Next Article in Journal
Review of High-Power-Density and Fault-Tolerant Design of Propulsion Motors for Electric Aircraft
Next Article in Special Issue
An Experimental and Detailed Kinetics Modeling Study of Norbornadiene in Hydrogen and Methane Mixtures: Ignition Delay Time and Spectroscopic CO Measurements
Previous Article in Journal
Modeling and Simulating Wind Energy Generation Systems by Means of Co-Simulation Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Experimental Characterization of a Novel Foam Burner Design for the Low-Excess-Enthalpy Combustion of Very Lean Syngas Mixtures

by
Kyriakos Fotiadis
1,*,
Akrivi Asimakopoulou
1,
Penelope Baltzopoulou
1,
Georgia Kastrinaki
1,
Dimitrios Koutsonikolas
1,
George Karagiannakis
1,
George Skevis
1,*,
Jana Richter
2 and
Fabian Mauss
2
1
Advanced Renewable Technologies & Environmental Materials in Integrated Systems, ARTEMIS, Chemical Process and Energy Resources Institute CPERI, Centre for Research and Technology Hellas CERTH, Thermi, 57001 Thessaloniki, Greece
2
Thermodynamics and Thermal Process Engineering, BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg, 03046 Cottbus, Germany
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(19), 7014; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16197014
Submission received: 31 August 2023 / Revised: 29 September 2023 / Accepted: 5 October 2023 / Published: 9 October 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Fuels and Combustion)

Abstract

:
In the present work, a novel foam burner design is proposed and experimentally evaluated for operation with highly diluted syngas mixtures. The lab-scale burner consists of a purpose-built, square-shaped, high-temperature-grade stainless steel tubular reactor filled with square-sectioned siliconized silico carbide (SiSiC) foams. The assembly was installed in an electrical furnace. Spatially resolved temperature measurements were obtained along the reactor axis, while simultaneous measurements of CO, CO2, H2, O2, and N2 were taken at the burner exit and the water levels were recorded upstream and downstream of the reactor. The results clearly show that flames can be stabilized along the reactor for a range of foam characteristics and operating conditions. Hydrogen conversion efficiencies in excess of 98%, and overall thermal efficiencies close to 95% were achieved for the selected operating conditions. Overall, the denser 10 ppi foam demonstrated superior combustion characteristics in terms of stability, lower enthalpy rises, and a wider operating range at the expense of a very modest pressure drop penalty. Finally, scanning electron microscopy, coupled with energy dispersion spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) and Raman spectroscopy analyses, was used to determine the morphological and compositional characteristics of the pristine and aged foams. After more than 100 h of operation, no significant performance degradation was observed, even though the burner design was subjected to considerable thermal stress.

1. Introduction

The efficient and environmentally friendly combustion of low-calorific value fuel mixtures is crucial for several applications such as waste heat recovery from gas turbine or high-temperature fuel cell off-gases [1,2]. The high inert content and very low calorific value of such mixtures reduces the flame temperatures and burning velocities, resulting in combustion stability issues. Gas streams with a poor combustible content require unique combustion technologies in order to face these challenges [3,4,5]. Porous burner technology involving gas preheating and intense heat and radical recirculation has been shown, in general, to be able to extend stable combustion well below the mixture lean flammability limits.
Combustion in porous inert media offers significant advantages compared to gas-phase combustion in terms of both the efficiency and emissions. The general mechanism of combustion inside the porous media is that the premixed air–fuel reacts in the cavities of the material and, due to the characteristics of the porous media, the heat is recirculating (excess enthalpy) inside the porous structure [4]. Porous burners are characterized by intense combustion due to the aforementioned heat recirculation phenomenon and enhanced hydrodynamic dispersion in the inert porous medium. The heat released via combustion is transferred to the solid phase, thereby increasing its temperature. The high thermal emissivity and thermal conductivity of the solid material compared with those of gases result in an enhanced heat transfer from the burned gases via combined conduction and radiation. This allows much higher preheating rates for the reactants compared to the common gas-phase combustion process. The phenomenon is called heat recirculation (enhanced enthalpy combustion) and leads locally to super-adiabatic temperatures. Further, depending on the porous material topology, there is enhanced cross-mixing of the gas stream due to the tortuous flow paths, which, in turn, enhances the transport of heat and intermediate species and increases the flame thickness (hydrodynamic dispersion). The combination of heat recirculation and hydrodynamic dispersion enables the efficient combustion of mixtures of low-energy content beyond the conventional gas-phase lean flammability limits. Further, a more homogeneous reaction zone is established with generally lower temperatures than the corresponding gas-phase flame. As a result, the flame stability is increased, and emissions are reduced [6,7]. Further, the low enthalpy rises and the homogeneous temperature field inside the burner results in very low NOx emissions. With very lean operation CO (and unburned hydrocarbons), emissions can also be eliminated [8,9,10,11].
Multilayer coatings are being investigated on SiC foams as a way to increase the resistance of the material to thermal shock. By coating the surface with cordierite, the combustion efficiency is increased, resulting in significantly reduced CO and NOx emissions [12]. Additionally, SiC 3D printing is an emerging technology that can be exploited, as the printing of complex geometries of SiC structures for demanding applications is currently commercially feasible [13].
In the present work, a novel foam burner design is proposed and experimentally evaluated for operation with very lean and highly diluted syngas mixtures. An extensive experimental campaign was carried out in order to evaluate the combustion stability and conversion efficiency of the burner as a function of the design and operating parameters.

2. Materials

The foams utilized in this study were made from siliconized silicon carbide (SiSiC), as this material is characterized by a higher thermal conductivity and has been successfully used in relevant studies [14]. Additionally, SiSiC has a low thermal expansion, high strength, and chemical resistance, aspects that makes the material suitable for hard-conditioned applications. The foams were square-shaped segments of 100 mm length each and a 20 × 20 mm cross section. Two different pore densities were tested (10 and 20 pores per inch—ppi). The foams were provided by EngiCer SA. The morphological properties of the two foams are provided in Table 1.
Due to the foam manufacturing process, the porosity cannot be specified as an independent parameter but can be determined indirectly. The porosities have been determined using Archimedes’ density measurement technique [14,15], with water as the penetrating medium.
The gaseous mixture employed in the tests was a lean fuel synthetic gas aiming to simulate real gas turbine exhaust composition. It was introduced into the reactor as two separate streams; namely the oxidizer (N2, O2) and the fuel (H2, CO, CO2, H2O) streams. High-purity gases and a controlled evaporator and mixer (CEM) from Bronkhorst were used to generate the relevant mixtures. Various fuel–air stoichiometries and dilution ratios were tested, as described in detail in Section 5 Results and Discussion.

3. Reactor Design

The total length of the stainless-steel reactor casing was 540 mm with a square cross-section of 26 × 26 mm. Two identical foams of 100 mm length each were placed at the center of the square pipe, resulting in an effective foam reactor length of 200 mm. The reactor casing was made of grade SS316 stainless steel, allowing for a high temperature and corrosion resistance. The spaces between the foams and the reactor walls were covered with insulating alumina–silica felt. Specifically, the foams were wrapped around via the insulating felt sheet, so that they were tightly canned inside the reactor (Figure 1).
Temperature profiles along the foam length for different fuel and oxidizer stream introduction points are shown in Figure 2. Thermocouples were placed along the reactor’s length in such a way as to obtain accurate and highly spatially resolved temperature measurements on the foam surface. A total of 18 sockets were drilled on the reactor wall, 16 located upon the foam area and 2 located at the front and rear end of the foam blocks, and the distance between the sockets was 12.5 mm each. The number of thermocouple measuring points on the foam surface was determined via allowing for a minimum acceptable distance between the sockets in order that the heat-affected zones (HAZs) of the welds did not affect one another and, thus, that material degradation was avoided. The minimum acceptable distance between two sockets was 15 mm, a restriction imposed also by machining requirements. For this reason, the reactor was drilled in a chevron pattern, as shown in Figure 3. The thermocouples positioning along the burner surface is schematically shown in Figure 3. The selected thermocouples were of K-type, with a measurement capability of up to 1250 °C.
The introduction of the fuel and oxidizer streams is crucial, as it affects both the flame stability and combustion performance. For this reason, some exploratory experimental tests were conducted in order to identify the optimum stream introduction pattern. Specifically, four different scenarios were examined for introducing reactants into the reactor, as graphically depicted in Figure 4. The tests were conducted with the 20 ppi foam for the indicative Experiment 3 (Table 2). In the first case, the fuel and oxidizer streams were introduced in the entrance of the pre-chamber at a distance of 18 cm upstream of the foam. In the second scenario, ¼″ stainless steel tubes were used as flow guides so that the introduction and mixing of the two streams took place downstream in the pre-chamber and at a distance of 5 cm from the foams. In the third scenario, the fuel guide was positioned in contact with the foam surface, while the oxidizer guide remained in a position 5 cm upstream, as in the previous case. In the final scenario, both the fuel and oxidizer stream guides were located so as to touch the front surface of the foam. In Figure 2, the temperature rise along the length of the foam for each case is represented. It is obvious that, for the last case, the temperature rise along the body of the foam is significantly higher, which indicates that the ignition of the syngas is taking place in the foams and not in the front inlet part, so that pre-ignition due to the established temperature is avoided.
Based on the test results, the fourth scenario (i.e., both the fuel and oxidizer guides touching the foam surface) was selected as the optimum for stream introduction and employed for the remainder of the experimental test campaign.
Empirical and semi-detailed calculations have been performed in order to define the appropriate range of inlet mixture flowrates that can sustain stable combustion within the specific reactor and ceramic foam. In general, a flame is stabilized at the location/conditions where the fresh gas velocity equals the burning velocity. Accordingly, an estimation of the burning velocities for the given mixtures was performed. In the present work, a simplified engineering approach is utilized in order to calculate the burning velocity of the examined mixtures according to a semi-empirical correlation based on the work of Bedoya et al., 2017 [6]. The correlation is based on the similarity between the Peclet numbers of free flames and flames stabilized in an inert porous media (i.e., the ceramic foam). The methodology used to obtain the foam flame speed and, consequently, derive the required flow rates for stable operation is the following. Adiabatic laminar flame speeds for freely-propagating mixtures with the same composition as those used in the current campaign are calculated using the CHEMKIN suite of the ANSYS software [16] and the detailed kinetic mechanism proposed by Malliotakis et al. [17]. The correlation in [6] is then used in order to obtain the corresponding burning velocities inside the foam burner. Volumetric flowrates are then derived, assuming that the flow velocity equals the burning velocity.
Computations show that for very lean mixtures (λ > 5), the burning velocity in the foam burner is slightly less than that of the freely propagating flame. For moderately lean mixtures the foam structure induces flame speeds of a factor of 3 compared to the freely propagating flames. Based on the above analysis, total inlet flow rates at 300 K in the range of 4–25 lt/min were specified for the experimental campaign.
The flow in the porous medium is laminar. Based on Darcy’s velocity, an effective Reynolds number can be calculated through the expression on the basis of foam permeability, K = 2.33 × 10−9 m2, and porosity, ε = 0.88. The values of the viscosity (μ) and density (ρ) for the nitrogen at 700 °C, as nitrogen was utilized for the preliminary tests, are as such: μ = 4.1 × 10−5 Pa×s, and ρ = 0.33 kg/m3. The resulting Re = 0.06, which is well into the Darcy flow regime [18].
R e = u ρ K 17.5 μ ε 3 / 2
The characteristic residence time based on the foam permeability and porosity is τres = 1 s.

4. Overall Experimental Setup

Both streams were precisely prepared with the aid of dedicated mass flow controllers (MFCs). With the use of a controlled evaporation mixer (CEM), the exact calculated mass of steam was introduced, and both the fuel and oxidizer flows were mixed up inside the reactor (Figure 5). For both streams, insulated heated lines (200 °C) were used in order to avoid the condensation of the steam in the lines and also to introduce the streams at high temperatures. The reactor containing the foams was placed inside a high-temperature split tube furnace (Modular Tube Furnace, Universal Mounting, up to 1200 °C-FeCrAl Heater Split Tube, Length: 340 mm, Diameter: 78 mm, THERMANSYS) (Figure 6a) and heated up to 700 °C. Insulation jackets were applied on the flanges in order to minimize the heating losses and to preserve the temperature uniformity on the foam blocks (Figure 6b). A uniform heating zone of adequate size to accommodate the foam burner was established, and the reactor was aligned with the furnace centerline. The length of the uniform heating zone of the furnace is approximately 120 mm, as provided by the manufacturer and confirmed by preliminary measurements.
The temperature was measured on site via a set of thermocouples on the surface of the foams. The pressure drop along the porous reactor was measured using a differential pressure transducer. Relative humidity measurements were also conducted via dedicated sensors placed upstream and downstream of the reactor. The composition of the reactants (fuel and oxidizer) and the products was measured upstream and downstream of the reactor using a fast-response multicomponent gas analyzer (Online Flue Gas Analyzer Gasboard-3000 UV).
The operation of the whole unit was monitored, and the collection of all experimental primary data was achieved using a dedicated in-house-built control unit (Data Acquisition (DAQ) System).

5. Results and Discussion

An extensive measurement campaign has been carried out in order to delineate the effects of the foam morphology, reactant flow rate, and reactant mixture composition on the combustion performance for both ppi cases.
The first group of experiments involves the variation of the reactant mixture composition, as shown in Table 2. In Experiments 1 and 2, there is a gradual decrease in N2 content, with a corresponding increase in H2O and CO2 levels. However, the total diluent percentage remains constant, at approximately 83%. Further, both the fuel levels in Experiment 2 are almost doubled compared to Experiment 1. However, the H2:CO:CO2 molar ratio remains unchanged in both experiments. In Experiments 3–6, there is a gradual increase in H2 levels, with both the CO and O2 (as well as the dilution) remaining essentially unchanged. This results in the hydrogen levels in the case of Experiment 6 being almost 65% higher than those in Experiment 3.
Turning to the second groups of experiments, the flow velocity of the reactants was increased from the reference value of 0.17 m/s (Experiment 7) by a factor of 2 and 3 in Experiments 8 and 9, respectively (Table 3).
A third parameter that affects the combustion performance is, naturally, the foam porosity, as demonstrated in Figure 7 and Figure 8. The effects of the foam porosity on the combustion performance were investigated for the conditions of Experiment 2. Figure 8 presents the temporal variation in temperature across the burner. In the case of 20 ppi combustion, there are significant instabilities in the upstream section of the burner, including possible extinction-re-ignition events. On the other hand, in the case of 10 ppi combustion, the profiles are exceptionally smooth. It should also be noted that the peak temperature in the case of the 20 ppi foam is significantly higher than in the case of the latter.
The increased combustion stability of the 10 ppi case is also clearly illustrated in Figure 7. Here, a flat region (where the temperature varies by less than 10 °C) covers more than 10 cm of the foam length and is established early upstream. On the contrary, no such flat region can be established in the case of 20 ppi. As can be discerned in Figure 8a, the first two temperature measuring points present disturbances and noise during the whole duration of the experiment. The fact that the first measuring point is higher than the upcoming ones indicates that back-flow or preignition occurs despite the fact that the gas introduction guides are on the foam blocks.
It is also important to highlight that this stable performance is not accompanied by a significant pressure drop. The 10 ppi foam displays a lower pressure drop than the 20 ppi case (Figure 9), with an insignificant deviation between the values for the two cases. Employing foam with more ppi consequently creates a higher pressure drop, though it still remains at low levels, less than 10 mbar.
As expected, the effects of variation in the flow velocity are more pronounced. As seen in Figure 10, a threefold increase in the flow velocity increased the pressure losses by a factor of more than 7.
The experimental data presented above are used in order to quantify the performance of the foam burner in terms of two indicators, namely, the thermal efficiency and the fuel conversion efficiency.
The combustion efficiency, ηc, and hydrogen conversion efficiency, H2,conv, are calculated for all experiments based on Equations (2) and (3), and the results are provided in Table 4 for the 20 ppi foam and Table 5 for the 10 ppi foam.
η c   = 1 m H 2 , o u t   L H V H 2 + m C O , o u t L H V C O m H 2 , i n   L H V H 2 + m C O , i n L H V C O
H 2 , c o n v % = 1 χ H 2 , o u t χ H 2 , i n
where LHV is the lower heating value. A simple inspection of the efficiency tables indicates that exceptionally high hydrogen conversion efficiencies can be obtained through the use of the denser (i.e., 10 ppi) foam. In particular, conversion efficiencies of the order of 97–98% are observed in cases of a relatively low velocity and correspondingly high residence time (Experiment 7), low dilution and correspondingly high heat release (Experiment 2), and high H2/CO ratios (Experiment 6). In the case of low dilution, however, there is a higher temperature increase, which leads to higher heat losses and thus a reduced overall thermal efficiency. The relatively low temperature rises in the case of Experiment 6, coupled with the homogeneous combustion demonstrated by the flat temperature profiles, leads to a high thermal efficiency of almost 95%—the highest obtained in the present study.
It is important to mention that the ΔΤ presented in the tables above is, in fact, the temperature rise when the fuel and oxidizer stream is introduced in the reactor. Combustion in the case of 20 ppi is characterized by higher temperature differences compared to the 10 ppi case. Although, in some experiments, the fuel conversion and thermal efficiency are higher, the combustion process is very much dependent on the total flow rate, as the less dense porous structure does not provide adequate stabilization. For example, the thermal and conversion efficiencies in Experiment 9 are 52% and 62%, respectively, for 20 ppi, while the corresponding figures for 10 ppi are 83% and 91%, respectively.

6. Foam Characterization

Scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy (SEM/EDS) (JEOL IT500, 20 kV) and Raman spectroscopy (micro-Raman in via instrument coupled with a solid state 785 cm−1 laser, ×50 Leica lens) analyses were used to identify the morphological and compositional characteristics of the fresh and aged (more than 100 operation hours) foams. After more than 100 h of operation, the color of the foams changed from black (pristine foams) to blueish-colored in general in several parts of the used structures, due to corrosion from the inhomogeneous temperature rise along the foam length, meaning that, at different points of the foam, the temperature is significantly higher [19]. Blue tempering marks (Figure 11) were indicated at the center of the foam block, in the exact location where the peak temperature was recorded. Morphologically, the fresh and aged foams are similar, showing no stress effect on the ceramic structure, similarly to other relevant aging studies on SiSiC foams [20].
SEM images depict the fresh and aged foam samples (Figure 12a,b, respectively), showing similar morphological characteristics for both cases. Higher-resolution images at Figure 12c show a high concentration of SiO2 particles, while, in the aged foam surface in Figure 12d, a reduced number of surface particles are observed. The area of Figure 12d was implemented on a blue region of the aged sample.
Further analysis via EDS was carried out in order to evaluate any possible alterations in chemical composition due to exposure to combustion reactions. The high-resolution image of the pristine foam exhibits surface particles of a different color to the ceramic substrate. Similar particles are also observed on the aged foam but at a much lower concentration.
EDS analysis was performed for aged and fresh foam segments for the wt% elemental analysis, showing an increased O (oxygen) content on the observed surface particles, indicating that these are actually SiO2 particles formed during ceramic SiSiC foam synthesis-firing (Figure 13 and Figure 14) and attributed to small amounts of oxygen coming from raw material impurities and/or small amounts of oxygen during the firing process. The exposure of the foam to burner conditions seems to have caused the partial elimination of such surface particles, and this can be attributed to either the sintering or the entrainment of such particles by the imposed flow.
The fresh and aged foam samples were analyzed via micro-Raman spectroscopy in order to further evaluate any potential chemical composition modification to the surface of the foams due to exposure to combustion reactions. The comparison of the spectra of the pristine and aged foam shows that, in both cases, a similar peak at 550 cm−1 attributed to free silicon (Figure 15) is observed. No other peaks are identifiable.

7. Conclusions

A novel foam burner design is proposed and experimentally evaluated for operation with highly diluted syngas mixtures. The foams utilized in the current study were made from SiSiC, and different porosities (10 and 20 ppi) were studied. The results indicate that the porosity can really affect the combustion mechanism. An extensive experimental campaign has clearly demonstrated that, under a range of operating conditions, such as different gas composition and flow velocities, promising combustion characteristics can be obtained in the cases of both foam porosities, as indicated by the observed or calculated homogeneous temperature profile along most of the reactor length, a very modest temperature rise, very high hydrogen conversion, and a high combustion efficiency. The temperature distribution along the reactor is more stable in the case of the 10 ppi configuration, also resulting in a fairly flat temperature profile along the foam burner axis. The combustion stability and efficiency for the 10 ppi foam are superior to those for the 20 ppi, especially for higher reactant flows and, in selected cases, hydrogen conversion of up to 98%, and an overall combustion efficiency of up to 95% can be obtained, e.g., in the case of Experiment 6. The additional pressure drop observed in the case of the 20 ppi foam is also very modest. The characterization of a pristine and aged foam (100 operation hours) showed that there is no significant impact on the material. A minor morphological difference identified via SEM analysis is attributed to the expected sintering phenomena as a result of more than 100 h of stream exposure and due to the temperature rise through the foam block.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.A., G.K. (George Karagiannakis), D.K., F.M. and G.S.; Unit design and realization A.A., K.F. and D.K., Data acquisition and curation, A.A. and K.F.; Materials Characterization P.B. and G.K. (Georgia Kastrinaki); Experimental methodology, A.A., K.F. and D.K.; project administration, A.A., G.K. (George Karagiannakis), J.R. and G.S.; writing—original draft, K.F.; writing—review and editing, K.F. and G.S.; funding acquisition, F.M. and J.R. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Land Brandenburg and the BTU Cottbus-Senftenberg through Tender “Durchführung von Porenbrenner-Experimenten”, within the TURBOFuelCellFuE project, Tender ID CXP9YY0RHM3.

Data Availability Statement

Data that support the findings of this study may be obtained from the corresponding author, upon request.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge Christodoulos Lekkos for support in the development of the data acquisition interfaces.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Trimis, D.; Durst, F. Combustion in a porous medium-advances and applications. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1996, 121, 153–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Wood, S.; Harris, A.T. Porous burners for lean-burn applications. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2008, 34, 667–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gharehghani, A.; Ghasemi, K.; Siavashi, M.; Mehranfar, S. Applications of porous materials in combustion systems: A comprehensive and state-of-the-art review. Fuel 2021, 304, 121411. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, L.; Yangbo, D.; Junrui, S.; Yongqi, L.; Xiaolong, W.; Bingquan, G.; Zhenyu, M. Experimental investigation on flame stability and emissions of lean premixed methane–air combustion in a developed divergent porous burner. J. Clean. Prod. 2023, 405, 137070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Mishra, S.C.; Steven, M.; Nemoda, S.; Talukdar, P.; Trimis, D.; Durst, F. Heat transfer analysis of a two-dimensional rectangular porous radiant burner. Heat Mass Transfer. 2006, 33, 467–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Bedoya, C.; Zarzalis, N.; Habisreuther, P. Experimental and Theoretical Study of Combustion under Elevated Pressure within Porous Inert Media. Energy Technol. 2017, 5, 1124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bedoya, C.; Dinkov, I.; Habisreuther, P.; Zarzalis, N.; Bockhorn, H.; Parthasarathy, P. Experimental study, 1D volume-averaged calculations and 3D direct pore level simulations of the flame stabilization in porous inert media at elevated pressure Combust. Flame 2015, 162, 3740–3754. [Google Scholar]
  8. Liu, J.F.; Hsieh, W.H. Experimental investigation of combustion in porous heating burners. Combust. Flame 2004, 138, 295–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Afsharvahid, S.; Ashman, P.J.; Dally, B.B. Investigation of NOx conversion characteristics in a porous medium. Combust. Flame 2008, 152, 604–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hsu, P.-F.; Evans, W.D.; Howell, J.R. Experimental and numerical study of premixed combustion within nonhomogeneous porous ceramics. Combust. Sci. Technol. 1993, 90, 149–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rumminger, M.D.; Dibble, R.W.; Heberle, N.H.; Crosley, D.R. Gas temperature above a porous radiant burner: Comparison of measurements and model predictions. Symp. (Int.) Combust. 1996, 26, 1755–1762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Xiong, L.; Fanghao, W.; Yawei, L.; Liping, P.; Qinghu, W.; Wen, Y.; Yibiao, X.; Yang, Z.; Chenhui, L. The enhanced thermal shock resistance and combustion efficiency of SiC reticulated porous ceramics via the construction of multi-layer coating. Ceram. Int. 2023, 4, 9097–9103. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Available online: https://www.ceramtec-industrial.com/en/ (accessed on 30 August 2023).
  14. Samoilenko, M.; Seers, P.; Terriault, P.; Brailovski, V. Design, manufacture and testing of porous materials with ordered and random porosity: Application to porous medium burners. Appl. Thermal Eng. 2019, 158, 113724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. ASTM-15; Standard Test Methods for Density of Compacted or Sintered Powder Metallurgy (PM) Products Using Archimedes’ Principle. ASTM: West Conshohocken, PA, USA, 2015.
  16. ANSYS CHEMKIN 17.0 (15151); ANSYS Reaction Design: San Diego, CA, USA, 2016.
  17. Malliotakis, Z.; Leplat, N.; Vourliotakis, G.; Keramiotis, C.; Skevis, G.; Founti, M.A. An experimental and detailed chemical kinetic investigation of the addition of C2 oxygenated species in rich ethylene premixed flames. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2019, 191, 2112–2135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xue, L.; Guo, X.; Chen, H. Fluid Flow in Porous Media, Chapter 2: Basic Theory; World Scientific: Singapore, 2020; p. 47. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rezaei, E.; Haussener, S.; Gianella, S.; Ortona, A. Early-stage oxidation behavior at high temperatures of SiSiC cellular architectures in a porous burner. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 16255–16261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ortona, A.; Pusterla, S.; Fino, P.; Mach, F.R.A.; Delgado, A. Aging of reticulated Si-SiC foams in porous burners. Adv. Appl. Ceram. 2010, 109, 246–251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Cross-section of the foam burner.
Figure 1. Cross-section of the foam burner.
Energies 16 07014 g001
Figure 2. The temperature rise along the foam length for different fuel and oxidizer stream introduction points.
Figure 2. The temperature rise along the foam length for different fuel and oxidizer stream introduction points.
Energies 16 07014 g002
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the chevron pattern drilling of the reactor (top), and illustration of the positioning of the thermocouples along the foam burner surface (bottom).
Figure 3. Schematic representation of the chevron pattern drilling of the reactor (top), and illustration of the positioning of the thermocouples along the foam burner surface (bottom).
Energies 16 07014 g003
Figure 4. Gas flow introduction strategies inside the porous burner: (a) flow guides midway inside the metallic reactor, (b) the flow guide for the fuel stream introduces the gas mixture at the front of the foam block, (c) at the entrance of the steel reactor, and (d) at the surface of the foam block.
Figure 4. Gas flow introduction strategies inside the porous burner: (a) flow guides midway inside the metallic reactor, (b) the flow guide for the fuel stream introduces the gas mixture at the front of the foam block, (c) at the entrance of the steel reactor, and (d) at the surface of the foam block.
Energies 16 07014 g004
Figure 5. Flow diagram of the experimental setup.
Figure 5. Flow diagram of the experimental setup.
Energies 16 07014 g005
Figure 6. (a) Foam burner enclaved in the tubular furnace, (b) insulation jackets applied on the burner flanges.
Figure 6. (a) Foam burner enclaved in the tubular furnace, (b) insulation jackets applied on the burner flanges.
Energies 16 07014 g006
Figure 7. The temperature profile along the reactor’s length for the two foam cases (Experiment 2).
Figure 7. The temperature profile along the reactor’s length for the two foam cases (Experiment 2).
Energies 16 07014 g007
Figure 8. The temperature variation with time for each individual measurement point, as shown in Figure 3, for the (a) 20 ppi and (b) 10 ppi foam (Experiment 2).
Figure 8. The temperature variation with time for each individual measurement point, as shown in Figure 3, for the (a) 20 ppi and (b) 10 ppi foam (Experiment 2).
Energies 16 07014 g008
Figure 9. The pressure drop profile along the reactor’s length for the two foam cases (Experiment 2).
Figure 9. The pressure drop profile along the reactor’s length for the two foam cases (Experiment 2).
Energies 16 07014 g009
Figure 10. The pressure drop profile along the reactor’s length for the three different flows (i.e., 0.17, 0.33, and 0.5 m/s in Experiments 7, 8, and 9, respectively).
Figure 10. The pressure drop profile along the reactor’s length for the three different flows (i.e., 0.17, 0.33, and 0.5 m/s in Experiments 7, 8, and 9, respectively).
Energies 16 07014 g010
Figure 11. A photograph of the aged (>100 operation hours) foam, showing the blue tempering marks at the center of the foam block at the locations where the peak temperatures were also recorded.
Figure 11. A photograph of the aged (>100 operation hours) foam, showing the blue tempering marks at the center of the foam block at the locations where the peak temperatures were also recorded.
Energies 16 07014 g011
Figure 12. SEM images of the 20 ppi foam (a) before use (pristine), (b) after use (aged), (c) a high-resolution image of the fresh surface exhibiting SiO2 particles, and (d) a high-resolution image of the aged surface exhibiting a lower concentration of SiO2 particles.
Figure 12. SEM images of the 20 ppi foam (a) before use (pristine), (b) after use (aged), (c) a high-resolution image of the fresh surface exhibiting SiO2 particles, and (d) a high-resolution image of the aged surface exhibiting a lower concentration of SiO2 particles.
Energies 16 07014 g012
Figure 13. The pristine foam EDS analysis of the SiSiC surface and of the particle surface, showing an increased oxygen content in the latter case; a high-resolution image showing the SiO2 particles on the surface.
Figure 13. The pristine foam EDS analysis of the SiSiC surface and of the particle surface, showing an increased oxygen content in the latter case; a high-resolution image showing the SiO2 particles on the surface.
Energies 16 07014 g013
Figure 14. The aged foam EDS analysis of the SiSiC surface and of the particle surface, showing increased oxygen content in the latter case; a high-resolution image showing the SiO2 particles on the surface.
Figure 14. The aged foam EDS analysis of the SiSiC surface and of the particle surface, showing increased oxygen content in the latter case; a high-resolution image showing the SiO2 particles on the surface.
Energies 16 07014 g014
Figure 15. Micro−Raman spectra depicting the silicon peak in the SiSiC structure.
Figure 15. Micro−Raman spectra depicting the silicon peak in the SiSiC structure.
Energies 16 07014 g015
Table 1. The morphological characteristics of the SiSiC foams used in the present work.
Table 1. The morphological characteristics of the SiSiC foams used in the present work.
Nominal Pore Density [ppi]Foam Density [g/cm3]Porosity [%]
100.45 ± 0.0586.1 ± 1.6
200.40 ± 0.0187.7 ± 0.3
Table 2. The initial conditions for the investigation of the effect of gas composition on combustion performance.
Table 2. The initial conditions for the investigation of the effect of gas composition on combustion performance.
Mole FractionExperiment 1Experiment 2Experiment 3Experiment 4Experiment 5Experiment 6
N266.91%54.22%72.70%72.40%71.99%71.69%
H24.01%7.33%2.05%2.46%3.01%3.42%
O213.69%11.09%14.91%14.85%14.76%14.71%
H2O11.95%20.99%8.12%8.09%8.04%8.01%
CO0.68%1.25%0.39%0.39%0.39%0.39%
CO22.77%5.12%1.82%1.81%1.80%1.79%
T [K]960960960960960960
u (m/s)0.170.170.170.170.170.17
Table 3. The initial conditions for the investigation of the effect of the flow velocity on the combustion performance.
Table 3. The initial conditions for the investigation of the effect of the flow velocity on the combustion performance.
Mole FractionExperiment 7Experiment 8Experiment 9
N272.19%72.19%72.19%
H22.74%2.74%2.74%
O214.81%14.81%14.81%
H2O8.07%8.07%8.07%
CO0.39%0.39%0.39%
CO21.80%1.80%1.80%
T [K]960960960
u (m/s)0.170.330.5
Table 4. The combustion efficiency and H2 conversion efficiency estimation based on LHV for the 20 ppi foam.
Table 4. The combustion efficiency and H2 conversion efficiency estimation based on LHV for the 20 ppi foam.
ExperimentEfficiency ηc (%)Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency H2,conv (%)ΔT
(Tmax-Tset)
Experiment 186.1494.7377.9
Experiment 286.5496.4676.4
Experiment 392.4997.4571.7
Experiment 484.6092.7265.1
Experiment 592.9098.1768.8
Experiment 691.4997.8066.4
Experiment 791.8695.6370.9
Experiment 882.6288.4042.1
Experiment 952.0262.3554
Table 5. The combustion efficiency and H2 conversion efficiency estimation based on LHV for the 10 ppi foam.
Table 5. The combustion efficiency and H2 conversion efficiency estimation based on LHV for the 10 ppi foam.
ExperimentEfficiency ηc (%)Hydrogen Conversion Efficiency H2,conv (%)ΔT
(Tmax-Tset)
Experiment 187.8394.7458.37
Experiment 288.3097.8964.20
Experiment 387.6090.4155.96
Experiment 492.7996.3156.19
Experiment 589.3392.9357.07
Experiment 694.6897.0358.37
Experiment 787.1198.1656.68
Experiment 886.8691.1756.98
Experiment 982.8891.3958.97
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Fotiadis, K.; Asimakopoulou, A.; Baltzopoulou, P.; Kastrinaki, G.; Koutsonikolas, D.; Karagiannakis, G.; Skevis, G.; Richter, J.; Mauss, F. Experimental Characterization of a Novel Foam Burner Design for the Low-Excess-Enthalpy Combustion of Very Lean Syngas Mixtures. Energies 2023, 16, 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16197014

AMA Style

Fotiadis K, Asimakopoulou A, Baltzopoulou P, Kastrinaki G, Koutsonikolas D, Karagiannakis G, Skevis G, Richter J, Mauss F. Experimental Characterization of a Novel Foam Burner Design for the Low-Excess-Enthalpy Combustion of Very Lean Syngas Mixtures. Energies. 2023; 16(19):7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16197014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Fotiadis, Kyriakos, Akrivi Asimakopoulou, Penelope Baltzopoulou, Georgia Kastrinaki, Dimitrios Koutsonikolas, George Karagiannakis, George Skevis, Jana Richter, and Fabian Mauss. 2023. "Experimental Characterization of a Novel Foam Burner Design for the Low-Excess-Enthalpy Combustion of Very Lean Syngas Mixtures" Energies 16, no. 19: 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16197014

APA Style

Fotiadis, K., Asimakopoulou, A., Baltzopoulou, P., Kastrinaki, G., Koutsonikolas, D., Karagiannakis, G., Skevis, G., Richter, J., & Mauss, F. (2023). Experimental Characterization of a Novel Foam Burner Design for the Low-Excess-Enthalpy Combustion of Very Lean Syngas Mixtures. Energies, 16(19), 7014. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16197014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop