Next Article in Journal
Assessment of Effects of Laser Light Combining Three Wavelengths (450, 520 and 640 nm) on Temperature Increase and Depth of Tissue Lesions in an Ex Vivo Study
Previous Article in Journal
Deformation Behavior of Nanocrystalline Body-Centered Cubic Iron with Segregated, Foreign Interstitial: A Molecular Dynamics Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic and Magneto-Caloric Properties of the Amorphous Fe92−xZr8Bx Ribbons

1
College of Engineering, Shanghai Polytechnic University, Shanghai 201209, China
2
Institute of Materials, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
3
Center for Advanced Microanalysis, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200444, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(23), 5334; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235334
Submission received: 28 October 2020 / Revised: 17 November 2020 / Accepted: 22 November 2020 / Published: 25 November 2020

Abstract

:
Magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the amorphous Fe92−xZr8Bx ribbons were studied in this work. Fully amorphous Fe89Zr8B3, Fe88Zr8B4, and Fe87Zr8B5 ribbons were fabricated. The Curie temperature (Tc), saturation magnetization (Ms), and the maximum entropy change with the variation of a magnetic field (−ΔSmpeak) of the glassy ribbons were significantly improved by the boron addition. The mechanism for the enhanced Tc and −ΔSmpeak by boron addition was studied.

1. Introduction

With the rising concerns on environmental pollution and the higher and higher cost of energy, it is an urgent need recently to develop energy-saving and environmental-friendly materials, such as new energy storage materials, magnetocaloric materials, giant impedance materials, thermoelectric materials, and magneto-strictive materials [1,2,3,4,5]. Magnetocaloric materials are the materials that exhibit an adiabatic temperature change when they experience a magnetization or demagnetization process, which is called the magnetocaloric effect (MCE). Magnetic refrigerators using the magnetocaloric alloys or compounds as working materials are believed to be more compact (because of solid refrigerant) and efficient (due to their lower energy consumption) than the traditional vapor compression/expansion refrigerator. Furthermore, the magnetic refrigerators are considered to be safer to the environment because they do not emit ozone-depleting gases [6,7]. Therefore, the magnetocaloric materials have recently attracted more and more attention, and as a result, a great number of magnetocaloric alloys or compounds have been developed in the past several decades [8,9,10].
The amorphous alloys, which exhibit higher corrosion resistance and better mechanical properties than the crystalline alloys, are considered to be suitable candidates for magnetic refrigerants because they exhibit rather broad magnetic entropy change (−ΔSm) peak [11,12]. The broadened −ΔSm peak and the resulted high value of refrigeration capacity (RC) lead to a rather wide working temperature range and a large amount of cooling, which is an important indicator that helps to obtain the maximum cooling capacity in the Ericsson cycle [13]. The amorphous alloys can be fabricated within a large compositional range, indicating that the Curie temperature (Tc) and properties, depending on the alloy compositions, can be easily tuned [14].
Among the amorphous alloys that have been studied so far, Gd-based amorphous alloys and some high-entropy alloys show good reversible magnetocaloric effects [15,16,17]. Usually, the large maximum −ΔSm (−ΔSmpeak) value of these amorphous alloys only obtained at low temperatures and their high cost limit their industrial applications. Although some amorphous alloys with reduced Gd content can achieve application conditions in the room temperature range, they still have shortcomings in terms of cost, magnetocaloric effect, and forming ability [18,19]. In contrast, the low-cost transition metal (TM)-based amorphous alloys represented by the Fe-based amorphous alloy gained more and more attention.
In previous studies, Fe100−xBx (x = 12–28) amorphous alloy exhibits good soft magnetic properties [20,21], However, almost all the compositions of the Curie temperatures, Tc, are above room temperature. By adding Nb, Y, Nd, or Mn elements to amorphous system, the Curie temperature is greatly reduced, but it fails to increase the magnetic entropy change value of the alloy or even deteriorate [22]. On the other hand, FeZr binary system alloys exhibit excellent soft magnetic properties near room temperature and are accompanied with a −ΔSmpeak close to about half of the Gd [23,24]. As a result, substitution of Fe by transition metals Nb, Mn, Y, or metalloid elements B can significantly change the magnetic properties [25,26,27]. In particular, the addition of B can even make the alloy appear ferromagnetic near room temperature. For the purpose of meeting the requirements of magnetic refrigerants in a domestic refrigerator, recently, many multicomponent Fe-based amorphous alloys with excellent magnetocaloric properties have been synthesized based on the ternary Fe-Zr-B glass-forming alloys [27,28,29,30]. The lower Zr content Fe-B-Zr amorphous alloys usually have a lower MCE with the −ΔSmpeak about 1.04 J K−1 kg−1 for a field change of 0–15 kOe in the Fe94−xZr6Bx (x = 5, 6, 8, and 10) amorphous alloys. When the Zr content is increased, the ΔSm of the alloy becomes significantly improved: for instance, the magnetic properties, phase transitions, and MCE were systematically studied in amorphous Fe89−xBxZr11 (x = 0–10) alloys and the Tc got enhanced with B addition and the −ΔSm value to be about 1.73 J K−1 kg−1 for the Fe79Zr11B10 sample. Meanwhile, the addition of a series of 3D elements, such as Cu, Cr, Mn, Co, Ni..., also obtained a series of FeZrB-based amorphous alloys with a good ΔSm value near room temperature [31,32,33,34,35,36]. Recently, related studies have shown that FeZrB(Cu,Co...) amorphous alloys also have dispersed nanocrystalline particles on the amorphous matrix [37,38]. Appropriate selection and control methods of heat treatment can make nanocrystalline particles aggregate and grow, further, by selectively removing the surface nanocrystalline particles, the amorphous materials with nanoporosity on the surface can be obtained. However, after the selective dealloying treatment of nanocrystalline amorphous alloys, it is found that the magnetization of the alloys is improved. This is mainly related to the increase in the concentration of ferromagnetic atoms in the system, which also provides a way to further improve the magnetic properties of the amorphous alloys.
Through the previous study on the Fe88Zr8B4 amorphous alloy [30,39,40], it is found that a moderate Zr content makes the alloy exhibit good magnetic properties near room temperature. However, the mechanism for their good magnetocaloric properties has not been investigated systematically. Therefore, the detailed investigation on the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of Fe-Zr-B ternary metallic glasses may be helpful for the understanding of the tailorable magnetic and magnetocaloric properties near room temperature in the multicomponent Fe-Zr-B-based metallic glasses. In the present work, we fabricated Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous samples in the shape of ribbons with an average thickness of 0.04 mm. Magnetic properties of the amorphous samples were measured and their magnetocaloric properties were obtained. The dependence of Tc as well as −ΔSmpeak on the composition of the metallic glasses were constructed for the purpose of revealing the mechanism involved.

2. Experiments

Alloy ingots with a nominal composition of Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) were prepared by arc melting a mixture of high-purity (99.95 wt%) Fe, Zr metallic pieces and Fe-B pre-alloy for at least four times in a non-consumable electrode high vacuum arc melting furnace. Fe92−xZr8Bx ribbons with an average thickness of ~0.04 mm were prepared by ejecting the melts from the quartz tube to the surface of a rotating copper wheel under a pure Ar atmosphere. The surface speed of the copper wheel was optimized at 30 m/s. Structure of the ribbons was checked by X-ray diffraction (XRD) using the Kα radiation of Cu on a Rigaku diffractometer (model D/max-2550) (Rigaku, Tokyo, Japan). Thermal properties about the glass transition temperature (Tg), crystallization temperature (Tx) and the liquidus temperature (Tl) of the amorphous ribbons were measured by a Netzsch DSC-404C differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) (Netzsch, Selb, Germany) under a purified argon atmosphere at a heating rate of 20 K/min. Microstructures of the amorphous ribbons were observed by a JEOL JEM-2010F (JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) high-resolution electron microscope (HREM). The specimens for HREM observations were prepared by ion-polishing under a pure argon atmosphere using the GATAN 691 precision ion-polishing system (AMETEK, Berwyn, PA, USA). Magnetic properties of the as-spun ribbons were measured by a Quantum Design Physical Properties Measurement System (Ever cool II): the temperature dependence of the magnetization (M-T) curves were obtained under a field of 0.03 T in the cooling process; hysteresis loops were measured under a field of 5 T at 10 K and 380 K, respectively; isothermal magnetization (M-H) curves were obtained at various temperatures under a field of 5 T. The heat capacity (Cp(T)) of the Fe87Zr8B5 amorphous ribbon was also measured by PPMS near its Tc under a zero magnetic field.

3. Results and Discussion

X-ray diffraction patterns of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) ribbons are presented in Figure 1. Only one typical broadened diffraction hump was observed between 2θ of 30° and 35° on each pattern; and the absence of visible crystalline peaks are present on the XRD curves of the ribbons. It indicates that the Fe92−xZr8Bx ribbons are fully amorphous structures.
The amorphous feature of the Fe92−xZr8Bx ribbons prepared under the linear velocity of 30 m/s can be further confirmed from their differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) trace (Figure 2). The obvious endothermic glass transition behaviors before the crystallization and the visible crystallization exothermic peak (see the small figure in Figure 2) also verify the amorphous characteristics of the ribbon. As seen from the DSC trace, the onset temperatures of glass transition (Tg) of Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) are about 798 K, 805 K, 807 K; and crystallization (Tx) is about 827 K, 834 K, and 837 K, respectively.
In order to verify the above assumption more intuitively, high-resolution electron microscope (HREM) micrographs of the Fe88Zr8B4 sample were performed and depicted in Figure 3. The HREM image reveals the fully amorphous characteristics with only short-range order in the disordered matrix. Similar features in XRD patterns and the DSC curves of these samples indicates the approximate structural features in all other samples studied.
Coercivity and saturation magnetization (Ms) of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) glassy ribbons were obtained from the hysteresis loops measured at 10 K under 5 T. As shown in Figure 4a, the nearly zero coercivity of all the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) glassy samples indicates that the metallic glasses are soft magnetic properties at 10 K. Ms of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) glassy ribbons obtained from their hysteresis loops are about 107.5 Am2/kg for x = 3, 109.2 Am2/kg for x = 4, and 110.7 Am2/kg for x = 5, respectively. The dependence of Ms on the boron content of the three glassy samples, as plotted in the inset of Figure 4a, shows a roughly linear relationship between Ms and x. The increasing Ms with x in the Fe92−xZr8Bx metallic glasses is most likely related to the improved Fe-B interactions with increasing B content [27,39]. The enhanced Ms implies the improvement of MCE by boron addition in the Fe92−xZr8Bx amorphous alloys because Ms or −ΔSm depends on the ordering of magnetic moments in metallic glasses upon magnetization.
In addition, unlike the rare earth (RE)-transition metal (TM)-based (RE-TM-based) metallic glasses, the enhanced interaction by boron addition may result in the improvement of Tc in Fe92−xZr8Bx glassy alloys because Tc of the Fe-based metallic glass samples primarily depend on the 3d-3d direct interaction [27,29,34,35,36,37]. Figure 4b shows the variation of magnetization on the temperature (M-T curves) of the Fe92−xZr8Bx glassy samples measured under 0.03 T. Tc derived from the M-T curves is about 271 K for Fe89Zr8B3, 291 K for Fe88Zr8B4, and 306 K for Fe87Zr8B5 amorphous ribbons. The Curie temperatures of the glassy samples were located in the working temperature range of a domestic refrigerator, which indicates that the Fe92−xZr8Bx glasses ribbons may be the good working medium of magnetic refrigeration when the −ΔSmpeak of these alloys are high enough.
By measuring the isothermal magnetization (M-H) curves of the Fe92−xZr8Bx glassy ribbons at various temperatures, we can calculate the −ΔSm of these amorphous alloys. Figure 5 shows the −ΔSm plots at different temperatures under the magnetic fields of 1 T, 1.5 T, 2 T, 2.5 T, 3 T, 3.5 T, 4 T, 4.5 T, and 5 T. According to the trend, with a flat and continuously changing value, shown in the −ΔSm-T curves, it can be seen that the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) metallic glasses exhibit the secondary magnetic phase transition features of a soft magnetic alloy. −ΔSmpeak values of the glassy ribbons under 1 T, 2 T, 3 T, 4 T, and 5 T are listed in Table 1. The −ΔSmHn relationship for the three samples were constructed and the n values at different temperatures were obtained. Figure 6a illustrates the ln(−ΔSm) vs. ln(H) plots near the Curie temperature of the three glassy samples and their linearly fitted lines. n is about 0.771 for Fe89Zr8B3 at 270 K, 0.769 for Fe88Zr8B4 at 290 K, and 0.766 for Fe87Zr8B5 at 305 K. The values of n near Tc are approximately consistent in the alloys, and the alloys with fully amorphous structures exhibit 2rd magnetic phase transition [17,41,42]. The n-T curves for the Fe92−xZr8Bx glassy samples, seen in the inset of Figure 6a, display typical magnetocaloric behaviors of soft magnetic metallic glasses: n is nearly 1 at low temperature when the sample is ferromagnetic, then gradually reduces to a minimum value near Tc, and finally increases dramatically to a value up to 2 at the paramagnetic state [18,43].
−ΔSmpeak of Fe92−xZr8Bx amorphous alloys, as predicted above, increases with boron addition: −ΔSmpeak under 5 T at x = 5 is about 6.9% higher than the −ΔSmpeak value at x = 4 and about 18.2% higher the −ΔSmpeak value at x = 3. The increasing −ΔSmpeak as well as Ms with boron addition is most likely due to the exciting of free electrons in Fe atoms to a high spin state and thus strengthening the overall magnetic moments by adding of nonmagnetic B element. Therefore, the dependence of −ΔSmpeak on Tc of the Fe92−xZr8Bx metallic glasses is contrary to the −ΔSmpeak-Tc relationship proposed by Belo et al. [44] in the RE-based glassy samples. The −ΔSmpeak (under 5 T) vs. Tc plots in several Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous samples (listed in Table 1), and their linear fitting (dash line) is illustrated in Figure 4b. −ΔSmpeak for these Fe-Zr-B-based glassy ribbons increases monotonically with the Cutie temperature, which is possibly because the magnetic interactions in the Fe-Zr-B-based glass is not so complicated as the situation in the RE-based amorphous samples.
It is worthy to note that the Fe87Zr8B5 amorphous alloy exhibits a rather high −ΔSmpeak at the temperature near 305 K. For instance, the −ΔSmpeak under 5 T of the Fe87Zr8B5 glassy sample reaches to 3.25 J K−1 kg−1 at 305 K, which is comparable to that of the Fe87Zr8B4Sm1 amorphous ribbon (3.27 J K−1 kg−1 at 308 K) and the Fe87Zr9B4 amorphous ribbon (3.29 J K−1 kg−1 at 304 K), but is larger than that of the Fe87Zr6B6Cu1 (3 J K−1 kg−1 at 300 K) metallic glass [29,30,35]. In order to reveal the refrigeration efficiency of the Fe87Zr8B5 amorphous alloy, we calculate the temperature rise under an adiabatic condition (ΔTad) of the sample according to
Δ T a d ( T , 0 H ) = T C p ( T ) Δ S m ( T , 0 H )
The ΔTad-T curve of the Fe87Zr8B5 glassy ribbon is shown in Figure 7, the inset is the Cp(T)) curve. The maximum ΔTad for the Fe87Zr8B5 metallic ribbon is about 0.76 K under 1.5 T, and 1.98 K under 5 T, respectively.

4. Conclusions

In summary, the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) glassy ribbons were successfully prepared. The magnetic and magnetocaloric behaviors of these glassy samples were studied. Tc of the Fe92−xZr8Bx glassy samples is about 271 K at x = 3, about 291 K at x = 4, and about 306 K at x = 5. It was found that Tc, −ΔSmpeak, and Ms of the Fe92−xZr8Bx amorphous samples show an increase trend with the boron content. The simultaneously increasing Ms, Tc, and −ΔSmpeak with boron content in the Fe92−xZr8Bx amorphous alloys is mostly likely attributed to the enhanced interaction between the Fe-B atoms by boron addition. The high −ΔSmpeak and ΔTad of the Fe87Zr8B5 metallic ribbon near 305 K indicate that the amorphous sample may be a good candidate for the magnetic refrigerants of a domestic magnetic refrigerator.

Author Contributions

X.W.: Data curation, Writing—original draft. Q.W.: Data curation, Writing—original draft. B.Z.T. and L.C.: Data curation, Methodology, Writing—original draft. D.D. and L.X.: Conceptualization, Methodology, Writing—review & editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

The National Nature Science Foundation of China: 51271103; the National Nature Science Foundation of China: 51701003; the National Nature Science Foundation of China: 51671119; the National Nature Science Foundation of China: 51675323; the Non-ferrous metal materials preparation and processing state key laboratory open project: 19AZ02; Shanghai Natural Science Foundation Project: 20ZR1421000; Materials Science and Engineering Discipline of Shanghai Polytechnic University: XXKZD1601.

Acknowledgments

The work described in this paper was supported by the National Nature Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 51271103, 51701003, 51671119 and 51675323), the non-ferrous metal materials preparation, and processing state key laboratory open project (Grant No. 19AZ02), Shanghai Natural Science Foundation Project (No. 20ZR1421000), and Materials Science and Engineering Discipline of Shanghai Polytechnic University (XXKZD1601).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shen, X.; Liu, H.; Cheng, X.B.; Yan, C.; Huang, J.Q. Beyond lithium ion batteries: Higher energy density battery systems based on lithium metal anodes. Energy Storage Mater. 2018, 12, 161–175. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Gschneider, K.A.; Pecharsky, V.K. Magnetocaloric Materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 2000, 30, 387–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  3. Phan, M.H.; Peng, H.X. Giant magnetoimpedance materials: Fundamentals and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2008, 53, 323–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Yang, L.; Chen, Z.G.; Dargusch, M.S.; Zou, J. High Performance Thermoelectric Materials: Progress and Their Applications. Adv. Energy Mater. 2018, 8, 1701797. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Tang, B.Z.; Guo, D.Q.; Xia, L.; Ding, D.; Chan, K.C. Magnetoelastic and magnetocaloric properties of Tb62.5Co37.5 amorphous alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 728, 747–751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Tishin, A.M.; Spichkin, Y.I. The magnetocaloric effect and its applications. Inst. Phys. Bristol. 2003. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. de Oliveira, N.A.; von Ranke, P.J. Theoretical aspects of the magnetocaloric effect. Phys. Rep. 2010, 489, 89–160. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Gschneider, K.A.; Pecharsky, V.K.; Tsokol, A.O. Recent developments in magnetocaloric materials. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2005, 68, 1479–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Franco, V.; Blázquez, J.S.; Ipus, J.J.; Law, J.Y.; Moreno-Ramírez, L.M.; Conde, A. Magnetocaloric effect: From materials research to refrigeration devices. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 112–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Chaudhary, V.; Chen, X.; Ramanujan, R.V. Iron and manganese based magnetocaloric materials for near room temperature thermal management. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 100, 64–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Franco, V.; Conde, A. Magnetic refrigerants with continuous phase transitions: Amorphous and nanostructured materials. Scr. Mater. 2012, 69, 594–599. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Brück, E. Developments in magnetocaloric refrigeration. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, R381–R391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hashimoto, T.; Kuzuhara, T.; Matsumoto, K.; Sahashi, M.; Inomata, K.; Tomokiyo, A.; Yayama, H. New application of complex magnetic materials to the magnetic refrigerant in an Ericsson magnetic refrigerator. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 62, 3873–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luo, Q.; Wang, W.H. Rare earth based bulk metallic glasses. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2009, 355, 759–775. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Xia, L.; Tang, M.B.; Chan, K.C.; Dong, Y.D. Large magnetic entropy change and adiabatic temperature rise of a Gd55Al20Co20Ni5 bulk metallic glass. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 223904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Tang, B.Z.; Huang, L.W.; Song, M.N.; Ding, D.; Wang, X.; Xia, L. Compositional dependence of magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the Gd-Ni binary amorphous alloys. J. Non-Cryst. Solids. 2019, 522, 119589. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huo, J.T.; Huo, L.H.; Li, J.W.; Men, H.; Wang, X.M.; Inoue, A.; Chang, C.T.; Wang, J.Q.; Li, R.W. High-entropy bulk metallic glasses as promising magnetic refrigerants. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 073902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, B.Z.; Xie, H.X.; Li, D.M.; Xia, L.; Yu, P. Microstructure and its effect on magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the Co50Gd50−xFex glassy ribbons. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2020, 533, 119935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Wang, X.; Tang, B.Z.; Wang, Q.; Yu, P.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Co50Gd48−xFe2Nix amorphous alloys with high adiabatic temperature rise near the hot end of a domestic magnetic refrigerator. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2020, 544, 120146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Hasegawa, R.; Ray, R. Iron-boron metallic glasses. J. Appl. Phys. 1978, 49, 4174–4179. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. O’Handley, R.C. Physics of ferromagnetic amorphous alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 62, R15. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Waske, A.; Schwarz, B.; Mattern, N.; Eckert, J. Magnetocaloric (Fe–B)-based amorphous alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2013, 329, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Maeda, H.; Sato, M.; Uehara, M. Fe-Zr Amorphous Alloys for Magnetic Refrigerants near Room Temperature. J. Jpn. Inst. Met. 1983, 47, 688–691. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  24. Wang, Y.Y.; Hou, K.; Bi, X. Hydrogenated Fe90M10 (M: Zr and Sc) amorphous alloys with enhanced room-temperature magnetocaloric effect. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 689, 564–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Min, S.G.; Kim, K.S.; Yu, S.C.; Suh, H.S.; Lee, S.W. Analysis of magnetization and magnetocaloric effect in amorphous FeZrMn ribbons. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 97, 10M310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Kim, K.S.; Min, S.G.; Yu, S.C.; Oh, S.K.; Kim, Y.C.; Kim, K.Y. The large magnetocaloric effect in amorphous Fe91−xYxZr9 (x=0, 5, 10) alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2006, 304, E642–E644. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Mishra, D.; Gurram, M.; Reddy, A.; Perumal, A.; Saravanan, P.; Srinivasan, A. Enhanced soft magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect in B substituted amorphous Fe-Zr alloy ribbons. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2010, 175, 253–260. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Guo, D.Q.; Chan, K.C.; Xia, L.; Yu, P. Magneto-caloric effect of FexZryB100−x−y metallic ribbons for room temperature magnetic refrigeration. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 423, 379–385. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Yu, P.; Zhang, J.Z.; Xia, L. Effect of boron on the magneto-caloric effect in Fe91−xZr9Bx (x= 3, 4, 5) amorphous alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 13948–13955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Alvarez-Alonso, P.; Sánchez Llamazares, J.L.; Sánchez-Valdés, C.F.; Fdez-Gubieda, M.L.; Gorria, P.; Blanco, J.A. High-magnetic field characterization of magnetocaloric effect in FeZrB(Cu) amorphous ribbons. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 17A710. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Li, X.Z.; Pan, Y. Magnetocaloric effect in Fe-Zr-B-M (M = Ni, Co, Al, and Ti) amorphous alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 116, 093910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kiss, L.F.; Kemeny, T.; Franco, V.; Conde, A. Enhancement of magnetocaloric effect in B-rich FeZrBCu amorphous alloys. J. Alloys Compd. 2015, 622, 756–760. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fang, Y.K.; Yeh, C.C.; Hsieh, C.C.; Chang, C.W.; Chang, H.W.; Chang, W.C.; Li, X.M.; Li, W. Magnetocaloric effect in Fe-Zr-B-M (M=Mn, Cr, and Co) amorphous systems. J. Appl. Phys. 2009, 105, 07A910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Gan, L.H.; Ma, L.Y.; Tang, B.Z.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Effect of Co substitution on the glass forming ability and magnetocaloric effect of Fe88Zr8B4 amorphous alloys. Sci. China Phys. Mech. Astro. 2017, 60, 076121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Chen, L.S.; Zhang, J.Z.; Lin, W.; Yu, P.; Xia, L. Outstanding magnetocaloric effect of Fe88−xZr8B4Smx (x=0, 1, 2, 3) amorphous alloys. Sci. China-Phys. Mech. Astro. 2018, 61, 056121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Yu, P.; Zhang, J.Z.; Xia, L. Fe87Zr7B4Co2 amorphous alloy with excellent magneto-caloric effect near room temperature. Intermetallics 2018, 95, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Zhang, H.Y.; Fornell, J.; Feng, Y.P.; Golvano, I.; Barób, M.D.; Pellicer, E.; Sort, J. Inducing surface nanoporosity on Fe-based metallic glass matrix composites by selective dealloying. Mater. Charact. 2019, 153, 46–51. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Nagase, T.; Yokoyama, A.; Umakoshi, Y. In situ TEM observation of the glass-to-liquid transition of metallic glass in Fe-Zr-B-Cu alloy. Scr. Mater. 2010, 63, 1020–1023. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Álvarez, P.; Gorria, P.; Marcos, J.S.; Barquín, L.F.; Blanco, J.A. The role of boron on the magneto-caloric effect of FeZrB metallic glasses. Intermetallics 2010, 18, 2464–2467. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Álvarez, P.; Marcos, J.S.; Gorria, P.; Barquín, L.F.; Blanco, J.A. Magneto-caloric effect in FeZrB amorphous alloys near room temperature. J. Alloys. Compd. 2010, 504, S150–S154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Franco, V.; Blázquez, J.S.; Conde, A. The influence of Co addition on the magnetocaloric effect of Nanoperm-type amorphous alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2006, 100, 064307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Banerjee, S.K. On a generalized approach to first and second order magnetic transitions. Phys. Lett. 1964, 12, 16–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Law, J.Y.; Franco, V.; Moreno-Ramírez, L.M.; Conde, A.; Karpenkov, D.Y.; Radulov, I.; Skokov, K.P.; Gutfleisch, O. A quantitative criterion for determining the order of magnetic phase transitions using the magnetocaloric effect. Nat. Commun. 2018, 9, 2680. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  44. Bloe, J.H.; Amaral, J.S.; Pereira, A.M.; Amaral, V.S.; Araujo, J.P. On the Curie temperature dependency of the magnetocaloric effect. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 100, 242407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) as-spun ribbons.
Figure 1. XRD patterns of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) as-spun ribbons.
Materials 13 05334 g001
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) traces of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) alloys with the heating curves obtained at 20 K/min; the inset is the melt DSC trace.
Figure 2. Differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) traces of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) alloys with the heating curves obtained at 20 K/min; the inset is the melt DSC trace.
Materials 13 05334 g002
Figure 3. High-resolution electron microscope (HREM) micrograph of Fe88Zr8B4 sample.
Figure 3. High-resolution electron microscope (HREM) micrograph of Fe88Zr8B4 sample.
Materials 13 05334 g003
Figure 4. (a) Hysteresis loops of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous ribbons measured at 10 K under a field of 5 T; the inset is the relationship between the Ms and x. (b) The M-T curves of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous alloys measured under a field of 0.03 T.
Figure 4. (a) Hysteresis loops of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous ribbons measured at 10 K under a field of 5 T; the inset is the relationship between the Ms and x. (b) The M-T curves of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous alloys measured under a field of 0.03 T.
Materials 13 05334 g004
Figure 5. −ΔSm-T curves of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous ribbons under various magnetic fields: (a) x = 3, (b) x = 4, and (c) x = 5.
Figure 5. −ΔSm-T curves of the Fe92−xZr8Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous ribbons under various magnetic fields: (a) x = 3, (b) x = 4, and (c) x = 5.
Materials 13 05334 g005
Figure 6. (a) The −ΔSmpeakHn relationship of the Fe91−xZr9Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous alloys at Tc, the inset is the n-T curves of the three amorphous alloys; (b) the −ΔSmpeak (under 5 T) vs. Tc plots and the linear fitting (dash line) these plots in several Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous samples (listed in Table 1).
Figure 6. (a) The −ΔSmpeakHn relationship of the Fe91−xZr9Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous alloys at Tc, the inset is the n-T curves of the three amorphous alloys; (b) the −ΔSmpeak (under 5 T) vs. Tc plots and the linear fitting (dash line) these plots in several Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous samples (listed in Table 1).
Materials 13 05334 g006
Figure 7. ΔTad-T curve of the Fe87Zr8B5 amorphous alloy under the fields of 1.5 T and 5 T, the inset is the Cp(T) curve of the amorphous alloy.
Figure 7. ΔTad-T curve of the Fe87Zr8B5 amorphous alloy under the fields of 1.5 T and 5 T, the inset is the Cp(T) curve of the amorphous alloy.
Materials 13 05334 g007
Table 1. Curie temperature, Tc, and −ΔSmpeak of the several Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous samples.
Table 1. Curie temperature, Tc, and −ΔSmpeak of the several Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous samples.
Composition−ΔSmpeak * (J kg−1 K−1)Tc (K)Ref.
1 T1.5 T2 T3 T5 T
Fe89Zr8B30.791.081.351.852.75271Present work
Fe88Zr8B40.881.201.502.063.04291
Fe87Zr8B50.941.291.612.193.25306
Fe88Zr9B30.941.281.592.163.17286[29]
Fe87Zr9B40.991.351.672.263.29304
Fe86Zr9B51.021.391.722.33.34327
Fe88Zr8B40.871.21.52.063.04292[34]
Fe87Co1Zr8B40.931.291.612.23.24317
Fe86Co2Zr8B40.981.351.692.313.38340
Fe87Zr8B4Sm10.981.331.652.243.27308[35]
Fe86Zr8B4Sm21.041.411.732.323.35325
Fe85Zr8B4Sm31.091.471.812.443.55333
Fe87Zr7B4Co21.011.381.722.343.42333[36]
* The maximum magnetic entropy change (−ΔSm) value in the −ΔSm-T curves.
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Tang, B.Z.; Ding, D.; Cui, L.; Xia, L. Magnetic and Magneto-Caloric Properties of the Amorphous Fe92−xZr8Bx Ribbons. Materials 2020, 13, 5334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235334

AMA Style

Wang X, Wang Q, Tang BZ, Ding D, Cui L, Xia L. Magnetic and Magneto-Caloric Properties of the Amorphous Fe92−xZr8Bx Ribbons. Materials. 2020; 13(23):5334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235334

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Xin, Qiang Wang, Ben Zhen Tang, Ding Ding, Li Cui, and Lei Xia. 2020. "Magnetic and Magneto-Caloric Properties of the Amorphous Fe92−xZr8Bx Ribbons" Materials 13, no. 23: 5334. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13235334

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop