Next Article in Journal
Influence of Electrical Traps on the Current Density Degradation of Inverted Perovskite Solar Cells
Next Article in Special Issue
Loading Graphene Quantum Dots into Optical-Magneto Nanoparticles for Real-Time Tracking In Vivo
Previous Article in Journal
Mechanical Properties and Applications of Recycled Polycarbonate Particle Material Extrusion-Based Additive Manufacturing
Previous Article in Special Issue
Preparation and In Vitro Release of Total Alkaloids from Alstonia Scholaris Leaves Loaded mPEG-PLA Microspheres
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

CO-Releasing Materials: An Emphasis on Therapeutic Implications, as Release and Subsequent Cytotoxicity Are the Part of Therapy

1
Key Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry MOE, School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China
2
Department of Biochemistry, College of Life Sciences, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an 710062, China
3
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Xi’an Jiaotong University, Xi’an 710049, China
4
Institute of Process Engineering, Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 100190, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(10), 1643; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101643
Submission received: 7 April 2019 / Revised: 14 May 2019 / Accepted: 14 May 2019 / Published: 20 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Materials in Drug Release and Drug Delivery Systems)

Abstract

:
The CO-releasing materials (CORMats) are used as substances for producing CO molecules for therapeutic purposes. Carbon monoxide (CO) imparts toxic effects to biological organisms at higher concentration. If this characteristic is utilized in a controlled manner, it can act as a cell-signaling agent for important pathological and pharmacokinetic functions; hence offering many new applications and treatments. Recently, research on therapeutic applications using the CO treatment has gained much attention due to its nontoxic nature, and its injection into the human body using several conjugate systems. Mainly, there are two types of CO insertion techniques into the human body, i.e., direct and indirect CO insertion. Indirect CO insertion offers an advantage of avoiding toxicity as compared to direct CO insertion. For the indirect CO inhalation method, developers are facing certain problems, such as its inability to achieve the specific cellular targets and how to control the dosage of CO. To address these issues, researchers have adopted alternative strategies regarded as CO-releasing molecules (CORMs). CO is covalently attached with metal carbonyl complexes (MCCs), which generate various CORMs such as CORM-1, CORM-2, CORM-3, ALF492, CORM-A1 and ALF186. When these molecules are inserted into the human body, CO is released from these compounds at a controlled rate under certain conditions or/and triggers. Such reactions are helpful in achieving cellular level targets with a controlled release of the CO amount. However on the other hand, CORMs also produce a metal residue (termed as i-CORMs) upon degradation that can initiate harmful toxic activity inside the body. To improve the performance of the CO precursor with the restricted development of i-CORMs, several new CORMats have been developed such as micellization, peptide, vitamins, MOFs, polymerization, nanoparticles, protein, metallodendrimer, nanosheet and nanodiamond, etc. In this review article, we shall describe modern ways of CO administration; focusing primarily on exclusive features of CORM’s tissue accumulations and their toxicities. This report also elaborates on the kinetic profile of the CO gas. The comprehension of developmental phases of CORMats shall be useful for exploring the ideal CO therapeutic drugs in the future of medical sciences.

1. Introduction

Carbon monoxide (CO) is considered harmful due to its toxic behavior since the last century. It has a tasteless, odorless and colorless nature. Its colorless nature allows CO to remain undetectable even at high concentrations and toxic levels, thus marked as the “silent killer” [1,2]. This poisonous CO behavior is exerted due to the formation of carboxy hemoglobin (COHb) along with oxygen present in the mainstream blood circulation. Haldane and Douglas scientifically explored it the first time through dissociation curves of CO-hemoglobin using a constant percentage of CO along with a variable percentage of oxygen at an atmospheric pressure [3,4]. The ubiquitous enzyme, heme oxygenase (HO) has been investigated in most of the biological species. In the middle of the 19th century, two scientists Tenhunen and Schmidt discovered the intracellular CO production by heme oxygenase with an enzyme being the heme catalyst [5,6]. HO is categorized under two isoforms: HO-1 (HMOX1; gene name), with its capability to remain inducible in all cell functions; and HO-2 (HMOX2; gene name), that is constitutively expressed and substantially contained in vasculature and testes [7,8]. HO-1 is identified as an element exclusively found in spleen and liver [9]; however it might be influenced by varying intensity in most biological tissues. Both HO-1 and HO-2 indicate the rate-determining step, drag-out biliverdin from the heme conversion with the CO release and Iron product associated with a tetra pyrrole ring. Biliverdin using biliverdin reductase transforms into bilirubin while generating ferritin quickly from the Iron segregate (Figure 1) [10]. The released amount of CO attaches with the Iron containing objects due to its higher diffusion rate and tendency. It tends to make itself bonded with blood in the circulatory system; and ultimately it is exhaled through lungs. CO causes a common sagginess by bringing affliction for the mammalians, completely dependent on oxygen for the blood transport system and mitochondrial respiration. Collectively, endogenously generated CO is featured in the physiological role. Generally, a low dose of CO gas endures tremendous benefits and can achieve remarkable therapeutic targets.
CO is endogenously produced by either specific enzymes or through gas transmission into a biological system, both types exhibit the physiology and pathophysiology functions through inter- and intra- cellular interactions. The endogenously produced CO also raises their potential as a therapeutic agent. The scientists and researchers are availing this opportunity and spending their time and energies for developing modern drug techniques [11]. Their aim is to explore the modern work with the novelty of this great strategy.

1.1. CO Biological Scope

The CO gas is known for its leading role as a molecular messenger in the physiological process for the nervous system [12] and also for following some important therapeutic treatments [2,13]. It has the potential for anti-inflammatory [14], anti-proliferative [15], anti-atherogenic [16], anti-allodynia [17], anti-nociceptive [18], anti-hyperalgesia [17], and anti-apoptotic [19] effects. It is vital for vasodilatory phenomena reducing intraocular pressure [20], immunosuppressive administrated medications [21] and also has the capability to develop the pathological cellular process (Figure 2) [22]. CO also has many advantages for different biological organs: Organ transplantation [2], protection [23] and preservation; heart [24,25,26]; kidney [23,27,28,29]; liver [30,31]; lungs [32,33]; pancreatic islet [34] and the small intestine [35]. It is helpful to de-escalate the Ischemia/Reperfusion Injury (IRI) [36], mitigate the myocardial infarction and allograft rejection [37], stimulate the cytoprotective [38], and is also involved in anti-microbial [39] and anti-hypertensive activities [40]. It has a modulated utility for heme-dependent proteins like mitochondrial cytochromes and NADPH [28,41]. Moreover, the intercellular CO production by heme oxygenase has proved itself as a valuable reagent [42]. The pharmaceutical dose through endogenous CO enrichment or exogenous direct transformation is flourishing and will be attracted as a therapeutic interest lately.

1.2. CO Therapeutic Ways

Mainly, there are two ways to insert the CO molecules as a therapeutic agent inside the human body, i.e., direct and indirect CO insertion. The direct inhalation has not been preferred, owing to its rise in the COHb level above 10% and lack of tissue selectivity (Figure 3). Moreover, it provides a direct interaction of the CO and lungs only while detainment of CO is also observed in this method. These limitations don’t allow CO to approach other biological organisms for therapy. To overcome these problems, researchers have developed an alternate strategy called “Exogenous Endeavor” for obtaining the required therapeutic actions. In the early 19th century, researchers also recognized the toxic gas NO as the nitro drug having therapeutic impacts. The nitric medications are well demonstrated as nitric oxide-releasing molecules (NORMs), and that established their well reputation afterward CORMs cogitation [43].

1.3. Why Exogenous Endeavor is Required?

The CO-releasing fragment is basically an exogenous endeavor that has opened up the paths for therapeutic treatments (Figure 4). The exogenous stakeholder CO, makes space for searching the affected sites, reaches at the diseased tissue site and makes conflict/collusion with the selected tissues for the destruction of damaged organs or/and diseased cells. If required, the CO-releasing rate can be regulated and modified according to specs. To disintegrate CORMs and CORMats into CO and metal residue, numerous activators are being administratively applied for controlling the CO liberation rate that has already been experienced in Photo-CORMs and Photo-CORMats through Ultra Violet (UV), Visible and NIR light with on/off switching facility [11,46,47,48,49,50]. The photon energy also has a utility to extract CO from its parent organometallic ligand. The main advantage of CO’s exogenous interactions with the mammalian organism is that it reduces the CO moiety to be directly induced into blood streams for maintaining the COHb under allowable serum levels (up to 10%). Without an endogenous CO administration, it is quite challenging to get productive outcomes.

1.4. Clinical Translations

In spite of its hazardous nature, a controlled CO direct inhalation has some therapeutic benefits as well. A clinical trial of controlled CO dosage was conducted on healthy volunteers for temporary paralysis of intestines known as Post-Operative Ileus (POI), and usually every patient is engaged in this POI after surgery of the abdomen. This clinical study revealed that serious POI complications could be significantly reduced if the CO dose (~250 ppm) is inhaled before and after the colon surgery (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT01050712). Another CO clinical translation test also shows a transplantation protection when the CO–saturated medium is provided for harvesting islets as it protects the cell from chronic pancreatitis (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02567240).
This valuable intensive information about the CO therapeutic analysis plays a vital role for all the researchers’ attention. Although there are few unfavorable emblems associated with releasing CO moiety, but recent outcomes of therapeutic potential helps to promote CO as preclinical stems [13]. This novel idea was initiated through clinical and pre-clinical trials for either the direct inhaled therapy [13] or oral intake of CO-releasing substances including CORMs or CORMats, which is a modern result of the professional chemistry enterprise [51].

1.5. Challenges and Demanding Features of CORMs and CORMats

Although CORMs and CORMats have a tremendous therapeutic utility but it also possesses some sort of following limitations for releasing the embedded CO.
  • Availability, solubility and stability of reagents under ambient conditions.
  • Feasibility to release the captured CO from in situ CORM.
  • Controllability to release CO kinetics up to a desired level.
  • Prone to toxicity which arises due to the transition metal foundation of metal-ligand fragments.
The abovementioned fundamentals have been discussed as a prescribed domain while exploring the CO discharge. Considering the CO gas as a therapy treatment based on CORMs and CORMats are easier to control by the transportation of gas molecules rather than the direct CO gas intake. Moreover, the rapid diffusion of these small molecules limits their ability to concentrate in specific tissues. Many challenges also arise during movability of the CO gas molecules by these strategies. Both the carbonyl transition metal and all its degradation products are biologically toxic in nature. Hence, it is difficult to manage the CO discharge with respective biological tissues. Particularly, the release of the CO molecules from CORMs also participates in depositing heavy metal ions inside the human body, which could be harmful for biological organisms.

1.6. Triggers

There are different ways to disintegrate CORMs/CORMats for the release of CO moiety by means of; peculiar physiological conditions [52], trigger by temperature [53], activation by an enzyme [54], pH alteration and increase in reactive oxygen species (ROS) concentration, accessibility to distinct wavelength of light [55,56], either using thermal degradation or ligand exchange/substitution or both [53] and prototypically activation through oxidation mechanism [11,57,58]. In order to deliver the CO molecules at a specified therapeutic rate, it is necessary to characterize the CORMs and CORMats entities, as quantification of such mechanisms might be contingent with its physical conditions like O2, temperature, assay solution and light conditions.

1.7. CO Identifier

The authorized CO identification method consists of the following techniques: Electrochemical assays [59,60], laser infrared absorption [61] and gas chromatography [62]. Moreover, a colorimetric CO sensor facility is an alternative platform, especially for observing the CO behavior in living cellular tissues or/and organs [63,64]. The vibrational spectroscopy technique (such as IR, infrared and Raman) is one of the quickest ways to monitor the CO attached with transition metal through carbonylation at distinctive bond ranges. To date, the plethora method “Myoglobin Assay” famous as “Gold Standard” has been in operation for in vitro interrogation of the CO release from CORMs and CORMats. The “Myoglobin assay” is also a worthy and standard method for observing the behavior of the CO release kinetics in a biological environment and monitors the performed activity of CO (Equation (1)).
Mb + CO → Mb-CO
Recently, It has been observed that binuclear Rhodium compounds, i.e., cis-[Rh2(C6H4PPh2)2(O2CCH3)2](HAc)2] can detect CO with a substantial selectivity and superior sensitivity [65]. The gas-phase IR spectroscopy is the most reliable and high-resolution technique for analyzing the CO release activity. For directly sensing the CO, various gas chromatography (GC) detectors have been introduced to date including the gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) [66], reduction gas detector (GC-RGD) [67] and thermal conductivity detector (GC-TCD). The fluorescent probe has the ability to recognize the CO-release entity even at a low concentration as compared with the myoglobin assay, but it is unable to operate in a short interval kinetic measurement (for that at least one hour interaction is required) [68,69].

1.8. The Development Phases of CORMs Motifs

1.8.1. Metal Carbonyl Complexes (MCCs)

To construct the bonding relation between the CO and low valent metal ions for producing carbonyl complexes (M-CO), the M-CO bonds must undergo an inert ambiance along with reducing conditions, which are mostly feasible in organic solvents. Irrespective of a metal physical state, the CO gas can react and develop the volatile metal carbonyl complexes (MCCs) for example, Ni(CO)4 and Fe(CO)5 [70]. MCC acts as a core entity for organometallic transition chemistry. The general representation for MCCs is [Mm(CO)xLy][Q±]z [53], in which, M, L are the basic entity known as transition metal (B, Cr, Mn, Fe, Co, Mo, Ru, Rh, W, Re, Ir) [71], and ancillary ligand might be the C, O, P, N, S or halide ligand. Furthermore, Q and z represent the counter ion and overall complex charges. If no counter ion is available, then z will be zero. Moreover, m, y, z are calibrated as stoichiometric coefficients and x and m values should be ≥ 1 [53]. Modern and classic complexes can be distinguished by two determining factors: Low oxidation state (OS) or either very low oxidation state (LOS) and total valance electron occupied in the outer coordination sphere. For 4th, 9th, and 10th groups, the compounds were observed to have 16e- configuration and the rest of the complexes were generally observed having 18e- configuration. Each of these commodities must comply with the chemical, biological and physical characteristics of MCCs. Furthermore, it needs to be precisely selected in the configuration of pharmaceutical CORMs [71].
It is important to note that CORM and CORMats are stable in the aqueous medium, and it is also feasible to store it under ambient environmental conditions like the majority of other pharmaceutical drugs. Their circulation must be ensured, as it needs contact both with the diseased and damaged tissues. Moreover, the potent and non-toxic metabolites may be left behind after the CO removal. This is exactly what is required and regarded as therapeutic features. It sets the basic pattern, in the line of action for the development of such challenge-able MCCs. Mostly, during administration MCCs incorporates with the organic solvent and results in traditional oxygen-free atmosphere. These medical conditions might be different from a variety of other biological surroundings, considering that most reactants and their resulting complexes are uncertain under ambient conditions, i.e., oxygen and humidity [71]. Hypothetically, this biological activity of MCCs remains toxic in nature like Ni(CO)4, and (MeCp)Mn(CO)3 (MMT) as an anti-knock gasoline additive [72]. Hence, the common MCCs chemistry can act as a simple guideline for the development of pharmaceutical CORMs. Currently, this research is focused on novel strategies for establishing MCCs-CORM’s activity and specifically for therapeutic purposes.
The above discussion suggested that MCCs when triggered as CORM’s, become a competitor for the CO availability during its decomposition. In organometallic complexes the releasing strategy is as follows: A new incoming ligand (L’) can push itself to a metal center resulting in a new bond, which establishes and influences on the coordination number. The elevated coordination number then promotes it to elongate the M-CO bonds, and eventually it then breaks. Consequently, the CO is liberated by this method and the new L’-M bond is constructed. This information provides the foundations of the CORMs concept. The chemistry of MCCs provides per se different strategies and has an adverse impact on the CO release (Scheme 1) [53].

1.8.2. Proposed Strategies for CORMs Development

CORMs based on metal-to-ligand charge transfers (MLCT) morphology. These CORMs are the elementary motifs with organometallic ingredients; corresponding to a series of MCCs occupied at the transition metal core. Other exclusive features are mentioned below:
  • Structural variance of unique chemistry;
  • Expected divergence with different oxidation states;
  • Covalently bound with the metal center;
  • Assisting alterations for the attached carbonyl ligands;
  • The dynamics of co-ligands binding;
  • Tendency of the outer coordination sphere.
As abovementioned, the spectroscopic nature of MCCs confirms the identification and recognition of significant trace elements like ruthenium [73,74], manganese [49,74,75,76,77,78], iron [37,79], cobalt [80,81], tungsten [82], osmium [83], molybdenum [82] and rhenium [84]. The developed organometallic carbonyl complexes CORMs are CORM-1, CORM-2, CORM-3, CORM-401, ALF492, CORM-A1, B12-ReCORM-2, Re-CORM-1, CORMA-1-PLA and ALF186.
Along with organometallic complexes, the miscellaneous compounds can be nominated as the CORMs family. In this scenario, numerous nonmetallic compounds [85] have been accomplished by entertaining the CO release such as silica-carboxylates [86], borano-carbonates [87], borano-carbamates [88], xanthene carboxylic acid (XCA) [89], unsaturated cyclic diketones (DKs) [90], methylene chloride (MC) [91,92], meso-carboxy BODIPYs [46], hydroxy-flavones [93] (Scheme 2). Furthermore, 1,2-disubstituted ferrocenes belongs to an aldehyde family, unfavorably elicits the toxicity and its slow release mechanism restricts the researchers from developing another nonmetallic CORMs (NCORMs). The main drawbacks of NCORM are potentially a low CO content releasing, and always producing organic molecules along with the CO moiety. Anyhow, NCORM clinical traits have shown their utility to communicate with biological activity [94].

1.9. CORM’s Therapeutic Scope

Strategically, the synthesis route of CORMs development is not the only objective. The main theme of this CORM’s innovation is to obtain the therapeutic advantage eventually. The biological significance of CORM is associated with their bacterial performance in cells lines, (i.e., standard myoglobin assay). The important biological roles of CORMs are listed below (Table 1).

1.10. Solubility

For making CORM acceptable as a pharmaceutical drug in the mammalian biological system, solubility is one of the most prominent factors where the researcher can evaluate the proficiency of the product. Solubility estimates how much CORMs and CORMats are convenient for the practical demonstration. CORM-2 is soluble in DMSO, olive oil and PEG [95,112], while CORM-3 contributes to the water compatibility with a weak acidic nature (pH = 3) [26,37]. Specifically, CORM-A1 possesses the water solubility and stability but it breaks-down immediately after liberating the CO under acidic condition (pH = 11) [87]. CORM-ALF186 can afford the disintegration in the water system and is unstable at an aerobic condition [113] and ALF062 is soluble in methanol and DMSO, while it remains unstable in the air [98,113]. Furthermore, CORM-1 has the compatibility with DMSO and ethanol [114].
Although the CORMs motif is good for releasing the CO moiety, but the tissue selectivity and targeting sites dilemma has reduced its overall biological performance and hence lost its therapeutic significance. Most importantly, the toxicity of organometallic complexes is handled very poorly, so to reduce the toxicity and increase its reactivity, it requires an exploration of all the alternative strategies. Therefore, the researchers have moved from CORMs to CORMats.

2. Research on New CO Transport Materials

As discussed, the MCCs are the admissible and professional class of (soluble) CORMs; however, it has been imperative to examine their probable shortcomings. In fact, a small number of organometallic compounds can be manipulated for pharmaceutical agents predominantly caused by the side-reaction of metals with biological chemical compounds, (e.g., nucleophilic or even electrophilic side chains of proteins) together with the toxicity of several heavy metals. Water-soluble CORMs are approaching the entire body organism and it could accelerate the toxicity against healthy tissues. The spatial and acceptable releasing rate of it into biological tissues/cells is still the utmost challenge. Furthermore, the CO-releasing activity inevitably accumulates a metal and co-ligand fragment, probably takes part in the biological activity as well. This residue (i-CORMs) can be managed through the insoluble framework. On the basis of abovementioned issues and challenges, new and compatible CO transport materials and strategies are emerging in order to get rid of the CO lethal gas dilemma and to convert it into a valuable clinical agent. CORM-1 [115], CORM-2 [116,117], CORM-3 [118] and CORM-A1 [87] have been tested in various disease models to observe their therapeutic effects and to obtain its surprisingly outcomes in typical clinical conditions [2,119]. CORM-3 has good cure-ability for inflammatory disorders like rheumatoid arthritis, osteoarthritis and collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) [97,120,121]. CORM-A1 provides ameliorated course in experimental auto-immune uveoretinitis (EAU) [122], while CORM-2 attenuates the tumor proliferation [123] and a considerable enhancement the coagulation and slow-down of the fibrinolytic bleeding [117,124] and improves survival in the liver injury affected by cecal ligation and perforation (CLP) [116,125]. CORM-3, CORM-2 and ALF-062 corroborates with antimicrobial functions [98,126,127,128,129,130,131]. The CO is encouraging the proliferation of endothelial cells, progenitor cells and regulatory T-cells [34,132,133]. There is still more interrogation required for further improvement to employ practical knowledge. So, the development of the solid CO precursor in tandem with peculiar trigger for releasing the enclosed CO gas commodity is an imperative research motive. To date, due to the unavailability of a safe delivery system for CORM; none of those prescribed formulations could have been employed in humans as a direct dose for respective damaged tissues or disease. Although a few scientific proposals have been presented in that scenario for making CORMs as a clinically viable project, but none of them exhibits the secure transportation material system for the patient’s right choice. All that discussion pursued that the nanoscale and macromolecular carrier system could be exploited to obtain a selected tissue enrichment and proposed mechanism strategy for CORMs delivery (Scheme 3) [134,135].
The clinical trials on CORMs proved that CORMs exhibited the important biological applications, but after CORMs, the degradation metal residue (i-CORMs) also caused toxicity unfortunately [136]. The prohibited i-CORMs activity containment is a big challenge for the researchers. To reduce toxicity and capture the i-CORMs toxic moiety, scientists have explored a strategy known as CORMats. In this strategy, firstly, CO is entrapped inside the CORMats through specific administration, and then upon certain conditions the captured CO is escaped out. Several scaffolds and conjugated formulations have been introduced in this scope and it is still under investigation by compatible conjugate CORM’s such as Ruthenium-MCC (Ru-MCC) and Manganese-MCCs (Mn-MCC) by different nano-transporting services such as Iron MOFs [137,138], peptide [139,140,141,142,143,144], micellization [55,59,145], protein [121,146,147,148,149], vitamins [150,151,152,153], co-polymer systems [47,154,155,156], nanofiber gel [142], inorganic hybrid scaffolds [157,158,159,160] and metallodendrimers [161] (Figure 5). The intrinsic toxicity control of i-CORMats is the top priority for each developed system.

2.1. Micellization

Hubbell et al. engineered the micellization technique as the CO-producer with reduced diffusion; creditably targeted to the distal tissue draining sites [59]. Micelles were synthesized by the tri-block copolymer composed of poly(ornithine acrylamide) block and poly(ethylene glycol) block (hydrophilic nature) hosted by [Ru(CO)3Cl-(ornithinate)] moieties with poly(n-butylacrylamide) block (hydrophobic nature). The CO-releasing micelles consists of a triblock copolymers (Figure 6): A hydrophilic poly(ethylene glycol) (PEG) fragment that stabilizes the micelles; a poly-OrnRu fragment that releases CO. A hydrophobic poly(n-butylacrylamide) fragment drives to construct the micelles forms.
The micelles polymer can be used as a pharmaceutically acceptable carrier to solubilize the poorly soluble drugs and produces the therapeutic effect against the targeting sites. Probably it promotes the reduction in toxic effects of the drugs on normal tissues and organs. Significantly, the toxicity of the Ru(CO)3Cl moiety is well-reduced in the polymer micelle due to the stealth characteristic of the PEG fragment. Moreover, the micelles moderately respond to human monocytes against the lipopolysaccharide (LPS) -induced inflammatory disease model. Importantly, poly(ethylene glycol) attenuates the toxic feature of [Ru(CO)3Cl(amino acidate)] moieties. The addition of cysteine allows the release of CO from an occupied area with a slower rate as compared to [Ru(CO)3Cl(glycinate)] (CORM-3). The release of CO from micelles was tested in a myoglobin assay and it has been found to be slower than CORM-3. The diffusion of the Orn-Ru substrate is facing hindrance in the cells due to the micelles stereoscopic effect. Anyhow, the mechanism approach of CO-releasing is not obvious. It has been evidently proved through experiments that thiol compounds such as cysteine, glutathione and protein are compatible to induce the CO release from micelles.
Hiroshi Maeda et al. incorporated the tricarbonyldichlororuthenium dimer (CORM-2: [RuCl(μ-Cl)(CO)3]2) as water-soluble styrene-maleic acid and copolymer (SMA) while gaining the optimum half-life and numerous therapeutic effects [145]. They established the micellization structure for encapsulating the CORM-2 (SMA/CORM-2) (Figure 7). The micellization has good water solubility and it is compatible with the aqueous environment. The sustain CO kinetic profile performs well in vivo bioactivity such as murine model of inflammatory colitis. The half-life of this complex was almost 35-folds compared with the free CORM-2.
In spite of the ligand exchange CO-release mechanism, photo light is able to disintegrate the CORMats moiety as the CO donor. Robert Igarashi and Yi Liao explored the micelle-based photo-CORMs synthesized by the cyclic α-diketones (α-DK) encapsulation [55]. These CORMs require visible photo light for releasing the embedded CO. This research demonstrates the therapeutic potential of CORMs. The photo-activated micelle CORMs strategy has been explained in Figure 8. During the study of these micelle CORMats on the cell proliferation, it has been found that no difference was monitored in the viability of cells in response to the micelles of DKs.

2.2. Peptide

John reported a self-assembled amphiphilic peptide (PA) that was used to produce the CO [142]. Thereby, a covalent combination of a hydrophobic alkyl chain and a hydrophilic short sequence peptide endures the self-assembled peptide chain material. Amphiphilic peptides can spontaneously release CO and are prone to toxicity themselves. In that perspective they first designed the amphiphilic peptide PA1; which contains a β -aspartate residue to generate the NH2-CH-RCOOH unit closely resembling the CORM-3 fragment. Next, PA1 and [Ru(CO)3Cl2]2 were synthesized in the presence of sodium methoxide at room temperature to synthesize the CO-releasing peptide PA2 (Figure 9). The CO kinetic release curve proved that peptide P2 was synthesized in an aqueous solution like the first-order rate constant of CORM-3. The half-life of the CO released from both sources is quite identical. The half-life of CO released from CORM-3 is 2.14 ± 0.17 min, while the half-life of the CO released peptide P2 is 2.16 ± 0.05 min. In order to increase the half-life of CO released from P2, the incorporation of nanofiber gel PA2 and a strong gel PA was made. The half-life of the CO released from this nanofiber gel was significantly increased (~17.8 min) compared to PA2 and CORM-3 in an aqueous solution.
Rather than encapsulating a mere CO segment inside the transport materials, the CORMs entity incorporates with different functional groups of parent CORM’s ligand commodity. In that scenario, peptide is linked with the Manganese-based Photo-CORM [Mn(CO)3]+ ligand tpm (tris(pyrazolyl)methane) using a Pd-catalyzed based Songashira cross-coupling mechanism and click reaction at N-terminal (azide-) and side-chain (iodoarene-) functionalization [140].
Ulrich Schatzschneider exposed the peptide linkage for the CORMats development [144]. They introduced the Mo-carbonyl [Mo(CO)4(bpyCH3,CHO)] associated with aldehyde functional groups at the peripheral position. The bioactive β -target peptide ligand 2,20-bipyridine (bpy) attached with molybdenum-carbonyl by N-terminal bonds of aminoxy acetic through catalyst-free and bio-orthogonal oxime ligation (Figure 10). The photo-activated CORMats gets activated upon 468 nm photons lights irradiations.
Radacki and Ulrich Schatzschneider jointly synthesized the Manganese carbonyl complexes [Mn(bpeaNHCH2C6H4CHO)(CO)3]PF6 [139]. The peptides ligand 2,2-bis(pyrazolyl)ethylamine (bpea) is bearing aminoxy, azide and N-terminal alkyne residues (Figure 11). The researchers applied the transforming growth factor β-recognizing (TGF-β) peptide sequence for developing the photo-activated delivery agent. This peptide conjugation could be utilized for further development of new CORMats.
The JJ Kodanko group successfully synthesized the ionic water-soluble compound [FeII(CO)(N4Py)] by a method of continuous CO bubbling through a ligand N4Py and one equivalent of FeII(ClO4)2 under the action of the organic solvent acetone (ClO4)2 (Figure 12A) [141]. A myoglobin experiment shows that the compound is stable under dark conditions and its releasing half-life is more than one day. When it was irradiated with 365 nm ultraviolet light, the CO can be quickly released. According to MTT experimental studies, [FeII(CO)(N4Py)](ClO4)2 exhibited the effective cytotoxicity against human prostate cancer cell line (PC-3) under light-induced conditions. When the concentration reaches 10 μM the cell survival rate was monitored as 63% of the control group. In order to further investigate the CO release behavior, the carbonyl segment with acetonitrile was replaced. The UV-vis analysis found that the substitution process is very slow [FeII-(MeCN)(N4Py)]2+ and the concentration of acetonitrile was a quick step to replace CO. Moreover, it was also found that the N4Py ligand can be modified with a peptide (Ac-Ala-Gly-OBn) to obtain a peptide-conjugated photo-induced release molecule (Figure 12B). Biological experiments have showed that the peptide chain conjugation might be evaluated for the improvement of cell-specific itself or tissue-specific CO transport properties.
In the development of Photo-CORMats, metal-coligand plays a vital role in the photoexcitation at a prescribed wavelength. This allows the photons energy to penetrate and push the CO molecules to pull out these molecules from the metal-ligand fragment. In other words, these wavelengths are providing extra energy that enables the CO molecules excitation from its parent location. The CORM-2 and CORM-3 are hydrolytically active. Synthetically, these CORMs could be transformed into the photo-activated reagent. Leone Spiccia and Ulrich Schatzschneider described the ruthenium (II) dicarbonyl complexes functionalized with 2-(2-pyridyl)pyrimidine-4-carboxylic acid (CppH) (Figure 13A) [143]. They were able to successfully construct the monomeric PNA backbone with ruthenium (II) di-carbonyl complexes to produce ruthenium (II) dicarbonyl dichloride-based PNA-like monomer [RuCl2(Cpp-L-PNA)CO2] (where PNA= peptide nucleic acid) (Figure 13B).

2.3. Proteins

G. J. Bernardes et al. disclosed that CORMs was compatible with the protein complexes transportation (Figure 14) [121]. They presented that the RuII(CO)2-protein complexes using the reaction between CORM-3 and histidine fragment at the protein surface, the spontaneous CO is released to deliver in cells and mice. They also discussed that plasma protein acts as a CO carrier for in vivo by the CORM-3 formulation. Therapeutically, the controlled CO release favors in downregulation of the cytokines interleukin, i.e., IL-6 and IL-10.
Another Ruthenium (II) carbonyl reagent cis-[Ru(CO)2(H2O)4]2+ has been reported for the spontaneous CO release in live cells using histidine (His) metalloprotein and retained at IL-8 (Figure 15a) [148]. The cis-[Ru(CO)2]2+ carbonyl segment could be produced by aqua dirutheniumcarbonyl cis-[Ru(CO)2(H2O)4]2+ (Figure 15b). It was also explained that metalloproteins can be modified as organometallic pro-drugs rather than catalysis. Such artificial metallohydrolase performance can be compared with the human carbonic anhydrase (CA)-II.
In spite of the CORMs fragment incorporation with protein, Takafumi Ueno et al. explored the cages of protein for CO releasing [149]. They administrated the ferritin (Fr) cage of protein for capturing the CORM-3 moiety (Figure 16). Furthermore, it was observed that the half-life of the CO release could be enhanced; which indicates a good sign for ideal drug development. When they interrogated their performance at the biological sites, they described that the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) becomes 10-times higher than the parent CORM-3. The CORM-3 protein cage is quite a unique way of CORM’s engineering.
Additionally, Takafumi Ueno et al. explored the immobilization of the crosslinked hen egg white lysozyme CL-HEWL crystal deposit on MCCs for therapeutic purposes [146]. The scientist disclosed that NF-κB is remarkably high in order to respond to the pathological signals. The extra scaffold Ruthenium carbonyl moiety (Ru·CL-HEWL), was used to induce the NF-κB activation and immobilized Ruthenium carbonyl [cis-Ru(CO)2X4]2- moieties inside the protein cage (Ru·CL-HEWL). Optimist approaches of this transport service bear the potential of the artificial extracellular scaffold.
NF-κB can be regulated by the protein fragment. Susumu Kitagawa et al. disclosed the crystalline assembly of protein with CORM-2 in polyhedra crystals (PhC) [147]. They introduced the ruthenium carbonyls immobilized on hexahistidine. The activation of NF-κB was significantly improved up to six folds. This therapeutic research will lead to further investigation on the extracellular scaffold.

2.4. Vitamins

Anna Yu. Bogdanovab et al. presented the cyanocobalamin (B12) as a biocompatible B12-ReII(CO)2 scaffold for CORMats (Figure 17) [150]. They incorporated the cis-trans-[ReII(CO)2Br2]0 core having 17e- dicarbonyl complexes. This research also elaborated that ReCORM-1 is compatible with B12 for pharmaceutical applications, and the obtained cobalamin conjugates are also feasible with aqueous aerobic media. Interestingly, after CO releasing, metal degradation is not involved in toxicity due to the exclusive configuration and metal oxidation of ReO4- generation.
The most promising anticancer drug agent is a macromolecular conjugate. The HO-1 and transcription factor Nrf2 are the prime parameters to provide resistance against inflammation and oxidative stress disease. In this analogy, biliverdin is the enzymatic activity of HO-1, while CO directs the therapeutic exploitation. Roberta Foresti et al. found that hybrid molecules were simultaneously involved in the CO liberation and Nrf2 activation [151]. The newly developed CORMats termed as hybrid-CORMats (HY-CORMats) is shown in Figure 18.
After synthesizing the HY-CORMats, researchers further interrogated the biological activities and described the HO-1 expression along with the nuclear accumulation of Nrf2 and showed viability in different cell types (Scheme 4).
A. Pamplona’s group coordinated the galactose with a central metal to synthesize a polyhydric-containing water-soluble CORMats [RuCl2-thiogalacto-pyranoside(CO)3] (ALF492) through Sulphur bond (Figure 19) [152]. The Sulphur bond coordination of the galactose ligand with the central metal increases the water solubility and biocompatibility. This compound also exhibited the appropriate drug-like properties. The presence of the galactose ligand increases the specificity of liver glycoprotein. A myoglobin study was used to monitor the CO release kinetic profile. The target selectivity of ALF492 can be well administrated. Significantly, when ALF492 is mixed with the antimalarial drug artesunate, ALF492 responds to the effective adjuvant treatment for cerebral malaria. Collectively, this marks the outstanding potential of ALF492 in the treatment of falciparum malaria.
The CC Romao group synthesized the molybdenum-based water-soluble release molecule Mo(CO)3(CNCR’R"CO2H)3 (R’=R"=H, ALF795) (R’=R"=CH3, ALF794) (Figure 20) [153]. Myoglobin experiments have shown that compounds were stable and did not decompose in an aerobic aqueous solution for at least 1 hr. ALF794 is less toxic and suitable for drug-like properties. It can deliver CO to acetamido phenol-induced liver in mice with acute liver failure. After 5 min, intravenous injection, the ratio of ALF794 in liver/blood and liver/kidney were reported at 5.27 and 12.58, respectively and ALF795 liver/blood and liver/kidney ratios were observed at 0.33 and 0.50, respectively.

2.5. Polymers

The aforementioned most promising anticancer drug agent is a macromolecular conjugate. Ruth Duncan et al. reported for the first time a polymer-anticancer conjugate [154]. These macromolecular drugs consist of at least three (3) parts: One is a polymer carrier (HPMA), which transports metal organic drugs such as Mn(CO)3 light-induced CORMs; the second is a biodegradable polymer drug connector; the third is an anti-tumor agent. The Bruckmann and Kunz groups reported that N-(2-hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide (HPMA) and pentacarbonyl bromide were heated under the re-flux of a dry acetone solution to obtain a copolymer P1 at high yield (Figure 21) [155]. Inducing CORMs can passively transport CO to release metal drugs for tumor cells or sites of inflammation. The polymer conjugate P1 releases CO at 365 nm light, which is not cytotoxic to the HCT116 human colon cancer and HepG2 liver cancer cells.
HPMA-copolymer has a great nature of water solubility. Bernhard Spingler et al. discovered the copolymer materials [156]. The bis(2-pyridylmethyl)benzylamine ligand was prepared from picolyl chloride and benzylamine, then this ligand coordinated with Re(CO)3 moiety to construct the HPMA-co-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-4-vinylbenzylamine copolymers (Figure 22). HPMA-copolymer characteristics such as the average molecular weight can be modified according to the requirement by replacing the radical starter and co-monomers. For instance, the molecular weight 52KDa is the appropriate choice for remarkably enhancing the permeability and retention (EPR) effect. The established copolymer system with the Re(CO)3 fragment has an ability to diagnose the used 99mTc. Moreover, the identical behavior in IR spectra and X-ray crystallography have shown their resemblance in the binding sites of Re(CO)3-labelled copolymer and bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-amine-derived complexes (solid-state structures (SSS) of ·CH2Cl2 and·CH2Cl2·H2O). HPMA-morphology can be efficient for targeting the tumor sites for the EPR effect.
Not only solvent exchange triggers complexes have been reported but photons energy has also been explored in this research area. Pierri et al. have shown that the water-soluble photo-CORM can be controlled through NIR photons energy. They utilized the amphiphilic polymer for encapsulating the Photo-CORM trans-Mn(bpy)(PPh3)(CO2)2 (Figure 23) [47]. Since CO has a strong ligand field (L.F), so its absorption bands lies in higher energy zone almost closer to the UV-region [162]. Usually Photo-CORMats belongs to the MCCs family and having CO photolysis-lability from the excited states of LF associated metal-centered [163]. Although the higher MLCT transitions obviate the ligand re-configuration, during the MLCT exhibition, the photolysis might be affected due to π-back-bonding of metal-to-CO configuration [164]. The energy gaps were found between the MLCT and LF excited states. The lower excitation states of MCLT have reduced the ligand lability as compared to LF states [163]. Thus, it is difficult to construct the Photo-induced-CO-release upon NIR or longer visible wavelengths. Up-conversion nanoparticles (UCNPs), (i.e., lanthanide ion doped) have a utility of uncaging from NIR photolysis wavelengths. UCNPs are already claimed as photodynamic therapy [165,166]. Those research analysts firstly developed the polymer matrix UNCPs@PL-PEG (an amphiphilic phospholipid-functionalized poly(ethylene glycol) then used NIR photons energy as a trigger to release the CO segment for biological purposes. PL-PEG shows a remarkable characteristic of water solubility and it has also provided space for incoming other soluble photo-organic CORMs. These organic compounds might be helpful for searching the special physiological targets.

2.6. Metal Organic Frameworks (MOFs-CORMats)

Metzler-Nolte et al. synthesized the hybrid material metal-organic framework as a class of porous coordinated polymer to encapsulate the CO segment. [138]. They established the bio-compatibility with MOFs; NH2-MIL-88B (Fe) and MIL-88B (Fe) by capturing the CO at susceptible FeII and FeIII coordinative unsaturated metal sites (CUSs). Unfavorably, it requires higher activation temperature [167] (≥ 550 K). An adventuring feature of MOF has a breathing effect while providing accommodation for CO at the adjacent site; probably having a controlled CO release, potential through the opening/closing gesture of porous MOF.
Instead, it encapsulates the mere CO segment. The research can also accommodate the CORM’s fragment inside MOFs. A new class of Manganese carbonyl complex Photo-CORMs has been explored from Zr(IV) based MOF. MnBr(bpydc)(CO)3 (bpydc=5,5’-dicarboxylate-2,2’-bipyridine) embedded into Zr(IV) MOFs [137]. This photo-activated commodity has been evaluated into cellular substrates along with the biocompatible polymer matrix, claimed to be controlled and efficient light-induced CO-release. After the successful CO release from CORMats, the inability in containment of metal degradation growth, this leads to scientists being reluctant for the employment of genuine medication. The CO has played its own role effectively; how other body organisms responds remains questionable.

2.7. Porous Structure Materials

Porous structure materials have already been in use for encapsulation of the CORMs commodity for the usage of the CO release. Maldonado, Elisa Barea et al. shared the amazing research work about the organometallic community by embedding the anion porous framework with the exhibition of the cation exchange strategy (Figure 24) [50]. This innovation invigorates under physiological condition while it is triggered by visible light. At first, they developed the air-stable, nontoxic, photoactive and water-soluble cation species CORM [Mn(tacn)(CO)3]+ (ALF472+) then encapsulates into anionic porous matrixes belonging to the inorganic framework. Anionic silica matrix exerts the good administration by reducing the CO release kinetics and providing the control-able rate. The ALF472@hybrid silica-SO3 material might support the on/off switch delivery management, probably experiencing the command and control on the released CO. For ensuring the safety of the CORMats, the process metal degradation fragment was examined for ALF472@MCM-41-SO3 up to 72 h and no significant appearance was reported. This silica framework is providing an 80% CORMs metal fragment containment. In phototherapies, the CO supplied is a provocative feature in the controlled manner, such as many inflammatory skin issues and topical skin cancer treatment.
Although many of the CORMats have been explored for therapeutic purposes, but the lack of biocompatibility and inconvenient features like solubility and toxicity from organometallic compounds, it could not be used as a drug agent. To overcome this dilemma, CORM-1 has been embedded into the nonporous fibers structure poly(L-lactide-co-D/L-lactide). The bioavailability and water accessibility were confidently achieved by photo-activated electro-spinning [111]. Specifically, there was no toxicity observed during the mouse fibroblast 3T3 cells culture. This feature might be promoting the CORMats into viable drug materials in the future.

2.8. Nanaoparticles

Among the CO-carrying support system, nanoparticles are intensely focused because nanoparticles can passively target the malignant cells and actively involve with the targeted tumor cells. Ulrich Schatzschneider et al. open the gateway for the nanoparticles carriers of Silicium dioxide as photoactivatable CORMats [157]. These research analysts, first time synthesized the 3-azidopropane-functionalized SiO2 nanoparticles, followed by [Mn(CO)3(tpm-L1)] in a dimethylamide solution at room temperature. Manganese-based Photo-CORM [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+ whose tpm ligand is linked with Silicium dioxide nanoparticles by CuAAC “click” reaction through construction of the Azido group by emulsion copolymerization of (3-azidopropyl)triethoxysilane and trimethoxymethylsilane at the surface. In this mechanism nanoparticles were functionalized with manganese tricarbonyl as light-induced CORMats (Figure 25). SiO2 nanoparticles are stable in nature with an amazing bio-compatibly and easy to modify at the surface. It means that various target molecules could be incorporated at the surface to achieve the drug delivery objectives. Eventually, it will increase the drug delivery capacity at specific sites. So therefore, reduce the systemic risk. To reduce the side effects of chemotherapy, SiO2 nanoparticles provide the most valuable platform for tumor drug delivery.
In the nanoparticle carrier strategy, Urara Hasegawa et al. introduced the CO-releasing polymeric nanoparticles (CONPs) through phenylboronic acid-catechol complexation of catechol-bearing CO-donor Ru(CO)3Cl(L-DOPA) and phenylboronic acid-containing framboidal nanoparticles. It has been testified in a biological organism and gives feedback to cysteine, and subdues the pro-inflammatory mediator’s IL-6 [168].

2.9. Nanosheets

The encapsulation of CORM’s commodity shows promising features. X. Chen et al. worked out to cage the Manganese-carbonyl CORM inside the small MnCO-graphene oxide (PEG-BPY[MnBr(CO)3]-GO) nanosheet, recruited as a drug carrier trigger by NIR light energy with on-demand CO release for photochemical CORMats [48]. They successfully constructed the novel combinations of the CO-release mechanism but triggered facility provided inconvenience for therapeutic purposes. However, we also need to pay attention to its complete management system, as in some cases big trouble may be faced for its state of being clinically applied or not. Merely an advantage for the CO releasing behavior is not enough, as it will always be difficult to handle it and nearly impossible for remote area patients, thus it raises a concern for being a practically viable medicine or not. Moreover, there might be no concern to what happens to metal degradation and leftover residue, which actually needs to be addressed properly too. Apart from this, how can we provide this medication to the patient using NIR trigging, so its mobility will remain the utmost challenge. In reality, the novel production in terms of its laboratory scale is quite different from its practical application as a cure agent.

2.10. Metallodendrimers

Metallodendrimers has a monodisperse nature with facile preparation. This exclusive feature is demonstrated by Smith et al. to entrepreneur the Photo-CORMats (Figure 26) [161]. For this purpose, Photo-CORM Mn(CO)3 moiety scaffolds with polypyridyl dendritic. The general representation of polypyridyl dendritic is [DAB-PPI-{MnBr(bpyCH3,CH=N)(CO)3}n] (whereas DAB=1,4-diaminobutane, PPI=poly(propyleneimine), bpy=bipyridyl). Photo-activated metallodendritic CORMats has been observed to liberate CO molecules upon 410 nm visible light photons penetration.

2.11. Nanodiamond (ND)

The tpm ligand of Photo-CORM [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+ peptide material and nanoparticle [Mn(CO)3(tpm-L1)] could further be constructed to explore the azide-modified nanodiamond (ND) by CuAAC (copper-catalyzed 1,3-dipolar azide–alkyne cycloaddition) “click” formation as Manganese-MCCs Photo-CORMats (Figure 27) [159]. Dordelmann, G. et al. introduced the first-time CuAAC coupling to attach the CO-liberating agent with ND as a biocompatible supporter. Photoactivatable CORM [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+ retained at the ND’s surface for CO biological services and therapeutic purposes and were evaluated through standard myoglobin assay.
Different CORMats are compatible with special cellular environments and are free to perform their therapeutic activities. Certain conditions restrict CORMats activities; definitely it would directly affect the therapeutic performance. CORMats therapeutic potential relies on the material’s nature such as solubility, compatibility and activation mechanism. Another advantage of CORMats is to modify the CORMats assembly according to respective disease cells, which could be more helpful in searching the selective targets. For cancer treatment, the redirected T-cells, i.e., chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell might be providing a governing principle for cancer therapy [169]. CAR-Tcell is easier to find its own therapeutic targets from the peculiar receptor configuration. This exclusive feature facilitates gene-therapy. Similarly, this morphology can be applied to the CORMats development for special tissue selectivity. Numerous CORMats with their biological significance are described in Table 2.
Briefly if the above intensive research discussion is summarized; it is evident that Ru-MCCs and Mn-MCCs are the right choices for nano-medicine due to bio-compatibility and tremendous prescribed feasibility analysis especially Ru-MCCs due to its lessened toxicity. Scrolling down from micellization to nanodiamond, all CO-prescriptions have CO liberation capability, but none of them could be claimed as safe therapeutic management and can’t be directly applied for exogenous CO-prodrug. During the CORMats administration, rather than focus on the exploration of new advanced materials, the researchers might be considering already existing pharmaceutical materials. A pharmaceutical drug like substance such as crystalline smectite clay; is one of the promising biocompatible and pharmaceutical composites, which could be transformed into CORMats after proper formulation and careful administration. There are two types of strategies that have been introduced for the CORMats production. One is exploiting from the already developed CORMs with biocompatible materials as CO carriers. Another analogy is captured from the CO moiety in the vicinity of material specific akin to MOFs [138]. Already developed CO incorporating strategies are generalized in Table 3.

3. CO-Releasing Kinetic Profile

CORMs and CORMats must have a CO utility to deliver in response to the biological system soon after trigger. The specified trigger plays a decisive role for therapeutic applications. Their kinetics is highly dependent on the trigger facility at which they are applied for. The CO discharging rate was exclusively committed for searching the affected sites of selected targets. The half-life (t1/2) of CORMs/CORMats (t1/2 is defined in time duration as half of the introduced CORMs/CORMats amount will be dis-integrated) is the key parameter for examining the CORMs/CORMats stability and sustainability. The fast CO-releasing rate is difficult to attain predetermined clinical objectives.
Just an illustration [170], the half-life (t1/2) of CORM-3 is 3.6 min only when anticipated with the human plasma. At that moment, CORM-3 dissolves in plasma configuration and suddenly reacting with albumin, supplies CO2 and Ru(CO)2 segment; and also makes an alliance with protein in vivo circulation, where CO serves slowly and nonspecifically [171]. Non-technical CO release is unable to deliver the necessary pharmaceutical features. Likewise slow and fast CO release molecules would be engineered to accommodate the distinct clinical trials (Figure 28).
The half-life of CORM-1 and CORM-2 is about 1 min in PBS (phosphate buffered saline) at 37 temperature with pH~7.4 [37,172]. Such types of half-lives are considered very short intervals. The CORMs and CORMats deliberation must be regulated along with integral body fluids in order to communicate with victim organs and/or tissues before CORMs/CORMats (as CO-producer) consume entire CO quantity [173]. To improve the sustainability of CO carriers, the half-life (t1/2) should be extended for few minutes, but somehow few seconds and milliseconds extension will be more beneficial. A different designated strategy has promoted the transient CO releases. These mechanisms will be observed through ion-channel kinetic studies [174]. The extended pharmacokinetic qualities containing nanomaterials (NPs) and macromolecular models could be exploited for the management of CO transporters or CO carriers.

4. CORMs/CORMats Cytotoxicity and Tissue Accumulation

In addition to CORMs and CORMats pharmaceutical advantages, it delivers some adverse effects too because of their toxicological profile or even proliferation of toxic metal residues (i-CORMs/i-CORMats) resulting soon after CORMs/CORMats launch the CO into the biological environment [95,175,176,177]. Subsequently, a particular deficiency of CORMs/CORMats is usually observed after the CO excretion; their CO-missing analogues tend to prevail in situ administration. Therefore the transition-heavy metal core usually harbors cofactors and is involved in some uncontrolled reactions/activities with neighboring tissues/cells, thereby contributing serious cellular impairment (Figure 29).
Wang et al. studied the in vivo toxicity, cytotoxicity, metabolism and bio-distribution of two carbonyl metal CORMs series including Ru(CO)3ClnL and M(CO)5L (M= Cr, Mo, W) [178]. The cytotoxic effect was monitored on murine macrophages through MTT colorimetric assay with respect to IC50 and LD50 values; the severely damaged kidney and liver were observed to picture both morphological and functional aspects. The cell culture RAW264.7 was incubated with CORMs/CORMats while examining cytotoxicity and demonstrates their bactericidal activity against a variety of microbes, including Staphylococcus aureus, Escherichia coli, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa [126,127]. In this study, they found the uneven distribution of metal complexes in organs and tissues that subsequent damage through metal ions oxidation such as Ruthenium complexes. It was oxidized from RuII to RuIII by P450 enzymes. This toxicity issue was elucidated by Winburn et al., they also performed the CORM’s toxicological profile [179]. CORM-2 and its depleted form i-CORM-2 were studied and compared in two kidney cell lines (MDCK and HeK lines) and primary rat cardiomyocytes. This study explained that the CORM-2 cytoprotective concentration (<20mM) is approaching to cytotoxic value (>100 mM). Moreover, both CORM-2 and i-CORM-2 exerted the cellular toxicity by means of the abnormal cell cytology, cell cycle arrest, reduced cell viability, increased apoptosis and inhibited mitochondrial enzyme activity [136]. These particular consequences were observed through the metal-core mediated toxicity. Different studies have also been explored that intensifying the polarity of CORMs/CORMats would be possibly limiting their penetration over the cellular membrane, and thus attenuating their toxicity [136].

5. Concluding Remarks

CO is generally infamous for its toxicity, but a controlled dose of CO shows useful biological impacts. The CO’s detail analysis exhibits endogenous production by heme oxygenase and explores the therapeutic scope. This scientific study not only confirms the endogenous generation of CO, which has important potential in pathological tissues but also guarantees exogenously released CO’s therapeutic impacts. Therefore, the challenges for the pharmaceutical drug chemists have always been and are continuing still, for the development of a risk-free and more convenient strategy to deliver therapeutic CO dosage. The CO administration with biological system suggests their therapeutic potential. This CO administration relies on MCCs for CO liberation. Thus, CORMats were developed by MCCs with different conjugate/scaffold systems. The CORMats have been covalently assembled with different nanomaterial including polymers, silica nanoparticles, proteins cages, vitamins, metallodendrimer, micelles, nanodiamond and nanofiber gel (peptide amphiphilic) or even incorporated with magnetic nanoparticles (maghemite), tablets, non-woven, or either MOFs for following features: To enhance sustainability and stability; to approach the special cellular tissues/organs; to reduce the toxicity; to attain the EPR- effect; or to permit special triggers facilities. CORM has the capability to deliver the CO to tissues and cells in vivo, in-fact constitute the most appropriate scheme to accomplish the therapeutic outcomes. This proof-of-concept refers to the medicinal chemists to endeavor modern CORMats furnished with ADME (CORMats characteristics: Administration, Distribution, Metabolism, Excretion), prerequisite for the clinical utility. As a prodrug, these developed mechanisms are highly dependent on in vivo performance. It has been worth mentioning that many pharmaceutical materials were also claimed to be non-toxic such as smectite clay that might be transformed into CORMats for promising therapeutic benefits. Probably crystalline smectite clays are the best choice for the CORMats development due to its con-comitant administration. Additionally, their layered structure exfoliations and cation exchange capacity (CEC) have been encouraging for developing the new class of CORMats. Furthermore, it is mandatory to investigate the metal residues (remaining fragments) after CO liberation, if any side effect of newly developed materials is reported should try to minimize it by modern carrier designs. The aim of the controlled CO delivery management was sponsored by tissue selection and distribution. The CORMats activation with different triggers did not permit to develop “universal” CORMats for every disease model. The method of CORMs/CORMats trigger or even CO activation is used to disintegrate the MCCs through photo, thermal, enzyme, pH, oxidation and solvent trigger CORMs/CORMats bearing ligand exchange strategies. These CORMs/CORMats strategies are promising candidates of the therapeutic potential and deserve exclusive attention for thorough therapeutic investigations.
The toxicity of the CO precursor is still a big challenge for the researchers. The CORMs/CORMats toxicity was in-action during and after the CO release with depleted metal residues abbreviated as i-CORMs/CORMats. The fast CO release helps to study the ion-channel path, while the slow release favors tissue targets. It is mandatory that CORMs/i-CORMs and CORMats/i-CORMats (before/after CO release) should not be participating in any toxic activity. Otherwise it will not be possible to prescribe for patients; as the safety of human organs is the utmost priority.
The above discussion confirms that CORMs and CORMats are accountable for the CO-produce being the active ingredient. It should be noted that CORMats did not technically modify specific receptors but only provided a transport and discharge services for the CO gas. Therefore, the therapeutic impacts of CORMats under physiological conditions to employ CO preferentially and professionally against damaged biological tissues/organism must prevail and ensure the quick release of loaded CO upon trigger.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.Z. and Y.W. (Yanyan Wang); Methodology, Y.W. (Yanyan Wang), M.F., Y.H. and W.Z.; Writing —Original Draft Preparation, M.F., H.S., Y.H., N.M., K.N. and Y.W. (Yanyan Wang); Writing —Review and Editing, Y.H., N.M., Y.W. (Ya Wu), W.D., R.L., K.N., W.Z. and M.F.; Supervision, Z.G. and W.Z.; Project Administration, W.Z. and Z.G.

Funding

This research was supported by the grant from National Natural Science Foundation of China (21771122, 21571121), the 111 Project (B14041), the Program for Chang Jiang Scholars and Innovative Research Team in University (IRT_14R33), Key Research and Development Project of Shaanxi Science and Technology Department (2017SF-064).

Acknowledgments

This work was performed within the “211 Project” of Ministry of Education (MOE) China at the Key Laboratory of Applied Surface and Colloid Chemistry with the support of China Scholarship Council program at Shaanxi Normal University, Xi’an, China.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interests regarding the publication of the paper.

References

  1. Pitto-Barry, A.; Lupan, A.; Ellingford, C.; Attia, A.A.A.; Barry, N.P.E. New Class of Hybrid Materials for Detection, Capture, and "On-Demand" Release of Carbon Monoxide. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2018, 10, 13693–13701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Motterlini, R.; Otterbein, L.E. The therapeutic potential of carbon monoxide. Nat. Rev. Drug Discov. 2010, 9, 728–743. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Haldane, J.B.S. Carbon monoxide as a tissue poison. Biochem. J. 1927, 21, 1068–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Douglas, C.G.; Haldane, J.S.; Haldane, J.B.S. The laws of combination of haemoglobin with carbon monoxide and oxygen. J. Physiol. 1912, 44, 275–304. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  5. Tenhunen, R.; Marver, H.S.; Schmid, R. Microsomal heme oxygenase. Characterization of the enzyme. J. Biol. Chem. 1969, 244, 6388–6394. [Google Scholar]
  6. Tenhunen, R.; Marver, H.S.; Schmid, R. The enzymatic conversion of heme to bilirubin by microsomal heme oxygenase. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 1968, 61, 748–755. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kocer, G.; Nasircilar Ulker, S.; Senturk, U.K. The contribution of carbon monoxide to vascular tonus. Microcirculation 2018, 25, e12495. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Peng, J.; Hu, T.; Li, J.; Du, J.; Zhu, K.; Cheng, B.; Li, K. Shepherd’s Purse Polyphenols Exert Its Anti-Inflammatory and Antioxidative Effects Associated with Suppressing MAPK and NF-kappaB Pathways and Heme Oxygenase-1 Activation. Oxidative Med. Cell. Longev. 2019, 2019, 7202695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Dercho, R.A.; Nakatsu, K.; Wong, R.J.; Stevenson, D.K.; Vreman, H.J. Determination of in vivo carbon monoxide production in laboratory animals via exhaled air. J. Pharmacol. Toxicol. Methods 2006, 54, 288–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Heinemann, S.H.; Hoshi, T.; Westerhausen, M.; Schiller, A. Carbon monoxide—Physiology, detection and controlled release. Chem. Commun. 2014, 50, 3644–3660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Yang, S.; Chen, M.; Zhou, L.; Zhang, G.; Gao, Z.; Zhang, W. Photo-activated CO-releasing molecules (PhotoCORMs) of robust sawhorse scaffolds [μ2-OOCR1, η1-NH2CHR2(C=O] OCH3, Ru(I)2CO4]. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 3727–3733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Stupfel, M.; Bouley, G. Physiological and biochemical effects on rats and mice exposed to small concentrations of carbon monoxide for long periods. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 1970, 174, 342–368. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Ling, K.; Men, F.; Wang, W.C.; Zhou, Y.Q.; Zhang, H.W.; Ye, D.W. Carbon Monoxide and Its Controlled Release: Therapeutic Application, Detection, and Development of Carbon Monoxide Releasing Molecules (CORMs). J. Med. Chem. 2018, 61, 2611–2635. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Otterbein, L.E. Carbon monoxide: Innovative anti-inflammatory properties of an age-old gas molecule. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2002, 4, 309–319. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Otterbein, L.E.; Soares, M.P.; Yamashita, K.; Bach, F.H. Heme oxygenase-1: Unleashing the protective properties of heme. Trends Immunol. 2003, 24, 449–455. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zamani, M.; Aleyasin, A.; Fakhrzadeh, H.; Kiavar, M.; Raoufzadeh, S.; Larijani, B.; Mahmoodi, E. Heme Oxigenase 2 Gene Polymorphisms as Genetic Risk Factor in Atherosclerosis in Iranian Patients. Iran. Red Crescent Med. J. 2010, 12, 559–563. [Google Scholar]
  17. Joshi, H.P.; Kim, S.B.; Kim, S.; Kumar, H.; Jo, M.J.; Choi, H.; Kim, J.; Kyung, J.W.; Sohn, S.; Kim, K.T.; et al. Nanocarrier-mediated Delivery of CORM-2 Enhances Anti-allodynic and Anti-hyperalgesic Effects of CORM-2. Mol. Neurobiol. 2019, 56. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Motterlini, R.; Haas, B.; Foresti, R. Emerging concepts on the anti-inflammatory actions of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs). Med. Gas Res. 2012, 2, 28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Al-Huseini, L.M.; Aw Yeang, H.X.; Hamdam, J.M.; Sethu, S.; Alhumeed, N.; Wong, W.; Sathish, J.G. Heme oxygenase-1 regulates dendritic cell function through modulation of p38 MAPK-CREB/ATF1 signaling. J. Biol. Chem. 2014, 289, 16442–16451. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Stagni, E.; Privitera, M.G.; Bucolo, C.; Leggio, G.M.; Motterlini, R.; Drago, F. A water-soluble carbon monoxide-releasing molecule (CORM-3) lowers intraocular pressure in rabbits. Br. J. Ophthalmol. 2009, 93, 254–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Allanson, M.; Reeve, V.E. Ultraviolet A (320-400 nm) modulation of ultraviolet B (290-320 nm)-induced immune suppression is mediated by carbon monoxide. J. Investig. Dermatol. 2005, 124, 644–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Mazzola, S.; Forni, M.; Albertini, M.; Bacci, M.L.; Zannoni, A.; Gentilini, F.; Lavitrano, M.; Bach, F.H.; Otterbein, L.E.; Clement, M.G. Carbon monoxide pretreatment prevents respiratory derangement and ameliorates hyperacute endotoxic shock in pigs. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 2045–2047. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bagul, A.; Hosgood, S.A.; Kaushik, M.; Nicholson, M.L. Carbon monoxide protects against ischemia-reperfusion injury in an experimental model of controlled nonheartbeating donor kidney. Transplantation 2008, 85, 576–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Sato, K.; Balla, J.; Otterbein, L.; Smith, R.N.; Brouard, S.; Lin, Y.; Csizmadia, E.; Sevigny, J.; Robson, S.C.; Vercellotti, G.; et al. Carbon monoxide generated by heme oxygenase-1 suppresses the rejection of mouse-to-rat cardiac transplants. J. Immunol. 2001, 166, 4185–4194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Chen, B.; Guo, L.; Fan, C.; Bolisetty, S.; Joseph, R.; Wright, M.M.; Agarwal, A.; George, J.F. Carbon monoxide rescues heme oxygenase-1-deficient mice from arterial thrombosis in allogeneic aortic transplantation. Am. J. Pathol. 2009, 175, 422–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Clark, J.E.; Naughton, P.; Shurey, S.; Green, C.J.; Johnson, T.R.; Mann, B.E.; Foresti, R.; Motterlini, R. Cardioprotective actions by a water-soluble carbon monoxide-releasing molecule. Circ. Res. 2003, 93, e2–e8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yoshida, J.; Ozaki, K.S.; Nalesnik, M.A.; Ueki, S.; Castillo-Rama, M.; Faleo, G.; Ezzelarab, M.; Nakao, A.; Ekser, B.; Echeverri, G.J.; et al. Ex vivo application of carbon monoxide in UW solution prevents transplant-induced renal ischemia/reperfusion injury in pigs. Am. J. Transplant. 2010, 10, 763–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Sandouka, A.; Fuller, B.J.; Mann, B.E.; Green, C.J.; Foresti, R.; Motterlini, R. Treatment with CO-RMs during cold storage improves renal function at reperfusion. Kidney Int. 2006, 69, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. Nakao, A.; Faleo, G.; Shimizu, H.; Nakahira, K.; Kohmoto, J.; Sugimoto, R.; Choi, A.M.; McCurry, K.R.; Takahashi, T.; Murase, N. Ex vivo carbon monoxide prevents cytochrome P450 degradation and ischemia/reperfusion injury of kidney grafts. Kidney Int. 2008, 74, 1009–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  30. Pizarro, M.D.; Rodriguez, J.V.; Mamprin, M.E.; Fuller, B.J.; Mann, B.E.; Motterlini, R.; Guibert, E.E. Protective effects of a carbon monoxide-releasing molecule (CORM-3) during hepatic cold preservation. Cryobiology 2009, 58, 248–255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  31. Kaizu, T.; Ikeda, A.; Nakao, A.; Tsung, A.; Toyokawa, H.; Ueki, S.; Geller, D.A.; Murase, N. Protection of transplant-induced hepatic ischemia/reperfusion injury with carbon monoxide via MEK/ERK1/2 pathway downregulation. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 294, G236–G244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Kohmoto, J.; Nakao, A.; Sugimoto, R.; Wang, Y.; Zhan, J.; Ueda, H.; McCurry, K.R. Carbon monoxide-saturated preservation solution protects lung grafts from ischemia-reperfusion injury. J. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. 2008, 136, 1067–1075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Minamoto, K.; Harada, H.; Lama, V.N.; Fedarau, M.A.; Pinsky, D.J. Reciprocal regulation of airway rejection by the inducible gas-forming enzymes heme oxygenase and nitric oxide synthase. J. Exp. Med. 2005, 202, 283–294. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Lee, S.S.; Gao, W.; Mazzola, S.; Thomas, M.N.; Csizmadia, E.; Otterbein, L.E.; Bach, F.H.; Wang, H. Heme oxygenase-1, carbon monoxide, and bilirubin induce tolerance in recipients toward islet allografts by modulating T regulatory cells. FASEB J. 2007, 21, 3450–3457. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  35. Nakao, A.; Toyokawa, H.; Tsung, A.; Nalesnik, M.A.; Stolz, D.B.; Kohmoto, J.; Ikeda, A.; Tomiyama, K.; Harada, T.; Takahashi, T.; et al. Ex vivo application of carbon monoxide in University of Wisconsin solution to prevent intestinal cold ischemia/reperfusion injury. Am. J. Transplant. 2006, 6, 2243–2255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Bojakowski, K.; Gaciong, Z.; Grochowiecki, T.; Szmidt, J. Carbon monoxide may reduce ischemia reperfusion injury: A case report of complicated kidney transplantation from a carbon monoxide poisoned donor. Transplant. Proc. 2007, 39, 2928–2929. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Motterlini, R.; Mann, B.E.; Foresti, R. Therapeutic applications of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. Expert Opin. Investig. Drugs 2005, 14, 1305–1318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ryter, S.W.; Choi, A.M. Cytoprotective and anti-inflammatory actions of carbon monoxide in organ injury and sepsis models. Novartis Found. Symp. 2007, 280, 165–175. [Google Scholar]
  39. Nobre, L.S.; Jeremias, H.; Romao, C.C.; Saraiva, L.M. Examining the antimicrobial activity and toxicity to animal cells of different types of CO-releasing molecules. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 1455–1466. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  40. Motterlini, R.; Gonzales, A.; Foresti, R.; Clark, J.E.; Green, C.J.; Winslow, R.M. Heme oxygenase-1-derived carbon monoxide contributes to the suppression of acute hypertensive responses in vivo. Circ. Res. 1998, 83, 568–577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  41. Taille, C.; El-Benna, J.; Lanone, S.; Boczkowski, J.; Motterlini, R. Mitochondrial respiratory chain and NAD(P)H oxidase are targets for the antiproliferative effect of carbon monoxide in human airway smooth muscle. J. Biol. Chem. 2005, 280, 25350–25360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Siow, R.C.; Sato, H.; Mann, G.E. Heme oxygenase-carbon monoxide signalling pathway in atherosclerosis: Anti-atherogenic actions of bilirubin and carbon monoxide? Cardiovasc. Res. 1999, 41, 385–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Crespy, D.; Landfester, K.; Schubert, U.S.; Schiller, A. Potential photoactivated metallopharmaceuticals: From active molecules to supported drugs. Chem. Commun. 2010, 46, 6651–6662. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Otterbein, L.E. The evolution of carbon monoxide into medicine. Respir. Care 2009, 54, 925–932. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Omaye, S.T. Metabolic modulation of carbon monoxide toxicity. Toxicology 2002, 180, 139–150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Palao, E.; Slanina, T.; Muchová, L.; Šolomek, T.; Vítek, L.; Klán, P. Transition-Metal-Free CO-Releasing BODIPY Derivatives Activatable by Visible to NIR Light as Promising Bioactive Molecules. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 126–133. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  47. Pierri, A.E.; Huang, P.J.; Garcia, J.V.; Stanfill, J.G.; Chui, M.; Wu, G.; Zheng, N.; Ford, P.C. A photoCORM nanocarrier for CO release using NIR light. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 2072–2075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  48. He, Q.; Kiesewetter, D.O.; Qu, Y.; Fu, X.; Fan, J.; Huang, P.; Liu, Y.; Zhu, G.; Liu, Y.; Qian, Z.; et al. NIR-Responsive On-Demand Release of CO from Metal Carbonyl-Caged Graphene Oxide Nanomedicine. Adv. Mater. 2015, 27, 6741–6746. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Mede, R.; Hoffmann, P.; Klein, M.; Goerls, H.; Schmitt, M.; Neugebauer, U.; Gessner, G.; Heinemann, S.H.; Popp, J.; Westerhausen, M. A Water-Soluble Mn(CO)3-Based and Non-Toxic PhotoCORM for Administration of Carbon Monoxide Inside of Cells. Z. Anorg. Allg. Chem. 2017, 643, 2057–2062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Carmona, F.J.; Rojas, S.; Sanchez, P.; Jeremias, H.; Marques, A.R.; Romao, C.C.; Choquesillo-Lazarte, D.; Navarro, J.A.; Maldonado, C.R.; Barea, E. Cation Exchange Strategy for the Encapsulation of a Photoactive CO-Releasing Organometallic Molecule into Anionic Porous Frameworks. Inorg. Chem. 2016, 55, 6525–6531. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Foresti, R.; Bani-Hani, M.G.; Motterlini, R. Use of carbon monoxide as a therapeutic agent: Promises and challenges. Intensive Care Med. 2008, 34, 649–658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Kueh, J.T.B.; Stanley, N.J.; Hewitt, R.J.; Woods, L.M.; Larsen, L.; Harrison, J.C.; Rennison, D.; Brimble, M.A.; Sammut, I.A.; Larsen, D.S. Norborn-2-en-7-ones as physiologically-triggered carbon monoxide-releasing prodrugs. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 5454–5459. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Romão, C.C.; Blättler, W.A.; Seixas, J.D.; Bernardes, G.J.L. Developing drug molecules for therapy with carbon monoxide. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2012, 41, 3571–3583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  54. Stamellou, E.; Storz, D.; Botov, S.; Ntasis, E.; Wedel, J.; Sollazzo, S.; Krämer, B.K.; van Son, W.; Seelen, M.; Schmalz, H.G.; et al. Different design of enzyme-triggered CO-releasing molecules (ET-CORMs) reveals quantitative differences in biological activities in terms of toxicity and inflammation. Redox Biol. 2014, 2, 739–748. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  55. Peng, P.; Wang, C.; Shi, Z.; Johns, V.K.; Ma, L.; Oyer, J.; Copik, A.; Igarashi, R.; Liao, Y. Visible-light activatable organic CO-releasing molecules (PhotoCORMs) that simultaneously generate fluorophores. Org. Biomol. Chem. 2013, 11, 6671–6674. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Schatzschneider, U. Photoactivated Biological Activity of Transition-Metal Complexes. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 2010, 1451–1467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Seixas, J.D.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Santos-Silva, T.; Otterbein, L.E.; Gallo, D.J.; Rodrigues, S.S.; Guerreiro, B.H.; Gonçalves, A.M.L.; Penacho, N.; Marques, A.R.; et al. Characterization of a versatile organometallic pro-drug (CORM) for experimental CO based therapeutics. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 5985–5998. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Queiroga, C.S.F.; Vercelli, A.; Vieira, H.L.A. Carbon monoxide and the CNS: Challenges and achievements. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 1533–1545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Hasegawa, U.; van der Vlies, A.J.; Simeoni, E.; Wandrey, C.; Hubbell, J.A. Carbon monoxide-releasing micelles for immunotherapy. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2010, 132, 18273–18280. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Park, S.S.; Kim, J.; Lee, Y. Improved electrochemical microsensor for the real-time simultaneous analysis of endogenous nitric oxide and carbon monoxide generation. Anal. Chem. 2012, 84, 1792–1796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Morimoto, Y.; Durante, W.; Lancaster, D.G.; Klattenhoff, J.; Tittel, F.K. Real-time measurements of endogenous CO production from vascular cells using an ultrasensitive laser sensor. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2001, 280, H483–H488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Marks, G.S.; Vreman, H.J.; McLaughlin, B.E.; Brien, J.F.; Nakatsu, K. Measurement of endogenous carbon monoxide formation in biological systems. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2002, 4, 271–277. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Barbe, J.M.; Canard, G.; Brandes, S.; Guilard, R. Selective chemisorption of carbon monoxide by organic-inorganic hybrid materials incorporating cobalt(III) corroles as sensing components. Chemistry 2007, 13, 2118–2129. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. McLean, S.; Mann, B.E.; Poole, R.K. Sulfite species enhance carbon monoxide release from CO-releasing molecules: Implications for the deoxymyoglobin assay of activity. Anal. Biochem. 2012, 427, 36–40. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Esteban, J.; Ros-Lis, J.V.; Martinez-Manez, R.; Marcos, M.D.; Moragues, M.; Soto, J.; Sancenon, F. Sensitive and selective chromogenic sensing of carbon monoxide by using binuclear rhodium complexes. Angew. Chem. 2010, 49, 4934–4937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Nandi, C.; Debnath, R.; Debroy, P. Intelligent Control Systems for Carbon Monoxide Detection in IoT Environments. In Guide to Ambient Intelligence in the IoT Environment: Principles, Technologies and Applications; Mahmood, Z., Ed.; Springer International Publishing: Cham, Switerzland, 2019; pp. 153–176. [Google Scholar]
  67. Vreman, H.J.; Stevenson, D.K. Heme oxygenase activity as measured by carbon monoxide production. Anal. Biochem. 1988, 168, 31–38. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Yuan, L.; Lin, W.; Tan, L.; Zheng, K.; Huang, W. Lighting up carbon monoxide: Fluorescent probes for monitoring CO in living cells. Angew. Chem. 2013, 52, 1628–1630. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Michel, B.W.; Lippert, A.R.; Chang, C.J. A Reaction-Based Fluorescent Probe for Selective Imaging of Carbon Monoxide in Living Cells Using a Palladium-Mediated Carbonylation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2012, 134, 15668–15671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Bauschlicher, C.W., Jr; Bagus, P.S. The metal–carbonyl bond in Ni(CO)4 and Fe(CO)5: A clear–cut analysis. J. Chem. Phys. 1984, 81, 5889–5898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Schatzschneider, U. Novel lead structures and activation mechanisms for CO-releasing molecules (CORMs). Br. J. Pharmacol. 2015, 172, 1638–1650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Kitazawa, M.; Wagner, J.R.; Kirby, M.L.; Anantharam, V.; Kanthasamy, A.G. Oxidative stress and mitochondrial-mediated apoptosis in dopaminergic cells exposed to methylcyclopentadienyl manganese tricarbonyl. J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther. 2002, 302, 26–35. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  73. Gessner, G.; Sahoo, N.; Swain, S.M.; Hirth, G.; Schonherr, R.; Mede, R.; Westerhausen, M.; Brewitz, H.H.; Heimer, P.; Imhof, D.; et al. CO-independent modification of K(+) channels by tricarbonyldichlororuthenium(II) dimer (CORM-2). Eur. J. Pharmacol. 2017, 815, 33–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  74. Mansour, A.M. Rapid green and blue light-induced CO release from bromazepam Mn(I) and Ru(II) carbonyls: Synthesis, density functional theory and biological activity evaluation. Appl. Organomet. Chem. 2017, 31, e3564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Carmona, F.J.; Jimenez-Amezcua, I.; Rojas, S.; Romao, C.C.; Navarro, J.A.R.; Maldonado, C.R.; Barea, E. Aluminum Doped MCM-41 Nanoparticles as Platforms for the Dual Encapsulation of a CO-Releasing Molecule and Cisplatin. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 10474–10480. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. Wareham, L.K.; McLean, S.; Begg, R.; Rana, N.; Ali, S.; Kendall, J.J.; Sanguinetti, G.; Mann, B.E.; Poole, R.K. The Broad-Spectrum Antimicrobial Potential of [Mn(CO)4(S2CNMe(CH2CO2H))], a Water-Soluble CO-Releasing Molecule (CORM-401): Intracellular Accumulation, Transcriptomic and Statistical Analyses, and Membrane Polarization. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2018, 28, 1286–1308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  77. Mansour, A.M.; Shehab, O.R. Reactivity of visible-light induced CO releasing thiourea-based Mn(I) tricarbonyl bromide (CORM-NS1) towards lysozyme. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2018, 480, 159–165. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Aucott, B.J.; Ward, J.S.; Andrew, S.G.; Milani, J.; Whitwood, A.C.; Lynam, J.M.; Parkin, A.; Fairlamb, I.J.S. Redox-tagged carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CORMs): Ferrocene-containing [Mn(C-N)(CO)4] complexes as a promising new CORM class. Inorg. Chem. 2017, 56, 5431–5440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Kretschmer, R.; Gessner, G.; Goerls, H.; Heinemann, S.H.; Westerhausen, M. Dicarbonyl-bis(cysteamine)iron(II): A light induced carbon monoxide releasing molecule based on iron (CORM-S1). J. Inorg. Biochem. 2011, 105, 6–9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Li, J.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, Q.; Bai, Z.; Zhao, Q.; Wang, Z.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B. Synthesis and biological activities of carbonyl cobalt CORMs with selectively inhibiting cyclooxygenase-2. J. Organomet. Chem. 2018, 874, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gong, Y.; Zhang, T.; Li, M.; Xi, N.; Zheng, Y.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B. Toxicity, bio-distribution and metabolism of CO-releasing molecules based on cobalt. Free Radic. Biol. Med. 2016, 97, 362–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  82. Wong, J.; MacDonald, N.; Mottillo, C.; Hiskic, I.; Butler, I.S.; Friscic, T. Synthesis of Organometallic C0-Releasing Molecules (CORMs) in the Absence of a Bulk Organic Solvent; American Chemical Society: Denver, CO, USA, 2015; INOR-785. [Google Scholar]
  83. Finze, M.; Bernhardt, E.; Willner, H.; Lehmann, C.W.; Aubke, F. Homoleptic, sigma-bonded octahedral superelectrophilic metal carbonyl cations of iron(II), ruthenium(II), and osmium(II). Part 2: Syntheses and characterizations of [M(CO)(6)][BF(4)](2) (M = Fe, Ru, Os). Inorg. Chem. 2005, 44, 4206–4214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Kottelat, E.; Chabert, V.; Crochet, A.; Fromm, K.M.; Zobi, F. Towards Cardiolite-Inspired Carbon Monoxide Releasing Molecules—Reactivity of d4, d5 Rhenium and d6 Manganese Carbonyl Complexes with Isocyanide Ligands. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 2015, 5628–5638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Abeyrathna, N.; Washington, K.; Bashur, C.; Liao, Y. Nonmetallic carbon monoxide releasing molecules (CORMs). Org. Biomol. Chem. 2017, 15, 8692–8699. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Friis, S.D.; Taaning, R.H.; Lindhardt, A.T.; Skrydstrup, T. Silacarboxylic acids as efficient carbon monoxide releasing molecules: Synthesis and application in palladium-catalyzed carbonylation reactions. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2011, 133, 18114–18117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  87. Motterlini, R.; Sawle, P.; Hammad, J.; Bains, S.; Alberto, R.; Foresti, R.; Green, C.J. CORM-A1: A new pharmacologically active carbon monoxide-releasing molecule. FASEB J. 2005, 19, 284–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  88. Klein, M.; Neugebauer, U.; Schmitt, M.; Popp, J. Elucidation of the CO-Release Kinetics of CORM-A1 by Means of Vibrational Spectroscopy. Chemphyschem A Eur. J. Chem. Phys. Phys. Chem. 2016, 17, 985–993. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Antony, L.A.; Slanina, T.; Sebej, P.; Solomek, T.; Klan, P. Fluorescein analogue xanthene-9-carboxylic acid: A transition-metal-free CO releasing molecule activated by green light. Org. Lett. 2013, 15, 4552–4555. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Mondal, R.; Okhrimenko, A.N.; Shah, B.K.; Neckers, D.C. Photodecarbonylation of alpha-diketones: A mechanistic study of reactions leading to acenes. J. Phys.Chem. B 2008, 112, 11–15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  91. Martins, P.N.A.; Reuzel-Selke, A.; Jurisch, A.; Atrott, K.; Pascher, A.; Pratschke, J.; Buelow, R.; Neuhaus, P.; Volk, H.D.; Tullius, S.G. Induction of carbon monoxide in the donor reduces graft immunogenicity and chronic graft deterioration. Transplant. Proc. 2005, 37, 379–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Chauveau, C.; Bouchet, D.; Roussel, J.C.; Mathieu, P.; Braudeau, C.; Renaudin, K.; Tesson, L.; Soulillou, J.P.; Iyer, S.; Buelow, R.; et al. Gene Transfer of Heme Oxygenase-1 and Carbon Monoxide Delivery Inhibit Chronic Rejection. Am. J. Transplant. 2002, 2, 581–592. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  93. Anderson, S.N.; Richards, J.M.; Esquer, H.J.; Benninghoff, A.D.; Arif, A.M.; Berreau, L.M. A Structurally-Tunable 3-Hydroxyflavone Motif for Visible Light-Induced Carbon Monoxide-Releasing Molecules (CORMs). ChemistryOpen 2015, 4, 590–594. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Petrovski, Ž.; Norton de Matos, M.R.P.; Braga, S.S.; Pereira, C.C.L.; Matos, M.L.; Gonçalves, I.S.; Pillinger, M.; Alves, P.M.; Romão, C.C. Synthesis, characterization and antitumor activity of 1,2-disubstituted ferrocenes and cyclodextrin inclusion complexes. J. Organomet. Chem. 2008, 693, 675–684. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  95. Motterlini, R.; Clark, J.E.; Foresti, R.; Sarathchandra, P.; Mann, B.E.; Green, C.J. Carbon monoxide-releasing molecules: Characterization of biochemical and vascular activities. Circ. Res. 2002, 90, E17–E24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Steiger, C.; Luhmann, T.; Meinel, L. Oral drug delivery of therapeutic gases—Carbon monoxide release for gastrointestinal diseases. J. Control. Release 2014, 189, 46–53. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  97. Ferrandiz, M.L.; Maicas, N.; Garcia-Arnandis, I.; Terencio, M.C.; Motterlini, R.; Devesa, I.; Joosten, L.A.; van den Berg, W.B.; Alcaraz, M.J. Treatment with a CO-releasing molecule (CORM-3) reduces joint inflammation and erosion in murine collagen-induced arthritis. Ann. Rheum. Dis. 2008, 67, 1211–1217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Nobre, L.S.; Seixas, J.D.; Romao, C.C.; Saraiva, L.M. Antimicrobial action of carbon monoxide-releasing compounds. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2007, 51, 4303–4307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  99. Bikiel, D.E.; Gonzalez Solveyra, E.; Di Salvo, F.; Milagre, H.M.; Eberlin, M.N.; Correa, R.S.; Ellena, J.; Estrin, D.A.; Doctorovich, F. Tetrachlorocarbonyliridates: Water-soluble carbon monoxide releasing molecules rate-modulated by the sixth ligand. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 2334–2345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  100. Braud, L.; Pini, M.; Wilson, J.L.; Czibik, G.; Sawaki, D.; Derumeaux, G.; Foresti, R.; Motterlini, R. A carbon monoxide-releasing molecule (CORM-401) induces a metabolic switch in adipocytes and improves insulin-sensitivity on high fat diet-induced obesity in mice. Arch. Cardiovasc. Dis. Suppl. 2018, 10, 188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Wareham, L.K.; Poole, R.K.; Tinajero-Trejo, M. CO-releasing Metal Carbonyl Compounds as Antimicrobial Agents in the Post-antibiotic Era. J. Biol. Chem. 2015, 290, 18999–19007. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Zhang, W.Q.; Atkin, A.J.; Thatcher, R.J.; Whitwood, A.C.; Fairlamb, I.J.; Lynam, J.M. Diversity and design of metal-based carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs) in aqueous systems: Revealing the essential trends. Dalton Trans. 2009, 4351–4358. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Seixas, J.D.; Santos, M.F.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Coelho, A.C.; Reis, P.M.; Veiros, L.F.; Marques, A.R.; Penacho, N.; Goncalves, A.M.; Romao, M.J.; et al. A contribution to the rational design of Ru(CO)3Cl2L complexes for in vivo delivery of CO. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 5058–5075. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Suliman, H.B.; Zobi, F.; Piantadosi, C.A. Heme Oxygenase-1/Carbon Monoxide System and Embryonic Stem Cell Differentiation and Maturation into Cardiomyocytes. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2016, 24, 345–360. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Musameh, M.D.; Green, C.J.; Mann, B.E.; Fuller, B.J.; Motterlini, R. Improved myocardial function after cold storage with preservation solution supplemented with a carbon monoxide-releasing molecule (CORM-3). J. Heart Lung Transplant. 2007, 26, 1192–1198. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  106. Ulbrich, F.; Hagmann, C.; Buerkle, H.; Romao, C.C.; Schallner, N.; Goebel, U.; Biermann, J. The Carbon monoxide releasing molecule ALF-186 mediates anti-inflammatory and neuroprotective effects via the soluble guanylate cyclase ß1 in rats’ retinal ganglion cells after ischemia and reperfusion injury. J. Neuroinflamm. 2017, 14, 130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  107. Zhang, W.Q.; Whitwood, A.C.; Fairlamb, I.J.; Lynam, J.M. Group 6 carbon monoxide-releasing metal complexes with biologically-compatible leaving groups. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 8941–8952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Long, L.; Jiang, X.; Wang, X.; Xiao, Z.; Liu, X. Water-soluble diiron hexacarbonyl complex as a CO-RM: Controllable CO-releasing, releasing mechanism and biocompatibility. Dalton Trans. 2013, 42, 15663–15669. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Zobi, F.; Degonda, A.; Schaub, M.C.; Bogdanova, A.Y. CO releasing properties and cytoprotective effect of cis-trans-[Re(II)(CO)2Br2L2]n complexes. Inorg. Chem. 2010, 49, 7313–7322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Schatzschneider, U. PhotoCORMs: Light-triggered release of carbon monoxide from the coordination sphere of transition metal complexes for biological applications. Inorg. Chim. Acta 2011, 374, 19–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Bohlender, C.; Gläser, S.; Klein, M.; Weisser, J.; Thein, S.; Neugebauer, U.; Popp, J.; Wyrwa, R.; Schiller, A. Light-triggered CO release from nanoporous non-wovens. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 1454–1463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  112. Lomont, J.P.; Nguyen, S.C.; Harris, C.B. Exploring the utility of tandem thermal-photochemical CO delivery with CORM-2. Organometallics 2014, 33, 6179–6185. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  113. Bannenberg, G.L.; Vieira, H.L. Therapeutic applications of the gaseous mediators carbon monoxide and hydrogen sulfide. Expert Opin. Ther. Pat. 2009, 19, 663–682. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. Motterlini, R.; Mann, B.E.; Johnson, T.R.; Clark, J.E.; Foresti, R.; Green, C.J. Bioactivity and pharmacological actions of carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. Curr. Pharm. Des. 2003, 9, 2525–2539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  115. Fiumana, E.; Parfenova, H.; Jaggar, J.H.; Leffler, C.W. Carbon monoxide mediates vasodilator effects of glutamate in isolated pressurized cerebral arterioles of newborn pigs. Am. J. Physiol. Heart Circ. Physiol. 2003, 284, H1073–H1079. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  116. Cepinskas, G.; Katada, K.; Bihari, A.; Potter, R.F. Carbon monoxide liberated from carbon monoxide-releasing molecule CORM-2 attenuates inflammation in the liver of septic mice. Am. J. Physiol. Gastrointest. Liver Physiol. 2008, 294, G184–G191. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  117. Nielsen, V.G.; Chawla, N.; Mangla, D.; Gomes, S.B.; Arkebauer, M.R.; Wasko, K.A.; Sadacharam, K.; Vosseller, K. Carbon monoxide-releasing molecule-2 enhances coagulation in rabbit plasma and decreases bleeding time in clopidogrel/aspirin-treated rabbits. Blood Coagul. Fibrinolysis Int. J. Haemost. Thromb. 2011, 22, 756–759. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Santos-Silva, T.; Mukhopadhyay, A.; Seixas, J.D.; Bernardes, G.J.; Romao, C.C.; Romao, M.J. Towards improved therapeutic CORMs: Understanding the reactivity of CORM-3 with proteins. Curr. Med. Chem. 2011, 18, 3361–3366. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. Maines, M.D. Heme oxygenase: Function, multiplicity, regulatory mechanisms, and clinical applications. FASEB J. 1988, 2, 2557–2568. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  120. Freitas, A.; Alves-Filho, J.C.; Secco, D.D.; Neto, A.F.; Ferreira, S.H.; Barja-Fidalgo, C.; Cunha, F.Q. Heme oxygenase/carbon monoxide-biliverdin pathway down regulates neutrophil rolling, adhesion and migration in acute inflammation. Br. J. Pharmacol. 2006, 149, 345–354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  121. Chaves-Ferreira, M.; Albuquerque, I.S.; Matak-Vinkovic, D.; Coelho, A.C.; Carvalho, S.M.; Saraiva, L.M.; Romao, C.C.; Bernardes, G.J. Spontaneous CO release from Ru(II)(CO)2-protein complexes in aqueous solution, cells, and mice. Angew. Chem. 2015, 54, 1172–1175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Chora, A.A.; Fontoura, P.; Cunha, A.; Pais, T.F.; Cardoso, S.; Ho, P.P.; Lee, L.Y.; Sobel, R.A.; Steinman, L.; Soares, M.P. Heme oxygenase-1 and carbon monoxide suppress autoimmune neuroinflammation. J. Clin. Investig. 2007, 117, 438–447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Vitek, L.; Gbelcova, H.; Muchova, L.; Vanova, K.; Zelenka, J.; Konickova, R.; Suk, J.; Zadinova, M.; Knejzlik, Z.; Ahmad, S.; et al. Antiproliferative effects of carbon monoxide on pancreatic cancer. Dig. Liver Dis. 2014, 46, 369–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Chlopicki, S.; Lomnicka, M.; Fedorowicz, A.; Grochal, E.; Kramkowski, K.; Mogielnicki, A.; Buczko, W.; Motterlini, R. Inhibition of platelet aggregation by carbon monoxide-releasing molecules (CO-RMs): Comparison with NO donors. Naunyn Schmiedeberg’s Arch. Pharmacol. 2012, 385, 641–650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  125. Chung, S.W.; Liu, X.; Macias, A.A.; Baron, R.M.; Perrella, M.A. Heme oxygenase-1-derived carbon monoxide enhances the host defense response to microbial sepsis in mice. J. Clin. Investig. 2008, 118, 239–247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Desmard, M.; Davidge, K.S.; Bouvet, O.; Morin, D.; Roux, D.; Foresti, R.; Ricard, J.D.; Denamur, E.; Poole, R.K.; Montravers, P.; et al. A carbon monoxide-releasing molecule (CORM-3) exerts bactericidal activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and improves survival in an animal model of bacteraemia. FASEB J. 2009, 23, 1023–1031. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  127. Desmard, M.; Foresti, R.; Morin, D.; Dagouassat, M.; Berdeaux, A.; Denamur, E.; Crook, S.H.; Mann, B.E.; Scapens, D.; Montravers, P.; et al. Differential antibacterial activity against Pseudomonas aeruginosa by carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. Antioxid. Redox Signal. 2012, 16, 153–163. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Murray, T.S.; Okegbe, C.; Gao, Y.; Kazmierczak, B.I.; Motterlini, R.; Dietrich, L.E.; Bruscia, E.M. The carbon monoxide releasing molecule CORM-2 attenuates Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation. PLoS ONE 2012, 7, e35499. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Wegiel, B.; Larsen, R.; Gallo, D.; Chin, B.Y.; Harris, C.; Mannam, P.; Kaczmarek, E.; Lee, P.J.; Zuckerbraun, B.S.; Flavell, R.; et al. Macrophages sense and kill bacteria through carbon monoxide-dependent inflammasome activation. J. Clin. Investig. 2014, 124, 4926–4940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Otterbein, L.E.; May, A.; Chin, B.Y. Carbon monoxide increases macrophage bacterial clearance through Toll-like receptor (TLR)4 expression. Cell. Mol. Biol. 2005, 51, 433–440. [Google Scholar]
  131. Tavares, A.F.; Teixeira, M.; Romao, C.C.; Seixas, J.D.; Nobre, L.S.; Saraiva, L.M. Reactive oxygen species mediate bactericidal killing elicited by carbon monoxide-releasing molecules. J. Biol. Chem. 2011, 286, 26708–26717. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Hu, C.M.; Lin, H.H.; Chiang, M.T.; Chang, P.F.; Chau, L.Y. Systemic expression of heme oxygenase-1 ameliorates type 1 diabetes in NOD mice. Diabetes 2007, 56, 1240–1247. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  133. Wegiel, B.; Gallo, D.J.; Raman, K.G.; Karlsson, J.M.; Ozanich, B.; Chin, B.Y.; Tzeng, E.; Ahmad, S.; Ahmed, A.; Baty, C.J.; et al. Nitric oxide-dependent bone marrow progenitor mobilization by carbon monoxide enhances endothelial repair after vascular injury. Circulation 2010, 121, 537–548. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  134. Nguyen, D.; Boyer, C. Macromolecular and Inorganic Nanomaterials Scaffolds for Carbon Monoxide Delivery: Recent Developments and Future Trends. ACS Biomater. Sci. Eng. 2015, 1, 895–913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  135. Kautz, A.C.; Kunz, P.C.; Janiak, C. CO-releasing molecule (CORM) conjugate systems. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 18045–18063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  136. Schallner, N.; Otterbein, L.E. Friend or foe? Carbon monoxide and the mitochondria. Front. Physiol. 2015, 6, 17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  137. Diring, S.; Carné-Sánchez, A.; Zhang, J.; Ikemura, S.; Kim, C.; Inaba, H.; Kitagawa, S.; Furukawa, S. Light responsive metal–organic frameworks as controllable CO-releasing cell culture substrates. Chem. Sci. 2017, 8, 2381–2386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  138. Ma, M.; Noei, H.; Mienert, B.; Niesel, J.; Bill, E.; Muhler, M.; Fischer, R.A.; Wang, Y.; Schatzschneider, U.; Metzler-Nolte, N. Iron metal-organic frameworks MIL-88B and NH2-MIL-88B for the loading and delivery of the gasotransmitter carbon monoxide. Chemistry 2013, 19, 6785–6790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Pai, S.; Radacki, K.; Schatzschneider, U. Sonogashira, CuAAC, and Oxime Ligations for the Synthesis of MnI Tricarbonyl PhotoCORM Peptide Conjugates. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2014, 2014, 2886–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Pfeiffer, H.; Rojas, A.; Niesel, J.; Schatzschneider, U. Sonogashira and Click reactions for the N-terminal and side-chain functionalization of peptides with [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+-based CO releasing molecules (tpm = tris(pyrazolyl)methane). Dalton Trans. 2009, 4292–4298. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Jackson, C.S.; Schmitt, S.; Dou, Q.P.; Kodanko, J.J. Synthesis, characterization, and reactivity of the stable iron carbonyl complex [Fe(CO)(N4Py)](ClO4)2: Photoactivated carbon monoxide release, growth inhibitory activity, and peptide ligation. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 5336–5338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Matson, J.B.; Webber, M.J.; Tamboli, V.K.; Weber, B.; Stupp, S.I. A peptide-based material for therapeutic carbon monoxide delivery. Soft Matter 2012, 8, 6689–6692. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  143. Bischof, C.; Joshi, T.; Dimri, A.; Spiccia, L.; Schatzschneider, U. Synthesis, spectroscopic properties, and photoinduced CO-release studies of functionalized ruthenium(II) polypyridyl complexes: Versatile building blocks for development of CORM-peptide nucleic acid bioconjugates. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 9297–9308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  144. Pfeiffer, H.; Sowik, T.; Schatzschneider, U. Bioorthogonal oxime ligation of a Mo(CO)4(N–N) CO-releasing molecule (CORM) to a TGF β-binding peptide. J. Organomet. Chem. 2013, 734, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  145. Yin, H.; Fang, J.; Liao, L.; Nakamura, H.; Maeda, H. Styrene-maleic acid copolymer-encapsulated CORM2, a water-soluble carbon monoxide (CO) donor with a constant CO-releasing property, exhibits therapeutic potential for inflammatory bowel disease. J. Control. Release 2014, 187, 14–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Tabe, H.; Fujita, K.; Abe, S.; Tsujimoto, M.; Kuchimaru, T.; Kizaka-Kondoh, S.; Takano, M.; Kitagawa, S.; Ueno, T. Preparation of a Cross-Linked Porous Protein Crystal Containing Ru Carbonyl Complexes as a CO-Releasing Extracellular Scaffold. Inorg. Chem. 2015, 54, 215–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  147. Tabe, H.; Shimoi, T.; Fujita, K.; Abe, S.; Ijiri, H.; Tsujimoto, M.; Kuchimaru, T.; Kizaka-Kondo, S.; Mori, H.; Kitagawa, S.; et al. Design of a CO-releasing Extracellular Scaffold Using in Vivo Protein Crystals. Chem. Lett. 2015, 44, 342–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Albuquerque, I.S.; Jeremias, H.F.; Chaves-Ferreira, M.; Matak-Vinkovic, D.; Boutureira, O.; Romão, C.C.; Bernardes, G.J.L. An artificial CO-releasing metalloprotein built by histidine-selective metallation. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 3993–3996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  149. Fujita, K.; Tanaka, Y.; Sho, T.; Ozeki, S.; Abe, S.; Hikage, T.; Kuchimaru, T.; Kizaka-Kondoh, S.; Ueno, T. Intracellular CO release from composite of ferritin and ruthenium carbonyl complexes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2014, 136, 16902–16908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  150. Zobi, F.; Blacque, O.; Jacobs, R.A.; Schaub, M.C.; Bogdanova, A.Y. 17 e−rhenium dicarbonyl CO-releasing molecules on a cobalamin scaffold for biological application. Dalton Trans. 2012, 41, 370–378. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Wilson, J.L.; Fayad Kobeissi, S.; Oudir, S.; Haas, B.; Michel, B.; Dubois Rande, J.L.; Ollivier, A.; Martens, T.; Rivard, M.; Motterlini, R.; et al. Design and synthesis of new hybrid molecules that activate the transcription factor Nrf2 and simultaneously release carbon monoxide. Chemistry 2014, 20, 14698–14704. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  152. Pena, A.C.; Penacho, N.; Mancio-Silva, L.; Neres, R.; Seixas, J.D.; Fernandes, A.C.; Romao, C.C.; Mota, M.M.; Bernardes, G.J.; Pamplona, A. A novel carbon monoxide-releasing molecule fully protects mice from severe malaria. Antimicrob. Agents Chemother. 2012, 56, 1281–1290. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Marques, A.R.; Kromer, L.; Gallo, D.J.; Penacho, N.; Rodrigues, S.S.; Seixas, J.D.; Bernardes, G.J.L.; Reis, P.M.; Otterbein, S.L.; Ruggieri, R.A.; et al. Generation of Carbon Monoxide Releasing Molecules (CO-RMs) as Drug Candidates for the Treatment of Acute Liver Injury: Targeting of CO-RMs to the Liver. Organometallics 2012, 31, 5810–5822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Duncan, R. Polymer conjugates as anticancer nanomedicines. Nat. Rev. Cancer 2006, 6, 688–701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Brückmann, N.E.; Wahl, M.; Reiß, G.J.; Kohns, M.; Wätjen, W.; Kunz, P.C. Polymer Conjugates of Photoinducible CO-Releasing Molecules. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2011, 2011, 4571–4577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Kunz, P.C.; Brückmann, N.E.; Spingler, B. Towards Polymer Diagnostic Agents―Copolymers of N-(2-Hydroxypropyl)methacrylamide and Bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-4-vinylbenzylamine: Synthesis, Characterisation and Re(CO)3-Labelling. Eur. J. Inorg. Chem. 2007, 2007, 394–399. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Dördelmann, G.; Pfeiffer, H.; Birkner, A.; Schatzschneider, U. Silicium Dioxide Nanoparticles As Carriers for Photoactivatable CO-Releasing Molecules (PhotoCORMs). Inorg. Chem. 2011, 50, 4362–4367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. Gonzales, M.A.; Han, H.; Moyes, A.; Radinos, A.; Hobbs, A.J.; Coombs, N.; Oliver, S.R.J.; Mascharak, P.K. Light-triggered carbon monoxide delivery with Al-MCM-41-based nanoparticles bearing a designed manganese carbonyl complex. J. Mater. Chem. B 2014, 2, 2107–2113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Dordelmann, G.; Meinhardt, T.; Sowik, T.; Krueger, A.; Schatzschneider, U. CuAAC click functionalization of azide-modified nanodiamond with a photoactivatable CO-releasing molecule (PhotoCORM) based on [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+. Chem. Commun. 2012, 48, 11528–11530. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Kunz, P.C.; Meyer, H.; Barthel, J.; Sollazzo, S.; Schmidt, A.M.; Janiak, C. Metal carbonyls supported on iron oxide nanoparticles to trigger the CO-gasotransmitter release by magnetic heating. Chem. Commun. 2013, 49, 4896–4898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Govender, P.; Pai, S.; Schatzschneider, U.; Smith, G.S. Next generation PhotoCORMs: Polynuclear tricarbonylmanganese(I)-functionalized polypyridyl metallodendrimers. Inorg. Chem. 2013, 52, 5470–5478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Cadranel, A.; Pieslinger, G.E.; Tongying, P.; Kuno, M.K.; Baraldo, L.M.; Hodak, J.H. Spectroscopic signatures of ligand field states in {Ru(II)(imine)} complexes. Dalton Trans. 2016, 45, 5464–5475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Gonzales, M.A. Iron, Manganese and Ruthenium Metal Carbonyls as Photoactive Carbon Monoxide Releasing Molecules (photoCORMS): Ligand Design Strategies, Syntheses and Structure Characterizations. Ph.D. Thesis, University of California, Santa Cruz, CA, USA, 2013. [Google Scholar]
  164. Khramov, D.M.; Lynch, V.M.; Bielawski, C.W. N-Heterocyclic Carbene−Transition Metal Complexes:  Spectroscopic and Crystallographic Analyses of π-Back-bonding Interactions. Organometallics 2007, 26, 6042–6049. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Wang, C.; Cheng, L.; Liu, Z. Drug delivery with upconversion nanoparticles for multi-functional targeted cancer cell imaging and therapy. Biomaterials 2011, 32, 1110–1120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Zhao, Z.; Han, Y.; Lin, C.; Hu, D.; Wang, F.; Chen, X.; Chen, Z.; Zheng, N. Multifunctional core-shell upconverting nanoparticles for imaging and photodynamic therapy of liver cancer cells. Chem. Asian J. 2012, 7, 830–837. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  167. Yoon, J.W.; Seo, Y.-K.; Hwang, Y.K.; Chang, J.-S.; Leclerc, H.; Wuttke, S.; Bazin, P.; Vimont, A.; Daturi, M.; Bloch, E.; et al. Controlled Reducibility of a Metal–Organic Framework with Coordinatively Unsaturated Sites for Preferential Gas Sorption. Angew. Chem. Intl. Ed. 2010, 49, 5949–5952. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  168. van der Vlies, A.J.; Inubushi, R.; Uyama, H.; Hasegawa, U. Polymeric Framboidal Nanoparticles Loaded with a Carbon Monoxide Donor via Phenylboronic Acid-Catechol Complexation. Bioconjugate Chem. 2016, 27, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. Muhammad, N.; Mao, Q.; Xia, H. CAR T-cells for cancer therapy. Biotechnol. Genet. Eng. Rev. 2017, 33, 190–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Johnson, T.R.; Mann, B.E.; Teasdale, I.P.; Adams, H.; Foresti, R.; Green, C.J.; Motterlini, R. Metal carbonyls as pharmaceuticals? [Ru(CO)3Cl(glycinate)], a CO-releasing molecule with an extensive aqueous solution chemistry. Dalton Trans. 2007, 1500–1508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  171. Narayan, S.P.; Choi, C.H.; Hao, L.; Calabrese, C.M.; Auyeung, E.; Zhang, C.; Goor, O.J.; Mirkin, C.A. The Sequence-Specific Cellular Uptake of Spherical Nucleic Acid Nanoparticle Conjugates. Small (Weinh. Bergstr. Ger. ) 2015, 11, 4173–4182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  172. Nguyen, D.; Adnan, N.N.; Oliver, S.; Boyer, C. The Interaction of CORM-2 with Block Copolymers Containing Poly(4-vinylpyridine): Macromolecular Scaffolds for Carbon Monoxide Delivery in Biological Systems. Macromol. Rapid Comm. 2016, 37, 739–744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  173. Garcia-Gallego, S.; Bernardes, G.J. Carbon-monoxide-releasing molecules for the delivery of therapeutic CO in vivo. Angew. Chem. 2014, 53, 9712–9721. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  174. Dallas, M.L.; Scragg, J.L.; Peers, C. Modulation of hTREK-1 by carbon monoxide. Neuroreport 2008, 19, 345–348. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Lundvig, D.M.; Immenschuh, S.; Wagener, F.A. Heme oxygenase, inflammation, and fibrosis: The good, the bad, and the ugly? Front. Pharmacol. 2012, 3, 81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Szeremeta, M.; Petelska, A.D.; Kotynska, J.; Niemcunowicz-Janica, A.; Figaszewski, Z.A. The effect of fatal carbon monoxide poisoning on the surface charge of blood cells. J. Membr. Biol. 2013, 246, 717–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Petelska, A.D.; Kotynska, J.; Figaszewski, Z.A. The effect of fatal carbon monoxide poisoning on the equilibria between cell membranes and the electrolyte solution. J. Membr. Biol. 2015, 248, 157–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Wang, P.; Liu, H.; Zhao, Q.; Chen, Y.; Liu, B.; Zhang, B.; Zheng, Q. Syntheses and evaluation of drug-like properties of CO-releasing molecules containing ruthenium and group 6 metal. Eur. J. Med. Chem. 2014, 74, 199–215. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Winburn, I.C.; Gunatunga, K.; McKernan, R.D.; Walker, R.J.; Sammut, I.A.; Harrison, J.C. Cell damage following carbon monoxide releasing molecule exposure: Implications for therapeutic applications. Basic Clin. Pharmacol. Toxicol. 2012, 111, 31–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. The intracellular carbon monoxide (CO) production by heme oxygenase (HO) in the mammalian system justifies its biological role.
Figure 1. The intracellular carbon monoxide (CO) production by heme oxygenase (HO) in the mammalian system justifies its biological role.
Materials 12 01643 g001
Figure 2. The coagulation and fibrinolysis scope of CO-releasing materials (CORMats).
Figure 2. The coagulation and fibrinolysis scope of CO-releasing materials (CORMats).
Materials 12 01643 g002
Figure 3. The carboxy hemoglobin (COHb) percentage is increasing in the direct CO inhalation beyond the therapeutic zone (~10%) during the mainstream blood circulation. (This information is based on data reported in reference [44,45]).
Figure 3. The carboxy hemoglobin (COHb) percentage is increasing in the direct CO inhalation beyond the therapeutic zone (~10%) during the mainstream blood circulation. (This information is based on data reported in reference [44,45]).
Materials 12 01643 g003
Figure 4. The feasibility analysis of the CO direct and indirect inhalation shows their different biological observance inside a human body.
Figure 4. The feasibility analysis of the CO direct and indirect inhalation shows their different biological observance inside a human body.
Materials 12 01643 g004
Scheme 1. CO releases from the ligand-metal CO framework (LnM-CO).
Scheme 1. CO releases from the ligand-metal CO framework (LnM-CO).
Materials 12 01643 sch001
Scheme 2. Various CO-releasing molecules (CORMs) formulation associates with different functional capabilities.
Scheme 2. Various CO-releasing molecules (CORMs) formulation associates with different functional capabilities.
Materials 12 01643 sch002
Scheme 3. Various organometallics MCCs incorporate with numerous conjugate systems to produce carbonylation complexes, i.e., CORMats for therapeutic CO release upon trigging.
Scheme 3. Various organometallics MCCs incorporate with numerous conjugate systems to produce carbonylation complexes, i.e., CORMats for therapeutic CO release upon trigging.
Materials 12 01643 sch003
Figure 5. The CO-releasing administration with different conjugate and encapsulate strategies.
Figure 5. The CO-releasing administration with different conjugate and encapsulate strategies.
Materials 12 01643 g005
Figure 6. Triblock copolymer assembles for releasing the CO at biological sites.
Figure 6. Triblock copolymer assembles for releasing the CO at biological sites.
Materials 12 01643 g006
Figure 7. Tricarbonylchlororuthenium (II) dimer (CORM-2) synthesized with water-soluble styrene-maleic acid copolymer (SMA) for micellization CORMats.
Figure 7. Tricarbonylchlororuthenium (II) dimer (CORM-2) synthesized with water-soluble styrene-maleic acid copolymer (SMA) for micellization CORMats.
Materials 12 01643 g007
Figure 8. Synthesis route of unsaturated α-diketones (α-DKs) has been activated by photons energy.
Figure 8. Synthesis route of unsaturated α-diketones (α-DKs) has been activated by photons energy.
Materials 12 01643 g008
Figure 9. Synthesis of PA2 having CO-moiety for spontaneous release CO.
Figure 9. Synthesis of PA2 having CO-moiety for spontaneous release CO.
Materials 12 01643 g009
Figure 10. [Mo(CO)4(bpyCH3,CHO)] complex has been constructed through bio-orthogonal peptide conjugate.
Figure 10. [Mo(CO)4(bpyCH3,CHO)] complex has been constructed through bio-orthogonal peptide conjugate.
Materials 12 01643 g010
Figure 11. The synthesis route of [Mn(bpeaNHCH2C6H4CHO)(CO)3]PF6 for Photo-CORMats.
Figure 11. The synthesis route of [Mn(bpeaNHCH2C6H4CHO)(CO)3]PF6 for Photo-CORMats.
Materials 12 01643 g011
Figure 12. The ionic water-soluble Iron complexes [FeII(CO)(N4Py)] (A) could be modified into Photo-CORMats by the replacement of the N4Py ligand with peptide china Ac-Ala-Gly-OBn (B) for the improvement of the cell-specific itself or tissue-specific therapeutic properties.
Figure 12. The ionic water-soluble Iron complexes [FeII(CO)(N4Py)] (A) could be modified into Photo-CORMats by the replacement of the N4Py ligand with peptide china Ac-Ala-Gly-OBn (B) for the improvement of the cell-specific itself or tissue-specific therapeutic properties.
Materials 12 01643 g012
Figure 13. The hydrolytically activated Ruthenium dicarbonyl complexes CORM-2 and CORM-3 could be transformed into Photo-CORMats by peptide ligands through different functionalization: (A) Polypyridyl ligand of 2-(2-pyridyl)pyrimidine-4-carboxylic acide (CppH); (B) monomeric PNA backbone.
Figure 13. The hydrolytically activated Ruthenium dicarbonyl complexes CORM-2 and CORM-3 could be transformed into Photo-CORMats by peptide ligands through different functionalization: (A) Polypyridyl ligand of 2-(2-pyridyl)pyrimidine-4-carboxylic acide (CppH); (B) monomeric PNA backbone.
Materials 12 01643 g013
Figure 14. The reactivity of the fac-[RuL3(CO)3]2+ complex (A) and CORM-3 react with single-His protein (B).
Figure 14. The reactivity of the fac-[RuL3(CO)3]2+ complex (A) and CORM-3 react with single-His protein (B).
Materials 12 01643 g014
Figure 15. The spontaneous CO release by metalloprotein: (A) The carbonyl reagent cis-[Ru(CO)2(H2O)4]2+ spontaneous CO release in live cells using histidine (His) metalloprotein and retained at IL-8; (B) the cis-[Ru(CO)2]2+ carbonyl segment can be produced by the aqua carbonyl cis-[RuII(CO)2(H2O)4]2+.
Figure 15. The spontaneous CO release by metalloprotein: (A) The carbonyl reagent cis-[Ru(CO)2(H2O)4]2+ spontaneous CO release in live cells using histidine (His) metalloprotein and retained at IL-8; (B) the cis-[Ru(CO)2]2+ carbonyl segment can be produced by the aqua carbonyl cis-[RuII(CO)2(H2O)4]2+.
Materials 12 01643 g015
Figure 16. The recombinant L-chain apoferritin (apo-rHLFr) of Ru carbonyl complexes.
Figure 16. The recombinant L-chain apoferritin (apo-rHLFr) of Ru carbonyl complexes.
Materials 12 01643 g016
Figure 17. B12-ReII(CO)2 CORMats conjugate: (A) B12-ReCORM-2; (B) B12-ReCORM-4.
Figure 17. B12-ReII(CO)2 CORMats conjugate: (A) B12-ReCORM-2; (B) B12-ReCORM-4.
Materials 12 01643 g017
Figure 18. Synthesis route of hybrid CORMats: (A) HY-CORMats-1; (B) HY-CORMats-2.
Figure 18. Synthesis route of hybrid CORMats: (A) HY-CORMats-1; (B) HY-CORMats-2.
Materials 12 01643 g018
Scheme 4. The hybrid CORMats (HY-CORMats-1) has a CO moiety for various anti-inflammatory, antioxidant actions and induced nuclear accumulation of Nrf2.
Scheme 4. The hybrid CORMats (HY-CORMats-1) has a CO moiety for various anti-inflammatory, antioxidant actions and induced nuclear accumulation of Nrf2.
Materials 12 01643 sch004
Figure 19. Galactose chelated three carbonyl ruthenium complexes.
Figure 19. Galactose chelated three carbonyl ruthenium complexes.
Materials 12 01643 g019
Figure 20. β-isocyanate coordinated molybdenum carbonyl complexes.
Figure 20. β-isocyanate coordinated molybdenum carbonyl complexes.
Materials 12 01643 g020
Figure 21. The copolymer P1 synthesized for releasing CO segment.
Figure 21. The copolymer P1 synthesized for releasing CO segment.
Materials 12 01643 g021
Figure 22. The copolymers HPMA-co-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-4-vinyl-benzylamine construct through Re(CO)3 moiety.
Figure 22. The copolymers HPMA-co-bis(2-pyridylmethyl)-4-vinyl-benzylamine construct through Re(CO)3 moiety.
Materials 12 01643 g022
Figure 23. NIR-responsive amphiphilic polymer conjugates (PhotoCORMats).
Figure 23. NIR-responsive amphiphilic polymer conjugates (PhotoCORMats).
Materials 12 01643 g023
Figure 24. Photo-activated ALF472 CORM [Mn(tacn)(CO)3]Br simulated under physiological parameter.
Figure 24. Photo-activated ALF472 CORM [Mn(tacn)(CO)3]Br simulated under physiological parameter.
Materials 12 01643 g024
Figure 25. The mechanism of Manganese tricarbonyl functionalized with silica nanoparticles.
Figure 25. The mechanism of Manganese tricarbonyl functionalized with silica nanoparticles.
Materials 12 01643 g025
Figure 26. Metallodendrimers photoactivated CORMats.
Figure 26. Metallodendrimers photoactivated CORMats.
Materials 12 01643 g026
Figure 27. The [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+-functionalized nanodiamond (ND) immobilized on azidemodified ND’surface through CuAAC ‘‘click’’ reaction.
Figure 27. The [Mn(CO)3(tpm)]+-functionalized nanodiamond (ND) immobilized on azidemodified ND’surface through CuAAC ‘‘click’’ reaction.
Materials 12 01643 g027
Figure 28. The CO-releasing rate profile reflects the different characteristics: (a) Slow CO release has therapeutic significance; (b) fast CO release demonstrates the path of ion-channel kinetics.
Figure 28. The CO-releasing rate profile reflects the different characteristics: (a) Slow CO release has therapeutic significance; (b) fast CO release demonstrates the path of ion-channel kinetics.
Materials 12 01643 g028
Figure 29. The CORMs/CORMats integration exhibited the cytotoxicity of metal residue (i-CORMs/CORMats).
Figure 29. The CORMs/CORMats integration exhibited the cytotoxicity of metal residue (i-CORMs/CORMats).
Materials 12 01643 g029
Table 1. Nonmetallic and organometallics CO-releasing molecules (CORM’s) fragments exhibited therapeutics activities.
Table 1. Nonmetallic and organometallics CO-releasing molecules (CORM’s) fragments exhibited therapeutics activities.
ListCORMsTherapeutic ImplicationsRefs
1CORM-1Increase coronary perfusion pressures; attenuates the L-NAME-mediated; restore unstable blood pressure and modulates vessel contractility ex-vivo in animals.[95]
2CORM-2Attenuates inflammatory response in lungs and liver; induces vasorelaxation; protects against IRI; activates K+/Ca+2 channels; possible for pulmonary hypertension.[95,96]
3CORM-3Improves the liver & kidney functions during transplantation; Vasorelaxation induction; prevents sepsis & cardiac graft rejection; helps in bacterial infections; support rheumatoid arthritis; RBF improvement in the treatment of cynomolgus for monkeys.[23,28,71,97,98,99]
4CORM-401Improves insulin-sensitivity and metabolic switch induces in adipocytes.[100]
5ALF492In severe malaria, fully protects with artesunate combination.[101]
6CORM-A1Induces the vasorelaxation; Increases RBF and reduced vascular; gives resistance in the kidney of mice; good cerebroprotective agent for epileptic seizures treatments.[102]
7Re-CORM-1Anti-oxidative characteristic and protects against IRI from the affected neonatal rat of cardiomyocytes.[103]
8B12-ReCORM-2Protects against IRI (neonatal rat cardio-myocyte); hindrance cell mortality up to 80%; support the cardiac repairing and cardiac disease (ameliorates degenerative); anti-oxidative agent; augments and direct cardiomyogenesis.[104,105]
93-hydroxyflavon CORMsExerting anti-oxidative activity; anti-inflammatory services and anti-cancer effects.[46,55,89]
10ALF 186Protective effects for gastric ulcers and neuro protective, while IRI-induced apoptosis of retinal ganglion cells (RGC).[106,107,108,109]
11CORMA-1-PLAPrevents fibroblasts and internalized into 3T3 cells during metabolic and hypoxia depletion conditions.[110]
12α-DK-CORMsAbsorbs in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) KG-1 cells and releases CO In-vivo upon 470nm irradiation.[111]
Table 2. Conjugate strategies for therapeutic CO release.
Table 2. Conjugate strategies for therapeutic CO release.
Sr. #CORMatsTherapeutic ImplicationsRefs
1MicellizationBioactive in a murine model of inflammatory colitis; potential for curing the ROS affected inflammatory disease; In response to human monocytes and attenuates the LPS-induced inflammatory.[55,59,145]
2ProteinsRegulation the cytokines IL-6 and IL-10; artificial metallohydrolase performance and elevated NF-κB factor (10 folds).[121,146,147,148,149]
3VitaminsShows HO-1 expression; inducing nuclear accumulation of Nrf2; antimalarial drug artesunate and acute liver failure.[150,151,152,153]
4PolymersHCT116 human colon cancer and HepG2 liver cancer cells; enhance the EPR effect and targeting the tumor sites; achieve special and selective physiological targets.[47,154,155,156]
5Porous structure materialsInflammatory skin issues and topical skin cancer treatment. Surprisingly, no toxicity was found in mouse fibroblast 3T3 cells.[50,111].
6NanoparticlesCysteine and subdues feedback to pro-inflammatory mediator’s IL-6; cardiovascular therapy and relax the rat aorta muscle rings.[157,168]
7PeptideHuman prostate cancer cell line (PC-3) and supported cardiomyocyte viability.[139,140,141,142,143,144]
8Nano-sheetsControllable CO release (e.g. GO-MnCORMats) suitable for inflammatory diseases after LPS stimulation and responsive intracellular CO release.[48]
9Nano-diamondNano-diamond precursor compatible with photons, hopefully, could be modified for special cell targeting.[159]
10MOFsInflammatory bowel disease and expected pharmacological applications by downsizing the MOF crystals to the nanoscale.[137,138]
11MetallodendrimersPotential for inflammatory disease and cancer cells.[161]
Table 3. Summarize the CO-releasing substrate along with their association.
Table 3. Summarize the CO-releasing substrate along with their association.
StrategiesCO-Release MechanismMolecules/Materials
CO-releasing molecules (CORMs)organometallicsCORM-1, CORM-2, CORM-3, ALF492, CORM-A1, B12-ReCORM-2, Re-CORM-1, CORMA-1-PLA and ALF186.
nonmetallicSilica-carboxylates, boranocarbonates, boranocarbamates, xanthene carboxylic acid (XCA), hydroxy-flavones, 1,2-disubstituted ferrocenes, methylene chloride, meso-carboxy BODIPYs, unsaturated cyclic and diketones (DKs).
CO-releasing materials (CORMats)conjugated systemsMicellization, peptide, vitamins, proteins, polymers, metal organic framework, nanoparticles, nano-sheets, porous structure materials, metallodendrimer and nano-diamond.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Faizan, M.; Muhammad, N.; Niazi, K.U.K.; Hu, Y.; Wang, Y.; Wu, Y.; Sun, H.; Liu, R.; Dong, W.; Zhang, W.; et al. CO-Releasing Materials: An Emphasis on Therapeutic Implications, as Release and Subsequent Cytotoxicity Are the Part of Therapy. Materials 2019, 12, 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101643

AMA Style

Faizan M, Muhammad N, Niazi KUK, Hu Y, Wang Y, Wu Y, Sun H, Liu R, Dong W, Zhang W, et al. CO-Releasing Materials: An Emphasis on Therapeutic Implications, as Release and Subsequent Cytotoxicity Are the Part of Therapy. Materials. 2019; 12(10):1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101643

Chicago/Turabian Style

Faizan, Muhammad, Niaz Muhammad, Kifayat Ullah Khan Niazi, Yongxia Hu, Yanyan Wang, Ya Wu, Huaming Sun, Ruixia Liu, Wensheng Dong, Weiqiang Zhang, and et al. 2019. "CO-Releasing Materials: An Emphasis on Therapeutic Implications, as Release and Subsequent Cytotoxicity Are the Part of Therapy" Materials 12, no. 10: 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101643

APA Style

Faizan, M., Muhammad, N., Niazi, K. U. K., Hu, Y., Wang, Y., Wu, Y., Sun, H., Liu, R., Dong, W., Zhang, W., & Gao, Z. (2019). CO-Releasing Materials: An Emphasis on Therapeutic Implications, as Release and Subsequent Cytotoxicity Are the Part of Therapy. Materials, 12(10), 1643. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12101643

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop