Next Article in Journal
A Novel PAPR Reduction Scheme for Low-Cost Terminals in 6G
Previous Article in Journal
Influence of Water on the Methane Adsorption Capacity of Organic-Rich Shales and Its Controlling Factors: A Review
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Energies
Volume 16
Issue 8
10.3390/en16083306
energies-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

An Overview of the State of the Art and Challenges in the Use of Gelling and Thickening Agents to Create Stable Thermal Energy Storage Materials

by
Rajendran Prabakaran
1,*,
Palanisamy Dhamodharan
1,
Anbalagan Sathishkumar
2,
Paride Gullo
3,
Muthuraman Ponrajan Vikram
4,
Saravanan Pandiaraj
5,
Abdullah Alodhayb
6,
Ghada A. Khouqeer
7 and
Sung-Chul Kim
1,*
1
School of Mechanical Engineering, Yeungnam University, 280 Daehak-Ro, Gyeongsan 712-749, Republic of Korea
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur 603203, India
3
Department of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering, University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Alsion 2, 6400 Sønderborg, Denmark
4
Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Saveetha School of Engineering, SIMATS, Chennai 602105, India
5
Department of Basic Science and Self-Development Skills, CFY Deanship, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
6
Department of Physics and Astronomy, College of Science, King Saud University, Riyadh 11451, Saudi Arabia
7
Department of Physics, Imam Mohammad Ibn Saud Islamic University (IMSIU), Riyadh 11564, Saudi Arabia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(8), 3306; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083306
Submission received: 1 March 2023 / Revised: 28 March 2023 / Accepted: 6 April 2023 / Published: 7 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Section G: Energy and Buildings)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Building cooling and heating, solar-powered energy production, energy recovery, and other energy-consuming industries have all seen an increase in the use of cold/hot latent thermal energy storage (LH-TES). Through energy recovery, LH-TES that uses phase-change materials (PCMs) as a storage medium helps to close the energy supply and demand gap and raises the possibility of energy savings. However, the stability, thermal, physical, and chemical properties of the PCM play a major role in how effectively it can be used. In recent years, adding gelling and thickening agents (GTAs) has gained popularity apart from the nanoparticles (NPs) and nucleating triggers (NTs), particularly for the creation of stable PCMs. Therefore, the current work’s goal is to provide an overview of how GTAs are used in the process of developing reliable PCMs for TES applications. It has been found that using GTAs not only increased stability but also decreased sedimentation, leakage, and the supercooling degree (SCD). It was noted that the addition of a GTA with a weight percentage of 2–15% resulted in excellent stability with a negligible leakage rate and latent heat reduced by 3.6–35% after only 200 cycles. Furthermore, PCMs for solar-thermal and building heating systems in the medium-temperature range (21–61 °C) were mostly studied for their performance with GTAs, but no study for a cool TES application was reported. Most works have studied inorganic PCM components with GTAs, and a few reports are available for paraffin. However, the GTA blending resulted in reduced thermal performance due to a decrease in thermal conductivity, latent heat, and a rise in viscosity. Further, NTs and NPs with small amounts were seeded into the PCM-GTA for eradicating the SCD with enhanced TC and accelerated energy transfer.

1. Introduction

The growth of thermal energy storage (TES) is increasing day-by-day by offering excellent performance in energy management, which enables it to reduce the energy gap between supply and demand [1]. Among the available TES approaches displayed in Figure 1, latent heat TES (LH-TES) has a higher volumetric energy density and less weight, aided by phase-change materials (PCMs) as a storage component [2,3,4]. It is already proven that the addition of LH-TES is beneficial for building cooling, solar-thermal systems, thermal management units (TMUs) in batteries/electronics and transport vehicle cooling, etc. [5,6,7,8,9]. To develop efficient LH-TES, various PCM categories have been utilized, such as inorganic, eutectic, and organic matter, as mentioned in Figure 2 [10,11]. For instance, organic matter includes paraffin wax, fatty acids, and certain alcohols, while inorganics include water, metals, salts, and their hydrates. Eutectic matter is a combination of two substances from the same group or from different groups [12]. Paraffin PCMs originate from the alkane group consisting of straight-chain hydrocarbons. The properties may vary based on the hydrocarbon count with a melting range between 23 °C and 67 °C. Mostly, the paraffin-based PCMs were used in solar heating applications, as they melt in the range of 50–65 °C [13,14].
Compared to organic matter, inorganic has roughly two times higher storage capacity with good numbers in latent heat and thermal conductivity (TC) values and is notably non-flammable in nature [15]. However, these inorganic PCMs were primarily affected by a higher supercooling degree (SCD), which lead to uneven nucleation and further prolonged the phase transition time [16]. Based on the mixing types, eutectics were also found to have some cons and pros with respect to their own inherent thermophysical properties [17]. Hence, the selection of appropriate PCM involves many critical factors, such as availability, cost, chemical stability, long-term storage cycles, and the hazard factor [18]. Recently, advances in designing LH-TES are encouraged, wherein many techniques have been used to enhance the heat-storing ability of PCM [19]. Despite being a promising PCM type, many complications have been faced during the implementation of PCMs in the LH-TES units, such as leakage, segregation, phase separation, SCD, corrosion, instability (both chemical and physical), lower rate of energy exchange, and lower TC [20,21]. Many technical signs of progress have been discovered to enhance PCM efficiency, namely, nucleating triggers (NTs) (to suppress the SCD), encapsulation (to eradicate the PCM outflow and increase the effective area), fins, and nanomaterials (NMs) (to enhance the thermal properties) [22,23,24,25,26]. Implementing these approaches can help to hasten the energy rate during the heat exchange through the declined SCD and increase the effective area and thermal properties. However, the problems associated with phase separation, volume change, stability, seepage, and shape stability still exist [27].
In the recent years, gelling and thickening agents (GTAs) have attracted some researchers in the PCM field for alleviating the problems related to volume change, seepage, segregation, and shape stability [28]. Gelling is the process of cross-linking PCM with a substance (such as a polymer) to form a three-dimensional network that holds the PCM molecules together, while thickening is the process of incorporating a substance into PCMs to improve viscosity and retain the PCM molecules together [29]. As a result, strong bonding among the molecules will be formed and minimized the leakage during melting. In addition, GTAs also ensure uniform melting during the phase transition process resulting from improved stability despite the higher viscosity of the PCM.
GTAs helps to improve the rigidity and steady blend when mixed with the base materials. Depending on the enhancer, the texture formation was varied from lower to higher viscosities, irrespective of the mixing concentration [30]. Figure 3 illustrates the various applications of the GTAs, including medicinal, food/preservatives, petrochemical, textile, cosmetics, incendiaries and explosives, and TES sectors.
In the medicinal sector, a GTA was employed in the semisolid formulation process to obtain a stable texture (gels) for external drugs [31]. In chemical sectors, the rheological properties of the chemicals are modified by blending them with GTAs, which also helps to improve their stability [32]. The textures of packed food items, namely sauces, salad dressing, soups, liquidity foods, and jams, can be made using GTAs to achieve the desired texture and taste [33]. GTAs (products of guar gum) also help with fluid fracturing in the explosive and petrochemical industries by keeping the proppants inside the fluid [28]. Moreover, GTAs (polyacrylic acid) have been used in textile printing, paints, and colorants [34]. However, the review work conducted by Cong et al. [28] confirms that the usage of GTAs has not been explored to the fullest extent in the LH-TES sector. Therefore, the information on GTA usage in PCM for the LH-TES field are limited, including information on concentration levels, preparation approaches, and underlying mechanisms. As for now, there have been only few comprehensive works reported on the use of GTAs in TES [28], most studies have focused on all the methods employed for the enhancement of the PCM’s thermal/physical parameters [35]. Therefore, this review specifically focuses on the use of GTAs in PCMs for LH-TES and reports a thorough assessment covering the following topics, section-wise:
  • Section 2: GTA classifications based on individual characteristics;
  • Section 3: GTA mechanisms;
  • Section 4: Preparation methods for PCM-GTA composites;
  • Section 5: Application of GTAs in LH-TES—with NTs and with NPs;
  • Section 6: Summary, challenges, and future scope.

2. GTA Classifications

Based on the material resources, the available GTAs have been categorized into three types, namely (a) natural resource GTAs, (b) synthetic GTAs, and (c) semi-synthetic GTAs; further, these were sub-categorized as (i) organic GTAs and (ii) inorganic GTAs based on their chemical characteristics [32]. The overview of the GTA classifications is illustrated in Figure 4 and the detailed discussions on each category are explained in the succeeding paragraphs.

2.1. Natural GTAs

Natural GTAs have been derived from a variety of naturally plentiful sources, including exudates (from plants and seeds), direct plants, seeds, animal meats, seaweeds, microbial poly-carbohydrates, chitosan, and minerals. Except for minerals, the majority of natural GTAs are made up of organic material. Hydrophilic agar molecules (derived from seaweed) have been used as an addition to increase the capacity of foods to gel while improving stability. However, due to their insoluble nature, these cannot be used in normal or cold water. The hydrating procedure assists in making them soluble in hot water (>80 °C) [36]. Similar to agar, alginates and reversible-nature carrageenan extracted from red and brown seaweeds, respectively, belong to sulfated polysaccharides [37]. Three forms of carrageenans were found, namely, iota, lambda, and kappa, in which iota and kappa are preferred for mild and thick gelling, respectively, while lambda is good for thickening [38]. The kappa form was mostly identified in daily industries (air bubble stabilizing in ice cream and cheese processing), and iota is used for suspending supplementary items in soy milk and salad dressings. Lambda is used in many liquid foods (tomato sauces, syrups, and beverages) for developing texture formation. All forms have good water solubility, while lambda cannot form a gel when mixed with cold water. Lambda is the most expensive of the three forms, and kappa is the most commonly used in food applications [39,40]. Unlike carrageenan, alginates are found to be a versatile GTA, as they can be used for film formatting, stabilizing, and thickening, as well as gelling. Additionally, they have good soluble character in all ranges of water temperature (liquid phase) owing to the existence of calcium ions [38].
Gelatin is mostly processed from animal tissues, and it has a wide range of applications in medicinal and food industries. It has a wider range of structures, from fine particles to flakes, and has superior water-soluble character. It acts as a texturizer or stabilizer, and a thickener in various foods, namely margarine, cheese, and cream [41]. Extracted seed/vegetable products such as guar gum (GG) and xanthan gum (XG) have been identified for thickening purposes, and the latter is the most frequently used. Galactose and mannose are two sugars found in the plant cluster bean and are combined to form GG, while XG is obtained through the fermentation of vegetable leaves of cabbage, cauliflower, broccoli, etc. [42,43]. GG has poor strength in gelling, though it has excellent ability in water thickening compared to other GTAs, and a low wt.% produces more thickening and increases viscosity. A major issue with GG is its unstable nature at lower pH (<3.5) and higher temperatures (>90 °C), and also that it requires polyols and borate ions to reduce the viscosity and augment gelation [28]. The attractive soft texture of XG prompts its usage as a GTA in non-food and food applications, and it is also found as a stabilizer in various solutions (foam, emulsion, etc.) [28]. XGs can easily hydrate in water at normal temperatures, though the dispersion time increases when the temperature and mixing speed fall. Moreover, premixing with water is recommenced for XG before adding the supplementary items (salts) because of its salt tolerance. Among the natural GTAs, XG is mostly employed in LH-TES owing to its superior stability under wide operating conditions (temperature > 300 °C and 2.5 < pH > 11), despite fungal/deprivation issues [44].

2.2. Synthetic GTAs

Synthetic matter is superior to natural GTAs for various applications, such as cosmetics, medicinal and chemical uses, and it provides flexibility in creating specific GTA formulations for wider use. Compared to natural GTAs, synthetic GTAs have longer life, are cheaper, and can produce required quantities with various sizes [32]. Some notable synthetic GTAs are vinyl-based (VB), acyclic-based, and cellulose-based polymers (CB) and copolymers, with CBs being most commonly used in the cosmetics field [32]. VB-based GTAs such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) have been found in food-packing applications and have positive aspects, such as being water soluble, having excellent film texturing, and being biodegradable and non-toxic [45]. PVA is used to prevent food spoilage by inhibiting contact between food items and titanium dioxide and oxygen [45,46]. PVA is easily clingable and stretchable, making it a perfect option for fresh and hot products. However, its poor permeability and moisture-absorbing nature limits its use, and it requires additional material modifications (such as chitosan film, citric acid, etc.) for reducing such issues [47].
A non-ionic derivative polyethylene glycol (PEG) is employed in textiles and medicinal purposes, namely diapers and surgical gauzes [32]. However, there is a possibility of leakage at higher temperatures with PEG in PCMs, but LH modification was insignificant with some PCMs despite an increased viscosity and reduced TC. A wider range of PEG is available based on its molecular weight, with an increase in molecular weight increasing its PCT (phase-change temperature) [48]. Moreover, PEG alone is used as a PCM in various LH-TES applications, despite poor interfacial force and TC. The instability of PEG is prevented by mixing with starch, cellulose, and synthetic GTAs (poly-acrylamide (PAAM) and copolymers) [3].

2.3. Semi-Synthetic GTAs

Cellulose-derivative semi-synthetic GTAs have been identified as esters and ethers with dissimilar properties (mechanical and chemical). These GTAs are known for oxidation, hydrolysis, surface activity, thermo-plastic film nature, and viscosity. Esters are non-soluble in water despite having excellent thickening, while ethers have excellent solubility. Some notable ethers (cellulose) are Carboxymethyl cellulose (CMC), hydroxyethyl cellulose, ethyl cellulose, methylcellulose, and sodium CMC, while cellulose acetate butyrate, hydroxypropyl methylcellulose phthalate, cellulose acetate phthalate, and cellulose acetate belong to esters [32]. The chemical/mechanical properties of the natural starches have been improved by esterification, cross-linking, and grafting, in which the water resistance of a natural GTA (starch) was altered through esterification by using epoxides. The starches’ adhesion nature (utility), tensile strength, and water/heat resistant stability were improved via cross-linking (forming a covalent bond (non-polar) among hydroxyl starches) [49]. PAAM is another notable GTA and is mostly used in paper manufacturing (for strengthening), electrophoresis (as a biomaterial), water purification (as a flocculent), medicine (as a hydrogel), and oil recovery fields (as an enhancer) [50,51]. Some studies have been found with PAAM as a GTA for PCMs through developing hybrid PCM aerogels [52]. However, the major issue with semi-synthetic GTAs is their tendency to be prone to microbial contamination, and it is also suggested to hydrate them before use with PCMs; these were mostly used for making lotions, shampoos, and creams [53]. Among the various semi-synthetics, CMC is mostly employed for many purposes as an emulsifier, GTA, and stabilizer. However, it is recommended for cold LH-TES because of the weak gel formation at higher temperatures. Some notable properties and applications of the available GTAs are listed in Table 1. It is noted that most of the GTAs have good water solubility and are reversible. Further, some of them were not recommended for acidic solutions (e.g., agar and gelatin), and some others were not good for high-temperature applications (e.g., PEG, GG, and XG). The properties such as density and viscosity of each GTA can be varied based on their derivatives, hence the general properties for their workability and application were only mentioned. Moreover, no specific approach was reported on the selection criteria for the PCM-TES application, and this should be explored in the future. Therefore, the effect of gelling mechanisms followed by sample preparation and a start-of-art review on the application of GTAs in PCM-TES were described in detail.

3. GTA Mechanism

Gelling and thickening processes are almost interwoven, in which the former increases the viscosity of the PCM and the latter helps to hold PCM molecules through interlinking. However, the mechanisms that prevail in both processes are interconnected, and sometimes it is hard to differentiate them because they share similar processes and the level of interlinked force can vary [28]. The level of interlinking is low in thickening, while it peaks during gelling, and the mechanism that prevails during the viscosity increments can vary depending upon the GTA used. Apart from the GTA’s nature, external (environment) factors, namely GTA concentration/molar mass, pH level, ionic strength, pressure, enzyme existence, solvent quality, and temperature, can also affect gel and thickening formation [54,55]. Overall, three major mechanisms have been reported during the mixing of GTAs and the base fluid [28], as shown in Figure 5. Interlacing and physical mechanisms are involved in thickening, while physical and chemical mechanisms are involved in gelling.
  • Interlace thickening: This mechanism is observed in natural GTAs and is characterized by a high elastic nature with pseudo-plastic behavior. The increase in viscosity during thickening occurs due to the entangling of heavy polymer molecules in the solution. The efficacy of the thickening process is determined by the molecular weight of the polymer [56].
  • Physical thickening: This mechanism is observed in good water-soluble GTAs and light-molecular-weight molecules, which make an interconnection with one another to form a texture, resulting in an increase in viscosity [57]. Additionally, the interconnection strength depends on the GTA nature: if the strength is higher it leads to an increase in viscosity at a higher rate.
  • Physical gelling: This mechanism is experienced in gel with reversible nature, and external conditions such as temperature, pressure, and pH significantly affect the physical gelling [58]. H2 bonding can be achieved by modulating the temperature or pH of the water-based solution. The repulsion effect between hydrophilic and hydrophobic components results in hydrophobic gelling. Similarly, the interfacing of anionic and ionic components leads to coacervation gelling.
  • Chemical gelling: This mechanism occurs due to the reaction among the functional components, creating covalent chemical gelling. The type of chemical gelling varies based on the GTA’s nature and corresponding functionalization [58]. Redox reactions due to the formation of free radicals produce radical polymerization gelling, while click reaction gelling is mostly employed in biological fields because of its efficiency, strong gelling, and hastened reaction kinetics even at medium temperatures.

4. PCM + GTA Preparation

The preparation of PCM + GTA can be performed using three approaches: (i) liquid PCM (melt) mixing (LPM), (ii) solution (solid PCM) mixing (SM), and (iii) dry PCM mixing (DPM). The selection of the preparation method among the three approaches mostly depends on the usage of the base PCM and its composites. More importantly, the concentration of each constituent should be properly measured before preparation [28]. The layout of each preparation approach is displayed in Figure 6. In the LPM method, first the selected PCM needs to be in pure liquid form and heated at a constant temperature (>PCT of the PCM). Then, the required mass of the GTA in powder form is added to the PCM liquids and allowed to undergo the stirring process until proper mixing is achieved. The time taken for the stirring process varies for each type of PCM and GTA used.
The SM method is usually applied for solid PCM (example: salt hydrates) + solution mixtures (water). First, the required quantity of the solid PCM is added into the liquid water to undergo stirring to ensure homogenous mixing, followed by a GTA seeded into the PCM solution. In the DPM method, both the PCM and GTA are dry powder, and both powders (usually different sized) are mixed using the milling process to aid uniform mixing. Mostly, the LPM and DPM approaches are employed owing to the simplified preparation steps. For instance, Saeed et al. [59] blended FA and Methyl Palmitate (MP) (60/40 by molar ratio) at 50 °C, followed by 10% (by mass) of 2-hydroxypropyl ether cellulose (HPEC) addition, and the sample was stirred for 30 min at the same temperature. After ensuring proper mixing, the sample was softened through heating at 70 °C, and then 10% (by mass) of graphene nanoplatelets (GNPs) was added into PCM/HPEC sample to enhance the TES performance. However, Cong et al. [28] mention that if the PCM is planned to make with NTs and NPs to improve TC and reduce the SCD, it is recommended to add the GTA at the end. Similarly, Wang et al. [60] mixed PAAM into a sodium acetate trihydrate (SAT) + Tetrasodium pyrophosphate decahydrate (TPD) PCM composite (liquid), in which TPD is an NA, while SAT is a PCM.

5. Application of GTA in LH-TES

As mentioned earlier, the addition of a GTA to PCMs can reduce/eliminate phase separation and leakage by forming texture and increasing viscosity. This section discusses some notable observations from previous studies that were reported for the various combinations of PCMs and GTAs.

5.1. PCM + GTA with NTs

In 1980, Marks [61] introduced attapulgite clay (9.3 wt.%) as a GTA in Glauber’s salt (GS) + water solution (1:10 ratio) with borax (2.7 wt.%) as an NT. The pure PCM showed poor cyclic stability, with a rapid reduction in LH from 238 to 63 kJ kg−1 after few (40) cycles. This could affect the long-term performance of the LH-TES, but the addition of a GTA showed excellent stability, with 105 kJ kg−1 of LH even after 200 cycles, despite a slight reduction in initial LH. Telkes [62] used the same GS + water + borax-based PCM with inorganic thixotropic material (ITM) as a GTA. The concentration of ITM was varied from 0 to 10% and gel formation was observed with >6% of ITM in the PCM solution; in addition, excellent cyclic (10 cycles) stability was also observed. In another study [63], the CMC (2–4 wt.%) was utilized in an SAT + potassium sulfates (PS)-based PCM to make stable components, and various NTs were tested to diminish the SCD. The observed SCDs of the PCM were 3–4 °C and 0–3 °C with borax (3 wt.%) and PS (2 wt.%), respectively. The same kind of result was also confirmed by Shin et al. [64], and the observed TC, LH, and SCD were 0.64 W m−1 K−1, 227 J g−1, and 3–4 °C, respectively, with borax inclusion (1.9 wt.%). Cabeza et al. [65] employed three GTAs, namely bentonite, cellulose (M and MHE), and starch (wheat flour), in an SAT-PCM. A drastic drop in LH was observed (20–35%) despite a similar PCT, and MHE-cellulose showed good stability until 65 °C as compared to other GTAs.
The improper melting (stability) of disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate (DHPD) was enhanced by adding 3–5 wt.% of sodium alginate (thickener) or polyacrylate sodium (gelling) [66]. The results showed that the use of sodium alginate eliminated phase separation, while polyacrylate sodium seeding prevented phase degradation. Both amylose and sodium alginate grafted sodium acrylates showed excellent stability after a certain number of thermal cycles [67,68]. CMC, as a GTA, was used in the salt hydrate mixture containing 60% magnesium nitrate hexahydrate (MNH) and 40% magnesium chloride hexahydrate (MCH) by Qing et al. [69] and examined for its impact by varying the wt.% from 1 to 20. Notably, good stability was observed with 5 wt.% of CMC, despite a 32% reduction in storage capacity. However, El-Sebaii et al. [70] employed additional water with a sealed container for an MCH-PCM, which helped to avoid the reduction in LH due to the GTA addition. Combining one kind of GTA (CMC) with another (silica gel) was also carried out by Ramirez et al. [71] to enhance the SAT stability. In a GTA concentration (<3 wt.%), 15% of silica gel was mixed with 85% of CMC. The results showed an increment in melting cycle with a reduction in CMC wt.%, while the SCD decremented notably. Further, the chemical structure of CMC helped prevent segregation during phase change with reduced crystallization energy. However, the increased silica gel proportion eased fusion but not crystallization. Finally, the combination of two GTAs aided in enhancing LH recovery.
Ushak et al. [72] studied the performance of a PCM (inorganic salt)-based TMU for batteries by adding PEG 600 (5 wt.%) with various NTs. Among the salts, GS was found to be the best PCM option owing to its satisfactory stability after six cycles. PEG 600 (5 wt.%) reduced the LH of the PCM from 220.5 to 181.6 J g−1, and the PCT marginally rose from 36.8 to 37.7 °C. Further, 5 wt.% of boric acid was added as an NT to reduce the SCD, resulting in a 5.6% increase in LH. Alkan et al. [73] elucidated the significance of PVA in the TES performance of calcium chloride hexahydrate (CaCl2.6H2) (CCH) and GS. The DSC of freezing, and melting of the CCH and GS with PVA are illustrated in Figure 7. According to Figure 7a,b, the LH observed during energy storage (freezing) and the release (melting) of GS + PVA is greater than CCH + PVA by 67.8% and 71.1%, respectively. This could be due to the superior water-soluble nature of GS compared to CCH. As shown in Figure 7c,d, the change in temperature for CCH + PVA is always faster than GS + PVA, which could be due to the higher TC and lower LH of the CCH.
Karimineghlani et al. [74] compared the performance of lithium nitrate trihydrate (LNH) with PVA (15 wt.%) and compared its gel formation with a water solution + PVA (15 wt.%). The visual analysis regarding the gel formation between LNH + PVA and water + PVA is illustrated in Figure 8a, which showed an easy flowing nature of water + PVA, while mild gel formation was seen with LNH + PVA without crystals. The gel formation of LNH + PVA as a function of temperature during the cooling/heating cycle (shown in Figure 8b) indicated the solid-to-gel transition occurrence at ~20 °C. Further, the leakage result of LNH with and without PVA is displayed in Figure 8c. It is observed that the seeding of PVA had an excellent result in holding the LNH molecules together and restricting the leakage. Eutectic PCM strengthening (stability) was conducted by including sodium alginate (0–5 wt.%) [75]. The DSC results showed a reduction in LH by 35.1% with 5 wt.% of sodium alginate, and freezing onset was also prolonged by 2.9 °C. More importantly, incremented viscosity with GTA addition causes the PCM diffusion and minimizes the crystallization energy, leading to a reduced SCD. The significance of five NTs and gelatin (as a GTA) on a BHO-PCM was examined by Wang et al. [76] for a hot LH-TES application. Adding calcium fluoride (1 wt.%) provided superior performance among the various NTs with gelatin (1 wt.%), with a lower SCD (1.8 °C) and excellent LH (343 kJ kg−1) and TC (0.96 W m−1 K−1).
In order to attain a stable and reliable thermal performance of DHPD, Peng et al. [77] utilized silica (fumed) as a GTA, and the photographic views of DHPD samples with 2 wt.% of silica (fumed) are illustrated in Figure 9. The effect of FS inclusion on the melting, freezing, and TC of the DHPD is displayed in Figure 10a–c, respectively. It is perceived that the PCTs of the pure and GTA-added DHPD were found to be 35.5 °C and 33.6–35.2 °C, respectively. More importantly, a steady phase was only seen with pure and 2 wt.% seeded DHPDs, which ensured that 2 wt.% addition of a GTA (silica) was better than other loadings. Despite a reduced SCD from 14.4 to 8.7 °C (Figure 10b), there were no changes in the total melting period (40 min), while the solidification was prolonged. This could be due to the increased velocity, which limited the freezing progress despite increased TC (Figure 10c).
Important observations from existing PCM + GTA + NA studies are consolidated in Table 2. Overall, the inclusion of a GTA alone helped prevent seepage and provided better stability for the PCMs, with some even reducing the SCD notably. Additionally, the NT seeding along with a GTA in the PCM eliminated the SCD and ensured crystallization with reduced energy. However, there was a reduction in LH and TC with increased viscosity, which limited the loading level of the GTA. Additionally, it does not hasten the melting/solidification process. Therefore, further studies need to be conducted to address these issues through the addition of NPs along with a GTA into the PCMs.

5.2. PCM + GTA with NPs

With better TC and a more active heat transfer area, NP addition is a cutting-edge method for increasing the energy transfer rate in several thermal utilities, including TES, solar-thermal units, and TMUs [83,84,85,86,87]. Colloidal stability is a negative factor associated with the addition of NPs to the PCM, whereas the addition of a GTA increased the PCM’s stability despite lower TC and LH levels. As a result, the research community has also experimented with combining NPs and GTAs to create an effective PCM (enhanced TC with superior stability and tiny SCD), and the results are discussed in this sub-section.
Li et al. [88] prepared an SAT-potassium chloride (PC)-based PCM through the seeding of CMC and aluminum oxide (Al2O3) as the GTA and NP, respectively. They varied the wt.% of PC and Al2O3 in the range of 0–10 and 0–5, respectively, with 4 wt.% of CMC. The optimum PCM was achieved by feeding the PC, CMC, and Al2O3 into the PCM by 8, 4, and 1 wt.%, respectively. The observed SCD, LH, and PCT of the optimum PCM were 0.1 °C, 232.3 J g−1, and 50.45 °C, respectively. Ag (Silver) (0.6 wt.%) and Cu (copper) (0.5 wt.%) NPs were also seeded into SAT with CMC instead of Al2O3, resulting in a similar SCD and LH [71,89]. An efficient GS-PCM was realized by Li et al. [90] through the seeding of CBO, EG (expanded graphite), and CMC. The energy storage/releasing of the GS-PCM with and without EG and CBO is displayed in Figure 11. The feeding of CBO reduced the SCD despite a huge loss in storage level. Further addition of EG helped to regain GS’s capacity during storage. Among the various GS-PCM samples, GS + CBO + EG (7 wt.%) produced good results with a 19 °C reduction in the SCD and a 3.6% increment in TC. A combination of hydrophobic silica (1–5 vol.%) and graphite (1–15 vol.%) was utilized by Gorbacheva et al. [91] for improving the paraffin’s TES properties. They observed percolation in the PCM after seeding HS at about 3 vol.%. Further addition of graphite (15 vol.%) aided in good energy performance, with a 33% of TC augmentation. Dong et al. [92] used a PEG-PCM with copper sulfide and PVP (polyethylene pyrrolidone) for photo-thermal utilization, and melt mixing was employed for sample preparation. They varied the concentration of copper sulfide from 2–10 wt.% with 2 wt.% of PVP in PEG. They observed a reduction in LH from 171.8 to 156.2 J g−1, while TC incremented from 0.235 to 0.247 W m−1 K−1.
Carbon NPs (CNPs) were found to be superior to metal NPs (MNPs) [93,94], providing an excellent increase in TC with minor modifications in the density and viscosity owing to their excellent active heat transfer area. It has also been shown that CNPs lead to higher TC increments compared with MNPs [95,96,97,98]. Liu et al. [99] prepared a new PCM comprising GS (PCM), PAAS (GTA), and MWCNTs (multi-walled carbon nanotubes), and mechanical mixing was employed during sample production, as shown in Figure 12. Their results showed a 141.7% enhancement in TC due to the MWCNT seeding (3 wt.%) into the GS-PAAS PCM, and only 3.6% of LH was reduced even after 500 thermal cycles. In another study, 1–10 wt.% of GNPs was added along with HPEC (10 wt.%) in a PCM mixture (fatty acids +MP) [59]. As a result, TC was increased by 102% with GNPs (10 wt.%) despite a 7% LH drop; more importantly, there was only a minor change in the PCT with a 0.1 °C SCD. Furthermore, the PCM passed the thermal reliability test, showing consistent thermal performance over 30,000 thermal cycles with no appreciable variations in the PCT and LH.
Wei et al. [100] developed a hybrid structure using GNPs and CNFs in a PEG-PCM for TMUs. The solution mixing approach followed by sonication and vacuum drying were used for preparing the PEG-GNP-CNF samples, as shown in Figure 13. The results of the PEG + CNF-GNP samples, namely heating, cooling, melting LH, and cyclic stability, are displayed in Figure 14. The analysis revealed only marginal changes in the peak point during melting/cooling, and a 12.6% drop in LH was observed with 4 wt.% GNPs. However, the presence of network formation resulted in great cyclic stability over 500 cycles.
Vasilyev et al. [101] used a hybrid GTA containing MIL and HAS (in a ratio of 17:83 by mass) in a bio-PCM to increase its stability. Additionally, GNPs and MWCNTs were added separately as NPs to enhance the TC of the bio-PCM + GTA. Initially, the GTA concentration was varied from 0 to 15 wt.%, and it was observed that leakage of the samples was negligible (2%) with 15 wt.% of the GTA, as shown in Figure 15a. Further, leakage of the PCM-GTA samples with MWCNTs and GNPs was also examined (Figure 15b), and it was observed that the sample with the GTA and GNPs showed a very low leakage (2%), while the sample with MWCNTs had a notable leakage. The heating and cooling results from Figure 15c,d, respectively, showed that the GNP-containing PCM sample hastened the process owing to the excellent TC augmentation compared to the other samples. The overall observations from the PCM + GTA with NPs are listed in Table 3. It was inferred that the drawbacks of reduced TC and slower energy rates during storage/release due to the GTA addition were significantly eliminated with the seeding of NPs into the PCM + GTA samples; furthermore, the NPs also acted as NTs and suppressed the SCD.

6. Summary, Limitations, and Potential Scope of PCMs with GTA

The present work describes a critical assessment of how the stability of the PCMs can be improved with the aid of various GTAs. Prior to discussing the state of art of the PCM-TES performance, a brief discussion about the TES, PCM, and GTA classification was presented. Although the addition of GTAs to the PCMs has been found to improve their physical and chemical stability over multiple cycles, with negligible seepage and a reduced SCD, some limitations concerning viscosity, TC, LH, and energy storage/releasing rates must be addressed before this new type of PCM can be used in real-world applications. Moreover, most of the available GTAs have been seeded with inorganic PCMs, especially salts for hot and medium LH-TES applications, and few have been tried for bio- and organic PCMs (Paraffin). Most of the studies used about 2–15 wt.% of the GTA in the PCM and investigated its stability and leakage rate. Even after 200 cycles, LH reduced by 3.6–35% only with GTA addition, which is significantly better than pure PCMs. Mostly, the PCM + GTA performances have been tested for the application of solar-thermal and building heating systems. Additionally, different types of GTAs require different preparation methods, such as preheating followed by melt mixing, direct mixing, and vacuum drying. Further, numerous studies have used a single GTA, and more lately, hybrid GTAs, which combine two or more types of GTAs, have been increasingly used to improve seepage resistance. To satisfy the expanded TES criteria, more research is needed on the velocity profile, separation of liquid/solid PCM molecules during melting and crystallization, and storage/release rates. In particular, a system-level study considering actual conditions needs to be explored more elaborately to ensure the practically viability.
Moreover, NTs were seeded with a GTA for the total eradication of the SCD, even though there was still a decreased rate of energy release/storage. In order to accelerate the energy rates during melting and crystallization through enhanced TC, MNPs and CNPs were introduced to the PCM-GTA-NT solutions. However, adding more materials to the PCM still has the potential to increase viscosity, which in turn affects the natural convection. NP sedimentation appears to be the main factor affecting the long-term operation of the TES. Moreover, some studies mixed the NPs early in the preparation process, while others employed them only at the very end; this needs to be addressed in detail. The usage of a water PCM in cold LH-TES for solar-thermal and building cooling systems has increased recently [103,104,105,106,107,108,109], and research on the effects of GTAs, NPs, and NTs on the performance of water PCMs can be exploited to create more energy-efficient components. Furthermore, hybrid NPs may also be useful for PCM-GTA samples to further increase TC. Most of the studies reported the GTA’s concentration for achieving the stable PCM. However, external (environment) factors, namely pH level, ionic strength, pressure, enzyme existence, temperature, and solvent quality on the PCM’s stability need to be explored. The development of novel PCM-GTAs with various NT and NP types (single/hybrid) for commercial LH-TES applications, together with energy, exergy, and cost–benefit analyses, has tremendous potential. The environmental impact of PCM-GTAs for their entire life cycle using a Life Cycle Assessment for designing cost-effective and sustainable LH-TES systems needs to be explored [110].

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, R.P. and S.-C.K.; methodology, R.P.; data collection and formal analysis, R.P., P.D. and A.S.; writing—original draft preparation, R.P.; validation, writing—review and editing, M.P.V., P.G., S.P., A.A. and G.A.K.; writing—review and editing, S.-C.K.; supervision, S.-C.K. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Nomenclature

CBCellulose-based
CCHCalcium chloride hexahydrate
CNFCellulose nanofibrils
CNPCarbon nanoparticle
DHPDDisodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate
DPMDry PCM mixing
GGGuar gum
GNPGraphene nanoplatelets
GSGlauber’s salt
GTAGelling and thickening agents
HPECHydroxypropyl ether cellulose
ITMInorganic thixotropic material
LHLatent heat (J g−1 or kJ kg−1)
LNHLithium nitrate trihydrate
LPMLiquid PCM mixing
MCHMagnesium chloride hexahydrate
MNHMagnesium nitrate hexahydrate
MNPMetal nanoparticle
MWCNTMulti-walled carbon nanotubes
NPNanoparticle
NTNucleating trigger
PAAMPoly-acrylamide
PCMPhase-change material
PCTPhase-change temperature (°C)
PEGPolyethylene glycol
PSPotassium sulfates
PVAPolyvinyl alcohol
PVPPolyethylene pyrrolidone
SATSodium acetate trihydrate
SCDSupercooling degree (°C)
SMSolution mixing
TCThermal conductivity (W m−1 K−1)
TESThermal energy storage
TMUThermal management unit
VBVinyl-based
XGXanthan gum

References

  1. Prabakaran, R.; Sidney, S.; Lal, D.M.; Selvam, C.; Harish, S. Solidification of graphene-assisted phase change nanocomposites inside a sphere for cold storage applications. Energies 2019, 12, 3473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  2. Samykano, M. Role of phase change materials in thermal energy storage: Potential, recent progress and technical challenges. Sustain. Energy Technol. Assess. 2022, 52, 102234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Purohit, B.K.; Sistla, V.S. Inorganic salt hydrate for thermal energy storage application: A review. Energy Storage 2021, 3, e212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bruno, F.; Belusko, M.; Liu, M.; Tay, N.H.S. Using Solid-Liquid Phase Change Materials (PCMs) in Thermal Energy Storage Systems. In Advances in Thermal Energy Storage Systems; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2015; pp. 201–246. [Google Scholar]
  5. Prabakaran, R.; Kumar, J.P.N.; Lal, D.M.; Selvam, C.; Harish, S. Constrained melting of graphene-based phase change nanocomposites inside a sphere. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2020, 139, 941–952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Cabeza, L.F.; Castell, A.; Barreneche, C.D.; De Gracia, A.; Fernández, A.I. Materials used as PCM in thermal energy storage in buildings: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2011, 15, 1675–1695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, Q.; Wu, C.; Wang, X.; Sun, S.; Cui, D.; Pan, S.; Sheng, H. A review of eutectic salts as phase change energy storage materials in the context of concentrated solar power. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2023, 205, 123904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Feliński, P.; Sekret, R. Effect of a low cost parabolic reflector on the charging efficiency of an evacuated tube collector/storage system with a PCM. Solar Energy 2017, 144, 758–766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Thakur, A.K.; Ahmed, M.S.; Kang, H.; Prabakaran, R.; Said, Z.; Rahman, S.; Sathyamurthy, R.; Kim, J.; Hwang, J.Y. Critical Review on Internal and External Battery Thermal Management Systems for Fast Charging Applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2023, 13, 2202944. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zare, M.; Mikkonen, K.S. Phase Change Materials for Life Science Applications. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2023, 33, 2213455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kenisarin, M.; Mahkamov, K. Salt hydrates as latent heat storage materials: Thermophysical properties and costs. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2016, 145, 255–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Selvnes, H.; Allouche, Y.; Manescu, R.I.; Hafner, A. Review on cold thermal energy storage applied to refrigeration systems using phase change materials. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2021, 22, 100807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Feliński, P.; Sekret, R. Experimental study of evacuated tube collector/storage system containing paraffin as a PCM. Energy 2016, 114, 1063–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Feliński, P.; Sekret, R. Effect of PCM application inside an evacuated tube collector on the thermal performance of a domestic hot water system. Energy Build. 2017, 152, 558–567. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Pielichowska, K.; Pielichowski, K. Phase change materials for thermal energy storage. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2014, 65, 67–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Sathishkumar, A.; Cheralathan, M. Charging and discharging processes of low capacity nano-PCM based cool thermal energy storage system: An experimental study. Energy 2023, 263, 125700. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alva, G.; Liu, L.; Huang, X.; Fang, G. Thermal energy storage materials and systems for solar energy applications. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 68, 693–706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zsembinszki, G.; Fernández, A.G.; Cabeza, L.F. Selection of the appropriate phase change material for two innovative compact energy storage systems in residential buildings. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 2116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  19. Castell, A.; Sole, C. Design of latent heat storage systems using phase change materials (PCMs). In Advances in Thermal Energy Storage Systems; Woodhead Publishing: Sawston, UK, 2014; pp. 285–305. [Google Scholar]
  20. Salunkhe, P.B. Investigations on latent heat storage materials for solar water and space heating applications. J. Energy Storage 2017, 12, 243–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shirbani, M.; Siavashi, M.; Bidabadi, M. Phase Change Materials Energy Storage Enhancement Schemes and Implementing the Lattice Boltzmann Method for Simulations: A Review. Energies 2023, 16, 1059. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Sathishkumar, A.; Cheralathan, M. Influence of thermal transport properties of NEPCM for cool thermal energy storage system. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2022, 147, 367–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Huang, Y.; Stonehouse, A.; Abeykoon, C. Encapsulation methods for phase change materials—A critical review. Int. J. Heat Mass Transf. 2023, 200, 123458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ye, W.; Jamshideasli, D.; Khodadadi, J.M. Improved Performance of Latent Heat Energy Storage Systems in Response to Utilization of High Thermal Conductivity Fins. Energies 2023, 16, 1277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ganesh Kumar, P.; Prabakaran, R.; Sakthivadivel, D.; Thangapandian, N.; Velraj, R.; Kim, S.C. Effect of shot blasting on droplet contact angle of carbon aided phase change nanocomposites. Surf. Eng. 2021, 37, 1002–1011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, S.C.; Prabakaran, R.; Sakthivadivel, D.; Thangapandian, N.; Bhatia, A.; Kumar, P.G. Thermal transport properties of carbon-assisted phase change nanocomposite. Fuller. Nanotub. Carb. Nanostruct. 2020, 28, 925–933. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Nartowska, E.; Styś-Maniara, M.; Kozłowski, T. The Potential Environmental and Social Influence of the Inorganic Salt Hydrates Used as a Phase Change Material for Thermal Energy Storage in Solar Installations. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2023, 20, 1331. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  28. Cong, L.; Zou, B.; Palacios, A.; Navarro, M.E.; Qiao, G.; Ding, Y. Thickening and gelling agents for formulation of thermal energy storage materials—A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 155, 111906. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Saha, D.; Bhattacharya, S. Hydrocolloids as thickening and gelling agents in food: A critical review. J. Food Sci. Technol. 2010, 47, 587–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Raut, D.; Kalamkar, V.R. A review on latent heat energy storage for solar thermal water-lithium bromide vapor absorption refrigeration system. J. Energy Storage 2022, 55, 105828. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Yin, C.; Lan, J.; Wang, X.; Zhang, Y.; Ran, R.; Shi, L.Y. Shape-stable hydrated salts/polyacrylamide phase-change organohydrogels for smart temperature management. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2021, 13, 21810–21821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Alves, T.F.; Morsink, M.; Batain, F.; Chaud, M.V.; Almeida, T.; Fernandes, D.A.; da Silva, C.F.; Souto, E.B.; Severino, P. Applications of natural, semi-synthetic, and synthetic polymers in cosmetic formulations. Cosmetics 2020, 7, 75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Liu, B.; Yang, H.; Zhu, C.; Xiao, J.; Cao, H.; Simal-Gandara, J.; Li, Y.; Fan, D.; Deng, J. A comprehensive review of food gels: Formation mechanisms, functions, applications, and challenges. Critic. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2022, 1–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ebrahim, S.A.; Hassabo, A.G.; Othman, H. Natural thickener in textile printing (A Mini Review). J. Text. Color. Polym. Sci. 2021, 18, 55–64. [Google Scholar]
  35. Tao, Y.B.; He, Y.L. A review of phase change material and performance enhancement method for latent heat storage system. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 93, 245–259. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Lee, W.K.; Lim, Y.Y.; Leow, A.T.; Namasivayam, P.; Abdullah, J.O.; Ho, C.L. Factors affecting yield and gelling properties of agar. J. Appl. Phycol. 2017, 29, 1527–1540. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Jayakody, M.M.; Vanniarachchy, M.P.; Wijesekara, I. Seaweed derived alginate, agar, and carrageenan based edible coatings and films for the food industry: A review. J. Food Meas. Charact. 2022, 16, 1195–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ramdhan, T.; Ching, S.H.; Prakash, S.; Bhandari, B. Physical and mechanical properties of alginate based composite gels. Trends Food Sci. Technol. 2020, 106, 150–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Shafie, M.H.; Kamal, M.L.; Zulkiflee, F.F.; Hasan, S.; Uyop, N.H.; Abdullah, S.; Hussin, N.A.; Tan, Y.C.; Zafarina, Z. Application of Carrageenan extract from red seaweed (Rhodophyta) in cosmetic products: A review. J. Indian Chem. Soc. 2022, 28, 100613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Aga, M.B.; Dar, A.H.; Nayik, G.A.; Panesar, P.S.; Allai, F.; Khan, S.A.; Shams, R.; Kennedy, J.F.; Altaf, A. Recent insights into carrageenan-based bio-nanocomposite polymers in food applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2021, 192, 197–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Luo, Q.; Hossen, M.A.; Zeng, Y.; Dai, J.; Li, S.; Qin, W.; Liu, Y. Gelatin-based composite films and their application in food packaging: A review. J. Food Eng. 2022, 313, 110762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Thombare, N.; Jha, U.; Mishra, S.; Siddiqui, M.Z. Guar gum as a promising starting material for diverse applications: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2016, 88, 361–372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Petri, D.F. Xanthan gum: A versatile biopolymer for biomedical and technological applications. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2015, 132, 42035. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Yang, L.; Villalobos, U.; Akhmetov, B.; Gil, A.; Khor, J.O.; Palacios, A.; Li, Y.; Ding, Y.; Cabeza, L.F.; Tan, W.L.; et al. A comprehensive review on sub-zero temperature cold thermal energy storage materials, technologies, and applications: State of the art and recent developments. Appl. Energy 2021, 288, 116555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Rahman, L.; Goswami, J. Poly (Vinyl Alcohol) as Sustainable and Eco-Friendly Packaging: A Review. J. Packag. Technol. Res. 2022, 7, 1–10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Gaikwad, K.K.; Singh, S.; Lee, Y.S. Oxygen scavenging films in food packaging. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2018, 16, 523–538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Gautam, L.; Warkar, S.G.; Ahmad, S.I.; Kant, R.; Jain, M. A review on carboxylic acid cross-linked polyvinyl alcohol: Properties and applications. Polym. Eng. Sci. 2022, 62, 225–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Sundararajan, S.; Samui, A.B.; Kulkarni, P.S. Versatility of polyethylene glycol (PEG) in designing solid–solid phase change materials (PCMs) for thermal management and their application to innovative technologies. J. Mater. Chem A 2017, 5, 18379–18396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Watcharakitti, J.; Win, E.E.; Nimnuan, J.; Smith, S.M. Modified starch-based adhesives: A review. Polymers 2022, 14, 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  50. Maurya, N.K.; Mandal, A. Studies on behavior of suspension of silica nanoparticle in aqueous polyacrylamide solution for application in enhanced oil recovery. Petr. Sci. Technol. 2016, 34, 429–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. El Karsani, K.S.; Al-Muntasheri, G.A.; Sultan, A.S.; Hussein, I.A. Impact of salts on polyacrylamide hydrolysis and gelation: New insights. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2014, 131, 41185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Han, X.; Jiang, Y. Preparation and characterization of a form-stable phase change hydrogel for heat-protective clothing. New J. Chem. 2023, 47, 1818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Patil, A.; Sandewicz, R.W. Cosmetic science and polymer chemistry: Perfect together. In Polymers for Personal Care and Cosmetics, American Chemical Society; American Chemical Society: Washington, DC, USA, 2013; pp. 13–37. [Google Scholar]
  54. Banerjee, S.; Bhattacharya, S. Food gels: Gelling process and new applications. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 2012, 52, 334–346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  55. Himashree, P.; Sengar, A.S.; Sunil, C.K. Food thickening agents: Sources, chemistry, properties and applications—A review. Int. J. Gastron. Food Sci. 2022, 27, 100468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Lohani, A.; Singh, G.; Bhattacharya, S.S.; Verma, A. Interpenetrating polymer networks as innovative drug delivery systems. J. Drug Deliv. 2014, 2014, 583612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  57. Kadajji, V.G.; Betageri, G.V. Water soluble polymers for pharmaceutical applications. Polymers 2011, 3, 1972–2009. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  58. Bearat, H.H.; Lee, B.H.; Vernon, B.L. Comparison of properties between NIPAAm-based simultaneously physically and chemically gelling polymer systems for use in vivo. Acta Biomater. 2012, 8, 3629–3642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Saeed, R.M.; Schlegel, J.P.; Castano, C.; Sawafta, R. Preparation and enhanced thermal performance of novel (solid to gel) form-stable eutectic PCM modified by nano-graphene platelets. J. Energy Storage 2018, 15, 91–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, Y.; Yu, K.; Peng, H.; Ling, X. Preparation and thermal properties of sodium acetate trihydrate as a novel phase change material for energy storage. Energy 2019, 167, 269–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Marks, S. An investigation of the thermal energy storage capacity of Glauber’s salt with respect to thermal cycling. Solar Energy 1980, 25, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Telkes, M. Thermal energy storage in salt hydrates. Solar Energy Mater. 1980, 2, 381–393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ryu, H.W.; Woo, S.W.; Shin, B.C.; Kim, S.D. Prevention of supercooling and stabilization of inorganic salt hydrates as latent heat storage materials. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 1992, 27, 161–172. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Shin, B.C.; Kim, S.D.; Won-Hoon, P. Phase separation and supercooling of a latent heat-storage material. Energy 1989, 14, 921–930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Cabeza, L.F.; Svensson, G.; Hiebler, S.; Mehling, H. Thermal performance of sodium acetate trihydrate thickened with different materials as phase change energy storage material. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2003, 23, 1697–1704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Lan, X.Z.; Tan, Z.C.; Yue, D.T.; Shi, Q.; Yang, C.G. Heat storage performance of disodium hydrogen phosphate dodecahydrate: Prevention of phase separation by thickening and gelling methods. Chin. J. Chem. 2007, 25, 921–925. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Lan, X.Z.; Tan, Z.C.; Shi, Q.; Yang, C.G. A novel gelling method for stabilization of phase change material Na2HPO4·12H2O with sodium alginate grafted sodium acrylate. Thermochim. Acta 2007, 463, 18–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Lan, X.Z.; Tan, Z.C.; Shi, Q.; Gao, Z.H. Gelled Na2HPO4·12H2O with amylose-g-sodium acrylate: Heat storage performance, heat capacity and heat of fusion. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2009, 96, 1035–1040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Ding, Q.; Luo, X.; Lin, X.; Zhang, H. Study of magnesium nitrate hexahydrate and magnesium chloride hexahydrate mixture as phase change material. In Proceedings of the 2012 Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference IEEE, Shanghai, China, 27–29 March 2012; pp. 1–4. [Google Scholar]
  70. El-Sebaii, A.A.; Al-Heniti, S.; Al-Agel, F.; Al-Ghamdi, A.A.; Al-Marzouki, F. One thousand thermal cycles of magnesium chloride hexahydrate as a promising PCM for indoor solar cooking. Energy Convers. Manag. 2011, 52, 1771–1777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Ramirez, B.G.; Glorieux, C.; Martinez, E.S.; Cuautle, J.F. Tuning of thermal properties of sodium acetate trihydrate by blending with polymer and silver nanoparticles. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2014, 62, 838–844. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Ushak, S.; Galazutdinova, Y.; Gutierrez, A.; Cabeza, L.F.; Farid, M.M.; Grágeda, M. Thermal management system of li-ion batteries using inorganic phase-change materials. In Proceedings of the EuroSun 2014: International Conference on Solar Energy and Buildings, Aix-les-Bains, France, 16–19 September 2014. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Alkan, C.; Döğüşcü, D.K.; Gottschalk, A.; Ramamoorthi, U.; Kumar, A.; Yadav, S.K.; Yadav, A.S.; Adıgüzel, E.; Altıntaş, A.; Damlıoğlu, Y.; et al. Polyvinyl alcohol-salt hydrate mixtures as passive thermal energy storage systems. Energy Procedia. 2016, 91, 1012–1017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  74. Karimineghlani, P.; Emmons, E.; Green, M.J.; Shamberger, P.; Sukhishvili, S.A. A temperature-responsive poly (vinyl alcohol) gel for controlling fluidity of an inorganic phase change material. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 12474–12482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Liang, L.; Chen, X. Preparation and thermal properties of eutectic hydrate salt phase change thermal energy storage material. Int. J. Photoenergy 2018, 2018, 6432047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Wang, Q.; Wang, J.; Chen, Y.; Zhao, C.Y. Experimental investigation of barium hydroxide octahydrate as latent heat storage materials. Solar Energy 2019, 177, 99–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Peng, S.; Huang, J.; Wang, T.; Zhu, P. Effect of fumed silica additive on supercooling, thermal reliability and thermal stability of Na2HPO4·12H2O as inorganic PCM. Thermochim. Acta 2019, 675, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Dannemand, M.; Johansen, J.B.; Furbo, S. Solidification behavior and thermal conductivity of bulk sodium acetate trihydrate composites with thickening agents and graphite. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2016, 145, 287–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  79. Xiao, Q.; Zhang, M.; Fan, J.; Li, L.; Xu, T.; Yuan, W. Thermal conductivity enhancement of hydrated salt phase change materials employing copper foam as the supporting material. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2019, 199, 91–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Vasilyev, G.; Koifman, N.; Shuster, M.; Gishvoliner, M.; Cohen, Y.; Zussman, E. Synergistic Effect of Two Organogelators for the Creation of Bio-Based, Shape-Stable Phase-Change Materials. Langmuir 2020, 36, 15572–15582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  81. Oh, K.; Kwon, S.; Xu, W.; Wang, X.; Toivakka, M. Effect of micro-and nanofibrillated cellulose on the phase stability of sodium sulfate decahydrate based phase change material. Cellulose 2020, 27, 5003–5016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Shi, X.; Yazdani, M.R.; Ajdary, R.; Rojas, O.J. Leakage-proof microencapsulation of phase change materials by emulsification with acetylated cellulose nanofibrils. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 254, 117279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Prabakaran, R.; Sidney, S.; Lal, D.M.; Harish, S.; Kim, S.C. Experimental performance of a mobile air conditioning unit with small thermal energy storage for idle stop/start vehicles. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2022, 147, 5117–5132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Thakur, A.K.; Prabakaran, R.; Elkadeem, M.R.; Sharshir, S.W.; Arıcı, M.; Wang, C.; Zhao, W.; Hwang, J.Y.; Saidur, R. A state of art review and future viewpoint on advance cooling techniques for Lithium–ion battery system of electric vehicles. J. Energy Storage 2020, 32, 101771. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kumar, P.G.; Sakthivadivel, D.; Prabakaran, R.; Vigneswaran, S.; SakthiPriya, M.; Thakur, A.K.; Sathyamurthy, R.; Kim, S.C. Exploring the thermo-physical characteristic of novel multi-wall carbon nanotube—Therminol-55-based nanofluids for solar-thermal applications. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 10717–10728. [Google Scholar]
  86. Eneren, P.; Aksoy, Y.T.; Vetrano, M.R. Experiments on Single-Phase Nanofluid Heat Transfer Mechanisms in Microchannel Heat Sinks: A Review. Energies 2022, 15, 2525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Modi, N.; Wang, X.; Negnevitsky, M. Solar Hot Water Systems Using Latent Heat Thermal Energy Storage: Perspectives and Challenges. Energies 2023, 16, 1969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Li, X.; Zhou, Y.; Nian, H.; Zhu, F.; Ren, X.; Dong, O.; Hai, C.; Shen, Y.; Zeng, J. Preparation and thermal energy storage studies of CH3COONa3H2O–KCl composites salt system with enhanced phase change performance. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2016, 102, 708–715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  89. Cui, W.; Yuan, Y.; Sun, L.; Cao, X.; Yang, X. Experimental studies on the supercooling and melting/freezing characteristics of nano-copper/sodium acetate trihydrate composite phase change materials. Renew. Energy 2016, 99, 1029–1037. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Li, C.; Zhang, B.; Xie, B.; Zhao, X.; Chen, J. Tailored phase change behavior of Na2SO410H2O/expanded graphite composite for thermal energy storage. Energy Convers. Manag. 2020, 208, 112586. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Gorbacheva, S.N.; Makarova, V.V.; Ilyin, S.O. Hydrophobic nanosilica-stabilized graphite particles for improving thermal conductivity of paraffin wax-based phase-change materials. J. Energy Storage 2021, 36, 102417. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Dong, Y.; Liu, H.; Zhang, N.; Zhou, J.; Pan, X. Photo-to-thermal conversion and energy storage of polyethylene glycol/copper sulfide composite PCMs. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2022, 238, 111583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Kumar, P.G.; Prabakaran, R.; Sakthivadivel, D.; Somasundaram, P.; Vigneswaran, V.S.; Kim, S.C. Ultrasonication time optimization for multi-walled carbon nanotube based Therminol-55 nanofluid: An experimental investigation. J. Therm. Analysis Calorim. 2022, 147, 10329–10336. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Thakur, A.K.; Ahmed, M.S.; Park, J.; Prabakaran, R.; Sidney, S.; Sathyamurthy, R.; Kim, S.C.; Periasamy, S.; Kim, J.; Hwang, J.Y. A review on carbon nanomaterials for K-ion battery anode: Progress and perspectives. Int. J. Energy Res. 2022, 46, 4033–4070. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Gu, J.; Du, J.; Li, Y.; Li, J.; Chen, L.; Chai, Y.; Li, Y. Preparation and Characterization of n-Octadecane@SiO2/GO and n-Octadecane@SiO2/Ag Nanoencapsulated Phase Change Material for Immersion Cooling of Li-Ion Battery. Energies 2023, 16, 1498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Mebarek-Oudina, F.; Chabani, I. Review on Nano Enhanced PCMs: Insight on nePCM Application in Thermal Management/Storage Systems. Energies 2023, 16, 1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Kalidasan, B.; Pandey, A.K.; Rahman, S.; Sharma, K.; Tyagi, V.V. Experimental Investigation of Graphene Nanoplatelets Enhanced Low Temperature Ternary Eutectic Salt Hydrate Phase Change Material. Energies 2023, 16, 1574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Olabi, A.G.; Wilberforce, T.; Elsaid, K.; Sayed, E.T.; Ramadan, M.; Rahman, S.A.; Abdelkareem, M.A. Recent progress on Carbon-based nanomaterial for phase change materials: Prospects and challenges. Therm. Sci. Eng. Prog. 2021, 23, 100920. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Liu, Y.; Yu, K.; Gao, X.; Ren, M.; Jia, M.; Yang, Y. Enhanced thermal properties of hydrate salt/poly (acrylate sodium) copolymer hydrogel as form-stable phase change material via incorporation of hydroxyl carbon nanotubes. Solar Energy Mater. Solar Cells 2020, 208, 110387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Wei, X.; Jin, X.Z.; Zhang, N.; Qi, X.D.; Yang, J.H.; Zhou, Z.W.; Wang, Y. Constructing cellulose nanocrystal/graphene nanoplatelet networks in phase change materials toward intelligent thermal management. Carbohydr. Polym. 2021, 253, 117290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Vasilyev, G.; Koifman, N.; Shuster, M.; Gishvoliner, M.; Cohen, Y.; Zussman, E. Phase Change Material with Gelation Imparting Shape Stability. ACS Omega 2022, 7, 11887–11902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  102. Chen, F.; Liu, X.; Wang, Z.; Tie, S.; Wang, C.A. Hierarchically porous CMC/rGO/CNFs aerogels for leakage-proof mirabilite phase change materials with superior energy thermal storage. Front. Mater. Sci. 2022, 16, 220619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Bott, C.; Dressel, I.; Bayer, P. State-of-technology review of water-based closed seasonal thermal energy storage systems. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2019, 113, 109241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Prakash, R.; Ravindra, M.R. Cold thermal energy storage for milk chilling: A numerical and experimental study. J. Food Eng. 2023, 337, 111223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  105. Sathishkumar, A.; Cheralathan, M. Influence of functionalized carbon flake on phase change characteristics of deionized (DI) water for cool thermal storage system. Fuller. Nanotub. Carb. Nanostruct. 2022, 30, 958–968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Jeyaraman, P.N.; Prabakaran, R.; Dhasan, M.L. A novel solar operated DC compressor refrigerator with thermal energy storage. Energy Sour. Part A Recovery Utiliz. Environ. Eff. 2023, 45, 860–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Sidney, S.; Dhasan, M.L.; Harish, S. Experimental investigation of freezing and melting characteristics of graphene-based phase change nanocomposite for cold thermal energy storage applications. Appl. Sci. 2019, 9, 1099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  108. Sidney, S.; Prabakaran, R.; Kim, S.C.; Dhasan, M.L. A novel solar-powered milk cooling refrigeration unit with cold thermal energy storage for rural application. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 2022, 29, 16346–16370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  109. Sundaram, P.; Kalaisselvane, A.; Sathishkumar, A.; Ganesh Kumar, P.; Kim, S.C.; Prabakaran, R. Synthesis, stability, and heat transfer behavior of water and graphene nanoplatelet-based nanofluid for cool thermal storage applications. J. Energy Storage 2023, 64, 107219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Gracia, A.; Rincóna, L.; Castell, A.; Jiménez, M.; Boer, D.; Medranoa, M.; Cabeza, L.F. Life Cycle Assesment of the inclusion of phase change materials (PCM) in experimental buildings. Energybuild 2010, 2, 1517–1523. [Google Scholar]
Energies 16 03306 g001 550
Figure 1. TES technologies with a focus on materials.
Figure 1. TES technologies with a focus on materials.
Energies 16 03306 g001
Energies 16 03306 g002 550
Figure 2. Classification of the PCM.
Figure 2. Classification of the PCM.
Energies 16 03306 g002
Energies 16 03306 g003 550
Figure 3. GTA applications in various sectors.
Figure 3. GTA applications in various sectors.
Energies 16 03306 g003
Energies 16 03306 g004 550
Figure 4. Overview of the GTA classifications.
Figure 4. Overview of the GTA classifications.
Energies 16 03306 g004
Energies 16 03306 g005 550
Figure 5. GTA mechanisms [28].
Figure 5. GTA mechanisms [28].
Energies 16 03306 g005
Energies 16 03306 g006 550
Figure 6. PCM + GTA preparation approaches [28].
Figure 6. PCM + GTA preparation approaches [28].
Energies 16 03306 g006
Energies 16 03306 g007 550
Figure 7. (a) DSC of GS + PVA; (b) DSC of CCH + PVA; (c) freezing and (d) melting of GS and CCH with PVA [73].
Figure 7. (a) DSC of GS + PVA; (b) DSC of CCH + PVA; (c) freezing and (d) melting of GS and CCH with PVA [73].
Energies 16 03306 g007
Energies 16 03306 g008 550
Figure 8. (a) Photographic view of water + PVA and LNH + PVA samples; (b) heating and cooling curves; (c) melting of LNH with and without PVA [74].
Figure 8. (a) Photographic view of water + PVA and LNH + PVA samples; (b) heating and cooling curves; (c) melting of LNH with and without PVA [74].
Energies 16 03306 g008
Energies 16 03306 g009 550
Figure 9. (a) Silica (fumed); (b) DHPD; and (c) DHPD + silica (2 wt.%) [77].
Figure 9. (a) Silica (fumed); (b) DHPD; and (c) DHPD + silica (2 wt.%) [77].
Energies 16 03306 g009
Energies 16 03306 g010 550
Figure 10. (a) Melting cycle; (b) freezing cycle; and (c) TC of the DHPD samples [77].
Figure 10. (a) Melting cycle; (b) freezing cycle; and (c) TC of the DHPD samples [77].
Energies 16 03306 g010
Energies 16 03306 g011 550
Figure 11. Energy storage/release of the GS-PCM with/without CBO and EG [90].
Figure 11. Energy storage/release of the GS-PCM with/without CBO and EG [90].
Energies 16 03306 g011
Energies 16 03306 g012 550
Figure 12. Sample preparation approach used by Liu et al. [99]: (a) PCM + GTA and (b) PCM + NM + NA + GTA.
Figure 12. Sample preparation approach used by Liu et al. [99]: (a) PCM + GTA and (b) PCM + NM + NA + GTA.
Energies 16 03306 g012
Energies 16 03306 g013 550
Figure 13. Sample preparation approach followed by Wei et al. [100].
Figure 13. Sample preparation approach followed by Wei et al. [100].
Energies 16 03306 g013
Energies 16 03306 g014 550
Figure 14. (a) Heating DSC; (b) cooling DSC; (c) melting LH; and (d) cyclic analysis [100].
Figure 14. (a) Heating DSC; (b) cooling DSC; (c) melting LH; and (d) cyclic analysis [100].
Energies 16 03306 g014
Energies 16 03306 g015 550
Figure 15. (a) GTA versus leakage rate; (b) leakage of the samples used; (c) heating curve; and (d) cooling curve [101].
Figure 15. (a) GTA versus leakage rate; (b) leakage of the samples used; (c) heating curve; and (d) cooling curve [101].
Energies 16 03306 g015
Table
Table 1. General properties of available GTAs from the existing studies [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53].
Table 1. General properties of available GTAs from the existing studies [28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46,47,48,49,50,51,52,53].
GTA TypeStructureIonic ChargeSolubilityLimitationWorking NatureApplication (Industries)
AgarLinear/hetero- polymersNon-ionicOnly in hot waterNot recommended for acidic solutions (pH < 4)ReversibleFood, medical, and leather
AlginatesLinear/hetero-/homo-polymersAnionicWater (except lambda in cold water)Salt solution (base) might cause the gelling formationReversibleFood and medical
GelatinProtein-based biopolymerCovalent compoundsWater solublePoor mechanical properties and short degradation timesReversibleFood and medical
GGHydrophilic biopolymerNon-ionicWater solubleUnstable nature at lower pH (<3.5) and higher temperatures (>90 °C)ReversibleFood, cosmetics, paper, and medical
XGHetero-polymersAnionicWater solubleNot recommended in heat-produced (>300 °C) process and (high) salt solventsShear-thinning/reversible pseudo-plasticityFood
PVALinear aliphaticCationicWater solublePoor permeability and moisture-absorbing natureShear-thinning/reversibleFood
PEGLinear (semicrystalline polyether)Non-ionicWater solubleMay cause leakage at higher temperatures, poor loading capacityShear-thinning/reversibleTextile and medical
PAAMLinear-chain or cross-linkedCationicWater solubleProne to microbial contamination and more difficult to prepare and handle than other GTAsShear-thinning/reversibleMedical, oil recovery, and waste-water treatment
CMCLinearAnionicWater solublePoor antimicrobial propertiesShear-thinning/reversibleMedical
Table
Table 2. Notable observations from the existing PCM + NT+ GTA studies.
Table 2. Notable observations from the existing PCM + NT+ GTA studies.
PCMGTA/wt.%NT/wt.%Preparation ApproachObservationsApplicationRef.
PCT Melting (°C)SCD (°C)TC (W m−1 K−1)LH (kJ kg−1) (No. of Cycles)
GSAttapulgite clay/9.3Borax/2.7SM32.47-105 (200)Space heating[61]
SATCMC/3
SAP/3		PS/2
Borax/3		LPM58
32		0–3
3–4		0.6
0.64		206 (200)
227 (200)		Solar heating[63]
DHPDSodium alginate-SM35.4--260.9 (-)-[68]
MNH + MCH (60:40)CMC/5-LPM57--100 (100)Solar heating and building[69]
SATCMC + silica gel (85:15)/3Silver-62.13--285.8 (10)Solar heating[71]
GSPEG/5Boric acid/5-34.9--191.8 (-)Battery[72]
CCH
GS		PVA--42.1
34.2		-
-		0.16–0.19248.7 (-)
80.0 (-)		Green house and food preservation[73]
SATXG/0.5
CMC/1		-LPM--0.54
0.64		-Solar thermal[78]
SATXG/2Disodium phosphate/-LPM58.8--240.3 (200)Solar thermal[79]
Fatty acidsMT-800 (Mil)/3-LPM58.1----[80]
GSFibrillated cellulose (nano/micro-sized)/1Borax/5SM291.9---[81]
ParaffinCellulose nanofibrils (CNF)/20-SM54.89-171.4Building heating[82]
Table
Table 3. Notable observations from the existing PCM + NT+ GTA studies with NPs.
Table 3. Notable observations from the existing PCM + NT+ GTA studies with NPs.
PCMGTA/wt.%NP/wt.%Preparation ApproachObservationsApplicationRef.
PCT Melting (°C)SCD (°C)TC (W m−1 K−1)LH (kJ kg−1) (No. of Cycles)
SAT + PCCMC/4Al2O3/1Simple blending50.450.1-232.3 (50)Building and water heating[88]
SATCMC/3Cu/0.5Dispersion in liquid SAT57.80.50.936231.4 (50)-[89]
GSCMC/2EG/0.7-31.068.031.96114 (50)Building envelope[90]
ParaffinSilica/3Graphite/15LPM57.5--131.6-[91]
PEGPVP/2Cu Sulfide/10 56.2313.370.247151.8 (100)Solar thermal[92]
GSPAAS/7MWCNT/3Mechanical mixing38.5-1.38180.4 (500)Solar thermal[99]
PEGCNC/8GNP/4Physical compound59.6-2.018145.2 (100)Electronic devices[100]
Bio-PCMMil + HAS (17:83 by mass)/15GNP/3
MWCNT/0.6		LPM26.9–28.30.2–0.30.454
0.33		-Green house and water heating[101]
Mirabilite-PCMCMC/-GO + CNF/---0.7–1-86.3 (1500)Solar thermal[102]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Prabakaran, R.; Dhamodharan, P.; Sathishkumar, A.; Gullo, P.; Vikram, M.P.; Pandiaraj, S.; Alodhayb, A.; Khouqeer, G.A.; Kim, S.-C. An Overview of the State of the Art and Challenges in the Use of Gelling and Thickening Agents to Create Stable Thermal Energy Storage Materials. Energies 2023, 16, 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083306

AMA Style

Prabakaran R, Dhamodharan P, Sathishkumar A, Gullo P, Vikram MP, Pandiaraj S, Alodhayb A, Khouqeer GA, Kim S-C. An Overview of the State of the Art and Challenges in the Use of Gelling and Thickening Agents to Create Stable Thermal Energy Storage Materials. Energies. 2023; 16(8):3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083306

Chicago/Turabian Style

Prabakaran, Rajendran, Palanisamy Dhamodharan, Anbalagan Sathishkumar, Paride Gullo, Muthuraman Ponrajan Vikram, Saravanan Pandiaraj, Abdullah Alodhayb, Ghada A. Khouqeer, and Sung-Chul Kim. 2023. "An Overview of the State of the Art and Challenges in the Use of Gelling and Thickening Agents to Create Stable Thermal Energy Storage Materials" Energies 16, no. 8: 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083306

APA Style

Prabakaran, R., Dhamodharan, P., Sathishkumar, A., Gullo, P., Vikram, M. P., Pandiaraj, S., Alodhayb, A., Khouqeer, G. A., & Kim, S.-C. (2023). An Overview of the State of the Art and Challenges in the Use of Gelling and Thickening Agents to Create Stable Thermal Energy Storage Materials. Energies, 16(8), 3306. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083306

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop