Next Article in Journal
Investigation of Biomass Integrated Air Gasification Regenerative Gas Turbine Power Plants
Previous Article in Journal
Carbon Black/Polyvinylidene Fluoride Nanocomposite Membranes for Direct Solar Distillation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Energy from the Waves: Integration of a HESS to a Wave Energy Converter in a DC Bus Electrical Architecture to Enhance Grid Power Quality
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems

1
Department of Mechanical Engineering, Sebelas Maret University, Surakarta 57126, Indonesia
2
Mechanical Engineering Department, Universitas Kebangsaan Republik Indonesia, Bandung 40263, Indonesia
3
Mechanical Engineering Department, Sultan Ageng Tirtayasa University, Serang 42124, Indonesia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2022, 15(3), 742; https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030742
Submission received: 23 November 2021 / Revised: 20 December 2021 / Accepted: 10 January 2022 / Published: 20 January 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Green Energy)

Abstract

Geothermal energy is one of the primary sources of clean electricity generation as the world transitions away from fossil fuels. In comparison to enhanced geothermal methods based on artificial fracturing, closed-loop geothermal systems (CLGSs) avoid seismicity-induced risk, are independent of reservoir permeability, and do not require the direct interaction between the fluid and the geothermal reservoir. In recent years, the development of CLGS technologies that offer high energy efficiencies has been explored. Research on coaxial closed-loop geothermal systems (CCLGS) and U-shaped closed-loop geothermal system (UCLGS) systems were reviewed in this paper. These studies were categorized based on their design, modeling methods, and heat transfer performance. It was found that UCLGSs had superior heat transfer performances compared to CCLGS. In addition, UCLGSs that utilized CO2 as a working fluid were found to be promising technologies that could help in addressing the future challenges associated with zero-emission compliance and green energy demand. Further research to improve the heat transfer performance of CLGS, especially with regards to improvements in wellbore layout, equipment sizing, and its integration with CO2 capture technologies is critical to ensuring the feasibility of this technology in the future.
Keywords: systematic review; heat transfer performance; closed loop; CLGS; enhanced geothermal system systematic review; heat transfer performance; closed loop; CLGS; enhanced geothermal system

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Budiono, A.; Suyitno, S.; Rosyadi, I.; Faishal, A.; Ilyas, A.X. A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems. Energies 2022, 15, 742. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030742

AMA Style

Budiono A, Suyitno S, Rosyadi I, Faishal A, Ilyas AX. A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems. Energies. 2022; 15(3):742. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030742

Chicago/Turabian Style

Budiono, Andres, Suyitno Suyitno, Imron Rosyadi, Afif Faishal, and Albert Xaverio Ilyas. 2022. "A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems" Energies 15, no. 3: 742. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030742

APA Style

Budiono, A., Suyitno, S., Rosyadi, I., Faishal, A., & Ilyas, A. X. (2022). A Systematic Review of the Design and Heat Transfer Performance of Enhanced Closed-Loop Geothermal Systems. Energies, 15(3), 742. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15030742

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop