Next Article in Journal
Use of Ashes from Lignite Combustion as Fillers in Rubber Mixtures to Reduce VOC Emissions
Previous Article in Journal
Flexible Theoretical Calculation of Loop Length and Area Density of Weft-Knitted Structures: Part II
 
 
Search for Articles:
Title / Keyword
Author / Affiliation / Email
Journal
Article Type
 
 
Advanced Search
 
Section
Special Issue
Volume
Issue
Number
Page
 
Journals
Materials
Volume 14
Issue 17
10.3390/ma14174987
materials-logo
Submit to this Journal Review for this Journal Propose a Special Issue
► Article Menu

Article Menu

share Share announcement Help format_quote Cite question_answer Discuss in SciProfiles thumb_up
...
Endorse textsms
...
Comment
first_page
settings
Order Article Reprints
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Characterization and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Silver- and Silica-Based Nanostructures

by
Elżbieta Adamska
1,
Karolina Niska
2,
Anna Wcisło
1 and
Beata Grobelna
1,*
1
Faculty of Chemistry, University of Gdansk, Wita Stwosza 63, 80-308 Gdańsk, Poland
2
Department of Medical Chemistry, Faculty of Medicine, Medical University of Gdańsk, Debinki St., 80-210 Gdańsk, Poland
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(17), 4987; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174987
Submission received: 18 June 2021 / Revised: 26 August 2021 / Accepted: 28 August 2021 / Published: 31 August 2021
Browse Figures
Versions Notes

Abstract

:
Core-shell structures are the most common type of composite material nanostructures due to their multifunctional properties. Silver nanoparticles show broad antimicrobial activity, but the safety of their utilization still remains an issue to tackle. In many applications, the silver core is coated with inorganic shell to reduce the metal toxicity. This article presents the synthesis of various materials based on silver and silica nanoparticles, including SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and sandwich nanostructures—Ag@SiO2@Ag—and the morphology of these nanomaterials based on transmission electron microscopy (TEM), UV-Vis spectroscopy, and FT-IR spectroscopy. Moreover, we conducted the angle measurements due to the strong relationship between the level of surface wettability and cell adhesion efficiency. The main aim of the study was to determine the cytotoxicity of the obtained materials against two types of human skin cells—keratinocytes (HaCaT) and fibroblasts (HDF). We found that among all the obtained structures, SiO2@Ag and Ag@SiO2 showed the lowest cell toxicity and very high half-maximal inhibitory concentration. Moreover, the measurements of the contact angle showed that Ag@SiO2 nanostructures were different from other materials due to their superhydrophilic nature. The novel approach presented here shows the promise of implementing core-shell type nanomaterials in skin-applied cosmetic or medical products.

Graphical Abstract

1. Introduction

In recent years, nanosilver (Ag NPs) has often been used in everyday products, including dressings [1,2,3], cleaning agents [4], cosmetics [5,6], and controlled drug delivery [7] due to its enhanced antibacterial or antifungal properties compared with macro-scale silver. Moreover, silver nanoparticles have unique properties, such as optical properties concerning the surface plasmon phenomenon [8]. Despite the many advantages of Ag NPs, there are more scientific publications indicating its toxic properties, which are influenced by many factors, including those that are most important, such as size [6], shape [9], or the type of nanoparticle synthesis [10].
Due to the absolute safety requirements of the marketed products, materials that combine the advantages of nanoparticles and low toxicity are highly required. The solution to this problem is the modification of nanoparticles with inorganic compounds, e.g., silica (SiO2) [11]. In addition, silica-based nanoparticles exhibit strong biological activities, for example, promotion of osteoblasts, adhesion, proliferation, and stimulation of the osteogenic differentiation in vivo [12,13,14].
The type of obtained nanostructures that are composed of two materials are called core-shell nanostructures and can be divided into various categories according to their physicochemical properties—for example, core-shell nanoparticles, core-shell magnetics, core-shell silica nanoparticles, or core-shell polymer nanoparticles [15]. Taking into account recent scientific reports, the interest of scientists is focused primarily on silica-covered metal structures, the most frequently studied of which are Ag@SiO2 [8,16,17], Au@SiO2 [18,19,20], or TiO2@SiO2 [21,22,23]. It is worth mentioning that core-shell nanomaterials are not only less cytotoxic but also show high dispersibility, biocompatibility, and improved thermal and chemical stability [7]. Importantly, scientific reports show that silica-coated metals do not lose their unique properties, such as the antimicrobial properties of Ag NPs in Ag@SiO2 structures [24,25]. Moreover, the importance of the hydrophilicity of core-shell nanostructures in biological applications is also well known [26].
The complex morphology of nanostructures can be examined using various methods. The standard techniques are electron microscopy—including scanning (SEM) or transmission (TEM), Fourier-transform infrared spectroscopy (FT-IR), or thermogravimetric analysis (TG). In addition, all the methods are under constant development, which allows accurate characterization of the nanoparticle surfaces, including the determination of active groups number [27].
One of the nanoparticles’ description parameters is their potential toxicity, including the determination of an exposure route. There are several routes of human exposure to nanoparticles [28,29,30], including pulmonary [31,32,33], oral [34,35,36,37], and transdermal [6,38,39,40]. One of the most susceptible routes of nanoparticles action is the transdermal route. This is not only due to the large number of cosmetic and medical products utilizing nanostructures but also because of the small size of nanoparticles. We currently know that penetration of nanoparticles by the percutaneous route can occur in two ways: through the hair follicles and through the spaces between corneocytes [5]. Since the first barrier on the skin that nanoparticles come into contact with is the stratum corneum, corneocytes are the most susceptible to them. Moreover, some studies indicate that nanoparticles can penetrate deeper, i.e., into the vicinity of fibroblasts, which in turn enables the penetration of the blood vessels and distribution in the whole organism [6].
However, due to the relative novelty of core-shell structures and despite the insight in surface and deep skin cells cytotoxicity, we lack studies on the safety of nanomolecules. In the present work, we synthesized nanoparticles of silver, silica, and core-shell structures with various silver and silica configurations—SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag. Due to differences in potential penetration depth, the cytotoxicity of these structures was determined on two human skin cell lines: keratinocytes (HaCaT) and fibroblasts (HDF).

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials and Reagents

All chemicals were of analytical grade and were used without further purification. Acetone, ammonia solutions (25%), cetyltrimethylammonium bromide (CTAB), ethanol, hydrazine hydrate (N2H4·H2O), poly(vinylpolypyrrolidone) (PVP), silver nitrate, (AgNO3, 99.99%), sodium borohydride (NaBH4), tetraethyl orthosilicate (TEOS), and trisodium citrate (Na-cit) were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich (Poznan, Poland). All the samples were prepared using deionized water produced using a Hydrolab system installed in our laboratory.
The human dermal fibroblasts (HDF) were purchased from Cell Applications, Inc. (San Diego, CA, USA), and spontaneously immortalized human keratinocytes from histologically normal skin (HaCaT) were a kind gift from Professor Michal Zmijewski (Medical University of Gdansk, Poland). HDF and HaCaT cells were cultured in Dulbecco’s modified Eagle’s medium (DMEM) with high glucose, supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS), 6 μg/mL penicillin-G, and 10 μg/mL streptomycin under controlled conditions of 37 °C in a humidified atmosphere containing 5% CO2. When 80–90% confluency was obtained, cells were enzymatically detached with trypsin-EDTA and transferred into new T-75 cm2 tissue culture flasks.

2.2. Synthesis

2.2.1. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles (Ag NPs)

There are many methods available for silver nanoparticles synthesis. Most of them are based on a reduction in silver nitrate, with sodium borohydride as a reducing agent. In our case, silver nanoparticles were prepared according to the method described previously by Szczepańska et al. [6]. First, we prepared 60 mL of 0.002 M sodium borohydride and cooled it in an ice bath for half an hour. Then, 20 mL of 0.001 M silver nitrate was slowly added to the solution with stirring. The synthesis was continued until the color of the solution changed to yellow.

2.2.2. Synthesis of Silica Nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs)

In order to obtain SiO2 NPs, the method presented by Sakthisabarimoorthi et al. was modified [41]. To 80 mL of ethanol was added 2.5 mL of ammonia water and 5 mL of water with vigorous stirring. The prepared solution was then combined with 5 mL of TEOS. Reactions were carried out for 24 h at room temperature with constant stirring. The solution was separated by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 20 min and washed several times with ethanol.

2.2.3. Synthesis of SiO2@Ag

SiO2@Ag was obtained according to the method described by Sakthisabarimoorthi et al. [41]. The dried SiO2 NPs (0.05 g) were dissolved in 20 mL of ethanol followed by the addition of 15 mL of 0.02 M silver nitrate with 1 mL of ammonia solution. After 20 min, 10 mL of PVP was added and allowed to mix. Then, 5 mL of 0.02 M NaBH4 was injected into the mixture, which was stirred for 0.5 h at room temperature. SiO2@Ag was collected by centrifugation at 6000 rpm for 20 min and washed with ethanol and deionized water.

2.2.4. Synthesis of Ag@SiO2

Ag@SiO2 nanostructures were prepared according to the method described by Synak et al. [8]. Initially, 40 mL of Ag NPs, 20 mL of ethanol, and 0.25 mL of sodium citrate (0.3 M) were mixed. To adjust the pH to about 9, a small amount of ammonia water was added. Subsequently, the solution was mixed with 10 mL of TEOS. The Ag@SiO2 structures were collected by centrifugation and washed with a mixture of water and ethanol.

2.2.5. Synthesis of Ag@SiO2@Ag

Ag@SiO2@Ag structures were obtained based on the modified method of Zhao et al. [16]. Amounts of 1.5 mL of hydrazine solution and 0.9 mmol of CTAB were added to 250 mL of distilled water, with vigorous stirring for several minutes at room temperature. A silver nitrate solution (1.5 mmol, 10 mL) was then prepared, which was added dropwise to the solution obtained above. Then, 50 mL of ethanol, 2.5 mL of aqueous ammonia solution, and 0.5 mL of TEOS were added successively with stirring. The reaction was carried out for 8 h. After this time, the resulting structures were separated by centrifugation and washed several times with ethanol and water.

2.3. Methods

Transmission electron microscopy (TEM) images were made using a Tecnai G2 Spirit BioTWIN by FEI. UV-Vis Spectroscopy spectra were obtained using a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 18 (wavelength accuracy ± 0.1 nm, resolution 0.1 nm, measurement range 300–700 nm). FT-IR spectroscopy analysis was carried out using a Bruker IFS66 spectrometer.
The thermal analysis of the nanostructures was conducted using Jupiter STA 449 F3 thermogravimetry connected to a QMS 403 C quadrupole mass spectrometer (NETZSCH, Germany). The measurements were carried out in an inert gas (nitrogen) atmosphere, from room temperature to 1000 °C, with a heating rate of 10 °C/min.
The contact angle measurements were made using a Kruss (Hamburg, Germany) DSA100 goniometer. Prior to measurement, a suspension of nanoparticles in ethanol (dispersed by ultrasound) was applied to a glass plate and allowed to evaporate at room temperature. The thus formed nanoparticle surface was subjected to further tests. A water drop of 2 µL volume was applied with a syringe to the surface made of the tested nanoparticles. The contact angle on both sides of the droplet was measured by a CCD camera, and after digital image analysis, the average contact angle was determined using Young–Laplace method. Each measurement was repeated 20 times [42,43,44,45].
Before testing for cytotoxicity, all structures were subjected to multiple purification of organic impurities, primarily through multiple washing of nanoparticles and drying. Cell viability was determined using MTT (3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide) assay. The cells were seeded into 96-well microplates with 12–14 × 103/100 µL cells per well. The following day, fibroblast and keratinocyte cells were exposed to various concentrations of silver and silica-based nanostructures prepared ex tempore in serum-free cell culture medium and incubated for 24 h. Then, tetrazolium dye (MTT) was added to each well. After 2 h, medium was removed and obtained formazan crystals were dissolved in dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO). The absorbance was recorded at 492 nm. The data are presented as a percentage of the control values (untreated cells), which was set as 100%.
The experimental data are presented as the mean ± SD for at least triplicate determination of three independent experiments. The obtained results were analyzed using commercially available software (GraphPad Prism 5) based on one-way ANOVA and Tukey’s post hoc test. p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. The IC50 was determined by nonlinear regression analysis: log (inhibitor) vs. normalized response.

3. Results and Discussion

The design of new classes of materials, especially for medicine or cosmetology, constantly challenges scientists working in the field of materials science. Silver and gold nanoparticles have been studied for decades because of their optical [46], magnetic [47], and antimicrobial properties [6]. Despite the numerous advantages, we know that silver nanoparticles can be extremely dangerous to the body’s organs. Therefore, to overcome this problem researchers and scientists focus their attention on the incorporation of silver nanoparticles in a silica matrix. These structures, called core-shell, exhibit improved properties in relation to the same metallic nanoparticles, such as controlled size and additives that prevent agglomeration.
Thus, the primary goal of the present study was to prepare and characterize new types of core-shell nanomaterials for potential use as the components of cosmetic or medical products applied onto the skin. Insights from studies of the proposed nanostructures will contribute to the selection of those with the lowest cytotoxicity and the highest hydrophilicity.

3.1. Synthesis and Characterization of Nanocomposite

As illustrated in Scheme 1, the preparation of different types of core-shell nanostructures was achieved in two steps. In the case of SiO2@Ag nanostructures, the preparation started from the synthesis of silica nanoparticles (SiO2 NPs). We used the Ströber method, which involves the hydrolysis and then condensation of tetraethoxysilane (TEOS). This reaction is possible due to the basic pH obtained by the addition of ammonia, water, and an alcoholic solvent—in this case, ethanol. Under these conditions, the hydrolysis takes place, leading to the attachment of hydroxyl groups. Next, SiO2 nanosparticles were centrifuged, washed with ethanol, and dried. In the second step, Ag NPs were formed from the silver nitrate in the presence of NaBH4 as a reductant. In addition, polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) was added to prevent agglomeration, and ammonia was added to form Ag(NH3)2+ ions. Finally, due to the electrostatic attraction of Si-O− anions formed on the surface of SiO2 NPs and the Ag(NH3)2+ cation, the core-shell nanostructures were obtained (see Scheme 1-a). In the case of Ag@SiO2 preparation and sandwich nanostructures of Ag@SiO2@Ag type, the synthesis route was started from the reduction in silver nitrate in an aqueous solution. Sodium citrate (Na-cit) was used as a reducing agent for the synthesis of Ag@SiO2 nanostructures (Scheme 1-a). However, in the case of the Ag@SiO2@Ag nanostructures preparation, hydrazine was used as a reductant (Scheme 1-b). Additionally, in the case of sandwich nanomaterials, we added cetrimonium bromide (CTAB) as a surfactant to prevent the surface aggregation of Ag NPs. In the next step, the silver nanoparticles were coated with silica using the previously mentioned Ströber method.

3.2. Transmission Electron Microscopy—Morphology Analysis

The morphology of the obtained structures was determined using transmission electron microscopy (TEM), and all nanostructures were spherical in shape (Figure 1). Figure 1a shows silver nanoparticles (Ag NPs) with a diameter between 5 and 30 nm. The SiO2 NPs are presented in Figure 1b, where their high agglomeration is visible, and the diameter of a single particle is about 30 nm.
Figure 1c–e shows a typical micrograph of the studied core-shell nanocomposite. The bright area depicts silica, and the dark area depicts nanosilver. As for SiO2@Ag (Figure 1c), it is difficult to observe the size of the individual components of the material, but the diameter of the entire structure can be determined, which is about 100 nm. Moreover, in the case of SiO2@Ag, we observed that the silver nanoparticles agglomerating on the surface form a uniform coating. Figure 1d shows the Ag@SiO2 core-shell, where the silver core is 20 to 80 nm in diameter, while the shell measures about 20 nm. In the case of the Ag@SiO2@Ag structure (Figure 1e), starting from the center of the structure, the diameter of the metallic core is 70–90 nm, the silica shell is 15 nm, and the nanoparticles attached to them are of small size, 10–15 nm.

3.3. UV-Vis Spectroscopy

The UV-Vis spectroscopy method enables observation of the maximum absorption of silver nanoparticles that is in the range of 350–450 nm. In the case of silica in the 300–700 nm measurement range, no maximum absorption was observed [48].
The spectra of Ag NPs, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag are presented in Figure 2. Ag NPs were prepared in a solution, and we observed here a characteristic absorption maximum at about 400 nm. However, in the case of core-shell nanostructures, the spectra were measured as a suspension in water. For SiO2@Ag, a maximum was observed at 420 nm, which corresponds to a coating of Ag NPs. The Ag@SiO2 nanostructures were characterized by the lack of maximum absorption, which is probably due to the high thickness of the SiO2 coating. In the case of Ag@SiO2@Ag structures, a low-intensity peak at 430 nm was noticeable, which is also related to the presence of Ag NPs on the surface.

3.4. FT-IR Spectroscopy Analysis

Additionally, we carried out FT-IR measurements to gain a deeper insight into the chemical composition of the obtained materials. Previous studies show that the FT-IR technique enables the detection of various groups on the surface of the obtained materials. Figure 3 shows the FT-IR spectra of Ag NPs, SiO2 NPs, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag. The spectrum of Ag NPs includes several bands that can come from ethanol. The peak located at 3430 cm−1 is associated with the -OH stretching vibrations that come from alcohol. Two bands located at 2920 and 2850 cm−1 correspond to C-H stretching vibrations, both characteristic of ethanol. The weak band located at 1630 cm−1 can be associated with the bending vibration of the hydrogen in the -OH group. In addition, the peak placed at 1080 cm−1 is associated with the C-O stretching vibrations from ethanol [49].
The FT-IR spectrum of SiO2 NPs contains several bands characteristic of silica. The broad band in the 2900–3500 cm−1 with maximum placed at 3430 cm−1 and weak peak located at 1630 cm−1 can be assigned to -OH stretching and bending vibration, respectively, due to the presence of water molecules adsorbed onto the silica surface. The set of the bands located at 1100, 800, and 470 cm−1 corresponds to the asymmetric stretching vibrations, symmetric stretching vibrations, and bending vibration in Si-O-Si group, respectively. The characteristic band at 960 cm−1 can be assigned to silanol (Si-OH) groups [50,51].
Characteristic bands appeared in the FTIR spectrum recorded for SiO2@Ag nanostructure. The bands observed at 2920 and 2850 cm−1 can be assigned to the stretching vibrations in the -CH2 groups due to the polyvinylpyrrolidone (PVP) utilization during the synthesis [42]. Moreover, a low intensity peak at 550 cm−1 indicates the presence of Ag NPs on the SiO2 surface and belongs to Ag-O stretching vibration [52,53,54].
In the case of Ag@SiO2 nanostructures, the peaks indicating the presence of silica on the surface were presented above and are described in the details in our previous paper [42].
Furthermore, the FT-IR spectrum of Ag@SiO2@Ag sandwich nanostructure presents characteristic bands of this nanostructure. The bands placed at 2920 and 2850 cm−1 can be attributed to the C−H stretching vibration of methyl and methylene groups, which comes from CTAB [55]. In addition, the presence of silver in the outer shell exposes a peak placed at 550 cm−1, indicating the stretching vibration of Ag-O bond.

3.5. Thermogravimetric Analysis

Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) and derivative thermogravimetric analysis (DTG) for SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag are presented in Figure 4.
The decomposition of SiO2@Ag nanomaterial in air atmosphere occurs in two stages. The first weight loss is observed at the TG curve in the range of 65 and 290 °C. The weight loss of 5.32% is attributed to water evaporation, which is physically adsorbed on the material surface. In the temperature range between 290 and 360 °C, another significant weight loss of 3.48% is observed and could be assigned to the reduction in hydroxyl groups present on the surface of studied material. However, in the case of Ag@SiO2, a similar weight loss is observed, as in the previous papers [11,56,57].
The decomposition of Ag@SiO2@Ag nanomaterial occurs in three stages. The first small signal that is seen in DTG curve is also the result of water and alcohol evaporation. The weight loss of 25.11% observed in the region within 200 to 350 °C could be assigned to hydrolysis and polycondensation reactions of the unreacted alkoxy and hydroxy groups [58]. The second peak observed in DTG curves centered at 460 °C with the weight loss of 4.99% mainly corresponds to the composition of organic groups from TEOS used in the synthesis [27].

3.6. Contact Angle Measurement

A series of measurements of the contact angle was performed to determine the hydrophilicity of the tested nanoparticles, as well as the influence of the core-shell system type on these properties.
Generally, all the tested nanoparticles are hydrophilic and have a much lower contact angle value than the control sample (glass plate—55°) (Figure 5). Reference measurements were made for Ag NPs and SiO2 NPs, for which the contact angle was 18.4° and 0°, respectively. The contact angle of about 5° is a characteristic of the superhydrophilic class particles. Therefore, SiO2 NPs are superhydrophilic, while Ag@SiO2 are characterized by the highest hydrophilicity among all silver- and silica-based nanostructures. The present study shows that the presence of silver in the shell reduces the hydrophilicity of a nanoparticle. We observe this both for SiO2@Ag and for doping the SiO2 shell with silver for Ag@SiO2@Ag. Although wettability results from both the chemical nature and the roughness of the surface [42], in this case the investigated nanoparticles (Ag@SiO2 and SiO2@Ag) are similar in size; therefore, we may assume that the roughness is comparable. Here, we assume that the differences are only due to the chemical properties of these nanoparticles. Moreover, good wettability of Ag@SiO2 nanomaterial shows the promise of its utilization as a drug carrier in medicine and cosmetology.

3.7. Cytotoxic Effect of SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, Ag@SiO2@Ag, and SiO2 Nanoparticles

The application of various nanostructures in cosmetic or medical products not only improves their sterility and stability but also overcomes the barrier of the cuticle. Thus, the nanostructures enable the cosmetic actives to enter the target site of the skin, perform the sustained release function, and solve various skin problems or cure diseases.
Silver nanoparticles are used as antibacterial materials in medical and cosmetic products due to their excellent antibacterial activity. Previous studies show that silver nanoparticles can destroy over 650 microorganisms compared with antibiotics. With the growing number of medical and cosmetic products containing nanosilver, its biological safety becomes an urgent issue. Silver nanoparticles possess particular physicochemical properties that determine the extent of their cytotoxicity in biological systems [59]. Unfortunately, recent studies show the cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles on various types of cells, including human peripheral blood cells, rat liver cell, and mouse germ line cells [60]. Moreover, results of the studies indicate that silver nanoparticles exhibit intense toxicity upon some tissues and that after ingestion they can induce neurological problems, kidney damage, stomach upset, and skin irritation [61]. In [62], the authors provide comprehensive information about particle size and toxicity—that is, lower particle size is responsible for higher toxicity. Aggregation and sedimentation lead to a decrease in the activity of biologically active particles. Moreover, cytotoxicity not only depends on Ag NPs’ properties but also the organism’s variation plays a vital role.
However, to overcome the challenges that come along with the utilization of silver nanoparticles as a nanocarrier in medical or cosmetic products, we must consider their incorporation into a silica shell to limit cytotoxicity.
In line with the research trend concerning the cytotoxicity of silver nanoparticles, our recent studies showed that cytotoxicity depends on their physicochemical properties. According to our results, the large Ag NPs (100 nm) at low concentration of 0.6–5 ppm exhibited a higher cytotoxic effect on HaCaT and HDF cells, whereas the lower viability of HEM cells was observed at a concentration range of 2.5–5 ppm, compared with the smaller Ag NPs (20 nm). The determined IC50 parameter for the larger Ag NPs for HaCaT cells was 0.75 ppm and for HDF cells it was 0.92 ppm, while for the smaller Ag NPs for HaCaT cells it was >15 ppm, and for HDF it was 8.44 ppm [6].
These studies cover silica and silver-based nanostructures—namely, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, Ag@SiO2@Ag, and SiO2. We evaluated the influence of various nanostructure types on the viability of immortalized human keratinocytes—HaCaT (Figure 6) and human dermal fibroblasts—HDF (Figure 7) using MTT assay in the 1 to 1000 ppm range. The obtained results show that Ag@SiO2@Ag significantly decreased the cell viability at low concentration in both tested cell lines (IC50 = 12.41 ppm for HaCaT, IC50 = 27.53 ppm for HDF). It is supposed that the cytotoxicity of Ag@SiO2@Ag is caused by the small size of Ag NPs on the surface, i.e., 10–15 nm. SiO2@Ag and Ag@SiO2 nanostructures exhibited minimal toxic effect on cells and were characterized by very high half-maximal inhibitory concentration (Table 1 and Table 2). Unexpectedly, the low cytotoxicity of SiO2@Ag is probably due to their larger diameter the higher proportion of silica core to silver shell and agglomeration of silver nanoparticles on the silica surface. What is important is that the silica used in the tested nanostructures did not cause any toxicity at used concentrations (IC50 > 1000 ppm). The obtained results suggest that the silver nanoparticles modified by silica have dramatically decreased toxicity. In addition, Yan Li et al. [63] showed that genotoxicity was related to the size and coating materials of AgNPs.

4. Conclusions

We successfully developed the preparation method of the structurally stable materials based on silver and silica nanoparticles, including SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and sandwich structures—Ag@SiO2@Ag. We confirmed the morphology of these structures using methods such as transmission electron microscopy (TEM), UV-Vis spectroscopy, and FT-IR spectroscopy. Measurements of the contact angle showed that Ag@SiO2 is a superhydrophilic nanomaterial, which influences its potentially wide application.
The obtained results suggest that modification of silver nanoparticles by silica dramatically decreases the toxicity of silver. Moreover, Ag@SiO2 showed the lowest cytotoxicity against the two skin cell lines used in the study—keratinocytes (HaCaT) and fibroblasts (HDF).
Therefore, the designed Ag@SiO2 nanostructures are promising candidates for a potential use as a new nanocarrier drug-delivery system in the fields of medicine and cosmetology.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, E.A. and B.G.; methodology, E.A., B.G., K.N. and A.W.; formal analysis, E.A., K.N. and A.W.; investigation, E.A., B.G., K.N. and A.W.; writing—original draft preparation, E.A., B.G., K.N. and A.W.; writing—review and editing, E.A., B.G., K.N. and A.W.; visualization, E.A. and B.G.; supervision, B.G.; funding acquisition, E.A. and B.G. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the grant BMN 539-T050-B874-21 (E.A.).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Krishnan, P.D.; Banas, D.; Durai, R.D.; Kabanov, D.; Hosnedlova, B.; Kepinska, M.; Fernandez, C.; Ruttkay-Nedecky, B.; Nguyen, H.V.; Farid, A.; et al. Silver Nanomaterials for Wound Dressing Applications. Pharmaceutics 2020, 12, 821. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Eghbalifam, N.; Shojaosadati, S.A.; Hashemi-Najafabadi, S.; Khorasani, A.C. Synthesis and Characterization of Antimicrobial Wound Dressing Material Based on Silver Nanoparticles Loaded Gum Arabic Nanofibers. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2020, 155, 119–130. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Gupta, A.; Briffa, S.M.; Swingler, S.; Gibson, H.; Kannappan, V.; Adamus, G.; Kowalczuk, M.; Martin, C.; Radecka, I. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles Using Curcumin-Cyclodextrins Loaded into Bacterial Cellulose-Based Hydrogels for Wound Dressing Applications. Biomacromolecules 2020, 21, 1802–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  4. Deshmukh, S.P.; Patil, S.M.; Mullani, S.B.; Delekar, S.D. Silver Nanoparticles as an Effective Disinfectant: A Review. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019, 97, 954–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Fytianos, G.; Rahdar, A.; Kyzas, G.Z. Nanomaterials in Cosmetics: Recent Updates. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 979. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Szczepańska, E.; Bielicka-Giełdoń, A.; Niska, K.; Strankowska, J.; Żebrowska, J.; Inkielewicz-Stępniak, I.; Łubkowska, B.; Swebocki, T.; Skowron, P.; Grobelna, B. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles in Context of Their Cytotoxicity, Antibacterial Activities, Skin Penetration and Application in Skincare Products. Supramol. Chem. 2020, 32, 207–221. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kumar, R.; Mondal, K.; Panda, P.K.; Kaushik, A.; Abolhassani, R.; Ahuja, R.; Rubahn, H.-G.; Mishra, Y.K. Core–Shell Nanostructures: Perspectives towards Drug Delivery Applications. J. Mater. Chem. B 2020, 8, 8992–9027. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Synak, A.; Szczepańska, E.; Grobelna, B.; Gondek, J.; Mońka, M.; Gryczynski, I.; Bojarski, P. Photophysical Properties and Detection of Valrubicin on Plasmonic Platforms. Dyes Pigment. 2019, 163, 623–627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tak, Y.K.; Pal, S.; Naoghare, P.K.; Rangasamy, S.; Song, J.M. Shape-Dependent Skin Penetration of Silver Nanoparticles: Does It Really Matter? Sci. Rep. 2015, 5, 16908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  10. Iravani, S.; Korbekandi, H.; Mirmohammadi, S.V.; Zolfaghari, B. Synthesis of Silver Nanoparticles: Chemical, Physical and Biological Methods. Res. Pharm. Sci. 2014, 9, 385–406. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  11. Malekzadeh, M.; Yeung, K.L.; Halali, M.; Chang, Q. Synthesis of Nanostructured Ag@SiO2-Penicillin from High Purity Ag NPs Prepared by Electromagnetic Levitation Melting Process. Mater. Sci. Eng. C 2019, 102, 616–622. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Lewandowska-Łańcucka, J.; Gilarska, A.; Buła, A.; Horak, W.; Łatkiewicz, A.; Nowakowska, M. Genipin Crosslinked Bioactive Collagen/Chitosan/Hyaluronic Acid Injectable Hydrogels Structurally Amended via Covalent Attachment of Surface-Modified Silica Particles. Int. J. Biol. Macromol. 2019, 136, 1196–1208. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  13. Keshavarz, M.; Tan, B.; Venkatakrishnan, K. Cell Selective Apoptosis Induced by Polymorphic Alteration of Self-Assembled Silica Nanowebs. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2017, 9, 6292–6305. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Kim, I.-Y.; Joachim, E.; Choi, H.; Kim, K. Toxicity of Silica Nanoparticles Depends on Size, Dose, and Cell Type. Nanomed. Nanotechnol. Biol. Med. 2015, 11, 1407–1416. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Kumar, V.B.; Kumar, R.; Gedanken, A.; Shefi, O. Fluorescent Metal-Doped Carbon Dots for Neuronal Manipulations. Ultrason. Sonochem. 2019, 52, 205–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhao, B.; Dong, Z.; Wang, Q.; Xu, Y.; Zhang, N.; Liu, W.; Lou, F.; Wang, Y. Highly Efficient Mesoporous Core-Shell Structured Ag@SiO2 Nanosphere as an Environmentally Friendly Catalyst for Hydrogenation of Nitrobenzene. Nanomaterials 2020, 10, 883. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Huang, J.; Han, X.; Zhao, X.; Meng, C. Facile Preparation of Core-Shell Ag@SiO2 Nanoparticles and Their Application in Spectrally Splitting PV/T Systems. Energy 2021, 215, 119111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Swinton, D.J.; Zhang, H.; Boroujerdi, A.F.B.; Tyree, K.L.; Burke, R.A.; Turner, M.F.; Salia, I.H.; McClary, T.S. Comparative Analysis of Au and Au@SiO2 Nanoparticle–Protein Interactions for Evaluation as Platforms in Theranostic Applications. ACS Omega 2020, 5, 6348–6357. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  19. Zhang, S.; Xu, X.; Zhang, G.; Liu, B.; Yang, J. One-Pot One-Step Synthesis of Au@SiO2 Core–Shell Nanoparticles and Their Shell-Thickness-Dependent Fluorescent Properties. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 17674–17678. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  20. Nallathamby, P.D.; Hopf, J.; Irimata, L.E.; McGinnity, T.L.; Roeder, R.K. Preparation of Fluorescent Au–SiO2 Core–Shell Nanoparticles and Nanorods with Tunable Silica Shell Thickness and Surface Modification for Immunotargeting. J. Mater. Chem. B 2016, 4, 5418–5428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Huang, C.; Wang, F.; Wang, D.; Guo, Z. Wear-Resistant and Robust Superamphiphobic Coatings with Hierarchical TiO2 /SiO2 Composite Particles and Inorganic Adhesives. New J. Chem. 2020, 44, 1194–1203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Pakdel, E.; Daoud, W.A.; Seyedin, S.; Wang, J.; Razal, J.M.; Sun, L.; Wang, X. Tunable Photocatalytic Selectivity of TiO2/SiO2 Nanocomposites: Effect of Silica and Isolation Approach. Colloids Surf. A Physicochem. Eng. Asp. 2018, 552, 130–141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Selim, M.S.; El-Safty, S.A.; Azzam, A.M.; Shenashen, M.A.; El-Sockary, M.A.; Abo Elenien, O.M. Superhydrophobic Silicone/TiO2–SiO2 Nanorod-like Composites for Marine Fouling Release Coatings. ChemistrySelect 2019, 4, 3395–3407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Alimunnisa, J.; Ravichandran, K.; Meena, K.S. Synthesis and Characterization of Ag@SiO2 Core-Shell Nanoparticles for Antibacterial and Environmental Applications. J. Mol. Liq. 2017, 231, 281–287. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Otari, S.V.; Yadav, H.M.; Thorat, N.D.; Patil, R.M.; Lee, J.K.; Pawar, S.H. Facile One Pot Synthesis of Core Shell Ag@SiO2 Nanoparticles for Catalytic and Antimicrobial Activity. Mater. Lett. 2016, 167, 179–182. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Fratoddi, I. Hydrophobic and Hydrophilic Au and Ag Nanoparticles. Breakthroughs and Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2018, 8, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  27. Szczepańska, E.; Grobelna, B.; Ryl, J.; Kulpa, A.; Ossowski, T.; Niedziałkowski, P. Efficient Method for the Concentration Determination of Fmoc Groups Incorporated in the Core-Shell Materials by Fmoc–Glycine. Molecules 2020, 25, 3983. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Theodorou, I.; Ryan, M.; Tetley, T.; Porter, A. Inhalation of Silver Nanomaterials—Seeing the Risks. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2014, 15, 23936–23974. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  29. De Matteis, V. Exposure to Inorganic Nanoparticles: Routes of Entry, Immune Response, Biodistribution and In Vitro/In Vivo Toxicity Evaluation. Toxics 2017, 5, 29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  30. Ferdous, Z.; Nemmar, A. Health Impact of Silver Nanoparticles: A Review of the Biodistribution and Toxicity Following Various Routes of Exposure. Int. J. Mol. Sci. 2020, 21, 2375. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  31. Quadros, M.E.; Marr, L.C. Silver Nanoparticles and Total Aerosols Emitted by Nanotechnology-Related Consumer Spray Products. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2011, 45, 10713–10719. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Hadrup, N.; Sharma, A.K.; Loeschner, K.; Jacobsen, N.R. Pulmonary Toxicity of Silver Vapours, Nanoparticles and Fine Dusts: A Review. Regul. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 2020, 115, 104690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Yang, Y.-F.; Wang, W.-M.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lu, T.-H.; Liao, C.-M. Assessing Human Exposure Risk and Lung Disease Burden Posed by Airborne Silver Nanoparticles Emitted by Consumer Spray Products. Int. J. Nanomed. 2019, 14, 1687–1703. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Simbine, E.O.; da Rodrigues, L.C.; Lapa-Guimarães, J.; Kamimura, E.S.; Corassin, C.H.; de Oliveira, C.A.F.; Simbine, E.O.; da Rodrigues, L.C.; Lapa-Guimarães, J.; Kamimura, E.S.; et al. Application of Silver Nanoparticles in Food Packages: A Review. Food Sci. Technol. 2019, 39, 793–802. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  35. McClements, D.J.; Xiao, H. Is Nano Safe in Foods? Establishing the Factors Impacting the Gastrointestinal Fate and Toxicity of Organic and Inorganic Food-Grade Nanoparticles. NPJ Sci. Food 2017, 1, 6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Cueva, C.; Gil-Sánchez, I.; Tamargo, A.; Miralles, B.; Crespo, J.; Bartolomé, B.; Moreno-Arribas, M.V. Gastrointestinal Digestion of Food-Use Silver Nanoparticles in the Dynamic SIMulator of the GastroIntestinal Tract (Simgi®). Impact on Human Gut Microbiota. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2019, 132, 110657. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Gaillet, S.; Rouanet, J.-M. Silver Nanoparticles: Their Potential Toxic Effects after Oral Exposure and Underlying Mechanisms–A Review. Food Chem. Toxicol. 2015, 77, 58–63. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  38. Kalantari, K.; Mostafavi, E.; Afifi, A.M.; Izadiyan, Z.; Jahangirian, H.; Rafiee-Moghaddam, R.; Webster, T.J. Wound Dressings Functionalized with Silver Nanoparticles: Promises and Pitfalls. Nanoscale 2020, 12, 2268–2291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  39. Bianco, C.; Visser, M.J.; Pluut, O.A.; Svetličić, V.; Pletikapić, G.; Jakasa, I.; Riethmuller, C.; Adami, G.; Filon, F.L.; Schwegler-Berry, D.; et al. Characterization of Silver Particles in the Stratum Corneum of Healthy Subjects and Atopic Dermatitis Patients Dermally Exposed to a Silver-Containing Garment. Nanotoxicology 2016, 10, 1480–1491. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  40. Wang, M.; Marepally, S.K.; Vemula, P.K.; Xu, C. Chapter 5-Inorganic Nanoparticles for Transdermal Drug Delivery and Topical Application. In Nanoscience in Dermatology; Hamblin, M.R., Avci, P., Prow, T.W., Eds.; Academic Press: Boston, MA, USA, 2016; pp. 57–72. ISBN 978-0-12-802926-8. [Google Scholar]
  41. Sakthisabarimoorthi, A.; Dhas, S.A.M.B.; Jose, M. Fabrication and Nonlinear Optical Investigations of SiO2@Ag Core-Shell Nanoparticles. Mater. Sci. Semicond. Process. 2017, 71, 69–75. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Szczepańska, E.; Synak, A.; Bojarski, P.; Niedziałkowski, P.; Wcisło, A.; Ossowski, T.; Grobelna, B. Dansyl-Labelled Ag@SiO2 Core-Shell Nanostructures—Synthesis, Characterization, and Metal-Enhanced Fluorescence. Materials 2020, 13, 5168. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Swebocki, T.; Niedziałkowski, P.; Cirocka, A.; Szczepańska, E.; Ossowski, T.; Wcisło, A. In Pursuit of Key Features for Constructing Electrochemical Biosensors–Electrochemical and Acid-Base Characteristic of Self-Assembled Monolayers on Gold. Supramol. Chem. 2020, 32, 256–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Dąbrowa, T.; Wcisło, A.; Majstrzyk, W.; Niedziałkowski, P.; Ossowski, T.; Więckiewicz, W.; Gotszalk, T. Adhesion as a Component of Retention Force of Overdenture Prostheses-Study on Selected Au Based Dental Materials Used for Telescopic Crowns Using Atomic Force Microscopy and Contact Angle Techniques. J. Mech. Behav. Biomed. Mater. 2021, 121, 104648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  45. Cirocka, A.; Zarzeczańska, D.; Wcisło, A.; Ryl, J.; Bogdanowicz, R.; Finke, B.; Ossowski, T. Tuning of the Electrochemical Properties of Transparent Fluorine-Doped Tin Oxide Electrodes by Microwave Pulsed-Plasma Polymerized Allylamine. Electrochim. Acta 2019, 313, 432–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Synak, A.; Grobelna, B.; Raut, S.; Bojarski, P.; Gryczyński, I.; Karczewski, J.; Shtoyko, T. Metal Enhanced Fluorescence of Flavin Mononucleotide Using New Plasmonic Platform. Opt. Mater. 2016, 59, 136–140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  47. Kulpa, A.; Ryl, J.; Skowierzak, G.; Koterwa, A.; Schroeder, G.; Ossowski, T.; Niedziałkowski, P. Comparison of Cadmium Cd2+ and Lead Pb2+ Binding by Fe2O3@SiO2-EDTA Nanoparticles–Binding Stability and Kinetic Studies. Electroanalysis 2020, 32, 588–597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Panwar, K.; Jassal, M.; Agrawal, A.K. In Situ Synthesis of Ag–SiO2 Janus Particles with Epoxy Functionality for Textile Applications. Particuology 2015, 19, 107–112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Ruíz-Baltazar, A.; Esparza, R.; Pérez, R.; Rosas, G. Spectroscopy Study of Silver Nanoparticles Produced by Chemical Reduction. Mater. Sci. Forum 2013, 755, 15–20. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Musić, S.; Filipović-Vinceković, N.; Sekovanić, L. Precipitation of Amorphous SiO2 Particles and Their Properties. Braz. J. Chem. Eng. 2011, 28, 89–94. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Gui-Long, X.; Changyun, D.; Yun, L.; Pi-Hui, P.; Jian, H.; Zhuoru, Y. Preparation and Characterization of Raspberry-like SiO2 Particles by the Sol-Gel Method. Nanomater. Nanotechnol. 2011, 1, 21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Chiu, Y.; Rambabu, U.; Hsu, M.-H.; Shieh, H.-P.; Chen, C.-Y.; Lin, H.-H. Fabrication and Nonlinear Optical Properties of Nanoparticle Silver Oxide Films. J. Appl. Phys. 2003, 94, 1996–2001. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  53. Assis, M.; Simoes, L.G.P.; Tremiliosi, G.C.; Coelho, D.; Minozzi, D.T.; Santos, R.I.; Vilela, D.C.B.; do Santos, J.R.; Ribeiro, L.K.; Rosa, I.L.V.; et al. SiO2-Ag Composite as a Highly Virucidal Material: A Roadmap That Rapidly Eliminates SARS-CoV-2. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 638. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Sakthisabarimoorthi, A.; Martin Britto Dhas, S.A.; Jose, M. Nonlinear Optical Properties of Ag@SiO2 Core-Shell Nanoparticles Investigated by Continuous Wave He-Ne Laser. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2018, 212, 224–229. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Su, G.; Yang, C.; Zhu, J.-J. Fabrication of Gold Nanorods with Tunable Longitudinal Surface Plasmon Resonance Peaks by Reductive Dopamine. Langmuir 2015, 31, 817–823. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Blinov, A.V.; Blinova, A.A.; Kravtsov, A.A.; Gvozdenko, A.A.; Kobina, A.V.; Momot, E.V. Synthesis of Multicomponent Systems Based on Silicon Dioxide and Noble Metal Nanoparticles; AIP Conference Proceedings: Erode, India, 2019; p. 040011. [Google Scholar]
  57. Li, Y.; Zhang, B.-P.; Zhao, C.-H.; Zhao, J.-X. Structure Transition, Formation, and Optical Absorption Property Study of Ag/SiO2 Nanofilm by Sol–Gel Method. J. Mater. Res. 2012, 27, 3141–3146. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Grobelna, B.; Szabelski, M.; Kledzik, K.; Kłonkowski, A.M. Luminescent Properties of Sm(III) Ions in Ln2(WO4)3 Entrapped in Silica Xerogel. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2007, 353, 2861–2866. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Vimbela, G.V.; Ngo, S.M.; Fraze, C.; Yang, L.; Stout, D.A. Antibacterial Properties and Toxicity from Metallic Nanomaterials. Int. J. Nanomed. 2017, 12, 3941–3965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  60. Ge, L.; Li, Q.; Wang, M.; Ouyang, J.; Li, X.; Xing, M.M. Nanosilver Particles in Medical Applications: Synthesis, Performance, and Toxicity. Int. J. Nanomed. 2014, 9, 2399–2407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  61. Bharadwaj, P.S. Silver or Silver Nanoparticle a Safety or a Risk. J. Environ. Res. Dev. 2012, 7, 452–456. [Google Scholar]
  62. Akter, M.; Md.Sikder, T.; Md. Rahman, M.; Ullah, A.K.M.A.; Hossain, K.F.B.; Banik, S.; Hosokawa, T.; Saito, T.; Kurasaki, M. A Systematic Review on Silver Nanoparticles-Induced Cytotoxicity: Physicochemical Properties and Perspectives. J. Adv. Res. 2018, 9, 1–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  63. Li, Y.; Bhalli, J.A.; Ding, W.; Yan, J.; Pearce, M.G.; Sadiq, R.; Cunningham, C.K.; Jones, M.Y.; Monroe, W.A.; Howard, P.C.; et al. Cytotoxicity and Genotoxicity Assessment of Silver Nanoparticles in Mouse. Nanotoxicology 2014, 8, 36–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
Materials 14 04987 sch001 550
Scheme 1. The synthesis routes of the presented nanostructures based on silver and silica. The numbers in the diagram correspond to the synthesis of the respective structure—(1) SiO2@Ag, (2) (a) Ag@SiO2, (b) Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Scheme 1. The synthesis routes of the presented nanostructures based on silver and silica. The numbers in the diagram correspond to the synthesis of the respective structure—(1) SiO2@Ag, (2) (a) Ag@SiO2, (b) Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Materials 14 04987 sch001
Materials 14 04987 g001 550
Figure 1. TEM photo of (a) Ag NPs, (b) SiO2 NPs, (c) SiO2@Ag, (d) Ag@SiO2, and (e) Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Figure 1. TEM photo of (a) Ag NPs, (b) SiO2 NPs, (c) SiO2@Ag, (d) Ag@SiO2, and (e) Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Materials 14 04987 g001
Materials 14 04987 g002 550
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of (a) Ag NPs, (b) SiO2@Ag, (c) Ag@SiO2, and (d) Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Figure 2. Absorption spectra of (a) Ag NPs, (b) SiO2@Ag, (c) Ag@SiO2, and (d) Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Materials 14 04987 g002
Materials 14 04987 g003 550
Figure 3. Fourier-transform infrared spectra for (a) Ag NPs, SiO2 NPs and (b) SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Figure 3. Fourier-transform infrared spectra for (a) Ag NPs, SiO2 NPs and (b) SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Materials 14 04987 g003
Materials 14 04987 g004 550
Figure 4. TG and DTG curves for SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Figure 4. TG and DTG curves for SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag.
Materials 14 04987 g004
Materials 14 04987 g005 550
Figure 5. Photographs showing water contact angle measurement results for the measured samples Ag NPs, SiO2 NPs, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag (measurements of Ag NPs and Ag@SiO2 reprinted (adapted) from [42] which is an open access article and permits unrestricted use)).
Figure 5. Photographs showing water contact angle measurement results for the measured samples Ag NPs, SiO2 NPs, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag (measurements of Ag NPs and Ag@SiO2 reprinted (adapted) from [42] which is an open access article and permits unrestricted use)).
Materials 14 04987 g005
Materials 14 04987 g006 550
Figure 6. The viability of HaCaT keratinocytes cells after 24 h of exposure to (A) SiO2 NPs (diameter 30 nm), (B) SiO2@Ag, (C) Ag@SiO2, (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag evaluated using MTT test. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD from three separate experiments. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus control (left panel). The IC50 values were calculated using a nonlinear regression analysis for HaCaT cells exposed to (B) SiO2@Ag, (C) Ag@SiO2, (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag. Data are expressed as means ± SD for at least three replicates. R2—coefficient of determination (right panel).
Figure 6. The viability of HaCaT keratinocytes cells after 24 h of exposure to (A) SiO2 NPs (diameter 30 nm), (B) SiO2@Ag, (C) Ag@SiO2, (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag evaluated using MTT test. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD from three separate experiments. ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus control (left panel). The IC50 values were calculated using a nonlinear regression analysis for HaCaT cells exposed to (B) SiO2@Ag, (C) Ag@SiO2, (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag. Data are expressed as means ± SD for at least three replicates. R2—coefficient of determination (right panel).
Materials 14 04987 g006
Materials 14 04987 g007 550
Figure 7. The viability of the HDF fibroblasts cells after 24 h of exposure to (A) SiO2 NPs (diameter 30 nm), (B) SiO2@Ag, (C) Ag@SiO2, (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag evaluated using MTT test. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus control (left panel). The IC50 values were calculated using a nonlinear regression analysis for HDF cells exposed to (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag. Data are expressed as means ± SD for at least three replicates. R2—coefficient of determination (right panel).
Figure 7. The viability of the HDF fibroblasts cells after 24 h of exposure to (A) SiO2 NPs (diameter 30 nm), (B) SiO2@Ag, (C) Ag@SiO2, (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag evaluated using MTT test. Data are expressed as mean values ± SD from three separate experiments. * p < 0.05 ** p < 0.01; *** p < 0.001 versus control (left panel). The IC50 values were calculated using a nonlinear regression analysis for HDF cells exposed to (D) Ag@SiO2@Ag. Data are expressed as means ± SD for at least three replicates. R2—coefficient of determination (right panel).
Materials 14 04987 g007
Table
Table 1. IC50 and logIC50 for HaCaT of Ag NPs (20 nm), Ag NPs (100 nm) reported in [6], and SiO2, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag for HaCaT cells.
Table 1. IC50 and logIC50 for HaCaT of Ag NPs (20 nm), Ag NPs (100 nm) reported in [6], and SiO2, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag for HaCaT cells.
HaCaT
Ag NPs
(20 nm)		Ag NPs
(100 nm)		SiO2 NPsSiO2@AgAg@SiO2Ag@SiO2@Ag
IC50>15 ppm0.75 ppm>1000 ppm573.6 ppm589.4 ppm12.41 ppm
logIC50-−6.135 ± 0.071-2.759 ± 0.0632.770 ± 0.1321.094 ± 0.097
Table
Table 2. IC50 and log IC50 of Ag NPs (20 nm), Ag NPs (100 nm) reported in [6], and SiO2 NPs, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag for HDF cells.
Table 2. IC50 and log IC50 of Ag NPs (20 nm), Ag NPs (100 nm) reported in [6], and SiO2 NPs, SiO2@Ag, Ag@SiO2, and Ag@SiO2@Ag for HDF cells.
HDF
Ag NPs
(20 nm)		Ag NPs
(100 nm)		SiO2 NPsSiO2@AgAg@SiO2Ag@SiO2@Ag
IC508.44 ppm0.92 ppm>1000 ppm>1000 ppm>1000 ppm27.53 ppm
logIC50−5.074 ± 0.1040−6.04 ± 0.052---1.044 ± 0.0418
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Adamska, E.; Niska, K.; Wcisło, A.; Grobelna, B. Characterization and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Silver- and Silica-Based Nanostructures. Materials 2021, 14, 4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174987

AMA Style

Adamska E, Niska K, Wcisło A, Grobelna B. Characterization and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Silver- and Silica-Based Nanostructures. Materials. 2021; 14(17):4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174987

Chicago/Turabian Style

Adamska, Elżbieta, Karolina Niska, Anna Wcisło, and Beata Grobelna. 2021. "Characterization and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Silver- and Silica-Based Nanostructures" Materials 14, no. 17: 4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174987

APA Style

Adamska, E., Niska, K., Wcisło, A., & Grobelna, B. (2021). Characterization and Cytotoxicity Comparison of Silver- and Silica-Based Nanostructures. Materials, 14(17), 4987. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14174987

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop