Next Article in Journal
Injection Molding of 3-3 Hydroxyapatite Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Effect of the Morphology of Tungsten Oxide Embedded in Sodium Alginate/Polyvinylpyrrolidone Composite Beads on the Photocatalytic Degradation of Methylene Blue Dye Solution
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Magnetic Domain-Wall Induced Electric Polarization in NdCrO3 Polycrystalline Ceramic

1
School of Materials Science and Engineering, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
2
Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Materials, Guilin University of Electronic Technology, Guilin 541004, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2020, 13(8), 1904; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081904
Submission received: 20 March 2020 / Revised: 13 April 2020 / Accepted: 15 April 2020 / Published: 17 April 2020
(This article belongs to the Section Materials Physics)

Abstract

:
We reported the magnetic, dielectric and magnetoelectric properties of NdCrO3 polycrystalline ceramics. Magnetization curves revealed two magnetic transitions at 227 K and 38 K, which corresponded to Cr3+ canted antiferromagnetic ordering and Cr3+ spin reorientation phase transition, respectively. At 11.5 K, a Schottky-type anomaly was observed, caused by Nd3+ ground doublet Zeeman splitting. High-temperature dielectric relaxation exhibited a type of thermally activated relaxation process, which mainly resulted from the Maxwell–Wagner effect. The spin-reorientation of Cr3+ ions and the Nd3+ ground doublet splitting were observed to be accompanied by an electric polarization. The polarization could be induced by the presence of the antiferromagnetic-type domain walls, which led to spatial inversion symmetry breaking.

1. Introduction

Multiferroic materials, defined as those with multiple order parameters coexisting and coupling with each other, have received great attention in recent years due to their potential applications in multiple-state memory elements and spintronic devices [1,2]. However, single-phase multiferroics are rare because ferroelectricity and magnetism are often mutually exclusive [3]. Therefore, an exploring of multiferroics based on the emerging physical mechanism is an important and challenging issue. Until now, several mechanisms have been established for magnetically induced ferroelectricity, such as metal–ligand pd hybridization, symmetric-exchange striction, and antisymmetric inverse Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction [4,5,6]. In recent years, the polarization induced by the magnetic domain wall has been demonstrated theoretically, such as those occurring in Lu2CoMno6 [7], R2NiMno6 [8] and AFeO3 (A = Lu, Y, Gd, Sm) [9,10].
Rare-earth orthochromites (RCrO3) represent an attractive class of compounds due to the cross coupling between the 3d spins of transition metal ions and 4f moments of rare-earth ions, similar to RMnO3. The Néel temperature can be improved without affecting the saturation magnetization when Mn is substituted with Cr [11,12]. RCrO3 (R = La, Pr, Sm, Nd, Gd, Tb, Ho, Dy, Er, Tm, Lu) compounds have shown potential multiferroic properties mostly due to the exchange striction between the R and Cr moments [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. The NdCrO3 magnetization curve differs significantly from those typically found in the rare-earth orthochromites [22]. Below the Néel temperature (227 K), two peaks were observed at about 200 K and 35 K, respectively. In addition, NdCrO3 is with rich ferroelectric property. Indra et al. [19] reported ferroelectricity around ∼88 K in NdCrO3, and the synchrotron diffraction study suggested that the ferroelectricity arose from the structural transformation from the centrosymmetric space group Pnma to a non-centrosymmetric space group Pna21. Shanker et al. [21] reported that NdCrO3 is a relaxor ferroelectric (500 K at 1 MHz). Yin et al. [20] reported a dielectric anomaly in the vicinity of the Nd3+ spins ordering the temperature of the NdCrO3, but the nature of the anomaly was not clear.
In this work, we studied the magnetic, dielectric and magnetoelectric properties of a NdCrO3 polycrystalline sample in the temperature range of 5 K–360 K. We observed interesting novel phenomena such as the dielectric anomaly at reorientation temperature (~38 K) of Cr3+, which could be affected by the magnetic field and may indicate an electric polarization. The magnetic field-dependent polarization could be induced by the presence of anti-phase antiferromagnetic (AFM)-type domain walls, which leads to spatial inversion symmetry breaking [9].

2. Experiment

NdCrO3 polycrystalline ceramics were synthesized by conventional solid-state reaction. The detailed preparation process was similar to our previous work [23]. X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns of the samples were recorded using a PANalytical Xpert Pro PW 3040 diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The morphology of the samples was measured by a field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM). The dielectric property of the samples was measured by a Precision Impedance Analyzer (Wayne Kerr Electronics, 6500B, Cavendish Square, London, England). A physical properties measurement system (PPMS 9T, Quantum Design) was used for measuring the temperature dependence of the magnetization and dielectric constants of the samples.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows the Rietveld refinement result of the XRD data of the NdCrO3 polycrystalline ceramics. The Rietveld refinement with space group Pbnm delivers the lattice parameters of a = 5.420(9) Å, b = 5.483(3) Å, and c = 7.693(3) Å for the compound with a goodness-of-fitting value of χ2 = 1.53 and Rwp = 14.6%. The FESEM image of the NdCrO3 bulk is shown in Figure 1b. The morphology of the sample consisted of irregular grains of different sizes, in which large grains were formed by stacking the thin plate layer by layer.
Figure 2 shows the zero-field-cooled (ZFC) and field-cooled (FC) temperature-dependent dc magnetization from 5 K to 320 K under a measuring field of 100 Oe. Two magnetic transitions, TN and TSR, occurred at about 227 K and 38 K, respectively, which were consistent with previous studies [22,24,25,26] and their magnetic behavior could be explained by the strong effective field on the Nd3+ moments exerted by the ordered Cr3+ spin system [27,28]. The first transition temperature TN (227 K) corresponded to canted AFM transition of the Cr3+ magnetic moments and the system showed a weak ferromagnetism. Thus, below TN, the Cr3+ moments configuration was from Γ2(Fx, Cy, Gz) into Γ1(Ax, Gy, Cz) at 38 K (spin reorientation) due to the magnetic crystal anisotropy. From the ZFC curves in Figure 2, a small hump was observed at T ≈ 11.5 K (named as TSP), which originated from the two-level Schottky effect caused by the split of the ‘Nd’ ground doublet [29]. The inset showed the reciprocal of the dc magnetic susceptibility curve (FC) and obeyed the Curie–Weiss law. Furthermore, the derived effective magnetic moment was ~5.845 μB/f.u., which was bigger than the theoretical one (5.3 μB/f.u.). The difference was either due to the magnetic polarization of the Nd moments by the Cr moments or ascribed to a slight change of the susceptibility due to the crystal field splitting effects of the excited 7FJ levels [23].
Frequency dependence of the real part (ε′) of the dielectric constant (Figure 3a) and the loss (tan δ) (Figure 3b) from 100 K to 360 K exhibited a thermal-activated relaxation behavior [23]. In the frequency range probed, dielectric relaxations could arise from two mechanisms: (a) the mobility of oxygen vacancies. The activation energy in various perovskite materials was in the range of 0.9–1.48 eV for the dielectric relaxations related to the mobility of oxygen vacancy [30]. In general, for a thermally activated relaxation process, the variation of peak position (TM) can be described by the Arrhenius law:
Ƒ = ƒ0 exp (-Ea/kBTM)
where ƒ0 is the pre-exponential, Ea is the activation energy. Figure 3c shows the Arrhenius plots of tan δ for the relaxation. The solid line shows the fitting to the experiment data by Equation (1). The activation energy was derived to be about 0.313 eV. Therefore, the type of dielectric relaxation was not attributed to the mobility of oxygen vacancies. (b) Maxwell–Wagner relaxation originating from different conductivities between regions in the sample [31]. The characteristic of the Maxwell–Wagner relaxation mechanism is the f−1 dependence of the imaginary part of dielectric constant data (ε″) at lower frequencies [23,31]. The slope of log(ε″) vs. log(f) is about (−1) in the frequency range of 102–106 Hz, as shown in the inset of Figure 3b at 110 K, clearly suggesting the presence of the Maxwell–Wagner relaxation. Since the contributions arising from grain (g), grain boundary (gb), and specimen-electrode interface can be separated by Nyquist plots [32], the Nyquist plot (Z” vs. Z’) was studied (shown in Figure 3d). The Nyquist plot was well fitted with an equivalent circuit. The circuit made up of two sub-circuits in the series indicated that there were two relaxations corresponding to the grain boundaries and grains [32,33].
Figure 4a shows the dielectric behavior at a high frequency (106 Hz) in 5 K–65 K at zero and 2 T fields. At a zero magnetic field, there were dielectric anomalies around TSR and TSP marked in Figure 4b and the behaviors were more significant when an external magnetic field was applied. The results indicated that there are native magnetoelectric coupling. As mentioned before, the magnetic configuration was changed from Γ2(Fx, Cy, Gz) to Γ1(Ax, Gy, Cz) at 38 K. Γ1(Ax, Gy, Cz) configuration is an AFM-type magnetic structure. Therefore, the electric polarization does not arise from the non-collinear magnetism. Yanez-Vilar [7] reported that a polarization may arise as a result of anti-phase AFM domain boundaries, i.e., it does not require non-collinear magnetism or spin-orbit coupling. In addition, Yang reported that an improper polarization originates from an exchange striction mechanism that drives a polar displacement of the oxygen ions located at the magnetic domain walls in SmFeO3 with an orthorhombic structure [9]. Moreover, additional calculations ratified that the mechanism was general among magnetic perovskites with an orthorhombic SmFeO3-like structure. Therefore, we may elucidate the dielectric anomaly by an AFM-type spin arrangement at domain walls that break the spatial inversion symmetry and cause polarization along a specific direction. Such an explanation agrees well with the theoretical calculations for the NdCrO3 material [9].

4. Conclusions

In summary, the magnetic, dielectric and magnetoelectric properties of polycrystalline NdCrO3 ceramics were studied. Magnetization measurements showed that there were three magnetic transitions at 227 K, 38 K and 11.5 K, respectively. The dielectric constant measurements showed that the high temperature relaxation results from the Maxwell–Wagner effect. The abnormal dielectric phenomena at 106 Hz at a low temperature indicated that there was native magnetoelectric coupling. Further analysis showed that the magnetic field-dependent polarization can be induced by the presence of the AFM-type spin arrangement domain walls, which leads to spatial inversion symmetry breaking.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, X.Z. and H.Z.; methodology, S.W.; validation, S.W., Y.B. and L.F.; formal analysis, S.W. and X.Z.; investigation, S.W., Y.B.; data curation, X.Z.; writing—original draft preparation, S.W.; writing—review and editing, X.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was supported by the National Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51802052), National Science Foundation of Guangxi (Grant No. 2017GXNSFAA198373), Guangxi Key Laboratory of Information Material Foundation (Grant No. 191004-Z, 191019-Z).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ramesh, R.; Spaldin, N.A. Multiferroics: Progress and prospects in thin films. Nat. Mater. 2007, 6, 21–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Wang, J.; Neaton, J.B.; Zheng, H.; Nagarajan, V.; Ogale, S.B.; Liu, B.; Viehland, D.; Vaithyanathan, V.; Schlom, D.G.; Waghmare, U.V.; et al. Epitaxial BiFeO3 multiferroic thin film heterostructures. Science 2003, 299, 1719–1722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Hill, N.A. Why are there so few magnetic ferroelectrics? J. Phys. Chem. B 2000, 104, 6694–6709. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Arima, T.H. Ferroelectricity induced by proper-screw type magnetic order. J. Phys. Soc. Jpn. 2007, 76, 073702. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Eerenstein, W.; Mathur, N.; Scott, J.F. Multiferroic and magnetoelectric materials. Nature 2006, 442, 759–765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Tokura, Y.; Seki, S.; Nagaosa, N. Multiferroics of spin origin. Rep. Prog. Phys. 2014, 77, 076501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  7. Yanez-Vilar, S.; Mun, E.; Zapf, V.; Ueland, B.; Gardner, J.S.; Thompson, J.; Singleton, J.; Sanchez-Andujar, M.; Mira, J.; Biskup, N.; et al. Multiferroic behavior in the double-perovskite LuMnCoO. Phys. Rev. B 2011, 84, 134427. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Zhou, H.Y.; Zhao, H.J.; Zhang, W.Q.; Chen, X.M. Magnetic domain wall induced ferroelectricity in double perovskites. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2015, 106, 152901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Yang, Y.; Xiang, H.; Zhao, H.; Stroppa, A.; Zhang, J.; Cao, S.; Iniguez, J.; Bellaiche, L.; Ren, W. Improper ferroelectricity at antiferromagnetic domain walls of perovskite oxides. Phys. Rev. B 2017, 96, 104431. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Wang, W.X.; Sun, W.; Zhang, G.B.; Cheng, Z.X.; Wang, Y.X. Magnetic domain-wall induced ferroelectric polarization in rare-earth orthoferrites AFeO3 (A= Lu, Y, Gd): First-principles calculations. J. Mater. Chem. C 2019, 7, 10059–10065. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Sahu, J.R.; Serrao, C.R.; Rao, C.N.R. Modification of the multiferroic properties of YCrO3 and LuCrO3 by Mn substitution. Solid State Commun. 2008, 145, 52–55. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Dahal, J.N.; Syed Ali, K.S.; Mishra, S.R.; Alam, J. Structural, Magnetic, and Mössbauer Studies of Transition Metal-Doped Gd2Fe16Ga0.5TM0.5 Intermetallic Compounds (TM = Cr, Mn, Co, Ni, Cu, and Zn). Magnetochemistry 2018, 4, 54. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  13. Rajeswaran, B.; Khomskii, D.I.; Zvezdin, A.K.; Rao, C.N.R.; Sundaresan, A. Field-induced polar order at the Néel temperature of chromium in rare-earth orthochromites: Interplay of rare-earth and Cr magnetism. Phys. Rev. B 2012, 86, 214409. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  14. Preethi Meher, K.R.S.; Wahl, A.; Maignan, A.; Martin, C.; Lebedev, O.I. Observation of electric polarization reversal and magnetodielectric effect in orthochromites: A comparison between LuCrO3 andErCrO3. Phys. Rev. B 2014, 89, 144401. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Ghosh, A.; Pal, A.; Dey, K.; Majumdar, S.; Giri, S. A typical multiferroicity of HoCrO3 in bulk and film geometry. J. Mater. Chem. C 2015, 3, 4162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Ghosh, A.; Dey, K.; Chakraborty, M.; Majumdar, S.; Giri, S. Polar octahedral rotations, cation displacement and ferroelectricity in multiferroic SmCrO3. Europhys. Lett. 2014, 107, 47012. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Gupta, P.; Poddar, P. Using Raman and dielectric spectroscopy to elucidate the spin phonon and magnetoelectric coupling in DyCrO3 nanoplatelets. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 10094–10101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Meher, K.R.S.P.; Martin, C.; Caignaert, V.; Damay, F.; Maignan, A. Multiferroics and magnetoelectrics: A comparison between some chromites and cobaltites. Chem. Mater. 2014, 26, 830–836. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Indra, A.; Dey, K.; Midya, A.; Mandal, P.; Gutowski, O.; Rütt, U.; Majumdar, S.; Giri, S. Erratum: Magnetoelectric coupling and exchange bias effects in multiferroic NdCrO3. J. Phys. Condens. Matter 2016, 28, 166005. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Yin, L.H.; Yang, J.; Tong, P.; Luo, X.; Park, C.B.; Shin, K.W.; Song, W.H.; Dai, J.M.; Kim, K.H.; Zhu, X.B.; et al. Role of rare earth ions in the magnetic, magnetocaloric and magnetoelectric properties of RCrO3 (R = Dy, Nd, Tb, Er) crystals. J. Mater. Chem. C 2016, 4, 11198–111204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Shanker, J.; Buchi Suresh, M.; Narsinga Rao, G.; Suresh Babu, D. Colossal dielectric, relaxor ferroelectric, diamagnetic and weak ferromagnetic properties of NdCrO3 perovskite nanoparticles. J. Mater. Sci. 2019, 54, 5595–5604. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Hornreich, R.M.; Komet, Y.; Nolan, R.; Wanklyn, B.M.; Yaeger, I. Magneto-optical and magnetization studies in the rare-earth orthochromites. VI. NdCrO3. Phys. Rev. B 1975, 12, 5094. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Bai, Y.; Wang, S.W.; Zhang, X.; Zhao, Z.K.; Shao, Y.P.; Yao, R.; Yang, M.M.; Gao, Y.B. Negative magnetization, dielectric and magnetodielectric properties of EuCrO3. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 026101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Du, Y.; Cheng, Z.X.; Wang, X.L.; Dou, S.X. Structure, magnetic, and thermal properties of Nd1-xLaxCrO3 (0 <= x <= 1.0). J. Appl. Phys. 2000, 108, 093914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  25. Shamir, N.; Shaked, H.; Shtrikman, S. Magnetic structure of some rare-earth orthochromites. Phys. Rev. B 1981, 24, 6642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lufaso, M.W.; Mugavero, S.J.; GemmillY, W.R.; Lee, Y.; Vogt, T.; ZurLoye, H.C. Pressure-and temperature-dependent X-ray diffraction studies of NdCrO3. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 433, 91–96. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Hornreich, R. Magnetic interactions and weak ferromagnetism in the rare-earth orthochromites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 1978, 7, 280–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Wang, L.; Wang, S.W.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, L.L.; Yao, R.; Rao, G.H. Reversals of magnetization and exchange-bias in perovskite chromite YbCrO3. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 662, 268–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Schweizer, K.S.; Chandler, D. Vibrational dephasing and frequency shifts of polyatomic molecules in solution. J. Chem. Phys. 1982, 76, 2296–2314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Bidault, O.; Goux, P.; Kchikech, M.; Belkaoumi, M.; Maglione, M. Space-charge relaxation in perovskites. Phys. Rev. B 1994, 49, 7868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Von Hippel, A.R. Dielectrics and Waves; MIT Press: Cambridge, MA, USA, 1966. [Google Scholar]
  32. Idrees, M.; Nadeem, M.; Atif, M.; Siddique, M.; Mehmood, M.; Hassan, M.M. Origin of colossal dielectric response in LaFeO3. Acta. Mater. 2011, 59, 1338–1345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Wang, S.W.; Zhang, X.; Yao, R.; Fan, L.G.; Zhou, H.Y. High-Temperature Dielectric Relaxation Behaviors in Mn3O4 Polycrystals. Materials 2019, 12, 4026. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
Figure 1. (Color online) (a) Rietveld refinement result of the XRD pattern, (b) FESEM morphology of the NdCrO3 sample.
Figure 1. (Color online) (a) Rietveld refinement result of the XRD pattern, (b) FESEM morphology of the NdCrO3 sample.
Materials 13 01904 g001
Figure 2. (Color online) Temperature-dependent magnetization curve of NdCrO3 at the magnetic field of 100 Oe. The inset shows the reciprocal of the dc magnetic susceptibility vs. the temperature.
Figure 2. (Color online) Temperature-dependent magnetization curve of NdCrO3 at the magnetic field of 100 Oe. The inset shows the reciprocal of the dc magnetic susceptibility vs. the temperature.
Materials 13 01904 g002
Figure 3. (Color online) (a) The real part (ε′) of the dielectric constant vs. temperature at various frequencies. (b) Corresponding dielectric loss (tan δ). The inset is log (ε″) vs. log (f) at 110 K in the low frequency region and the solid line is the one with slope −1. (c) The lnƒ vs. 1000/T derived from tan δ. (d) Nyquist plots at 300 K for the circuit shown.
Figure 3. (Color online) (a) The real part (ε′) of the dielectric constant vs. temperature at various frequencies. (b) Corresponding dielectric loss (tan δ). The inset is log (ε″) vs. log (f) at 110 K in the low frequency region and the solid line is the one with slope −1. (c) The lnƒ vs. 1000/T derived from tan δ. (d) Nyquist plots at 300 K for the circuit shown.
Materials 13 01904 g003
Figure 4. (Color online) (a) ε′ vs. temperature at different fields. (b) ZFC magnetization curve under at 100 Oe.
Figure 4. (Color online) (a) ε′ vs. temperature at different fields. (b) ZFC magnetization curve under at 100 Oe.
Materials 13 01904 g004

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, S.; Bai, Y.; Zhang, X.; Fan, L.; Zhou, H. Magnetic Domain-Wall Induced Electric Polarization in NdCrO3 Polycrystalline Ceramic. Materials 2020, 13, 1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081904

AMA Style

Wang S, Bai Y, Zhang X, Fan L, Zhou H. Magnetic Domain-Wall Induced Electric Polarization in NdCrO3 Polycrystalline Ceramic. Materials. 2020; 13(8):1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081904

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Songwei, Yang Bai, Xin Zhang, Liguo Fan, and Huaiying Zhou. 2020. "Magnetic Domain-Wall Induced Electric Polarization in NdCrO3 Polycrystalline Ceramic" Materials 13, no. 8: 1904. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma13081904

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop