Next Article in Journal
Synthesis and Properties of Carbon Nanotube-Grafted Silica Nanoarchitecture-Reinforced Poly(Lactic Acid)
Next Article in Special Issue
Low-Concentration Indium Doping in Solution-Processed Zinc Oxide Films for Thin-Film Transistors
Previous Article in Journal
First Principles Study of Adsorption of Hydrogen on Typical Alloying Elements and Inclusions in Molten 2219 Al Alloy
Previous Article in Special Issue
Thin-Film Coated Plastic Wrap for Food Packaging
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Synthesis and Characterization of Gelatin-Based Crosslinkers for the Fabrication of Superabsorbent Hydrogels

by
Penphitcha Amonpattaratkit
1,
Sureerat Khunmanee
1,
Dong Hyun Kim
2 and
Hansoo Park
1,*
1
Department of Integrative Engineering, Chung-Ang University, Seoul 156756, Korea
2
Korea Institute of Industrial Technology, Gyeonggi 15588, Korea
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2017, 10(7), 826; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070826
Submission received: 30 May 2017 / Revised: 30 June 2017 / Accepted: 10 July 2017 / Published: 19 July 2017
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Selected Papers from IEEE ICASI 2017)

Abstract

:
In this work, crosslinkers were prepared by conjugating high- and low-molecular-weight gelatin with different mole ratios of itaconic acid (IA) with double bonds. Then, the gelatin-itaconic acid (gelatin-IA) crosslinkers were compared with the gelatin-methacrylate (gelatin-MA) crosslinkers. The molecular weights and structures of gelatin-MA and gelatin-IA were confirmed using gel permeation chromatography (GPC) and nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR). Additionally, the swelling ratio and biodegradation properties of the hydrogels using IA as starting monomers and gelatin-IA and gelatin-MA as crosslinkers were investigated. Both hydrogels prepared with high and low molecular weights of gelatin-IA showed higher swelling ratios than those prepared with the gelatin-MA. The results also showed that absorbent hydrogels with different biodegradabilities and swelling ratios could be prepared by changing the ratio of the gelatin-based crosslinkers.

1. Introduction

Hydrogels are crosslinked networks of hydrophilic polymers that can swell in water and gain much higher masses. The physical and biochemical properties of hydrogels are largely dependent on their compositions, polymerization methods, and crosslinking density [1,2]. Moreover, superabsorbent hydrogels have been widely applied in many fields such as agriculture, drug-delivery systems, and hygienic products. Recently, natural (e.g., starch, cellulose, and gelatin) hydrogels have attracted much interest for alleviating environmental pollution [1]. Among them, gelatin derived from denatured collagen has been widely used in the food industry as an emulsifier, gelling and water retention agent, and in drug delivery because of its non-toxicity, storage stability, and cost-effectiveness [3,4,5].
Particularly, gelatin methacrylate (gelatin-MA), formed by incorporating methacrylate groups into the amine-containing side group of gelatin, has been investigated as a useful crosslinker for the preparation of network materials forming hydrogel systems in biomedical applications due to their biocompatibilities and natural cell binding [6,7,8,9]. Nichol and co-workers [7] studied surface and 3D cell binding, cell elongation, and migration properties of gelatin-MA. A photocrosslinkable interpenetration polymer network (IPN) hydrogel based on gelatin-MA and silk fibroin (SF) was fabricated by Xiao et al. [6] via sequential polymerization. Lai et al. prepared gelatin-MA-based hydrogels by adding carboxybetaine methacrylate (CBMA), leading to slower degradation, controlled drug release rate, and low toxicity of gelatin-MA/CBMA [10]. Moreover, gelatin-MA hydrogels have additional advantageous properties such as low cost, ease of production, and predictable degradation [6,7,10,11,12].
Recently, further improvements have been made in gelatin-based crosslinkers producing soft and flexible polymeric materials that can absorb a large amount of saline, water, or other solutions [13]. Itaconic acid (IA) is highly water-soluble due to its carboxylic groups, which may increase the hydrophilic characteristics of the polymer chains into which it is incorporated [14]. The preparation of natural polymers with IA-based hydrogels such as starch-g-acrylamide/itaconic acid, gum-poly(itaconic acid), and gelatin-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-itaconic acid)-based superabsorbent hydrogels have been synthesized [13,14,15]. However, there have been no systematic studies on the effect of the concentration of IA as well as the molecular weight (high (90,000 Da) and low (4800 Da)) of gelatin on a gelatin-based crosslinker (gelatin-IA) for hydrogel formation. In this study, crosslinkers based on high- and low-molecular-weight gelatin were synthesized with various IA ratios and compared with the gelatin-MA crosslinker. The effects of the molecular weight of gelatin and the ratio of MA to IA on the hydrogel characteristics were also investigated.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Characterization of High-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-MA (HGM) and Gelatin-IA (HGI) Crosslinkers and Hydrogels

The effects of high-molecular-weight gelatin-MA (HGM) and gelatin-IA (HGI) crosslinkers were investigated (Table 1). The formation of gelatin-based crosslinkers was confirmed by 1H-NMR. Figure 1 shows the 1H-NMR spectra of HGM (Figure 1a) and HGI (Figure 1b). New signals appeared between 5.2 and 6.0 ppm (A and B) in the spectra of HGM and HGI, indicating the conversion of additional functional groups in the gelatin molecules, demonstrating the successful conjugation of methacrylate and itaconic acid groups to the gelatin molecules. In addition, the disappearance or decrease of the intensity of the lysine methylene (NH2) signal at 2.9 ppm in HGM and HGI was observed after all the lysine residues were reacted, which agreed with the observations of Lai and coworkers [10]. These results suggest that gelatin was successfully modified at the molecular level by the conversion of functional groups [16].
We confirmed the gel formation and shape of the HGM and HGI hydrogels, as shown in Figure 2. The swelling ratio of 9 w/v % HGM and HGI hydrogels demonstrated that HGM hydrogels did not show significant differences depending on the amount of MA incorporated. However, the swelling ratio of HGI hydrogels increased with the amount of IA. We believe that high degrees of grafting would result in a possible increase in the capacity of water absorption, since itaconic acid is a diprotic acid. The highest swelling ratio (38 g/g) was obtained at 750 mM of gelatin-IA. It was also observed that the swelling ratio of HGI hydrogels increased with longer periods of time and reached up to 60 g/g. This may be due to the large amount water diffused into the HGI hydrogels, leading to fast degradation followed by the enhancement of the swelling ratio [17].
The scanning electron microscopy (SEM) results depicted in Figure 3 show that both HGM and HGI hydrogels had interconnected pores. Capillary channels were also observed, which may enable water molecules to enter into the network. This observation is in agreement with that of Hosseinzadeh and coworkers, showing similar hydrogel structures [13]. Interestingly, while the composition of the 9 w/v % of gelatin-MA did not have a great effect on the microstructure of the hydrogels, the composition of gelatin-IA affected their microstructures, correlating directly with the swelling behaviors. It is believed that these pores are the regions of water permeation and interaction of external moieties with the hydrophilic groups of the hydrogels [12,18].
In this work, the percentage of biodegradation (Dt) of HGI750 (which had the highest swelling ratio) and HGM750 (which had the lowest swelling ratio) hydrogels was measured by the continuous biochemical oxygen demand (BOD) test, as shown in Figure 4. The results show that the biodegradation of HGM750 hydrogel was slightly slower than that of the HGI750 hydrogel. This indicates that a higher swelling ratio and porosity increased water absorption, which may be responsible for the increase in the degradation of the samples [19]. However, the difference was not as large as we expected considering the dramatic difference in their swelling ratios. We believe that this could be due to the setup of the biodegradation test. In this experiment, biodegradation was measured by the oxygen consumption of microorganisms, and the water absorption might not affect this degradation rate since the gelatin is extremely biodegradable by microbial enzymes.

2.2. Characterization of High-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-IA (HGI) and Low-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-IA (LGI) Crosslinkers and Hydrogels

Figure 5 shows the 1H-NMR spectra of high- and low-molecular-weight gelatin, HGI and LGI. Signals appeared in the spectra of the gelatin derivatives at 5.2 ppm ≤ δ ≤ 6.0 ppm, which confirms the conjugation of gelatin with IA, as discussed previously.
As shown in Figure 6, the swelling ratio of the LGI hydrogel is slightly higher than that of the HGI hydrogel, which is in agreement with a previous report [20]. Collins and Birkinshaw investigated the effect of hyaluronic acid (HA) and molecular weight on the swelling ratios and degradation properties of hydrogels. It was found that low-molecular-weight HA hydrogel had higher swelling ratios and rapidly degraded after equilibrium water content was reached, compared with high-molecular-weight HA hydrogels. It was also observed that the swelling ratio of gelatin-IA hydrogels increased with increasing amount of IA in both LGI and HGI hydrogels. Interestingly, we observed a decrease in the swelling ratio of LGI hydrogels. This could be explained by the fact that the polymer chain in LGI hydrogels were dissolved and washed away after degradation, while the polymer chains still remained as part of the main chain for HGI hydrogels after degradation.
In addition, the effect of various compositions of HGI and LGI hydrogels on their microstructures and swelling behaviors were studied, as shown in Figure 7. It was found that the microstructure of LGI hydrogels is similar to the microstructure of HGI and HGM hydrogels [13,18].
A comparison of the high and low molecular weights of HGI and LGI in terms of their biodegradation properties is shown in Figure 8. Biodegradation slightly increased with increasing amounts of itaconic acid. The degradation of the hydrogels was apparent as a loss of physical coherence and identity in the swelling medium [20]. In addition, the biodegradation of LGI was slightly higher than that of HGI. We also found only a small difference in the degradation rate between LGI and HGI hydrogels, which was consistent with previous experiments. After the formation of the gelatin-IA network, the molecular weight of gelatin had no significant effect on the microstructure and biodegradation of the gelatin-IA hydrogels, but it did affect the swelling ratio.

3. Materials and Methods

3.1. Fabrication of High-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-MA (HGM) and Gelatin-IA (HGI), and Low-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-IA (LGI) Crosslinkers

Gelatin (Type A, 300 bloom from porcine skin, ~90,000 Da), methacrylic anhydride (MA), itaconic acid (IA), N,N,N’,N’-tetramethylethylenediamine (NHS), initiator ammonium persulfate (APS), and terminator N,N,N′,N′-tetramethylethylenediamine (TEMED) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (St. Louis, MO, USA). 1-ethyl-3-(3-dimethylaminopropyl) carbodiimide hydrochloride (EDC) was purchased from Thermo Scientific (Rockford, USA). For gelatin hydrolysis, a 5 w/v % gelatin solution was prepared at room temperature. Its pH value was adjusted to pH 8 with 0.5 M NaOH. Afterwards, the solution was placed in a water bath maintained at 80 °C and stirred for 4.5 h. The mixture was dialyzed for 3 days against distilled water at room temperature. The molecular weight of the gelatin after hydrolysis (~4800 Da) was investigated by gel permeation chromatography (GPC).
High- and low-molecular-weight gelatins (HG and LG) were mixed into a Dulbecco’s phosphate buffered saline (DPBS; Hyclone) solution at 60 °C and stirred for 2 h until complete dissolution. MA was added dropwise, and IA was added with EDC and NHS for gelatin-MA and gelatin-IA preparation, respectively, under an Ar atmosphere with vigorous stirring. The different compositions used for the synthesis are shown in Table 1. After 5 h, additional DPBS was added at 60 °C for 15 min to terminate the reaction. The mixture was dialyzed for 1 week against distilled water at 40 °C (for gelatin-MA) and room temperature (for gelatin-IA) to remove salt and unreacted MA and IA. The solutions were stored at −80 °C until frozen and then lyophilized for 48 h to form a white porous foam.

3.2. Fabrication of HGM, HGI, and LGI Hydrogels

For hydrogel preparation, 9 w/v % of the dried gelatin-MA and gelatin-IA crosslinkers were mixed into DPBS at 37 °C in a water bath until fully dissolved to prepare gelatin-MA and gelatin-IA solutions. APS (initiator), IA (monomer), and TEMED (terminator) solutions (0.3 M) were also prepared with DPBS. Finally, the hydrogel was lyophilized for 48 h.

3.3. Characterization of HGM, HGI, and LGI Crosslinkers and Hydrogels

The functional groups of gelatin-MA and gelatin-IA were identified by nuclear magnetic resonance (1H-NMR, Varian, Palo Alto, CA, USA). 1H-NMR spectra were collected at 35 °C in deuterium oxide (Sigma-Aldrich) at a frequency of 600 MHz. The microstructures of gelatin-MA and gelatin-IA hydrogels were investigated by SEM. Dried hydrogel samples were coated with platinum and imaged in an SEM instrument (Hitachi S-3400N, Tokyo, Japan). For swelling measurements, gelatin-MA and gelatin-IA hydrogels were immersed in distilled water and allowed to soak for 1, 2, 4, 6, 8, 10, 24, 96, 168, 336, and 504 h at room temperature. The swelling ratio was calculated according to Equation (1):
Swelling ratio = Ws − Wd/Wd
where Wd and Ws are the weights of the dry and swollen hydrogels, respectively.
For the biodegradation test, the percentage biodegradation (Dt) of high-molecular-weight gelatin-MA (HGM) and high- and low-molecular-weight gelatin-IA (HGI and LGI) hydrogels was investigated for 1, 4, 7, 14, and 21 days according to ISO 14851:1999. First, a microorganism solution was prepared by mixing solid solution diluted with standard media 5 v/v %. After that, air was supplied by an air pump and oxygen concentration was checked for saturation at ~8.3 mg/L by a dissolved oxygen meter. Each hydrogel, after freeze-drying (1 g), was mixed with 200 mL of microorganism solution in a BOD bottle. All sample bottles were kept in an incubator at 25 °C and spun at 100 rpm. After that the oxygen concentration of sample was checked every 1, 4, 7, 14, and 21 days. Moreover, after the measurement ay day 7, re-aerated solutions with saturated oxygen concentrations were added to the bottles.
Percentage biodegradation (Dt) was calculated as the ratio of specific biochemical oxygen demand (BODs) to the theoretical oxygen demand (ThOD), using Equation (2):
Dt = BODs/ThOD × 100
The ThOD (mg/mg) of a substance CcHhClclNnSsPpNanaOo of relative molecular mass Mr can be calculated using Equation (3):
ThOD = 16[2c + 0.5 (h-cl-3n) + 3s + 2.5p + 0.5na − o]/Mr
The BODs were calculated using Equation (4):
BODs = Ur × Oc
where Ur and Oc are the relative oxygen uptake and total oxygen capacity, respectively.
Determination of the Ur measured in the aqueous phase in each bottle was performed using Equation (5):
Ur = CBr − Ct/Cs
where CBr, Ct, and Cs are the dissolved-oxygen concentrations (mg/L) after incubation at time t in the blank bottles and each test bottle, and the saturation value for dissolved oxygen (8.3 mg/L), respectively.
Determination of the Oc of a bottle from the maximum oxygen was performed using Equation (6):
Oc = (0.28 × Vg) + (0.009 × Vl)
where Vg and Vl are the volume of gas and liquid in an incubation bottle (mL), respectively.

4. Conclusions

Gelatin-MA- and gelatin-IA-based hydrogels were synthesized to study the effects of different mole ratios of gelatin:MA and gelatin:IA on the microstructure, swelling, crosslinking behaviors, and biodegradability of the hydrogels. The conjugation of gelatin with MA and IA was confirmed by 1H-NMR. The highest swelling ratio was found for the low-molecular-weight gelatin-IA hydrogel. The swelling ratio of the gelatin-IA hydrogels increased with increasing IA content. Furthermore, a porous structure was found in all the hydrogels. The most biodegradation was recorded for the LGI750 low-molecular-weight gelatin-IA hydrogel.

Acknowledgments

This research was supported by a grant from the Korea Health Technology R & D Project through the Korea Health Industry Development Institute (KHIDI), funded by the Ministry of Health & Welfare, Republic of Korea (grant number: HI15C1744), the Bio&Medical Technology Development Programof the National Research Foundation (NRF) funded by the Ministry of Science, ICT & Future Planning (NRF-2014M3A9D3033887), and Technology Innovation Program (10050526, Development of disposable diaper based on biomass-oriented biodegradable super absorbent polymers) funded by the Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MI, Korea).

Author Contributions

P.A., D.H.K. and H.P. conceived and designed the study; P.A. and S.K. performed the experiments; P.A. and H.P. wrote the paper and analyzed the data. All the authors collaborated on the manuscript’s revision.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yue, K.; Trujillo-de Santiago, G.; Alvarez, M.M.; Tamayol, A.; Annabi, N.; Khademhosseini, A. Synthesis, properties, and biomedical applications of gelatin methacryloyl (GelMA) hydrogels. Biomaterials 2015, 73, 254–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Annabi, N.; Tamayol, A.; Uquillas, J.A.; Akbari, M.; Bertassoni, L.E.; Cha, C.; Camci-Unal, G.; Dokmeci, M.R.; Peppas, N.A.; Khademhosseini, A. 25th anniversary article: Rational design and applications of hydrogels in regenerative medicine. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 85–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Dickinson, E.; Chen, J. Heat-set whey protein emulsion gels: Role of active and inactive filler particles. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 1999, 20, 197–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Young, S.; Wong, M.; Tabata, Y.; Mikos, A.G. Gelatin as a delivery vehicle for the controlled release of bioactive molecules. J. Control. Release 2005, 109, 256–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Kong, Y.; Li, D.; Wang, L.; Adhikari, B. Preparation of gelatin microparticles using water-in-water (w/w) emulsification technique. J. Food Eng. 2011, 103, 9–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Xiao, W.; He, J.; Nichol, J.W.; Wang, L.; Hutson, C.B.; Wang, B.; Du, Y.; Fan, H.; Khademhosseini, A. Synthesis and characterization of photocrosslinkable gelatin and silk fibroin interpenetrating polymer network hydrogels. Acta Biomater. 2011, 7, 2384–2393. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Nichol, J.W.; Koshy, S.; Bae, H.; Hwang, C.M.; Yamanlar, S.; Khademhosseini, A. Cell-laden microengineered gelatin methacrylate hydrogels. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 5536–5544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Aubin, H.; Nichol, J.W.; Hutson, C.B.; Bae, H.; Sieminski, A.L.; Cropek, D.M.; Akhyari, P.; Khademhosseini, A. Directed 3D cell alignment and elongation in microengineered hydrogels. Biomaterials 2010, 31, 6941–6951. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  9. Benton, J.A.; DeForest, C.A.; Vivekanandan, V.; Anseth, K.S. Photocrosslinking of gelatin macromers to synthesize porous hydrogels that promote valvular interstitial cell function. Tissue Eng. Part A 2009, 15, 3221–3230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  10. Lai, T.C.; Yu, J.; Tsai, W.B. Gelatin methacrylate/carboxybetaine methacrylate hydrogels with tunable crosslinking for controlled drug release. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 2304–2313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Begam, T.; Nagpal, A.K.; Singhal, R. A comparative study of swelling properties of hydrogels based on poly (acrylamide-co-methyl methacrylate) containing physical and chemical crosslinks. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2003, 89, 779–786. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mohammad, S.; Heidari, B. Crosslinked graft copolymer of methacrylic acid and gelatin as a novel hydrogel with pH-responsiveness properties. Materials 2011, 4, 543–552. [Google Scholar]
  13. Hosseinzadeh, H.; Abbasian, M.; Hassanzadeh, S. Synthesis, characterization and swelling behavior investigation of gelatin-g-poly(acrylic acid-co-itaconic acid). Iran. Chem. Commun. 2014, 2, 196–208. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lanthonga, P.; Nuisin, R.; Kiatkamjornwong, S. Directional breeding of high itaconic acid yielding strain of aspergillus terreus with a new plate technique. Carbohydr. Polym. 2006, 66, 229–245. [Google Scholar]
  15. Sharma, R.; Kalia, S.; Kaith, B.S.; Kumar, A.; Thakur, P.; Pathania, D.; Srivastava, M.K. Ggum-poly(Itaconic Acid) based superabsorbents via two step free radical aqueous polymerization for environmental and antibacterial applications. J. Polym. Environ. 2016, 24, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Hoch, E.; Hirth, T.; Tovar, G.E.M.; Borchers, K. Chemical tailoring of gelatin to adjust its chemical and physical properties for functional bioprinting. J. Mater. Chem. B 2013, 1, 5675–5685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Wu, C.-S.; Liao, H.-T. A new biodegradable blends prepared from polylactide and hyaluronic acid. Polymer 2005, 46, 10017–10026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Pourjavadi, A.; Jahromi, P.E.; Seidi, F.; Salimi, H. Synthesis and swelling behavior of acrylatedstarch-g-poly (acrylic acid) and acrylatedstarch-g-poly (acrylamide) hydrogels. Carbohydr. Polym. 2010, 79, 933–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Gomes, M.E.; Ribeiro, A.S.; Malafaya, P.B.; Reis, R.L.; Cunha, A.M. A new approach based on injection moulding to produce biodegradable starch-based polymeric scaffolds: Morphology, mechanical and degradation behaviour. Biomaterials 2001, 22, 883–889. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Collins, M.N.; Birkinshaw, C. Investigation of the swelling behavior of crosslinked hyaluronic acid films and hydrogels produced using homogeneous reactions. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2008, 109, 923–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectra of (a) High-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-MA (HGM) and (b) High-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-IA (HGI) crosslinkers.
Figure 1. 1H-NMR spectra of (a) High-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-MA (HGM) and (b) High-Molecular-Weight Gelatin-IA (HGI) crosslinkers.
Materials 10 00826 g001
Figure 2. Swelling ratio (a) and photographs (b) of 9 w/v % of HGM and HGI hydrogels.
Figure 2. Swelling ratio (a) and photographs (b) of 9 w/v % of HGM and HGI hydrogels.
Materials 10 00826 g002
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photograph of 9 w/v % of HGM and HGI hydrogels.
Figure 3. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) photograph of 9 w/v % of HGM and HGI hydrogels.
Materials 10 00826 g003
Figure 4. Percentage of biodegradation of 9 w/v % HGM750 and HGI750 hydrogels.
Figure 4. Percentage of biodegradation of 9 w/v % HGM750 and HGI750 hydrogels.
Materials 10 00826 g004
Figure 5. 1H-NMR spectra of high-molecular-weight gelatin (HG), low-molecular-weight gelatin (LG), HGI, and LGI crosslinker.
Figure 5. 1H-NMR spectra of high-molecular-weight gelatin (HG), low-molecular-weight gelatin (LG), HGI, and LGI crosslinker.
Materials 10 00826 g005
Figure 6. Swelling ratios (a) and photographs (b) of 9 w/v % HGI and LGI hydrogels.
Figure 6. Swelling ratios (a) and photographs (b) of 9 w/v % HGI and LGI hydrogels.
Materials 10 00826 g006
Figure 7. SEM micrograph of 9 w/v % HGI and LGI hydrogels.
Figure 7. SEM micrograph of 9 w/v % HGI and LGI hydrogels.
Materials 10 00826 g007
Figure 8. Percentage of biodegradation of 9 w/v % HGI and LGI hydrogels.
Figure 8. Percentage of biodegradation of 9 w/v % HGI and LGI hydrogels.
Materials 10 00826 g008
Table 1. Compositions with different mole ratios of methacrylic anhydride (MA) and itaconic acid (IA) and high and low molecular weights of gelatin.
Table 1. Compositions with different mole ratios of methacrylic anhydride (MA) and itaconic acid (IA) and high and low molecular weights of gelatin.
AbbreviationMolecular Weight of Gelatin (Da)Amount of MA or IA (mM)Gelatin:MA or IA (Mole Ratio)
HG90,000--
LG4800--
HGM15090,0001501:540
HGM45090,0004501:1620
HGM75090,0007501:2700
HGI15090,0001501:540
HGI45090,000 4501:1620
HGL75090,0007501:2700
LGI15048001501:30
LGI45048004501:90
LGI75048007501:150

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Amonpattaratkit, P.; Khunmanee, S.; Kim, D.H.; Park, H. Synthesis and Characterization of Gelatin-Based Crosslinkers for the Fabrication of Superabsorbent Hydrogels. Materials 2017, 10, 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070826

AMA Style

Amonpattaratkit P, Khunmanee S, Kim DH, Park H. Synthesis and Characterization of Gelatin-Based Crosslinkers for the Fabrication of Superabsorbent Hydrogels. Materials. 2017; 10(7):826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070826

Chicago/Turabian Style

Amonpattaratkit, Penphitcha, Sureerat Khunmanee, Dong Hyun Kim, and Hansoo Park. 2017. "Synthesis and Characterization of Gelatin-Based Crosslinkers for the Fabrication of Superabsorbent Hydrogels" Materials 10, no. 7: 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070826

APA Style

Amonpattaratkit, P., Khunmanee, S., Kim, D. H., & Park, H. (2017). Synthesis and Characterization of Gelatin-Based Crosslinkers for the Fabrication of Superabsorbent Hydrogels. Materials, 10(7), 826. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma10070826

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop