Next Article in Journal
Electrical and Optical Properties of CaTi1−yFeyO3−δ Perovskite Films as Interlayers for Optoelectronic Applications
Next Article in Special Issue
Tailoring of the Distribution of SERS-Active Silver Nanoparticles by Post-Deposition Low-Energy Ion Beam Irradiation
Previous Article in Journal
Radiation Damage in Polyethylene Naphthalate Thin-Film Scintillators
Previous Article in Special Issue
A Metal-Containing NP Approach to Treat Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA): Prospects and Challenges
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Impact of Co Doping and Annealing Temperature on the Electrochemical Performance and Structural Characteristics of SnO2 Nanoparticulate Photoanodes

by
Abeer S. Altowyan
1,*,
Mohamed Shaban
2,3,*,
Khaled Abdelkarem
3 and
Adel M. El Sayed
4,*
1
Department of Physics, College of Science, Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, P.O. Box 84428, Riyadh 11671, Saudi Arabia
2
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Islamic University of Madinah, P.O. Box 170, Al Madinah Al Monawara 42351, Saudi Arabia
3
Nanophotonics and Applications (NPA) Lab, Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Beni-Suef University, Beni-Suef 62514, Egypt
4
Physics Department, Faculty of Science, Fayoum University, El Fayoum 63514, Egypt
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(19), 6534; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196534
Submission received: 20 July 2022 / Revised: 11 August 2022 / Accepted: 26 August 2022 / Published: 21 September 2022
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Metal-Based Nanoparticles)

Abstract

:
Obtaining H2 energy from H2O using the most abundant solar radiation is an outstanding approach to zero pollution. This work focuses on studying the effect of Co doping and calcination on the structure, morphology, and optical properties of spin-coated SnO2 films as well as their photoelectrochemical (PEC) efficiency. The structures and morphologies of the films were investigated by XRD, AFM, and Raman spectra. The results confirmed the preparation of SnO2 of the rutile phase, with crystallite sizes in the range of 18.4–29.2 nm. AFM showed the granular structure and smooth surfaces having limited roughness. UV-Vis spectroscopy showed that the absorption spectra depend on the calcination temperature and the Co content, and the films have optical bandgap (Eg) in the range of 3.67–3.93 eV. The prepared samples were applied for the PEC hydrogen generation after optimizing the sample doping ratio, using electrolyte (HCl, Na2SO4, NaOH), electrode reusability, applied temperature, and monochromatic illumination. Additionally, the electrode stability, thermodynamic parameters, conversion efficiency, number of hydrogen moles, and PEC impedance were evaluated and discussed, while the SnO2 films were used as working electrodes and platinum sheet as an auxiliary or counter electrode (2-electrode system) and both were dipped in the electrolyte. The highest photocurrent (21.25 mA/cm2), number of hydrogen moles (20.4 mmol/h.cm2), incident photon-to-current change efficiency (6.892%@307 nm and +1 V), and the absorbed photon-to-current conversion efficiency (4.61% at ~500 nm and +1 V) were recorded for the 2.5% Co-doped SnO2 photoanode that annealed at 673 K.

1. Introduction

Developing an efficient and clean energy technology with zero pollution became the centre of attention to meet the energy demand at the time of fossil fuel depletion. As an outstanding approach, converting renewable solar energy to highly efficient, eco-friendly, and affordable H2 energy using H2O splitting is attracting intensive research interest worldwide [1,2]. In addition to CO2 zero-emission, the H2 energy value is ~122–142 kJ/g which is 2.8–3.0 times larger than the energy value obtained from liquid hydrocarbons used as fuel [3,4]. In this context, many attempts have been carried out to adapt various transparent metal oxides (TCOs) as photoanode in the electrochemical cell for H2 energy generation. Among them is a stannic oxide (SnO2).
SnO2 is nontoxic, highly transparent, abundant in nature, has good electrical conductivity, and has a high electron mobility of ~(1–2) × 102 cm2/V·s. Additionally, the SnO2 can be easily manufactured as thin films and powder. According to Cetinorgu et al., vacuum arc-formed SnO2 thin films are chemically stable in HCl and NaOH solutions and did not dissolve after 27 h [5]. Moreover, a specific capacity in the order of 1.49 A h.g−1 was reported for SnO2 nanoparticles (NPs). Additionally, SnO2 has a wide direct bandgap (Eg = 3.6 eV at room temperature (RT)), which slows down degradation and increases device stability, but it also reduces the number of photogenerated electron-hole pairs that are generated when exposed to UV radiation. Therefore, it may be used for solar energy applications, such as the production of photoelectrochemical (PEC) H2, if it is made with more surface area and optical absorption in the UV/Vis region. Consequently, SnO2 is attracting continuous interest for utilisation in optoelectronic devices, sensors, capacitors, Li-ion batteries, UV photocatalytic, and as an electrode material for energy conversion [3,4,6,7,8,9].
The multifunctionality of SnO2 can be tuned by controlling the synthetic technique and preparative parameters and by inducing compositional changes via doping processes. Srinivas et al. reported that Co doping can introduce RT ferromagnetism in SnO2 as diluted magnetic semiconductors [10]. This ferromagnetism was found to depend on the surface diffusion of Co atoms, defects distribution, size of the material, and its surface conditions. According to Mazloom and Ghodsi, SnO2’s n-type conductivity can change to p-type with an increase in the films’ resistivity as long as the Co doping level is higher than 3.0 at.% [11]. Additionally, Korotcenkov et al. demonstrated that a Co doping level in the range of 2–4% was sufficient to create a sufficient concentration of catalytically active centres (Sn atoms and oxygen vacancies) for O3 dissociation and reducing gas oxidation, which produced gas sensing effects for SnO2 [12]. Podurets et al. [13] fabricated SnO2@ZnO, SnO2@SnO2, and SnO2@TiO2 of core-shell morphology by atomic layer deposition (ALD). The obtained Eg for SnO2 and TiO2 shells were only 2.8 and 3.1 eV, respectively, and these values result in interesting photocatalytic activity under UV and visible-light irradiation. Geng et al. [6] fabricated Au-SnO2 nanorods/activated carbon by a solvothermal process to yield an energy density as high as 168.9 Wh/kg. Wu et al. [1] developed SnO2 (nanodots)/g-C3N4 (nanosheets) by one-step polymerisation technique and obtained H2 production activity about 6.1 times larger than that of g-C3N4. The nanodots act as a bridge and yield a higher separation rate for the photogenerated electrons. Bozheyev et al. [14] achieved a photocurrent density of 6 × 10−4 A/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE and the highest incident photon to current transfer efficiency (IPCE) of 22% at 450 nm by controlling the Mo doping ratio in the magnetron co-sputtered SnO2 films. Additionally, SnO2/BiVO4/rGO construction yielded a photocurrent of 2.05 mA/cm2 at 1.23 VRHE, (about four times of the BiVO4 alone) and IPCE of ~2.5 times that of BiVO4 at 400 nm [15]. Wang et al. [16] fabricated SnO2/Ag/SnO2 tri-layers on float substrate by magnetron sputtering. The film showed a sheet resistance of 5.92 Ω/sq and transmittance of 87.0% which is useful for use in CdTe solar cells.
Moreover, interesting modifications in the performance of SnO2 were achieved by doping with transition metals. Cu and N co-doping during the hydrothermal synthesis of SnO2 induced a large increase in O deficiency from ~27.2 to 36.7%. This change accelerated the rate of charge transfer and improved the performance of SnO2 in the reduction of CO2 to format a liquid fuel and H2 storage material [17]. Ismail and Abdul Majeed [18] deposited Pd-doped SnO2 by spray pyrolysis on porous Si substrates to work as a solar cell with a conversion efficiency >14% at 5 wt.% Pd doping combined with Voc = 456 mV, Jsc = 0.041 A/cm2 and FF = 79%. Sohal et al. [19] prepared Er (1–5 wt.%) doped SnO2 NPs by co-precipitation and films of thicknesses 50–150 nm by electron beam evaporation. The 100 nm thick film doped with 3.0 wt.% Er exhibited a maximum response for NO2 at RT. Ni and Co co-doped SnO2 NPs with crystallite sizes between 12.5 and 22 nm and grains sizes between 50.36 and 78.2 nm were produced by Matussin et al. using a biogenic and ecologically benign approach [20]. These NPs showed enhanced activity as photo-antioxidants and in photoconversion of 4-nitrophenol under visible light irradiation. Similarly, Khan et al. [2] reported the total removal of 4-Nitrophenol in less than 5 min by using the chemically prepared Fe-SnO2 NPs. The crystallinity of chemically produced SnO2 NPs is increased, the rate at which electron/hole pairs recombine is decreased, and the photocatalytic activity toward RhB, when exposed to visible light, is increased, according to Toloman et al. [8].
The material’s crystallinity is mainly relayed on the heat treatment and this crystallinity affects the Eg, rate of electron-hole recombination, and the efficiency of energy conversion [21]. Based on the literature survey, there is no complete report on the effect of Co doping and heat treatment on structural properties, water splitting ability, and H2 production efficiency of SnO2 thin films. This work aims to demonstrate for the first time the effects of Co doping and calcination temperature (CT) on the structure, morphology, optical characteristics, and PEC catalytic activity of the spin-coated SnO2 photoelectrodes. In addition to examining the impact of PEC temperature on the performance of the optimised photoelectrode, the conversion efficiencies under white and monochromatic light illumination and the number of hydrogen moles generated are also assessed. In particular, this study focuses on optimizing the CT and Co doping level to increase the optical absorption and surface area by enhancing the optical and textural aspects of PEC SnO2-based electrodes for solar H2 generation.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials and Preparation

Un-doped and 2.5, 5.0, and 7.5 at.% Co-doped SnO2 thin films were prepared by dissolving ~1.13 g SnCl2.2H2O (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) of molecular weight (MW) = 225.63 g/mol in 10 mL pure ethanol. For the doped solution, certain amounts of Co(NO3)2. 6H2O or CoH12N2O12 (Aldrich, St. Louis, MO, USA) of MW = 291.03 were added. The solutions were stirred at 323 K for 2 h till getting clear and homogeneous solutions and aged for 24 h at (300 K). The glass slides of specific dimensions were treated by sonication in acetone, methanol, and deionised water before being air dried. The sol-gel produced solutions were deposited on the glass slides at 2000 rpm for 25 s, then dried at 473 K for 5 min on an electric hot plate. Six coatings were performed to increase the films’ thickness, before the final calcination at 673, 773, and 873 K for 2 h in an air furnace. In each case, the furnace was left to cool to RT and this process takes 8–10 h. Before use, the samples were kept in zipper bags to avoid the moisture effect.

2.2. Measurements

Investigating phase purity and crystallinity was done by using X-ray diffraction (X’PertPro MRD, Philips, Malvern, UK) by assisting with Cu–Kα radiation of wavelength 0.1542 nm during steps of 0.02°. 2D and 3D images to study the film’s morphology, roughness, and thickness of the samples were taken by the atomic force microscope of non-contact mode (XE-100E, Park, Suwon, Korea). The vibrational properties of the films (Raman spectra) were recorded by Thermo Fisher (Austin, TX, USA) DXR Raman spectrometer with an 8 mW power laser beam of 532 nm wavelength. The absorbance spectra in the range of 200–1350 nm, for determination of the bandgaps, were recorded by UV-vis-NIR 3700 double beam Shimadzu spectrophotometer (Maryland, MD, USA). All these measurements were carried out at RT. The PEC H2O splitting was measured by a 2400-Keithley SourceMeter in 100 mL of 0.5 M HCl, NaOH, and Na2SO4 solutions at RT with a scanning rate of 1 mV/s. The nanocomposite electrode with a 1 cm2 surface area was used as the photoanode, and the counter electrode of the same area was the Pt-electrode. i.e., for PEC measurements, both a working 1 cm2 electrode and a counter 1 cm2 Pt electrode are used (2-electrode System). The photocurrent density-voltage (Jph-V) behaviours were measured under a standard white illuminance (AM 1.5 G, 100 mW/cm2) and evaluated with the use of a 400 W mercury xenon light source (Newport, MODEL: 66926-500HX-R07, Newport, UK) and utilizing the 2400-Keithley SourceMeter (Tektronix company, Beaverton, OR, USA).

3. Results and Discussions

3.1. XRD and AFM Study

Figure S1 (Supplementary Materials) shows XRD patterns of the as-deposited films (before annealing). The wide peak (halo) extends from 17° to 38° on the 2θ scale indicating the amorphous structure of the film. After doping with 2.5–7.5% Co, two peaks around 26° and 34° appear to be superimposed on this halo peak. This indicates that Co doping enhanced the crystallinity of the as-deposited films. This can take place when the Co2+ ions form stable solid solutions with SnO2 and take the regular lattice positions in the SnO2 lattice [22].
XRD of the pure and Co-doped films calcined at temperatures in the range of 673–873 K are depicted in Figure 1a–c. As seen, all films show polycrystalline structures. The observed diffraction peaks at ~26.63°, 33.87°, 37.92°, 51.78°, and 64.72° correspond to (110), (101), (210), (211) and (112) planes of SnO2 tetragonal phase, respectively. These wide peaks indicate the formation of nano-crystalline SnO2 materials. No peaks related to Co metal or one of its oxides are detected. A similar result was reported for the chemically precipitated Fe-doped SnO2 NPs [2]. XRD of spray deposited Pd-doped SnO2 contained only one sharp (110) peak [18]. However, increasing the annealing temperature to 873 K encouraged the formation of the unstable SnO phase, indicated by a sign (*) and a peak at 31.85° [23]. Similarly, SnO diffraction peaks were observed among those of SnO2 that were prepared by the chemical vapour deposition at 600 °C [24].
The preferred orientation feature can be quantified by the texture coefficient (TC) that signifies the texture of a specific plane. The thin film with randomly oriented crystallites presents TC = 1, and TC > 1 implies the preferred growth, i.e., a larger abundance of crystallites oriented in a (hkl) direction. TC was calculated considering the main three peaks; (110), (101), and (211), using XRD data and the following equation: T C ( h k l ) = I ( h k l ) / I o ( h k l ) 1 Z I ( h k l ) / I o ( h k l ) [25], where I(hkl) and Io(hkl) refer to the relative intensity and the standard JCPDS intensity of the plane (hkl), respectively, and Z is the reflections. From Table 1, it is noted that TC (110) and TC (101) are larger than unity. This suggests the existence of more crystals related to these two peaks. The origins of the noted orientation of the (110) plane can be explained by the periodic band chains theory (PBC) [26]. Previously, it was reported that doping with more than 3.0 wt.% Er in the e-beam evaporated snO2 films changed the preferred growth direction from (110) to (302) [19]. The CT (673–873 K) does not affect the peaks’ position. Additionally, it is seen from Figure 1 that the doping with 2.5–7.5 at.% Co causes no peaks’ shift. This may be because the two ions Co2+ and Sn4+ have very close ionic radii of 0.74 Å and 0.71 Å, respectively [20]. Carbon doping (10–50 wt.%) into SnO2 resulted in a slight shift (by 0.26°) towards lower 2θ values [3]. Figure 1a demonstrates that for the undoped film, the calcinated sample at 773 K had more intense XRD peaks than the calcinated sample at 673 K. This suggests that the film’s crystallinity improved when the CT was raised from 673 to 773 K. A similar observation was reported for SnO2 NPs prepared by continuous flow hydrothermal route, at pH = 3 and annealing temperatures in the range of 523–673 K [7]. However, increasing the temperature to 873 K made the peaks of reduced intensity. This may ascribe to the mismatching between the film and the glass substrates which may be bent at this high temperature. SnO2 film doped with 2.5 at.% Co and calcined at 673 or 773 K exhibits peaks of relatively higher intensity compared with those of the un-doped film indicating an additional increase in the film’s crystallinity. Increasing Co content to 5.0 and 7.5 at.% reduces the peaks’ intensity of the film calcined at 673 K, but this intensity increases with increasing temperature to 773 and 873 K. The broadness of SnO2 diffraction lines with increasing Co content suggests the intercalation of Co2+ into SnO2 and these ions create specific disorders and lead to compositional heterogeneity [2].
The crystallite size (Cs) and the dislocation density ( δ = 1 C s 2 ) of the samples were calculated utilizing the Scherer equation; Cs = 0.9λ/Γ cos θ, where λ = 0.154 nm (the wavelength emitted from the Kα-Cu source), Γ is the full-width at half maximum intensity, considering the main three peaks; (110), (101) and (211). The obtained values are listed in Table 1. As can be noticed, Co doping and CT have a significant effect on both Cs and δ. All films have Cs in the range of 18.4–29.2 nm. Higher content of Co (5.0–7.5 at.%) leads to a decrease in Cs, however, increasing CT hinders this increase. Similarly, excessive doping with Ta (2.6–15.5 at.%) resulted in deterioration of crystallinity of SnO2 film prepared by radio-frequency sputtering [9]. Er-doping significantly increased the crystallite size of SnO2 films from 17.3 nm to ~29.5 nm, which was then marginally changed with increasing Er content [19]. The obtained results mean that the films’ crystallinity can be controlled by Co doping and calcination.
The films’ surface morphology was examined by AFM via capturing 2D and 3D images, Figure 2a–f and Figure S2 (Supplementary Materials). As seen from Figure S2, the unannealed pure film exhibits no definite morphology, however, the 5.0% Co doped film exhibits a nanoparticulate morphology with a relatively high particle density per unit area. The 3D and 2D images of 2.5 at.%-doped SnO2 calcined at 673 K, Figure 3a,b illustrates that the surface is of granular morphology, i.e., the surface is composed of a very large number of spherical-shaped particles and size less than 20 nm and average root-mean-square roughness (Rrms) of ~18 nm. Increasing the CT to 773 K led to a larger grain size of 23 nm and reduced Rrms to 14 nm, Figure 2c,d. However, increasing Co content to 5.0 at.% decreased the grain size to 22 nm and the Rrms to 11 nm, Figure 2e,f. The obtained thicknesses of the films were ranged from 255 to 270 nm, as mentioned in Table 2. Thus, the prepared films are of relatively smooth surfaces and are useful for optoelectronic and photocatalytic applications [9]. Figure 2g–i shows the role of CT (673–873 K) on the SnO2 films doped with the higher content of Co (7.5 at.%). As seen, both the grain size and surface roughness increase with annealing temperature. Similarly, the chemically precipitated Fe-SnO2 appeared under FE-SEM in the form of blocks of 500 nm in size that were composed of NPs with an average size of ≈25 nm [2]. These findings show that the measurements made by XRD and AFM are consistent.

3.2. Raman Spectral Analysis and Optical Properties

For deeper insights and further confirmation of the SnO2 phase under calcination and Co loadings, Raman spectra were recorded and presented in Figure 3. Four peaks appear in the spectra of the films; two weak peaks at 452 and 780 cm−1 and two strong wide peaks at 552 and 1090 cm−1. The 452 cm−1 peak (Eg mode) and 780 cm−1 peak (B2g mode) are due to the vibration of O in the O plane and the construction/expansion of Sn–O bonds, respectively, which usually occur in nanocrystalline tin oxide [25]. B2g mode is slightly shifted under the effect of CT and Co loading. The broad peak at 552 cm−1 is related to the rutile phase of SnO2 [19]. This result is consistent with XRD results. As seen, increasing the CT and Co content resulted in changing the intensity of this peak. The most intense broad peak at 1090 cm−1 is related to the multi-phonon transitions [27]. The Eg mode is highly sensitive to oxygen vacancies, and its appearance indicates that our samples can be used for photocatalytic applications and photoelectrochemical cells.
Figure 4a–d displays the UV/Vis absorbance spectra of the films doped with 0.0–7.5 at.% Co and calcined at 673 and 773 K. The films exhibit an absorption peak at ~290 nm and an absorption edge at ~235 nm which is equivalent to 3.70 eV. According to Puga et al. [28], SnO2 exhibits a substantial UV absorbance band (270–300 nm). The clear interference fringes that are seen in all films confirm the smoothness and homogeneity of the films seen in AFM images. The 2.5% Co-doped film annealed at 673 K shows relatively higher absorption in the studied wavelength range. The interference fringes of films calcined at 773 K begin at a lower wavelength and their number is larger than the films calcined at 673 K. Increasing CT resulted in denser films of more compacted layers. The direct optical band gap Eg can be evaluated utilizing Tauc’s formula (αhυ)2 = A(hυ–Eg), whereas the incident photon energy h υ   ( eV ) = 1242 λ   ( nm ) , A is a constant, and α is the absorption coefficient (α = 2.303 Absorption/film thickness). The insets of Figure 4a,b show the (αhυ)2 vs. plots. Eg is obtained by extrapolating the linear portion to zero absorption and Table 2 provides their values. Eg values are between 3.67 and 3.93 eV. The decrease in Eg of SnO2 with doping till 5.0 at.% is related to the introduction of electronic states in its bandgap. Although it has been reported that increasing CT increases oxygen vacancies [29], the effect of enhanced crystallisation outweighs the effect of oxygen vacancy concentration (Ov), which results in a decrease in the number of charge carriers inside the material in films that are calcined at 773 K. The drop in Eg from 3.73 to 3.67 eV at a doping level of 7.5 at.% may be related to an elevated Ov. This is also anticipated at CT = 873 K, where the presence of the low valence state (Sn2+), depicted in Figure 1c, results in an increase in Ov and unbound electrons that lower the conduction band’s bottom and, consequently, reduce Eg. In rare circumstances, the Ov can introduce mid-gap states by acting as shallow donors [30].
Therefore, Co doping and calculations can be effectively used to tune the optical properties of SnO2. Yang et al. [17] reported a decrease in the Eg of SnO2 from 3.45 to 3.33 eV after doping with 7.0% (Cu and N). Then, 18 at.% Mo doping into SnO2 prepared by the magnetron co-sputtering technique shrank the Eg from 3.65 to 2.7 eV [14]. Additionally, 10 at.% (Co, Ni) doping reduced the Eg of SnO2 NPs synthesized using a green process from 3.33 to 2.08 eV [20]. Moreover, Pd doping (1–5 wt.%) narrowed Eg of SnO2 from 3.65 to 3.25 eV [18]. Ta doping in the range of (2.6–7.8 at.%) widen Eg of SnO2 from 3.99 to 4.21 eV that then reduced it to 4.17 eV at 15.5 at.% Ta. In addition, Er doping (0–3 wt.%) for the e-beam evaporated SnO2 film, 100 nm thickness, narrowed its Eg from 3.88 to 3.63 eV, then it widen to 3.72 eV at 5.0 wt.% Er [19]. Thus, doping with transition metal is a facial method to reduce Eg of SnO2 to be more valid for photocatalytic application under visible light exposure.

3.3. Photoelectrochemical H2 Generation

3.3.1. Influence of the Doping Ratio and the Used Electrolyte

The PEC cell electrolyte is one of the essential things that has a major impact on the PEC performance of the photoelectrode. The photocatalytic interfaces will differ in several ways depending on how the electrolytes are changed. The chosen electrolyte must be compatible with the PEC catalyst being used. Electrochemical interactions between photo-electrodes and electrolytes are prohibited, and their optical absorption bands must not overlap. The electrolyte structure, which alters the conductivity of electrolytes and affects ion transport, has a substantial impact on the rate of PEC H2 generation. The rate of H2 oxidation and the catalytic effectiveness of the PEC are influenced by the electrolyte’s conductivity and pH [31]. The electrolyte impedance may decrease due to insufficient active cations or anions like Na+/SO42− or OH, which may stimulate band bending. To pinpoint the main differences in the PEC performances of the examined photoanodes; a strong acid (HCl, pH = 0.3), a strong basic (NaOH, pH = 13.69), and a neutral salt (Na2SO4) were all used at the concentration (0.5 M). In Figure 5b, the current density rises in the following order: Jph(NaOH) > Jph(HCL) > Jph(Na2SO4), with the Jph’s value growing as the utilised bias rises. The maximum Jph value in solutions of NaOH, HCL, and Na2SO4 is 21.25 mA/cm2, 10.972 mA/cm2, and 5.09 mA/cm2, respectively. Therefore, NaOH is the ideal electrolyte for the PEC process using 2.5% Co-doped SnO2 anode calcination temperature at 673 K, abbreviated to (2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO2. By reducing the Fermi level to a lower energy level through adsorbing extra H+/OH− species following the relationship EF = EF(pH0) − 0:059 × pH (at RT), the surface charges of doped metal oxides and the separation of electrons from holes are both influenced by pH variations [32]. In other words, depending on the pH of the electrolyte solution, the fermi level for metal oxide semiconductors is located at various energy sites. The location of the Fermi level at the electrode’s surface has an impact on how much the potential of the photo-generated electrons is reduced. The overpotential or motive factor for hydrogen synthesis reduces as EF’s energy level rises [33]. The Jph’s value for the (2.5% Co, 673 K), SnO2 photoelectrode (21.25 mA/cm2) is significantly high than that for the (0% Co, 673 K), and (7.5% Co, 673 K), SnO2 photoelectrodes (8.43, 5.23, and 3.325 mA/cm2, respectively) under light exposure. despite the very slight difference in energy gap between them. Due to the surface’s composition of many spherical particles with sizes less than 20 nm and higher Rrms (18 nm) than other samples, it exhibits more absorption in the wavelength range under study and has a larger surface area. In order to get the highest photocurrent density in the NaOH electrolyte, the optimum photoanode is (2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO2. With the addition of OH ions in that pH range, the measured current density in the various electrolytes increases at pH ≥ 7.

3.3.2. PEC Reusability and Stability of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO2 Photoanode

In 0.5 M NaOH and utilizing a 2400-Keithley SourceMeter the reproducibility of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO2 photoanode was investigated by measuring the photocurrent density at +1 V in a standard white light environment for 12 consecutive runs, as illustrated in Figure 6a. The photocurrent density of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO2 photoanode was 19.28 mA/cm2 in the first run, indicating that the photoelectrochemical water splitting mechanism is more efficient in light, as after 12 consecutive cycles, the photocurrent density decreased by 32.76%, from 19.28 to 12.99 mA/cm2, showing excellent reproducibility and reusability for the optimised SnO2 photoanode in white light at RT.
The PEC stability of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoanode is studied for a lengthy time in 0.5 M NaOH under the influence of white light and @+1 V between the photoanode and the platinum electrode. The change in photocurrent density with time is used to calculate the number of PEC H2 moles as shown in Figure 6b [34]. Equation (1) was theoretically used to calculate the number of H2 moles using Faraday’s law [35];
H 2 ( moles ) =   0 t J ph dt F
where F = 9.65 × 104 C/mol (Faraday constant) and t is the elapsed time during the process. The number of hydrogen moles produced over time is presented in Figure 6b. This figure almost showed linear production of hydrogen, which can be used to confirm the stability of the designed PEC electrode. The obtained number of H2 moles per active area theoretically is 41.4 mmol h−1cm−2. To measure the flow rate of the H2 gas in SCCM, the outlet of the closed PEC unit is connected to the ALICAT Mass Flow Meter (Model: MB, 0-100SCCM (Standard mL/min)). Experimentally, the value is found to be 14.71 SCCM for our 1 cm−2 film which is equivalent to 39.45 mmol.h−1.cm−2. This value, which is pretty close to the value obtained theoretically, confirms the excellent effectiveness of the proposed photoelectrode.
The solar-to-hydrogen efficiency (STH), which is the overall efficiency of the PEC water splitting cell, is defined as the proportion of overall hydrogen energy production to overall solar energy (AM 1.5 G, 100 mWcm2). Equation (2) was used to calculate STH % [36]:
STH = [ ( H 2 / S )   ×   ( 237   KJ / mol ) ] / [ P total   ×   A ]
where Ptotal is the illuminating light’s total power density in mW/cm2, A is the lighted section of the photoelectrode’s area in cm2, and H2/S is the H2 moles’ generation rate in mmol/sec. The computed STH for the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode is 24.65%.

3.3.3. Effect of Temperature and Thermodynamic Parameters

Figure 7a shows how the PEC Jph-voltage curve of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrodes in 0.5M NaOH electrolyte was affected by heating from RT to 363 K. The current density increased from 15.4 mA.cm−2 to 17.1 mA.cm−2 by rising T to 318 K and then reduced from 15.4 mA.cm−2 to 8.3 mA.cm−2 by raising T to 363 K, as can be seen in this figure. Evaluation of thermodynamic parameters including activation energy (Ea), enthalpy ( Δ H*), and entropy ( Δ s*) is also required. Figure 7b illustrates the relationship between the absolute temperature reciprocal (1/T) and the Jph (rate of reaction) of the photoelectrode of (2.5% Co, 673 K). The slope of the linear fitting in Figure 7b is used to calculate the value of Ea using the Arrhenius equation [37]:
Ln   ( J ph ) = E a R
where R is the universal gas constant (8.314 J/K.mol). From Figure 7b, slope = −Ea/R and the Ea of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) electrode is 10.032 kJ/mol. In addition, the values of ΔH* and ΔS* for the PEC H2 production are estimated by using Eyring equation by drawing a relationship between Ln (Jph.T−1) and (T−1) as displayed in Figure 7c. The Eyring equation can be written as [38]:
Ln J ph T = Δ H * R .   1 T + Ln ( K B h ) + Δ S * R
where KB = 1.38 × 10−23 J/K (the Boltzmann’s constant), and h = 6.626 × 10−34 J.s (the Planck’s constant). For (2.5% Co, 673 K), the linear fitting’s slope gives a value of 12.78 kJ/mol for ΔH*, while its intercept gives a value of 311.113 J/mol for ΔS*.

3.3.4. Effect of Monochromatic Light Illumination and Conversion Efficiencies

The Jph is shown vs. applied voltage for the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoanode in 0.5M NaOH at room temperature under monochromatic light in Figure 8a. A series of optical bandpass filters covering the visible spectrum from 307 to 636 nm were used. The maximum photocurrent, Jph = 17.06 mA.cm−2, was obtained at 307 nm. The lowest photocurrent, Jph = 14.14 mA.cm−2, was recorded at 636 nm as illustrated in the inset of Figure 8a. This current density-wavelength dependency may be related to the photo electrocatalytic response of the optimum photoelectrode for the H2 production process and supports the absorption characteristic of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode in every wavelength. In general, this behaviour supports the photoelectrode’s comprehensive response and ability to absorb a significant amount of the solar spectrum in the UV-Vis range.
Measuring the incident photon-to-current conversion efficiency (IPCE) at various wavelengths further ensures the improved solar absorption of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode and its use for effective H2 generation from H2O splitting. Equation (5) is used to get the IPCE% at a constant applied voltage (+1 V) [39,40]:
IPCE % = 1240 . J ph λ . P .   100  
where λ(nm) is the wavelength of the incident photons and P is the incident light power density of the Xenon lamp (Newport, 66142-500HX-R07) at each wavelength. Figure 8b represents the fluctuation of IPCE percentage with wavelength (λ). The (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode’s highest IPCE % is 6.892% @307 nm, which is in line with the optimum photoelectrode’s maximal absorption. Optically related losses such as photon transmittance (Tr) and reflectance (R) were not taken into account in the IPCE calculation. To account for optical losses, it is required to assess the internal quantum efficiency, also referred to as the absorbed photon-to-current conversion efficiency (APCE%). The percentage of PEC-produced charges that contributed to the resulting photocurrent per absorbed photon is known as the APCE%. APCE is calculated by Equation (6) [8,41]:
APCE ( λ ) = IPCE ( λ ) A ( λ ) = IPCE ( λ ) 1 R T r
where A(λ) is the optical absorbance. Figure 8c demonstrates the change of APCE% versus the incident λ. This figure shows three prominent APCE% values; 4.61% at ~500 nm, 4.595% around 470 nm, and 4.575% around 460 nm.
The extra electrical energy to the system must be removed when introducing a tiny applied voltage to the PEC system to estimate the photoelectrode catalytic efficacy. The applied bias photon-to-current efficiency (ABPE%) might be employed for this purpose. Equation (7) is used to calculate the ABPE% values for the designed photoelectrode [42,43]:
ABPE % = J ph × ( 1.23 V a p p ) p × 100 ,
where 1.23 is the standard state reversible potential of H2O and the externally applied voltage is denoted by Vapp. Figure 8d shows the ABPE % values for various electrolytes as a function of applied voltage. The highest value of ABPE% is 1.827%@NaOH 0.495 V, ABPE % of 1.07% @HCL 0.619 V and 0.19% @Na2SO4 0.94 V, respectively. It is worth noting that the photoelectrode’s good performance at low voltage might be beneficial for PEC cell setup.

3.3.5. PEC Impedance Spectroscopy (PEC-IS)

The charge transfer between the active photoelectrode and the electrolyte junction determines the photoelectrochemical system’s impedance. PEC-IS study was made at room temperature using CHI electrochemical workstation (CH Instruments CHI660E) to investigate the dynamics of the charge carriers for the optimum (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode. The PEC-IS measurements’ frequency (f) range was 0.01–100,000 Hz at 0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) under white light exposure. Figure 9a displays Nyquist plots of electrodes submerged in 0.5M NaOH at (0.0% Co, 673 K), (2.5% Co, 673 K), (5.0% Co, 673 K), and (7.5% Co, 673 K). The Bode charts in Figure 9b,c show the outcomes for the optimum (2.5% Co, 673 K) electrode. The redox reaction is shown by a narrow semicircle of a modest diameter on the high-f range of the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode Nyquist plot [44], which is subsequently a linear stage filling the area of middle/low fs. The middle/low fs area is covered by a linear transition that follows the redox process [44]. These PEC-IS plots demonstrated mixed diffusion/kinetic controlled pathways. To further comprehend the PEC-IS observations via hydrogen evolution reaction (HER), the PEC-IS spectra were fitted to a straightforward analogous Randle circuit in the inset of Figure 9a. Using the ZSimpWin program, the Randle equivalent circuit was applied to simulate the PEC-IS spectra, as illustrated in Figure 9a. From Nyquist plot intercepts, the electrolyte resistance (Rs = 171 Ω) is obtained at high fs. The semicircle diameter in the Nyquist plot is the same as the charge transfer resistance (Rct = 145 Ω). Concurrently, in the analogous circuit, the Warburg impedance is W = 0.0092 and the double-layer capacitance is Cdl = 1.99 mF. The fundamental regulator of the HER is thus the charge transfer process (CTP), which is ensured by the uni-loop of the Nyquist plot. The optimum electrode can then generate a significant quantity of H2. The electron/hole recombination is typically deployed in conjunction with the charge transfer procedure (CTP) to regulate the HER. In other words, the small value of Rct that was observed indicates that the amount of charge recombination at the electrode/electrolyte interface was much decreased, which is consistent with the enhanced HER [45]. Bode charts for the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode at the H2 generation possibility in 0.5 M NaOH electrolyte at 25 °C are displayed in Figure 9b,c. Figure 9b depicts the overall impedance variation with f, and Figure 9c shows the phase variation with f. This chart illustrates capacitive contribution in between, along with resistive regimes at low and way higher fs. The double-layer capacitance (Cdl) of the photoelectrode and the charge transfer resistance (Rct) relate to the low-f regime. The creation of a partially protective layer at the electrode’s surface may be connected to the very high-f regime. At 16.63 Hz, the highest phase shift (ϴmax = 5.11°) is discovered. Figure 9c was used to estimate the charge carrier lifetime using the relation τ n = 1/2π ƒmax [46]. The obtained lifetime for the optimized photoelectrode is 9.57 ms. In addition, the data derived from Figure 9 show a significant decrease in charge recombination at the electrolyte/electrode interface. Along with enhanced ionic conductivity and electrolyte diffusion in the (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode, this also relates to a kinetically simple PEC system.
Finally, the PEC performance was obtained in this study compared with many previously studied SnO2- based PEC electrodes as revealed in Table 3 [47,48,49,50,51,52,53,54,55,56,57,58]. The values of J, IPCE, and ABPE confirm that the (2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO2 is an efficient electrode for the PEC H2O splitting under visible light exposure. Therefore, it has been concluded that the (2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO2 electrode is very suitable for the PEC reactor.

4. Conclusions

The influence of Co doping (0.0–7.5 at.%) and calcination temperatures in the range of (673–873 K) on the structure, morphology, optical characteristics, and PEC performance of the sol-gel spin-coated SnO2 thin films photoanodes have been studied. The production of the SnO2 rutile phase with crystallite sizes in the range of 18.4–29.2 nm was validated by XRD and Raman spectra. The granular structure and smooth surfaces with minimal roughness were revealed by AFM. UV-vis spectroscopy showed that the absorption of the films depends on Co content and annealing temperature, 2.5 at.% Co-doped film calcined at 673 K showed a higher absorption. Additionally, the optical bandgap (Eg) of all films was in the range of 3.67–3.93 eV and significantly depend on Co content and the calcination temperature. After adjusting the sample doping ratio, employing electrolyte (HCl, Na2SO4, NaOH), electrode reusability, applied temperature, and monochromatic illumination, the produced samples were used for efficient photoelectrochemical hydrogen production from water. Electrode stability, thermodynamic characteristics, conversion efficiencies, amount of hydrogen moles, and PEC impedance were also assessed and discussed. The 2.5% Co-doped SnO2 photoanode that annealed at 673 K had the highest photocurrent (21.25 mA/cm2), number of hydrogen moles (20.4 mmol/h.cm2), IPCE (6.892%@307 nm), and APCE (4.61% at ~500 nm). The optimised photoelectrode may be appropriate for industrial applications due to its excellent stability, high conversion efficiency, and inexpensive cost.

Supplementary Materials

The following supporting information can be downloaded at: https://www.mdpi.com/article/10.3390/ma15196534/s1, Figure S1: shows XRD patterns of the as-deposited films (before annealing); Figure S2: 2D AFM images for (a) pure and (b) 5.0% Co-doped films before annealing.

Author Contributions

Conceptualisation, M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; methodology, M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; validation, A.S.A., M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; formal analysis, M.S., K.A., A.S.A. and A.M.E.S.; investigation, A.S.A., M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; resources, A.S.A., M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; data curation, M.S., K.A., A.S.A. and A.M.E.S.; writing—original draft preparation, M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; writing—review and editing, A.S.A., M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; visualisation, A.S.A., M.S., K.A. and A.M.E.S.; project administration, A.S.A.; funding acquisition, A.S.A. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R16), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Not applicable.

Acknowledgments

The authors express their gratitude to Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University Researchers Supporting Project number (PNURSP2022R16), Princess Nourah bint Abdulrahman University, Riyadh, Saudi Arabia.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Wu, H.; Yu, S.; Wang, Y.; Han, J.; Wang, L.; Song, N.; Dong, H.; Li, C. A facile one-step strategy to construct 0D/2D SnO2/g-C3N4 heterojunction photoelectrode for high-efficiency hydrogen production performance from water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 30142–30152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Khan, S.B.; Kamal, T.; Asiri, A.M.; Bakhsh, E.M. Iron doped nanocomposites based efficient catalyst for hydrogen production and reduction of organic pollutant. Colloids Surf. A 2021, 608, 125502. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Mallikarjuna, K.; Bari, G.A.K.M.R.; Vattikuti, S.V.P.; Kim, H. Synthesis of carbon-doped SnO2 nanostructures for visible-light-driven photocatalytic hydrogen production from water splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 32789–32796. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Abdelkarim, O.; Kaur, J.; Liu, J.; Navarro-Pardo, F.; Zarrin, H.; Yurtsever, A.; Bassioni, G.; Wang, Z.M.; Selopal, G.S.; Rosei, F. Two-dimensional functionalized hexagonal boron nitride for quantum dot photoelectrochemical hydrogen generation. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 20698–20713. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Cetinorgu, E.; Goldsmith, S. Chemical and thermal stability of the characteristics of filtered vacuum arc deposited ZnO, SnO2 and zinc stannate thin films. J. Phys. D Appl. Phys. 2007, 40, 5220–5226. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Geng, J.; Chen, J.; Ma, C.; Ning, X. Hierarchical nanostructured Au-SnO2 for enhanced energy storage performance. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 29395–29406. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Mamakhel, A.; Søndergaard, M.; Borup, K.; Iversen, B.B. Continuous flow hydrothermal synthesis of rutile SnO2 nanoparticles: Exploration of pH and temperature effects. J. Supercrit. Fluids 2020, 166, 105029. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Shaban, M.; Almohammedi, A.; Saad, R.; Sayed, A.M.E. Design of SnO2:Ni,Ir Nanoparticulate Photoelectrodes for Efficient Photoelectrochemical Water Splitting. Nanomaterials 2022, 12, 453. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Al-Kuhaili, M.F. Co-sputtered tantalum-doped tin oxide thin films for transparent conducting applications. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 257, 123749. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Srinivas, K.; Vithal, M.; Sreedhar, B.; Raja, M.M.; Reddy, P.V. Structural, Optical, and Magnetic Properties of Nanocrystalline Co Doped SnO2 Based Diluted Magnetic Semiconductors. J. Phys. Chem. C 2009, 113, 3543–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Mazloom, J.; Ghodsi, F.E. Spectroscopic, microscopic, and electrical characterization of nanostructured SnO2: Co thin films prepared by sol–gel spin coating technique. Mater. Res. Bull. 2013, 48, 1468–1476. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Korotcenkov, G.; Boris, I.; Brinzari, V.; Hand, S.H.; Cho, B.K. The role of doping effect on the response of SnO2-based thin film gas sensors: Analysis based on the results obtained for Co-doped SnO2 films deposited by spray pyrolysis. Sens. Actuators B 2013, 182, 112–124. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Podurets, A.; Kolokolov, D.; Barr, M.K.S.; Ubyivovk, E.; Osmolowsky, M.; Bobrysheva, N.; Bachmann, J.; Osmolovskaya, O. Enhanced visible-light photocatalytic activity of core-shell oxide nanoparticles synthesized by wet chemical precipitation and atomic layer deposition. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2020, 533, 147520. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bozheyev, F.; Akinoglu, E.M.; Wu, L.; Lou, S.; Giersig, M. Effect of Mo-doping in SnO2 thin film photoanodes for water oxidation. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2020, 45, 33448–33456. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Bai, S.; Tian, K.; Meng, J.C.; Zhao, Y.; Sun, J.; Zhang, K.; Feng, Y.; Luo, R.; Li, D.; Chen, A. Reduced graphene oxide decorated SnO2/BiVO4 photoanode for photoelectrochemical water splitting. J. Alloy Compd. 2021, 855, 156780. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Wang, W.; Wei, X.; Wang, C.; Zhou, W.; Zhu, B.; Wang, C.; Liu, L. Fabrication and thermo stability of the SnO2/Ag/SnO2 tri-layer transparent conductor deposited by magnetic sputtering. Ceram. Int. 2021, 47, 3548–3552. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Yang, H.; Li, Y.; Zhang, D.; Li, Z.; Wang, J.; Yang, D.; Hao, X.; Guan, G. Defect-engineering of tin oxide via (Cu, N) co-doping for electrocatalytic and photocatalytic CO2 reduction into formate. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2020, 227, 115947. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ismail, R.A.; Majeed, A.M.A. Preparation and investigation of nanostructured SnO2: Pd/ porous silicon/c-Si heterostructure solar cell. J. Solid State Electrochem. 2021, 25, 1039–1048. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Sohal, M.K.; Mahajan, A.; Gasso, S.; Nahirniak, S.V.; Dontsova, T.A.; Singh, R.C. Modification of SnO2 surface oxygen vacancies through Er doping for ultralow NO2 detection. Mater. Res. Bull. 2021, 133, 111051. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Matussin, S.N.; Harunsani, M.H.; Tan, A.L.; Cho, M.H.; Khan, M.M. Effect of Co2+ and Ni2+ co-doping on SnO2 synthesized via phytogenic method for photoantioxidant studies and photoconversion of 4-nitrophenol. Mater. Today Communicat. 2020, 25, 101677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Lee, S.H.; Hong, Y.; Ryu, H.; Yun, J. Improving the photostability of cupric oxide nanorods. Thin Solid Film. 2020, 697, 137849. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Toloman, D.; Popa, A.; Stefan, M.; Silipas, T.D.; Suciu, R.C.; Barbu-Tudoran, L.; Pana, O. Enhanced photocatalytic activity of Co doped SnO2 nanoparticles by controlling the oxygen vacancy states. Opt. Mater. 2020, 110, 110472. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Barakat, M.A.Y.; Shaban, M.; El Sayed, A.M. Structural, ultrasonic and spectroscopic studies of tin oxide thin films; effect of Ir and (Ni, Ir) double doping. Mater. Res. Express 2018, 5, 066407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Karslıoğlu, R.; Uysal, M.; Akbulut, H. The effect of substrate temperature on the electrical and optic properties of nanocrystalline tin oxide coatings produced by APCVD. J. Cryst. Growth 2011, 327, 22–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. El Sayed, A.M.; Taha, S.; Shaban, M.; Said, G. Tuning the structural, electrical and optical properties of tin oxide thin films via cobalt doping and annealing. Superlattices Microstruct. 2016, 95, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, J.T.; Shi, X.L.; Zhong, X.H.; Wang, J.N.; Pyrah, L.; Sanderson, K.D.; Ramsey, P.M.; Hirata, M.; Tsuri, K. Morphology control of fluorine-doped tin oxide thin films for enhanced light trapping. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2015, 132, 578–588. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Shaban, M.; Abdelkarem, K.; El Sayed, A.M. Structural, optical and gas sensing properties of Cu2O/CuO mixed phase: Effect of the number of coated layers and (Cr + S) co-Doping. Phase Transit. 2019, 92, 347–359. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Puga, F.; Navío, J.A.; Hidalgo, M.C. Enhanced UV and visible light photocatalytic properties of synthesized AgBr/SnO2 composites. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2021, 257, 117948. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Jiang, M.; Zhang, G.; Li, C.; Liu, J.; Guo, K.; Ning, H.; Shi, M.; Guo, D.; Yao, R.; Peng, J. Effects of rapid thermal annealing on wide band gap tungsten oxide films. Superlattices Microstruct. 2020, 142, 106541. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Hsu, C.-H.; Geng, X.-P.; Wu, W.-Y.; Zhao, M.-J.; Zhang, X.-Y.; Huang, P.-H.; Lien, S.-Y. Air Annealing Effect on Oxygen Vacancy Defects in Al-doped ZnO Films Grown by High-Speed Atmospheric Atomic Layer Deposition. Molecules 2020, 25, 5043. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Sun, C.-W.; Hsiau, S.-S. Effect of Electrolyte Concentration Difference on Hydrogen Production during PEM Electrolysis. J. Electrochem. Sci. Technol. 2018, 9, 99–108. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Koval, C.A.; Howard, J.N. Electron transfer at semiconductor electrode-liquid electrolyte interfaces. Chem. Rev. 1992, 92, 411–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Tayyebi, A.; Soltani, T.; Lee, B.-K. Effect of pH on photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical (PEC) properties of monoclinic bismuth vanadate. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2019, 534, 37–46. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Ahmad, I.; Akhtar, M.S.; Ahmed, E.; Ahmad, M. Highly efficient visible light driven photocatalytic activity of graphene and CNTs based Mg doped ZnO photocatalysts: A comparative study. Sep. Purif. Technol. 2020, 245, 116892. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Ahmed, A.M.; Mohamed, F.; Ashraf, A.M.; Shaban, M.; Aslam, A.; Khan, P.; Asiri, A.M. Enhanced photoelectrochemical water splitting activity of carbon nanotubes@ TiO2 nanoribbons in different electrolytes. Chemosphere 2020, 238, 124554. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  36. Choudhary, S.; Upadhyay, S.; Kumar, P.; Singh, N.; Satsangi, V.R.; Shrivastav, R.; Dass, S. Nanostructured bilayered thin films in photoelectrochemical water splitting—A review. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 18713–18730. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Mattheis, J.; Werner, J.H.; Rau, U. Finite mobility effects on the radiative efficiency limit of pn-junction solar cells. Phys. Rev. B 2008, 77, 085203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Mohamed, F.; Rabia, M.; Shaban, M. Synthesis and characterization of biogenic iron oxides of different nanomorphologies from pomegranate peels for efficient solar hydrogen production. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2020, 9, 4255–4271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Ahmed, A.M.; Abdalla, E.M.; Shaban, M. Simple and low-cost synthesis of Ba-doped CuO thin films for highly efficient solar generation of hydrogen. J. Phys. Chem. C 2020, 124, 22347–22356. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Ahmed, A.M.; Rabia, M.; Shaban, M. The structure and photoelectrochemical activity of Cr-doped PbS thin films grown by chemical bath deposition. RSC Adv. 2020, 10, 14458–14470. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  41. Jiang, C.; Moniz, S.J.A.; Wang, A.; Zhang, T.; Tang, J. Photoelectrochemical devices for solar water splitting–materials and challenges. Chem. Society Rev. 2017, 46, 4645–4660. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  42. Aboud, A.A.; Shaban, M.; Revaprasadu, N. Effect of Cu, Ni and Pb doping on the photo-electrochemical activity of ZnO thin films. RSC Adv. 2019, 9, 7729–7736. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  43. Zayed, M.; Nasser, N.; Shaban, M.; Alshaikh, H.; Hamdy, H.; Ahmed, A.M. Effect of morphology and plasmonic on Au/ZnO films for efficient photoelectrochemical water splitting. Nanomaterials 2021, 11, 2338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Rabia, M.; Shaban, M.; Adel, A.; Abdel-Khaliek, A.A. Effect of Plasmonic Au Nanoparticles on the Photoactivity of Polyaniline/Indium Tin Oxide Electrodes for Water Splitting. Environ. Prog. Sustain. Energy 2019, 38, 13171. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Helal, N.H. Corrosion inhibition and adsorption behavior of methionine on Mg-Al-Zn alloy. J. Chem. Eng. Mater. Sci. 2011, 2, 28–38. [Google Scholar]
  46. Tian, H.; Zhao, G.; Zhang, Y.-N.; Wang, Y.; Cao, T. Hierarchical (0 0 1) facet anatase/rutile TiO2 heterojunction photoanode with enhanced photoelectrocatalytic performance. Electrochim. Acta 2013, 96, 199–205. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Mohammadnezhad, G.; Momeni, M.M.; Nasiriani, F. Enhanced photoelectrochemical performance of tin oxide decorated tungsten oxide doped TiO2 nanotube by electrodeposition for water splitting. J. Electroanalyt. Chem. 2020, 876, 114505. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Tian, M.; Peng, W.; Shang, B.; Tao, W.; Xiao, Y. Facile fabrication of visible light driven tin oxide photoanode and its photoelectrochemical water splitting properties. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2012, 37, 12827–12832. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Azevedo, J.; Tilley, S.D.; Schreier, M.; Stefik, M.; Sousa, C.; Araújo, J.P.; Mendes, A.; Grätzel, M.; Mayer, M.T. Tin oxide as stable protective layer for composite cuprous oxide water-splitting photocathodes. Nano Energy 2016, 24, 10–16. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Hernández, S.; Tortello, M.; Sacco, A.; Quaglio, M.; Meyer, T.; Bianco, S.; Saracco, G.; Pirri, C.F.; Tresso, E. New Transparent Laser-Drilled Fluorine-doped Tin Oxide covered Quartz Electrodes for Photo-Electrochemical Water Splitting. Electrochim. Acta 2014, 131, 184–194. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Seza, A.; Soleimani, F.; Naseri, N.; Soltaninejad, M.; Montazeri, S.M.; Sadrnezhaad, S.K.; Mohammadi, M.R.; Moghadam, H.A.; Forouzandeh, M.; Amin, M.H. Novel microwave-assisted synthesis of porous g-C3N4/SnO2 nanocomposite for solar water-splitting. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2018, 440, 153–161. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Dholam, R.; Patel, N.; Santini, A.; Miotello, A. Efficient indium tin oxide/Cr-doped-TiO2 multilayer thin films for H2 production by photocatalytic water-splitting. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy 2010, 35, 9581–9590. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. Zhang, Z.; Gao, G.; Wu, Z.; Han, W.; Wang, Y.; Fu, W.; Li, X.; Xie, E. Toward efficient photoelectrochemical water-splitting by using screw-like SnO2 nanostructures as photoanode after being decorated with CdS quantum dots. Nano Energy 2016, 19, 318–327. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  54. Vattikuti, S.V.P.; Reddy, P.A.K.; Shim, J.; Byon, C. Visible-Light-Driven Photocatalytic Activity of SnO2-ZnO Quantum Dots Anchored on g-C3N4 Nanosheets for Photocatalytic Pollutant Degradation and H2 Production. ACS Omega 2018, 3, 7587–7602. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. Mohammad, A.; Khan, M.E.; Karim, M.R.; Cho, M.H. Synergistically effective and highly visible light responsive SnO2-g-C3N4 nanostructures for improved photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical performance. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2019, 495, 143432. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  56. Guerrero-Araque, D.; Acevedo-Peña, P.; Ramírez-Ortega, D.; Lartundo-Rojas, L.; Gómez, R. SnO2–TiO2 structures and the effect of CuO, CoO metal oxide on photocatalytic hydrogen production. J. Chem. Technol. Biotechnol. 2017, 92, 1531–1539. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Khan, M.M.; Ansari, S.A.; Khan, M.E.; Ansari, M.O.; Min, B.K.; Cho, M.H. Visible light-induced enhanced photoelectrochemical and photocatalytic studies of gold decorated SnO2 nanostructures. New J. Chem. 2015, 39, 2758–2766. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  58. Liao, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, M.; Liu, Z.; Ding, L.; Li, Y. Enhanced photocatalytic and photoelectrochemical activities of SnO2/SiC nanowire heterostructure photocatalysts. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 658, 642–648. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (ac) XRD charts of pure and doped tin oxide films at different annealing temperatures. The sign (*) indicates the formation of the SnO phase at 873 K.
Figure 1. (ac) XRD charts of pure and doped tin oxide films at different annealing temperatures. The sign (*) indicates the formation of the SnO phase at 873 K.
Materials 15 06534 g001
Figure 2. 3D & 2D AFM images of (ad) SnO2: 2.5% Co at 673 K and 773 K, (e,f) SnO2: 5.0% Co at 773 K; and (gi) 2D AFM images of SnO2: 7.5 thin films at 673, 773,and 873 K, respectively.
Figure 2. 3D & 2D AFM images of (ad) SnO2: 2.5% Co at 673 K and 773 K, (e,f) SnO2: 5.0% Co at 773 K; and (gi) 2D AFM images of SnO2: 7.5 thin films at 673, 773,and 873 K, respectively.
Materials 15 06534 g002
Figure 3. (ac): Raman spectra of pure and doped tin oxide films at different CT.
Figure 3. (ac): Raman spectra of pure and doped tin oxide films at different CT.
Materials 15 06534 g003
Figure 4. Optical absorption spectra of (a) pure and 2.5 at.%, and (b) 5.0 at.% and 7.5 at.% Co-doped tin oxide films at 673 and 773 K. The insets are Tuac’s plots for bandgap determination.
Figure 4. Optical absorption spectra of (a) pure and 2.5 at.%, and (b) 5.0 at.% and 7.5 at.% Co-doped tin oxide films at 673 and 773 K. The insets are Tuac’s plots for bandgap determination.
Materials 15 06534 g004
Figure 5. (a) The electrodes’ photocurrent density-voltage curves in 100 mL of 0.5 M NaOH for different samples, and (b) The (2.5% Co, 673 K) electrode photocurrent density-voltage curves in 100 mL of 0.5 M HCl, Na2SO4, and NaOH for optimised sample in the existence and absence of light.
Figure 5. (a) The electrodes’ photocurrent density-voltage curves in 100 mL of 0.5 M NaOH for different samples, and (b) The (2.5% Co, 673 K) electrode photocurrent density-voltage curves in 100 mL of 0.5 M HCl, Na2SO4, and NaOH for optimised sample in the existence and absence of light.
Materials 15 06534 g005
Figure 6. The change of Jph of (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode (a) for 12 runs of reusability under white light illumination at +1 V in RT and (b) the number of H2 moles with elapsed time for (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoanode @+1 V in RT.
Figure 6. The change of Jph of (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode (a) for 12 runs of reusability under white light illumination at +1 V in RT and (b) the number of H2 moles with elapsed time for (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoanode @+1 V in RT.
Materials 15 06534 g006
Figure 7. Effect of temperature for the 2.5% Co, 673 K; (a) the change of Jph-voltage curves at distinctive temperatures, (b) ln(Jph) vs. (T−1), and (c) Ln(Jph.T−1) vs. (T−1).
Figure 7. Effect of temperature for the 2.5% Co, 673 K; (a) the change of Jph-voltage curves at distinctive temperatures, (b) ln(Jph) vs. (T−1), and (c) Ln(Jph.T−1) vs. (T−1).
Materials 15 06534 g007
Figure 8. (a) Jph-voltage characteristics of (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode under monochromatic light illumination at RT in 0.5M NaOH, (b) IPCE% and (c) ABCE% (λ) @+1 V versus the incident wavelength, and (d) ABPE% versus the applied voltage for various electrolytes.
Figure 8. (a) Jph-voltage characteristics of (2.5% Co, 673 K) photoelectrode under monochromatic light illumination at RT in 0.5M NaOH, (b) IPCE% and (c) ABCE% (λ) @+1 V versus the incident wavelength, and (d) ABPE% versus the applied voltage for various electrolytes.
Materials 15 06534 g008
Figure 9. (a) Nyquist plots for undoped and doped photoelectrodes in 0.5M NaOH electrolyte at 298 K and 0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and under white light illumination. Bode plots (b) the change of the overall impedance versus frequency and (c) the change of phase versus frequency.
Figure 9. (a) Nyquist plots for undoped and doped photoelectrodes in 0.5M NaOH electrolyte at 298 K and 0 V (vs. Ag/AgCl) and under white light illumination. Bode plots (b) the change of the overall impedance versus frequency and (c) the change of phase versus frequency.
Materials 15 06534 g009
Table 1. XRD data: calcination temperature CT, the texture coefficient (TC) for (110), (101), and (211) planes, crystallite size Cs and dislocation density δ.
Table 1. XRD data: calcination temperature CT, the texture coefficient (TC) for (110), (101), and (211) planes, crystallite size Cs and dislocation density δ.
FilmCTTCCs (nm)δ × 10−3 (1/nm2)
(110)(101)(211)
Un-doped SnO2673 K1.3771.0540.56823.41.83
773 K1.3571.0620.58129.21.17
873 K1.2671.090.64224.31.69
2.5 at.% Co673 K1.3681.0910.54125.61.53
773 K1.3031.1150.58227.71.3
873 K1.3541.0960.5526.21.46
5.0 at.% Co673 K1.3091.1390.55221.22.22
773 K1.3191.1020.57922.32.01
873 K1.5141.0770.4124.11.72
7.5 at.% Co673 K1.3541.0960.5518.42.95
773 K1.341.1150.54522.61.96
873 K1.4891.0710.44126.71.4
Table 2. Values of Films’ thickness and optical band gap (Eg).
Table 2. Values of Films’ thickness and optical band gap (Eg).
FilmCTThickness (nm)Eg (eV)
Un-doped SnO2673 K2563.75
773 K2593.93
873 K255
2.5 at.% Co673 K2623.7
773 K2653.82
873 K261
5.0 at.% Co673 K2673.68
773 K2703.75
873 K264
7.5 at.% Co673 K2573.73
773 K2593.67
873 K256
Table 3. Comparison of the values of Jph, IPCE%, and ABPE% for the current work with previously studied values for different SnO2-based photocatalysts.
Table 3. Comparison of the values of Jph, IPCE%, and ABPE% for the current work with previously studied values for different SnO2-based photocatalysts.
CatalystElectrolyteJph (mA/cm2)IPCE %H2 Production RateRef.
SnO2 decorated tungsten
oxide doped TiO2 nanotube (Sn-WTNT)
KOH[email protected] V--[47]
SnO2Na2SO40.1@1 V2.3%@400 nm-[48]
Cu2O/SnO2/RuO2Na2SO4[email protected] E/V vs. RHE--[49]
Laser-Drilled Fluorine-doped Tin Oxide covered Quartz ElectrodesSodium Phosphate Buffer[email protected] V--[50]
g-C3N4/SnO2Na2SO4[email protected] V--[51]
Indium Tin Oxide (ITO)/Cr-doped-TiO2H2SO4[email protected] V--[52]
SnO2/CdS quantum dotsNa2SO39.9@0 V40%@375 nm-[53]
SnO2-ZnO Quantum
Dots/g-C3N4 (SZ/g-C3N4)
5% aqueous glycerol solution--13,673.61 μmol g–1/5 h[54]
SnO2-g—C3N4Na2SO48.9@1 V--[55]
(1%CuO, 1%CoO) co-doped SnO2-TiO2Water/methanol solution (1:1)--1486.4 µmol g−1 h−1[56]
Au–SnO2Na2SO41.3 mA@−1 V--[57]
SnO2/SiC nanowiresH2SO4[email protected] V-274 μmol g−1 h−1[58]
(2.5% Co, 673 K) SnO20.5M NaOH21.25@1V6.892%@307 nm39.45 mmol.h−1 cm−2This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Altowyan, A.S.; Shaban, M.; Abdelkarem, K.; El Sayed, A.M. The Impact of Co Doping and Annealing Temperature on the Electrochemical Performance and Structural Characteristics of SnO2 Nanoparticulate Photoanodes. Materials 2022, 15, 6534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196534

AMA Style

Altowyan AS, Shaban M, Abdelkarem K, El Sayed AM. The Impact of Co Doping and Annealing Temperature on the Electrochemical Performance and Structural Characteristics of SnO2 Nanoparticulate Photoanodes. Materials. 2022; 15(19):6534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196534

Chicago/Turabian Style

Altowyan, Abeer S., Mohamed Shaban, Khaled Abdelkarem, and Adel M. El Sayed. 2022. "The Impact of Co Doping and Annealing Temperature on the Electrochemical Performance and Structural Characteristics of SnO2 Nanoparticulate Photoanodes" Materials 15, no. 19: 6534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196534

APA Style

Altowyan, A. S., Shaban, M., Abdelkarem, K., & El Sayed, A. M. (2022). The Impact of Co Doping and Annealing Temperature on the Electrochemical Performance and Structural Characteristics of SnO2 Nanoparticulate Photoanodes. Materials, 15(19), 6534. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196534

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop