Next Article in Journal
Infra-Red Active Dirac Plasmon Serie in Potassium Doped-Graphene (KC8) Nanoribbons Array on Al2O3 Substrate
Previous Article in Journal
Design of Shape Memory Thermoplastic Material Systems for FDM-Type Additive Manufacturing
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Communication

Ionic Liquids Separating Rubber Latex from Guayule

Department of Chemical Engineering, Louisiana Tech University, 818 Nelson Ave, Ruston, LA 71272, USA
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(15), 4255; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154255
Submission received: 13 July 2021 / Revised: 27 July 2021 / Accepted: 28 July 2021 / Published: 30 July 2021

Abstract

:
Danger to rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) from South American leaf blight fungus imperils the world’s source of natural latex for essential rubber products. Avoiding latex allergies also requires a non-Hevea latex source. The present methods for removing latex entrapped in the individual cells of guayule plants require environmentally hazardous chemicals. This study proposes a new method for latex extraction from guayule using various ionic liquids (ILs) to dissolve cell walls and release latex, as substantiated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) data.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

Rubber is an essential part of modern economies. Rubber from natural sources is superior in tensile strength and other properties to synthetic rubber and also is not derived from fossil fuels [1,2]. Rubber trees (Hevea brasiliensis) originated in the Amazon basin in South America but have been planted in many tropical regions beginning in 1876. However, South American leaf blight (Microcyclus ulei), caused by a fungus, has devastated rubber trees in South America, so that there is presently no commercial-scale natural rubber production there. This fungus has the potential to be distributed in other areas where rubber trees are grown, eventually causing a worldwide shortage of natural rubber latex. Other leaf blights threaten Southeast Asia rubber trees, as well [3]. Non-rubber tree latex-containing plants, such as guayule (Parthenium argentatum), are a possible substitute for latex from Hevea brasiliensis if such a crisis should occur. Guayule latex, in particular, also has advantages over rubber tree latex in that it is non-allergenic [4,5]. Other plants, such as Taraxacum kok-saghyz (Russian dandelion), can also be used to produce rubber, but guayule has an advantage in that it thrives in an arid climate with marginal soil [6,7].
Latex rubber from non-rubber tree plants, such as guayule, is contained within the plant cells, requiring the breaking of parenchyma cell walls to release the latex suspended in the aqueous cytoplasm [8]. Typically, grinding/milling at a pH of 10 is employed to break cell walls and release latex [9]. Alternatively, volatile organic solvents, both polar or non-polar, may be used to release latex [10]. The process waste streams, which are either high pH or comprised of volatile organic compounds, may be devastating when released into the environment [9]. A more environmentally friendly process is vitally needed.
Ionic liquids (ILs) are defined as water-free organic salts with melting points at temperatures below their decomposition temperature [11]. They have been reported to break down cell walls in plants [12,13]. Their large cations cause the poor organization of cations with anions, thus lowering these solvents’ melting points. As they are salts, ILs have extremely low vapor pressures, which facilitates recycling and makes them “green” when they are used in biomass pretreatment. Some ILs have been reported to be of low hazard to the environment, such as 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate (Emim Ac), a low toxicity IL (LD50 > 2000 mg kg−1) [14]. If halogens and sulfur are avoided when synthesizing ILs, then their decomposition products are reported to be relatively harmless [15]. Nevertheless, full life cycle analyses need to be conducted even on these ILs [16]. Further advanced ionic liquids, such as deep eutectic solvents, may also be even more ecofriendly for biomass deconstruction [17]. The present work investigates the effect of various ionic liquids on the removal of latex from guayule stems. Our hypothesis is that a process using an environmentally friendly IL can be found to release latex from guayule, as indicated by FTIR analysis of the products obtained.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

Guayule stems were collected from two-year-old plants of improved germplasm (CAL-7), generously provided by Dr. Hussein Abdel-Haleem from the US Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center at Maricopa Agricultural Center, Maricopa, AZ, USA. CAL-7 was developed by the University of California and released for its high rubber content [14,15]. It has a rubber content of approximately 10% [16]. The stems were stored in the refrigerator prior to use. Wire cutters were used to chop the stems; a blender (SharkNinja Operating LLC, Chino, CA, USA) was used to grind the pieces. Lastly, the ground guayule was sieved between 14 and 20 count mesh sieves to obtain particles of approximately 1 mm in diameter. The ILs 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate >95% (Emim Ac), 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium lactate >98% (Emim Lact), 1,3-dimethylimidazolium dimethylphosphate >98% (Dmim Dmp), and 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate >98% (Emim Dep) were purchased from IoLiTec, Inc. [18] and used as received. Recycling of ionic liquids was reported as a means of re-using these materials [19,20]. Centrifuged Natural Latex Liquid Rubber for comparison was purchased from Holden’s Latex Corporation (New York, NY, USA).

2.2. Methods

Guayule (2 g) was mixed with 20 g of the IL for a 1:10 mass ratio. The capped glassware with the mixture was immersed in an oil bath at temperatures of 110, 125, or 140 °C with magnetic stirring. Samples were taken at 30, 60, 90, and 120 min. After sampling, approximately 7 g of water was added to each sample in a tube. The tubes were vortexed and then centrifuged for 10 min at about 1000 RPM. The layers obtained were separated by pipetting prior to Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy. Latex clumps were separated by vacuum filtration. Each sample was analyzed using a Nicolet IR 100 FTIR-ATR (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) with a diamond crystal using 32 scans per sample and a resolution of 2.0 for frequencies of 700 to 4000 cm−1. Spectra were obtained under ambient lab conditions (22 °C, 1 atm).

3. Results

The effect of ionic liquid expected on cell walls is shown in Figure 1. After pretreatment with the various ionic liquids, and the addition of water, either two or three layers formed and became even more distinct with centrifugation. All two or three layers were separately characterized by FTIR. The top layer was observed to contain clumps, historically called worms. The top layer would be expected to be rubber latex, since its density was measured as 0.95 g/cm3, while the density of water was 1.0 g/cm3 and the density of Emim Ac was measured at 1.1 g/cm3 [14]. Figure 2 shows a schematic of the layers observed. Samples from the top layer after centrifugation showed the relevant vibrations but varied in intensity with reaction conditions. Lower layers after centrifugation showed only peaks for the IL or the original biomass.
The most relevant and characteristic IR vibrations for guayule latex were reported to be near 740 cm−1, 830 cm−1, 1370 cm−1, 1440 cm−1, and 1655 cm−1 [21]. For natural rubber, the 742 cm−1 vibration was attributed to a rocking –CH2– bond that would exist if the latex bonds to an adjacent isoprene [22]. A vibration corresponding to the backbone C–H out-of-plane mode (C=C–H) at 836 cm−1 shifted to 843 cm−1 when under strain, as would exist with FTIR-ATR measurements [23].
A 1037 cm−1 vibration was assigned to a rocking –CH3 group, a 1245 cm−1 vibration to a twisting –CH2– bond, a 1375 cm−1 vibration to a –CH3 deformation, and a 1447 cm−1 vibration to a –CH2– deformation or a rocking –CH3 group [22]. A 1654 cm−1 vibration was assigned to C=C stretching [24]. The relevant vibrations and their assignments can be seen in Table 1. Vibrations for latex that overlap with the IL, such as 1090 cm−1 (a twisting –CH2–), were not analyzed or discussed since conclusions cannot be drawn from these data.
The “worms” in the top layer after centrifugation showed the relevant vibrations, although they varied in intensity with reaction conditions. Lower layers after centrifugation showed only peaks for the IL or the original biomass. As seen in Figure 3 and Table 1 for Emim Ac pretreatment, all latex vibrations exist for a 60 min pretreatment at 110 °C and at 125 °C, but shorter or longer pretreatment times show weaker characteristic vibrations. In these Emim Ac pretreated spectra in Figure 3, a sharp vibration was seen at 1170 cm−1, which reflects contamination with Emim Ac. At the highest temperature, 140 °C, the most characteristic vibrations are seen at the shortest time of 30 min. These findings suggest that the severity of IL pretreatment can affect the latex produced. Too long a time at high temperature may cause degradation of the latex, while too short a time does not degrade the cell wall enough to allow the latex to escape.
When guayule was pretreated with 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium lactate (Emim Lact), all the latex vibrations that did not overlap with the Emim Lact spectra were observed at the conditions 125 °C for 30 min, but longer times of 60 min, 90 min, and 120 min showed fewer common vibrations. Again, higher pretreatment severity likely decomposed latex.
For 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium diethylphosphate (Emim Dep), pretreatment at 125 °C 30 min, 60 min, and 90 min showed latex vibrations, but not 120 min. For 1,3-dimethylimidazolium dimethylphosphate (Dmim Dmp) pretreatment at 125 °C, 60 min of pretreatment showed more latex vibrations compared to 30 min, 90 min, and 120 min, showing 60 min to be the optimal time for pretreatment with this IL.

4. Discussion

Analyses of FTIR spectra from IL pretreatment of guayule suggest that cell walls are broken, allowing the rubber latex inside to escape. The addition of water leads to the formation of layers, with the lowest density top layer showing characteristic rubber latex vibrations in the FTIR spectra. The bottom layers shows the spectral characteristics of IL or biomass residue. Cellulose would be expected to remain in the residue in the lower layers, since the ILs used tend to sparingly dissolve cellulose [25]. A more environmentally friendly method for the separation of rubber latex from guayule may then be possible, permitting it to become a backup source of natural rubber latex, should Hevea brasiliensis succumb to disease in Asia. Future studies of cell wall breakage of guayule and other rubber-containing plants using advanced ionic liquids could allow for even more environmentally friendly solutions to processing plants for rubber products. In addition, future work is needed to compare this method to conventional methods and to find if latex rubber is contaminated with IL, although Emim Ac has been reported to be harmless to aquatic life [26]. Future work of a careful accounting of IL solvent and the ability to recycle it will be needed to justify the economics of this method.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, J.G.L.; methodology, J.G.L., H.T.Z. and E.T.A.; formal analysis, J.G.L., H.T.Z. and E.T.A.; investigation, H.T.Z. and E.T.A.; data curation, H.T.Z. and E.T.A.; writing—original draft preparation, J.G.L., H.T.Z. and E.T.A.; writing—review and editing, J.G.L.; supervision, J.G.L.; project administration, J.G.L.; funding acquisition, J.G.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was supported by the EPA Region 6 P2 program [Grant number NP-01F55301-0].

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available within this article.

Acknowledgments

The authors want to acknowledge support from Narendra Kumar (Louisiana Tech). Guayule stems (CAL-7) were generously provided by Hussein Abdel-Haleem from the US Arid-Land Agricultural Research Center at Maricopa Agricultural center.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. De Sarkar, M.; Mukunda, P.G.; De, P.P.; Bhowmick, A.K. Degradation of hydrogenated styrene-butadiene rubber at high temperature. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1997, 70, 855–870. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Cornish, K.; Williams, J.; Hall, J.L.; McCoy, R.G. Production and properties of Yulex® - The natural solution to latex allergy. Rubber Chem. Technol. 2008, 81, 709–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Moore, M. Leaf Disease Threatens Natural Rubber Production. Available online: https://www.tirebusiness.com/news/leaf-disease-threatens-natural-rubber-production (accessed on 7 August 2020).
  4. Cornish, K.; Brichta, J.L. Purification of Hypoallergenic Latex from Guayule; ASHS Press: Alexandria, VA, USA, 2002. [Google Scholar]
  5. Hamilton, R.G.; Cornish, K. Immunogenicity studies of guayule and guayule latex in occupationally exposed workers. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2010, 31, 197–201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Kreuzberger, M.; Hahn, T.; Zibek, S.; Schiemann, J.; Thiele, K. Seasonal pattern of biomass and rubber and inulin of wild Russian dandelion (Taraxacum koksaghyz L. Rodin) under experimental field conditions. Eur. J. Agron. 2016, 80, 66–77. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Rousset, A.; Amor, A.; Punvichai, T.; Perino, S.; Palu, S.; Dorget, M.; Pioch, D.; Chemat, F. Guayule (Parthenium argentatum A. Gray), a Renewable Resource for Natural Polyisoprene and Resin: Composition, Processes and Applications. Molecules 2021, 26, 664. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Rasutis, D.; Soratana, K.; McMahan, C.; Landis, A.E. A sustainability review of domestic rubber from the guayule plant. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2015, 70, 383–394. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Coffelt, T.A.; Williams, C.F. Characterization and recycling of waste water from guayule latex extraction. Ind. Crop. Prod. 2009, 29, 648–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, Y.; Mouri, H.; Beaulieu, M. Processes for the Removal of Rubber from TKS Plant Matter. U.S. Patent 9,567,457, 14 February 2017. [Google Scholar]
  11. Mariani, A.; Bonomo, M.; Gao, X.; Centrella, B.; Nucara, A.; Buscaino, R.; Barge, A.; Barbero, N.; Gontrani, L.; Passerini, S. The unseen evidence of Reduced Ionicity: The elephant in (the) room temperature ionic liquids. J. Mol. Liq. 2021, 324. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Mood, S.H.; Golfeshan, A.H.; Tabatabaei, M.; Jouzani, G.S.; Najafi, G.H.; Gholami, M.; Ardjmand, M. Lignocellulosic biomass to bioethanol, a comprehensive review with a focus on pretreatment. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2013, 27, 77–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lynam, J.G.; Reza, M.T.; Vasquez, V.R.; Coronella, C.J. Pretreatment of rice hulls by ionic liquid dissolution. Bioresour. Technol. 2012, 114, 629–636. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Sun, N.; Rahman, M.; Qin, Y.; Maxim, M.L.; Rodríguez, H.; Rogers, R.D. Complete dissolution and partial delignification of wood in the ionic liquid 1-ethyl-3-methylimidazolium acetate. Green Chem. 2009, 11, 646–655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Lynam, J.G. Loblolly pine pretreatment by ionic liquid-glycerol mixtures. Biomass Convers. Biorefinery 2015. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Maciel, V.G.; Wales, D.J.; Seferin, M.; Ugaya, C.M.L.; Sans, V. State-of-the-art and limitations in the life cycle assessment of ionic liquids. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 217, 844–858. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Isci, A.; Erdem, G.M.; Elmaci, S.B.; Sakiyan, O.; Lamp, A.; Kaltschmitt, M. Effect of microwave-assisted deep eutectic solvent pretreatment on lignocellulosic structure and bioconversion of wheat straw. Cellulose 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Available online: http://www.iolitec-usa.com (accessed on 29 July 2021).
  19. Lynam, J.G.; Chow, G.I.; Coronella, C.J.; Hiibel, S.R. Ionic liquid and water separation by membrane distillation. Chem. Eng. J. 2016, 288, 557–561. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, J.; Chen, C.; Wang, L.; Lei, Y.; Ji, H.; Liu, S. Utilization of inorganic salts as adjuvants for ionic liquid–water pretreatment of lignocellulosic biomass: Enzymatic hydrolysis and ionic liquid recycle. 3 Biotech 2019, 9. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Banigan, T.F.; Verbiscar, A.J.; Oda, T.A. Infrared spectrophotometric analysis for natural rubber in guayule shrubs. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1982, 55, 407–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Rolere, S.; Liengprayoon, S.; Vaysse, L.; Sainte-Beuve, J.; Bonfils, F. Investigating natural rubber composition with Fourier Transform Infrared (FT-IR) spectroscopy: A rapid and non-destructive method to determine both protein and lipid contents simultaneously. Polym. Test. 2015, 43, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Choi, I.S.; Roland, C.M. Strain-crystallization of guayule and hevea rubbers. Rubber Chem. Technol. 1997, 70, 202–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Kishore, K.; Pandey, H.K. Spectral studies on plant rubbers. Prog. Polym. Sci. 1986, 12, 155–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Brandt, A.; Gräsvik, J.; Hallett, J.P.; Welton, T. Deconstruction of lignocellulosic biomass with ionic liquids. Green Chem. 2013, 15, 550–583. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  26. Ventura, S.P.M.; Marques, C.S.; Rosatella, A.A.; Afonso, C.A.M.; Gonçalves, F.; Coutinho, J.A.P. Toxicity assessment of various ionic liquid families towards Vibrio fischeri marine bacteria. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 2012, 76, 162–168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Schematic of Ionic Liquid Action.
Figure 1. Schematic of Ionic Liquid Action.
Materials 14 04255 g001
Figure 2. Schematic of Layers after Ionic Liquid Pretreatment.
Figure 2. Schematic of Layers after Ionic Liquid Pretreatment.
Materials 14 04255 g002
Figure 3. FTIR spectra in the fingerprint region of commercial latex, guayule pretreated with Emim Ac at 110 °C for 60 min (EA 110 C 60 min), guayule pretreated with Emim Ac at 125 °C for 60 min (EA 125 C 60 min), Emim Ac, and untreated guayule.
Figure 3. FTIR spectra in the fingerprint region of commercial latex, guayule pretreated with Emim Ac at 110 °C for 60 min (EA 110 C 60 min), guayule pretreated with Emim Ac at 125 °C for 60 min (EA 125 C 60 min), Emim Ac, and untreated guayule.
Materials 14 04255 g003
Table 1. Vibrations Common to Guayule Latex and Guayule Pretreated with Emim Ac.
Table 1. Vibrations Common to Guayule Latex and Guayule Pretreated with Emim Ac.
Latex Wave-Number (cm−1)16541447137512451037843742
Bond
Vibration
C=C stretching–CH2– deformation/rocking
–CH3
–CH3 deformationtwisting –CH2rocking
–CH3 group
backbone C–H out-of-plane moderocking
–CH2
110 °C/30 min
110 °C/60 min
110 °C/90 min
110 °C/120 min
125 °C/30 min
125 °C/60 min
125 °C/90 min
125 °C/120 min
140 °C/30 min
140 °C/60 min
140 °C/90 min
140 °C/120 min
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Lynam, J.G.; Zugger, H.T.; Amedee, E.T. Ionic Liquids Separating Rubber Latex from Guayule. Materials 2021, 14, 4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154255

AMA Style

Lynam JG, Zugger HT, Amedee ET. Ionic Liquids Separating Rubber Latex from Guayule. Materials. 2021; 14(15):4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154255

Chicago/Turabian Style

Lynam, Joan G., Holden T. Zugger, and Elizabeth T. Amedee. 2021. "Ionic Liquids Separating Rubber Latex from Guayule" Materials 14, no. 15: 4255. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14154255

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop