Next Article in Journal
Zeolite NaY-Copper Composites Produced by Sintering Processes for Adsorption Heat Transformation—Technology, Structure and Performance
Previous Article in Journal
One Process Does Not Make a Life Cycle—Comment to Marcinkowski and Kopania
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effect of the HPDI and PPCI Combustion Modes of Direct-Injection Natural Gas Engine on Combustion and Emissions

State Key Laboratory of Engines, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2021, 14(7), 1957; https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071957
Submission received: 16 March 2021 / Revised: 28 March 2021 / Accepted: 29 March 2021 / Published: 1 April 2021

Abstract

:
Natural gas (NG) engines have very broad application prospects. The pilot-ignited NG diesel engine can be organized into two combustion modes according to the sequence of oil and gas injection: (1) High-pressure direct injection, where NG is mainly diffused combustion; and (2) partially premixed compression ignition, where NG is mainly premixed combustion. In this study, we used CONVERGE to explore the influence of the NG injection timing on the distribution of the mixture equivalence ratio, ignition characteristics, thermal efficiency, emission, and combustion reaction rate under the two combustion modes. We also used a multi-step soot model to analyze the particle mass and quantity. We showed herein that the NG injection timing significantly affects the mixture distribution in the cylinder, thereby consequently affecting the combustion process. Both very early and very late injection times were not conducive to NG combustion. In addition, the mass, quantity, and diameter of the soot produced by diffusion combustion were larger than those produced with premixed combustion.

1. Introduction

Seeking more efficient and clean alternative fuels, improving the engine thermal efficiency, and reducing emissions are common concerns with the increasingly strict emission regulations. Among various alternative fuels, natural gas (NG) has a great appeal. NG has the advantages of wide source, low price, and clean combustion. It also has certain advantages in improving engine emissions. In recent years, research on NG engines has become one of the major research contents that are greatly significant for alleviating energy shortages and reducing environmental pollution.
NG is more suitable for compression ignition engines because of its high auto-ignition temperature. The NG diesel dual-fuel engine uses NG as the main fuel. A small amount of diesel is then injected near the top dead center as the ignition source of the fuel–air mixture. This particular type of dual-fuel engine is called the pilot-ignited NG diesel engine (PINGD).
In most applications, NG is injected into the intake manifold to evenly mix with air, and then during the intake stroke, a uniform NG-air mixture is drawn into a cylinder. However, special high-pressure gaseous injectors allow NG to be injected directly into the cylinder shortly before the end of the compression stroke [1]. This technology provides a better fuel economy and a more efficient combustion and has the key feature of both NG and diesel using a single injector [2,3]. We have two combustion modes according to the injection order of diesel and NG: High-pressure direct injection (HPDI, first injection of diesel and then NG) and partially premixed compression ignition (PPCI, first injection of NG and then diesel). Benefiting from the sensitive transient response, in-cylinder direct injection NG has become an attractive choice for heavy-duty engines to meet Euro VI regulations and reduce greenhouse gas emissions [4]. This will promote the promotion of NG and hydrogenated vegetable oil and help reduce fuel costs [5]. However, due to the complex structure of the injector and fuel supply system, the total cost will still be affected. Therefore, further reducing costs is one of the future development directions.
Some advanced combustion concepts about NG engines have been proposed and studied. Di Blasio et al. developed a multi-dimensional simulation model suitable for NG-diesel dual-fuel (DF) light-duty engines. The model can accurately predict ignition delay, cylinder pressure, heat release rate (HRR), and unburned hydrocarbons (UHC) [6]. The authors then studied the effect of the compression ratio on combustion and emissions in DF mode. Studies have shown that due to the inherent H/C characteristics of NG, CO2 emissions can be significantly reduced [7]. In order to further reduce emissions and improve fuel economy, scholars combined PPCI and DF, and found that advanced injection strategies and EGR can help further improve the performance of DF engines [8]. In addition, changes in NOx emissions and soot emissions show opposite trends [9]. Therefore, it is necessary to develop alternative fuels and study advanced combustion concepts suitable for NG engines to improve the fuel economy of compression ignition engines and reduce emissions, while balancing NOx-soot emissions.
Over the years, many studies have been conducted to improve PINGD combustion and emissions. Compared with ordinary diesel engines, NOx emissions have been significantly reduced, whereas CO emissions have been significantly increased. This problem can be solved by preheating the intake air and increasing the amount of pilot fuel [10]. These measures can also reduce UHC emissions, which is another major problem related to PINGD. However, increasing the amount of pilot fuel increases the particulate matter emissions [11]. A simulation calculation showed that the partial premixing of NG can effectively reduce CO and soot emissions, but causes the increase of NOx emissions, which can be solved by adding EGR [12,13].
At present, conventional diesel engines mainly use Diesel Particulate Filter (DPF) to capture particulate emissions with an efficiency that can be above 90%. However, when used in PINGD, the DPF efficiency is only 60–70%, making particulate emissions a problem worth considering. In their study, Di Blasio et al. showed that reducing the amount of pilot fuel and using a lower compression ratio leads to a reduction in the particle number and diameter [14]. Cowan et al. demonstrated that increasing the injection pressure can reduce the particulate emission mass and particle number. However, when compared, EGR addition significantly affects the particle number increase [15]. The injection pulse separation (PSEP) of NG and diesel also has a significant impact on particulate emissions. Research results have shown that the peak heat release rate and the NOx emissions increase as the PSEP is shortened. Moreover, the combustion duration and the particulate emissions decrease [16]. Jones et al. found that diesel injection has little effect on particulate emissions, indicating that most of the particulate emissions of PINGD may be caused by the diffusion combustion of NG [17].
NG engines are considered to be a promising solution that can effectively reduce greenhouse gas (CO2) emissions and keep the production of pollutants within limits [6]. At present, there have been many researches [18,19] and applications (e.g., marine engines, trucks and passenger cars) [6] regarding NG engines. Nevertheless, there is still a lack of research on the effects of injection timing on combustion and emission characteristics in the two injection modes of direct injection PINGD. The mechanism of the parameters on the spray mixing process, concentration distribution, and ignition process is still unclear. Therefore, this research mainly aims to explore the influence of the NG injection timing on the distribution of the mixture equivalence ratio, ignition characteristics, and combustion reaction rate under the two combustion modes of HPDI and PPCI and analyze the thermal efficiency, emission, particle mass, and quantity. This study can reveal the mechanism of injection timing and help rationally organize the fuel mixing process to improve thermal efficiency and reduce emissions. The research results serve as a reference to enterprises and researchers.

2. Model Description

The engine parameters were based on the direct-injection NG engine developed by Weichai Westport New Energy Power Co., Ltd., Weifang City, China. The 1/9 combustion chamber was modeled and analyzed herein, with the main parameters listed in Table 1.
Figure 1 depicts the 1/9 combustion chamber model at the top dead center (720° Crankshaft Angle (CA)). The engine injector had nine holes. The jet was symmetrically distributed along the cylinder axis.
Table 2 shows the parameter settings of the simulation analysis. The diesel injection mass of each case was fixed. The load was adjusted by changing the NG injection pulse width.
The soot model used in the calculation is an improved multi-step phenomenological (MSP) soot model [20,21]. The model defines acetylene as the main reaction material for the soot precursor generation and the soot surface growth. The detailed model is coupled to the original MSP soot model considering the important role of the accurate prediction of the acetylene generation path in building a soot model to predict the soot generation process. The new model combines the advantages of MSP and detailed models. Figure 2 displays the model structure diagram.
The equation for solving the soot mass density Y S and the quantity density N is [22]:
d d t Y s   =   M C ( R 4   ˙ +   R 7 ˙     R 8 ˙ 12     R 9 ˙ )
d d t N   =   N A M C M n u c R 4 ˙     R 6 ˙
where M C is the molar mass of the carbon atoms; M n u c is the molar mass of the soot particles; N A is Avogadro’s constant; and R i ˙ is the chemical reaction rate.
Table 3 shows the model selection in the computational fluid dynamics (CFD) numerical simulation calculation process.
We simulated the operation process and compared the data with that of Westport to verify the model reliability. Figure 3 illustrates that the simulation data of the heat release rate and the cylinder pressure were in a good agreement with the experimental data; thus, the model was reasonable.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Influence of the NG Injection Timing on the Combustion Process in the HPDI Combustion Mode

In this study, the diesel injection volume, injection pressure, injection timing, and injection duration were fixed to ensure the consistency of the diesel injection, ignition, and combustion processes. Under the abovementioned premise, the NG injection timing and the pulse width were changed to study the influence of different injection strategies on combustion and emissions under medium and low loads. Table 4 shows the operating parameters of the simulated engine under low (indicated mean effective pressure (IMEP) = 0.27 MPa, cases 1–6) and medium (IMEP = 0.8 MPa, cases 7–12) loads.
Figure 4 depicts the effect of different NG injection timings on the heat release rate under low and medium loads. After the diesel was injected into the cylinder, it quickly evaporated and mixed with air. The diesel fuel quickly burned when the combustion conditions were reached, resulting in the formation of the first exothermic peak. High-pressure NG was then injected into the cylinder and ignited, resulting in the formation of the second exothermic peak. At different injection timings, the cylinder pressure, temperature, and combustion state of the diesel jet were different when NG started to burn. Therefore, the injection timing had a very large impact on the ignition and heat release characteristics of the mixed gas and a significant impact on the emission. Figure 5 shows the effect of different NG injection timings on the cylinder pressure at low and medium loads. As PSEP increased, the start of combustion delayed, which caused CA50 to lag, and part of the combustion process occurred after TDC. Eventually, the peak pressure in the cylinder decreased, and the time when the peak occurred delayed.
Table 5 shows the concentration field of the NG and the temperature field at different NG injection timings under the medium load. The NG injection timing determined the NG jet distribution in the high-temperature area formed by diesel combustion, which consequently affected the combustion process. After being injected into the cylinder, the high-pressure NG quickly mixed with air, forming combustible gas at the jet’s head and periphery. The combustible gas was ignited after it came into contact with the high-temperature area. The flame then spread along the co nnmbustible mixture area toward the nozzle. The contact area between the combustible mixture and high-temperature areas continued to increase with the injection timing delay. Therefore, the mixture ignited at multiple points and quickly burned. The combustion process was mainly manifested as injection, mixing, and combustion at the same time.
Figure 6 presents the emissions at different injection timings under medium and low loads. The NOx emissions generally showed a downward trend, while the HC emissions first decreased and then increased as the injection timing was delayed. The lower temperature in the cylinder caused by the injection delay led to a reduction in the NOx emissions. When the PSEP was short, the rich gas mixture made the NG unable to burn completely. On the contrary, when the PSEP was long, the NG incompletely burned. Compared with that under the low load, the high temperature under the medium load lasted longer, making the NOx emission higher. At the same time, it can be observed that CO2 emissions increased significantly due to the increase of NG. In addition, soot emissions and NOx emissions had opposite trends. The reason is that the high temperature thermodynamic environment promoted NOx generation and soot oxidation. How to balance NOx-soot emissions is also a question worth discussing.

3.2. Influence of the NG Injection Timing on the Combustion Process in the PPCI Combustion Mode

The research method of the PPCI combustion mode was similar to that of the HPDI mode. Table 6 shows the parameters under the low (IMEP = 0.27 MPa, cases 13–17) and medium (IMEP = 0.8 MPa, cases 18–22) loads.
Figure 7 illustrates the effect of different injection timings on the heat release rate under low and medium loads. When the PSEP was relatively short, the diesel fuel quickly ignited the injected NG, and the other part of the NG continued to be injected into the cylinder. The entire combustion was a partially premixed combustion. The heat release began to show two stages as the PSEP increased: Diesel combustion heat release and NG combustion heat release. The NG that was injected early and the air were fully mixed to form an over-lean mixture because the PSEP was very long. Therefore, after the diesel ignition, the over-lean mixture could not be completely and quickly burnt, resulting in a significant prolongation of the combustion duration and a considerable part of the NG burning slowly after the top dead center. Figure 8 shows the cylinder pressure under a low load and medium load. With the increase of PSEP, the time of combustion started and CA50 advanced, causing combustion to occur before TDC, so the peak cylinder pressure increased. However, when the PSEP was too long, NG and pilot diesel burned separately and formed two exothermic peaks, which reduced the pressure peak.
Table 7 lists the concentration field of the NG and the temperature field at different injection timings under the medium load. In the PPCI combustion mode, the NG was first injected into the cylinder and mixed with air to form a mixture. When the PSEP was relatively short, the combustible mixture at the jet’s tail was ignited after the diesel was burned, and the flame moved toward the jet’s head. The characteristic was that the heat release phase of the diesel and NG combustion was adjacent, and the combustion duration was short. A large amount of air−fuel mixture was distributed in the piston bowl and clearances when the injection timing was further advanced. After the diesel was burned, only a small amount of the air−NG mixture near the flame was ignited, and the air−NG mixture in the clearance was not ignited.
Figure 9 shows the NOx and HC emissions at different injection timings under medium and low loads. The NOx emissions increased, but the HC emissions decreased as the injection timing was delayed. High temperature is an important condition for NOx generation. Due to the advancement of the injection timing, NG was injected into the cylinder and mixed with air earlier, which enhanced the premixed part of combustion, reduced the combustion temperature, and shortened the duration of the high temperature, consequently suppressing the NOx emissions and soot oxidation. NOx–soot emissions showed the same trend as under the HPDI mode. The HC emissions increased with the advancement of the injection timing because the NG distributed in the clearance was incompletely burned or not ignited, and the relatively lagging combustion caused unburned HC to be discharged from the cylinder with the exhaust gas.

3.3. Influence of HPDI and PPCI Combustion on the Thermal Efficiency under Medium and Low Loads

Figure 10 presents the thermal efficiency of the two combustion modes. The thermal efficiency first increased, then decreased as the injection timing was delayed. The most suitable PSEP was used to maximize the indicated thermal efficiency. The highest indicated thermal efficiencies under the four groups of working conditions were 46.5%, 49%, 43.4%, and 48.1%. Compared with that in the low load, the thermal efficiency was higher under the medium load. In addition, the thermal efficiency of the HPDI combustion mode was higher than that of the PPCI combustion mode. Figure 11 shows the energy balance analysis of the two combustion modes. Due to the low combustion temperature and short duration of the high temperature, the heat transfer loss in the PPCI mode was significantly lower than that in HPDI mode. Although the incomplete combustion of NG in the PPCI mode resulted in a higher combustion loss, the overall energy loss in the PPCI mode was still lower.
In the HPDI mode, the high-temperature zone formed by the pilot diesel combustion became larger, and the thermal atmosphere improved as the PSEP increased, leading to multiple ignitions in the mixed-gas area. This was beneficial in increasing the combustion rate. In addition, a proper PSEP helped reduce the compression loss; hence, the thermal efficiency was improved. However, part of the combustion occurred in the power stroke, and the thermal efficiency decreased instead as the PSEP further increased.
In the PPCI mode, the mixed gas in the piston bowl and clearances decreased as the PSEP decreased, solving the incomplete combustion problem. At the same time, the burning rate increased, and the thermal efficiency significantly increased. However, with the further decrease of the PSEP, the thermal efficiency fluctuated up and down under the combined effect of the combustion rate increase and the CA50 delay.
For the two combustion modes, the PSEP affected the thermal atmosphere, mixture distribution, combustion rate, and CA50, and ultimately affected the thermal efficiency. The highest thermal efficiency had the corresponding best PSEP.
Figure 12 shows the effect of the load and the combustion mode on CA50 and combustion duration. In the HPDI mode, CA50 lagged significantly as the injection timing lagged. In the PPCI mode, diesel and NG burned separately if the PSEP was too long, and the CA50 lagged significantly. Compared with the low load, more fuel could be found in the cylinder at the medium load; hence, the combustion duration was longer, and the CA50 lag was more obvious.

3.4. Particle Emission Characteristics

The particulate emissions of intake-port-injected PINGD are generally significantly lower than those of diesel engines, benefiting from fuel characteristics and premixed combustion. However, direct-injection PINGD uses diffusion combustion in the HPDI combustion mode, which has an adverse effect on particulate emissions. Particulate emissions have become a factor worth studying, considering the low efficiency of DPF when running on PINGD. We used a multi-step soot model to conduct an in-depth analysis of the simulated data to explore the effect of different combustion modes on particulate emissions. Furthermore, we investigated the mass, quantity, and diameter of particulate emissions under the HPDI and PPCI modes.
Figure 13 depicts the particle mass in different combustion modes under the low load. The particle mass of diffusion combustion was higher than that of premixed combustion. The injection timing had little effect on the particle mass of the premixed combustion, but with the advancement of the injection timing, the particle mass of diffusion combustion first increased, then decreased. The mixing and the combustion of NG proceeded at the same time when the injection timing was early, resulting in a closer phase of the NG and diesel combustion. In this case, the temperature in the cylinder was relatively high, and the duration was long, which was beneficial to the particle oxidation. With the delay of the injection timing, the temperature decreased, and the duration shortened, resulting in particle increase. When the injection timing was further delayed, the thermodynamic atmosphere in the cylinder was not enough to support the full combustion of NG, and the mixture became lean. At this time, a large amount of HC emissions was produced, and the particles were reduced.
Figure 14 illustrates the combustion path diagram in the two modes. Part of the richer mixture in HPDI combustion promoted the production of more particulate emissions. However, the equivalent ratio of PPCI combustion was relatively small; hence, we observed fewer particulate emissions.
Table 8 shows the temperature, equivalence ratio, and particle concentration distribution under the two combustion modes. In the HPDI mode, the combustion process was diffusion combustion. The mixture formation and combustion occurred at the same time. The particle generation occurred in the combustion zone. In the PPCI mode, the combustion process was premixed combustion. The equivalent was relatively small when the mixture was burned, inhibiting the soot generation. In this combustion mode, the soot generation mainly occurred in the region with a richer mixture.
Figure 15 depicts the changes in the particle mass and number densities when the injection time was −7.5 °CA after top dead center (ATDC) in the HPDI combustion mode. The diesel and the NG began to burn sequentially at 711 °CA and 713 °CA. The particulate emissions were mainly contributed by the NG combustion. The NG began to burn after 713 °CA. At this time, the surface growth of the particles promoted the particle mass growth. Therefore, the particle mass density started to rise rapidly. The total surface area of the particles increased as the number of particles increased. The oxidation of oxygen and hydroxyl also gradually increased. At 718.5 °CA, the particle mass density began to decrease and eventually stabilized. The average diameter of the particles in the HPDI mode was less than 10 nm, denoting nuclear particles.
Figure 16 shows the changes in the particle mass and number densities at the injection time of −12.5 °CA ATDC in the PPCI combustion mode. In this case, NG and diesel were combusted at 714 °CA, and the particle mass density and number density began to rise. The particle mass density began to decrease after 718 °CA because of the shorter combustion duration in the PPCI mode. Affected by diesel combustion, the average particle diameter at the beginning of the combustion was relatively large, reaching approximately 100 nm; however, the average particle diameter then rapidly decreased and fell below 10 nm. Compared with HPDI combustion, the average diameter of the PPCI combustion particles was smaller.
A comparison of the two combustion modes showed that the number density of the soot particles under HPDI combustion was higher than that under PPCI combustion, reaching 7–8 times. Meanwhile, the mass density could reach 10 times. The diameter of the soot particles under HPDI combustion was also larger. Mixing and combustion proceeded together in HPDI combustion; hence, a richer mixture was obtained during combustion. An incomplete combustion can promote acetylene production, which consequently promotes soot precursor generation and surface growth. The final performance involved the particle number and diameter both at a high level.

4. Conclusions

The following conclusions were drawn from this study:
  • The heat release rate in both HPDI and PPCI combustion modes has a single peak when the PSEP is short. The analysis of the combustion process shows that in the HPDI mode, injection and combustion proceed together, whereas in the PPCI mode, the mixture at the end of the NG jet ignites. The heat release rates of both modes are bimodal when the PSEP is longer. Multiple ignitions occur in the HPDI combustion mode, while in the PPCI combustion mode, the NG injected earlier forms an over-lean mixture, resulting in an incomplete combustion.
  • The combustion duration of the medium load is longer than that of the low load. Moreover, the delay of CA50 is more obvious. The thermal efficiency of the medium load is higher than that of the low load, and that of the HPDI mode is higher than that of the PPCI mode. The highest indicated thermal efficiency is 49%.
  • When the diesel injection timing does not change, the NOx emissions show a downward trend with the delay of the NG injection timing. In the HPDI combustion mode, the HC emissions first decrease, then increase. In the PPCI combustion mode, the NOx emissions increase, and the HC emissions decrease.
  • The particles are mainly contributed by the NG diffusion combustion. The particle mass, number, and diameter of the HPDI mode are all larger than those of the PPCI mode. The particle mass density can reach 10 times. The particle number density can reach 7–8 times. The average particle diameter of HPDI and PPCI combustion is less than 10 nm. The average diameter of the PPCI combustion particles is smaller. The NG injection timing significantly affected the particle generation in the HPDI mode, but only slightly affected the PPCI mode.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, S.J. and B.W.; Methodology, B.W.; Software, S.J., J.L. and L.D.; Validation, S.J.; Formal analysis, S.J.; Investigation, S.J.; Resources, S.J. and B.W.; Data curation, S.J., J.L. and L.D.; Writing—original draft, S.J.; Writing—review and editing, S.J., J.L. and B.W.; Visualization, S.J. and L.D.; Supervision, B.W.; Project administration, S.J. and B.W.; Funding acquisition, B.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No.2017YFB0103500), by the Natural Science Foundation of Tianjin through its project funding NO.19JCYBJC21200, and by the National Engineering Laboratory for Mobile Source Emission Control Technology (No. NELMS2018A05).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Glossary

The following abbreviations were used in this manuscript:
ATDCAfter top dead center
CACrankshaft angle
CA50The crankshaft angle corresponding to the moment that combustion heat release accounts for 50% of the total heat release in a cycle
CFDComputational fluid dynamics
DFDual-fuel
DPFDiesel particulate filter
HCHydrocarbons
HPDIHigh-pressure direct injection
HRRHeat release rate
IMEPIndicated mean effective pressure
MSPMulti-Step Phenomenological
NGNatural Gas
PINGDPilot-ignited natural gas diesel engine
PPCIPartially premixed compression ignition
PSEPInjection pulse separation
TDCTop dead center
UHCUnburned hydrocarbons

References

  1. Hiltner, J.; Samimy, M. The impact of injection timing on in-cylinder fuel distribution in a natural gas powered engine. SAE Trans. 1997. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hassaneen, A.E.; Varde, K.S.; Bawady, A.H.; Morgan, A.-A. A Study of the Flame Development and Rapid Burn Durations in a Lean-Burn Fuel Injected Natural Gas SI Engine; SAE Technical Paper 0148-7191; SAE: Warrendale, PA, USA, 1998; Available online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/981384/ (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  3. Patychuk, B.D. Particulate Matter Emission Characterization from a Natural-Gas High-Pressure Direct-Injection Engine. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  4. Ouelette, P.; Goudie, D.; McTaggart-Cowan, G. Progress in the development of natural gas high pressure direct injection for Euro VI heavy-duty trucks. In Internationaler Motorenkongress 2016; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016; pp. 591–607. [Google Scholar]
  5. Mumford, D.; Goudie, D.; Saunders, J. Potential and Challenges of HPDI; SAE Technical Paper; SAE: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017; Available online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/2017-01-1928/ (accessed on 1 April 2021). [CrossRef]
  6. Fraioli, V.; Beatrice, C.; Di Blasio, G.; Belgiorno, G.; Migliaccio, M. Multidimensional Simulations of Combustion in Methane-Diesel Dual-Fuel Light-Duty Engines; SAE Technical Paper; SAE: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017; Available online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/2017-01-0568/ (accessed on 1 April 2021). [CrossRef]
  7. Di Blasio, G.; Belgiorno, G.; Beatrice, C. Parametric Analysis of Compression Ratio Variation Effects on Thermodynamic, Gaseous Pollutant and Particle Emissions of a Dual-Fuel CH4-Diesel Light Duty Engine; SAE Technical Paper; SAE: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017; Available online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/2017-01-0764/ (accessed on 1 April 2021). [CrossRef]
  8. Belgiorno, G.; Dimitrakopoulos, N.; Di Blasio, G.; Beatrice, C.; Tuner, M.; Tunestal, P. Parametric Analysis of the Effect of Pilot Quantity, Combustion Phasing and EGR on Efficiencies of a Gasoline PPC Light-Duty Engine; SAE Technical Paper; SAE: Warrendale, PA, USA, 2017; Available online: https://saemobilus.sae.org/content/2017-24-0084/ (accessed on 1 April 2021). [CrossRef]
  9. Dimitrakopoulos, N.; Belgiorno, G.; Tunér, M.; Tunestål, P.; Di Blasio, G. Effect of EGR routing on efficiency and emissions of a PPC engine. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2019, 152, 742–750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Papagiannakis, R.; Kotsiopoulos, P.; Zannis, T.; Yfantis, E.; Hountalas, D.; Rakopoulos, C. Theoretical study of the effects of engine parameters on performance and emissions of a pilot ignited natural gas diesel engine. Energy 2010, 35, 1129–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, J.; Yang, F.; Wang, H.; Ouyang, M.; Hao, S. Effects of pilot fuel quantity on the emissions characteristics of a CNG/diesel dual fuel engine with optimized pilot injection timing. Appl. Energy 2013, 110, 201–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Li, M.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, X.; Ma, Y.; Zheng, Q. Soot emission prediction in pilot ignited direct injection natural gas engine based on n-heptane/toluene/methane/PAH mechanism. Energy 2018, 163, 660–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Li, M.; Zheng, X.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Z.; Shen, B.; Liu, X. The effects of partially premixed combustion mode on the performance and emissions of a direct injection natural gas engine. Fuel 2019, 250, 218–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Di Blasio, G.; Belgiorno, G.; Beatrice, C. Effects on performances, emissions and particle size distributions of a dual fuel (methane-diesel) light-duty engine varying the compression ratio. Appl. Energy 2017, 204, 726–740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. McTaggart-Cowan, G.; Bushe, W.; Rogak, S.; Hill, P.; Munshi, S. PM and NO x Reduction by Injection Parameter Alterations in a Direct Injected, Pilot Ignited, Heavy Duty Natural Gas Engine With EGR at Various Operating Conditions. SAE Trans. 2005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. McTaggart-Cowan, G.P. Pollutant Formation in a Gaseous-Fuelled, Direct Injection Engine. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  17. Jones, H.L. Source and Characterization of Particulate Matter from a Pilot-Ignited Natural Gas Fuelled Engine. Ph.D. Thesis, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada, 2004. [Google Scholar]
  18. Sahoo, B.B.; Sahoo, N.; Saha, U.K. Effect of engine parameters and type of gaseous fuel on the performance of dual-fuel gas diesel engines—A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2009, 13, 1151–1184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wei, L.; Geng, P. A review on natural gas/diesel dual fuel combustion, emissions and performance. Fuel Process. Technol. 2016, 142, 264–278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Tao, F.; Foster, D.E.; Reitz, R.D. Characterization of soot particle distribution in conventional, non-premixed DI diesel flame using a multi-step phenomenological soot model. Proc. Combust. Inst. 2007, 31, 2991–2998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tao, F. Application of Complex Chemistry to Investigate Combustion Zone Structure of DI Diesel Sprays under Engine-Like Conditions. COMODIA 2001 2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Zhao, F. Research on the Mechanism of Low-Temperature Combustion of Diesel Engines to Achieve Ultra-Low Carbon Smoke Emissions. Tianjin University: Tianjin, China, 2013. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CDFD&dbname=CDFDLAST2015&filename=1015041101.nh&v=ccOr56xC0TbxohZqIZC3e%25mmd2Fm76IStRNnCiIHpI90oy3N5RmXY2xMiG6AW2pErFvVC (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  23. Sun, H. Transient Flow Field Simulation of Internal Combustion Engine Based on Unstructured Dynamic Grid. Harbin Engineering University: Harbin, China, 2014. Available online: https://kns.cnki.net/kcms/detail/detail.aspx?dbcode=CMFD&dbname=CMFD201801&filename=1017241388.nh&v=fIfyBEdBA5uZn5v%25mmd2B1GmaFbc7l254x4qkuZ4QVhiSGs8WqccPlp2f5%25mmd2BCxsqbbP6N8 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  24. Ricart, L.; Xin, J.; Bower, G.R.; Reitz, R.D. In-cylinder measurement and modeling of liquid fuel spray penetration in a heavy-duty diesel engine. SAE Trans. 1997, 1622–1640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Anthony Amsden, L. A Block-Structured KIVA Program for Engines with Vertical or Canted Valves; Los Alamos National Laboratory: Los Alamos, NM, USA, 1999. Available online: https://www.osti.gov/biblio/1230082 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
  26. Schmidt, D.P.; Rutland, C. A new droplet collision algorithm. J. Comput. Phys. 2000, 164, 62–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. O’Rourke, P.J.; Amsden, A. A spray/wall interaction submodel for the KIVA-3 wall film model. SAE Trans. 2000. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Senecal, P.; Pomraning, E.; Richards, K.; Briggs, T.; Choi, C.; McDavid, R.; Patterson, M. Multi-dimensional modeling of direct-injection diesel spray liquid length and flame lift-off length using CFD and parallel detailed chemistry. SAE Trans. 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ra, Y.; Reitz, R.D. A reduced chemical kinetic model for IC engine combustion simulations with primary reference fuels. Combust. Flame 2008, 155, 713–738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Han, Z.; Reitz, R.D. A temperature wall function formulation for variable-density turbulent flows with application to engine convective heat transfer modeling. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 1997, 40, 613–625. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Heywood, J.B. Internal Combustion Engine Fundamentals; McGraw-Hill Education: New York, NY, USA, 2018; Available online: https://www.accessengineeringlibrary.com/content/book/9781260116106 (accessed on 1 April 2021).
Figure 1. Combustion chamber model at the top dead center.
Figure 1. Combustion chamber model at the top dead center.
Energies 14 01957 g001
Figure 2. Soot model structure diagram.
Figure 2. Soot model structure diagram.
Energies 14 01957 g002
Figure 3. Comparison of the simulation results and the test data.
Figure 3. Comparison of the simulation results and the test data.
Energies 14 01957 g003
Figure 4. Heat release rate in the high-pressure direct injection (HPDI) mode.
Figure 4. Heat release rate in the high-pressure direct injection (HPDI) mode.
Energies 14 01957 g004
Figure 5. Cylinder pressure in the HPDI mode.
Figure 5. Cylinder pressure in the HPDI mode.
Energies 14 01957 g005
Figure 6. Emissions in the HPDI mode.
Figure 6. Emissions in the HPDI mode.
Energies 14 01957 g006
Figure 7. Heat release rate in the partially premixed compression ignition (PPCI) mode.
Figure 7. Heat release rate in the partially premixed compression ignition (PPCI) mode.
Energies 14 01957 g007
Figure 8. Cylinder pressure in the PPCI mode.
Figure 8. Cylinder pressure in the PPCI mode.
Energies 14 01957 g008
Figure 9. Emissions in the PPCI mode.
Figure 9. Emissions in the PPCI mode.
Energies 14 01957 g009
Figure 10. Thermal efficiency of the two combustion modes under medium and low loads.
Figure 10. Thermal efficiency of the two combustion modes under medium and low loads.
Energies 14 01957 g010
Figure 11. Energy balance analysis of the two modes.
Figure 11. Energy balance analysis of the two modes.
Energies 14 01957 g011
Figure 12. CA50 and combustion duration of the two combustion modes under medium and low loads.
Figure 12. CA50 and combustion duration of the two combustion modes under medium and low loads.
Energies 14 01957 g012
Figure 13. Particulate mass under different combustion modes.
Figure 13. Particulate mass under different combustion modes.
Energies 14 01957 g013
Figure 14. Combustion path in the two combustion modes.
Figure 14. Combustion path in the two combustion modes.
Energies 14 01957 g014
Figure 15. Particle mass density and number density under diffusion combustion.
Figure 15. Particle mass density and number density under diffusion combustion.
Energies 14 01957 g015
Figure 16. Particle mass density and number density under premixed combustion.
Figure 16. Particle mass density and number density under premixed combustion.
Energies 14 01957 g016
Table 1. Main technical parameters of the engine.
Table 1. Main technical parameters of the engine.
ParameterValue
Bore × stroke/mm137 × 169
Connecting rod length/mm261
Displacement/L14.9
Compression ratio17:1
Vortex ratio1.2
Speed/rpm1300
Combustion chamber shapeω
Cone angle of injection (°)72
Number of spray holes × diameter/mm9 × 0.17
Intake valve closing time/°CA ATDC−150
Exhaust valve opening time/°CA ATDC140
Table 2. Parameter settings of the simulation analysis.
Table 2. Parameter settings of the simulation analysis.
ParameterValue
Speed/rpm1300
Calculation area/°CA ATDC−150–140
Initial temperature of NG/K303
NG injection pressure/MPa30
NG compositionCH4 (91.018%) and C2H6 (8.982%)
Gas composition in the cylinderO2 (21%) and N2 (79%)
Vortex ratio1.2
Diesel injection mass (mg/cycle)5.63
Proportion of the diesel heating value under low load18%
Percentage of the diesel heating value under medium load10%
Table 3. CFD numerical simulation sub-model selection.
Table 3. CFD numerical simulation sub-model selection.
ClassificationModel
Turbulence model Standard   k ε model [23]
Spray modelBroken model KH RT model [24]
Evaporation model Frossling model [25]
Collision model NTC and wall   film models [26,27]
Combustion modelCombustion modelSAGE chemical reaction solver [28,29]
Wall heat transfer modelHan and Reitz model [30]
Emission modelNOx emission modelExtended Zel’dovich NOx model [31]
Soot emission modelMSP model [20,21,22]
Table 4. Related parameters of numerical simulation.
Table 4. Related parameters of numerical simulation.
Case123456
NG injection timing (°CA ATDC)−12.5−10−7.5−5−2.50
NG injection pressure (MPa)303030303030
NG injection mass (mg/cycle)23.3123.3123.3123.3123.3123.31
Diesel injection timing (°CA ATDC)−15−15−15−15−15−15
Diesel injection pressure (MPa)313131313131
Diesel injection mass (mg/cycle)5.635.635.635.635.635.63
Proportion of diesel heating value18%18%18%18%18%18%
Case789101112
NG injection timing (°CA ATDC)−15−12.5−10−7.5−5−2.5
NG injection pressure (MPa)303030303030
NG injection mass (mg/cycle)46.6246.6246.6246.6246.6246.62
Diesel injection timing (°CA ATDC)−15−15−15−15−15−15
Diesel injection pressure (MPa)313131313131
Diesel injection mass (mg/cycle)5.635.635.635.635.635.63
Proportion of diesel heating value10%10%10%10%10%10%
Table 5. Concentration and temperature fields in the HPDI mode.
Table 5. Concentration and temperature fields in the HPDI mode.
Concentration FieldTemperature Field
Case789789
−8 Energies 14 01957 i033 Energies 14 01957 i034 Energies 14 01957 i035 Energies 14 01957 i036 Energies 14 01957 i037 Energies 14 01957 i038
−5 Energies 14 01957 i039 Energies 14 01957 i040 Energies 14 01957 i041 Energies 14 01957 i042 Energies 14 01957 i043 Energies 14 01957 i044
−2 Energies 14 01957 i045 Energies 14 01957 i046 Energies 14 01957 i047 Energies 14 01957 i048 Energies 14 01957 i049 Energies 14 01957 i050
TDC Energies 14 01957 i051 Energies 14 01957 i052 Energies 14 01957 i053 Energies 14 01957 i054 Energies 14 01957 i055 Energies 14 01957 i056
Case101112101112
−1 Energies 14 01957 i057 Energies 14 01957 i058 Energies 14 01957 i059 Energies 14 01957 i060 Energies 14 01957 i061 Energies 14 01957 i062
1 Energies 14 01957 i063 Energies 14 01957 i064 Energies 14 01957 i065 Energies 14 01957 i066 Energies 14 01957 i067 Energies 14 01957 i068
2 Energies 14 01957 i069 Energies 14 01957 i070 Energies 14 01957 i071 Energies 14 01957 i072 Energies 14 01957 i073 Energies 14 01957 i074
2.5 Energies 14 01957 i075 Energies 14 01957 i076 Energies 14 01957 i077 Energies 14 01957 i078 Energies 14 01957 i079 Energies 14 01957 i080
Ruler Energies 14 01957 i081 Energies 14 01957 i082
Table 6. Related numerical simulation parameters.
Table 6. Related numerical simulation parameters.
Case1314151617
NG injection timing (°CA ATDC)−20−17.5−15−12.5−10
NG injection pressure (MPa)3030303030
NG injection mass (mg/cycle)23.3123.3123.3123.3123.31
Diesel injection timing (°CA ATDC)−10−10−10−10−10
Diesel injection pressure (MPa)3131313131
Diesel injection mass (mg/cycle)5.635.635.635.635.63
Proportion of the diesel heating value18%18%18%18%18%
Case1819202122
NG injection timing (°CA ATDC)−25−22.5−20−17.5−15
NG injection pressure (MPa)3030303030
NG injection mass(mg/cycle)46.6246.6246.6246.6246.62
Diesel injection timing (°CA ATDC)−10−10−10−10−10
Diesel injection pressure (MPa)3131313131
Diesel injection mass (mg/cycle)5.635.635.635.635.63
Proportion of the diesel heating value10%10%10%10%10%
Table 7. Concentration and temperature fields in the PPCI mode.
Table 7. Concentration and temperature fields in the PPCI mode.
Concentration FieldTemperature Field
Case−7−31−6.5−4.5−2.5
18 Energies 14 01957 i083 Energies 14 01957 i084 Energies 14 01957 i085 Energies 14 01957 i086 Energies 14 01957 i087 Energies 14 01957 i088
19 Energies 14 01957 i089 Energies 14 01957 i090 Energies 14 01957 i091 Energies 14 01957 i092 Energies 14 01957 i093 Energies 14 01957 i094
20 Energies 14 01957 i095 Energies 14 01957 i096 Energies 14 01957 i097 Energies 14 01957 i098 Energies 14 01957 i099 Energies 14 01957 i100
21 Energies 14 01957 i101 Energies 14 01957 i102 Energies 14 01957 i103 Energies 14 01957 i104 Energies 14 01957 i105 Energies 14 01957 i106
22 Energies 14 01957 i107 Energies 14 01957 i108 Energies 14 01957 i109 Energies 14 01957 i110 Energies 14 01957 i111 Energies 14 01957 i112
Ruler Energies 14 01957 i113 Energies 14 01957 i114
Table 8. Temperature, equivalence ratio, and particle concentration distribution under the two combustion modes.
Table 8. Temperature, equivalence ratio, and particle concentration distribution under the two combustion modes.
HPDI−8−5−3−1
Temperature Energies 14 01957 i115 Energies 14 01957 i116 Energies 14 01957 i117 Energies 14 01957 i118
Equivalence ratio Energies 14 01957 i119 Energies 14 01957 i120 Energies 14 01957 i121 Energies 14 01957 i122
Particulates Energies 14 01957 i123 Energies 14 01957 i124 Energies 14 01957 i125 Energies 14 01957 i126
PPCI−7−6−4−2
Temperature Energies 14 01957 i127 Energies 14 01957 i128 Energies 14 01957 i129 Energies 14 01957 i130
Equivalence ratio Energies 14 01957 i131 Energies 14 01957 i132 Energies 14 01957 i133 Energies 14 01957 i134
Particulates Energies 14 01957 i135 Energies 14 01957 i136 Energies 14 01957 i137 Energies 14 01957 i138
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jin, S.; Li, J.; Deng, L.; Wu, B. Effect of the HPDI and PPCI Combustion Modes of Direct-Injection Natural Gas Engine on Combustion and Emissions. Energies 2021, 14, 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071957

AMA Style

Jin S, Li J, Deng L, Wu B. Effect of the HPDI and PPCI Combustion Modes of Direct-Injection Natural Gas Engine on Combustion and Emissions. Energies. 2021; 14(7):1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071957

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jin, Shouying, Jinze Li, Longfei Deng, and Binyang Wu. 2021. "Effect of the HPDI and PPCI Combustion Modes of Direct-Injection Natural Gas Engine on Combustion and Emissions" Energies 14, no. 7: 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071957

APA Style

Jin, S., Li, J., Deng, L., & Wu, B. (2021). Effect of the HPDI and PPCI Combustion Modes of Direct-Injection Natural Gas Engine on Combustion and Emissions. Energies, 14(7), 1957. https://doi.org/10.3390/en14071957

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop