Fossil Fuel Prospects in the Energy of the Future (Energy 5.0): A Review

Abstract

Achieving the energy and climate goals of sustainable development, declared by the UN as imperative and relevant for the upcoming Society 5.0 with its human-centricity of technological development, requires ensuring a “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition, preserving but at the same time modifying the role of fossil fuels in economic development. In this regard, the purpose of this review is to analyze the structure of publications in the field of technological platforms for the energy of the future (Energy 5.0), with digital human-centric modernization and investment in fossil fuel extraction in the context of the Fourth Energy Transition. To achieve this goal, this review presents a comprehensive overview of research in the field of determining the prospects of fossil fuels within Energy 5.0, characterized not only by the dominance of renewable energy sources and the imperative of zero CO₂ emissions, but also by the introduction of human-centric technologies of Industry 5.0 (the Industrial Internet of Everything, collaborative artificial intelligence, digital triplets). It was concluded that further research in such areas of Energy 5.0 development as the human-centric vector of modernization of fossil fuel extraction and investment, achieving energy and climate goals for sustainable development, reducing CO₂ emissions in the mineral extractive sector itself, and developing CO₂ capture and utilization technologies is important and promising for a “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition.

1. Introduction

The full refusal of fossil fuels and the accelerated transition to zero carbon emissions would lead to a rollback for humanity by 40,000 years and the death of a significant part of it. Even today, we cannot but note the failure of the net-zero policy, confirmed by the increase in the use of fossil coal in Germany, the budget problems in Sri Lanka in 2022 due to the refusal to produce and use chemical fertilizers within the framework of ESG policy, and political turbulence in the Netherlands in 2023 due to the reduction in livestock by a third in order to reduce nitrogen emissions [1]. The complexity and contradictions of the Fourth Energy Transition (to renewable energy) are evidenced by the need for changes not only in energy technologies, but also in the broader scope [2] mentioned in the United Nations Sustainable Goals (Goal 7, affordable and clean energy; Goal 9, industry, innovation, and infrastructure; Goal 1, sustainable cities and communities; Goal 12, responsible consumption and production; Goal 13, climate action) [3]. The coming Fifth Industrial Revolution (Industry 5.0) is a technological platform that inherits the technology of the Fourth Industrial Revolution and allows building processes based on the interests of not only digital technology developers and investors, but workers, customers, and environmentalists. It is expected to be human-centric not only in the creation of material goods, but also in providing society with cheap energy sufficient to meet the expanded needs of a “digital society” [4], without shocks in energy production and consumption.

Such a “seamless” energy transition is expected due to Energy 5.0—the power industry segment of the Industry 5.0 technological platform. It promises to bring human-centric technologies (the Internet of Things and the Internet of Everything, artificial intelligence, Big Data, blockchain) not only to the production of energy from renewable sources, but also to the extraction of fossil fuels and the capture of greenhouse gases, in order to make their symbiosis possible for the benefit of humanity [5,6].

Overall, the challenges associated with global climate change due to the use of fossil fuels suggest that the available natural resources are suitable for the energy transition [7], if it is accompanied by the latest advances in the digital technologies of Industry 4.0, which, striving for human-centricity and collaboration between people and machines, will allow energy production and consumption to reach an unprecedented level of efficiency within the framework of Energy 5.0 [8].

The case of Indonesia shows that in order to reduce carbon emissions by 41% in 2030, the national energy sector has to move to a new technology platform (Industry 5.0) faster than expected. This may be achieved through investments in “greening” fossil fuels and thermal energy production, as well as the interactive modeling of the competitiveness of wind power plants compared to coal-fired power plants in more remote areas [9].

The energy transition corresponding to the technological level of Industry 5.0 should be associated not only with low carbon emissions, but also with fair access to energy (“fair energy transition”). The principles of the energy justice framework include procedural, distributive, restorative, recognition, and globalistic principles, which are consistent with the paradigm of Energy 5.0 [10]. Even at the level of individual digital systems (such as Bluetooth data transmission), the energy efficiency at the Industry 5.0 level does not call into question technical aspects (such as data transfer speed) that require maintaining the current level of energy production [11].

In addition, the harmony of renewable and fossil energy sources—the basis of a “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition—is also considered in terms of intelligent transport systems, smart cities, and Society 5.0 (socio-economic and cultural strategies for the development of society based on the use of digital technologies in all spheres of life), which are taking the place of the main energy consumers in the Energy 5.0 concept [12]. However, today, we can already see the limitations of energy efficiency growth in such areas as smart healthcare, industrial production, transport, and agriculture, which widely implement the Internet of Things (IoT) and the digital technologies of Industry 4.0. In particular, due to high energy requirements, the mass transition to 6G networks is slowing down [13], which is activating the discussion on preserving the prospects of fossil fuels and the decarbonization of the economy [14].

The synchronization of the development of renewable and fossil energy sources in the concept of Society 5.0—the basis of Industry 5.0—affects not only their extraction (Energy 5.0), but also their sales, which are being transformed within the framework of the Marketing 5.0 concept [15], as shown in Figure 1 (dotted arrows show relations that will be developed in the nearest future).

In general, the synergy of non-renewable energy production and radical reduction in environmental impacts within the framework of Industry 5.0 seems to be quite achievable. This is due to the sustainability and human-centricity of technologies such as Big Data, cloud computing, smart robots, the Internet of Things, and artificial intelligence, which will be transformed towards human-centric collaboration with machines with the inevitable increase in energy consumption [16].

The technological platform for the Fourth Energy Transition—Energy 5.0—provides new opportunities for the fossil fuel extraction and utilization sector by combining human creativity and robotic productivity in the transition from artificial to augmented intelligence, from digital twins to digital triplets, from smart to collaborative robots, and from 4G and 5G networks to 6G [17].

The collaborative technologies of Industry 5.0, used to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals (SDG) dictated by Society 5.0, are capable of ensuring a “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition, taking into account the realities of the global energy market—with the competition between fossil and renewable energy source producers for supplies and investments, for political preferences and subsidies, as well as the requirement for equal access to energy from developing countries [18]. We agree that without the integration of physical and cyberspace (Society 5.0) in Energy 5.0, it is impossible to build energy systems of the future in which the exponentially growing demand for energy can be met on the basis of a balance between fossil and renewable energy sources [19]. This is the human-centric nature of Energy 5.0, since it is people, not robots, who are the end-consumers of energy, and their energy and environmental needs, including climate stability, must be taken into account when designing Smart Cities and Smart Houses, and organizing solar and wind farms on the territory of abandoned mining enterprises [20].

Thus, research on fossil fuel prospects in Energy 5.0 can create a bridge from theory to practice for a “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition, in which the human-centric technologies of Industry 5.0 will allow maintaining and increasing the level of energy consumption while simultaneously reducing greenhouse gas emissions.

The purpose of this review is a quantitative and qualitative analysis of publications’ structure in the field of the energy sector technological platforms of future society (Society 5.0)—Energy 5.0, the digital human-centric modernization of the fossil fuel extraction industries (Mining 5.0, Oil and Gas 5.0) and their investment—to determine the main directions of further research.

The tasks set in the review include identifying key areas of interest for researchers in fossil fuel extraction technologies and the development of human-centric technologies of Industry 5.0, focusing on which in the future will allow us to determine the principles and conditions for using hydrocarbons for a “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition and achieving SDG (providing cheap energy and eliminating the negative impact on the climate).

To achieve the goal, this review is organized into six sections.

Section 1 describes the problem of determining the prospects of fossil fuels in ensuring a seamless Fourth Energy Transition and the expansion of the Energy 5.0 platform to achieve SDG in the scientific literature.

Section 2, “Methodology”, describes the goal, objectives, and structure of the study, as well as a quantitative assessment of the range of studies reviewed.

Section 3, “Energy 5.0 as a Legacy of Energy 4.0”, provides an overview of works that reveal the specifics of the transition from the Energy 4.0 to 5.0 platform in the context of meeting the energy needs of Society 5.0, taking into account the differences between Energy 5.0 and 4.0.

Section 4, “Fossil Energy Sources in the Transition to Energy 5.0”, contains an analysis of publications in the field of hydrocarbons’ prospects in the Fourth Energy Transition and the impact of the expansion of the Industry 5.0 human-centric digital technologies on it.

Section 5, “Prospects for Investing in Energy Production in Energy 5.0”, considers the issues of funds’ sources in these industries, the reduction in investment risks against the background of fluctuations in prices for non-renewable energy sources, and the role of public policy in their regulation.

Section 6, “Conclusions and Prospects”, is devoted to the conclusions made on the results of the publications’ review, and the identification of limitations in the study of fossil energy prospects in the transition to Energy 5.0 and possible ways to overcome them.

2. Methodology

The main part of the publications reviewed is related to the analysis of the prospects for fossil fuels use within the framework of Energy 5.0 to ensure a “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition, with the dominance of renewable energy sources and quasi-zero greenhouse gas emissions.

The context of this review is a constructive criticism of selected research papers, the reliance on which will allow us to determine the prospects of fossil fuels in the Fourth Energy Transition, which are associated with the implementation of human-centric technologies of Energy 5.0.

The selection of sources for this review was made using such bibliometric databases as Google Scholar, GeoRef, Springer Nature Link and Scientometrics, Science Direct, Clarivate (Web of Science), PubMed, Scopus, as well as CiteSpace Software 1.0. The keywords were Industry 5.0, Energy 5.0, Fossil Energy Sources, Society 5.0, Oil and Gas 5.0, Mining 5.0, Human-Centricity, Sustainable Development Goals (SDG), Renewable Energy, the Internet of Everything, Artificial Intelligence, Digital Twins and Triplets.

Figure 2 shows the distribution of publications analyzed in this review by areas and years.

The data in Figure 2 indicate the growth of the researches’ interest in Energy 5.0 and related areas every year, especially in 2024. These articles in scientific journals and monographs (108 and 28 from 145 in total) present the majority of publications considered in this Review. The structure of the research area in terms of the keywords used for searching sources for the review is shown in Figure 3.

As can be seen in Figure 3, since 2022 there has been an increase in researchers’ interest in the problems of Energy 5.0 and energy transition, as well as Society 5.0. In 2024, the growth in the number of publications on these topics, which continued in 2023 as well, accelerated. A similar picture is observed for the analysis of the place of fossil fuels in ensuring the energy transition and its investment. In turn, the researchers’ interest in the analysis of the Oil and Gas and Mining 5.0—the segments of the Industry 5.0 technological platform in the fossil fuels sector—seems to be quite stable.

Thus, there is a growing interest of the scientific community in finding ways to ensure a safe and “seamless” transition to renewable energy, in which the industry platform of human-centered technologies Industry 5.0 (Energy 5.0) radically changes the prospects for the use of fossil fuels to achieve SDGs.

3. Energy 5.0 as a Legacy of Energy 4.0

3.1. Energy 5.0—A Platform for Meeting the Energy Needs of Society 5.0

The movement towards Society 5.0 with its human-centricity and post-abundance, including energy intensity, poses a dilemma between technological progress and public well-being associated with the elimination of the energy industry’s negative impact on the climate and ecosystems of large cities, and actualizes the problems of job displacement and data privacy [21]. At the same time, there is the fact that in Industry 5.0, a balance must be maintained between providing machines with energy, and people with super-affordable goods and safe environment [22]. This suggests that the weaknesses in energy production associated with the discontinuous nature of the transition from fossil to renewable energy sources and their limited availability for developing countries should be eliminated.

This entails a shift in the paradigm of industrial development, as the fusion of digital and manufacturing technologies should promote sustainable communication and cooperation between industries based on the Internet of Things and artificial intelligence, at the center of which should be electrical energy as the most important resource for society [23]. Providing the post-information society with the necessary amount of energy while reducing greenhouse gas emissions requires new ways of making political, managerial and engineering decisions, relying not only on human but also human–machine intelligence [24] as a new function of scientific and technological progress for long-term solutions to environmental and social problems [25].

As Society 5.0 is built around Industry 5.0 technologies, the principles of economic development will change towards the prioritized production of public goods (such as affordable energy) and reductions in the anthropogenic impact of basic industries on the environment (Figure 4) [26].

Figure 4 clearly illustrates the two qualitative transitions that have occurred in the 20th and 21st centuries, from the dominance of electrical machines to cyber–physical systems and further to human-centric production. The massive involvement of society in technological development (Society 5.0) increases the demands for energy supply—on a larger scale and with less damage to the environment. Definitely, the Fourth Energy Transition implies using the full potential of human-centric Industry 5.0 technologies to protect the environment, but it raises energy supply issues that national governments [27] must address together with businesses and citizens in order to move towards a “fully sustainable society” [28,29].

In general, it is necessary to distinguish between approaches to understanding the concepts of Society 5.0, which originated in Japan, and European Industry 5.0. This difference lies in the fact that in the first case, industry must adapt to the growing demands of society, including placing energy at the center of the industry’s future structure. On the contrary, in the case of Industry 5.0, Energy 5.0 is one of the platforms for the sustainable development of industrial production [30]. At the same time, digital transformation to the level of Industry 5.0 equally affects both society and the economy, which allows for concluding that the leading role of energy in meeting public needs in the future is associated with the diffusion of such technologies as artificial intelligence, the Internet of Everything, and machine learning (Figure 5).

Figure 5 illustrates an important commonality between Industry 5.0 and Society 5.0—the demand for a sustainable environment and technology, which becomes realizable when cyber and physical space are connected to guarantee individual access to public goods, which include sustainable energy. This contains the promotion of talents and the achievement of a high standard of living while achieving the SDGs. This vision of the Energy 5.0 technological platform as the basis for the sustainable functioning of Society 5.0 can be supplemented by digital twins and triplets of physical processes (Figure 6), the widespread use of which is necessary for the balanced use of renewable and fossil energy sources [31].

The transition from physical to digital twins, shown in Figure 6, opens up new opportunities for using virtualization platforms, cloud computing, and artificial intelligence to complement rather than replace human–machine interaction. Furthermore, it is worth noting the “core” of the transition from Industry 4.0 to Industry 5.0—the collaborative interaction between humans and robots, as well as between digital twins and triplets (collaborative interactive cyber–physical systems (CPS) are shown in Figure 7).

Figure 7 shows how the concept of digital development changes from Industry 4.0 to 5.0 as it focuses on human-centric goals, supply chains, and workforce requirements. In particular, digital triplets open up new possibilities for extreme product customization and unprecedented supply chain flexibility, while human–robot collaboration brings into operation new consumer interactions in interactive products. In relation to Energy 5.0, this means that the collaboration of robots and people engaged in the extraction and combustion of fossil fuels must have the same technological level as the interaction of renewable energy systems and electrical grids. It means the use of the full potential of Industry 5.0, accumulated during the evolution of Industry 4.0 digital technologies (Figure 8) [32].

The diffusion of Industry 5.0 technologies in the energy sector (the emergence of the Energy 5.0 platform), shown in Figure 8, reflects the development of Internet of Things technologies to the level of the Internet of Everything. This includes the development of automation and robotics to digital triplets, and cybersecurity to continuous monitoring and learning in innovation (moving from the stage of preliminary preparation to integration and optimization, and further to continuous improvements). Industry 4.0 and Industry 5.0 have introduced many innovative technologies in industrial enterprises, turning them into complex digital systems. On the other hand, the importance of energy management in the industry is growing for both sustainability and economic reasons; however, the potential of Industry 4.0/5.0 technologies in improving energy management systems is not fully understood.

The future collaboration of humans and robots in the energy sector, carried out today on the basis of Industry 4.0, and from the mid-21st century on the basis of Industry 5.0, allows us to perceive Energy 5.0 as a new “energy landscape”. It is a paradigm shift in energy production and consumption towards adaptability, efficiency and sustainability, due to intelligent automation and decentralization, and the widespread use of human–machine interfaces [33]. It is expected that the connection of centralized and decentralized energy systems using collaborative artificial intelligence will help avoid “black swans”—shocks in energy supply—and their dramatic consequences for increasingly energy-dependent society [34], and reduce the risks associated with the transition from Industry 4.0 to 5.0 [35].

In detail, the Energy 5.0 technological platform is a “cross-section” of Industry 5.0, with an emphasis on Big Industrial Data, the virtualization and modeling of production processes, the Internet of Things for applications in automation, real-time monitoring and Human–Machine Interface/Graphical User Interface (HMI/GUI), intelligent manufacturing and industrial CPS, microgrids of Smart Enterprises, Houses and Cities [36], and next-generation additive manufacturing with intelligent robotic [37]. With regard to energy production and consumption, the problems of cybersecurity, the management of supply chains and networks, and the influence of the human factor on the stability of networks (features of Energy 4.0) should be solved by means of technological integration. In turn, Industry 5.0 (Energy 5.0) should allow for predictive maintenance by smart CPS and collaborative robots [38].

At the same time, at the level of Industry 4.0, there remain unresolved problems of equal and fair access to cheap energy, which harms, first of all, developing countries. Their solution is expected from Energy 5.0 [39] through the integration of artificial intelligence into the resource supply, production and distribution of energy, as well as its pricing and investments [40], the modification of business interests by giving them social significance and responsibility in the new digital world of Society 5.0 [41]. Since Society 5.0 implies the integration of technologies and human life outside of society, it is expected that the energy industry will be able to quickly adapt to technological advances in terms of meeting the growing needs for sustainable energy throughout the world (including countries completely dependent on the fossil sources), while reducing the negative impact on the environment, primarily on the climate [42]. Within the framework of the national economy as a system integrating various industries and types of human activity, a more holistic approach to the creation of values, including those related to energy, is allowed by the transition to Industry 5.0 in the form of interactive relations between humans and machines, as presented in Figure 9 [43].

Figure 9 reflects the main idea of the change in value creation in the era of Industry 5.0—the transition from the use of physical assets to virtualized ones due to human–machine interactions on the one hand, and the integration of social, environmental and economic SDG on the other. Thus, it can be argued that the upcoming transition to Industry 5.0, also called “the formation of a new landscape of digital technologies and automation” [44], will entail deep changes in energy production and its resource provision. That is why it is important to ensure a “seamless transition” from the digital energy systems of Energy 4.0 to the human-centric CPS of Energy 5.0.

3.2. Differences Between Energy 5.0 and Energy 4.0

The connection between the Fourth Energy Transition, the tightening of greenhouse gas emission requirements, the growth of fossil fuel costs, and the emergence of new environmental technologies—all this is reflected in the concern of G20 countries about the prospects for economic growth in the context of growing energy demand as Industry 4.0 technologies expand [45].

It is clear that economic growth accelerates the consumption of fossil fuels and increases CO₂ emissions, while urbanization reduces them [46]. The shift of the center of gravity of energy consumption—from industry to Smart Cities—has expanded the understanding that the transition to renewable energy will require the development of smart grid technology and its infrastructure, which will make them an important condition for the transition from Energy 4.0 to 5.0, with its characteristic mitigation of the cumulative effects of climate change [47]. The integration of solar and wind energy, artificial intelligence and the Internet of Everything within the framework of Energy 5.0 is possible with the provision of intelligent energy management. This makes it possible to overcome the contradiction between the need for reducing the impact of fossil energy sources on the environment, and at the same time meeting the growing energy needs of a new digital society in the transition from Energy 4.0 to 5.0 [48]. An important role in this transition is given to generative models of artificial intelligence, which can give the production and transmission of energy on the Energy 5.0 platform the properties of adaptability, security, and high productivity of machine-to-machine communications, which distinguish it from Energy 4.0 [49].

It should be noted that the transition to the Energy 5.0 platform, with its human-centric technologies and concern for the environment, does not entail the one-time refusal of fossil fuels, since cyber–social systems in the mining and oil and gas sectors are designed to fill the energy deficit and ensure its fair distribution between developed and developing countries [50]. Thus, the UK currently produces only 28.1% of its electricity from renewable energy sources, Brazil installed 2.0 GW of photovoltaic systems by 2018 (6% of total energy production), Dubai plans to increase its renewable capacity to 5.0 GW by 2030 (40% of total generation) [51]. In turn, the horizons of renewable energy in Energy 5.0 are determined by the prospect of its integration with artificial intelligence and Big Data analytics [52], which makes progress focused on people and their needs truly sustainable (in the context of achieving the UN SDG) [53].

The change in the value paradigm of energy development in the transition from Energy 4.0 to 5.0 is associated with a radical step forward in terms of economical production of energy and its sources [54], as well as with the competition of renewable and fossil sources in the long term [55], with integrated digitalization and the greening of energy production [56]. At the same time, the difference between Energy 5.0 and 4.0 is in higher dependence on digital technologies, which explains the need for more reliable cybersecurity measures [57], especially in the context of the conceptualization of Industry 5.0 as a whole human-oriented, flexible and environmentally sustainable production process [58].

The technological differences between Energy 5.0 and 4.0 are determined by the differences in the “core” of Industry 5.0 and 4.0, in particular, the use of digital cognitive clones of processes, people and equipment (technologically empowered entities that imitate the operation of machines and human behavior when making operational decisions), which are used within the framework of intelligent manufacturing [59]. In addition, the use of quantum computing and 6G networks within Energy 5.0 can increase the efficiency of human–machine interaction by 400%, and reduce the probable number of errors by 133% compared to Energy 4.0 [60].

4. Fossil Energy Sources in the Transition to Energy 5.0

The world’s proven reserves of oil, gas and coal are 1688 billion barrels, 6558 trillion cubic feet and 891 billion tons, respectively, which are consumed at the rate of 0.092, 0.329 and 7.89 per day, respectively. At the same time, the growth of proven reserves of oil, gas and coal is increasing at the rate of 600 million barrels, 400 billion cubic feet and 19.2 gigatons of oil equivalent per year, respectively. The annual consumption growth rate is 1.4 billion barrels of oil, 4.5 cubic feet of gas and 3.1 million tons of coal. The global annual energy demand of over 12 billion tons of oil equivalent results in emissions of 39.5 gigatonnes of CO₂, and by 2050 energy demand could grow by 25–50%, with annual CO₂ emissions reaching 75 gigatonnes. Therefore, renewable energy sources should help to solve the dual problem of meeting energy demand and preserving the climate, which predetermines high initial investments. The transition to renewable energy requires investments in producing 150 petawatt-hours (PWh) of energy. Therefore, the most likely path for energy production development by the end of the 21st century seems to be an energy mix consisting of fossil fuels, hydrogen, biofuels and renewable energy sources [61].

For the “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition, additional renewable capacity should be 37,670.6 TWh in order to completely eliminate fossil fuels. This means that in order to maintain global energy supply at the 2018 level, 221,594 new renewable power plants and 574.3 TWh of stationary storage capacity would need to be built in one month, which looks very optimistic [62].

The transition to Energy 5.0 forces us to consider not only coal, peat, oil shale, natural gas and oil as fossil fuels, but also hydrogen produced from coal (brown hydrogen) and gas (blue hydrogen) [63]. Green hydrogen, which is produced by the electrolysis of water using electricity from renewable sources [64], is considered to be an alternative to brown and blue hydrogen produced from coal; its production volumes are growing worldwide [65]. However, the specific costs of producing green hydrogen are still relatively high [66], and a significant expansion of green hydrogen in the global energy balance is possible with an excess of energy from renewable sources, which will be difficult to achieve in the near future [67].

Biogas is also considered along with them (as a more environmentally sustainable energy source, more in line with the imperative of decarbonization) [68]. In 1960–2021, only the partial substitution of fossil fuels occurred, while developing countries are replacing fossil fuels at an average higher rate compared to technologically advanced countries [69]. One of the trends in the development of the fossil energy extraction sector has been a decrease in the share of oil in the global energy balance from 50% in the 1970s to 29% in the 2020s, largely due to its replacement by natural gas [70].

The point is that in order to phase out fossil fuels by 2050, it is necessary to increase the renewable energy production, according to various estimates, by 6 or 8 times if energy demand remains at the 2020 level, but the most likely growth is 50–100%. Therefore, the required 15–18-fold increase in renewable energy production does not seem possible, given that the transition to Industry 5.0 can increase energy consumption by 1.5% per year, and therefore energy efficiency should grow at an accelerated rate [71]. Based on national low-carbon energy development plans, the use of fossil gas is likely to grow by 86% in the cities of forty developed countries by 2035, while it should be reduced by 30% within the framework of a number of energy strategies and charters [72].

In general, the transition from fossil fuels to renewable energy in the context of achieving the above-mentioned SDG occurs within the framework of a certain business cycle of the industry, in which the roles of different types of energy carriers change, the need for carbon capture and the use of natural gas as a “bridge” fuel increases, as well as the use of fossil fuels for non-energy (chemical) purposes [73], which provides certain prospects for the parity use of fossil energy carriers in the future [74].

The phases of the future energy cycle, in which, during the transition from the stage of production expansion (maturity) to the broad commercialization of Energy 5.0 technologies, lithium and sodium–sulfur energy storage devices and compressed air systems will be replaced by underground thermal energy storage facilities, hydrogen, and cold water storages. When analyzing the cycle of renewable energy expansion and the restructuring of fossil sources, a number of authors draw attention to their higher profitability—using the example of 181 MW floating photovoltaic system in Taiwan, which is one of the largest similar systems in the world [75]. Other authors emphasize the importance of the technological transformation of fossil energy production to the level of Industry 5.0 (Mining 5.0 and Oil and Gas 5.0) [76], arguing that in order to effectively replace 1% of fossil fuels, a 1.15% increase in renewable energy generation is necessary, which is currently achievable through hydropower, itself developing at a comparable rate to thermal energy (Figure 10 and Figure 11), but in 10-times smaller volumes [77].

That is, the largest renewable energy sectors, such as wind and solar energy, must demonstrate high growth rates through integration with digital technologies of Industry 5.0, in order to achieve a successful balance with cheap thermal energy [78]. It should be considered that in the last 25 years, an increase in the share of emissions from coal to natural gas (the share of coal has been declining in many countries) has been observed [79]. Despite the obstacles, there is growing momentum towards integrating renewable and non-renewable energy sources to achieve energy goals for sustainable development and reduce climate risks [80].

In turn, the uncertainty of the success of transition to Energy 5.0 is associated with the volatility of production and prices of electricity and natural gas, as well as investments in new renewable energy facilities, which remain high without new breakthroughs in production and design technologies, assigned to Industry 5.0 [81]. Digital, production and environmental innovations in the energy sector significantly affect the investment attractiveness of fossil fuels [82]. Investment decisions in the context of uncertainty in the timing of the Fourth Energy Transition should be based on numerous factors, including the electricity market price, the fossil fuels cost, the carbon dioxide price, and the investment costs [83].

Furthermore, the implementation of digital human-centric technologies of Industry 5.0 provides proactive and effective measures for the integrated management of renewable and non-renewable energy production to achieve widespread availability, security and decarbonization [84]. This is consistent with the opinion that it is impossible to completely abandon the use of fossil fuels and the desirability of measures to mitigate the effects of climate change, including carbon capture, utilization and storage, as well as the use of hydrogen produced from coal and natural gas [85]. The development of advanced CO₂ capture and storage technologies can ensure a zero balance of its emissions at lower costs, which means that the mining complex, as the main beneficiary of high prices for fossil energy, can play an important role in solving the greenhouse gas problem, while reducing the risk of depreciation of its assets [86].

In particular, local communities in the United States are entirely dependent on fossil fuel industries providing high-paying jobs and essential public services [87]. In the energy balance of the Kingdom of Morocco, traditional energy sources account for 80%, which is motivated by their uninterruptible nature and the lack of complete control over renewable energy technologies obtained from outside [88]. Factors accelerating the transition to renewable energy, along with the expansion of the Industry 5.0 technologies, include the development of short-term electricity storage systems for photovoltaic installations and electrolysis systems for wind power plants [89], as well as methane hydrates, wave, tidal energy and biomass—a “bridge” or rapid replacement for fossil energy sources [90]. Biological and thermochemical technologies for the conversion of biomass and agricultural waste are preferable for the production of biofuels [91]. Energy from forest biomass is currently the most widely used renewable energy source in Finland [92]. There is also positive experience in using bio-resources to produce aviation fuel [93].

Although biomass is more renewable than fossil fuels, its Energy Return on Investment (EROI) is lower and its replacement will not reduce CO₂ emissions [94], and a 40% reduction in global thermal coal production will reduce the Earth’s temperature by a maximum 1.5 °C (with a 50% probability), which will have catastrophic consequences for 2 billion people on the Earth [95]. However, fossil fuel companies can develop green innovations and enter renewable industries by implementing the human-centered lean manufacturing technologies of Industry 5.0 [96], which is consistent with the goals of a circular economy and sustainable development [97].

It should be noted that a number of authors have argued that nuclear energy consumption increases fossil fuel consumption in the United States, but reduces fossil fuel consumption in Africa. Therefore, the abandonment of fossil fuels in favor of nuclear energy is not capable of compensating for the “failure” in energy supply for developing countries, even in the short term [98]. A number of countries are currently developing a self-sustaining thermonuclear reaction of “burning plasma”, which offers both unprecedented breakthroughs for energy and critical environmental risks [99].

Unlike nuclear fuel, which has been considered as an alternative to fossil fuels since the 1960s, the latest electronic fuel (e-fuel) is a truly modern analogue of environmental pollutants. It is produced with the help of modern technologies of water electrolysis using renewable electricity and carbon dioxide (CO₂) captured at industrial sites or from the air (CCUS, DAC). As a result, it is possible to obtain carbon-neutral synthetic fuel with an emphasis on electro-hydrogen (e-H₂), which can be converted into various types of electronic fuel (e-methane, e-methanol, e-gasoline). Accordingly, the Industry 5.0 technologies (generative artificial intelligence, collaborative robots, and digital triplets) are capable of automating the process of e-fuel production almost completely, the growth of which will reduce its cost [100]. It is undeniable that renewable energy sources (solar, wind and wave) should diversify the energy balance of countries, and also develop alternatives, but their intermittent nature requires significant costs for storing energy for its continuous supply, which cannot be compensated for by anything other than the use of fossil sources for decades [101]. This correlates with the idea that parity in the use of renewable and non-renewable energy sources is impossible without the widespread implementation of local intelligent networks based on collaborative robotics and generative artificial intelligence [102].

Digital collaborative technologies of Industry 5.0 allow for increasing the productivity of the Energy 5.0 platform. However, they do not provide an alternative to decarbonization in themselves. Romania achieved a successful reduction in emissions into the atmosphere and an increase in energy production when replacing coal with natural gas—one fossil fuel with another [103]. At the same time, the advantage of renewable energy sources in achieving the goal of sustainable development related to access to cheap energy for all countries is the possibility of their uniform distribution in the world. This, however, is constrained by the high cost of wind and photovoltaic equipment with high specific power [104]. That is, it is precisely investment and market problems that can today act as an obstacle to a massive and final transition to renewable energy sources [105]. Therefore, in order to increase the investment attractiveness and reduce the production price of renewable energy compared to the use of fossil energy, subsidies and price interventions are used, which in fact work “in favor of the rich” and should be replaced by an alternative policy of supporting the Energy 5.0 green technologies [106].

In addition, the modern mining industry is aimed at benefiting from the Fourth Energy Transition, gradually replacing profits from the extraction of fossil fuels with the extraction of “transition” minerals—copper, nickel, manganese, lithium, cobalt, among others, used for the production of photovoltaic cells, wind turbines, and long-term energy storage devices (Figure 12) [107].

As for natural gas production, it can retain an important role in the energy balance, first as a “bridge” fuel and then as a means of gradual transition to decarbonized energy sources, provided that carbon dioxide removal technologies, an integral part of Energy 5.0, are developed [108].

5. Prospects for Investing in Energy Production in Energy 5.0

The structure of renewable energy as an investment object in 2023 looked as follows: solar energy—36.67%, hydropower—32.76%, wind energy—26.29%; bioenergy—3.88%, geothermal energy—0.38%, tidal energy—0.01% of the world’s renewable capacity [109].

The growing world population and the expansion of digital technologies of Industry 4.0, and in the future Industry 5.0, are driving an exponential increase in energy demand. This requires additional investment in renewable energy sources that can meet global demand without harming the environment. However, investments in solar, wind and hydropower remain highly volatile in terms of the returns on and market value of portfolios [110]. In turn, the unconditional implementation of ESG principles in a number of EU countries has led to a reduction in long-term investments in the exploration and production of fossil energy sources, which in turn has led to a sharp increase in prices on the world markets [111]. Along with this, the most critical risks in the energy sector today are equipment aging and adaptation to the requirements of climate change and decarbonization, including the abandonment of coal. Despite this, fossil fuels still provide over 60% of the world’s electricity production, and investing in their production is critical to global energy security [112].

In general, the fundamental idea of achieving zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050 requires investments of more than USD 7 trillion per year, while the total of national programs and strategies includes less than USD 2 trillion per year [113]. Moreover, there is an opinion that for developed countries, the growth of investments in renewable energy slows down economic growth—an increase in income from investments in renewable energy by 1% in developed countries reduces the rate of economic growth by 0.0001%, and in developing countries it increases it by 0.001% [114].

The growth of investments in renewable energy can be explained by the strengthening of state regulation the reduction in specific investment costs for renewable energy technologies (which have recently become attractive to venture funds and public markets [115]), and the declared compromise between zero CO₂ emissions and a “seamless” energy transition [116]. Investments in renewable energy as an alternative to capital investments in the extraction and combustion of fossil hydrocarbons are spurred by the accelerated digital industrialization of the G7 countries [117]. There, the subsidies are gradually being redistributed in favor of environmental investments in industries that are the slowest to switch to renewable energy sources and reduce greenhouse gas emissions (steel, cement) [118]. As a number of authors have written, in developing countries, governments are also gradually internalizing direct and indirect subsidies to prevent fossil fuel industries from gaining a comparative advantage in capital markets [119].

The potential of ESG investments in the context of the Fourth Energy Transition can be characterized as “co-evolutionary and convergent”, which means promoting economic growth in the context of the penetration of the Industry 5.0 technologies into various sectors of the economy and the Fourth Energy Transition [120]. Within the Fourth Energy Transition itself, the return on investment in renewable energy goes through several stages, at each of which their energy efficiency (Energy Return on Investment, EROI) is not the same, and the use of renewable energy sources competes with non-renewable ones [121]. The acceleration of the Fourth Energy Transition leads to the acceleration of decline in EROI, which stabilizes after the use of 100% renewable energy sources [122]. In turn, subsidizing the transition to renewable energy sources is a new direction within the climate agenda, since the externalities from this are significant and do not fall under subsidies, especially in developing countries (Figure 13) [117].

For example, the energy deficit in sub-Saharan Africa is due to extremely high international energy prices, so most countries introduce energy subsidies to increase its availability. However, these subsidies are focused on fossil fuels, and the negative effect of such subsidies is higher in countries at the very beginning of the Fourth Energy Transition [124]. In contrast, “green cryptocurrencies”, which can serve as an alternative to subsidies, have shown significant hedging effectiveness against fossil fuels [125].

In general, the growth of investment in renewable energy projects in 2010–2022 was accompanied by an increase in the production of fossil hydrocarbons, which is due to economic growth in developing countries based on the expansion of energy consumption (Figure 14) [126].

At the same time, it is important to note the idea that fossil energy sources have been depleting over time and, after passing the peak of production, lose their prospects for providing an uninterrupted and reliable source of cheap energy [127]. The specificity of the Fourth Energy Transition here is seen in the lack of alternatives to using the Energy 5.0 platform for the gradual replacement of its fossil sources (Figure 15).

Delaying massive investment in renewable energy sources and the Industry 5.0 technologies to manage their use leads to more externalities from the fossil fuels’ negative impact on the climate, in particular, less equitable access to cheap energy [128]. Therefore, investments in technological breakthroughs in renewable energy will allow for extending the period of fossil fuel deposits’ exploitation, and thus, keep natural resources in the ground longer [129]. In addition, investments in nuclear energy do not allow reducing the consumption of fossil fuels and moving on to effective measures in reducing the industry’s impact on the climate, which is proven by the example of the USA [130]. The focus of investors on the production of hydrogen and methanol will contribute to the expansion of alternative energy sources in the form of fuel for marine transportation [131], as well as ammonia as an alternative to heavy fuel oil [132].

Investment in renewable sources should cover all three areas of this energy segment: the development of digital collaborative technologies of Energy 5.0; the production of relatively cheap photovoltaic, wind, and tidal energy systems; the development of CO₂ capture and energy saving technologies [133]. Therefore, it is extremely important to increase the efficiency of fossil fuel use through the introduction of digital technologies of Mining 4.0 [134,135] in order to accelerate the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions [136], which is confirmed by the economies of ASEAN countries [137].

An alternative to investing in fossil fuel extraction could be investing in thermochemical energy recovery technologies from municipal solid waste, which does not eliminate the negative impact on the atmosphere in the form of CO₂ emissions, but allows for replacing hydrocarbons that are in short supply for many countries. This is confirmed by the positive experience of the Asokore Mampong Municipality in Ghana, where the use of municipal solid waste for energy production yields 4.24 × 104 kWh/day and 1.6 × 104 MWh/year, which is equivalent to 1.33 kilotons of oil equivalent (8.2% of the municipality’s electricity needs in 2021) [138]. Indonesia’s commitment to the Paris Agreement is not adequately reflected in significant CO₂ emissions in the energy sector, despite the huge potential of renewable energy sources in the country [139].

Institutional investors—various funds and banks—controlling USD 154 trillion, are interested in the development of the production, distribution and consumption of fossil fuels, subject to the transition to Mining 5.0 as a component of the Energy 5.0 platform [140], financed in developing countries (promising consumers of fossil fuels) through foreign investment and urbanization [141]. At the same time, the dependence on the extraction and combustion of fossil hydrocarbons is much less sensitive to government policy. In particular, the politically driven deployment of renewable energy sources in China should lead to a 36% decrease in electricity prices in the period 2021–2100, but without government intervention, lower electricity prices could lead to a 42% reduction in investment in hydropower by 2050 [142]. In Jordan, the attempt to join the Fourth Energy Transition was driven by the imperative of national energy security [143]. The iterative modeling of fossil fuel transition demonstrates the risk of unprecedented volatility in global, American and Japanese stock indices [144]. Accordingly, investment strategies in the context of the Fourth Energy Transition include the diversification of capital investments into and within fossil and renewable energy sources, increased investment in R&D for the Energy 5.0 platform, and the implementation of innovative energy mix management business models [145]. A number of studies have found that investment risks for companies engaged in fossil fuel extraction do not differ significantly from the risks and returns of non-renewable energy companies [146].

National specifics of energy investment regulation in the transition to Energy 5.0 include a “push” towards a phased refusal of fossil fuels (France, The Netherlands, Germany) and a policy of encouraging investment in renewable energy sources (Spain and Czech Republic) [147]. Environmental issues have pushed the government of the Republic of Guinea, which has traditionally relied on the development of fossil fuel production as the main source of energy, to introduce innovative technologies for the efficient extraction of hydrocarbons and the conservation of produced energy [148].

In general, the strict commitments to move towards zero CO₂ emissions adopted by the developed countries have failed to stop the influx of capital into fossil fuel production, largely due to the innovative development of the oil, gas and coal industries to the level of Industry 5.0, which makes them partially compliant with the requirements of Energy 5.0 [149]. Thus, although the predicted impact of the transition to electric vehicles on reducing CO₂ emissions in the UK has been sufficiently studied, there is a partial understanding of the potential socio-macroeconomic effects—the impact on GDP and jobs [150], taking into account the inertia of thinking of both politicians and civil society [151].

6. Conclusions and Prospects

The upcoming Fourth Energy Transition—from the dominance of fossil fuels to renewable energy sources—is based on the assumption that global carbon emissions can be reduced to zero. The use of fossil fuels—a source of greenhouse gas emissions—was limited by the Paris Agreement COP21 of 2015. In many ways, this ran counter to the achievement of the United Nations SDG, such as ensuring affordable energy and preserving the climate, especially for developing countries that do not have large investment resources and depend on energy production by burning fossil hydrocarbons. Therefore, a “seamless” energy transition—without a drop in energy supply and increasing inequity in access to it—is possible within the framework of the innovative development of both renewable and non-renewable energy segments, grounding Energy 5.0 as the platform of Industry 5.0.

This review highlights the results of research by international scientific teams, which reflect the role and prospects for the use of fossil fuels on the Energy 5.0 platform for a “seamless” and safe Fourth Energy Transition. Since Energy 5.0 is associated with expectations of the sustainable satisfaction of the energy needs of peoples around the world, a thorough scientific examination and a wide range of discussions are necessary. They should regard the prospects for increasing energy supply in response to the rapid implementation of digital technologies of Industry 4.0, and in the future Industry 5.0, in all spheres of human life, as well as the catch-up industrialization of developing countries.

Based upon the reviewed works, it was noted, first, that the need for the use of fossil fuels will remain consistent for the next few decades. This is largely due to the contradiction between the imperative of zero CO₂ emissions and the achievement of SDG related to fair access to cheap energy, as well as due to the reduction in tolerance to nuclear energy. Also, the development of collaborative technologies of robotics and the Internet of Everything, characteristic of the upcoming Industry 5.0, is capable of bringing technological platforms for the extraction of fossil fuels (Mining 5.0, Oil and Gas 5.0) to a new level of environmental efficiency and lean production. It allows them to take place on the platform of Energy 5.0—the energy of the future. In addition, Energy 5.0 includes technologies of generative artificial intelligence, as well as digital twins and triplets, which allow for increasing energy efficiency in smart enterprises, cities and entire industries, which will further reduce the burden on the use of fossil fuels.

Restrictions on the use of fossil fuels in the transition to Energy 5.0 are due to the presence of both objective and subjective limitations, mainly related to investment in their extraction—subsidies, legislative and public pressure. At the same time, reliance on human-centric ultra-high-performance cyber systems of Industry 5.0 in the implementation of projects to modernize existing (and develop new) hydrocarbon deposits will allow us to closely approach the standards of low greenhouse gas emissions and avoid growing cybersecurity risks as artificial intelligence systems, collaborative robots, and digital triplets become more complex. Also, the introduction of generative artificial intelligence in the planning and management systems of single enterprises, clusters, and entire industries for the extraction of fossil fuels in the transition to Energy 5.0 will reduce the impact of price fluctuations on investment decisions.

Thus, the answers to the challenges and limitations of fossil hydrocarbons use in the transition to Energy 5.0 as a platform for meeting the growing needs of the future society (Society 5.0) for cheap and sustainable energy lie in the intensification of research into the field of the Energy 5.0 technologies and the related platforms Mining 5.0 and Oil and Gas 5.0. These promising studies are expected to deepen the understanding of the impossibility of the “seamless” Fourth Energy Transition without a radical modernization of the fuel segment of the energy sector, the disclosure of its potential in terms of lean production and rational energy consumption, as well as integration into the ESG investment system. In general, from the transition of the fossil fuels’ extraction and combustion segment to the human-centric platform Energy 5.0, we should expect the removal of industry from the list of critical threats to the environment, as well as the proffering of a long-term solution to the problem of access to cheap energy on a global scale.