Correction: Yalçın, S.; Herdem, M.S. Optimizing EV Battery Management: Advanced Hybrid Reinforcement Learning Models for Efficient Charging and Discharging. Energies 2024, 17, 2883

In the original publication [1], two references were unintentionally omitted. Additionally, necessary citations and permissions for Figures 1B and 5 were not properly included. We outline below the specific changes made to correct these oversights:

1. 

Figure Adjustments and Permissions:

• We replaced Figure 10 with Table 1 to clarify the data better and address potential copyright issues. This change has been documented with a new citation, now listed as a Reference 59.
• Figure 1B has now been correctly cited as a Reference 44, and Figure 1A has been updated accordingly.

Table 1. The results of the adaptive test study are also shown in Ref. [59].

Test Parameters	The Data on Rewards	Cycle Number
		200	400	600	800	1000
Cumulative Return [-]	AOF	0	0	0	−246	−241
	SOF	−223	−435	−753	−1142	−1344
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.026	0.078	0.121	0.153	0.178
Temperature Violation [°C]	AOF	−2.35	−0.07	−2.41	0	0.01
	SOF	2.33	4.23	5.87	7.28	7.52
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.027	0.077	0.101	0.146	0.169
Voltage Violation [V]	AOF	0	0.06	0.38	0.17	0.16
	SOF	0.03	0.42	0.16	0.24	0.32
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.024	0.068	0.104	0.141	0.174
Time [min]	AOF	32.3	32.7	36.4	38.7	46.8
	SOF	25.7	26.9	27.7	28.3	30.5
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.028	0.053	0.102	0.152	0.179

AOF: Adaptive output feedback; SOF: Static output feedback; $R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$: Resistance.

Table 1. The results of the adaptive test study are also shown in Ref. [59].

Test Parameters	The Data on Rewards	Cycle Number
		200	400	600	800	1000
Cumulative Return [-]	AOF	0	0	0	−246	−241
	SOF	−223	−435	−753	−1142	−1344
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.026	0.078	0.121	0.153	0.178
Temperature Violation [°C]	AOF	−2.35	−0.07	−2.41	0	0.01
	SOF	2.33	4.23	5.87	7.28	7.52
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.027	0.077	0.101	0.146	0.169
Voltage Violation [V]	AOF	0	0.06	0.38	0.17	0.16
	SOF	0.03	0.42	0.16	0.24	0.32
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.024	0.068	0.104	0.141	0.174
Time [min]	AOF	32.3	32.7	36.4	38.7	46.8
	SOF	25.7	26.9	27.7	28.3	30.5
	$R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$	0.028	0.053	0.102	0.152	0.179

AOF: Adaptive output feedback; SOF: Static output feedback; $R_f^{-}\left[\Omega \right]$: Resistance.

Figure 1. (A) Actor-critic approach in Continuous State/Action spaces. (B) Lithium-ion movement during battery charging [44].

Figure 1. (A) Actor-critic approach in Continuous State/Action spaces. (B) Lithium-ion movement during battery charging [44].

44.

Jaguemont, J.; Boulon, L.; Dube, Y. A comprehensive review of lithium-ion batteries used in hybrid and electric vehicles at cold temperatures. Appl. Energy 2016, 164, 99–114.

59.

Park, S.; Pozzi, A.; Perez, H.; Kandel, A.; Kim, G.; Choi, Y.; Joe, W.T.; Raimondo, D.M.; Moura, S. A deep reinforcement learning framework for fast charging of Li-ion batteries. IEEE TTE 2022, 8, 2770–2784.

2. 

Content Related to Figures:

• Our paper primarily explores various Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) methods, including DDQN, DDPG, and SAC. Previously, Figures 5 and 10 were used solely for comparison purposes. Figure 5 is correctly cited according to Reference 43, for which we have obtained the necessary permissions.
• As previously mentioned, Figure 10 has been replaced by Table 1 to enhance clarity, supported by the addition of Reference 59.

3. 

Textual Adjustments:

• Minor textual adjustments have been made throughout the manuscript to reflect these changes clearly. Following the correction, all reference numbers in the manuscript have also been updated.

The authors state that the scientific conclusions are unaffected. This correction was approved by the Academic Editor. The original publication has also been updated.