Next Article in Journal
Application-Oriented Growth of a Molybdenum Disulfide (MoS2) Single Layer by Means of Parametrically Optimized Chemical Vapor Deposition
Next Article in Special Issue
Highly Insulated Wall Systems with Exterior Insulation of Polyisocyanurate under Different Facer Materials: Material Characterization and Long-Term Hygrothermal Performance Assessment
Previous Article in Journal
Trace Organic Compound Removal from Wastewater Reverse-Osmosis Concentrate by Advanced Oxidation Processes with UV/O3/H2O2
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Comparative Study on the Thermal Energy Storage Performance of Bio-Based and Paraffin-Based PCMs Using DSC Procedures
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Optimization of Multilayered Walls for Building Envelopes Including PCM-Based Composites

Materials 2020, 13(12), 2787; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13122787
by Victor D. Fachinotti 1,*, Facundo Bre 1, Christoph Mankel 2, Eduardus A. B. Koenders 2 and Antonio Caggiano 2,3
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2020, 13(12), 2787; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13122787
Submission received: 18 May 2020 / Revised: 13 June 2020 / Accepted: 17 June 2020 / Published: 20 June 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Energy in Construction and Building Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

The topic "Optimization of multilayered walls for building 2 envelopes including PCM-based composites" seems to be interesting specially in countries in which energy consumption has a significant role. The manuscript prepared in a good way however it could be improved by the following comments:

1) The introduction is too long. it would be better to cut from line 95 and add the text to a new section which could call Analysis procedure or something else.

2) The wall simulated with only 2 different materials however the variety of such construction would be totally different.

3) The quality of all graphs (figures) should improve.

4) The whole results should verify by physical model or real construction. The lack of real data is clear on the paper.

5) Some of the names written in another font which I'm not sure if it fits the Journal format (like line 23-24, 111, ...)

6) There are lots of figures, equations, and tables citation which missed during the preparation of the manuscript (like lines 105-106, 142-143, 146, 160, 186, ...)

 

 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Please check the cited references. Twenty "Error! Reference source not found" are present in the paper text.

 

 

Author Response

Point 1: Please check the cited references. Twenty "Error! Reference source not found" are present in the paper text.

Response 1: We would like to thank the reviewer for making us realize of these errors. They did not exist in the .doc file we uploaded, being apparently produced when the journal submitting system converted it into .pdf. We will warn the editor to fix this bug.

Reviewer 3 Report

This paper presents results from an experimental program aimed to develop a method for optimizing multilayered walls via the use of PCM composites. The presented idea is interesting. The following items are to be addressed before the manuscript can be published:

  • Typos exist across the manuscript. Especially those related to incorrect citations i.e. “Error! Reference source not found”
  • How economical is the proposed system? As compared to commercially available products.
  • Heat transfer is primarily a function of thermal properties. Please elaborate a bit on the density of the system. How sensitive is this property to temperatures?
  • Can the proposed insulation system also work as a fire insulation? The works of Hawileh et al. show the use of gypsum-based system can be effective. Perhaps this point can be highlighted.

    This paper presents results from an experimental program aimed to develop a method for optimizing multilayered walls via the use of PCM composites. The presented idea is interesting. The following items are to be addressed before the manuscript can be published:

    • Typos exist across the manuscript. Especially those related to incorrect citations i.e. “Error! Reference source not found”
    • How economical is the proposed system? As compared to commercially available products.
    • Heat transfer is primarily a function of thermal properties. Please elaborate a bit on the density of the system. How sensitive is this property to temperatures?
    • Can the proposed insulation system also work as a fire insulation? The works of Hawileh et al. show the use of gypsum-based system can be effective. Perhaps this point can be highlighted.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 3 Report

Thank you!

Back to TopTop