Next Article in Journal
Effect of Different Surface Treatments of Lithium Disilicate on the Adhesive Properties of Resin Cements
Next Article in Special Issue
Stiffener Design to Maintain Line Heating Efficiency during the Lifting Process Considering Phase Transformation
Previous Article in Journal
A High-Efficiency TiO2/ZnO Nano-Film with Surface Oxygen Vacancies for Dye Degradation
Previous Article in Special Issue
An Experimental Investigation on the Cutting Quality of Three Different Rock Specimens Using High Power Multimode Fiber Laser
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Effect of Au-Coating on the Laser Spot Cutting on Spring Contact Probe (SCP) for Semi-Conductor Inspection

Materials 2021, 14(12), 3300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123300
by Youngjin Seo 1,†, Jungsoo Nam 2,3,†, Huitaek Yun 3, Martin Byung Guk Jun 3 and Dongkyoung Lee 1,4,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2: Anonymous
Reviewer 3: Anonymous
Materials 2021, 14(12), 3300; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14123300
Submission received: 30 April 2021 / Revised: 7 June 2021 / Accepted: 8 June 2021 / Published: 15 June 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advanced Design for Manufacturing Processes (Second Volume))

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

The authors present the laser spot cutting on Au-coating layer by a laser system. The proposed manuscript within the scope of the IJAMT journal. Some of the results observations are interesting, however, if the paper can be improved in the following areas, it would add more value to the readers:

a) For the industrial application, authors could provide the application fields (i.e. future size, critical properties, and etc.).

b) Abstract should contain results of the original works and should be summarized well.

c) The parameters selection should be systemically described.

d) For the experiments, the roundness evaluation, the evaluation formula is necessary.

e) The mechanism of laser spot formation and the non-circular hole phenomenons should be described. 

f) Not only the morphology but also the contact electrical properties is critical for spring contact probe. In the manuscript without describe discussion.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for your submission, the topic of the paper is very interesting.  Micro-laser cutting is a very perspective method for this specific kind of problem. I have several comments and questions.

  1. On the third page is an error of the reference source.
  2. The results in figures 4, 5, and 6 are results from one experiment or it was made several times and the results are an average value?
  3. In line 86 is mentioned a comparison of the results in Fig. 4 with results for the uncoated version. But why are these results not given in the paper?
  4. It would be appropriate to supplement the results with generalized conclusions and possible evaluation of suitable parameters for the given application.
  5. How will the above results affect the change in the thickness of the Au-coating layer?

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The work concerns the influence of laser spot cutting parameters on the size of ablation zone, the heat affected zone and penetration depth of Au- coated samples
and without the coating. The topic of the work is interesting and important for application reasons.
Experimental works are of a basic nature and concern only the measurements of the indicated parameters at different laser spot cutting parameters (energy, pulse duration and repetition)
without a deeper analysis of the impact of laser processing parameters on changes in the microstructure of the cut elements, which may be significant due to their properties. The conclusions are imprecise, after reading the paper it is not clear whether the presence of Au coating has a positive effect on the cutting process or not. The working language is simple and clear. There are a few editing errors, one literature source (reference) is missing, as indicated in the .pdf file It is a promising work, but in the opinion of the reviewer it is required to improve the research quality by in-depth analysis of cutting areas microstructure in the cross-section, including EDS analysis.
After completing the research, the manuscript may be re-submitted for publication in Materials

 

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Round 2

Reviewer 2 Report

Thank you for the made improvement. Mainly the answer to my 4th question could be described in more detail and help to improve the scientific potential more. Did you see in my first review also the basic recommendation where I mentioned what can be or must be improved? Mainly the methods and results have to be better described? 
 

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 3 Report

The manuscript text is supplemented and the discussion of the results
is extended. Figures' description are corrected. The missing information
is entered as recommended by the reviewer but m
icrostructural studies have not been performed.
There is no single image of the microstructure to show that the coating is present.
The work has the character of basic research, a kind of report
on the selection of laser cutting process parameters for coated and uncoated samples, due to the penetration depth and symmetry of the melting zone. research and in order to conduct an in-depth analysis of the impact of the above-mentioned parameters
on the microstructure and material properties
changes in HAZ after laser cutting. Due to the scientific value of the manuscript, I do not recommend it for publication in Materials.      

Author Response

Thanks for your comments.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop