3.1. Fatigue Performance Acording to Concrete Srength
Table 3 arranges the values of the deflection at mid-span, the strains at the center of the upper and lower rebars, and the strain change of the CFRP tendon according to strength of the concrete and measured in each specimen under static load of 100 kN after 1, 1000, 2 million fatigue loading cycles. The increase of the deflection at mid-span following the accumulation of fatigue is seen to be provoked by the concrete creep, the degradation of the material bonding the tendon and concrete, and the plastic deformation of the CFRP tendon [
21,
22]. As shown in
Figure 5, the deflection experienced the largest increase rate below 1000 loading cycles and increased gradually until 100,000 cycles to remain practically constant until 2 million cycles.
The residual strength can be measured using the static loading results listed in
Table 4.
Figure 6a plots the load-deflection curves measured at mid-span. The comparison of the residual strength with respect to the concrete strength reveals that, compared to Control, specimen E-OX-1-30-80% developed yield strength larger by 42% and ultimate strength larger by 51%. Similar observation can also be done for specimen E-OX-1-40-80%.
Figure 6b shows the residual strength of the specimens after fatigue loading. The results are seen to be nearly identical to those obtained in a previous work [
23] in which static loading was applied without preliminary fatigue loading. When static loading is applied without accumulation of fatigue, the load-deflection curve presents three distinct behaviors that are the crack behavior, the yield behavior and the fatigue behavior. However, the load-deflection curve of the specimen which experienced fatigue loading presents two behaviors that are the yield behavior and the fatigue behavior without crack behavior since the specimen has already cracked. This indicates that damage or loss of the performance did practically not occur following the accumulation of fatigue. Moreover, there was no significant difference in the performance developed by the specimens with concrete strength of 30 MPa and 40 MPa. This means that the strengthening effect is not particularly influenced by the accumulation of fatigue nor the concrete strength if sufficient strengthening is secured.
Figure 7 plots the strains measured at the center and quarter lengths of the CFRP tendon under the upper load according to the accumulation of fatigue loading cycle. As shown in
Figure 7a, similarly to the deflection, the strain exhibited its largest increase rate below 1000 loading cycles and increased gradually until 100,000 cycles to remain nearly unchanged until 2 million cycles. The strain at early fatigue would have decreased in occurrence of slip between the epoxy and the tendon [
24] but such behavior cannot be observed here and resembles that of the deflection, which indicates that bond slip did not occur. Recalling that the CFRP tendon is 4800 mm-long, the strains plotted in
Figure 7b were measured at the center (2400 mm) and quarter lengths (1200 mm and 3600 mm). In the graph, the horizontal axis represents the position along the length of the CFRP tendon and the vertical axis represents the strain at upper load after 2 million cycles of fatigue loading. The increase of the strain at the center of the tendon can be clearly distinguished with the increase of the load because the CFRP tendon-concrete bond performance is secured by the epoxy filler. This indicates the absence of bond slip in the anchored ends according to the accumulation of fatigue.
Figure 8 plots the strain of the tendon under static loading. The indicated strain gathers the strain developed during tensioning and the strain developed along the accumulation of fatigue. Both specimens are seen to show similar strains and behavior at failure of the tendon. In addition, the tendon reached its tensile performance before rupture under the loading applied after the compressive failure of concrete. Consequently, the accumulation of the fatigue load appears to have a poor effect on the loss of the performance or tension force of the CFRP tendon.
Figure 9 describes the variation of the strain at mid-span of the beam at upper load according to the accumulation of fatigue loading. The strain in all the specimens experienced steep increase from 1 cycle to 1000 cycles and stabilized gradually until 2 million cycles. In some case, the strain remained unchanged or decreased beyond 1 million cycles.
The ductility of the specimens with respect to the concrete strength is shown in
Figure 10. Here, the ductility is defined as the ratio of the deflection at yielding to that at failure. The ductility of the prestressed NSMR specimens tends to decrease compared to that before strengthening. A previous study reported that the ductility tended to reduce by about 45% when prestressed NSMR is achieved using a CFRP tendon with high bond strength [
18]. This is confirmed here with a decrease of the ductility by 42% for specimen E-OX-1-30-80% and by 40% for specimen E-OX-1-40-80% compared to Control and, indicates that the accumulation of fatigue loading does not affect significantly the ductility.
3.2. Fatigue Performance According to Developed Length of CFRP Tendon
Table 5 arranges the deflection at mid-span, the strain in the upper and lower reinforcements at mid-span and the strain change at the center of the CFRP tendon measured under static load of 100 kN after 1, 1000 and 2 million fatigue cycles and according to the developed length of the CFRP tendon. As shown in
Figure 11, the deflection exhibited the largest increase rate below 1000 cycles, increased gradually until 100,000 cycles and stabilized until 2 million cycles. Compared to Control, the deflection under upper load after 2 million cycles was smaller by 44% for specimen E-OX-1-40-67%, by 37% for specimen E-OX-1-40-80% and by 22% for specimen E-OX-1-40-93%.
Table 6 arranges the results of the static loading test for the residual strength with respect to the developed length of the CFRP tendon. The load-deflection curves at mid-span of the beam members plotted in
Figure 12a show that, compared to Control, specimen E-OX-1-40-67% developed yield load larger by 45% and ultimate load larger by 54% and that specimen E-OX-1-40-80% also developed comparable residual strength. As shown in
Figure 12b, the residual strength after fatigue loading is practically identical to that developed by specimens which were subjected only to static loading. This indicates that the accumulation of fatigue does not provoke any damage nor performance loss of the prestressed NSMR specimens. In addition, the insignificance of the change in the performance developed by the specimens with developed lengths of 67%, 80% and 93% of the CFRP tendon demonstrates that the developed length of the tendon has practically no effect on the strengthening performance given that appropriate tensioning has been secured. However, shear failure would occur due to the increase of inclined cracks if the anchors are installed outside the effective depth d [
3]. This is the case for specimen E-OX-1-40-67% in which the anchors are disposed outside the effective depth d and inclined cracks are seen to occur around the anchor as shown in
Figure 13. Following, an appropriate and sufficient developed length should be secured to prevent the anchor be installed outside the effective depth d.
Figure 14a plots the strains measured at the center and quarter lengths of the CFRP tendon under the upper load according to the accumulation of fatigue loading. Similarly to the deflection behavior, the strain exhibited the largest increase rate below 1000 cycles, increased gradually until 100,000 cycles and stabilized until 2 million cycles. As mentioned above, this indicates that bond slip did not occur at the epoxy-tendon interface. The strains were measured at lengths of 4000 mm, 4800 mm and 5600 mm along the tendon with reference to the center at the same positions listed in
Table 7.
Figure 14b plots the strains at upper load measured after 2 million cycles. Here also, it appears that bond slip did not occur at the anchored ends with respect to the length of the tendon.
Figure 15 presents the strain of the tendon according to the static load. The indicated strains include the strain developed at tensioning and the strain caused by the accumulated fatigue loading. All the three specimens exhibit similar behavior and strain at failure. Moreover, the tendon reached its tensile performance before rupture under the loading applied after the compressive failure of concrete. Accordingly, the accumulation of the fatigue load appears to have poor effect on the loss of the performance like the tension force of the CFRP tendon.
Figure 16 describes the steel and CFRP strain variation at mid-span of the beam members under the upper load according to the accumulation of fatigue loading. The strain in all the specimens is seen to experience the largest increase rate below 1000 cycles, to increase gradually until 100,000 cycles and to stabilize until 2 million cycles. In some case, the strain remained unchanged or decreased beyond 1 million cycles.
Figure 17 shows the ductility of the specimens with respect to the developed length of the CFRP tendon. The ductility appears to have reduced by 44% for specimen E-OX-1-40-67%, by 40% for specimen E-OX-1-40-80% and by 38% for specimen E-OX-1-93% compared to Control. In other words, the ductility increased with longer developed length of the tendon. Therefore, longer developed length of the tendon seems to be favorable for securing stable ductile behavior. Moreover, since the observed ductility complies with that reported in a previous study [
25], it can be stated that the accumulation of fatigue loading has no particular effect on the ductility of the prestressed NSMR specimens with respect to the developed length.