Next Article in Journal
Spherical Silica Modified with Magnesium and Ruthenium—Synthesis, Characterization and Catalytic Properties
Previous Article in Journal
Analysis of the Quasi-Static and Dynamic Fracture of the Silica Refractory Using the Mesoscale Discrete Element Modelling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Fabrication of AlGaN High Frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator by Reactive RF Magnetron Co-sputtering System

1
Department of Electrical Engineering, National Sun Yat-sen University, Kaohsiung 80424, Taiwan
2
Department of Electronic Engineering, HungKuo Delin University of Technology, New Taipei 236, Taiwan
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2021, 14(23), 7377; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237377
Submission received: 15 October 2021 / Revised: 18 November 2021 / Accepted: 23 November 2021 / Published: 1 December 2021
(This article belongs to the Topic Inorganic Thin Film Materials)

Abstract

:
In this study, aluminum gallium nitride (AlGaN) thin films are used as the piezoelectric layers to fabricate solidly mounted resonators (SMR) for high frequency acoustic wave devices. AlGaN film is deposited on a Bragg reflector, composed of three pairs of Mo and SiO2 films, through a reactive radio frequency (RF) magnetron co-sputtering system at room temperature. The optimized deposition parameters of AlGaN film have a sputtering power of 175 W for Al target, sputtering power of 25 W for GaN target, N2 flow ratio (N2/Ar + N2) of 60%, and sputtering pressure of 10 mTorr. The obtained AlGaN film has a smooth surface, uniform crystal grains, and strong c-axis orientation. The contents of Al and Ga in the AlGaN film, analyzed by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) are 81% and 19%, respectively. Finally, the frequency response s11 of the obtained SMR device shows that the center frequency is 3.60 GHz, the return loss is about −8.62 dB, the electromechanical coupling coefficient (kt2) is 2.33%, the quality factor (Q) value is 96.93 and the figure of merit (FoM) value is 2.26.

1. Introduction

In recent years, wireless communication systems have been advanced to 4G and 5G. At the same time, the acoustic wave devices used in wireless communication equipment have higher requirements, such as frequency response, kt2, Q, and FoM [1,2,3]. The acoustic wave devices commonly used in wireless communication can be divided into bulk acoustic wave (BAW) and surface acoustic wave (SAW). The bulk acoustic wave device has lower insertion loss, higher frequency, and wider frequency band [4,5,6,7,8]; therefore, it is suitable for high frequency wireless communication system applications. The BAW resonator has two kinds of structure, one is the film bulk acoustic resonator (FBAR), and the other is solidly mounted resonator (SMR). The SMR structure does not require an etching process like the FBAR structure; therefore, it is relatively stable, and the process yield of the device can be improved [8,9,10,11,12,13].
On the other hand, the commonly used piezoelectric materials in acoustic wave devices are aluminum nitride (AlN) and zinc oxide (ZnO) [14,15,16,17]. In recent years, some literature has studied the applications of AlGaN and AlScN in acoustic wave devices [18,19]. Both Wurtzite AlN and GaN have c-axis-oriented polarities and similar piezoelectric characteristics [20]. Therefore, GaN and AlGaN are also suitable for the applications of acoustic wave devices. In order to obtain high qualities of GaN and AlGaN, it often needs high temperature processes [21,22,23]. In 2016, J.B. Shealy et al. successfully fabricated thin film bulk acoustic resonators (FBAR) with single crystal AlGaN thin films, prepared using metal–organic chemical vapor deposition (MOCVD) method [18]. On the other hand, sputtering has lots of advantages such as low temperature growth, enhanced film quality with smaller grain size, and surface roughness, etc. In 2021, N.A. Othman et al. deposited AlGaN thin films on Si substrates through a co-sputtering technique. The structures and morphological characteristics of AlGaN films were discussed [24]. In this study, piezoelectric AlGaN thin films were deposited by a reactive RF magnetron co-sputtering system at room temperature to fabricate solidly mounted resonators (SMR) with a center frequency of around 3.5 GHz.

2. Materials and Methods

The structure of an SMR device, consisting of a Bragg reflector on a Si substrate, a bottom electrode, a piezoelectric layer, and a top electrode, is shown in Figure 1. The Bragg reflector was composed of 3 pairs of Mo and SiO2 films as high and low acoustic impedance layers, which were deposited using a direct current (DC) sputtering system and a reactive RF magnetron sputtering system, respectively. The thicknesses of Mo and SiO2 films were calculated to be 437 nm and 361 nm to fit the desired 3.5 GHz frequency response of SMR devices, through the theoretical formula of v = f × 4d, in which, v and 4d were the velocity and thickness of individual Mo or SiO2 film, respectively, and f was the center frequency of resonance. Pt/Ti (100 nm/12 nm) thin films as the bottom and top electrodes were deposited on the Bragg reflector and piezoelectric layer by a DC sputtering system. The piezoelectric AlGaN thin film was deposited by a reactive RF magnetron co-sputtering system. A 2 inch metallic Al (99.999% purity) and a 2 inch alloyed GaN (99.999% purity) were used as the source targets. The RF sputtering power supplies were applied to Al and GaN targets, separately, and the sputtering pressure was varied from 10 mTorr to 30 mTorr with gas flow ratio (N2/N2 + Ar) of 60%, to deposit AlGaN thin films at room temperature. The preferred orientation and crystal characteristics of AlGaN films were analyzed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advance) with CuKα radiation. The surface morphologies and cross-sectional images of the AlGaN films were analyzed by a scanning electron microscope (SEM, JEOL JSM-6700F). The element analysis of AlGaN film was carried out by energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS, JEOL JSM-6700F). The frequency response of the SMR device was measured by a network analyzer, E5071C, and a CASCADE high-frequency probe station.

3. Results and Discussion

In the study of AlGaN thin films, the deposition parameters of sputtering power, sputtering pressure, and gas flow ratio (N2/N2 + Ar) were varied. The preliminary results showed that films exhibited better characteristics as the sputtering power of 175 W for Al target and 25 W for GaN target, respectively, and the gas flow ratio (N2/N2 + Ar) of 60% at room temperature. This study was focused on the effects of sputtering pressure on the characteristics of AlGaN thin films. The sputtering pressure varied from 10 to 30 mTorr, and the crystalline structures, the surface morphologies, and the cross-sectional images of AlGaN thin films were discussed.
The XRD patterns of the resulting AlGaN films deposited under different sputtering pressures are shown in Figure 2. It can be seen that the AlGaN films exhibit c-axis (002) orientation under sputtering pressures of 10 mTorr and 20 mTorr. However, as the pressure increases further, the (002) peak intensity of the AlGaN film becomes weaker and even absent in the c-axis orientation. This phenomenon is similar to that reported by N.A. Othman et al. [24]; that is, the crystal quality of AlGaN film decreases as N2 flow increases.
According to the literature, the diffraction peak of AlN (002) is about 2θ = 36° [17], while that of the AlGaN film deposited at sputtering pressure of 10 mTorr is about 2θ = 35.55°. There exists a shift of 0.45° for (002) diffraction peak between AlGaN and AlN films. The reason is that when gallium is doped into AlN, part of the larger Ga atoms replaces Al atoms in the lattice, which will result in the change of the lattice structure and cause the shift in the diffraction peak [19,25]. This phenomenon is similar to the doping of Sc atoms into AlN to form ScAlN films [26].
The surface morphologies and cross-sectional images of AlGaN thin films deposited under different sputtering pressures were analyzed by SEM, as shown in Figure 3. The films all present a uniform pebble-like surface morphology. However, it can be found from the cross-sectional images that when the sputtering pressure increases, the thickness of AlGaN film decreases from 1160 nm to 432 nm under a deposition time of 3 h, and the film is unlikely to be deposited and there is no columnar structure. As the pressure increases, the structure of the AlGaN film gradually changes from the original pebble-like structure and columnar structure to an agglomerated structure. The overall crystal characteristics are also greatly degraded, which will have a large impact on the fabrication of SMR devices and may make the SMR devices have no frequency response. In order to obtain a 3.5 GHz SMR resonator, three pairs of Mo and SiO2 films were deposited on a Si substrate as the Bragg reflector, on which bottom electrode (Pt/Ti), piezoelectric AlGaN layer, and top electrode (Pt/Ti) were deposited in sequence. The cross-sectional image of an AlGaN-based SMR device is shown in Figure 4. The interfaces between the electrode layers, the piezoelectric layers, and the Bragg reflector layers are smooth, uniform, and clearly visible in the fabricated SMR device. The prepared piezoelectric AlGaN film has a columnar structure and c-axis orientation. The thickness of AlGaN film was adjusted to be about 770 nm by controlling the deposition time to fit the desired resonance frequency, according to the theoretical calculation of v = f × 2d—in which v was the wave velocity of AlGaN film, f was the center frequency, and 2d was the thickness of AlGaN film. Besides, the element analysis of energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS) showed that the contents of Al and Ga in the AlGaN film were 81% and 19%, respectively.
The frequency response (s11) of the SMR device with 770 nm AlGaN film as the piezoelectric layer is shown in Figure 5. The results show that the resonance frequency and return loss of the SMR device are 3.6 GHz and −8.62 dB, respectively.
The frequency responses, kt2, Q, and FoM of the SMR device can be analyzed through the network analyzer, which are calculated as follows [1,2,3]:
k t 2 = tan = ( π 2 ) ( f s f p ) tan ( ( π 2 ) ( f s f p ) ) ( π 2 ) 2 ( f p f s f p )
Q = 2 π f × τ ( f ) × mag ( s 11 ) 1 mag ( s 11 ) 2
FoM = Q ( device ) × k t 2 ( device )
Among them, fs is the series resonance frequency, fp is the parallel resonance frequency, τ(f) is the time delay of the network analyzer, and mag(s11) is the return loss (s11) value. The resulted performance parameters of the SMR device in this work showed that kt2 was 2.33%, Q value was 96.93, and FoM was 2.26, respectively. By comparing, the return loss, kt2, Q, and FoM values are worse than those obtained in device using the single crystal AlGaN film as the piezoelectric layer deposited by MOCVD method [19]. The reason may be that the higher the resonance frequency of acoustic wave device, the thinner the piezoelectric layer that is needed, which may result in the poor crystalline characteristics of the piezoelectric layer [8]. The performance of the SMR device can be improved through a thermal annealing process of piezoelectric layer and the precise control of the thicknesses of reflective layers in the Bragg reflector [8].

4. Conclusions

In this study, the Bragg reflector, composed of three pairs of Mo and SiO2 films, was firstly fabricated on a Si substrate, then the AlGaN thin film was successfully deposited on the Bragg reflector by a reactive RF magnetron co-sputtering system at room temperature. Under a sputtering power of 175 W for Al target, a sputtering power of 25 W for GaN target, a N2 flow ratio of 60%, and a sputtering pressure of 10 mTorr, the optimized AlGaN film with a smooth surface, uniform crystal grains, and strong c-axis-orientated crystallization was obtained. The contents of Al and Ga in the AlGaN film were 81% and 19%, respectively.
The AlGaN-based SMR device with good performance was successfully fabricated. The frequency response (s11) of the SMR device showed that the resonance frequency was 3.60 GHz, the return loss was about −8.62 dB, the kt2 was 2.33%, the Q value was 96.93, and the FoM value was 2.26, respectively.

Author Contributions

Data curation, Y.-C.C. (Yu-Chen Chang); formal analysis, Y.-C.C. (Yu-Chen Chang); writing—original draft preparation, Y.-C.C. (Yu-Chen Chang) and Y.-C.C. (Ying-Chung Chen); writing—review and editing, Y.-C.C. (Ying-Chung Chen) and C.-C.C. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan. (No. MOST 107-2221-E-110-052-MY2, No. MOST 109-2221-E-110-028 and No. MOST 110-2622-E-110-008.) and the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C. (107RSI0007).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This study was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China, Taiwan and the Ministry of Education, Taiwan, R.O.C.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Yu, L.; Jin, H.; Hu, N.; Dong, S.; Luo, J. Flexible film bulk acoustic resonators and filter-like structure made directly on polymer substrates. Integr. Ferroelectr. 2016, 168, 157–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Patel, R.; Bansal, D.; Agrawal, V.K.; Rangra, K.; Boolchandani, D. Fabrication and RF characterization of zinc oxide based film bulk acoustic resonator. Superlattices Microstruct. 2018, 118, 104–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Corso, C.D.; Dickherber, A.; Hunt, W.D.; Corso, C.D. Lateral field excitation of thickness shear mode waves in a thin film ZnO solidly mounted resonator. J. Appl. Phys. 2007, 101, 054514. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhao, J.H.; Xing, Y.H.; Han, J.; Lin, W.K.; Yun, X.F.; Sun, Y.H.; Zhou, X.; Wang, Z.M.; Cao, X.; Zhang, B.S.; et al. The research of dual-mode film bulk acoustic resonator for enhancing temperature sensitivity. Semicond. Sci. Technol. 2021, 36, 025018. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Afzal, A.; Iqbal, N.; Mujahid, A.; Schirhagl, R. Advanced vapor recognition materials for selective and fast responsive surface acoustic wave sensors: A review. Anal. Chim. Acta 2013, 787, 36–49. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  6. Serhane, R.; Abdelli-Messaci, S.; Lafane, S.; Khales, H.; Aouimeur, W.; Hassein-Bey, A.; Boutkedjirt, T. Pulsed laser deposition of piezoelectric ZnO thin films for bulk acoustic wave devices. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2014, 288, 572–578. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Zhang, X.; Xu, W.C.; Chae, J. Temperature effects on a high Q FBAR in liquid. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2011, 166, 264–268. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chang, Y.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Li, B.R.; Shih, W.C.; Lin, J.M.; Chang, W.T.; Cheng, C.C. Effects of Thermal Annealing on the Characteristics of High Frequency FBAR Devices. Coatings 2021, 11, 397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Kim, H.H.; Ju, B.K.; Lee, Y.H.; Lee, S.H.; Lee, J.K.; Kim, S.W. A noble suspended type thin film resonator (STFR) using the SOI technology. Sens. Actuator A Phys. 2001, 89, 255–258. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Huang, C.L.; Tay, K.W.; Wu, L. Fabrication and performance analysis of film bulk acoustic wave resonators. Mater. Lett. 2005, 59, 1012–1016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Chung, C.J.; Chen, Y.C.; Cheng, C.C.; Kao, K.S. Synthesis and bulk acoustic wave properties on the dual mode frequency shift of solidly mounted resonators. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2008, 55, 857–864. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  12. Kim, D.H.; Yim, M.; Chai, D.; Park, J.S.; Yoon, G. Improved resonance characteristics by thermal annealing of W/SiO2 multi-layers in film bulk acoustic wave resonator devices. Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 2004, 43, 1545–1550. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Lee, S.H.; Kim, J.H.; Mansfeld, G.D.; Yoon, K.H.; Lee, J.K. Influence of electrodes and Bragg reflector on the quality of thin film bulk acoustic wave resonators. In Proceedings of the 2002 IEEE International Frequency Control Symposium and PDA Exhibition (Cat. No.02CH37234), New Orleans, LA, USA, 31 May 2002; pp. 45–49. [Google Scholar]
  14. Mirea, T.; Clement, M.; Olivares, J.; Iborra, E. Assessment of the absolute mass attachment to an AlN-based solidly mounted resonator using a single shear mode. IEEE Electron. Device Lett. 2020, 41, 609–612. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Qin, L.F.; Chen, Q.M.; Cheng, H.B.; Wang, Q.M. Analytical study of dual-mode thin film bulk acoustic resonators (FBARs) based on ZnO and AlN films with tilted c-axis orientation. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2010, 57, 1840–1853. [Google Scholar] [PubMed]
  16. Sun, P.; Chen, Y.R.; Tang, T.T.; Shen, J.; Liu, X.; Yang, X.M.; Gao, C. Effect of c-axis tilted orientation ZnO thin film on shear-mode bulk acoustic resonator in liquid environment. Mater. Express 2020, 10, 1477–1483. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chung, C.J.; Chen, Y.C.; Cheng, C.C.; Wei, C.L.; Kao, K.S. Influence of surface roughness of Bragg reflectors on resonance characteristics of solidly-mounted resonators. IEEE Trans. Ultrason. Ferroelectr. Freq. Control 2007, 54, 802–808. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  18. Shealy, J.B.; Hodge, M.D.; Patel, P.; Vetury, R.; Feldman, A.Y.; Gibb, S.R.; Boomgarden, M.D.; Lewis, M.P.; Shealy, J.B.; Shealy, J.R. Single crystal AlGaN bulk acoustic wave resonators on silicon substrates with high electromechanical coupling. In Proceedings of the 2016 IEEE Radio Frequency Integrated Circuits Symposium (RFIC), San Francisco, CA, USA, 22–24 May 2016; pp. 103–106. [Google Scholar]
  19. Wang, W.B.; Mayrhofer, P.M.; He, X.L.; Gillinger, M.; Ye, Z.; Wang, X.Z.; Bittner, A.; Schmid, U.; Luo, J.K. High performance AlScN thin film based surface acoustic wave devices with large electromechanical coupling coefficient. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2014, 105, 133502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Uehara, M.; Mizuno, T.; Aida, Y.; Yamada, H.; Umeda, K.; Akiyama, M. Increase in the piezoelectric response of scandium-doped gallium nitride thin films sputtered using a metal interlayer for piezo MEMS. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2019, 114, 012902. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mitterhuber, L.; Hammer, R.; Dengg, T.; Spitaler, J. Thermal Characterization and Modelling of AlGaN-GaN Multilayer Structures for HEMT Applications. Energies 2020, 13, 2363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Ni, R.X.; Chuo, C.C.; Yang, K.; Ai, Y.J.; Zhang, L.; Cheng, Z.; Liu, Z.; Jia, L.F.; Zhang, Y. AlGaN-based ultraviolet light-emitting diode on high-temperature annealed sputtered AlN template. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 794, 8–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dinh, D.V.; Amano, H.; Pristovsek, M. Nonpolar m-plane AlxGa1-xN layers grown on m-plane sapphire by MOVPE. J. Cryst. Growth 2019, 512, 100–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Othman, N.A.; Nayan, N.; Mustafa, M.K.; Azman, Z.; Hasnan, M.M.I.M.; Bakri, A.S.; Jaffar, S.N.; Bakar, A.S.A.; Mamat, M.H.; Mohd Yusop, Z.M.; et al. Structural and Morphological Properties of AlGaN Thin Films Prepared by Co-sputtering Technique. In Proceedings of the 2021 IEEE Regional Symposium on Micro and Nanoelectronics (RSM), Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia, 2–4 August 2021; pp. 20–23. [Google Scholar]
  25. Chung, C.Y.; Chen, Y.C.; Chen, Y.C.; Kao, K.S.; Chang, Y.C. Fabrication of a 3.5-GHz Solidly Mounted Resonator by Using an AlScN Piezoelectric Thin Film. Coatings 2021, 11, 1151. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Tholander, C.; Abrikosov, I.A.; Hultman, L.; Tasnadi, F. Volume matching condition to establish the enhanced piezoelectricity in ternary (Sc,Y)0.5(Al,Ga,In)0.5N alloys. Phys. Rev. B 2013, 87, 094107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
Figure 1. The structure of an SMR device.
Figure 1. The structure of an SMR device.
Materials 14 07377 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the AlGaN films deposited under different sputtering pressures.
Figure 2. XRD patterns of the AlGaN films deposited under different sputtering pressures.
Materials 14 07377 g002
Figure 3. The surface morphologies and cross-sectional images of AlGaN films deposited under different sputtering pressures; (a) 10 mTorr, (b) 20 mTorr, and (c) 30 mTorr.
Figure 3. The surface morphologies and cross-sectional images of AlGaN films deposited under different sputtering pressures; (a) 10 mTorr, (b) 20 mTorr, and (c) 30 mTorr.
Materials 14 07377 g003
Figure 4. The cross-sectional image of an AlGaN-based SMR device.
Figure 4. The cross-sectional image of an AlGaN-based SMR device.
Materials 14 07377 g004
Figure 5. Frequency response of the SMR device with 770 nm AlGaN film as the piezoelectric layer.
Figure 5. Frequency response of the SMR device with 770 nm AlGaN film as the piezoelectric layer.
Materials 14 07377 g005
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Chang, Y.-C.; Chen, Y.-C.; Cheng, C.-C. Fabrication of AlGaN High Frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator by Reactive RF Magnetron Co-sputtering System. Materials 2021, 14, 7377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237377

AMA Style

Chang Y-C, Chen Y-C, Cheng C-C. Fabrication of AlGaN High Frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator by Reactive RF Magnetron Co-sputtering System. Materials. 2021; 14(23):7377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237377

Chicago/Turabian Style

Chang, Yu-Chen, Ying-Chung Chen, and Chien-Chuan Cheng. 2021. "Fabrication of AlGaN High Frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator by Reactive RF Magnetron Co-sputtering System" Materials 14, no. 23: 7377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237377

APA Style

Chang, Y. -C., Chen, Y. -C., & Cheng, C. -C. (2021). Fabrication of AlGaN High Frequency Bulk Acoustic Resonator by Reactive RF Magnetron Co-sputtering System. Materials, 14(23), 7377. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma14237377

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop