Next Article in Journal
Influence of M-EMS on Fluid Flow and Initial Solidification in Slab Continuous Casting
Previous Article in Journal
Study on the Mechanism of the Reversible Color Change of Polyacrylic Acid Modified Gold Nanoparticles Responding to pH
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Extraction of Al from Coarse Al–Si Alloy by The Selective Liquation Method

School of Metallurgy, Northeastern University, 3-11Wenhua Road, Heping District, Shenyang 110819, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(13), 3680; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133680
Submission received: 6 May 2021 / Revised: 16 June 2021 / Accepted: 16 June 2021 / Published: 1 July 2021

Abstract

:
A selective liquation process to extract Al from a coarse Al–Si alloy, produced by carbothermal reduction, was investigated on the laboratory scale. The products obtained by selective liquation–vacuum distillation were analyzed by X-ray diffraction, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry and scanning electron microscopy. During the selective liquation process with the use of zinc as the solvent, the pure aluminum in the coarse Al–Si alloy dissolved in the zinc melt to form an α-solid solution with zinc, and most of the silicon and iron-rich phases and Al–Si–Fe intermetallics precipitated and grew into massive grains that entered into the slag and separated with the Zn–Al alloy melt. However, some fine silicon particles remained in the Zn–Al alloy. Thus, Al–Si alloys conforming to industrial application standards were obtained when the Zn–Al alloys were separated by a distillation process.

1. Introduction

The production rate of global primary aluminum is second only to iron among metallic materials, and its output was more than sixty-five million tons in 2020. At present, aluminum is produced by the electrolysis of alumina, which is extracted from bauxite. As the only method of industrial production, electrolysis methods are high in cost, consume considerable amounts of energy, contribute to serious environmental pollution, and require high-grade bauxite [1,2]. More than four tons of high-grade bauxite releases more than four tons of red mud when one ton of aluminum is manufactured, and another 30 kg of spent potlining is released after electrolytic cell failure [3,4]. The red mud is a kind of highly alkaline slag [5,6], and spent potlining is a hazardous waste containing toxic and soluble cyanides and fluorides [7,8]. There are currently no effective methods for disposing of red mud and the spent potlining. At present, these waste products are stockpiled, which not only occupies land, but also raises a range of environmental issues. Furthermore, supplies of high-grade bauxite are insufficient and are being rapidly consumed. Environmental protection and effective use of limited resources are the main problem restricting the development of the aluminum industry. Many researchers are exploring new more efficient aluminum extraction methods [9,10,11,12].
There are a large number of low-grade alumina-containing ores and industrial aluminiferous waste slag. Most low-grade alumina-containing resources, such as low-grade bauxite, kaolinite, and feldspar, are mainly composed of Al2O3 and SiO2. Most industrial aluminiferous waste slag also mainly contains Al2O3 and SiO2, such as fly ash, aluminum ash, flotation tailings of bauxite, oil shale residue, and gangue. The waste slag causes serious pollution in the surrounding environment and requires effective processing
The production of a coarse Al–Si alloy by carbothermal reduction is considered to be one potential method for making use of industrial aluminiferous waste slag [13,14]. It is also considered to be an efficient method of extracting aluminum from low-grade aluminum ore. The underlying principle of the method is the carbothermal reduction of Al2O3 and SiO2 in an arc furnace. A coarse Al–Si alloy containing 35–60 wt% aluminum, 25–60 wt% silicon, and 2–15 wt% iron can be obtained after carbothermal reduction. When the content of iron is higher than 5 wt%, the material is also called a coarse Al–Si–Fe alloy. Coarse Al–Si alloys have several applications, such as deoxidizers for steelmaking and reductants for magnesium smelting, or can be used as materials for extracting aluminum and to produce casting Al–Si alloys [15]. Extracting aluminum from casting Al–Si alloys is considered to be a feasible process for aluminum production. The following methods are used to extract aluminum from coarse Al–Si alloys. The first involves disproportionation reactions of aluminum in the coarse Al–Si alloy or Al–Si–Fe alloy by reaction with AlCl3 or AlF3 to form AlCl or AlF gas at high temperature, which is separated from Si and Fe and reverted to aluminum, AlCl3 or AlF3 at low temperature [16,17]. The second method involves the separation of aluminum by molten salt electrolysis. The aluminum in the coarse Al–Si alloy as a soluble anode is dissolved into the electrolytes and reduced to aluminum at the cathode, whereas Si, Fe, and other impurities remain in the anode alloy in solid form. The third method is selective liquation, which takes advantage of the higher solubility of aluminum compared to iron and silicon in zinc, magnesium or mercury at a given temperature. Aluminum dissolved in zinc, magnesium, or mercury forms a liquid alloy, which separates from Si, Fe, and other impurities that form slag. Of these three methods for extracting aluminum from coarse Al–Si alloys, the third has the lowest energy consumption and highest efficiency.
In the present paper, the mechanism of the extraction process of aluminum and the distribution of Al, Si and Fe phases in alloys and Zn–Al–Si–Fe slags by the selective liquation of zinc were studied.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

The coarse Al–Si alloys used in the experiments come from Dengfeng Electric Group Aluminum Alloy Corporation, Henan, China. The coarse Al–Si alloy used kaolinite as its raw material and anthracite as a reductant, and thus contained many metallic impurities, oxides and carbides. Iron, calcium, and titanium are the main metallic impurities. Other impurities include alumina, ferric oxide, and silicon oxide in the form of complex oxides such as porzite (3Al2O3∙2SiO2). The impurities in the form of oxides can be removed by refining, but the metallic impurities cannot. Figure 1 shows X-ray diffraction (XRD) of the coarse Al–Si alloy before and after refining. In the present experiments, a solvent refining method was used. A mixture of NaCl, KCl, and Na3AlF6 was used as the purificant. The NaCl and KCl used in the experiments were all analytically pure reagents, produced by Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., (Beijing, China) where NaCl and KCl were dried at 300 °C for 5 h. Table 1 lists the main composition of the coarse Al–Si alloy and refining coarse Al–Si alloy. The Zn liquation agent had a purity of 99.9% and was acquired from Huludao Zinc Industry Co. Ltd., Liaoning, China. Figure 2 shows the extraction process flow diagram.
As shown in Table 1, there is a high content of impurities in the coarse Al–Si alloy produced by the carbothermal reduction method. Figure 3b–e show the elemental distribution and scanning electron microscope images of the Al–Si alloy, respectively. The Fe-rich phases in the coarse Al–Si alloy are all in the form of Al–Si–Fe intermetallics (i.e., 39.43 wt% Al, 32.79 wt% Si, and 27.78 wt% Fe). As shown in Figure 3b, the aluminum is mainly in the form of pure aluminum (e.g., point B) and Al–Si–Fe intermetallics (e.g., point A), and the silicon is mainly in the form of pure silicon (e.g., point C) and Al–Si–Fe intermetallics (e.g., point A). In addition, a small amount of fine silicon particles is unevenly distributed in the aluminum with some dissolution into the aluminum. Refining experiments were carried out at 1187 K for 30 min using a composition of 47.0 wt%NaCl–9.0 wt%KCl–44.0 wt.% Na3AlF6 as the purificant. As shown in Figure 1, the diffraction peaks of many oxides are not obvious after the refining process.

2.2. Experimental Process

Experiments were performed in a high-purity alumina crucible with a capacity of 1000 g, an internal diameter of 100 mm, and a height of 150 mm. Before the liquation experiments, the zinc metal was placed into the alumina crucible and heated to 1223 K in a resistance furnace. The refined coarse Al–Si alloy was added to the zinc, and stirred slowly until all the coarse Al–Si alloy melted into the zinc to form a Zn–Al–Si–Fe alloy [18,19]. Afterwards, the alloy was slowly cooled to 823–1023 K and maintained at that temperature for 30 min. Some semi-solidified solid alloy, i.e., slag, separated out from the melt and collected under the melt. The semi-solidified solid slag was an Fe- and Si-rich Zn–Al–Si–Fe alloy, and the melt was a Zn–Al alloy. After the liquation process, vacuum distillation experiments were performed in a vacuum furnace. In the distillation process, the Zn was distilled from the Zn–Al alloy and the Zn–Al–Fe–Si alloy, aluminum, and an Al–Si–Fe alloy were obtained [20,21]. Most of the aluminum was extracted from the coarse Al–Si alloy by selective liquation and vacuum distillation.
The composition of alloys and slag was analyzed by inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP-OES, iCAP 6500, Thermo Fisher Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). The phases and microstructure of the products were identified by X-ray diffraction analysis (XRD, Bragg–Brentano mode, X Pert ProMPDDY2094 (PANalytical B.V., Almelo, The Netherlands), 2θ: 5–90°, step size: 0.015°/0.1 s, Working voltage: 40 kV, Working current: 40 mA) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Ultra Plus-43-13, Zeiss, Oberkochen, German). The yield of the Zn–Al alloy of the selective liquation process was calculated by Equation (1) and the Al extraction efficiency was calculated by Equation (2):
η Zn Al = m Zn Al m Zn Al + m s × 100 %
η Al = m Zn Al × 1 ω Zn M Al Si × 100 %
where η Al is the Al extraction efficiency (%); η Zn Al is the Zn–Al alloy extraction efficiency (%); m Zn Al is the weight of the Zn–Al alloy (g); m s is the weight of slag (g); ω Zn is the content of Zn in the Zn–Al alloy (wt%); and M Al Si is the weight of the coarse Al–Si alloy (g).

3. Results

3.1. Selective Liquation Process

3.1.1. The Influence of Liquation Temperature

In the selective liquation process, the liquation temperature affects the quality of Zn–Al alloys and determines the content of silicon and iron in the Zn–Al alloy. The influence of the liquation temperature under conditions of a 2.5-mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy is shown in Figure 4.
Figure 4a shows the iron and silicon distribution ratio of slag to alloy obtained at different temperatures. This result shows that the contents of iron and silicon in slag were far higher than those in the Zn–Al alloys. After a selective liquation process, a Zn–Al alloy, which contained mainly Zn, Al, and Si, and a slag which contained mainly Zn, Al, Si, Fe, Ti, and Ca were obtained. Hence, most of the silicon and other impurities, such as iron, titanium, and calcium, in the coarse Al–Si alloy were separated from the aluminum by the selective liquation process. The iron and silicon distribution ratio of slag to alloy decreased as the liquation temperature was increased. Thus, an Al–Si alloy rather than pure aluminum was obtained after zinc was removed by vacuum distillation. According to Equation (1), the extraction efficiencies of aluminum and the yield of Zn–Al alloys at various liquation temperatures are shown in Figure 4b. This result shows that the extraction efficiency of aluminum and the yield of Zn–Al alloys increased as the liquation temperature was increased. When the zinc of the Zn–Al alloy and slag was distilled out, Al–Si alloys and Al–Si–Fe alloys were obtained. The contents of Si, Fe, and Al in the Al–Si alloys are plotted in Figure 5.
As shown in Figure 5, the content of silicon and iron in Al–Si alloys increased. The contents of Al, Si, and Fe in the Al–Si alloys were 73–85 wt%, 15–25 wt% and 0.30–2.00 wt%, respectively. When the temperature was below 873 K, the content of Fe in the products obtained by the distillation of Zn–Al alloys was lower than 0.70 wt%. The contents of other impurities conformed with the quality standards of the casting Al–Si alloys. When the liquation temperature was greater than 873 K, the content of Fe surpassed the ratified content (0.7 wt%).

3.1.2. The Influence of the Mass Ratio of Zinc to Coarse Al–Si Alloy

The mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy is another factor that affects the extraction of Al from coarse Al–Si alloys. The effects of the mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy on the slag and product contents when the liquation temperature was 873 K are shown in Figure 6.
Figure 6a shows that the iron and silicon distribution ratio of slag to alloy was high at different mass ratios of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy. As shown in Figure 6b, the extraction efficiency of aluminum and the yield of the Zn–Al alloys increased as the mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy was increased. The content of Al and Si in the Zn–Al alloys decreased as the mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy was increased. The contents of Si, Fe, and Al in the Al–Si alloys were distilled out and are plotted in Figure 7.
These results show that the content of Al and Si in the Al–Si alloys was in the range of 84–94 wt% and 6–15 wt%. The content of Fe in the Al–Si alloys was in the range of 0.50–1.20 wt% and increased as the mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy was increased.
Figure 8 shows XRD patterns of the Zn–Al alloy and slag at a liquation temperature of 873 K and 2.5 mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy.
Therefore, Al–Si alloys rather than pure aluminum are formed by a selective liquation process involving coarse Al–Si alloys as a feedstock and using zinc as a solvent. The Al–Si alloys can be used as master alloys for casting Al–Si alloys. Among the requirements for casting Al–Si alloys, Fe is the primary impurity and its content should be below 0.7 wt%. To meet these iron requirements, the liquation temperature should be maintained below 923 K and the mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy should be below 3.0. The optimum technological conditions are a liquation temperature of 873–925 K and a mass ratio of zinc to Al–Si alloy in the range of 2.5–3.0. Under these conditions, the Al–Zn alloy contains approximately 80 wt% zinc, 16–17 wt% aluminum, 2–3 wt% silicon, and less than 0.17 wt% iron. When the zinc is distilled out, the Si content in Al–Si alloys was 10–15 wt%, the Fe content was below 0.7 wt%, and contents of other impurities were very low.

3.2. Principle of Selective Liquation Process with Zinc

The SEM and elemental distribution of the Zn–Al alloy and slag formed by selective liquation at 873 K with a 2.5 mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy are shown in Figure 9 and Figure 10, respectively.
The SEM, elemental distribution and EDS analyses indicate that the Zn–Al alloy mainly consisted of a η-solid solution (e.g., point A, consisting of 100% Zn) and an α-solid solution [22] (e.g., point B, approximately 75% Zn and 25% Al). Except for a very small amount in the solid solution, most of the silicon was in the form of pure silicon grains (e.g., point C, which is 100% Si). The iron content was very low and evenly distributed throughout the alloy.
The SEM, elemental distribution and EDS analyses indicate that the slag is a kind of Zn–Al–Si–Fe alloy and mainly consists of a η-solid solution (e.g., point D consists of 98.74% Zn and 1.26% Al), pure silicon grains (e.g., point E consists of 100% Si), and Al–Si–Fe intermetallics. Most of the silicon is in the form of large pure silicon grains and some is in the form of Al–Si–Fe intermetallics. The iron-rich phase is an all Al–Si–Fe intermetallic, which is granular (e.g., point F and consists of 39.91% Al, 33.03% Si, 25.16% Fe, and 1.9% Zn) and a long strip (e.g., point G consists of 23.31% Al, 39.87% Si, 32.46% Fe, and 4.19% Zn).
On the basis of the results presented in Figure 3, Figure 9 and Figure 10, it is concluded that during the selective liquation process, the pure aluminum in the coarse Al–Si alloy enters into the zinc melt to form an α solid solution. The silicon existing in the form of pure silicon grows into massive silicon grains, most of which deposit into the slag at the bottom of melt. However, some fine silicon particles remain in the Zn–Al alloy. The iron-rich phases, i.e., the Al–Si–Fe intermetallics, all deposit into the slag and some become needle-like phases with high iron contents during the selective liquation process. The iron content of the obtained Zn–Al alloy is very low (below 0.20 wt%).

3.3. Zinc Separated by a Distillation Process

The zinc in the Zn–Al alloy and slag can be separated by a distillation process when the distillation temperature is greater than 1173 K. The zinc can be recovered and an Al–Si alloy is obtained. The ICP results of the Al–Si alloy indicate that the content of zinc is less than 0.1%. Hence, zinc is effectively completely recovered and might be reused. Table 2 lists the main composition of the Al–Si alloy after zinc is separated by a distillation process.

4. Conclusions

In the coarse Al–Si alloy produced by a carbothermal reduction method, Fe-rich phases are present in the form of Al–Si–Fe intermetallics, and silicon is present mainly in the form of pure silicon and Al–Si–Fe intermetallics. During a selective liquation process, pure aluminum in the coarse Al–Si alloy dissolves in the zinc melt to form an α-solid solution with zinc, and most of the silicon and the iron-rich phases, Al–Si–Fe intermetallics, precipitate and grow into massive grains, which deposit into the slag and separate with the Zn–Al alloy melt; however, some fine silicon particles remain in the Zn–Al alloy. The product of the aluminum extraction from a coarse Al–Si alloy by selective liquation with zinc as the solvent is an Al–Si alloy with a low content of Fe rather than pure aluminum. A kind of Al–Si alloy conforming to industrial application standards, containing 85–90 wt% Al, 10–15 wt% Si, and less than 0.6 wt% Fe, can be obtained at a liquation temperature of 873 K and a 2.5 mass ratio of zinc to the coarse Al–Si alloy. The aluminum extraction rate is in the range of 35–40%.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, B.L.; methodology, B.L.; software, B.L.; validation, B.L.; formal analysis, B.L. and Y.W.; investigation, resources, B.L., Y.W., B.G.; data curation, B.L.; writing—original draft preparation, B.L.; writing—review and editing, B.L., Y.W. and B.G.; project administration, B.L. and Y.W. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFC1901905), the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (N162502002) and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (51704150).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data are contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Barry, T.S.; Saidou, T.; Birinci, M.; Erdemoglu, M. Thermal and mechanical activation in acid leaching processes of non-bauxite ores available for alumina production A Review. Min. Metall. Explor. 2019, 36, 557–569. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Mymrin, V.; Molinetti, A.; Alekseev, K.; Avanci, M.A.; Klitzke, W.; Silva, D.A.; Ferraz, F.A.; Larozinski, N.A.; Catai, R.E. Characterization of construction materials on the base of mortar waste, activated by aluminum anodization sludge and lime production waste. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 212, 202–212. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Vigneshwaran, S.; Uthayakumar, M.; Arumugaprabu, V. Development and sustainability of industrial waste-based red mud hybrid composites. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 230, 862–868. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Wang, Y.W.; Peng, J.P.; Di, Y.Z. Separation and recycling of spent carbon cathode blocks in the aluminum industry by the vacuum distillation process. JOM 2018, 70, 1877–1883. [Google Scholar]
  5. Xu, X.H.; Song, J.; Li, Y.; Wu, J.F.; Liu, X.; Zhang, C. The microstructure and properties of ceramic tiles from solid wastes of Bayer red muds. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 212, 266–274. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhu, X.B.; Li, W.; Zhao, H.; Zhang, C.X. Selective Dealkalization of Red Mud Using Calcium Oxide with Pressure Leaching. JOM 2019, 70, 2800–2806. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sørlie, M.; Øye, H.A. Cathodes in Aluminum Electrolysis, 3rd ed.; Aluminum-Verlag Marketing & Kommunikation GmbH: Dusseldorf, Germany, 2010. [Google Scholar]
  8. Shi, Z.N.; Li, W. Study on reclaiming spent pot lin-ing of aluminium electrolysis cells by alkaline leaching and acid leaching. Rare Met. 2009, 28, 728–731. [Google Scholar]
  9. Yang, W.J.; Liu, X.W.; Liu, J.Z.; Wang, Z.H.; Zhou, J.H.; Cen, K.F. Thermodynamics analysis of carbothermal-chlorination reduction in aluminum production. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2017, 111, 876–883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Foley, E.; Herwig, G.L. Production of Aluminum and Aluminum Alloys from Aluminum Chloride. U.S. Patent 3,464,900, 2 September 1969. [Google Scholar]
  11. Zhao, L. Calcination of aluminum chloride hexahydrate (ACH) for alumina production: Implications for alumina extraction from aluminum rich fly ash (ARFA). Arch. Metall. Mater. 2018, 63, 235–240. [Google Scholar]
  12. Guo, Y.X.; Li, J.; Yan, K.Z.; Cao, L.Q.; Cheng, F.Q. A prospective process for alumina extraction via the co-treatment of coal fly ash and bauxite red mud: Investigation of the process. Hydrometallugy 2019, 186, 98–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Chen, X.M.; Yang, B.; Tao, D.P.; Dai, Y.N. Formation Mechanism of [AlCl] n during Production of Aluminum by AlCl Disproportionation. Acta Phys. Chim. Sin. 2019, 26, 415–421. [Google Scholar]
  14. Lu, H.M.; Han, H.Q. Producing aluminum-silicon alloys from high-aluminum bearing coal fly ash by carbothermal reduction method. In Proceedings of the 2007 TMS Annual Meeting: Technical Sessions on Light Metal, Orlando, FL, USA, 25 February–1 March 2007. [Google Scholar]
  15. You, J.; Wang, Y.W.; Feng, N.X. Preparation of casting alloy ZL101 with coarse aluminum-silicon alloy. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2018, 18, 116–120. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Feng, Y.B.; Yang, B.; Dai, Y.N. Thermodynamics on formation of C, Al4C3 and Al2O3 in AlCl disproportionation process in vacuum to produce aluminum. Trans. Nonferr. Met. Soc. China 2014, 24, 3366–3371. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, X.M.; Yang, B.; Tao, D.P.; Dai, Y.N. Theory Study of AlCl Disproportionation Reaction Mechanism on Al (110) Surface. Metall. Mater. Trans. B Process. Metall. Mater. Process. Sci. 2010, 41, 137–145. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Tang, H.Q.; Zeng, J.M.; Li, H.L.; Si, J.Y. Phase Diagram of Zn-Al binary system. Spec. Cast. Nonferr. Alloy. 2006, 6, 387–389. [Google Scholar]
  19. Li, G.L.; Jiang, Z.X. Explanation of phase structure of Zn-Al binary alloy. Steel Wire Prod. 2002, 28, 54–55. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liu, Y.Y.; Yang, B. Study on Separation of Al—Zn Alloy by vacuum distillation. Jiangsu Metall. 2008, 36, 32–34. [Google Scholar]
  21. Utigard, T.A. The properties and uses of fluxes in molten aluminum processing. JOM 1998, 50, 38–43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Tang, H.Q.; Zeng, J.M.; Li, H.L.; Si, J.Y. Study on binary phase diagram of Zn-Al system. Spec. Cast. Nonferr. Alloy 2006, 26, 387–388. [Google Scholar]
Figure 1. XRD of spectra of coarse Al–Si alloy. (a) before; (b) after the refining.
Figure 1. XRD of spectra of coarse Al–Si alloy. (a) before; (b) after the refining.
Materials 14 03680 g001
Figure 2. Extraction process flow diagram.
Figure 2. Extraction process flow diagram.
Materials 14 03680 g002
Figure 3. Photograph of coarse Al–Si alloy and elemental distributions of refined coarse Al–Si alloy. (a) coarse Al–Si alloy; (b) SEM of coarse Al–Si alloy; (c) Distribution of aluminum; (d) Distribution of silicon; (e) Distribution of iron.
Figure 3. Photograph of coarse Al–Si alloy and elemental distributions of refined coarse Al–Si alloy. (a) coarse Al–Si alloy; (b) SEM of coarse Al–Si alloy; (c) Distribution of aluminum; (d) Distribution of silicon; (e) Distribution of iron.
Materials 14 03680 g003
Figure 4. The influence of liquation temperature. (a) Curves of the extraction rate and the yield at various liquation temperatures; (b) The element distribution ratio of slag to alloy.
Figure 4. The influence of liquation temperature. (a) Curves of the extraction rate and the yield at various liquation temperatures; (b) The element distribution ratio of slag to alloy.
Materials 14 03680 g004
Figure 5. Effect of liquation temperature on composition of the Al–Si alloys.
Figure 5. Effect of liquation temperature on composition of the Al–Si alloys.
Materials 14 03680 g005
Figure 6. The influence of the mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy. (a) Effect of mass ratio on the extraction rate and yield. (b) The element distribution ratio of slag to alloy.
Figure 6. The influence of the mass ratio of zinc to coarse Al–Si alloy. (a) Effect of mass ratio on the extraction rate and yield. (b) The element distribution ratio of slag to alloy.
Materials 14 03680 g006
Figure 7. Effect mass ratio on composition of the Al–Si alloys.
Figure 7. Effect mass ratio on composition of the Al–Si alloys.
Materials 14 03680 g007
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the Zn–Al alloy and slag. (a) Slag; (b) Zn–Al alloy.
Figure 8. XRD patterns of the Zn–Al alloy and slag. (a) Slag; (b) Zn–Al alloy.
Materials 14 03680 g008
Figure 9. Elemental distributions of Zn–Al alloy. (a) SEM of Zn–Al alloy; (b) Distribution of zinc; (c) Distribution of aluminum ; (d) Distribution of silicon ; (e) Distribution of iron.
Figure 9. Elemental distributions of Zn–Al alloy. (a) SEM of Zn–Al alloy; (b) Distribution of zinc; (c) Distribution of aluminum ; (d) Distribution of silicon ; (e) Distribution of iron.
Materials 14 03680 g009
Figure 10. Elemental distributions of Zn–Al–Si–Fe alloy slag. (a) SEM of Zn–Al–Si–Fe alloy; (b) Distribution of zinc; (c) Distribution of aluminum; (d) Distribution of silicon; (e) Distribution of iron.
Figure 10. Elemental distributions of Zn–Al–Si–Fe alloy slag. (a) SEM of Zn–Al–Si–Fe alloy; (b) Distribution of zinc; (c) Distribution of aluminum; (d) Distribution of silicon; (e) Distribution of iron.
Materials 14 03680 g010
Table 1. Composition of the coarse Al–Si alloy (wt%).
Table 1. Composition of the coarse Al–Si alloy (wt%).
ElementAlSiFeCaTiMgZnCuOther Impurities
Coarse alloy58.5025.484.362.060.720.010.010.01<12.35
Refining coarse alloy60.5031.355.311.870.940.010.010.01-
Table 2. Composition of Al–Si alloy (wt%).
Table 2. Composition of Al–Si alloy (wt%).
ElementAlSiFeZnTiOther Impurities
Content84.1314.590.580.10<0.1<0.5
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, B.; Wang, Y.; Gao, B. Extraction of Al from Coarse Al–Si Alloy by The Selective Liquation Method. Materials 2021, 14, 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133680

AMA Style

Li B, Wang Y, Gao B. Extraction of Al from Coarse Al–Si Alloy by The Selective Liquation Method. Materials. 2021; 14(13):3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133680

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Bo, Yaowu Wang, and Bingliang Gao. 2021. "Extraction of Al from Coarse Al–Si Alloy by The Selective Liquation Method" Materials 14, no. 13: 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133680

APA Style

Li, B., Wang, Y., & Gao, B. (2021). Extraction of Al from Coarse Al–Si Alloy by The Selective Liquation Method. Materials, 14(13), 3680. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14133680

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop