Next Article in Journal
Geotechnical Evaluation of Loess Modifications as the Sustainable Compacted Soil Liner Material in Solid Waste Landfill
Next Article in Special Issue
Microstructural Origin of the High-Energy Storage Performance in Epitaxial Lead-Free Ba(Zr0.2Ti0.8)O3 Thick Films
Previous Article in Journal
Corrosion Layers on Archaeological Cast Iron from Nanhai I
Previous Article in Special Issue
Enhanced Energy Storage Properties of La-Doped Sr0.6Ba0.4Nb2O6 Relaxor Ferroelectric Ceramics Prepared by Spark Plasma Sintering
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Enhanced Energy-Storage Performances in Sodium Bismuth Titanate-Based Relaxation Ferroelectric Ceramics with Optimized Polarization by Tuning Sintering Temperature

1
Inner Mongolia Key Laboratory of Ferroelectric-Related New Energy Materials and Devices, School of Materials and Metallurgy, Inner Mongolia University of Science and Technology, Baotou 014010, China
2
Yunnan Longivy Technology Co., Ltd., Kunming 650217, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
These authors contributed equally to this work.
Materials 2022, 15(14), 4981; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144981
Submission received: 13 June 2022 / Revised: 1 July 2022 / Accepted: 14 July 2022 / Published: 18 July 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Preparation and Properties of Novel Energy Storage Materials)

Abstract

:
Energy-storage capacitors based on relaxation ferroelectric ceramics have attracted a lot of interest in pulse power devices. How to improve the energy density by designing the structure of ceramics through simple approaches is still a challenge. Herein, enhanced energy-storage performances are achieved in relaxation ferroelectric 0.9 (0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3)-0.1NaNbO3 (NBT-BT-NN) ceramics by tuning sintering temperature. The original observation based on Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM) presented that the sintering temperature has a key effect on the electrical homogeneousness of the ceramics. It is found that a high electrical homogeneousness can induce quick and active domain switching due to the weakening of the constraint from built-in fields, resulting in a big polarization difference. This work provides a feasible strategy to design high-performance energy-storage ceramic capacitors.

1. Introduction

In recent years, with the energy structure gradually transforming, ceramic capacitors have received considerable attention due to their high-power density, good thermal stability, and fast charge–discharge speed [1,2,3]. However, the low energy-storage density has become a major obstacle for its practical applications [4,5]. Therefore, improving the energy-storage density and efficiency of ceramic capacitors is a current research hotspot [6,7]. Generally, the total energy storage (W), the recoverable energy-storage density (Wrec), the loss energy density (Wloss), and energy efficiency (η) of dielectric capacitors can be calculated and analyzed by the following formulas [8,9]:
W   =   0 P m a x E d P
W r e c   = P r P m a x E d P
Wloss = WWrec
η = W r e c W   ×   100 % = W r e c W r e c   + W l o s s     ×   100 %
where E, Pmax and Pr express the applied electric field, maximum polarization and remnant polarization, respectively. As shown in the schematic diagram in Figure 1, excellent energy-storage properties can be achieved by improving Pmax, reducing Pr and increasing the electric breakdown strength (Eb) at the same time [10,11,12].
In previous studies, researchers used chemical modifications and structural design to improve energy-storage performance and have achieved some good results. For instance, Yang et al. found that grain boundary diffusion could be prevented by doping elements; thus, effectively inhibiting grain growth. On this basis, by introducing BiFeO3 into K0.5Na0.5NbO3 and reducing the grain size from 5.4 to 0.15 µm, 0.9K0.5Na0.5NbO3-0.1BiFeO3 ceramics with Wrec of 2 J cm−3 at 206 kV cm−1 were successfully obtained [13]. Compared with macroscopic ferroelectric domains, PNRs have lower switching barriers and higher dynamic activity under external electric fields. Therefore, the energy-storage ceramics constructed by PNRs unfold higher Wrec, slimmer hysteresis loops, and higher efficiency, which attract the attention of researchers. An effective strategy to achieve ultrahigh energy-storage performance via nano-scale polarization mismatch was proposed by Hu’s team. They fabricated 0.6BaTiO3-0.4Bi(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3 ceramics and obtained a high Wrec of 4.49 J cm−3 and η of 93% [14]. The researchers also took advantage of the strong anisotropic of the perovskite structure by adjusting its orientation to achieve better performance. Bai and his partners fabricated <001>-oriented 0.94BNT–0.06BT ceramics using the template grain growth method, and realized Wrec of 1.6 J cm−3 with excellent frequency stability (0.1~100 Hz) and temperature stability (25~120 °C) [15]. Synthetic of two-phase composite materials is also an effective strategy to improve energy-storage density. For example, core-shell structures are widely used in the design of ferroelectric composites. Xu et al. fabricated the BaTiO3@SiO2 ceramics which obtained 4.799 J cm−3 recoverable energy storage at 370 kV cm−1, in which the SiO2 coating prevents the growth of the grain and makes the structure compact; thus, reducing the leakage current to obtain good energy-storage performance [16].
According to the above research, it is feasible to improve the energy-storage performance of materials by composition doping or structural design [17,18]. However, these methods have many uncertain factors and large instability, so there is still a long way to go to be put into practice [19,20,21]. Therefore, a simple, stable, and easy to implement method needs to be explored. In this work, 0.9 (0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3)-0.1NaNbO3 (NBT-BT-NN) ferroelectric ceramics were prepared by a traditional solid-state sintering method. Exploring the influence of different sintering temperatures on the dielectric properties, and energy-storage behavior for proving that optimizing the sintering temperature, is a simple and stable method to improve the energy-storage performance of materials.

2. Materials and Methods

In this work, a series of NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics (sintering at 1000, 1050, 1100, 1150 and 1200 °C, abbreviated as C1000, C1050, C1100, C1150 and C1200) were prepared by a traditional solid-state sintering method.
According to formula 0.9 (0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3)-0.1NaNbO3, various oxides and carbonate (Sinopharm Chemical Reagent Co., Ltd., Shanghai, China) of TiO2 (98.0%), Bi2O3 (99.2%), Nb2O5 (99.9%), Na2CO3 (99.8%), and BaTiO3 (99.0%) were weighed and mixed for the synthesis of ceramic powders.
The mixed raw materials were added with anhydrous alcohol for 24 h of ball milling, and the resulting slurries were dried and ground into powders. Then, it was heated to 800 °C in a muffle furnace and kept for 2 h. After grinding to powder, anhydrous alcohol was added and mixed again in a ball mill for 24 h and dried. Subsequently, the pellets were prepared in an electric powder pressing machine with PVA solution as the binder. Ceramics are obtained by sintering pellets in a muffle furnace at the above temperature for 2 h. Finally, the polished ceramic piece was plated with a gold electrode with a 2 mm diameter for dielectric and ferroelectric properties testing.
The phase composition of the sintered NBT-BT-NN ceramics was characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Bruker D8 Advanced Diffractometer, German). The diffractometer used a Cu target, the X-ray scanning speed is 4 °/min, and the scanning angle is selected as 20°~70°. The surface morphology of the ceramics was conducted by the scanning electron microscopy (FE-SEM, ZEISS Supra 55, German). Polarization-electric field loops of the ceramics were characterized by a ferroelectric analyzer (Radiant Technologies, Inc., Albuquerque, NM). The domains of ceramic were observed by the piezoelectric force microscope (PFM, Bruker, Icon). The microscopic electrical properties of ceramic surfaces were tested using a surface Kelvin probe force microscopy (KPFM, Bruker, Icon). The dielectric property was measured by a computer-controlled LCR meter (TH2828, Tongue, China).

3. Results and Discussion

The XRD patterns of NBT-BT-NN ceramics were displayed in Figure 2. A main perovskite phase was formed for all the ceramics, and a small quantity of the pyrochlore phase was observed. The sharp diffraction peak and the relatively large diffraction intensity indicate a high crystallinity, and NN has good solid solubility in NBT-BT ceramics [22]. Therefore, the NBT-BT-NN ceramics can be synthesized in a wide temperature range with high quality, which will be beneficial to the testing of their dielectric and ferroelectric properties.
Figure 3a–e illustrate SEM images of NBT-BT-NN ceramics. It can be seen from the figure that with the increase in sintering temperature, the density of ceramics increases first, and then decreases. Among them, C1050 is the densest. The grain distribution was presented in the inset of Figure 3a–e. Compared with the other ceramics, the C1050 exhibits a small grain size and a concentrated distribution, indicating outstanding uniformity. For further comparison, the average grain size of the C1050 is 0.79 µm, which is the minimum among all ceramics. Small grain size is beneficial to the energy-storage performances of ceramic materials [23].
The frequency dependence of dielectric constant (εr) of NBT-BT-NN ceramics from 10 kHz to 1 MHz at room temperature was displayed in Figure 4a. The εr of all sintering temperatures decrease with increasing frequency. This is mainly because the change of its internal electric dipole is affected by the test frequency under the electric field, and the εr is affected accordingly [24]. With the increase in frequency, the switching speed of the electric dipole cannot keep up with the turning speed of the applied electric field gradually, which makes the intensity of polarization weaken correspondingly. These changes also indicate that the dielectric constant is highly dependent on sintering temperature [25]. In the meantime, with the sintering temperature rising from 1000 °C to 1200 °C, the εr increases firstly, and then decreases, and the maximum value is obtained at the sintering temperature of 1050 °C. Figure 4c shows the εr comparison at 10 kHz. The εr of the ceramics is 1599, 2208, 2072, 1763 and 1698 at different sintering temperatures from 1000 to 1200 °C at 10 kHz, respectively. The results prove that the sintering temperature of 1050 °C can enhance dielectric properties of the ceramics.
Figure 4b shows the temperature dependence of εr of NBT-BT-NN ceramics with different sintering temperatures at 1 MHz. Typical characteristics of relaxor behavior, namely broadened dielectric peaks, can be observed over the measured temperature range of 50 to 250 °C [26,27]. The temperature Tm, corresponding to the maximum εr, is related to the thermal relaxation of PNRs and the transition from rhombohedral (R3c) PNRs to tetragonal (P4bm) PNRs [28]. The variation trend of Tm for each ceramic is shown in Figure 4d: Tm moves toward the lower temperature range as the sintering temperature increases. This phenomenon indicates an increased degree of diffusion phase change, and ceramics show stronger relaxation behavior. Generally speaking, dielectric materials with relatively large εr often show excellent energy-storage behavior, so the NBT-BT-NN C1050 are expected to obtain a relatively large energy-storage density.
To investigate the energy-storage performance of NBT-BT-NN ceramics with different sintering temperatures, the variations of P-E, Wrec and η under different electric fields at room temperature and 100 Hz are shown in Figure 5. With the increase in the electric field, the polarization increases, and the P-E loops gradually show a saturation state. It can be calculated that the energy-storage density of all NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics increases as the electric field increases. However, the electric field will also increase the Wloss, which leads to the reduction of η. Among them, when the electric field increases from 20 to 120 kV cm−1, the Wrec of the ceramic with a sintering temperature of 1050 °C obtains the largest increase compared with the other ceramics, increasing from 0.04 to 1.42 J cm−3, and maintains a high η of 71%. This further proves that 1050 °C is a suitable sintering temperature for NBT-BT-NN energy-storage ceramics.
Figure 6a displays the P-E loops of the NBT-BT-NN ceramics at different sintering temperatures and Figure 6b shows their corresponding values of Pmax−Pr. The P-E loops were measured at room temperature under the field of 120 kV cm−1 at the frequency of 100 Hz. It can be clearly seen that all ceramics show typical hysteresis loops of relaxor ferroelectric, the polarization is close to saturation under high electric field, and all maintain slimmer shapes. Among them, the ceramics with a sintering temperature of 1050 °C have the largest Pmax. The results of Pmax−Pr have an important impact on the energy-storage performance of dielectric energy-storage ceramics, and its values are calculated and indicated in Figure 6b. The Pmax−Pr values of ceramics sintered at 1000~1200 °C were 27.5, 30.3, 29.6, 29.4, and 28.2 µC cm−2, respectively. It can be seen that the C1050 has the maximum Pmax−Pr value, which is beneficial to obtain a larger Wrec. Figure 6c shows the Wrec and η of ceramics at different sintering temperatures. The Wrec of ceramics sintered at 1000~1200 °C are 1.35, 1.42, 1.38, 1.37 and 1.32 J cm−3, respectively. The corresponding η are 73%, 71%, 70%, 69% and 68%. As expected, the sintered ceramics with the maximum Pmax−Pr value at 1050 °C showed the highest energy-storage density of 1.42 J cm−3, and achieved a large energy-storage efficiency. That is to say, the sintering temperature of ceramics has a great impact on Wrec and η. According to the comparative results, sintering at 1050 °C is the optimal sintering schedule.
Changes in dielectric behavior and energy-storage performance are usually closely related to domain morphology and its dynamic response to the external electric field. PFM is an effective tool to deeply study the micromorphology of materials [29]. The domain structure and evolution process of C1050 and C1200 after poling with −200 V electric field are shown in Figure 7a–f. Figure 7a,d show the initial states of the two ceramics when polarized: strip regions with alternating light and dark can be seen in both ceramics, which belong to the long-range ordered ferroelectric domain morphology. As the voltage is removed, the domains are gradually switched [30]. The C1050 had only a small number of domains that did not switch after 15 min of rest, and finally recovered to the initial state completely after 30 min. Correspondingly, as shown in Figure 7e, most of the domains of C1200 were still in the polarized state after 15 min, and finally returned to the unpolarized state after 30 min. Compared with other ceramics, the internal electric field of C1050 has less hindrance to domain switching, and the response speed of domains to the external electric field is fast. Most of the domains can quickly return to an unpolarized state. This corresponds to the slimmer P-E loops and smaller Pr of the ceramics, thus achieving better energy-storage performance.
Figure 8a–e show the surface potential and the corresponding potential distribution statistics of NBT-BT-NN ceramics with different sintering temperatures obtained by KPFM. The different colors in the figures indicate the potential distribution on the ceramic surface. Figure 8a,e show a large range of their potential distribution, with multiple peaks appearing. Figure 8b has only one peak, which is relatively sharp. This indicates that the C1050 has a more uniform potential. The wide potential distribution may cause the formation of multiple energy barriers in the ceramics, and then cause the generation of internal electric fields [31]. These internal electric fields inhibit the switching of the domains to some extent, resulting in the decrease of Pmax and the increase of Pr, and producing a smaller Pmax−Pr value. The uniform potential indicates the high electrical uniformity, which has little effect on the domain switching under the external electric field. Therefore, the C1050 have a larger Pmax−Pr value.
Figure 9a shows the temperature dependence of the P-E hysteresis loops of C1050 from 20 °C to 180 °C at 60 kV cm−1. It can be seen that the ceramics exhibit typical ferroelectric hysteresis loops at all test temperatures, and the Pr and the coercive field (Ec) of the ceramics decrease with the increasing temperature. The decrease of Pr is caused by the decrease in overall polarization strength of dielectric material as a result of the increase in temperature. At the same time, with the increase in test temperature, the interface energy of the ferroelectric domain decreases gradually, which easily leads to the change of domain wall movement, and thus leads to the reduction of Ec [32]. Moreover, the P-E loops gradually become slimmer and slimmer with the increments of test temperature, and reach the thinnest state at 100 °C, which is conducive to obtaining a larger energy-storage density and efficiency. Figure 9b shows the variation of energy-storage density and efficiency with the test temperature corresponding to Figure 9a. At 20 °C, the Wrec of NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramic is 0.4 J cm−3, and the corresponding energy-storage efficiency is 66%. With the increase of the test temperature, the energy-storage density and efficiency showed a trend of first increasing and then decreasing, and the maximum energy-storage density was obtained when the test temperature was 100 °C. At 180 °C, the Wrec is 0.43 J cm−3, and the energy-storage efficiency reaches 78%. Compared with the test result at room temperature, the energy-storage density and efficiency increased by 7.5% and 18%, respectively. The above results show that NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics have better temperature stability of energy-storage behavior in the temperature range of 20~180 °C.

4. Conclusions

In conclusion, 0.9 (0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3)-0.1NaNbO3 (NBT-BT-NN) ceramics were prepared by the traditional solid-state method, and the effects of different sintering temperatures on dielectric properties and energy-storage performance were investigated. All ferroelectric ceramics are highly crystalline and exhibit predominantly perovskite phases. The C1050 has the best dielectric properties, the ferroelectric properties are stable under different test electric fields and a large Wrec of 1.42 J cm−3 together with the moderate η of 71% at 120 kV cm−1 was obtained. Based on the analysis of KPFM test data, the C1050 achieved outstanding performance due to its rapid switching of electric domain and uniform surface potential. In addition, the ceramic exhibits excellent temperature stability in a wide temperature range of 20~180 °C. Therefore, NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics sintered at 1050 °C are promising candidates for pulsed power capacitors applications. Moreover, it is proven that the method to obtain excellent energy-storage performance by adjusting sintering temperature is stable and easy to realize.

Author Contributions

J.W., Z.M. and Y.Y. contributed equally to this work. Conceptualization, original draft preparation, J.W., Z.M. and Y.Y.; methodology, Y.Y.; software, J.W.; validation, Z.M. and Y.Y.; formal analysis, Y.Y.; investigation, Z.M.; writing—review and editing, J.W. and Z.M.; data curation, Y.Z. and N.S.; supervision, N.S., Y.L., R.L. and X.H.; project administration, Y.L. and N.S.; funding acquisition, Y.L. and X.H. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research received no external funding.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors acknowledge the support from the Natural Science Foundation of Inner Mongolia (2019ZD12, 2021JQ06), the Program for “Grassland Talents” Innovation Team of Inner Mongolia (Rare Earth Modified Lead-free Ferroelectric Multilayer Ceramic Capacitors Innovative Talent Team), and Scientific and Technological Development Foundation of the Central Guidance Local (2021ZY0008), Youth Science and Technology Talents Project of Inner Mongolia (NJYT22061), “Light of the West” talent training program of Chinese Academy of Sciences, and Key Science and Technology Program of Ordos City (2021EEDSCXQDFZ014).

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funders had no role in the design of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, or in the decision to publish the results.

References

  1. Cao, W.; Li, T.; Chen, P.; Wang, C. Outstanding Energy Storage Performance of Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-BaTiO3-(Sr0.85Bi0.1)(Mg1/3Nb2/3)O3 Lead-Free Ceramics. ACS Appl. Energy Mater. 2021, 4, 9362–9367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Lu, Z.; Wang, G.; Bao, W.; Li, J.; Li, L.; Mostaed, A.; Yang, H.; Ji, H.; Li, D.; Feteira, A.; et al. Superior energy density through tailored dopant strategies in multilayer ceramic capacitors. Energy Environ. Sci. 2020, 13, 2938–2948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, H.; Wei, T.; Zhang, Q.; Ma, W.; Fan, P.; Salamon, D.; Zhang, S.-T.; Nan, B.; Tan, H.; Ye, Z.-G. A review on the development of lead-free ferroelectric energy-storage ceramics and multilayer capacitors. J. Mater. Chem. C 2020, 8, 16648–16667. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Ogihara, H.; Randall, C.A.; Trolier-McKinstry, S. High-Energy Density Capacitors Utilizing 0.7BaTiO3-0.3BiScO3 Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2009, 92, 1719–1724. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cao, W.; Li, W.; Zhang, T.; Sheng, J.; Hou, Y.; Feng, Y.; Yu, Y.; Fei, W. High-Energy Storage Density and Efficiency of (1−x)[0.94 NBT−0.06 BT]−xST Lead-Free Ceramics. Energy Technol. 2015, 3, 1198–1204. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Hannan, M.A.; Hoque, M.M.; Mohamed, A.; Ayob, A. Review of energy storage systems for electric vehicle applications: Issues and challenges. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 2017, 69, 771–789. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Lv, J.; Li, Q.; Li, Y.; Tang, M.; Jin, D.; Yan, Y.; Fan, B.; Jin, L.; Liu, G. Significantly improved energy storage performance of NBT-BT based ceramics through domain control and preparation optimization. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 420, 129900. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Liu, N.; Liang, R.; Zhou, Z.; Dong, X. Designing lead-free bismuth ferrite-based ceramics learning from relaxor ferroelectric behavior for simultaneous high energy density and efficiency under low electric field. J. Mater. Chem. C 2018, 6, 10211–10217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Wang, G.; Li, J.; Zhang, X.; Fan, Z.; Yang, F.; Feteira, A.; Zhou, D.; Sinclair, D.C.; Ma, T.; Tan, X.; et al. Ultrahigh energy storage density lead-free multilayers by controlled electrical homogeneity. Energy Environ. Sci. 2019, 12, 582–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xu, Q.; Li, T.; Hao, H.; Zhang, S.; Wang, Z.; Cao, M.; Yao, Z.; Liu, H. Enhanced energy storage properties of NaNbO3 modified Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3 based ceramics. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 35, 545–553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Zannen, M.; Lahmar, A.; Khemakhem, H.; El Marssi, M. Energy storage property in lead free gd doped Na1/2Bi1/2TiO3 ceramics. Solid State Commun. 2016, 245, 1–4. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Gao, F.; Dong, X.; Mao, C.; Liu, W.; Zhang, H.; Yang, L.; Cao, F.; Wang, G.; Jones, J. Energy-Storage Properties of 0.89Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3-0.05K0.5Na0.5NbO3 Lead-Free Anti-ferroelectric Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2011, 94, 4382–4386. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Yang, Z.; Gao, F.; Du, H.; Jin, L.; Yan, L.; Hu, Q.; Yu, Y.; Qu, S.; Wei, X.; Xu, Z.; et al. Grain size engineered lead-free ceramics with both large energy storage density and ultrahigh mechanical properties. Nano Energy 2019, 58, 768–777. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Hu, Q.; Tian, Y.; Zhu, Q.; Bian, J.; Jin, L.; Du, H.; Alikin, D.O.; Shur, V.Y.; Feng, Y.; Xu, Z.; et al. Achieve ultrahigh energy storage performance in BaTiO3-Bi(Mg1/2Ti1/2)O3 relaxor ferroelectric ceramics via nano-scale polarization mismatch and reconstruction. Nano Energy 2020, 67, 104264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bai, W.; Zhao, X.; Ding, Y.; Wang, L.; Zheng, P.; Hao, J.; Zhai, J. Giant Field-Induced Strain with Low Hysteresis and Boosted Energy Storage Performance under Low Electric Field in (Bi0.5Na0.5)TiO3-Based Grain Orientation-Controlled Ceramics. Adv. Electron. Mater. 2020, 6, 2000332. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Xu, C.; Su, R.; Wang, Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhang, D.; Wang, J.; Bian, J.; Wu, C.; Lou, X.; Yang, Y. Tuning the microstructure of BaTiO3@SiO2 core-shell nanoparticles for high energy storage composite ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 784, 173–181. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Alkathy, M.S.; Hezam, A.; Manoja, K.S.D.; Wang, J.; Cheng, C.; Byrappa, K.; Raju, K.C.J. Effect of sintering temperature on structural, electrical, and ferroelectric properties of lanthanum and sodium co-substituted barium titanate ceramics. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 762, 49–61. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Li, T.; Cao, W.; Chen, P.; Wang, J.; Wang, C. Effects of sintering method on the structural, dielectric and energy storage properties of AgNbO3 lead-free antiferroelectric ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 2021, 56, 13499–13508. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, T.; Zhao, Z.; Liang, X.; Hu, K.; Li, S.; Zhang, Y. Dependence of dielectric and energy storage properties on sintering temperature in lead lanthanum zirconate titanate antiferroelectric ceramics. Mater. Res. Express 2019, 6, 126303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhu, J.; Ma, Z.; Su, Q.; Meng, X.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Hao, X. Enhanced energy-storage properties of lead-free Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-based relaxor ferroelectric ceramics by tuning sintering temperature. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 26258–26267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Yu, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Zhang, Y.; Li, H.; Zhang, Q.; Lu, Y.; He, Y. High-temperature energy storage performances in (1-x)(Na0.50Bi0.50TiO3)-xBaZrO3 lead-free relaxor ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2020, 46, 28652–28658. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Yan, F.; Shi, Y.; Zhou, X.; Zhu, K.; Shen, B.; Zhai, J. Optimization of polarization and electric field of bismuth ferrite-based ceramics for capacitor applications. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 127945. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Hu, B.; Fan, H.; Ning, L.; Wen, Y.; Wang, C. High energy storage performance of [(Bi0.5Na0.5)0.94Ba0.06]0.97La0.03Ti1-x(Al0.5Nb0.5)xO3 ceramics with enhanced dielectric breakdown strength. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 15160–15166. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Yao, Y.; Li, Y.; Sun, N.; Du, J.; Li, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, Q.; Hao, X. Enhanced dielectric and energy-storage properties in ZnO-doped 0.9(0.94Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3)-0.1NaNbO3 ceramics. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 5961–5966. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Hiruma, Y.; Nagata, H.; Takenaka, T. Phase diagrams and electrical properties of (Bi1/2Na1/2)TiO3-based solid solutions. J. Appl. Phys. 2008, 104, 124106. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Zhang, S.-T.; Kounga, A.B.; Aulbach, E.; Deng, Y. Temperature-Dependent Electrical Properties of 0.94Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-0.06BaTiO3 Ceramics. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2008, 91, 3950–3954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Xu, Q.; Liu, H.; Zhang, L.; Xie, J.; Hao, H.; Cao, M.; Yao, Z.; Lanagan, M.T. Structure and electrical properties of lead-free Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-based ceramics for energy-storage applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 59280–59291. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Ma, Z.; Su, Q.; Zhu, J.; Meng, X.; Zhao, Y.; Xin, G.; Li, Y.; Hao, X. Optimization of energy-storage properties for lead-free relaxor-ferroelectric (1-x)Na0.5Bi0.5TiO3-xSr0.7Nd0.2TiO3 ceramics. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 217–228. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Qi, H.; Xie, A.; Tian, A.; Zuo, R. Superior Energy-Storage Capacitors with Simultaneously Giant Energy Density and Efficiency Using Nanodomain Engineered BiFeO3-BaTiO3-NaNbO3 Lead-Free Bulk Ferroelectrics. Adv. Energy Mater. 2019, 10, 1903338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Kang, R.; Wang, Z.; Lou, X.; Liu, W.; Shi, P.; Zhu, X.; Guo, X.; Li, S.; Sun, H.; Zhang, L.; et al. Energy storage performance of Bi0.5Na0.5TiO3-based relaxor ferroelectric ceramics with superior temperature stability under low electric fields. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 410, 128376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Li, Y.; Wang, G.; Gong, A.; Zhang, S.; Liu, J.; Sun, N.; Hao, X. High-Performance Ferroelectric Electromagnetic Attenuation Materials with Multiple Polar Units Based on Nanodomain Engineering. Small 2022, 18, 2106302. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  32. Yang, H.; Liu, P.; Yan, F.; Lin, Y.; Wang, T. A novel lead-free ceramic with layered structure for high energy storage applications. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 773, 244–249. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of P-E loops for realizing superior energy-storage properties.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of P-E loops for realizing superior energy-storage properties.
Materials 15 04981 g001
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of NBT-BT-NN ceramics in a wide range from 20° to 70°.
Figure 2. X-ray diffraction patterns of NBT-BT-NN ceramics in a wide range from 20° to 70°.
Materials 15 04981 g002
Figure 3. SEM images of the NBT-BT-NN ceramics with sintering temperature of (a) 1000 °C, (b) 1050 °C, (c) 1100 °C, (d) 1150 °C, (e) 1200 °C. The insets in (ae) are the corresponding grain size distribution. (f) Variation of average grain size of ceramics at different sintering temperatures.
Figure 3. SEM images of the NBT-BT-NN ceramics with sintering temperature of (a) 1000 °C, (b) 1050 °C, (c) 1100 °C, (d) 1150 °C, (e) 1200 °C. The insets in (ae) are the corresponding grain size distribution. (f) Variation of average grain size of ceramics at different sintering temperatures.
Materials 15 04981 g003
Figure 4. (a) Frequency dependent of the dielectric constant and (b) the corresponding change at 10 kHz for NBT-BT-NN ceramics. (c) Temperature dependence of dielectric constant and (d) the variation trend of Tm for each ceramic.
Figure 4. (a) Frequency dependent of the dielectric constant and (b) the corresponding change at 10 kHz for NBT-BT-NN ceramics. (c) Temperature dependence of dielectric constant and (d) the variation trend of Tm for each ceramic.
Materials 15 04981 g004
Figure 5. Room temperature P-E loops under different sintering temperatures for the NBT-BT-NN ceramics (a) 1000 °C, (b) 1050 °C, (c) 1100 °C, (d) 1150 °C, (e) 1200 °C, (fj) shows the variation of Wrec and η as a function of the applied field.
Figure 5. Room temperature P-E loops under different sintering temperatures for the NBT-BT-NN ceramics (a) 1000 °C, (b) 1050 °C, (c) 1100 °C, (d) 1150 °C, (e) 1200 °C, (fj) shows the variation of Wrec and η as a function of the applied field.
Materials 15 04981 g005
Figure 6. (a) Room temperature P-E loops of NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics at different sintering temperatures. (b) Pmax−Pr values of each ceramic. (c) The Wrec and η of NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics at different sintering temperatures.
Figure 6. (a) Room temperature P-E loops of NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics at different sintering temperatures. (b) Pmax−Pr values of each ceramic. (c) The Wrec and η of NBT-BT-NN ferroelectric ceramics at different sintering temperatures.
Materials 15 04981 g006
Figure 7. PFM image of NBT-BT-NN ceramics at different sintering temperatures (ac) 1050 °C, (df) 1200 °C.
Figure 7. PFM image of NBT-BT-NN ceramics at different sintering temperatures (ac) 1050 °C, (df) 1200 °C.
Materials 15 04981 g007
Figure 8. The surface potential maps and corresponding potential profile of NBT-BT-NN ceramics at different sintering temperatures (a) 1000 °C, (b) 1050 °C, (c) 1100 °C, (d) 1150 °C, (e) 1200 °C.
Figure 8. The surface potential maps and corresponding potential profile of NBT-BT-NN ceramics at different sintering temperatures (a) 1000 °C, (b) 1050 °C, (c) 1100 °C, (d) 1150 °C, (e) 1200 °C.
Materials 15 04981 g008
Figure 9. (a) P-E loops of NBT-BT-NN ceramic which were measured at different test temperatures. (b) Temperature dependence of Wrec and η of NBT-BT-NN ceramic.
Figure 9. (a) P-E loops of NBT-BT-NN ceramic which were measured at different test temperatures. (b) Temperature dependence of Wrec and η of NBT-BT-NN ceramic.
Materials 15 04981 g009
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wu, J.; Ma, Z.; Yao, Y.; Sun, N.; Zhao, Y.; Li, Y.; Liu, R.; Hao, X. Enhanced Energy-Storage Performances in Sodium Bismuth Titanate-Based Relaxation Ferroelectric Ceramics with Optimized Polarization by Tuning Sintering Temperature. Materials 2022, 15, 4981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144981

AMA Style

Wu J, Ma Z, Yao Y, Sun N, Zhao Y, Li Y, Liu R, Hao X. Enhanced Energy-Storage Performances in Sodium Bismuth Titanate-Based Relaxation Ferroelectric Ceramics with Optimized Polarization by Tuning Sintering Temperature. Materials. 2022; 15(14):4981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144981

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wu, Jianhua, Ziyue Ma, Yuan Yao, Ningning Sun, Ye Zhao, Yong Li, Runchang Liu, and Xihong Hao. 2022. "Enhanced Energy-Storage Performances in Sodium Bismuth Titanate-Based Relaxation Ferroelectric Ceramics with Optimized Polarization by Tuning Sintering Temperature" Materials 15, no. 14: 4981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144981

APA Style

Wu, J., Ma, Z., Yao, Y., Sun, N., Zhao, Y., Li, Y., Liu, R., & Hao, X. (2022). Enhanced Energy-Storage Performances in Sodium Bismuth Titanate-Based Relaxation Ferroelectric Ceramics with Optimized Polarization by Tuning Sintering Temperature. Materials, 15(14), 4981. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15144981

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop