Next Article in Journal
Dynamic Behavior of Aluminum Alloy Aw 5005 Undergoing Interfacial Friction and Specimen Configuration in Split Hopkinson Pressure Bar System at High Strain Rates and Temperatures
Next Article in Special Issue
Highly Effective Methods of Obtaining N-Doped Graphene by Gamma Irradiation
Previous Article in Journal
The Use of Ultra-Small Fe3O4 Magnetic Nanoparticles for Hydrothermal Synthesis of Fe3+-Doped Titanate Nanotubes
Previous Article in Special Issue
Ciprofloxacin and Graphene Oxide Combination—New Face of a Known Drug
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 13
Issue 20
10.3390/ma13204611
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Nickel-Embedded Carbon Materials Derived from Wheat Flour for Li-Ion Storage

by
Wen Ding
,
Xiaozhong Wu
*,
Yanyan Li
,
Shuo Wang
and
Shuping Zhuo
*
School of Chemistry and Chemical Engineering, Shandong University of Technology, Zibo 255049, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(20), 4611; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204611
Submission received: 2 September 2020 / Revised: 11 October 2020 / Accepted: 13 October 2020 / Published: 16 October 2020
(This article belongs to the Special Issue New Findings in Carbon-Based Materials: From Functionalization to Applications)
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
The biomass-based carbons anode materials have drawn significant attention because of admirable electrochemical performance on account of their nontoxicity and abundance resources. Herein, a novel type of nickel-embedded carbon material (nickel@carbon) is prepared by carbonizing the dough which is synthesized by mixing wheat flour and nickel nitrate as anode material in lithium-ion batteries. In the course of the carbonization process, the wheat flour is employed as a carbon precursor, while the nickel nitrate is introduced as both a graphitization catalyst and a pore-forming agent. The in situ formed Ni nanoparticles play a crucial role in catalyzing graphitization and regulating the carbon nanocrystalline structure. Mainly owing to the graphite-like carbon microcrystalline structure and the microporosity structure, the NC-600 sample exhibits a favorable reversible capacity (700.8 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 200 cycles), good rate performance (51.3 mAh g−1 at 20 A g−1), and long-cycling durability (257.25 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1 after 800 cycles). Hence, this work proposes a promising inexpensive and highly sustainable biomass-based carbon anode material with superior electrochemical properties in LIBs.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the pollution of the environment and consumption of energy, renewable energy technologies have attracted worldwide attention. The development of efficient energy storage equipment, such as supercapacitors and rechargeable batteries, has been a focused topic now. Lithium-ion batteries (LIBs) occupy important status in the automotive and portable electronic devices such as wearable microelectronic devices and electric transportation on account of their outstanding properties. In the past years, considerable studies have been proposed around the promising battery anode materials [1,2,3,4,5,6].
Carbon materials as typical anode materials have been investigated proverbially nowadays. Owing to the long durability, excellent specific capacity, and superior rate abilities, the hard carbons have been emerging as promising anode materials. Among these, the biomass-based carbon materials have been extensively studied as anode materials in rechargeable batteries for their nontoxicity and abundance resources in the past decades. The carbon materials derived from various biomass sources [7,8,9], such as rice husk [10], starch [11,12,13], nut shells [14,15,16,17], fruit peels [18,19], flour [20,21,22,23] as electrode materials have exhibited superior electrochemistry properties. For example, the spherical hard carbon derived from potato starch gave an invertible capacity of about 531 mAh g−1 at 0.1C for LIBs [24]. The orange peel-derived hard carbon displayed the capacity of 301 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1 for LIBs [18]. Sweet potato-derived carbon achieved a capacity of 965 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 for LIBs [13]. Zhou reported highly graphitic carbon nanosheets derived from the wheat stalk with a high capacity of 502 mAh g−1 at 0.1C for LIBs [25]. However, to develop biomass-based carbon anode, materials with high specific capacity and superior rate capacity are still in great need.
Wheat flour is a powder made from the grinding of wheat, mainly composed of starch, gluten, and a small amount of fat. Many studies have showed wheat flour as a promising precursor for carbon electrode materials because of its extensive sources, less toxic effects, high yield, and high carbon content [26]. Yu reported an environmental flour-derived hierarchical nitrogen-doped porous carbon/polyaniline (HPC/PANI) electrode, which displayed a splendid specific capacitance of 1080 F g−1 at 1 A g−1 [27]. The carbon originated from wheat flour delivered a good specific capacity of 390 mAh g−1 at 1C with a good rate and cycle performance for LIBs [28]. The wheat flour-based carbon materials have been used as various kinds of electrode materials for supercapacitors and other batteries recently [27,29,30,31,32]. Recently, metal and metallic oxide encapsulated into porous carbon is considered to be a simple method to obtain composite with good electrochemical property, such as Sb/C composite [33], MnO/metal/carbon nanohybrid [34], CuO/C [35].
In this study, we successfully synthesized a novel hard carbon embedded with nickel nanoparticles (nickel@carbon, denoted as NC-600 and NC-800) by carbonizing the dough which is prepared by mixing wheat flour and the nickel nitrate. In this process, the wheat flour is employed as a carbon precursor, while the nickel nitrate is introduced as both a pore-forming agent and a graphitization catalyst. The in situ formed Ni nanoparticles in the carbonization process, play an important role in the catalyzed graphitization, and regulate the carbon nanocrystalline structure. Owning to the graphite-like carbon microcrystalline structure, the carbon microporosity structure, and the fast charge transfer, the NC-600 sample exhibits a superior specific capacity (700.8 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 200 cycles), good performance rate (51.3 mAh g−1 at 20 A g−1), and long-cycling durability (257.25 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1 after 800 cycles) for LIBs, which are much better than the carbon materials derived from simple carbonization of flour without nickel nitrate.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Preparation of Bio-Derived Carbon Materials

Wheat flour was purchased from a supermarket. Typically, 1 g of Ni (NO3)2·6H2O (Aladdin, Shanghai, China) was dispersed into 5 mL deionized water (Aladdin, Shanghai, China) under stirring until dissolved. Then 5 g of wheat flour was added into the above solution gradually to knead repeatedly. The obtained dough was freeze-dried and placed into a porcelain boat, and transferred into a tubular furnace (Kejing Material Technology Co. LTD, Hefei, China). The heating rate was 5 °C min−1 from room temperature to 600 or 800 °C in an atmosphere of N2 for 2 h. Subsequently, the obtained black monolith was cracked into powders and washed by hydrochloric acid and deionized water for several times. Finally, the NC-600 and NC-800 samples were separated by vacuum filtering and dried under vacuum at 80 °C for 24 h.
Additionally, the WFC-600 and WFC-800 were prepared in the same way as NC-600 and NC-800 without adding Ni(NO3)2. The numbers “600” and “800” represented the carbonization temperatures.

2.2. Analysis and Characterization

The morphology and structure of the obtained NC-600(800) and WFC-600(800) were inspected by an FEI Sirion 200 (Netherlands) high-resolution scanning electron microscope (SEM, FEI, Eindhoven) and a JEOL JEM 2100 (Japan) transmission electron microscope (TEM JEOL, Tokyo, Japan). The X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS, Escalab 250, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was utilized to analyze the surface chemistry. The elements distribution was detected by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS, FEI, Eindhoven, The Netherlands). The phase was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Panalytical X PertPro advance diffraction, Bruker AXS, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation. Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was carried out using a Perkin-Elmer instrument (SDT 650, TA Instruments, New Castle, DE, USA) at a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 ranging from room temperature to 800 °C in the air. Raman spectra (LabRAM HR800 from JY Horiba, Paris, France) was performed to characterize the crystal structure. The specific surface area was investigated by the Barrett-Emmett-Teller (BET) method by an ASAP2460 system. Adsorption in pore size distribution was studied by the nonlocal density functional theory (NLDFT).

2.3. Electrochemical Test

The electrochemical properties of the NC-600(800) and WFC-600(800) samples were analyzed by coin-type cells (CR2032, Canrd, Guangdong, China). Typically, the coating slurries were prepared with the active materials, polyvinylidene fluoride (PVDF, ARKEMA, Paris, France), and conducting agent (Super P, Lion, Tokyo, Japan) with a mass ratio of 8:1:1 in N-methyl-2-pyrrolidinone solvent (Aladdin, Shanghai, China). The prepared mixture was coated on a Cu foil and dried under vacuum at 80 °C for 12 h. Then, the Cu foil was cut into discs with a diameter of 1.2 cm, where the mass loading of the active materials for each Cu foil was about 1–2 mg cm−2. The Li foil was used as a counter electrode and Celgard 2400 membrane as the separator. About 1M LiPF6 dissolved in ethylene carbonate (EC) and diethyl carbonate (DEC) (1:1 by volume) was used as the electrolyte (Fosai, Suzhou, China). The cells 2032 coin were all assembled in an argon-filled glove box. The LAND CT2001A battery instrument (Lanhe, Wuhan, China) was applied to test the Galvanostatic charge/discharge (GCD) cycling with the range of 0.01–3 V at various current rates. CHI660D electrochemical workstation was used to test the cyclic voltammetry (CV) at room temperature. The PARSTAT 4000 electrochemical workstation was applied to analyze the electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) results at the frequency range of 100 kHz to 0.01 Hz.

3. Results and Discussion

The synthesis process of the nickel@carbon materials is as follows. First, a dough is prepared by repeated malaxation of the mixture of wheat flour, nickel nitrate, and deionized water. After freeze-drying, the dried dough is carbonized under N2 protection. After the sample was washed by hydrochloric acid and deionized water, the final samples are successfully acquired after drying in the vacuum.
As shown in the XRD patterns (Figure 1a), all the four samples exhibit a broad diffraction peak at ~25°, ascribing to the (002) lattice plane of graphitic carbon. As for the prepared NC-600 and NC-800, three sharp diffraction peaks at 2θ = 44.5, 51.8, and 76.4° are observed, which could be assigned to the lattice planes of (111), (200), and (220) for nickel metal with (Fm-3m) space group (JCPDS card 65-2865), respectively [36,37,38,39]. The metallic nickel is formed via a reduction reaction of Ni (NO3)2 by the surrounding carbon atoms under high carbonization temperature [40,41]. It is well-known that the crystalline structure of the carbon anode materials, for example, the (002) lattice plane, significantly influences the intercalation/de-intercalation of Li+. The (002) peaks of the obtained samples are asymmetric, indicating the coexistence of graphitic and amorphous domains [9]. The peak fitting of the (002) lattice plane can be seen in Figure 1b,c and Figure S1, and Table S1. The microspores result from cross-links between smaller domains of graphitic stacks that could increase the average interlayer spacing [8]. According to Table S1, the d-spacing range of the WFC-600, NC-600, WFC-800, and NC-800 above 0.401 nm is ascribed to highly disordered nanocrystallites for Li+ insertion freely. The d-spacing of the WFC-600, NC-600, WFC-800, and NC-800 range from 0.379 to 0.398 nm corresponds to “pseudo-graphitic” carbon, and the range from 0.336 to 0.342 nm and is referred to as “graphite-like” carbon [42,43]. Consequently, the Ni2+ could assist the chemical modification by promoting the formation of the expanded nanographite, which can supply more intercalation active sites for Li+ storage.
Figure 1d and Figure S2 show the Raman spectra of WFC-600, NC-600, WFC-800, and NC-800. Two main peaks at ~1584 cm−1 and ~1351 cm−1 correspond to the in-plane symmetric sp2 C-C bondstretching vibration of graphitic carbon (G band) and the vibration of disordered carbon (D band) at the edges of the graphite sheets, respectively [44]. As is well-known, the intensity ratio of ID/IG demonstrates the degree of disorder and the average size of the sp2 domains [10,45]. The peak shape of the obtained products is quite similar. The ID/IG values (Table S1) of NC-600 and NC-800 are lower than those of WFC-600 and WFC-800, respectively, indicating the sp2 content increases and some graphite-like nanocrystalline structure forms in the nickel@carbon materials possibly because of the catalyzation effect of Ni particles [9,46].
Figure 1e shows the TG curves of WFC-600 and NC-600. The small weight loss below 200 °C is on account of the evaporation of the H2O molecule which adsorbed on the surface of the sample. There are obvious differences between the WFC-600 and NC-600 in thermogravimetric behavior curves above 200 °C. The WFC-600 and NC-600 exhibit weight loss of 13.9% and 6.6% from 270 °C and 400 °C respectively, indicating the latter sample possesses much higher oxidation resistance performance. The possible reason is that the Ni nanoparticles in NC-600 catalyze the graphitization of the carbon materials during the carbonization process, reflected by the results of XRD and Raman spectra. When the temperature reaches 800 °C, the remaining weight of WFC-600 is only 1.19%, suggesting a tiny content of ashes. Comparatively, the remaining weight of NC-600 is 15.9% (mainly NiO) [47,48]. Accordingly, the Ni content of NC-600 could be determined to be 12.5%. N2 sorption analysis was performed to measure the specific surface area and the porosity of the carbon material (Figure 1f). The large adsorption quantities at the very low relative pressure and the small adsorption quantities at p/p0 > 0.4 indicate that NC-600 and NC-800 have a dominant microporosity and minor mesoporosity. This is more visible in the pore size distribution plots. The BET surface specific area of NC-600 and NC-800 is 470.5 m2 g−1 and 321.3 m2 g−1 (Table 1), respectively. The porous structure is probably formed by the reaction of Ni(NO3)2 and wheat flour in the carbonization process and the removal of Ni metal during the post-treatment of HCl [11]. Comparatively, the specific surface areas of WFC-600 and WFC-800 are very low indicating a nonporous structure.
The morphology and microstructure of WFC-600, NC-600, WFC-800, and NC-800 are illustrated in Figure 2 and Figures S3 and S4. WFC-600 (Figure 2a,b and Figure S3a) exhibits a relatively smooth surface, and no obvious pores are observed on its surface [20]. Comparatively, numerous pores appear on NC-600 (Figure 2c,d and Figure S3b). Similar results are obtained for WFC-800 and NC-800 (Figure S4).
TEM observations demonstrate that the nickel nanoparticles are homogeneously distributed in the NC-600 carbon (Figure 2g,h). The size of Ni particles ranged from 4.7 to 12 nm and approximately 8.7 nm on average determined by the number frequency histogram (inset in Figure 2g). Figure S5d displays that after carbonization at 600 °C, some graphite-like clusters appear on the edges of the Ni nanoparticles with lower interplanar ordering, and most of them in the material are disorder carbon at 600 °C [9]. Figure 2h shows the HR-TEM image of nickel nanoparticles. The fringes with spacings of 0.206 nm correspond to the (111) face of nickel metal. Compared with NC-600, NC-800 (Figure S6) shows an obvious graphitic-like structure and more graphitized carbon fragments are distributed around the Ni particles because of the high carbonization temperature. Therefore, the graphitization degree of NC-800 is significantly enhanced. Moreover, the metal lattice could also be found in NC-800 apparently (Figure S6c,d). The type of elements and their contents of the prepared samples are determined by energy dispersive spectroscopy and are illustrated in Table 1. Moreover, the C, N, and O elements are homogeneously distributed in the WFC-600 (Figure S7) while the C, N, O, and Ni are uniformly observed in NC-600 (Figure 2i), as confirmed by EDS characterization.
The X-ray photoelectron spectrum (XPS) for NC-600 (inset in Figure 3a) demonstrates that the NC-600 is composed of C, N, O, and Ni elements. In the case of C-species, the spectrum of NC-600 could be deconvolved into three peaks. The peaks at 284.6, 285.2, and 286.4 eV are assigned to the sp2 hybridized C-C, C-N, and C-O, respectively. In the case of N-species, pyridinic-N, pyrrolic-N, and graphitic-N of NC-600 are found because the peaks are centered at 398.7, 400.4, and 401.4 eV, respectively (Figure 3b) [49]. In the case of O-species, including the C=O quinone group and C-OH phenol group bonds, the peaks are located at 531.3 and 533.7 eV, respectively (Figure 3c) [50]. The peaks in Ni 2p spectrum (Figure 3d) centered at 852.8 and 870.1 eV are referred to as Ni 2p 3/2 and Ni 2p 1/2 signals of metallic nickel Ni0. The peaks at 856.1, 873.6, 861.0, and 879.9 eV are associated with the Ni2+, which are generated from the surface partial oxidation of nickel [51]. Additionally, the NiO could not be detected by XRD, demonstrating that the major existence form of nickel is metallic Ni0 [52].
The initial 3 CV curves (Figure 4a,b and Figure S8a,b) investigate the electrochemical properties of the NC-600 (800) and WFC-600 (800) for LIBs. The CV profiles of the WFC-600 and WFC-800 (Figure 4a and Figure S8a) are typical carbonaceous anode materials [53]. In the initial CV curve of NC-600 (Figure 4b), a wide cathodic current peak present at 0.63 V is unavailable in the 2nd and 3rd scans. The reason could be assigned to the formation of SEI (solid electrolyte interface) film, the Li+ insertion into carbon material, and the reduction of NiO to metallic Ni [11,51]. During the subsequent anodic scan, the two weak peaks at 0.24 and 1.25 are ascribed to the Li+ extraction from the graphitic carbon layers, the partial decomposition of the SEI layer, and the oxidation reaction of Ni to NiO [8,13]. Moreover, these subsequent CV curves nearly overlap, suggesting that the electrode supports good stability during the lithiation/delithiation process [54]. In the 1st cycle of NC-800 (Figure S8b), there are two obvious cathodic peaks at 0.5 and 1.1 V which could be referred to the reduction of NiO with Li+ and to the generation of metallic Ni and Li2O, the formation of the SEI layer. Afterward, in the anodic process, two weak anodic peaks occur at 1.6 V and 2.6 V ascribed to the oxidation reaction of Ni to NiO. The two cathodic peaks in the subsequent scan are moved to 0.75 V and 1.5 V because of the modification of the microstructure and the electrolyte decomposition [51]. Moreover, the CV curves of the second and the third cycles are overlapped, suggesting good reversible electrochemical reactions [4,38].
Figure 4c,d and Figure S8c,d delivers the galvanostatic charge/discharge profiles for WFC-600, NC-600, WFC-800, and NC-800 samples at 1st, 2nd, and 3rd cycles at 0.1 A g−1. The first coulombic efficiencies of the WFC-600 and NC-600 are 56.4% and 57.6%, respectively, while those of the WFC-800 and NC-800 are only approximately 37.5% and 50%, respectively. The reason probably is the electrolyte decomposition at the electrode/electrolyte interface [55]. Figure 4e depicts the cyclic performance of the prepared samples at 0.1 A g−1. The capacity of the NC-600 is 700.8 mAh g−1 at the current density of 0.1 A g−1 after 200 cycles, better than that of WFC-600 (342.9 mAh g−1). A similar result is obtained for NC-800 and WFC-800, with the discharge capacities of 464.8 and 297.4 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1, respectively (Figure S9). These facts demonstrate the significant positive effect of the Ni embedding on the Li+ storage performance. First, the Ni catalyzes the formation of the graphite-like carbon microcrystalline structure, thus providing more stable intercalation sites for Li+ [42]. Second, the activation reaction between Ni(NO3)2 and carbon and the acid-etching post-treatment introduce abundant micropores into the Ni@carbon, leading to additional defect sites for Li+ storage and better ionic diffusivity [8,9,56,57]. Additionally, the charge transfer may be improved because of the existence of Ni nanoparticles proved by EIS spectra next.
Figure 4f exhibits the rate property of the WFC-600 and NC-600 at 0.1, 0.2, 0.5, 1, 2, 5, 10, and 20 A g−1 for LIBs. The NC-600 can deliver reversible capacities of 609.6, 547.95, 476.4, 369.9, 264.1, 188.6, 92.6, and 51.3 mAh g−1 for LIBs, which are higher than those of WFC-600 obtained at the same current densities. The specific capacity of NC-600 remains 51.3 mAh g−1 at 20 A g−1, and then the capacity quickly recovered when the current density reduced to 0.1 A g−1, demonstrating good charge-discharge transfer kinetics within the NC-600 architecture. The specific charge capacities of NC-800 (Figure S9) are lower than those of NC-600 because of the higher content of graphitic fragments for NC-800 limits the insertion of Li+. WFC-600 and NC-600 exhibit good long cycle performance at 1A g−1 for LIB. After 800 cycles, the capacity of WFC-600 and NC-600 is 162.8 and 257.25 mAh g−1, respectively (Figure 4g). Previously reported biomass-derived carbons and metal@carbon materials are sweet potato-derived carbon (320 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 200 cycles), NiO/C hollow microspheres (628 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 100 cycles), C/Ni700 (205 mAh g−1 at 1C after 50 cycles), NiO-graphene (646 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 35 cycles) and Ni-graphene (675 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 35 cycles), etc., (Table 2). Comparatively, NC-600 exhibits the advantages in rate capacity (51.3 mAh g−1 at 20 A g−1) and cycling stability (700.8 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 200 cycles; 257.2 mAh g−1 at 1 A g−1 after 800 cycles). The unique structure of the NC-600 with nanocrystalline structure and the introduced defect sites lead to good Li+ storage and better ionic diffusivity. Therefore, NC-600 is a material with high performance and good application prospects.
The electronic transport properties of the materials are explored by the electrochemical impedance spectra (Figure 4h and Figure S9c). Typically, the straight line is ascribed to the ion diffusion process (Rw), the following semicircle is associated with the charge transfer resistance (Rct), and the high-frequency region reflects the electrode resistance (Re). The lower charge transfer resistance of NC-600 (NC-800) than WFC-600 (WFC-800) is because the microstructure of the former electrode materials with more defects can provide additional sites, and the anchored nickel nanoparticles can initiate fast electron transfer and better ionic diffusivity during the cycling process [7,8,23,58].
The CV profiles of NC-600 at various scan rates from 0.2–10 mV s−1 are shown to investigate the contributions of different mechanisms for LIBs (Figure 5a). The Equations (1) and (2) can express the charge storage mechanism between the response currents (i) and the scan rates (v) [44].
i = a v b
i ( V ) = k 1 v + k 2 v 0.5
Here, b is an indicator of capacitive process free of diffusion limitations (when b = 1), diffusion-controlled process (when b = 0.5), or mixed mechanism (0.5 < b < 1). The b value could be obtained from the slope of the log (i) versus log (v) plots. For carbon anode materials, the diffusion-controlled reaction suggests the intercalation reactions while the capacitive process free of diffusion limitations indicates the electrochemical double layer (EDL) and pseudocapacitive storage processes [65,66,67]. The b values for NC-600 is 0.74 (Figure 5b), suggesting a surface capacitive process domination, a combination of diffusion capacitance and surface capacitance lithium storage mechanism. The capacitive contribution ratios gradually grow with the increase of scan rates, reaching up to 46.1% for NC-600 (Figure 5c) at the scan rate of 10 mV s−1. The b values of NC-600 indicate the good distribution of the main intercalation mechanism for Li+ storage which also identifies the formation of the graphite-like carbon structure.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we produced a novel hard carbon embedded with nickel nanoparticles (nickel@carbon) by carbonizing the dough which is prepared by mixing wheat flour and the nickel nitrate. The introduced Ni is proved to play a vital role in the catalyzed graphitization and regulated the carbon nanocrystalline structure, and made a positive effect on the Li+ storage performance. Because of the unique structure, the NC-600 sample shows the favorable electrochemical performance, with a reversible capacity of up to 700.8 mAh g−1 at 0.1 A g−1 after 200 cycles, long-term cyclic performance of up to 257.25 mAh g−1 after 800 cycles, and good rate capability with 51.3 mAh g−1 at 20 A g−1. The unique inexpensive NC-600 and their environment-friendly synthesis approach can be applied to develop advanced transition metal/oxides-embed hard carbon materials for future electrochemical energy storage and conversion applications.

Supplementary Materials

The following are available online at https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1944/13/20/4611/s1, Figure S1: Peak fitting of the (002) peaks of (a) WFC-800 and (b) NC-800; Figure S2. (a) Raman spectrum; (b,c) Raman spectra of WFC-800 and NC-800; Figure S3. SEM images of (a) WFC-600 and (b) NC-600; Figure S4. (a–c) SEM images of WFC-800 and (d–f) NC-800; Figure S5. TEM images of (a,b) WFC-600 and (c,d) NC-600; Figure S6. TEM images of (a,b) WFC-800 and (c,d) NC-800; Figure S7. EDS of the WFC-600; Figure S8. Cyclic voltammetry curves of (a) the WFC-800, (b) NC-800 at the first three cycles; the charge-discharge profiles of (c) WFC-800 and (d) NC-800 samples at initial three cycles at 0.1 A g−1; Figure S9. (a) The cyclic performance of WFC-800 and NC-800 at 0.1 A g−1; (b) the rate-performance of WFC-800 and NC-800 electrodes; (c) EIS spectra of WFC-800 and NC-800 for LIBs, Table S1. Physical parameters of the composites from XRD and Raman patterns.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, W.D. and S.Z.; methodology, software, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft preparation, W.D.; validation, formal analysis, visualization, S.W., Y.L. and W.D.; resources, writing—review and editing, supervision, project administration, funding acquisition, S.Z. and X.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

We are grateful for the financial support by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC21978159, 51907110) and the Opening Fund of State Key Laboratory of Heavy Oil Processing (SKLOP202002004).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wang, W.; Zhou, J.; Wang, Z.; Zhao, L.; Li, P.; Yang, Y.; Yang, C.; Huang, H.; Guo, S. Short-Range Order in Mesoporous Carbon Boosts Potassium-Ion Battery Performance. Adv. Energy Mater. 2017, 8, 1701648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Di Lecce, D.; Verrelli, R.; Hassoun, J. Lithium-ion batteries for sustainable energy storage: Recent advances towards new cell configurations. Green Chem. 2017, 19, 3442–3467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Liu, H.; Jia, M.; Yue, S.; Cao, B.; Zhu, Q.; Sun, N.; Xu, B. Creative utilization of natural nanocomposites: Nitrogen-rich mesoporous carbon for a high-performance sodium ion battery. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 9572–9579. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Shi, W.; Zhang, Y.; Key, J.; Shen, P.K. Three-dimensional graphene sheets with NiO nanobelt outgrowths for enhanced capacity and long term high rate cycling Li-ion battery anode material. J. Power Sour. 2018, 379, 362–370. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Li, Q.; Yi, Z.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, X.; Yin, D.; Wang, L. Microwave-assisted synthesis of the sandwich-like porous Al2O3/RGO nanosheets anchoring NiO nanocomposite as anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 427, 354–362. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jiao, Y.; Han, D.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, X.; Guo, G.; Hu, J.; Yang, D.; Dong, A. Fabrication of three-dimensionally interconnected nanoparticle superlattices and their lithium-ion storage properties. Nat. Commun. 2015, 6, 6420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. He, D.; Gao, Y.; Wang, Z.; Yao, Y.; Wu, L.; Zhang, J.; Huang, Z.-H.; Wang, M.-X. One-step green fabrication of hierarchically porous hollow carbon nanospheres (HCNSs) from raw biomass: Formation mechanisms and supercapacitor applications. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2021, 581, 238–250. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gao, H.; Zhou, T.; Zheng, Y.; Zhang, Q.; Liu, Y.; Chen, J.; Liu, H.; Guo, Z. CoS Quantum Dot Nanoclusters for High-Energy Potassium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1702634. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Sun, N.; Guan, Z.; Liu, Y.; Cao, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Liu, H.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, P.; Xu, B. Extended “Adsorption–Insertion” Model: A New Insight into the Sodium Storage Mechanism of Hard Carbons. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 9, 1901351. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Rybarczyk, M.K.; Li, Y.; Qiao, M.; Hu, Y.-S.; Titirici, M.-M.; Lieder, M. Hard carbon derived from rice husk as low cost negative electrodes in Na-ion batteries. J. Energy Chem. 2019, 29, 17–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  11. Zhou, K.; Hu, M.; He, Y.-B.; Yang, L.; Han, C.; Lv, R.; Kang, F.; Li, B. Transition metal assisted synthesis of tunable pore structure carbon with high performance as sodium/lithium ion battery anode. Carbon 2018, 129, 667–673. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhu, C.; Chen, J.; Liu, S.; Cheng, B.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, P.; Zhang, Q.; Li, Y.; Zhong, S. Improved electrochemical performance of bagasse and starch-modified LiNi0.5Mn0.3Co0.2O2 materials for lithium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 53, 5242–5254. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Zheng, P.; Liu, T.; Zhang, J.; Zhang, L.; Liu, Y.; JianFeng, H.; Guo, S. Sweet potato-derived carbon nanoparticles as anode for lithium ion battery. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 40737–40741. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Xu, X.; Gao, J.; Tian, Q.; Zhai, X.; Liu, Y. Walnut shell derived porous carbon for a symmetric all-solid-state supercapacitor. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2017, 411, 170–176. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wahid, M.; Gawli, Y.; Puthusseri, D.; Kumar, A.; Shelke, M.V.; Ogale, S. Nutty Carbon: Morphology Replicating Hard Carbon from Walnut Shell for Na Ion Battery Anode. ACS Omega 2017, 2, 3601–3609. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  16. Jayaraman, S.; Jain, A.; Ulaganathan, M.; Edison, E.; Srinivasan, M.; Balasubramanian, R.; Aravindan, V.; Madhavi, S. Li-ion vs. Na-ion capacitors: A performance evaluation with coconut shell derived mesoporous carbon and natural plant based hard carbon. Chem. Eng. J. 2017, 316, 506–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Lv, W.; Wen, F.; Xiang, J.; Zhao, J.; Li, L.; Wang, L.; Liu, Z.; Tian, Y. Peanut shell derived hard carbon as ultralong cycling anodes for lithium and sodium batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 176, 533–541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Xiang, J.; Lv, W.; Mu, C.; Zhao, J.; Wang, B. Activated hard carbon from orange peel for lithium/sodium ion battery anode with long cycle life. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 701, 870–874. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, F.; Qin, F.; Zhang, K.; Fang, J.; Lai, Y.; Li, J. Hierarchically porous carbon derived from banana peel for lithium sulfur battery with high areal and gravimetric sulfur loading. J. Power Sour. 2017, 362, 160–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, Z.; Song, N.; Zhang, Y.; Schwab, Y.; He, J.; Li, X. Carbon Nanotubes Derived from Yeast-Fermented Wheat Flour and Their Energy Storage Application. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 11386–11396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Hu, M.; Wang, J.; Liu, J.; Wang, P.; Feng, Y.; Wang, H.; Nie, N.; Wang, Y.; Huang, Y. A flour-based one-stop supercapacitor with intrinsic self-healability and stretchability after self-healing and biodegradability. Energy Storage Mater. 2019, 21, 174–179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Lan, G.; Wang, Y.; Qiu, Y.; Wang, X.; Liang, J.; Han, W.; Tang, H.; Liu, H.; Liu, J.; Li, Y. Wheat flour-derived N-doped mesoporous carbon extrudate as superior metal-free catalysts for acetylene hydrochlorination. Chem. Commun. 2018, 54, 623–626. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Xu, R.; Zhang, K.; Wei, R.; Yuan, M.; Zhang, Y.; Liang, F.; Yao, Y. High-capacity flour-based nano-Si/C composite anode materials for lithium-ion batteries. Ionics 2019, 26, 1–11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Zheng, J.; Chen, X.; Zhong, X.; Li, S.; Liu, T.; Zhuang, G.; Li, X.; Deng, S.; Mei, D.; Wang, J.-G. Hierarchical Porous NC@CuCo Nitride Nanosheet Networks: Highly Efficient Bifunctional Electrocatalyst for Overall Water Splitting and Selective Electrooxidation of Benzyl Alcohol. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2017, 27, 1704169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Zhou, X.; Chen, F.; Bai, T.; Long, B.; Liao, Q.; Ren, Y.; Yang, J. Interconnected highly graphitic carbon nanosheets derived from wheat stalk as high performance anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Green Chem. 2016, 18, 2078–2088. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhao, H.; Cheng, Y.; Ji, G.; Zhang, B.; Ji, G.; Du, Y. Achieving Sustainable Ultralight Electromagnetic Absorber from Flour by Turning Surface Morphology of Nanoporous Carbon. ACS Sustain. Chem. Eng. 2018, 6, 15850–15857. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Yu, P.; Zhang, Z.; Zheng, L.; Teng, F.; Hu, L.; Fang, X. A Novel Sustainable Flour Derived Hierarchical Nitrogen-Doped Porous Carbon/Polyaniline Electrode for Advanced Asymmetric Supercapacitors. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1601111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Lim, D.G.; Kim, K.; Razdan, M.; Diaz, R.; Osswald, S.; Pol, V.G. Lithium storage in structurally tunable carbon anode derived from sustainable source. Carbon 2017, 121, 134–142. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wu, X.; Jiang, L.; Long, C.; Fan, Z. From flour to honeycomb-like carbon foam: Carbon makes room for high energy density supercapacitors. Nano Energy 2015, 13, 527–536. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hong, X.; Liub, Y.; Fub, J.; Wangb, X.; Zhangc, T.; Wangd, S.; Houc, F.; Liangce, J. A Wheat Flour Derived Hierarchical Porous Carbon/Graphitic Carbon Nitride Composite for High-Performance Lithium-Sulfur Batteries. Carbon 2020, 170, 119–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Parekh, M.H.; Sediako, A.D.; Naseri, A.; Thomson, M.J.; Pol, V.G. In Situ Mechanistic Elucidation of Superior Si-C-Graphite Li-Ion Battery Anode Formation with Thermal Safety Aspects. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 10, 1902799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Zhan, C.; Yu, X.; Kang, F.; Liang, Q.; Liu, W.; Wang, Y.; Lv, R.; Huang, Z.-H. Flour food waste derived activated carbon for high-performance supercapacitors. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 89391–89396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yi, Z.; Han, Q.; Zan, P.; Wu, Y.; Cheng, Y.; Wang, L. Sb nanoparticles encapsulated into porous carbon matrixes for high-performance lithium-ion battery anodes. J. Power Sour. 2016, 331, 16–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  34. Wang, X.; Ma, L.; Ji, Q.; Meng, J.; Liang, S.; Xu, Z.; Wang, M.; Zuo, X.; Xiao, Y.; Zhu, J.; et al. MnO/Metal/Carbon Nanohybrid Lithium-Ion Battery Anode With Enhanced Electrochemical Performance: Universal Facile Scalable Synthesis and Fundamental Understanding. Adv. Mater. Interfaces 2019, 6, 1900335. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ma, L.; Meng, J.; Cheng, Y.; Gao, J.; Wang, X.; Ji, Q.; Wang, M.; Zuo, X.; Zhu, J.; Xia, Y. Epoxy Resin Enables Facile Scalable Synthesis of CuO/C Nanohybrid Lithium-Ion Battery Anode with Enhanced Electrochemical Performance. ChemistrySelect 2020, 5, 5479–5487. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Naghash, A.R.; Etsell, T.H.; Xu, S. XRD and XPS Study of Cu−Ni Interactions on Reduced Copper−Nickel−Aluminum Oxide Solid Solution Catalysts. Chem. Mater. 2006, 18, 2480–2488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhao, Y.; Li, X.; Yan, B.; Xiong, D.; Li, D.; Lawes, S.; Sun, X. Recent Developments and Understanding of Novel Mixed Transition-Metal Oxides as Anodes in Lithium Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2016, 6, 1502175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Zou, F.; Chen, Y.M.; Liu, K.; Yu, Z.; Liang, W.; Bhaway, S.M.; Zhu, Y. Metal Organic Frameworks Derived Hierarchical Hollow NiO/Ni/Graphene Composites for Lithium and Sodium Storage. ACS Nano 2016, 10, 377–386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ma, Y.; Liang, X.; Tong, S.; Bao, G.; Ren, Q.; Dai, Z. Gold Nanoshell Nanomicelles for Potential Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Light-Triggered Drug Release, and Photothermal Therapy. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2012, 23, 815–822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Song, Y.; Feng, A.; Liu, Z.; Li, D. Zeta potentials of PDMS surfaces modified with poly(ethylene glycol) by physisorption. Electrophoresis 2019, 41, 761–768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Liao, C.; Yang, B.; Zhang, N.; Liu, M.; Chen, G.; Jiang, X.; Chen, G.; Yang, J.; Liu, X.; Chan, T.; et al. Constructing Conductive Interfaces between Nickel Oxide Nanocrystals and Polymer Carbon Nitride for Efficient Electrocatalytic Oxygen Evolution Reaction. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2019, 29, 1904020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Yu, Z.-L.; Xin, S.; You, Y.; Yu, L.; Lin, Y.; Xu, D.-W.; Qiao, C.; Huang, Z.-H.; Yang, N.; Yu, S.-H.; et al. Ion-Catalyzed Synthesis of Microporous Hard Carbon Embedded with Expanded Nanographite for Enhanced Lithium/Sodium Storage. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2016, 138, 14915–14922. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Cao, Y.; Xiao, L.; Sushko, M.L.; Wang, W.; Schwenzer, B.; Xiao, J.; Nie, Z.; Saraf, L.V.; Yang, Z.; Liu, J. Sodium Ion Insertion in Hollow Carbon Nanowires for Battery Applications. Nano Lett. 2012, 12, 3783–3787. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Li, P.; Hwang, J.-Y.; Park, S.-M.; Sun, Y.-K. Superior lithium/potassium storage capability of nitrogen-rich porous carbon nanosheets derived from petroleum coke. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 12551–12558. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Ou, J.; Zhang, Y.; Chen, L.; Zhao, Q.; Meng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Xiao, D. Nitrogen-rich porous carbon derived from biomass as a high performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2015, 3, 6534–6541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Zhang, K.; Li, X.; Liang, J.; Zhu, Y.; Hu, L.; Cheng, Q.; Guo, C.; Lin, N.; Qian, Y. Nitrogen-doped porous interconnected double-shelled hollow carbon spheres with high capacity for lithium ion batteries and sodium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2015, 155, 174–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Yang, C.C.; Zhang, D.M.; Du, L.; Jiang, Q. Hollow Ni–NiO nanoparticles embedded in porous carbon nanosheets as a hybrid anode for sodium-ion batteries with an ultra-long cycle life. J. Mater. Chem. A 2018, 6, 12663–12671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Subramaniyam, C.M.; Srinivasan, N.; Tai, Z.; Liu, H.-K.; Goodenough, J.B.; Dou, S.X. Self-assembled porous carbon microparticles derived from halloysite clay as a lithium battery anode. J. Mater. Chem. A 2017, 5, 7345–7354. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Tang, T.; Zhang, T.; Li, W.; Huang, X.; Wang, X.; Qiu, H.; Hou, Y. Mesoporous N-doped graphene prepared by a soft-template method with high performance in Li–S batteries. Nanoscale 2019, 11, 7440–7446. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hao, R.; Lan, H.; Kuang, C.; Wang, H.; Guo, L. Superior potassium storage in chitin-derived natural nitrogen-doped carbon nanofibers. Carbon 2018, 128, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Jae, W.; Song, J.; Hong, J.J.; Kim, J. Raspberry-like hollow Ni/NiO nanospheres anchored on graphitic carbon sheets as anode material for lithium-ion batteries. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 805, 957–966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Marchetti, L.; Miserque, F.; Perrin, S.; Pijolat, M. XPS study of Ni-base alloys oxide films formed in primary conditions of pressurized water reactor. Surf. Interface Anal. 2015, 47, 632–642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Chen, L.; Zhang, Y.; Lin, C.; Yang, W.; Meng, Y.; Guo, Y.; Li, M.; Xiao, D. Hierarchically porous nitrogen-rich carbon derived from wheat straw as an ultra-high-rate anode for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2014, 2, 9684–9690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Tian, J.; Shao, Q.; Dong, X.; Zheng, J.; Pan, D.; Zhang, X.; Cao, H.; Hao, L.; Liu, J.; Mai, X.; et al. Bio-template synthesized NiO/C hollow microspheres with enhanced Li-ion battery electrochemical performance. Electrochim. Acta 2018, 261, 236–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Liu, H.; Jia, M.; Sun, N.; Cao, B.; Chen, R.; Zhu, Q.; Wu, F.; Qiao, N.; Xu, B. Nitrogen-Rich Mesoporous Carbon as Anode Material for High-Performance Sodium-Ion Batteries. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 27124–27130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  56. Liu, P.; Li, Y.; Hu, Y.-S.; Li, H.; Chen, L.; Huang, X. A waste biomass derived hard carbon as a high-performance anode material for sodium-ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2016, 4, 13046–13052. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Xiao, Y.; Su, D.; Wang, X.; Wu, S.; Zhou, L.; Shi, Y.; Fang, S.; Cheng, H.-M.; Li, F. CuS Microspheres with Tunable Interlayer Space and Micropore as a High-Rate and Long-Life Anode for Sodium-Ion Batteries. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1800930. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Mai, Y.; Tu, J.; Gu, C.; Wang, X. Graphene anchored with nickel nanoparticles as a high-performance anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sour. 2012, 209, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Yang, J.; Zhou, X.-Y.; Li, J.; Zou, Y.-L.; Tang, J. Study of nano-porous hard carbons as anode materials for lithium ion batteries. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2012, 135, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Wang, N.; Liu, Q.; Sun, B.; Gu, J.; Yu, B.; Zhang, W.; Zhang, D. N-doped catalytic graphitized hard carbon for high-performance lithium/sodium-ion batteries. Sci. Rep. 2018, 8, 9934. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Wang, L.; Schnepp, Z.; Titirici, M.M. Rice husk-derived carbon anodes for lithium ion batteries. J. Mater. Chem. A 2013, 1, 5269–5273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wu, Z.; Wang, L.; Huang, J.; Zou, J.; Chen, S.; Cheng, H.; Jiang, C.; Gao, P.; Niu, X. Loofah-derived carbon as an anode material for potassium ion and lithium ion batteries. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 306, 446–453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mai, Y.; Shi, S.; Zhang, D.; Lu, Y.; Gu, C.; Tu, J. NiO–Graphene hybrid as an anode material for lithium ion batteries. J. Power Sour. 2012, 204, 155–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Soler-Piña, F.J.; Hernández-Rentero, C.; Caballero, Á.; Morales, J.; Rodríguez-Castellón, E.; Canales-Vázquez, J. Highly graphitized carbon nanosheets with embedded Ni nanocrystals as anode for Li-ion batteries. Nano Res. 2019, 13, 86–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Bin, D.S.; Duan, S.Y.; Lin, X.J.; Liu, L.; Liu, Y.; Xu, Y.S.; Wan, L.J. Structural engineering of SnS2/Graphene nanocomposite for high-performance K-ion battery anode. Nano Energy 2019, 60, 912–918. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Mariappan, V.K.; Krishnamoorthy, K.; Pazhamalai, P.; Natarajan, S.; Sahoo, S.; Nardekar, S.S.; Kim, S.-J. Antimonene dendritic nanostructures: Dual-functional materials for high-performance energy storage and harvesting devices. Nano Energy 2020, 77, 105248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  67. Li, X.-L.; Bai, S.; Yue, X.-Y.; Chen, D.; Qiu, Q.-Q.; Song, Y.; Wu, X.-J.; Zhou, Y.-N. Rod-shaped monoclinic CoMo2S4 with exceptionally reversible phase conversion for sodium storage. J. Alloys Compd. 2020, 838, 155613. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Materials 13 04611 g001 550
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of WFC-800, NC-800, WFC-600 and NC-600; (b,c) the fitting of (002) peaks for WFC-600 and NC-600; (d) Raman spectra of WFC-600 and NC-600; (e) TG curves of WFC-600 and NC-600; (f) N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore-size distribution curves of NC-600 and NC-800.
Figure 1. (a) XRD patterns of WFC-800, NC-800, WFC-600 and NC-600; (b,c) the fitting of (002) peaks for WFC-600 and NC-600; (d) Raman spectra of WFC-600 and NC-600; (e) TG curves of WFC-600 and NC-600; (f) N2 adsorption−desorption isotherms and the corresponding pore-size distribution curves of NC-600 and NC-800.
Materials 13 04611 g001
Materials 13 04611 g002 550
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,b) WFC-600 and (c,d) NC-600; TEM of (e,f) WFC-600 and (g,h) NC-600; (i) EDS mapping of the NC-600.
Figure 2. SEM images of (a,b) WFC-600 and (c,d) NC-600; TEM of (e,f) WFC-600 and (g,h) NC-600; (i) EDS mapping of the NC-600.
Materials 13 04611 g002
Materials 13 04611 g003 550
Figure 3. (a) XPS spectrum of the NC-600 and fine XPS spectrum of C 1s, (b) N 1s (c) O 1s, (d) Ni 2p spectra for NC-600.
Figure 3. (a) XPS spectrum of the NC-600 and fine XPS spectrum of C 1s, (b) N 1s (c) O 1s, (d) Ni 2p spectra for NC-600.
Materials 13 04611 g003
Materials 13 04611 g004 550
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammetry curves for (a) the WFC-600, (b) NC-600 at initial three cycles at 0.2 mV s−1; the galvanostatic discharge-charge voltage profiles for (c) WFC-600, (d) NC-600 samples at 0.1 A g−1; (e) the cyclic performance at 0.1 A g−1 for WFC-600 and NC-600; (f) the tests of rate-performance of WFC-600 and NC-600; (g) the cyclic performance of WFC-600, NC-600 at 1 A g−1; (h) EIS spectra of WFC-600 and NC-600.
Figure 4. Cyclic voltammetry curves for (a) the WFC-600, (b) NC-600 at initial three cycles at 0.2 mV s−1; the galvanostatic discharge-charge voltage profiles for (c) WFC-600, (d) NC-600 samples at 0.1 A g−1; (e) the cyclic performance at 0.1 A g−1 for WFC-600 and NC-600; (f) the tests of rate-performance of WFC-600 and NC-600; (g) the cyclic performance of WFC-600, NC-600 at 1 A g−1; (h) EIS spectra of WFC-600 and NC-600.
Materials 13 04611 g004
Materials 13 04611 g005 550
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms of NC-600 at various scan rates (a); the relationship between peak currents and scan rates (b); survey of the capacitive and diffusion-controlled contribution ratio at different scan rates; Normalized contribution ratio of diffusion and capacitive capacities at different scan rates of NC-600 (c).
Figure 5. Cyclic voltammograms of NC-600 at various scan rates (a); the relationship between peak currents and scan rates (b); survey of the capacitive and diffusion-controlled contribution ratio at different scan rates; Normalized contribution ratio of diffusion and capacitive capacities at different scan rates of NC-600 (c).
Materials 13 04611 g005
Table
Table 1. Texture properties and element compositions of the samples.
Table 1. Texture properties and element compositions of the samples.
SamplePorosity ParametersElement Composition (atom %)
SBET (m2g−1)VT (cm3g−1)Vmeso (cm3g−1)Vmicro (cm3g−1)CNONi
WFC-6003.3///87.04.28.8/
NC-600470.50.30.10.285.13.19.22.6
WFC-8003.5///84.19.76.2/
NC-800321.30.20.080.183.42.99.72.7
Table
Table 2. The comparison of LIB properties between the NC-600 and other biomass carbon.
Table 2. The comparison of LIB properties between the NC-600 and other biomass carbon.
MaterialsSpecific Capacity (mAh g−1)Current Density (A g−1)Cycle StabilityReferences
glucosamine-based porous carbon2640.1100[11]
structurally tunable carbon2171C100[28]
nano-porous hard carbons453.10.2C50[59]
nitrogen-doped porous hollow carbon5121.5C500[46]
sweet potato-derived carbon3200.1200[13]
N-doped graphitized hard carbon3890.1100[60]
rice husk-derived carbon4030.2C100[61]
Loofah-derived carbon2250.1200[62]
NiO/C hollow microspheres6280.1100[54]
Ni-graphene6750.135[58]
NiO-graphene646.10.135[63]
C/Ni7002051C200[64]
NC-600700.80.1200this work
257.21800
51.32010
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Ding, W.; Wu, X.; Li, Y.; Wang, S.; Zhuo, S. Nickel-Embedded Carbon Materials Derived from Wheat Flour for Li-Ion Storage. Materials 2020, 13, 4611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204611

AMA Style

Ding W, Wu X, Li Y, Wang S, Zhuo S. Nickel-Embedded Carbon Materials Derived from Wheat Flour for Li-Ion Storage. Materials. 2020; 13(20):4611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204611

Chicago/Turabian Style

Ding, Wen, Xiaozhong Wu, Yanyan Li, Shuo Wang, and Shuping Zhuo. 2020. "Nickel-Embedded Carbon Materials Derived from Wheat Flour for Li-Ion Storage" Materials 13, no. 20: 4611. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13204611

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop