determined Distribution of Material and Its Volumes

A batch of material of volume V1(10) was applied to the upper surface of the trough I of the test equipment (Figure 3) inclined by an angle (see Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4). The slope of the trough was then increased, always by increments of 5 deg, and the values (for three successive measurements) of the distance of material distribution on the trough surface and the volume of material that spilled over the belt cleat were recorded in Table 5 and Table 6, as determined by subtraction in the measuring cylinder.
Figure 11. Batch volume Vi [cm3] buckwheat spread on the surface of the conveyor belt for H1 = 10 mm. Length of the distribution z(x) for δ–Θ (deg) (a) 15 deg, (b) 20 deg and (c) 25 deg.
Figure 11. Batch volume Vi [cm3] buckwheat spread on the surface of the conveyor belt for H1 = 10 mm. Length of the distribution z(x) for δ–Θ (deg) (a) 15 deg, (b) 20 deg and (c) 25 deg.
Energies 14 07984 g011
Figure 12. Batch volume Vi [cm3] of barley groats spread on the surface of the conveyor belt at H1 = 15 mm. Length of the distribution z(x) for (δ–Θ) (deg) (a) 10 deg, (b) 15 deg, (c) 20 deg and (d) 25 deg.
Figure 12. Batch volume Vi [cm3] of barley groats spread on the surface of the conveyor belt at H1 = 15 mm. Length of the distribution z(x) for (δ–Θ) (deg) (a) 10 deg, (b) 15 deg, (c) 20 deg and (d) 25 deg.
Energies 14 07984 g012
Table 5. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 10 mm belt cleat.
Table 5. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 10 mm belt cleat.
MaterialBuckwheatBarley Greats
H1/bp (mm)10/149.3
δ–Θ (deg)10152025301015202530
z(x)(δ–Θ) (mm)604432 528 5215942312419
6342 53426226045332221
61413329215943322121
Σ z(x)(δ–Θ)184127998364178130966761
Σ z(x)(δ–Θ)/n61.342.333.027.621.359.343.332.022.320.3
V3(δ–Θ) (cm3)23181411102319151210
V2(δ–Θ) (cm3)-5432-4432
5 see Figure 11.
Table 6. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 15 mm belt cleat.
Table 6. Volume of material Vi(δ–Θ) [cm3] for H1 = 15 mm belt cleat.
MaterialBuckwheatBarley Greats
H1/bp (mm15/224
δ–Θ (deg)10152025301015202530
z(x)(δ–Θ) (mm)100894939319486523928
968553403098 68447 64026
98865136289783 64936 629
Σ z(x)(δ–Θ)2942601531158928925314811583
Σ z(x)(δ–Θ)/n98.086.651.038.329.796.384.349.338.327.6
V3(δ–Θ) [cm3]77604939337761483932
V2(δ–Θ) [cm3]-1711106-161397
6 see Figure 12.

4. Discussion

The experimentally obtained values of the distribution distance of the bulk material (see Table 5 and Table 6) on the surface of the trough differ from the values of z(x), theoretically calculated according to [30] and also according to Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4. This fundamental difference of the two values can be explained by the impossibility of determining the exact value of the dynamic angle of repose Θ of the material batch, which is reported by the performed partial experimental measurements on the test equipment (Figure 3). The static angle of repose (see Figure 4) of the bulk material is generally defined as the angle that the tangent of the slope of the bulk material makes to the plane of the base surface on which the bulk material is poured. The dynamic angle of repose Θ arises, if the base oscillates, as a result of the grain rearrangement in the layered cone of bulk material with the tangent slope of the material to the plane of the base surface at an angle ψ at the moment of the beginning of shaking. The vibration of the base surface can, when bulk material is carried away on the surface of the conveyor belt of the belt conveyor, be expressed by the repeated deflection of the conveyor belt (so-called rolling resistance) between two adjacent roller supports during its movement along the circumference of the entire working length of the belt conveyor. The amount of deflection of the conveyor belt is influenced, among other things, by the centrifugal forces [2,5] acting on the conveyor belt and the conveyed material as it moves along the deflection curve [38]. The need to increase the tension in the belt with a view to reducing the drag is indicated in connection with higher belt speeds [39].
The results of theoretical assumptions confirmed by experimental measurements show that the distribution of loose material in the longitudinal direction on the surface of the trough (conveyor belt) decreases with an increasing angle of inclination δ of the conveyor and with increasing value of dynamic angle of repose Θ. The value of the dynamic angle of repose of the bulk material decreases from its maximum Θmax = ψ [deg] to its minimum Θmin = Θ [deg]. The actual value of the dynamic angle of repose of the conveyed material (and thus also the volume of each sub-batch) between the two adjacent belt cleats installed on the conveyor belt depends on the degree (i.e., intensity and length of time) of shaking the bulk material batch.
The size of the batch V3(δ–Θ) of material, which is prevented from moving on the surface of the conveyor belt due to the installed belt cleat, depends on the height H and the length bp of the cleat. The maximum length of the cleat bp is generally chosen so as to prevent the conveyed grains of material from falling over the edges of the conveyor belt. The length bp of the cleat is optimally equal to the used loading width of the conveyor belt b [10,11]. A lower selected cross-sectional length causes a reduction in the cross-section of the bulk material Sxy [31], since the calculated cross-sectional area of the belt filling S1 [11] is proportional to the square of the used loading width of the belt b.
The minimum height of the belt cleat H should be chosen with a size corresponding to the height hmax (Figure 5a) of the parabolic cross-sectional area S1 of the transported material. The lower height of the belt cleat (see H1 in Figure 5b) causes the volume V2(δ–Θ) of the batch of conveyed material to spill over the belt cleat at the moment the material is fed to the conveyor belt on a steeply inclined belt conveyor.
To prevent the material grains from overflowing over the upper edge of the belt cleat of height H conveyed at an angle of inclination δ (which is the maximum of all inclinations of the angled belt conveyor sections) it is necessary to feed a precisely measured volume of material V1(δ–Θ), the magnitude of which can be determined according to Equation (4), onto the conveyor belt, into the space between the two neighboring belt cleats, if the angle ψ is input after the angle of repose Θ.

5. Conclusions

Continuous transport of loose fine and coarse-grained bulk materials by belt conveyors, the angle of inclination of which exceeds the limit angle of inclination of transport of belt conveyors of classical construction, can be performed by conveyor belts with belt cleats. The transverse belt cleats, of the respective heights and construction, are mounted on the working surface of the endless loop of the conveyor belt at regular intervals, the size of which must be suitably designed. The choice of the mutual spacing of belt cleats is influenced in particular by the longitudinal distribution of the batch of transported material retained by the belt cleat of a given height and length.
The maximum distance over which a batch of conveyed bulk material extends in the longitudinal axis of the conveyor belt can be expressed according to the relationship given in the paper. The size of this distance as well as the volume of the batch of transported material significantly affects the height of the transverse partition and the value of the difference between the angle of inclination of the transport and the angle of repose of the material. The paper also presents the equations for calculating the volume of a batch of conveyed material, according to which it is possible to analytically determine the theoretical volume of bulk material, which is retained by a belt cleat installed on the working surface of the conveyor belt, and which is angled in relation to horizontal plane at an angle of δ.
Capacity increase of transport capability, i.e., the amount of transported material per time unit, of a steeply inclined belt conveyor can be influenced by the speed of movement of the conveyor belt, and by the volume and the spacing of the batches of material carried by the conveyor belt.
The volumetric size of the batch of material which extends along the working surface of the conveyor belt in front of the belt cleat is proportional to the width and height of the belt cleat and is greatly affected by the angle expressed as the difference between the transport angle and the material angle of repose.
The cross-section of the filling of the straight and trough loading profile of the conveyor belt is expressed in the professional literature and technical standards using the dynamic angle of repose Θ. When grains of loose bulk material are carried by a conveyor belt, the individual grains of the material are exposed to dynamic effects, e.g., due to belt deflection between adjacent roller supports, which cause the material grains to slide down a slope (whose tangent to the horizontal plane is at an angle ψ) of bulk material spread on the conveyor belt and spreading them over a larger area.
It is difficult and practically impossible to express in general what actual values the angle of repose (minimum Θ and maximum ψ) of the transported material acquires at a given moment of the total time when the material is transported by the conveyor belt.
The test device described in the paper was created in the laboratory. Experimentally obtained values of the distance over which the batch of conveyed bulk material extends on the longitudinal axis of the conveyor belt, on the test device created, can be used for validation with mathematically determined values (see Table 2, Table 3 and Table 4) and also for verification of practically measured data (Table 5 and Table 6) with theoretical data, which are listed in Table 1.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.H. and J.F.; methodology, L.H.; software, L.H.; validation, L.H.; formal analysis, L.H.; investigation, L.H.; resources, L.H.; data curation, L.H.; writing—original draft preparation, L.H.; writing—review and editing, L.H.; visualization, L.H.; supervision, J.F.; project administration, L.H.; funding acquisition, L.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work has been supported by The Ministry of Education, Youth and Sports of the Czech Republic from the Specific Research Project SV3401X41 (SP2021/06).

Data Availability Statement

The data supporting reported results can be found, including links to publicly archived datasets analyzed or generated during the study, can be found in Laboratory Research and Testing of Institute of Transport, Faculty Mechanical Engineering, VSB—Technical University of Ostrava.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Yardley, E.D.; Stace, L.R. Belt Conveying of Minerals; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2008; ISBN 9781845692308. [Google Scholar]
  2. Marasova, D.; Taraba, V.; Grujic, M.; Fedorko, G.; Bindzar, P.; Husakova, N. Pásová doprava; PONT s.r.o.: Košice, Slovakia, 2006; ISBN 80-8073-628-6. [Google Scholar]
  3. Zur, T.; Hardygora, M. Przenośniki taśmowe w górnictwie; Śląsk sp. z o.o.: Katowice, Poland, 1996; ISBN 83-7164-004-8. [Google Scholar]
  4. Antoniak, J. Urządzenia i systemy transportu podziemnego w kopalniach, wyd. II; Wydawnictwo Śląsk: Katowice, Poland, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  5. Antoniak, J. Obliczenia przenośników taśmowych; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej, skrypty uczelniane: Gliwice, Poland, 1992; Volume 1683. [Google Scholar]
  6. Antoniak, J. Przenośniki taśmowe. Wprowadzenia do teorii i obliczenia; Wydawnictwo Politechniki Śląskiej: Gliwice, Poland, 2004; ISBN 83-7335-266-X. [Google Scholar]
  7. Hardygora, M.; Wachowicz, J.; Czaplicka-Kolarz, K.; Markusik, S. Taśmy przenośnikowe; Wydawnictwa Naukowo-Techniczne: Warszawa, Poland, 1999; ISBN 83-204-2402-X. [Google Scholar]
  8. Kozłowski, T.; Wodecki, J.; Zimroz, R.; Błazej, R.; Hardygora, M. A Diagnostics of Conveyor Belt Splices. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 6259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. ČSN ISO 5048. Continuous Mechanical Handling Equipment—Belt Conveyors with Carrying Idlers—Calculation of Operating Power and Tensile Forces; ÚNI: Praha, Czech Republic, 1994; p. 15. [Google Scholar]
  10. ČSN 26 3102. Belt Conveyors—Calculation Bases; ÚNM: Praha, Czech Republic, 1988; p. 48. [Google Scholar]
  11. ČSN ISO 2406. Continuous Mechanical Handling Equipment—Mobile and Portable Conveyors—Constructional Specifications; ÚNI: Praha, Czech Republic, 1993; p. 4. [Google Scholar]
  12. Grujic, M.; Dragana, E. Advantages of high angle belt conveyors (hac) in mining. In Applied Mechanics and Materials; Trans Tech Publications Ltd.: Bäch, Switzerland, 2014; Volume 683. [Google Scholar]
  13. Perten, J. Krutonaklonnyje konvejeri. (In English: High Angle Conveyors); Mashinostrejenie: Leningrad, Russia, 1997; ISBN 621-867-212-7. [Google Scholar]
  14. Hrabovsky, L. Pásové dopravníky převyšující mezní úhel slonu dopravy; VSB-Technical University Ostrava: Ostrava, Czech Republic, 2005; Volume 127, ISBN 80-248-0779-3. [Google Scholar]
  15. Ross, E. Using Cleats to Extend Belt Conveyor Capabilities. Plant Eng. 1983, 37, 58–63. [Google Scholar]
  16. Ross, E. How to Attach and Apply Belt Conveyor Cleats. Plant Eng. 1983, 37, 132–139. [Google Scholar]
  17. Molnar, V.; Fedorko, G.; Honus, S.; Andrejiova, M.; Grincova, A.; Michalik, P.; Palencar, J. Research in placement of measuring sensors on hexagonal idler housing with regard to requirements of pipe conveyor failure analysis. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2020, 116, 104703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Silvey, D.H.; Rugman, G. Belting. In Encyclopedia of Polymer Science and Technology; Wiley: New York, NY, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  19. McTurk, J.R.; Birdsey, N. Specialised belt conveyors. South Afr. Mech. Eng. 1993, 43, 142–146. [Google Scholar]
  20. Homišin, J.; Grega, R.; Kaššay, P.; Fedorko, G.; Molnár, V. Removal of systematic failure of belt conveyor drive by reducing vibrations. Eng. Fail. Anal. 2019, 99, 192–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hardygóra, M.; Bajda, M.; Błażej, R. Laboratory testing of conveyor textile belt joints used in underground mines. Min. Sci. 2015, 22, 161–169. [Google Scholar]
  22. Alviari, L.P.; Anggamawarti, M.F.; Sanjiwani, Y.; Risonarta, V.Y. Classification of Impact Damage on A Rubber-Textile Conveyor Belt: A Review. Int. J. Mech. Eng. Technol. Appl. 2020, 1, 21–27. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Krol, R.; Kawalec, W.; Gladysiewicz, L. An effective belt conveyor for underground ore transportation systems. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2017; Volume 95, p. 042047. [Google Scholar]
  24. Dos Santos, J.A. The Cost and Value of High Angle Conveying—A Comparison of Economics for different Conveying Paths. Bulk Solids Handl. 2013, 33, 18. [Google Scholar]
  25. Stehlikova, B.; Molnar, V.; Fedorko, G.; Michalik, P.; Paulikova, A. Research about influence of the tension forces, asymmetrical tensioning and filling rate of pipe conveyor belt filled with the material on the contact forces of idler rolls in hexagonal idler housing. Measurement 2020, 156, 107598. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fedorko, G.; Molnar, V.; Vasil, M.; Salai, R. Proposal of digital twin for testing and measuring of transport belts for pipe conveyors within the concept Industry 4.0. Measurement 2021, 174, 108978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wozniak, D.; Hardygora, M. Method for laboratory testing rubber penetration of steel cords in conveyor belts. Min. Sci. 2020, 27, 105–117. [Google Scholar]
  28. Marasova, D.; Ambrisko, L.; Caban, L. Determination of the Quality of Rubber Composites Based on their Testing. Qual. Access Success 2019, 20, 18–21. [Google Scholar]
  29. Gierz, Ł.; Warguła, Ł.; Kukla, M.; Koszela, K.; Zwiachel, T.S. Computer aided modeling of wood chips transport by means of a belt conveyor with use of discrete element method. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 9091. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bajda, M.; Hardygóra, M. Analysis of the Influence of the Type of Belt on the Energy Consumption of Transport Processes in a Belt Conveyor. Energies 2021, 14, 6180. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hrabovsky, L. Loose Material Filling in the Loading Trough Profile of the Belt Conveyor. In IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2021; p. 012016. [Google Scholar]
  32. Fullard, B. Improve Operations Through the Use of Conveyor Belt Cleats. Ind. Eng. 1992, 24, 32–40. [Google Scholar]
  33. Bruce, R.C. Development of cleated belt bagasse conveyors. In Proceedings of the 2008 Conference of the Australian Society of Sugar Cane Technologists, Townsville, Qld, Australia, 29 April–2 May 2008; pp. 517–525. [Google Scholar]
  34. Wang, M.; Liu, Q.; Ou, Y.; Zou, X. Experimental Study of the Seed-Filling Uniformity of Sugarcane Single-Bud Billet Planter. Sugar Tech 2021, 23, 827–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Guo, S.; Huang, W.; Li, X. Normal Force and Sag Resistance of Pipe Conveyor. Chin. J. Mech. Eng. 2020, 33, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Tarpay, I. Steep incline and vertical conveyors-advantages, challenges and applications. In 13th International Conference on Bulk Materials Storage, Handling and Transportation; Engineers Australia: Barton, ACT, Australia, 2019; Volume 330. [Google Scholar]
  37. Paelke, J.W.; Emerton, R.C.; Williams, J.A. Wyoming coal mine truck load-out facility carries 65,000 tons per month on FLEXOWELL steep angle conveyors. Bulk Solids Handling 1986, 6, 321–324. [Google Scholar]
  38. Klimecky, O.; Veverkova, H.; Bailotti, K.; Muller, J. Manipulace s Materiálem: Doprava v Lomech; VSB of Ostrava: Ostrava, Czech Republic, 1988; p. 320. [Google Scholar]
  39. Havelka, Z.; Tuma, J. Teorie Pásových Dopravníků; SNTL Praha: Praha, Czech Republic, 1971; p. 211. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Conveyor with conveyor belt with belt cleats. 1—conveyor belt, 2—batch of transported material, 3—belt cleat.
Figure 1. Conveyor with conveyor belt with belt cleats. 1—conveyor belt, 2—batch of transported material, 3—belt cleat.
Energies 14 07984 g001
Figure 2. Conveyor belt (a) with belt cleats, (b) types of belt cleats, (c) with belt cleats and corrugated side edges.
Figure 2. Conveyor belt (a) with belt cleats, (b) types of belt cleats, (c) with belt cleats and corrugated side edges.
Energies 14 07984 g002
Figure 3. Testing device to determine shape, volume, and length of spread material batches (I)—trough, (II)—tilting mechanism, (1)—sliding plate, (2)—digital inclinometer, (3)—digital protractor, (4)—ruler.
Figure 3. Testing device to determine shape, volume, and length of spread material batches (I)—trough, (II)—tilting mechanism, (1)—sliding plate, (2)—digital inclinometer, (3)—digital protractor, (4)—ruler.
Energies 14 07984 g003
Figure 4. Angles of repose of the transported material (a) chickpeas, (b) barley groats.
Figure 4. Angles of repose of the transported material (a) chickpeas, (b) barley groats.
Energies 14 07984 g004
Figure 5. Transverse and longitudinal cross-section through a batch of transported material (a) H ≥ hmax, (b) H1 ≤ hmax.
Figure 5. Transverse and longitudinal cross-section through a batch of transported material (a) H ≥ hmax, (b) H1 ≤ hmax.
Energies 14 07984 g005
Figure 6. Batch volume of the transported material (see Table 2) (a) V1(10)*1 (cm3), (b) V2(15)*1 (cm3), (c) V3(15)*1 (cm3), (d) V2(20)*1 (cm3).
Figure 6. Batch volume of the transported material (see Table 2) (a) V1(10)*1 (cm3), (b) V2(15)*1 (cm3), (c) V3(15)*1 (cm3), (d) V2(20)*1 (cm3).
Energies 14 07984 g006
Figure 7. Volumes of material batches remaining on the conveyor belt and spilling over the transverse belt cleat of a height H1 = 10 mm.
Figure 7. Volumes of material batches remaining on the conveyor belt and spilling over the transverse belt cleat of a height H1 = 10 mm.
Energies 14 07984 g007
Figure 8. Volume of material remaining on the conveyor belt and spilling over the belt cleat of a height of H1 = 15 mm.
Figure 8. Volume of material remaining on the conveyor belt and spilling over the belt cleat of a height of H1 = 15 mm.
Energies 14 07984 g008
Figure 9. Batch volume V3(δ–Θ) material, spread on the conveyor belt, retained by a belt cleat with a height of H1 = 20 mm.
Figure 9. Batch volume V3(δ–Θ) material, spread on the conveyor belt, retained by a belt cleat with a height of H1 = 20 mm.
Energies 14 07984 g009
Figure 10. Batch volume V2(δ–Θ) of material spilling over a belt cleat of a height H1 = 20 mm.
Figure 10. Batch volume V2(δ–Θ) of material spilling over a belt cleat of a height H1 = 20 mm.
Energies 14 07984 g010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Hrabovský, L.; Fries, J. Transport Performance of a Steeply Situated Belt Conveyor. Energies 2021, 14, 7984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237984

AMA Style

Hrabovský L, Fries J. Transport Performance of a Steeply Situated Belt Conveyor. Energies. 2021; 14(23):7984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237984

Chicago/Turabian Style

Hrabovský, Leopold, and Jiří Fries. 2021. "Transport Performance of a Steeply Situated Belt Conveyor" Energies 14, no. 23: 7984. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14237984

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop