Next Article in Journal
Unsteady-State CO2 Foam Generation and Propagation: Laboratory and Field Insights
Next Article in Special Issue
Vibration-Based Energy Harvesters: New Ways to Scavenge Energy
Previous Article in Journal
Safe and Effective Smart Urban Transportation—Energy Flow in Electric (EV) and Hybrid Electric Vehicles (HEV)
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Piezoelectric Smart Textile for Energy Harvesting and Wearable Self-Powered Sensors
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Design of a More Efficient Rotating-EM Energy Floor with Lead-Screw and Clutch Mechanism

by
Thitima Jintanawan
1,
Gridsada Phanomchoeng
1,2,*,
Surapong Suwankawin
3,
Weeraphat Thamwiphat
1,
Varinthorn Khunkiat
1 and
Wasu Watanasiri
1
1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
2
Micro/Nano Electromechanical Integrated Device Research Unit, Faculty of Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
3
Department of Electrical Engineering, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok 10330, Thailand
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(18), 6539; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186539
Submission received: 8 August 2022 / Revised: 2 September 2022 / Accepted: 4 September 2022 / Published: 7 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Vibration-Based Energy Harvesters)

Abstract

:
There is an interest in harvesting energy from people’s footsteps in crowded areas to power smart electronic devices with low consumption. The average power consumption of these devices is approximately 10 μW. The energy from our footsteps is green and free, because walking is a routine activity in everyday life. The energy floor is one of the most efficient pieces of equipment in vibration-based energy harvesting. The paper aims to improve the previous design of the energy floor—called Genpath—which uses a rotational electromagnetic (EM) technique to generate electricity from human footsteps. The design consists of two main parts of (1) the EM generator, including the lead-screw mechanism for translation-to-rotation conversion, and (2) the Power Management and Storage (PMS) circuit. The improvement was focused on the part of the EM generator. A thorough investigation of the design components reveals that the EM generator shaft in the previous Genpath design cannot continuously rotate when the floor-tile reaches the bottom end, resulting in no energy gain. Therefore, a one-way clutch is implemented to the system to disengage the generator shaft from the lead-screw motion when the floor-tile reaches the allowable displacement. During the disengagement, the EM generator shaft still proceeds with a free rotation and could generate more power. In our analysis, the dynamic model of the electro-mechanical systems with the one-way clutch was successfully developed and used to predict the energy performances of the VEH floors and fine-tune the design parameters. The analytical result is shown that the spring stiffness mainly affects the force transmitted to the EM generator, and then the induced voltage and power of the generator, thus, the value of the stiffness is one of the critical design parameters to optimize. Finally, the new prototype consisting of 12-V-DC generator, mechanisms of lead-screw and clutch, as well as coil springs with the optimal stiffness of 1700 N/m was built and tested. The average energy produced by the new prototype is 3637 mJ (or average power of 3219 mW), per footstep which is 2935 mJ greater than that of the previous design. Moreover, to raise the social awareness about energy usage, the sets of Genpath have been used to organize an exhibition, “Genpath Empower our Journey”. The people who stroll forward on the paths can realize how much energy they gain from their footsteps.

1. Introduction

In recent decades, the Internet of things (IoT) has caused technological evolution not only in industries or factories, but also in household life. The IoT technology found in the present products such as smart phones, smart watch, IoT sensors, Global Positioning System (GPS) tracking, data acquisition system (DAQ) system, and wireless devices has been involved in most residential, educational, medical and industrial sectors [1,2]. Consequently, more electrical power sources are needed to operate such increasing industrial and household products. The power needs of mobile devices such as smart watches, RFID, or MEMS sensors varies from few microwatts to hundreds of milliwatts for mobile phone or GPS applications, but most devices are usually in a sleep mode for 99.9% of their operation time. They wake up for a few milliseconds only to communicate data. Despite this, the advanced technology makes each product requires only a low power supply because the average power consumption of these devices is approximately 10 μW [3]. There are more than 14.4 billion IoT devices requiring power in 2022 and there will be 27.0 billion devices more in 2025 [4,5]. The world’s demand of electrical power has been rapidly growing!
With the wireless fourth/fifth-generation (4G/5G) of cellular network technology, the current IoT products are convenient for mobile use and are capable of working 7 days and 24 h. The continuity requirement makes the battery technology one of the key features of the products [6]. However, battery lifespan and charging seem to be issues of the power source. Therefore, energy harvesting is attracting attention as “enabling technology” to expand the IoT utilization and enhance life and social resilience [7,8,9]. Energy harvesting utilizes the ambient energy present in the environment by converting them into electrical energy and using them as a remote power source for the autonomous electronic devices or circuits. The ambient energy may come from heat, electromagnetic, wind, solar power, and vibration [10,11,12,13,14,15]. Moreover, vibration-based energy from human movement is currently one of the most interesting sources for harvesting and being used as a remote power source [16,17].
For the vibration-based energy harvesting from people’s footsteps, walking is a normal activity that everyone does every day. The heel strike of a person’s walk can generate energy of 2–20 watts or power of 1–5 joules per step [18]. The energy from people walking is green and free. If a simple calculation is performed based on the prediction of more than 21 trillion walking steps per day [19,20], and all of energy from the walking steps could be ideally harvested, one can imagine how much energy is obtained. There are some commercial products which can harvest energy from human walking such as energy storage shoes and the energy floor [21,22,23,24]. Pavegen and Energy Floors have produced a commercial system that generates power from footsteps [22,23]. The electromagnetic generator system of Pavegen can generate energy of 2 to 4 joules, or around 5 watts of power of off-grid electrical energy per step, while Energy Floors focuses on converting humans dancing and playing games to electrical energy. However, there are few technical details of those products published thus far.
To harvest energy from human walking, a Vibration Energy Harvesting (VEH) system called Genpath, the smart floor capable of conversing kinetic energy from thousands, has been developed [24,25]. It can be installed in places where crowds of people walk to harvest energy. Genpath in [24,25] utilized the lead screw or rack-pinion mechanism to convert the translation of the floor-tile to the rotation of the electromagnetic (EM) generator to induce voltage when the force from a footstep is applied. Then, the electrical voltage and power generated by the EM generator are processed by the connected Power Management and Storage (PMS) circuit. The harvested power is then stored in the rechargeable batteries. The power from the battery can be supplied to the smart IoT-devices with low energy consumption. Ref. [24] reports that the Genpath prototype-II or Genpath V1 produces an average energy of up to 702 mJ (or average power of 520 mW) per footstep.
However, a thorough investigation of the design components as well as the dynamics of the Genpath system reveals that it can be improved for a more efficient design. The Genpath V1 design still has limitations described as follows. The major limitation of Genpath V1 is that the EM generator shaft cannot continuously rotate when the floor-tile moves to the bottom end. When the EM generator shaft is stopped, the EM generator cannot generate energy. Moreover, the spring stiffness of Genpath affects the force transmitted to the EM generator and also the induced voltage and power. To optimize the spring stiffness is also necessary.
Therefore, the objective of the paper is to present a more efficient design of vibration-based energy harvesting (VEH) floor. Based on the design of Genpath V1, the VEH floor embedded with the rotational electromagnetic (EM) generator, the key concept of the new design is to use the one-way clutch to disengage the rotation of the generator shaft from the lead screw and bevel gear during the restoring period, allowing the generator to continue its free rotation and thus gain more energy. In addition, with the clutch disengagement, the frictional resistance on the mechanical side of the movement converter can be reduced, allowing the implement of the softer spring in the design to increase the maximum speed and also the induced voltage peak of the generator. Consequently, the new design of the energy floor with the clutch and the softer springs is much more efficient than the previous design. To achieve this purpose, the dynamic models of the electro-mechanical systems with a one-way clutch were developed using MATLAB®/Simulink for predicting the energy performance of the VEH floors, and the dynamic models were used to fine-tune the design parameters. The entire system consists of two main parts: (1) the EM generator, including the translation-to-rotation conversion mechanism, and (2) the Power Management and Storage (PMS) circuit. For simplicity, a direct-current (DC) generator was used in the design to produce electricity. The lead-screw mechanisms were adopted to converse a linear motion from a human’s pedal to a rotation of the generator’s rotor. The PMS circuit with extra low energy consumption was designed to simultaneously convert and store electrical energy. The paper is organized into the following sections. In Section 2, the conceptual design of the system is described in detail. Then the model and analysis parameters are presented in Section 3. Next, the Genpath V2 prototype and its test results are presented in Section 4. Further, the power management system of the Genpath is presented in Section 5. The installation and demonstration of application are presented in Section 6. Finally, the conclusion is stated in Section 7.

2. Conceptual Design

Recently, energy harvesting from human motion has become a common interest. The energy floor which harvests energy from human footsteps is applicable to crowded areas. The design of the energy floor using an electromagnetic generator is quite simple and efficient [22,23,24,25]. In the design, there exists a mechanism to convert a linear motion to a rotational motion to drive the generator. From the design of Genpath V1 [24], the lead screw and bevel gear were used to convert the motion. The bevel gear was then connected to the generator shaft to transmit the power. When the floor tile reaches the allowable displacement at the bottom end, the springs installed at the corners help restore the system back to its equilibrium. This electro-mechanical harvester [24] can generate an averaged energy of 702 mJ per footstep. However, there was a major flaw in the mechanism yet to be improved. Based on the profile of force [26] applied from a footstep and the corresponding harvested power/energy typically obtained from the previous design [24], respectively. For 0.7 s of footstep force applying, there is an interval which the harvester has no energy gain ~0.2 s, i.e., during 0.4–0.6 s, as observed in the results of [24]. It occurs when the floor-tile motion is limited by the allowable displacement of 15 mm, causing both the lead screw and the generator shaft ceased. Therefore, no electrical power is generated during 0.4–0.6 s. All the parts stay at rest until the combined restoring spring force and applied force can overcome the friction in the system, and then they are restored back to the initial position. There was also a limitation of spring tuning in the restoring period of the previous design. Theoretically, to harvest more energy, the softer spring with smaller value of coefficient is desirable [24]. However, the spring coefficient in the previous design [24] needs to be at least 20,000 N/m to overcome the system friction and be capable to restore the floor tile back.
A one-way clutch mechanism is proposed to solve the existing problems. A one-way clutch is a coupling machine element where its inner ring is only coupled and rotated with the outer ring in one direction but rotated freely in the opposite direction. The clutch is used to disengage the rotation of the generator shaft from the lead screw and bevel gear during the restoring period, allowing the generator to continue its free rotation and thus gain more energy. The schematic diagram in Figure 1a illustrates the design of the energy floor with the one-way clutch mechanism. The clutch is assembled to the system through the customized housing as shown in Figure 1b. Additionally, the function of the one-way clutch mechanism is shown in Figure 1c.
In operation, the floor-tile first moves down due to the applied force from a footstep, causing the nut which is fixed to the tile center to move down and drive the lead screw to rotate about its axis. The lead screw’s rotation is then transmitted to the DC generator through the bevel gear. The rotation of the generator shaft causes the induced voltage and hence the power to be harvested. When the floor tile reaches its allowable displacement of 15 mm and tends to restore back to the equilibrium position with spring forces, the lead-screw rotation starts to rotate in the opposite direction. Meanwhile, the clutch is disengaged, and the generator continues to rotate, but now freely, with its inertia.

3. Modeling and Analysis

In this section, the equations governing the electro-mechanical system with clutch design are presented. The equations governing both stages of the clutch engagement and disengagement were developed. Then, the harvested power/energy can be predicted using Matlab®/Simulink [27]. The developed analytical model is used for the parametric study where the parameter set could be optimized.

3.1. Governing Equations

For the clutch engagement stage, the equations governing the electro-mechanical system with the lead screw and clutch design are not different from those governing the system without clutch. The interested reader can follow the detailed derivation from [24]. The equations are
[ i ˙ ˙ θ ˙ θ ¨ ] = [ ( R G   +   R L L ) 0 K t L 0 0 1 K t J e q Δ 0 d m J e q Δ ] [ i θ θ ˙ ] + [ 0 0 F ( t ) F s J e g ]
Or
[ i ˙ ˙ x ˙ x ¨ ] = [ ( R G   +   R L L ) 0 K t L 0 0 1 l K t 2 π J e q Δ 0 l d m 2 π J e q Δ ] [ i x x ˙ ] + [ 0 0 l ( F ( t ) F s ) 2 π J e g ]
where the state variables: i is the current, θ is the angular position of the lead screw and the bevel gear and x = l θ 2 π is the displacement of the floor tile. Note that l is the pitch of the lead screw. Additionally, F ( t ) is the footstep applied force and FS is the restoring spring force. In (1) and (2), J e q = m l 2 π + ( J 1 + J G ) Δ is the equivalent moment of inertia corresponding to the mass of the plate and nut m, and the mass moments of inertia of the lead screw and bevel gear J1 and JG, respectively. In addition, Δ is the adjusted coefficient according to the frictions in the power transmission, where Δ = l 2 π η 1 η 2 , with η1 and η2 are the efficiencies of the screw thread and the thrust bearing, respectively. The damping coefficient dm in (1) and (2) is simply represented the viscous damping due to the friction in the bevel gear and the clutch. For the electrical side, Kt is the back emf (torque) constant, L is the inductance of the generator, RG is the resistance of the generator and RL is the resistance of the load and F(t) is input force.
The instantaneous power from the generator when the load resistance is connected is then
P = i 2 R L .
The averaged energy and averaged power harvested in one footstep can be determined, respectively, from
E = 0 T P d t ,
P a v = E T .
If the inductance L is negligible, (1) can be decoupled and simplified as
J e q θ ¨ + ( c m + c e ) θ ˙ + F s = F ( t ) ,
and
i = ( K t R G + R L ) θ ˙ ,
where cm and ce are mechanical damping and electrical damping, respectively, given by
c m = d m Δ ,   c e = K t 2 Δ ( R G + R L ) ,
From [28], the optimized load resistance for the maximum power is then
R L = R G + K t 2 c m ,
For the stage of clutch disengagement, the generator is rotated free with the initial conditions obtained from the final time of the engagement period. The governing Equations (1) is then simplified for the disengagement period as
[ i ˙ ˙ θ ˙ θ ¨ ] = [ ( R G + R L L ) 0 K t L 0 0 1 K t J G 0 d m 0 J G ] [ i θ θ ˙ ] + [ 0 0 0 ] ,
Note that when the clutch is disengaged, the terms of inertia and friction according to the lead screw and the bevel gear are omitted from (10). Additionally, the term dm0 in (10) is represented only the damping according to the friction in the clutch; hence d m 0 d m .

3.2. Simulink Model of the Harvesting System with Clutch Design

Figure 2 shows the Matlab®/Simulink model of the electro-mechanical system with clutch design for energy harvesting, according to (1)–(6) and (10). First, the parameter set as shown in Table 1, mostly based on the previous design, Genpath V1 [24], was used for the simulation. Both the footstep force obtained from [26] and the half-sine force function, shown in Figure 3, were alternatively used as the applied force and input to the Simulink model. The half-sine force function is used to evaluate the simulation and experiment because during the experiment in the laboratory, the Genpath V2 is pushed by foot. Thus, the footstep force is similar to a half-sine wave. For verification, the induced voltage and current and the corresponding power and energy from the prediction and from the experiment were compared in Figure 4. The magnitudes and profiles of the analytical results agree well with those from the experiment. In Figure 4, the predicted voltage/current and power/energy according to the half-sine force input is however more accurate, because the footstep force applied in the test is probably different from the normal walk. In addition, close agreement of the analytical and experimental results of the harvested power/energy summarized in Table 2 gives us confidence on the further use of the analytical model for the parametric design in Section 3.3.
Furthermore, the predicted voltage and power/energy harvesting from both the previous design of Genpath V1 [24] and the current design of Genpath V2 with clutch were compared in Figure 5. The prediction of both designs is also compared in Table 3. First, the accumulated energy summarized in Table 3 clearly reveals the improvement of performance of the new design with clutch, which yields total energy of 2501 mJ, i.e., 39% higher than that of the previous Genpath V1. In Figure 5, for the Genpath V1 without clutch, there is the dead zone with no energy gain during 0.4–0.7 s, or when the floor tile reaches the bottom end and stops. Nevertheless, for the design of Genpath V2, when the floor tile reaches the bottom limit, the clutch functions as disengagement, causing the generator rotation continued. Therefore, as seen from the red curves in Figure 5b, there exists additional power to be generated at t > 0.4 s and also more accumulated energy. It is proved that the design concept of the model with clutch significantly helps increase the harvested energy. Another advantage of the design with clutch is to solve the limitation in spring tunning as stated earlier, and it will be discussed in the following section.

3.3. Design of Parameters

The analytical model developed in Section 3.2 was used for the selection of optimized parameters. The effect of various mechanical and electrical parameters on the harvested power/energy was investigated. The mechanical parameters are the stiffness coefficient of spring k, the mass of the plate and nut m, and the mass moments of inertia of the lead screw and bevel gear J1 and JG. The electrical parameters are the back emf (torque) constant Kt and the resistances of the generator and load RG and RL.

3.3.1. Stiffness Coefficient of Spring and Inertias

Figure 6 shows the averaged power when the stiffness coefficient of spring k and the inertia terms, including the mass of the plate and nut m, and the mass moments of inertia of the lead screw and bevel gear J1 and JG, are varied, respectively.
In Figure 6a, the averaged power generated from the energy floor is decreased when the stiffness coefficient is increased. With lower stiffness coefficient k, the velocity of the floor vibration transmitted to the generator shaft is rising, resulting in the increase in the shaft’s rotational speed which yields the higher power to be generated. Figure 6a also shows that the stiffness coefficient could be selected much lower than the nominal value of 18,000 N/m to increase the power. Although there is a limitation on using the softer spring in Genpath V1 because of the insufficient restoring force to restore the floor tile back [24], several functional tests with a wide range of softer springs proved no such problem found on the new Genpath V2. When the clutch in the new design is disengaged, the friction torque from the generator is cut-off. Therefore, the restoring force provided by the soft spring still overcomes all the friction from mechanical parts, and is capable of restoring the system back to equilibrium. Consequently, the value of the stiffness coefficient of the springs should be designed as low as possible. However, for durability, the minimum value of an equivalent stiffness coefficient of the coil springs should be ~1500 N/m based on the experiment evaluation of Genpath V2 with the spring stiffness coefficient of 18,000, 3800, 1700, and 760 N/m.
The inertia terms have less effect on the averaged power as seen in Figure 6b–d and Table 4. There is a tiny change in the averaged power when either the mass of the plate and nut m, or the mass moments of inertia of the lead screw and bevel gear J1 and JG is varied. Therefore, there is no need for adjusting the inertia parameters to improve the performance of the energy floor.

3.3.2. RG and Kt

Figure 7 shows the contour plot of the averaged power obtained from the generator when the back emf constant Kt and the internal resistance of the generator RG are varied. In Figure 7, the generator with greater value of Kt, but smaller value of RG yields the higher power. However, the value of the back emf constant Kt is naturally proportional to the internal resistance RG. With the similar plot as Figure 7, one could select the proper type and characteristics of the generator motor to improve the performance of the energy floor.

3.3.3. Optimized Resistive Load RL

Figure 8 shows the averaged power when the load resistance RL is varied. It is found that the optimized value of RL for the highest power is at 41 Ω which is slightly higher than the internal resistance RG of the generator. The slight difference of RL and RG might be because of the compensation of the equivalent mechanical resistance according to the frictional damping as derived in (9). The load resistance RL of the system can be designed approximately equal to the internal resistance RG of the generator.

4. Prototype and Test Results

Figure 9 shows the Genpath V2 built with the key components as listed in Table 5. The major changes of the design were (1) the clutch was installed to the system, and (2) the much softer coil springs with stiffness coefficient of 1700 N/m were selected to replace the springs in the previous model. To perform the performance test, Figure 10 shows the measurement of the voltage across the load resistor RL and the current i when a normal footstep is applied. Then, the corresponding electrical power and energy were determined from the test results. The experimental results are shown in Figure 11 by the red plots, comparing to the simulation results. It is noted that with the soft spring replacement, the peaks of the induced voltage and current in Figure 11a are much higher than those from the previous prototype, thus the Genpath V2 provides much higher power and energy. Furthermore, Figure 11 also shows the new design with clutch helps extend the interval of energy harvesting after ~0.4 s when the clutch is disengaged. The performance of the Genpath V2 is also summarized in Table 6. The prototype produces an average energy of 3637 mJ (or average power of 3219 mW), per footstep. The energy generated by the new Genpath’s prototype was 2935 mJ greater than that of the previous design [24]. With the clutch included in the design, the capability of extending the period of energy harvesting and of increasing the electrical peaks with the softer spring significantly improve the performance.

5. Power Management System

The power management and storage (PMS) circuit was designed to convert and store electrical energy at the same time. Figure 12 shows the power management and storage. PMS is conducted by a power electronics converter which is comprised of 2 parts: active bridge rectifier and buck-boost converter. Firstly, the AC voltage from generator is rectified by the active-bridge rectifier, the efficiency of this type of rectifier is higher than that of the typical diode-bridge rectifier. Secondly, the buck-boost converter helps to transfer the DC power and charge into a 6V-4.5Ah battery. Lastly, in order to gain the maximum power transfer, the buck-boost converter functions in accordance with the matching-impedance control scheme embedded in the MCU PIC16F1776. The detail of the PMS presents in [24].
In [24], the efficiency of PMS is investigated; the efficiency of active rectifier is 95.78%, the efficiency of buck-boost converter is 78% and the overall efficiency of the PMS is 74.72%. In addition, the power consumption of PMS, from the experimental measurement, is about 94 mW.

6. Installation and Exhibition

The purpose of the project is also to raise the social awareness about energy usage as well as the thought of energy harvesting from the environment. To achieve the purpose, there was the exhibition, “Genpath Empower our Journey”, arranged during the project. Nine sets of Genpath prototypes with allowable displacement of 10 mm were built and installed for the public exhibition under the slogan “Harness Energy in Every Footsteps”. The exhibition is set at the faculty of engineering, Chulalongkorn university, and displays during May to August 2022. Figure 13 illustrates the exhibition environment. Figure 13a shows the Genpath exhibition design drawing. The exhibition was set up in a crowded area and it was not blocking the traffic. The ramp, the Genpath exhibition walkway, was built with the slope of 6 degree and the height of 30 cm for installing the nine sets of Genpath. Thus, the pedestrian is able to comfortably walk on the ramp.
Figure 13d shows the Genpath Exhibition Walkway. The people who stroll forward on the paths can realize how much energy they gain from their footsteps from the display monitors. There are two monitors to display the Genpath Exhibition results. The upper monitor is used to display the exhibition information and give the audient the knowledge and the social awareness about energy usage. Then, the lower monitor is used to display energy results, the energy converting from walking and the total energy collected in a day, as shown in Figure 13b. Moreover, the harvested energy was utilized in the mobile phone charge with the charging terminal shown in Figure 13d. In summary, the benefit of the Genpath is also for a lot of applications, such as a wireless sensor and Internet of Thing applications (IoTs).

7. Conclusions

The design of the energy floor using the electromagnetic generator is proved to be efficient. The thorough investigation of the design components as well as the dynamic analysis of the system help improve its efficiency. The entire system consists of two main parts of (1) the EM generator, including the lead-screw mechanism for translation-to-rotation conversion, and (2) the Power Management and Storage (PMS) circuit. It was found that the EM generator shaft in the previous design [24] cannot continuously rotate when the floor-tile reaches the bottom end, resulting in no energy gain. A one-way clutch is implemented to the system to disengage the generator shaft from the lead-screw motion when the floor-tile reaches the allowable displacement. During the disengagement, the EM generator shaft still proceeds a free rotation and generates more power. Moreover, the spring stiffness mainly affects the force transmitted to the EM generator and the induced voltage of the generator, thus the stiffness value is needed to be optimized to increase the harvested power. In our analysis, the dynamic model of the electro-mechanical systems with the one-way clutch was successfully used to predict the energy performances of the VEH floors and fine-tune the design parameters. The new prototype consisting of 12-V-DC generator, mechanisms of lead-screw and clutch, and coil springs with optimal stiffness of 1700 N/m was built and tested. The average energy produced by the new prototype is 3637 mJ (or average power of 3219 mW) per footstep, which is 2935 mJ greater than that of the previous design [24]. Moreover, to raise the social awareness about energy usage, the sets of Genpath have been used to organize an exhibition, “Genpath Empower our Journey”. The people who stroll forward on the paths can realize how much energy they gain from their footsteps.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, T.J., G.P. and S.S.; methodology, T.J., G.P. and S.S.; software, W.T., V.K. and W.W.; validation, T.J., G.P. and S.S.; formal analysis, T.J.; investigation, T.J., W.T., V.K. and W.W.; resources, G.P.; data curation, W.T., V.K. and W.W.; writing—original draft preparation, T.J. and G.P.; writing—review and editing, T.J., G.P. and S.S.; visualization, T.J. and G.P.; supervision, S.S.; project administration, G.P.; funding acquisition, T.J. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by Ratchadaphiseksomphot Endowment Fund Chulalongkorn University, grant number CU_GI_63_07_21_01.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank W. Lowattanamart, V. Suttisung, and S. Sintragoonchai who initiated and supported the idea on the project and built up Genpath prototype-I. Special thanks to CU VISION X and Chulalongkorn University Technology Center for supporting the research innovation eco-system.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Pérez, L.; Rodríguez-Jiménez, S.; Rodríguez, N.; Usamentiaga, R.; García, D.F. Digital Twin and Virtual Reality Based Methodology for Multi-Robot Manufacturing Cell Commissioning. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 3633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Liu, M.; Fang, S.; Dong, H.; Xu, C. Review of digital twin about concepts, technologies, and industrial applications. J. Manuf. Syst. 2021, 58, 346–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vocca, H.; Cottone, F. Kinetic energy harvesting. In ICT-Energy-Concepts Towards Zero-Power Information and Communication Technology; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hasan, M. State of IoT 2022: Number of connected IoT devices growing 18% to 14.4 billion globally. IOT Anal. Mark. Insights Internet Things 2022. Available online: https://iot-analytics.com/number-connected-iot-devices/ (accessed on 31 July 2022).
  5. Shah, A.S.; Nasir, H.; Fayaz, M.; Lajis, A.; Shah, A. A review on energy consumption optimization techniques in IoT based smart building environments. Information 2019, 10, 108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chalasani, S.; Conrad, J.M. A survey of energy harvesting sources for embedded systems. In Proceedings of the IEEE SoutheastCon 2008, Huntsville, AL, USA, 3–6 April 2008; pp. 442–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Akinaga, H. Recent advances and future prospects in energy harvesting technologies. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2020, 59, 110201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Jayakumar, H.; Lee, K.; Lee, W.S.; Raha, A.; Kim, Y.; Raghunathan, V. Powering the internet of things. In Proceedings of the 2014 International Symposium on Low Power Electronics and Design, La Jolla, CA, USA, 11–13 August 2014; pp. 375–380. [Google Scholar]
  9. Elahi, H.; Munir, K.; Eugeni, M.; Atek, S.; Gaudenzi, P. Energy harvesting towards self-powered IoT devices. Energies 2020, 13, 5528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Dinulovic, D.; Brooks, M.; Haug, M.; Petrovic, T. Rotational electromagnetic energy harvesting system. Phys. Procedia 2015, 75, 1244–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Weimer, M.A.; Paing, T.S.; Zane, R.A. Remote area wind energy harvesting for low-power autonomous sensors. In Proceedings of the 2006 37th IEEE Power Electronics Specialists Conference, Jeju, Korea, 18–22 June 2006; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  12. Alippi, C.; Galperti, C. An adaptive system for optimal solar energy harvesting in wireless sensor network nodes. IEEE Trans. Circuits Syst. I Regul. Pap. 2008, 55, 1742–1750. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wei, X.; Zhao, Z.; Wang, L.; Jin, X.; Yuan, Z.; Wu, Z.; Lin Wang, Z. Energy conversion system based on Curie effect and triboelectric nanogenerator for low-grade heat energy harvesting. Nano Energy 2022, 91, 106652. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Jin, X.; Yuan, Z.; Shi, Y.; Sun, Y.; Li, R.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Wu, Z.; Lin Wang, Z. Triboelectric Nanogenerator Based on a Rotational Magnetic Ball for Harvesting Transmission Line Magnetic Energy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2108827. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wu, Z.; Guo, H.; Ding, W.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, L.; Lin Wang, Z. A Hybridized Triboelectric–Electromagnetic Water Wave Energy Harvester Based on a Magnetic Sphere. ACS Nano 2019, 13, 2349–2356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Brunner, S.; Gerst, M.; Pylatiuk, C. Design of a body energy harvesting system for the upper extremity. Curr. Dir. Biomed. Eng. 2017, 3, 331–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Choi, Y.M.; Lee, M.G.; Jeon, Y. Wearable biomechanical energy harvesting technologies. Energies 2017, 10, 1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Beeby, S.P.; Torah, R.N.; Tudor, M.J.; Glynne-Jones, P.; O’Donnell, T.; Saha, C.R.; Roy, S. A Micro Electromagnetic Generator for Vibration Energy Harvesting. J. Micromech. Microeng. 2007, 17, 1257–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bassett Jr, D.R.; Wyatt, H.R.; Thompson, H.; Peters, J.C.; Hill, J.O. Pedometer-measured physical activity and health behaviors in United States adults. Med. Sci. Sports Exerc. 2010, 42, 1819. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. World Population Prospects 2019. Available online: https://population.un.org/wpp/ (accessed on 31 July 2022).
  21. Riemer, R.; Shapiro, A. Biomechanical Energy Harvesting from Human Motion: Theory, State of the Art, Design Guidelines, and Future Directions. J. Neuroeng. Rehab. 2011, 8, 22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Energy Floors 2022. Available online: https://energy-floors.com (accessed on 31 July 2022).
  23. Pavegen 2022. Available online: https://pavegen.com/ (accessed on 31 July 2022).
  24. Jintanawan, T.; Phanomchoeng, G.; Suwankawin, S.; Kreepoke, P.; Chetchatree, P.; U-viengchai, C. Design of Kinetic-Energy Harvesting Floors. Energies 2020, 13, 5419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Lowattanamart, W.; Suttisung, V.; Sintragoonchai, S.; Phanomchoeng, G.; Jintanawan, T. Feasibility on development of kinetic-energy harvesting floors. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science; IOP Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2020; Volume 463, p. 012107. [Google Scholar]
  26. Liu, M.; Lin, R.; Zhou, S.; Yu, Y.; Ishida, A.; McGrath, M.; Kennedy, B.; Hajj, M.; Zuo, L. Design, Simulation and Experiment of a Novel High Efficiency Energy Harvesting Paver. Appl. Energy 2018, 212, 966–975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. The MathWorks Inc., Matlab. Available online: https://www.mathworks.com (accessed on 23 April 2022).
  28. Stephen, N.G. On Energy Harvesting from Ambient Vibration. J. Sound Vib. 2006, 1–2, 409–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The design of kinetic-energy harvesting floor with the one-way clutch mechanism: (a) schematic diagram of Genpath V2 design; (b) clutch housing; (c) function of the one-way clutch mechanism.
Figure 1. The design of kinetic-energy harvesting floor with the one-way clutch mechanism: (a) schematic diagram of Genpath V2 design; (b) clutch housing; (c) function of the one-way clutch mechanism.
Energies 15 06539 g001
Figure 2. Simulink model for the electromagnetic (EM) generator with lead-screw design and one-way clutch mechanism.
Figure 2. Simulink model for the electromagnetic (EM) generator with lead-screw design and one-way clutch mechanism.
Energies 15 06539 g002
Figure 3. Input footstep force.
Figure 3. Input footstep force.
Energies 15 06539 g003
Figure 4. Voltage, current, power, and energy of the Genpath V2 from experiment and simulation: (a) voltage and current of the Genpath V2. (b) power, and energy of the Genpath V2.
Figure 4. Voltage, current, power, and energy of the Genpath V2 from experiment and simulation: (a) voltage and current of the Genpath V2. (b) power, and energy of the Genpath V2.
Energies 15 06539 g004
Figure 5. Voltage, current, power, and energy of the Genpath V1 and V2 from simulation when K = 18,000 N/m: (a) voltage and current of the Genpath V1 and V2. (b) power, and energy of the Genpath V1 and V2.
Figure 5. Voltage, current, power, and energy of the Genpath V1 and V2 from simulation when K = 18,000 N/m: (a) voltage and current of the Genpath V1 and V2. (b) power, and energy of the Genpath V1 and V2.
Energies 15 06539 g005
Figure 6. Averaged power when the parameters are varied: (a) stiffness coefficient of spring is varied; (b) moment of inertia of bevel gear is varied; (c) moment of inertia of lead screw is varied; (d) mass of nut and plate is varied.
Figure 6. Averaged power when the parameters are varied: (a) stiffness coefficient of spring is varied; (b) moment of inertia of bevel gear is varied; (c) moment of inertia of lead screw is varied; (d) mass of nut and plate is varied.
Energies 15 06539 g006
Figure 7. Contour plot of the averaged power when generator constant and resistance of generator are varied.
Figure 7. Contour plot of the averaged power when generator constant and resistance of generator are varied.
Energies 15 06539 g007
Figure 8. Averaged power when the load resistance is varied.
Figure 8. Averaged power when the load resistance is varied.
Energies 15 06539 g008
Figure 9. Genpath V2 design. (a) Photograph of Genpath V2; (b) Photograph of Genpaht V2 Mechanism.
Figure 9. Genpath V2 design. (a) Photograph of Genpath V2; (b) Photograph of Genpaht V2 Mechanism.
Energies 15 06539 g009
Figure 10. The measurement of the voltage across the load resistor and the current.
Figure 10. The measurement of the voltage across the load resistor and the current.
Energies 15 06539 g010
Figure 11. Voltage, current, power, and energy of the Genpath V2 from experiment and simulation when K = 1700 N/m: (a) voltage and current of the Genpath V2. (b) power, and energy of the Genpath V2.
Figure 11. Voltage, current, power, and energy of the Genpath V2 from experiment and simulation when K = 1700 N/m: (a) voltage and current of the Genpath V2. (b) power, and energy of the Genpath V2.
Energies 15 06539 g011
Figure 12. Circuit of power management and storage system.
Figure 12. Circuit of power management and storage system.
Energies 15 06539 g012
Figure 13. Genpath exhibition, “Genpath empower our journey”: (a) Genpath exhibition design drawing (b) energy result display (c) PMS for the exhibition walkway (d) Genpath exhibition walkway.
Figure 13. Genpath exhibition, “Genpath empower our journey”: (a) Genpath exhibition design drawing (b) energy result display (c) PMS for the exhibition walkway (d) Genpath exhibition walkway.
Energies 15 06539 g013
Table 1. Genpath V2 parameters.
Table 1. Genpath V2 parameters.
ParametersValue
Pitch of Lead Screw (l)8 mm
Mass of Nut and Plate (m)2.16 kg
Moment of Inertia of lead screw (Jl)2.5536 × 10−6 kg·m2
Moment of inertia of bevel gear (JG)8.6750 × 10−7 kg·m2
Lead angle30 degrees
Spring Coefficient (k)18,000 N/m
Damping Coefficient (d)11,000 N·s/m
Resistance of Generator (RG)37 Ohm
Inductance (L)3.6 × 10−3 H
Generator constant (Kt)0.2903 Vs/rad
Resistance of Load (RL)30 Ohm
Friction coefficient (µ) 0.21
Efficient of thrust bearing ηthrust0.8101
Efficient of thread ηthread0.6444
Table 2. Performances of the Genpath V2 when K = 18,000 N/m.
Table 2. Performances of the Genpath V2 when K = 18,000 N/m.
ExperimentSimulation with Half-Sine Wave ForceSimulation with
Normal Walking Force
VariablesValues per FootstepValues per FootstepValues per Footstep
Maximum voltage15.60 V14.80 V17.61 V
Average voltage6.11 V5.58 V4.24 V
Maximum current408.0 mA493.1 mA587.1 mA
Average current154.4 mA186.0 mA141.2 mA
Maximum power6.33 W7.30 W10.34 W
Average power1572 mW1853 mW1377 mW
Wave duration1.02 s1.35 s1.35 s
Average energy1603 mJ2501 mJ1859 mJ
Table 3. Performances of the Genpath V1 and V2 when K = 18,000 N/m.
Table 3. Performances of the Genpath V1 and V2 when K = 18,000 N/m.
Genpath V1 Simulation with Half-Sine Wave ForceGenpath V2 Simulation with Half-Sine Wave Force
VariablesValues per FootstepValues per Footstep
Maximum voltage14.78 V14.78 V
Average voltage1.93 V5.377 V
Maximum current493.2 mA493.1 mA
Average current64.3 mA179.2 mA
Maximum power7.30 W7.30 W
Average power1289 mW1786 mW
Wave duration1.40 s1.40 s
Average energy1804 mJ2501 mJ
Table 4. Comparison of power when the parameters are varied.
Table 4. Comparison of power when the parameters are varied.
Decrease 20%Decrease 10%Normal ValueIncrease 10%Increase 20%
Spring Coefficient (k) N/m14,40016,20018,00019,80021,600
Power (W)1.7511.691.62971.5681.5113
% Power Increase/Decrease+7.44%+3.70%0.00%−3.79%−7.27%
Moment of inertia of bevel gear (JG) kg·m26.9400 × 1077.8075 × 1078.6750 × 1079.5425 × 10710.4100 × 107
Power (W)1.61071.62021.62971.63921.6487
% Power Increase/Decrease−1.16%−0.58%0.00%+0.58%+1.17%
Moment of Inertia of lead screw (Jl) kg·m22.0428 × 10−62.2982 × 10−62.5536 × 10−62.8089 × 10−63.0640 × 10−6
Power (W)1.57371.60181.62971.65771.6858
% Power Increase/Decrease−3.44%−1.71%0.00%+1.72%+3.44%
Mass of Nut and Plate (m) kg1.7281.9442.162.3762.592
Power (W)1.59401.61191.62971.64761.6654
% Power Increase/Decrease−2.19%−1.09%0.00%+1.10%+2.19%
Table 5. Parameter of Genpath V2.
Table 5. Parameter of Genpath V2.
Genpath V2
ItemDimensionsNumber
Wood plate400 × 400 × 5 mm2
Linear guideDiameter 12 mm
Length 90 mm
4
Linear bearingInner diameter 12 mm4
Shaft couplingInner diameter 12 mm4
Coil spring *Length 60 mm
Diameter 2.2 mm
4
Shaft to generatorDiameter 8 mm
Length 60 mm
1
Nut and lead screwDiameter 8 mm
Pitch 2 mm
1
Flexible coupling8 mm1
Bevel gearInner diameter 8 mm2
Ball bearingInner diameter 8 mm3
ClutchCSK8 PP1
Housing22 × 32 × 29 mm1
GeneratorZGA37RG 12V 300 rpm1
* Coil springs are made of difference materials and Genpath V2 with the spring stiffness coefficient of 18,000, 3800, 1700, and 760 N/m have been experimented.
Table 6. Performances of the Genpath V1 [24] and the Genpath V2 when K = 1700 N/m.
Table 6. Performances of the Genpath V1 [24] and the Genpath V2 when K = 1700 N/m.
VariablesGenpath V1Genpath V2Genpath V2Genpath V2
ExperimentExperimentSimulation with
Half-Sine Wave Force
Simulation with
Normal Walking Force
Values per FootstepValues per FootstepValues per FootstepValues per Footstep
Maximum voltage9.5 V21.60 V20.95 V22.12 V
Average voltage2.88 V8.59 V6.53 V5.376 V
Maximum current285 mA590 mA698.2 mA737.2 mA
Average current88 mA231.1 mA217.8 mA179.2 mA
Maximum power2.71 W12.74 W14.62 W16.31 W
Average power520 mW3219 mW2782 mW2335 mW
Wave duration1.35 s1.13 s1.40 s1.40 s
Average energy702 mJ3637 mJ3895 mJ3269 mJ
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Jintanawan, T.; Phanomchoeng, G.; Suwankawin, S.; Thamwiphat, W.; Khunkiat, V.; Watanasiri, W. Design of a More Efficient Rotating-EM Energy Floor with Lead-Screw and Clutch Mechanism. Energies 2022, 15, 6539. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186539

AMA Style

Jintanawan T, Phanomchoeng G, Suwankawin S, Thamwiphat W, Khunkiat V, Watanasiri W. Design of a More Efficient Rotating-EM Energy Floor with Lead-Screw and Clutch Mechanism. Energies. 2022; 15(18):6539. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186539

Chicago/Turabian Style

Jintanawan, Thitima, Gridsada Phanomchoeng, Surapong Suwankawin, Weeraphat Thamwiphat, Varinthorn Khunkiat, and Wasu Watanasiri. 2022. "Design of a More Efficient Rotating-EM Energy Floor with Lead-Screw and Clutch Mechanism" Energies 15, no. 18: 6539. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15186539

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop