Next Article in Journal
Unidimensional and 3D Analyses of a Radial Inflow Turbine for an Organic Rankine Cycle under Design and Off-Design Conditions
Next Article in Special Issue
TGA-FTIR Analysis of Biomass Samples Based on the Thermal Decomposition Behavior of Hemicellulose, Cellulose, and Lignin
Previous Article in Journal
Investigation of the Electrical Properties of Mineral Oils with and without Carbon Nanotube Concentration under Different Magnetic Fields Applied in Transformer Applications
Previous Article in Special Issue
Characterization of the Ensemble of Lignin-Remodeling DyP-Type Peroxidases from Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2)
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Recent Advances in Lignin-Based Biofuel Production

1
Department of Nanotechnology Engineering, Zonguldak Bulent Ecevit University, 67100 Zonguldak, Turkey
2
Biomaterials and Nanotechnology Research Group & NanoTeam, 34473 Istanbul, Turkey
3
Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Kahramanmaraş Sutçu Imam University, 46050 Kahramanmaraş, Turkey
4
Department of Aerospace Engineering, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, 06010 Ankara, Turkey
5
Department of Biosystem Engineering, Igdir University, 76000 Igdir, Turkey
6
Department of Forest Industrial Engineering, Istanbul University Cerrahpasa, 34098 Istanbul, Turkey
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2023, 16(8), 3382; https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083382
Submission received: 8 February 2023 / Revised: 25 March 2023 / Accepted: 5 April 2023 / Published: 12 April 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Biofuels Production from Lignocellulosic Biomass)

Abstract

:
Lignin is a polymer found in the cell walls of plants and is an important component of wood. Lignin-derived fuels have attracted attention as a means of producing biofuels from biomass in recent years. There are two basic methods for converting lignin into fuel: thermochemical and catalytic. Lignin-derived fuels have the potential to reduce dependency on fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. However, more research is needed to optimize the production of lignin-derived fuels and to determine their environmental impact. This review aims to evaluate the development of lignin-derived fuels from an economic and environmental point of view while presenting a broad perspective.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Lignocellulosic biomass is a promising source of raw materials used to produce biofuels. The rapid depletion of fossil fuel resources in the world and the increase in the environmental effects of these resources have led to the use of sustainable energy resources instead of fossil fuels. The formation of toxic gases by fossil fuels pollutes the environment and causes global warming [1,2,3,4,5]. The use of lignocellulosic biomass in biofuel production not only reduces emissions, but also helps to reduce greenhouse gases. In addition, the renewability and abundance of lignocellulosic biomass is very important for environmentally friendly biofuel production [6,7,8,9,10,11,12]. Today, biomass-based fuels are commercially available. For example; The number of bioethanol (made from cellulose and hemicellulose-based carbohydrates) and biodiesel (produced using vegetable oils) fuel stations is increasing in the USA and Canada. However, considering price–performance comparisons and purity levels, the quality of the resulting fuel needs to be improved. In the literature, biomass-based fuels are evaluated under two basic classes as furanic biofuels and cycloalkane biofuels. Furanics use the dehydration of carbohydrates to produce compounds with a furanic structure. Cycloalkanes are produced by hydro-deoxygenation of lignin with the help of lignin phenolic compounds. Cycloalkanes obtained using lignin can be used directly as fuel and mixed with conventional gasoline. Thus, a reduction in fuel density, volumetric heating, and NOx emissions can be achieved by using conventional gasoline–cycloalkane biofuel mixtures [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20]. Lignin-derived biofuels have the potential to be a sustainable alternative to fossil fuels, as they can be produced from renewable plant materials and have a lower carbon footprint. Overall, the potential for lignin-derived biofuels is promising, but more research and development are needed before it becomes a practical and economically viable alternative to fossil fuels. Lignin can be converted into a range of fuels, including gasoline, diesel, and aviation fuel. These fuels have similar properties to their fossil-based counterparts, making them suitable for use in a wide range of applications. In addition, lignin-based fuels can be blended with traditional fossil fuels, helping to reduce the overall carbon intensity of the transportation sector [21,22,23]. Conventional aviation fuel is derived from fossil fuels, which contribute significantly to greenhouse gas emissions. Lignin-based aviation fuel offers a renewable alternative that can reduce emissions and improve air quality. Lignin-derived aviation fuels have the potential to significantly reduce our dependence on fossil fuels and reduce greenhouse gas emissions. Although still in the early stages of development, lignin aviation fuels have shown positive results in laboratory tests and have great implications for the future of aviation [24,25,26]. Biofuels obtained by using lignin can be used in many different fields (heat, electricity, and fuel production) [27,28,29,30,31,32,33]. Today, the future of lignin-based biofuels is possible by understanding the basic elements and mechanism of lignin-based biofuels [34]. In this context, this review article will examine the economics and sustainability of lignin biofuels, as well as the processes and mechanisms necessary to understand the role of lignin in biofuel production, and contribute to the industrial design of lignin-based biofuels in the future.

2. Lignin and Its Derivatives

Lignocellulosic micro and nano materials derived from natural lignocellulosic biomass contain three basic components. They consist approximately of 35–50% cellulose, 5–30% lignin and 20–35% hemicellulose by weight [35,36]. Lignin is known as the second most abundant naturally occurring organic substance on Earth after cellulose [37,38]. It disperses around the cellulose fibers in the plant cell wall together with the hemicellulose. In addition, lignin is covalently bonded to the carbohydrate/cellulose structure [39,40,41,42]. It is known that the total amount of biomass in the world corresponds to an estimated 1.85–2.4 × 1012 tons, and approximately 20% of the total biomass amount is lignin [43]. Although it varies according to the extraction process, it has a molecular mass of 1000–20,000 g mol−1 [44,45]. Lignin and lignin derivatives can be used to obtain many products with high added value, especially carbon fiber, some oxidized products, phenolic compounds, synthesis gas, various hydrocarbons, and biofuels [46,47,48]. There are numerous properties which make lignin qualify as a unique natural resource. These properties include biodegradability, structural integrity, antioxidant/fungal/microbial behavior, abundance, chemical/biological/enzymatic stability, fire/UV resistance, and hydrophilicity/hydrophobicity (depending on the lignin source). Moreover, lignin is known to possess excellent physicochemical, rheological, and viscoelastic properties, strong film-forming capacity, and good compatibility with many industrial chemicals compared to cellulose and hemicellulose [49,50,51,52,53,54,55]. Despite the abovementioned outstanding properties, utilization of lignin at an industrial scale is still difficult, primarily because of its impurity, chemical reactivity, and delicate structure [56]. Depending mainly on the isolation method, lignin is classified into several species and derivatives. Figure 1 presents a summary of lignin species under four main headings. Lignin derivatives and isolation mechanisms typically used, along with the most general approach, are kraft lignin [57], lignosulfonate lignin [58], soda lignin [59], organosolv lignin [60], isolated lignin [61], acid hydrolysis lignin [62], ball-milled lignin [63], and degraded lignin [64].

3. Modification and Pretreatment of Lignin for Improved Biofuel Conversion

Lignocellulosic biomass has the potential to be a valuable resource for the production of biofuels, but its conversion into useful products is hindered by the presence of lignin. Lignin is a complex polymer that is difficult to degrade and therefore generally needs to be modified and pretreated before it can be used for biofuel production. The process of modifying and pretreating lignin is important for improving the efficiency of biofuel conversion from lignocellulosic biomass. Pretreatment can improve the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass by breaking down the complex polymeric structure of lignin, thus enabling the release of sugars and other valuable compounds [66,67]. Acid, alkaline, and enzymatic hydrolysis techniques are used for pretreating lignin. Acid and alkaline hydrolysis involve the use of acids or bases to break down the polymer structure of lignin, while enzymatic hydrolysis involves the use of enzymes to catalyze the degradation of lignin [68,69]. Pretreatment is an important step in the process of converting lignocellulosic biomass into useful products, and it can have a significant impact on the economics of biofuel production and is essential for improving the efficiency of biofuel conversion from lignocellulosic biomass. The cost of pretreatment is directly related to the price of lignocellulosic biomass, as the cost of pretreatment is often proportional to the amount of lignin that needs to be broken down [70,71]. Additionally, pretreatment can also reduce the energy requirements for biofuel conversion, as breaking down the lignin requires less energy than that of cellulose and hemicellulose. In order to maximize the potential of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel production, it is important to understand the different strategies for pretreating lignin, and their impact on the biofuel conversion of lignocellulosic biomass. By exploring the different strategies for modifying and pretreating lignin, it is possible to reveal the potential of lignocellulosic biomass for biofuel conversion [72,73].

Different Pretreatment Strategies of Lignin

Acid hydrolysis is one of the most common methods of extracting lignin from lignocellulosic biomass. Acid hydrolysis involves the use of acids such as sulfuric acid, hydrochloric acid, and nitric acid. This method involves the use of acid to break down the bonds of the lignin molecule. The relative amount of lignin increases with longer reaction times and/or greater acid concentrations for all biomasses. The acid hydrolysis process is used to produce sugars and biobased platform chemicals from lignocellulosic biomass. Additionally, acid hydrolysis is used to produce lignin-derived solid acids (LDSAs) and to extract furfural and acetic acid from hot water hydrolysis liquor. A comparative study of acid hydrolysis of lignin and polysaccharides in biomasses was conducted to investigate the effects of different acid hydrolysis conditions. The results showed that lignin reactions (dissolution/deposition) occurred in a greater extent for bagasse and straw than for eucalyptus, considering similar conditions of acid hydrolysis. The sugar content quantified in eucalyptus decreased as the acid concentration and/or reaction time in the second hydrolysis increased. It was also found that glucose, galactose, and mannose were more resistant to harsher acidic conditions than xylose and arabinose [74].
The alkaline pretreatment is another chemical pretreatment technique which uses chemicals such as ammonia (aqueous, liquid, and gaseous), sodium hydroxide, sodium carbonate, and calcium hydroxide (lime). Alkaline reagents primarily interact with lignin; as a result, they are more effective at removing lignin. Pretreatment chemicals that are alkaline are less caustic than those that are acidic, like sulfuric acid and sulfite. As demonstrated by soaking in sodium hydroxide or ammonium hydroxide, alkaline pretreatments are performed under milder conditions, some of them even at ambient temperature. By using these techniques, the need for expensive materials and specialized designs to combat corrosion and harsh reaction conditions may be avoided [75].
Enzymatic hydrolysis is yet another strategy for pretreating lignin. This process involves the use of enzymes like ligninases, cellulases, and hemicellulases to catalyze the degradation of lignin. Enzymatic hydrolysis is often used in conjunction with other pretreatment strategies, such as acid and alkaline hydrolysis. Enzymes are an important component of lignocellulosic pretreatment, as they are used to catalyze the breakdown of lignin. Enzymes, however, can be expensive and have a limited lifespan, as they are often denatured by the pretreatment process. As such, it is important to examine the reusability of enzymes in order to maximize the efficiency of lignocellulosic pretreatment [76,77].
Physical methods, such as mechanical grinding, mechanical extrusion, microwave, and pyrolysis can also be used to modify lignin. These methods can be effective in breaking down lignin into smaller pieces, but they are also energy-intensive and can generate unwanted by-products [78]. In addition to these methods, there are also other strategies for pretreating lignin, such as biomass sonification. Biomass sonification involves the use of ultrasound to break down the complex polymer structure of lignin, thus resulting in the release of valuable compounds and improving the digestibility of lignocellulosic biomass [79]. Biomass sonification is an emerging technology and has several benefits, including lower energy requirements, higher sugar yields, and lower costs. The lower energy requirements of biomass sonification make it an attractive option for the pretreatment of lignin. In addition, biomass sonification can also increase sugar yield from lignocellulosic biomass, thereby providing higher biofuel yields, making it an attractive option for biofuel production [80,81].
Biological methods, such as the use of microorganisms, can also be used to modify lignin. Microorganisms like fungus can break down lignin through a process called biotreatment, which involves the secretion of enzymes that digest lignin. This method is environmentally friendly and can be more cost-effective than chemical or physical methods. However, the biotreatment method is limited by the low biofuels yield [82].

4. Lignin-Based Biofuels via Thermochemical Routes

The conversion of lignin to high value-added chemicals and materials via thermochemical methods has been an attractive research theme in the literature, because these methods are convenient for industrial scale production with relative ease and more economy [83,84,85]. Thermochemical conversion techniques of lignocellulosic biomass include various conversion techniques such as pyrolysis, hydrothermal carbonization, and gasification, and Table 1 shows the minimum process requirements and post-processing products required to perform these techniques [86,87,88,89,90,91]. These thermochemical techniques are advantageous over the direct combustion process in that they release a lower amount of hazardous gases and enable the formation of high value-added compounds during the conversion process [92,93].

4.1. Hydrothermal Carbonization

The literature meaning of hydrothermal carbonization refers to the chemical and physical transformation of lignocellulosic biomaterial in environments containing high heat and pressure [94]. When lignin is subjected to hydrothermal treatment, its solubility increases. In addition, it interacts more quickly with water on a physical and chemical level and forms carbonaceous structures at the end of the process. The hydrothermal carbonization process includes demethoxylation, alkylation, condensation, hydrolysis, and cleavage of carbon–oxygen–carbon and carbon–carbon bonds [95,96]. While the bonds in the aromatic rings are not split in the hydrothermal carbonization process, the ether bonds and carbon–carbon bonds are cleaved in the hydrothermal carbonization process of lignin [97,98]. Compared to the pyrolysis process, hydrothermal carbonization can be directly applied to the high-moisture lignin without requiring pretreatment or much energy. However, hydrothermal carbonization technology is not widely used in industry. This is attributed to a number of problems encountered in the industry such as high pressures required in the reactor, high investment costs, and the wall effect in the heat–mass transfer during the process. Hydrothermal carbonization technology, although it has some negative aspects, can be applied for the production of value-added chemical materials and multifunctional materials obtained from the lignin and its derivatives [99,100,101]. Kim et al. [102] used the hydrothermal carbonization (HTC) method to obtain biofuel from lignin. It has been determined that the properties of hydrocoal produced with the help of HTC have characteristics similar to coal or other coal-based materials that have the potential to be used in place of coal. With the hydrothermal carbonization process, an increase in the carbon content of the biomass can be achieved. Xiao et al. [103] reported that the carbon content of the biomass, which was determined to be approximately 48%, increased to approximately 72% with the increase in carbon content after HTC treatment. In another study, lignin showed almost twice the char-forming properties of the HTC process compared to hemicellulose and cellulose [104].

4.2. Pyrolysis

The products obtained via pyrolysis in large quantities are known as bio-oil, combustible gas, and biochar. Several steps are required for lignin to be used in pyrolysis [94,105]. In the fast pyrolysis process, carbonization in the lignocellulosic mass can be minimized. In addition, liquid efficiency may be greater in the rapid pyrolysis process [106,107,108]. The pyrolysis of lignin typically takes place at temperatures between 400 and 750 °C. At the beginning of the pyrolysis process, the first bonds to break from the biomass are ether bonds with weak bond strengths. The efficiency of lignin pyrolysis increases when the temperature rises above 400 °C. At temperatures above 400 °C, however, the decomposition process becomes complex and tar formation is observed [109]. The pyrolysis process is generally evaluated under two headings as slow pyrolysis and fast pyrolysis. The primary basic product in the slow pyrolysis process is biomass char. In rapid pyrolysis, the main product is typically a liquid called pyrolysis oil or bio-oil. Rapid heating (typically > 100 °C/s) of lignocellulosic biomass is required to obtain high-yield bio-oil. It has been reported in the studies that the pyrolysis oil yield can be increased up to approximately 70% with the pyrolysis processes. During the pyrolysis process of lignin, thermally stable products such as CO, CO2, H2O, volatile liquids, phenolic compounds, gaseous hydrocarbons, coal, and coke are generally obtained [110,111,112,113,114,115].

4.3. Biomass Liquefaction

Liquefaction of biomass can be applied to many raw materials. However, biomass liquefaction is not used commercially [116]. Hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) is the process of converting biomass (aqueous) into liquid fuel by processing it with temperature and pressure [117]. In the HTL, water acts as a solvent. This also eliminates the need for biomass drying. Moreover, it allows reactions to occur at low temperatures. Hydrothermal liquefaction is typically performed for 0.2 to 1 h at temperatures of 300–400 °C and pressures of 5–20 MPa [118,119]. The bio-oils obtained by the HTL process are in semi-liquid form, with a dark smoky odor [120,121,122]. There are many HTL studies in the literature using different lignin compositions at different temperatures and pressures. Abdelaziz et al. [123,124], in a study by the HTL method, reported that depolymerization of kraft lignin was achieved at a lignin content of approximately 5% by weight under 130 bar pressure at temperatures lower than 250 °C. HTL, performed in another study, showed the bio-oil with 10% lignin content to be obtained with the aid of a catalyst at 300 °C with approximately 50% yield [125]. In a similar study, it was reported to obtain bio-oil with an efficiency of up to 60% at 280 °C [126]. Although the hydrothermal liquefaction (HTL) technology allows the phenolic compounds in the lignin structure to be easily separated from the body in the aqueous medium, the technology has limitations such as the need for high temperatures, dilute concentrations, and the need for a second hydroprocessing step in biofuel production [127]. It is the process of thermal decomposition of biomass under supercritical conditions at high pressure and temperatures of 250–400 °C [128]. With the help of supercritical fluid extraction, organic compounds in the biomass can be effectively separated. The biofuels obtained in this way are affected by various factors such as the duration, temperature, and pressure of the separation process [129]. To obtain biofuel, ethanol and methanol were used many times as organic solvents in the supercritical liquid extraction process. Apart from these solvents, 2-propanol and 2-butanol are also used as solvents in biofuel production [130,131].

4.4. Gasification

Another way to obtain biofuel from lignin with the help of thermochemical pathways is gasification. This process is performed at very high temperatures such as 850 °C and above. Combustible gases and synthesis gases are produced by the gasification process. The gases produced from here can be used to obtain products with high added value, such as fuel. Gasification of lignin from a lignocellulosic biomass is currently being implemented on a pilot scale due to high investment costs and uncertainties in the production costs [132].
Among the current topics of the recent past are the degradation of lignin with the help of thermochemical pathways and the conversion of lignin into valuable chemicals and fuels as a result of degradation. Thanks to the content of high aromatic parts in the molecular structure of lignin, thermochemical depolymerization of lignin can be achieved, and many products with high added-value phenolic part content can be produced at high productivity rates. Efficient use of lignin can reduce greenhouse gas emissions both directly (in this way, biofuels, and chemicals can directly produce) and indirectly (lignin products can increase the viability of biorefineries) [133,134,135,136,137,138].

5. Lignin-Based Biofuels via Catalytic Routes

Pyrolysis oil derived using lignin has some disadvantages. Some of these disadvantages can be listed as being thermally unstable, poor volatility, low calorific value, and high coking tendency [139]. Because of these shortcomings, the oil obtained from the pyrolysis of lignin cannot be used directly as bio-oil [140]. Therefore, the pyrolysis oil needs to be upgraded via catalytic methods. The catalytic methods used to upgrade the pyrolysis oil are hydrodeoxygenation, zeolite cracking, and hydrogenation [141]. The ambient conditions required for the catalytic oxidation of lignin and the comparison of the catalytic process types are given in Table 2.

5.1. Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO)

Hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) is a catalytic method used in biofuel production to remove oxygen in the molecular structure. In the literature, the hydrodeoxygenation process is also referred to as hydro-pyrolysis, hydrocracking, hydro-treatment and hydrogenolysis. In this process, high hydrogen pressure is mainly used to eliminate the presence of oxygen [142,143,144,145,146]. Typically, the environmental conditions required for an HDO reaction to occur include temperatures of 120–400 °C and hydrogen partial pressures of as high as 10–20 MPa [142,146,147]. If the HDO process is to be carried out using a heterogeneous catalyst, temperatures in the range of approximately 200–500 °C are used [147]. The type of catalyst utilized during the HDO process is important. The choice of catalyst varies depends on effectiveness of hydrodeoxygenation [142,146]. Many different catalyst types such as Ru, Pt, CoMoS, Mo2N, P, Co, WP, Ni2P, Ni–Cu, Ni–Co have been used in hydrodeoxygenation (HDO) reaction [148,149,150,151,152,153,154].
Jan et al. [155] aimed to obtain cycloalkanes by hydropyrolysis of lignin. For this purpose, they used HZSM-5 and Pd/HZSM-5 catalysts in their study. The results showed that the catalyst with the presence of Pd positively affected the hydrogenation reaction, catalyzed the reaction and greatly increased the yield of the cycloalkanes. In recent studies [156,157], a catalytic HDO reaction was used to produce biofuels from lignin. A bifunctional catalyst with bimetallic properties was used for the HDO reaction. The findings showed that the catalyst used had the highest hydrocarbon selectivity compared to the bimetallic catalysts used in other studies.
One study reported fuel production from cyclopentanol by evaluating lignin alkylation and hydrodeoxygenation together. In the study, beech powder was depolymerized and lignin oil resulting from depolymerization was used to obtain fuel. The characterization results revealed that the phenolic groups in the lignin oil content were converted into a fuel-usable precursor by approximately 80% as a result of HDO. Moreover, the resulting fuel mixture was reported to have a material density of 0.91 g/mL at 20 °C and a freezing point of less than −60 °C [158].
Zhong et al. [159] prepared Ru-based catalysts in different formulations to evaluate them as biofuels and examined the fuel properties of the catalysts by comparing their hydrodeoxygenation performance on lignin-based phenolic compounds. When the results were examined, it was reported that the Ru-based catalyst with TiO2 nanosphere offered the most effective hydrodeoxygenation performance (approximately 50% increase in hydrocarbon content in lignin oil upgrading).

5.2. Zeolite Creaking

Crystalline solids with microporous structures are called zeolites. Zeolites are known as industrial catalysts and are frequently used in petroleum refining applications. Zeolite catalysts can be used to develop bio-oil. This process is generally carried out at temperatures of 350–500 °C and at atmospheric pressure [160,161]. It is a pressure-free reactor with the low amount of hydrogen required for zeolite cracking. In addition, the coking problem encountered in the HDO process is more effective in zeolite cracking [162,163,164].

5.3. Hydrogenation

The hydrogenation process of biomass has received increasing attention in recent years owing to its potential as a renewable fuel source. The hydrogenation process of biomass involves the conversion of carbon-containing molecules into hydrocarbons by reacting them with hydrogen in the presence of a catalyst. Biomass generally refers to any type of biological material that can be used as fuel or as a source for the production of energy. Unlike fossil fuels (e.g., coal and natural gas), biomass is renewable and can be replenished through natural processes. The hydrogenation of biomass generates usable fuels, such as ethanol and biodiesel, which can be burned to obtain heat and generate electricity [165]. The hydrogenation of biomass converts complex organic molecules to simpler ones with correspondingly lower molecular masses. The resulting low-molecular-mass fuel burns easily and, thus, is used in various industrial processes. The most common method of hydrogenating biomass involves exposing it to hydrogen in a liquid phase in the presence of a catalyst at temperatures ranging from 100 °C to 500 °C. In this process, the organic molecules are converted into short-chained hydrocarbons that can then be further processed to yield other useful products, such as jet fuels. Depending on the desired product and the properties of the raw material, different catalysts such as ruthenium, nickel, iron, cobalt, and molybdenum can be used in this process [166,167].
Hydrogenation of lignin is a chemical process that involves the addition of hydrogen atoms to lignin molecules in order to alter their chemical and physical properties. By modifying the chemical structure of lignin, it is possible to increase its solubility, reduce its viscosity, and improve its thermal stability, all of which are important properties for the production of biofuels and other bioproducts [168]. There are several methods for hydrogenating lignin, including catalytic hydrogenation, which involves the use of a metal catalyst to facilitate the addition of hydrogen atoms to lignin molecules, and non-catalytic hydrogenation, which relies on the use of high pressure and temperature to induce the addition of hydrogen atoms [169]. Catalyst samples used for catalytic hydrogenation of the lignin, the temperatures in which hydrogenation is performed, and the yields of the lignin are summarized in Table 3. One major challenge in the hydrogenation of lignin is the diversity of its chemical structure, which can vary significantly depending on the plant source and the processing conditions. As a result, it is difficult to predict the outcome of the hydrogenation process and to optimize it for specific applications [170]. Despite these challenges, the hydrogenation of lignin has the potential to provide significant benefits in the production of biofuels and other bioproducts. By modifying the chemical and physical properties of lignin, it is possible to improve the efficiency and yield of biofuel production, reduce the environmental impact of biofuel production, and potentially create new markets for lignin-based products [171]. Overall, the hydrogenation of lignin is an exciting area of research with significant potential for the development of sustainable, low-carbon technologies and products. As research in this field continues to advance, it is likely that we will see further progress and innovations in the use of lignin in biofuel and other bioproduct production.

6. Environmental and Cost Impact of Lignin Biofuels

The method used in the literature to identify opportunities to improve the environmental performance of a product throughout its life cycle (end of life) is called life cycle assessment (LCA) [178]. Techno-economic analysis (TEA) is carried out with the LCA and is generally defined as having similar functional units with the LCA outputs. All the costs required for a large-scale commercial biorefinery can be determined using techno-economic analysis. It is possible to evaluate the environmental and economic impact of lignin production thanks to data obtained from tools such as life cycle assessment (LCA) and techno-economic analysis (TEA). When the literature is examined, LCA studies on lignin can be evaluated under two headings. The first can be specified as life cycle assessment studies on lignin extraction (usually kraft extraction processes), and the second as LCA studies on lignin-based products [179,180].
Budsberg et al. [181] investigated the LCA evaluation of hydrocarbon biojet fuel obtained by bioconversion of poplar biomass. In the study, global warming potentials (GWP) and fossil fuel uses (FFU) for produced biojet and petroleum fuels were determined separately. The GWP and FFU values for petroleum fuel ranged from approximately 32 to 73 g MJ−1 CO2 and 0.71 to 1.0 MJ MJ−1 for biojet fuel, while the GWP and FFU values were 93 MJ−1 CO2 and 1.2 MJ MJ−1, respectively. From this point of view, it has been reported in the study that biojet fuels obtained using poplar biomass cause a decrease in global warming potential (GWP) and fossil fuel use (FFU) compared to fossil-based jet fuel, and it is promising for the development of biofuels that are needed by the aviation industry in the future.
In a study, the possibility of using pyrolytic lignin as a fuel was examined techno-economically, and for this, a model biorefinery was created using LCA. When the modeling results were evaluated, it was calculated that the required cost for the biorefinery plant setup was approximately $277 million. In addition, the greenhouse gas (CO2) emission values of the simulated biorefinery resulted in a reduction of approximately 60% compared to the petroleum-based refinery [182].
Obydenkova et al. [183] studied the environmental economics (production and transportation cost) of lignin-derived transportation fuels. In their study, the researchers discussed the suitability of fast pyrolysis of lignin in vehicles used in the marine and automotive industries in two parts, together with LCA and TEA analyses. In the first part, rapid pyrolysis of lignin was examined for TEA. In the second part, the greenhouse gas emissions of biofuels obtained by using lignin were evaluated by LCA. According to the TEA results, it was calculated that the minimum production costs of lignin biofuels in the marine and automotive fields ranged from 10 to 13.5 $/GJ, while the transportation costs in the same areas ranged from 14.4 to 18.1 $/GJ. When the LCA results were analyzed, it was determined that the greenhouse gas emissions of all fuels were not at levels compatible with the US renewable fuel standard (RFS). When all the results were evaluated, it was stated in the study that the economical use of lignin-derived transportation fuels was beneficial.
Shahbaz et al. [184] investigated the TEA of biomass components in the yield of slow-pyrolysis products of components in lignocellulosic biomass (cellulose, lignin, hemicellulose). According to the analysis, the cost of lignin pyrolysis was more economical (lignin ($110/t), cellulose ($285/t), and hemicellulose ($296/t)). Also, when comparing pyrolysis CO2 emission values, lignin was approximately 4 times lower than other biomass components. When all the obtained results were evaluated, it showed that lignin pyrolysis was more advantageous compared to cellulose and hemicellulose under the specified conditions.
Shen et al. [185] demonstrated a new catalytic way to produce hydrocarbons from waste lignin for use in jet fuels. In addition, TEA of the new catalytic pathway was performed. TEA results reported that the lowest selling price of lignin jet fuel obtained by catalytic raising of waste lignin was approximately $6.35–1 (10% discounted value).
Kumaniaev et al. [186] converted birch bark into biofuel to be used as a fuel for road and aviation applications, then an environmental assessment was made. When the LCA results were analyzed, it was reported that the life cycle greenhouse gases (GHG) released during the process amounted to 1.7 kg of CO2.
Moretti et al. [187] examined in depth the life cycle evaluations of lignin and lignin derivative products in the literature. According to the results of the examination, it was determined that the LCA studies on lignin and lignin derivatives were limited. Only a few studies have been reported to consider the lignin utilization stage and lignin end of life. Moreover, it has been determined that almost all of the LCAs prepared on lignin have been investigated for their effect on climate change. In addition, it has been observed in the studies that the LCA data are obtained mainly from laboratory and process simulations.

7. Conclusions and Future Prospects

Lignin, a complex polymer found in the cell walls of plants, has long been considered a waste product in the paper and pulp industry. However, recent research has shown that lignin can be converted into a range of valuable fuels and chemicals, opening up new opportunities for the bioenergy sector. One of the main advantages of lignin-derived fuels is their potential to reduce reliance on fossil fuels. Lignin is a renewable resource that can be sourced from a variety of plant materials, including wood chips, straw, and corn stalks. As such, lignin-based fuels have the potential to significantly reduce greenhouse gas emissions, helping the fight against climate change. There are several potential benefits to using lignin as biofuel feedstock. These benefits include abundance, renewability, and carbon neutrality.
  • Abundance: Lignin is a waste product of the paper and pulp industry, and is produced in large quantities. This makes it a potentially cheap and readily available feedstock for biofuel production.
  • Renewability: Lignin is a renewable resource, as it can be derived from plants that can be grown and harvested repeatedly.
  • Carbon neutrality: Lignin is composed of carbon, hydrogen, and oxygen, and when it is burned as a biofuel, it releases the same amount of carbon dioxide as was absorbed by the plants during their growth. This means that the carbon emissions of lignin-derived biofuels are considered to be carbon neutral.
There are also a number of other potential applications for lignin-derived fuels, for example, biochar, resins, and plastics. Despite the many potential benefits of lignin-derived fuels, there are also some challenges to their widespread adoption. One of the main obstacles is the cost of production, which is currently higher than that of traditional fossil fuels. However, as production processes are refined and scaled up, it is likely that the cost of lignin-based fuels will become more competitive with fossil fuels. Modification of lignin is an important factor in improving the biofuel conversion of biomass. While there are several methods available, each has its own limitations and challenges. Another challenge is the need for more research and development to optimize the production of lignin-based fuels. LCA and TEA studies on lignin biofuels are a new and promising approach to meet these needs. While there are challenges to be overcome, the future looks bright for lignin-based fuels and for the bioenergy sector as a whole.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.K., T.S., O.O., M.H.A. and Z.C.; Data Curation, E.K., T.S., O.O., M.H.A. and Z.C.; Investigation, E.K., T.S., O.O., M.H.A. and Z.C., Methodology, E.K. and T.S. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank the Turkish Academy of Sciences and Biomaterials, and the Nanotechnology Research Group and Nanoteam for their contributions to this review article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Lu, H.; Yadav, V.; Zhong, M.; Bilal, M.; Taherzadeh, M.J.; Iqbal, H.M. Bioengineered microbial platforms for biomass-derived biofuel production—A review. Chemosphere 2022, 288, 132528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Li, P.; Fu, X.; Zhang, L.; Li, S. CRISPR/Cas-based screening of a gene activation library in Saccharomyces cerevisiae identifies a crucial role of OLE 1 in thermotolerance. Microb. Biotechnol. 2019, 12, 1154–1163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Sarker, T.R.; Nanda, S.; Dalai, A.K.; Meda, V. A review of torrefaction technology for upgrading lignocellulosic biomass to solid biofuels. Bioenergy Res. 2021, 14, 645–669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Xia, J.; Yu, Y.; Chen, H.; Zhou, J.; Tan, Z.; He, S.; Zhu, X.; Shi, H.; Liu, P.; Bilal, M.; et al. Improved lignocellulose degradation efficiency by fusion of β-glucosidase, exoglucanase, and carbohydrate-binding module from Caldicellulosiruptor saccharolyticus. BioResources 2019, 14, 6767–6780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Amusa, A.A.; Ahmad, A.L.; Adewole, J.K. Mechanism and compatibility of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass and polymeric mixed matrix membranes: A review. Membranes 2020, 10, 370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Halmann, M.; Steinfeld, A. Fuel saving, carbon dioxide emission avoidance, and syngas production by tri-reforming of flue gases from coal-and gas-fired power stations, and by the carbothermic reduction of iron oxide. Energy 2006, 31, 3171–3185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Bilal, M.; Iqbal, H. Recent advancements in the life cycle analysis of lignocellulosic biomass. Curr. Sustain. Renew. Energy Rep. 2020, 7, 100–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhu, J.; Yan, C.; Zhang, X.; Yang, C.; Jiang, M.; Zhang, X. A sustainable platform of lignin: From bioresources to materials and their applications in rechargeable batteries and supercapacitors. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2020, 76, 100788. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Bajwa, D.S.; Pourhashem, G.; Ullah, A.H.; Bajwa, S.G. A concise review of current lignin production, applications, products and their environmental impact. Ind. Crops Prod. 2019, 139, 111526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, C.; Jiang, X.; Shen, X.; Hu, J.; Tang, W.; Wu, X.; Ragauskas, A.; Jameel, H.; Meng, X.; Yong, Q. Lignin-enzyme interaction: A roadblock for efficient enzymatic hydrolysis of lignocellulosics. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2022, 154, 111822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Avilov, O. Management of consumption according to the special role of need for safety. Ekon. Manaz. Spektrum 2021, 15, 75–83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Novak, A.; Bennett, D.; Kliestik, T. Product decision-making information systems, real-time sensor networks, and artificial intelligence-driven big data analytics in sustainable Industry 4.0. Econ. Manag. Financ. Mark. 2021, 16, 62–72. [Google Scholar]
  13. Ahmad, F.B.; Kalam, M.A.; Zhang, Z.; Masjuki, H.H. Sustainable production of furan-based oxygenated fuel additives from pentose-rich biomass residues. Energy Convers. Manag. 2022, 14, 100222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Gundekari, S.; Karmee, S.K. Catalytic Hydropyrolysis of Lignin for the Preparation of Cyclic Hydrocarbon-Based Biofuels. Catalysts 2022, 12, 1651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. RajeshKumar, B.; Saravanan, S.; NiranjanKumar, R.; Nishanth, B.; Rana, D.; Nagendran, A. Effect of lignin-derived cyclohexanol on combustion, performance and emissions of a direct-injection agricultural diesel engine under naturally aspirated and exhaust gas recirculation (EGR) modes. Fuel 2016, 181, 630–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, W.; Chen, J.; Liu, R.; Wang, S.; Chen, L.; Li, K. Hydrodeoxygenation of Lignin-Derived Phenolic Monomers and Dimers to Alkane Fuels over Bi functional Zeolite-Supported Metal Catalysts. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2014, 2, 683–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Roman-Leshkov, Y.; Barrett, C.J.; Liu, Z.Y.; Dumesic, J.A. Production of dimethyl furan for liquid fuels from biomass-derived carbohydrates. Nature 2007, 447, 982–986. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Herreros, J.M.; Jones, A.; Sukjit, E.; Tsolakis, A. Blending lignin-derived oxygenate in enhanced multi-component diesel fuel for improved emissions. Appl. Energy 2014, 116, 58–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Ragauskas, A.J.; Beckham, G.T.; Biddy, M.J.; Chandra, R.; Chen, F.; Davis, M.F.; Davison, B.H.; Dixon, R.A.; Gilna, P.; Keller, M.; et al. Lignin valorization: Improving lignin processing in the biorefinery. Science 2014, 344, 1246843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Ralph, J.; Lapierre, C.; Boerjan, W. Lignin structure and its engineering. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2019, 56, 240–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Fang, Z.; Smith, R.L., Jr. Production of Biofuels and Chemicals from Lignin; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2016. [Google Scholar]
  22. Zeng, Y.; Zhao, S.; Yang, S.; Ding, S.Y. Lignin plays a negative role in the biochemical process for producing lignocellulosic biofuels. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2014, 27, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xu, C.; Arancon, R.A.D.; Labidi, J.; Luque, R. Lignin depolymerisation strategies: Towards valuable chemicals and fuels. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2014, 43, 7485–7500. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ma, R.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, X. Catalytic oxidation of biorefinery lignin to value-added chemicals to support sustainable biofuel production. ChemSusChem 2015, 8, 24–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Yang, Z.; Xu, Z.; Feng, M.; Cort, J.R.; Gieleciak, R.; Heyne, J.; Yang, B. Lignin-based jet fuel and its blending effect with conventional jet fuel. Fuel 2022, 321, 124040. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Ruan, H.; Qin, Y.; Heyne, J.; Gieleciak, R.; Feng, M.; Yang, B. Chemical compositions and properties of lignin-based jet fuel range hydrocarbons. Fuel 2019, 256, 115947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Chiaramonti, D.; Buffi, M.; Palmisano, P.; Redaelli, S. Lignin-based advanced biofuels: A novel route towards aviation fuels. Chem. Eng. Trans. 2016, 50, 109–114. [Google Scholar]
  28. Chen, Y.; Liu, J.; Zeng, Q.; Liang, Z.; Ye, X.; Lv, Y.; Liu, M. Preparation of Eucommia ulmoides lignin-based high-performance biochar containing sulfonic group: Synergistic pyrolysis mechanism and tetracycline hydrochloride adsorption. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 329, 124856. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Gul, E.; Alrawashdeh, K.A.B.; Masek, O.; Skreiberg, Ø.; Corona, A.; Zampilli, M.; Wang, L.; Samaras, P.; Yang, Q.; Fantozzi, F. Production and use of biochar from lignin and lignin-rich residues (such as digestate and olive stones) for wastewater treatment. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2021, 158, 105263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, C.; Zhao, M.; Li, Q.; Liu, Z.; Hao, N.; Meng, X.; Li, J.; Lin, F.; Fang, L.; Yuan, J.S.; et al. Phototunable Lignin Plastics to Enable Recyclability. ChemSusChem 2021, 14, 4260–4269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Huang, J.; Liu, W.; Qiu, X. High performance thermoplastic elastomers with biomass lignin as plastic phase. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 6550–6560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Poovaiah, C.R.; Nageswara-Rao, M.; Soneji, J.R.; Baxter, H.L.; Stewart, C.N., Jr. Altered lignin biosynthesis using biotechnology to improve lignocellulosic biofuel feedstocks. Plant Biotechnol. J. 2014, 12, 1163–1173. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Zakzeski, J.; Bruijnincx, P.C.; Jongerius, A.L.; Weckhuysen, B.M. The catalytic valorization of lignin for the production of renewable chemicals. Chem. Rev. 2010, 110, 3552–3599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  34. Nigam, P.S.; Singh, A. Production of liquid biofuels from renewable resources. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2011, 37, 52–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Borges, C.S.; Akhavan-Safar, A.; Marques, E.A.; Carbas, R.J.; Ueffing, C.; Weißgraeber, P.; da Silva, L.F. Effect of water ingress on the mechanical and chemical properties of polybutylene terephthalate reinforced with glass fibers. Materials 2021, 14, 1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zor, M.; Mengeloğlu, F.; Aydemir, D.; Şen, F.; Kocatürk, E.; Candan, Z.; Ozcelik, O. Wood Plastic Composites (WPCs): Applications of Nanomaterials. In Emerging Nanomaterials; Springer: Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany, 2023; pp. 97–133. [Google Scholar]
  37. Bruijnincx, P.C.; Rinaldi, R.; Weckhuysen, B.M. Unlocking the potential of a sleeping giant: Lignins as sustainable raw materials for renewable fuels, chemicals and materials. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4860–4861. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Torres, L.A.Z.; Woiciechowski, A.L.; de Andrade Tanobe, V.O.; Karp, S.G.; Lorenci, L.C.G.; Faulds, C.; Soccol, C.R. Lignin as a potential source of high-added value compounds: A review. J. Clean. Prod. 2020, 263, 121499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ghaffar, S.H.; Fan, M. Structural analysis for lignin characteristics in biomass straw. Biomass Bioenergy 2013, 57, 264–279. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Boerjan, W.; Ralph, J.; Baucher, M. Lignin biosynthesis. Annu. Rev. Plant Biol. 2003, 54, 519–546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Feldman, D. Lignin nanocomposites. J. Macromol. Sci. A 2016, 53, 382–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Liu, C.-J. Deciphering the enigma of lignification: Precursor transport, oxidation, and the topochemistry of lignin assembly. Mol. Plant 2012, 5, 304–317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  43. Grabber, J.H. How do lignin composition, structure, and cross-linking affect degradability? A review of cell wall model studies. Crop. Sci. 2005, 45, 820–831. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  44. Rosillo-Calle, F.; de Groot, P.; Hemstock, S.L.; Woods, J. Non-Woody Biomass and Secondary Fuels. In The Biomass Assessment Handbook; Routledge: Abingdon-on-Thames, UK, 2012; p. 110. [Google Scholar]
  45. Doherty, W.O.S.; Mousavioun, P.; Fellows, C.M. Value-adding to cellulosic ethanol: Lignin polymers. Ind. Crops. Prod. 2011, 33, 259–276. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Norgren, M.; Edlund, H. Lignin: Recent advances and emerging applications. Curr. Opin. Colloid Interface Sci. 2014, 19, 409–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Stojanovska, E.; Pampal, E.S.; Kilic, A.; Quddus, M.; Candan, Z. Developing and characterization of lignin-based fibrous nanocarbon electrodes for energy storage devices. Compos. B Eng. 2019, 158, 239–248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Stojanovska, E.; Kurtulus, M.; Abdelgawad, A.; Candan, Z.; Kilic, A. Developing lignin-based bio-nanofibers by centrifugal spinning technique. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2018, 113, 98–105. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Sharma, V.; Tsai, M.L.; Nargotra, P.; Chen, C.W.; Sun, P.P.; Singhania, R.R.; Dong, C.D. Journey of lignin from a roadblock to bridge for lignocellulose biorefineries: A comprehensive review. Sci. Total Environ. 2023, 861, 160560. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Thakur, V.K.; Thakur, M.K. Recent advances in green hydrogels from lignin: A review. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2015, 72, 834–847. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  51. Laurichesse, S.; Avérous, L. Chemical modification of lignins: Towards biobased polymers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 2014, 39, 1266–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Pan, X.; Kadla, J.F.; Ehara, K.; Gilkes, N.; Saddler, J.N. Organosolv ethanol lignin from hybrid poplar as a radical scavenger: Relationship between lignin structure, extraction conditions, and antioxidant activity. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2006, 54, 5806–5813. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Cruz, J.M.; Domínguez, J.M.; Domínguez, H.; Parajó, J.C. Antioxidant and antimicrobial effects of extracts from hydrolysates of lignocellulosic materials. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2001, 49, 2459–2464. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Toh, K.; Nakano, S.; Yokoyama, H.; Ebe, K.; Gotoh, K.; Noda, H. Anti-deterioration effect of lignin as an ultraviolet absorbent in polypropylene and polyethylene. Polym. J. 2005, 37, 633. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  55. Réti, C.; Casetta, M.; Duquesne, S.; Bourbigot, S.; Delobel, R. Flammability properties of intumescent PLA including starch and lignin. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2008, 19, 628–635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Wang, J.; Deng, Y.; Qian, Y.; Qiu, X.; Ren, Y.; Yang, D. Reduction of lignin color via one-step UV irradiation. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 695–699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Vishtal, A.G.; Kraslawski, A. Challenges in industrial applications of technical lignins. BioResources 2011, 6, 3547–3568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Chakar, F.S.; Ragauskas, A.J. Review of current and future softwood kraft lignin process chemistry. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2004, 20, 131–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Matsushita, Y.; Yasuda, S. Preparation and evaluation of lignosulfonates as a dispersant for gypsum paste from acid hydrolysis lignin. Bioresour. Technol. 2005, 96, 465–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Mousavioun, P.; Doherty, W.O. Chemical and thermal properties of fractionated bagasse soda lignin. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 31, 52–58. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Glasser, W.G. About making lignin great again—Some lessons from the past. Front. Chem. 2019, 7, 565. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  62. Wang, K.; Bauer, S.; Sun, R.-C. Structural transformation of miscanthus × giganteus lignin fractionated under mild formosolv, basic organosolv, and cellulolytic enzyme conditions. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012, 60, 144–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Watkins, D.; Nuruddin, M.; Hosur, M.; Tcherbi-Narteh, A.; Jeelani, S. Extraction and characterization of lignin from different biomass resources. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2015, 4, 26–32. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  64. Samuel, R.; Pu, Y.; Raman, B.; Ragauskas, A.J. Structural characterization and comparison of switchgrass ball-milled lignin before and after dilute acid pretreatment. Appl. Biochem. Biotechnol. 2010, 162, 62–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Xf, T.; Fang, Z.; Guo, F. Impact and prospective of fungal pre-treatment of lignocellulosic biomass for enzymatic hydrolysis. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2012, 6, 335–350. [Google Scholar]
  66. Yoo, C.G.; Meng, X.; Pu, Y.; Ragauskas, A.J. The critical role of lignin in lignocellulosic biomass conversion and recent pretreatment strategies: A comprehensive review. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 301, 122784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Mankar, A.R.; Modak, A.; Pant, K.K. Recent advances in the valorization of lignin: A key focus on pretreatment, characterization, and catalytic depolymerization strategies for future biorefineries. Adv. Sustain. Syst. 2022, 6, 2100299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Figueiredo, P.; Lintinen, K.; Hirvonen, J.T.; Kostiainen, M.A.; Santos, H.A. Properties and chemical modifications of lignin: Towards lignin-based nanomaterials for biomedical applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 233–269. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Huang, D.; Li, R.; Xu, P.; Li, T.; Deng, R.; Chen, S.; Zhang, Q. The cornerstone of realizing lignin value-addition: Exploiting the native structure and properties of lignin by extraction methods. J. Chem. Eng. 2020, 402, 126237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Agbor, V.B.; Cicek, N.; Sparling, R.; Berlin, A.; Levin, D.B. Biomass pretreatment: Fundamentals toward application. Biotechnol. Adv. 2011, 29, 675–685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  71. Narron, R.H.; Kim, H.; Chang, H.M.; Jameel, H.; Park, S. Biomass pretreatments capable of enabling lignin valorization in a biorefinery process. Curr. Opin. Biotechnol. 2016, 38, 39–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  72. Sheng, Y.; Lam, S.S.; Wu, Y.; Ge, S.; Wu, J.; Cai, L.; Huang, Z.; Le, Q.V.; Sonne, C.; Xia, C. Enzymatic conversion of pretreated lignocellulosic biomass: A review on influence of structural changes of lignin. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 324, 124631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Carvalho, D.M.; Colodette, J.L. Comparative study of acid hydrolysis of lignin and polysaccharides in biomasses. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 12, 6907–6923. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Xu, L.; Zhang, S.J.; Zhong, C.; Li, B.Z.; Yuan, Y.J. Alkali-based pretreatment-facilitated lignin valorization: A review. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2020, 59, 16923–16938. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Zhang, S.; Xiao, J.; Wang, G.; Chen, G. Enzymatic hydrolysis of lignin by ligninolytic enzymes and analysis of the hydrolyzed lignin products. Bioresour. Technol. 2020, 304, 122975. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  76. Yuan, Y.; Jiang, B.; Chen, H.; Wu, W.; Wu, S.; Jin, Y.; Xiao, H. Recent advances in understanding the effects of lignin structural characteristics on enzymatic hydrolysis. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2021, 14, 205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  77. Kumar, A.K.; Sharma, S. Recent updates on different methods of pretreatment of lignocellulosic feedstocks: A review. Bioresour. Bioprocess. 2017, 4, 7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  78. Rehman, M.S.U.; Kim, I.; Chisti, Y.; Han, J.I. Use of ultrasound in the production of bioethanol from lignocellulosic biomass. Energy Educ. Sci. Technol. Part A Energy Sci. Res. 2013, 30, 1391–1410. [Google Scholar]
  79. Luo, J.; Fang, Z.; Smith Jr, R.L. Ultrasound-enhanced conversion of biomass to biofuels. Prog. Energy Combust. Sci. 2014, 41, 56–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Bundhoo, Z.M.; Mohee, R. Ultrasound-assisted biological conversion of biomass and waste materials to biofuels: A review. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2018, 40, 298–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Madadi, M.; Abbas, A. Lignin degradation by fungal pretreatment: A review. J. Plant. Pathol. Microbiol. 2017, 8, 398–404. [Google Scholar]
  82. Zhang, X.S.; Yang, G.X.; Jiang, H.; Liu, W.J.; Ding, H.S. Mass production of chemicals from biomass-derived oil by directly atmospheric distillation coupled with co-pyrolysis. Sci. Rep. 2013, 3, 1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  83. Dodds, D.R.; Gross, R.A. Chemicals from biomass. Science 2007, 318, 1250–1251. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Vispute, T.P.; Zhang, H.; Sanna, A.; Xiao, R.; Huber, G.W. Renewable chemical commodity feedstocks from integrated catalytic processing of pyrolysis oils. Science 2010, 330, 1222–1227. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Kageyama, H.; Osada, S.; Nakata, H.; Kubota, M.; Matsuda, H. Effect of coexisting inorganic chlorides on lead volatilization from CaO–SiO2–Al2O3 molten slag under municipal solid waste gasification and melting conditions. Fuel 2013, 103, 94–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Arena, U. Process and technological aspects of municipal solid waste gasification. A review. J. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 625–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Zhang, L.; Champagne, P.; Xu, C.C. Bio-crude production from secondary pulp/paper-mill sludge and waste newspaper via co-liquefaction in hot-compressed water. Energy 2011, 36, 2142–2150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Hwang, I.H.; Aoyama, H.; Matsuto, T.; Nakagishi, T.; Matsuo, T. Recovery of solid fuel from municipal solid waste by hydrothermal treatment using subcritical water. J. Waste Manag. 2012, 32, 410–416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Luo, S.; Xiao, B.; Hu, Z.; Liu, S. Effect of particle size on pyrolysis of single-component municipal solid waste in fixed bed reactor. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2010, 35, 93–97. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Ateş, F.; Miskolczi, N.; Borsodi, N. Comparision of real waste (MSW and MPW) pyrolysis in batch reactor over different catalysts. Part I: Product yields, gas and pyrolysis oil properties. Bioresour. Technol. 2013, 133, 443–454. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Bhaskar, T.; Matsui, T.; Kaneko, J.; Uddin, M.A.; Muto, A.; Sakata, Y. Novel calcium based sorbent (Ca-C) for the dehalogenation (Br, Cl) process during halogenated mixed plastic (PP/PE/PS/PVC and HIPS-Br) pyrolysis. Green Chem. 2002, 4, 372–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Liu, W.J.; Jiang, H.; Yu, H.Q. Thermochemical conversion of lignin to functional materials: A review and future directions. Green Chem. 2015, 17, 4888–4907. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Osman, A.I.; Mehta, N.; Elgarahy, A.M.; Al-Hinai, A.; Al-Muhtaseb, A.A.H.; Rooney, D.W. Conversion of biomass to biofuels and life cycle assessment: A review. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2021, 19, 4075–4118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Peterson, A.A.; Vogel, F.; Lachance, R.P.; Froling, M.; Antal, J.M.J.; Tester, J.W. Thermochemical biofuel production in hydrothermal media: A review of sub-and supercritical water technologies. Energy Environ. Sci. 2008, 1, 32–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Barbier, J.; Charon, N.; Dupassieux, N.; Loppinet-Serani, A.; Mahé, L.; Ponthus, J.; Courtiade, M.; Ducrozet, A.; Quoineaud, A.-A.; Cansell, F. Hydrothermal conversion of lignin compounds. A detailed study of fragmentation and condensation reaction pathways. Biomass Bioenergy 2012, 46, 479–491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Kang, S.; Li, X.; Fan, J.; Chang, J. Classified separation of lignin hydrothermal liquefied products. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2011, 50, 11288–11296. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Ehara, K.; Saka, S.; Kawamoto, H. Characterization of the lignin-derived products from wood as treated in supercritical water. J. Wood Sci. 2002, 48, 320–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Wang, H.J.; Zhao, Y.; Wang, C.; Fu, Y.; Guo, Q. Theoretical study on the pyrolysis process of lignin dimer model compounds. Acta Chim. Sin. 2009, 67, 893–900. [Google Scholar]
  99. Singh, R.; Prakash, A.; Balagurumurthy, B.; Bhaskar, T. Recent Advances in Thermo-Chemical Conversion of Biomass; Pandey, A., Bhaskar, T., Stöcker, M., Sukumaran, R.K., Eds.; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; pp. 269–291. [Google Scholar]
  100. Czernik, S.; Bridgwater, A.V. Overview of applications of biomass fast pyrolysis oil. Energy Fuels 2004, 18, 590–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Fu, J.; Bai, L.; Chi, M.; Xu, X.; Chen, Z.; Yu, K. Study on the evolution pattern of the chemical structure of Fenton pretreated lignin during hydrothermal carbonization. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2022, 10, 107184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Kim, D.; Lee, K.; Park, K.Y. Upgrading the characteristics of biochar from cellulose, lignin, and xylan for solid biofuel production from biomass by hydrothermal carbonization. J. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2016, 42, 95–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  103. Xiao, L.P.; Shi, Z.J.; Xu, F.; Sun, R.C. Hydrothermal carbonization of lignocellulosic biomass. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118, 619–623. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Cagnon, B.; Py, X.; Guillot, A.; Stoeckli, F.; Chambat, G. Contributions of hemicellulose, cellulose and lignin to the mass and the porous properties of chars and steam activated carbons from various lignocellulosic precursors. Bioresour. Technol. 2009, 100, 292–298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Broch, A.; Jena, U.; Hoekman, S.K.; Langford, J. Analysis of solid and aqueous phase products from hydrothermal carbonization of whole and lipid-extracted algae. Energies 2013, 7, 62–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  106. Zhou, S.; Pecha, B.; van Kuppevelt, M.; McDonald, A.G.; Garcia-Perez, M. Slow and fast pyrolysis of Douglas-fir lignin: Importance of liquid-intermediate formation on the distribution of products. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 66, 398–409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Poveda-Giraldo, J.A.; Solarte-Toro, J.C.; Alzate, C.A.C. The potential use of lignin as a platform product in biorefineries: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110688. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Babu, B.V. Biomass pyrolysis: A state-of-the-art review. Biofuels Bioprod. Bior. 2008, 2, 393–414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Bridgwater, A.V.; Peacocke, G.V.C. Fast pyrolysis processes for biomass. Renew. Sust. Energ. Rev. 2000, 4, 1–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Xiangyu, L.; Lu, S.; Yujue, W.; Yanqing, Y.; Chengwen, W.; Li, X.; Wang, Z. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of Kraft lignin with HZSM-5 zeolite for producing aromatic hydrocarbons, Frontiers Environ. Sci. Eng. 2012, 6, 295–303. [Google Scholar]
  111. Jegers, H.E.; Klein, M.T. Primary and secondary lignin pyrolysis reaction pathways. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1985, 24, 173–183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Wright, M.M.; Daugaard, D.E.; Satrio, J.A.; Brown, R.C. Techno-Economic Analysis of Biomass Fast Pyrolysis to Transportation Fuels. Fuel 2010, 89, S2–S10. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  113. Kawamoto, H. Lignin pyrolysis reactions. J. Wood Sci. 2017, 6, 117–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  114. Li, C.; Zhao, X.; Wang, A.; Huber, G.W.; Zhang, T. Catalytic transformation of lignin for the production of chemicals and fuels. Chem. Rev. 2015, 115, 11559–11624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Benali, M.; Périn-Levasseur, Z.; Savulescu, L.; Kouisni, L.; Jemaa, N.; Kudra, T.; Paleologou, M. Implementation of lignin-based biorefinery into a Canadian softwood kraft pulp mill: Optimal resources integration and economic viability assessment. Biomass Bioenergy 2014, 67, 473–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Windt, M.; Meier, D.; Marsman, J.H.; Heeres, H.J.; de Koning, S. Micro-pyrolysis of technical lignins in a new modular rig and product analysis by GC-MS/FID and GC x GC-TOFMS/FID. J. Anal. Appl. Pyrolysis 2009, 85, 38–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Pandey, M.P.; Kim, C.S. Lignin Depolymerization and Conversion: A Review of Thermochemical Methods. Chem. Eng. Technol. 2011, 34, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Rahimi, Z.; Anand, A.; Gautam, S. An overview on thermochemical conversion and potential evaluation of biofuels derived from agricultural wastes. Energy Nexus 2022, 7, 100125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Robinson, K.K. Reaction engineering of direct coal liquefaction. Energies 2009, 2, 976–10006. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Elliott, D.C.; Biller, P.; Ross, A.B.; Schmidt, A.J.; Jones, S.B. Hydrothermal liquefaction of biomass: Developments from batch to continuous process. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 178, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Xiu, S.; Shahbazi, A. Bio-oil production and upgrading research: A review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2012, 16, 4406–4414. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bensaid, S.; Conti, R.; Fino, D. Direct liquefaction of ligno-cellulosic residues for liquid fuel production. Fuel 2012, 94, 324–332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Abdelaziz, O.Y.; Li, K.; Tunå, P.; Hulteberg, C.P. Continuous catalytic depolymerisation and conversion of industrial kraft lignin into low-molecular-weight aromatics. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2018, 8, 455–470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  124. Abdelaziz, O.Y.; Hulteberg, C.P. Lignin Depolymerization under Continuous-Flow Conditions: Highlights of Recent Developments. ChemSusChem 2020, 13, 4382–4384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Rana, M.; Islam, M.N.; Agarwal, A.; Taki, G.; Park, S.J.; Dong, S.; Jo, Y.-T.; Park, J.H. Production of phenol-rich monomers from kraft lignin hydrothermolysates in basic-subcritical water over MoO3/SBA-15 catalyst. Energy Fuels 2018, 32, 11564–11575. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Feng, L.; Li, X.; Wang, Z.; Liu, B. Catalytic hydrothermal liquefaction of lignin for production of aromatic hydrocarbon over metal supported mesoporous catalyst. Bioresour. Technol. 2021, 323, 124569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Lawoko, M.; Samec, J.S. Kraft lignin valorization: Biofuels and thermoset materials in focus. Curr. Opin. Green Sustain. Chem. 2022, 40, 100738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Durak, H. Bio-oil production from biomass via supercritical fluid extraction. AIP Conf. Proc. 2016, 1726, 020099. [Google Scholar]
  129. Akalın, M.K.; Tekin, K.; Karagöz, S. Supercritical fluid extraction of biofuels from biomass. Environ. Chem. Lett. 2017, 15, 29–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Durak, H. Bio-oil production from Glycyrrhiza glabra through supercritical fluid extraction. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2014, 95, 373–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Ibarra-Gonzalez, P.; Rong, B.G. A review of the current state of biofuels production from lignocellulosic biomass using thermochemical conversion routes. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 2019, 27, 1523–1535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Mu, W.; Ben, H.; Ragauskas, A.; Deng, Y. Lignin pyrolysis components and upgrading—Technology review. Bioenergy Res. 2013, 6, 1183–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Roberts, V.M.; Stein, V.; Reiner, T.; Lemonidou, A.; Li, X.; Lercher, J.A. Towards Quantitative Catalytic Lignin Depolymerization. Chem. Eur. J. 2011, 17, 5939–5948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Osada, M.; Sato, T.; Watanabe, M.; Shirai, M.; Arai, K. Catalytic gasification of wood biomass in subcritical and supercritical water. Combust. Sci. Technol. 2006, 178, 537–552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kijima, M.; Hirukawa, T.; Hanawa, F.; Hata, T. Thermal conversion of alkaline lignin and its structured derivatives to porous carbonized materials. Bioresour. Technol. 2011, 102, 6279–6285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  136. Sturgeon, M.R.; O’Brien, M.H.; Ciesielski, P.N.; Katahira, R.; Kruger, J.S.; Chmely, S.C.; Hamlin, J.; Kelsey, L.; Hunsinger, G.B.; Beckham, G.T.; et al. Lignin depolymerisation by nickel supported layered-double hydroxide catalysts. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 824–835. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Wang, X.; Rinaldi, R. Solvent effects on the hydrogenolysis of diphenyl ether with Raney nickel and their implications for the conversion of lignin. ChemSusChem 2012, 5, 1455–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Azadi, P.; Inderwildi, O.R.; Farnood, R.; King, D.A. Liquid fuels, hydrogen and chemicals from lignin: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 21, 506–523. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Huber, G.W.; Iborra, S.; Corma, A. Synthesis of transportation fuels from biomass: Chemistry, catalysts, and engineering. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 4044–4098. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  140. Fan, L.; Zhang, Y.; Liu, S.; Zhou, N.; Chen, P.; Cheng, Y.; Addy, M.; Lu, Q.; Omar, M.M.; Liu, Y. Bio-oil from fast pyrolysis of lignin: Effects of process and upgrading parameters. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 241, 1118–1126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Saidi, M.; Samimi, F.; Karimipourfard, D.; Nimmanwudipong, T.; Gates, B.C.; Rahimpour, M.R. Upgrading of lignin-derived bio-oils by catalytic hydrodeoxygenation. Energy Environ. Sci. 2014, 7, 103–129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. McCarty, T.; Sesmero, J. Uncertainty, irreversibility, and investment in second-generation biofuels. BioEnergy Res. 2015, 8, 675–687. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  143. Diao, X.; Ji, N. Rational design of MoS2-based catalysts toward lignin hydrodeoxygenation: Interplay of structure, catalysis, and stability. J. Energy Chem. 2022, 77, 601–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Elliott, D.C. Historical developments in hydroprocessing bio-oils. Energy Fuels 2007, 21, 1792–1815. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Furimsky, E. Catalytic hydrodeoxygenation. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2000, 199, 147–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  146. Li, X.; Chen, G.; Liu, C.; Ma, W.; Yan, B.; Zhang, J. Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived bio-oil using molecular sieves supported metal catalysts: A critical review. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 71, 296–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Laskar, D.D.; Yang, B.; Wang, H.; Lee, J. Pathways for biomass-derived lignin to hydrocarbon fuels. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2013, 7, 602–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Do, P.T.; Foster, A.J.; Chen, J.; Lobo, R.F. Bimetallic effects in the hydrodeoxygenation of meta-cresol on γ-Al2O3 supported Pt–Ni and Pt–Co catalysts. Green Chem. 2012, 14, 1388–1397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wang, Y.; Wu, J.; Wang, S. Hydrodeoxygenation of bio-oil over Pt-based supported catalysts: Importance of mesopores and acidity of the support to compounds with different oxygen contents. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 12635–12640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Ruiz, P.E.; Frederick, B.G.; De Sisto, W.J.; Austin, R.N.; Radovic, L.R.; Leiva, K.; Garcia, R.; Escalona, N.; Wheeler, M.C. Guaiacol hydrodeoxygenation on MoS2 catalysts: Influence of activated carbon supports. Catal. Commun. 2012, 27, 44–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Ghampson, I.T.; Sepúlveda, C.; Garcia, R.; Radovic, L.R.; Fierro, J.G.; DeSisto, W.J.; Escalona, N. Hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol over carbon-supported molybdenum nitride catalysts: Effects of nitriding methods and support properties. Appl. Catal. A Gen. 2012, 439, 111–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Li, K.; Wang, R.; Chen, J. Hydrodeoxygenation of anisole over silica-supported Ni2P, MoP, and NiMoP catalysts. Energy Fuels 2011, 25, 854–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Olcese, R.N.; Bettahar, M.; Petitjean, D.; Malaman, B.; Giovanella, F.; Dufour, A. Gas-phase hydrodeoxygenation of guaiacol over Fe/SiO2 catalyst. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2012, 115, 63–73. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Ambursa, M.M.; Juan, J.C.; Yahaya, Y.; Taufiq-Yap, Y.H.; Lin, Y.C.; Lee, H.V. A review on catalytic hydrodeoxygenation of lignin to transportation fuels by using nickel-based catalysts. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2021, 138, 110667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Jan, O.; Marchand, R.; Anjos, L.C.; Seufitelli, G.V.; Nikolla, E.; Resende, F.L. Hydropyrolysis of lignin using Pd/HZSM-5. Energy Fuels 2015, 29, 1793–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  156. Wang, H.; Ben, H.; Ruan, H.; Zhang, L.; Pu, Y.; Feng, M.; Ragauskas, A.J.; Yang, B. Effects of lignin structure on hydrodeoxygenation reactivity of pine wood lignin to valuable chemicals. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1824–1830. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Yang, S.; Shi, C.; Shen, Z.; Pan, L.; Huang, Z.; Zhang, X.; Zou, J.J. Conversion of lignin oil and hemicellulose derivative into high-density jet fuel. J. Energy Chem. 2023, 77, 452–460. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Zhong, Z.; Li, J.; Jian, M.; Shu, R.; Tian, Z.; Wang, C.; Chen, Y.; Shi, N.; Wu, Y. Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived phenolic compounds over Ru/TiO2 catalyst: Effect of TiO2 morphology. Fuel 2023, 333, 126241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dwiatmoko, A.A.; Zhou, L.; Kim, I.; Choi, J.W.; Suh, D.J.; Ha, J.M. Hydrodeoxygenation of lignin-derived monomers and lignocellulose pyrolysis oil on the carbon-supported Ru catalysts. Catal. Today 2016, 265, 192–198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Han, Y.; Gholizadeh, M.; Tran, C.C.; Kaliaguine, S.; Li, C.Z.; Olarte, M.; Garcia-Perez, M. Hydrotreatment of pyrolysis bio-oil: A review. Fuel Process. Technol. 2019, 195, 106140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Lazaridis, P.A.; Fotopoulos, A.P.; Karakoulia, S.A.; Triantafyllidis, K.S. Catalytic fast pyrolysis of kraft lignin with conventional, mesoporous and nanosized ZSM-5 zeolite for the production of alkyl-phenols and aromatics. Front. Chem. 2018, 6, 295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  162. Valle, B.; Palos, R.; Bilbao, J.; Gayubo, A.G. Role of zeolite properties in bio-oil deoxygenation and hydrocarbons production by catalytic cracking. Fuel Process. Technol. 2022, 227, 107130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Rezaei, P.S.; Shafaghat, H.; Daud WM, A.W. Production of green aromatics and olefins by catalytic cracking of oxygenate compounds derived from biomass pyrolysis: A review. Appl. Catal. 2014, 469, 490–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Wang, Y.; Fang, Y.; He, T.; Hu, H.; Wu, J. Hydrodeoxygenation of dibenzofuran over noble metal supported on mesoporous zeolite. Catal. Commun. 2011, 12, 1201–1205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Akhade, S.A.; Singh, N.; Gutiérrez, O.Y.; Lopez-Ruiz, J.; Wang, H.; Holladay, J.D.; Liu, Y.; Karkamkar, A.; Weber, R.S.; Glezakou, V.A.; et al. Electrocatalytic hydrogenation of biomass-derived organics: A review. Chem. Rev. 2020, 120, 11370–11419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Yan, Z.P.; Lin, L.; Liu, S. Synthesis of γ-valerolactone by hydrogenation of biomass-derived levulinic acid over Ru/C catalyst. Energy Fuels 2009, 23, 3853–3858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  167. Rinaldi, R. Catalytic Hydrogenation for Biomass Valorization; Royal Society of Chemistry: London, UK, 2015; Volume 13. [Google Scholar]
  168. Yan, N.; Zhao, C.; Dyson, P.J.; Wang, C.; Liu, L.T.; Kou, Y. Selective degradation of wood lignin over noble-metal catalysts in a two-step process. ChemSusChem 2008, 1, 626–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  169. Petrus, L.; Noordermeer, M.A. Biomass to biofuels, a chemical perspective. Green Chem. 2006, 8, 861–867. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Shu, R.; Xu, Y.; Chen, P.; Ma, L.; Zhang, Q.; Zhou, L.; Wang, C. Mild hydrogenation of lignin depolymerization products over Ni/SiO2 catalyst. Energy Fuels 2017, 31, 7208–7213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Vriamont, C.E.; Chen, T.; Romain, C.; Corbett, P.; Manageracharath, P.; Peet, J.; Conifer, C.M.; Hallett, J.P.; Britovsek, G.J.P. From lignin to chemicals: Hydrogenation of lignin models and mechanistic insights into hydrodeoxygenation via low-temperature C–O bond cleavage. ACS Catal. 2019, 9, 2345–2354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Song, Q.; Wang, F.; Cai, J.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, J.; Yu, W.; Xu, J. Lignin depolymerization (LDP) in alcohol over nickel-based catalysts via a fragmentation–hydrogenolysis process. Energy Environ. Sci. 2013, 6, 994–1007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Shu, R.; Long, J.; Yuan, Z.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, T.; Wang, C.; Ma, L. Efficient and product-controlled depolymerization of lignin oriented by metal chloride cooperated with Pd/C. Bioresour. Technol. 2015, 179, 84–90. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Ye, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Fan, J.; Chang, J. Selective production of 4-ethylphenolics from lignin via mild hydrogenolysis. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 118, 648–651. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Singh, S.K.; Ekhe, J.D. Towards effective lignin conversion: HZSM-5 catalyzed one-pot solvolytic depolymerization/hydrodeoxygenation of lignin into value added compounds. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 27971–27978. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Guo, H.; Zhang, B.; Li, C.; Peng, C.; Dai, T.; Xie, H.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T. Tungsten carbide: A remarkably efficient catalyst for the selective cleavage of lignin C− O bonds. ChemSusChem 2016, 9, 3220–3229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Barta, K.; Warner, G.R.; Beach, E.S.; Anastas, P.T. Depolymerization of organosolv lignin to aromatic compounds over Cu-doped porous metal oxides. Green Chem. 2014, 16, 191–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Hermansson, F.; Janssen, M.; Svanström, M. Allocation in life cycle assessment of lignin. Int. J. Life Cycle Assess. 2020, 25, 1620–1632. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Beaucamp, A.; Muddasar, M.; Amiinu, I.S.; Leite, M.M.; Culebras, M.; Latha, K.; Gutierrez, M.C.; Rodriguez-Padron, D.; del Monte, F.; Collins, M.N. Lignin for energy applications–state of the art, life cycle, technoeconomic analysis and future trends. Green Chem. 2022, 24, 8193–8226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Kosamia, N.M.; Samavi, M.; Piok, K.; Rakshit, S.K. Perspectives for scale up of biorefineries using biochemical conversion pathways: Technology status, techno-economic, and sustainable approaches. Fuel 2022, 324, 124532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Budsberg, E.; Crawford, J.T.; Morgan, H.; Chin, W.S.; Bura, R.; Gustafson, R. Hydrocarbon bio-jet fuel from bioconversion of poplar biomass: Life cycle assessment. Biotechnol. Biofuels 2016, 9, 170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  182. Li, W.; Dang, Q.; Smith, R.; Brown, R.C.; Wright, M.M. Techno-economic analysis of the stabilization of bio-oil fractions for insertion into petroleum refineries. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2017, 5, 1528–1537. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Obydenkova, S.V.; Kouris, P.D.; Hensen, E.J.; Heeres, H.J.; Boot, M.D. Environmental economics of lignin derived transport fuels. Bioresour. Technol. 2017, 243, 589–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  184. Shahbaz, M.; AlNouss, A.; Parthasarathy, P.; Abdelaal, A.H.; Mackey, H.; McKay, G.; Al-Ansari, T. Investigation of biomass components on the slow pyrolysis products yield using Aspen Plus for techno-economic analysis. Biomass Convers. Biorefin. 2020, 12, 669–681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  185. Shen, R.; Tao, L.; Yang, B. Techno-economic analysis of jet-fuel production from biorefinery waste lignin. Biofuels Bioprod. Biorefin. 2019, 13, 486–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Kumaniaev, I.; Navare, K.; Mendes, N.C.; Placet, V.; Van Acker, K.; Samec, J.S. Conversion of birch bark to biofuels. Green Chem. 2020, 22, 2255–2263. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  187. Moretti, C.; Corona, B.; Hoefnagels, R.; Vural-Gürsel, I.; Gosselink, R.; Junginger, M. Review of life cycle assessments of lignin and derived products: Lessons learned. Sci. Total Environ. 2021, 770, 144656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. The most common lignin derivatives known in the literature, their sources, production, and classification [65].
Figure 1. The most common lignin derivatives known in the literature, their sources, production, and classification [65].
Energies 16 03382 g001
Table 1. Thermochemical pathways used to convert biomass to biofuel, process requirements, and post-process products.
Table 1. Thermochemical pathways used to convert biomass to biofuel, process requirements, and post-process products.
ProcessProcess
Requirements
ProductAdvantages and Disadvantages
Hydrothermal Carbonization180–250 °C
several hours
Gas
Liquid
Hydrochar
  • It does not require pretreatment or much energy compared to pyrolysis, and the moisture content can be applied directly to the lignin.
  • It is possible to produce multifunctional materials with chemicals with high added value.
  • It requires high pressure for the reactor.
  • Investment costs are high.
Pyrolysis350–700 °C
>30 min
Bio-oil
Biochar
Gas
  • It requires lower operating costs compared to other thermochemical processes.
  • Generally, it is possible to obtain high oil yields of approximately 75–80% after the pyrolysis process.
Biomass
Liquefaction
300–400 °C
0.2–1.0 h
5–20 MPa
Bio-oil
  • It can be applied to many raw materials.
  • The biomass used does not need to be dried.
  • The reactions take place at low temperatures.
  • It has no commercial use.
  • Dilute concentration is required for the process.
Supercritical Fluid Extraction250–400 °CBio-oil
  • The process has the convenience of working continuously.
  • Biomass has a higher conversion rate.
  • No catalyst is needed during the process.
  • Operating costs are high.
Gasification>700 °C
atm pressure
Syngas
Fuel gas
  • In energy recovery, it is possible to produce products with high efficiency, high added value, and generally less emissions; complex technology.
  • It requires high investment, production, and operating costs.
  • It is usually implemented on a pilot scale.
Table 2. Comparison of the catalytic pathways used to convert biomass to biofuel.
Table 2. Comparison of the catalytic pathways used to convert biomass to biofuel.
ProcessProcess RequirementsAdvantages and Disadvantages
Hydrodeoxygenation120–400 °C
10–20 MPa hydrogen pressure.
  • It is environmentally friendly.
  • It is possible to obtain bio-oil containing compounds with higher heating value.
Zeolite Cracking350–500 °C
atmospheric pressure
  • Zeolites can show catalytic activity up to 50% of their volume.
  • The production of aromatic compounds by the process is done without H2 requirements.
  • The resulting product has a low heating value compared to hydrodeoxygenated oils.
HydrogenationExposure to hydrogen in a liquid phase at 100 °C to 500 °C with suitable catalyst.
  • High efficiency is obtained.
  • The resulting fuel burns easily.
  • It can be used in various industrial applications.
Table 3. Effects of temperature-catalyst changes on yield during the lignin hydrogenation process.
Table 3. Effects of temperature-catalyst changes on yield during the lignin hydrogenation process.
CatalystTemperatureYieldReference
Ni/C200 °C54%[172]
Pd/C with CrCl3280 °C78.2–83.2%[173]
Ru/C200–250 °C76.7%[174]
HZSM-5 with NaOH220 °C61%[175]
W2C/AC260 °C12.7%[176]
Porous Cu–Mg–Al oxide140–220 °C63%[177]
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kocaturk, E.; Salan, T.; Ozcelik, O.; Alma, M.H.; Candan, Z. Recent Advances in Lignin-Based Biofuel Production. Energies 2023, 16, 3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083382

AMA Style

Kocaturk E, Salan T, Ozcelik O, Alma MH, Candan Z. Recent Advances in Lignin-Based Biofuel Production. Energies. 2023; 16(8):3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083382

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kocaturk, Engin, Tufan Salan, Orhan Ozcelik, Mehmet Hakkı Alma, and Zeki Candan. 2023. "Recent Advances in Lignin-Based Biofuel Production" Energies 16, no. 8: 3382. https://doi.org/10.3390/en16083382

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop