Next Article in Journal
Application of Quantum Neural Network for Solar Irradiance Forecasting: A Case Study Using the Folsom Dataset, California
Previous Article in Journal
Determination of Ambient Air Vaporizers’ Performance Based on a Study on Heat Transfer in Longitudinal Finned Tubes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Experimental Comparison of Robust Control Algorithms for Torque Ripple Reduction in Multiphase Induction Generators
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Control of Grid-Connected and Standalone Microhydraulic Turbine Using a Six-Phase Induction Generator

by
Marius Ouédraogo
,
Amine Yazidi
and
Franck Betin
*
Laboratory of Innovative Technologies (LTI, UR 3899), University of Picardie Jules Verne, 80000 Amiens, France
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(14), 3581; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143581
Submission received: 27 May 2024 / Revised: 6 July 2024 / Accepted: 17 July 2024 / Published: 21 July 2024

Abstract

:
Microhydraulic turbines offer a promising solution for decentralized energy production, suitable for both grid-connected and standalone applications, due to their compactness and high efficiency. This paper introduces a control approach for such systems employing microhydraulic turbines as distributed generators (DGs), utilizing six-phase induction generators for electricity production. This study emphasizes control strategies for both grid-connected and standalone modes utilizing proportional-integral (PI) controllers. An integrated energy storage system based on Li-Ion battery technology is also implemented to store the excess energy and compensate for production deficits to meet demand. The results obtained using MATLAB/Simulink demonstrate efficient and reliable power management among production sources, the grid and the local load, highlighting the unique contribution of employing a six-phase induction generator with the energy storage system.

1. Introduction

The increasing demand for electricity and challenges related to environmental sustainability have prompted the exploration of innovative energy alternatives using renewable energy sources [1] such as wind, solar, and hydroelectric power. In contrast to large-scale installations which operate using flowing water, these stand out for their cost-effectiveness, sustainability and environmental friendliness due to the absence of water reservoirs, making them more ecologic [2]. They emerge as a promising solution for clean and reliable electricity generation for grid-connected [3] and standalone [2] systems by harnessing the power of small watercourses.
Associating renewable energy with energy storage mechanisms is essential to address fluctuations in electricity demand, thereby ensuring a continuous and stable power supply for grid-connected systems [4]. It is also of particular importance for standalone applications, distant from the utility grid, reducing their dependence on conventional and costly energy sources with a reliable and sustainable supply.
The challenging conditions and difficult accessibility in which microhydraulic power plants operate can increase maintenance costs. Therefore, the robustness, reliability and efficiency of the generator used are crucial for ensuring reliable microhydraulic power generation in harsh and remote off-grid areas. In this context, the most suitable type of generator for microhydraulic applications is the induction machine, also known as an induction generator. which is well suited for such environments [5,6]. Additionally, the sustainability challenges of micro hydro power plants, as highlighted in the research, emphasize the importance of proper design, construction, operation, and maintenance of the generators to guarantee their efficiency and long-term viability [7]. In [8], the use of regulated electrical machines, such as induction dual-power machines, in small hydropower plants underscores their relevance and potential for addressing the maintenance and robustness concerns in microhydraulic power generation. In the case of construction, using the classical three-phase induction machine is not electrical-fault-tolerant. One of the solutions consists of using a real multiphase machine associated with a corresponding converter [9].
Research studies have explored various configurations, including machines with four [10], five [11,12], six [13,14], seven [15], nine [16], and eleven phases [17]. Among these, machines with a number of phases that are multiples of three, such as the six-phase machine, have garnered particular interest. This is because they can be constructed from a conventional three-phase structure through simple rewinding [18], allowing them to leverage existing three-phase converters in the market.
Six-phase machines can be configured with either a single neutral point or two neutral points. In the case of a fault on one phase, the single neutral point configuration isolates only the faulty phase, whereas the two neutral points configuration deactivates the entire star of the affected phase. Six-phase machines are categorized into two types based on their phase displacement: symmetric [19] and asymmetric [20]. In the asymmetric configuration, where there is a 30° phase displacement between two phase groups, the torque ripple is lower compared to the symmetric configuration, which has a 60° phase displacement between phase groups.
Using a six-phase induction generator (6PIG) offers several advantages, including high-power handling capability by dividing the required power between phases, reduced torque pulsations, reduced stator copper losses, reduced rotor harmonic currents, and improved reliability [21]. This type of machine is suitable for medium- to high-power electric drive applications (20 KW–8 MW) and wind energy conversion systems [22]. In addition to the aforementioned advantages, another one is that in case of failure in one to three phases, the production still continues but the power is reduced and ripples appear. Theses ripples can be responsible for the destruction of the structure of the generator. To extract maximum power and to handle ripples in case of fault, several control strategies have been studied in the literature, such as Indirect Rotor Flux Oriented Controller (IRFOC) [23,24], Fuzzy Logic Controller (FLC) [25] and Variable Structure Controller (VSC) [26,27]. The control is performed using the generator side converter of the back-to-back converter system used to interface between the generator and the grid and the local load.
The microhydraulic system is a form of distributed generation (DG) [28] that is connected to the grid through a voltage source inverter (VSI). Voltage source inverters are commonly utilized as a power electronics interface to integrate renewable-energy-based distributed generation systems with the grid and microgrids [29]. VSIs are employed to convert DC power into AC power for supply to the grid [30] or the local load. With DG, VSI can operate in either the grid-connected mode or in the standalone mode, making them a reliable source of electrical power [31].
In grid-tied operation, DG delivers power to the utility and the local load. The objective of grid-connected renewable energy sources converters is to process power and inject sinusoidal currents into the grid. This system, which directly supplies power to the grid, is gaining popularity due to cost reductions [32]. To inject energy into the grid, the total harmonic distortion (THD) of the output current is limited to less than 5%, as defined by the IEEE standard 1547, to comply with the grid code and enhance the quality of electricity circulating in the electrical system [33,34]. Filters have been studied and designed to improve energy quality before grid injection, such as L, LC and LCL filters, which have been extensively researched. According to [35], these filters must effectively attenuate switching frequency harmonics while maintaining low impedance for the fundamental component. The comparison indicates that while the output voltage waveform remains consistent across filters, the LCL filter excels in distortion reduction and harmonic attenuation compared to L and LC filters. However, it introduces resonance and ripple issues [35], necessitating techniques like PI regulators based on dq models [36], active and passive damping methods [37] and passivity-based control [38,39] to ensure system stability and reduce independence between the filter and the grid impedance. Some studies have been conducted on grid-connected systems utilizing six-phase induction generators. In [40], a proposal was put forward for a six-phase induction generator designed for a variable speed wind energy conversion system.
In the standalone mode, DG disconnects from the grid but continues supplying the local load. Due to the intermittent nature of renewable energies, an energy storage system is necessary in standalone operation to balance the energy between the source and the local load. This energy storage system is connected to the DC link trough a bidirectional DC-DC converter (BDC). A self-excited six-phase induction generator for standalone renewable energy generation is proposed in [41]. The reviewed studies on grid-connected and standalone systems using six-phase induction generators do not address energy storage systems, which are crucial for both operational modes. Thus, this paper proposes a complete system with the energy storage system.
To produce electricity in a small-scale, a storage energy system is needed, whether it is in grid-connected or standalone mode. It can store the excess energy when the generated power is more than the required load power and restitute it when the power generated is not sufficient. It also ensures the fluctuation of the power.
In this paper, the 24 kW, 230 V, 12 pairs of poles Squirrel Cage Six-Phase Induction Generator (SC6PIG, Table A1) constructed in our laboratory is coupled with a gearbox to simulate a wind turbine or microhydraulic turbine. The high number of poles reduces the generator’s rated speed simplifying or eliminating the gearbox, which is prone to mechanical faults, while enhancing resilience against electrical and mechanical issues. As depicted in Figure 1, illustrating the overall system configuration, the generator is connected to both the grid and a load to simulate operation in both grid-connected and standalone modes. This system also incorporates an energy storage system. The components of the system include the following:
-
A squirrel cage six-phase induction generator for power generation.
-
A back-to-back converter linking the generator to the grid and/or local load to extract and inject power via DC link. Two three-phase voltage source inverters (VSIs) are employed to connect the six-phase induction generator, with the VSI on the grid-side connected to the load and/or grid via an LCL filter.
-
A lithium-ion battery connected to the DC link through a bidirectional DC-DC converter.
The entire system described in this paper was modeled and simulated using MATLAB/Simulink® Version: 23.2.0.2599560 (R2023b) Update 8 to assess its performance and reliability.
Section 2 will focus on the modeling and control of the six-phase induction generator. Grid-connected and standalone mode control schemes will be studied in Section 3 and Section 4, respectively. Section 5 will examine the storage system as a whole. Lastly, Section 6 will be dedicated to the results and discussions, followed by the conclusion in Section 7.

2. Modeling and Control of a Six-Phase Induction Generator

2.1. Modeling

The squirrel cage six-phase induction generator (SC6PIG) is made up of a stator composed of six identical windings electrically phase shifted by 60° and a rotor composed of a metal bar and a short-circuit ring. The Figure 2 represents the stator of the SC6PIG.
Based on the main equations of voltage, torque, and rotor speed in the natural reference frame (aa’bb’cc’) [42], the studied model corresponds to a simplified version of the equivalent interne circuit model [13,14,43]. The stator and rotor are represented by resistances, self-inductances, and mutual inductances. The equations for stator and rotor voltages are expressed as follows:
V s 6 = R s 6 I s 6 + d dt ϕ s = R s 6 I s 6 + L s d dt I s 6 + emf s
V r 6 = R r 6 I r 6 + d dt ϕ r = R r 6 I r 6 + L r d dt I r 6 + emf r
ϕ s = L sr × I r 6 + L s I s 6
ϕ r = L sr T I s 6 + L r I r 6
The stator and rotor voltages, currents, fluxes and resistances for the six stator and rotor windings are provided as follows:
V s 6 = V sa V sb V sc V sd V se V sf T V r 6 = V ra V rb V rc V rd V re V rf T ϕ s 6 = ϕ sa ϕ sb ϕ sc ϕ sd ϕ se ϕ sf T ϕ r 6 = ϕ ra ϕ rb ϕ rc ϕ rd ϕ re ϕ rf T I s 6 = I sa I sb I sc I sd I se I sf T I r 6 = I ra I rb I rc I rd I re I rf T R s 6 = diag 6 ( R s ) R r 6 = diag 6 ( R r )
The electromagnetic torque equation, depending on the stator and rotor currents, is given by:
T e = p I s 6 T L sr ϴ r I r 6
The relationship between the torque and the rotor speed is given by:
J d Ω r dt + f Ω r = T e + T L

2.2. Indirect Field-Oriented Control

The vector control of the induction machine, also known as field-oriented control (FOC), involves decoupling between the rotor flux and the electromagnetic torque of the generator in order to achieve the best dynamic performance offered by the control of a separate excitation DC machine, where decoupling occurs naturally, as illustrated in Figure 3.
The control of the SC6PIG uses the equations in the dq rotating reference frame. To obtain dq equations, we first employ the decoupling transformation T6 deducted from [44] while keeping the same total powers under the transformation to the natural reference frame. It is then transformed to the stationary reference frame ( α β z1z2z3z4). With a sinusoidal distribution for stator winding, only ( α β ) components lead to fundamental flux and torque production; the other components (z1z2z3z4) represent the stator losses, which will not be analyzed in this paper and neglected.
V s α β = T 6 V s 6
with
T 6 = 1 3 1 cos ϴ cos 2 ϴ cos 3 ϴ cos 2 ϴ cos ϴ 0 sin ϴ sin 2 ϴ sin 3 ϴ sin ϴ 2 sin ϴ 1 cos 2 ϴ cos 4 ϴ cos 6 ϴ cos 4 ϴ cos 2 ϴ 0 sin 2 ϴ sin 4 ϴ sin 6 ϴ sin 4 ϴ sin 2 ϴ 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2 1 2
The rotating reference frame dq is obtain by applying the Park transformation T2 to the stationary one.
V sdq = T 2 V s α β
with
T 2 = cos θ s sin θ s sin θ s cos θ s
The simplified equation in the dq reference frame for the control is given by:
V sd V sq = R s 0 0 R s I sd I sq + d ϕ sd dt d ϕ sq dt + 0 ω s ω s 0 ϕ sd ϕ sq
With
ϕ sd ϕ sq = L s 0 0 L s I sd I sq + M 0 0 M I rd I srq
The expression of electromagnetic torque in the dq rotating reference frame is as follows:
T e = pM ϕ rd I sd ϕ rq I sd
The IRFOC method is realized by making the rotor flux follow only the d axis by turning the dq reference to cancel the q axis.
rd = r rq = 0
The implementation requires the estimation or computation of θ S from the rotor speed measure Ω and the pulsation of the slip ω sl [45].
θ S = ω r + ω sl dt
To ensure decoupling, we need to set up stator currents’ I sd and I sq regulation loops.
V sd = σ L s d i sd dt + R s + M 2 R r L r 2 i sd ω s σ L s i sq + MR r L r 2 rd V sq = σ L s d i sq dt + R s + M 2 R r L r 2 i sq + ω s σ L s i sd + M L r p Ω r
With the coefficient of dispersion σ = 1 M 2 L s L r .
For the decoupled system, two new inputs ( V sd 1 , V sq 1 ) will be injected into the control [46].
V sd 1 = V sd + fem sd V sq 1 = V sq + fem sq
The compensation terms fem sd and fem sq are used in the news control with opposites sign to delete the coupling.
fem sd = ω s σ L s i sq + MR r L r 2 rd fem sq = ω s σ L s i sd M L r p Ω r
The transfer function between the input and the output is finally given by:
i sd = L r 2 R s L r 2 + R r M 2 + σ L s L r 2 S V sd 1 i sq = L r 2 R s L r 2 + R r M 2 + σ L s L r 2 S V sq 1
By analogy to a second-order system, we can deduce the proportional integral (PI) regulator parameters:
K i = ω n 2 × σ L s K p = K i 2 ξ ω n M 2 L r T r K i R s K i

3. Grid-Connected Control Scheme

3.1. Voltage Source Inverter for Grid-Connected and Standalone Mode

VSI is essential for both grid-connected and standalone system. It permits the extraction and the injection of the power to the grid and/or the local load.
In the grid-connected mode, the voltage and frequency are determined by the grid, and the VSI operates as a current-controlled inverter. This means that within their nested control loops systems, the inner loops manage current, while the outer loops handle active and reactive power control or DC link voltage control [29].
In the standalone mode, the VSI is in charge for adjusting the voltage and frequency for local load [47]. Because of the lack of the utility grid, the output voltage has to be controlled in terms of magnitude and frequency. This means that, although the inner control loops in their nested control loop system are current controllers, similar to grid-connected VSIs, the outer loops are the output AC voltage controllers [29].
Several methods are studied for controlling the VSI for the both modes. In this paper, the PI controller based on the dq reference frame is used. In this method, PI controllers are used as regulators ensuring a zero steady-state [29].

3.2. DC Link Control

The DC link is a component of the energy conversion system that allows to maintain the constant continuous voltage to supply others electrics components within the conversion chain. The DC bus control is essential in energy storage system and grid energy injection applications since it permits to guarantee the supply stability and energy conversion efficiency and also realize the active power flux transfer drawn from the generator to the grid. The equation of the DC link voltage is given by:
d V dc dt = 1 C dc I dc V dc R dc
V dc , C dc and R dc are, respectively the DC link voltage, capacitor and resistor.
For the control, we use voltage regulator such as PI that adjust the control of supply converters for compensate load variation or voltage in generator side at the converter output. The transfer function of the DC bus is:
G dc s = 1 sC dc
The closed loop transfer function is:
T s = k p s + k i C dc s 2 + k p s + k i
The regulator parameters are determined by analogy between the DC bus and the quadratic transfer function. PI regulator parameters are found by these equations:
k i = ω n 2 C dc k p = 2 ξ ω n C dc

3.3. Grid Currents Control

Some scientific studies have analyzed systems connected to single-phase [32,48] and three-phase electrical grids [49,50]. Single-phase grids, commonly used in residential and small business applications are studied for their energy efficiency, load management and integration of renewable energy sources. Three-phase grids favored in industrial and commercial contexts are the focus of research on optimizing energy distribution, reducing electrical losses, and improving grid stability. These studies highlight the specific challenges and opportunities for each type of grid in the context of energy transition and sustainable development. Our study will focus on the connection to three-phase electrical grids.
The third-order filter chosen for our study provides better harmonic attenuation. This improves the quality of the energy transiting through the utility grid to comply with current standards. The figure below depicts a schematic of one phase of the LCL filter.
Based on Figure 4, the Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law permits to write the expressions in inverter and grid side for one phase that is given by:
L 1 d I 1 t dt + R 1 I 1 t = V c V inv L 2 d I 2 t dt + R 2 I 2 t = V grid V c
The Node rule permits to write the relationship between currents:
C d V c t dt = I 1 t I 2 t
By applying park transformation denoted T,
T = 2 3 cos θ cos θ 2 π 3 cos θ 4 π 3 sin θ sin θ 2 π 3 sin θ 4 π 3 1 2 1 2 1 2
the LCL filter model in the dq rotating reference frame is as follows:
d I 1 d dt = ω I 1 q R 1 L 1 I 1 d + 1 L 1 V inv d 1 L 1 V cd d I 1 q dt = ω I 1 d R 1 L 1 I 1 q + 1 L 1 V inv q 1 L 1 V cq d I 2 d dt = ω I 2 q R 2 L 2 I 2 d 1 L 2 V cd + 1 L 2 V gridd d I 2 q dt = ω I 2 d R 2 L 2 I 2 q 1 L 2 V cq + 1 L 2 V gridq d V cd dt = ω V cq + 1 C I 1 d 1 C I 2 d d V cq dt = ω V cd + 1 C I 2 d 1 C I 2 q
The dq model obtained allows to set up the currents control with PI regulator. In high frequency, the capacity is having like a wire and the voltage is closed to zero. By neglecting the capacity, we have:
V gridd = V invd d I d dt RI d + L ω I q V gridq = V invq d I q dt RI q L ω I d
With = L 1 + L 2 , R = R 1 + R 2 .
Assuming the above equations, we can write:
V gridd _ ref = K P + K I s I dref I d + L ω I q + V gridd V gridq _ ref = K P + K I s I qref I q L ω I d + V gridq
With
K P + K I s I dref I d = L d I d dt + RI d K P + K I s I qref I q = L d I q dt + RI q
The equations in the dq rotating reference frame introduce cross-coupling between the d and q axes, which deteriorates the control system performance. For this grid-connected VSI, a decoupling technique in the d and q axes’ currents’ control loops is required. This technique helps to suppress the sensitivity to the load changes, enhances disturbance rejection capability, and improves the output current THD in the presence of non-linear loads [23].

3.4. Active and Reactive Power Control

With the dq rotating reference frame, V gridd becomes constant and corresponds to the grid’s rated voltage and V gridq becomes zero. The active power is controlled by the d axis’ current reference signal determined by the output of V dc as follows [51]:
P dc * = V dc × I dref
The active power delivered to the grid is:
P grid * = P dc * + P inv + P f
where P f is filter power absorbed by resistances and P inv is the loss power owing to the condition and commutation. By neglecting the loss powers, we have:
P grid * = P dc *
Then, I dref * is obtained by:
I dref * = V dc I c V grid
The reactive power is controlled by setting the quadratic current reference I qref to zero, because only active power must be injected to the grid. Thereby, we have to set up:
I qref = 0
The active and reactive power of the grid can be determined by:
P = V d I d + V q I q Q = V q I d V d I q

3.5. Grid Synchronization

To connect a system to a three-phase electrical grid utility via an inverter, it is essential that the inverter output voltage be synchronized with that of the grid. This involves the frequency and the phase of the output voltage of the inverter corresponding to those of the grid. Several methods are used in the literature. The method used in this paper is a phase-locked loop (PLL), which generates an output signal that synchronizes the input signal in phase and frequency using regulation loop. The synchronization process is carried out in real time, which causes the loop to work constantly.
The control system in the grid-connected mode is shown in the following Figure 5.

4. Control Scheme for Standalone Mode

Standalone systems have been extensively studied in the literature [29,52]. These systems, which operate independently of the main electrical grid, are particularly relevant in remote or rural areas where access to the grid is limited or nonexistent. Research on standalone systems focuses on several aspects to improve their efficiency, including optimization of renewable energy sources, energy storage management, energy efficiency and load management.
Based on the aforementioned Figure 4, the Kirchhoff’s Voltage Law and the Node rule allow us to write the following formula:
L dI t dt + R I t = V i V L
C d V c t dt = I i I o
In applying Park transformation, the filter model in the dq rotating reference frame becomes:
L d dt I Ld I Lq = R ω L ω L R I Ld I Lq + V id V cd V iq V cq
C d dt V cd V cq = C ω V cd C ω V cq + I Ld I od I Lq I oq
with Laplace transformation, we have:
I Ld I Lq = 1 LS + R V id V cd V iq V cq + ω LI Lq ω L I Ld
V cd V cq = 1 CS C ω V cd C ω V cq + I Ld I od I Lq I oq
In grid-connected operation and in standalone VSI, cross-coupling exists in both current and voltage control loops. In [47], a damp resistor controller is used to dissipate excess power during fault or over generation. For improving the dynamic performance of the controller in this work, the cross couplings terms are nullified by the decoupled network with feed-forward signals Vcd and Vcq. The VSI must maintain an output voltage with low Total Harmonic Distortions (THD) for all types of loads. The THD level should comply with the IEEE standard 1547, which sets a limit of 5% [53].
Figure 6 illustrates the control system in standalone mode used in this paper.

5. Energy Storage System

The energy storage system is essential for integrating renewable energies, addressing the intermittent and less predictable nature of sources. An energy storage system serves various purposes:
(1)
For isolated locations, it ensures autonomy by building up an energy reserve during periods of excess production and releasing it when production temporarily falls short or stops. It means that it ensures the balance of energy between the source and the local load [53].
(2)
For grid-connected systems, it maintains a real-time balance between production and consumption, improves the stability and reliability of the grid, and promotes a more efficient use of renewable energies, reducing dependence on fossil fuels and associated greenhouse gas emissions from electricity production using polluting energy sources.
Several storage technics are used in the literature, including a battery storage system, which store energy in the form of chemical energy and release it in the form of electrical energy by oxidation and reduction of their materials. The battery storage system is preferred over other storage technics or devices due to its performance and significantly higher energy density [53]. Assuming all the various types of battery storage system studied in the literature, lithium-ion technology is one of the best compromises in terms of energy density, energy efficiency (between 95% and 99%), duty life, low self-discharge, very low memory effect and high flexibility, as well as in terms of energy/power ratio.

Bidirectional DC/DC Converter Control

The growing demand for generating power from renewable energy sources has made energy storage and the integration of energy storage devices with the grid a significant challenge. A bidirectional DC-DC converter (BDC) provides the required bidirectional power flow for battery charging and discharging [54]. It is based on the power demand of the local load and the microturbine, employing a six-phase induction generator input. Bidirectional DC-DC converters are of two types: non-isolated and isolated topologies. The transformer-less, non-isolated topology is simple and has a reduced number of components with more efficiency than isolated BDC [55].
The BDC is constituted of IGBT (Qi) in parallel with a diode Di (i = 1–2), as shown in Figure 7.
When transistor Q2 and diode D1 are switched ON, the bidirectional converter (BDC) functions as a boost converter, supplying power to the local load in a discharging or injecting mode. Conversely, when transistor Q1 and diode D2 are switched ON, the BDC operates as a buck converter, injecting power into the battery during a charging or harvesting mode. This means that the BDC is used to increase the output voltage when there is high demand from the local load, while it functions in buck mode to protect the battery by providing optimal charging voltage [55].
Several studies have focused on voltage and/or current regulation for BDCs. In these studies, a proportional-integral (PI) control strategy is employed to track the reference voltage or current of the bidirectional converter. An inner current loop is utilized to stabilize battery current against any system fluctuations in both grid-connected and standalone modes. In standalone mode, an outer voltage loop also regulates the DC link voltage, maintaining it at a constant value as a reference while managing charge/discharge currents to/from the battery bank based on the required local load power [56].
The DC link voltage V dc is sensed and compared with a reference voltage V dcref . The error signal is then processed with a PI controller to generate the reference of battery current I batref . I batref is compared with the sensed battery current I bat and the resulting error is passed through the second PI controller. This generates the control modulation signal for pulse width modulation (PWM), as depicted in Figure 8. To ensure the modulation signal remains within the range of ±1, a saturation block is employed.

6. Results and Interpretation

As the test bench does not include all the required elements, such as the storage system, only the experimental results from the six-phase induction generator side will be presented in this paper and compared to those from the simulation. Therefore, only the simulation results will be discussed in the remainder of this study. The experimental results will be addressed in another article, pending the receipt of the missing equipment.
Figure 9 depicts the currents of the six phases of the induction generator both in simulation (a) and experimentation (b) for several distinct levels of stator currents references.
Figure 10a,b represents, respectively, the direct and quadratic currents of the six-phase induction generator both in simulation and experimentation, while Figure 11a,b depicts the simulated and experimental electromagnetic power delivered by the induction generator.
Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11 show that the model of the six-phase induction generator associated with the control used for simulation is realistic since the experimental and simulation results are very close.

6.1. Results in Grid-Connected Mode

6.1.1. Without Local Load

In this section, the grid-connected system operates without any load. The aim is to demonstrate the effectiveness and efficiency of managing flow transfers such as injection into the grid or storage in the battery, as shown by the results below.
In this scenario of Figure 12, from 0 to 2.5 s, only the battery supplies energy to the grid (magenta color). During this period, the generator flux is expected to reach its nominal value. The generator is loaded at −500 N·m at t = 2.5 s (green color), resulting in an increase in the power injected into the grid (blue color). The battery supply is interrupted at 3.5 s. At 5 s, the contribution of the generator, loaded at −1000 N∙m, increases, and some of the generated energy is used to recharge the battery. Throughout the scenario, the reactive power of the grid (red color) is maintained at 0.
Figure 13 represents the currents on the inverter side (Figure 13a) and the grid side (Figure 13b). In this scenario, the magnitudes of the currents are nearly the same. The only point of difference is the quality of the currents. Those from the inverter contain harmonics due to the switching of the switches (semiconductors). Owing to the LCL filter, those from the grid are significantly cleaner and comply with grid standards. In Figure 14, it is noticeable that the total harmonic distortion (THD) of the grid current (Figure 14b) is significantly lower than 5%, which complies with the standards of the electrical grid. This is attributed to the LCL filter.

6.1.2. With Local Load

As in the previous section, the grid-connected system now supplies a local load. In this scenario, a 10 KW load is added (cyan color). Initially, between 0 and 2 s, no energy is supplied by the generator or the battery; so, all the energy required for the local load comes from the grid (indicated in blue). At t = 2 s, the storage system (magenta color) begins to power the local load. By charging the generator (green color) at t = 3 s, there is enough energy to supply the load, and the surplus is fed back into the grid. At 5 s, the battery supply is discontinued, and the generator supply is increased, with still sufficient energy for the local load and surplus fed back into the grid. One second later, grid injection is stopped, and the surplus is used to charge the battery. Contrary to the scenario without the local load, where the reactive power (red color) of the grid is zero, here, it has a fixed value corresponding to the reactive power of the local load (yellow color) due to disturbances related to the LCL filter (Figure 15).
Figure 16 represents the currents on the inverter side (Figure 16a) and the grid side (Figure 16b). In contrast to the previous scenario, the two currents are not identical due to the load, which can draw energy from sources such as the six-phase induction generator and the battery, or from the grid in case of production shortfall. It should be noted that in the event of abundant production, the surplus is injected into the grid or used to charge the battery. In Figure 17, despite the presence of the local load, the grid-side current has a total harmonic distortion (THD) of less than 5%.
Since the load remains constant throughout the simulation, the current also remains constant, as shown in Figure 18.

6.2. Standalone Mode Results

In this section, the system operates in standalone mode, meaning without a grid utility connection. Power sources such as the six-phase induction generator and battery directly and exclusively supply the local load. In an autonomous system, there is no grid; so, the voltage magnitude and frequency are generated by the inverter. In this scenario shown in Figure 19, if the generator output (green color) is lower than what the load requires (cyan color), the deficit is drawn from the battery (magenta color). Similarly, if it exceeds the load’s requirements, the surplus is used to charge the battery. Initially set at 7 kW, the local load is increased to 10 KW at t = 5 s.
Despite the absence of the grid utility, it can be noted that the voltage of the local load is perfectly controlled at a peak magnitude of 400 V (as shown in Figure 20a). As the local load is not constant, the current follows the trends of its evolution shown in Figure 20b.

7. Conclusions

In conclusion, this study demonstrates the feasibility and effectiveness of utilizing microhydraulic turbines as distributed generators coupled with six-phase induction generators for decentralized energy production, complemented by an energy storage system using Li-Ion batteries. The proposed control strategies employing proportional-integral (PI) controllers effectively manage energy production in both grid-connected and standalone modes. The integration of the Li-Ion battery energy storage system enhances system reliability by mitigating production deficits and storing excess energy. MATLAB/Simulink simulations underscored efficient coordination among production sources, the grid, and local loads.
The next challenge identified in this study is to develop a control strategy that integrates reactive power compensation to limit reactive power injection into the grid, particularly during disturbances associated with adding loads to the LCL filter. Subsequently, a unified control strategy encompassing both grid-connected and autonomous modes will be explored, incorporating an energy management algorithm.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Methodology, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Software, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Validation, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Formal analysis, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Investigation, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Resources, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Data curation, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Writing—original draft, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Writing—review & editing, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Visualization, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Supervision, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Project administration, M.O., A.Y. and F.B.; Funding acquisition, M.O., A.Y. and F.B. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the «Hauts de France» Region Council and Grand-Soissons Agglomeration.

Data Availability Statement

No new data were created or analyzed in this study.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix A

SC6PIGSquirrel Cage Six-Phase Induction Generator
BDCBidirectional DC-DC converter
PLLPhase locked loop
DGDistributed generator
IGBTIsolate gate bipolar transistor
FOCField-oriented control
VSIVoltage source inverter
THDTotal harmonic distortion
PIProportional integral
FLCFuzzy logic controller

Appendix B

Table A1. Rated parameters of the SC6PIG.
Table A1. Rated parameters of the SC6PIG.
ParameterValueUnit
Rated Power24Kw
Rated Torque 2350Nm
Rated Voltage 230V
Rated Speed 119Rpm
Rated Current 32.3A
Frequency 25Hz
Number of pole pairs 12-
Stator Resistance Rs0.262Ω
Rotor Resistance Rr0.64Ω
Stator Inductance Ls0.0827H
Rotor Inductance Lr 0.0813H
Mutual Inductance M 0.0789H
Friction Coefficient 21.39Nm/rad/s
Inertia Coefficient704Kg∙ m 2
Table A2. Rated parameters of the battery (Li-Ion).
Table A2. Rated parameters of the battery (Li-Ion).
ParameterValueUnit
Total energy capacity9.8 kWh@25 °C (77 °F), 100% SOC-
Battery capacity63Ah
Voltage rangeCharge (468 to 550 Vdc)V
Discharge (430 to 507 Vdc)V
Current rangeCharge (10.7 A@467 V)A
Discharge (11.7 A@427 V)A
Table A3. Rated parameters of the grid’s side components.
Table A3. Rated parameters of the grid’s side components.
Parameter ValueUnit
DC bus voltage650V
Filter resistors (R1 & R2)0.2Ω
Filter inductance (L1 & L2)1500 & 750μH
Filter capacitors 10μf
Grid voltage 400V
Frequency50Hz

Appendix C

Table A4. PIC parameters in FOC.
Table A4. PIC parameters in FOC.
ParametersValue
Proportional gain Ki1383
Proportional gain kp5.5
Table A5. PIC parameters in grid-connected system.
Table A5. PIC parameters in grid-connected system.
ParametersValue
Proportional gain Ki ( I d q ) 100
Proportional gain kp ( I d q ) 2.5
Proportional gain Ki ( V d c ) 5
Proportional gain kp ( V d c ) 0.5
Proportional gain Ki ( I b a t ) 25
Proportional gain kp ( I b a t ) 0.001
Table A6. PIC parameters in standalone system.
Table A6. PIC parameters in standalone system.
ParametersValue
Proportional gain Ki ( I d q ) 100
Proportional gain kp ( I d q ) 0.001
Proportional gain Ki ( V d q ) 0.1
Proportional gain kp ( V d q ) 10
Proportional gain Ki ( V d c ) 100
Proportional gain kp ( V d c ) 0.01
Proportional gain Ki ( I b a t ) 25
Proportional gain kp ( I b a t ) 0.01

References

  1. Li, L.; Lin, J.; Wu, N.; Xie, S.; Meng, C.; Zheng, Y.; Wang, X.; Zhao, Y. Review and outlook on the international renewable energy development. Energy Built Environ. 2022, 3, 139–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Hoq, M.T.; Nawshad, U.; Islam, M.; Sina, I.; Syfullah, M.; Rahman, R. Micro Hydro Power: Promising Solution for Off-Grid Renewable Energy Source. Int. J. Sci. Eng. Res. 2011, 2, 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  3. Nababan, S.; Muljadi, E.; Blaabjerg, F. An overview of power topologies for micro-hydro turbines. In Proceedings of the 2012 3rd IEEE International Symposium on Power Electronics for Distributed Generation Systems (PEDG), Aalborg, Denmark, 25–28 June 2012; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2012; pp. 737–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Worku, M. Recent Advances in Energy Storage Systems for Renewable Source Grid Integration: A Comprehensive Review. Sustainability 2022, 14, 5985. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Micro Hydro Power (MHP)-Pros and Cons-Energypedia. Available online: https://energypedia.info/wiki/Micro_Hydro_Power_(MHP)_-_Pros_and_Cons (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  6. Youssef, K.H.; Wahba, M.A.; Yousef, H.A.; Omar, A.S. A new method for voltage and frequency control of stand-alone self-excited induction generator using PWM converter with variable DC link voltage. In Proceedings of the 2008 American Control Conference, Seattle, WA, USA, 11–13 June 2008; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2008; pp. 2486–2491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Didik, H.; Bambang, P.N.; Asep, S.; Purwanto, Y.A. Sustainability Challenge of Micro Hydro Power Development in Indonesia. IOP Conf. Ser. Earth Environ. Sci. 2018, 147, 012031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Using Regulated Electrical Machines in Small Hydropower Plants Operating in a Power Network|Russian Electrical Engineering. Available online: https://link.springer.com/article/10.3103/S1068371218050061 (accessed on 11 January 2024).
  9. Pantea, A.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Capolino, G.A.; Lanfranchi, V. Six-phase Axial Flux Permanent Magnet generator model: Simulation and experimental validation. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE 25th International Symposium on Industrial Electronics (ISIE), Santa Clara, CA, USA, 8–10 June 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Semail, E.; Meibody-Tabar, F.; Benkhoris, M.F.; Razik, H.; Pietrzak-David, M.; Monmasson, E.; Bouscayrol, A.; Davat, B.; Delarue, P.; Fornel, B.; et al. Machines polyphasées: De la modélisation multimachine à la commande. J3ea 2005, 4, 12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Abdel-Khalik, A.S.; Ahmed, S. Performance Evaluation of a Five-Phase Modular Winding Induction Machine. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2012, 59, 2654–2669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kulandaivel, G.; Sundaram, E.; Gunasekaran, M.; Chenniappan, S. Five-phase induction motor drive-A comprehensive review. Front. Energy Res. 2023, 11, 1178169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yazidi, A.; Pantea, A.; Betin, F.; Carriere, S.; Henao, H.; Capolino, G.-A. Six-phase induction machine model for simulation and control purposes. In Proceedings of the IECON 2014—40th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Dallas, TX, USA, 29 October 2014–1 November 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 881–887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Pantea, A.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Taherzadeh, M.; Carriere, S.; Henao, H.; Capolino, G.-A. Six-Phase Induction Machine Model for Electrical Fault Simulation Using the Circuit-Oriented Method. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2016, 63, 494–503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chandramohan, K.; Kalyanasundaram, R. Dynamic Modeling of Seven-Phase Induction Generator. Energy Procedia 2017, 117, 369–376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. De Souza, T.S.; Bastos, R.R.; Cardoso Filho, B.J. Modeling and Control of a Nine-Phase Induction Machine with Open Phases. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2018, 54, 6576–6585. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Masoud, M.I.; Abdelkhalik, A.S. Performance Evaluation of Eleven-Phase Induction Machine with Different PWM Techniques. J. Eng. Res. TJER 2015, 12, 1–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pantea, A. Modélisation, Simulation et Contrôle D’une Génératrice Multiphasée à Grand Nombre de Pôles Pour L’éolien. Available online: https://theses.hal.science/tel-03650568 (accessed on 23 June 2024).
  19. Pantea, A.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Carriere, S.; Capolino, G.-A. Simulation and experimental control of six-phase induction generator for wind turbines. In Proceedings of the 2016 XXII International Conference on Electrical Machines (ICEM), Lausanne, Switzerland, 4–7 September 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1181–1186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Alattar, M.; Alsammak, A. Speed Control of Asymmetrical Six Phase Induction Motor based Fuzzy Logic Controller. Int. Res. J. Eng. Technol. IRJET 2020, 7, 213–217. [Google Scholar]
  21. Pantea, A.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Carriere, S.; Sivert, A.; Capolino, G.-A. Fault tolerant control of six-phase induction generator for wind turbines. In Proceedings of the 2017 IEEE International Electric Machines and Drives Conference (IEMDC), Miami, FL, USA, 21–24 May 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Abdel-Khalik, A.S.; Abdel-Majeed, M.S.; Ahmed, S. Effect of Winding Configuration on Six-Phase Induction Machine Parameters and Performance. IEEE Access 2020, 8, 223009–223020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Pantea, A.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Carriere, S.; Sivert, A.; Vacossin, B.; Henao, H.; Capolino, G.-A. Fault-Tolerant Control of a Low-Speed Six-Phase Induction Generator for Wind Turbines. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2019, 55, 426–436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Pantea, A.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Carriere, S.; Sivert, A.; Capolino, G.-A. Fault Tolerant Control of Six-Phase Induction Gene.Pdf. 2017. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/stampPDF/getPDF.jsp?tp=&a-number=8002161&ref=aHR0cHM6Ly9pZWVleHBsb3JlLmllZWUub3JnL2Fic3RyYWN0L2RvY3VtZW50LzgwMDIxNjE= (accessed on 22 January 2024).
  25. Pantea, A.; Nurwati, T.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Carriere, S.; Capolino, G.-A. Fuzzy Logic Control of a Low Speed Six-Phase Induction Generator for Wind Turbines. In Proceedings of the IECON 2018-44th Annual Conference of the IEEE Industrial Electronics Society, Washington, DC, USA, 21–23 October 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 5813–5818. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. OBouyahia, O.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F.; Capolino, G.-A. Fuzzy Variable Structure Control of a Six Phase Induction Generator. In Proceedings of the 2023 IEEE International Electric Machines & Drives Conference (IEMDC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 15–18 May 2023; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2023; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Bouyahia, O.; Betin, F.; Yazidi, A. Fault-tolerant Variable Structure Control of a Low Speed 6-Phase Induction Generator. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE 13th International Symposium on Diagnostics for Electrical Machines, Power Electronics and Drives (SDEMPED), Dallas, TX, USA, 22–25 August 2021; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2021; pp. 92–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Raza, A.; Xu, D.; Mian, M.; Ahmed, J. A micro hydro power plant for distributed generation using municipal water waste with archimedes screw. In Proceedings of the 2013 16th International Multi Topic Conference, INMIC 2013, Lahore, Pakistan, 19–20 December 2013; pp. 66–71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Analysis and Controller Design for Stand-Alone VSIs in Synchronous Reference Frame-Ramezani-2017-IET Power Electronics-Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://ietresearch.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1049/iet-pel.2016.0883 (accessed on 27 January 2024).
  30. Ünlü, M.; Çamur, S.; Beşer, E.; AriFoğlu, B. Sinusoidal current injection based on a line-commutated inverter for single-phase grid-connected renewable energy sources. Turk. J. Elec. Eng. Comp. Sci. 2016, 24, 4670–4681. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Liu, Z.; Liu, J.; Zhao, Y. A Unified Control Strategy for Three-Phase Inverter in Distributed Generation. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2014, 29, 1176–1191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Sedo, J.; Kascak, S. Design of output LCL filter and control of single-phase inverter for grid-connected system. Electr. Eng. 2017, 99, 1217–1232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jo, J.; Liu, Z.; Cha, H. A New Design Method of LCL Filter for Single Phase Grid Connected Power Converter. In Proceedings of the 2019 International Symposium on Electrical and Electronics Engineering (ISEE), Ho Chi Minh, Vietnam, 10–12 October 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 189–193. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Liserre, M.; Blaabjerg, F.; Hansen, S. Design and Control of an LCL-Filter-Based Three-Phase Active Rectifier. IEEE Trans. Ind. Applicat. 2005, 41, 1281–1291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Dhaneria, A.; Khambhadiya, H. Design of AC side filter for Grid Tied Solar Inverter. In Proceedings of the 2019 4th International Conference on Recent Trends on Electronics, Information, Communication & Technology (RTEICT), Bangalore, India, 17–18 May 2019; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2019; pp. 1375–1378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Arab, N.; Kedjar, B.; Al-Haddad, K. D-Q frame optimal control of single phase grid connected inverter with LCL filter. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Electrical Power and Energy Conference (EPEC), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 12–14 October 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Wu, W.; He, Y.; Tang, T.; Blaabjerg, F. A New Design Method for the Passive Damped LCL and LLCL Filter-Based Single-Phase Grid-Tied Inverter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2013, 60, 4339–4350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chou, S.-F.; Wang, X.; Blaabjerg, F. Passivity-based LCL Filter Design of Grid-Connected VSCs with Converter Side Current Feedback. In Proceedings of the 2018 International Power Electronics Conference (IPEC-Niigata 2018-ECCE Asia), Niigata, Japan, 20–24 May 2018; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2018; pp. 1711–1718. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Wang, X.; Blaabjerg, F.; Loh, P.C. Passivity-Based Stability Analysis and Damping Injection for Multiparalleled VSCs with LCL Filters. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2017, 32, 8922–8935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Chinmaya, K.A.; Singh, G.K. Modeling and experimental analysis of grid-connected six-phase induction generator for variable speed wind energy conversion system. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 2019, 166, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Singh, G.K. Modeling and experimental analysis of a self-excited six-phase induction generator for stand-alone renewable energy generation. Renew. Energy 2008, 33, 1605–1621. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nurwati, T. Contribution to Fuzzy Logic Controller of Six-Phase Induction Generator for Wind Turbine Application. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Picardy Jules Verne, Amiens, France, 2019. Available online: https://www.theses.fr/2019AMIE0064 (accessed on 23 January 2024).
  43. Aroquiadassou, G.; Henao, H.; Capolino, G.A.; Boglietti, A.; Cavagnino, A. A simple circuit-oriented model for predicting six-phase induction machine performances. In Proceedings of the IECON 2006-32nd Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics, Paris, France, 6–10 November 2006; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2006; pp. 1441–1446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Renukadevi, G.; Rajambal, K. Generalized model of multi-phase induction motor drive using matlab/simulink. In ISGT2011-India; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2011; pp. 114–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Baghli, L. Modélisation et Commande de la Machine Asynchrone. 2020. Available online: https://www.baghli.com/dl/courscmde/cours_cmde_MAS.pdf (accessed on 28 January 2024).
  46. Bouyahia, O. Génération Électrique Tolérante Aux Défauts à Base de Structures Multiphasées: Comparaison, Choix D’une Technologie, Transfert Technologique. Ph.D. Thesis, Université de Picardie Jules Verne, Amiens, France, 2022. Available online: https://theses.hal.science/tel-04073881 (accessed on 28 January 2024).
  47. Abdulelah, A.M.; Ouahid, B.; Youcef, S. Control of a Stand-Alone Variable Speed Wind Turbine with a Permanent Magnet Synchronous Generator. In Proceedings of the 2021 18th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD), Monastir, Tunisia, 22–25 March 2021; pp. 546–550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Bourguiba, I.; Houari, A.; Belloumi, H.; Kourda, F. Control of single-phase grid connected photovoltaic inverter. In Proceedings of the 2016 4th International Conference on Control Engineering & Information Technology (CEIT), Hammamet, Tunisia, 16–18 December 2016; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2016; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Das Gupta, T.; Kumar, D.; Chaudhary, K. Modelling and analysis of grid-tied fuel cell system with synchronous reference frame control. In Proceedings of the 2017 4th International Conference on Power, Control & Embedded Systems (ICPCES), Allahabad, India, 9–11 March 2017; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2017; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Wang, C.; Sun, J. Study on control method for the grid-connected inverter with LCL filter. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE Workshop on Advanced Research and Technology in Industry Applications (WARTIA), Ottawa, ON, Canada, 29–30 September 2014; IEEE: Piscataway, NJ, USA, 2014; pp. 1337–1341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Hamrouni, N.; Jraidi, M.; Chérif, A. New method of current control for LCL-interfaced grid-connected three phase voltage source inverter. Rev. Des Energ. Renouvelables 2010, 13, 71. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Sagiraju, D.; Obulesu, Y.P.; Choppavarapu, S. Dynamic performance improvement of standalone battery integrated PMSG wind energy system using proportional resonant controller. Eng. Sci. Technol. Int. J. 2017, 20, 1353–1365. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Sahu, P.K.; Jena, S.; Babu, B.C. Power management and bus voltage control of a battery backup-based stand-alone PV system. Electr. Eng. 2022, 104, 97–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Bidirectional DC-DC Converter in Solar PV System for Battery Charging Application|IEEE Conference Publication|IEEE Xplore. Available online: https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/8537391 (accessed on 24 January 2024).
  55. Wang, Y.-X.; Qin, F.-F.; Kim, Y.-B. Bidirectional DC-DC converter design and implementation for lithium-ion battery application. In Proceedings of the 2014 IEEE PES Asia-Pacific Power and Energy Engineering Conference (APPEEC), Hong Kong, China, 7–10 December 2014; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Hussein, M.M.; Senjyu, T.; Orabi, M.; Wahab, M.A.A.; Hamada, M.M. Control of a Stand-Alone Variable Speed Wind Energy Supply System. Appl. Sci. 2013, 3, 437–456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Overall system.
Figure 1. Overall system.
Energies 17 03581 g001
Figure 2. Six-phase stator windings.
Figure 2. Six-phase stator windings.
Energies 17 03581 g002
Figure 3. Field-oriented control scheme.
Figure 3. Field-oriented control scheme.
Energies 17 03581 g003
Figure 4. Single phase of LCL filter.
Figure 4. Single phase of LCL filter.
Energies 17 03581 g004
Figure 5. Grid-connected system control.
Figure 5. Grid-connected system control.
Energies 17 03581 g005
Figure 6. Standalone system control.
Figure 6. Standalone system control.
Energies 17 03581 g006
Figure 7. Bidirectional DC converter with the battery.
Figure 7. Bidirectional DC converter with the battery.
Energies 17 03581 g007
Figure 8. Bidirectional DC converter control.
Figure 8. Bidirectional DC converter control.
Energies 17 03581 g008
Figure 9. (a) Simulation result of the generator stator currents, (b) experimental result of the generator stator currents.
Figure 9. (a) Simulation result of the generator stator currents, (b) experimental result of the generator stator currents.
Energies 17 03581 g009
Figure 10. Direct and quadratic current: (a) simulation and (b) experimentation.
Figure 10. Direct and quadratic current: (a) simulation and (b) experimentation.
Energies 17 03581 g010
Figure 11. Electromagnetic power: (a) simulation and (b) experimentation.
Figure 11. Electromagnetic power: (a) simulation and (b) experimentation.
Energies 17 03581 g011
Figure 12. Active and reactive power of the generator, battery and the grid.
Figure 12. Active and reactive power of the generator, battery and the grid.
Energies 17 03581 g012
Figure 13. (a) Inverter currents. (b) Grid currents.
Figure 13. (a) Inverter currents. (b) Grid currents.
Energies 17 03581 g013
Figure 14. The harmonic distortion rate in grid-connected mode without load of (a) inverter currents and (b) grid currents.
Figure 14. The harmonic distortion rate in grid-connected mode without load of (a) inverter currents and (b) grid currents.
Energies 17 03581 g014
Figure 15. Active and reactive power of the generator, the battery, the grid and the local load.
Figure 15. Active and reactive power of the generator, the battery, the grid and the local load.
Energies 17 03581 g015
Figure 16. (a) Inverter currents. (b) Grid-side currents.
Figure 16. (a) Inverter currents. (b) Grid-side currents.
Energies 17 03581 g016
Figure 17. The harmonic distortion rate in grid-connected mode with load of (a) inverter currents and (b) grid currents.
Figure 17. The harmonic distortion rate in grid-connected mode with load of (a) inverter currents and (b) grid currents.
Energies 17 03581 g017
Figure 18. (a) Load voltage. (b) Load currents.
Figure 18. (a) Load voltage. (b) Load currents.
Energies 17 03581 g018
Figure 19. Active and reactive power of the generator, the battery and the local load.
Figure 19. Active and reactive power of the generator, the battery and the local load.
Energies 17 03581 g019
Figure 20. (a) Local load voltage and (b) the local load current.
Figure 20. (a) Local load voltage and (b) the local load current.
Energies 17 03581 g020
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ouédraogo, M.; Yazidi, A.; Betin, F. Control of Grid-Connected and Standalone Microhydraulic Turbine Using a Six-Phase Induction Generator. Energies 2024, 17, 3581. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143581

AMA Style

Ouédraogo M, Yazidi A, Betin F. Control of Grid-Connected and Standalone Microhydraulic Turbine Using a Six-Phase Induction Generator. Energies. 2024; 17(14):3581. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143581

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ouédraogo, Marius, Amine Yazidi, and Franck Betin. 2024. "Control of Grid-Connected and Standalone Microhydraulic Turbine Using a Six-Phase Induction Generator" Energies 17, no. 14: 3581. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17143581

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop