Next Article in Journal
Functionalisation of Silicone by Drug-Embedded Chitosan Nanoparticles for Potential Applications in Otorhinolaryngology
Next Article in Special Issue
Catalytically Active Imine-based Covalent Organic Frameworks for Detoxification of Nerve Agent Simulants in Aqueous Media
Previous Article in Journal
Quality Control of High Carbon Steel for Steel Wires
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Effects of Alkali Metal (Li, Na, and K) Incorporation in NH2–MIL125(Ti) on the Performance of CO2 Adsorption

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Chang’an University, Xi’an 710061, China
2
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(6), 844; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060844
Submission received: 9 January 2019 / Revised: 26 February 2019 / Accepted: 8 March 2019 / Published: 13 March 2019

Abstract

:
A series of titanium-based, metal–organic framework (MOF) materials, xM@NH2-MIL125(Ti) (x is the alkali metal loading percentage during the synthesis; M = Li, Na, K), have been synthesized solvothermally. Alkali metal doping in the NH2–MIL125(Ti) in situ solvothermal process demonstrated a vital modification of the material structure and surface morphology for the CO2 adsorption capacity at ambient conditions. By changing the reactants’ precursor, including different kinds of alkali metal, the morphology of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) can be adjusted from a tetragonal plate through a circular plate to a truncated octahedron. The variation of the alkali metal loading results in substantial differences in the CO2 adsorption. The properties of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) were evaluated via functional group coordination using FT-IR, phase identification based on X-ray diffraction (XRD), surface morphology through scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as N2 and CO2 adsorption by physical gas adsorption analysis. This work reveals a new pathway to the modification of MOF materials for high-efficiency CO2 adsorption.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

With rapid economic growth, excessive carbon consumption correlated with enhanced CO2 emission into the atmosphere has caused involved environmental problems, such as global warming and climate change [1]. Carbon capture and storage (CCS) has been considered a prospective technological strategy to slow down gas emissions and alleviate the climate [2]. Up to now, there are multifarious approaches to CO2 storage and separation, such as solvent absorption, physicochemical adsorption, membrane separation, cryogenic distillation, and so on [3]. Among the technologies applied for this purpose, adsorption of CO2 into porous solid materials, such as zeolites, mesoporous silicas, porous carbon, and metal–organic frameworks (MOFs), has been gaining increasing attention due to its low energy requirements, cost-effectiveness, high adsorption capacity, and regeneration [4,5,6,7].
MOFs, exhibiting large internal surface area, controllable porosity and pore walls, and affinity for particular valuable gases, have been regarded as potential CO2 adsorption and separation materials under mild conditions. Usually, MOFs are constructed through metal ions or clusters as connected centers, and polyfunctional organic ligands as connected linkers. As a matter of fact, the extended framework can be controlled by selecting the appropriate metal centers and organic linkers to obtain the desired structural features and physicochemical properties. In order to promote the CO2 adsorption capacity and the separation selectivity over other gases, various strategies have been reported, such as metal cation incorporation [8,9], pore size and shape tuning [10], and ligand functionality [11,12,13].
The alkali metal incorporation strategy has been widely utilized in the field of hydrogen storage, which has been confirmed to be effective. However, the influence of alkali metal incorporation into MOF materials on CO2 capture has been relatively less investigated. Lan et al. and Cao et al. showed clearly, by multiscale simulation, that the CO2 uptake of lithium-doped covalent organic frameworks (COFs) was enhanced by four to eight times compared with the pristine COFs at 298 K and 1 bar [14,15]. Mu et al. studied the effect of different metal doping on the gas adsorption performance of MOFs through a grand canonical Monte Carlo (GCMC) simulation [16]. They found that CO2 preferentially adsorbs at the alkali metal doping position. Babarao et al. studied Mg-IRMOF-1 and Be-IRMOF-1(Isoreticular metal-organic frameworks, IRMOF), indicating that alkaline earth metal ion substitution improves adsorption capacity [17]. Xiang et al. analyzed the CO2 adsorption results of Li@Cu3(BTC)2, CNT@Cu3(BTC)2, and Li@CNT@Cu3(BTC)2, and they found that lithium doping actually improved CO2 adsorption capacity, and increased by 305% for Li@CNT@Cu3(BTC)2 [18].
Doping metal ions into an MOF can improve adsorption performance, as metal ions can increase the interaction energy between CO2 and MOFs. Virtually most of the reports on alkali metal incorporation in MOFs are established on theoretical models and computer simulations. Actually, direct verification of this effect through lab experiments is still a challenge. Surveying the effect of alkali metal doping in MOFs on CO2 capture became urgent for us. The in situ incorporation procedure of metal ions into MOFs during the solvothermal process is straightforward compared with the post-synthetic modification procedure.
To further improve the CO2 adsorption performance of MOFs, the introduction of amino groups (–NR2) into the organic linkers are considered to be effective. The amino group can act as a Lewis basic active site, with strong binding to carbon dioxide, and the presence of the lone electron pair enhances the affinity between an MOF and carbon dioxide molecules. Zhu et al. indicated that the basic sites of MOFs can be generated by either direct synthesis or post-synthetic modification. In the case of direct synthesis, the basicity may originate from metal centers, organic ligands, and the interplay between the two. For post-synthetic modification, both metal sites and ligands are available for the introduction of basic species [19]. Kim et al. point out that pore engineering of MOFs utilizing Lewis basic functionalities are beneficial for CO2 adsorption. Using N-containing, aromatic, ring-based Lewis basic ligands to establish MOFs is one main strategy for the pore engineering [20]. Yang et al. reported that the −NH2 functional group can exhibit a good effect and provide a strong affinity for CO2 molecules in adsorption [21]. At the same time, the procedure of introducing a functional group is complicated, and the pore window might be blocked by the functional groups [19,22].
The titanium-based MOF NH2–MIL125 (Material of Institute Lavoisier, MIL) has been investigated for different fields, such as gas storage, gas separation, and photocatalysis [23,24,25,26]. The amino-functionalization of MOFs is believed to improve CO2 adsorption, so NH2–MIL125 was chosen to be investigated. The structure of NH2–MIL125 is quasi-cubic tetragonal system, constructed with octameric Ti8O8(OH)4 oxo-clusters connected by amino-dicarboxylate linkers. In addition, the incorporation of alkali metal into Ti-MOF has not been reported. In this study, a sequence of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) (M = Li, Na, K) was successfully synthesized by in situ cation incorporation, in order to understand the impact of the doping of alkali metals on the CO2 adsorption capacity of NH2–MIL125(Ti).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Chemicals

Titanium isopropoxide (98%, AR) and 2-aminoterephthalic acid (H2BDC–NH2, AR) were purchased from J&K Scientific Ltd. (Beijing, China). Lithium chloride (LiCl, AR), sodium chloride (NaCl, AR) and potassium chloride (KCl, AR) were purchased from Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd. (Shanghai, China). Methanol (CH3OH, AR) and N,N-dimethylformamide (DMF, AR) were provided by Tianjin Fuchen Chemicals Co. Ltd. (Tianjin, China). All the chemicals were used as received, without further purification.

2.2. Synthesis of NH2–MIL125(Ti)

The synthesis of NH2–MIL125(Ti) was performed by dissolving H2BDC–NH2 (1.449 g, 8 mmol) in 30 mL DMF/methanol (1:1 V/V) and stirred for 10 min at room temperature; then, titanium isopropoxide (1.308 g, 1.39 mL, 4.5 mmol) was added to the above solution and stirred for another 30 min. The mixture was transferred into a Teflon liner inserted in a stainless-steel autoclave. Then the autoclave was sealed and the mixture was heated for 16 h at 150 °C. After cooling slowly to ambient temperature, the obtained yellow powder was filtered and washed with DMF and methanol, and the resultant product was finally vacuum-dried at 60 °C overnight.

2.3. Synthesis of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti)

The alkali metal-doped NH2–MIL125(Ti) samples were prepared through the in situ synthesis method. MCl (M = Li+, Na+, K+) was milled into fine particles and dissolved in DMF. The above solution containing M+ was then added to the solution containing H2BDC–NH2 and titanium isopropoxide. The synthesis and activation of the alkali metal cation incorporated NH2–MIL125(Ti) followed the same route of NH2–MIL125(Ti). The yellow powder product was denoted as xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti), where M is related to the alkali metal cation (Li+, Na+, K+), and x represents the mass ratio (1% and 2%) of alkali metal chloride to the pure NH2–MIL125(Ti). For the 1% case, as the sum mass of H2BDC–NH2 and titanium isopropoxide were 2.757 g, so 0.028 g of MCl (0.65 mmol for LiCl, 0.47 mmol for NaCl, and 0.37 mmol for KCl) was added. All the obtained samples after final filtration were vacuum-dried at 60 °C overnight. The yield, 90% of the product, is nearly the same as the pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti).

2.4. Sample Characterization

FT-IR spectra were obtained on AXS TENSOR-27 FT-IR spectrometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany), with KBr pellets at room temperature in the range of 4000–500 cm−1, with a resolution of 4 cm−1. Powder X-ray diffraction (PXRD) data were performed on a Advance-D8 (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation operating at 40 kV and 40 mA, in the range of 5° < 2θ < 50°, with a step length of 0.02° (2θ). X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) data were collected on an Axis Ultra DLD (Kratos Analytical Ltd. of Shimadzu Corporation, Manchester, UK) with Al Kα (hν = 1486.7 eV), operating at 15 kV and 10 mA. All curves have been charge-corrected to the main line of the carbon C1’s spectral component (C/C, C/H), set to 284.80 eV. Thermal stability was characterized via TA-SDT Q600 (TA Instruments, NewCastle, DE, USA) from room temperature to 900 °C, under a heating rate of 5 °C·min−1 in N2 atmosphere and with a flowing rate of 10 mL·min−1. The contents of the metal ions were analyzed by ICP-OES730 (Agilent, Santa Clara, CA, USA). The scanning electron microscope (SEM) and energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) were carried out using a Hitachi SU8020 (Hitachi High-Technologies Corporation, Tokyo, Japan). The powder surface was gold that had been metalized previously. N2 and CO2 adsorption isotherms were obtained using Autosorb-1 (Quantachrome Instruments, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The samples were pre-treated to remove excess water molecules and impurities at 150 °C for 8 h under vacuum, and the CO2 adsorption isotherm was tested at 273 and 293 K.

3. Results

3.1. FT-IR Analysis

The FT-IR spectra of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti), as shown in Figure 1, shows the characteristic vibration peaks before and after the alkali metal doping. There is no obvious change in the region of the peaks, but the intensity is slightly changed. To be specific, 3420–3452 cm−1 shows the contribution of −NH2 group in the structure. The vibration bands located at about 1637 and 1500 cm−1 belonged to carbonyl asymmetric stretching vibrations, and vibration bands located at 1298 cm−1 could be assigned to the C–H symmetric stretching vibrations of the benzene ring. The peak around 760 cm−1 is the Ti–O stretching for non-bound oxygen atoms, and 500–755 cm−1 is the Ti–O–Ti stretching vibration [27].

3.2. X-ray Diffraction Analysis

XRD patterns of NH2–MIL125(Ti) synthesized with different loadings of Li, Na, and K are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that all samples still maintained the crystal structure of NH2–MIL125(Ti). It shows that xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) exhibited the distinct characteristic diffraction peaks at 2θ = 6.8°, 9.8°, 12.1°, 17.3°, and 18.8°, which were consistent with the experimental and calculated patterns of NH2–MIL125(Ti) [27], and no additional peaks were observed; this means that no other crystalline impurity phases formed after the modification, indicating that the crystal structure of NH2–MIL125(Ti) was well maintained. Therefore, we speculate that the doping of alkali metal ions during the solvothermal synthesis would not affect the crystalline structures of NH2–MIL125(Ti). However, the characteristic diffraction peak positions around 6.8° of xK@NH2-MIL125(Ti) have been shifted slightly for the case of potassium ion doping, as shown in Figure 2d, which is owing to the larger ionic radius of K+ than of Li+ and Na+ [28]. The larger ionic radius may cause differences in the construction of the framework during the solvothermal synthesis.

3.3. X-ray Photoelectron Spectrometer

XPS measurements were carried out to determine the chemical composition and electronic structure of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti). As shown in Figure 3, the wide-scan XPS spectra of all the samples show four peaks. The peak of 288.7 eV, corresponding to C 1s, indicates the existence of a C element. Similarly, the peaks of 399.6 eV for N at 1s, 458.9 eV for Ti at 2p, and 288.7 eV for O at 1s, indicate the existence of N, Ti, and O elements. In the 1s spectrum for N, the peak at 399.6 eV belonged to the N of the amine group protruding or stretching out into the cavities. The peak at 403.1 eV can be assigned to the positively charged –N=+ and –NH–+ [29]. The symmetric peaks in the Ti 2p spectrum located at 458.9 eV and 464.6 eV are attributed for Ti 2p3/2 and Ti 2p1/2, respectively. This means that the oxidation state Ti in the titanium–oxo cluster remains in IV. Combining with the experimental results of XRD and N2 adsorption, it can be inferred that the amine groups are not coordinated with metal ions, but may be protruding into the empty space of the internal porous [29]. The XPS peaks of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) are nearly the same as those of NH2-MIL125(Ti), which indicates that the alkali metal doping procedure has little influence on the electronic structures of NH2-MIL125(Ti).

3.4. Thermal Stability

The thermal stability and decomposition temperatures of NH2–MIL125 and xM@NH2–MIL125 were investigated via thermogravimetric analysis (TGA). It can be seen from Figure 4 that there are three stages of weight losses in the TGA curves. NH2–MIL125, xLi@NH2–MIL125, xNa@NH2–MIL125, and xK@NH2–MIL125 showed similar weight-loss behaviors. The first weight loss, between 30 and 130 °C, was caused by the removal of physically adsorbed water, bound water, and free solvent molecules (such as methanol) [27]. At the region of 130 to 300 °C, the weight loss curves of all the samples gradually decreased, which was due to the removal of the DMF and non-coordinated organic linkers of H2BDC–NH2 trapped in the material. When the temperature reached around 300 °C, a sudden weight loss occurred, which corresponds to the degradation of the framework to TiO2 anatase [11,23]. The thermogravimetric results show that xM@NH2–MIL125 can remain thermally stable at 300 °C.

3.5. Scanning Electron Microscopy

The morphology of pristine NH2–MIL125 and xM@NH2–MIL125 are shown in Figure 5. NH2–MIL125 (Figure 5a) and xNa@NH2–MIL125 (Figure 5c) exert thin and circular plate shapes. The NH2–MIL125 involves an average particle size of 6 μm, which is similar to the conventional synthetic method of NH2–MIL125 (5 μm) [23], while xLi@NH2–MIL125 has a tetragonal plate shape with a particle size of 5 μm (Figure 5b). The average particle size of xNa@NH2–MIL125 is 8 μm, with a circular plate shape (Figure 5c). However, xK@NH2–MIL125 has a truncated octahedron shape with the particle size of 15 μm (Figure 5d). The crystal size increases in the sequence of Li, Na, and K, reflecting the different growth rates of the xM@NH2–MIL125. The titanium precursor contains different amount of alkali metal ions during the solvothermal synthesis. As for the case of 1M@NH2–MIL125(Ti), there was 0.65 mmol of LiCl, 0.47 mmol of NaCl, and 0.37 mmol of KCl in the solvothermal precursor, respectively. The titanium precursor containing K ions involves the lowest doping ions molar concentration, which may have less influence on the moving of Ti and the growing rate of Ti–O in the titanium precursor, resulting in the highest particle size.
The alkali metal incorporation has an influence on the kinetics of hydrolysis and condensation reactions. The morphology evolution of the crystal has affected the changes of NH2–MIL125. Thus, special polyhedrons of NH2-MIL125 from the tetragonal plate through the circular plate to a truncated octahedron were obtained. The crystal morphology of NH2–MIL125(Ti) changing in our work is a little different from what Hu et al. previously reported [27]. They controlled the crystal morphology from the circular plate to the octahedron, by altering the concentration of reactants from low to high and by changing the total solvent volume. In our work, the concentration of the reactant was the same when adding different kind of alkali metal salts, but the total ion concentration was decreased in the sequence of Li, Na, and K, which caused the different growth rates. Hu et al. reported that the perfect NH2–MIL125 crystal should be rhombic dodecahedron morphology by Bravais-Friedel-Donnay-Harker (BFDH) theory [30]. It can be concluded that these morphology changes were affected by the total concentration of the ions in the solvothermal precursors.
To verify that the alkali metals were doped into NH2–MIL125 homogeneously, the mapping images of the 1K@NH2–MIL125 through SEM–EDS were performed. As can be seen in Figure 6, the C, N, Ti, K, and Cl elements are uniformly dispersed in the 1K@NH2–MIL125, indicating that the K ions have been well distributed into the framework of the 1K@NH2–MIL125. The same results were found in the 1Na@NH2–MIL125(Ti). The doped alkali metal ions might be well incorporated into the structure, or just dispersed on the surface of the Ti8O8(OH)4–(O2C–C6H5–CO2–NH2)6. The alkali metals presumably exist in the form of chlorides, because the alkali oxide needs a higher temperature to be obtained [31]. The signal intensity of lithium is too weak to determine its dispersion in xLi@NH2–MIL125 by SEM–EDS imaging, due to the high background noises.

3.6. Alkali Metal Content

Inductively Coupled Plasma-Optical Eemission Spectroscopy (ICP–OES) analyses were performed to examine the presence and quantity of the alkali metal for xLi@NH2–MIL125(Ti), and the results are listed in Table 1. The experimental titanium content for both doped and original NH2–MIL125(Ti) are nearly the same, which is between 15.7~16.9 wt %. This is close to the theoretical calculating value 23 wt % for NH2–MIL125(Ti) and Ti8O8(OH)4–(O2C–C6H3–CO2–NH2)6 [11]. The higher lithium content can be observed by increasing the lithium loading in the precursor. The amount of Li and Na in the framework drops greatly after a series of solvent exchanging treatment, because the alkali metal does not coordinate with the organic ligands and its small atomic radius. For the K case, maybe there are more K ions trapped in the pores or on the surface of the framework, so the ICP results of K are higher than those for Li and Na.

3.7. N2 Asorption Isotherms

Nitrogen adsorption isotherms were measured to obtain the porosity of xM@NH2–MIL125, and the results are shown in Figure 7. All obtained N2 adsorption isotherms of the xM@NH2–MIL125 series exhibited a type I isotherm curve. The Brunauere Emmette Teller (BET) surface area was calculated in the relative pressure (P/P0) range of 0.05 to 0.3, and the detailed adsorption data were summarized in Table 1. The NH2–MIL125(Ti) structure involves octahedral cages of 12.5 Å and tetrahedral cages of 6.1 Å, and are accessible through triangular windows of 5–7 Å. At low relative pressure, the significant adsorption amount indicates that the materials involve microporosity [22,28].
It was found that the surface areas of xM@NH2–MIL125 increased observably after alkali cation doping, in the sequence of 1Li+ > 1Na+ > 1K+ > 2Li+ > 2Na+ > 2K+. The surface areas are 1470, 1451, and 1226 m2·g−1 after 1 wt % Li, Na, K incorporation, respectively, which is a significant improvement compared with 1038 m2·g−1 for the pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti). It is worth pointing out that the BET specific surface area of the pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti) in our work is lower than those reported in the reference, including 862~1469 m2 g−1 [23], 1203 m2 g−1 [21], 1215 m2 g−1 [32], and 1041~1268 m2 g−1 [27]. The pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti) and the xM@NH2-MIL125 are using the same synthetic procedure and calcination temperatures in this work, to investigate the tendency of the alkali metal doping effects.
The enhancement of 1Li@NH2–MIL125 was greater than that observed for 1Na@NH2–MIL125 and 1K@NH2–MIL125. The increasing trend of surface area correlates excellently with the conclusions from the SEM and XRD investigations, as described previously. However, the specific surface area dropped rapidly when the alkali metal doping amount increased to 2 wt %. Perhaps a doping amount 2 wt % of the dopants themselves (Li, Na, and K) is too much, and the channels or pores of NH2-MIL125 might be blocked [8]. Therefore, the alkali metal doping can promote the specific surface area and pore volumes of the NH2–MIL125(Ti), but excessive doping will block the pores of metal organic framework, consequently reducing its performance. It is very important to select suitable alkali metal type and doping dosage for the purpose of improving the gas adsorption performance of MOFs.

3.8. CO2 Adsorption Isotherms Measured

CO2 adsorption isotherms of NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) at 293 K and 1 atm are shown in Figure 8. All the samples show a steep initial increase at low pressures, which is characteristic of a high-CO2-adsorption material with microporsity. In the research system for carbon dioxide adsorption, the presence of amino functionalization provides more active sites, NH2–MIL125 showed a higher quantity of CO2 adsorption, as summarized in Table 2.
It can be seen from the CO2 adsorption isotherms that the CO2 adsorption amount of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) increased when the 1 wt % alkali metal was introduced during the solvothermal synthesis. The adsorption amounts are 4.60, 4.57, and 3.55 mmol g−1 for 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti), 1Na@NH2–MIL125(Ti), and 1K@NH2–MIL125(Ti), respectively. The CO2 adsorption capacity of 1M@NH2–MIL125 is in the sequence of Li > Na > K, which is consistent with the order of the decreasing ionic radius, and in agreement with the N2 adsorption performance. Of these compounds, 1Li@NH2-MIL125(Ti) showed the highest CO2 adsorption capacity, but the amount is still much lower than that of Mg-MOF-74 [36].
One reason why alkali metal doping increases the carbon dioxide adsorption capacity is the influence of the framework structure. The enhancement is maybe due to the defect site of the frameworks caused by the alkali metal doping tuning the crystallite framework (interpenetrated level), surface (surface area, pore etc.), and adsorptive site (dipole interaction) [28]. As we discussed before, the alkali metal doped xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) has a larger specific surface area, and the morphology of the MOFs changed. The specific surface area of NH2–MIL125(Ti) increases due to the decrease of the particle size, which leads to a large amount of CO2 adsorption. The CO2 adsorption capacity has a positive correlation with the SBET, as shown in Figure 9. The surface area of the 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti) is much higher than that of the NH2–MIL125(Ti) and 2Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti), so the higher CO2 adsorption of 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti) is understandable. The approximate CO2 adsorption capacity for 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti) and 1Na@NH2–MIL125(Ti) may because the surface area of them are closed.
The results of the CO2 adsorption on xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) is not only relevant to the specific surface area, but also to the alkali metal dispersed in the framework of the xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti). Another reason why alkali metal doping increases the carbon dioxide adsorption capacity is that carbon dioxide preferentially adsorbs around the alkali metal ions, and computer simulations by Mu et al. confirm this view [16]. They found that the first ionization energies and the electron donating ability of the alkali metal atoms are much lower than the boron group metal and alkaline earth metal atoms, thereby causing more ion partial charges. The first ionization energy is the minimal energy required to remove an electron from the atom or molecule isolated in free space and in its ground electronic state. The electrostatic interaction between CO2 and MOFs increases with increasingly induced charges. The 2Na@NH2–MIL125(Ti) has a bit of a smaller surface area than NH2–MIL125(Ti), but a larger CO2 adsorption, which may contribute to its smaller pore size and the doping of alkali metals. Therefore, the doping of alkali metal helps to improve the CO2 adsorption properties of NH2-MIL125(Ti).
The heat of CO2 adsorption for NH2–MIL125 and 1Li@NH2–MIL125 were calculated using the Clausius–Clapeyron equation, based on the CO2 adsorption isotherms at 273 and 293 K, as shown in Figure 10. Of those tested, 1Li@NH2–MIL125 showed a higher heat of CO2 adsorption (42–26 kJ mol−1) than NH2–MIL125 (21–17 kJ mol−1). However, the value is lower than that of MIL-100 (63–23 kJ mol−1) [23]. The heat of CO2 adsorption at a CO2 coverage of 2.0 wt % for 1Li@NH2–MIL125 is estimated to be 28.2 kJ mol−1, which is much higher than that of NH2–MIL125 (17.1 kJ mol−1), suggesting a much stronger interaction between adsorbed CO2 and 1Li@NH2–MIL125.

3.9. CO2 Adsorption Regenerability

The recycle test of 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti) on CO2 adsorption was performed to test its regenerability for gas capture applications, because of it having the highest capacity for CO2 adsorption in xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti). Figure 11 shows the static CO2 adsorption capacity of 1Li@NH2-MIL125(Ti) at 293 K. The sample was desorpted by vacuum before the new test. The readsorption amount is nearly stable for six cycles, with no obvious loss in activity. This indicates that the adsorption mechanism of CO2 is mainly based on physical adsorption [8].

4. Conclusions

A series of xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) has been synthesized by in situ incorporation of alkali metal, which is straightforward and can tune the morphology of MOFs, compared with post-modification procedures. The effect of in situ alkali metal incorporation into the structure was demonstrated through the experimental data of N2 and CO2 adsorption of MOFs. The CO2 adsorption is mainly affected by the van der Waals forces between the framework and CO2 molecules. The smaller pore size, the Lewis basic active site −NH2 groups, and the alkali metals in our work are all beneficial for CO2 adsorption. The introduction of alkali metal mainly affects the CO2 adsorption in two respects. On the one hand, it impacts the crystal growth rate of MOFs, resulting the different morphology and size of grains, thus leading to the differences in specific surface area and pore size, which has a significant impact on the CO2 adsorption. On the other hand, the alkali metals, existing in the final framework after a series of solvent exchanging treatments, have an influence on the CO2 adsorption. This enhancement is due to the increased specific surface area and alkali metal coordinated on the defects of the cage construction. It was found that 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti) is the most efficient CO2 adsorbent among xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti). Although the amount is still lower than the reported MOFs, such as Mg-MOF-74, alkali metal doping has proven to be an effective modification strategy. This preliminary study is a practical attempt to improve the performance of MOF materials on CO2 adsorption, which will promote related research on CO2 conversion reactions.

Author Contributions

L.S. (Lifang Song) designed the experiments and drafted the manuscript; C.X. participated in the experiments and measurements; H.X. and S.Q. contributed to the analysis of the data; L.S. (Lixian Sun) and H.C. participated in the discussion of the results.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51502021, the State Scholarship Fund from the China Scholarship Council, grant number 201706565013, the Natural Science Basic Research Plan in Shaanxi Province of China, grant number 2017JQ2025, and the Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Laboratory Foundation, grant number 151001-K.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Yongpeng Xia for SEM and gas adsorption measurements.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Fernandez-Martinez, M.; Sardans, J.; Chevallier, F.; Ciais, P.; Obersteiner, M.; Vicca, S.; Canadell, J.G.; Bastos, A.; Friedlingstein, P.; Sitch, S.; et al. Global trends in carbon sinks and their relationships with CO2 and temperature. Nat. Clim. Chang. 2019, 9, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bui, M.; Adjiman, C.S.; Bardow, A.; Anthony, E.J.; Boston, A.; Brown, S.; Fennell, P.S.; Fuss, S.; Galindo, A.; Hackett, L.A.; et al. Carbon capture and storage (CCS): The way forward. Energy Environ. Sci. 2018, 11, 1062–1176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Patel, H.A.; Byun, J.; Yavuz, C.T. Carbon Dioxide Capture Adsorbents: Chemistry and Methods. ChemSusChem 2017, 10, 1303–1317. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Moura, P.A.S.; Bezerra, D.P.; Vilarrasa-Garcia, E.; Bastos-Neto, M.; Azevedo, D.C.S. Adsorption equilibria of CO2 and CH4 in cation-exchanged zeolites 13X. Adsorption 2016, 22, 71–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Sanchez-Zambrano, K.S.; Lima Duarte, L.; Maia, D.A.S.; Vilarrasa-Garcia, E.; Bastos-Neto, M.; Rodriguez-Castellon, E.; de Azevedo, D.C.S. CO2 Capture with Mesoporous Silicas Modified with Amines by Double Functionalization: Assessment of Adsorption/Desorption Cycles. Materials 2018, 11, 887. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Yin, F.Q.; Wu, Z.J.; Luo, X.Y.; Zhuang, L.Z.; Ou, H.Z.; Chen, S.X. Synthesis of nitrogen-rich hollow microspheres for CO2 adsorption. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 3805–3816. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Jin, C.N.; Zhang, S.N.; Zhang, Z.J.; Chen, Y. Mimic Carbonic Anhydrase Using Metal-Organic Frameworks for CO2 Capture and Conversion. Inorg. Chem. 2018, 57, 2169–2174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Cao, Y.; Zhao, Y.X.; Song, F.J.; Zhong, Q. Alkali metal cation doping of metal-organic framework for enhancing carbon dioxide adsorption capacity. J. Energy Chem. 2014, 23, 468–474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, S.; Ma, Z.W.; Du, X.Y.; Zhang, S.Q.; Chen, Z.B. Lanthanum doping of metal-organic frameworks-5 and its effect on thermal stability and CO2 adsorption property. Mater. Express 2018, 8, 381–387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Wen, H.M.; Li, L.B.; Lin, R.B.; Li, B.; Hu, B.; Zhou, W.; Hu, J.; Chen, B. Fine-tuning of nano-traps in a stable metal-organic framework for highly efficient removal of propyne from propylene. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 6931–6937. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rada, Z.H.; Abid, H.R.; Shang, J.; He, Y.D.; Webley, P.; Liu, S.M.; Sun, H.; Wang, S. Effects of amino functionality on uptake of CO2, CH4 and selectivity of CO2/CH4 on titanium based MOFs. Fuel 2015, 160, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Vaidhyanathan, R.; Iremonger, S.S.; Shimizu, G.K.H.; Boyd, P.G.; Alavi, S.; Woo, T.K. Direct Observation and Quantification of CO2 Binding within an Amine-Functionalized Nanoporous Solid. Science 2010, 330, 650–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Cao, Y.; Zhang, H.M.; Song, F.J.; Huang, T.; Ji, J.Y.; Zhong, Q.; Chu, W.; Xu, Q. UiO-66-NH2/GO Composite: Synthesis, Characterization and CO2 Adsorption Performance. Materials 2018, 11, 589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Lan, J.H.; Cao, D.P.; Wang, W.C. High Uptakes of Methane in Li-Doped 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks. Langmuir 2010, 26, 220–226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Cao, D.P.; Lan, J.H.; Wang, W.C.; Smit, B. Lithium-Doped 3D Covalent Organic Frameworks: High-Capacity Hydrogen Storage Materials. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2009, 48, 4730–4733. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  16. Mu, W.; Liu, D.H.; Zhong, C.L. A computational study of the effect of doping metals on CO2/CH4 separation in metal-organic frameworks. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2011, 143, 66–72. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Babarao, R.; Jiang, J.W. Molecular screening of metal-organic frameworks for CO2 storage. Langmuir 2008, 24, 6270–6278. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Xiang, Z.H.; Hu, Z.; Cao, D.P.; Yang, W.T.; Lu, J.M.; Han, B.Y.; Wang, W. Metal-Organic Frameworks with Incorporated Carbon Nanotubes: Improving Carbon Dioxide and Methane Storage Capacities by Lithium Doping. Angew. Chem. Int. Edit. 2011, 50, 491–494. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhu, L.; Liu, X.Q.; Jiang, H.L.; Sun, L.B. Metal-Organic Frameworks for Heterogeneous Basic Catalysis. Chem. Rev. 2017, 117, 8129–8176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  20. Kim, Y.; Huh, S. Pore engineering of metal-organic frameworks: Introduction of chemically accessible Lewis basic sites inside MOF channels. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 3524–3550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yang, Y.; Lin, R.J.; Ge, L.; Hou, L.; Bernhardt, P.; Rufford, T.E.; Wang, S.; Rudolph, V.; Wang, Y.-Y.; Zhu, Z. Synthesis and characterization of three amino-functionalized metal-organic frameworks based on the 2-aminoterephthalic ligand. Dalton Trans. 2015, 44, 8190–8197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Zhang, X.L.; Chen, Z.J.; Yang, X.Q.; Li, M.Y.; Chen, C.; Zhang, N. The fixation of carbon dioxide with epoxides catalyzed by cation-exchanged metal-organic framework. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 258, 55–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kim, S.N.; Kim, J.; Kim, H.Y.; Cho, H.Y.; Ahn, W.S. Adsorption/catalytic properties of MIL-125 and NH2-MIL-125. Catal. Today 2013, 204, 85–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Sohail, M.; Yun, Y.N.; Lee, E.; Kim, S.K.; Cho, K.; Kim, J.N.; Kim, T.W.; Moon, J.H.; Kim, H. Synthesis of Highly Crystalline NH2-MIL-125 (Ti) with S-Shaped Water Isotherms for Adsorption Heat Transformation. Cryst Growth Des. 2017, 17, 1208–1213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Nasalevich, M.A.; Becker, R.; Ramos-Fernandez, E.V.; Castellanos, S.; Veber, S.L.; Fedin, M.V.; Kapteijn, F.; Reek, J.N.H.; van der Vlugt, J.I.; Gascon, J. Co@NH2-MIL-125(Ti): Cobaloxime-derived metal-organic framework-based composite for light-driven H-2 production. Energy Environ. Sci. 2015, 8, 364–375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Martis, M.; Meicheng, W.; Mori, K.; Yamashit, H. Fabrication of metal nanoparticles in metal organic framework NH2-MIL-125 by UV photo-assisted methods for optimized catalytic properties. Catal. Today 2014, 235, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hu, S.; Liu, M.; Li, K.Y.; Zuo, Y.; Zhang, A.F.; Song, C.S.; Zhang, G.L.; Guo, X.W. Solvothermal synthesis of NH2-MIL-125(Ti) from circular plate to octahedron. Crystengcomm 2014, 16, 9645–9650. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Chaemchuem, S.; Kui, Z.; Verpoort, F. Control of interpenetration via in situ lithium incorporation in MOFs and their gas adsorption properties and selectivity. CrystEngComm 2016, 18, 7614–7619. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, H.; Yuan, X.Z.; Wu, Y.; Zeng, G.M.; Chen, X.H.; Leng, L.J.; Wu, Z.B.; Jiang, L.B.; Li, H. Facile synthesis of amino-functionalized titanium metal-organic frameworks and their superior visible-light photocatalytic activity for Cr(VI) reduction. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 286, 187–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hu, S.; Liu, M.; Guo, X.W.; Kuang, Z.C.; Li, K.Y.; Song, C.S. Effect of titanium ester on synthesizing NH2-MIL-125(Ti): Morphology changes from circular plate to octahedron and rhombic dodecahedron. J. Solid State Chem. 2018, 262, 237–243. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Lu, J.T.; Jiao, C.L.; Majeed, Z.; Jiang, H.Q. Magnesium and Nitrogen Co-Doped Mesoporous Carbon with Enhanced Microporosity for CO2 Adsorption. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Daliran, S.; Santiago-Portillo, A.; Navalon, S.; Oveisi, A.R.; Alvaro, M.; Ghorbani-Vaghei, R.; Azarifar, D.; Garcia, H. Cu(II)-Schiff base covalently anchored to MIL-125(Ti)-NH2 as heterogeneous catalyst for oxidation reactions. J. Colloid Interfaces Sci. 2018, 532, 700–710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Anbia, M.; Hoseini, V. Enhancement of CO2 adsorption on nanoporous chromium terephthalate (MIL-101) by amine modification. J. Nat. Gas Chem. 2012, 21, 339–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Molavi, H.; Eskandari, A.; Shojaei, A.; Mousavi, S.A. Enhancing CO2/N2 adsorption selectivity via post-synthetic modification of NH2-UiO-66(Zr). Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2018, 257, 193–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Hong, D.H.; Suh, M.P. Enhancing CO2 Separation Ability of a Metal-Organic Framework by Post-Synthetic Ligand Exchange with Flexible Aliphatic Carboxylates. Chem. Eur. J. 2014, 20, 426–434. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yang, D.A.; Cho, H.Y.; Kim, J.; Yang, S.T.; Ahn, W.S. CO2 capture and conversion using Mg-MOF-74 prepared by a sonochemical method. Energy Environ. Sci. 2012, 5, 6465–6473. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of H2BDC–NH2, NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Figure 1. FT-IR spectra of H2BDC–NH2, NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Materials 12 00844 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of doped NH2–MIL125(Ti): (a) xLi@NH2–MIL125(Ti), (b) xNa@NH2–MIL125(Ti), (c) xK@NH2–MIL125(Ti), and (d) magnification part for xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Figure 2. XRD patterns of doped NH2–MIL125(Ti): (a) xLi@NH2–MIL125(Ti), (b) xNa@NH2–MIL125(Ti), (c) xK@NH2–MIL125(Ti), and (d) magnification part for xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Materials 12 00844 g002
Figure 3. The X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) spectra of doped and pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti): (a) survey, (b) N 1s, (c) C 1s, (d) Ti 2p.
Figure 3. The X-ray photoelectron spectrometer (XPS) spectra of doped and pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti): (a) survey, (b) N 1s, (c) C 1s, (d) Ti 2p.
Materials 12 00844 g003
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Figure 4. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) curves of NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Materials 12 00844 g004
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of doped and pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti): (a) NH2–MIL125(Ti), (b) xLi@NH2–MIL125(Ti), (c) xNa@NH2–MIL125(Ti), and (d) xK@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Figure 5. Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) images of doped and pristine NH2–MIL125(Ti): (a) NH2–MIL125(Ti), (b) xLi@NH2–MIL125(Ti), (c) xNa@NH2–MIL125(Ti), and (d) xK@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Materials 12 00844 g005
Figure 6. SEM–energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping of 1K@NH2–MIL125(Ti) elements: C, N, Ti, K, and Cl.
Figure 6. SEM–energy-dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) mapping of 1K@NH2–MIL125(Ti) elements: C, N, Ti, K, and Cl.
Materials 12 00844 g006
Figure 7. N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K for NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Figure 7. N2 adsorption isotherms at 77 K for NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti).
Materials 12 00844 g007
Figure 8. CO2 adsorption isotherms of NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) at 293 K.
Figure 8. CO2 adsorption isotherms of NH2–MIL125(Ti) and xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) at 293 K.
Materials 12 00844 g008
Figure 9. The relationship of CO2 uptake on xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) with SBET at 293 K and 1 atm.
Figure 9. The relationship of CO2 uptake on xM@NH2–MIL125(Ti) with SBET at 293 K and 1 atm.
Materials 12 00844 g009
Figure 10. (a) The CO2 adsorption isotherms at 273 and 293 K. (b) The heats of CO2 adsorption of 1Li@NH2–MIL125 and NH2–MIL125.
Figure 10. (a) The CO2 adsorption isotherms at 273 and 293 K. (b) The heats of CO2 adsorption of 1Li@NH2–MIL125 and NH2–MIL125.
Materials 12 00844 g010
Figure 11. Recycle test of CO2 adsorption on 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti) at 293 K.
Figure 11. Recycle test of CO2 adsorption on 1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti) at 293 K.
Materials 12 00844 g011
Table 1. Textural properties of NH2–MIL125 doped with different amounts of alkali metal.
Table 1. Textural properties of NH2–MIL125 doped with different amounts of alkali metal.
SamplesSBET
(m2 g−1)
CO2 Adsorption
(mmol g1)
Alkali Metal Introduced in the Synthesis
(wt %)
Metal Analysis
(ICP, wt %)
TiAlkali Metal
NH2–MIL125(Ti)10382.13016.30
1Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti)14704.600.16416.70.082
2Li@NH2–MIL125(Ti)11152.310.32716.10.099
1Na@NH2–MIL125(Ti)14514.570.39315.70.065
2Na@NH2–MIL125(Ti)9852.500.78716.90.118
1K@NH2–MIL125(Ti)12263.550.52415.60.378
2K@NH2–MIL125(Ti)8722.081.04915.80.456
Table 2. Comparison of CO2 adsorption on reported metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).
Table 2. Comparison of CO2 adsorption on reported metal–organic frameworks (MOFs).
MOFsConditionCO2 Adsorption (mmol g−1)References
PEHA-MIL-101298 K, 10 bar1.30[33]
MIL-101(Cr)298 K, 10 bar0.85[33]
NH2-UiO-66298 K, 1 bar3.15[34]
UiO-66-AD6298 K, 1 bar2.63[35]
Mg-MOF-74298 K, 1 bar7.95[36]
MIL125(Ti)298 K, 1 bar3.00[11]
NH2-MIL125(Ti)298 K, 1 bar2.18[11]
NH2-MIL125(Ti)293 K, 1 bar2.13This work
1Li@NH2-MIL125(Ti)293 K, 1 bar4.60This work
1Na@NH2-MIL125(Ti)293 K, 1 bar4.57This work
1K@NH2-MIL125(Ti)293 K, 1 bar3.55This work

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Song, L.; Xue, C.; Xia, H.; Qiu, S.; Sun, L.; Chen, H. Effects of Alkali Metal (Li, Na, and K) Incorporation in NH2–MIL125(Ti) on the Performance of CO2 Adsorption. Materials 2019, 12, 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060844

AMA Style

Song L, Xue C, Xia H, Qiu S, Sun L, Chen H. Effects of Alkali Metal (Li, Na, and K) Incorporation in NH2–MIL125(Ti) on the Performance of CO2 Adsorption. Materials. 2019; 12(6):844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060844

Chicago/Turabian Style

Song, Lifang, Cheng Xue, Huiyun Xia, Shujun Qiu, Lixian Sun, and Huaxin Chen. 2019. "Effects of Alkali Metal (Li, Na, and K) Incorporation in NH2–MIL125(Ti) on the Performance of CO2 Adsorption" Materials 12, no. 6: 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060844

APA Style

Song, L., Xue, C., Xia, H., Qiu, S., Sun, L., & Chen, H. (2019). Effects of Alkali Metal (Li, Na, and K) Incorporation in NH2–MIL125(Ti) on the Performance of CO2 Adsorption. Materials, 12(6), 844. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12060844

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop