Next Article in Journal
A Comparative Study of Cytotoxicity of PPG and PEG Surface-Modified 2-D Ti3C2 MXene Flakes on Human Cancer Cells and Their Photothermal Response
Next Article in Special Issue
High-Temperature Corrosion of APS- and HVOF-Coated Nickel-Based Super Alloy under Air Oxidation and Melted Salt Domains
Previous Article in Journal
Study of the Relationship between the Structural Parameters of Magnetic Polypropylene-Knitted Fabric and Human Skin Microcirculation
Previous Article in Special Issue
Influence of Laser Treatment on the Corrosion Resistance of Cr3C2-25(Ni20Cr) Cermet Coating
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Structure and Properties of TiO2/nanoTiO2 Bimodal Coatings Obtained by a Hybrid PVD/ALD Method on 316L Steel Substrate

1
Department of Engineering Materials and Biomaterials, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
2
Materials Research Laboratory, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Silesian University of Technology, Konarskiego 18A, 44-100 Gliwice, Poland
3
Department of Materials and Metallurgy Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, University of West Bohemia, Univerzitni 22, 30614 Plzen, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(16), 4369; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164369
Submission received: 28 June 2021 / Revised: 22 July 2021 / Accepted: 29 July 2021 / Published: 4 August 2021
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Corrosion Resistance of Alloy and Coating Materials)

Abstract

:
This paper presents the synergy of the effect of two surface engineering technologies—magnetron sputtering (MS-PVD) and atomic layer deposition (ALD) on the structure and properties of 316L steel. Recent studies indicate that PVD coatings, despite their thickness of a few micrometers, have many discontinuities and structural defects, which may lead to pitting corrosion after time. Applying an ALD layer to a PVD coating seals its structure and contributes to extending the service life of the coating. Investigations of the structure and morphology of the produced layers were carried out using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) and atomic force microscope (AFM). In addition, the structure of the coatings was investigated on the cross-section using a scanning-transmission electron microscope S/TEM. The tribological properties of the materials studied were determined by the ball-on-disc method. The corrosion resistance of the tested materials was determined by the electrochemical potentiodynamic method by recording the polarization curves of the anodes. Additional information about the electrochemical properties of the tested samples, including the quality, their tightness, and their resistivity, was obtained by electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS). In addition, the main mechanisms of corrosion and tribological wear were determined by SEM observations after corrosion tests and after tribological tests. The study showed that the fabrication of hybrid layers by MS-PVD and ALD techniques allows obtaining coatings with electrochemical properties superior to those of layers fabricated by only one method.

1. Introduction

316L austenitic steel has excellent corrosion and mechanical properties, thanks to its chromium and nickel content, which makes it suitable for a variety of industrial and biomedical applications. When considering biomedical applications, many materials exhibit better properties than this steel, e.g., antibacterial properties, and yet this steel is used much more frequently. The main factor that determines the use of 316L steel as a biomedical material is its price and availability. Unfortunately, when used for long periods in conditions that do not allow for regular maintenance (e.g., as an implant in the human body), the passive layer, which determines corrosion resistance, becomes brittle and vulnerable to the external environment. Chloride anions causing pitting corrosion have a particular effect [1]. One of the ways to improve its corrosion resistance and also to increase its biocompatibility is to apply thin films showing the desired properties.
Although coatings on biomedical materials and especially on corrosion-resistant steels have been used for years, their dynamic development has taken place during the last decade. Admittedly, modified PVD methods make it possible to produce coatings that exhibit high abrasion resistance and hardness and good corrosion resistance of the coated parts [2,3]. However, a “perfect” PVD coating that is suitable for a variety of applications and free of structural defects has not yet been produced. On the other hand, although the coatings deposited by the ALD technique on these materials are very thin and do not show very good mechanical properties [4,5], they are characterized by very good anti-corrosion properties [6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14].
To obtain a combination of the discussed properties (high corrosion protection and good tribological properties) hybrid coatings are used, which are made by both methods simultaneously [15,16,17]. An example of hybrid PVD + ALD coating, which has been described in [18,19,20], is the CrN-Al2O3/TiO2 coating deposited on steels in various layer arrangement combinations providing the best anti-corrosion properties. In this case, Al2O3/TiO2 layers obtained by the ALD technique tightly cover all imperfections of PVD–CrN coating, providing a barrier for the development of corrosion. In another work, PVD + ALD hybrid coatings consisting of TiAlN/TiN/Al2O3 and TiCN/Al2O3 layers were studied [15]. The authors in this work [15] also demonstrated that the ALD layer, or in this case the Al2O3 phase, seals the PVD layer and thus significantly improves the corrosion resistance of the test substrate.
In the reported studies, this sequence of PVD + ALD layers was usually used [15,21]; this fact is explained by the desire to fill the cavities in the PVD layer. As can be seen from the literature review, the authors have only studied hybrid coatings consisting of different phases. Thus far, there are few studies on coatings consisting of layers of the same phase and obtained by different surface treatment technologies. To improve the corrosion and tribological properties of stainless steel, Al2O3 [21,22,23], TiO₂ [24,25], or a combination of both oxides in the form of nanolaminates [26,27,28,29] are commonly used. Coatings consisting of nitrides [13] or oxides of other metals [30] are also used, but in this case, deterioration of the discussed properties is often observed. Therefore, the authors of this paper, considering the very good anti-corrosion properties of the TiO2 phase, decided to investigate the so-called bimodal TiO₂/nanoTiO₂ coating. The presented work aims to investigate the influence of the TiO2/nanoTiO2 coating process conditions obtained by a hybrid process combining magnetron sputtering (MS-PVD) and atomic layer deposition (ALD) methods on the structure and selected properties of these coatings.

2. Materials and Working Concept

Tests were conducted on uncoated and coated Cr-Ni-Mo austenitic steel specimens. The samples were ground and polished and cleaned in an ultrasonic cleaner in acetone before coating. The dimensions of the specimens are shown in Figure 1, and their chemical compositions are shown in Table 1.
The conceptual approach and optimization of the deposition conditions of the individual PVD and ALD layers was a two-step process. The first stage was concerned with optimizing the conditions for ALD deposition of titanium oxide. The highest corrosion resistance was the criterion for optimizing the ALD deposition process. Then, bimodal coatings were fabricated by PVD + ALD methods, in which the PVD layer deposition conditions were changed, while the ALD layer was deposited with previously optimized parameters (Figure 2).

2.1. Coatings Made by ALD Process

Coatings were deposited using the Thermal ALD method in an ALD PICOSUN R-200 flow reactor (Masala, Finland). The precursors were titanium tetrachloride and water. The variable parameters were the number of cycles. Four variants of coatings were performed. The coatings were applied at different numbers of ALD cycles (Table 2). The process temperature was fixed and was set at 200 °C. It was selected based on previous experience and research published in [31]. The deposition conditions are shown in Table 2. The titanium precursor was TiCl4 and the oxygen was H2O.

2.2. Hybrid Coatings

Hybrid coatings were deposited by depositing an optimized ALD layer on samples with PVD coatings applied (Kurt J Lesker PVD 75, Clairton, PA, USA). The hybrid coating combinations are shown in Table 3.

3. Methodology

The structure study was performed using a ZEISS Supra 35 microscope (Zeiss, Oberkochen, Germany). The imaging method used was secondary electron detection (SE) and an intra-lens detector. Analysis of the chemical composition in the microspheres was performed using the EDS method. The accelerating voltage was in the range of 5–20 kV.
A Park System XE-100 (Suwon, Korea) atomic force microscope was used to study the morphology of the studied samples. A non-contact mode was used with a probe elastic constant of 40 N/m and a resonance frequency of 300 kHz.
The electrochemical properties were determined by the following methods: potentiodynamic and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy. Tests were performed using Atlas Sollich 0531EU (Rębiechowo, Poland) potentiostat/galvanostat in 3.5% NaCl aqueous solution and Ringer’s solution at room temperature (23 °C) or temperature-simulating conditions in the human body (37 °C). The corrosion tests were performed in a three-electrode system, in which the reference electrode was an Ag/AgCl electrode with a potential of 207 mV, and the auxiliary electrode was made as a stainless steel wire. The corrosion resistance tests were performed in two steps:
  • Determination of the open circuit potential (Eocp) by 1;
  • Potentiodynamic method in the potential range Estart = Eocp − 100 mV to Efinish = Eocp + 100 mV, potential rise rate 1 mV/s
Characteristic electrical quantities describing corrosion resistance, i.e., current density (Jcor) and corrosion potential (Ecor) as well as polarization resistance (Rpol) were determined using the Tafel method and AtlasLab software (Version 2.24, Atlas Sollich, Banino, Poland).
The electrical properties of the materials were also determined by a second impedance spectroscopy method, first by stabilizing the samples in the test environment for 15 min without current flow and then with forced AC flowing through the solidified system at an amplitude of 10 mV in the frequency range from 100 kHz to 10 mHz. The results are presented as Nyquist and Bode plots. To accurately represent the relationships appearing in the studied electrochemical process, an electrical equivalent circuit was assigned to them using AtlasLab and EC-Lab software (Version 11.20, BioLogic Science Instruments, Seyssinet-Pariset, France). The numerically generated curves were then matched to those recorded in the experiment and Constant Phase Element (CPE) nonlinear elements were used in addition to typical resistors.
Abrasion resistance tests were performed using the ball-on-disc method. The counterexample used was a WC-Co carbide ball with a diameter of 6 mm. The tests were performed at room temperature under the following test conditions: diameter 6 mm, linear velocity v = 0.5 cm/s, and normal force Fn = 0.5 N. The tests were performed with 500 cycles, where one cycle is one full rotation of the test specimen around its axis. The friction coefficient as a function of the number of cycles was the parameter recorded.
The structure of coatings on the cross-section was examined using a scanning-transmission electron microscope S/TEM Titan 80–300 made by FEI (Eindhoven, The Netherlands). Investigations of so-called lamellae were performed in both scanning and transmission modes at an applied accelerating voltage of 300 kV. The analysis of the chemical composition in the microspheres was performed using EDS and EELS spectroscopy. Phase analysis was performed by electron diffraction.

4. Results and Discussion

The evaluation of the degree of corrosion resistance first consisted of corrosion tests of ALD-coated samples at varying numbers of process cycles. The tests were performed in Ringer’s solution at 37 °C. The open-circuit potential was determined under current-free conditions (Figure 3a), and in the next step, potentiodynamic polarization curves in the cathodic and anodic range were recorded for Tafel analysis (Figure 3b), the results of which are shown in Table 4.
All the samples with ALD coatings applied showed similar stationary potential values, albeit lower than the 316L steel substrate material sample, which may indicate the deteriorating stability in the studied environment for the coated samples.
Comparing the results obtained from the Tafel analysis, it can be concluded that the application of ALD coatings on the steel substrate resulted in an improvement in the resistance of the tested materials as indicated by an increase in polarization resistance from 2.6 to 3.5 times, the exception being the sample with the coating obtained after 1200 cycles, for which higher values of corrosion potential and current density were recorded compared to all other samples. The improvement in the resistance to the harmful effects of the tested environment of Ringer’s solution for the samples coated with ALD is also confirmed by the results of the value of the corrosion current density, which decreased to about 22 ÷ 38% of the value for the sample made of 316L steel.
The TiO2 coating obtained by PVD at 120 min was examined for comparison. Table 5 summarizes the results of the Tafel analysis performed on the basis of the potentiometric test in Ringer’s solution. From the study, the PVD coating shows a slight improvement in corrosion resistance, but it should be noted that its effect on corrosion resistance is small.
Observation of the surfaces of the investigated coatings by scanning electron microscopy revealed that the obtained layers are homogeneous, without pores and discontinuities. The morphology of the coatings reflects the morphology of the substrate, in particular, the scratches that remain after polishing the substrate before coating (Figure 4).
The atomic force microscope examination of the coating surfaces revealed that the ALD 400 and ALD 800 coatings exhibit the highest homogeneity. The layers obtained at the lowest and highest number of ALD 200 and ALD 1200 cycles, respectively, exhibit some inhomogeneity reflected by the AFM images and higher surface roughness than ALD 400 and 800 (Figure 4, Table 6).
The general idea of bimodal coatings is shown in Figure 5. The first layer obtained by the PVD method provides high adhesion of the coating to the substrate, and in addition, the synergy obtained from the combination of these two technologies will allow obtaining a coating with physicochemical properties better than those of the layers obtained by each technology separately).
The table shows the conditions for obtaining the hybrid coatings. In the PVD process, the parameter was the deposition time. Three variants of the coating were made during deposition lasting half an hour, one hour, and two hours. Another titanium oxide layer was deposited on so-prepared titanium oxide layers by the ALD method in ALD 400 process optimized earlier. The coatings were designated successively as Hybrid 1, Hybrid 2, and Hybrid 3 (Table 3).
Corrosion resistance tests for bimodal coated materials were performed using identical conditions and sequential steps as for ALD coated samples. First, the three-electrode system was set up, and the steady-state potential was recorded for one hour (Figure 6a). Then, the anodic polarization curves were read from Eocp − 100 mV to Eocp + 100 mV for Tafel analysis (Figure 6b).
Based on the curves of the open-circuit potential, it can be observed that although its highest value was obtained for the sample with the coating applied for 30 min, clear jumps in the value of the potential may indicate its instability in the studied environment, which was not recorded for the samples after 60 and 90 min of the coating application process. The value of the free potential of the tested materials varied within a small range from −150 to −50 mV, and the highest value combined with a stable reading was recorded for the Hybrid 3 sample.
Analyzing the characteristic values determined by Tafel’s method, it can be stated that the materials coated with hybrid coatings were characterized by better corrosion resistance in comparison with the base material, which is evidenced by a higher value of polarization resistance and lower value of corrosion current density. The best corrosion resistance results in the studied environment were observed for the Hybrid 3 sample after 120 min PVD layer application process.
Additionally, the beneficial effect of the applied bimodal PVD + ALD 400 coatings was observed by comparing the electrochemical test results with samples coated with ALD coating only (Figure 6, Table 7). The hybrid sample maintained for the shortest coating time exhibited better anti-corrosion properties than the best of the samples after coating with ALD coating only, as evidenced by both lower current density values of the hybrid samples and higher polarization resistance values.
To better characterize the electrochemical properties of the produced PVD + ALD coatings, impedance spectroscopy studies were performed for them. The use of the impedance method, which involves polarizing samples with an alternating voltage, allows very rapid results of the electrode response of the material under test. It is performed according to generally accepted procedures [32,33,34,35] at low voltage amplitude, in a wide range of frequencies and usually at equilibrium potential. The first step was to determine the equilibrium potential for each of the samples and then to record the impedance spectra in the frequency range of 100 kHz to 10 mHz, which were presented on the Nyquist and Bode diagrams. Based on the curves recorded during the test for the tested samples, an equivalent electrical circuit best describing the corrosion system was fitted, which consists of two CPE constant-phase elements (Figure 7), and its resultant impedance can be written with the following relation:
Z = R s + 1 1 R 1 + Y 1 ( j ω )   n 1 + 1 1 R 2 + Y 2 ( j ω )   n 2
In the proposed electrical circuit, Rs is related to the resistance of the electrolyte or Ringer’s solution. R1 is the charge transfer resistance to the electrolyte from the surface zone of the material, that is, the first coating at the electrolyte, in this case, the ALD 400 coating. The CPE1 element models the capacitance of this zone. R2 is the charge transfer resistance across the phase boundary. The CPE2 element, on the other hand, can be thought of as reflecting the electrical properties of the double layer at the phase boundary.
Based on analyzing the shape of the curves from the Nyquist diagram (Figure 8), it can be concluded that in an attempt to simplify them into a linear function, the greater the value of the directional coefficient; in other words, the greater the value of the angle of inclination of such a curve, the greater the value of the resistance to electric current. Therefore, it is seen that increasing the time of application of PVD coatings to the substrate material favored the improvement of corrosion resistance of the produced material. The highest slope angle is for the sample with the hybrid coating after 120 min and the lowest for the coating applied for 30 min; i.e., the Hybrid 3 sample had the highest corrosion resistance in the tested environment, while the Hybrid 1 sample had the lowest (Table 8).
Presented in the form of a Bode plot, the impedance changes allow tracking the behavior of the corrosion system over a wide frequency range. The recorded curves show a characteristic course and decreasing impedance value with increasing frequency of the voltage signal (Figure 9a). The lowest impedance value in the whole range of the tested frequencies was found for the sample of the substrate material, while the highest impedance value was registered for the Hybrid 3 sample. In addition, the Bode plot shows a positive effect of prolonging the PVD coating process on the corrosion resistance of the material. The longer the period, the higher the impedance values obtained in the results.
The second type of Bode diagram (Figure 9b), showing the dependence of the phase shift angle on the impedance modulus, enables the evaluation of the quality or the tightness of the obtained coatings. In this case, the higher the value of the angle, the better the quality of the obtained sample, so the highest value can be evaluated for the Hybrid 3 coating material, the highest angle value of 82° can be read for it, and the lowest value was shown for the substrate material sample, about 71°. Similarly to the analysis of the previous results, it can be concluded that the prolongation of the PVD coating application process resulted in better coating quality, as evidenced by the increasing value of the phase shift angle.
It should be noted that the presented research is rather basic research, and possible applications are hypothetical at this stage of research. Thus, in addition to applications in biomedical engineering, such coatings could be used to coat, for example, structural details (components). Therefore, corrosion resistance tests were performed in a 3.5% NaCl solution. The test environment and temperature differ from previous corrosion tests. In this case, the following operating conditions of the EU potentiometer with a three-electrode measuring system (ATLAS-SOLLICH ATLAS 0531 EU) were used:
  • Electrolyte: 3.5% NaCl
  • Temperature: room temp.
  • Eocp during 1 h
  • Potential growth rate 1 mV/s
  • Electrodes: RE: Ag/AgCl; CE: steel; WE: samples
The results of the recorded open circuit potential and potentiodynamic test curves in an aqueous solution of 3.5% NaCl are shown in Figure 10. For all three materials with hybrid coatings, the stability of the potential values in the tested environment was found, the value of which increased with increasing PVD coating deposition time from about −150 mV for the material with the coating obtained after 30 min to about −50 mV after 120 min of deposition.
The analysis of the results obtained from the Tafel calculations (Table 9) allows us to conclude that the application of hybrid coatings on the steel substrate caused a favorable change in the corrosion resistance of the tested materials, which is evidenced by an increase in the polarization resistance from 0.5 MΩ·cm2 for the substrate material to 1.2 MΩ·cm2 for Hybrid 1 sample, 3.9 MΩ·cm2 for Hybrid 2 sample and 10 times for Hybrid 3 sample. A similar relationship was noted by comparing the corrosion current density results, the lowest value of which was 1.2 nA/cm2 for the Hybrid 3 sample, decreased when shortening the PVD coating application time to 2.2 nA/cm2 for the Hybrid 1 sample but was still more than 4× higher than for the 316L steel substrate material.
Examination of the morphology (Figure 11, Table 10) of the bimodal coatings showed that the coatings have a compact structure without pores or discontinuities. Cracks are visible on the surface, which are residues from the substrate grinding process. The structure of the studied coatings in the morphological images consists of grains of different sizes. The smallest grains are shown by the TiO2/nanoTiO2 layer for which the PVD layer of titanium oxide was obtained in the shortest time of 30 min. (Hybrid 1). The largest grains are shown by the Hybrid 3 coating in which the PVD layer was deposited for 2 h. Furthermore, chemical composition analysis by EDS confirmed the presence of titanium and oxygen elements suitable for bimodal layers. Moreover, peaks from the steel substrate dominate the spectrograms (Figure 12).
Observation of the coating surface after corrosion testing revealed small corrosion pits. EDS analysis confirmed the presence of a titanium element in the area outside the pitting, indicating the presence of a coating at this location. However, EDS analysis from the pitted areas also confirms the presence of a titanium peak, which is undoubtedly due to the excitation region also covering the coating area (Figure 13).
Figure 14 shows plots of the friction coefficient µ as a function of the number of cycles for an uncoated steel specimen and one coated with a hybrid TiO2/nanoTiO2 bimodal coating. The friction coefficient plot for the uncoated sample is approximately µ = 0.75 and is close to the theoretical value for the steel-sintered carbide friction pair. In the case of a sample coated with a bimodal coating, the coefficient of friction initially did not exceed a mean value of 0.2 and increased to approximately µ = 0.4 during the test. As a result of scanning electron microscope observations, abrasion was found to be the main wear mechanism of both the tested samples and carbide counterexamples. Furrows were also found to be present (Figure 15). Moreover, the adhesive build-up of abraded coating material was found in different places of the wear path, which is confirmed by the presence of titanium and oxygen reflections on the EDS spectra from this area (Figure 15b,c).
Based on the examination of a thin film from a cross-section of a bimodal TiO2/TiO2 coating by transmission electron microscopy, it was confirmed that the coating exhibits a layered structure (Figure 16). The layers are discussed sequentially starting from the substrate. The thicknesses of each layer are 28 nm, 93 nm, and 15 nm. EELS and EDS investigations of the chemical composition of the micro-areas confirm the presence of elements appropriate for individual layers, i.e., titanium for the first layer and titanium and oxygen for the second and third layers (Figure 17). The first two layers obtained by MSPVD show features of crystalline structure. Moreover, diffraction analysis confirmed the presence of the TiO2 phase with tetragonal structure P42/mnm in the second layer (Figure 18). The third layer is also titanium oxide, as confirmed by chemical composition analysis. Despite this, however, it shows clear characteristics of an amorphous phase.

5. Summary

The importance of coating technology as a technology for shaping the structure and surface properties of engineering materials, including PVD and ALD methods, is increasing in modern industry due to the numerous possibilities of application of these technologies to different groups of engineering materials and their high efficiency, ecological advantages, and economic justification.
The best anti-corrosion properties are provided by bimodal TiO2/nanoTiO2 coating obtained by hybrid PVD + ALD process designated as Hybrid 3. The applied coatings, both by the ALD process and the combination of PVD and ALD methods, improved the corrosion resistance of the tested 316L steel in electrochemical tests. For the best of the samples after the ALD process, the corrosion current decreased by 77% compared to the substrate material, and for the samples with the hybrid coating, there was an even greater improvement as the corrosion current density decreased by 85% (Figure 19).
This is because the nanoTiO2 layer with amorphous structure characteristics obtained by the ALD technique tightly covers all imperfections (nano cracks, chipping) of the TiO2 coating, which is a barrier to the development of corrosion. The very good corrosion resistance of TiO2 layers deposited by ALD technology was also confirmed by the authors in works [24,25,36]. The morphology of the studied coatings shows a granular structure with variable grain size. The PVD layer is responsible for the granularity of these coatings because, as shown by TEM studies of thin films on cross-section, this layer exhibits a crystalline structure. The ALD layer, on the other hand, exhibits an amorphous structural structure with a small thickness. It also accurately reproduces the morphology of the preceding PVD layer.
Similarly, as in the case of corrosion resistance test in Ringer’s solution, the applied hybrid coatings in NaCl word solution significantly improved the properties of the substrate material, for both characteristic electrochemical parameters an improvement was found: the corrosion current density decreased by almost 8 times and polarization resistance by 10 times in comparison with the substrate material (Figure 20).
Sealing the PVD coating with an ALD coating designated as Hybrid 3 also resulted in improved tribological properties. As a result of the application of the bimodal TiO2/TiO2 coating on the substrate made of austenitic steel, a very low coefficient of friction ranging from 0.2 to 0.4 was observed in the first phase of the test until the critical number of cycles was reached. The lower coefficient of friction and thus low wear of the hybrid bimodal TiO2/TiO2 coating should be attributed to compensating any deficiencies of the PVD coating through the strengthening effect of the ALD layer sealing it. This layer largely reduced areas that could have been the origin of crack initiation and chipping.
The excellent corrosion resistance and improved tribological properties obtained by the TiO2/TiO2 bimodal coating are closely related to the obtained hybrid structure, which, as shown by cross-sectional studies using S-TEM, consists of two layers with crystalline features and a tetragonal lattice, which are sealed by an ALD layer with the features of an amorphous phase. The formation of the amorphous structure is related to the number of cycles of the ALD process. A lower number of cycles favors the formation of the amorphous structure of the TiO2 phase. This was also confirmed in the research work [32].

6. Conclusions

Based on the performed studies, it can be concluded that:
  • The use of a hybrid process combining PVD and ALD methods for the deposition of bimodal TiO2/nanoTiO2 coatings makes it possible to obtain, by synergy, high corrosion resistance of the coated 316L steel impossible to obtain using each coating technique separately.
  • An improvement in the corrosion resistance of the tested materials was found in both Ringer’s solution and an aqueous solution of 3.5% NaCl. The greatest improvement was observed for Hybrid 3. In this case, the corrosion current density decreased by 85%. Using sodium chloride solution, the corrosion current density decreased eightfold. On the other hand, the polarization resistance value increased 10-fold compared to the substrate material.
  • The tested coatings show an effect on reducing the friction coefficient in the first phase of the test to reach a critical number of cycles and thus improving the tribological contact in the case of Hybrid 3.
  • TiO2 layer obtained by the PVD technique shows crystalline structure while the titanium oxide layer deposited by the ALD process is amorphous.
In conclusion, as a result of the performed research, we recommend Hybrid 3 coating. It provides improved tribological properties and very high corrosion resistance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.S.; methodology, M.S., D.P., Ł.R., M.P. and A.K.-P.; investigation, M.S., D.P., Ł.R., M.P., A.K. and A.K.-P.; interpretation of data, M.S., D.P., Ł.R., M.P, A.K. and A.K.-P.; data curation, M.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., D.P., Ł.R., M.P. and A.K.-P.; writing—review and editing, M.S., D.P., Ł.R., M.P., A.K. and A.K.-P.; visualization, M.S., D.P.; supervision, M.S.; project administration, M.S.; funding acquisition, M.S.; D.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This publication was co-financed by the European Union from the European Social Fund within the framework of the project “The Silesian University of Technology as a Centre for Advanced Education based on Research and Innovation” No. POWR-03.05.00-00-Z098/17/00.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement:

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the students participating in the above-mentioned project: Łukasz Giel, Angelika Kowol, Marek Legaszewski, Patrycja Płonka, Martyna Szczekocka, Michalina Tompalska for their help in carrying out the selected research for the project.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Daubert, J.S.; Hill, G.T.; Gotsch, H.N.; Gremaud, A.P.; Ovental, J.S.; Williams, P.S.; Oldham, C.J.; Parsons, G.N. Corrosion Protection of Copper Using Al2O3, TiO2, ZnO, HfO2, and ZrO2 Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 4192–4201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  2. Staszuk, M.; Pakuła, D.; Chladek, G.; Pawlyta, M.; Pancielejko, M.; Czaja, P. Investigation of the structure and properties of PVD coatings and ALD plus PVD hybrid coatings deposited on sialon tool ceramics. Vacuum 2018, 153, 184–190. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Staszuk, M.; Pakuła, D.; Reimann, Ł.; Mariusz, K.; Basiaga, M.; Mysłek, D.; Kríž, A. Structure and Properties of ZnO Coatings Obtained by Atomic Layer Deposition (ALD) Method on a Cr-Ni-Mo Steel Substrate Type. Materials 2020, 13, 4223. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ylivaara, O.M.; Liu, X.; Kilpi, L.; Lyytinen, J.; Schneider, D.; Laitinend, M.; Julin, J.; Ali, S.; Sintonen, S.; Berdova, M.; et al. Aluminum oxide from trimethylaluminum and water by atomic layer deposition: The temperature dependence of residual stress, elastic modulus, hardness and adhesion. Thin Solid Films 2014, 552, 124–135. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Jõgiaas, T.; Zabels, R.; Tamma, A.; Merisalu, M.; Hussainova, I.; Heikkilä, M.; Mändar, H.; Kukli, K.; Ritala, M.; Leskelä, M. Mechanical properties of aluminum, zirconium, hafnium and tantalum oxides and their nanolaminates grown by atomic layer deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2015, 282, 36–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Wang, X.-Z.; Muneshwar, T.-P.; Fan, H.-Q.; Cadien, K.; Luo, J.-L. Achieving ultrahigh corrosion resistance and conductive zirconium oxynitride coating on metal bipolar plates by plasma enhanced atomic layer deposition. J. Power Sources 2018, 397, 32–36. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Yang, Q.; Yuan, W.; Liu, X.; Zheng, Y.; Cui, Z.; Yang, X.; Pan, H.; Wua, S. Atomic layer deposited ZrO2 nanofilm on Mg-Sr alloy for enhanced corrosion resistance and biocompatibility. Acta Biomater. 2017, 58, 515–526. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  8. Haemmerli, A.J.; Doll, J.C.; Provine, J.; Howe, R.T.; Goldhaber-Gordon, D.; Pruitt, B.L. Ultra-thin atomic layer deposition films for corrosion resistance. In Proceedings of the Transducers 2013, Barcelona, Spain, 16–20 June 2013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Du, X.; Zhang, K.; Holland, K.; Tombler, T.; Moskovits, M. Chemical corrosion protection of optical components using atomic layer deposition. Appl. Opt. 2009, 48, 6470–6474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Hendricks, O.L.; Tang-Kong, R.; Babadi, A.; McIntyre, P.C.; Chidsey, C. Atomic layer deposited TiO2-IrOx alloys enable corrosion resistant water oxidation on silicon at high photovoltage. Chem. Mater. 2019, 31/1, 90–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Müller, B.; Haugen, H.; Nilsen, O.; Tiainen, H. Atomic layer deposited TiO2 protects porous ceramic foams from grain boundary corrosion. Corros. Sci. 2016, 106, 35–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Díaz, B.; Härkönen, E.; Swiatowska, J.; Seyeux, A.; Maurice, V.; Ritala, M.; Marcus, P. Corrosion properties of steel protected by nanometre-thick oxide coating. Corros. Sci. 2014, 82, 208–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yun, E.-Y.; Lee, W.-J.; Wang, Q.-M.; Kwon, S.-H. Electrical and corrosion properties of titanium aluminum nitride thin films prepared by Plasma-Enhanced Atomic Layer Deposition. J. Mater. Sci. Technol. 2017, 33, 295–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Woźniak, A.; Walke, W.; Jakóbik-Kolon, A.; Ziębowicz, B.; Brytan, Z.; Adamiak, M. The Influence of ZnO Oxide Layer on the Physicochemical Behavior of Ti6Al4V Titanium Alloy. Materials 2021, 14, 230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Marin, E.; Guzman, L.; Lanzutti, A.; Fedrizzi, L.; Saikkonen, M. Chemical and electrochemical characterization of hybrid PVD+ALD hard coatings on tool steel. Electrochem. Commun. 2009, 11, 2060–2063. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Leppäniem, J.; Sippola, P.; Broas, M.; Aromaa, J.; Lipsanen, H.; Koskinen, J. Corrosion protection of steel with multilayer coatings: Improving the sealing properties of physical vapor deposition CrN coatings with Al2O3/TiO2 atomic layer deposition nanolaminates. Thin Solid Film. 2017, 627, 59–68. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  17. Härkönen, E.; Kolev, I.; Díaz, B.; Światowska, J.; Maurice, V.; Seyeux, A.; Marcus, P.; Fenker, M.; Toth, L.; Radnoczi, G.; et al. Sealing of Hard CrN and DLC Coatings with Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2014, 6, 1893–1901. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Wan, Z.; Zhang, T.F.; Ding, J.C.; Kim, C.M.; Park, S.H.; Yang, Y.; Kim, K.H.; Kwon, S.H. Enhanced corrosion resistance of PVD-CrN coatings by ALD sealing layers. Nanoscale Res. Lett. 2017, 12, 248. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  19. Leppaniemi, J.; Sippola, P.; Peltonen, A.; Aroma, J.J.; Lipsanen, H.; Koskinen, J. Effect of surface wear on corrosion protection of steel by CrN coatings sealed with Atomic Layer Deposition. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 1791–1800. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Shan, C.X.; Hou, X.; Kwang-Leong, C.; Choquet, P. Improvement in corrosion resistance of CrN coated stainless steel by conformal TiO2 deposition. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2008, 202, 2147–2151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Basiaga, M.; Jendruś, R.; Walke, W.; Paszenda, Z.; Kaczmarek, M.; Popczyk, M. Influence of surface modification on properties of stainless steel used for implants. Arch. Met. Mater. 2016, 6, 2965–2969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Fedel, M.; Deflorian, F. Electrochemical characterization of atomic layer deposited Al2O3 coatings on AISI 316L stainless steel. Electrochim. Acta 2016, 203, 404–415. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Kukli, K.; Salmi, E.; Jõgiaas, T.; Zabels, R.; Schuisky, M.; Westlinder, J.; Mizohata, K.; Ritala, M.; Leskelä, M. Atomic layer deposition of aluminum oxide on modified steel substrates. Surf. Coat. Technol. 2016, 304, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Basiaga, M.; Walke, W.; Nakonieczny, D.; Hyla, A. Physiochemical properties of TiO2 nanoparticle thin films deposited on stainless steel. Metalurgija 2017, 56, 171–174. [Google Scholar]
  25. Kajzer, W.; Kajzer, A.; Grygiel-Pradelok, M.; Ziebowicz, A.; Ziebowicz, B. Evaluation of Physicochemical Properties of TiO2 Layer on AISI 316LVM Steel Intended for Urology. Adv. Intell. Syst. 2016, 472, 385–398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Mondal, J.; Marques, A.; Aarika, L.; Kozlovaa, J.; Simões, A.; Sammelselg, V. Development of a thin ceramic-graphene nanolaminate coating for corrosion protection of stainless steel. Corros. Sci. 2016, 105, 161–169. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Marin, E.; Guzman, L.; Lanzutti, A.; Ensinger, W.; Fedrizzi, L. Multilayer Al2O3/TiO2 Atomic Layer Deposition coatings for the corrosion protection of stainless steel. Thin Solid Film. 2012, 522, 283–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Aarika, L.; Kozlova, J.; Mändara, H.; Aarika, J.; Sammelselg, V. Chemical resistance of TiO2 and Al2O3 single-layer and multilayer coatings atomic layer deposited from hydrogen-free precursors on silicon and stainless steel. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2019, 228, 285–292. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Marin, E.; Lanzutti, A.; Fedrizzi, L. Tribological properties of nanometric Atomic Layer Depositions applied on AISI 420 stainless steel. Tribol. Ind. 2013, 35, 208–216. [Google Scholar]
  30. Díaz, B.; Swiatowska, J.; Maurice, V.; Seyeux, A.; Härkönen, E.; Ritala, M.; Tervakangas, S.; Kolehmainen, J.; Marcus, P. Tantalum oxide nanocoatings prepared by atomic layer and filtered cathodic arc deposition for corrosion protection of steel: Comparative surface and electrochemical analysis. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 90, 232–245. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Basiaga, M.; Walke, W.; Staszuk, M.; Kajzer, W.; Kajzer, A.; Nowińska, K. Influence of ALD process parameters on the physical and chemical properties of the surface of vascular stents. Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 2017, 17/1, 32–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Oliveira, J.L.; Skilbred, A.W.B.; Lokend, A.; Henriques, R.R.; Soares, B.G. Effect of accelerated ageing procedures and flash rust inhibitors on the anti-corrosive performance of epoxy coatings: EIS and dynamic-mechanical analysis. Prog. Org. Coat. 2021, 159, 106387. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Saeed, M.A.; Kang, H.C.; Yoo, K.; Asiam, F.K.; Lee, J.-J.; Shim, J.W. Cosensitization of metal-based dyes for high-performance dye-sensitized photovoltaics under ambient lighting conditions. Dye. Pigment. 2021, 194, 109624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Joseph, A.; Eapen, M.K.; Mampilly, M.E.; Sajith, V. Comparison of Corrosion Resistance Properties of Electrophoretically Deposited MoS2 and WS2 Nanosheets Coatings on Mild Steel. Met. Mater. Trans. A 2021. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lee, J.H.; You, Y.J.; Saeed, M.A.; Kim, S.-H.; Choi, S.-H.; Kim, S.; Lee, S.Y.; Park, J.-S.; Shim, J.W. Undoped tin dioxide transparent electrodes for efficient and cost-effective indoor organic photovoltaics (SnO2 electrode for indoor organic photovoltaics). NPG Asia Mater. 2021, 13, 43. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zhu, C.; Ma, F.; Dai, Z.; Ma, D. Atomic Layer Deposition of TiO2 Thin Films on the Inner Walls of Steel Tubes Increases Anti-coking Properties. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 32102–32111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Figure 1. Test material: (a) sample dimensions, (b) uncoated substrates, and (c) samples with tested ALD coatings.
Figure 1. Test material: (a) sample dimensions, (b) uncoated substrates, and (c) samples with tested ALD coatings.
Materials 14 04369 g001
Figure 2. The concept of work.
Figure 2. The concept of work.
Materials 14 04369 g002
Figure 3. Electrochemical test curves of ALD coated materials: (a) open circuit potential, (b) anodic polarization curves.
Figure 3. Electrochemical test curves of ALD coated materials: (a) open circuit potential, (b) anodic polarization curves.
Materials 14 04369 g003
Figure 4. Morphology of ALD coatings (SEM, AFM): (a) ALD 200, (b) ALD 400, (c) ALD 800, (d) ALD 1200.
Figure 4. Morphology of ALD coatings (SEM, AFM): (a) ALD 200, (b) ALD 400, (c) ALD 800, (d) ALD 1200.
Materials 14 04369 g004
Figure 5. The idea of TiO2/nanoTiO2 bimodal coatings obtained by PVD/ALD hybrid process.
Figure 5. The idea of TiO2/nanoTiO2 bimodal coatings obtained by PVD/ALD hybrid process.
Materials 14 04369 g005
Figure 6. Electrochemical testing results of PVD + ALD hybrid coated materials: (a) open circuit potential, (b) anodic polarization curves in the range for Tafel analysis.
Figure 6. Electrochemical testing results of PVD + ALD hybrid coated materials: (a) open circuit potential, (b) anodic polarization curves in the range for Tafel analysis.
Materials 14 04369 g006
Figure 7. Electrical equivalent circuit for the investigated materials in Ringer’s solution.
Figure 7. Electrical equivalent circuit for the investigated materials in Ringer’s solution.
Materials 14 04369 g007
Figure 8. Impedance spectrum of the tested materials (for designated stationary potentials)—Nyquist representation.
Figure 8. Impedance spectrum of the tested materials (for designated stationary potentials)—Nyquist representation.
Materials 14 04369 g008
Figure 9. Impedance spectrum of the tested materials (for designated stationary potentials)—Bode representation: (a) impedance as a function of frequency, (b) phase angle as a function of frequency.
Figure 9. Impedance spectrum of the tested materials (for designated stationary potentials)—Bode representation: (a) impedance as a function of frequency, (b) phase angle as a function of frequency.
Materials 14 04369 g009
Figure 10. Electrochemical test curves of hybrid coated materials in 3.5% NaCl solution: (a) open circuit potential, (b) anodic polarization curves in the range for Tafel analysis.
Figure 10. Electrochemical test curves of hybrid coated materials in 3.5% NaCl solution: (a) open circuit potential, (b) anodic polarization curves in the range for Tafel analysis.
Materials 14 04369 g010
Figure 11. Morphology of PVD/ALD coatings (SEM, AFM): (a) Hybrid 1, (b), Hybrid 2, (c) Hybrid 3.
Figure 11. Morphology of PVD/ALD coatings (SEM, AFM): (a) Hybrid 1, (b), Hybrid 2, (c) Hybrid 3.
Materials 14 04369 g011
Figure 12. X-ray energy-dispersive plot of the area shown in Figure 11c.
Figure 12. X-ray energy-dispersive plot of the area shown in Figure 11c.
Materials 14 04369 g012
Figure 13. Corrosion mechanisms—SEM observations.
Figure 13. Corrosion mechanisms—SEM observations.
Materials 14 04369 g013
Figure 14. Friction coefficient as a function of the number of cycles for uncoated 316L steel substrate material and TiO2/nanoTiO2 (Hybrid 3) coating obtained by hybrid method.
Figure 14. Friction coefficient as a function of the number of cycles for uncoated 316L steel substrate material and TiO2/nanoTiO2 (Hybrid 3) coating obtained by hybrid method.
Materials 14 04369 g014
Figure 15. (a,b) Wear trace after the “ball-on-disc” wear test for TiO2/nanoTiO2 (Hybrid 3) bimodal coatings, (c) X-ray energy dispersive plot the area X1 as in Figure b, (d) wear place after the “ball-on-disc” wear test for cemented carbides ball as counter-sample.
Figure 15. (a,b) Wear trace after the “ball-on-disc” wear test for TiO2/nanoTiO2 (Hybrid 3) bimodal coatings, (c) X-ray energy dispersive plot the area X1 as in Figure b, (d) wear place after the “ball-on-disc” wear test for cemented carbides ball as counter-sample.
Materials 14 04369 g015
Figure 16. Structure (STEM) of TiO2/TiO2 bimodal coating: (a) structure of cross-section coating, (b) structure of TiO2 (ALD) layer and PVD / ALD transition zone, (c) structure of Ti sublayer (PVD), (d) structure of TiO2 (PVD) layer.
Figure 16. Structure (STEM) of TiO2/TiO2 bimodal coating: (a) structure of cross-section coating, (b) structure of TiO2 (ALD) layer and PVD / ALD transition zone, (c) structure of Ti sublayer (PVD), (d) structure of TiO2 (PVD) layer.
Materials 14 04369 g016
Figure 17. (a) EELS energy loss spectrum from areas X1, X2, and X3 according to Figure 16, (b) X-ray energy-dispersive plot of the area X3 shown in Figure 16.
Figure 17. (a) EELS energy loss spectrum from areas X1, X2, and X3 according to Figure 16, (b) X-ray energy-dispersive plot of the area X3 shown in Figure 16.
Materials 14 04369 g017
Figure 18. Structure (TEM) of TiO2/TiO2 bimodal coating obtained: (a,b) bright field (b with diffraction pattern).
Figure 18. Structure (TEM) of TiO2/TiO2 bimodal coating obtained: (a,b) bright field (b with diffraction pattern).
Materials 14 04369 g018
Figure 19. Summary of corrosion parameters values from Tafel analysis of samples with ALD and PVD+ALD coatings in Ringer’s solution.
Figure 19. Summary of corrosion parameters values from Tafel analysis of samples with ALD and PVD+ALD coatings in Ringer’s solution.
Materials 14 04369 g019
Figure 20. Summary of corrosion parameters values from Tafel analysis of samples with hybrid coating in 3.5% NaCl solution.
Figure 20. Summary of corrosion parameters values from Tafel analysis of samples with hybrid coating in 3.5% NaCl solution.
Materials 14 04369 g020
Table 1. Chemical composition of X2CrNiMo17–12–2/1.4404 steel.
Table 1. Chemical composition of X2CrNiMo17–12–2/1.4404 steel.
Elemental Concentration [%]
CCrNiMnMoNPS
0.00618.310.71.672.110.070.040.02
Table 2. Deposition conditions of ALD coatings.
Table 2. Deposition conditions of ALD coatings.
Temperature (°C)Reagent Feed Time (s)Cleaning Time (s)Number of Cycles
TiCl4H2OAfter TiCl4After H2O
2000.10.145200
400
800
1200
Table 3. Conditions of deposition of hybrid coatings.
Table 3. Conditions of deposition of hybrid coatings.
Hybrid 1Hybrid 2Hybrid 3
PVD (TiO2)Metal vapour source (target)Ti
GasesN2, O2
Temperature proc. (°C)100
Ti layer deposition time (min.)2
Deposition time of TiO2 layer (min.)3060120
Power on magnetron source (W)200
BIAS (V)140
ALD (TiO2)Titanium sourceTiCl4
Oxygen sourceH2O
Temperature (°C).200
Number of ALD cycles400
Table 4. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of ALD coated samples.
Table 4. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of ALD coated samples.
316LALD 200ALD 400ALD 800ALD 1200
Ecor (V)−0.073−0.164−0.144−0.181−0.239
Jcor (nA/cm2)11.54.44.32.623.1
Rpol (MΩ∙cm2)0.661.752.332.10.14
Table 5. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of PVD coated samples.
Table 5. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of PVD coated samples.
316LTiO2 (PVD 120 min)
Ecor (V)−0.073−0.136
Jcor (nA/cm2)11.55.7
Rpol (MΩ∙cm2)0.660.69
Table 6. Summary of coating roughness obtained by the ALD process.
Table 6. Summary of coating roughness obtained by the ALD process.
Roughness Ra (nm)
ALD 200ALD 400ALD 800ALD 1200
6.032.762.468.53
Table 7. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of hybrid coated samples in Ringer solution.
Table 7. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of hybrid coated samples in Ringer solution.
316LHybrid 1Hybrid 2Hybrid 3
Ecorr (V)−0.073−0.073−0.218−0.097
Jcorr (nA/cm2)11.52.62.01.1
Rpol (MΩ∙cm2)0.72.72.97.4
Table 8. Electrical equivalent circuit values of the tested hybrid samples.
Table 8. Electrical equivalent circuit values of the tested hybrid samples.
MaterialRs (Ω·cm2)Y1 (µS·cm2)N1R1 (kΩ·cm2)Y2 (µS·cm2)N2R2 (MΩ·cm2)
361L6.222.70.7756.219.40.85910.8
Hybrid 16.614.9 × 10−60.8056.84.7 × 10−60.84714.9
Hybrid 26.22.7 × 10−60.8896.32.2 × 10−60.92610.4
Hybrid 37.02.2 × 10−60.8657.21.9 × 10−60.99723.8
Table 9. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of hybrid coated samples in 3.5% NaCl solution.
Table 9. Summary of corrosion parameter values from Tafel analysis of hybrid coated samples in 3.5% NaCl solution.
316LHybrid 1Hybrid 2Hybrid 3
Ecorr (V)−0.089−0.219−0.159−0.108
Jcorr (nA/cm2)9.52.21.41.2
Rpol (MΩ·cm2)0.51.23.95.0
Table 10. PVD + ALD bimodal coatings roughness summary.
Table 10. PVD + ALD bimodal coatings roughness summary.
Roughness Ra (nm)
Hybrid 1Hybrid 2Hybrid 3
2.32.22.8
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Staszuk, M.; Pakuła, D.; Reimann, Ł.; Kloc-Ptaszna, A.; Pawlyta, M.; Kříž, A. Structure and Properties of TiO2/nanoTiO2 Bimodal Coatings Obtained by a Hybrid PVD/ALD Method on 316L Steel Substrate. Materials 2021, 14, 4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164369

AMA Style

Staszuk M, Pakuła D, Reimann Ł, Kloc-Ptaszna A, Pawlyta M, Kříž A. Structure and Properties of TiO2/nanoTiO2 Bimodal Coatings Obtained by a Hybrid PVD/ALD Method on 316L Steel Substrate. Materials. 2021; 14(16):4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164369

Chicago/Turabian Style

Staszuk, Marcin, Daniel Pakuła, Łukasz Reimann, Anna Kloc-Ptaszna, Mirosława Pawlyta, and Antonín Kříž. 2021. "Structure and Properties of TiO2/nanoTiO2 Bimodal Coatings Obtained by a Hybrid PVD/ALD Method on 316L Steel Substrate" Materials 14, no. 16: 4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164369

APA Style

Staszuk, M., Pakuła, D., Reimann, Ł., Kloc-Ptaszna, A., Pawlyta, M., & Kříž, A. (2021). Structure and Properties of TiO2/nanoTiO2 Bimodal Coatings Obtained by a Hybrid PVD/ALD Method on 316L Steel Substrate. Materials, 14(16), 4369. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14164369

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop