Next Article in Journal
Preparation, Structural Characterization of Anti-Cancer Drugs-Mediated Self-Assembly from the Pluronic Copolymers through Synchrotron SAXS Investigation
Previous Article in Journal
A High Temporal-Spatial Resolution Temperature Sensor for Simultaneous Measurement of Anisotropic Heat Flow
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Review

Nanotube Functionalization: Investigation, Methods and Demonstrated Applications

by
Marianna V. Kharlamova
1,
Maksim Paukov
2 and
Maria G. Burdanova
2,3,*
1
Centre for Advanced Material Application (CEMEA), Slovak Academy of Sciences, Dubravska Cesta 5807/9, 845 11 Bratislava, Slovakia
2
Center for Photonics and 2D Materials, Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology, Institutsky Lane 9, 141700 Dolgoprudny, Russia
3
Institute of Solid State Physics, Russian Academy of Sciences, 142432 Chernogolovka, Russia
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(15), 5386; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155386
Submission received: 7 July 2022 / Revised: 28 July 2022 / Accepted: 1 August 2022 / Published: 5 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Carbon Materials)

Abstract

:
This review presents an update on nanotube functionalization, including an investigation of their methods and applications. The review starts with the discussion of microscopy and spectroscopy investigations of functionalized carbon nanotubes (CNTs). The results of transmission electron microscopy and scanning tunnelling microscopy, X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy, infrared spectroscopy, Raman spectroscopy and resistivity measurements are summarized. The update on the methods of the functionalization of CNTs, such as covalent and non-covalent modification or the substitution of carbon atoms, is presented. The demonstrated applications of functionalized CNTs in nanoelectronics, composites, electrochemical energy storage, electrode materials, sensors and biomedicine are discussed.

1. Introduction

The carbon nanotubes (CNTs) are modified by different routes, such as covalent and non-covalent modification of the outer surface, the substitution of atoms or the filling of CNT channels [1,2,3,4].
Covalent functionalization (adsorption) requires reactive species that can form covalent adducts with the sp2 carbon of CNT. The main advantage of the covalent functionalization of CNTs is that it is stronger than non-covalent interactions, however, it requires damage to the sidewalls. Unlike non-covalent functionalization, it changes the electronic structure, resulting in the irreversible loss of double bonds. These changes can affect conductivity properties and therefore, some applications [5,6,7,8,9,10].
Surface modifications of SWCNTs are not only achievable by covalent functionalization, but also by non-covalent methods. Known examples of molecules spontaneously assembling into micelles around SWCNTs are polymers [11], polycyclic aromatic compounds [12,13,14,15,16], biological species [17] and surfactants [18,19,20].
Covalent incorporation of foreign atoms within the CNT lattice is proposed for the effective engineering of CNT properties by consequent doping. Numerous materials have been used for SWCNTs’ substitution, such as N, B, P, Si, Cl or Ar. The important parameter in this case is the controlled concentration of the embedded atoms. Substitutional doping introduces strongly localized electronic features in the valence or conduction bands of CNTs, which makes it different from doping. Different methods can be utilized for the substitution of atoms: arc-discharge, laser-ablation, CVD, chemical reactions and plasma treatment [6].
This review is dedicated to the methods of nanotube functionalization. Section 2 discusses the microscopy and spectroscopy of functionalized CNTs. Section 3 demonstrates the update on covalent and non-covalent modification, the substitution of carbon atoms in CNTs and the filling of CNTs. Section 4 presents applications of functionalized CNTs.

2. Microscopy and Spectroscopy of Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes

There are several methods of the functionalization of carbon nanotubes:
(a)
exterior covalently attached functional groups,
(b)
exterior physisorbed moieties,
(c)
heteroatoms directly incorporated into the sp2 mesh,
(d)
endohedral filling of SWCNTs.
Each of these distinct techniques is a well-established research area with a distinct origin and history. To which extent the different techniques are applicable depends greatly on the intended modification and the requirements of a specific application. They were all tailored toward specific aims in accordance with their unique weaknesses and strengths. In this context there cannot be a meaningful classification according to general advantages and disadvantages. Yet, for a novel use case, the features of the existing techniques can be evaluated according to the current goals and requirements.
In this section we discuss the microscopy and spectroscopy of fluorinated CNTs. Attaching various functional groups (typically by covalent bonding) constitutes exterior chemical modification of the walls of SWCNTs [21]. The inception and further development of this kind of modification was and is strongly motivated by making SWCNTs soluble. This is a key requirement for virtually any large-scale bulk material processing. Pristine SWCNTs are completely insoluble in aqueous solutions or any other known organic solvents [21,22]. They can be dispersed temporally by ultrasonic agitation, but will quickly precipitate after the sonication is stopped [21]. Surface modification is also the way to let SWCNTs specifically interact with many different compounds [17,23,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43]. Engineering nanotube-based supramolecular complexes opens up new avenues for the design of nanodevices. If suited polar groups are attached to the surface of SWCNTs, they can be dissolved in aqueous biological systems [21]. The correct choice of functional groups can also lead to changes in their electronic properties [22].
Figure 1 shows the transmission electron microscopy (TEM, JEOL model 2010 TEM using 100 keV beam energy, Tokyo, Japan) image of the purified SWCNT starting material (A), fluorinated SWCNTs at 325 °C (B) and fluorinated SWCNTs at 500 °C (C, D) [44]. Single-walled carbon nanotubes were produced by the dual-pulsed laser vaporization of Co/Ni doped graphite rods. The starting material was a very clean SWCNT. Fluorination at 325 °C leaves the SWCNTs largely intact. Fluorination at 500 °C is obviously very destructive. The structures in Figure 1C are morphologically still reminiscent of the bundles of the SWCNT, but they are clearly disordered internally. The structures in Figure 1D are also a common product of the high temperature fluorination. They appear to be hollow and are more reminiscent of defective MWCNTs [44].
In Ref. [45], SWCNTs were functionalized using a reactive ion etching system with CF4 and SF6 plasmas. Figure 2 shows the TEM images of the pristine SWCNTs and the samples exposed to SF6 at −200 V bias and CF4 at −200 V bias. The SWCNTs’ network was similarly functionalized in all of the shown samples, forming bundles due to van der Waals interactions. Meanwhile, the CNTs appeared to be unharmed.
Figure 3 compares scanning tunnelling microscopy (STM) images of a fully fluorinated (a) and a pristine SWCNT (b) [46]. The fluorinated SWCNT features sharp segmentation into irregular, short, dark sections separating longer, bright, axial sections. The bright sections are due to the piecewise fluorination. Atomic resolution is readily achievable and commonly reported for a wide range of scanning parameters, also covering those that were used for the pristine SWCNT in Figure 4b. Atomic resolution is not readily achievable for fully fluorinated SWCNTs, albeit the chiral twist is resolved [46].
CNTs were fluorinated at different temperatures ranging from 150 to 300 °C. The C 1s X-ray photoelectron spectra (XPS) of the pristine SWCNT in Figure 4a show the narrow asymmetric peak of the sp2 carbon at 284.3 eV [47]. The tail above 285 eV indicates a minor presence of sp3 carbon. Upon fluorination at increasing reaction temperatures, the sp2 peak becomes less intense as new peaks at higher binding energies arise and grow in intensity. The C 1s spectral range undergoes well visible changes. Each fluorination temperature has a clearly distinct fingerprint due to different chemical shifts. Figure 4b shows the line shape analysis of the C 1s spectrum after fluorination at 300 °C. The individual Gaussian peaks are identified as sp2 (A), sp3 (B), various oxygenation states (C–E) and also multiple fluorination states (F–H). The peaks, F, G and H at 291.2 eV, 292.9 eV and 294.6 eV, are ascribed to C-F, C-F2 and C-F3 bonds, respectively. The F 1s XPS spectra in Figure 4c shift to higher binding energies and grow in intensity with higher fluorination temperatures [47]. The F 1s peak position shifts abruptly above 200 °C from 687 eV to 691 eV. This marks the transition from semi-ionic fluorine to fully covalent C-F bonding. This interpretation is corroborated by the known F 1s position in covalent hexafluorobenzene at 691 eV. The C to F stoichiometry, as evaluated from integrated peak areas and the photoelectron cross section, increases monotonically and reaches about 0.65 at 300 °C [47].
The Fourier-transformed infrared (FTIR) spectra in Figure 5 belong to pristine SWCNTs and different temperatures of fluorinated SWCNTs. The fluorination temperatures were 150, 200, 250 and 300 °C. The close-up in the lower panel shows only the spectra of fluorinated SWCNTs and reveals a decrease in the peak at 1100 cm−1 and an increase in the peak at 1230 cm−1 with increasing fluorination temperature. The first shrinking peak signifies the loss of ionic fluorine while the second growing peak confirms a gain of covalent C-F bonds. The broad bands around 2350 cm−1 and 3400 cm−1 belong to CO2 and OH groups.
Figure 6 presents the Raman spectra of undoped SWCNTs and fluorinated SWCNTs taken at various temperatures [48]. The undoped and fluorinated SWCNTs have a smaller peak near 200 cm−1, which corresponds to the SWCNTs’ distinctive breathing mode. It was shown that the breathing mode is suppressed due to doping. Broadband spectra consist of distinctive 1580 cm−1 and 1360 cm−1 (G and D band, respectively) peaks. As the fluorination temperature rises, the intensity ratios (IG/ID) decrease. This demonstrates the alteration in the bulk structural characteristics of CNTs after fluorination [48].
In Ref. [49], the impact of CF4 gaseous plasma treatment on SWCNTs was investigated. In particular, Raman spectroscopy showed that CNTs had more disordered sp3 bonds, associated with functionalization, as gas flow rates in the plasma and exposure duration in the plasma were increased (Figure 7a). XPS has been used as a means of detecting chemical species attached to the CNTs. The F 1s region of the XPS spectra of SWCNTs exposed to the CF4 plasma, the SF6 plasma and the pristine control sample are shown in Figure 7b. The tubes treated with CF4 plasma was fitted with two large Gaussian peaks, one at 686 eV in the semi-ionic region and another at 687.5 eV in the region which corresponds to covalent C–F bonding. Over all exposure conditions, the SWCNTs treated in SF6 plasma only needed one peak at 687 eV, toward the covalent area of the F 1s spectra. The weak sputtering effects cause the broad low intensity peak at 689.5 eV that is visible after both functionalization procedures.

3. Modification of Carbon Nanotubes

3.1. Covalent Modification

Defect functionalization is based on the attachment of the desired functional group to the existing or intentionally created defects on the CNT. In reality, CNTs are not ideal nanostructures, but rather contain 1–3% of defects that naturally occur during synthesis. Another type of defect can invariably be introduced during the preparation and purification stages. Ultrasonic treatment and shear mixing, widely used to disperse CNTs in solution, can introduce these defects. The effect of sonication is based on the cavitation effect that is able to break the CNT aggregates (bundles) in addition to the shear force effect. This causes the formation of the structural defects and eventually, their breakage. After defect introduction, the sidewalls are expected to be chemically active, thus improving the reactivity of the CNTs.
Oxygenated sites can also be considered defects. Chemical oxidation of nanotubes is mainly achieved by using either wet chemistry or gaseous oxidants. One way of creating defects and functional groups is oxidative damage to the nanotube framework via strong acids or oxidants, such as HNO3, H2SO4 or KMnO4, which leave holes functionalized with oxygenated functional groups as well as open CNT caps [50,51,52]. The oxidation can also be archived by using hydrochloric acid [53,54], hydrogen peroxide [7], potassium permanganate [55], oxidative persulfates [56] and hypochlorites [57]. In Ref. [52], it was shown that the oxidation of CNTs with concentrated HNO3 results in defect formation in addition to the opening of the ends of the nanotubes. Besides that, it stimulates the formation of the aromatic polycyclic compounds (i.e., fulvic acids on the surface), which can be removed by an alkali and then reversibly reabsorbed. This consequently results in the improvement of the dispersion of CNTs in the aqueous solution.
The gas phase functionalization of CNTs, including oxidation, was carried out. Here, carbon dioxide [58,59], water vapor [60], air, oxygen [61,62,63] and ozone [64,65,66] were used as oxidants. Water vapor is effective as an oxidizing reagent only when it is introduced into the reaction during CVD synthesis of CNTs [60]. It was shown that in this method, nanotubes are produced with a sufficiently large number of defects and oxygen content up to 42 wt.% in different functional groups. So far, the oxidation with oxygen in the air is the most effective method of oxidation as it proceeds with the simultaneous CNT cleaning, shorting and opening. In general, oxidation treatment leads to the p-type doping of CNTs, shifting the Fermi level towards the valence band.
Moreover, some functionalization methods are combined together. For example, in [67], the effectiveness of the same carboxylation of CNTs in a mixture of nitrogen-nitric acid (3:1) is accompanied by cavitation caused by ultrasonic action at room temperature. In addition, the effectiveness of hydrogen peroxide for the oxidation of CNTs increases with UV irradiation [68,69]. Air can be used for additional oxidization of CNTs pre-treated with acids [70].
It was also shown that the oxidation processes strongly depend on the curvature of the CNT’s wall and consequently, the diameter dependence [71,72,73]. Upon oxidative functionalization of CNTs, the affinity of their surfaces to various solvents and polymer matrices increases. The defects on CNTs created by oxidants are stabilized by bonding with carboxylic acid (–COOH) or hydroxyl (–OH) groups and ketone, alcohol and ester group formation. These groups can be used as precursors for further functionalization: silanization [74,75,76], esterification [77,78,79], thiolation, alkylation, arylation and biomolecule and polymer attachment.
CNT silanization is the interaction of oxidized CNTs with organosilanes. The silanization after oxidation usually takes place in a few steps. Firstly, the hydrolysis of silanes into silanols is performed. The creation of hydrogen bonds between oligomers and the surface hydroxyl groups of carbon nanofillers as well as the condensation of silanols into oligomers occurs in the next phase. Finally, Si-O-C bonds are created through the interaction of Si-OH groups with OH groups on CNTs. The 3-aminopropyltriethoxysi-lane has been widely used as a silane agent [80,81,82,83,84]. Lin et al. used comparable techniques to attach both polyethylene glycol and iron oxide in silica nanoparticles to the surface of CNTs [85].
Access to numerous CNT surface functionalizations is made possible by adding carboxylic and hydroxyl groups to CNTs. CNTs can be functionalized via esterification or amidation. Typically, carboxylic groups are activated to acyl chlorides by thionyl chloride, and then amidation and esterification reactions convert them to carboxamides (or carboxyesters) to introduce a variety of functional groups as nucleophiles, such as aliphatic or aryl amines, amino acid derivatives, ensims, peptides, or amino-group-substituted dendrimers [64,78,79]. Thiolation with sodium sulfite and sodium hydroxide and carboxylation with thionyl chloride are used to attach a similar thiol group [86]. The presence of carboxyl groups themselves leads to the reduction of van der Waals interactions between CNTs, which results in effective debundeling and separation into individual but shortened nanotubes.
The chemical manipulation of carbon nanotube sidewalls via fluorination and then defluorination is well developed [48,49,87]. It can be carried out efficiently in the presence of F2 at temperatures between 150 and 400 °C [88]. The interest is that the fluorine atoms can then be substituted by alkyl groups or by amines. Fluorinated CNTs are widely used for a wide range of chemical functionalization. For example, sidewall alkylation and arynation of fluorinated SWCNTs was performed using alkyllitium species, including methyl, ethyl, butyl, hexyl, octyl and dodecyl species. Amino groups can also be attached to the sidewalls of fluorinated CNTs [89]. These materials exhibit an excellent reinforcement effect in epoxy-based systems, which results in improved properties like mechanical robustness. The chlorination and bromination are another two methods that have been used for SWCNT functionalization. Chlorine applied to the functionalization of CNTs can be liquid precursors such as thionyl chloride, chloroform, trichloromethane, tetrachloroethylene or hydrochloric acid or solid precursors such as dichlorocarbene or chlorine gas precursors [90,91,92,93]. Purified CNT samples attached 1.8 at.% of bromine after two days in saturated bromine vapors at room temperature [94,95].
The most common approach to hydrogenation is wet chemistry which includes the dispersion of a mixture of lithium and CNT in diaminoethane [96]. The protonation of reduced lithium also reduces CNT with methanol, leading to the formation of hydrogenated SWCNTs [97]. As a result, the covalently bonded CH derivatives are formed. High-boiling polyomides were also used as the hydrogenation reagent for CNTs [98]. At room temperature, it has been demonstrated that hydrogenated SWNTs with covalent C-H bonds constitute a stable hydrogen storage vehicle [99,100,101].
CNTs functionalized with fluorescein or a fluorescent bioactive peptide can also effectively cross the cell membrane without significant damage of the membrane [102,103]. For therapeutic biomolecules, such as proteins, peptides, deoxyribonucleic acid (DNA) and siRNA, covalent functionalization has been widely reported [104]. For example, CNTs were used to deliver streptavidin into the cell [105]. It has been demonstrated that SWNTs may be covalently functionalized to peptide nucleic acid (PNA), an analog of uncharged DNA, and then hybridized to molecular wires containing complementary DNA [106]. There have been several reports of bovine serum albumin protein molecules adhering to f-MWCNTs in an aqueous buffer solution [107]. CNTs can introduce a DNA molecule into the cell nucleus which opens an opportunity to use CNTs in gen-delivery [108]. CNT, after covalent functionalization, can be used to carry peptide antigens [109]. Recently, the translocation of the RNA into breast cancer cells using non-functionalized SWCNTs has also been reported [110].
In general, the covalently functionalized CNTs are soluble in many organic solvents due to the attachment of polar or nonpolar groups. The main difficulty in developing covalent functionalization arises from sp2 to sp3 hybridization. This consequently leads to changes in mechanical, optical and electrical properties. On the other hand, the covalently functionalized CNTs open the road to many applications, which require the change in optical and electrical properties [111,112].

3.2. Non-Covalent Modification

The first commonly used non-covalent functionalization is surfactant based. These types of molecules result in the dispersion of the CNTs via physical adsorption. Both ionic and non-ionic surfactants have been used. The known surface charge of CNTs can be used to predict the colloidal stability of CNT solutions and the interaction (adsorption) mechanism with ionic surfactants. A larger negative surface charge and steric repulsion, for instance, are produced when CNTs and SDS interact through hydrophobic components, which increases the stability of the dispersion. Therefore, the purification procedure and tube wall functionalization, which influences its surface charge, may be used to regulate the adsorption mechanism of ionic surfactants [113]. While the polar portion of surfactants interacts with solvent molecules, the hydrophobic (nonpolar) portion is often oriented toward the surface of CNTs. The most popular surfactant for the dispersion of CNTs in aqueous media are sodium dodecyl sulphate (SDS), sodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate (SDBS), cetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide, Tween, Triton X and a siloxane polyether copolymer [114,115,116,117,118,119,120]. One of the important parameters for the dispersion of CNTs is CNT to surfactant concentration. For example, a homogeneous dispersion of CNTs was found at the optimum composition of 0.5 wt% CNT and 2 wt% SDS relative to water. Ref. [121] found that the surfactant dispersing power follows the order of SDS < Tween 20 < Tween 80 < TX-100. Meanwhile, it was shown that SDBS exhibited superior capability compared to TX100 and SDS in terms of its capacity to disperse SWCNTs [20]. However, it was reported that the dispersion of MWCNTs in three surfactants followed the order of SDS < CTAB < TX100 [122]. While surfactants are often necessary to utilize individualized SWCNTs in the dispersion, improved surfactant-removing protocols are needed to recover the initial SWCNT properties to ensure optimal performance. The washing with organic solvents [123,124], acidic oxidation [123] and annealing in inert [123] or oxygen atmospheres are used for this purpose [125].
Through π-π interfaces, aromatic compounds like anthracene, phenanthrene, pentacene, porphyrin, pyrene and fullerene interact with one another. Under mild sonication, the strong bonding of functional molecules and large systems allows for debundling and produces hydrophilicity. A CNT@Pyrene hybrid was developed, aimed at improvement heat transport due to the anion addition [126]. The Biotin−streptavidin recognition method is described in [127]. This complex showed stability at 18 days and an excellent loading capacity (about 1 streptavidin tetramer per 20 nm of SWNT). The anthracene groups were covalently added to the hydroxylated CNTs to aid in the orientation of the laccase active sites for direct electron transfer between enzymes and electrodes [128]. The excellent electrochemical catalytic property and stability of the SWCNTs functionalized with ferrocene was reported by Yang et al. [129]. Huang et al. have used ferrocene for the non-covalent functionalization of SWCNTs for L-glutamate detection [130].
The interaction of polymers with the CNT surface via wrapping was used to improve the dispersion of CNT in water and organic solvent and to further enable the separation of CNTs by metallicity and chirality and the separation of CNTs from carbonaceous and metal impurities [131,132,133]. The polyvinyl pyrrolidone, polyvinylidene fluoride, polystyrene sulfonate, cellulose derivatives, polypyrroles, glycolipids and redox polymers was successfully used for CNT dispersion [134].
Dispersions of MWCNT with the pluronic surfactant F-127 were made with the intention of examining the interactions of CNT with biological tissues [135]. A water soluble globular protein called bovine serum albumin adheres to the surface of CNTs and improves dispersibility [136]. Similar results were shown for MWNT−PEG composites [94]. It was concluded that functionalizing CNT with PEG enhanced the dispersion of the CNTs and increased their heat capacities [137,138,139]. To act as a shRNA delivery vehicle, a modified branched polyethylenimine was grafted to carboxylated single-walled carbon nanotubes (SWCNT) using a polyethylene glycol (PEG) linker [140]. CNTs functionalized with DNA were shown to have enhanced stability when used in different applications [141,142,143,144,145]. Similar to proteins, DNA form tight helices around CNTs, or non-covalent conjugates. DNA-functionalized CNTs were more effective than plain MWCNTs against malignant tissues [145]. Despite the popularity of research on SWCNT-DNA conjugates, only a small number of works have studied the removal of adsorbed DNA on SWCNTs using biological, physical and chemical treatments [103]. Numerous biological and pharmacological uses of chitosan, including drug delivery, cancer treatment and biosensors, have been researched [146,147,148]. Chitosan could effectively disperse the SWCNTs and provide a suitable biological interface for the immobilization of biomolecules [149]. The functionalized CNTs complexed siRNA and demonstrated 10–30% silencing activity and 10–60% cytotoxicity [150]. siRNA delivery using CNTs were successfully utilized [151].
Finally, we would like to discuss the mechanical interlocking of SWCNT as a possible route for non-covalent functionalization. In particular, in [152], the macrocycle precursors that were terminated with bisalkenes and wrapped around the NT by ring-closing metathesis were furnished with two-extended tetrathiafulvalene SWNT recognition units.

3.3. Substitution of Atoms in CNTs

Nitrogen has one more electron than C, which it can easily substitute for C atoms. There are two types of C–N bonds that occur: pyridine-type in which each N atom is bonded to two carbon atoms and a type in which the N atom is bonded to three carbon atoms. The first type results in either a p- or n-type doping depending on the concentration of N atoms; meanwhile, the second type leads to n-type conducting behavior. In situ doping techniques include high temperature arc-discharge [153,154], chemical vapor deposition (CVD) [155,156,157,158], chemically solvothermal procedures [159] and laser ablation methods [160,161]. Also, n-type doping can be archived by various post-treatment methods [162,163]. The post-thermal treating of oxidized CNTs with ammonia was performed [164]. Doping of isolated SWNTs with nitrogen was achieved by mixing appropriate amounts of acetonitrile with xylene. The 2–6 at.% of nitrogen in the SWNTs was observed in a controllable manner [165].
The halogens, such as fluorine, chloride and bromide, can also be attached to the sidewall of CNTs. As mentioned in Section 1, fluorination can effectively be used for further covalent functionalization. The fluorination of CNTs, the formation of so-called fluorotubes, is usually performed by temperature treatment in a molecular fluorine environment at 150–600 °C. The precise temperature control results in the control of the activity of the substitution, and therefore, in the degree of the fluorination. The heavily doped CNTs were produced and showed increased solubility in alcohols [166]. The comparison between graphene and CNT fluorination suggested that the curvature resulted in a weakening of the C−F bonding covalence [167]. By diluting fluorine with nitrogen at a ratio of 4:1 and treating SWCNTs with such a mixture at 250 °C for 10 h, the tubes were fluorinized with the stoichiometry of CF0.43. The heating resulted NTs under He with temperatures ranging from 100 to 400 °C desorbed the fluorine [168]. Hydrazine defunctionalizes fluorinated nanotubes, allowing for the recovery of intact CNTs after treatment. Interestingly, fluorinated single-walled nanotubes were highly insulating. The fluorination has been studied using various synthesis parameters [169,170].
The commonly used alternative method for CNT functionalization via substitution is chlorination. Usually, the source of chlorine comes from liquid precursors such as thionyl chloride, chloroform, trichloromethane, tetrachloroethylene or hydrochloric acid or solids such as dichlorocarbene or gaseous precursors such as Cl2. The removal of metal catalysts and amorphous carbon residues from CNT has been reported to be accomplished using Cl2 gas and Cl2 aqueous solution treatments. Simultaneously, this protocol introduces chlorine but with a relatively low amount [171]. The chlorine substitution with the concentration of 2.5 atom % on SWCNTs was shown by using electrochemical functionalization in a HCl and KCl aqueous solution [172]. A similar concentration (up to 2.9 atom %) of chlorine was introduced through treatment with SOCl2 under a high temperature and pressure with prolonged reaction times of up to 14 days [173]. Recently, carbon tetrachloride cold plasma was shown to produce chlorinated CNTs [174]. Chlorine is fixed to the nanotube’s edges and flaws as a result of the operation.
A method of purification for CNT polluted by carbon impurities was used because of the low sensitivity of CNTs to bromination. However, the C−Br bond is more reactive than the comparable iodinated fluoro- or chloro-derivatives. The bromination of CNTs required relatively difficult to achieve conditions as compared to other carbon nanostructures. With bromine in the liquid, gas or plasma phases, it can only be done by electrochemical, electrothermal or microwave processes at a higher temperature. Despite the improvement that has been shown, bromination causes a small amount of CNT degradation and fragmentation [175]. Bromine-containing SWCNTs were demonstrated to have metallic properties [176]. In [177], the CNTs were combined with liquid bromine for 10 days at 55 °C and then repeatedly washed with CCl4, carbon tetrachloride. The perpendicular arrangement of bromine atoms in relation to the CNT surface was readily seen using TEM. Br atom conjugation was made possible in the graphite structure of CNTs (2.8 % weight) by electrochemical oxidation of inorganic salts such as KBr [178]. Additionally, CNTs that had already been treated in aqueous solution were brominated using microwaves. A high Br atom concentration of 5–8 percent by weight was archived [179]. Elemental bromine and a group of Lewis acids (BBr3, BF3-Et2O, AlBr3, FeBr3, ZnBr2, etc.) may also be used to chemically brominate CNT, producing materials with 10–20% wt Br content. According to Bulusheva, the suction of CNT in liquid Br yields the C17Br stoichiometry. The covalent bromination process with a total weight of 4.9% in CCl4 solution at microwave irradiation and a cool CH3Br plasma were described in [180]. N-bromosuccinimide, NH4NO3/NBS and Br2 were used in an electrophilic addition and radical reaction with UV light or conventional heating to archive the effective bromination [181]. In comparison to other methods, this one was proven to be the most mild, delicate, ecologically friendly and quick. The effective bromine doping of single-walled carbon nanotube films under ultrasound was recently published [182].
The literature has covered a lot of various substitution methods, including the substitution by I, S, Si, Se, P-N and Ar. Another technique for changing the graphitic structure of CNTs is iodination. First, a modified Hunsdiecker reaction was used to carry it out [183]. It was found that Cl, Br and I easily produced halogenated CNTs at high temperatures and pressures. The CNTs have also been doped with iodine atoms using the straightforward solvent thermal reaction process [24] and their characteristics have been examined [184,185]. In order to illustrate the replacement of impurities in both materials, mono- and divacancies were produced in graphene and SWCNTs using the Ar plasma treatment [186]. Using STEM and other techniques, the Ar ions were plainly visible on the surface of CNTs.

4. Applications

The functionalized CNTs have been used in numerous applications. Here, we focus on some in which functionalization is the key to achieve a certain application. In particular, surfactant, used for functionalization, helped to sort SWCNTs by chirality and electronic types. First of all, the complete separation can be achieved if SWCNTs are present in the suspension as individual nanotubes. Secondly, the micelles created by the surfactant help to control the density and therefore, are useful in density gradient centrifugation (DGC), chromatography and two-phase separation. In [187], it was shown that the equal concentrations of surfactant, SDS and SC, results in distinct metal–semiconductor separation using DGC. Later work performed by Antaris et al. showed that metallic and semiconducting nanotubes can be sorted separately using X-shaped block copolymer Tetronic 1107 and the linear block copolymer Pluronic F68, respectively [188]. The non-ionic, biocompatible block copolymers can be used to isolate semiconducting and metallic SWNTs using density gradient ultracentrifugation. Pluronics with shorter hydrophobic chain lengths (Figure 8, top nanotubes) lead to a higher purity semiconducting SWNT layer formation in the centrifuge tube, while X-shaped Tetronic block copolymers (Figure 8, middle nanotubes) display an affinity for metallic SWNTs. This observation is proven by absorption spectroscopy measurement spectra consisting of unique absorption features associated with semiconducting and metallic SWNTs (Figure 8, right). The SWCNTs dispersed in a combination of surfactant such as SDS, DOC and SC separated them not only by the diameters, but also by chirality in the two-phase separation technique [189]. In addition, spontaneously aligned SWCNTs prepared by vacuum filtration have to be highly dispersed to prevent the formation of aligned bundle monodomains. In particular, SWCNTs functionalized by m-polyaminobenzene sulfonic acid was used and showed good dispersion in water and therefore, high order alignment was archived [190].
CNTs have further been utilized as a polymer matrix filler material. In the polymer matrix, the functionalized CNTs produce improved homogeneity and dispersion. It was demonstrated that interactions between CNTs and a polymer matrix are necessary for efficient CNT integration [191,192]. The colloidal behavior of the different functionalized CNTs, including carboxylated, octadecyl amide-functionalized and hydroxylated CNTs, was investigated in [193]. While −COOH and −OH are strongly polar, CNT-ODA is extremely stable in mixed polar−nonpolar solvents because of the amide groups (−CO-NH-) and nonpolar octadecyl groups (−C18H37). According to Figure 9 the CNT-COOH dispersion was extremely steady throughout the course of six hours. The dispersed amine-functionalized CNTs were analyzed by SEM after being mixed with the resin matrix. On the resin’s surface, there were some CNTs that weren’t functionalized, which shows how vital functional groups are for dispersion in epoxy resin [194]. Different sets of functionalization groups and polymers made using different processes were examined in the collection of papers published by Mallakpour et al. [195]. For instance, using a microwave-assisted technique, carboxylated MWCNT was covalently functionalized with 5-aminoisophthalic acid, increasing its solubility and dispersibility. In a different study, they revealed that S-valine amino acid was covalently attached to carboxylated MWCNTs via an amide bond and successfully dispersed in different aromatic polymers.
In electrochemical energy storage technologies, such as lithium-ion batteries, supercapacitors, solar cells and fuel cells, functionalized CNTs have been thoroughly researched. Low-density CNTs demonstrate outstanding high-rate capabilities and cycle performance, according to tests on composite LiCoO2. For instance, SnO2-functionalized CNT derived from CNT functionalized with sulfonic acid was employed in lithium-ion battery anodes without the usage of a binder, conductive agent or current collector [196,197]. In this study, the SnO2@CNTF’s lithium storage capacity was determined using galvanostatic charge/discharge under the circumstances of a 100, 200, 500 and 1000 mA/g rate (Figure 10a,b). The SnO2 particles created in this experiment have superior rate capability and cycle stability compared to pure silicon particles [196].
As materials for electrodes, CNTs have been extensively studied. Various organic and inorganic compounds have been successfully coated on CNTs to enhance the electrode performance. When functionalizing CNT electrodes for the detection of glucose, urea and bisphenol A, noble metals like gold and silver nanoparticles have been utilized [198,199,200]. Numerous studies have been conducted on the enzyme sensors based on the electrodes of CNTs functionalized with nanomaterials including gold, platinum and graphene [201,202,203]. It was stated that an electrode for the detection of dopamine and uric acid has been developed using a combination of graphene foam, CNTs and gold nanoparticles [204]. pn junctions are produced for some applications by partially doping the CNT sheet [205]. While the p-type film is doped with benzylviologen, the n-type area is created by doping the as-grown material.
SWCNTs have been extensively explored for gas sensing applications because of their distinctive electrical characteristics. In order to preserve the increased contact with the detectable molecules caused by the enhanced surface interaction, it is crucial to solubilize and isolate CNTs for this purpose. Many research studies have functionalized the surface of SWNTS with different sensing materials in order to further improve the sensing performance, including the sensitivity and specificity (e.g., metallic nanoparticles, macromolecules, polymeric materials and bioreceptors, etc.). Different concentrations of butanone and 3-octanone were found using the electrochemical sensor in the N2 matrix [206]. As can be seen, a steady reduction in the anodic peak current (Ip) was detected with a negative shift in potential as the concentration of butanone increased (Figure 11a,b). Additionally, the MWNTs/Au-Ag/GCE electrochemical test method enables the detection of volatile biomarkers linked to stomach cancer cells. At a normal temperature, functionalized CNT exhibits a superior sensing performance to virgin samples and a strong sensitivity toward several chemicals, including benzene [207]. The detection of environmental air pollutants is one of the prominent directions where carbon nanotubes have been extensively applied [208].
Additionally, the functionality can lower the toxicity and improve the biocapability. Reduced blood circulation time, reticuloendothelial system uptake and other effects are caused by PEGylated CNTs [209]. It was also demonstrated that PEGylation did not impede SWCNT absorption into cells when the PEG chain’s molecular weight was less than 2000. The biological biocompatibility of PEG grafted to lipidophilic polymers is superior [210]. Oligothiophene-terminated PEG was used to effectively disperse CNTs in aqueous solution [210]. Particularly, the investigation focused on the important organs of mice injected intravenously with PEG-SWCNTs or non-PEG-SWCNTs. Following injection with oxidized SWCNTs, the lung tissue of control mice is shown in Figure 11a. There are concentrations of black, particulate particles that are probably not PEG-SWCNTs embedded in the lung parenchyma. In Figure 11b, black granular concretions can be seen in the lung tissue of mice that received injections of PEG-SWCNTs, however they seem to be smaller and fewer in number. Additionally, mononuclear reactive cells that are almost certainly macrophages surround these clumps [211].
The encapsulation of materials in CNTs has attracted interest. Metals and compounds have been placed into CNTs and can be manipulated using magnetic fields to target cells [212]. Furthermore, the endohedral functionalization can be used in targeted drug delivery and biomedical imaging [212,213]. SWCNTs filled with DNA and anticancer drugs such as hexamethylmelamine, irinotecan, indole and cisplatin were effectively used for targeted and efficient drug delivery. The release of drugs at the target can be triggered by electric stimulation, the pH of the medium or temperature. Magnetic resonance imaging used CNT encapsulated with magnetic atoms in a contrast agent such as gadolinium (III) salts, iron oxide or nitroxide radicals. Liquid chromatography mass spectrometry analysis was used to determine the composition of the phospholipids that were adsorbed on the SWCNTs. Phosphatidylcholines (PC) and phosphatidylglycerols, the two most prevalent forms of surfactant phospholipids, were discovered to be preferentially adsorbed by SWCNTs [214].
High water transport rates, supported by functionalized carbon nanotube pores, closely resemble the structure of aquaporin channels, making them excellent candidates for the creation of artificial water channels and high-performance membranes [215,216,217]. Functionalized CNTs were also proposed for the adsorption and removal of contaminants. These functional groups affect the adsorption capability of CNTs by making CNTs more hydrophilic for efficient adsorption. In particular, CNT membrane—filters were investigated due to the known high mechanical robustness and high porosity. Recently, various chemical modification methods were used for CNTs (fluorination, cycloaddition, reaction with diazonium salt, oxidation and radical polymerization) to enhance the CNT’s solubility and reactivity to water remediation [218]. A variety of MWCNT-modified electrospun membranes were developed to immobilize enzymes. CNTs have also received significant attention in fuel cell treatment [197].

5. Conclusions

The chemistry of carbon nanotubes represents a serious topic in science and technology. Modification of the outer surface is performed by covalent attachment of functional groups. Here, it is considered with transmission electron microscopy, scanning tunnelling microscopy, Raman spectroscopy and X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy. Modification of the outer surface of carbon nanotubes by the wrapping and adsorption of molecules is an important technique. The substitution of atoms into carbon nanotubes via other atoms is a way to tailor the physical properties of nanotubes. The filling of carbon nanotubes opens up a way to study the chemistry and physics of carbon nanotubes. The demonstrated applications of functionalized CNTs are presented.

Author Contributions

M.G.B. and M.V.K.: writing—original draft preparation, writing and editing. M.P.: writing—editing. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

M.G.B. and M.I.P. acknowledge the Russian Science Foundation project No. 21-79-10097 and Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation No. FSMG-2021-0005. M.G.B. acknowledges the funding for postdoctoral researchers with experience in international work leading research centers to conduct research in leading laboratories at the Moscow Institute of Physics and Technology. These studies were partly performed during the implementation of the project Building-up Centre for the advanced materials application of the Slovak Academy of Sciences, ITMS project code 313021T081 supported by the Research & Innovation Operational Programme, funded by the ERDF.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

All authors would like to acknowledge C. Kramberger for editing.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript:
CNTCarbon nanotube
CTABCetyltrimethyl ammonium bromide
CVDChemical vapor deposition
DGCDensity gradient centrifugation
DGUDensity gradient ultracentrifugation
DNADeoxyribonucleic acid
DOCSodium deoxycholate
EELSElectron energy loss spectroscopy
F-SWCNTFluorinated single-walled carbon nanotube
FTIRFourier-transformed infrared spectra
GCEGlassy carbon electrode
MWCNTMulti-walled carbon nanotube
NPNanoparticles
PNAPeptide nucleic acid
SCSodium cholate
SDBSSodium dodecyl benzene sulfonate
SDSSodium dodecyl sulphate
siRNASmall interfering ribonucleic acid
STEMScanning transmission electron microscopy
STMScanning tunnelling microscopy
SWCNTSingle-walled carbon nanotube
TEMTransmission electron microscopy
TXTriton X
UVUltraviolet
XPSX-ray photoelectron spectra

References

  1. Kharlamova, M.V. Electronic Properties of Pristine and Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Phys.-Uspekhi 2013, 56, 1047–1073. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Kharlamova, M.V. Advances in Tailoring the Electronic Properties of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2016, 77, 125–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Burdanova, M.G.; Liu, M.; Staniforth, M.; Zheng, Y.; Xiang, R.; Chiashi, S.; Anisimov, A.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Maruyama, S.; Lloyd-Hughes, J. Intertube Excitonic Coupling in Nanotube Van Der Waals Heterostructures. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2022, 32, 2104969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Kashtiban, R.J.; Burdanova, M.G.; Vasylenko, A.; Wynn, J.; Medeiros, P.V.C.; Ramasse, Q.; Morris, A.J.; Quigley, D.; Lloyd-Hughes, J.; Sloan, J. Linear and Helical Cesium Iodide Atomic Chains in Ultranarrow Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Impact on Optical Properties. ACS Nano 2021, 15, 13389–13398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Burdanova, M.G.; Tsapenko, A.P.; Kharlamova, M.V.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Gorshunov, B.P.; Kono, J.; Lloyd-Hughes, J. A Review of the Terahertz Conductivity and Photoconductivity of Carbon Nanotubes and Heteronanotubes. Adv. Opt. Mater. 2021, 9, 2101042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Jouni, M.; Fedorko, P.; Celle, C.; Djurado, D.; Chenevier, P.; Faure-Vincent, J. Conductivity vs Functionalization in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Films. SN Appl. Sci. 2022, 4, 132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Kharlamova, M.V.; Kramberger, C. Applications of Filled Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes: Progress, Challenges, and Perspectives. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Burdanova, M.G.; Katyba, G.M.; Kashtiban, R.; Komandin, G.A.; Butler-Caddle, E.; Staniforth, M.; Mkrtchyan, A.A.; Krasnikov, D.V.; Gladush, Y.G.; Sloan, J.; et al. Ultrafast, High Modulation Depth Terahertz Modulators Based on Carbon Nanotube Thin Films. Carbon 2021, 173, 245–252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Burdanova, M.G.; Tsapenko, A.P.; Satco, D.A.; Kashtiban, R.; Mosley, C.D.W.; Monti, M.; Staniforth, M.; Sloan, J.; Gladush, Y.G.; Nasibulin, A.G.; et al. Giant Negative Terahertz Photoconductivity in Controllably Doped Carbon Nanotube Networks. ACS Photonics 2019, 6, 1058–1066. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Gladush, Y.; Mkrtchyan, A.A.; Kopylova, D.S.; Ivanenko, A.; Nyushkov, B.; Kobtsev, S.; Kokhanovskiy, A.; Khegai, A.; Melkumov, M.; Burdanova, M.; et al. Ionic Liquid Gated Carbon Nanotube Saturable Absorber for Switchable Pulse Generation. Nano Lett. 2019, 19, 5836–5843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Thostenson, E.T.; Ren, Z.; Chou, T.W. Advances in the Science and Technology of Carbon Nanotubes and Their Composites: A Review. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2001, 61, 1899–1912. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Cui, J.; Burghard, M.; Kern, K. Reversible Sidewall Osmylation of Individual Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 613–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Paloniemi, H.; Ääritalo, T.; Laiho, T.; Liuke, H.; Kocharova, N.; Haapakka, K.; Terzi, F.; Seeber, R.; Lukkari, J. Water-Soluble Full-Length Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Polyelectrolytes: Preparation and Characterization. J. Phys. Chem. B 2005, 109, 8634–8642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Nakashima, N.; Tomonari, Y.; Murakami, H. Water-Soluble Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes via Noncovalent Sidewall-Functionalization with a Pyrene-Carrying Ammonium Ion. Chem. Lett. 2002, 31, 638–639. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Guldi, D.M.; Rahman, G.M.A.; Jux, N.; Balbinot, D.; Hartnagel, U.; Tagmatarchis, N.; Prato, M. Functional Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Nanohybrids-Associating SWNTs with Water-Soluble Enzyme Model Systems. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 9830–9838. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Kitaygorodskiy, A.; Wang, W.; Xie, S.Y.; Lin, Y.; Shiral Fernando, K.A.; Wang, X.; Qu, L.; Chen, B.; Sun, Y.P. NMR Detection of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Solution. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 7517–7520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Katz, E.; Willner, I. Biomolecule-Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: Applications in Nanobioelectronics. Chemphyschem 2004, 5, 1084–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Moore, V.C.; Strano, M.S.; Haroz, E.H.; Hauge, R.H.; Smalley, R.E.; Schmidt, J.; Talmon, Y. Individually Suspended Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Various Surfactants. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 1379–1382. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Matarredona, O.; Rhoads, H.; Li, Z.; Harwell, J.H.; Balzano, L.; Resasco, D.E. Dispersion of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Aqueous Solutions of the Anionic Surfactant NaDDBS. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 13357–13367. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Islam, M.F.; Rojas, E.; Bergey, D.M.; Johnson, A.T.; Yodh, A.G. High Weight Fraction Surfactant Solubilization of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Water. Nano Lett. 2003, 3, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Tasis, D.; Tagmatarchis, N.; Bianco, A.; Prato, M. Chemistry of Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Rev. 2006, 106, 1105–1136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  22. Monthioux, M.; Flahaut, E.; Cleuziou, J.P. Hybrid Carbon Nanotubes: Strategy, Progress, and Perspectives. J. Mater. Res. 2006, 21, 2774–2793. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Balasubramanian, K.; Burghard, M. Chemically Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. Small 2005, 1, 180–192. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bahr, J.L.; Tour, J.M. Covalent Chemistry of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Mater. Chem. 2002, 12, 1952–1958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Banerjee, S.; Kahn, M.G.C.; Wong, S.S. Rational Chemical Strategies for Carbon Nanotube Functionalization. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2003, 9, 1898–1908. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Banerjee, S.; Hemraj-Benny, T.; Wong, S.S. Covalent Surface Chemistry of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Adv. Mater. 2005, 17, 17–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Controlled Synthesis and Modification of Carbon Nanotubes and C60: Carbon Nanostructures for Advanced Polymeric Composite Materials-Dai-2001-Advanced Materials-Wiley Online Library. Available online: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/1521-4095%28200107%2913%3A12/13%3C899%3A%3AAID-ADMA899%3E3.0.CO%3B2-G (accessed on 24 July 2022).
  28. Davis, J.J.; Coleman, K.S.; Azamian, B.R.; Bagshaw, C.B.; Green, M.L.H. Chemical and Biochemical Sensing with Modified Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2003, 9, 3732–3739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. De La Torre, G.; Blau, W.; Torres, T. A Survey on the Functionalization of Single-Walled Nanotubes. The Chemical of Phthalocyanine Moieties. Nanotechnology 2003, 14, 765. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Dyke, C.A.; Tour, J.M. Solvent-Free Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 1156–1157. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Dyke, C.A.; Tour, J.M. Overcoming the Insolubility of Carbon Nanotubes Through High Degrees of Sidewall Functionalization. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2004, 10, 812–817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Fischer, J.E. Chemical Doping of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1079–1086. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  33. Muñoz-Écija, T.; Vargas-Quesada, B.; Chinchilla-Rodríguez, Z. Identification and Visualization of the Intellectual Structure and the Main Research Lines in Nanoscience and Nanotechnology at the Worldwide Level. J. Nanoparticle Res. 2017, 19, 62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  34. Hilding, J.; Grulke, E.A.; Zhang, Z.G.; Lockwood, F. Dispersion of Carbon Nanotubes in Liquids. J. Dispers. Sci. Technol. 2007, 24, 1–41. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Atzrodt, J.; Derdau, V.; Kerr, W.; Reid, M. Applications of Hydrogen Isotopes in the Life Sciences. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2017, 23, 627–628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Hirsch, A.; Vostrowsky, O. Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. Top. Curr. Chem. 2005, 245, 193–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Lu, X.; Chen, Z. Curved Pi-Conjugation, Aromaticity, and the Related Chemistry of Small Fullerenes (<C60) and Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Rev. 2005, 105, 3643–3696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Niyogi, S.; Hamon, M.A.; Hu, H.; Zhao, B.; Bhowmik, P.; Sen, R.; Itkis, M.E.; Haddon, R.C. Chemistry of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1105–1113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  39. Lukzen, N.N.; Ivanov, K.L.; Morozov, V.A.; Sagdeev, R.Z.; Kattnig, D.; Grampp, G. Chemical Polarization of Electrons of Spin-Correlated Radical Ion Pairs in Nanotubes. Dokl. Phys. Chem. 2006, 409, 233–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Sinnott, S.B. Chemical Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes. J. Nanosci. Nanotechnol. 2002, 2, 113–123. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Sun, Y.P.; Fu, K.; Lin, Y.; Huang, W. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: Properties and Applications. Acc. Chem. Res. 2002, 35, 1096–1104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Tasis, D.; Tagmatarchis, N.; Georgakilas, V.; Prato, M. Soluble Carbon Nanotubes. Chem.–A Eur. J. 2003, 9, 4000–4008. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  43. Terrones, M. Science and Technology of the Twenty-First Century: Synthesis, Properties, and Applications of Carbon Nanotubes. Annu. Rev. Mater. Res. 2003, 33, 419–501. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Mickelson, E.T.; Huffman, C.B.; Rinzler, A.G.; Smalley, R.E.; Hauge, R.H.; Margrave, J.L. Fluorination of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1998, 296, 188–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Plank, N. Functionalisation of Carbon Nanotubes for Molecular Electronics. Microelectron. Eng. 2004, 73–74, 578–582. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  46. Kelly, K.F.; Chiang, I.W.; Mickelson, E.T.; Hauge, R.H.; Margrave, J.L.; Wang, X.; Scuseria, G.E.; Radloff, C.; Halas, N.J. Insight into the Mechanism of Sidewall Functionalization of Single-Walled Nanotubes: An STM Study. Chem. Phys. Lett. 1999, 313, 445–450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. An, K.H.; Heo, J.G.; Jeon, K.G.; Bae, D.J.; Jo, C.; Yang, C.W.; Park, C.Y.; Lee, Y.H.; Lee, Y.S.; Chung, Y.S. X-ray Photoemission Spectroscopy Study of Fluorinated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2002, 80, 4235. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  48. Lee, Y.S.; Cho, T.H.; Lee, B.K.; Rho, J.S.; An, K.H.; Lee, Y.H. Surface Properties of Fluorinated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Fluor. Chem. 2003, 120, 99–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Plank, N.O.V.; Jiang, L.; Cheung, R. Fluorination of Carbon Nanotubes in CF4 Plasma. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2003, 83, 2426. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Esumi, K.; Ishigami, M.; Nakajima, A.; Sawada, K.; Honda, H. Chemical Treatment of Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 1996, 34, 279–281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Yu, R.; Chen, L.; Liu, Q.; Lin, J.; Tan, K.L.; Ng, S.C.; Chan, H.S.O.; Xu, G.Q.; Hor, T.S.A. Platinum Deposition on Carbon Nanotubes via Chemical Modification. Chem. Mater. 1998, 10, 718–722. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Wang, Z.; Shirley, M.D.; Meikle, S.T.; Whitby, R.L.D.; Mikhalovsky, S.V. The Surface Acidity of Acid Oxidised Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and the Influence of in-Situ Generated Fulvic Acids on Their Stability in Aqueous Dispersions. Carbon 2009, 47, 73–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Datsyuk, V.; Kalyva, M.; Papagelis, K.; Parthenios, J.; Tasis, D.; Siokou, A.; Kallitsis, I.; Galiotis, C. Chemical Oxidation of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 2008, 46, 833–840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Lu, C.; Chiu, H. Chemical Modification of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes for Sorption of Zn2+ from Aqueous Solution. Chem. Eng. J. 2008, 139, 462–468. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Hernadi, K.; Siska, A.; Thiên-Nga, L.; Forró, L.; Kiricsi, I. Reactivity of Different Kinds of Carbon during Oxidative Purification of Catalytically Prepared Carbon Nanotubes. Solid State Ion. 2001, 141, 203–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Zhang, N.; Xie, J.; Varadan, V.K. Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes by Potassium Permanganate Assisted with Phase Transfer Catalyst. Smart Mater. Struct. 2002, 11, 962–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Lu, C.; Liu, C.; Rao, G.P. Comparisons of Sorbent Cost for the Removal of Ni2+ from Aqueous Solution by Carbon Nanotubes and Granular Activated Carbon. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 151, 239–246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  58. Huang, J.Q.; Zhang, Q.; Zhao, M.Q.; Wei, F. The Release of Free Standing Vertically-Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays from a Substrate Using CO2 Oxidation. Carbon 2010, 5, 1441–1450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Lu, M.; Lu, M.; He, Q.; Li, Y.; Xu, C.; Ji, K.; Dai, Z. Influence of Carbon Dioxide Plasma Treatment on the Dry Adhesion of Vertical Aligned Carbon Nanotube Arrays. Nanotechnology 2020, 31, 345701. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Ran, M.; Sun, W.; Liu, Y.; Chu, W.; Jiang, C. Functionalization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Using Water-Assisted Chemical Vapor Deposition. J. Solid State Chem. 2013, 197, 517–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Ajayan, P.M.; Ebbesen, T.W.; Ichihashi, T.; Iijima, S.; Tanigaki, K.; Hiura, H. Opening Carbon Nanotubes with Oxygen and Implications for Filling. Nature 1993, 362, 522–525. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Wang, X.; Ouyang, C.; Dou, S.; Liu, D.; Wang, S. Oxidized Carbon Nanotubes as an Efficient Metal-Free Electrocatalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 41901–41904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Ye, B.; Kim, S.I.; Lee, M.; Ezazi, M.; Kim, H.D.; Kwon, G.; Lee, D.H. Synthesis of Oxygen Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes and Their Application for Selective Catalytic Reduction of NOx with NH3. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 16700–16708. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  64. Morales-Lara, F.; Pérez-Mendoza, M.J.; Altmajer-Vaz, D.; García-Román, M.; Melguizo, M.; López-Garzón, F.J.; Domingo-García, M. Functionalization of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes by Ozone at Basic PH. Comparison with Oxygen Plasma and Ozone in Gas Phase. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 11647–11655. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  65. Peng, K.; Liu, L.Q.; Li, H.; Meyer, H.; Zhang, Z. Room Temperature Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes Using an Ozone/Water Vapor Mixture. Carbon 2011, 1, 70–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  66. Simmons, J.M.; Nichols, B.M.; Baker, S.E.; Marcus, M.S.; Castellini, O.M.; Lee, C.S.; Hamers, R.J.; Eriksson, M.A. Effect of Ozone Oxidation on Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 7113–7118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  67. Ng, C.M.; Manickam, S. Improved Functionalization and Recovery of Carboxylated Carbon Nanotubes Using the Acoustic Cavitation Approach. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2013, 557, 97–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  68. Martín, O.; Gutierrez, H.R.; Maroto-Valiente, A.; Terrones, M.; Blanco, T.; Baselga, J. An Efficient Method for the Carboxylation of Few-Wall Carbon Nanotubes with Little Damage to Their Sidewalls. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2013, 140, 499–507. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  69. Grujicic, M.; Cao, G.; Rao, A.M.; Tritt, T.M.; Nayak, S. UV-Light Enhanced Oxidation of Carbon Nanotubes. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2003, 214, 289–303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Dutta, D.; Dubey, R.; Yadav, J.; Shami, T.C.; Rao, K.U.B.; Dutta, D.; Dubey, R.; Yadav, J.; Shami, T.C.; Rao, K.U.B. Preparation of Spongy Microspheres Consisting of Functionalized Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes. New Carbon Mater. 2011, 26, 98–102. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  71. Zhou, W.; Ooi, Y.H.; Russo, R.; Papanek, P.; Luzzi, D.E.; Fischer, J.E.; Bronikowski, M.J.; Willis, P.A.; Smalley, R.E. Structural Characterization and Diameter-Dependent Oxidative Stability of Single Wall Carbon Nanotubes Synthesized by the Catalytic Decomposition of CO. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2001, 350, 6–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  72. Singh, D.K.; Iyer, P.K.; Giri, P.K. Diameter Dependence of Oxidative Stability in Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes: Role of Defects and Effect of Vacuum Annealing. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 084313. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  73. Ye, J.; Wu, S.; Ni, K.; Tan, Z.; Xu, J.; Tao, Z.; Zhu, Y. Diameter-Sensitive Breakdown of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes upon KOH Activation. ChemPhysChem 2017, 18, 1929–1936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  74. Avilés, F.; Sierra-Chi, C.A.; Nistal, A.; May-Pat, A.; Rubio, F.; Rubio, J. Influence of Silane Concentration on the Silanization of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 2013, 57, 520–529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  75. Ma, P.C.; Kim, J.K.; Tang, B.Z. Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes Using a Silane Coupling Agent. Carbon 2006, 44, 3232–3238. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  76. Yaghoubi, A.; Alavi Nikje, M.M. Silanization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and the Study of Its Effects on the Properties of Polyurethane Rigid Foam Nanocomposites. Compos. Part A Appl. Sci. Manuf. 2018, 109, 338–344. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  77. Hamon, M.A.; Hui, H.; Bhowmik, P.; Itkis, H.M.E.; Haddon, R.C. Ester-Functionalized Soluble Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Appl. Phys. A 2002, 74, 333–338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  78. Malikov, E.Y.; Muradov, M.B.; Akperov, O.H.; Eyvazova, G.M.; Puskás, R.; Madarász, D.; Nagy, L.; Kukovecz, Á.; Kónya, Z. Synthesis and Characterization of Polyvinyl Alcohol Based Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube Nanocomposites. Phys. E Low-Dimens. Syst. Nanostruct. 2014, 61, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  79. Basiuk, E.V.; Basiuk, V.A.; Bañuelos, J.G.; Saniger-Blesa, J.M.; Pokrovskiy, V.A.; Gromovoy, T.Y.; Mischanchuk, A.V.; Mischanchuk, B.G. Interaction of Oxidized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Vaporous Aliphatic Amines. J. Phys. Chem. B 2002, 106, 1588–1597. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  80. Lavorgna, M.; Romeo, V.; Martone, A.; Zarrelli, M.; Giordano, M.; Buonocore, G.G.; Qu, M.Z.; Fei, G.X.; Xia, H.S. Silanization and Silica Enrichment of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes: Synergistic Effects on the Thermal-Mechanical Properties of Epoxy Nanocomposites. Eur. Polym. J. 2013, 49, 428–438. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  81. Gammoudi, H.; Belkhiria, F.; Helali, S.; ben Assaker, I.; Gammoudi, I.; Morote, F.; Souissi, A.; Karyaoui, M.; Amlouk, M.; Cohen-Bouhacina, T.; et al. Chemically Grafted of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes onto a Functionalized Silicon Surface. J. Alloy Compd. 2017, 694, 1036–1044. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Chua, T.P.; Mariatti, M.; Azizan, A.; Rashid, A.A. Effects of Surface-Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes on the Properties of Poly(Dimethyl Siloxane) Nanocomposites. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2010, 70, 671–677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Zhou, H.; Zhang, C.; Li, H.; Du, Z. Fabrication of Silica Nanoparticles on the Surface of Functionalized Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 2011, 1, 126–132. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Valentini, L.; Macan, J.; Armentano, I.; Mengoni, F.; Kenny, J.M. Modification of Fluorinated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Aminosilane Molecules. Carbon 2006, 44, 2196–2201. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Lin, T.W.; Salzmann, C.G.; Shao, L.D.; Yu, C.H.; Green, M.L.H.; Tsang, S.C. Polyethylene Glycol Grafting and Attachment of Encapsulated Magnetic Iron Oxide Silica Nanoparticles onto Chlorosilanized Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 2009, 6, 1415–1420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Cui, J.B.; Daghlian, C.P.; Gibson, U.J. Solubility and Electrical Transport Properties of Thiolated Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Appl. Phys. 2005, 98, 044320. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  87. Lee, Y.S. Syntheses and Properties of Fluorinated Carbon Materials. J. Fluor. Chem. 2007, 128, 392–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Adamska, M.; Narkiewicz, U. Fluorination of Carbon Nanotubes—A Review. J. Fluor. Chem. 2017, 200, 179–189. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Pulikkathara, M.X.; Khabashesku, V.N. Covalent Sidewall Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Amino Acids. Russ. Chem. Bull. 2009, 57, 1054–1062. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  90. Kónya, Z.; Vesselenyi, I.; Niesz, K.; Kukovecz, A.; Demortier, A.; Fonseca, A.; Delhalle, J.; Mekhalif, Z.; Nagy, J.B.; Koós, A.A.; et al. Large Scale Production of Short Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2002, 360, 429–435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  91. Lee, W.H.; Kim, S.J.; Lee, W.J.; Lee, J.G.; Haddon, R.C.; Reucroft, P.J. X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopic Studies of Surface Modified Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Material. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2001, 181, 121–127. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  92. Duesberg, G.S.; Graupner, R.; Downes, P.; Minett, A.; Ley, L.; Roth, S.; Nicoloso, N. Hydrothermal Functionalisation of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Synth. Met. 2004, 142, 263–266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  93. Barthos, R.; Méhn, D.; Demortier, A.; Pierard, N.; Morciaux, Y.; Demortier, G.; Fonseca, A.; Nagy, J.B. Functionalization of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Using Alkyl-Halides. Carbon 2005, 43, 321–325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  94. Mazov, I.; Krasnikov, D.; Stadnichenko, A.; Kuznetsov, V.; Romanenko, A.; Anikeeva, O.; Tkachev, E. Direct Vapor-Phase Bromination of Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Nanotechnol. 2012, 2012, 954084. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  95. Bulusheva, L.G.; Okotrub, A.V.; Flahaut, E.; Asanov, I.P.; Gevko, P.N.; Koroteev, V.O.; Fedoseeva, Y.V.; Yaya, A.; Ewels, C.P. Bromination of Double-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 2012, 24, 2708–2715. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  96. Tang, X.; Zhao, Y.; Jiao, Q.; Cao, Y. Hydrogenation of Multi-walled Carbon Nanotubes in Ethylenediamine. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2010, 18, 14–23. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  97. Krueger, A. New Carbon Materials: Biological Applications of Functionalized Nanodiamond Materials. Chem.—A Eur. J. 2008, 14, 1382–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  98. Marshall, M.W.; Popa-Nita, S.; Shapter, J.G. Measurement of Functionalised Carbon Nanotube Carboxylic Acid Groups Using a Simple Chemical Process. Carbon 2006, 44, 1137–1141. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  99. Nikitin, A.; Li, X.; Zhang, Z.; Ogasawara, H.; Dai, H.; Nilsson, A. Hydrogen Storage in Carbon Nanotubes through the Formation of Stable C−H Bonds. Nano Lett. 2007, 8, 162–167. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  100. Froudakis, G.E. Hydrogen Storage in Nanotubes & Nanostructures. Mater. Today 2011, 14, 324–328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  101. Dillon, A.C.; Jones, K.M.; Bekkedahl, T.A.; Kiang, C.H.; Bethune, D.S.; Heben, M.J. Storage of Hydrogen in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nature 1997, 386, 377–379. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  102. Pantarotto, D.; Singh, R.; McCarthy, D.; Erhardt, M.; Briand, J.-P.; Prato, M.; Kostarelos, K.; Bianco, A.; Pantarotto, D.-C.D.; Prato, M.; et al. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes for Plasmid DNA Gene Delivery. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2004, 43, 5242–5246. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  103. Geng, J.; Kim, K.; Zhang, J.; Escalada, A.; Tunuguntla, R.; Comolli, L.R.; Allen, F.I.; Shnyrova, A.V.; Cho, K.R.; Munoz, D.; et al. Stochastic Transport through Carbon Nanotubes in Lipid Bilayers and Live Cell Membranes. Nature 2014, 514, 612–615. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  104. Chen, L.; Xie, H.; Yu, W. Functionalization Methods of Carbon Nanotubes and Its Applications. Carbon Nanotub. Appl. Electron Devices 2011, 41, 215–222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  105. Chen, X.; Kis, A.; Zettl, A.; Bertozzi, C.R. A Cell Nanoinjector Based on Carbon Nanotubes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 2007, 104, 8218–8222. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  106. Mintmire, J.W.; Dunlap, B.I.; White, C.T.; Nielsen, P.E.; Engholm, M.; Berg, R.H.; Buchardt, O.S.; Verschueren, A.R.M.; Dekker, C.; Derycke, V.; et al. Carbon Nanotubes with DNA Recognition. Nature 2002, 420, 761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  107. Awasthi, K.; Singh, D.P.; Singh, S. Attachment of Biomolecules (Protein and DNA) to Amino-Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. New Carbon Mater. 2009, 24, 301–306. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  108. Zare, H.; Ahmadi, S.; Ghasemi, A.; Ghanbari, M.; Rabiee, N.; Bagherzadeh, M.; Karimi, M.; Webster, T.J.; Hamblin, M.R.; Mostafavi, E. Carbon Nanotubes: Smart Drug/Gene Delivery Carriers. Int. J. Nanomed. 2021, 16, 1681–1706. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  109. Villa, C.H.; Dao, T.; Ahearn, I.; Fehrenbacher, N.; Casey, E.; Rey, D.A.; Korontsvit, T.; Zakhaleva, V.; Batt, C.A.; Philips, M.R.; et al. Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes Deliver Peptide Antigen into Dendritic Cells and Enhance IgG Responses to Tumor-Associated Antigens. ACS Nano 2011, 5, 5300. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  110. Lu, Q.; Moore, J.M.; Huang, G.; Mount, A.S.; Rao, A.M.; Larcom, L.L.; Ke, P.C. RNA Polymer Translocation with Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Nano Lett. 2004, 4, 2473–2477. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  111. Duan, H.G.; Jha, A.; Li, X.; Tiwari, V.; Ye, H.; Nayak, P.K.; Zhu, X.L.; Li, Z.; Martinez, T.J.; Thorwart, M.; et al. Intermolecular Vibrations Mediate Ultrafast Singlet Fission. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, 52–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  112. Piao, Y.; Meany, B.; Powell, L.R.; Valley, N.; Kwon, H.; Schatz, G.C.; Wang, Y. Brightening of Carbon Nanotube Photoluminescence through the Incorporation of Sp3 Defects. Nat. Chem. 2013, 5, 840–845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  113. White, B.; Banerjee, S.; O’Brien, S.; Turro, N.J.; Herman, I.P. Zeta-Potential Measurements of Surfactant-Wrapped Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 111, 13684–13690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  114. McDonald, T.J.; Engtrakul, C.; Jones, M.; Rumbles, G.; Heben, M.J. Kinetics of PL Quenching during Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Rebundling and Diameter-Dependent Surfactant Interactions. J. Phys. Chem. B 2006, 110, 25339–25346. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  115. Britz, D.A.; Khlobystov, A.N. Noncovalent Interactions of Molecules with Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2006, 35, 637–659. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  116. Priya, B.R.; Byrne, H.J. Investigation of Sodium Dodecyl Benzene Sulfonate Assisted Dispersion and Debundling of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2007, 112, 332–337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  117. Zhang, Q.; Huang, J.Q.; Qian, W.Z.; Zhang, Y.Y.; Wei, F. The Road for Nanomaterials Industry: A Review of Carbon Nanotube Production, Post-Treatment, and Bulk Applications for Composites and Energy Storage. Small 2013, 9, 1237–1265. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  118. Wenseleers, W.; Vlasov, I.L.; Goovaerts, E.; Obraztsova, E.D.; Lobach, A.S.; Bouwen, A. Efficient Isolation and Solubilization of Pristine Single-Walled Nanotubes in Bile Salt Micelles. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2004, 14, 1105–1112. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  119. O’Connell, M.J.; Bachilo, S.H.; Huffman, C.B.; Moore, V.C.; Strano, M.S.; Haroz, E.H.; Rialon, K.L.; Boul, P.J.; Noon, W.H.; Kittrell, C.; et al. Band Gap Fluorescence from Individual Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Science 2002, 297, 593–596. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  120. Zhang, C.; Wang, P.; Barnes, B.; Fortner, J.; Wang, Y. Cleanly Removable Surfactant for Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 2021, 33, 4551–4557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  121. Rastogi, R.; Kaushal, R.; Tripathi, S.K.; Sharma, A.L.; Kaur, I.; Bharadwaj, L.M. Comparative Study of Carbon Nanotube Dispersion Using Surfactants. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2008, 328, 421–428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  122. Bai, Y.; Park, I.S.; Lee, S.J.; Bae, T.S.; Watari, F.; Uo, M.; Lee, M.H. Aqueous Dispersion of Surfactant-Modified Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Application as an Antibacterial Agent. Carbon 2011, 49, 3663–3671. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  123. Yun, D.J.; Kim, J.M.; Ra, H.; Byun, S.; Kim, H.; Park, G.S.; Park, S.; Rhee, S.W. The Physical/Chemical Properties and Electrode Performance Variations of SWNT Films in Consequence of Solution Based Surfactant Elimination Processes. Org. Electron. 2013, 14, 2962–2972. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  124. Rossi, J.E.; Soule, K.J.; Cleveland, E.; Schmucker, S.W.; Cress, C.D.; Cox, N.D.; Merrill, A.; Landi, B.J. Removal of Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Surfactant from Aqueous Dispersions of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2017, 495, 140–148. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  125. Urper, O.; Çakmak, İ.; Karatepe, N. Fabrication of Carbon Nanotube Transparent Conductive Films by Vacuum Filtration Method. Mater. Lett. 2018, 223, 210–214. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  126. Billing, B.K.; Mayank; Agnihotri, P.K.; Singh, N. Development of Pyrene-Stacked Carbon Nanotube-Based Hybrid: Measurement of NO3- Ions Using Fluorescence Spectroscopy. Analyst 2018, 143, 3343–3352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  127. Liu, Z.; Galli, F.; Janssen, K.G.H.; Jiang, L.; van der Linden, H.J.; de Geus, D.C.; Voskamp, P.; Kuil, M.E.; Olsthoorn, R.C.L.; Oosterkamp, T.H.; et al. Stable Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube-Streptavidin Complex for Biorecognition. J. Phys. Chem. C 2010, 114, 4345–4352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  128. Meredith, M.T.; Minson, M.; Hickey, D.; Artyushkova, K.; Glatzhofer, D.T.; Minteer, S.D. Anthracene-Modified Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes as Direct Electron Transfer Scaffolds for Enzymatic Oxygen Reduction. ACS Catal. 2011, 1, 1683–1690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  129. Yang, X.; Lu, Y.; Ma, Y.; Li, Y.; Du, F.; Chen, Y. Noncovalent Nanohybrid of Ferrocene with Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Its Enhanced Electrochemical Property. Chem. Phys. Lett. 2006, 420, 416–420. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  130. Huang, X.J.; Im, H.S.; Lee, D.H.; Kim, H.S.; Choi, Y.K. Ferrocene Functionalized Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Bundles. Hybrid Interdigitated Construction Film for l-Glutamate Detection. J. Phys. Chem. C 2006, 111, 1200–1206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  131. Khripin, C.Y.; Fagan, J.A.; Zheng, M. Spontaneous Partition of Carbon Nanotubes in Polymer-Modified Aqueous Phases. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2013, 135, 6822–6825. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  132. Subbaiyan, N.K.; Cambré, S.; Parra-Vasquez, A.N.G.; Hároz, E.H.; Doorn, S.K.; Duque, J.G. Role of Surfactants and Salt in Aqueous Two-Phase Separation of Carbon Nanotubes toward Simple Chirality Isolation. ACS Nano 2014, 8, 1619–1628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  133. Defillet, J.; Avramenko, M.; Martinati, M.; López Carrillo, M.Á.; van der Elst, D.; Wenseleers, W.; Cambré, S. The Role of the Bile Salt Surfactant Sodium Deoxycholate in Aqueous Two-Phase Separation of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Revealed by Systematic Parameter Variations. Carbon 2022, 195, 349–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  134. Namasivayam, M.; Andersson, M.R.; Shapter, J.G.; Koloor, R.; Ayatollahi, R.; Petrů, M.; Petrů, P. A Comparative Study on the Role of Polyvinylpyrrolidone Molecular Weight on the Functionalization of Various Carbon Nanotubes and Their Composites. Polymers 2021, 13, 2447. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  135. Monteiro-Riviere, N.A.; Inman, A.O.; Wang, Y.Y.; Nemanich, R.J. Surfactant Effects on Carbon Nanotube Interactions with Human Keratinocytes. Nanomedicine 2005, 1, 293–299. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  136. Wang, X.; Xia, T.; Ntim, S.A.; Ji, Z.; George, S.; Meng, H.; Zhang, H.; Castranova, V.; Mitra, S.; Nel, A.E. Quantitative Techniques for Assessing and Controlling the Dispersion and Biological Effects of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes in Mammalian Tissue Culture Cells. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 7241–7252. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  137. Vaisman, L.; Marom, G.; Wagner, H.D. Dispersions of Surface-Modified Carbon Nanotubes in Water-Soluble and Water-Insoluble Polymers. Adv. Funct. Mater. 2006, 16, 357–363. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  138. Manasrah, A.D.; Laoui, T.; Zaidi, S.J.; Atieh, M.A. Effect of PEG Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes on the Enhancement of Thermal and Physical Properties of Nanofluids. Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci. 2017, 84, 231–241. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  139. Sharmeen, S.; Rahman, A.F.M.M.; Lubna, M.M.; Salem, K.S.; Islam, R.; Khan, M.A. Polyethylene Glycol Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes/Gelatin-Chitosan Nanocomposite: An Approach for Significant Drug Release. Bioact. Mater. 2018, 3, 236–244. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  140. Taghavi, S.; Nia, A.H.; Abnous, K.; Ramezani, M. Polyethylenimine-Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes Tagged with AS1411 Aptamer for Combination Gene and Drug Delivery into Human Gastric Cancer Cells. Int. J. Pharm. 2017, 516, 301–312. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  141. Cavuslar, O.; Unal, H. Self-Assembly of DNA Wrapped Carbon Nanotubes and Asymmetrical Cyanine Dyes into Fluorescent Nanohybrids. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 22380–22389. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  142. Kim, J.M.; Kim, S.H.; Kim, N.Y.; Ryou, M.H.; Bae, H.; Kim, J.H.; Lee, Y.G.; Lee, S.Y. Nanofibrous Conductive Binders Based on DNA-Wrapped Carbon Nanotubes for Lithium Battery Electrodes. iScience 2020, 23, 101739. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  143. McMorrow, J.; Freeley, M.; Palma, M. DNA-Wrapped Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Assemblies. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2017, 56, 5302–5308. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  144. Streit, J.K.; Fagan, J.A.; Zheng, M. A Low Energy Route to DNA-Wrapped Carbon Nanotubes via Replacement of Bile Salt Surfactants. Anal. Chem. 2017, 89, 10496–10503. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  145. Singh, R.; Pantarotto, D.; McCarthy, D.; Chaloin, O.; Hoebeke, J.; Partidos, C.D.; Briand, J.P.; Prato, M.; Bianco, A.; Kostarelos, K. Binding and Condensation of Plasmid DNA onto Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: Toward the Construction of Nanotube-Based Gene Delivery Vectors. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2005, 127, 4388–4396. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  146. Vardharajula, S.; Ali, S.Z.; Tiwari, P.M.; Eroǧlu, E.; Vig, K.; Dennis, V.A.; Singh, S.R. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes: Biomedical Applications. Int. J. Nanomed. 2012, 7, 5361–5374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  147. Shkodra, B.; Petrelli, M.; Costa Angeli, M.A.; Garoli, D.; Nakatsuka, N.; Lugli, P.; Petti, L. Electrolyte-Gated Carbon Nanotube Field-Effect Transistor-Based Biosensors: Principles and Applications. Appl. Phys. Rev. 2021, 8, 041325. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  148. Burdanova, M.G.; Kharlamova, M.V.; Kramberger, C.; Nikitin, M.P. Applications of Pristine and Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes, Graphene, and Graphene Nanoribbons in Biomedicine. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 3020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  149. Wu, B.; Ou, Z.; Xing, D. Functional Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes/Chitosan Conjugate for Tumor Cells Targeting. In Eighth International Conference on Photonics and Imaging in Biology and Medicine (PIBM 2009); SPIE: Bellingham, WA, USA, 2009; Volume 7519, pp. 142–149. [Google Scholar]
  150. Varkouhi, A.K.; Foillard, S.; Lammers, T.; Schiffelers, R.M.; Doris, E.; Hennink, W.E.; Storm, G. SiRNA Delivery with Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. Int. J. Pharm. 2011, 416, 419–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  151. Alidori, S.; Asqiriba, K.; Londero, P.; Bergkvist, M.; Leona, M.; Scheinberg, D.A.; McDevitt, M.R. Deploying RNA and DNA with Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 5982–5992. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  152. De Juan, A.; Pouillon, Y.; Ruiz-González, L.; Torres-Pardo, A.; Casado, S.; Martín, N.; Rubio, Á.; Pérez, E.M. Mechanically Interlocked Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 2014, 53, 5394–5400. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  153. Sun, L.; Wang, C.; Zhou, Y.; Zhang, X.; Cai, B.; Qiu, J. Flowing Nitrogen Assisted-Arc Discharge Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Single-Walled Carbon Nanohorns. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2013, 277, 88–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  154. Jung, S.H.; Kim, M.R.; Jeong, S.H.; Kim, S.U.; Lee, O.J.; Lee, K.H.; Suh, J.H.; Park, C.K. High-Yield Synthesis of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Arc Discharge in Liquid Nitrogen. Appl. Phys. A 2003, 76, 285–286. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  155. Mo, Z.; Liao, S.; Zheng, Y.; Fu, Z. Preparation of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotube Arrays and Their Catalysis towards Cathodic Oxygen Reduction in Acidic and Alkaline Media. Carbon 2012, 50, 2620–2627. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  156. Sharifi, T.; Nitze, F.; Barzegar, H.R.; Tai, C.W.; Mazurkiewicz, M.; Malolepszy, A.; Stobinski, L.; Wågberg, T. Nitrogen Doped Multi Walled Carbon Nanotubes Produced by CVD-Correlating XPS and Raman Spectroscopy for the Study of Nitrogen Inclusion. Carbon 2012, 50, 3535–3541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  157. Tao, X.Y.; Zhang, X.B.; Sun, F.Y.; Cheng, J.P.; Liu, F.; Luo, Z.Q. Large-Scale CVD Synthesis of Nitrogen-Doped Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes with Controllable Nitrogen Content on a CoxMg1−xMoO4 Catalyst. Diam. Relat. Mater. 2007, 3, 425–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  158. She, X.; Yang, D.; Jing, D.; Yuan, F.; Yang, W.; Guo, L.; Che, Y. Nitrogen-Doped One-Dimensional (1D) Macroporous Carbonaceous Nanotube Arrays and Their Application in Electrocatalytic Oxygen Reduction Reactions. Nanoscale 2014, 6, 11057–11061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  159. Chen, L.; Xia, K.; Huang, L.; Li, L.; Pei, L.; Fei, S. Facile Synthesis and Hydrogen Storage Application of Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes with Bamboo-like Structure. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2013, 38, 3297–3303. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  160. Shi, W.; Venkatachalam, K.; Gavalas, V.; Qian, D.; Andrews, R.; Bachas, L.G.; Chopra, N. The Role of Plasma Treatment on Electrochemical Capacitance of Undoped and Nitrogen Doped Carbon Nanotubes. Nanomater. Energy 2015, 2, 71–81. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  161. Du, Z.; Wang, S.; Kong, C.; Deng, Q.; Wang, G.; Liang, C.; Tang, H. Microwave Plasma Synthesized Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes for Oxygen Reduction. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2015, 19, 1541–1549. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  162. Chan, L.H.; Hong, K.H.; Xiao, D.Q.; Lin, T.C.; Lai, S.H.; Hsieh, W.J.; Shih, H.C. Resolution of the Binding Configuration in Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes. Phys. Rev. B-Condens. Matter Mater. Phys. 2004, 70, 125408. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  163. Nagaiah, T.C.; Kundu, S.; Bron, M.; Muhler, M.; Schuhmann, W. Nitrogen-Doped Carbon Nanotubes as a Cathode Catalyst for the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Medium. Electrochem. Commun. 2010, 3, 338–341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  164. Vikkisk, M.; Kruusenberg, I.; Ratso, S.; Joost, U.; Shulg, E.; Kink, I.; Rauwel, P.; Tammeveski, K. Enhanced Electrocatalytic Activity of Nitrogen-Doped Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes towards the Oxygen Reduction Reaction in Alkaline Media. RSC Adv. 2015, 5, 59495–59505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  165. Keskar, G.; Rao, R.; Luo, J.; Hudson, J.; Chen, J.; Rao, A.M. Growth, Nitrogen Doping and Characterization of Isolated Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes Using Liquid Precursors. CPL 2005, 412, 269–273. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  166. Mickelson, E.T.; Chiang, I.W.; Zimmerman, J.L.; Boul, P.J.; Lozano, J.; Liu, J.; Smalley, R.E.; Hauge, R.H.; Margrave, J.L. Solvation of Fluorinated Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes in Alcohol Solvents. J. Phys. Chem. B 1999, 103, 4318–4322. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  167. Zhang, W.; Dubois, M.; Guérin, K.; Bonnet, P.; Kharbache, H.; Masin, F.; Kharitonov, A.P.; Hamwi, A. Effect of Curvature on C–F Bonding in Fluorinated Carbons: From Fullerene and Derivatives to Graphite. Phys. Chem. Chem. Phys. 2010, 12, 1388–1398. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  168. Pehrsson, P.E.; Zhao, W.; Baldwin, J.W.; Song, C.; Liu, J.; Kooi, S.; Zheng, B. Thermal Fluorination and Annealing of Single-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. B 2003, 107, 5690–5695. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  169. An, K.H.; Park, K.A.; Heo, J.G.; Lee, J.Y.; Jeon, K.K.; Lim, S.C.; Yang, C.W.; Lee, Y.S.; Lee, Y.H. Structural Transformation of Fluorinated Carbon Nanotubes Induced by in Situ Electron-Beam Irradiation. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2003, 125, 3057–3061. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  170. Chamssedine, F.; Guérin, K.; Dubois, M.; Disa, E.; Petit, E.; El Fawal, Z.; Hamwi, A. Fluorination of Single Walled Carbon Nanotubes at Low Temperature: Towards the Reversible Fluorine Storage into Carbon Nanotubes. J. Fluor. Chem. 2011, 132, 1072–1078. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  171. Zamora-Ledezma, C.; Añez, L.; Primera, J.; Silva, P.; Etienne-Calas, S.; Anglaret, E. Photoluminescent Single Wall Carbon Nanotube–Silica Composite Gels. Carbon 2008, 46, 1253–1255. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  172. Rafailov, P.M.; Thomsen, C.; Monev, M.; Dettlaff-Weglikowska, U.; Roth, S. Electrochemical Functionalization of SWNT Bundles in Acid and Salt Media as Observed by Raman and X-ray Photoelectron Spectroscopy. Physica Status Solidi (b) 2008, 245, 1967–1970. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  173. Qian, Z.; Ma, J.; Zhou, J.; Lin, P.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.; Feng, H. Facile Synthesis of Halogenated Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Their Unusual Photoluminescence. J. Mater. Chem. 2012, 22, 22113–22119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  174. Abdelkader, V.K.; Scelfo, S.; García-Gallarín, C.; Godino-Salido, M.L.; Domingo-García, M.; López-Garzón, F.J.; Pérez-Mendoza, M. Carbon Tetrachloride Cold Plasma for Extensive Chlorination of Carbon Nanotubes. J. Phys. Chem. C 2013, 117, 16677–16685. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  175. Vejpravova, J.; Pacakova, B.; Kalbac, M. Magnetic Impurities in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes and Graphene: A Review. Analyst 2016, 141, 2639–2656. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  176. Lee, R.S.; Kim, H.J.; Fischer, J.E.; Thess, A.; Smalley, R.E. Conductivity Enhancement in Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Bundles Doped with K and Br. Nature 1997, 388, 255–257. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  177. Jin, Z.; Xu, G.Q.; Goh, S.H. A Preferentially Ordered Accumulation of Bromine on Multi-Wall Carbon Nanotubes. Carbon 2000, 38, 1135–1139. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  178. Unger, E.; Graham, A.; Kreupl, F.; Liebau, M.; Hoenlein, W. Electrochemical Functionalization of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes for Solvation and Purification. Curr. Appl. Phys. 2002, 2, 107–111. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  179. Colomer, J.F.; Marega, R.; Traboulsi, H.; Meneghetti, M.; van Tendeloo, G.; Bonifazi, D. Microwave-Assisted Bromination of Double-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 2009, 21, 4747–4749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  180. Abdelkader, V.K.; Domingo-García, M.; Melguizo, M.; López-Garzón, R.; Javier López-Garzón, F.; Pérez-Mendoza, M. Covalent Bromination of Multi-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Iodine Bromide and Cold Plasma Treatments. Carbon 2015, 93, 276–285. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  181. Moradi, L.; Etesami, I. New Route for Bromination of Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes under Mild and Efficient Conditions. Fuller. Nanotub. Carbon Nanostruct. 2016, 24, 213–218. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  182. Milowska, K.Z.; Krzywiecki, M.; Payne, M.C.; Janas, D. Effective Doping of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Films with Bromine under Ultrasound. Mater. Des. 2022, 213, 110310. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  183. Coleman, K.S.; Chakraborty, A.K.; Bailey, S.R.; Sloan, J.; Alexander, M. Iodination of Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes. Chem. Mater. 2007, 19, 1076–1081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  184. Zhao, Y.; Wei, J.; Vajtai, R.; Ajayan, P.M.; Barrera, E.V. Iodine Doped Carbon Nanotube Cables Exceeding Specific Electrical Conductivity of Metals. Sci. Rep. 2011, 1, 83. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  185. Zhou, J.; Lin, P.; Ma, J.; Shan, X.; Feng, H.; Chen, C.; Chen, J.; Qian, Z. Facile Synthesis of Halogenated Carbon Quantum Dots as an Important Intermediate for Surface Modification. RSC Adv. 2013, 3, 9625–9628. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  186. Inani, H.; Mustonen, K.; Markevich, A.; Ding, E.X.; Tripathi, M.; Hussain, A.; Mangler, C.; Kauppinen, E.I.; Susi, T.; Kotakoski, J. Silicon Substitution in Nanotubes and Graphene via Intermittent Vacancies. J. Phys. Chem. C 2019, 123, 13136–13140. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  187. Arnold, M.S.; Green, A.A.; Hulvat, J.F.; Stupp, S.I.; Hersam, M.C. Sorting Carbon Nanotubes by Electronic Structure Using Density Differentiation. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 1, 60–65. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  188. Antaris, A.L.; Seo, J.W.T.; Green, A.A.; Hersam, M.C. Sorting Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes by Electronic Type Using Nonionic, Biocompatible Block Copolymers. ACS Nano 2010, 4, 4725–4732. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  189. Fagan, J.A.; Khripin, C.Y.; Silvera Batista, C.A.; Simpson, J.R.; Hároz, E.H.; Hight Walker, A.R.; Zheng, M. Isolation of Specific Small-Diameter Single-Wall Carbon Nanotube Species via Aqueous Two-Phase Extraction. Adv. Mater. 2014, 26, 2800–2804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  190. Gao, W.; Kono, J. Science and Applications of Wafer-Scale Crystalline Carbon Nanotube Films Prepared through Controlled Vacuum Filtration. R. Soc. Open Sci. 2019, 6, 181605. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  191. Thostenson, E.T.; Chou, T.W. Processing-Structure-Multi-Functional Property Relationship in Carbon Nanotube/Epoxy Composites. Carbon 2006, 44, 3022–3029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  192. Ci, L.; Bai, J.B. The Reinforcement Role of Carbon Nanotubes in Epoxy Composites with Different Matrix Stiffness. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2006, 66, 3–4, 599–603. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  193. Roy, S.; Petrova, R.S.; Mitra, S. Effect of Carbon Nanotube (CNT) Functionalization in Epoxy-CNT Composites. Nanotechnol. Rev. 2018, 7, 475–485. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  194. Wang, H.F.; Xu, Q. Materials Design for Rechargeable Metal-Air Batteries. Matter 2019, 1, 565–595. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  195. Mallakpour, S.; Soltanian, S. Surface Functionalization of Carbon Nanotubes: Fabrication and Applications. RSC Adv. 2016, 6, 109916–109935. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  196. Ku, N.; Cheon, J.; Lee, K.; Jung, Y.; Yoon, S.Y.; Kim, T. Hydrophilic and Conductive Carbon Nanotube Fibers for High-Performance Lithium-Ion Batteries. Materials 2021, 14, 7822. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  197. Guerrero Moreno, N.; Gervasio, D.; Godínez García, A.; Pérez Robles, J.F. Polybenzimidazole-Multiwall Carbon Nanotubes Composite Membranes for Polymer Electrolyte Membrane Fuel Cells. J. Power Sources 2015, 300, 229–237. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  198. Kumar, T.H.V.; Sundramoorthy, A.K. Non-Enzymatic Electrochemical Detection of Urea on Silver Nanoparticles Anchored Nitrogen-Doped Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Modified Electrode. J. Electrochem. Soc. 2018, 165, B3006–B3016. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  199. Ben Messaoud, N.; Ghica, M.E.; Dridi, C.; ben Ali, M.; Brett, C.M.A. Electrochemical Sensor Based on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotube and Gold Nanoparticle Modified Electrode for the Sensitive Detection of Bisphenol A. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 253, 513–522. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  200. Kangkamano, T.; Numnuam, A.; Limbut, W.; Kanatharana, P.; Thavarungkul, P. Chitosan Cryogel with Embedded Gold Nanoparticles Decorated Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes Modified Electrode for Highly Sensitive Flow Based Non-Enzymatic Glucose Sensor. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2017, 246, 854–863. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  201. Madhurantakam, S.; Jayanth Babu, K.; Balaguru Rayappan, J.B.; Krishnan, U.M. Fabrication of Mediator-Free Hybrid Nano-Interfaced Electrochemical Biosensor for Monitoring Cancer Cell Proliferation. Biosens. Bioelectron. 2017, 87, 832–841. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  202. Chen, C.; Ran, R.; Yang, Z.; Lv, R.; Shen, W.; Kang, F.; Huang, Z.H. An Efficient Flexible Electrochemical Glucose Sensor Based on Carbon Nanotubes/Carbonized Silk Fabrics Decorated with Pt Microspheres. Sens. Actuators B Chem. 2018, 256, 63–70. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  203. Magar, H.S.; Ghica, M.E.; Abbas, M.N.; Brett, C.M.A. A Novel Sensitive Amperometric Choline Biosensor Based on Multiwalled Carbon Nanotubes and Gold Nanoparticles. Talanta 2017, 167, 462–469. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  204. Huang, B.; Liu, J.; Lai, L.; Yu, F.; Ying, X.; Ye, B.C.; Li, Y. A Free-Standing Electrochemical Sensor Based on Graphene Foam-Carbon Nanotube Composite Coupled with Gold Nanoparticles and Its Sensing Application for Electrochemical Determination of Dopamine and Uric Acid. J. Electroanal. Chem. 2017, 801, 129–134. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  205. He, X.; Fujimura, N.; Lloyd, J.M.; Erickson, K.J.; Talin, A.A.; Zhang, Q.; Gao, W.; Jiang, Q.; Kawano, Y.; Hauge, R.H.; et al. Carbon Nanotube Terahertz Detector. Nano Lett. 2014, 14, 3953–3958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  206. Zhang, Y.; Gao, G.; Liu, H.; Fu, H.; Fan, J.; Wang, K.; Chen, Y.; Li, B.; Zhang, C.; Zhi, X.; et al. Identification of Volatile Biomarkers of Gastric Cancer Cells and Ultrasensitive Electrochemical Detection Based on Sensing Interface of Au-Ag Alloy Coated MWCNTs. Theranostics 2014, 4, 154–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  207. Janudin, N.; Abdullah, N.; Wan Yunus, W.M.Z.; Yasin, F.M.; Yaacob, M.H.; Mohamad Saidi, N.; Kasim, N.A.M. Effect of Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes in the Detection of Benzene at Room Temperature. J. Nanotechnol. 2018, 2018, 2107898. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  208. Su, H.C.; Tran, T.T.; Bosze, W.; Myung, N.V. Chemiresistive Sensor Arrays for Detection of Air Pollutants Based on Carbon Nanotubes Functionalized with Porphyrin and Phthalocyanine Derivatives. Sens. Actuators Rep. 2020, 2, 100011. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  209. Liu, Z.; Chen, K.; Davis, C.; Sherlock, S.; Cao, Q.; Chen, X.; Dai, H. Drug Delivery with Carbon Nanotubes for in Vivo Cancer Treatment. Cancer Res. 2008, 68, 6652–6660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  210. Liu, Z.; Cai, W.; He, L.; Nakayama, N.; Chen, K.; Sun, X.; Chen, X.; Dai, H. In Vivo Biodistribution and Highly Efficient Tumour Targeting of Carbon Nanotubes in Mice. Nat. Nanotechnol. 2006, 2, 47–52. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  211. Bhirde, A.A.; Patel, S.; Sousa, A.A.; Patel, V.; Molinolo, A.A.; Ji, Y.; Leapman, R.D.; Gutkind, J.S.; Rusling, J.F. Distribution and Clearance of PEG-Single-Walled Carbon Nanotube Cancer Drug Delivery Vehicles in Mice. Nanomedicine 2010, 5, 1535–1546. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  212. Zhang, Y.; Bai, Y.; Yan, B. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes for Potential Medicinal Applications. Drug Discov. Today 2010, 15, 428. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  213. Martincic, M.; Tobias, G. Filled Carbon Nanotubes in Biomedical Imaging and Drug Delivery. Expert Opin. Drug Deliv. 2015, 12, 563–581. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  214. Kapralov, A.A.; Feng, W.H.; Amoscato, A.A.; Yanamala, N.; Balasubramanian, K.; Winnica, D.E.; Kisin, E.R.; Kotchey, G.P.; Gou, P.; Sparvero, L.J.; et al. Adsorption of Surfactant Lipids by Single-Walled Carbon Nanotubes in Mouse Lung upon Pharyngeal Aspiration. ACS Nano 2012, 6, 4147–4156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  215. Li, Z.; Li, Y.; Yao, Y.C.; Aydin, F.; Zhan, C.; Chen, Y.; Elimelech, M.; Pham, T.A.; Noy, A. Strong Differential Monovalent Anion Selectivity in Narrow Diameter Carbon Nanotube Porins. ACS Nano 2020, 14, 6269–6275. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  216. Li, Y.; Li, Z.; Aydin, F.; Quan, J.; Chen, X.; Yao, Y.C.; Zhan, C.; Chen, Y.; Pham, T.A.; Noy, A. Water-Ion Permselectivity of Narrow-Diameter Carbon Nanotubes. Sci. Adv. 2020, 6, 9966–9982. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  217. Tunuguntla, R.H.; Henley, R.Y.; Yao, Y.C.; Pham, T.A.; Wanunu, M.; Noy, A. Enhanced Water Permeability and Tunable Ion Selectivity in Subnanometer Carbon Nanotube Porins. Science 2017, 357, 792–796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  218. Lee, K.M.; Wong, C.P.P.; Tan, T.L.; Lai, C.W. Functionalized Carbon Nanotubes for Adsorptive Removal of Water Pollutants. Mater. Sci. Eng. B 2018, 236, 61–69. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. TEM micrograph of purified SWCNTs (a). TEM micrograph of SWCNTs after fluorination at 325 °C (b). TEM micrographs of SWCNTs after fluorination at 500 °C reveal a mixture of defective bundles (c) and MWCNTs (d). Scale bar, 10 nm. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 1998 Elsevier.
Figure 1. TEM micrograph of purified SWCNTs (a). TEM micrograph of SWCNTs after fluorination at 325 °C (b). TEM micrographs of SWCNTs after fluorination at 500 °C reveal a mixture of defective bundles (c) and MWCNTs (d). Scale bar, 10 nm. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [44]. Copyright 1998 Elsevier.
Materials 15 05386 g001
Figure 2. TEM images of samples at 100 kV: (a) control unexposed samples; (b) exposed to SF6 at −200 V bias; (c) exposed to CF4 at -200 V bias. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright 2004 Elsevier.
Figure 2. TEM images of samples at 100 kV: (a) control unexposed samples; (b) exposed to SF6 at −200 V bias; (c) exposed to CF4 at -200 V bias. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [45]. Copyright 2004 Elsevier.
Materials 15 05386 g002
Figure 3. STM images of a SWCNT (a) after fluorination at 250 °C for 12 h. The bright regions correspond to sections on the tube covered by fluorine atoms. (b) A pristine single-walled carbon nanotube was deposited on an Au (111) surface grown on mica substrate and imaged with a C60-functionalized STM tip. The image is high-pass filtered Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2002 Elsevier.
Figure 3. STM images of a SWCNT (a) after fluorination at 250 °C for 12 h. The bright regions correspond to sections on the tube covered by fluorine atoms. (b) A pristine single-walled carbon nanotube was deposited on an Au (111) surface grown on mica substrate and imaged with a C60-functionalized STM tip. The image is high-pass filtered Reprinted with permission from Ref. [46]. Copyright 2002 Elsevier.
Materials 15 05386 g003
Figure 4. (a) C 1s XPS spectra of pristine SWCNTs and SWCNTs fluorinated at 150, 200, 250 and 300 °C. (b) Gaussian peak fitting of the C 1s XPS spectra of the SWCNTs after fluorination at 300 °C. The individual peaks are due to sp2 (A), sp3 (B), oxygen bonds (C–E) and fluorine bonds (F–H). (c) F 1s XPS spectra of the same fluorinated SWCNTs. (d) Atomic F/C ratio versus fluorination temperature Reprinted with permission from Ref. [47]. Copyright 2002 Elsevier.
Figure 4. (a) C 1s XPS spectra of pristine SWCNTs and SWCNTs fluorinated at 150, 200, 250 and 300 °C. (b) Gaussian peak fitting of the C 1s XPS spectra of the SWCNTs after fluorination at 300 °C. The individual peaks are due to sp2 (A), sp3 (B), oxygen bonds (C–E) and fluorine bonds (F–H). (c) F 1s XPS spectra of the same fluorinated SWCNTs. (d) Atomic F/C ratio versus fluorination temperature Reprinted with permission from Ref. [47]. Copyright 2002 Elsevier.
Materials 15 05386 g004
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of pristine SWCNTs and SWCNTs fluorinated at 150, 200, 250 and 300 °C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2003 Elsevier.
Figure 5. FTIR spectra of pristine SWCNTs and SWCNTs fluorinated at 150, 200, 250 and 300 °C. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2003 Elsevier.
Materials 15 05386 g005
Figure 6. The Raman spectra of the pristine SWCNTs and the nanotubes fluorinated at 150, 200, 250 and 300 °C. The inset shows the dependence of the intensities of G and D modes on the doping temperature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2003 Elsevier.
Figure 6. The Raman spectra of the pristine SWCNTs and the nanotubes fluorinated at 150, 200, 250 and 300 °C. The inset shows the dependence of the intensities of G and D modes on the doping temperature. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [48]. Copyright 2003 Elsevier.
Materials 15 05386 g006
Figure 7. (a) Raman spectra of control and CF4 plasma exposed single-walled CNTs. (b) The deconvoluted F 1s peak for the SF6 and CF4 plasma exposed SWCNTs at −200 V for 1 min in comparison to the unexposed control sample. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2004 Elsevier.
Figure 7. (a) Raman spectra of control and CF4 plasma exposed single-walled CNTs. (b) The deconvoluted F 1s peak for the SF6 and CF4 plasma exposed SWCNTs at −200 V for 1 min in comparison to the unexposed control sample. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [49]. Copyright 2004 Elsevier.
Materials 15 05386 g007
Figure 8. Centrifuge tubes after DGU separations using Pluronic F108 (top) and Pluronic F68 (middle) are shown in pictures. Optical absorbance spectra of the SWNTs that were extracted in the centrifuge tube at the locations shown by arrows [188]. The colors of CNTs represent their color in suspension.
Figure 8. Centrifuge tubes after DGU separations using Pluronic F108 (top) and Pluronic F68 (middle) are shown in pictures. Optical absorbance spectra of the SWNTs that were extracted in the centrifuge tube at the locations shown by arrows [188]. The colors of CNTs represent their color in suspension.
Materials 15 05386 g008
Figure 9. Photographs of various CNT dispersion in dilute epoxy solution (xylene-butanol (1:1) mixture) when the mixture was allowed to settle for 6 h. From left to right: CNT-ODA; CNT-OH; CNT-COOH and CNT-raw Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [193]. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society.
Figure 9. Photographs of various CNT dispersion in dilute epoxy solution (xylene-butanol (1:1) mixture) when the mixture was allowed to settle for 6 h. From left to right: CNT-ODA; CNT-OH; CNT-COOH and CNT-raw Copyright 2010, American Chemical Society. Reprinted with permission from Ref. [193]. Copyright 2004 American Chemical Society.
Materials 15 05386 g009
Figure 10. (a) Rate performance at a current density ranging from 100 to 1000 mA/g of SnO2@CNTF and (b) relative values of the capacity [196]. Colours showed different specific capacities.
Figure 10. (a) Rate performance at a current density ranging from 100 to 1000 mA/g of SnO2@CNTF and (b) relative values of the capacity [196]. Colours showed different specific capacities.
Materials 15 05386 g010
Figure 11. (a) The cyclic voltammograms of MWNTs/Au-Ag/GCE (butanone was varied from a to h: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.45 and 0.55 ppm, respectively). (b) The cyclic voltammograms of MWNTs/Au-Ag/GCE under different concentrations of 3-octanone (varying from a to f: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2 and 0.25 ppm, respectively). The inset shows a line plot of the peak current (Ip) against the concentration of butanone and 3-octanone [206].
Figure 11. (a) The cyclic voltammograms of MWNTs/Au-Ag/GCE (butanone was varied from a to h: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.25, 0.35, 0.45 and 0.55 ppm, respectively). (b) The cyclic voltammograms of MWNTs/Au-Ag/GCE under different concentrations of 3-octanone (varying from a to f: 0, 0.05, 0.1, 0.15, 0.2 and 0.25 ppm, respectively). The inset shows a line plot of the peak current (Ip) against the concentration of butanone and 3-octanone [206].
Materials 15 05386 g011
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Kharlamova, M.V.; Paukov, M.; Burdanova, M.G. Nanotube Functionalization: Investigation, Methods and Demonstrated Applications. Materials 2022, 15, 5386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155386

AMA Style

Kharlamova MV, Paukov M, Burdanova MG. Nanotube Functionalization: Investigation, Methods and Demonstrated Applications. Materials. 2022; 15(15):5386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155386

Chicago/Turabian Style

Kharlamova, Marianna V., Maksim Paukov, and Maria G. Burdanova. 2022. "Nanotube Functionalization: Investigation, Methods and Demonstrated Applications" Materials 15, no. 15: 5386. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15155386

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop