Next Article in Journal
Some Issues with Statistical Crystal Plasticity Models: Description of the Effects Triggered in FCC Crystals by Loading with Strain-Path Changes
Previous Article in Journal
Energy and Electronic Properties of Nanostructures Based on the CL-20 Framework with the Replacement of the Carbon Atoms by Silicon and Germanium: A Density Functional Theory Study
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

The Effect of Selected Factors on the Strength of Stitches of Upholstery Faux Leather

1
Department of Furniture and Wood Products, Faculty of Wood Sciences and Technology, Technical University in Zvolen, T. G. Masaryka 24, 96001 Zvolen, Slovakia
2
Department of Furniture Design, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Poznan University of Life Sciences, Wojska Polskiego 38/42, 60-627 Poznan, Poland
3
Department of Furniture, Design and Living, Faculty of Forestry and Wood Technology, Mendel University in Brno, Zemědělská 1665/1, 613 00 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(19), 6585; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196585
Submission received: 9 August 2022 / Revised: 19 September 2022 / Accepted: 20 September 2022 / Published: 22 September 2022

Abstract

:
With their properties, upholstery covering materials significantly influence the quality of upholstered products. These materials form the surface layer of upholstered furniture; any damage to this material is immediately visible to the user. We consider the stitches connecting the covering fabrics to be one of the critical points of the upholstered surface, therefore they must have the required strength. Faux leather is one of the most used upholstery materials. The main aim of the paper is to determine the effect of upholstery faux leather, stitch length, point needle, and needle size on the strength of the stitches and the seam efficiency. The results of the experiment proved the suitability of using a sewing needle LR for joining covering materials such as faux leathers. The highest force to seam a rupture in the joints was achieved in the direction of the warp yarns of the underlying layer of PU (Polyurethane) faux leather with a stitch length of 4 mm and needle type LR/90. The highest seam efficiency was achieved with seams in the direction of the weft yarns of the PVC (Polyvinyl chloride) faux leather underlying layer with a stitch length of 4 mm and needle type LR/90. If the underlying layer of faux leather is a fabric with canvas binding, a higher seam efficiency of joints is assumed.

1. Introduction

The upholstery fabric leaves a first impression on the user, so it is essential that it meets broad quality requirements. When selecting the upholstery fabric, the way of upholstering, the nature of the pile, the Martindale rating, and the fire resistance must be taken into account. Factors that affect the comfort and quality of using the covering textiles include not only hygienic and aesthetic properties but especially their mechanical properties. In addition to the comfort characteristics of upholstery, the strength of the covering material, resistance to abrasion, and pilling are the most important quality factors of upholstered furniture. Covering materials used for furniture upholstery are sheet materials that need to be divided according to the required cutting plan and then joined again with stitches. The construction and material composition of the upholstery material affects not only the quality of the upholstered surface, but also the mechanical and appearance properties of the stitches. Composites from woven and knitted fabrics made of polyester multifilament fibres are most used due to the relatively low cost and good properties. Such composites also include various types of artificial leather. For these materials used in upholstery, we do not have sufficient information on the influence of basic factors on seam strength. The supporting layer of this material is made of polyester yarns. The most important features of polyester fibres are good durability and dimensional stability, high strength, easy maintenance, fast drying, low moisture adsorption, resistance to most chemicals and resistance to high temperatures. Rapid technological development, interdisciplinary research and cooperation between the science and industry have enabled the development of new materials in composites for furniture upholstery. The covering materials are almost exclusively joined by stitches–seams. The location and size of the load of the furniture construction must be considered when the stitches are created and positioned on the cover of the upholstered product. The seam strength of the covering material is often lower compared to the seamless areas of the cover. The quality and textile product serviceability loaded with operational forces usually depends on the strength and quality of the stitches, as well as on the properties of the fabrics [1,2].
To ensure product quality, manufacturers of upholstered furniture are interested in assessing the quality of joints of upholstery material. There is only a small amount of scientific work that comprehensively deals with the influence of several parameters on the strength of sewn joints of upholstery fabrics. Information regarding the quality of the stitches is more from the field of fashion textiles. The works [3,4] are focused on seam creasing, evaluation, and prediction of its quality. Relationships between yarn tension, types of sewing threads and seam quality, the impact of fabric parameters and properties on a 2D cutting and stitching line are presented in work [5,6]. Scientific works investigate the effects of the type of stitches on the strength of the sewing, the effect of the mechanical properties of cotton fabrics on the quality of the sewn joints, while claiming that the quality of the sewn joints depends on the strength, stretchability and density of the fabric being joined [7,8]. To minimize the deformations in the fabric in the seams and to keep the seam strong and durable if possible, it is necessary to select an appropriate sewing thread, stitch length, and other parameters such as needle characteristics, thread tension, and stitch type [9,10,11]. The study [12] is aimed at the static tensile tests for selected upholstery fabrics and the identification of the most optimal connections for fabric and stitch. The conclusion was drawn that the fabric tensile strength was the highest for Secret 10 fabric. In addition, the strength of upholstery covers is not influenced by the direction of the fabric die cut. The used method implemented for upholstered furniture allows for an objective assessment of the strength of upholstery covers and the selection of the most advantageous fabric–seam combination for future furniture designs. The choice of the type of stitches and the factors that affect their quality can be expressed using the seam efficiency of the joint. Compared to cotton threads, polyester threads achieve higher seam efficiency. In addition to the strength properties of stitches of fashion textiles, it is also important to recognize their elastic and deformation characteristics, and it is necessary to seek and create suitable methods for their evaluation [13]. When attaching fabric to complicated shapes and structures, different stitching techniques are employed. The researchers have reported that the core spun thread gives higher seam efficiency as compared to the conventional sewing thread and that the use of silicon finish decreases the seam efficiency. The tensile strength of the woven fabric not only depends on the strength of the constituent yarns, but also on the fabric geometry, warp and weft density, weave designs, yarn interlacement pattern, weaving conditions as well as fabric finishing treatments. Geršak reveals that tensile strength of woven fabric is decreased by the application of the sewing operations, and the ultimate serviceability of a sewn article depends on the technical features of the fabric as well as the seam [14,15]. The authors [16] pointed out that the fireproofing of fabrics changes the seam strength, which may be due to fabric stiffening, resulting in less fabric flexibility. In their research they aimed to determine the influence of thread type on the tearing strength of seams. The scientific work [17] studied a challenging example of an uneven appearance of the two-needle decorative seams of leather seat covers. Four natural and two artificial leathers were tested in the study. It was confirmed that the uneven appearance was influenced by the type of leather, the point of the sewing needle and the sewing thread.
One of the main sewing parameters, directly related to artificial leather sewability and quality of final product, is the needle penetration force (NPF). This force affects the initial deformation of the sewn joint and the size of the hole in the upholstery fabric. The results showed that the effect of backing fabric structure on NPF is significant. The highest NPF values were observed in woven fabric reinforced samples, followed by those reinforced with knitted and then nonwoven fabrics. It was observed that effect of needle point type on NPF is not significant. Moreover, it was seen that finer needles enhanced sewability in terms of reducing the amount of force exerted on the artificial leather [18]. Needle penetration force also affects needle heating in polyester blend upholstery fabrics, higher sewing speeds can cause burnt spots on the fabric, lower seam strength, and a decrease in production due to thread breakage [19,20,21].
The finite element method was used for stitch analysis [22]. The analysis of the thread tension demonstrates that the upper and bottom thread tension mainly influences the formation of the current stitch, and the force cannot cause redistribution or slippage of the previous, already build stitches. The FEM model was tested at different friction coefficients and foam stiffnesses and the simulations demonstrate logical results, comparable to the analytically predicted one. The numerical characterization of the mechanical behaviour of a vertical spacer yarn in thick warp knitted spacer fabrics was processed in the study [23]. In addition, some scientific studies also deal with the analysis and effect of the inner layers of the upholstery system on the quality of the covering layers of the upholstered furniture [24,25,26,27]. One of the important properties for evaluating the quality and safety of upholstered furniture is flammability, which is described in scientific papers [28,29,30,31].
The function of the seam is to provide a uniform transmission of loads between two joined materials and to keep their integrity, which is not completely possible with a stitched seam [32,33]. When using upholstered furniture, the joints on the functional surfaces of the covering materials are subjected to tension. Tensile strength perpendicular to the seam is the basic mechanical property of stitches of covering material. The main aim of the paper is to determine the effect of upholstery faux leather, stitch length, point needle, and needle size on the strength of the stitches and the seam efficiency and establish recommendations for manufacturers of upholstered furniture that use faux leathers. The experimental techniques and approach for the mentioned tests were designed based on the standard procedure and testing equipment.

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Material of Upholstery Covers

Material composition (textile construction) can be characterized as a two-layer material. The strength of the stitches was analysed on the two types of upholstery faux leather with different densities and different base layers. The reverse side of the covering material is the underlying textile with the mechanical properties, and the front side is made up of a layer of synthetic polymer. Material A is PU (Polyurethane) faux leather fabric (Figure 1a) with a base layer of pressed fabric from 100% PES (Polyester), and the surface, facing layer is made of PU. Material B is PVC (Polyvinyl chloride) faux leather fabric (Figure 1b) with the base material 100% PES with a folded twill weave and the surface layer is a PVC coating.
The highly strong and durable 100% polyester sewing thread Synton 30 was used as a connecting material. This thread is most often used when sewing upholstered furniture covers. The strength of the sewing thread is 28 N; its longitudinal elongation is 12% at rapture.

2.2. Type of Sewing Needles

The needle point is the “point” or tip of the needle. There are different needle points available, which will determine both the appearance of the hole in the material and the appearance of the stitch. Two types of Groz-Beckert sewing needles, needle size 90/14 and 100/14, were used to create stitches. The metric sizing system corresponds to the diameter of the needle in the hundredths of a millimetre. Size 100 is one millimetre thick. The R-Style needle was the type used (Figure 2a). R point needles are known as universal or round point needles, used for any general-purpose sewing. R point needles are the standard for lockstitch machines and are commonly used for woven fabrics and soft leather. R point needles will produce a slightly angled or irregular stitch. The thread will be slightly elevated. A sewing needle with an LR tip was the second type used (Figure 2b). LR point needles cut the leather to the right at a 45-degree angle in the direction of the sewing, producing a slight to medium slanted stitch formation. The sewn thread is slightly elevated and stitch holes are visible. LR point needles are commonly used for decorative seams on footwear, leather bags, leather garments, and anything from soft to medium/hard leather.
The shape and dimensions of the samples (Figure 3a) were made according to ISO 13935-1:2014 [34]. The samples were created so that we could determine the effect of fabric type, needle size, point needles, and seam length on the strength of the stitch strength. For each type of covering material, stitches in both the warp direction and the weft direction of the base layer were created. We used two needle sizes, 90 and 100, to create a stitch. The point needles R and LR for each needle size were used. The stitches were made with a two-thread tying stitch, with a stitch length of 4 mm and 5 mm. We applied only these two lengths of stitches, because these are recommended for stitching leathers covering material, and yields the best stitch quality as well. Stitches with a length of 3 mm are too small and cause early tearing of the material under load. The longer the stitch, for example a stitch length of 6 mm, the looser the seam. Stitches with long stitch lengths hold the fabric together with less tension. The stitches were made on a Juki industrial sewing machine, with a tying stitch at a sewing speed of 4000 stitches/min.
To determine the maximum force to rupture the seam, the Strip method was used, according to ISO 13935-1: 2014. The tests were performed using the universal numerically controlled testing machine LabTEST 4.05 (Test&Motion, Labor Tech, Praha, Czech Republic). During the tensile test, the clamping length was set to 200 mm ± 1 mm, and the loading speed was 100 mm/min. The maximum force was recorded, and the type of damage of the sample was evaluated during the test. The samples were prepared in both the basic and the weft direction of the covering materials. The joints were loaded with a tensile force perpendicular to the seam line. The maximum force to rupture the seam was determined. The loading scheme of the sample and the performance of the test are shown in Figure 3b.
The strength of the fabric must be determined to evaluate the effectiveness of the stitches. The dimensions of the reference samples for determining the strength of the fabric are the same as the samples with stitches. Additionally, the methodology of loading and determining the maximum force and textile rapture was the same. The efficiency of the stitch PS is determined following the Equation (1):
P S = F Smax F FLmax · 100 % ,
where: FSmax seamed fabric strength (N), FFLmax unseamed fabric strength (N).

3. Results

The maximum force to seam rupture force FSmax (N) for seamed samples were measured to evaluate the tensile properties of the seams. The average rupture force of reference samples of unseamed faux leather FFLmax (N) are shown in Table 1.
Average values of maximum force to rupture the seam FSmax using the strip method are shown in Table 2.
Following Duncan’s test (Table 3 and Table 4), the effect of selected factors on the strength of the stitches was determined. In the case of PU faux leather, an effect of 100% of all monitored factors on joint strength is shown. Moreover, the effect of all three factors acting simultaneously is statistically significant at the 5% significance level (p = 0.00475). In the case of PVC faux leather, the effect of all three factors on the bond strength of the joint is 100% (p = 0.000).

4. Discussion

4.1. Evaluation of Strength

The reference samples of unstitched faux leather achieved the highest strength in the direction of the warp yarn of the underlying layer. The average strength value of PU faux leather in the warp direction is 37.5% (1008.14 N) higher than that of PVC faux leather (630.08 N). In the weft direction of the base layer, the average strength value of PU faux leather was higher by 35.34% (699.32 N) compared to PVC faux leather (452.24 N).
The highest average values of the force to seam rupture were achieved by PU faux leather, with a stitch length of 4 mm and a needle type LR/90. Stitches generally achieved higher seam rupture forces in the warp direction; the highest breaking force was achieved with PU faux leather. In the warp direction, with a stitch length of 4 mm and a needle type LR 90, the breaking force was higher by 17.40% (521.92 N) than that of PVC faux leather (431.07 N). In the weft direction, with a stitch length of 4 mm and a needle type LR 90, the breaking force was lower by 1.16% (426.36 N) than that of PVC faux leather (431.06 N), which is a statistically non-significant difference. Moreover, the study [12] confirmed that, in general, the strength of the seam is higher in the warp direction.
Seam efficiency is defined as the capacity of the material to carry a seam. In general, the efficiency of the seams is 60–80%. Low seam efficiency values indicate that the stitched material will already be damaged during sewing. In general, the tested covering materials and the stitches achieved higher strength to seam rupture in the warp direction of the underlying layer of faux leather. The finding can be explained as the warp yarns of fabrics almost always have a higher strength than the weft yarns. This can be achieved, e.g., using the long and thick fibres in the construction of the yarn and by a more even structure of the fabric in the direction of the warp.
The seam efficiency values (Table 5) of the tested joints of artificial leather fabrics ranged from 34.04% (PU faux leather fabric, in the warp direction, stitch length 5 mm, R/90) to 95.32% (PVC faux leather fabric, in the weft direction, stitch length 4 mm, LR/90). The highest seam efficiency was achieved in the direction of the weft yarns of the underlying layer with both faux leather covering materials, with type needles LR/90 and a stitch length of 4 mm. Seam efficiency of the PVC faux leather (95.32%) was the highest, 33% more than PU faux leather (60.96%).

4.2. Evaluation of Deformations and Damage

Since the warp yarns are stronger in both types of faux leather, the deformation in the direction of the warp fibres was also smaller. This was evident in the case of stitches, where the lowest deformations occurred in the case of PU faux leather fabric. With an LR/90 needle and a stitch length of 4 mm, the deformation was 26.47 mm, with a stitch length of 5 mm, the deformation was 22.76 mm. On average, 33% larger deformations occurred in the case of PVC faux leather, where with an R/100 needle and a stitch length of 4 mm, the deformation was 33.47 mm, and with a stitch length of 5 mm, the deformation was 32.19 mm.
Deformations are higher when stressing in the weft direction, this is due to the flexibility of the weft yarns, as well as their lower strength. The lowest deformations were achieved with PU faux leather fabric joints. With a needle type R/90 and a stitch length of 4 mm, the deformation was 47.31 mm, with a stitch length of 5 mm, the deformation was 45.99 mm. On average, 16% higher deformations occurred with PVC faux leather, where with an R/90 needle, and a stitch length of 4 mm the deformation was 57.27 mm, with a stitch length of 5 mm the deformation was 50.68 mm. The measured values showed that longer stitches of 5 mm are more suitable. It is a seam with a lower density of stitches, which causes less damage to the underlying layer of the covering material.
When stitches are stressed in the direction of the warp fibres, seam slippage is visible. The yarn in the underlying fabric was pulled out of the seam along the edge. With this type of deformation, the weft yarns in the underlying fabric are separated, the weaving of which has a higher elasticity. This type of damage was more pronounced in the stitches of the PU faux leather fabric covering material. When stressing the stitches of PVC faux leather fabric, the warp yarns of the underlying fabric ruptured when the maximum force was reached. The characteristic seam slippage damage is shown in Figure 4.
Seam grinning occurred when stitches were stressed in the weft direction. A gap was created in the stitches, exposing the sewing thread, which tore when the maximum force was reached. The damage was also manifested by the enlargement of the hole into which the needle penetrated. It can be also seen in the case of a stitch length of 4 mm, i.e., with reduced seam density, seam grinning increases. Sewing thread in a seam that is loaded perpendicular to the stitch line tends to tear. The characteristic damage of seam grinning is shown in Figure 5. The results of our research are comparable with the study [12], where the seam failure is determined by the direction of the specimen’s die-cut. In both fabric types, the weft and warp are significantly different; hence, the variable form of destruction is closely related to the cutting direction of the samples.

5. Conclusions

Stitches and seam types are very important when evaluating the upholstery quality. Stitches are used to join the patterns of the upholstery, and seams give the shape and detail of the upholstery. The types of fabrics and their structural properties have a significant impact on seam efficiency. When using faux leather as covering upholstery materials, it is necessary to consider the type of the underlying layer of the textiles in terms of the seam efficiency and its damage and defects. If the underlying layer of faux leather is a fabric with canvas binding, a higher seam efficiency of joints is assumed.
In terms of the strength of the stitches and the influence of all investigated factors, the joint with a stitch length of 4 mm is the most suitable for PU faux leather in both the warp and weft directions of the underlying layer. For PVC faux leather in the direction of the warp and weft yarns of the underlying layer, a stitch with a length of 4 and 5 mm is suitable. The difference in the strength of the seams is minimal, which is caused by the uniform structure of the underlying layer in both directions.
In terms of seam efficiency, it is recommended to use the LR needle for sewing faux leather. The seams achieved higher efficiency in the case of both types of covering materials.
When testing both types of covering materials, the highest seam efficiency of 95.32% was achieved for PVC faux leather joint. The higher efficiency of PVC stitches indicates the appropriate selection of all factors affecting the stitches. Since the factors affecting the seam efficiency are the same for both covering materials, whereby the efficiency of PU faux leather stitched joints is lower, we recommend experimentally verifying the effect of another factor, the fineness of the sewing thread.
If it is possible in terms of the cutting plan and the construction of the covering fabric, the stitches should be made in the direction of the warp yarns. In this direction, the strength of both the fabric and the joint is higher.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, A.V. and N.L.; methodology, A.V.; software, N.L.; validation, N.L. and A.V.; formal analysis, R.K. and E.M.; investigation, N.L. and A.V.; resources, R.K. and E.M.; data curation, N.L., A.V. and R.K.; writing original draft preparation, N.L. and R.K.; writing review and editing, N.L.; visualization, N.L., R.K. and E.M.; supervision, A.V.; project administration, N.L.; funding acquisition, N.L. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Grant Agency of the Ministry of Education, Science, Research and Sport of the Slovak Republic and Slovak Academy of Sciences, project VEGA; no. 1/0264/22; Influence of process parameters of CNC technology on the quality of furniture joints.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Germanova-Krasteva, D.; Petrov, H. Investigation on the seam’s quality by sewing of light fabrics. Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 2008, 20, 57–64. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bharani, M.; Shiyamaladevi, P.S.S.; Mahendra Gowda, R.V. Characterization of Seam Strength and Seam Slippage on Cotton Fabric with Woven Structures and Finish. Res. J. Eng. Sci. 2012, 1, 41–50. [Google Scholar]
  3. Stylios, G.; Sotomi, J.O. Investigation of Seam Pucker in Lightweight Synthetic Fabrics as an Aesthetic Property Part I: A Cognitive Model for the Measurement of Seam Pucker. J. Text. Inst. 1993, 84, 593–600. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Jin, T.; Yeol, J. Objective Evaluation of Fabric Wrinkles and Seam Puckers Using Fractal Geometry. Text. Res. J. 2000, 70, 469–475. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Rajput, B.; Kakde, M.; Gulhane, S.; Mohite, S.; Raichurkar, P.P. Effect of Sewing Parameters on Seam Strength and Seam Efficiency. Trends Text. Eng. Fash. Technol. 2018, 4, 4–5. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Owczarek, M. Impact of fabric parameters and properties on a 2D cutting and stitching line. Commun. Dev. Assem. Text. Prod. 2020, 1, 80–87. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Borse, S.; Sonawane, K.; Kakde, M.V.; Shinde, T.A. Review on analysis of seam quality. In Chemistry and Technology of Natural and Synthetic Dyes and Pigments; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2020. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Chen, D.; Cheng, P.; Li, Y. Investigation of interactions between fabric performance, sewing process parameters and seam pucker of shirt fabric. J. Eng. Fibers Fabr. 2021, 16, 155892502110203. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Ali, N.; Rehan, A.M.; Ahmed, Z.; Memon, H.; Hussain, A. Effect of Different Types of Seam, Stitch Class and Stitch Density on Seam Performance. J. Appl. Emerg. Sci. 2016, 5, 32–43. [Google Scholar]
  10. Choudhary, A.K.; Goel, A. Effect of Some Fabric and Sewing Conditions on Apparel Seam Characteristics. J. Text. 2013, 2013, 157034. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Rogina-Car, B.; Schwarz, I.; Kovačević, S. Analysis of Woven Fabric at the Place of the Sewn Seam. Autex Res. J. 2018, 18, 216–220. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Lange, J.; Ciura, A.; Majewski, A.; Wojnowska, M. Study on the Influence of Selected Fabrics and Stitching on the Strength of Upholstery Covers. Materials 2022, 15, 3854. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Daukantienė, V.; Lapinskienė, M. Influence of the deformation mode on seam slippage in woven fabrics. Fibers Polym. 2012, 13, 1086–1093. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Geršak, J.; Knez, B. Reduction In Thread Strength As A Cause Of Loading In The Sewing Process. Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 1991, 3, 6–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Iftikhar, F.; Hussain, T.; Malik, M.; Ali, Z.; Nazir, A.; Riaz, S.; Malik, S. Fabric Structural Parameters Effect on Seam Efficiency-Effect of Woven Fabric Structural Parameters on Seam Efficiency. J. Text. Sci. Eng. 2018, 8, 1–7. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Skorupińska, E.; Wiaderek, K.; Sydor, M. Influence of technological parameters on the upholstery seams in furniture. Ann. WULS -SGGW. For. Wood Technol. 2021, 114, 110–115. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Zelova, K.; Glombikova, V.; Havelka, A. Problems with perfect-looking two-needle decorative seams in the manufacture of leather car seat covers. Text. Res. J. 2020, 90, 49–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Ahmadi, M.S.; Rahimi, S. Effect of needle type and backing fabric structure on sewing needle penetration force in artificial leather. In Proceedings of the 18th AUTEX World Textile Conference, Istanbul, Turkey, 20–22 June 2018; pp. 611–614. [Google Scholar]
  19. Yukseloglu, S.M.; Çitoğlu, F.; Çetinkaya, B. A study on the needle heating in polyester blend upholstery fabrics. Ind. Text. 2013, 64, 246–253. [Google Scholar]
  20. Liasi, E.; Du, R.; Simon, D.; Bujas-Dimitrejevic, J.; Liburdi, F. An experimental study of needle heating in sewing heavy materials using infrared radiometry. Int. J. Cloth. Sci. Technol. 1999, 11, 300–314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Mazari, A. Effect of Needle Heating on the Sewing of Medical Textiles. Polymers 2021, 13, 4405. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Kyosev, Y.; Kühn, T. Joining High Thickness Materials by Sewing–first Modelling Steps of the Stitched Place. Appl. Compos. Mater. 2022, 29, 83–93. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Brisa, V.J.D.; Helbig, F.; Kroll, L. Numerical characterisation of the mechanical behaviour of a vertical spacer yarn in thick warp knitted spacer fabrics. J. Ind. Text. 2014, 45, 101–117. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Šulgan, R.; Slabejová, G.; Navrátil, V.; Bahýl, V. Tepelné namáhanie čalúnnických materiálov sálavým teplom. Acta Fac. Xylologiae 1999, 41, 47–57. [Google Scholar]
  25. Dziegielewski, S.; Smardzewski, J. Badania Formatek Sprezynowych Mebli Tapicerowanych. In Čalúnnicke Dni; Technical University in Zvolen: Zvolen, Slovak, 1995; pp. 18–19. [Google Scholar]
  26. Lusiak, A.; Smardzewski, J. Creative thinking in designing furniture for pre-school children. Ann. Wars. Univ. Life Sci. SGGW For. Wood Technol. 2010, 70, 270–278. [Google Scholar]
  27. Silber, G.; Alizadeh, M.; Salimi, M. Large Deformation Analysis for Soft Foams Based on Hyperelasticity. J. Mech. 2010, 26, 327–334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Makovická Osvaldová, L.; Marková, I.; Vandlíčková, M.; Gašpercová, S.; Titko, M. Fire Characteristics of Upholstery Materials in Seats. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 2020, 17, 3341. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Lounis, M.; Leconte, S.; Rousselle, C.; Belzunces, L.P.; Desauziers, V.; Lopez-Cuesta, J.-M.; Julien, J.M.; Guenot, D.; Bourgeois, D. Fireproofing of domestic upholstered furniture: Migration of flame retardants and potential risks. J. Hazard. Mater. 2019, 366, 556–562. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Yang, J.; Rein, G.; Chen, H.; Zammarano, M. Smoldering propensity in upholstered furniture: Effects of mock-up configuration and foam thickness. Appl. Therm. Eng. 2020, 181, 115873. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chivas, C.; Guillaume, E.; Sainrat, A.; Barbosa, V. Assessment of risks and benefits in the use of flame retardants in upholstered furniture in continental Europe. Fire Saf. J. 2009, 44, 801–807. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Kovačević, S.; Domjanić, J.; Brnada, S.; Schwarz, I. Textile Composites for Seat Upholstery. In Textiles for Advanced Applications; IntechOpen: London, UK, 2017. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Fatahi, I.A.; Apau, E.; Asare, T.O.; Gyamfi, E.E. The Use of Composite Textile Techniques as Upholstery Fabric for Interior Furnishing. Int. J. Innov. Res. Dev. 2022, 11. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. ISO 13935-1: 2014; Textiles—Seam Tensile Properties of Fabrics and Made-Up Textile Articles—Part 1: Determination of Maximum Force to Seam Rupture Using the Strip Method. Comite Europeen de Normalisation: Brussels, Belgium, 2014.
Figure 1. Types of tested faux leathers (150× magnification); left back side, right top side (a) PU faux leather fabric, (b) PVC faux leather fabric.
Figure 1. Types of tested faux leathers (150× magnification); left back side, right top side (a) PU faux leather fabric, (b) PVC faux leather fabric.
Materials 15 06585 g001
Figure 2. (a) tip of the needle R, (b) tip of the needle LR.
Figure 2. (a) tip of the needle R, (b) tip of the needle LR.
Materials 15 06585 g002
Figure 3. (a) the sample dimensions, (b) testing of the stitch.
Figure 3. (a) the sample dimensions, (b) testing of the stitch.
Materials 15 06585 g003
Figure 4. Seam slippage (a) PU faux leather fabric; (b) PVC faux leather fabric.
Figure 4. Seam slippage (a) PU faux leather fabric; (b) PVC faux leather fabric.
Materials 15 06585 g004
Figure 5. Seam grinning: (a) PU faux leather fabric; (b) PVC faux leather fabric.
Figure 5. Seam grinning: (a) PU faux leather fabric; (b) PVC faux leather fabric.
Materials 15 06585 g005
Table 1. Average values of unseamed fabric strength FFLmax (N).
Table 1. Average values of unseamed fabric strength FFLmax (N).
Material A: PU Faux Leather FabricMaterial B: PVC Faux Leather Fabric
Load in the warp
FFLmax (N)
Load in the weft
FFLmax (N)
Load in the warp
FFLmax (N)
Load in the weft
FFLmax (N)
1008.14699.32630.08452.24
Table 2. Average values of seamed fabric strength FSmax (N). * The standard deviation (SD) is given in brackets.
Table 2. Average values of seamed fabric strength FSmax (N). * The standard deviation (SD) is given in brackets.
Point Needle/Needle SizeMaterial A: PU Faux Leather Fabric Material B: PVC Faux Leather Fabric
Load in the
Warp Direction
Load in the
Weft Direction
Load in the
Warp Direction
Load in the
Weft Direction
Steam Length (mm)Steam Length (mm)Steam Length (mm)Steam Length (mm)
4 mm5 mm4 mm5 mm4 mm5 mm4 mm5 mm
R/90463.82
(SD = 9.05) *
343.21
(24.02)
386.46
(20.76)
400.44
(10.38)
362.46
(16.55)
407.75
(11.01)
408.11
(11.68)
347.00
(18.01)
R/100492.97
(24.56)
456.12
(20.73)
380.60
(13.46)
391.32
(16.32)
357.01
(16.54)
400.00
(5.72)
400.05
(15.80)
339.12
(5.52)
LR/90521.92
(14.25)
413.26
(14.76)
426.32
(22.46)
407.99
(14.83)
431.07
(8.17)
407.67
(18.64)
431.06
(18.13)
420.93
(17.66)
LR/100517.12
(18.21)
409.19
(19.04)
424.52
(23.05)
407.43
(21.32)
412.11
(8.91)
410.67
(5.83)
411.4
25.96)
382.59
(7.70)
Table 3. Basic table of three-factor analysis of variance for the strength of joints of PU faux leather.
Table 3. Basic table of three-factor analysis of variance for the strength of joints of PU faux leather.
Source of VariationSum of SquaresDoFMSFP
Intercept20,494,153120,494,15344,469.820.000000
Load Direction69,059169,059149.850.000000
Needle size33,852311,28424.490.000000
Stitch length66,029166,029143.270.000000
Load Direction × Needle size21,6303721015.640.000000
Load Direction × Stitch length58,473158,473126.880.000000
Needle size × Stitch length11,788339298.530.000045
Load Direction × Needle size × Stitch length6352321174.590.004755
Table 4. Basic table of three-factor analysis of variance for strength of joints PVC faux leather.
Table 4. Basic table of three-factor analysis of variance for strength of joints PVC faux leather.
Source of VariationSum of SquaresDoFMSFP
Intercept17,651,343117,651,34356,459.800.000000
Load Direction2044120446.540.012129
Needle size49,50631650252.780.000000
Stitch length61961619619.820.000023
Load Direction × Needle size36331210.390.762619
Load Direction × Stitch length17,933117,93357.360.000000
Needle size × Stitch length178335941.900.134563
Load Direction × Needle size × Stitch length24,2833809425.890.000000
Table 5. Seam efficiency for Faux Leather Fabric.
Table 5. Seam efficiency for Faux Leather Fabric.
Point Needle/Needle SizeMaterial A: PU Faux Leather FabricMaterial B: PVC Faux Leather Fabric
Load in the
Warp Direction
Load in the
Weft Direction
Load in the
Warp Direction
Load in the
Weft Direction
Steam Length (mm)Steam Length (mm)Steam Length (mm)Steam Length (mm)
4 mm5 mm4 mm5 mm4 mm5 mm4 mm5 mm
R/9046.01%34.04%55.26%55.26%57.53%64.71%90.24%76.73%
R/10048.90%45.24%54.42%55.96%56.66%63.48%88.46%74.99%
LR/9051.77%40.99%60.96%58.34%68.42%68.41%95.32%93.08%
LR/10051.29%40.59%60.70%58.26%65.41%65.18%90.97%84.60%
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Vilhanová, A.; Langová, N.; Kłos, R.; Máchová, E. The Effect of Selected Factors on the Strength of Stitches of Upholstery Faux Leather. Materials 2022, 15, 6585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196585

AMA Style

Vilhanová A, Langová N, Kłos R, Máchová E. The Effect of Selected Factors on the Strength of Stitches of Upholstery Faux Leather. Materials. 2022; 15(19):6585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196585

Chicago/Turabian Style

Vilhanová, Anna, Nadežda Langová, Robert Kłos, and Eliška Máchová. 2022. "The Effect of Selected Factors on the Strength of Stitches of Upholstery Faux Leather" Materials 15, no. 19: 6585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196585

APA Style

Vilhanová, A., Langová, N., Kłos, R., & Máchová, E. (2022). The Effect of Selected Factors on the Strength of Stitches of Upholstery Faux Leather. Materials, 15(19), 6585. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196585

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop