Next Article in Journal
The Influence of the Type of Fibers on the Reduction of the Threshold Effect in the Transition Zone of a Railway Track
Previous Article in Journal
Isogeometric Analysis of Graphene-Reinforced Functionally Gradient Piezoelectric Plates Resting on Winkler Elastic Foundations
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Development of Environmentally Clean Construction Materials Using Industrial Waste

by
Galiya Zhanzakovna Alzhanova
1,*,
Yelaman Kanatovich Aibuldinov
2,*,
Zhanar Baktybaevna Iskakova
1,
Saniya Manarbekkyzy Khabidolda
1,
Gaziz Galymovich Abdiyussupov
2,
Madi Toktasynuly Omirzak
2,
Gunasekaran Murali
3 and
Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin
3
1
Research Institute of New Chemical Technologies, L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University, 010008 Nur-Sultan, Kazakhstan
2
Department of Chemistry and Chemical Technology, Kh. Dosmukhamedov Atyrau University, 060001 Atyrau, Kazakhstan
3
Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, 195291 St. Petersburg, Russia
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(16), 5726; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165726
Submission received: 22 June 2022 / Revised: 8 August 2022 / Accepted: 13 August 2022 / Published: 19 August 2022

Abstract

:
The accumulated waste generated from industries severely affects environmental conditions. Using waste as a construction material or soil stabilization is an emerging area in the construction industry. Introducing new additive materials to strengthen local soils using industrial waste is an inexpensive and more effective method to improve the soil. In light of this, this study aims to develop environmentally clean construction materials for stabilizing natural loam (NL) using red mud (RM), blast furnace slag (BFS), and lime production waste (LPW). Nine different mixtures were prepared with four different combinations of RM (20, 30, and 40%), BFS (25, 30 and 35%), LPW (4, 6 and 8%), and various content of NL. X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS), and axial compressive strength were examined. The results indicated that the optimum strength was obtained from the sample containing 40% of RM, 35% of BFS, and 8% of LPW. The observed compressive strength of the sample for 90 days was 7.38 MPa, water resistance was 7.12 MPa, and frost resistance was 7.35 MP, with low linear expansion meeting the demands for first class construction materials of the Kazakh norms. The mineral composition analysis evidenced the lack of heavy metals contaminants and hazardous compounds. Based on strength and environmental performance, RM, BFS, LPW, and NL mix can be used as a road base material. This process is believed to reduce environmental pollution related to RM and BFS, and lower the road base cost.

1. Introduction

There is a great interest in using industrial waste worldwide and a growing interest in using recycled materials in road construction. Using industrial waste, such as fly ash, metallurgical slags, plastic waste, and others, is common in many countries. The technical characteristics of such industrial by-products make it possible to replace some natural aggregates or binding materials in road construction [1,2]. Introducing industrial waste as building materials is one of the effective methods of using it in construction and eliminates waste disposal in large quantities [3]. Bauxite residue or red mud (RM) is an industrial waste generated in bauxite ore processing into alumina after strong alkali leaching. A study reported that the production of 1 ton of alumina produces 11.5 tons of RM [4]. About 120 million tons of red mud are produced worldwide each year, and it is estimated that 30 billion metric tons have already been accumulated worldwide [5]. Using waste materials to strengthen the soil is an emerging field in geotechnical engineering [6,7,8,9,10].
The RM mud is very caustic and its pH can be between 9.0 and 12.5. The high alkalinity storage of RM leads to serious environmental problems [11]. However, the alkaline characteristics of the bauxite residue reduce with enlarged duration following utilization: the cation exchangeability and the exchange capacity of sodium decrease with increasing post-disposal time [12]. RM may also contain elevated concentrations of natural radioactive elements [13,14]. RM can be used in various ways, such as building materials; adsorbents for heavy metal removal; and pigment production, and as a resource for recovering iron, titanium, and other trace metals [15]. Using significant amounts of red mud in road construction is one of the most common procedures. RM has limited practical applications in road construction, depending on the process conditions, refinery design, and bauxite quality [16]. However, comparative studies of the potential use of bauxite residues in road construction are still insufficient [17]. Using RM to produce building materials, including cement, ceramics, bricks, etc., can help solve environmental issues [5]. RM has low cost, high strength, and moisture resistance, and can be used as a road base material in China [18]. The use of bauxite residues to produce asphalt mixtures and road construction has attracted the attention of researchers. The potential use of coarse RM in the construction industry as road bases, embankments, and fillers for levees and seawalls. The tested sample contains 70% of coarse RM, 25% of fly ash, and 5% of lime. The results suggest that the stabilized residue outperformed the traditional material and can be used as a road base material with enhanced performance [19]. This is due to the strength of eco-friendly materials used for road bases with a content of 30% RM. Results indicated that the optimum proportions of sample strength after curing for 7 and 28 days were 5.92 MPa and 6.66 MPa, respectively. The observed strength is within the limits suggested by Chinese standards (5–7 MPa) [20]. The production of a road base material utilized raw components of RM, electrolytic manganese, and carbide slag. The findings revealed that the unconfined compressive strength after 7 days was 5.6 MPa. The excellent polymerized and pore structures were observed in road base materials under the synergistic action [21].
Ferrous slag is a by-product formed under high temperatures due to melting waste rock of iron-containing materials, flux, and impurities [22]. The chemical composition of ferrous slag mostly consists of oxides of iron, aluminium, silicon, magnesium, calcium, and manganese. The production process, raw materials, method, and cooling rate affect the number of substances formed [23]. Ferrous slags are classified into acidic and basic slags. Acidic slags contain more acidic oxides of silicon and phosphorus. Basic slags contain mostly basic oxides of ferrum, calcium, and magnesium. Some elements’ concentration in different slag types exceeds general environmental guidelines based on multiple exposure routes [24]. Studies have shown that the release of iron slag deposits has a detrimental effect on surface and groundwater [25]. Radioactive elements may be present in the composition of ferrous slag, for example, isotopes of potassium, radium, and thorium. Many studies have observed that large amounts of deposited slag can contaminate soil and groundwater by leaching toxic elements such as Cd, Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni, and Zn [26]. Ferrous slags have long been utilized as inert stones in the construction of road foundations. Ferrous slag is a very valuable resource and can be used in the construction of very high-quality road surfaces, as it has excellent technical and physical characteristics compared to a filler made of natural materials. Ferrous slag is disposed of in one tank by numerous factories. The accumulation of steel slag in landfills without treatment, which is caused by the release of heavy metals from steel slag, seriously pollutes rivers and agricultural land. There have been numerous attempts to safely reuse steel slag by lowering the danger involved.
Approximately 0.3–1 tons of blast furnace slag (BFS) is produced during the production of 1 tons of pig iron [27]. BFS and fly ash are used for road surface stabilization. It can also be mixed with lime to improve the strength and durability of some roads for superior pavement performance [28]. BFS has been used to replace coarse and fine aggregates in asphalt concrete mixtures [29]. Air-cooled slag is hard and has fine properties, so it is suitable as an aggregate. Adding granular slag to concrete increases its strength and durability since the slag has good cement properties. Granulated and expanded slag is practiced as a light filler in construction due to its low density [30,31]. BFS is also used to stabilize soft clay to increase its strength and can replace a high cement content in concrete production [32,33]. With this in mind, it is advisable to use recycled materials in construction to save space for landfill purposes, reduce carbon dioxide, and reduce waste-related costs [34,35]. Blast furnace slag has been established to have the ability to improve strength by interacting with lime to generate more C-S-H gel [36]. BFS is the major base material used in the alkali-activated binders [37].
Lime production waste (LPW) is generated when calcite or carbonate raw materials are burned at temperatures below 960 °C and can be sold as a by-product containing lime and other components (Al2O3, MgO, Fe2O3, and others). LPW is usually utilized to neutralize the soil’s acidity, make Portland cement, and disinfect wastewater. Due to its chemical interaction, LPW is employed as an alkaline activator of particle surfaces of different industrial and municipal wastes to generate novel composites and building materials [38]. Zhang and Li (2019) [39] investigated a stabilization of red mud comprising 22.5% of fly ash and 7.5% of lime. Findings indicated the excellent performance in temperature shrinkage, dry shrinkage, and freezing and thawing. The compression rebound modulus of developed materials is superior to commonly used materials. A comparative study of standard and admixture-based soil was carried out by Nitish Kumar (2022) [40]. The admixtures used were fly ash (10, 20, 30, and 40%), lime sludge (5, 10, 15, and 20%) and polypropylene fibres (0.25, 0.5, 0.75, and 1.0%). Results revealed that the addition of fly ash, which ranged from 20 to 30%, exhibited an excellent strength. The maximum shear strength was observed in soil with 20% fly ash and for California bearing ratio of soil with 20% fly ash. Fibers with 0.5 and 0.75% exhibited a good California bearing ratio and shear strength, respectively. In the case of lime addition, the maximum values found for California bearing ratio and shear strength were 20 and 10%, respectively.
Several literatures are available regarding the characterization of the individual materials. However, the different combinations of soil using these materials and their characterization were unexplored by any researchers. The pozzolanic reactivity of a component depends on the amorphous silica content, fineness, mixing ratio, available alkaline medium, and temperature [41]. To fill this research gap, this study aims to develop eco-friendly materials by replacing natural materials with blast furnace slag, red mud, and lime production waste. X-ray diffraction (XRD), X-ray fluorescence (XRF), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), and axial compressive strength were examined. The main goals of this study are develop environmentally clean construction materials for stabilizing natural loam (NL) (composites with the highest possible fractions of industrial wastes RM, BFS) and LPW; and find new eco-friendly materials with mechanical qualities appropriate for civil engineering applications. Production wastes are used as a binder for NL for road base construction with complete replacement of traditional layers of natural sand and rubble. The current analysis shows that RM and BFS make up the majority of the combinations with LPW and NL (40 and 35%, respectively). Developed materials can be utilized for road base, municipal and industrial waste dumps, building foundations, tile and brick manufacturing, etc. These compositions’ novelty, high concentration of industrial waste, binding of heavy metals, and ease of manufacture make them superior to those found in the literature. With improved mechanical qualities, these composites can also be utilized to create bricks, blocks, and other types of construction materials. This study’s significance and urgency stem from the steadily rising level of environmental pollution caused by industrial wastes and the global increase in atmospheric temperature, which has recently resulted in environmental catastrophes across the globe.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Materials

All materials were sourced from the different locations at Kazakhstan. The BFS is collected from ArcelorMittal Temirtau, Karaganda. The collected samples were crushed to lower the granulometry of the BFS. Red mud is collected from the Pavlodar aluminium plant, substandard lime from Lime Plant of Pavlodar region at Maikain. The loam soil sample is collected from a quarry to extract non-metallic materials near the city of Nur-Sultan. The materials were examined after a few days from the date of collection. The collected four materials are shown in Figure 1.

2.2. Sample Preparation and Mixing Combinations

Every raw material sample was put through the drying process. The soft samples were pulverized in a porcelain mortar, and BFS was crushed in a ball mill and sieved through a 1.14 mm sieve. The dry mix of the materials was performed at various compositions, as demonstrated in Table 1. The mixing composition used in this study was selected based on the earlier research experience [42]. The mix id was labeled based on the content of RM, BFS, and LPW. For example, from the first mix (R20-B25-L4), R20 denoted the 20% of RM, B25 denoted a 25% of BFS, and L4 denoted a 4% of LPW. The other eight mix id were labeled in a similar way. In order to generate a 30 × 30 mm cylindrical sample, the mixtures were homogenized, hydrated at the optimal humidity (10–12%), compacted with a 10 MPa force, and hardened in outdoor circumstances. Figure 2a,b shows the tools used to prepare the specimens and the specimen’s appearance before testing, respectively. Nine different samples were arranged for pondering on 3, 7, 14, 28, 60, 90, 180, and 365 days of the test examples to calculate the midpoints, which add up to an amount of close to 900 samples. The samples were prepared from components taken in mass proportions, mixing RM, BFS, LPW, and NL at different ratios.

2.3. Methods

The following complementary techniques and research approaches were used to characterize the raw materials and final products to achieve the goal [43]. The mineral composition was studied using the X-ray Diffraction (XRD) from Philips PW 1830/40 Powder diffractometer (Caerphilly, United Kingdom). The machine was operated with an acceleration voltage of 40 kV and an X-ray beam current of 30 mA. Morphologically, the chemical composition of the raw materials was determined using an X-ray Fluorescence (XRF) Spectrometer Cu-tube (Philips Panalytical, Calgary, Canada) working with a characteristic CuKα wavelength of 1.5406 nm and machine is equipped with a Ni-filter. The elemental analysis of solubility and lixiviation of metals from liquid extracts was carried out by atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) on a Perkin Elmer 4100 spectrometer (Waltham, MA, USA). The SEM was performed using Ultra Plus (Carl Zeiss AG) to investigate the surface morphology of samples. The physical properties of the developed samples were examined for uniaxial compression, water, and frost resistance. Studies of changes in the strength of samples during the hydration of materials were carried out by studying the limit under uniaxial compression. The control of the change in the coefficient of linear expansion of materials during the hydration of samples was determined with a digital caliper. The calorimeter identified the chemical properties and carbonate content by changing the pH value. The electronic balance (ESJ201A, Zhejiang, China), ball mill (XQM-1. Hunan, China), and pH meter (PHS-25. Zhejiang, China) were used during the process.
The water-resistance coefficient was determined from the axial resistance strength of the samples on the 28th and 90th day. The change in the water resistance of materials after hydration and hardening after 28 and 90 days was determined in accordance with the requirements of the state standard of the Republic of Kazakhstan ST RK 973-94 «Stone materials and soils treated with inorganic binders for road and airfield construction».
The formula for calculating the water-resistance coefficient (WR) is given in Equation (1):
W R = R S A T R A M B
RSAT—the uniaxial compressive resistance on the 28th day after sample total immersion in water for 24 h; RAMB—resistance under ambient conditions.
The water absorption values were calculated using Equation (2):
W A = M S A T M D M D × 100
WA—water absorption (%); MSAT—sample mass after 24-h water-saturation (g); MD—dry sample mass (g).
The formula for calculating the frost resistance coefficient (CFR) is given in Equation (3):
C F R = R F R S A T
RF—the axial compressive strength after 25 freezing/thawing cycles, where each freeze occurs at negative 25 °C for 8 h; thawing also takes 8 h in water at positive 20 °C.
RF—the compressive strength after 24 h of water saturation at 20–25 °C.
The test measurements were measured employing a calliper, and the linear expansion coefficient (α) was calculated using Equation (4):
α = D F D I D I × 100 %
DI—initial diameter (mm); DF—final diameter (mm) [36].

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Raw Materials Characterization

3.1.1. Chemical Composition

Table 2 shows the major elements of resources by the XRF method. They mainly consist of Al, Si, Ca, and Fe. However, RM, BFS, and LPW contain more Ca than NL, whereas NL contains more Si than the rest. Both RM and BFS showed approximately the same total Ti, Al, and Mn content. The RM contains a large amount of iron (17.47%). Some iron compounds may contribute to the removal of copper [44]. The content of copper and other heavy metals in all components was not detected; the presence of manganese is negligible (by the AAS method).
The XRF examination of RM showed that most components are: CaO (45.15%), SiO2 (17.59%), Fe-oxides (25.39%), Al2O3 (4.57%), TiO2 (2.90%), and Na2O (2.81). These components are in good agreement with the other study [45]. According to studies, various toxic metals in RM concentrations range from 0.01 to 1% of the total weight [46], [47]. By AAS method (Table 3), the presence of heavy metals was found, such as Pb (0.17%), Zn (0.10%), Cu (0.05%), As (0.47%), etc. Heavy metals are well known for their carcinogenic and toxic properties. However, their content in RM is insignificant. Studies have reported that the presence of zinc in sediments has a more negative effect on the development of soil strength than other metals [48]. BFS is rich in CaO (37.75%) and pozzolans like SiO2 (31.86%) and Al2O3 (10.02%), and contains SO3 (2.67%). This is consistent with the findings of other studies by BFS [49,50]. Pozzolanic active phase (s) in any waste allows it to be used in practical applications [51].
The study of the values of leaching and solubility of metals from slag showed no excess of the maximum permissible concentrations for any chemical element (Table 4). NL mostly consists of SiO2 (56.45%) and concentration of Al2O3 (16.41%), CaO (11.43%), and Fe2O3 (7.94%). A noticeable content of FeO + Fe2O3 gives the soil a light brown color. The chemical composition of the LPW used as an activator content is 98.52%, and the impurities content of 1.51%. The raw materials contain more active mineral components, such as 2CaO SiO2, commonly used in construction materials. The main component of LPW is calcium hydroxide, which supplements sufficient calcium and hydroxide. In an alkaline environment, the compounds react with calcium hydroxide and as a result, cementing materials are formed, which determine the increase in the strengthening of the road foundation. The detailed chemical composition of the raw materials is shown in Table 3.
The pH values of RM, BFS, LPW, and NL are shown in Table 5, indicating that the alkalinity of RM is stronger than that of BFS, which may affect the hydration reaction. Alkaline minerals, such as calcite, tricalcium aluminate, apatite, hydrocalumite, and other minor components, contribute to RM’s alkalinity [52]. One of the most important components in soil system stabilization is pH. If the pH of the soil is more than 7, it has good reactivity with lime. In our case, natural loam is closer to neutral. The pH of the soil may differ based on the mine’s properties [53]. It is effective for the dissolution of silica and alumina at a higher pH, resulting in an increase in pozzolanic reaction, which contributes to greater flocculation. The alkali elements will be incorporated into the CSH phases over time and with increasing hydration, at least in the phase stabilization field of CSH with a pH greater than 9.5 [54]. Furthermore, as the pH rises, the hydrolysis of Si-O accelerates. Slag dissolution releases more aluminum ions, promoting the formation of ettringite.

3.1.2. Structure of the Components

The analysis of the granulometric composition (Table 6) showed that more than half of the RM particles have a size of 1–2 microns and 10–50 microns. RM particles are characterized by high specific surface areas ranging from 15 to 58 m2/g [55]. RM has a low settling rate, low hydraulic conductivity, and a relatively high water-holding capacity because of its large specific surface area [49]. The number of particles approaching 1 mm in size (250–1000 microns) is only 5%, and exceeding the size of 1 mm is 2%.

3.1.3. The Morphological Structure of the Components

Figure 3 shows the microscopic images of raw materials obtained by SEM. The composition of the RM used includes a large number of iron oxides (27.39%), which explains the brown color of the bauxite residue used. The other components did not differ in color and appearance. All raw materials have a microstructure of shapeless microparticles of various sizes. The differences in materials in terms of morphology and particle size can be seen. It can be seen in the figure that raw materials are powdery substances that are agglomerated. RM has small irregular particles. Most of the samples’ surfaces are depicted as flow-rounded aggregates of varied sizes and shapes that are chemically unrelated; the pores between them are also of diverse sizes and shapes. According to micrographs, such a structure has amorphous compounds. The crystalline components identified by XRD may be hidden under the upper amorphous layer or have thin dimensions that cannot be distinguished with such magnification. BFS particles came in various sizes and forms, with some having sharp edges and morphology modification was evident by milling. As shown in Figure 3b, the degree of disorder on slag particle surfaces increased with scratches and uneven surfaces. The LPW particles have round forms with various diameters, as is typical of amorphous materials. NL has a homogeneous surface covered with cracks and rounded particles of various sizes.
The elemental composition of the spot on the sample surface of the raw material in Figure 4 was characterized by energy dispersive spectrometry (EDS). Micrographs with element distribution mapping on the sample’s focused surface allow researchers to examine high-relief surfaces, receive information about the state of the surface layer, and change the picture of sub-layers. The EDS graphs of the areas of RM points and the points of microchemical analysis by the EDS method showed the high content of chemical elements O, Ca, Al, Na, and C, respectively. This corresponds to Na2CaSiO4 and CaCO3 being surrounded by NaAlO2, which semi-quantitatively corresponds to CaTiO3 and SiO2. According to the EDS spectra, the main elements of BFS are Ca, Si, Al, Mg, Na, C, and O. This corresponds to the CaO-MgO-Al2O3-SiO2 system. The findings support the presence of the principal components determined by XRF: CaO, SiO2, MgO, Al2O3, and Na2O, together with minor admixtures of additional elements. The study of the micro-chemical composition of LPW showed a pronounced homogeneity of the chemical composition of the material at the nearest points. The primary components of LPW, represented by the elements Ca, O, and C (corresponding to CaO and CaCO3), are shown in Figure 4c. The presence of a large amount of amorphous phase NL can be determined by checking the chemical composition of crystal-like soil particles by the EDS method. The main elements included in the composition of NL are Si, O, Al, Mg, and C, corresponding to the content of quartz, calcite, and other minerals in NL. The SEM-EDS analysis results support these conclusions.

3.1.4. Mineral Composition

On a semi-quantitative basis, X-ray phase analysis was performed on powder using a diffractogram of powder samples using the method of equal attachments and artificial mixtures. A quantitative ratio of crystal phases was determined. Characteristic diffraction reflexes allowing identification of the phases present are noted. In the research by Long et al. (2019) [56] and Gonzalez et al. (2021) [57], the mineralogical composition and microstructures of tests were decided by XRD and SEM. Figure 5 shows the XRD patterns for raw materials. The interpretation of diffractograms was carried out using data from the ICDD card file: the PDF2 powder diffraction data base (Powder Diffraction File) and diffractograms of minerals free of impurities. The diffraction peaks of RM were complicated and overlapped seriously comparing with the other crystal, and almost all phases with strong diffraction peaks were silicate mineral and iron-related phases. The major minerals detailed by researchers in RM are boehmite, kaolinite, quartz, rutile, diaspore, hematite, calcite, goethite, muscovite, and tricalcium aluminate [58,59,60]. Figure 3a shows the main mineral components of RM. The results of semi-quantitative X-ray phase analysis of crystalline phases show the presence of minerals like hatrurite (41.0%), iron silicate (22%), hematite (9.5%), magnetite (7.8%), perovskite (6.9%), and intermetallic compounds Al-Fe-Si (12.7%). The highest point of the peak shape appears at 2θ = 35.5°, and the diffraction peak was enriched with the higher peak-shape and the wider peak-surface between the angle of 29.4–35.9°, which further indicated that the content of silicate mineral in RM was relatively rich.
According to the XRD analysis, BFS represents a mixture of oxides of relatively complex chemical composition (Figure 5b); its composition was mainly presented by such mineral phases as calcite akermanite-gehlenite (66.3%), fayalite (23.7%), monticellite (5.6%), and gypsum (4.3%), typical for metallurgical slags. All XRD peaks of, except for the akermanite-gehlenite peak at 2θ = 31.2°, have a low intensity, indicating a low content of these minerals in the BFS. The second intense peak system at 2θ = 30° is related to fayalite. The amorphous phase represents the bulk of the sample, as evidenced by the large XRD background.
The clay minerals from NL (Figure 5c), include quartz (69.3, the highest peak shape appears at 2θ = 29.7°), albite (13.4%), calcite (10.2%), and orthoclase (7%). High amorphous phase content in the loam under study is characterized by a relatively low intensity scale and a very high X-ray background.
Figure 3d depicts the mineralogical phases of LPW. It can be seen that the main minerals are portlandite (85.8%) and calcite (14.2%). The most intense diffraction peak for portlandite is observed at diffraction angles, 2θ also equaling to 34.1°, I = 100%. This fact also suggests that the raw carbonate was stored under high humidity conditions after it was calcined. The second intense peak system is at 2θ = 29.5° and is related to calcite CaCO3, implying that the calcination temperature is insufficient for lime production as a raw material. Ca (OH)2, the major component of LPW, can supply enough calcium and hydroxide ions to generate an alkaline environment that promotes hydration. It is possible that the content of aluminum, calcium, and silicon oxides in the system can be activated by a hydroxide ion, which partially combines with a sulfate ion to form a burning substance that gives the system hydraulically cementing properties.

3.2. Physical and Mechanical Properties of the Developed Materials

This section presents the results of a study of changes in the physical and mechanical properties of samples as a result of their hydration and curing for 90 days. The values of the mechanical properties of the samples were calculated as the average and standard deviation of nine sample measurements.

3.2.1. Axial Resistance of Test Specimens

With increased concentrations of BFS, RM, and LPW, the strengthened materials’ different values grew gradually over time (Figure 6). The strength values of the samples were 0.67–3.56 MPa in 3 days, after 28 days 1.55–6.69 MPa, and 3.33–7.38 MPa after 90 days. The variations are barely noticeable and fall within the strength measures’ standard deviation. The collected experimental data’s axial resistance strength standard deviation values were never greater than 5% of the average means. The standard deviations of the test samples were low and varied between 0.005 and 0.10. The value of their strength is directly dependent on the content of each of the components. Composition R20-B25-L4 does not meet the requirements for practical use as a building material, since it demonstrated the least strength. The introduction of a 4% LPW additive as an activator of the astringent properties of slag does not give a fundamental increase in the strength of materials. Some materials with 6–8% LPW reached the strength of the first class already on the 28th day. The samples of composition R40-B35-L8 showed the best results among all the samples.
Figure 6 shows the compressive strength changes of test samples from 3 to 90 days. The addition of BFS, RM, and LPW improved compressive strength. Generally, when soil is mixed with RM, BFS, and LPW, there are chemical reactions that take place between them, which provide an improvement in strength. In any case, a few variables control the chemical responses, which give the change in quality-strength, such as moisture content, type of minerals, curing condition, weathering condition, and time. By the age of 90 days, the Kazakhstan building regulations for the strength of the first class (4–6 MPa) of first composition R20-B25-L4 with the disposal of three types of industrial waste meet for all compositions except one with minimum amounts of slag BFS (25%), RM (20%), and LPW (4%) with maximum soil content (51%). An increase in the content of LPW, RM, and BFS in materials invariably leads to an increase in their strength over time. This increase in strength leads to a decrease in the consumption of alkaline Ca and Mg ions to create and maintain high alkalinity necessary for the processes of alkaline excitation of surfaces of chemically neutral soil particles and slag particles with the removal of new amounts of Ca and Mg ions into the interstitial space. The strength of the best sample R40-B35-L8 was between 3.56 and 7.36 MPa after 90 days. Samples of the composition R40-B35-L8 already on the 3rd day have a strength of 3.56 MPa, which corresponds to the strength of the II-th class of road bases, and after 28 days these materials already correspond to the I-th class of strength of road bases (>6 MPa). In the previous investigation, NL was strengthened by LPW, ground-cooled ferrous slag [42]. The values also increased as the content of components and LPW increased over 90 days. The development of the C-S-H gel was aided by reactive CaO, SiO2, and Al2O3 in raw materials. Components react exceedingly slowly with water, resulting in the development of a hardening binder. According to the results and earlier studies, the compressive strength of stabilized soil samples increases with an increase in percentage of lime and of slag, and the compressive strength of stabilized soil samples increases with an increase in days of curing [36,61]. The compressive strength was increased using lime. Longer curing durations make the benefit more pronounced [62].

3.2.2. Coefficient of Linear Dilatation and Shrinkage of Samples

The linear expansion coefficient of the samples was carried out on 3, 28, and 90 days, depending on the content of the components and the hydration time. Composites’ linear shrinkage is inversely proportional to their porosity. In other words, their coefficient of linear shrinkage decreases as their porosity increases. Values of the composites increased gradually (Figure 7) during the first 28 days, and the decreasing trend was observed until the 90th day, when values were between 1.15 and 1.72%. This is a more intensive shrinkage process compared to the previous age of the samples with the introduction of a large amount of LPW. Comparison of the difference in the expansion values at 3- and 90-day ages of each of the compositions shows that materials with a lower LPW content expand noticeably more than samples with a large amount of LPW. Perhaps this phenomenon is explained by a decrease in the stickiness of loam particles with a decrease in their number by 20–40%. Some samples’ shrinkage, which started 60 days before and continued to develop strength, shows compaction by tightening the material particles to the center. Perhaps this difference is explained by the difference in the slag’s chemical and mineral compositions. When the strength and expansion of samples are compared, it is clear that the maximal intensity of these processes of modifying the mechanical properties of samples occurs on the first day of hydration of mixes. If these processes had proceeded with the same intensity for all 90 days, the strength of the samples would have reached higher values. Samples with a lower NL content expand noticeably more than samples with a large amount of soil. Perhaps this phenomenon is explained by the decrease in the stickiness of NL particles with a decrease in their content (samples R40-B35-L4, R40-B35-L6, and R40-B35-L8). According to previous studies, the coefficient of linear expansion of samples begins to decrease due to gel compaction during syneresis. The standard deviations of the linear expansion coefficient of the test samples were low and varied between 0.003 and 0.016.

3.2.3. Water and Frost Resistance of the Materials

The study of water and frost resistance of the developed compositions was studied in accordance with the requirements of the technical conditions of the state standard of the Republic of Kazakhstan ST RK 973-94 “Stone materials and soils treated with inorganic binders for road and airfield construction” for strengthening soils with slags, after hydration and hardening after 28 and 90 days. According to the building regulations of Kazakhstan, water-resistance and frost resistance of samples meets the requirements except for sample R20-B25-L4. The remaining samples meet the requirements of the first strength class (4–6 MPa) of water-saturated samples and the value of the frost resistance coefficient. The water-resistance coefficient of materials after 90 days of hydration was observed to be 1.13. The coefficient of frost resistance after 25 cycles of freezing-thawing was observed up to 1.14. An increase in the parameters of hardening of materials for water resistance from 28 to 90 days is proof of strengthening the structure of the samples. The strength values of the samples after 24 h of full water saturation fluctuate within 1.39–6.32 MPa at 28 days and 3.33–7.12 MPa at 90 days. The strengths for frost resistance values of the samples were 1.3–6.89 MPa in 28 days and 3.3–7.35 MPa after 90 days. The water resistance of materials increases simultaneously with an increase in their strength and changes in the coefficient of linear expansion of the samples. The frost resistance coefficient after 25 freeze-thaw cycles is in the range of 0.70–0.89, which also significantly exceeds the requirements. During each of the 25 expansions of the samples due to the crystallization of water into ice particles, the volume of materials expands and microcracks and microvoids form throughout the volume of the samples. When melting ice crystals are immersed in water at + 25 °C for 8 h, they leave pores that fill with water and hydrate new amounts of alkaline elements, causing a second wave of synthesis of sol-gel neoplasms that strengthen the samples. The composition R40-B35-L8 exhibited the highest results of water resistance and frost resistance. With the introduction of highly alkaline RM sludge into the soil, the strength under uniaxial compression increases as well as the samples’ water and frost resistance. The data in Figure 8 shows that with the increasing strength of materials, their water and frost resistance also increase. Mymrin (2015) [63] investigated and explained the reason for the coefficient of frost resistance value exceeding one: The phenomenon of micro-desquamation of slag particles was caused by temperature shocks, as well as increased surface hydration, alkaline corrosion, and the synthesis of new formations that strengthen the samples over 25 freezing and thawing cycles.
The standard deviations of the water resistance and frost resistance increase with axial resistance. The standard deviations of the test samples were low and varied between 0.01 and 0.09. A similar increase in the mechanical properties of concrete is observed when testing the frost resistance of materials. The standard deviations of the test samples were low and varied between 0.01 and 0.21. This significantly affected the improvement of the strength properties of concrete [64].

3.2.4. Changes in the Carbonate Content of Materials during Hydration of Samples

Figure 9 illustrates the carbonatization of the studied compounds, which begins immediately after the mixtures are hydrated. The amount of carbon dioxide absorption from the atmosphere is directly proportional to the amount of calcium oxide injected and the time after hydration begins. The change in the carbonate content of samples was determined by the weight loss method using an interaction with hydrochloric acid (HCl) in a calcimeter. According to Figure 9, it can be seen that the synthesis of crystalline or amorphous calcite cannot provide such increases in the strength of samples. The carbonate content values of the samples ranged from 4.38 to 6.98% at 3 days, 8.35 to 12.01 at 28 days and 10.8 to 13.23% at 90 days. The standard deviations of the carbonate content were low and varied between 0 and 0.16. The maximum values of standard deviations are observed in the samples R20-B25-L8, R30-B30-L4, and R40-B35-L4. The process of adsorption of CO2 in the air gradually reduces its intensity between 28 and 90 days. The formation of Ca (OH)2 mineral portlandite reduces the porosity of materials. A decrease in the porosity of the samples and the formation of a shell around lime particles as the chemically most active component of the initial mixture leads to a decrease in the intake of air and the CO2 contained in it. The growth of carbonates in the samples contributes to an increase in strength. The further strength gain may occur due to the compaction of previously formed sol-gel structures. It is possible to assume the synthesis of other new formations, such as amorphous compounds of the C-S-H group of a changing ratio of elements. The amorphous gel that forms between the particles in the beginning materials, in accordance with the principle of amorphous hardening, strengthens the sample’s bulk.
By using waste as a valuable raw material and displacing relatively expensive and increasingly scarce pure natural materials, it will be possible to put an end to industrial dumps that pollute the environment in Kazakhstan as soon as possible if the findings of these studies are applied at the industrial level. Developed construction materials may have a good application in the market for construction materials because of their lower costs in current processes and may play an important role in eliminating the storage of production waste in Kazakhstan.

4. Conclusions

The combination of RM, BFS, and LPW showed positive results in the strength and durability of NL in both dry and wet environments. The mechanical properties, hydration characteristics, and environmental friendliness performance of the production waste based road base material were studied. The study of their properties begun in the early stages (up to 90 days inclusive) of hardening of samples. Based on the experimental results, the following conclusions can be made:
1. The possibility of developing materials for road construction based on various industrial wastes (RM, BFS, and LPW) and NL was experimentally confirmed. In order to achieve maximum mechanical properties in the developed composites, LPW additives were used as a highly alkaline activator of the chemical interaction between BFS and NL.
2. The strength, mechanical properties, and durability improved with the increased ratios in the mixture. R40-B35-L8 exhibited the highest values of physical properties with maximum amounts of slag BFS (35%), RM (40%), and LPW (8%). The compressive strength of the samples reached up to 7.38 MPa at 90 days; judging by the dynamics, it will continue to grow, but at a slower pace.
3. Industrial waste materials such as RM, BFS, and LPW can be attractive due to the simplicity of the technological process for strengthening NL. The linear expansion coefficient slowly increased from 0.63 to 1.65% at 90 days. The coefficient of linear expansion of samples begun to decrease due to gel compaction during syneresis.
4. An increase in the parameters of hardening of materials for water resistance from 28 to 90 days is proof of strengthening the structure of the samples. With the introduction of highly alkaline RM sludge into the soil, the strength under uniaxial compression increased as well as the samples’ water and frost resistance. The materials showed high water and frost resistance, met the requirements of top building materials, and had significantly lower linear expansion values at all stages of their strengthening. The samples’ strengths for water resistance values were 1.39–6.32 MPa at 28 days and 3.33–7.12 MPa at 90 days. The strengths for frost resistance values of the samples were 1.3–6.89 MPa at 28 days and 3.3–7.35 MPa at 90 days.
5. The calculated carbonate content values of the samples were 4.38–6.98% at 3 days, 8.35–12.01 at 28 days, and 10.8–13.23% at 90 days. The process of adsorption of CO2 in the air gradually reduced its intensity between 28 and 90 days. The growth of carbonates in the samples contributed to an increase in the strength of the samples.
6. In addition to a significant increase in the strength of materials, the environment protection goal was achieved—the disposal of hazardous industrial waste—from processing bauxite RM with a high content of hazardous chemical compounds. Waste utilization positively impacts the environment since it reduces waste disposal, extends the life of industrial landfills, and reduces environmental harm caused by natural material extraction. Consequently, the developed materials significantly contribute to environmental conservation. The low cost of industrial waste used in research and the possibility of using it in large quantities makes it economically feasible compared to traditional natural raw materials. These materials allow a reduction in the irreversible destruction of natural binders in quarries for the extraction of natural building materials.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization Y.K.A., G.M., G.Z.A., Z.B.I., and N.I.V., methodology Y.K.A., investigation Y.K.A., G.G.A., M.T.O., G.Z.A., S.M.K., and Z.B.I., validation Y.K.A., G.Z.A., and G.M., formal analysis Y.K.A., G.Z.A., and G.M., data curation Y.K.A., G.Z.A., G.M., G.G.A., and M.T.O., resources Y.K.A., Z.B.I., G.Z.A., and G.M., writing—original draft preparation, writing—review and editing G.Z.A. and G.M., supervision Y.K.A., G.M., Z.B.I., and N.I.V., visualization G.Z.A., S.M.K., and G.M., funding acquisition G.M., N.I.V. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research is funded by the Science Committee of the Ministry of Education and Science of the Republic of Kazakhstan (Grant № AP13067712 «Chemical study of the structure of innovative composites obtained through the interaction of natural raw materials and waste of enterprises»). The research was funded by the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of the Russian Federation as the grant Self-Healing Construction Materials (contract No. 075-15-2021-590 dated 04.06.2021).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to the Laboratory of Self-Healing Structural Materials of the Center for the National Technological Initiative «New Manufacturing Technologies» (Peter the Great St. Petersburg Polytechnic University, St. Petersburg 195251, Russia) for recommendations and advice.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Abbreviations

RMRed mud
BFSBlast furnace slag
SSSteel slag
NLNatural loam
LPWLime production waste
SEMScanning electron microscope
XRDX-ray Diffraction
XRFX-ray fluorescence
EDSEnergy dispersive spectroscopy
AASAtomic absorption spectroscopy

References

  1. Kehagia, F. Construction of an Unpaved Road Using Industrial By-Products (Bauxite Residue). WSEAS Trans. Environ. Dev. 2014, 10, 160–168. [Google Scholar]
  2. Mohammadhosseini, H.; Ngian, S.P.; Alyousef, R.; Tahir, M.M. Synergistic Effects of Waste Plastic Food Tray as Low-Cost Fibrous Materials and Palm Oil Fuel Ash on Transport Properties and Drying Shrinkage of Concrete. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 42, 102826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Senff, L.; Hotza, D.; Labrincha, J.A. Effect of Red Mud Addition on the Rheological Behaviour and on Hardened State Characteristics of Cement Mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2011, 25, 163–170. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Zhu, X.; Li, W.; Guan, X. An Active Dealkalization of Red Mud with Roasting and Water Leaching. J. Hazard. Mater. 2015, 286, 85–91. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  5. Khairul, M.A.; Zanganeh, J.; Moghtaderi, B. The Composition, Recycling and Utilisation of Bayer Red Mud. Resour. Conserv. Recycl. 2019, 141, 483–498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Sabri, M.M.; Shashkin, K.G. Improvement of the Soil Deformation Modulus Using an Expandable Polyurethane Resin. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2018, 83, 222–234. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Sabri, M.M.; Shashkin, K.G.; Zakharin, E.; Ulybin, A.V. Soil Stabilization and Foundation Restoration Using an Expandable Polyurethane Resin. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2018, 82, 68–80. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Sabri, M.; Bugrov, A.; Panov, S.; Davidenko, V. Ground Improvement Using an Expandable Polyurethane Resin. In Proceedings of the MATEC Web of Conferences, Saint-Petersburg, Russia, 19–20 November 2018; Volume 245. [Google Scholar]
  9. Sabri, M.M.; Shashkin, K.G. The Mechanical Properties of the Expandable Polyurethane Resin Based on Its Volumetric Expansion Nature. Mag. Civ. Eng. 2020, 98, 9811. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Sabri, M.M.S.; Vatin, N.I.; Alsaffar, K.A.M. Soil Injection Technology Using an Expandable Polyurethane Resin: A Review. Polymers 2021, 13, 3666. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  11. Feng, L.; Yao, W.; Zheng, K.; Cui, N.; Xie, N. Synergistically Using Bauxite Residue (Red Mud) and Other Solid Wastes to Manufacture Eco-Friendly Cementitious Materials. Buildings 2022, 12, 117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Kong, X.; Guo, Y.; Xue, S.; Hartley, W.; Wu, C.; Ye, Y.; Cheng, Q. Natural Evolution of Alkaline Characteristics in Bauxite Residue. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 143, 224–230. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Somlai, J.; Jobbágy, V.; Kovács, J.; Tarján, S.; Kovács, T. Radiological Aspects of the Usability of Red Mud as Building Material Additive. J. Hazard. Mater. 2008, 150, 541–545. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  14. Gu, H.; Wang, N.; Liu, S. Radiological Restrictions of Using Red Mud as Building Material Additive. Waste Manag. Res. J. Int. Solid Wastes Public Clean. Assoc. ISWA 2012, 30, 961–965. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  15. Qi, Y. The Neutralization and Recycling of Red Mud-a Review. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2021, 1759, 012004. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Paramguru, R.K.; Rath, P.C.; Misra, V.N. Trends in Red Mud Utilization—A Review. Miner. Process. Extr. Metall. Rev. 2005, 26, 1–29. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Deelwal, K.; Dharavath, K.; Kulshreshtha, M. Stabilization of Red Mud by Lime, Gypsum and Investigating Its Possible Use As a Geotechnical Material in the Civil Construction. Int. J. Adv. Eng. Technol. 2014, 7, 1238–1244. [Google Scholar]
  18. Zhang, J.; Yao, Z.; Wang, K.; Wang, F.; Jiang, H.; Liang, M.; Wei, J.; Airey, G. Sustainable Utilization of Bauxite Residue (Red Mud) as a Road Material in Pavements: A Critical Review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 270, 121419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Jitsangiam, P.; Nikraz, H. Sustainable Use of Coarse Bauxite Residue for Alternative Roadway Construction Materials. Aust. J. Civ. Eng. 2013, 11, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Mukiza, E.; Liu, X.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, N. Preparation and Characterization of a Red Mud-Based Road Base Material: Strength Formation Mechanism and Leaching Characteristics. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 220, 297–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhang, Y.; Liu, X.; Xu, Y.; Tang, B.; Wang, Y.; Mukiza, E. Synergic Effects of Electrolytic Manganese Residue-Red Mud-Carbide Slag on the Road Base Strength and Durability Properties. Constr. Build. Mater. 2019, 220, 364–374. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. O’Connor, J.; Nguyen, T.B.T.; Honeyands, T.; Monaghan, B.; O’Dea, D.; Rinklebe, J.; Vinu, A.; Hoang, S.A.; Singh, G.; Kirkham, M.B.; et al. Production, Characterisation, Utilisation, and Beneficial Soil Application of Steel Slag: A Review. J. Hazard. Mater. 2021, 419, 126478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  23. Xue, Y.; Hou, H.; Zhu, S. Characteristics and Mechanisms of Phosphate Adsorption onto Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag. J. Hazard. Mater. 2009, 162, 973–980. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  24. Piatak, N.M.; Parsons, M.B.; Seal, R.R. Characteristics and Environmental Aspects of Slag: A Review; Elsevier: Amsterdam, The Netherlands, 2015; Volume 57, ISBN 7036486252. [Google Scholar]
  25. Bayless, E.R.; Bullen, T.D.; Fitzpatrick, J.A. Use of 87Sr/86Sr and Δ11B to Identify Slag-Affected Sediment in Southern Lake Michigan. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2004, 38, 1330–1337. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  26. Wang, X.; Li, X.; Yan, X.; Tu, C.; Yu, Z. Environmental Risks for Application of Iron and Steel Slags in Soils in China: A Review. Pedosphere 2021, 31, 28–42. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Wang, D.L.; Chen, M.L.; Tsang, D.D.C.W. Chapter 5—Green Remediation by Using Low-Carbon Cement-Based Stabilization/Solidification Approaches. In Sustainable Remediation of Contaminated Soil and Groundwater; Hou, D., Ed.; Butterworth-Heinemann: Oxford, UK, 2020; pp. 93–118. ISBN 978-0-12-817982-6. [Google Scholar]
  28. Kambole, C.; Paige-Green, P.; Kupolati, W.K.; Ndambuki, J.M.; Adeboje, A.O. Basic Oxygen Furnace Slag for Road Pavements: A Review of Material Characteristics and Performance for Effective Utilisation in Southern Africa. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 148, 618–631. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jamshidi, A.; White, G. Evaluation of Performance and Challenges of Use of Waste Materials in Pavement Construction: A Critical Review. Appl. Sci. 2020, 10, 226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Zhang, Y.; Ong, Y.J.; Yi, Y. Comparison between CaO- and MgO-Activated Ground Granulated Blast-Furnace Slag (GGBS) for Stabilization/Solidification of Zn-Contaminated Clay Slurry. Chemosphere 2022, 286, 131860. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Smirnova, O.M.; Potyomkin, D.A. Influence of Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Properties on the Superplasticizers Effect. Int. J. Civ. Eng. Technol. 2018, 9, 874–880. [Google Scholar]
  32. Wang, Q.; Yan, P.; Mi, G. Effect of Blended Steel Slag-GBFS Mineral Admixture on Hydration and Strength of Cement. Constr. Build. Mater. 2012, 35, 8–14. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Oti, J.; Kinuthia, J.; Bai, J. Compressive Strength and Microstructural Analysis of Unfired Clay Masonry Bricks. Eng. Geol. 2009, 109, 230–240. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Samadi, M.; Huseien, G.F.; Lim, N.H.A.S.; Mohammadhosseini, H.; Alyousef, R.; Mirza, J.; Rahman, A.B.A. Enhanced Performance of Nano-Palm Oil Ash-Based Green Mortar against Sulphate Environment. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 32, 101640. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Benjeddou, O.; Alyousef, R.; Mohammadhosseini, H.; Soussi, C.; Khadimallah, M.A.; Alabduljabbar, H.; Tahir, M.M. Utilisation of Waste Marble Powder as Low-Cost Cementing Materials in the Production of Mortar. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 32, 101642. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Mymrin, V.; Aibuldinov, E.K.; Alekseev, K.; Petukhov, V.; Avanci, M.A.; Kholodov, A.; Taskin, A.; Catai, R.E.; Iarozinski, A. Efficient Road Base Material from Kazakhstan’s Natural Loam Strengthened by Ground Cooled Ferrous Slag Activated by Lime Production Waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 1428–1436. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Asaad, M.A.; Huseien, G.F.; Memon, R.P.; Ghoshal, S.K.; Mohammadhosseini, H.; Alyousef, R. Enduring Performance of Alkali-Activated Mortars with Metakaolin as Granulated Blast Furnace Slag Replacement. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00845. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Obuzor, G.N.; Kinuthia, J.M.; Robinson, R.B. Enhancing the Durability of Flooded Low-Capacity Soils by Utilizing Lime-Activated Ground Granulated Blastfurnace Slag (GGBS). Eng. Geol. 2011, 123, 179–186. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Zhang, J.; Li, C. Experimental Study on Lime and Fly Ash–Stabilized Sintered Red Mud in Road Base. J. Test. Eval. 2018, 46, 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Kumar Sharma, N. Utilization of Fly Ash, Lime Sludge and Polypropylene Fiber as Stabilizers to Enhance Soil Properties. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Siddika, A.; Al Mamun, M.A.; Alyousef, R.; Mohammadhosseini, H. State-of-the-Art-Review on Rice Husk Ash: A Supplementary Cementitious Material in Concrete. J. King Saud Univ. Eng. Sci. 2021, 33, 294–307. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Mymrin, V.; Alekseev, K.; Fortini, O.M.; Aibuldinov, Y.K.; Pedroso, C.L.; Nagalli, A.; Winter, E.; Catai, R.E.; Costa, E.B.C. Environmentally Clean Materials from Hazardous Red Mud, Ground Cooled Ferrous Slag and Lime Production Waste. J. Clean. Prod. 2017, 161, 376–381. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Mymrin, V.; Alekseev, K.; Catai, R.E.; Nagalli, A.; Aibuldinov, Y.K.; Bekturganov, N.S.; Rose, J.L.; Izzo, R.L.S. Red Ceramics from Composites of Hazardous Sludge with Foundry Sand, Glass Waste and Acid Neutralization Salts. J. Environ. Chem. Eng. 2016, 4, 753–761. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Collins, R.N.; Clark, M.W.; Payne, T.E. Solid Phases Responsible for MnII, CrIII, CoII, Ni, CuII and Zn Immobilization by a Modified Bauxite Refinery Residue (Red Mud) at PH 7.5. Chem. Eng. J. 2014, 236, 419–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Li, S.; Zhang, J.; Li, Z.; Gao, Y.; Liu, C. Feasibility Study of Red Mud-Blast Furnace Slag Based Geopolymeric Grouting Material: Effect of Superplasticizers. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 267, 120910. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. Akıncı, A.; Artir, R. Characterization of Trace Elements and Radionuclides and Their Risk Assessment in Red Mud. Mater. Charact. 2008, 59, 417–421. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Qi, X.; Wang, H.; Huang, C.; Zhang, L.; Zhang, J.; Xu, B.; Li, F.; Araruna, J.T. Analysis of Bauxite Residue Components Responsible for Copper Removal and Related Reaction Products. Chemosphere 2018, 207, 209–217. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Pu, H.; Mastoi, A.K.; Chen, X.; Song, D.; Qiu, J.; Yang, P. An Integrated Method for the Rapid Dewatering and Solidification/Stabilization of Dredged Contaminated Sediment with a High Water Content. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 2021, 15, 67. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Duan, W.; Wang, D.; Wang, Z.; Zhan, Y.; Mu, T.; Yu, Q. A Novel Synergistic Method on Potential Green and High Value-Added Utilization of Blast Furnace Slag. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 329, 129804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Zhang, H.; He, Y.; Guan, Y.; Wang, C.; Ge, Z.; Sun, R.; Ling, Y.; Šavija, B. Statistical Mixture Design for Carbide Residue Activated Blast Furnace Slag Foamed Lightweight Concrete. SSRN Electron. J. 2022, 342, 127840. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Reddy, P.S.; Reddy, N.G.; Serjun, V.Z.; Mohanty, B.; Das, S.K.; Reddy, K.R.; Rao, B.H. Properties and Assessment of Applications of Red Mud (Bauxite Residue): Current Status and Research Needs; Springer: Dordrecht, The Netherlands, 2021; Volume 12, ISBN 0123456789. [Google Scholar]
  52. Kannan, P.; Banat, F.; Hasan, S.W.; Abu Haija, M. Neutralization of Bayer Bauxite Residue (Red Mud) by Various Brines: A Review of Chemistry and Engineering Processes. Hydrometallurgy 2021, 206, 105758. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Swain, B.; Goswami, S.; Das, M. Impact of Mining on Soil Quality: A Case Study from Hingula Opencast Coal Mine, Angul District, Orissa. Geol. Res. 2011, 10, 77–81. [Google Scholar]
  54. Kempl, J.; Çopuroǧlu, O. EH-PH- and Main Element Analyses of Blast Furnace Slag Cement Paste Pore Solutions Activated with Sodium Monofluorophosphate—Implications for Carbonation and Self-Healing. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2016, 71, 63–76. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Gräfe, M.; Power, G.; Klauber, C. Bauxite Residue Issues: III. Alkalinity and Associated Chemistry. Hydrometallurgy 2011, 108, 60–79. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Long, G.; Li, L.; Li, W.; Ma, K.; Dong, W.; Bai, C.; Zhou, J.L. Enhanced Mechanical Properties and Durability of Coal Gangue Reinforced Cement-Soil Mixture for Foundation Treatments. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 231, 468–482. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Gonzalez, J.; Sargent, P.; Ennis, C. Sewage Treatment Sludge Biochar Activated Blast Furnace Slag as a Low Carbon Binder for Soft Soil Stabilisation. J. Clean. Prod. 2021, 311, 127553. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Vladić Kancir, I.; Serdar, M. Contribution to Understanding of Synergy between Red Mud and Common Supplementary Cementitious Materials. Materials 2022, 15, 1968. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  59. Liu, Y.; Naidu, R.; Ming, H. Red Mud as an Amendment for Pollutants in Solid and Liquid Phases. Geoderma 2011, 163, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Qaidi, S.M.A.; Tayeh, B.A.; Isleem, H.F.; de Azevedo, A.R.G.; Ahmed, H.U.; Emad, W. Sustainable Utilization of Red Mud Waste (Bauxite Residue) and Slag for the Production of Geopolymer Composites: A Review. Case Stud. Constr. Mater. 2022, 16, e00994. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Manjunath, K.V.; Shekhar, H.; Kumar, M.; Kumar, P.; Kumar, R. Stabilization of Black Cotton Soil Using Ground Granulated Blast Furnace Slag. Int. J. Recent Technol. Eng. 2012, 1, 387–390. [Google Scholar]
  62. Raja, K.; Venkatachalam, S.; Vishnuvardhan, K.; Krishnan, R.S.R.; Selvan, V.T.; Vetriselvan, N. Materials Today: Proceedings A Review on Soil Stabilization Using Rice Husk Ash and Lime Sludge. Mater. Today Proc. 2022, in press. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  63. Mymrin, V.A.; Alekseev, K.P.; Catai, R.E.; Izzo, R.L.S.; Rose, J.L.; Nagalli, A.; Romano, C.A. Construction Material from Construction and Demolition Debris and Lime Production Wastes. Constr. Build. Mater. 2015, 79, 207–213. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  64. Zhang, C.; Wang, G.; Wu, C.; Li, J.; Wu, S.; Jiang, W.; Wang, X.; Wang, W.; Feng, M. Investigation of Hierarchical Porous Cold Bonded Lightweight Aggregates Produced from Red Mud and Solid-Waste-Based Cementitious Material. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 308, 124990. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Sourced materials: (a) NL; (b) RM; (c) BFS; (d) LPW.
Figure 1. Sourced materials: (a) NL; (b) RM; (c) BFS; (d) LPW.
Materials 15 05726 g001
Figure 2. Details of specimen preparation: (a) tools used for compaction; (b) appearance of compacted specimens.
Figure 2. Details of specimen preparation: (a) tools used for compaction; (b) appearance of compacted specimens.
Materials 15 05726 g002
Figure 3. The SEM images of the (a) NL, (b) RM, (c) BFS, (d) LPW.
Figure 3. The SEM images of the (a) NL, (b) RM, (c) BFS, (d) LPW.
Materials 15 05726 g003
Figure 4. The SEM-EDS analysis of (a) RM, (b) BFS, (c) LPW, (d) NL.
Figure 4. The SEM-EDS analysis of (a) RM, (b) BFS, (c) LPW, (d) NL.
Materials 15 05726 g004aMaterials 15 05726 g004b
Figure 5. XRD analyses of (a) RM, (b) BFS, (c) NL, and (d) LPW.
Figure 5. XRD analyses of (a) RM, (b) BFS, (c) NL, and (d) LPW.
Materials 15 05726 g005aMaterials 15 05726 g005b
Figure 6. Changes in axial resistance of samples after 3, 28, and 90 days.
Figure 6. Changes in axial resistance of samples after 3, 28, and 90 days.
Materials 15 05726 g006
Figure 7. Changing the coefficient of linear expansion of composite samples.
Figure 7. Changing the coefficient of linear expansion of composite samples.
Materials 15 05726 g007
Figure 8. Results: (a) water resistance and (b) frost resistance.
Figure 8. Results: (a) water resistance and (b) frost resistance.
Materials 15 05726 g008
Figure 9. Change in the carbonate content of materials.
Figure 9. Change in the carbonate content of materials.
Materials 15 05726 g009
Table 1. The mixing combination of the material.
Table 1. The mixing combination of the material.
SamplesMix IdCompositions, wt.%
Natural Loam Red Mud Blast Furnace SlagLime Production WasteMoisture Content
1R20-B25-L4512025410–12
2R20-B25-L6492025610–12
3R20-B25-L8472025810–12
4R30-B30-L4363030410–12
5R30-B30-L6343030610–12
6R30-B30-L8323030810–12
7R40-B35-L4214035410–12
8R40-B35-L6194035610–12
9R40-B35-L8174035810–12
Table 2. Main elements of raw materials.
Table 2. Main elements of raw materials.
Raw
Materials
Elements, wt.% (Average Value)
OMgNaCaKSiSAlTiMnFe
RM40.530.181.8428.58-7.350.242.121.520.1717.47
BFS40.575.010.3026.510.6814.641.055.220.380.525.12
LPW42.250.41-57.07-0.15-0.11---
NL47.281.550.457.782.8125.26-8.370.370.195.92
Table 3. Chemical composition of the raw materials.
Table 3. Chemical composition of the raw materials.
Raw
Materials
Oxides, wt.%
Al2O3Fe2O3CaOK2OMgOMnONa2OSiO2SO3TiO2C.L. *CO2 **Σ
RM4.5725.3945.15-0.330.262.8117.590.672.900.330.86100.00
BFS10.026.7037.750.848.420.680.4131.862.670.640.655.65100.00
LPW0.26-98.52-0.84--0.41--0.167.77100.00
NL16.417.9411.433.572.670.26-56.45-0.650.624.86100.00
* C.L.—calcination loss, ** CO2—calcimeter method.
Table 4. Solubility and leaching of toxic metals in RM and BFS.
Table 4. Solubility and leaching of toxic metals in RM and BFS.
MetalsRMBFSSanPiN *
2.1.7–2010
Leaching, (mg/L)Solubility, (mg/L)Leaching, (mg/L)Solubility, (mg/L)
As0.39<0.0010.20<0.00110
Pb<0.11<0.1<0.1<0.1250
Hg<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.0515
Cr<0.1<0.01<0.01<0.0011000
Ba<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.005-
Cd<0.01<0.002<0.01<0.00215
Al0.500.85<0.10<0.10-
Cu<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05750
Fe0.560.740.300.20-
Ni<0.05<0.05<0.05<0.05200
Zn<0.10<0.10<0.10<0.101750
* SanPiN 2.1.7.–2010. Sanitary and epidemiological rules and regulations.
Table 5. pH values of raw materials.
Table 5. pH values of raw materials.
PH Value of Raw Materials
NLBFSRMLPW
7.38.59.612.10
Table 6. Granulometric fractions of the materials.
Table 6. Granulometric fractions of the materials.
Raw
Materials
Granulometric Fractions
Mkm<11–56–1011–5051–100101–250>250
RMWeight %24652011106
FS109104211810
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Alzhanova, G.Z.; Aibuldinov, Y.K.; Iskakova, Z.B.; Khabidolda, S.M.; Abdiyussupov, G.G.; Omirzak, M.T.; Murali, G.; Vatin, N.I. Development of Environmentally Clean Construction Materials Using Industrial Waste. Materials 2022, 15, 5726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165726

AMA Style

Alzhanova GZ, Aibuldinov YK, Iskakova ZB, Khabidolda SM, Abdiyussupov GG, Omirzak MT, Murali G, Vatin NI. Development of Environmentally Clean Construction Materials Using Industrial Waste. Materials. 2022; 15(16):5726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165726

Chicago/Turabian Style

Alzhanova, Galiya Zhanzakovna, Yelaman Kanatovich Aibuldinov, Zhanar Baktybaevna Iskakova, Saniya Manarbekkyzy Khabidolda, Gaziz Galymovich Abdiyussupov, Madi Toktasynuly Omirzak, Gunasekaran Murali, and Nikolai Ivanovich Vatin. 2022. "Development of Environmentally Clean Construction Materials Using Industrial Waste" Materials 15, no. 16: 5726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165726

APA Style

Alzhanova, G. Z., Aibuldinov, Y. K., Iskakova, Z. B., Khabidolda, S. M., Abdiyussupov, G. G., Omirzak, M. T., Murali, G., & Vatin, N. I. (2022). Development of Environmentally Clean Construction Materials Using Industrial Waste. Materials, 15(16), 5726. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15165726

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop