Next Article in Journal
An Effective Power Dispatch of Photovoltaic Generators in DC Networks via the Antlion Optimizer
Previous Article in Journal
Wireless Technologies for Industry 4.0 Applications
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers

Department of Chemical Engineering Materials Environment, Sapienza University of Rome, Via Eudossiana 18, I-00184 Rome, Italy
Energies 2023, 16(3), 1351; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031351
Submission received: 1 December 2022 / Revised: 23 January 2023 / Accepted: 24 January 2023 / Published: 27 January 2023
(This article belongs to the Section H: Geo-Energy)

Abstract

The geothermal industry is fronted by a fundamental decade to grow and become an energy supplier in transitioning to a sustainable energy system. The introduction of Closed-Loop Geothermal energy systems (CLG) can overcome the negative social response and increase the attractiveness of geothermal developments. The present work aims to investigate and compare the performance of CLG systems. For the comparison, the case study of Campi Flegrei was chosen. The maximum depth was fixed at 2000 m, and the two configurations were set up to analyse the performance and evaluate the best operational configuration. Both CLG configurations showed decay in the output temperature of the working fluid during the production time. For a U-shaped design, it is possible to find a working condition that allows constant thermal power over time. The DBHE specific power was always more significant, up to 350 kW/m, compared to the U-shaped, which attained a maximum of 300 W/m (15%). The comparison with Beckers et al. analysis highlights the similarity of our results with their base case. The consideration of the CLG system’s length is related to the heat exchange and investment costs. For longer exchangers, there are higher investments and lower specific power.
Keywords: geothermal energy; closed-loop systems; deep borehole heat exchanger; U-loop geothermal energy; closed-loop systems; deep borehole heat exchanger; U-loop

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alimonti, C. Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers. Energies 2023, 16, 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031351

AMA Style

Alimonti C. Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers. Energies. 2023; 16(3):1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031351

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alimonti, Claudio. 2023. "Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers" Energies 16, no. 3: 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031351

APA Style

Alimonti, C. (2023). Technical Performance Comparison between U-Shaped and Deep Borehole Heat Exchangers. Energies, 16(3), 1351. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16031351

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop