Next Article in Journal
Harvesting Losses for a Cut-and-Chip Harvesting System Operating in Willow Short-Rotation Coppice
Previous Article in Journal
Multi-Objective Optimization with Active–Passive Technology Synergy for Rural Residences in Northern China
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Innovative Matrix-Type AC-AC Solid-State Transformer Eliminating Ripple Power with Double-Grid Frequency

School of Automation, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Energies 2024, 17(7), 1540; https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071540
Submission received: 15 February 2024 / Revised: 19 March 2024 / Accepted: 20 March 2024 / Published: 23 March 2024
(This article belongs to the Section F3: Power Electronics)

Abstract

:
Single-phase solid-state transformers (SSTs) have the advantages of a compact structure, higher reliability, and multiple functions, and have been widely studied. However, bulky energy storage elements and inherent ripple power with double-grid frequency issues are the main disadvantages of conventional single-phase SSTs. This paper presents a single-phase matrix-type AC-AC SST eliminating ripple power with double-grid frequency. The presented SST consists of a line-frequency-commutated rectifier without bulky DC-link capacitors, an LLC resonant converter, a buck converter, and a line-frequency-commutated inverter. The LLC operates efficiently with a fixed voltage gain, and the buck converter provides a voltage regulation function. As a result, high conversion efficiency, high power density, and potentially high reliability are achieved. A 1 kW SST prototype is developed and tested to validate the feasibility and functionality of the proposed methods.

1. Introduction

The solid-state transformer (SST), which is also called a power electronic transformer (PET), is a new power electronic equipment that uses power electronic technology and high-frequency transformers [1,2,3]. Although traditional line-frequency (LF) transformers have the advantages of a simple and reliable structure, as well as low maintenance costs, compared to SSTs, their disadvantages are also apparent. For example, they have a large weight and volume, poor controllability, and limited flexibility [4,5,6]. In order to overcome these shortcomings, solid-state transformers with advantages of voltage regulation, energy management, higher power density, better controllability, and improved flexibility have gradually entered the vision of the public and have attracted more and more attention. SSTs have rapidly developed into substitutes for traditional LF transformers and are widely applied in smart distribution power grids, electric traction, and many other fields [7,8,9].
In order to improve the performance of conversion efficiency, power density, controllability, flexibility, reliability, and manufacturing cost, various SST topologies have been presented and studied [10,11,12,13]. Generally, SST topologies are roughly classified into direct AC-AC topologies and indirect AC-DC-DC-AC topologies. Among the above two categories, AC-DC-DC-AC three-stage SSTs, which have the characteristics of reliable controllability and multiple functions for AC/DC outputs port, have been widely researched and applied [14]. However, the multi-stage power conversion topologies lead to the significant disadvantage of relatively low conversion efficiency. In addition, bulky energy storage elements on the DC links unavoidably limit the power density of SSTs, and the electrolytic capacitors on the DC links lead to a short service life, reduced power density, and unstable reliability of the system if the correct design scheme and effective heat management are not adopted [15]. The short lifespan of electrolytic capacitors is attributed to several factors. Firstly, the electrolyte inside the capacitor is prone to evaporation and drying, leading to a decrease in performance. Secondly, chemical reactions can occur within the electrolyte, further degrading the capacitor’s performance. Additionally, polarization effects and high temperatures accelerate aging, collectively contributing to the capacitor’s relatively short lifespan. Therefore, the direct AC-AC SST topologies, known as matrix-type SSTs, become a highly attractive alternative. Matrix-type SSTs contain relatively few power conversion stages, and there are no energy storage elements in the DC link, which makes it possible to use film capacitors instead of electrolytic capacitors [16]. As a result, matrix-type SSTs provide the advantages of achieving improved power density, higher conversion efficiency, and better reliability [17].
The two soft-switching isolation topologies frequently used in SSTs are the dual active bridge (DAB) and LLC resonant converter. Although the DAB converter has the ability to achieve higher conversion efficiency through good ZVS capability, as well as a reduced root-mean-square (RMS) and reactive power, the load and voltage-dependent ZVS characteristics make it unsuitable for direct AC-AC conversion applications [18]. In [19], a single-stage AC-AC SST-adopted series resonant converter (SRC) is presented, and it achieves the goal of higher efficiency. In [20], a single-stage matrix-type SST based on a current-fed SRC is proposed, achieving zero voltage switching of the primary side switches over a relatively wide range of input voltage. However, the ZVS operation of the LV side, controllability of the output, and bidirectional power flow are not realized, as the LV side bridge is treated solely as an uncontrolled diode rectifier. In [21], an AC-AC converter using an LLC resonant converter operated near the resonant frequency is developed, and the primary side switches of the transformer, which works at high frequency, are employed in the soft switching of the ZVS type.
Unlike the conventional single-phase SSTs, this paper presents a single-phase matrix-type AC-AC SST in order to overcome the main disadvantages of the bulky energy storage elements and inherent ripple power with double-grid frequency [22]. The proposed SST has no energy storage elements in the DC link and adopts the LLC resonant converter, which is composed of a half-bridge on primary and secondary sides. Considering its natural voltage reduction capability of 2:1, the half-bridge structure is chosen, which helps to reduce the design difficulty of the transformer working at high frequency [23]. At the same time, the number of switching devices and drivers is reduced, corresponding to a reduction in cost and an increase in power density.
The rest of the parts of this article are organized as follows. Section 2 introduces the topology of the proposed matrix-type AC-AC SST in detail and analyzes the operating principles. Then, Section 3 presents the analysis of ZVS and the control schemes. Afterward, Section 4 shows the experimental results to verify the proposed methods and topologies. Finally, the conclusion of this paper is drawn in Section 5.

2. Topology and Operating Principles of the Proposed SST

2.1. Proposed Topology

The topology, as illustrated in Figure 1, comprises a full-bridge rectifier combined with a high-frequency (HF) half-bridge on the grid side, a half-bridge LLC resonant converter on the transformer’s secondary side, a buck converter on the DC-link side, and a full-bridge inverter on the load side.
Because the LLC operates in discontinuous conduction mode, the intermediate high-frequency stage in this topology is a half-bridge discontinuous conduction mode series resonant converter (HC-DCM-SRC). S1 to S4 and S11 to S14 operate at line frequency, while S5 to S10 operates at high frequency (HF). The buck circuit works in the CCM mode. In comparison to the traditional matrix-type SST, this topology reduces the number of HF switches, resulting in a considerably simplified converter structure and reduced hardware costs.
Cp1, Cp2, Cs1, Cs2, and Cb are film capacitors known for their extended lifespan and compact size. Consequently, the potential power density and reliability of the system can be improved. Lp serves as the input-filtering inductor. Cr is the resonant capacitor and Lr and Lm are the resonant inductor and magnetizing inductor, respectively. T represents the HF transformer, with a turns ratio expressed as 1: n.
Due to the matrix-type structure, the DC-link voltages are the absolute value of the sinusoidal voltage, eliminating the need for large electrolytic capacitors in the topology. Hence, the electrolytic capacitorless structure enhances the potential reliability and power density of the system and achieves transient energy balance between the source and load, avoiding ripple power with double-grid frequency.

2.2. Operating Principles

Given the similarity in operational principles between forward and reverse power transmission in the SST, this section uses forward power transmission as an example.
The operation waveforms of the SST are displayed in Figure 2, with S1 to S14 representing the gate signals. As depicted in Figure 2 the full bridges on the grid and load sides commutate with LF in accordance with the polarity of the input voltage ui(t). When ui(t) > 0, switches S1, S4, S11, and S14 are turned on, while switches S2, S3, S12, and S13 are turned off. Conversely, when ui(t) < 0, the switching modes are reversed. Consequently, the DC-link voltages udc1(t) and udc2(t) are the absolute value of the sinusoidal voltage. To facilitate subsequent analysis, this article assumes that ui(t) = uo(t). Hence,
| u i ( t ) | = u d c 1 ( t ) = u d c 2 ( t ) / n = | u o ( t ) |
From (1), it can be seen that the topology achieves transient energy balance between the source and load, hence avoiding ripple power with double-grid frequency and providing inherent power factor correction (PFC).
The resonant frequency fr is determined by the resonant inductor Lr and resonant capacitor Cr, and the expression is as follows:
f r = 1 2 π L r C r
When the transformer’s magnetizing inductance Lm is added, the resonant frequency fm is expressed as follows:
f m = 1 2 π ( L r + L m ) C r
According to the relationship between fr, fm, and fs, there are three types of operating states of the LLC resonant circuit. When the switching frequency fs > fr, the primary side switches can achieve soft switching, but the secondary side diodes work in continuous conduction mode (CCM) and cannot achieve soft switching. When fr > fs > fm, switches on both primary and secondary sides can achieve soft switching. When fm > fs, the primary side switches operate in the capacitive domain and keep hard switching, which means that the switching loss is large. Therefore, in this paper, to achieve soft switching for both primary and secondary side switches of the LLC converter, the switching frequency fs is set to be lower than the resonant frequency fr.
For the buck converter, in order to regulate voltage and meet the load requirements, S9 and S10 are operated at high frequency to offer the desired amplitude of the half-cycle sinusoidal voltage ub(t). S9 and S10 complementally conduct, with the duty cycle of S9 being Dα. According to the volt-second balance principle, the output voltage of the buck circuit is
u b ( t ) = D α u d c 2 ( t )
For the full-bridge inverter on the output load side, the switches S11~S14 are commutated with line-frequency and have the same operating principles as the switches S1~S4. When the instantaneous value of the input voltage ui(t) turns to positive, switches S11~S14 are turned ON, while correspondingly switches S12 and S13 are turned OFF. On the contrary, When the instantaneous value of the input voltage ui(t) turns to negative, switches S11~S14 all act in reverse. Then, the half-cycle sinusoidal voltage ub(t) is turned to the expected sinusoidal output voltage uo(t).
In short, the designed topology of the single-phase matrix-type AC-AC SST using the appropriate operating principles gets rid of bulky energy storage elements, obtains the sinusoidal input and output, and avoids the ripple power with double-grid frequency. Figure 2 represents some key waveforms of the proposed SST.

3. ZVS Analysis and Control Scheme of the Proposed SST

3.1. ZVS Analysis

Usually, the high conversion efficiency is considered as one of the most important factors in the design of SST. Reducing switching loss and conduction loss can improve conversion efficiency. Therefore, the proposed SST needs to achieve ZVS on both the primary and secondary sides of the LLC SRC as much as possible.
Unlike the modulation strategy of a traditional LLC SRC, the proposed matrix-type SST topology adopts a novel control method to achieve ZVS operation of the secondary side. This is accomplished by generating a small spike in the secondary-side resonant current through introducing a slight phase shift between the gate control signals of the primary and secondary sides. Consequently, the current spike is utilized to discharge the effective output capacitor of the secondary-side MOSFET, thereby achieving ZVS. The specific waveform of the novel control method mentioned above is represented in Figure 3, where Tdp refers to the dead time of the bridge arm on the primary side, Tds refers to the dead time of the bridge arm on the secondary side, and Tp refers to the phase shift between the gate signal on the primary side and the secondary side; up refers to the primary bridge voltage of the LLC resonant converter, and us refers to the secondary bridge voltage of the LLC resonant converter.
As shown in Figure 3, near the dead time, the gate signals of the primary and secondary bridge arms of the LLC resonant converter are not exactly the same; a tiny phase shift Tp exists. As a result, a small voltage-second product is generated due to the tiny phase shift Tp during this interval. This product is then added to the resonant inductor Lr on the primary side, thereby creating a small resonant current spike on both the primary and secondary sides of the high-frequency transformer. Due to the generated negative resonant current spike in the secondary side of the high-frequency transformer, the parasitic capacitance of the switches on the secondary side is turned on and discharged, which finally realizes the soft switching of ZVS for all switches on the secondary side. As for the switches on the primary side, when designing this SST, the magnetizing inductance of the transformer is selected to be small enough to ensure that there is a large enough magnetizing current so that the parasitic capacitance of the switches on the primary side bridge arm can be turned to on and discharged within the dead time, which ensures the soft switching of ZVS for all switches on the primary side.
The design parameters to be considered for soft switching include switching frequency, magnetizing inductance, and dead time; then, the appropriate phase shift can be calculated. In short, the proposed control method can realize the soft switching of ZVS for all switches of the LLC resonant converter.

3.2. Control Scheme

The full-bridge rectifier on the input grid side and the full-bridge inverter on the output load side both operate in the line-frequency commutated, and the control method of the unfolding bridge is relatively simple. Therefore, in this section, the analysis of the control scheme should focus on the buck converter providing a voltage regulation function. The detailed explanation is displayed as follows.
The primary objective of designing a closed-loop system is to attain the desired output waveform while enhancing resilience to disturbances. This ensures that, even during transient load variations or input voltage disturbances, the output voltage amplitude remains constant, so it plays an important role in the stability of the system. The voltage and current double-closed-loop control structure obtains the reference current of the current inner loop from the voltage outer loop controlled by feedback. The control scheme of the voltage and current double-closed-loop control system is represented in Figure 4, where u*o refers to the desired output voltage of the inverter, i*o refers to the reference current of the output inductor, iL refers to the current of the load, ubi refers to the modulation voltage, and kb refers to the equivalent gain of the buck converter. The regulator GI(s) used by the current loop is the PI regulator, and the expression of GI(s) is as follows.
G I ( s ) = K p 1 + K i 1 s
The regulator GV(s) used in the voltage outer loop is also the PI regulator, and the expression of GV(s) is as follows:
G V ( s ) = K p 2 + K i 2 s
Different from the half-sinusoidal voltage shape of the secondary-side DC-link, the initial modulation voltage must be normalized according to the value of the instantaneous DC-link voltage on the secondary side.

4. Experimental Results

In this section, a 1 kW SST prototype is developed and tested to validate the feasibility and functionality of the proposed methods. The prototype of the proposed SST is shown in Figure 5, and the system experimental parameters are given in Table 1.
Figure 6 illustrates a comparison between the high-frequency SST proposed in this paper and traditional line-frequency transformers, with relevant parameters summarized in Table 2. As depicted in the figure, under the same power transmission conditions, the power electronic transformer exhibits significant advantages in terms of volume and weight compared to traditional line-frequency transformers. Therefore, the SST is highly suitable for applications where weight and volume constraints exist, and there are high demands for power density.
As shown in Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10 and Figure 11, the experimental results are in good agreement with the expected simulation results.
Figure 7 depicts the key waveforms of the proposed SST working under the original condition. Figure 7a displays the input and output voltage as well as current waveforms of the converter under rated voltage (1 kW condition). It can be observed from the figure that both the input and output voltages are 220 V. The input current is sinusoidal and in phase with the input voltage. Additionally, the output voltage is also sinusoidal and closely tracks the reference. Thus, it is evident that the proposed PET can generate sinusoidal input current and controllable output voltage. In Figure 7b, it becomes evident that the matrix-type structure of this SST results in the DC-link voltage being equal to the absolute value of the input voltage, that is, udc(t)= |ui(t)|. This design effectively eliminates the issue of dual LF power pulsation induced by traditional HF modulation. Additionally, it enables the substitution of electrolytic capacitors with thin film capacitors, leading to a substantial increase in the system’s power density. The transformer switching frequency is 65 kHz, and the current waveforms at the input and output terminals of the transformer both exhibit a sinusoidal envelope. In Figure 7e, udsp, ugsp, udss, and ugss are the primary-side drain-to-source voltage and gate-to-source voltage, and the secondary-side drain-to-source voltage and gate-to-source voltage, respectively. It can be observed in Figure 7e that, for both sides of MOSFETs, the rising edge of the gate-to-source voltage lags behind the falling edge of the drain-to-source voltage, demonstrating the ZVS operation of the SST.
The key waveforms of the proposed SST working under the light-load condition are given in Figure 8. The output power is 500 W, which is half of the rated power. The key waveforms of the proposed SST working under the heavy-load condition are given in Figure 9. The output power is 1200 W. The input voltage of the two groups mentioned above is the same as the original condition. Experimental results prove that the proposed SST obtains the desired output and achieves ZVS under different load conditions.
Figure 10 shows the key waveforms of the proposed SST working with higher input voltage. The input voltage is selected to increase by 15% from 220 to 253 Vrms. Figure 11 shows the key waveforms of the proposed SST working with lower input voltage. The input voltage is selected to decrease by 5% from 220 to 209 Vrms. The output power of the two groups is equal to the rated power. The implementation results indicate that the voltage control method proposed in this paper can effectively maintain the output voltage constant when the input voltage changes..
As can be seen from the above experimental results, the proposed SST in this paper realizes the main purpose of sinusoidal input and output and ZVS operation on both the primary and secondary sides with wide input voltage and output load ranges.
The proposed SM-SST is compared with the other converters presented in the literature, and the results are presented in Table 3.
The system efficiency is measured using the HIOKI 3390 power analyzer, which is manufactured by HIOKI Corporation from Japan. As depicted in Figure 12,at the rated load condition, the peak efficiency reaches 95.2%. The proposed topology in this paper significantly improves transmission efficiency.
Compared to [24,25], the proposed SST achieves ZVS for all high-frequency switches, even when the DC-link voltage varies. In contrast, refs. [24,25] always have two to four switches unable to achieve soft switching within half of the low-frequency cycle, resulting in significant switch losses. Unlike [25], the proposed topology in this paper adopts a matrix structure, allowing for the use of small film capacitors instead of electrolytic capacitors. This improvement enhances system stability and compactness. Compared to the literature [19], the SST proposed in this paper reduces the use of switches and inductors, thereby reducing switch conduction losses and hardware costs. Although the topology in this paper adopts a half-bridge structure on the primary side, resulting in a doubling of the effective current, the proper selection of switch devices allows this topology to achieve higher power density with fewer components, a smaller size, and a lower system cost.

5. Conclusions

This paper presents a single-phase matrix-type AC-AC SST designed to eliminate ripple power with double-grid frequency. By sharing the filter capacitor between the HF half-bridge and the LF rectifier on the primary side, significant reductions in power switches and conducting losses can be achieved. Additionally, through proper analysis of soft switching characteristics, all HF switches can realize ZVS under time-varying DC-link voltage, further reducing switching losses. Moreover, the matrix-type topology eliminates ripple power with double-grid frequency, and the use of film capacitors enhances system reliability and lifespan. The control strategy, employing a buck converter for power and AC output regulation, is simple and reliable, achieving PFC without the need for a current loop. Because the SST proposed in this paper enables direct AC-AC conversion and features a compact structure with high efficiency, future work will primarily focus on applying this converter to low-voltage distribution networks where the input and output voltage frequencies are the same, or in applications such as aerospace, aviation, transportation, and other scenarios with strict requirements on volume and weight.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, H.W.; Methodology, G.N.; Validation, T.Y. and M.W.; Writing—original draft, T.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 62173351), Science and Technology Innovation Program of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2021RC3010), JieBang Headed Program of Hunan Province (Grant No. 2021GK1120), JieBang Headed Program of Changsha (Grant No. kq2102006), Hunan Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 2023JJ30682).

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Huang, A.Q.; Crow, M.L.; Heydt, G.T.; Zheng, J.P.; Dale, S.J. The Future Renewable Electric Energy Delivery and Management (FREEDM) System: The Energy Internet. Proc. IEEE 2011, 99, 133–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Huber, J.E.; Kolar, J.W. Solid-State Transformers: On the Origins and Evolution of Key Concepts. IEEE Ind. Electron. Mag. 2016, 10, 19–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Lai, J.-S.; Lai, W.-H.; Moon, S.-R.; Zhang, L.; Maitra, A. A 15-kV class intelligent universal transformer for utility applications. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Long Beach, CA, USA, 20–24 March 2016; pp. 1974–1981. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Bifaretti, S.; Zanchetta, P.; Watson, A.; Tarisciotti, L.; Clare, J.C. Advanced Power Electronic Conversion and Control System for Universal and Flexible Power Management. IEEE Trans. Smart Grid 2011, 2, 231–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, H.; Prasai, A.; Moghe, R.; Chintakrinda, K.; Divan, D. A 50-kVA Three-Phase Solid-State Transformer Based on the Minimal Topology: Dyna-C. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2016, 31, 8126–8137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Meena, K.; Jayaswal, K.; Palwalia, D.K. Analysis of Dual Active Bridge Converter for Solid State Transformer Application using Single-Phase Shift Control Technique. In Proceedings of the 2020 International Conference on Inventive Computation Technologies (ICICT), Coimbatore, India, 26–28 February 2020; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Liu, Z.; Huang, Z.; Lee, F.C.; Li, Q. Digital-Based Interleaving Control for GaN-Based MHz CRM Totem-Pole PFC. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2016, 4, 808–814. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Santos, W.M.D.; Ortmann, M.S.; Schweitzer, R.; Mussa, S.A.; Martins, D.C. Design and conception of a DAB converter (Dual Active Bridge) using the gyrators theory. In Proceedings of the XI Brazilian Power Electronics Conference, Natal, Brazil, 11–15 September 2011; pp. 359–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Zhao, C.; Dujic, D.; Mester, A.; Steinke, J.K.; Weiss, M.; Lewdeni-Schmid, S.; Chaudhuri, T.; Stefanutti, P. Power Electronic Traction Transformer—Medium Voltage Prototype. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2014, 61, 3257–3268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Shah, D.; Crow, M.L. Online Volt-Var Control for Distribution Systems With Solid-State Transformers. IEEE Trans. Power Deliv. 2016, 31, 343–350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Kadandani, N.B.; Dahidah, M.; Ethni, S. An Overview of the Role of Solid State Transformer in Grid Connected Wind Farms. In Proceedings of the 2021 12th International Renewable Energy Congress (IREC), Hammamet, Tunisia, 26–28 October 2021; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zareie, M.; Poorali, B.; Eren, S.; Pahlevani, M. New DC–DC Converter With Direct Power Transfer Capability. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2021, 36, 5647–5663. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Wang, G.; Baek, S.; Elliott, J.; Kadavelugu, A.; Wang, F.; She, X.; Dutta, S.; Liu, Y.; Zhao, T.; Yao, W.; et al. Design and hardware implementation of Gen-1 silicon based solid state transformer. In Proceedings of the 2011 Twenty-Sixth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition (APEC), Fort Worth, TX, USA, 6–11 March 2011; pp. 1344–1349. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Wang, C.-M.; Cheng, C.-H.; Wu, B.-H. A single-stage series-resonant transformer-isolated AC-AC converter. In Proceedings of the 2018 13th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Wuhan, China, 31 May–2 June 2018; pp. 1039–1043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qin, H.; Kimball, J.W. Solid-State Transformer Architecture Using AC–AC Dual-Active-Bridge Converter. IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. 2013, 60, 3720–3730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Vorperian, V.; Cuk, S. A complete DC analysis of the series resonant converter. In Proceedings of the 1982 IEEE Power Electronics Specialists conference, Cambridge, MA, USA, 14–17 June 1982; pp. 85–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Redl, R.; Kislovski, A.S.; Erisman, B.P. Input-current-clamping: An inexpensive novel control technique to achieve compliance with harmonic regulations. In Proceedings of the Applied Power Electronics Conference. APEC ‘96, San Jose, CA, USA, 3–7 March 1996; Volume 1, pp. 145–151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Grigore, V.; Kyyra, J. High power factor rectifier based on buck converter operating in discontinuous capacitor voltage mode. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2000, 15, 1241–1249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Rahman, A.N.; Chen, S.-K.; Chiu, H.-J. Single Phase AC-AC Solid State Transformer based on Single Conversion Stage. In Proceedings of the 2019 IEEE Workshop on Wide Bandgap Power Devices and Applications in Asia (WiPDA Asia), Taipei, Taiwan, 23–25 May 2019; pp. 1–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, Q.; Wang, L.; Huang, A.Q.; Booth, K.; Zhang, L. 7.2-kV Single-Stage Solid-State Transformer Based on the Current-Fed Series Resonant Converter and 15-kV SiC mosfets. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 2019, 34, 1099–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Young, G.; Tomlins, G.; Keogh, A. “An Acdc Converter”, World Intellect; International Publication Number WO 2006/046220 A1; Property Organ: Geneva, Switzerland, 2006. [Google Scholar]
  22. Lazaro, A.; Barrado, A.; Pleite, J.; Vazquez, J.; Olias, E. Size and cost reduction of the energy-storage capacitors. In Proceedings of the Nineteenth Annual IEEE Applied Power Electronics Conference and Exposition, 2004, APEC’04, Anaheim, CA, USA, 22–26 February; 2004; Volume 2, pp. 723–729. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Rothmund, D.; Huber, J.E.; Kolar, J.W. Operating behavior and design of the half-cycle discontinuous-conduction-mode series-resonant-converter with small DC link capacitors. In Proceedings of the 2013 IEEE 14th Workshop on Control and Modeling for Power Electronics (COMPEL), Salt Lake City, UT, USA, 23–26 June 2013; pp. 1–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, H.; Yuan, S.; Jiang, L.; Yu, T.; Su, M. Single-Stage Matrix-Type Power Electronic Transformer with Reduced Switches. IEEE J. Emerg. Sel. Top. Power Electron. 2023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chambayil, A.; Chattopadhyay, S. A Single-stage Single Phase Bidirectional AC-AC Converter for Solid State Transformer Application. In Proceedings of the 2022 IEEE International Conference on Power Electronics, Drives and Energy Systems (PEDES), Jaipur, India, 14–17 December 2022; pp. 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed topology.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the proposed topology.
Energies 17 01540 g001
Figure 2. Key waveforms of the proposed SST.
Figure 2. Key waveforms of the proposed SST.
Energies 17 01540 g002
Figure 3. Key waveforms of the control method for ZVS.
Figure 3. Key waveforms of the control method for ZVS.
Energies 17 01540 g003
Figure 4. Control scheme of the double-closed loop.
Figure 4. Control scheme of the double-closed loop.
Energies 17 01540 g004
Figure 5. Prototype of the proposed SST.
Figure 5. Prototype of the proposed SST.
Energies 17 01540 g005
Figure 6. Comparison of parameters between LF transformer and HF transformer.
Figure 6. Comparison of parameters between LF transformer and HF transformer.
Energies 17 01540 g006
Figure 7. Experimental waveforms of the SST working under the original condition. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Figure 7. Experimental waveforms of the SST working under the original condition. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Energies 17 01540 g007
Figure 8. Experimental waveforms of the SST working under the light load. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Figure 8. Experimental waveforms of the SST working under the light load. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Energies 17 01540 g008
Figure 9. Experimental waveforms of the SST working under the heavy load. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Figure 9. Experimental waveforms of the SST working under the heavy load. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Energies 17 01540 g009
Figure 10. Experimental waveforms of the SST working with higher input voltage. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Figure 10. Experimental waveforms of the SST working with higher input voltage. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Energies 17 01540 g010
Figure 11. Experimental waveforms of the SST working with lower input voltage. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Figure 11. Experimental waveforms of the SST working with lower input voltage. (a) Input and output waveforms. (b) DC-link voltages and resonant currents. (c) Magnified view of (b) nearby the peak point of the input voltage. (d) Drain-to-source voltage and the gate-to-source voltage of the primary and secondary side MOSFETs (e) Magnified view of (d) nearby the peak point of the input voltage.
Energies 17 01540 g011
Figure 12. The efficiency of the SST prototype [15].
Figure 12. The efficiency of the SST prototype [15].
Energies 17 01540 g012
Table 1. Parameters of the proposed SST.
Table 1. Parameters of the proposed SST.
ParametersValue
Power rating1 kW
Input voltage ui220 V/50 Hz
Output voltage uo220 V/50 Hz
Resonant inductor Lr6.8 μH
Magnetizing inductance Lm350 μH
Resonant capacitor Cr0.9 mH
LLC switching frequency fs65 kHz
Buck frequency fn20 kHz
Turns ratio n1.2
Capacitor Cp1 and Cp26.6 μF
Capacitor Cs1 and Cs26.6 μF
Capacitor Cb2.2 μF
Inductor Li200 μH
Inductor Lo400 μH
Inductor Lb380 μH
Capacitor Co3.3 μF
Table 2. Comparison of parameters between LF transformer and HF transformer.
Table 2. Comparison of parameters between LF transformer and HF transformer.
ParemeterLF TransformerHF Transformer
Operating frequency50 Hz65 kHz
Power rating2 kW2 kW
Turns ratio1:11:1
Volume4174.5 cm3105.6 cm3
Weight28 kg3 kg
Table 3. Performance comparison with the AC-AC converters in the literature.
Table 3. Performance comparison with the AC-AC converters in the literature.
ParameterProposed Topology[24][25][19]
Switches14141216
Inductors3425
Bus capacitor modelFilm capacitorFilm capacitorElectrolytic capacitorFilm capacitor
Efficiency95.2%91.5%92.5%94.6%
MOSFETsFCH072N60F, 600 V, 52 A, 72 mΩFCH072N60F, 600 V, 52 A, 72 mΩC2M0080120D, 1200 V, 36 A, 80 mΩC2M0040120D, 1200 V, 55 A, 40 mΩ
Power rating1 kW1 kW1 kW3 kW
Peak voltage (per unit)1.692.022.251
RMS current (per unit)211.61
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, H.; Yu, T.; Wang, M.; Ning, G. Innovative Matrix-Type AC-AC Solid-State Transformer Eliminating Ripple Power with Double-Grid Frequency. Energies 2024, 17, 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071540

AMA Style

Wang H, Yu T, Wang M, Ning G. Innovative Matrix-Type AC-AC Solid-State Transformer Eliminating Ripple Power with Double-Grid Frequency. Energies. 2024; 17(7):1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071540

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Hui, Tianshi Yu, Manlin Wang, and Guangfu Ning. 2024. "Innovative Matrix-Type AC-AC Solid-State Transformer Eliminating Ripple Power with Double-Grid Frequency" Energies 17, no. 7: 1540. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17071540

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop