Next Article in Journal
Efficient Hydrothermal Synthesis of SSZ-13 with Variable Grain Size
Previous Article in Journal
Composite Heat Sink Material for Superconducting Tape in Fault Current Limiter Applications
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effects of Combined Usage of Supplementary Cementitious Materials on the Thermal Properties and Microstructure of High-Performance Concrete at High Temperatures

Materials 2020, 13(8), 1833; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081833
by Dong Lu 1,2,3, Zhuo Tang 1, Liang Zhang 1,*, Jianwei Zhou 4, Yue Gong 3, Yaogang Tian 3 and Jing Zhong 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Materials 2020, 13(8), 1833; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081833
Submission received: 19 March 2020 / Revised: 26 March 2020 / Accepted: 8 April 2020 / Published: 13 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Construction and Building Materials)

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

Dear Authors,

Most of my comments are on the attached PDF document. In general, I consider that the paper is interesting, related to the topic of the journal, and worth to be published after mayor revisions.

English should be revised by a native, as there are many sentences that are difficult to understand. Apart from that, some tests must be better explained, for instance, thermal conductivity test. In fact, an statistical analysis should be included in this part, showing, at least, the 95% confidence intervals with error bars on fig. 5.

Furthermore, I felt that the paper is too much based on a previous paper, denoting that, maybe, the information included in this paper should have already been included on that one. Thus, I recommend The Authors to repeat the compressive strength tests, as it would enhance the actual paper, strengthening also the previous one.

Finally, I am not an expert on the microstructure of the concrete at different temperatures, but XRD, DTA and SEM analyses seem to be well addressed and studied.

 

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Reviewer 2 Report

 

The paper is interesting and sound this reviewer just has a two comments:

In order to increase the value of the paper the first paragraph of the introduction must mention several cases of concrete structures that were submitted to high temperatures.

The testing method used different temperatures (400, 600, 800 and 1000 ℃) during 3 hours, and then naturally cooled. Why this method ? Usually in a fire its very unusual that a concrete structure will be 3 hours at high temperature before firefighters arrive. Also when they arrive they use water that will make high temperature concrete to suffer a thermal shock. Why not also simulate this shock ?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.doc

Round 2

Reviewer 1 Report

Thank you very much for taking into account my recommendations.

Back to TopTop