Next Article in Journal
Volcanic Mud Incorporating Paper Sludge as Raw Materials for Lightweight Aggregates
Previous Article in Journal
The Initial Stage in Oxidation of ZrNiSn (Half Heusler) Alloy by Oxygen
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Research on the Preparation and Properties of High Belite Sulphoaluminate Cement (HBSAC) Based on Various Industrial Solid Wastes

1
School of Civil Engineering, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao 266033, China
2
School of Architectural Engineering, Qingdao Agricultural University, Qingdao 266109, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2019, 12(9), 1510; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091510
Submission received: 10 April 2019 / Revised: 3 May 2019 / Accepted: 7 May 2019 / Published: 9 May 2019
(This article belongs to the Section Energy Materials)

Abstract

:
In this study, a variety of industrial solid wastes, including petroleum coke desulfurization slag, fly ash and carbide slag with natural resource bauxite, were used as raw materials to prepare high belite suphoaluminate cement, which contains a certain CaSO4 content without adding natural gypsum to the clinker. The sintering temperature, mineral composition, and the physical and mechanical properties of the cement clinkers were investigated. The techniques adopted included a comprehensive thermal analysis (DSC-TG), X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results revealed that it is completely feasible to prepare high belite sulphoaluminate cement with the various industrial solid wastes mentioned above and the utilization rate of the solid wastes is up to 80%. The sintering temperature ranges from 1225 °C to 1350 °C, and the optimal sintering temperature is approximately 1300 °C. The clinkers prepared at 1300 °C set and harden quickly and have a slightly higher water requirement of normal consistency. The mechanical strength is greatly affected by the CaSO4 and 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4 contents and the most reasonable CaSO4 content is 15%.

1. Introduction

Sulphoaluminate cement (SAC) is the third series of cements after Portland cement and aluminate cement, and it has the characteristics of early strength, high strength, high impermeability, high frost resistance, corrosion resistance, low alkali and low production energy consumption; SAC is widely used in rapid construction, rapid repair, winter construction, marine environments and underground engineering [1,2,3]. Its clinker is mainly composed of C4A3S (ye’elimite, 3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4) and β-C2S (belite, 2CaO·SiO2). Among them, C4A3S is an early strength mineral that can quickly hydrate to AFt (ettringite, 3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O) in the presence of gypsum to provide early strength [4]. Compared with C3S (alite, 3CaO·SiO2), the main mineral component of Portland cement, the formation temperature of C4A3S and the content of CaO are lower [5]. It not only saves a great deal of coal, power and limestone resources but also reduces CO2 emissions [6]. However, SAC has many defects, such as the low content and slow hydration of C2S, resulting in no significant increase in the later strength of SAC [7,8]; the formation of C4A3S requires a large amount of natural gypsum and high-quality aluminum resources.
As a new type of SAC, high belite sulphoaluminate cement (HBSAC) has an optimized mineral composition achieved by reducing the C4A3S content and increasing the C2S content [1,9], which effectively guarantees the development of late strength of the cement, reduces the amount of natural gypsum and alumina resources, and provides the conditions for the utilization of low-quality aluminum resources. Generally, limestone, bauxite or ball clay and gypsum are still used as raw materials for the preparation of HBSAC. However, after long-term and large-scale exploitation, the aforementioned raw materials are increasingly scarce, and the use of various industrial solid wastes as alternative raw materials has become the focus of researchers. El-Alfi et al. [10] succeeded in preparing HBSAC by sintering marble sludge waste, kaolinite and gypsum at 1200–1250 °C for 1 h without using limestone. Xue et al. [11] and Adolfsson et al. [12] used different types of steelmaking slag to get HBSAC, respectively. Sahu et al. [13] prepared HBSAC by calcining fly ash, limestone and gypsum at 1200 °C for 30 min without using any natural aluminum resources. Xu et al. [14] successfully obtained HBSAC from coal gangue, which not only made full use of the silicon and aluminium components in coal gangue but also utilized the low calorific value fuel function of coal gangue. Zhang et al. [15] applied titanium tailings to the preparation of HBSAC, showing that the high content of TiO2 has no adverse effect on cement formation, and proper amount of TiO2 can promote the formation of C2S. Huang et al. [16] used phosphogypsum to produce HBSAC as a raw material for the HBSAC clinker and added gypsum, which reduced the consumption of natural gypsum. Li et al. [17] employed lithium mica slag, whose main components are CS and Ca(AlO2)2, and low grad bauxite to prepare HBSAC with limestone and bauxite at 1270–1320 °C. Wang et al. [18] substituted natural gypsum for desulfurized gypsum, bauxite for red mud partially or fully to prepare HBSAC with limestone and bauxite at 1300 °C, the desulfurization gypsum and red mud can make up 70%–90% by mass of the total raw materials; and red mud as a resource of iron and aluminium in the preparation of HBSAC can also be seen in reference [19]. Tangshan Polar Bear Building Materials Co., Ltd. [20] adopted fly ash and desulfurization gypsum to produce fast-setting and quick-hardening HBSAC with other natural resources, which is popular in the Chinese cement market and has been applied in the Qingdao Airport and oilfields in Dongying, achieving good economic benefits. In addition, Li et al. [21] obtained HBSAC by microwave sintering with fly ash, baghouse dust and scrubber sludge as raw materials at 1150 °C for 10 min, showing obvious advantages of energy saving; Rungchet et al. [22] prepared HBSAC with fly ash, Al-rich sludge and flue gas desulfurization gypsum via the hydrothermal-calcination method at a calcination temperature of only 1050 °C, and the resulting products were friable and easy to grind, leading to energy saving. Overall, these works showed the feasibility to prepare HBSAC using various industrial wastes as raw materials. However, it needs to be emphasized that there is a large class of industrial solid waste—petroleum coke desulfurization slag—which is rarely considered but needs to be developed urgently.
In the coastal areas of Shandong Province, China, the crude oil for large refineries is mainly imported from the Middle East. The sulphur, nitrogen and metal element content in heavy and inferior crude oil are relatively high. Petroleum coke can only be desulfurized as fuel by circulating it in fluidized bed boilers. The desulfurization gypsum formed after this treatment is mixed with other combustion products to form petroleum coke desulfurization slag, whose main components are CaO and CS (anhydrite, CaSO4) [23]. Taking the Qingdao Refinery as an example, the discharge of petroleum coke desulfurization slag is more than 500,000 tons per year. However, its direct applications as building materials are limited because of the poor cement stability caused by CaO and CS in ordinary Portland cement and the secondary pollution caused by the release of SO2. At present, most of the slag is simply landfilled or stored in the open, which not only wastes land and resources but also pollutes the environment. Considering the preparation of HBSAC, it seems completely feasible to use petroleum coke desulfurization slag instead of limestone, which produces a large amount of CO2, and gypsum, which is a scarce resource, to provide calcium and sulfur elements needed for the clinker mineral formation. In addition, by controlling the amount of petroleum coke desulfurization slag, the residual CS in the clinker can replace the gypsum in the cement clinker admixture, which can further save natural gypsum.
Therefore, in this study, petroleum coke desulfurization slag was selected as the raw material for calcium and sulphur. To improve the comprehensive utilization of solid wastes, fly ash was selected as the raw material for aluminum and silica, while carbide slag (the waste residue from the hydrolysis of calcium carbide to acetylene) and bauxite were used as supplementary materials for calcium, aluminum and silica. Based on the materials mentioned above, HBSAC clinkers of varying CS contents were prepared, and their sintering temperature, mineral composition, physical and mechanical properties were also systematically studied.

2. Experimental Details

2.1. Raw Materials

The raw materials used in this study were petroleum coke desulfurization slag, fly ash, carbide slag and bauxite. The petroleum coke desulfurization slag was collected from the Sinopec Qingdao Refinery, Qingdao, China, the fly ash (Class I) from the Qingdao Municipal Concrete Industry Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China, the carbide slag from the Qingdao Qingxin Building Materials Co., Ltd., Qingdao, China, and bauxite from the Gongyi Wanying Environmental Protection Materials Co., Ltd., Gongyi, China. The main chemical composition of each raw material was measured by an X-ray fluorescence spectrometer (1800 type, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan) and are shown in Table 1.

2.2. Mix Design

In the process of developing a mixing design, it is assumed that the mineral formation reactions proceed as follows: (1)4CaO + Al2O3 + Fe2O3→C4AF (tetracalcium aluminoferrite, 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3); (2)3CaO + 3Al2O3 + CS→C4A3S; (3)2CaO + SiO2→β-C2S. Then, the mineral content of the target clinker should be set. In this study, a total of nine ratios in three series were designed, as shown in Table 2. Based on the mineral composition of the clinker, the chemical composition of the clinker can be calculated, and then the amounts of raw materials can be deduced. Meanwhile, it is necessary to control the alkalinity coefficient of the clinkers (i.e., Cm) [1] so that it is not less than 1.0, as it will also affect the raw material amounts, especially for the calcareous materials.

2.3. Preparation of Clinkers

The preparation of clinkers by using various industrial solid wastes can be divided into three steps: grinding and molding, preheating and sintering, and cooling and regrinding. The specific operations are as follows: (1) All of the raw materials were ground by a cement mill to pass through a 200 mesh square hole sieve and then mixed evenly and pressed into a steel matrix to form cylindrical test samples with a diameter of 15 mm and a height of 17 mm. (2) Samples were dried for 1 h in a drying oven at a constant temperature of 105 ± 5 °C and then preheated for 30 min in a high temperature electric furnace (SX-8-16 type, Beijing Ever Bright Medical Treatment Instruments Co., Ltd., Beijing, China) at a constant temperature of 950 °C and then sintered for 30 min in another high temperature electric furnace at a constant temperature. (3) The samples were removed and air cooled [24] and then ground to pass through a 200-mesh square hole sieve with a surplus of less than 5% or a Boer’s specific surface area of approximately 400 kg/m3. The processing diagram is shown in Figure 1.

2.4. Test Methods

A comprehensive thermal analyzer (SDT Q600 type, TA Instruments Co., New Castle, DE, U.S.A.) was employed to measure the weight change, the heat absorption and exothermy of raw materials during the sintering process, while the weight was monitored from room temperature (approximately 20 °C) to 1400 °C at a heating rate of 20 °C/min while continuously purging with N2. The mineral phase and hydration products of the clinkers were detected by an X-ray diffraction instrument (D8 advance type, Bruker Co., Karlsruhe, Germany) with the working conditions as follows: Cu target, voltage at 40 kV, current at 40 mA, 2-Theta scanning ranges from 5–60°, step width of 0.02° and a residence time of 0.05 s. The main chemical composition of the clinkers were measured by an X-ray fluorescence spectrometry (1800 type, Shimadzu Co., Kyoto, Japan). The basic physical properties of the clinkers, such as the water consumption at standard consistency and setting time, were determined according to the “Test methods for water requirement of normal consistency, setting time and soundness of the portland cement” (GB/T 1346-2011, China). According to the “Method of testing cements-Determination of strength” (GB/T 17671-1999, China) and the “Sulphoaluminate cement” (GB 20472-2006, China), the mechanical strength was tested, and the cement mortar pieces used were 40 × 40 × 160 mm samples prepared under a water–cement ratio of 0.52, which were cured for 1, 3, 7 and 28 days, respectively. A scanning electron microscope (JSM-7500F type, JEOL Co., LTD., Tokyo, Japan) with a working voltage of 5.0 kV was used to analyze the micromorphology of the clinker minerals and hydration products. The clinker samples were powdered, and the samples of the hydration products used were small pieces, which were sprayed with gold before testing.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Sintering Temperature of Clinkers

Comprehensive thermal analysis can characterize the mass and heat changes in the clinker formation process to approximate preliminarily the temperature of the reaction among the raw materials. As shown in Figure 2, the DSC-TG curves of the mixtures (i.e., samples I-1, II-1 and III-1) show a similar change rule. Combined with the DSC-TG curves of the raw materials in Figure 3, it is not difficult to obtain some meaningful results: when the temperature is below 200 °C, the endothermic peaks and mass loss in the DSC-TG curves should originate from the evaporation of the physical water in all the raw materials; when temperature reaches 400–500 °C, an endothermic peak should be caused by the decomposition of the Ca(OH)2 in the petroleum coke desulfurization slag (formed by the CaO absorbing water from the air) and in the carbide slag; at approximately 710 °C, 910 °C and 1050 °C, there are different sized endothermic peaks with mass loss, which are still caused by the petroleum coke desulfurization slag and carbide slag. It appears that there was no new mineral formation before 1050 °C, and in this process, the mass loss and heat change of the fly ash and bauxite were also not significant. The reason may be that these two raw materials have excellent resistance to elevated temperatures. After 1050 °C, all the raw materials were involved in the reaction, including a series of chemical changes such as the decomposition of the CS, the formation and decomposition of the C2AS (gehlenite, 2CaO·Al2O3·SiO2) [21], C4A3S, C5S2S (ternesite, 4CaO·2SiO2·CaSO4) [21,25,26] and β-C2S. The comprehensive effect was to form exothermic peaks in the 1050–1350 °C range, which was also used preliminarily as the sintering temperature.
To determine the clinker sintering temperature and assess the formation of products more accurately, an X-ray diffraction analysis was carried out. The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the sample II-1 cement clinker at different temperatures are given in Figure 4. When the sintering temperature is in the range of 950–1100 °C, the main products are CS, C2AS, CaO, Al2O3 and SiO2, and C4A3S begins to form in a small amount at 1050 °C, which is consistent with the results of the comprehensive thermal analysis. The temperature rises to 1150–1225 °C, C4A3S gradually forms in large quantities; additionally, the C2AS disappears and C5S2S appears, and the sintering products are mainly C4A3S and C5S2S. As the temperature continues to rise to 1250–1300 °C, the C5S2S decomposes, and β-C2S gradually forms; the main products are C4A3S, β-C2S and CS. At the same time, the intensity of the C4A3S and β-C2S diffraction peaks increases with the increase in temperature, while that of the CS decreases, indicating that the increase in temperature promotes high temperature reactions. As the temperature increases again, the intensity of the diffraction peaks of each product begins to decrease, and the CS diffraction peaks are hardly observed, especially after 1350 °C. This finding indicates that the increase in temperature has caused the decomposition of the mineral phases. It can be seen that the sintering temperature of the sample II-1 cement clinker ranges from 1250 °C to 1350 °C, and the optimum sintering temperature is 1300 °C. It is worth pointing out that the iron element did not form the anticipated C4AF but mainly formed C4A2.85Fe1.5S(3CaO·2.85Al2O3·1.5Fe2O3·CaSO4) by solid solution in the C4A3S [25], regardless of the sintering temperature.
In accordance with the same principle of analysis, all the other mix proportions besides sample II-1 were tested to study the influence of the mix proportion on the sintering temperature. Some of the results are shown in Figure 5, Figure 6 and Figure 7. As revealed in these figures, the sintering temperature ranges of the Series I, II, and III cement clinkers are approximately 12251325 °C, 12501350 °C, and 12751350 °C, respectively. Thus, with the increase of the CS content in the mix design, the lower limit of the sintering temperature increases gradually, which is controlled by the decomposition of C5S2S, and the range of the sintering temperature is basically maintained at 100 °C. In addition, the optimal sintering temperature of all the mix proportions is approximately 1300 °C.

3.2. Mineral Composition of Clinkers

The micromorphology of the minerals in the clinker was observed by scanning electron microscopy (SEM), and the mineral composition was qualitatively analyzed. Taking the sample II-1 cement clinker prepared at 1300 °C as an example, the results are shown in Figure 8. The cement clinker system was mainly composed of tabular C4A3S, blocky granular β-C2S, and radical and needle-bar CS. The mineral composition is basically consistent with the X-ray diffraction analysis.
In addition to the qualitative analysis of the mineral composition, a quantitative analysis of the clinker minerals was also carried out. The chemical composition of the cement clinkers prepared at 1300 °C was measured as shown in Table 3. The clinker mineral content is calculated according to Bogue’s equation [27]. However, because of the existence of residual CS and C4A2.85Fe1.5S and the absence of C4AF in the cement clinker, Bogue’s equation needs to be modified [28,29,30,31], as shown in Equations (1)–(4), while the alkalinity coefficient is also been modified, as shown in Equation (5).
ω(C2S) = 2.87ω(SiO2)
ω(C4A2.85Fe1.5S) = 3.48ω(Fe2O3)
ω(C4A3S) = 1.99[ω(Al2O3) − 1.21ω(Fe2O3)]
ω(CS) = 1.70ω(SO3) − 0.44ω(Al2O3) − 0.02ω(Fe2O3)
Cm = [ω(CaO) − 0.7ω(TiO2) − 0.41ω(CS)]/{0.73[ω(Al2O3) − 1.21ω(Fe2O3)] + 0.93ω(Fe2O3) + 1.87ω(SiO2)}
As revealed in Table 4, the actual mineral content of the cement clinker is not significantly different from the design content in Table 2. More specifically, the content error of the C4A3S and β-C2S is approximately 5%, while that of the CS is within 2%, even the content error between the C4A2.85Fe1.5S and C4AF is less than 5%. In addition, the alkalinity coefficients of all the clinkers are slightly greater than 1.0, indicating that the CaO in the raw materials can meet the requirements for the formation of various useful minerals.
By the qualitative and quantitative analyses mentioned above, the mineral composition of the clinkers basically conforms to the expected product, and it is indirectly proven that the mix design and sintering conditions are reasonable.

3.3. Physical and Mechanical Properties of the Clinkers

The physical and mechanical properties are the most basic elements of cement performance. In this study, the water requirement of normal consistency, setting time and mechanical strength of the clinkers with different proportions prepared at 1300 °C were tested. As shown in Table 5, the water requirement of normal consistency, which was prepared by using various solid wastes, is in the range of 36%–40%, which is slightly larger than that of typical clinkers (approximately 30%). The initial setting time and the final setting time are 17–25 min and 23–40 min, respectively. The setting time is relatively short, which is more suitable for projects involving emergency rescue and repair. Further analysis shows that the water requirement of normal consistency decreases and the setting time prolongs as the C4A3S content decreases in each series. In view of the fact that the early hydration of HBSAC is dominated by C4A3S [32,33,34], it can be considered that the C4A3S content plays a direct and decisive role in the water requirement of normal consistency and in the setting time. Comparing sample I-1 with II-1, or sample I-2, II-2 with III-1, or sample I-3 with III-2, it is easy to find that the water requirement of normal consistency decreases and the setting time shortens as the CS content increases under the same C4A3S content, which indicates that an increase in the CS content in the range of 10%–20% helps to accelerate the C4A3S hydration.
Figure 9 shows the mechanical strength of the cement clinkers measured by using the mortar pieces at a water-cement ratio of 0.52. As shown in Figure 9a, the bending strength of each series increases as the curing age increases, and the bending strength increases rapidly within 3 days and slows down after 3 days. For example, as the lowest early bending strengths of all the mixtures, the bending strengths of sample I-3 at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days are 2.4 MPa, 3.8 MPa, 5.2 MPa and 6.2 MPa, respectively, while the strength increases at 3, 7 and 28 days are 58%, 37% and 20%, respectively. Sample II-2, as the middle early bending strength sample of all the mixtures, has bending strengths of 5.5 MPa, 6.1 MPa, 6.2 MPa and 6.4 MPa, respectively at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days, and strength increases of 11%, 2% and 3%, respectively at 3, 7 and 28 days. Of all the mixtures, sample III-1 has the highest early bending strength; its bending strengths at 1, 3, 7 and 28 days are 6.0 MPa, 6.3 MPa, 6.6 MPa and 6.8 MPa, respectively, while the strength increases at 3, 7 and 28 days are 5%, 5%, and 3%, respectively. In addition, there are several other findings: (1) The increase in the bending strength of the samples in Series II and III at 7 days has decreased to less than 5%, while that of the samples in Series I is approximately 30%, which indicates that the increased CS content in the clinker has an obvious positive effect on the development of early bending strength [35]. (2) Comparing the bending strength of samples I-1 and II-1 (or samples I-2, II-2 and III-1) at different curing ages, it can be seen that under the same C4A3S content, the bending strength at 1, 3, and 7 days increases as the CS content increases. However, there is no similar trend for the bending strength at 28 days, which shows from another perspective that the increased CS content in the clinker has an obvious positive effect on the development of early bending strength. The bending strength at 28 days decreases with the β-C2S content decreases, which means that the hydration of β-C2S is the main factor for the strength development of the cement clinker in the later stage [36]. (3) During the entire 28-day curing process, the bending strength of each series decreases as the C4A3S content decreases. The β-C2S content does not change the development trend of the later strength, indicating that the hydration of β-C2S in the clinker is not so strong that the bending strength of the cement clinkers at 28 days is still dominated by the C4A3S content.
In terms of compressive strength, as shown in Figure 9b, there are obvious differences among the three series with the increase in the curing age. The compressive strength of Series I and III samples decreases at 28 days, while that of Series II samples maintains good growth during the whole curing age. It can be seen that the CS content in the clinker is not as high as possible, a lower or higher CS content in the clinker may have a negative impact on the compressive strength. The reasons are as follows: when the CS content is lower, the AFt phase formed in the early hydration stage is partly converted to the AFm (ettringite, C3A·CaSO4·12H2O) phase in the later hydration stage [37,38,39], as shown in Figure 10, which results in a decrease in the compressive strength; when the CS content is higher, the rate of the AFt phase formation in the early hydration stage is too fast, and the crystal structure continues to grow in the later hydration stage, which causes expansion and microcrack damage [26], and also results in a decrease in the compressive strength. According to the results of this experiment, 15% is the optimal CS content in this kind of cement clinker; under this content, the lowest compressive strengths are 42.1 MPa, 46.3 MPa, and the highest are 52.8 MPa, 64.3 MPa at 3 days and 28 days, respectively. The change rule of the compressive strength before 28 days is the same as that of the bending strength: the strength increases rapidly in 3 days but slows down after 3 days, and the increase of the CS content in the clinker has an obvious positive effect on the development of the early compressive strength. The specific strength value can be referred to in Figure 9b, and will not be repeated here.
The formation of the hydration products can reasonably reflect the development of the cement strength. As shown in Figure 11, the main hydration product of the cement is the AFt phase, and the C4A3S hydration is the main hydration reaction during the 7 days, while CS is gradually consumed. The C2S hydration is slow, and C2S diffraction peaks in the XRD patterns still change slightly at 28 days. In Figure 12, the needle bar phase is the AFt phase, and at the initial hydration stage, the AFt phase are fine needle rods, which gradually develop into thick needle rods as the curing age increases. At the later hydration stage, the flocculent C-S-H gel phase appears and intercalates with the needle AFt phase, which makes the structure of the cement paste denser and further increases the strength. Thus, the formation process of the hydration products coincides with the strength development law as the curing age increases. In addition, the XRD patterns and SEM micromorphology of the hydration products of the Series I cement clinker before 28 days and the Series II cement clinker during the whole curing age, are basically similar to those of the Series II cement clinker and are not listed here.

5. Conclusions

It is completely feasible to prepare HBSAC with petroleum coke desulfurization slag, fly ash, carbide slag and bauxite synergistically. The cement clinkers prepared contain 10%–20% of CS without adding additional natural gypsum. The comprehensive utilization rate of the solid waste is up to 80%.
The sintering temperature range of the cement clinkers prepared with solid wastes such as petroleum coke desulfurization slag and fly ash is 1225–1350 °C, and with a 5% gradient increase in the cement clinker CS content, the lower limit of the sintering temperature increases by a 25 °C gradient, which is caused by the increase in the C5S2S decomposition temperature. The optimal sintering temperature is approximately 1300 °C.
The mineral composition of the cement clinkers prepared with solid wastes such as petroleum coke desulfurization slag and fly ash is mainly C4A3S, β-C2S and CS. The iron element does not form the anticipated C4AF but mainly forms C4A2.85Fe1.5S by solid solution in C4A3S. The difference between the actual mineral content and the designed mineral content of the clinkers is within a reasonable range.
The cement clinkers prepared at 1300 °C set and harden quickly and have a slightly higher water requirement of normal consistency. The water requirement of normal consistency is 36%–40%, and the initial setting time and final setting time are 17–23 min, 25–40 min, respectively. The mechanical strength is greatly affected by the clinker CS and C4A3Scontents, and the optimal CS content is 15%. In terms of the hydration products of the cement clinkers, the AFt and C-S-H gel are still the main phases, which are formed by C4A3S hydration at the early stage and C2S hydration at the later stage, respectively.

Author Contributions

Investigation, methodology, formal analysis, data curation, and writing-original draft, D.S.; project administration, conceptualization, supervision, and writing-review and editing, Q.L.; visualization and funding acquisition, S.G.; validation, L.W.; resources, G.Y.; software, Y.G.

Funding

Projects No. 51878366, 51578297 and 51808310 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Projects No. ZR2017ZC0737 from the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province.

Acknowledgments

The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of Projects No. 51878366, 51578297 and 51808310 from the National Natural Science Foundation of China, Projects No. ZR2017ZC0737 from the Natural Science Foundation of Shandong Province.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
SACsulphoaluminate cement
HBSAChigh belite sulphoaluminate cement
C4A3S3CaO·3Al2O3·CaSO4
β-C2S2CaO·SiO2
CS CaSO4
C2AS 2CaO·Al2O3·SiO2
C5S2S 4CaO·2SiO2·CaSO4
C4AF 4CaO·Al2O3·Fe2O3
C4A2.85Fe1.5S3CaO·2.85Al2O3·1.5Fe2O3·CaSO4
AFtAFm 3CaO·Al2O3·3CaSO4·32H2O3CaO·Al2O3·CaSO4·12H2O

References

  1. Wang, Y.M.; Su, M.Z.; Zhang, L. Sulphoaluminate Cement, 1st ed.; Press of Beijing University of Technology: Beijing, China, 1999. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  2. Coppola, L.; Coffetti, D.; Crotti, E.; Pastore, T. CSA-based Portland-free binders to manufacture sustainable concretes for jointless slabs on ground. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 187, 691–698. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Coppola, L.; Coffetti, D.; Crotti, E. Use of tartaric acid for the production of sustainable Portland-free CSA-based mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 171, 243–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Hargis, C.W.; Kirchheim, A.P.; Monteiro, P.J.M.; Gartner, E.M. Early age hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate (synthetic ye’elimite, C4A3S) in the presence of gypsum and varying amounts of calcium hydroxide. Cem. Concr. Res. 2013, 48, 105–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ali, M.; Gopal, S.; Handoo, S. Studies on the formation kinetics of calcium sulphoaluminate. Cem. Concr. Res. 1994, 24, 715–720. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Coppola, L.; Coffetti, D.; Crotti, E.; Gazzaniga, G.; Pastore, T. An Empathetic Added Sustainability Index (EASI) for cementitious based construction materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 220, 475–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Ftikos, C.; Philippou, T. Preparation and hydration study of rich C2S cements. Cem. Concr. Res. 1990, 20, 934–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Pelletier-Chaignat, L.; Winnefeld, F.; Lothenbach, B.; Müller, C.J. Beneficial use of limestone filler with calcium sulphoaluminate cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 26, 619–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Li, J.; Zhou, C.Y.; Yang, Y.J. Optimization of mineral composition of high belite-sulphoaluminate clinker. J. Chin. Ceram. Soc. 2012, 40, 1618–2012. (In Chinese) [Google Scholar]
  10. El-Alfi, E.; Gado, R.; Gado, R. Preparation of calcium sulfoaluminate-belite cement from marble sludge waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 113, 764–772. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Xue, P.; Xu, A.; He, D.; Yang, Q.; Liu, G.; Engström, F.; Björkman, B. Research on the sintering process and characteristics of belite sulphoaluminate cement produced by BOF slag. Constr. Build. Mater. 2016, 122, 567–576. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Viggh, E.; Menad, N.; Björkman, B.; Adolfsson, D. Steelmaking slags as raw material for sulphoaluminate belite cement. Adv. Cem. Res. 2007, 19, 147–156. [Google Scholar] [Green Version]
  13. Sahu, S.; Majling, J. Preparation of sulphoaluminate belite cement from fly ash. Cem. Concr. Res. 1994, 24, 1065–1072. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, G.L. Research of utilizing coal gangue in Shi Zuishan district to produce series of sulphoaluminate cements. Master’s Thesis, Chengdu University of Technology, Chengdu, China, 2009. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  15. Zhang, J.S.; Sui, Z.T.; Shen, Y.M.; Hui, Z.F.; An, H.Y.; Gao, F. Research of producing high silicon blite sulfur aluminate cement by titanium tailings. Iron Steel Van. Tit. 2004, 25, 41–47. [Google Scholar]
  16. Huang, Y.B.; Qian, J.S.; Kang, X.J.; Yu, J.C.; Fan, Y.R.; Dang, Y.D. Belite-calcium sulfoaluminate cement prepared with phosphogypsum: Influence of P2O5 and F on the clinker formation and cement performances. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 203, 432–442. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Li, F.W. Research of preparing sulphate aluminium cement using calcium and aluminum residue and low grade bauxite. Master’s Thesis, Nanchang University, Nanchang, China, 2012. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  18. Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Zhu, J.; Wang, P.; Ma, C. Experimental Investigation and Modeling of Sulfoaluminate Cement Preparation Using Desulfurization Gypsum and Red Mud. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 52, 1261–1266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Senff, L.; Castela, A.; Hajjaji, W.; Hotza, D.; Labrincha, J. Formulations of sulfobelite cement through design of experiments. Constr. Mater. 2011, 25, 3410–3416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, Z.Q. “Fast-setting and quick-hardening belite sulphoaluminate cement clinker, its application and production process”. Chinese Patent No. 201410416928.8, 25 August 2015. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  21. Li, H.; Agrawal, D.K.; Cheng, J.; Silsbee, M.R. Microwave sintering of sulphoaluminate cement with utility wastes. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 1257–1261. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rungchet, A.; Chindaprasirt, P.; Wansom, S.; Pimraksa, K. Hydrothermal synthesis of calcium sulfoaluminate–belite cement from industrial waste materials. J. Clean. Prod. 2016, 115, 273–283. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, F.C. The properties and application of petroleum coke desulfuration residues. Master’s Thesis, Qingdao University of Technology, Qingdao, China, 2012. (In Chinese). [Google Scholar]
  24. Popescu, C.; Muntean, M.; Sharp, J. Industrial trial production of low energy belite cement. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003, 25, 689–693. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Bullerjahn, F.; Schmitt, D.; Ben Haha, M. Effect of raw mix design and of clinkering process on the formation and mineralogical composition of (ternesite) belite calcium sulphoaluminate ferrite clinker. Cem. Concr. Res. 2014, 59, 87–95. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. ROY, D.M.; Silsbee, M.R.; Xie, Z.H. Influences of Surplus SO3 in FBC Ash on Formation of Belite-Rich Sulfoaluminate Clinker, 3rd ed.; IAUS: Lexington, KY, USA, 1999. [Google Scholar]
  27. Bogue, R.H. Calculation of the Compounds in Portland Cement. Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. Ed. 1929, 1, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Mehta, P.K. Investigations on energy-saving cements. World Cem. Technol. 1980, 11, 166–177. [Google Scholar]
  29. Majling, J.; Sahu, S.; Vlna, M.; Roy, D.M. Relationship between raw mixture and mineralogical composition of sulfoaluminate belite clinkers in the system CaO-SiO2-Al2O3-Fe2O3-SO3. Cem. Concr. Res. 1993, 23, 1351–1356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Sharp, J.H.; Lawrence, C.D.; Yang, R. Calcium sulfoaluminate cements-low energy cements, special cements or what? Adv. Cem. Res. 1999, 11, 3–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, I.A.; Juenger, M.C. Incorporation of coal combustion residuals into calcium sulfoaluminate-belite cement clinkers. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2012, 34, 893–902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Glasser, F.; Zhang, L. High-performance cement matrices based on calcium sulfoaluminate–belite compositions. Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 1881–1886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Janotka, I.; Krajci, L.; Mojumdar, S.C. Performance of sulphoaluminate-belite cement with high C4A3S content. Ceram-Silikáty 2007, 51, 74. [Google Scholar]
  34. Álvarez-Pinazo, G.; Santacruz, I.; Aranda, M.A.G.; De La Torre, A.G.; León-Reina, L. Hydration Reactions and Mechanical Strength Developments of Iron-Rich Sulfobelite Eco-cements. Ind. Eng. Chem. 2013, 52, 16606–16614. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Berger, S.; Coumes, C.C.D.; Le Bescop, P.; Damidot, D. Influence of a thermal cycle at early age on the hydration of calcium sulphoaluminate cements with variable gypsum contents. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 149–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Chen, I.A.; Juenger, M.C.G. Synthesis and hydration of calcium sulfoaluminate belit cements with varied phase compositions. J. Mater. Sci. 2011, 46, 2568–2577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Rungchet, A.; Poon, C.; Chindaprasirt, P.; Pimraksa, K. Synthesis of low-temperature calcium sulfoaluminate-belite cements from industrial wastes and their hydration: Comparative studies between lignite fly ash and bottom ash. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2017, 83, 10–19. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Adolfsson, D.; Menad, N.; Viggh, E.; Björkman, B. Hydraulic properties of sulphoaluminate belite cement based on steelmaking slags. Adv. Cem. Res. 2007, 19, 133–138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Sahu, S.; Havlica, J.; Tomkova, V.; Majling, J. Hydration behaviour of sulphoaluminate belite cement in the presence of various calcium sulphates. Thermochim. Acta 1991, 175, 45–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Processing diagram of cement clinker preparation.
Figure 1. Processing diagram of cement clinker preparation.
Materials 12 01510 g001
Figure 2. Comprehensive thermal analysis (DSC-TG) curves of the mixtures: (a) I-1; (b) II-1; (c) III-1.
Figure 2. Comprehensive thermal analysis (DSC-TG) curves of the mixtures: (a) I-1; (b) II-1; (c) III-1.
Materials 12 01510 g002aMaterials 12 01510 g002b
Figure 3. Comprehensive thermal analysis (DSC-TG) curves of the raw materials: (a) petroleum coke desulfurization slag; (b) fly ash; (c) carbide slag; (d) bauxite.
Figure 3. Comprehensive thermal analysis (DSC-TG) curves of the raw materials: (a) petroleum coke desulfurization slag; (b) fly ash; (c) carbide slag; (d) bauxite.
Materials 12 01510 g003aMaterials 12 01510 g003b
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the sample II-1 cement clinker at different temperatures.
Figure 4. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the sample II-1 cement clinker at different temperatures.
Materials 12 01510 g004
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Series I cement clinkers at different temperatures.
Figure 5. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Series I cement clinkers at different temperatures.
Materials 12 01510 g005
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Series II cement clinkers at different temperatures.
Figure 6. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Series II cement clinkers at different temperatures.
Materials 12 01510 g006
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Series III cement clinkers at different temperatures.
Figure 7. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the Series III cement clinkers at different temperatures.
Materials 12 01510 g007
Figure 8. Micromorphology of the sample II-1 cement clinker: (a) C4A3S; (b) CS; (c) β-C2S.
Figure 8. Micromorphology of the sample II-1 cement clinker: (a) C4A3S; (b) CS; (c) β-C2S.
Materials 12 01510 g008
Figure 9. Mechanical strength of the cement clinkers: (a) bending strength; (b) compressive strength.
Figure 9. Mechanical strength of the cement clinkers: (a) bending strength; (b) compressive strength.
Materials 12 01510 g009
Figure 10. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micromorphology of the hydration products of the Series I cement clinker at 28 days: (a) XRD patterns; (b) SEM micromorphology.
Figure 10. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns and scanning electron microscopy (SEM) micromorphology of the hydration products of the Series I cement clinker at 28 days: (a) XRD patterns; (b) SEM micromorphology.
Materials 12 01510 g010
Figure 11. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the hydration products of the Series II cement clinker at different curing ages.
Figure 11. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the hydration products of the Series II cement clinker at different curing ages.
Materials 12 01510 g011
Figure 12. SEM micromorphology of the hydration products of the Series II cement clinker at different curing ages: (a) 1 day; (b) 3 days; (c) 7 days; (d) 28 days.
Figure 12. SEM micromorphology of the hydration products of the Series II cement clinker at different curing ages: (a) 1 day; (b) 3 days; (c) 7 days; (d) 28 days.
Materials 12 01510 g012
Table 1. Chemical composition of the raw materials, wt.%.
Table 1. Chemical composition of the raw materials, wt.%.
Raw MaterialCaOAl2O3SiO2Fe2O3SO3MgOTiO2LOI
Petroleum coke desulfurization slag52.930.964.561.1330.122.030.007.4899.21
Fly ash7.8627.4552.564.241.261.120.991.7397.21
Carbide slag66.021.474.610.681.970.250.0024.6299.62
Bauxite0.5164.0714.530.880.0015.382.561.0398.96
Table 2. Design of the mineral composition of the clinker and the proportion of the raw materials, wt.%.
Table 2. Design of the mineral composition of the clinker and the proportion of the raw materials, wt.%.
SeriesGroupClinker MineralsRaw Materials
C4AFC4A3SC2SCSPetroleum Coke Desulfurization SlagFly AshCarbide SlagBauxite
I1540451031.812.035.121.1
2535501029.016.038.616.4
3530551027.919.340.712.1
II1540401539.210.829.220.8
2535451537.514.332.016.2
3530501535.218.435.211.2
III1535402047.29.923.219.7
2530452045.013.826.414.8
3525502042.517.929.89.8
Table 3. Chemical composition of the cement clinkers, wt.%.
Table 3. Chemical composition of the cement clinkers, wt.%.
SeriesGroupCaOAl2O3Fe2O3SiO2SO3MgOTiO2
I145.7620.362.3613.9510.553.200.7396.91
247.2318.092.4415.469.862.420.6496.14
348.6515.972.5717.089.291.710.5595.82
II145.3420.782.3212.5613.673.040.6898.39
246.7518.242.4714.1312.932.300.6097.42
348.0416.022.6316.0712.271.470.5097.00
III145.8318.252.1512.6315.883.000.7798.51
247.2616.132.2914.2315.392.200.6898.18
348.7513.882.4515.6414.651.370.5897.32
Table 4. Mineral content, wt.% and alkalinity coefficient of the cement clinkers.
Table 4. Mineral content, wt.% and alkalinity coefficient of the cement clinkers.
SeriesGroupC4A3Sβ-C2SC4A2.85Fe1.5SCSCm
I134.8340.048.218.9392.011.01
230.1244.378.498.7591.731.02
325.5949.028.948.7192.261.02
II135.7736.058.0714.0593.941.01
230.3540.558.6013.9193.411.02
325.5546.129.1513.7694.581.00
III131.1436.257.4818.9293.791.01
226.5840.847.9719.0294.411.01
321.7244.898.5318.7593.891.03
Table 5. Physical properties of cement clinkers.
Table 5. Physical properties of cement clinkers.
SeriesGroupWater Requirement of Normal Consistency (wt.%)Initial Setting Time (min)Final Setting Time (min)
I139.521.8035.95
239.023.1737.75
338.524.5039.53
II137.520.1030.60
237.021.0831.58
336.522.7532.08
III137.017.0523.45
236.518.1826.42
336.019.3828.20

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Su, D.; Yue, G.; Li, Q.; Guo, Y.; Gao, S.; Wang, L. Research on the Preparation and Properties of High Belite Sulphoaluminate Cement (HBSAC) Based on Various Industrial Solid Wastes. Materials 2019, 12, 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091510

AMA Style

Su D, Yue G, Li Q, Guo Y, Gao S, Wang L. Research on the Preparation and Properties of High Belite Sulphoaluminate Cement (HBSAC) Based on Various Industrial Solid Wastes. Materials. 2019; 12(9):1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091510

Chicago/Turabian Style

Su, Dunlei, Gongbing Yue, Qiuyi Li, Yuanxin Guo, Song Gao, and Liang Wang. 2019. "Research on the Preparation and Properties of High Belite Sulphoaluminate Cement (HBSAC) Based on Various Industrial Solid Wastes" Materials 12, no. 9: 1510. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma12091510

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop