1. Introduction
Mekong Delta, Vietnam is facing significant increases in the demand for electricity because the demand for electricity for economic development is increasingly more rapidly than the economic growth rate. Considering the problems of identifying appropriate electricity sources for the development of the country and the pressure to manage the environment, the Mekong Delta has recently placed environment-friendly power plants in continuous operation, typically solar power [
1].
Located in the monsoon tropics, with the potential for massive solar energy, the Mekong Delta is entering a changing era of solar energy growth and utilization. Solar power plants and projects in the Mekong Delta are mostly concentrated in hot, dry, and high areas along the southwestern border, between Vietnam and Cambodia. This area has a stable climate and weather, and the number of hours of sunshine is much higher than in the wider region [
1].
With the advantage of a region with mild weather and climate, a stable rainy season, and an average number of sunny hours a year of over 2600, the average daily solar radiation intensity in the north is nearly 6 kWh/m
2. Along with large-scale factory construction projects, various applications of technology to utilize solar energy to generate electricity have been encouraged and widely disseminated by the authorities for use in daily life and production throughout the provinces in the Mekong Delta region [
2,
3]. Map of the annual average daily global horizontal irradiation is shown in
Figure 1.
The selection of locations for solar power plants that are sustainable and satisfy the strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-challenges (SWOC) analysis concepts is vital for the development of the country’s energy supply and to reduce environmental harm. Therefore, decision makers must consider both quantitative and qualitative factors.
In this study, two key processes were used to measure the performance level of each potential location. The weight of each criterion was initially computed by the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach. The relationships between the characteristics were explored in this manner to offer more realistic weights. The weighted aggregates sum product assessment (WASPAS) approach was deployed to determine the performance of each potential location in terms of the strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-challenges (SWOC) model.
An overview of the research contents and research goals is presented in the introduction section, and the basis for the formation of the research method is presented in the literature review section. The FAHP and WASPAS methods and case studies are introduced in
Section 3 and
Section 4 of this article, respectively. The results and findings of this study are described in detail in the conclusion.
2. Literature Review
Researchers consider MCDM to be one of the most popular treaties in the literature. The term “MCDM” refers to the process of selecting the best option from a set of options. Many models have been used to show the decision-making procedure, some of which have used MCDM methods, which have been used separately or in combination with other MCDM methods and other strategies. Various studies have used MCDM models to solve complicated decision-making problems that involve multiple criteria. These models have been applied in various fields and sectors. In the field of supply chain management, MCDM models are regularly applied to solve problems, such as facility location selection [
4,
5,
6,
7,
8], supplier performance evaluation [
9,
10,
11,
12], distribution channel development [
13,
14,
15], etc. Among these, supplier evaluation and selection processes, which involve multiple qualitative and quantitative criteria, are frequently supported by MCDM models.
Juan M.Sánchez-Lozano et al. [
16] combined geographical information systems (GISs) and multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods to assess the optimal photovoltaic solar power plant locations in southeast Spain. Devika Kannan et al. [
17] introduced a hybrid model utilizing Monte Carlo simulation with MCDM procedures to choose solar power plant locations in east Iran.
Yeliz Simsek et al. [
18] proposed a study that provides decision makers with a method for evaluating the sustainability of clean growth energy projects. Mehdi Jahangiri et al. [
19] applied the fuzzy MCDM technique to determine the optimal location in Qatar for solar and wind energy plants to produce hydrogen and electricity power. Aleksandra Bączkiewicz et al. [
20] present an approachable study based on two recently discovered multi-criteria decision-making (MCDM) methods: the characteristic objects method (COMET) combined with technique for order performance by similarity to ideal solution (TOPSIS) and stable preference ordering towards ideal solution (SPOTIS), which works as the baseline of a decision support system (DSS).
Chao-Rong Chen et al. [
21] used a hybrid MCDM model, including decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory (DEMATEL) and DEMATEL-based analytic network process (DANP) based on geographical information systems (GISs), to improve the performance of solar farms. Pilar Díaz-Cuevas et al. [
22] developed an integrated methodology using multi-criteria decision-making methods and geographical information systems to construct a renewable energy spatial planning model. Chia-Nan Wang et al. [
23] used data envelopment analysis (DEA) and grey-based multiple criteria decision-making (G-MCDM) for site selection for solar energy. Murugaperumal Krishnamoorthy et al. [
24] used two concepts to determine answers to questions related to micro-grid systems. As a result, the economic factor includes the total net present cost, and the cost of energy was found to be the lowest.
From this literature review, MCDM is the optimal technique for applications in complex situations that include multiple criteria and conflicting goals. This tool has received attention attention in the renewable energy industry because of its flexibility for decision-makers in multiple problems, such as project and location selection. Thus, in this study, we propose a fuzzy MCDM model for solar plant location selection.
3. Methodology
3.1. Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process
The fuzzy AHP model implementation is divided into four steps, which are as follows [
25,
26,
27,
28,
29,
30]:
Using fuzzy numbers, a pairwise comparison matrix is produced. The matrix is as follows:
where:
is the fuzzy element pairwise comparison matrix.
is the triangular fuzzy mean value when comparing the pair of priority between the items.
To convert fuzzy numbers to real numbers, the triangular fuzzy trigonometric technique is used as follows [
31]:
With: 0
When the diagonal matrix is matched, we obtain:
With: 0.
We obtain a comparison matrix with the elements as real numbers after performing the conversion method to obtain the fuzzy comparison matrix. This matrix is made up of n lines and n columns (n is the number of indicators). The matrix’s components represent the relative relevance of the indicator I vs. the column criteria:
The scale fuzzy conversion scale established by Kuswandati [
32] is used to evaluate the priority in the FAHP model.
The Lambda Max technique, developed by Saaty [
33], is used to compute the maximum particular value of the indicator:
where:
as the matrix’s maximum value.
A as the matrix of pairwise comparisons.
I is the same level unit matrix as matrix A.
Saaty utilized the consistency ratio (CR) after computing the maximum individual value of the consistency index (CI). This ratio balances the degree of consistency with the data’s (random) objectivity:
where CI represents the CI and RI represents the random index.
If CR ≤ 0.1, the fuzzy AHP model is adequate; otherwise, the pairwise comparison matrix must be re-evaluated:
where:
is the matrix’s maximum value
n is the proportion to the number of indicators.
Saaty examined the production of random matrices for each n-level comparison matrix and determined the RI according to the number of indications.
3.2. The Weighted Aggregates Sum Product Assessment (WASPAS)
When faced with a decision-making challenge, MCDM approaches, such as the weighted product model (WPM) and the weighted sum model (WSM), are commonly used to determine the optimal choice. WASPAS, a mixture of the aforementioned methods, is one of the most recent methods that can improve the accuracy in selecting the best alternative [
34]. According to the study, the WASPAS approach is more accurate than the WPM and WSM methods.
In recent years, the WASPAS approach has been used in a variety of applications. Bagocius et al. [
35] examined the WASPAS approach in conjunction with entropy methods in order to establish an ideal site for a deep-water port in Europe. Turkis et al. [
36] used a combination technique of fuzzy WASPAS and fuzzy AHP to identify a site for a retail center location owing to the intricacy of the problem. As a result of the preceding investigations, the WASPAS approach and its accuracy are employed for this study of risk qualitative analysis (RQA), as indicated below [
36]:
- 1.
is used to create a decision matrix, where xij is the performance of the ith option with regard to the jth criterion, q denotes the number of alternatives, and r denotes the number of criteria.
- 2.
The following two equations are used to normalize the decision matrix:
- 3.
The following equation is used to determine the significance of the ith alternative:
where
Wj represents the weight (relative significance) of the jth criteria.
- 4.
The overall significance of the ith choice is then determined using the following equation:
- 5.
The two WSM and WPM approaches are then blended using the joint additive based on the following equation:
- 6.
The following equation defines a more generalized equation for estimating the importance using the WASPAS method:
- 7.
The following equation is used to obtain the optimum values:
The variances
and
are calculated by the following equations:
- 8.
The normalized variance estimates for the first criterion values are derived as follows:
4. Case Study
With a lot of potential for renewable energy development, the Mekong Delta region is witnessing strong development of renewable power sources, especially wind and solar energy [
37].
In this study, an F-MCDM model was utilized, including strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-challenges (SWOC) analysis, the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (F-AHP) model, and the weighted aggregates sum product assessment (WASPAS) model, for plant location selection to provide solar energy in the south of Vietnam. In the initial stage of this study, all criteria were defined using SWOC analysis, experts, and a literature review. The fuzzy AHP structure of this study is shown in
Figure 2.
The Mekong Delta has a monsoon climate with two seasons: hot and rainy seasons. Every year, the region receives an average of 2200–2500 sunshine hours, with an average daily solar radiation energy of 4.3–4.9 kWh/m
2. This clearly indicates the potential for light energy conversion. It is estimated that for every 1m
2 of solar panels, 5 kWh can be converted each day. This light source is very consistent, with more than 90% of the days of each year receiving an adequate amount of sunlight for the solar panels to maintain operations [
38]. According to experts, there are eight locations (SP) with many favorable conditions for the development of solar energy. Information about these locations is presented in
Figure 3 and
Table 1.
In the multi-criteria decision-making model, the weight of the criteria significantly affects the model’s results. In this study, the FAHP model was applied to determine the weights of the criteria, all input data were evaluated by experts, and the result of the FAHP model was checked using the consistency ratio (CR) and consistency index (CI). The results are shown in
Table 2.
In the final stage, the weighted aggregates sum product assessment (WASPAS) approach was employed to calculate the performance of each potential location in terms of the strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-challenges (SWOC) model. A result of WASPAS model is shown in
Table 3,
Table 4,
Table 5 and
Table 6.
In this study, an MCDM-based approach was developed for the selection of locations for solar power plants in an uncertain decision-making environment. The selection criteria were ensured to satisfy the SWOC framework, where strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, and challenges criteria were considered. The proposed method employed FAHP to calculate the criteria weights and the WASPAS method to determine the performance score and ranking of potential locations in Mekong Delta Vietnam. As shown in
Figure 4, SP01 (Long Xuyen, An Giang) is the optimal location in this study.
5. Conclusions
The Mekong Delta is a very favorable place for the development of an energy industry cluster, especially solar energy, with an average radiation of 1387–1534 Kwh/KWp/year. The solar energy sector plays an important role in the development of the country’s energy power and mitigation of environmental harms. In addition to the advantage of being one of the countries that experiences the most sunshine hours each year on the world solar radiation map, the government’s preferential policies have created creating an impetus for solar power in Vietnam.
The MCDM model has been applied in many fields of engineering and science, but few works have used it for solar plant location selection under fuzzy environment conditions. In this study, two key processes were used to measure the performance level of each potential location. The weight of each criterion was computed in the first stage using the fuzzy analytic hierarchy process (FAHP) approach. The relationships between the characteristics were explored in this manner to offer more realistic weights. The weighted aggregates sum product assessment (WASPAS) approach was employed to calculate the performance of each potential location in terms of the strengths-weaknesses-opportunities-challenges (SWOC) model. The findings suggest that Long Xuyen, An Giang (SP01) is the most suitable location with a ranking score of 0.8937. The significant findings are explained as follows:
✓ The first hybrid framework for location evaluation and selection in Vietnam that uses SWOC analysis.
✓ The first study with the assistance of a case study that utilizes SWOC analysis, FAHP, and WASPAS together.
✓ The results of this study serve as a suitable calculation method for evaluating and selecting optimal locations for solar power plants, for both solar energy projects in Mekong Delta and globally.
For future research, the proposed model can be combined with other decision-making support model, such as TOPSIS and DEA, to determine the optimal locations for renewable energy projects.
Author Contributions
Conceptualization, N.V.T. and N.T.K.L.; Data curation, N.V.T. and N.T.K.L.; Formal analysis, N.V.T. and N.T.K.L.; Funding acquisition, N.V.T.; Investigation, N.T.K.L.; Methodology, N.V.T. and N.T.K.L.; Project administration, N.V.T.; Resources, N.V.T. and N.T.K.L.; Supervision, N.V.T.; Validation, N.V.T.; Writing—original draft, N.V.T.; Writing—review and editing, N.T.K.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.
Funding
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Van Lang University, Vietnam for financial support for this research.
Acknowledgments
The authors wish to express their gratitude to Van Lang University, Vietnam for support for this research.
Conflicts of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
References
- Điện Mặt Trời ở Đồng Bằng Sông Cửu Long Trên đà Phát Triển. Available online: https://kinhdoanhvaphattrien.vn/dien-mat-troi-o-dong-bang-song-cuu-long-tren-da-phat-trien.html (accessed on 10 August 2021).
- Điện Mặt Trời Phát Triển Mạnh ở Đồng Bằng Sông Cửu Long. Available online: http://ceid.gov.vn/dien-mat-troi-phat-trien-manh-o-dong-bang-song-cuu-long/ (accessed on 10 August 2021).
- Solar Resource Maps and GIS Data for 200+ Countries. Available online: https://solargis.com/maps-and-gis-data/overview (accessed on 10 August 2021).
- Kieu, P.; Nguyen, V.; Nguyen, V.; Ho, T. A Spherical Fuzzy Analytic Hierarchy Process (SF-AHP) and Combined Compromise Solution (CoCoSo) Algorithm in Distribution Center Location Selection: A Case Study in Agricultural Supply Chain. Axioms 2021, 10, 53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Tadić, S.; Krstić, M.; Roso, V.; Brnjac, N. Dry port terminal location selection by applying the hybrid grey MCDM model. Sustainability 2020, 12, 6983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Budak, A.; Kaya, İ.; Karaşan, A.; Erdoğan, M. Real-time location systems selection by using a fuzzy MCDM approach: An application in humanitarian relief logistics. Appl. Soft Comput. 2020, 92, 106322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Nguyen, V.; Thai, H.; Duong, D. Multi-criteria decision making (MCDM) approaches for solar power plant location selection in Viet Nam. Energies 2018, 11, 1504. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Ulutaş, A.; Balo, F.; Sua, L.; Demir, E.; Topal, A.; Jakovljević, V. A new integrated grey MCDM model: Case of warehouse location selection. Facta Univ. Ser. Mech. Eng. 2021, 19, 515. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Dweiri, F.; Kumar, S.; Khan, S.; Jain, V. Designing an integrated AHP based decision support system for supplier selection in automotive industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 2016, 62, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.; Nguyen, V.; Kao, J.; Chen, C.; Nguyen, V. Multi-criteria decision-making methods in fuzzy decision problems: A case study in the frozen shrimp industry. Symmetry 2021, 13, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Rezaeisaray, M.; Ebrahimnejad, S.; Khalili-Damghani, K. A novel hybrid MCDM approach for outsourcing supplier selection. J. Model. Manag. 2016, 11, 536–559. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Yazdani, M.; Chatterjee, P.; Zavadskas, E.; Zolfani, S.H. Integrated QFD-MCDM framework for green supplier selection. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 142, 3728–3740. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Liu, H.; Quan, M.; Li, Z.; Wang, Z. A new integrated MCDM model for sustainable supplier selection under interval-valued intuitionistic uncertain linguistic environment. Inf. Sci. 2019, 486, 254–270. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Prabhuram, T.; Rajmohan, M.; Tan, Y.; Johnson, R.R. Performance evaluation of Omni channel distribution network configurations using multi criteria decision making techniques. Ann. Oper. Res. 2020, 288, 435–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Titiyal, R.; Bhattacharya, S.; Thakkar, J. The distribution strategy selection for an e-tailer using a hybrid DANP VIKOR MCDM model. Benchmark. Int. J. 2019, 26, 395–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Sánchez-Lozano, J.M.; Teruel-Solano, J.; Soto-Elvira, P.L.; García-Cascales, M.S. Geographical Information Systems (GIS) and Multi-Criteria Decision Making (MCDM) methods for the evaluation of solar farms locations: Case study in south-eastern Spain. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 24, 544–556. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kannan, D.; Moazzeni, S.; mostafayi Darmian, S.; Afrasiabi, A. A hybrid approach based on MCDM methods and Monte Carlo simulation for sustainable evaluation of potential solar sites in east of Iran. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 279, 122368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Simsek, Y.; Watts, D.; Escobar, R. Sustainability evaluation of concentrated solar power (CSP) projects under clean development mechanism (CDM) by using multi criteria decision method (MCDM). Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 421–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Jahangiri, M.; Shamsabadi, A.A.; Mostafaeipour, A.; Rezaei, M.; Yousefi, Y.; Pomares, L.M. Using fuzzy MCDM technique to find the best location in Qatar for exploiting wind and solar energy to generate hydrogen and electricity. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 13862–13875. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bączkiewicz, A.; Kizielewicz, B.; Shekhovtsov, A.; Yelmikheiev, M.; Kozlov, V.; Sałabun, W. Comparative Analysis of Solar Panels with Determination of Local Significance Levels of Criteria Using the MCDM Methods Resistant to the Rank Reversal Phenomenon. Energies 2021, 14, 5727. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chen, C.R.; Huang, C.C.; Tsuei, H.J. A hybrid MCDM model for improving GIS-based solar farms site selection. Int. J. Photoenergy 2014, 2014, 925370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Díaz-Cuevas, P.; Domínguez-Bravo, J.; Prieto-Campos, A. Integrating MCDM and GIS for renewable energy spatial models: Assessing the individual and combined potential for wind, solar and biomass energy in Southern Spain. Clean Technol. Environ. Policy 2019, 21, 1855–1869. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Wang, C.N.; Dang, T.T.; Wang, J.W. A combined Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) and Grey Based Multiple Criteria Decision Making (G-MCDM) for solar PV power plants site selection: A case study in Vietnam. Energy Rep. 2022, 8, 1124–1142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Krishnamoorthy, M.; Periyanayagam AD, V.R.; Santhan Kumar, C.; Praveen Kumar, B.; Srinivasan, S.; Kathiravan, P. Optimal sizing, selection, and techno-economic analysis of battery storage for PV/BG-based hybrid rural electrification system. IETE J. Res. 2020, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, A.H.I. A fuzzy supplier selection model with the consideration of benefits opportunities, costs and risks. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 2879–2893. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.I.; Kang, H.Y.; Hsu, C.F.; Hung, H.C. A green supplier selection model for high-tech industry. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 7917–7927. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.I.; Kang, H.Y.; Hsu, C.F.; Hung, H.C. Fuzzy multiple goal programming applied to TFT-LCD supplier selection by downstream manufacturers. Expert Syst. Appl. 2009, 36, 6318–6325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Lee, H.I.; Kang, H.Y.; Wang, W.P. Analysis of priority mix planning for semiconductor fabrication under uncertainly. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 2005, 28, 351–361. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Cheng, C.H. Evaluating weapon systems using ranking fuzzy numbers. Fuzzy Sets Syst. 1999, 107, 25–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- dehghani, M.; Esmaeilian, M.; Tavakkoli-Moghaddam, R. Employing Fuzzy ANP for Green Supplier Selection and Order Allocations: A Case Study. Int. J. Econ. Manag. Sci. 2013, 2, 565–575. [Google Scholar]
- Lin, R.; Lin, J.J.; Shu, C.J.; Diodes, T.; Chao, H.; Peter, J.C. Note on group consistency in analytic hierarchy process. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 2008, 190, 627–678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Kuswandari, R. Assessment of Different Methods for Measuring the Sustainability of Forest Management. Master’s Thesis, International Institute for Geo-Information Science and Earth Observation Science, Enschede, The Netherlands, 2004. [Google Scholar]
- Saaty, T.L. The Analytic Hierarchy Process—Planning, Priority Setting, Resource Allocation; McGraw-Hill: New York, NY, USA, 1980. [Google Scholar]
- Zavadskas, E.; Turskis, Z.; Antucheviciene, J. Optimization of weighted aggregated sum product assessment. Electron. Electr. Eng. 2012, 122, 3–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Bagočius, V.; Zavadskas, K.; Turskis, Z. Multi-criteria selection of a deep-water port in Klaipeda. Procedia Eng. 2013, 57, 144–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
- Turskis, Z.; Zavadskas, E.; Antucheviciene, J.; Kosareva, N. A hybrid model based on fuzzy AHP and fuzzy WASPAS for construction site selection. Int. J. Comput. Commun. Control 2015, 10, 113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
- Chuyển Dịch Năng Lượng Bền Vững tại Đồng Bằng Sông Cửu Long—Bài 1: Xu Thế Tất Yếu và Bền Vững. Available online: https://moit.gov.vn/tin-tuc/70-nam-nganh-cong-thuong/chuyen-dich-nang-luong-ben-vung-tai-dong-bang-song-cuu-long-3.html (accessed on 10 August 2021).
- Đồng Bằng Sông Cửu Long: Phát Triển Năng Lượng Tái Tạo—Cơ Hội Ứng Phó Biến Đổi Khí Hậu. Available online: http://tnmttuyenquang.gov.vn/tin-tuc/khoa-hoc-cong-nghe!/Dong-bang-song-Cuu-Long-Phat-trien-nang-luong-tai-tao-co-hoi-ung-pho-BDKH-12577.html (accessed on 10 August 2021).
| Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. |
© 2022 by the authors. Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).