Next Article in Journal
Phase Equilibria and Magnetic Phases in the Ce-Fe-Co-B System
Previous Article in Journal
Numerical Simulation on Seismic Response of the Filled Joint under High Amplitude Stress Waves Using Finite-Discrete Element Method (FDEM)
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 10
Issue 1
10.3390/ma10010014
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Tuneable Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) Materials by Co-B and Ni-B Co-Doping

by
Nguyen Van Thang
*,
Niels Harmen van Dijk
and
Ekkes Brück
Fundamental Aspects of Materials and Energy, Department of Radiation Science and Technology, Delft University of Technology, Mekelweg 15, Delft 2629 JB, The Netherlands
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(1), 14; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010014
Submission received: 25 October 2016 / Revised: 5 December 2016 / Accepted: 15 December 2016 / Published: 27 December 2016
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The influence of Co (Ni) and B co-doping on the structural, magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) compounds is investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD), differential scanning calorimetry, magnetic and direct temperature change measurements. It is found that Co (Ni) and B co-doping is an effective approach to tune both the Curie temperature and the thermal hysteresis of (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) materials without losing either the giant magnetocaloric effect or the positive effect of the B substitution on the mechanical stability. An increase in B concentration leads to a rapid decrease in thermal hysteresis, while an increase in the Co or Ni concentration hardly changes the thermal hysteresis of the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) compounds. However, the Curie temperature decreases slowly as a function of the Co or Ni content, while it increases dramatically for increasing B concentration. Hence, the co-substitution of Fe and P by Co (Ni) and B, respectively, offers a new control parameter to adjust the Curie temperature and reduce the thermal hysteresis of the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) materials.

1. Introduction

The magnetocaloric effect (MCE), which was first described in 1917 by Weiss and Piccard [1,2], corresponds to the change in temperature when a magnetic field is changed under adiabatic conditions or the change in entropy when the field is changed under isothermal conditions. From a thermodynamic point of view, the isothermal magnetic entropy change Δ S m and the adiabatic temperature change Δ T a d are two characteristic parameters to evaluate the MCE of a magnetic material. Δ S m is a measure of how much heat can be transported (at a given temperature) by magnetic means, while Δ T a d is a measure of how big the temperature difference is that can be achieved in the transfer of the heat to and from the heat transfer fluid [3]. In other words, Δ S m determines the cooling capacity, and Δ T a d is directly associated with the driving force of heat transfer and thus determines the cycle frequency. Hence, to evaluate the MCE adequately, both Δ S m and Δ T a d need to be taken into account.
Magnetic materials that show a giant MCE have drawn widespread attention in the recent past due to their potential applications for room-temperature magnetic refrigeration [3,4]. Compared to the conventional vapour-compression refrigeration, this cooling technology promises a 25% higher energy efficiency and does not use dangerous and environmentally unfriendly refrigerants such as ozone depleting chemicals (e.g., chlorofluorocarbons (CFCs)), hazardous chemicals (e.g., ammonia (NH 3 )) or greenhouse gases (e.g., hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs) and hydrochlorofluorocarbons (HCFCs)) [3,5,6]. This makes magnetic refrigeration one of the most promising technologies to replace vapour-compression refrigeration in the near future.
Materials displaying a first-order magnetic transition (FOMT) near room temperature are promising candidates for magnetic refrigeration because these materials show a larger magnetocaloric effect (MCE) than those showing a second-order magnetic transition. In second order magnetic phase transitions, the existence of short-range order and spin fluctuations above the Curie temperature ( T C ) brings about a reduction in the maximum possible ∂ M ∂ T B value, and the maximum MCE is thus reduced accordingly. In contrast, a first-order magnetic phase transition ideally occurs at a certain temperature (the transition temperature, T t ) and then the ∂ M ∂ T B value should be theoretically infinitely large. Until now, the reported materials with a large MCE near room temperature are: Gd 5 (Si,Ge) 4 [7]; Mn(As,Sb) [8,9]; (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,X) with X = As, Ge, Si [10,11,12]; LaFe 13 − x Si x and its hydrides [13,14,15]; (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si,B) [16]; (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si,N) [17], NiMn-based Heusler alloys [18], FeRh [19]; MnCoGeB x [20]; MnCoGe 1 − x Ga x [21]; and MnCo 1 − x Fe x Si [22]. Among all above candidates for solid-state refrigerants, the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si)-based materials are some of the most promising because they provide optimal conditions for practical applications (large MCE, low cost starting materials, and environmental benefits). (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si)-based materials crystallize in the hexagonal Fe 2 P-type structure (space group P-62m). In this structure, there are two specific metallic and non-metallic sites. For 3d transition metals, Mn preferentially occupies the 3g site at the pyramidal (x 2 , 0, 1/2) position, while Fe preferentially occupies the 3f site at the tetrahedral (x 1 , 0, 0) position. The non-metal elements P and Si occupy the 1b site at the (0, 0, 1/2) position and the 2c site at the (1/3, 1/3, 0) position with weakly preferred occupation of Si on the 2c site [23].
From an application point of view, (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si)-based materials need to have a very small hysteresis that should at least be smaller than their adiabatic temperature change ( Δ T a d ) and have a continuously tunable T C close to the working temperature, so that they can be used as a feasible magnetic refrigerant material. Since the discovery of the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) system, much effort has been put into tuning the Curie temperature ( T C ) and reducing the thermal hysteresis ( Δ T h y s ) without losing the giant MCE by varying the Mn/Fe and/or P/Si ratio [24], by substituting Mn and Fe by other transition metal and rare earths [25] or by substituting P or Si by B [26,27]. It has been found that boron substitution leads to an enhanced mechanical stability and a significant decrease in thermal hysteresis without losing the giant MCE [27,28]. The substitution of either P or Si by B leads to a strong increase in T C , which complicates tuning T C by varying the boron content. In principle, one can keep the boron content constant and vary the Mn/Fe and/or P/Si ratio to tune T C . However, the adjustment of the Mn/Fe and/or P/Si ratio often leads to either a decrease in the magnetization or an increase in the Δ T h y s , which is undesired for magnetic refrigeration. Hence, tuning T C , while maintaining a thermal hysteresis as small as possible, is an essential step to practical magnetic refrigeration applications. It has recently been reported that the Co (Ni) substitution for either Mn or Fe lowers the Curie temperature and potentially reduces the thermal hysteresis [25,29,30]. Thus, co-doping of Co (Ni) and B in the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) system is expected to combine the positive effect of B substitution on improving the mechanical stability and reducing the thermal hysteresis, while T C can be tuned more easily than for sole B doping.
In this work, we show that it is possible to reduce the thermal hysteresis and tune T C , while keeping a large MCE and good mechanical stability in (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) compounds by Co(Ni) and B co-doping.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z Compounds

The influence of Co and B co-doping on the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si)-based materials was first investigated in a batch of samples with a fixed Co concentration. Figure 1 shows the X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns measured at 400 K (a temperature at which all the compounds are in the paramagnetic state) of Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds, with a nominal composition of z = 0.00, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06. All samples were found to crystallize in the hexagonal Fe 2 P-type structure (space group P-62m), indicating that the Co and B co-doping do not affect the Fe 2 P phase formation. A small amount of (Mn,Fe) 3 Si impurity phases (less than 5%), as often observed in this material system, is detected. The unit-cell volume decreases linearly for increasing B concentrations (about −0.23 Å 3 /at. % B), which is in good agreement with the results reported by Guillou et al. [27] for the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si,B) system. Similar to the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si,B) system, the lattice parameter a decreases, while the lattice parameter c increases, leading to a decrease in the c / a ratio with increasing B content, as shown in Figure 2.
The temperature dependence of the magnetization ( M − T curve) measured in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z series is shown in Figure 3. It is found that the Curie temperature ( T C ) of the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds increases rapidly for increasing B concentrations, which is consistent with the evolution of the c / a ratio. Strikingly, there is a significant decrease in the thermal hysteresis when z increases. For the z = 0.00 and 0.02 samples, the magnetic transitions display a large thermal hysteresis, which is a clear signal for a first-order magnetic transition. Nevertheless, for the z = 0.04 and 0.06 samples, the magnetic transitions are close to the border between a first-order and a second-order magnetic transition, which is supported by a broad transition and a very small (or even not experimentally observable) thermal hysteresis. The corresponding values of the thermal hysteresis for z = 0.00, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06 are Δ T h y s = 30.0, 17.0, 1.5, and 0.0 K, respectively. The average decrease in thermal hysteresis by B substitution is about 7 K/at. % B.
As can be seen in Figure 4, the lower and broader peak in the specific heat curves at T C indicate that the magnetic transition of the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds changes gradually from a first-order to a second-order magnetic transition for increasing z. Moreover, there is a decrease in the latent heat as a function of the boron content. The corresponding latent heat values obtained by the integration of the curves in a zero field for z = 0.00, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06 are 10.1, 8.0, 5.4 and 3.5 kJkg − 1 , respectively. From the above behavior, it is clear that an increase in the boron content weakens the first-order magnetic transition.
To evaluate the MCE of the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compound, the isofield magnetization M B (T) curves are measured in the vicinity of T C . The M B (T) curves have been used (instead of the isothermal magnetization M T (B) curves) to calculate the isothermal magnetic entropy change ( Δ S m ) because the application of the Maxwell equation on the M B (T) curves is expected to prevent the so-called “spike” caused by a phase co-existence [31,32]. The isofield M B (T) curves are first measured in the field upon cooling and then upon heating with a rate of 2 Kmin − 1 . For the calculation of Δ S m , only the data recorded upon cooling are used. Figure 5a shows Δ S m as a function of temperature in a field change of 1 and 2 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compound. The absolute values of Δ S m are 7.3 and 10.7 Jkg − 1 K − 1 for a field change of 1 and 2 T, respectively. The low value of the latent heat positively contributes to the large field dependence of the Curie temperature of d T C d B = 5.18 KT − 1 found in the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compound.
To obtain additional information on the nature of the phase transition, an Arrot plot (see Figure 5b) has been derived from the magnetic measurements in the vicinity of T C . The S-shaped magnetization curve confirms the presence of a first-order magnetic transition for this sample.
The magnetic field dependence of the magnetization of the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds with z = 0.00, 0.02, 0.04 and 0.06 at T = 5 K is shown in Figure 6. It is found that there is a slight decrease in the saturation magnetization ( M s ) for increasing z (about −0.04 μ B /f.u. at. % B).

2.2. Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04

The results in Section 2.1 indicate that the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compound, which shows a large isothermal entropy change and a small thermal hysteresis, is a very promising candidate for room-temperature magnetic refrigeration. Hence, a batch of samples based on a variation in the cobalt content Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 was prepared with the aim of tuning T C without losing the giant MCE or increasing Δ T h y s in the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) system.
The evolution of the lattice parameters and unit-cell volume as a function of temperature for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 is presented in Figure 7. The most prominent feature is the abrupt jump in the lattice parameters at the ferro to paramagnetic phase transition. This confirms the existence of a first-order magneto-elastic transition (FOMET). Three main features can be noticed for the influence of Co and B co-doping. First, the lattice parameter a decreases, while c increases, both in the ferromagnetic (FM) state and in the paramagnetic (PM) state for an increasing Co content. Second, the combined evolution of a and c results in an increase in the c / a ratio, both in the FM state and in the PM state. Finally, there is a very small volume change at the magnetic transition for these samples because the a and c parameters change in the opposite direction. It is worth noting that, similar to the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si,B) system, there is no noticeable Δ V at the FOMET ( Δ V / V < 0.05%). Guillou et al. [26] established that the absence of a unit-cell volume change at the transition improves the mechanical stability in the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si,B) system in comparison to the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) compounds. The Co and B co-doping still takes advantage of the strong impact of the B substitution to provide an enhanced mechanical stability.
Figure 8 shows the M-T curves measured in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 series. Consistent with the results reported by Huliyageqi et al. [30], it is found that an increase in the Co concentration lowers the Curie temperature, while the Δ T h y s value is retained to be very small ( Δ T h y s = 1–2 K) with a sharp transition at T C . The corresponding values of T C obtained from the heating curves for z = 0.07, 0.09, 0.11 and 0.13 are 316, 304, 295 and 272 K, respectively. Hence, keeping the B content constant and varying the Co content provides a handle to tune T C in a broad range around room temperature, while maintaining a very small thermal hysteresis. The variations in T C , Δ S m , Δ T h y s as a function of Co content for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds are summarized in Table 1.
Although Co and B co-doping leads to a partial loss of magnetic transition sharpness compared to (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si)-based materials, the Δ S m derived from the isofield magnetization curves, presented in Figure 9, is still comparable to those reported for giant-MCE materials like (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si,B) [26], Gd 5 Si 2 Ge 2 , Heusler alloys and La(Fe,Si) 13 H y [6]. The peak values, which are weakly depending on the Co content, are in the range of 5–9 and 9–12 JK − 1 kg − 1 for a field change of 1 and 2 T, respectively.
The adiabatic temperature change obtained from the direct measurements on the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds is shown in Figure 10. For a field change of 1.1 T, the Δ T a d of the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 powder samples varies from 1.8 to 2.0 K, which is comparable or slightly higher than those of the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si)-based materials [33]. It should be noted that we used powder samples rather than bulk samples for these direct measurements, which leads to a potential underestimation of the adiabatic temperature change due to lower thermal conductance between the sample and the thermocouple. In other words, the real values of Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds should be higher. Interestingly, there is hardly any change in the saturation magnetization (M s ) for increasing Co content. Therefore, when combining a fixed B concentration with varying the Co content, the size of the magnetic moments and the thermal hysteresis of (Mn,Fe,Co) 2 (P,Si,B)-based materials are retained, while keeping a large MCE in a wide range of working temperatures.

2.3. Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04

The experimental results in Section 2.2 show that co-doping of Co and B in the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) system offers a new control parameter to tune T C while keeping a small thermal hysteresis and preserving the positive effect of boron addition on the mechanical stability. However, Co is quite expensive, which affects fabrication costs, one of the most important factors for commercial applications. Hence, it is desirable to find another element that can replace Co, without any significant effect on both MCE and mechanical properties in (Mn,Fe,Co) 2 (P,Si,B) compounds, in order to lower fabrication costs. The experimental results from Wada et al. [25] show that the substitution of Fe by Ni in the (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) system has the same effect as Co substitution on both the Curie temperature and the thermal hysteresis. Moreover, Ni is three times cheaper than Co [34]. This suggests that Ni is an ideal choice to replace Co in the (Mn,Fe,Co) 2 (P,Si,B) system.
The XRD patterns of Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds with z = 0.06, 0.08, 0.10 and 0.12 shown in Figure 11 indicate that the co-substitution of Fe by Ni and P by B does not change the crystal structure. All of the samples crystallize in the hexagonal Fe 2 P-type structure (space group P-62m). The structure refinement results show that an increase in the Ni content leads to an increase in the c / a ratio resulting in a lower T C .
The magnetization versus temperature curves of the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds upon cooling and heating in an applied field of 1 T shown in Figure 12 indicate that all of the samples have sharp first-order magnetic transitions around T C . Similar to Co doping, an increase in Ni concentration leads to a decrease in T C , which is consistent with the results reported by Wada et al. [25]. It is worth noting that the change in Ni content does not significantly affect the thermal hysteresis. While T C amounts to 308, 298, 289 and 265 K for the samples with z = 0.06, 0.08, 0.10 and 0.12, respectively, the thermal hysteresis remains constant at 1–2 K.
Figure 13 shows Δ S m of the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds in a field change of 1 and 2 T. The Δ S m was derived from the isofield magnetization curves using the Maxwell relation. The peak values, which are weakly depending on the Ni content, are in the range of 6–8 and 9–13 JK − 1 kg − 1 for a field change of 1 and 2 T, respectively. Compared to the Co and B co-doping system, the isothermal magnetic entropy change of Ni and B co-doping system is slightly lower.
The adiabatic temperature change Δ T a d derived from the direct measurements is shown in Figure 14. For a field change of 1.1 T, the Δ T a d varies from 1.7 to 1.9 K. The Δ T a d (T) of Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 powder is comparable or slightly lower than that of Co and B co-doping samples. Hence, along with Co and B co doping, co-doping of Ni and B also offers an additional control parameter to tune T C and adjust the thermal hysteresis while maintaining a large MCE and improving mechanical properties in (Mn,Fe) 2 (P,Si) compounds. This makes the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds also very promising for room-temperature magnetic refrigeration.

3. Materials and Methods

Three series of samples were prepared in the same way: high-energy ball milling first followed by solid-state sintering. In the first series, a variation of the boron content was applied for Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z . In the second series, a variation of the cobalt content was applied for Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 . In the last series, a variation of the nickel content was applied for Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 . Stoichiometric quantities of the starting materials Mn, Fe, Co, red P, B and Si powders were ground in a planetary ball mill for 10 h with a constant rotation speed of 380 rpm. The planetary ball mill Fritsch Pulverisette (Fritsch International, Rudolstadt, Germany) with the grinding jars and ball made of tungsten carbide (7 balls with a diameter of 10 mm per jar) has been used to prepared all samples. The milled powders were compacted into small tablets (with a diameter of 12 mm and a height of 5–10 mm) with a pressure of 150 kgfcm − 2 . After pressing, the tablets were sealed in quartz ampoules under 200 mbar of Ar before employing the double-step sintering described in Ref. [35] and quenching into water. It is worth noting that all samples have good mechanical stability, which was supported by the absence of cracking after cooling the samples in liquid nitrogen.
The XRD data of all samples were collected at various temperatures in a PANalytical X-pert Pro diffractometer (Panalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) equipped with an Anton Paar TTK450 low-temperature chamber (Panalytical, Almelo, The Netherlands) using Cu-K α radiation and were refined using the Fullprof program [36]. A differential scanning calorimeter (DSC) equipped with a liquid nitrogen cooling system was used to measure the specific heat. Magnetic measurements were carried out in a Superconducting Quantum Interference Device (SQUID) magnetometer (MPMS XL, Quantum Design International, San Diego, CA, USA).
Direct measurements of the adiabatic temperature change Δ T a d for powder samples were performed in a home-built experimental setup, which is designed to track the temperature of the magnetocaloric materials during magnetization and demagnetization processes while the surrounding temperature is slowly scanned over the temperature range of interest. For the direct measurements, a thermocouple was put in the middle of the sample holder, which is a small pylon-shaped plastic cup. Then, the sample holder was filled with the sample. Kapok was put on top of the powder to compress the powder, which helps increase the heat contact of the sample with the thermocouple. Finally, the sample holder was covered by a plastic cap. During the measurements, the sample holders moved in and out a magnetic field generated by two permanent magnets at a frequency of 0.1 Hz. The temperature sweep rate of a climate chamber, which regulated the surrounding temperature, was about 0.5–1.5 K/min. This is relatively low with respect to the d T / d t related to the response time of the thermocouple (about 150 K/min). Hence, this set-up can be considered as operating under quasi-adiabatic conditions [37].
To ensure the reproducibility of the measurements, the measurements were carried out upon warming and cooling three times. Only the last warming and cooling Δ T a d (T) curves are presented in this work.

4. Conclusions

(Mn,Fe,Co) 2 (P,Si,B)-based and (Mn,Fe,Ni) 2 (P,Si,B)-based materials were prepared by high-energy ball milling and solid-state reaction. The effect of the co-substitution of Fe by Co or Ni and P by B on T C , Δ T h y s and the MCE has been studied systematically by XRD, DSC, and magnetic and direct temperature change measurements. The experimental results show that, by Co (Ni) and B co-doping, the thermal hysteresis is tunable to very small values (or even not experimentally observable) while maintaining a large MCE in a wide temperature range around room temperature. T C can be tuned from 272 to 316 K and from 265 to 308 K by varying Co content and Ni content, respectively. Therefore, co-substitution of Fe by Co (Ni) and P by B is found to be a promising approach to tune the Curie temperature, while keeping the thermal hysteresis as small as possible, maintaining a giant MCE and improving the mechanical stability in the (MnFe) 2 (P,Si) system. This makes (Mn,Fe,Co) 2 (P,Si,B) and (Mn,Fe,Ni) 2 (P,Si,B) compounds highly promising for near room-temperature magnetic refrigeration. In other words, Co-B and Ni-B co-doping offers new control parameters to bring practical magnetic cooling near room temperature a step closer.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge Anton J.E. Lefering, Bert Zwart and Reinier Siertsema for their technical assistance. This work is a part of an industrial partnership program IPP I28 of the Dutch Foundation for Fundamental Research on Matter (FOM), co-financed by the BASF New Business.

Author Contributions

The experiments were conceived by Niels Harmen van Dijk, Ekkes Brück and Nguyen Van Thang. Nguyen Van Thang performed the experiments and wrote the manuscript with the support of Niels Harmen van Dijk and Ekkes Brück. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations were used in this manuscript:
MCEMagnetocaloric effect
Δ S m Isothermal magnetic entropy change
Δ T a d Adiabatic temperature change
FOMTFirst-order magnetic transition
T C Curie temperature
XRDX-ray diffraction
DSCDifferential scanning calorimeter
SQUIDSuperconducting quantum interference device
Δ T h y s Thermal hysteresis
FOMETFirst-order magneto-elastic transition
FMFerromagnetic
PMParamagnetic

References

  1. Weiss, P.; Picard, A. Le phènomène magnètocalorique. J. Phys. Theor. Appl. 1917, 7, 103–109. (In French) [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Smith, A. Who discovered the magnetocaloric effect? Eur. Phys. J. H 2013, 38, 507–517. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Smith, A.; Bahl, C.R.; Bjørk, R.; Engelbrecht, K.; Nielsen, K.K.; Pryds, N. Materials Challenges for High Performance Magnetocaloric Refrigeration Devices. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 1288–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Franco, V.; Blázquez, J.; Ingale, B.; Conde, A. The Magnetocaloric Effect and Magnetic Refrigeration Near Room Temperature: Materials and Models. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2012, 42, 305–342. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tishin, A.M.; Spichkin, Y.I. The Magnetocaloric Effect and Its Applications; Institue of Physics Publishing: Bristol, UK, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  6. Gschneidner, K., Jr.; Pecharsky, V.; Tsokol, A. Recent developments in magnetocaloric materials. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2005, 68, 1479–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A. Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in Gd5(Si2Ge2). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 4494–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wada, H.; Tanabe, Y. Giant magnetocaloric effect of MnAs1−xSbx. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 79, 3302–3304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wada, H.; Morikawa, T.; Taniguchi, K.; Shibata, T.; Yamada, Y.; Akishige, Y. Giant magnetocaloric effect of MnAs1−x Sbx in the vicinity of first-order magnetic transition. Phys. B Condens. Matter 2003, 328, 114–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Tegus, O.; Brück, E.; Buschow, K.H.J.; de Boer, F.R. Transition-metal-based magnetic refrigerants for room-temperature applications. Nature 2002, 415, 150–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Trung, N.T.; Ou, Z.Q.; Gortenmulder, T.J.; Tegus, O.; Buschow, K.H.J.; Brück, E. Tunable thermal hysteresis in MnFe(P,Ge) compounds. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2009, 94, 102513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Cam Thanh, D.T.; Brück, E.; Trung, N.T.; Klaasse, J.C.P.; Buschow, K.H.J.; Ou, Z.Q.; Tegus, O.; Caron, L. Structure, magnetism, and magnetocaloric properties of MnFeP1−xSix compounds. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 103, 07B318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hu, F.; Shen, B.; Sun, J.; Cheng, Z.; Rao, G.; Zhang, X. Influence of negative lattice expansion and metamagnetic transition on magnetic entropy change in the compound LaFe11.4Si1.6. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2001, 78, 3675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, F.X.; Ilyn, M.; Tishin, A.M.; Sun, J.R.; Wang, G.J.; Chen, Y.F.; Wang, F.; Cheng, Z.H.; Shen, B.G. Direct measurements of magnetocaloric effect in the first-order system LaFe11.7Si1.3. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 93, 5503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Fujita, A.; Fujieda, S.; Hasegawa, Y.; Fukamichi, K. Itinerant-electron metamagnetic transition and large magnetocaloric effects in La(FexSi1−x)13 compounds and their hydrides. Phys. Rev. B 2003, 67, 104416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Guillou, F.; Yibole, H.; Porcari, G.; Zhang, L.; van Dijk, N.H.; Brück, E. Magnetocaloric effect, cyclability and coefficient of refrigerant performance in the MnFe(P,Si,B) system. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 063903. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Thang, N.; Miao, X.; van Dijk, N.; Brück, E. Structural and magnetocaloric properties of (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) materials with added nitrogen. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 670, 123–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Liu, J.; Gottschall, T.; Skokov, K.P.; Moore, J.D.; Gutfleisch, O. Giant magnetocaloric effect driven by structural transitions. Nat. Mater. 2012, 11, 620–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Nikitin, S.A.; Myalikgulyev, G.; Tishin, A.M.; Annaorazov, M.P.; Asatryan, K.A.; Tyurin, A.L. The magnetocaloric effect in Fe49Rh51 compound. Phys. Lett. A 1990, 148, 363–366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Quintana-Nedelcos, A.; Sánchez Llamazares, J.; Flores-Zuñiga, H. On the magnetostructural transition in MnCoGeBx alloy ribbons. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 644, 1003–1008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, D.; Nie, Z.; Wang, Z.; Huang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Wang, Y.D. Giant magnetocaloric effect in MnCoGe with minimal Ga substitution. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 387, 107–110. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Chen, J.; Wei, Z.; Liu, E.; Qi, X.; Wang, W.; Wu, G. Structural and magnetic properties of MnCo1−xFexSi alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2015, 387, 159–164. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Miao, X.F.; Caron, L.; Roy, P.; Dung, N.H.; Zhang, L.; Kockelmann, W.A.; de Groot, R.A.; van Dijk, N.H.; Brück, E. Tuning the phase transition in transition-metal-based magnetocaloric compounds. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 174429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Dung, N. Moment Formation and Giant Magnetocaloric Effects in Hexagonal Mn-Fe-P-Si Compounds. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  25. Wada, H.; Takahara, T.; Katagiri, K.; Ohnishi, T.; Soejima, K.; Yamashita, K. Recent progress of magnetocaloric effect and magnetic refrigerant materials of Mn compounds (invited). J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 172606. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Guillou, F.; Porcari, G.; Yibole, H.; van Dijk, N.; Brück, E. Taming the first-order transition in giant magnetocaloric materials. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2671–2675. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  27. Guillou, F.; Yibole, H.; van Dijk, N.; Brück, E. Effect of boron substitution on the ferromagnetic transition of MnFe0.95P2/3Si1/3. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 632, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guillou, F.; Yibole, H.; van Dijk, N.; Zhang, L.; Hardy, V.; Brück, E. About the mechanical stability of MnFe(P,Si,B) giant-magnetocaloric materials. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 617, 569–574. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Ou, Z. Magnetic Structure and Phase Formation of Magnetocaloric Mn-Fe-P-X Compounds. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  30. Huliyageqi, B.; Geng, Y.X.; Li, Y.J.; Tegus, O. A significant reduction of hysteresis in MnFe(P,Si) compounds. J. Korean Phys. Soc. 2013, 63, 525–528. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Tocado, L.; Palacios, E.; Burriel, R. Entropy determinations and magnetocaloric parameters in systems with first-order transitions: Study of MnAs. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 093918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Carvalho, A.M.G.; Coelho, A.; von Ranke, P.; Alves, C. The isothermal variation of the entropy (ΔST) may be miscalculated from magnetization isotherms in some cases: MnAs and Gd5Ge2Si2 compounds as examples. J. Alloys Compd. 2011, 509, 3452–3456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yibole, H.; Guillou, F.; Zhang, L.; van Dijk, N.H.; Brück, E. Direct measurement of the magnetocaloric effect in MnFe(P, X) (X = As, Ge, Si) materials. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2014, 47, 075002. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Commodity and Metal Prices. Available online: http://www.infomine.com/investment/metal-prices/ (accessed on 20 December 2016).
  35. Dung, N.H.; Zhang, L.; Ou, Z.Q.; Zhao, L.; van Eijck, L.; Mulders, A.M.; Avdeev, M.; Suard, E.; van Dijk, N.H.; Brück, E. High/low-moment phase transition in hexagonal Mn-Fe-P-Si compounds. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 045134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. The FullProf Suite. Available online: http://www.ill.eu/sites/fullprof/index.html (accessed on 20 December 2016).
  37. Yibole, H. Nature of the First-Order Magnetic Phase Transition in Giant-Magnetocaloric Materials. Ph.D. Thesis, TU Delft, Delft, The Netherlands, 2016. [Google Scholar]
Materials 10 00014 g001 550
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns measured at 400 K (T > T C ) for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds.
Figure 1. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns measured at 400 K (T > T C ) for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds.
Materials 10 00014 g001
Materials 10 00014 g002 550
Figure 2. Lattice parameters a (a) and c (b), the c / a ratio (c) and the unit-cell volume V (d) obtained from XRD measurements at 400 K as a function of the boron content for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds.
Figure 2. Lattice parameters a (a) and c (b), the c / a ratio (c) and the unit-cell volume V (d) obtained from XRD measurements at 400 K as a function of the boron content for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds.
Materials 10 00014 g002
Materials 10 00014 g003 550
Figure 3. Magnetization as a function of temperature measured on heating and cooling in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds. The temperature sweep rate is 2 K/min.
Figure 3. Magnetization as a function of temperature measured on heating and cooling in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds. The temperature sweep rate is 2 K/min.
Materials 10 00014 g003
Materials 10 00014 g004 550
Figure 4. Specific heat derived from Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds measured in the zero field upon cooling and heating.
Figure 4. Specific heat derived from Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) measurements for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds measured in the zero field upon cooling and heating.
Materials 10 00014 g004
Materials 10 00014 g005 550
Figure 5. (a) Magnetic entropy change ( Δ S m ) as a function of temperature for a field change of 1 T (black markers) and 2 T (red markers); (b) Arrot plots derived from isofield M B (T) curves measured upon cooling in the vicinity of T C for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compound.
Figure 5. (a) Magnetic entropy change ( Δ S m ) as a function of temperature for a field change of 1 T (black markers) and 2 T (red markers); (b) Arrot plots derived from isofield M B (T) curves measured upon cooling in the vicinity of T C for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compound.
Materials 10 00014 g005
Materials 10 00014 g006 550
Figure 6. Field dependence of the magnetization of Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds measured at a temperature of 5 K.
Figure 6. Field dependence of the magnetization of Mn 1.00 Fe 0.85 Co 0.10 P 0.55 − z Si 0.45 B z compounds measured at a temperature of 5 K.
Materials 10 00014 g006
Materials 10 00014 g007 550
Figure 7. Temperature dependence of the lattice parameters a (a) and c (b), the c / a ratio (c) and the unit-cell volume V (d) for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds with z = 0.07, 0.09, 0.11 and 0.13, derived from XRD patterns measured upon heating.
Figure 7. Temperature dependence of the lattice parameters a (a) and c (b), the c / a ratio (c) and the unit-cell volume V (d) for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds with z = 0.07, 0.09, 0.11 and 0.13, derived from XRD patterns measured upon heating.
Materials 10 00014 g007
Materials 10 00014 g008 550
Figure 8. Magnetization as a function of temperature measured on heating and cooling in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds. The temperature sweep rate is 2 K/min.
Figure 8. Magnetization as a function of temperature measured on heating and cooling in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds. The temperature sweep rate is 2 K/min.
Materials 10 00014 g008
Materials 10 00014 g009 550
Figure 9. Magnetic entropy change as a function of temperature for a field change of 1 T (lower curve) and 2 T (upper curve) derived from isofield M B (T) curves measured upon cooling in the vicinity of T C for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
Figure 9. Magnetic entropy change as a function of temperature for a field change of 1 T (lower curve) and 2 T (upper curve) derived from isofield M B (T) curves measured upon cooling in the vicinity of T C for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
Materials 10 00014 g009
Materials 10 00014 g010 550
Figure 10. Temperature dependence of the adiabatic temperature change obtained by direct measurements for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds in a magnetic field change of Δ B = 1.1 T.
Figure 10. Temperature dependence of the adiabatic temperature change obtained by direct measurements for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds in a magnetic field change of Δ B = 1.1 T.
Materials 10 00014 g010
Materials 10 00014 g011 550
Figure 11. XRD patterns measured at 400 K for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
Figure 11. XRD patterns measured at 400 K for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
Materials 10 00014 g011
Materials 10 00014 g012 550
Figure 12. Magnetization as a function of temperature measured on heating and cooling in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds. The applied sweep rate is 2 K/min.
Figure 12. Magnetization as a function of temperature measured on heating and cooling in a magnetic field of 1 T for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds. The applied sweep rate is 2 K/min.
Materials 10 00014 g012
Materials 10 00014 g013 550
Figure 13. Magnetic entropy change as a function of temperature for a field change of 1 T (lower curve) and 2 T (upper curve) derived from isofield M B (T) curves measured upon cooling in the vicinity of TC for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
Figure 13. Magnetic entropy change as a function of temperature for a field change of 1 T (lower curve) and 2 T (upper curve) derived from isofield M B (T) curves measured upon cooling in the vicinity of TC for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Ni z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
Materials 10 00014 g013
Materials 10 00014 g014 550
Figure 14. Temperature dependence of the adiabatic temperature change obtained by direct measurements for a magnetic field change of Δ B = 1.1 T.
Figure 14. Temperature dependence of the adiabatic temperature change obtained by direct measurements for a magnetic field change of Δ B = 1.1 T.
Materials 10 00014 g014
Table
Table 1. Curie temperature ( T C ) derived from the magnetization curves measured on heating, the isothermal entropy change ( Δ S m ) derived from the isofield magnetization curves in a field change of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 T, thermal hysteresis ( Δ T h y s ) derived from the magnetization curves measured in 1 T upon cooling and heating for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
Table 1. Curie temperature ( T C ) derived from the magnetization curves measured on heating, the isothermal entropy change ( Δ S m ) derived from the isofield magnetization curves in a field change of 0.5, 1.0, 1.5 and 2.0 T, thermal hysteresis ( Δ T h y s ) derived from the magnetization curves measured in 1 T upon cooling and heating for the Mn 1.00 Fe 0.95 − z Co z P 0.51 Si 0.45 B 0.04 compounds.
z T C Δ S m (JK − 1 kg − 1 ) Δ T hys (K)
Δ B = 0.5 T Δ B = 1.0 T Δ B = 1.5 T Δ B = 2.0 T
0.073162.75.36.88.11.3
0.093045.09.110.711.91.7
0.112953.77.710.011.42.5
0.132727.79.210.611.51.9

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Thang, N.V.; Dijk, N.H.v.; Brück, E. Tuneable Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) Materials by Co-B and Ni-B Co-Doping. Materials 2017, 10, 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010014

AMA Style

Thang NV, Dijk NHv, Brück E. Tuneable Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) Materials by Co-B and Ni-B Co-Doping. Materials. 2017; 10(1):14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010014

Chicago/Turabian Style

Thang, Nguyen Van, Niels Harmen van Dijk, and Ekkes Brück. 2017. "Tuneable Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) Materials by Co-B and Ni-B Co-Doping" Materials 10, no. 1: 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010014

APA Style

Thang, N. V., Dijk, N. H. v., & Brück, E. (2017). Tuneable Giant Magnetocaloric Effect in (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) Materials by Co-B and Ni-B Co-Doping. Materials, 10(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10010014

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop