Next Article in Journal
Results at the 1-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective Cohort Study with Short, Zirconia Implants
Previous Article in Journal
A Methodology for Optimizing the Calibration and Validation of Reactive Transport Models for Cement-Based Materials
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Preparation and Properties of Ce0.8Sm0.16Y0.03Gd0.01O1.9-BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 Composite Electrolyte

1
College of Chemistry and Civil Engineering, Shaoguan University, Shaoguan 512005, China
2
College of Energy Material and Chemical Engineering, Hefei University, Hefei 230601, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(16), 5591; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165591
Submission received: 1 July 2022 / Revised: 6 August 2022 / Accepted: 10 August 2022 / Published: 15 August 2022
(This article belongs to the Section Advanced and Functional Ceramics and Glasses)

Abstract

:
Samarium, gadolinium, and yttrium co-doped ceria (Ce0.8Sm0.16Y0.03Gd0.01O1.9, CSYG) and BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 (BIT07) powders were prepared by sol-gel and solid-state reaction methods, respectively. CSYG-BIT07 composite materials were obtained by mechanically mixing the two powders in different ratios and calcining at 1300 °C for 5 h. Samples were characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), as well as electrical properties and thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) measurements. A series of CSYG-BIT07 composite materials with relative densities higher than 95% were fabricated by sintering at 1300 °C for 5 h. The performance of the CSYG-BIT07 composite electrolyte was found to be related to the content of BIT07. The CSYG-15% BIT07 composite exhibited high oxide ion conductivity (σ800°C = 0.0126 S·cm−1 at 800 °C), moderate thermal expansion (TEC = 9.13 × 10−6/K between room temperature and 800 °C), and low electrical activation energy (Ea = 0.89 eV). These preliminary results indicate that the CSYG-BIT07 material is a promising electrolyte for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells (IT-SOFCs).

1. Introduction

Solid oxide fuel cells (SOFCs) have attracted considerable attention in recent years, owing to their high efficiency, environmentally friendly nature, fuel flexibility, and low cost [1,2,3]. SOFCs are composed of a porous oxide-based cathode, a dense ceramic electrolyte, and a porous ceramic–metal composite anode. Among these components, the electrolyte plays a key role in conducting ions, isolating fuels, and oxidizing gases. Nowadays, 8 mol% yttrium-stabilized zirconia (YSZ) is widely used as electrolyte material in SOFCs, owing to its pure oxygen ion conductivity and good compatibility with electrode materials [4,5]. YSZ needs to be operated at high temperature (800–1000 °C) to attain the required conductivity and high power output. This high working temperature poses a great challenge for the engineering of the various components of the SOFCs. Therefore, reducing the operating temperature has become a crucial task, which requires developing alternative electrolytes with higher ionic conductivity than YSZ [6,7].
Compared to YSZ, doped ceria is considered as one of the most promising electrolytes for IT-SOFCs. Doped ceria has many advantages, such as high oxide ion conductivity, high thermal stability, good compatibility with the electrodes, and good performance at low temperature [8,9,10,11]. When CeO2 is doped with divalent alkaline earth or trivalent rare earth metal oxides, the concentration of oxygen vacancies increases, due to the charge compensation mechanism, and thus the ionic conductivity is improved. However, CeO2-based materials tend to be partially reduced to Ce3+ in a reducing atmosphere at high temperature, cause electronic conductivity that will lead to a rapid degradation of the cell performance, and limit the extensive application of CeO2-based materials as electrolytes in SOFCs [9,10,11,12]. Co-doping approaches have been introduced to reduce the electronic conductivity. Previous studies found that ceria doped with two or more cations showed significantly higher ionic conductivity than the single-doped ceria electrolytes. Co-doping suppresses the ordering of oxygen vacancies and the reduction of Ce4+; this reduces the activation energy, and thus increases the ionic conductivity. Ce0.85(SmxNd1−x)0.15O2−δ, Ce0.80Gd0.2−xPrxO1.9, Ce0.80Gd0.2−xSmxO1.9, Ce0.82Sm0.16Sr0.02O1.90, Ce0.8CuxMn0.1−xZr0.1O2, Ce0.82La0.06Sm0.06Gd0.06O2−δ, and Ce0.85Gd0.10Mg0.05O2−δ are some well-known examples [3,9,12].
On the other hand, Ba2In2O5-based materials can serve as alternative electrolytes for IT-SOFCs, owing to their relatively high ionic conductivity and good compatibility with the cathode materials. Ba2In2O5 undergoes a phase transition from a high-temperature phase with perovskite structure to a low-temperature phase with brownmillerite structure at around 925 °C. The phase transition causes a sudden drop in conductivity below 925 °C. Previous studies have shown that substitution of In by Ti in the brownmillerite compound Ba2In2O5 induces disorder in the ordered arrangement of oxygen vacancies. At higher substitution levels (>15%), the compound transforms into a disordered perovskite structure at room temperature, exhibiting better anionic conductivity than the parent Ba2In2O5 phase [13,14,15,16,17,18]. In this context, the perovskite-type oxide BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 (BIT07) is an oxygen ion conductor with a conductivity similar to YSZ. Moreover, BIT07 presents an excellent structural compatibility with perovskite cathode substrates [13,14,16,17,18], and has proven to be a suitable electrolyte material for SOFCs.
In recent years, composite electrolytes consisting of at least two phases, i.e., a doped ceria main phase and other phases, have been successfully developed [19,20,21,22,23,24]. This double-matrix structure (phase) can overcome the drawbacks of single-phase materials and retain their advantages. The composite can effectively suppress the transformation from Ce4+ to Ce3+ of CeO2-based materials, and exhibits high ionic conductivity, high efficiency, and improved fuel cell performance at lower temperatures [12,19,20]. Therefore, combining the co-doping and composite formation approaches may further enhance the performances of SOFCs.
Composite electrolytes consisting of doped ceria and BIT07 have rarely been investigated. In this study, Sm3+, Gd3+, and Y3+ triple-doped CeO2-BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 (CSYG–BIT07) composite electrolytes were prepared to further enhance the ionic conductivity at intermediate/low temperatures. In addition, we investigated the effect of the BIT07 content on the phase composition, structure, and electrical conductivity of CSYG-BIT07 composite electrolytes.

2. Experimental

2.1. Sample Preparation

The Ce0.8Sm0.16Y0.03Gd0.01O1.9 (CSYG) material was synthesized via the sol-gel method. Sm(NO3)3·6H2O (99.9%), Y(NO3)3·6H2O (99%), Gd(NO3)3·6H2O (99.9%), Ce(NO3)3·6H2O (99.9%), and citric acid (99.9%) were dissolved separately in deionized water. Then, the solutions were mixed with a 3:2 molar ratio between citric acid and metallic ions. To promote the complexation of the metal ions, the pH was adjusted to around 7 by slow addition of ammonia. The as-mixed solution was stirred in a water bath maintained at a constant temperature of 80 °C for 4 h to form the sol. Upon water evaporation, a gel was obtained. The gel was poured into a crucible and calcined in a muffle furnace to generate loose powders, which were held at 600 °C for 3 h to obtain the initial CSYG powders. The synthesis procedure is shown in Figure 1.
BIT07 compounds were prepared by solid-state reaction of Ba(NO3)2 (99.9%), In2O3 (99.9%), and TiO2 (99%). Ba(NO3)2, In2O3, and TiO2 were weighed in appropriate amounts and mixed with ethanol in an agate mortar. The mixed oxides were compacted into a pellet and heated to 750 °C for 3 h, followed by cooling to room temperature. Finally, the resulting products were ground into finer powders using an agate mortar.
To prepare the composite electrolytes, the resulting CSYG and BIT07 powders were mixed with different molar ratios (5, 10, 15, 20, and 25 mol%) of BIT07, and ball-milled with zirconia balls for 24 h to obtain a uniformly mixed composite powder. After drying, an evenly mixed CSYG-BIT07 composite powder was obtained. According to the amount of BIT07 in the composite material, the obtained CSYG-BIT07 composite electrolytes were denoted as 5%BIT07, 10%BIT07, 15%BIT07, 20%BIT07, and 25%BIT07.
The as-synthesized CSYG-BIT07 powders were pressed at 10 MPa to obtain pellets of 12 mm in diameter and ~1.0 mm in thickness. Green pellets were sintered at 1300 °C for 5 h with a heating rate of 5 °C/min in air atmosphere, and then allowed to cool to room temperature. The preparation procedure of CSYG-BIT07 is shown in Figure 2.

2.2. Characterizations

Phase analysis of the samples was carried out by X-ray diffraction (XRD, Model Rigaku) with a 2θ range of 20–80°, a scanning rate of 5°/min, and a Cu Kα radiation source (λ = 0.15406 nm). Phase identification was performed using Joint Committee on powder diffraction standards (JCPDS) data and the Jade evaluation software. The surface morphology of the electrolyte was inspected by scanning electron microscopy (SEM, Model SU8220). To evaluate electrical performances, both sides of the sintered pellets were coated with silver paste and dried at 700 °C for 15 min to remove organic matter. Impedance measurements of the pellets were carried by two-probe impedance spectroscopy from 300 to 800 °C at intervals of 50 °C, in the frequency range of 105–10−1 Hz, using a GSL-1100X AC impedance analyzer. Data were collected and fitted to an equivalent circuit using the Zview software.
A 8 × 4 × 4 mm3 sintered sample was prepared to perform thermal expansion measurements from room temperature to 1000 °C at a heating rate of 5 °C/min in air, using a dilatometer (NETZSCH DIL 402 PC). The degree of thermal expansion of a material can be expressed in terms of the linear expansion coefficient α.
CSYG-BIT07 electrolyte (thickness: 0.4 mm)-supported electrodes and single cells were fabricated by printing. The anode slurry was prepared by mixing 40 wt% CSYG-BIT07 and 60 wt% NiO powders with a binder consisting of ethyl cellulose and terpineol. The cathode slurry was prepared by mixing 50 wt% CSYG-BIT07 and 50 wt% LSCF(La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ) powders with the same binder used for the anode slurry. The mixture was printed on the electrolyte as a circle with 6 mm diameter. After printing the electrode slurries onto the sintered electrolyte disk, the cell was burned at 550 °C for 4 h and then sintered in air at 1100 °C for 2 h. This process was repeated two times to increase the electrode thickness. Electrical performance measurements were conducted with an electrochemical analyzer (CHI-614D CHI, China).

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structural Analysis

Figure 3a displays the powder XRD patterns of CSYG and BIT07 at room temperature. The figure shows that the CSYG and BIT07 samples exhibited pure fluorite (JCPDS card no. 34-0394) and perovskite structures [17,18,19], respectively. The pattern of BIT07 showed a single perovskite phase, implying that Ti atoms were fully incorporated into the perovskite lattice, suppressing phase transitions and maintaining the perovskite phase at room temperature. This is due to the fact that the substitution of Ti for In produces oxygen vacancies in the Ba2In2O5 lattice; these vacancies can suppress the distortion to the orthorhombic symmetry and inhibit crystal phase transitions [16].
The XRD patterns of the CSYG-BIT07 composite electrolytes sintered at 1300 °C for 5 h are shown in Figure 3b. Two different phases were identified in the pattern of 5%BIT07, corresponding to CSYG and BIT07. New peaks were detected with increasing content of BIT07, corresponding to impurity phases formed during the sintering of CSYG and BIT07 under the selected conditions. The new other phases can be confirmed as BaTiO3 and Ba2In2O5. These results suggest the occurrence of a chemical reaction between the CSYG and BIT07 components and this is a serious problem which affects the use of CSYG-BIT07 in SOFCs. Further inspection of the 2θ region around 28.5° (Figure 3) reveals a shift in the (111)CSYG diffraction peak of the CSYG-BIT07 composite electrolyte relative to the pure CSYG phase. According to Bragg’s law, a shift in a diffraction peak is usually related to a variation in the lattice parameters. The lattice parameter (a0) of the cubic fluorite structure was calculated and shown in Table 1. In addition, it is worth noting that the degree of peak shift in the CSYG-15%BIT07 composite is greater than the composite with the other amount of BIT07. As a result, the unit cell volume is increased, which can be ascribed to the pinning effect of the new phase (i.e., BaTiO3 or Ba2In2O5). The slight diffusion of In3+ (0.80 Å) atoms is beneficial for increasing the number of oxygen vacancies in CSYG (the defect equation is provided below), which may result in an increase in ionic conductivity.
In 2 O 3 2 CeO 2 2 In Ce + 3 O O × + V O

3.2. Density and Microstructure

The relative density of CSYG-BIT07 sintered in air at 1300 °C for 5 h was measured using the Archimedes’ principle, and is shown in Table 1. It can be seen that the relative density of all samples is greater than the theoretical value by 95%. Moreover, the relative density increased when BIT07 was added, and then decreased with further increases in BIT07 content. The CSYG-15%BIT07 sample sintered in air at 1300 °C for 5 h exhibited the highest relative density of 98.8%, indicating that the densification temperature of CSYG-BIT07 was 100–200 °C lower than the CeO2-based materials prepared by solid-state synthesis [25,26,27]. The CSYG-BIT07 samples showed low temperature sinterability, which may assist the co-firing of other cell components of IT-SOFCs at reduced temperatures [28,29].
Figure 4 shows the cross-sectional SEM images of CSYG-15%BIT07 sintered at 1300 °C for 5 h. The CSYG-15%BIT07 sample consisted of well-defined grains separated by grain boundaries, and exhibited a sufficiently dense structure with few pores at grain boundaries or at the triple junction point. The relative density and SEM analysis results show that the composite electrolyte had a high density and could thus meet the corresponding requirements.

3.3. Impedance Analysis

The AC impedance method is an effective approach to study the electrical properties of solid electrolytes. The electrical properties of CSYG-BIT07 were studied by two-probe impedance spectroscopy. A typical impedance spectrum of the SOFC electrolyte consisted of three semicircles at high, intermediate, and low frequencies, corresponding to the grain (Rb), grain boundary (Rgb), and electrode (Rct) resistances, respectively [30,31]. Figure 5 shows the AC impedance spectra and equivalent circuit model of the CSYG-15%BIT07 sample sintered at 1300 °C, measured at different temperatures in air.
Figure 5a displays complex impedance graphs (Nyquist plots) of the samples at 500 °C. The complex impedance plots were fitted by the Zview software with the typical equivalent circuit shown in Figure 6a, which consisted of three parallel resistances (R) and constant phase elements (CPEs) connected in series. At high temperatures, the impedance decreased and the semicircles were shifted toward higher frequencies (Figure 5b–d). Increasing the temperature results in increased lattice thermal motion of the electrolyte material. Owing to non-Debye relaxation phenomena, the impedance arcs shift to higher frequencies with increasing temperature. This leads to the disappearance of the arcs associated with grains at higher temperatures, owing to the limited frequency range of the measurements [30,31,32,33].
The grain and grain boundary resistances were determined using equivalent electrical circuits. The total resistance (Rt) of the sample was the sum of Rb and Rgb. The total ionic conductivity (σt) at different temperatures was determined using the following equation [28,29,30,31]:
σ t = D S R t
where D, S, and Rt represent the thickness, area, and resistance of the sample, respectively.
Figure 6 shows that the total ionic conductivity of all samples increased with the temperature. Moreover, the conductivity of CSYG-BIT07 increased with the BIT07 content and reached a maximum for a content of 15%. Thereafter, the conductivity decreased with further increases in the BIT07 content. As shown in Table 1, the conductivities at 800 °C of CSYG-BIT07 samples with different BIT07 contents followed the order 15%BIT07 > 20%BIT07 > 25%BIT07 > 10%BIT07 > 5%BIT07, which indicates that BIT07 plays an important role in determining the conductivity. CSYG-15%BIT07 showed the highest conductivity of 0.0126 S·cm−1 at 800 °C.
Figure 7 shows an Arrhenius plot of the total conductivity of the CSYG-BIT07 electrolyte. The total conductivity data in the figure were well fitted with a straight line throughout the operating temperatures. This indicates that the temperature dependence of the total conductivity of the CSYG-BIT07 electrolyte can be expressed by the Arrhenius equation [31,32,33]:
σ t = σ 0 T exp ( E a k T )
where σ0, Ea, k, and T are the pre-exponential factor, activation energy, Boltzmann constant, and absolute temperature, respectively.
The activation energies calculated from the slope of the Arrhenius plot are shown in Table 1. The activation energies of CSYG-5%BIT07, CSYG-10%BIT07, CSYG-15%BIT07, CSYG-20%BIT07, and CSYG-25%BIT07 were 0.94, 0.99, 0.89, 0.92, and 1.01 eV, respectively. Therefore, we can conclude that the activation energy of the CSYG-BIT07 electrolyte depends on the amount of BIT07.

3.4. Thermal Expansion

The thermal expansion coefficient (TEC) is an important property of SOFCs. The TECs of the electrolyte, cathode, and anode should be close to each other to avoid microcracks and interfacial stress at the operating temperature [32,33]. The average thermal expansion coefficient can be determined by the following equation [34,35]:
TEC = ( L L 0 ) L 0 T T 0
where L0 is the original length (um) of the synthesized sample, L is the sample length (um) at the corresponding temperature, while T0 and T are the initial and final temperatures (K), respectively.
Figure 8 shows the thermal expansion curves of the CSYG-15%BIT07 electrolyte, which exhibited a linear trend in the temperature range of 400–1000 °C. The average value of the thermal expansion coefficient was calculated to be 9.13 × 10−6/K at temperatures ranging from 25 to 800 °C. The TEC values for cathode materials, such as La0.7Sr0.3MnO3 (LSM), La0.6Sr0.4Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ (LSCF), and La0.7Sr0.3MnO3–Zr0.92Y0.08O1.92 (LSM-YSZ) have been reported to be ~12 × 10−6, 14–15 × 10−6, and 10.5 × 10−6/K, respectively [34,35,36]. The TEC of Ni-Zr0.92Y0.08O1.92 (Ni-YSZ), Ni-Sm0.2Ce0.8O3−δ (Ni-SDC), and strontium titanate anode materials have been reported to be 12.3 × 10−6, 13.5 × 10−6, and 10.8 × 10−6/K, respectively [34,37,38]. This indicates that the measured TEC value for CSYG-15%BIT07, obtained in the present work, is compatible with the TEC of this composite with LSM-YSZ and SrTiO3 based electrodes [31,36,39].

3.5. Single Cell Performance

To evaluate the effect of the CSYG-15%BIT07 composite electrolyte on the output performance of SOFCs, we fabricated a single cell with NiO + CSYG-BIT07|CSYG-BIT07|LSCF + CSYG-BIT07 configuration. Figure 9 shows the current density vs. cell voltage (IV) and current density vs. power density (IP) curves of the CSYG-15%BIT07 electrolyte-based cell at 800 °C. The open circuit voltage (OCV) and current density only reached ~0.5 V and 0.32 A cm−2, respectively. The maximum power output was ~0.16 W cm−2 at 800 °C, which is lower than the published data [23,31,32] for Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95-1mol% MgO (0.47 W cm−2 at 700 °C) [40], La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O2.85-Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 (60 W cm−2 at 700 °C) [22], Ce0.8Sm0.15Ca0.05O1.875 (0.170 W cm−2 at 700 °C) [34], and La0.85Sr0.15Ga0.8Mg0.2O2.825 (0.185 W cm−2 at 700 °C) [41]. The fuel cell performance is relatively poor, which will limit the use of CSYG-BIT07 in SOFCs. Therefore, extensive theoretical and experimental investigations are required to improve the fuel cell performance in future work.

4. Conclusions

In the present work, a new type of composite electrolyte, CSYG-BIT07, was developed and used as electrolyte for IT-SOFCs. We characterized the structure, sinterability, and thermal/electrical properties of CSYG-BIT07 to study the effect of the BIT07 content. The results reveal that the new composite material was a two-phase composite ceramic. This shows that doping with BIT07 can promote the densification of electrolyte materials and lower the sintering temperature. CSYG-BIT07 electrolytes with relative densities greater than 95% were prepared by ball-milling a mixture of CSYG and BIT07 powders and sintering at 1300 °C for 5 h. The performance of the composite depends on the content of BIT07. A maximum oxide ionic conductivity (σ800°C = 0.0126 S·cm−1), minimum electrical activation energy (Ea = 0.89 eV), and moderate thermal expansion coefficient (TEC = 9.13 × 10−6/K between room temperature and 800 °C) were achieved by adding 15 mol% of BIT07. These results highlight the great application prospects of the CSYG-BIT07 composites in IT-SOFCs.

Author Contributions

Experiment, Y.W. and C.W.; writing—original draft preparation, J.Y. and Y.L.; data curation, X.Q.; writing—review and editing, C.T.; validation and analysis, C.C., C.T. and M.Z. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation (Nos. 2021A1515010671 and 2020A1515011221), the Guangdong Province Key Construction Discipline Scientific Research Ability Promotion Project (No. 2021ZDJS071), the Natural Science Foundation of Shaoguan University (No. SZ2020KJ03), the Shaoguan Science and Technology Foundation (No. 210724134530330), and the innovation Projects of Colleges and Universities in Guangdong Province (No. 2021KTSCX122).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Ivers-Tiffée, E.; Weber, A.; Herbstritt, D. Materials and technologies for SOFC-components. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2001, 21, 1805–1811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Peng, J.; Huang, J.; Wu, X.L.; Xu, Y.W.; Chen, H.; Li, X. Solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) performance evaluation, fault diagnosis and health control: A review. J. Power Sources 2021, 505, 230058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Ma, L.; Zhao, K.; Kim, B.H.; Li, Q.; Huang, J. Electrochemical performance of solid oxide fuel cells with Sm, Nd co-doped Ce0.85(SmxNd1−x)0.15O2−δ electrolyte. Ceram. Int. 2015, 41, 6391–6397. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Saebea, D.; Authayanun, S.; Patcharavorachot, Y.; Chatrattanawet, N.; Arpornwichanop, A. Electrochemical performance assessment of low-temperature solid oxide fuel cell with YSZ-based and SDC-based electrolytes. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2018, 43, 921–931. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Singh, K.L.; Sharma, P.; Singh, A.P.; Kumar, A.; Sekhon, S.S. Structural and electrical analysis of microwave processed YSZ electrolytes for SOFC Prepared by co-precipitation method. JOM 2017, 69, 2448–2452. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Zhang, J.; Lenser, C.; Menzler, N.H.; Guillon, O. Comparison of solid oxide fuel cell (SOFC) electrolyte materials for operation at 500 °C. Solid State Ion. 2020, 344, 115138. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Hussain, S.; Yangping, L. Review of solid oxide fuel cell materials: Cathode, anode, and electrolyte. Energy Transit. 2020, 4, 113–126. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Wang, J.; Chen, X.; Xie, S.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.; Meng, J.; Zhou, D. Bismuth tungstate/neodymium-doped ceria composite electrolyte for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell: Sintering aid and composite effect. J. Power Sources 2019, 428, 105–114. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Eressa, L.A.; Rao, P.V.B. Synthesis and characterization of Ytterbium and Samarium Co-doped ceria as an electrolyte for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cell application. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2020, 242, 121914. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zheng, J.; Zhu, H.; Li, W.; Ma, Z.; Ou, X.; Fan, Y.; Guo, Y.; Wang, X.; Ling, Y. Numerical study on the electron-blocking effect and optimized operation parameters of ceria-SOFCs with the pure Sm doping CeO2 electrolyte. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2021, 46, 13318–13329. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Santos, T.H.; Grilo, J.P.F.; Loureiro, F.J.A.; Fagg, D.P.; Fonseca, F.C.; Macedo, D.A. Structure, densification and electrical properties of Gd3+ and Cu2+ co-doped ceria solid electrolytes for SOFC applications: Effects of Gd2O3 content. Ceram. Int. 2018, 44, 2745–2751. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Anwar, M.; Ali, S.A.M.; Muchtar, A.; Somalu, M.R. Synthesis and characterization of M-doped ceria-ternary carbonate composite electrolytes (M = erbium, lanthanum and strontium) for low-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 775, 571–580. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Buvat, G.; Quarez, E.; Joubert, O. Innovative solid oxide fuel cells based on BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 electrolyte and La2Mo2O9 amorphous reduced phase as anode material. J. Power Sources 2016, 302, 107–113. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Benamira, M.; Thommy, L.; Moser, F.; Joubert, O.; Caldes, M.T. New anode materials for IT-SOFC derived from the electrolyte BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 by lanthanum and manganese doping. Solid State Ion. 2014, 265, 38–45. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Prakash, D.; Delahaye, T.; Joubert, O.; Caldes, M.T.; Piffard, Y. Intermediate temperature solid oxide fuel cell based on BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2007, 167, 111–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Jayaraman, V.; Magrez, A.; Caldes, M.; Joubert, O.; Ganne, M.; Piffard, Y.; Brohan, L. Characterization of perovskite systems derived from Ba2In2O5: Part I: The oxygen-deficient Ba2In2(1−x)Ti2xO5+x rectangle(1−x) (0 ≤ x ≤ 1) compounds. Solid State Ion. 2004, 170, 17–24. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Letilly, M.; La Salle, A.L.G.; Lachgar, A.; Joubert, O. Synthesis, structural analysis and electrochemical performances of BLSITCFx as new cathode materials for solid oxide fuel cells (SOFC) based on BIT07 electrolyte. J. Power Sources 2010, 195, 4779–4784. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Letilly, M.; Le Gal La Salle, A.; Caldes, M.; Marrony, M.; Joubert, O. Validation of BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 as SOFC Electrolyte with Nd2NiO4, LSM and LSCF as Cathodes. Fuel Cells 2009, 9, 622–629. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jaiswal, N.; Kumar, D.; Upadhyay, S.; Parkash, O. High electrical conductivity of nanocomposites based on Ce0.82Sm0.16Sr0.02O1.90 and (Li/Na)2CO3 for low temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2016, 42, 9004–9010. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Ricca, C.; Ringuedé, A.; Cassir, M.; Adamo, C.; Labat, F. Conduction mechanisms in oxide–carbonate electrolytes for SOFC: Highlighting the role of the interface from first-principles modeling. J. Phys. Chem. C 2018, 122, 10067–10077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Ding, H.; Guo, X.; Li, J.; Hu, Q.; Sun, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, G.; Yu, F.; Li, C.; Wang, Y. Processing and characterization of novel Ce0.8Sm0.1Bi0.1O2−δ-BaCe0.8Sm0.1Bi0.1O3−δ (BiSDC-BCSBi) composite electrolytes for intermediate-temperature solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2021, 46, 7515–7527. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Xu, S.; Lin, X.; Ge, B.; Ai, D.; Ma, J.; Peng, Z. Microstructure and electrical conductivity of La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O2.85-Ce0.8Gd0.2O1.9 composite electrolytes for SOFC s. Int. J. Appl. Ceram. Technol. 2019, 16, 108–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Dwivedi, S. Solid oxide fuel cell: Materials for anode, cathode and electrolyte. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 23988–24013. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Xu, D.; Liu, X.; Wang, D.; Yi, G.; Gao, Y.; Zhang, D.; Su, W. Fabrication and characterization of SDC–LSGM composite electrolytes material in IT-SOFCs. J. Alloys Compd. 2007, 429, 292–295. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Shri Prakash, B.; William Grips, V.K.; Aruna, S.T. A single step solution combustion approach for preparing gadolinium doped ceria solid oxide fuel cell electrolyte material suitable for wet powder and plasma spraying processes. J. Power Sources 2012, 214, 358–364. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Arabacı, A.; Altınçekiç, T.G.; Der, M.; Öksüzömer, M.A.F. Preparation and properties of ceramic electrolytes in the Nd and Gd Co-doped ceria systems prepared by polyol method. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 792, 1141–1149. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Anjaneya, K.C.; Nayaka, G.P.; Manjanna, J.; Govindaraj, G.; Ganesha, K.N. Studies on structural, morphological and electrical properties of Ce0.8Ln0.2O2−δ (Ln = Y3+, Gd3+, Sm3+, Nd3+ and La3+) solid solutions prepared by citrate complexation method. J. Alloys Compd. 2014, 585, 594–601. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Moon, H.; Kim, S.D.; Park, E.W.; Hyun, S.H.; Kim, H.S. Characteristics of SOFC single cells with anode active layer via tape casting and co-firing. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2008, 33, 2826–2833. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Dai, H.; Chen, H.; He, S.; Cai, G.; Guo, L. Improving solid oxide fuel cell performance by a single-step co-firing process. J. Power Sources 2015, 286, 427–430. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Anjaneya, K.C.; Singh, M.P. Synthesis and properties of gadolinium doped ceria electrolyte for IT-SOFCs by EDTA-citrate complexing method. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 695, 871–876. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Raghvendra; Singh, R.K.; Singh, P. Synthesis of La0.9Sr0.1Ga0.8Mg0.2O3−δ electrolyte via ethylene glycol route and its characterizations for IT-SOFC. Ceram. Int. 2014, 40, 7177–7184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Benamira, M.; Letilly, M.; Quarez, E.; Joubert, O.; La Salle, A.L.G. Optimization of SOFC anode/electrolyte assembly based on BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 (BIT07)/Ni-BIT07 using an interfacial anodic layer. J. Power Sources 2014, 251, 66–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Jiang, T.; Wang, Z.; Zhang, J.; Hao, X.; Rooney, D.; Liu, Y.; Sun, W.; Qiao, J.; Sun, K. Understanding the flash sintering of rare-earth-doped ceria for solid oxide fuel cell. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2015, 98, 1717–1723. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Wu, Y.C.; Liao, Y.Y. Effect of Ca2+ and Sr2+ doping on the microstructure and cell performance of samaria-doped ceria electrolytes used in solid oxide fuel cells. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2016, 41, 13591–13602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Paydar, S.; Gholaminezad, I.; Shirani-Faradonbeh, H.; Imanlou, S.; Akbar, N.; Paydar, M.H. Evaluating the cathodic polarization of La0.7Sr0.3MnO3–Zr0.84−xCexY0.16O1.92 (x = 0, 0.42, 0.84) composites for SOFCs. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2021, 32, 11129–11144. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Fan, B.; Yan, J.; Yan, X. The ionic conductivity, thermal expansion behavior, and chemical compatibility of La0.54Sr0.44Co0.2Fe0.8O3−δ as SOFC cathode material. Solid State Sci. 2011, 13, 1835–1839. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Drożdż-Cieśla, E.; Wyrwa, J.; Pyda, W.; Rękas, M. A new method of preparing Ni/YSZ cermet materials. J. Mater. Sci. 2012, 47, 2807–2817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Marina, O.A.; Canfield, N.L.; Stevenson, J.W. Thermal, electrical, and electrocatalytical properties of lanthanum-doped strontium titanate. Solid State Ion. 2002, 149, 21–28. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Venkataramana, K.; Madhuri, C.; Reddy, Y.S.; Bhikshamaiah, G.; Reddy, C.V. Structural, electrical and thermal expansion studies of tri-doped ceria electrolyte materials for IT-SOFCs. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 719, 97–107. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Bi, H.; Liu, X.; Zhu, L.; Sun, J.; Yu, S.; Yu, H.; Pei, L. Effect of MgO addition and grain size on the electrical properties of Ce0.9Gd0.1O1.95 electrolyte for IT-SOFCs. Int. J. Hydrog. Energy 2017, 42, 11735–11744. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Wu, Y.C.; Huang, W.H. Processing improvement and performance analysis of La0.85Sr0.15Ga0.8Mg0.2O2.825 electrolyte-supported fuel cells. Ceram. Int. 2017, 43, S729–S738. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Flow chart of preparation of CSYG powders.
Figure 1. Flow chart of preparation of CSYG powders.
Materials 15 05591 g001
Figure 2. Flow chart of preparation of CSYG-BIT07.
Figure 2. Flow chart of preparation of CSYG-BIT07.
Materials 15 05591 g002
Figure 3. XRD pattern of (a) CSYG and BIT07, (b) CSYG-BIT07 composite materials.
Figure 3. XRD pattern of (a) CSYG and BIT07, (b) CSYG-BIT07 composite materials.
Materials 15 05591 g003
Figure 4. SEM images of CSYG-15%BIT07 sintered at 1300 °C for 5 h.
Figure 4. SEM images of CSYG-15%BIT07 sintered at 1300 °C for 5 h.
Materials 15 05591 g004
Figure 5. AC impedance graph of CSYG-15%BIT07 at different temperatures. (a) 500 °C, (b) 600 °C, (c) 700 °C and (d) 800 °C.
Figure 5. AC impedance graph of CSYG-15%BIT07 at different temperatures. (a) 500 °C, (b) 600 °C, (c) 700 °C and (d) 800 °C.
Materials 15 05591 g005
Figure 6. Ionic conductivity of CSYG-BIT07. (a) Ionic conductivity vs. temperature. (b) Ionic conductivity vs. content.
Figure 6. Ionic conductivity of CSYG-BIT07. (a) Ionic conductivity vs. temperature. (b) Ionic conductivity vs. content.
Materials 15 05591 g006
Figure 7. Arrhenius plots for total conductivity of CSYG-BIT07.
Figure 7. Arrhenius plots for total conductivity of CSYG-BIT07.
Materials 15 05591 g007
Figure 8. Thermal expansion curves of CSYG-15%BIT07.
Figure 8. Thermal expansion curves of CSYG-15%BIT07.
Materials 15 05591 g008
Figure 9. Single cell performance of a single IT-SOFC. NiO + CSYG-BIT07|LSCF + CSYG-BIT07 measured at 800 °C.
Figure 9. Single cell performance of a single IT-SOFC. NiO + CSYG-BIT07|LSCF + CSYG-BIT07 measured at 800 °C.
Materials 15 05591 g009
Table 1. Properties of CSYG-BIT07 composite electrolyte.
Table 1. Properties of CSYG-BIT07 composite electrolyte.
Composition (BIT07 Content)Relative Density/%Lattice Parameter/(Å)σ700°C/(mS·cm−1)σ800°C/(mS·cm−1)Ea/(eV)
5%BIT0795.45.4321.934.780.94
10%BIT0795.65.4362.325.670.99
15%BIT0798.85.4625.3612.600.89
20%BIT0796.75.4433.929.310.92
25%BIT0796.45.4482.856.831.01
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Y.; Tian, C.; Zhu, M.; Yang, J.; Qu, X.; Chen, C.; Wang, C.; Liu, Y. Preparation and Properties of Ce0.8Sm0.16Y0.03Gd0.01O1.9-BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 Composite Electrolyte. Materials 2022, 15, 5591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165591

AMA Style

Wang Y, Tian C, Zhu M, Yang J, Qu X, Chen C, Wang C, Liu Y. Preparation and Properties of Ce0.8Sm0.16Y0.03Gd0.01O1.9-BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 Composite Electrolyte. Materials. 2022; 15(16):5591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165591

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Yajun, Changan Tian, Minzheng Zhu, Jie Yang, Xiaoling Qu, Cao Chen, Cao Wang, and Yang Liu. 2022. "Preparation and Properties of Ce0.8Sm0.16Y0.03Gd0.01O1.9-BaIn0.3Ti0.7O2.85 Composite Electrolyte" Materials 15, no. 16: 5591. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165591

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop