Next Article in Journal
Carbon Dioxide, Nitrous Oxide, and Methane: What Types of Greenhouse Gases Are Most Affected by Green Investments and Renewable Energy Development?
Previous Article in Journal
From Agricultural Waste to Energy: Assessing the Bioenergy Potential of South-Central Texas
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery

1
School of Mechanical and Material Engineering, North China University of Technology, Beijing 100144, China
2
Beijing Martial Delegate Agency, Equipment Department of Army, Beijing 100166, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(4), 803; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803
Submission received: 25 December 2023 / Revised: 5 February 2024 / Accepted: 6 February 2024 / Published: 7 February 2024
(This article belongs to the Section D2: Electrochem: Batteries, Fuel Cells, Capacitors)

Abstract

:
The SOC estimation of UAV lithium batteries plays a crucial role in the mission planning and safe flight of UAVs. Aiming at existing UAV lithium battery SOC estimation problems, such as low estimation accuracy and poor real-time performance, a real-time online estimation scheme for UAV lithium battery SOC is proposed. A model-based approach is adopted to establish an SOC estimation model on the basis of the Thevenin equivalent circuit model, and a UAV lithium battery online monitoring device is developed to monitor the current and voltage of the UAV lithium battery in real time and import the data into the SOC estimation model in real time for calculation. Using the developed online monitoring device, the current and voltage of the lithium UAV battery are monitored in real time, and the data are imported into the SOC estimation model in real time for calculation, realizing the real-time online estimation of the SOC of the lithium UAV battery. The experimental results show that the program can realize the real-time online estimation of UAV lithium battery SOC, and the estimation error is less than 3%, which meets the requirements of online estimation accuracy of the UAV lithium battery SOC.

1. Introduction

Uncrewed Aerial Vehicles (UAVs), specifically the kind of uncrewed aerial vehicle that flies remotely or autonomously, has been widely used in many fields, such as military reconnaissance, aerial photography, agricultural plant protection, and logistics and distribution [1,2]. The wide application of UAVs has put forward higher requirements for battery technology, in which Li-ion batteries have become the preferred power source for UAVs by ensuring higher safety while having advantages such as low weight and high discharge [3]. The real-time online estimation of the SOC of Li-ion batteries for UAVs plays a crucial role in the control and safe flight of UAVs [4]. However, the SOC of Li-ion batteries cannot be measured directly and needs to be obtained indirectly via other parameters and methods. Since the relationship between the voltage, current, internal resistance, and other parameters of Li-ion batteries exhibits a high degree of nonlinearity, it makes the accurate estimation of SOC difficult [5]. Currently, small UAV SOC estimation commonly uses the voltage measurement method and ampere-time integration method to estimate battery SOC; the estimation accuracy is within 10%, and the estimation technique has problems such as low estimation accuracy and poor real-time performance [6].
Therefore, this paper will address the problem of real-time online estimation of UAV lithium battery SOC. Using a model-based approach, a real-time online estimation scheme for UAV lithium battery SOC is proposed, and a lithium battery SOC estimation model is established on the basis of the Thevenin equivalent circuit model, real-time monitoring of the current and voltage of the UAV lithium battery, and real-time importing of the data into the SOC estimation model, realizing real-time estimation of the SOC of the UAV lithium battery, and verifying the scheme via experiments.

2. Methods

SOC (State of charge) refers to the percentage of the remaining capacity of the battery to the total capacity, which is used to reflect the remaining capacity of the battery [7]. The estimation of SOC is an important part of the UAV battery management system, and the accuracy of the estimation directly affects the flight performance and endurance of the UAV [4]. SOC is numerically defined as the ratio of the remaining capacity of the battery to the capacity of the battery as follows:
S O C = Q c C I
where Q c is the remaining capacity of the battery, and C I is the amount of power that the battery has when it is discharged at a constant current I .
If the SOC value is calculated in terms of the amount of electricity discharged, Q , the definition can be expressed as
S O C = 1 Q C I
where S O C = 1 indicates that the battery is fully charged and when S O C = 0 , the battery is in the state of full discharge.
The SOC estimation methods for UAV Li-ion batteries mainly include the open-circuit voltage method [8,9], the amperage-time integration method [10,11,12], the model-based method [13,14], and the data-driven method [15,16,17,18]. The open-circuit voltage method utilizes the fitting relationship between the open-circuit voltage value and the SOC to estimate the SOC, which belongs to the open-loop estimation method with high estimation accuracy, but because the open-circuit voltage value of the lithium-ion battery needs to be statically acquired over a long period of time, the real-time nature of this method is poor, and it cannot be applied to the estimation of SOC under the actual UAV working condition state. The amperage-time integration method also belongs to the open-loop SOC estimation method by integrating the discharge current to estimate the SOC of the UAV. The amperage-time integration method is also an open-loop SOC estimation method, which estimates the SOC of Li-ion batteries by integrating the discharge current. This method is easily affected by the accuracy of the current measurement, and the estimation results will generate cumulative errors over time, and at the same time, the method ignores the nonlinearity of the batteries and the influence of the battery temperature on the estimation of SOC, which results in low accuracy. The data-driven method is a method of estimating the SOC by analyzing the historical data of the batteries, and the internal chemical reaction, temperature change, and battery degradation of the batteries are taken into consideration. The data-driven method is a method to estimate SOC by analyzing the historical data of the battery, and this method takes into account the effects of the internal chemical reaction, temperature change, battery degradation, etc., on SOC, and has a higher accuracy, but the method requires higher data accuracy and quality, and if there are a large number of errors and missing data, it will lead to a significant reduction in the accuracy of the SOC estimation, and the computational cost is high, which makes it difficult to be applied to the actual estimation of the SOC of lithium batteries for UAVs; the model-based method is a method for estimating battery SOC by establishing a battery equivalent model, which takes into account the effects of internal chemical reactions, battery temperature and other factors, and is less data-dependent than the da-ta-driven method. The method can adjust the parameters according to the characteristics of the battery to adapt to different models of lithium batteries, and at the same time, it has the advantages of high accuracy, good real-time performance, and strong robustness [19]. Considering the flight requirements of UAVs, the existing technical conditions and the characteristics of lithium batteries, the model-based method is chosen to estimate the SOC of UAV lithium batteries, which consists of two parts: model building and state estimation algorithm, firstly, it is necessary to build the model and identify the parameters of the model, and then the design and validation of the SOC estimation algorithm is carried out.
This paper proposes a scheme for the real-time estimation of UAV lithium battery SOC using a model-based method, as shown in Figure 1. First, the MATLAB/Simulink R2022b software is used to establish a UAV lithium battery equivalent circuit model, and an offline parameter identification method is used to identify the internal parameters of the model and perform simulation verification. Then, the SOC estimation model of UAV lithium battery is established according to the battery equivalent circuit model, and the online monitoring module of UAV lithium battery status is designed and developed. The monitoring module measures and collects the real-time voltage and current of the lithium battery and transmits the data to the control terminal, imports the data into the SOC estimation model, and then realizes the real-time online estimation of SOC via the calculation of the SOC estimation model.

3. Modeling and Parameter Identification

The battery equivalence model is a mathematical model used to describe the behavior of the battery and is often used to simulate and predict the state parameters of the battery under different operating conditions, such as SOC and SOH (State of Health). The accuracy of the model is a key factor affecting the accuracy of SOC estimation [20].

3.1. Equivalent Modeling of Lithium Drone Batteries

Battery models mainly include electrochemical models, equivalent circuit models, and neural network models. The electrochemical model has advantages in battery electrode concentration estimation and charging strategy optimization due to its consideration of the internal characteristics of the battery. However, due to the high complexity of the model and a large amount of calculation, there are certain limitations in the practical application of the neural network model, and the neural network model obtains the prediction data, such as battery SOC, via the input of the collected battery information, such as current, voltage and temperature. The model requires a large amount of data and computing resources to train the model, and the estimation accuracy is highly dependent on data and the convergence speed is slow, which is not suitable for real-time online estimation of UAV lithium battery SOC. The equivalent circuit model uses electrical components such as resistors, capacitors, and voltage sources to form equivalent circuits to simulate the dynamic characteristics of a battery. The model is easy to implement and widely used for analysis using circuits and mathematical methods.
Lithium battery equivalent circuit models mainly include the Rint model [21,22,23], the Thevenin model [24,25,26], the dual-polarization model [27,28], the PNGV model [29], the GNL model [30], etc. The Rint model, also known as the internal resistance model, consists of an ideal voltage source U OCV and an ohmic internal resistance R 0 . U OCV and R 0 are both a function of the SOC and the temperature and is a simple and easy-to-implement model, but does not take into account the battery polarization effect, and the scope of application is smaller. The Thevenin model adds an RC network to the circuit of the Rint model to take into account the battery charging effect, which can better simulate the battery charging and charging. This model is simple and easy to realize, but it does not consider the polarization effect of the battery, and the scope of application is small. The Thevenin model adds an RC network on the circuit of the Rint model to consider the polarization effect of the battery, and it can better simulate the transient and steady-state characteristics of the voltage and current in the process of charging and discharging of the battery. The dual-polarization model, also known as the second-order RC model, is connected to an RC network in series with the Thevenin model, and the structure is changed to be more complicated. The dual-polarization model, also known as the second-order RC model, is based on Thevenin’s model with a series connection of an RC network, which makes the structure more complex but provides a more accurate description of the battery polarization characteristics and can more accurately simulate the actual characteristics of the battery, but the increase in the RC network leads to an increase in the amount of computation; the PNGV model is based on Thevenin’s model, with a capacitor C b connected in series with the main line, and the capacitor C b is used to describe the change in the OCV of the battery with the time integration of the load current. The time accumulation of load current on OCV, i.e., the effect of SOC changes on OCV, and the estimation accuracy is higher. The GNL model adds capacitance C b and self-discharge resistance R s on the basis of the dual-polarization model, which takes into account both the effect of SOC changes on OCV of the power battery and self-discharge phenomenon of the battery, and it is the most accurate of the five equivalent circuit models, but it also has the most complicated structure and a high computational cost, so the model has poor applicability in power battery SOC estimation. Among them, the Thevenin model, shown in Figure 2, has a simple structure and also takes into account the dynamic characteristics of the battery, with higher accuracy and lower computational complexity, and is widely used in lithium battery SOC estimation [20].
In the figure, U OCV is the electromotive force, R 0 is the ohmic internal resistance, R 1 is the polarization resistance, C 1 is the polarization capacitance, U RC is the RC loop voltage, U is the terminal voltage, and i ( t ) is the current.
The schematic diagram of the Thevenin equivalent circuit model lists the equations of state for the model as follows:
U = U OCV i ( t ) R 0 U RC
d U RC d t = i ( t ) C 1 U RC R 1 C 1
Based on the Thevenin equivalent circuit model, the equivalent circuit model of the UAV lithium battery shown in Figure 3 is constructed using the Simscape control library in MATLAB/Simulink R2022b software. The model mainly includes the SOC1 calculation module and the equivalent circuit module. The SOC1 calculation module is designed based on the ampere-time integration method; the module inputs the initial open-circuit voltage, and after the function, according to the fitting relationship between the open-circuit voltage and the SOC, we can obtain the initial SOC of the battery. It inputs the battery discharge current, and after the SOC1 calculation module, calculates the output of the SOC1. According to the SOC1, the output of the SOC1 can be obtained via the parameters of the SOC1. According to SOC1, the internal parameter values of the model in the SOC state can be obtained by checking the table, which reflects the battery characteristics of the lithium battery in the SOC state.

3.2. Parameter Identification and Simulation Verification of UAV Lithium Battery

Model parameter identification is the process of analyzing the selected model parameters and determining the specific parameters, and the accuracy of the parameter identification results is the key factor affecting the simulation accuracy of the model. According to the selected Thevenin equivalent circuit model and its equation of state (3~4), the parameters that need to be identified are battery electromotive force U ocv , ohmic internal resistance R 0 , polarization resistance R 1 , and polarization capacitance C 1 . Via the Hybrid Pulse Power Characteristic (HPPC) test of lithium battery, the current and voltage data of the lithium battery are collected, and the electromotive force U ocv , ohmic internal resistance R 0 , polarization resistance R 1 , and polarization capacitance C 1 of the battery in the equivalent model are identified according to their change law.
Taking the polymer lithium battery as the experimental object, the basic performance parameters of the battery used in the experiment are shown in Table 1.
In order to improve the accuracy of the test results, improvements were made on the basis of the traditional HPPC test method [31], which was improved from a constant current pulse test for every 10% discharge of the battery to a constant current pulse test for every 5% discharge. The specific experimental steps are as follows:
(1)
Under the set temperature conditions, charge the battery with a constant current and voltage at a charging current of 0.5 C, with a charging cut-off current of 0.01 C, at which time the SOC is 100%, and leave it for 1 h.
(2)
Discharge 5% of the battery at a discharge current of 1 C and leave it for 1 h.
(3)
Discharge the battery with a 3 C pulse current for 10 s and leave it for 40 s; charge it for 10 s and leave it for 40 s (to complete one HPPC experiment).
(4)
Perform cyclic experiments on steps (2)–(3) until the SOC of the battery = 0%.
In order to obtain the battery characteristics of Li-ion batteries under different temperatures, HPPC tests were conducted at −5 °C, 20 °C, and 40 °C, and the test platform included Sunway BTS–5V6A and thermostat box.
A complete HPPC test current and voltage variation curve is shown in Figure 4. In order to identify the battery parameters in each SOC state, the single constant current pulse test current and voltage variation curve are enlarged to study, as shown in Figure 5. The figure stipulates that the charging current is positive, and the discharge current is negative. The A~B stage is the pulse discharge process, and the B~D stage is the static process.
The sudden change in the terminal voltage in the B~C stage is caused by the ohmic internal resistance of the battery, and the formula for calculating the ohmic internal resistance is
R 0 = U BC I
The slow rise of terminal voltage in the C~D stage is mainly affected by the polarization resistance and polarization capacitance present inside the battery. In this process, the Thevenin equivalent circuit has zero input response, and the working voltage of the battery at any time in the C~D stage is calculated as follows:
U = U OCV I R 1 e t τ
The first-order exponential function fitting is performed on the rebound voltage curve in the C~D stage, and the fitting equation is as follows:
f ( x ) = A B e a x
Combined with (6) and (7), the calculation formulas of polarization resistance and polarization capacitance can be obtained:
R 1 = B I C 1 = I aB
Therefore, via the above identification methods, the ohmic internal resistance R 0 , polarization resistance R 1 , and polarization capacitance C 1 of the battery in different SOC states can be obtained, and the identification results are shown in Table 2.
According to Kirchhoff’s law, the mathematical expression for the electromotive force U OCV in this model can be obtained as follows:
U OCV = U + i ( t ) ( R 0 + R 1 ) i ( t ) R 1 e t R 1 C 1
Ignoring the influence of the thermodynamic characteristics of the positive and negative electrodes of lithium batteries, the electromotive force is numerically equal to the open-circuit voltage of the battery during the experimental test and analysis. The open-circuit voltage refers to the potential difference between the positive and negative electrodes when the battery passes through without current, that is, the voltage between the positive and negative electrodes when the battery is not working. The electromotive force U OCV of the battery in each SOC state under different temperature conditions can be obtained by the HPPC experiment, as shown in Figure 6.
The Gaussian fitting method with high goodness of fit was selected to fit the U OCV , SOC, and the U OCV SOC fitting equation was as follows:
  f x = a 1 × e x p ( x b 1 c 1 ) 2 +   a 2 × e x p ( x b 2 c 2 ) 2 +   a 3 × e x p ( x b 3 c 3 ) 2   +   a 4 × e x p ( x b 4 c 4 ) 2 + a 5 × e x p ( x b 5 c 5 ) 2
Among them, x stands for U OCV and f ( x ) for SOC.
The data were fitted by the data fitter to obtain the U ocv SOC fitting curve, as shown in Figure 7, with a goodness of fit curve of up to 99.8%, and the parameter fitting results are shown in Table 3.
In the constant temperature environment of 20 °C, the lithium battery with a capacity of 1000 mAh is tested for constant current discharge, and the lithium battery model is simulated and tested. The model simulation accuracy can be obtained by comparing the simulated terminal voltage and the actual terminal voltage value, and the comparison results are shown in Figure 8; the maximum relative error between the terminal voltage simulation value and the actual value is only 0.56%, and the model simulation accuracy is 99.4%.

4. SOC Estimation Model Establishment

Based on the above UAV lithium battery equivalent model and parameter identification results, the SOC estimation model of UAV lithium battery is established using MATLAB/Simulink R2022b software. The input of the model includes the real-time current and voltage of the UAV lithium battery, and the output of the model is the SOC of the battery, which consists of the reference SOC1 calculation module, the parameter lookup table module, and the SOC calculation module. Among them, the reference SOC1 calculation module mainly utilizes the ampere-time integration method to obtain the SOC reference value of the parameter lookup table module; the input of the module is the real-time current of the lithium battery, the output of the module is the SOC1, and the module is shown in Figure 9.
As shown in Figure 10, the parameter lookup module uses the Lookup in the toolbox to find the corresponding ohmic internal resistance R 0 , polarization resistance R 1 , and polarization capacitance C 1 of the lithium battery in each SOC state according to the SOC1 output by the reference SOC1 calculation module.
The input of the SOC calculation module is ohmic internal resistance R 0 , polarization resistance R 1 , and polarization capacitance C 1 , real-time current and voltage of lithium battery, and the SOC of a lithium battery can be calculated according to the mathematical expression of electromotive force U OCV (9) and the U OCV SOC fitting Equation (10), as shown in Figure 11.

5. Device Development and Performance Verification

Aiming at the engineering needs of the UAV lithium battery SOC estimation model that requires real-time input of real-time current and voltage of lithium battery, the UAV lithium battery status online monitoring module is designed. The module includes a lithium battery current and voltage measurement unit, a wireless communication unit, an adapter circuit board, a power supply, and a case. The lithium battery current and voltage measurement unit is a high-precision voltage and current measurement module model INA226, which can measure and collect the current and voltage of the lithium battery of the UAV in real time, with a measurement error of only 0.05%. The wireless communication unit is a TTL-Wi-Fi transmission module model DT-6, which can transmit the data collected by the measurement unit to the control terminal via Wi-Fi, and the ideal communication distance can reach 100 m. According to the interface settings of the measurement unit and the communication unit, an adapter board connecting the two units is designed using Altium Designer 19 software, and the circuit diagram of the adapter board is shown in Figure 12; it can realize the electrical connection between the measurement module and the communication module. The power supply of the module selects a 5 V constant voltage lithium battery, which can supply power to the module and set up a mechanical switch to control the module power on and off. According to the internal circuit board and power supply size, the use of SolidWorks 2022 software for the module of the overall space layout and shell design, the module size is 70 mm × 62 mm × 27 mm, and the module physical drawing is shown in Figure 13.
The lithium battery online monitoring module is connected to the positive and negative poles of the UAV and the UAV lithium battery, respectively. When the module switch is turned on, the lithium battery current and voltage can be measured in real time and the serial port assistant on the PC side sends the AT instruction to the module in real time. Then, the module receives the instruction and seamlessly transmits the current and voltage data to the PC in real time via Wi-Fi, and the data are processed in real time via the data identification program of MATLAB R2022b software. The model is imported into the model after processing, and the model is calculated and outputs the lithium battery SOC estimation results. The schematic diagram of the online estimation of SOC for UAV Li-ion battery is shown in Figure 14.
The serial port assistant saves the current and voltage data in DAT file format to the desktop in real time, and the MATLAB data recognition program is shown in Figure 15. The program reads and recognizes the string containing “+V=“ and “+A=“ in the file cyclically, extracts the corresponding current and voltage from the string, and saves them to the mat file in MATLAB work in chronological order until the program stops. The corresponding current and voltage are extracted and arranged in chronological order and saved to the mat file in MATLAB work until the program stops and the mat file keeps refreshing the data to ensure that the data can be imported to the SOC estimation model in real time.
Under the constant temperature environment of −5 °C, 20 °C, and 40 °C, the battery tester is utilized to simulate the discharge of the lithium battery under the working condition of the UAV, and the online monitoring module is connected to the positive and negative poles of the battery tester and lithium battery, respectively, and the discharge condition is set to be 1C constant current discharge for 30 min, so that the real-time online estimation of SOC is carried out for the lithium battery of the UAV, and the SOC estimation model in the process of experimentation can show the real-time display of SOC status of the lithium battery of the UAV as shown in Figure 16.
Shown in Figure 17a–c are the comparison graphs of reference SOC and estimated SOC curves of the UAV lithium battery under three temperature conditions of −5 °C, 20 °C, and 40 °C, respectively, and the comparison curves of the SOC estimation errors under three temperature environments are shown in Figure 18. The results show that the maximum absolute error Δmax of the scheme’s SOC estimation is 1.679%, and the estimation accuracy is 98.3%, which meets the requirements for the estimation accuracy of the residual power of the lithium battery of a small UAV. The scheme can realize the real-time online estimation of the SOC of the UAV lithium battery, and the response time is less than 1 s, with good real-time performance. The method can be applied to the real-time online estimation of SOC of different models of UAV lithium batteries, with strong generality.

6. Conclusions

Aiming at the problems of low estimation accuracy and poor real-time performance of the current UAV lithium battery SOC estimation, the existing UAV lithium battery SOC estimation methods are first analyzed and compared, and then a real-time online estimation scheme of the UAV lithium battery SOC state is proposed. A model-based approach is adopted to analyze and discuss different battery models, and the Thevenin model is selected for the UAV. The Thevenin model was chosen to model the UAV Li-ion battery equivalently, and the model was verified by parameter identification and simulation. Based on the battery equivalent model and parameter identification results, the SOC estimation model of the UAV lithium battery was established, and the online monitoring module for UAV lithium battery was developed. Finally, the SOC real-time online estimation experimental test is carried out on the UAV lithium battery.
The simulation test results prove that the simulation accuracy of the UAV lithium battery equivalent model can reach 99.4%; the results of the SOC real-time online estimation experimental test show that the SOC real-time online estimation scheme proposed in this study can realize the SOC online estimation of the lithium battery of the UAV with high precision, and the estimation accuracy can reach 97.4%, which can satisfy the requirements of the UAV for the accuracy of SOC estimation. At the same time, this scheme has the advantages of good real-time performance and strong versatility, and the program has the advantages of good real-time and strong generalization.
However, due to the limitation of experimental conditions, this scheme has not been applied to the SOC estimation of lithium batteries under the working conditions of actual UAVs. Compared with the laboratory conditions, the real-time online SOC estimation of UAVs under actual working conditions is susceptible to the influence of noise interference, load changes, temperature changes, and other factors, thus generating errors and leading to a decline in estimation accuracy. We will also consider adopting suitable methods to compensate for and correct the errors of noise, load, temperature, and other factors so as to further improve the accuracy of the real-time online estimation of the SOC of lithium UAV batteries and to strengthen the applicability of the real-time online estimation program of the SOC.

Author Contributions

J.L. independently completed model establishment and parameter identification, device development, and experimental verification. J.L. completed the scheme design and experimental design under the guidance of Z.D., F.L., H.Y. and C.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

  1. Xie, Q. Historical Status and Development Prospects of UAVs. Oper. Manag. 2016, 100–101. [Google Scholar]
  2. Liang, W. UAV + industry application, a promising future. Bus. Sch. 2018, 1. [Google Scholar]
  3. Huang, C.G.; Yin, H.J. Analysis of the Working Relationship between Lithium Battery and Charger Battery Management System. Southwest Automotive Information: First Half of 2011.0. Available online: https://www.southwestautomotiveprofessionals.org/ (accessed on 26 November 2023).
  4. Zhang, Y.; Wang, L.J.; Wu, T.Z. UAV SOC estimation analysis based on improved EKF. Power Technol. 2019, 43, 320–323. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, L.; Wang, S.L.; Chen, L. SOC estimation of lithium battery packs for small unmanned aerial vehicles based on extended Kalman filter. Manuf. Autom. 2018, 40, 94–97. [Google Scholar]
  6. Shi, W.H.; Wang, S.L.; Wang, C.M. Intelligent calculation of circuit equivalence and state of charge of UAV lithium battery. Autom. Instrum. 2020, 41, 65–70. [Google Scholar]
  7. Li, Y.J. Study on Correlation of Discharge Curve Fitting Coefficients and Residual Capacity of Different Capacity Lithium Batteries; Northeast Petroleum University: Daqing, China, 2023. [Google Scholar]
  8. Yu, Q.Q.; Wan, C.J.; Li, J.F. An open circuit voltage model fusion method for state of charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries. Energies 2021, 14, 1797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Somakettarin, N.; Funaki, T. Study on factors for accurate open circuit voltage characterizations in Mn-type Li-ion batteries. Batteries 2017, 3, 8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Li, Z.; Lu, L.G.; Ouyang, M.G. Comparison of methods to improve the accuracy of SOC estimation by ampere-hour integration method. J. Tsinghua Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2010, 50. 1293–1296+1301. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhang, M.Y.; Fan, X.B. Design of battery management system based on improved ampere-hour integration method. Int. J. Electr. Hybrid Veh. 2022, 14, 1. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. How, D.N.; Hannan, M.A.; Lipu, M.H.; Ker, P.J. State of charge estimation for lithium-ion batteries using model-based and data-driven methods: A review. IEEE Access 2019, 7, 136116–136136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Attanayaka, S.; Karunadasa, J.P.; Hemapala, K.T.M.U. Estimation of state of charge for lithium-ion batteries A Review. AIMS Energy 2019, 7, 186–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. He, Z.G.; Li, Y.T.; Sun, Y.Y. State-of-charge estimation of lithium-ion batteries based on an adaptive iterative extended Kalman filter. J. Energy Storage 2021, 39, 102593. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Hametner, C.; Jakubek, S.; Prochazka, W. Data-driven design of a cascaded observer for battery state of health estimation. IEEE Trans. Ind. Appl. 2018, 54, 6258–6266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xiong, R.; Sun, F.C.; He, H.W. Data-driven State-of-Charge estimator for electric vehicles battery using robust extended Kalman filter. Int. J. Automot. Technol. 2014, 15, 89–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Shah, A.; Shah, K.; Shah, C. State of charge, remaining useful life and knee point estimation based on artificial intelligence and Machine learning in lithium-ion EV batteries: A comprehensive review. Renew. Energy Focus 2022, 42, 146–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kou, F.R.; Luo, X.; Men, H. SOC estimation of lithium battery based on feature optimization and improved extreme learning machine. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 1234–1243. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, D.; Deng, J.J.; Zhang, Z.S. Review on safety warning strategy of electric vehicle power battery. Automot. Eng. 2023, 45, 1392–1407. [Google Scholar]
  20. Tan, B.R.; Du, J.H.; Ye, X.H. A review of model-based SOC estimation methods for lithium-ion batteries. Energy Storage Sci. Technol. 2023, 12, 1995–2010. [Google Scholar]
  21. Lin, C.T.; Qiu, B.; Chen, Q.S. Comparison of current input electric vehicle battery equivalent circuit models. J. Mech. Eng. 2005, 41, 76–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Nejad, S.; Gladwin, D.T.; Stone, D.A. A systematic review of lumped-parameter equivalent circuit models for real-time estimation of lithium-ion battery states. J. Power Sources 2016, 316, 183–196. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Ramsey, D.; German, R.; Bouscayrol, A. Comparison of equivalent circuit battery models for energetic studies on electric vehicles. In Proceedings of the 2020 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Gijon, Spain, 18 November–16 December 2020; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  24. Hidalgo-leon, R.; Urquizo, J.; Jacome-ruiz, P. Modeling battery under discharge using improved thevenin-shepherd electrical battery model. In Proceedings of the 2018 IEEE Vehicle Power and Propulsion Conference (VPPC), Chicago, IL, USA, 27–30 August 2018; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar]
  25. Zhou, J.; Hua, Y.H.; Liu, K. Research on a high-precision modeling scheme for lithium-ion batteries. Proc. CSEE 2019, 39, 6394–6403. [Google Scholar]
  26. Milishchuk, R.; Bogodorova, T. Thevenin-based battery model with ageing effects in modelica. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE 21st Mediterranean Electrotechnical Conference (MELECON), Palermo, Italy, 14–16 June 2022; pp. 243–248. [Google Scholar]
  27. Ji, Y.J.; Qiu, S.L.; Li, G. Simulation of second-order RC equivalent circuit model of lithium battery based on variable resistance and capacitance. J. Cent. South Univ. 2020, 27, 2606–2613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lai, X.; Zheng, Y.J.; Sun, T. A comparative study of different equivalent circuit models for estimating state-of-charge of lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 259, 566–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Madani, S.S.; Schaltz, E.; Kær, S.K. A review of different electric equivalent circuit models and parameter identification methods of lithium-ion batteries. ECS Trans. 2018, 87, 23–37. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yan, X.W.; Guo, Y.W.; Cui, Y. Electric vehicle battery SOC estimation based on GNL model adaptive Kalman filter. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2018, 1087, 052027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Hao, G.; Jin, T. Health status assessment of lithium batteries based on multi-scale data fusion. J. Jiangsu Univ. (Nat. Sci. Ed.) 2023, 44, 524–529. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. Real-time online estimation scheme of UAV lithium battery SOC.
Figure 1. Real-time online estimation scheme of UAV lithium battery SOC.
Energies 17 00803 g001
Figure 2. Thevenin equivalent circuit model.
Figure 2. Thevenin equivalent circuit model.
Energies 17 00803 g002
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit model of lithium battery for drones.
Figure 3. Equivalent circuit model of lithium battery for drones.
Energies 17 00803 g003
Figure 4. HPPC test current and voltage curve.
Figure 4. HPPC test current and voltage curve.
Energies 17 00803 g004
Figure 5. Curve of current and voltage variation for a single constant current pulse test.
Figure 5. Curve of current and voltage variation for a single constant current pulse test.
Energies 17 00803 g005
Figure 6. Battery electromotive force at different temperatures and SOC.
Figure 6. Battery electromotive force at different temperatures and SOC.
Energies 17 00803 g006
Figure 7. U ocv SOC fitting curve.
Figure 7. U ocv SOC fitting curve.
Energies 17 00803 g007
Figure 8. Comparison of battery terminal voltage simulation and experimental results.
Figure 8. Comparison of battery terminal voltage simulation and experimental results.
Energies 17 00803 g008
Figure 9. The reference SOC1 calculation module.
Figure 9. The reference SOC1 calculation module.
Energies 17 00803 g009
Figure 10. Parameter lookup module.
Figure 10. Parameter lookup module.
Energies 17 00803 g010
Figure 11. SOC compute module.
Figure 11. SOC compute module.
Energies 17 00803 g011
Figure 12. Interposer circuit diagram.
Figure 12. Interposer circuit diagram.
Energies 17 00803 g012
Figure 13. Physical diagram of lithium battery online monitoring module.
Figure 13. Physical diagram of lithium battery online monitoring module.
Energies 17 00803 g013
Figure 14. The schematic diagram of the online estimation of SOC for UAV Li-ion battery.
Figure 14. The schematic diagram of the online estimation of SOC for UAV Li-ion battery.
Energies 17 00803 g014
Figure 15. Data identification program.
Figure 15. Data identification program.
Energies 17 00803 g015
Figure 16. SOC estimation model real-time estimation interface.
Figure 16. SOC estimation model real-time estimation interface.
Energies 17 00803 g016
Figure 17. Reference SOC vs. Estimated SOC: (a) −5 °C; (b) 20 °C; (c) 40 °C.
Figure 17. Reference SOC vs. Estimated SOC: (a) −5 °C; (b) 20 °C; (c) 40 °C.
Energies 17 00803 g017
Figure 18. SOC estimation errors.
Figure 18. SOC estimation errors.
Energies 17 00803 g018
Table 1. Performance parameters of experimental lithium batteries.
Table 1. Performance parameters of experimental lithium batteries.
ParameterValue
Nominal capacity1000 mAh
Nominal voltage3.7 V
Charge cut-off voltage4.2 V
Discharge cut-off voltage2.75 V
Standard charging0.5 C
Table 2. Parameter identification results.
Table 2. Parameter identification results.
SOC (%) R 0 (Ω) R 1 (Ω) C 1 (F)
00.3030.067150.376
50.2980.043235.110
100.2960.039255.537
150.2860.050202.020
200.2970.036279.851
250.2850.050201.613
300.2950.032309.598
350.2890.043232.378
400.2980.032310.559
450.3010.029347.625
500.2940.036277.008
550.2940.031322.234
600.2900.035288.184
650.2960.034295.567
700.2900.038261.552
750.2960.036280.899
800.2870.046217.077
850.2970.040252.738
900.2890.042239.044
950.2900.042236.967
Table 3. Parameter fitting results.
Table 3. Parameter fitting results.
nanbncn
18.7194.5550.7213
2 2.342 × 10 13 7.9427.942
3−0.11394.1260.1168
49.001−9.27610
50.14013.8390.08771
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Dou, Z.; Li, J.; Yan, H.; Zhang, C.; Liu, F. Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery. Energies 2024, 17, 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803

AMA Style

Dou Z, Li J, Yan H, Zhang C, Liu F. Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery. Energies. 2024; 17(4):803. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803

Chicago/Turabian Style

Dou, Zhaoliang, Jiaxin Li, Hongjuan Yan, Chunlin Zhang, and Fengbin Liu. 2024. "Real-Time Online Estimation Technology and Implementation of State of Charge State of Uncrewed Aerial Vehicle Lithium Battery" Energies 17, no. 4: 803. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17040803

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop