Next Article in Journal
Preparation of Porous Ceramsite with Ammonium Acetate as Low-Temperature Decomposition Foaming Agent and Its Sound Absorption Performance
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of Density, Roughness, and Accuracy of the Atomic Diffusion Additive Manufacturing (ADAM) Process for Metal Parts
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 12
Issue 24
10.3390/ma12244123
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Facile One-Step Dynamic Hydrothermal Synthesis of Spinel LiMn2O4/Carbon Nanotubes Composite as Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries

by
Chaoqi Shen
,
Hui Xu
,
Liu Liu
,
Heshan Hu
,
Siyuan Chen
,
Liwei Su
and
Lianbang Wang
*
State Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Green Chemistry-Synthesis Technology, College of Chemical Engineering, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(24), 4123; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244123
Submission received: 31 October 2019 / Revised: 19 November 2019 / Accepted: 28 November 2019 / Published: 9 December 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Chemistry)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Nano-sized spinel LiMn2O4/carbon nanotubes (LMO/CNTs) composite is facilely synthesized via a one-step dynamic hydrothermal approach. The characterizations and electrochemical measurements reveal that LiMn2O4 particles with narrow size distribution are well dispersed with CNTs in the composite. The LMO/CNTs nanocomposite with 5 wt % CNTs displays a high specific discharge capacity of 114 mAh g−1 at 1C rate, and the retention rate after 180 cycles at room temperature reaches 94.5% in the potential window of 3.3 to 4.3 V vs. Li/Li+. Furthermore, the electrochemical performance of the composite with 5 wt % CNTs at elevated temperature (55 °C) is also impressive, 90% discharging capacity could be maintained after 100 cycles at 1C. Such excellent electrochemical performance of the final product is attributed to the content of CNTs added in the hydrothermal process and small particle size inherited from pretreated MnO2 precursor.

1. Introduction

Li-ion batteries (LIBs) are extremely important components in our society as power sources for diverse portable electronic devices and electric vehicles [1,2,3]. The emerging market of energy storage systems in different fields requires LIBs with low cost, high rate capability, improved safety, and reliability [4,5,6]. Eftekhari has discussed the related resources, research and manufacture of lithium-ion batteries in detail [7]. Currently, Ni–Co–Mn (NCM) ternary oxides and LiFePO4 are two representative cathode materials extensively used in LIBs [8,9]. However, the risk of thermorunaway and high cost of NMC [10,11] and relatively low energy density of LiFePO4 [12,13] motivate people to design novel cathode materials. Although many researchers have devoted efforts to improve the capability of NCM, how to guarantee the supply of Co will become a critical issue in the future [7]. Considering the cheap price, high operation potential (4 V vs. Li/Li+), environmental friendliness and relatively high electrical conductivity, it is believed that the spinel LiMn2O4 (LMO) can act as the supplement of NMC and LiFePO4 [14,15,16], especially in the application scenarios requiring low cost but working with gentle operation intensity, e.g., the e-bike.
Establishing a facile route to synthesize LMO cathode material with ideal capability is not easy. The main drawbacks of LMO are the structural instability induced by Jahn-Teller effect and dissolution of Mn2+, which result in poor cycling stability especially at elevated temperature (e.g., 55 °C) [17,18,19]. To solve such problems, nano-sized LMO are prepared to enhance the Li+ diffusion rate and improve structural stability, such as solvothermal [20], sol-gel [21], mechanical-chemical [22], and microwave sintering [23]. On the other hand, introducing modifications such as doping [24,25,26] and surface coating [27,28,29] is also quite universal. These measures are capable to optimize the crystal structure stability and suppress the dissolution of Mn2+ [30,31,32,33]. Recently, LMO/CNTs composites with excellent electrochemical performance have been reported [34,35,36]. Carbon nanotubes can not only increase the electronic conductivity of spinel LiMn2O4 but also improve the Li+ diffusion rate during charging and discharging [37,38]. With a solid-state synthesis route, carbon materials will be oxidized by oxygen or LiMn2O4 at high temperature, thus the hydrothermal process is the ideal method to obtain LiMn2O4/carbon composites in one step. However, a static hydrothermal method requires long reaction time (>48 h) and hard to obtain uniformly distributed LMO/CNTs composite with MnO2 precursor [39,40].
Herein, an improved dynamic hydrothermal process is developed by employing a one-step approach to synthesize nano-sized LiMn2O4/CNTs composites from MnO2 within 5 h. To a large extent, the morphologies of the final products are determined by MnO2 precursors. The small particle size of ball-milled MnO2 not only contributes to achieve faster hydrothermal reaction kinetics and minimize the impurities, but also realizes shorter lithium ion diffusion path during charging and discharging. CNTs are well-distributed in the nanocomposite as the stirring introduced into the reaction, and the amount of CNTs added into the hydrothermal system influences the electrochemical properties significantly. As a cathode material for LIBs, LiMn2O4/CNTs composite exhibits excellent cycling stability, even at elevated temperature 55 °C, which implies such material can be utilized as a candidate for energy storage applications. Thus the facile one-step dynamic hydrothermal synthesis method is an effective route to prepare composite materials with cheap solid precursors to apply not only in lithium-ion batteries but also other related fields.

2. Materials and Methods

LiOH·H2O, MnAc2·4H2O, MnO2, and CNTs were purchased from Aladdin (Shanghai, China). The CNTs were pre-treated in an acid solution mixed with 18.4 M H2SO4 and 15.3 M HNO3 in a volume ratio of 3:1 at 50 °C for 3 h before use. Manganese oxide (MnO2, 3.9 g) was wet ball-milled with 5 mL ethanol in agate jar with a rotating speed of ca. 600 rpm for 3 h. The powder was collected as a precursor for a hydrothermal reaction after ethanol removed.
The 3.9 g ball-milled MnO2, 3.675 g MnAc2·4H2O, and 300 mL LiOH solution (0.2 M) were mixed in a 500 ml dynamic stainless steel autoclave then sealed. The autoclave was heated up to 200 °C for 5 h with temperature increasing at 2 °C min−1, and the stirring rate was set at 200 rpm. After hydrothermal treatment, LMO powder (noted as S1) was collected by centrifuging and washing with deionized water three times. This LMO sample (S1) was dried in the vacuum oven at 120 °C for 12 h. Two composite samples with CNTs (2 wt% for S2 and 5 wt% for S3, respectively) were obtained through the same procedure. As a comparison, pristine MnO2 without ball milling was also employed to synthesize spinel LMO (noted as S0), and the difference between two MnO2 precursors was investigated.
The phase and crystallinity of the samples were identified by powder X-ray diffraction (XRD, X’Pert Pro, PANalytical, Almelo, Netherlands) with Cu Ka radiation (λ = 0.154056 nm) with 2θ angles from 10° to 80°. The morphologies of samples were investigated by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Nova NanoSEM 450, FEI company, Hillsboro, OR, USA) and transmission electron microscopy (TEM, Tecnai G2F30 S-Twin operated at 300 kV, FEI company, Hillsboro, OR, USA). Thermogravimetry (TGA, SDT Q600 V8.2 Build 100, TA instruments, New Castle, DE, USA measurement was also conducted in airflow at a 10 °C min−1 heating rate to estimate the content of the CNTs in the composites.
The electrochemical properties of the LMO/CNTs composites were evaluated with CR2032-type coin-cells, which were assembled in an argon-filled glove box. LMO/CNTs, a lithium foil, and a porous membrane (Celgard 2400, Charlotte, NC, USA) were used as a working electrode, a counter electrode and a separator, respectively. The working electrodes of LMO/CNTs were fabricated by casting slurries of the LMO/CNTs powders (80 wt%), polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, 10 wt%) and Super P (10 wt%) mixed in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidone (NMP) onto a carbon-coated aluminum foil. They were then dried in a vacuum oven at 120 °C overnight. The electrolyte was composed of 1 M LiPF6 solution in ethylene carbonate (EC) and dimethyl carbonate (DMC) (1:1 by volume). The cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) were conducted utilizing an Iviumstat (Eindhoven, Netherlands) electrochemical workstation. The voltage range for CV measurement was from 3.5 to 4.5 V with a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1. Furthermore, the coin cells were galvanostatically cycled using CT2001A (LAND Electronic Co., Wuhan, China) multi-channel battery test system in the voltage range from 3.3 to 4.3 V at room temperature and 55 °C.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1 illustrates the XRD patterns of the LMO/CNTs samples synthesized via a one-step dynamic hydrothermal method. After the hydrothermal reaction, the obtained samples S1–S3 demonstrated diffraction peaks indexing to a well-crystalline spinel-type LiMn2O4 phase. The peaks of CNTs could not be detected, which indicates the amount of CNTs was too small to identify [40]. In comparison, XRD pattern of S0 via pristine MnO2 shows peaks of Mn3O4 and MnO2. This can be ascribed to the lithium ion in solution being harder to intercalate into the Mn-O matrix because of the bigger size scale and related slow solid–liquid reaction kinetics. Then the impurity Mn3O4 is formed, and the pristine MnO2 cannot be consumed completely [41]. Furthermore, the peaks around 18.5° and 36° in XRD pattern of S0 corresponding to (111) and (311) of spinel LiMn2O4 shifted to higher angles, which implies the lattice constant was smaller than the ones from ball milled MnO2. Such a result is attributed to the defects of Li ion generating more Mn4+ in the lattice of S0, and the ionic radius of Mn4+ is smaller than that of Mn3+ [42].
To understand the differences induced by two types of MnO2 precursors, XRD and SEM images of pristine and ball milled MnO2 were taken. The XRD patterns in Figure S1 show the pristine MnO2 powder with a pure ramsdellite phase (black line), and relatively broader peaks of ball-milled MnO2 indicates the size scale of MnO2 decreasing. The morphology of pristine MnO2 was irregular and the size scale ranged from 1 μm to 5 μm, while after ball milling, the particle size reduced significantly (Figure S2). Furthermore, SEM images in the same low magnitude of LMO final products related to these two precursors are shown in Figure S3, and which manifest that the S0 and S1 inherited size scale and morphologies from their corresponding MnO2 precursors for the secondary particles. Such results suggest the importance of MnO2 pretreatment [39,40]. High energy ball-milling enlarges the surface area of MnO2 to accelerate the solid–liquid reaction kinetics during the hydrothermal process, and the effect is assumed to produce less impurity and lead to better electrochemical performance.
Despite different morphologies of secondary particles, the state of aggregation of primary particles is also distinct from each other. The SEM images of the LMO/CNTs samples are presented in Figure 2. Sample S0 displayed large severely packed primary particles (Figure 2a), such a structure resulted in poor lithium ion diffusion path during electrochemical reaction. However, it is apparent that the primary particle size of S1 was distributed from 50 nm to 80 nm, although there were still some bigger particles involved (Figure 2b); the individual particles offered larger solid–liquid contact area to improve lithium ion diffusion rate. The morphology of multi-walled carbon nanotubes used is shown in Figure S4, the length of CNTs is several micrometers and the diameter is around 15 nm with 20 layers. LiMn2O4 crystals in S2 and S3 obtain similar morphologies as S1 (Figure 2c,d), while the carbon nanotubes in these two samples (red arrows in figures) are hard to distinguish as the diameter is too small [43,44] and most CNTs are embedded in the secondary particles from the core to the surface. The TEM images of S3 confirm the distribution of CNTs in composites (Figure 3a,b), carbon nanotubes interact with primary LMO particles firmly and establish a nice conductive framework. The high resolution HR-TEM in Figure 3c shows the lattice fringes corresponding to (311), (440) and (222) of spinel lithium manganese oxide.
To determine the content of CNTs in the LMO/CNTs composites, TG measurements were conducted with temperature ranging from 50 to 700 °C in airflow (Figure 4). S1 without CNTs does not show significant weight loss during the heating process, while for the composites S2 and S3, the measured values of CNTs content 1.7% and 4.8% are about 0.2%–0.3% less than those calculated from the starting compositions. The differences may be owed to material loss during the centrifuging step. As the carbon materials will be oxidized in air at high temperature, the content of carbon in LMO/C composite prepared under such condition is quite low and very hard to control [39,45]. We also find the CNTs reacting with LiMn2O4 in inert atmosphere, LiMnO2 and Mn3O4 appear in XRD pattern of S3 annealed at 600 °C for 4 h under Ar flow (Figure S5), which indicates LiMn2O4 is reduced by CNTs. Thus either in inert gas or with air, the LMO/carbon composite is hard to obtain with fine control via solid-state procedure, while hydrothermal route could facilely achieve given amount of CNTs in LMO/CNTs composite.
The electrochemical properties of the synthesized LMO/CNTs composites are shown in Figure 5. There are two typical voltage plateaus of spinel LiMn2O4 in the charging-discharging curves shown in Figure 5a. During charging step, the lower plateau is associated to half of the Li+ ions extract from the tetrahedral sites in LiMn2O4 through Li–Li interaction to form Li0.5Mn2O4. Then, the rest half of lithium further extract without the aid of Li–Li interaction to generate λ-MnO2, thus the potential rises higher to form the second plateau [46]. The two plateaus during discharging in S0 are not clear due to the increasing polarization caused by lithium diffusion resistance [47], and it also demonstrates the limited high rate performance of this sample. The S0 from pristine MnO2 manifests poor specific capacity (80.1 mAh g−1 at 1C with efficiency of 98.99%), and the long cycling properties is unsatisfactory. This result reveals that the size scale of precursor influences the final product significantly, and the existence of impurity Mn3O4 in S0 also sacrifices the capacity as its inertness in the voltage window [48]. In comparison, S1 from ball-milled MnO2 exhibits a high reversible specific capacity of 111.8 mAh g−1 at 1C, even after 180 cycles the capacity maintained at 99.6 mAh g−1. Once CNTs were introduced into the reaction system, the electrochemical performance improved obviously. Although the specific discharge capacity at 1C was around 114 mAh g−1 for S2 and S3, after 180 cycles, the capacity retention rate maintained at 93% and 95% for S2 and S3 respectively, which was much better than S1 with the value of 89%. However, the energy efficiencies of S1, S2 and S3 were 98.56%, 98.86% and 98.65%, respectively, the effect of nano-sizing was not so obvious comparing to capacity. It is believed that the system kinetics improved with increasing active surface area to enhance specific capacity, while the ordered lattice in the bulk material favored the thermodynamics benefit to achieve high energy efficiency [49].
Figure 5c displays the rate performance of the final products, and the corresponding charging-discharging curves can be found in Figure S6. The S0 delivered the lowest capacity at all discharging rates, and LMO samples with small particle size achieved similar capacity at relatively low rates. While at 2C rate, S1 only showed capacity around 80 mAh g−1, the other two remain at 97 mAh g−1 and 104 mAh g−1, respectively. The charging–discharging curves in Figure S6 also illustrate the polarization during electrochemical reaction can be suppressed in LMO/CNTs composites and the existence of CNTs improved the rate capability effectively as enhancing the electronic conductivity of the active material [50]. The cells were cycled at 55 °C for 100 times with 1C rate to investigate the capacity retention performance under high temperature. As shown in Figure 5d, the retention rate was inferior to that at room temperature, which can be ascribed to the inevitable dissolution of Mn2+ into electrolyte being accelerated and degenerating the structural stability. The capacity of S0 decreased dramatically after 70 cycles in contrast, S1 maintained 73% after 100 cycles. This difference can be illustrated by the concentration of Mn3+ being suppressed with higher Li+ diffusion rate for S1, then particles with smaller size being more stable [51]. The existence of CNTs enhanced the thermal stability in a large scale, the capacity retention rates of S2 and S3 achieved 82% and 90% respectively, which implies the CNTs matrix could optimize the structural stability under high temperature. The improved electrochemical capability especially the cycling stability can be attributed to the small particle size and the addition of CNTs. The electron conductivity and lithium ion diffusion in bulk were optimized, then the concentration of Mn3+ could be balanced in the whole particle to suppress Jahn–Teller effect and relieve Mn2+ dissolution on the surface.
Figure 6a displays the cyclic voltammograms (CV) of samples between 3.5 and 4.5 V vs. Li/Li+ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1 after the 5th cycle at 1C rate. All of the CV curves show two redox peaks corresponding to the two-step of insertion and de-insertion of Li+ ions into and from the cubic spinel LiMn2O4 phase [52,53]. The peak shift corresponding to polarization of electrode was obvious for S0, which suggests low reversibility and fits well to poor cycling behavior. For S1–S3, it is interesting that the peaks around 4.1 V were close to each other, which implies the energy barrier of Li+ diffusion at this potential is analogous. However, the polarization around 3.95 V was distinct, S1 without CNTs showed the biggest potential gap of 0.12 V, while for S2 and S3, the gaps were 0.06 V and 0.04 V respectively. A similar result can also be found in the literature [47]. In conclusion, the addition of CNTs improved the lithium diffusion especially in the process of Li+ insertion and de-insertion between Li0.5Mn2O4 and LiMn2O4 phase, while for the next step with λ–MnO2 phase it was not so apparent and the mechanism requires further investigation.
With the purpose to obtain a further understanding on the composite, electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) measurements were taken at a fully discharged state (Figure 6b). EIS patterns consist of a typical semicircle in high-frequency range corresponding to charge–transfer resistance and a straight line in the low-frequency range, which was related to the diffusion of Li-ions into the bulk of active mass [47]. The equivalent circuit is shown in the inset on Figure 6b and the electrochemical parameters for the alternating current EIS results calculated by the Z-view software are listed in Table S1. The value of Rs corresponding to the resistant of the cell is similar for all samples, while Rct of S0 is the biggest (Rct ≈ 139.5 Ω), which is only 70.4 Ω for S1. That means the decrease in particle size is able to accelerate the Li+ transfer, then lead to better electrochemical capability. Moreover, S2 and S3 with CNTs exhibit lower Rct of 54.7 Ω and 43.5 Ω respectively, which can be ascribed to the enhanced charge transfer rate by the incorporated CNTs.

4. Conclusions

The LiMn2O4/CNTs (LMO/CNTs) composites are successfully synthesized using ball-milled MnO2 and MnAc2 as Mn precursors through a fast one-step dynamic hydrothermal process. Reducing the size scale of MnO2 precursor by ball milling and adding CNTs in dynamic hydrothermal procedure could improve the electrochemical performance of the final products effectively. As LiMn2O4 inherits the morphology of MnO2 precursor, the small particle size of MnO2 hinders the formation of Mn3O4 and MnO2 impurities due to the faster reaction kinetics, and the lithium diffusion path is shorter during electrochemical charging-discharging process. The introduction of carbon nanotubes in the LMO/CNTs composites can well confine the LMO nanoparticles from core to surface of secondary particles and construct electronic conductive network. The composite with 5 wt % CNTs shows the optimal electrochemical performance with discharge capacities of 114 and 106 mAh g−1 at 1C and 2C, respectively. Furthermore, the capacity retention rate under 55 ℃ could reach 90% after 100 cycles. Such a superior performance indicates that the LMO/CNTs composite has a great potential as a cathode material of lithium-ion batteries using in the fields with gentle operation intensity but requiring low cost, for example, the e-bike.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/12/24/4123/s1, Figure S1: the X-ray powder diffraction patterns of the MnO2 before and after ball milling, Figure S2: SEM images of the MnO2 (a) before and (b) after ball milling, Figure S3: SEM images of the LiMn2O4 synthesized via MnO2 (a) before and (b) after ball milling, Figure S4: TEM images of the multi-walled carbon nanotubes, Figure S5: the XRD patterns of S3 after annealing at 600 °C for 4 h under Ar flow, Figure S6: charge–discharge curves of different samples at various rate: (a–d) represent S0–S3 respectively, Table S1: Electrochemical parameters for the alternating current EIS results calculated using the Z-view software.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, C.S., L.S. and L.W.; Funding Acquisition, L.S. and L.W.; Investigation, C.S., H.X., L.L., H.H., S.C. and L.S.; Methodology, H.X. and L.L.; Project Administration, L.W.; Writing—Original Draft, C.S.; Writing—Review and Editing, L.W.

Funding

This research was funded by the Key Research and Development Program of Science and Technology Department of Zhejiang Province (2017C01023), and the Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang province (LGG18B030001).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript; or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Nitta, N.; Wu, F.X.; Lee, J.T.; Yushin, G. Li-ion battery materials: Present and future. Mater. Today 2015, 18, 252–264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Zubi, G.; Dufo-Lopez, R.; Carvalho, M.; Pasaoglu, G. The lithium-ion battery: State of the art and future perspectives. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2018, 89, 292–308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Yoshino, A. The Birth of the Lithium-Ion Battery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2012, 51, 5798–5800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Manthiram, A. An Outlook on Lithium Ion Battery Technology. ACS Cent. Sci. 2017, 3, 1063–1069. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  5. Kim, T.H.; Park, J.S.; Chang, S.K.; Choi, S.; Ryu, J.H.; Song, H.K. The Current Move of Lithium Ion Batteries Towards the Next Phase. Adv. Energy Mater. 2012, 2, 860–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Daniel, C. Materials and processing for lithium-ion batteries. Jom 2008, 60, 43–48. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Eftekhari, A. Lithium Batteries for Electric Vehicles: From Economy to Research Strategy. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2019, 7, 5602–5613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Marom, R.; Amalraj, S.F.; Leifer, N.; Jacob, D.; Aurbach, D. A review of advanced and practical lithium battery materials. J. Mater. Chem. 2011, 21, 9938–9954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, M.; Lu, J.; Chen, Z.W.; Amine, K. 30 Years of Lithium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Mater. 2018, 30, 1800561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Zheng, G.; Zhang, W.C.; Huang, X.D. Lithium-Ion Battery Electrochemical-Thermal Model Using Various Materials as Cathode Material: A Simulation Study. ChemistrySelect 2018, 3, 11573–11578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Liu, X.; Wu, Z.B.; Stoliarov, S.I.; Denlinger, M.; Masias, A.; Snyder, K. Heat release during thermally-induced failure of a lithium ion battery: Impact of cathode composition. Fire Saf. J. 2016, 85, 10–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Wang, J.J.; Sun, X.L. Olivine LiFePO4: The remaining challenges for future energy storage. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 1110–1138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Gong, C.L.; Xue, Z.G.; Wen, S.; Ye, Y.S.; Xie, X.L. Advanced carbon materials/olivine LiFePO4 composites cathode for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2016, 318, 93–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, G.J.; Liu, Z.H.; Zhang, C.J.; Cui, G.L.; Chen, L.Q. Strategies for improving the cyclability and thermo-stability of LiMn2O4-based batteries at elevated temperatures. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 4092–4123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wang, H.Q.; Lai, F.Y.; Li, Y.; Zhang, X.H.; Huang, Y.G.; Hu, S.J.; Li, Q.Y. Excellent stability of spinel LiMn2O4-based cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 177, 290–297. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tarascon, J.M.; Wang, E.; Shokoohi, F.K.; McKinnon, W.R.; Colson, S. The spinel phase of LiMn2O4 as a cathode in secondary lithium cells. J. Electrochem. Soc. 1991, 138, 2859–2864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Amatucci, G.G.; Pereira, N.; Zheng, T.; Tarascon, J.M. Failure mechanism and improvement of the elevated temperature cycling of LiMn2O4 compounds through the use of the LiAlxMn2−xO4−zFz solid solution. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2001, 148, A171–A182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yamaguchi, H.; Yamada, A.; Uwe, H. Jahn-Teller transition of LiMn2O4 studied by x-ray-absorption spectroscopy. Phys. Rev. B 1998, 58, 8–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Chung, K.Y.; Ryu, C.W.; Kim, K.B. Onset mechanism of Jahn-Teller distortion in 4 V LiMn2O4 and its suppression by LiM0.05Mn1.95O4 (M = Co, Ni) coating. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2005, 152, A791–A795. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. He, X.; Wang, J.; Jia, H.P.; Kloepsch, R.; Liu, H.D.; Beltrop, K.; Li, J. Ionic liquid-assisted solvothermal synthesis of hollow Mn2O3 anode and LiMn2O4 cathode materials for Li-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2015, 293, 306–311. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Han, C.G.; Zhu, C.Y.; Saito, G.; Akiyama, T. Improved electrochemical performance of LiMn2O4 surface-modified by a Mn4+-rich phase for rechargeable lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 209, 225–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Li, X.T.; Shao, Z.B.; Liu, K.R.; Liu, G.F.; Xu, B.S. Synthesis and electrochemical characterizations of LiMn2O4 prepared by high temperature ball milling combustion method with citric acid as fuel. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2018, 818, 204–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Tian, L.; Su, C.W.; Wang, Y.; Wen, B.X.; Bai, W.; Guo, J.M. Electrochemical properties of spinel LiMn2O4 cathode material prepared by a microwave-induced solution flameless combustion method. Vacuum 2019, 164, 153–157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Ram, P.; Goren, A.; Ferdov, S.; Silva, M.M.; Singhal, R.; Costa, C.M.; Sharma, R.K.; Lanceros-Mendez, S. Improved performance of rare earth doped LiMn2O4 cathodes for lithium-ion battery applications. New J. Chem. 2016, 40, 6244–6252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Ta, T.A.; Nguyen, H.S.; Nguyen, O.T.T.; Dang, C.T.; Hoang, L.A.; Pham, L.D. Crystalline structure and electrical conductivity of nickel substituted spinel lithium manganese oxide. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 065505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.L.; Li, Z.H.; Yang, J.; Tang, J.J.; Yu, J.J.; Nie, W.B.; Lei, G.T.; Xiao, Q.Z. Effect of Al-doping on the electrochemical properties of a three-dimensionally porous lithium manganese oxide for lithium-ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2012, 75, 115–122. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Tron, A.; Park, Y.D.; Mun, J. AlF3-coated LiMn2O4 as cathode material for aqueous rechargeable lithium battery with improved cycling stability. J. Power Sources 2016, 325, 360–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Waller, G.H.; Brooke, P.D.; Rainwater, B.H.; Lai, S.Y.; Hu, R.; Ding, Y.; Alamgir, F.M.; Sandhage, K.H.; Liu, M.L. Structure and surface chemistry of Al2O3 coated LiMn2O4 nanostructured electrodes with improved lifetime. J. Power Sources 2016, 306, 162–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yao, J.; Shen, C.; Zhang, P.; Gregory, D.H.; Wang, L. Surface coating of LiMn2O4 spinel via in situ hydrolysis route: Effect of the solution. Ionics 2013, 19, 739–745. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, X.F.; Xu, Y.L.; Wang, C.L. Suppression of Jahn-Teller distortion of spinel LiMn2O4 cathode. J. Alloys Compd. 2009, 479, 310–313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Capsoni, D.; Bini, M.; Chiodelli, G.; Mustarelli, P.; Massarotti, V.; Azzoni, C.B.; Mozzati, M.C.; Linati, L. Inhibition of Jahn-Teller cooperative distortion in LiMn2O4 spinel by Ga3+ doping. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 7432–7438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Yao, J.; Shen, C.; Zhang, P.; Ma, C.A.; Gregory, D.H.; Wang, L. Spinel-Li3.5+xTi5O12 coated LiMn2O4 with high surface Mn valence for an enhanced cycling performance at high temperature. Electrochem. Commun. 2013, 31, 92–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Shang, Y.H.; Lin, X.J.; Lu, X.; Huang, T.; Yu, A.H. Nano-TiO2(B) coated LiMn2O4 as cathode materials for lithium-ion batteries at elevated temperatures. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 156, 121–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Cetinkaya, T.; Akbulut, A.; Guler, M.O.; Akbulut, H. A different method for producing a flexible LiMn2O4/MWCNT composite electrode for lithium ion batteries. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2014, 44, 209–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ding, Y.H.; Li, J.X.; Zhao, Y.; Guan, L.H. Direct growth of LiMn2O4 on carbon nanotubes as cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. Mater. Lett. 2012, 68, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xia, H.; Wang, Y.; Lin, J.; Lu, L. Hydrothermal synthesis of MnO2/CNT nanocomposite with a CNT core/porous MnO2 sheath hierarchy architecture for supercapacitors. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2012, 7, 33. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  37. Li, X.; Kang, F.; Bai, X.; Shen, W. A novel network composite cathode of LiFePO4/multiwalled carbon nanotubes with high rate capability for lithium ion batteries. Electrochem. Commun. 2007, 9, 663–666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Chen, S.Y.; Mi, C.H.; Su, L.H.; Gao, B.; Fu, Q.B.; Zhang, X.G. Improved performances of mechanical-activated LiMn2O4/MWNTs cathode for aqueous rechargeable lithium batteries. J. Appl. Electrochem. 2009, 39, 1943–1948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Tang, M.; Yuan, A.; Zhao, H.; Xu, J. High-performance LiMn2O4 with enwrapped segmented carbon nanotubes as cathode material for energy storage. J. Power Sources 2013, 235, 5–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Zou, B.-K.; Ma, X.-H.; Tang, Z.-F.; Ding, C.-X.; Wen, Z.-Y.; Chen, C.-H. High rate LiMn2O4/carbon nanotube composite prepared by a two-step hydrothermal process. J. Power Sources 2014, 268, 491–497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Yao, J.; Lv, L.; Shen, C.; Zhang, P.; Aguey-Zinsou, K.-F.; Wang, L. Nano-sized spinel LiMn2O4 powder fabricated via modified dynamic hydrothermal synthesis. Ceram. Int. 2013, 39, 3359–3364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Nakamura, T.; Kajiyama, A. Low-temperature annealing of Li-Mn spinel oxide prepared at high temperature. Solid State Ion. 2000, 133, 195–202. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Seo, J.-H.; Verlinde, K.; Guo, J.; Heidary, D.S.B.; Rajagopalan, R.; Mallouk, T.E.; Randall, C.A. Cold sintering approach to fabrication of high rate performance binderless LiFePO4 cathode with high volumetric capacity. Scr. Mater. 2018, 146, 267–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Tang, M.; Yuan, A.; Xu, J. Synthesis of highly crystalline LiMn2O4/multiwalled carbon nanotube composite material with high performance as lithium-ion battery cathode via an improved two-step approach. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 166, 244–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Jo, J.; Nam, S.; Han, S.; Mathew, V.; Alfaruqi, M.H.; Pham, D.T.; Kim, S.; Park, S.; Park, S.; Kim, J. One-pot pyro synthesis of a nanosized-LiMn2O4/C cathode with enhanced lithium storage properties. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 24030–24038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kitta, M.; Akita, T.; Kohyama, M. Preparation of a spinel LiMn2O4 single crystal film from a MnO wafer. J. Power Sources 2013, 232, 7–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Luo, X.D.; Yin, Y.Z.; Yuan, M.; Zeng, W.; Lin, G.; Huang, B.; Li, Y.W.; Xiao, S.H. High performance composites of spinel LiMn2O4/3DG for lithium ion batteries. RSC Adv. 2018, 8, 877–884. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Christiansen, T.L.; Bøjesen, E.D.; Søndergaard, M.; Birgisson, S.; Becker, J.; Iversen, B.B. Crystal structure, microstructure and electrochemical properties of hydrothermally synthesised LiMn2O4. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 1996–2004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Eftekhari, A. Energy efficiency: A critically important but neglected factor in battery research. Sustain. Energy Fuels 2017, 1, 2053–2060. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Xia, H.; Ragavendran, K.R.; Xie, J.P.; Lu, L. Ultrafine LiMn2O4/carbon nanotube nanocomposite with excellent rate capability and cycling stability for lithium-ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2012, 212, 28–34. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Deng, Y.; Zhou, Y.; Shi, Z.; Zhou, X.; Quan, X.; Chen, G. Porous LiMn2O4 microspheres as durable high power cathode materials for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 8170–8177. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Tonti, D.; Torralvo, M.J.; Enciso, E.; Sobrados, I.; Sanz, J. Three-Dimensionally Ordered Macroporous Lithium Manganese Oxide for Rechargeable Lithium Batteries. Chem. Mater. 2008, 20, 4783–4790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Xi, L.J.; Wang, H.-E.; Lu, Z.G.; Yang, S.L.; Ma, R.G.; Deng, J.Q.; Chung, C.Y. Facile synthesis of porous LiMn2O4 spheres as positive electrode for high-power lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sources 2012, 198, 251–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 12 04123 g001 550
Figure 1. The X-ray powder diffraction patterns of the LiMn2O4/carbon nanotubes (LMO/CNTs) nanocomposites synthesized by the one-step hydrothermal process.
Figure 1. The X-ray powder diffraction patterns of the LiMn2O4/carbon nanotubes (LMO/CNTs) nanocomposites synthesized by the one-step hydrothermal process.
Materials 12 04123 g001
Materials 12 04123 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of four LMO/CNTs samples, (a–d) represent S0–S3, respectively.
Figure 2. SEM images of four LMO/CNTs samples, (a–d) represent S0–S3, respectively.
Materials 12 04123 g002
Materials 12 04123 g003 550
Figure 3. (a,b) TEM images and (c) HR-TEM of LMO/CNTs composite with 5 wt% CNTs.
Figure 3. (a,b) TEM images and (c) HR-TEM of LMO/CNTs composite with 5 wt% CNTs.
Materials 12 04123 g003
Materials 12 04123 g004 550
Figure 4. Thermogravimetry curves of the samples without (S1) and with CNTs (S2, S3).
Figure 4. Thermogravimetry curves of the samples without (S1) and with CNTs (S2, S3).
Materials 12 04123 g004
Materials 12 04123 g005 550
Figure 5. Electrochemical performance of the LMO/CNTs composites: (a) charging-discharging curves with 1C rate, (b) long cycling performance at 1C, (c) rate capability at room temperature and (d) long cycling performance at 1C rate under 55 °C.
Figure 5. Electrochemical performance of the LMO/CNTs composites: (a) charging-discharging curves with 1C rate, (b) long cycling performance at 1C, (c) rate capability at room temperature and (d) long cycling performance at 1C rate under 55 °C.
Materials 12 04123 g005
Materials 12 04123 g006 550
Figure 6. (a) Cyclic voltammograms (CV) of electrodes between 3.5 and 4.5 V vs. Li/Li+ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1, (b) electrochemical impedance spectra of three half cells with different samples after the 5th cycle at 1C rate and the open-circuit voltage of the cells was 3.5 V.
Figure 6. (a) Cyclic voltammograms (CV) of electrodes between 3.5 and 4.5 V vs. Li/Li+ at a scan rate of 0.1 mV s−1, (b) electrochemical impedance spectra of three half cells with different samples after the 5th cycle at 1C rate and the open-circuit voltage of the cells was 3.5 V.
Materials 12 04123 g006

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Shen, C.; Xu, H.; Liu, L.; Hu, H.; Chen, S.; Su, L.; Wang, L. Facile One-Step Dynamic Hydrothermal Synthesis of Spinel LiMn2O4/Carbon Nanotubes Composite as Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials 2019, 12, 4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244123

AMA Style

Shen C, Xu H, Liu L, Hu H, Chen S, Su L, Wang L. Facile One-Step Dynamic Hydrothermal Synthesis of Spinel LiMn2O4/Carbon Nanotubes Composite as Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials. 2019; 12(24):4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244123

Chicago/Turabian Style

Shen, Chaoqi, Hui Xu, Liu Liu, Heshan Hu, Siyuan Chen, Liwei Su, and Lianbang Wang. 2019. "Facile One-Step Dynamic Hydrothermal Synthesis of Spinel LiMn2O4/Carbon Nanotubes Composite as Cathode Material for Lithium-Ion Batteries" Materials 12, no. 24: 4123. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12244123

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop