Next Article in Journal
Effect of Internal Defects on the Fatigue Behavior of Additive Manufactured Metal Components: A Comparison between Ti6Al4V and Inconel 718
Previous Article in Journal
Simulation Analysis of Delamination Damage for the Thick-Walled Composite-Overwrapped Pressure Vessels
Previous Article in Special Issue
Crack-Resistant Cements under Drying: Results from Ring Shrinkage Tests and Multi-Physical Modeling
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Diatomaceous Earth—Lightweight Pozzolanic Admixtures for Repair Mortars—Complex Chemical and Physical Assessment

by
Milena Pavlíková
1,*,
Pavla Rovnaníková
2,
Martina Záleská
1 and
Zbyšek Pavlík
1
1
Department of Materials Engineering and Chemistry, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 29 Prague, Czech Republic
2
Institute of Chemistry, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Žižkova 17, Veveří, 602 00 Brno, Czech Republic
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(19), 6881; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196881
Submission received: 14 September 2022 / Revised: 29 September 2022 / Accepted: 29 September 2022 / Published: 3 October 2022

Abstract

:
The presented research is focused on the complex assessment of three different types of diatomaceous earth and evaluation of their ability for application as pozzolana active admixtures applicable in the concrete industry and the production of repair mortars applicable for historical masonry. The comprehensive experimental campaign comprised chemical, mineralogical, microstructural, and physical testing of raw materials, followed by the analyses and characterization of pozzolanic activity, rheology and heat evolution of fresh blended pastes, and testing of macrostructural and mechanical parameters of the hardened 28-days and 90-days samples. The obtained results gave evidence of the different behavior of researched diatomaceous earth when mixed with water and Portland cement. The differences in heat evolution, initial and final setting time, porosity, density, and mechanical parameters were identified based on chemical and phase composition, particle size, specific surface, and morphology of diatomaceous particles. Nevertheless, the researched mineral admixtures yielded a high strength activity index (92.9% to 113.6%), evinced their pozzolanic activity. Three fundamental factors were identified that affect diatomaceous earth’s contribution to the mechanical strength of cement blends. These are the filler effect, the pertinent acceleration of OPC hydration, and the pozzolanic reaction of diatomite with Portland cement hydrates. The optimum replacement level of ordinary Portland cement by diatomaceous earth to give maximum long-term strength enhancement is about 10 wt.%., but it might be further enhanced based on the properties of pozzolan.

1. Introduction

In the production of repair mortars, materials compatible with those initially inbuilt should find helpful. However, today’s building practice applies to the renewal of masonry repair mortars based mostly on cement, hydrophobic agent, modifying polymer-origin additives, and different fillers. Based on our previous research on mortars for the restoration of historical buildings [1], pure cement mortar should be avoided due to their incompatible porosity, mechanical strength, rigidity, and low water vapor permeability [2]. Therefore, lime-, natural hydraulic lime-, and blended cement-based mortars have been developed within the last decade and are increasingly applied in reconstruction treatments [3,4].
Together with compatibility and functionality issues, there is a rising interest in producing composite cement due to increasing ecological awareness and diminishing natural resources [5]. As global manufacturing of Portland cement contributes to approx. 7% of the total anthropogenic CO2 emissions, the mounting attention on environmental aspects of material conversion has influenced research towards possible modifications of Portland cement to meet better demands for sustainability in the construction sector [6]. This is done by using different types of low-carbon additives and admixtures and changing the composition and, thus, the performance of cement [7,8]. It is usually replaced in composite cement as part of clinker by supplementary cementitious materials (SCMs) [9,10]. They can be used by blending Portland cement at the cement plant or replacing Portland cement at the concrete plant. In most cases, the SCM can improve the durability and mechanical properties of conventional binders, especially if SCM are pozzolans, siliceous, or silico-aluminous mineral admixtures. The pozzolanic reaction involves two main parameters: the maximum calcium hydroxide consumption and the rate of hydration. These parameters depend mainly on the nature of pozzolanic material, its chemical and mineralogical composition, and its particle size [11].
The most widespread used SCMs have been fuel ash [12,13,14] and ground granulated blast furnace slag [15,16,17]. Metakaolin [18,19,20] was also applied to reduce the amount of cement produced and thus bring environmental and economic benefits. However, the availability of these materials becomes increasingly problematic, which will be further worsened in the near future. For this reason, there is a need to find and assess other alternatives to reduce Portland cement production and its harmful environmental impact [21].
Considering the necessity to find alternatives to well-established SCMs, three types of diatomaceous earth were investigated and assessed as prospective partial cement substitutes in a blended binder for repair mortars. In the case of pyramid stones in Egypt, it is believed that the fine limestone particles were bound together with calcium silicates produced from a reaction between diatomaceous earth and lime [22]. Diatomaceous earth deposits were found in Fayoum, roughly 70 km south of Cairo, Egypt [23].
The diatomaceous earth or diatomite is a lightweight rock of sedimentary origin, mainly consisting of the fossilized skeletal remains of diatom, a unicellular aquatic plant related to the algae skeleton fragments of diatom algae (Diatomea and Radiolaria), called frustules, with a wide variety of shape and size, which ranges from 0.75 µm to 1500 µm [24]. It is a highly porous structure containing up to 80–90% voids, constituting mainly amorphous silica with minor amounts of alumina and ferric oxide, followed by crystalline quartz, muscovite, feldspar [25], and characterized by a specific surface area up to 200 m2 [26].
The low cost, abundance, easy availability, excellent biocompatibility, non-toxicity, thermal stability, and chemical inertness make diatomite an intriguing material for applications ranging from filtration to pharmaceutics [27,28]. The unique combination of physical and chemical properties of diatomite makes it applicable for several industrial uses, as a filtration media for chemicals, various beverages, drinking water, sugar, etc., without altering their natural properties or for the removal of inorganic and organic pollutants. Because of its high porosity, diatomaceous earth is used not only as a beverage filter material but also as a mildly abrasive or mechanical pesticide. Usually, diatomite mined from geological deposits must be purified before being used; thermal pre-calcination and HCl washing are the treatments generally used to increase powder quality and to make the biomaterial inert as filter support [29]. In the construction industry, diatomite finds use in lightweight brick manufacturing [30,31] to produce ceramics [32,33,34] for the improvement of MOC composites [35] and as a part of shape-stabilized phase change materials [36,37]. It is also applied in designing and developing high-temperature resistant and thermal insulation materials [38,39] and as lightweight aggregate manufacturing mortar and concrete [40,41].
Different types of mineral admixtures are added to increase the cementitious material content, improve the workability of harsh cement blends, and achieve high strength without causing high internal temperatures. Aruntas and Tokyay [42] indicated that adding diatomite in Portland cement significantly affects grain size, i.e., increasing fineness. When diatomaceous earth is blended with ordinary Portland cement, it undergoes strength increases or simply acts as a filler while maintaining similar strength development [43,44]. Kastis [45] reported on the pozzolanic activity of diatomite, leading to the formation of higher amounts of hydrated products. Similarly, dos Santos and Cordeiro [46] observed enhancement of the pozzolanic activity of diatomite by grinding, i.e., by an increase of specific surface area. On the other hand, Aydin and Gül [47] indicated that the rise in diatomite content in concrete resulted in a sudden drop in its compressive strength. Due to the high specific surface area, ordinary Portland cement blended with diatomaceous earth requires more water, leading to inferior concretes [48,49]. Similarly, Lemons [26] reported that the high porosity of diatomite leads to increased water demand, limiting the substitution level of untreated diatomite earth [50,51]. As the use of diatomite as SCM brings some apparent advantages, and also drawbacks, there is a need to extend the present state of knowledge in the field of diatomaceous earth application in Portland cement blends and to conduct additional, comprehensive analyses of their effect on the final properties of the hardened products. In relation to high amorphous silica content, diatomite is assumed to be an environmentally friendly and cost-effective SCM. The up to now reported data on the application of diatomaceous earth as pozzolans are often contradictory, pointing out some adverse effects on the performance and properties of diatomite-cement blends. Therefore, research on the effectiveness of reactive SiO2-rich materials is highly actual and necessary to contribute to developing less energy-demand blended binders and, thus, construction materials. Moreover, the diatomaceous earth must be studied case by case due to its variation in mineralogical and chemical composition, morphology, fineness, pre-processing, etc. In this respect, the objective of the presented work was to investigate diatomite-Portland cement blends in the form of pastes with a constant water/binder ratio. Three types of diatomaceous earth were incorporated in cement paste mixtures as SCMs. The experimental campaign comprised the characterization of raw materials, behavior, and properties of fresh and hardened blended cement pastes. A broad set of experimental techniques was used to analyze the effects of material conversion in the diatomite-Portland cement system. Laboratory tests and measurements showed that the diatomite samples exhibited good pozzolanic activity and could substitute the currently used natural pozzolans. The best compressive strength values at later ages were obtained using the diatomaceous earth with the highest amorphous silica content. The late compressive strength of most pastes modified with diatomite was improved compared to that of reference cement paste which agrees with previously published reports [43,51,52].

2. Materials and Methods

2.1. Raw Materials

CEM I 42.5 R produced in the cement factory in Radotín, Czech Republic, was used as a primary binder. This hydraulic binder is made in accordance with the standard EN 197-1 [53]. The diatomaceous earth used in prepared pastes, denoted as BOR, is quarried in the Miocene Mydlovary formation in the South Bohemian basins. There is located at the biggest quarry in the Třeboň (Czech Republic) basin in the region between Ledenice and Borovany. The diatomaceous earth quarried here is pale-colored, grey to ochre, earthy or loosely cemented, and placed nearly horizontally. In some upper parts of this diatomite location, the spongo–diatomite layer is present. In the middle part of the quarry, the diatomite layer achieved about 100 m of thickness, whereas the average thickness is about 5.85 m. During sedimentation processes of Mydlovary formation, several ingressions of the sea onto land took place. The Borovany profile was opened in 1909 and belonged to the Schwarzenberg demesne. Diatomite mining continued after World War Two, and the new fabric named Colofrig was discovered in 1961. The tested diatomite (commercially labeled F4) is produced in LB MINERALS, s.r.o.(Horní Bříza, Czech Republic), a member of the LASSELSBERGER group, as a powder useful for filtration processes. For the comparison, two different types of calcined diatomaceous earth originating from Italy (Dal Cin Gildo S. p. a., Concorezzo, Italy), denoted as ENO3 and ENO7 (commercially EnorandallTM 3 and EnorandallTM 7), were tested.

2.2. Chemical and Physical Analysis of Raw Materials

The ability of SCMs to take part in the hydration reaction of blended binders depends on their chemical and physical properties. The total chemical composition of tested raw materials was determined using classical chemical analysis according to the Czech standard ČSN EN ISO 11885 and ČSN 720101. In the first step, the analyzed materials were melted together with LiBO2 and then dissolved in the solution. The solution composition was analyzed with ICP-OES (Inductively Coupled Plasma Atomic Emission Spectroscope) Jobin Yvon ULTIMA 2, Horiba Scientific. The total chemical composition of examined raw materials is presented in Table 1.
The content of four main clinker phases in PC calculated based on Bogue’s equations [54] was the following: C3S 65.9 wt.%, C2S 4.7 wt.%, C3A 7.4 wt.%, and C4AF 7.3 wt.%, respectively. The differences in the chemical composition in the case of diatomaceous earth are caused due to their origin. The powders ENO3 and ENO7 are of seawater origin, and the diatomite BOR has a freshwater origin, see the mass content of alkalis in Table 1.
The complete chemical analysis does not say anything about the reactivity of tested diatomaceous earth in an alkaline environment. In that case, there is essential to know the content of reactive amorphous phases. According to the standard ASTM C618-91 [55], the total content of the hydraulic oxides (SiO2 + Al2O3 + Fe2O3) in pozzolana active materials is recommended at 70 wt.% and the content of active SiO2 no less than 25 wt.%. For that reason, the XRD (X-Ray Diffraction) analysis of diatomite samples was performed. It was done using the Siemens D-5000 X-Ray diffractometer with Bragg-Brentano configuration (CuKα source, λ = 1.5405 Å). The phase identification was performed with Crystallographica Search Match (Version 2.0.3.1, Oxford Cryosystems, Oxford, UK) according to the Whole Pattern Fitting Structure Refinement invented by Rietveld [56]. The results of the XRD analysis are introduced in Table 2.
The differences in mineral and phase composition of the examined minerals are visible. The amount of amorphous was the highest for ENO7. The other two materials have about 43.0% (ENO3) and 22.6% (BOR) lower content in the amorphous phase. The presence of cristobalite, which anneals at high temperatures, declares the method of raw material processing. While diatomite BOR is produced only mechanically, the other two, ENO3 and ENO7, are calcination processed. The opal content in the sample ENO3 indicates the compacting rate because opal is replaced with quartz in compacted rocks. The presence of kaolinite and illite in the case of diatomite BOR is adequate for the quarry composition.
The chemical composition of raw materials was also examined with IR (infrared) analysis (see Figure 1a,b). Infrared spectra were measured using FTIR spectrometer Nicolet 6700 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA). Spectra were collected after 32 scans at 4 cm−1 resolution in absorbance mode. The samples were prepared by the standard KBr pellets method, the sample powders were dispersed in KBr (1/150 mg), and the transparent pellets were tested with a transmission accessory. The spectral regions were normalized to enable comparison of individual samples. Peak deconvolution using Gaussian peak fitting was performed to evidence the stretching mode contribution of the different functional groups.
Table 3 and Table 4 show the assignment of the major absorption bands of the tested raw materials.
FTIR spectra of siliceous materials exhibit peaks in two distinct regions [61]: peaks at >2500 cm−1 and <1300 cm−1. The first region is typical for O-H stretching vibration of absorbed or molecular water, while the second occurs due to several silica modes. The peak at 400–500 cm−1 can be assigned to the rocking motion of oxygen atoms bridging silicon atoms in siloxane bonds Si-O-Si. The symmetric vibrations of silicon atoms in siloxane bonds occur at ~800 cm−1. The most prominent peak in the spectrum presented at ~1100 cm−1 is dominated by the antisymmetric motion of silicon atoms in siloxane bonds. It consists of three components: a broad shoulder centered at 1115–1130 cm−1 assigned to longitudinal optical mode (LO νas -Si-O-Si), a strong peak centered at 1035–1045 cm−1 (transverse optical mode TO νas -Si-O-Si) and weak absorption at 950 cm−1 due to silanol (Si-OH) stretching vibrations [62].
The microstructure and morphology of diatomaceous earth particles are well apparent in Figure 2. The microstructural analysis was conducted using a scanning electron microscope (SEM) JSM-840, JEOL, Ltd., Equipped with a LaB6 cathode, thus providing a very high resolution.
Also visible, the sedimentary rock called diatomite or diatomaceous earth is composed of fossil SiO2-based cells of dead organisms called Diatomacea. In our case, all samples shove the centric genera [63]. These organisms have properties of both plants and animals, and for that reason, they create the fifth alone kingdom of Eukaryotes named Chromista [64]. The oldest fossils of Diatomacea come from the older Cretaceous period of Mesozoic, i.e., they date back to 120 million years ago. About 11 million cells form 1 cm3 of diatomaceous earth. The frustules are the hard and porous cell wall or external layer of Diatomacea, composed almost purely of polymerized SiO2. They are coated with a layer of organic substance, the acid polysaccharide Diatotepin [65]. The double-layered cell grows due to the active catching of siliceous acid from the environment with the speed of 4–18 molecules per second [66].
Physical parameters tested characterize raw materials from the view of size, shape, distribution, and especially specific surface of particles. The specific density of analyzed powders was also researched.
The particle size distribution of cement and diatomaceous earth was determined by a laser diffraction working device, Analysette 22 Micro Tec plus, Fritsch. The calculated values of particle volume fraction 10, 50, and 90% corresponding to the particle size are presented in Table 5. The particle size distribution curves of tested diatomaceous earth compared to PC CEMI 42.5 R are introduced in Figure 3.
A comparison with cement CEM I 42.5 R (the main peak at the particle size distribution curve was recorded for a pore diameter of 30.2 µm) showed that the powders of tested diatomaceous particles in the case of ENO 3 and ENO7 were coarser, nominally 39.8 µm and 32.7 µm, respectively. On the other side, the sample labeled BOR is slightly finer (26.8 µm). However, their particle size is sufficient for the intended application of the analyzed diatomaceous earth as a partial cement replacement.
Another parameter for describing the fineness of the tested materials is the specific surface area because most of the surface area comes from the smallest particles. The most common method for characterizing the surface area is the Blaine air permeability test for cement testing described in EN 196-6 [67]. The test is based on the fact that the rate at which air can pass through a porous bed of particles under a given pressure gradient is a function of the surface area of the powder. The metal chamber of known cross-sectional area and volume is filled with a known mass of fine powder, and then the time required to pass a known volume of air through the powder is measured. The surface area is determined through an empirical equation developed by measuring a standard, the powder of a known surface area, using the same instrument. The resulting values, called the Blaine fineness, are presented in Table 6.
The other way to explore the specific surface area is a measurement based on physisorption (physical adsorption). Applying inert gases, such as nitrogen, enables the determination of specific surface, total pore surface, total pore volume, and pore size distribution. For the measurement, apparatus Sorptomatic 1990 (Thermo Scientific, Waltham, MA, USA) was used. The equipment consists of two main parts: control and analytical sections. Common coolant for the analyses is liquid nitrogen (−192 °C); different ovens are available to perform analyses from room temperature up to 450 °C. The measured data were calculated according to the BET theory to obtain the values in Table 6.
As other fundamental physical characteristics of each material were tested, also specific density was experimentally determined using a fully automatic helium pycnometer Pycnomatic ATC (POROTEC). The instrument works under isothermal conditions, monitored with Peltier’s thermocouples, and the analytical process is controlled with a microprocessor. The tested sample’s maximum volume up to 62 cm3 guarantees precise density determination, which is presented in Table 6.
The reactivity of cement and pozzolana active materials is related to their Blaine fineness and specific surface area. In this case, the explored diatomaceous earth exhibit much higher Blaine fineness than measured for PC. For ENO3, ENO7, and BOR, the Blaine fineness values increased by 118%, 418%, and 482%, respectively. It is generally accepted strength of PC increases with its fineness [68]. It means the activity of mineral admixtures might also be enhanced by higher Blaine fineness. Similarly, mineral admixture, which is softer than PC in given fineness, results in improved durability of blended mortar [69].
The specific surface area is a better parameter for describing the fineness of powder materials. Still, it is difficult to pin down because most materials have features at different lengths, so the more sensitive the measurement, the more surface area will be found. Different measuring techniques thus give different values. As Taylor [70] reported, the gas sorption technique gives results a minimum of 2–3 times higher than the Blain value.
The analyzed powder materials were also specified by their physicochemical characteristics and performance, namely pH value, chemical reactivity, solubility, or content of soluble ions. The pH of the leached solution (1:10), which means 90 g of analyzed diatomaceous earth powder was immersed in 900 mL3 of distilled water for 24 h, was tested according to EN 12457-2 [71]. The analysis was performed with a pH glass electrode using the potentiometric method. A device inoLab pH/ION 740 (WTW) was used for the pH measurement. Before the measurement, the most important step was to calibrate the pH electrode with corresponding standard pH solutions. The pH values of the tested solutions are presented in Table 7. The different pH values declare the diverse origin of the tested diatomaceous earth that can influence the conditioning of reaction products.
The pozzolanic activity was determined using the Frattini test, specified in EN 196-5 [72]. The tested blends were prepared using CEM I 42.5 R (Radotín, Czech Republic) that was replaced by 5, 10, 20, and 30 wt.% with the researched diatomaceous earth. The tested cement/diatomite blends were mixed with 100 mL3 of boiled distilled water. Then, the samples were put in a sealed plastic bottle and placed in an oven at 40 °C. After 8 days, samples were filtered with a Buchner funnel. The filtrate was firstly analyzed to determine [OH] concentration with titration of HCl using a bromophenol blue indicator. Then, pH was adjusted to 12.5 by NaOH, and titration with EDTA using Murexide indicator [Ca2+] concentration was assessed. The calculated average values from the three measurements present one point in the pozzolanicity diagram. The test result is satisfactory if the concentration of dissolved Ca(OH)2 in suspension is lower than that of the saturated solution. The analyzed sample is pozzolana active as the point lies under the isotherm of Ca(OH)2 saturation, which is visible in Figure 4 a–c. Based on the Frattini test and PC substitution ratio, powders ENO7 and BOR were pozzolana active.
A modified Chapelle test was used to verify the Frattini test based on determining residual Ca(OH)2. This method is described in the French standard NF P18-513 [73]. The principle of the method is based on the reaction of 1 g of tested powder material with 2 g of CaO in 250 mL of water at 80 °C for 24 h. The amount of remaining CaO was analyzed using the same titration method as in the case of the Frattini test. The results were expressed in mg Ca(OH)2 fixed by the 1g of tested powder and gave straight information about the pozzolanic activity of the tested sample. Raverdy et al. [74] initially proposed that the mineral admixture is pozzolana active if 1 g of the tested sample absorbs more than 650 mg of Ca(OH)2. Results of the Chapelle test are summarized in Table 7.
Based on the amount of fixed Ca(OH)2, the lowest pozzolanic activity exhibited ENO3. It bonded by 81% and 98.5% less of Ca(OH)2 than ENO7 and BOR, respectively. However, all tested silica-based powders exhibited certain reactivity in the presence of hydrated CaO. The chemical reactivity of pozzolanic activity depends mainly on the size of pozzolana particles and the content of active components; it means the amount of amorphous siliceous and aluminous compounds. Jun-Yuan et al. [75] reported that pozzolana active material with a high percentage of the amorphous phase tends to be more reactive than those with a lower percentage of the amorphous phase. This indicates that diatomaceous earth has a smaller particle size and higher amorphous content and has a larger surface area to provide the silica and alumina compounds for higher pozzolanic activity. In this respect, the poor pozzolanic activity of diatomite ENO3 can be assigned to its lowest a-SiO2 and high pH content. ENO7 is richer in amorphous content than BOR. However, its Blaine fineness and BET-specific surface are much lower because of the lesser content of fixed Ca(OH)2.

2.3. Blended Pastes—Preparation and Characterization

The researched mineral admixtures were used as partial cement replacements in the paste mixtures. The dosage of diatomaceous earth was 5, 10, 15, and 20% of cement mass. Due to the high specific surface of diatomaceous earth, the water/binder ratio was 0.5 and was similar for all tested pastes. The consistency of fresh mixtures was studied in accordance with EN 1015-3 [76]. Initial and final setting times were measured by an automatic Vicat apparatus B 26600 (Form Test) in accordance with EN 196-3 [77]. The measurement was conducted in a 40 mm standard mold using a cylindrical needle with a flat tip area of 1 mm2. The workability tests were done at a constant laboratory temperature of (23 ± 1) °C.
Mineral admixtures are usually applied to reduce the overall heat of hydration, particularly the heat release rate, which controls the temperature rise in hardening blended cement paste. The calorimetric curves of tested mixtures were explored using isothermal calorimeter TAM air (TA Instruments) under the constant temperature of 25 °C. The control paste was prepared Portland cement CEMI 42.5 R (Radotín) with a water/cement ratio of 0.5. Diatomaceous earth was used as a partial PC replacement in modified pastes, 10% by cement mass. The used water/binder ratio was maintained, similar to in the case of reference cement paste.
XRD and IR analyses were conducted to explore the formation of hydration products, and details on these methods are introduced in Section 2.2. In IR analysis, the researched paste mixtures were analyzed in the chosen time intervals which corresponded to the progress of calorimetric curves of the relevant mixture. The hydration process was stopped by rinsing with ethanol on a glass frit filter.
Properties of the hardened cement pastes were tested on standard 40 mm × 40 mm × 160 mm prisms. The samples were continuously cured in water and tested after 28 days and 90 days, respectively. The measured structural parameters were bulk density, specific density, and total open porosity. These were assessed on dried samples; the samples were thoroughly dried at 60 °C before testing. The dry bulk density ρb (kg/m3) was obtained using a gravimetric principle in accordance with the standard EN 1015-10 [78]; specific density was measured by the automatic helium pycnometer Pycnomatic ATC (Thermo Scientific). The expanded combined uncertainties of these tests were 1.4% and 1.2%, respectively. The total open porosity ψ (%) was calculated from the obtained bulk density and specific density, with the expanded combined uncertainty equaling 2.0%. Flexural ff (MPa) and compressive fc (MPa) strength were determined in compliance with EN 1015-11 [79]. A free point bending test was arranged and conducted for flexural strength assessment. Young’s modulus was measured on a dynamic principle using ultrasound working device DIO 562 (Starmans). The uncertainty in determining mechanical parameters was 1.4% for ff and fc, and 2.3% for Ed.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Properties of Fresh Pastes

The values of spreading and data on the initial and final setting time of the analyzed pastes prepared with the constant water/binder ratio of 0.5 are summarized in Table 8. Here, data for pastes with 30% PC replacement are also introduced.
The highest value of spreading was recorded for reference paste RF. Typically, with the higher dosage of diatomaceous earth in a paste mixture, the spreading dropped, and workability was reduced, whereas the lower values of spreading were recorded for pastes with ENO3. However, the relative differences in spreading were for all three analyzed diatomaceous earth low. The Vicat setting began after 215 min. and 400 min. in the case of ENO7 enriched pastes and reference paste. It was completed after 350 to 690 min for BOR modified pastes and reference paste, respectively. It is apparent that the initial and final setting times significantly depended on the amount of applied diatomaceous admixtures. This occurs well after the sulfate reactions have stopped. However, the C-S-H formation in the acceleration phase of C3S dissolution displays the exact time dependence of the setting process [58]. It seems the investigated diatomaceous earth supports the hydration process and plays a micro-filler role.
The calorimetric curves of the investigated mixtures are presented in Figure 5 and Figure 6. In the initial phase of hydration, during the first 15 min after mixing with water, the fast development of a high amount of hydration heat took place, which is caused due to hydrolysis and dissolution of ions [80]. It follows a period of relative inactivity, the induction or dormant period. The cement mixture states plastic for several hours, it continues dissolution of ions, and the initial set can be determined. In the case of diatomite BOR, the gypsum reaction is influenced, accompanied by a higher value of hydration heat after one hour of hydration (Table 9) and a shortening of the dormant period, which finished after 1.4 h. The dormant period of other tested pastes ended after approx. 2.3 h from mixing. Then the silicates continued to hydrate rapidly, reaching a maximum rate at the end of the acceleration period, which corresponds with the maximum rate of heat evolution. For reference, cement paste is 11.15 h, for pastes enriched with diatomaceous earth ENO3, ENO7, and BOR, 11.1 h, 10.66 h, and 9.96 h, respectively. By this time, the final set has been passed, and early hardening has begun, corresponding to the values of setting time measured by the Vicat apparatus. The rate of reactions, thereafter, slows down until reaching a steady state. After 24 h, the development of hydration heat of diatomite enriched pastes was comparable with the value of hydration heat of reference paste, except for cement paste with ENO3, whose hydration heat was the lowest (see Table 9).
The type of phase precipitating during the hydration of blended binder is conditioned by chemistry, initially the hydrolysis/dissolution chemistry of the primary solid binder. Subsequently, the tendency for product growth means product crystallization and polymerization. XRD and IR analyses were conducted to explore the formation of hydration products. The XRD analysis of pastes performed after 1 h of hydration and the formed substances are presented in Table 10.
The primary pozzolanic reaction can be simply described as
C H + S + H C S H
Its kinetics is more similar to the slow rate of C2S hydration. The heat of this reaction is about −12 kJ/mole of CH compared to—43 kJ/mole of C2S. Thus, the addition of pozzolan (in this case, diatomaceous earth) has a similar effect to raising the C2S content of cement, thereby lowering the amount of early heat evolution and reducing early strength, but not long-term strength [80]. This was confirmed for PC blends with ENO3 and ENO7, whose hydration heat and overall heat development were lower and slower than that of reference paste RP. On the other hand, considering the results of heat evolution testing and values of 1-h hydration heat, diatomaceous BOR acted as a highly reactive pozzolan. With very reactive pozzolans content, the C/S ratio is significantly different, being close to 1.0, and the H/S ratio is slightly lower. This can be indicated as the secondary pozzolanic reaction with C-S-H, which can be written as
C 3 S + 2 S + 10.5 H 3 C S H 3.5
As diatomaceous earth BOR contains a significant amount of Al2O3, which might be potentially reactive, separate secondary reactions occur, which leads to the formation of calcium aluminate hydrates
C H + A + H C A H
The hydration process of tested cement pastes with 10% mass replacement of cement with diatomaceous earth was also monitored using IR analysis. The FTIR spectra are graphed in Figure 7, and Table 11 shows the assignment of the major absorption bands of tested mixtures.
The intensity of absorption bands of hydrated mixtures assigned to portlandite (~3641 cm1), water (~3500–3400 cm1 and ~ 1600–1650 cm1), and calcite (1426, 1385, and 875 cm1) is increased in comparison with pure Portland cement paste. The maximum absorption of O-H stretching vibration is moved to the higher wavenumbers, evincing more intensive intermolecular water interactions in hydrated compounds. The formation of the C-S-H phase (calcium silicate hydrate) is accompanied by the movement of maximum stretching vibration of SiO44− (925 cm1) of hatrurite (Ca3SiO5) to higher frequencies (968 cm1). The movement of stretching vibration of SiO44- (917 cm1) to higher frequencies (925 cm1) is due to the hydration of larnite (β-Ca2SiO4). The ettringite formation strongly affects the initial cement hydration [89]. Therefore, it is supposed that the behavior of blended cement pastes might be different at early and later ages. In this respect, longtime monitoring of PC/diatomaceous earth blends will be necessary for future research. The slow rate of pozzolanic reaction requires a prolonged period of moist curing to exploit the full benefits of adding a pozzolan. Without sufficient moist curing, pozzolan will act mainly as a microfiller.

3.2. Properties of 28-Days and 90-Days Pastes

The structural parameters of hardened pastes are summarized in Table 12. Data for 28-days and 90-day samples are presented. Typically, due to the progress in hydration and pozzolanic reactions, the increase in the bulk density values was observed over time which was further reflected in the lowered porosity. The examined mineral admixtures affected the structure of the hardened pastes differently. For ENO3, the drop in porosity exhibited pastes ENO3/5 and ENO3/10. For mixtures with a higher dosage of diatomaceous earth was, the porosity slightly higher than that of reference paste, and the redundant mineral admixture served as filler only. ENO7 decreased the porosity of blended pastes for PC replacement up to 15 wt.%. Contrary to that, using diatomaceous earth, BOR oppositely affected the porosity. The porosity was slightly increased for cement replacement ratio >15 wt.%. However, in this case, the diatomaceous earth also contributed to the cement matrix’s densification, which was well apparent for pastes BOR/5 ad BOR/15. The porosity results can be assigned to the increased fraction of CSH that provides a more homogeneous and compact microstructure, particularly if highly reactive, finely powdered pozzolans are used. In evaluating structural parameters, one must consider the differences in the progress of hydration and pozzolanic reactions of blended pastes and reference PC paste.
The results of the mechanical parameters assessment and values of strength activity index (SAI) are presented in Table 13. SAI was determined as a ratio of 28-days and 90-day compressive strength of the chosen blended paste and that of reference paste RP [90]. Similarly, as in the case of structural parameters, the prolonged curing time led to the densifying of studied pastes and, thus, an increase in the examined mechanical parameters. For 28-day samples, the lowest SAI (92.9%) was obtained for BOR/20 and the highest (113.6%) for ENO7/10. The 90-days SAI varied from 88.9% to 109.1%. The results of the SAI assessment gave clear evidence of pozzolanic reactivity of researched mineral admixtures. As SAI of 75% is usually considered as limiting value to classify mineral admixture among pozzolans, this criterion was safely met for all analyzed diatomaceous earth and cement blends. For ENO3, prolonged hydration was detected. Best mechanical performance yielded blended paste with ENO7, which proved its high reactivity. For all studied ENO7-enriched pastes, the compressive strength was higher or similar to that of reference paste except for paste with 20% cement substitution. In the case of ENO3, the drop in mechanical parameters was recorded for diatomaceous earth dosage >10 wt.%, but SAI was still satisfactory to rank this material as pozzolana active. The results of mechanical parameters testing agree with those reported by Değimenci and Yilmaz [51]. They reported that the compressive strength of mortars containing diatomite increases with age, and the rate of increase depends upon the cement replacement level. Similarly, Jang-Hyun and Chang-Bok [91] confirmed that diatomite could be used as an admixture to reinforce concrete durability and increase strength efficiency.

4. Conclusions

The following main conclusions can be drawn from the conducted tests and analyzes:
(i)
Three basic factors influence the contribution of diatomaceous earth to cement mixture strength when partially replacing Portland cement. These are the filler effect, the pertinent acceleration of ordinary Portland cement hydration, and the pozzolanic reaction of diatomite with cement hydrates.
(ii)
The filler effect is immediate. The acceleration of ordinary Portland cement hydration has a significant impact within the first 24 h, leading to the shortening of both initial and final setting time.
(iii)
Due to the chemical and phase composition, particle size, and morphology of diatomaceous particles, the examined blended pastes exhibited distinct rheology, heat release, the time evolution of hydration and pozzolanic reactions, structural parameters, and, consequently, mechanical strength.
(iv)
The progress in hydration and pozzolanic reactions was apparent from assessing 28-day and 90-day hardened samples.
(v)
Based on received SAI values, the researched mineral admixtures were classified as highly reactive pozzolans, which can be beneficially applied in the design and production of potentially more durable repair mortars applicable also for historical masonry with excessive moisture presence. However, the analyzed diatomaceous earth can also find use in the production of blended cement, cement-based composites, or as a part of multi-component binders. The ability to improve the reactivity of diatomite by additional grinding must also be considered in the preparation of blended binders.
(vi)
The optimum replacement level of ordinary Portland cement by diatomaceous earth to give maximum long-term strength enhancement is about 10 wt.%. However, an even higher dosage of diatomaceous earth provides materials of sufficient strength and Young’s modulus. For example, in the case of ENO7, the improvement in mechanical parameters was found to be up to 15% Portland cement replacement. With respect to identified SAI, the safe value of Portland cement substitution is 20 wt.%.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, M.P., P.R. and Z.P.; investigation, M.P., P.R. and M.Z.; data curation, M.P., P.R. and Z.P.; writing—original draft preparation, M.P. and Z.P.; writing—review and editing, M.P. and Z.P.; supervision, M.P., P.R. and Z.P.; project administration, M.P. and Z.P.; funding acquisition, Z.P. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the Grant Agency of the Czech Technical University in Prague, grant No SGS20/153/OHK1/3T/11, and by the Czech Science Foundation, grant No 21-06582S.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

The data presented in this study are available on request from the corresponding author. The data are not publicly available due to privacy.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Vyšvařil, M.; Pavlíková, M.; Záleská, M.; Pivák, A.; Žižlavský, T.; Rovnaníková, P.; Bayer, P.; Pavlík, Z. Non-hydrophobized perlite renders for repair and thermal insulation purposes: Influence of different binders on their properties and durability. Constr. Build. Mater. 2020, 263, 120617. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Pavlík, Z.; Pokorný, J.; Pavlíková, M.; Zemanová, L.; Záleská, M.; Vyšvăril, M.; Žižlavský, T. Mortars with crushed lava granulate for repair of damp historical buildings. Materials 2019, 12, 3557. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  3. Loureiro, A.M.S.; Paz, S.P.A.; Veiga, M.R.; Angélica, R.S. Assessment of compatibility between historic mortars and lime-METAKAOLIN restoration mortars made from amazon industrial waste. Appl. Clay Sci. 2020, 198, 105843. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Callebaut, K.; Elsen, J.; van Balen, K.; Viaene, W. Nineteenth century hydraulic restoration mortars in the Saint Michael’s Church (Leuven, Belgium): Natural hydraulic lime or cement? Cem. Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 397–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Ayati, B.; Newport, D.; Wong, H.; Cheeseman, C. Low-carbon cements: Potential for low-grade calcined clays to form supplementary cementitious materials. Clean. Mater. 2022, 5, 100099. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Scrivener, K.L.; John, V.M.; Gartner, E.M. UN Environment. Eco-efficient cements: Potential economically viable solutions for a low-CO2 cement-based materials industry. Cem. Concr. Res. 2018, 114, 2–26. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Athira, G.; Bahurudeen, A. Rheological properties of cement paste blended with sugarcane bagasse ash and rice straw ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 332, 127377. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Fediuk, R.; Smoliakov, A.; Stoyushko, N. Increase in composite binder activity. IOP Conf. Ser. Mater. Sci. Eng. 2016, 156, 012042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Siddique, S.; Jang, J.G.; Gupta, T. Developing marble slurry as supplementary cementitious material through calcination: Strength and microstructure study. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 293, 123474. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Biajawi, M.I.A.; Embong, R.; Muthusamy, K.; Ismail, N.; Obianyo, I. Recycled coal bottom ash as sustainable materials for cement replacement in cementitious Composites: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 338, 127624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Shi, C.; Fernández-Jimenez, A.; Palomo, A. New cements for 21st century: The pursuit of an alternative to Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2011, 41, 750–763. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zaleska, M.; Pavlikova, M.; Pavlik, Z.; Jankovsky, O.; Pokorny, J.; Tydlitat, V.; Svora, P.; Cerny, R. Physical and chemical characterization of technogenic pozzolans for the application in blended cements. Constr. Build. Mater. 2018, 160, 106–116. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Barabanshchikov, Y.; Usanova, K. Influence of silica fume on high-calcium fly ash expansion during hydration. Materials 2022, 15, 3544. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Amran, M.; Fediuk, R.; Murali, G.; Avudaiappan, S.; Ozbakkaloglu, T.; Vatin, N.; Karelina, M.; Klyuev, S.; Cholampour, A. Flay ash-based eco-efficient concretes: A comprehensive review of the short-term properties. Materials 2021, 14, 4264. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Amran, M.; Murali, G.; Khalid, N.H.A.; Fediuk, R.; Ozbakkalogiu, T.; Lee, Y.H.; Haruna, S.; Lee, Y.Y. Slag uses in making an ecofriendly and sustainable concrete: A review. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 272, 121942. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhang, Y.; Schlangen, E.; Çopuroğlu, O. Effect of slags of different origins and the role of sulfur in slag on the hydration characteristics of cement-slag systems. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 316, 125266. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Siddique, S.; Kim, H.; Jang, J.G. Properties of high-volume slag cement mortar incorporating circulating fluidized bed combustion fly ash and bottom ash. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 289, 123150. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Kocak, Y. Effects of metakaolin on the hydration development of Portland-composite cement. J. Build. Eng. 2020, 31, 101419. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Bucher, R.; Cyr, M.; Escadeillas, G. Performance-based evaluation of flash-metakaolin as cement replacement in marine structures-Case of chloride migration and corrosion. Constr. Build. Mater. 2021, 267, 120926. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Izadifard, R.A.; Moghadam, M.A.; Sepahi, M.M. Influence of metakaolin as a partial replacement of cement on characteristics of concrete exposed to high temperatures. J. Sust. Cement-Based Mater. 2021, 10, 336–352. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Jankovsky, O.; Pavlikova, M.; Sedmidubsky, D.; Bousa, D.; Lojka, M.; Pokorny, J.; Zaleska, M.; Pavlik, Z. Study on pozzolana activity of wheat straw ash as potential admixture for blended cements. Ceramics-Silikaty 2017, 61, 327–339. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  22. Sierra, E.J.; Miller, A.; Sakulich, A.R.; MacKenzie, K.; Barsoum, M.W. Pozzolanic activity of diatomaceous earth. J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 2010, 93, 3406–3410. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Flower, R.J. Diatoms in Ancient Building Materials: Application of Diatom Analysis to Egyptian Mud Bricks. Nova Hedwigia 2006, 130, 245–264. [Google Scholar]
  24. Paschen, S. Diatomaceous earth extraction, processing and application. Erzmetall 1986, 39, 158–161. [Google Scholar]
  25. Reka, A.A.; Pavlovski, B.; Fazlija, E.; Berisha, A.; Pacarizi, M.; Daghmehchi, M.; Sacalis, C.; Jovanovski, G.; Makreski, P.; Oral, A. Diatomaceous Earth: Characterization, thermal modification, and application. Open Chem. 2021, 19, 451–461. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Lemons, J.F. Diatomite. Am. Ceramic Soc. Bull. 1997, 76, 92–95. [Google Scholar]
  27. Dolley, T.P. Diatomite. Ceramic Bull. 1991, 70/5, 860. [Google Scholar]
  28. Rodriguez, C.; Minamo, I.; Para, C.; Pujante, P.; Benito, F. Properties of Precast Concrete Using Food Industry-Filtered Recycled Diatoms. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3137. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Goren, R.; Bazkara, T.; Marsoglu, M. A study on the purification of diatomite in hydrochloric acid. Scand. J. Metall. 2002, 31, 115–119. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Pimraksa, K.; Chindaprasirt, P. Lightweight bricks made of diatomaceous earth, lime and gypsum. Ceram. Int. 2009, 35, 471–478. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Man, J.; Gao, W.; Yan, S.; Liu, S.; Hao, H. Preparation of porous brick from diatomite and sugar filter mud at lower temperature. Constr. Build. Mater. 2017, 156, 135–1042. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Jiang, F.; Ling, X.; Zhang, L.; Cang, D.; Ding, Y. Modified diatomite-based porous ceramic to develop shape-stabilized NaNO3 salt with enhanced thermal conductivity for thermal energy storage. Sol. Energy Mater. Sol. Cells 2021, 231, 111328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Han, L.; Li, F.; Deng, X.; Wang, J.; Zhang, H.; Zhang, S. Foam-gelcasting preparation, microstructure and thermal insulation performance of porous diatomite ceramics with hierarchical pore structures. J. Eur. Ceram. Soc. 2017, 37, 2717–2725. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Sedlacik, M.; Nguyen, M.; Opravil, T.; Sokolar, R. Preparation and characterization of glass-ceramic foam from clay-rich waste diatomaceous earth. Materials 2022, 15, 1384. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Lauermannova, A.-M.; Lojka, M.; Jankovsky, O.; Faltysova, I.; Pavlikova, M.; Pivak, A.; Zaleska, M.; Pavlik, Z. High-performance magnesium oxychloride composites with silica sand and diatomite. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2021, 11, 957–969. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Xu, T.; Wu, F.; Zou, T.; Li, J.; Yang, J.; Zhou, X.; Liu, D.; Bie, Y. Development of diatomite-based shape-stabilized composite phase change material for use in floor radiant heating. J. Mol. Liq. 2022, 348, 118372. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Li, M. Mechanical and thermal performance assessment of paraffin/expanded vermiculite-diatomite composite phase change materials integrated mortar: Experimental and numerical approach. Sol. Energy 2021, 227, 343–353. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Kadscheev, I.D.; Popov, A.G.; Ivanov, S.E. Improving the thermal insulation of high-temperature furnaces by the use of diatomite. Refract. Ind. Ceram. 2009, 50, 98–100. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Li, X.Q.; Yu, T.Y.; Park, S.J.; Kim, Y.H. Reinforcing effects of gypsum composite with basalt fiber and diatomite for improvement of high-temperature endurance. Constr. Build. Mater. 2022, 325, 126762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  40. Taoukil, D.; El meski, Y.; Lahlaouti, M.I.; Djedjig, R.; El bouardi, A. Effect of the use of diatomite as partial replacement of sand on thermal and mechanical properties of mortars. J. Build. Eng. 2021, 42, 103038. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  41. Gunduz, L.; Kalkan, S.O. The effect of different natural porous aggregates on thermal characteristic feature in cementitious lightweight mortars for sustainable buildings. Iranian J. Sci. Technol. Trans. Civ. Eng. 2022. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  42. Aruntas, H.Y.; Tokyay, M. The use of diatomite as pozzolanic material in blended cement production. Cem. Concr. World 1996, 1, 3–41. [Google Scholar]
  43. Yilmaz, B.; Ediz, N. The use of raw and calcined diatomite in cement production. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2008, 30, 202–211. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  44. Li, J.; Zhang, W.; Chen, L.; Monteiro, P.J.M. Green concrete containing diatomaceous earth and limestone: Workability, mechanical properties, and life-cycle assessment. J. Clean. Prod. 2019, 223, 662–679. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  45. Kastis, D. Properties and hydration of blended cements with calcareous diatomite. Cem. Concr. Res. 2006, 36, 1821–1826. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  46. dos Santos, A.A.M.; Cordeiro, G.C. Investigation of particle characteristics and enhancing the pozzolanic activity of diatomite by grinding. Mater. Chem. Phys. 2021, 270, 124799. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  47. Aydin, A.C.; Gül, R. Influence of volcanic originated natural materials as additive on the setting time and some mechanical properties of concrete. Constr. Build. Mater. 2007, 21, 1277–1281. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  48. Lim, N.W.; Sabaa, B.A. The Pozzolanic Activity of Calcined Diatomite as a Factor of Temperature and Time. Key Eng. Mater. 1991, 53, 530–535. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  49. Fragoulis, D.; Stamatkis, M.G.; Papageorgiou, D.; Chaniotakis, E. The physical and mechanical properties of composite cements manufactured with calacareous and clayey Greek diatomite mixtures. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2005, 27, 205–209. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  50. Starnatakis, M.G.; Fragoulls, D.; Csirik, G.; Bedelean, I.; Pedersen, S. The influence of biogenic micro-silica-rich rocks on the properties of blended cements. Cem. Concr. Compos. 2003, 25, 177–184. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  51. Değimenci, N.; Yilmaz, A. Use of diatomite as partial replacement for Portland cement in cement mortars. Constr. Build. Mater. 2009, 23, 284–288. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  52. Yilmaz, B. A study on the effects of diatomite blend in natural pozzolan-blended cements. Adv. Cem. Res. 2008, 20, 13–21. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  53. EN 197-1; Cement–Part 1: Composition, Specifications and Conformity Criteria for Common Cements. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  54. Bogue, R.H. Calculation of the Compounds in Portland Cement. Ind. Eng. Chem. Anal. 1929, 1, 192–197. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  55. ASTM C618; Standard Specification for Coal Fly Ash and Raw or Calcined Natural Pozzolan for Use as a Mineral Admixture in Concrete. ASTM: Wet Conshohocken, PA, USA, 1998.
  56. Rietveld, H.M. Line profiles of neutron powder-diffraction peaks for structure refinement. Acta Cryst. 1967, 22, 151–152. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  57. Fernández-Carrasco, L.; Torrens-Martín, D.; Morales, L.M.; Martínez-Ramírez, S. Chapter 19 Infrared Spectroscopy in the Analysis of Building and Construction Materials. In Infrared Spectroscopy-Materials Science, Engineering and Technology; Theophanides, T., Ed.; BoD–Books on Demand: Norderstedt, Germany, 2012. [Google Scholar]
  58. Ylmén, R.; Jäglid, U.; Steenari, B.-M.; Panas, I. Early hydration and setting of Portland cement monitored by IR, SEM and Vicat techniques. Cem. Concr. Res. 2009, 39, 433–439. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  59. Ilia, I.K.; Stamatakis, M.G.; Perraki, T.S. Mineralogy and technical properties of clayey diatomites from north and central Greece. Cent. Eur. J. Geosci. 2009, 1/4, 393–403. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  60. Madejova, J.; Jnek, M.; Komadel, P.; Herbert, H.J.; Moog, H.C. FTIR analyses of water in MX-80 bentonite compacted from high salinary salt solution systems. Appl. Clay Sci. 2002, 20, 255–271. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  61. Fidalgo, A.; Ilhrco, L.M. The defect structure of sol–gel-derived silica/polytetrahydrofuran hybrid films by FTIR. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2001, 283, 144–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  62. Swan, G.E.A.; Patwarhan, S.V. Application of Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR) for assessing biogenic silica sample purity in geochemical analyses and palaeoenvironmental research. Clim. Past 2011, 7, 65–74. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  63. Kaczmarska, I.; Ehrman, J.M.; Bates, S.S. A review of auxospore structure, ontogeny and diatom phylogeny. In Proceedings of the 16th International Diatom Symposium, Athens, Greece, 25 August–1 September 2000. [Google Scholar]
  64. Cavalier-Smith, T. Kingdoms Protozoa and Chromista and the eozoan root of the eukaryotic tree. Biol. Lett. 2010, 6/3, 342–345. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  65. Werner, D. The Biology of Diatoms; Blackwell: Oxford, UK, 1977. [Google Scholar]
  66. Round, F.M.; Crawford, R.M.; Mann, D.G. The Diatoms–Biology and Morphology of the Genera; Cambridge University Press: Cambridge, UK, 1990. [Google Scholar]
  67. EN 196-6; Methods of Testing Cement–Part 6: Determination of Fineness. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2010.
  68. Neville, A.M.; Brooks, J.J. Concrete Technology; Longman Scientific and Technical: New York, NY, USA, 1987. [Google Scholar]
  69. Binici, H.; Aksogan, O.; Cagatay, I.H.; Tokyay, M.; Emsen, E. The effect of particle size distribution on the properties of blended cements incorporating GGBFS and natural pozzolan (NP). Powder Technol. 2007, 177, 140–147. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  70. Taylor, H.F.W. Cement Chemistry, 2nd ed.; Thomas Telford: London, UK, 1997. [Google Scholar]
  71. EN 12457-2; Characterisation of Waste-Leaching-Compliance Test for Leaching of Granular Waste Materials and Sludges-Part 2: One stage Batch Test at a Liquid to Solid Ratio of 10 l/kg for Materials with Particle Size below 4 mm (without or with Size Reduction). European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2002.
  72. EN 196-5; Methods of Testing Cement-Part 5: Pozzolanicity Test for Pozzolanic Cement. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2011.
  73. NF P18-513; Pozzolanic Addition for Concrete-Metakaolin-Definitions, Specifications And Conformity Criteria. Association Française de Normalisation: La Plaine Saint-Denis, France, 2010.
  74. Raverdy, M.; Brivot, F.; Paillere, A.M.; Dron, R. Appreciation de L’activite Pouzzolanique des Constituants Secondaires; 7 th International Congress Chemical Cement: Paris, France, 1980; Volume 3, pp. 36–41. [Google Scholar]
  75. Jun-Yuan, H.; Scheetz, B.E.; Roy, D.M. Hydration of fly ash-portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 1984, 14, 505–511. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  76. EN 1015-3; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry-Part 3: Determination of Consistence of Fresh Mortar (by Flow Table). European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
  77. EN 196-3; Methods of Testing Cement-Part 3: Determination of Setting Times and Soundness. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 1997.
  78. EN 1015-10; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 10: Determination of Dry Bulk Density of Hardened Mortar. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 1999.
  79. EN 1015-11; Methods of Test for Mortar for Masonry—Part 11: Determination of Flexural and Compressive Strength of Hardened Mortar. European Committee for Standardization: Brussels, Belgium, 2020.
  80. Mindess, S.; Young, J.F.; Darwin, D. Concrete, 2nd ed.; Pearson Education Inc.: Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 2003. [Google Scholar]
  81. Bhaskar, J.S.; Parthasarathy, G. Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopic Characterization of Kaolinite from Assam and Meghalaya, Northeastern India. J. Mod. Phys. 2010, 1, 206–210. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  82. Hughes, T.L.; Methven, C.M.; Jones, T.G.J.; Pelham, S.E.; Fletcher, P.; Hall, C. Determining cement composition by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy. Adv. Cem. Bas. Mat. 1995, 2, 91–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  83. Richard, T.; Mercurz, L.; Poulet, F.; d’Hendecourt, L. Diffuse reflectance infrared Fourier transform spectroscopy as a tool to characterise water in adsorption/confinement situations. J. Colloid Interface Sci. 2006, 304, 125–136. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  84. Trezza, M.A.; Lavat, A.E. Analysis of the system 3CaO.Al2O3.CaSO4.2H2O-CaCO3-H2O by FT-IR spectroscopy. Cem Concr. Res. 2001, 31, 869–872. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  85. Silva, D.A.; Roman, H.R.; Gleize, P.J.P. Evidences of chemical interaction between EVA and hydrating Portland cement. Cem. Concr. Res. 2002, 32, 1383–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  86. Horgnies, M.; Chen, J.J.; Bouillon, C. Overview about the use of Fourier Transform Infrared spectroscopy to study cementitious materials. WIT Transactions on Engineering Sciences 2013, 77, 251–262. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  87. Delgado, A.H.; Paroli, R.M.; Beaudoin, J.J. Comparison of IR Techniques for the Characterization of Construction Cement Minerals and Hydrated Products. Appl. Spectr. 1996, 60/8, 970–976. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  88. Liang, T.; Nanru, Y. Hydration products of calcium aluminoferrite in the presence of gypsum. Cem. Concr. Res. 1994, 24, 150–158. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  89. Payá, J.; Monzo, J.M.; Borrachero, M.V.; Velazquez, S. Pozzolanic reaction rate of fluid catalytic cracking catalyst residue (FC3R) in cement paste. Adv. Cem Res. 2013, 25, 112–118. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  90. Pavlíková, M.; Zemanová, L.; Záleská, M.; Pokorný, J.; Lojka, M.; Jankovský, O.; Pavlík, Z. Ternary blended binder for production of a novel type of lightweight repair mortar. Materials 2019, 12, 996. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  91. Jang-Hyun, P.; Chang-Bok, Y. Properties and durability of cement mortar using calcium stearate and natural pozzolan for concrete surface treatment. Materials 2022, 15, 5762. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of raw materials: (a) CEM I 42.5R, (b) diatomaceous earth.
Figure 1. FTIR spectra of raw materials: (a) CEM I 42.5R, (b) diatomaceous earth.
Materials 15 06881 g001aMaterials 15 06881 g001b
Figure 2. SEM analysis of diatomaceous earth (a) ENO3, (b) ENO7, (c) BOR.
Figure 2. SEM analysis of diatomaceous earth (a) ENO3, (b) ENO7, (c) BOR.
Materials 15 06881 g002
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of diatomaceous earth and CEMI 42.5R.
Figure 3. Particle size distribution of diatomaceous earth and CEMI 42.5R.
Materials 15 06881 g003
Figure 4. The pozzolana activity analysis of Diatomaceous earth using Frattini test, (a) ENO3, (b) ENO7, (c) BOR.
Figure 4. The pozzolana activity analysis of Diatomaceous earth using Frattini test, (a) ENO3, (b) ENO7, (c) BOR.
Materials 15 06881 g004aMaterials 15 06881 g004b
Figure 5. The calorimetric curves of tested pastes were obtained during the first 30 min.
Figure 5. The calorimetric curves of tested pastes were obtained during the first 30 min.
Materials 15 06881 g005
Figure 6. The calorimetric curves of tested pastes were obtained during the first 30 h.
Figure 6. The calorimetric curves of tested pastes were obtained during the first 30 h.
Materials 15 06881 g006
Figure 7. The IR analysis of the hydration process of (a) ROR, (b) ENO3/10, (c) ENO7/10, (d) BOR/10.
Figure 7. The IR analysis of the hydration process of (a) ROR, (b) ENO3/10, (c) ENO7/10, (d) BOR/10.
Materials 15 06881 g007
Table 1. Chemical composition of base materials.
Table 1. Chemical composition of base materials.
Parameter, SubstanceCEM I 42.5 RENO3ENO7BOR
Content (Mass %)
Annealing loss at 105 °C0.400.0582.583.30
Insoluble fraction1.632.001.202.48
SiO2 19.0089.7090.9082.90
Al2O34.313.403.2013.20
Fe2O32.402.103.101.50
TiO20.280.600.600.60
CaO62.900.600.570.30
MgO1.800.200.200.20
K2O0.820.300.300.90
Na2O0.142.700.200.10
P2O50.160.100.800.10
SO33.240.000.000.10
Table 2. XRD data of diatomites.
Table 2. XRD data of diatomites.
SubstanceENO3ENO7BOR
Content (wt.%)
amorphous phase37.7066.1053.90
Opal CT22.050.000.00
SiO2 quartz0.0017.006.00
SiO2 tridymit1.100.000.00
SiO2 cristobalite39.2016.100.00
Al2(Si2O5)(OH)4 Kaolinite 0.000.0032.70
K2(Al4FeO)(Si6Al2O20)(OH)4 illite0.000.007.30
Table 3. Assignments of the major absorption bands of CEM I 42.5 R, Radotín [57].
Table 3. Assignments of the major absorption bands of CEM I 42.5 R, Radotín [57].
Wavenumbers (cm−1)Assignment
3641ν (O-H) in portlandite (Ca(OH)2)
3552ν (O-H) in water, chemisorption of water on the surface of molecules
3420ν (H-O-H) in water, chemisorption of water on the surface of molecules
2513, 1426, 876, 715ν (C=O) in calcite (CaCO3)
1617ν2 (O-H) in water
1384
1152, 1114, 1095
ν (C=O) in CO32− compounds
ν3 (SO42−) in gypsum, basanite, and anhydrite [58]
970, 924 ν3 (Si-O) in C3S
902, 780, 516, 509, 421ν (Al-O) in C3A
845ν4 (Si-O) in β−C2S
522ν4 (Si-O) in C3S
700–500
459
ν (Fe-O) in C4AF
ν4 (Si-O-Si)
Table 4. Assignments of the major absorption bands of tested diatomaceous earth [59].
Table 4. Assignments of the major absorption bands of tested diatomaceous earth [59].
Wavenumbers (cm−1)Assignment
3696
3651
3620
ν (H-O-H) free
ν (O-H) inner surface [60]
ν (O-H) in crystalline molecules
~3436
1631
ν (H-O-H) in water, chemisorption of water on the surface of molecules
ν (H-O-H) in water in minerals
1385ν (C=O) in CO32− compounds
1099ν (Si-O-Si) asymmetric in plane vibration
950
797, 695
650–500
538
470
ν (Si-OH)
ν (Si-O)
ν (Si-O-AlIV)
ν (Fe-O) in Fe2O3
ν4 (Si-O-Si)
Table 5. Particle size distribution parameters.
Table 5. Particle size distribution parameters.
MaterialSize (µm)
Freq d10
Size (µm)
Freq d50
Size (µm)
Freq d90
CEMI 42.5R5.823.435.5
ENO322.337.563.5
ENO719.629.043.0
BOR9.523.032.5
Table 6. Physical properties of cement and diatomaceous earth.
Table 6. Physical properties of cement and diatomaceous earth.
MaterialBlaine Fineness
(m2·kg−1)
BET Specific Surface Area
(m2·kg−1)
Specific Density
(kg·m−3)
CEMI 42.5R3605 5002 860
ENO37852 4942 334
ENO71 8652 0072 399
BOR2 09518 3122 416
Table 7. Physico-chemical properties of tested materials.
Table 7. Physico-chemical properties of tested materials.
MaterialpH Value
(-)
Pozzolanic Activity
(mg Ca(OH)2 Fixed by 1 g)
CEM I 42.5R12.451147
ENO39.34246
ENO77.111349
BOR6.491614
Table 8. The values of spreading and setting time of tested pastes.
Table 8. The values of spreading and setting time of tested pastes.
Paste MixtureValue of Spreading
(mm)
Initial Setting Time
(min.)
Final Setting Time
(min.)
RP>300400690
ENO3/5280 × 280355635
ENO3/10240 × 245330635
ENO3/15210 × 210280500
ENO3/20180 × 180245375
ENO3/30150 × 145240350
ENO7/5255 × 260380680
ENO7/10210 × 210315640
ENO7/15175 × 175225410
ENO7/20140 × 140215395
ENO7/30140 × 140215390
BOR/5260 × 260375670
BOR/10210 × 210350640
BOR/15165 × 165250450
BOR/20145 × 145240355
BOR/30140 × 140220350
Table 9. Hydration heat of tested pastes relative to cement weight.
Table 9. Hydration heat of tested pastes relative to cement weight.
Paste Mixture1 h
(J·g−1)
24 h
(J·g−1)
RP7.56203.15
ENO3/101.04161.87
ENO7/101.63202.08
BOR/1011.77202.08
Table 10. Results of XRD analysis of cement pastes after 1 h of hydration.
Table 10. Results of XRD analysis of cement pastes after 1 h of hydration.
SubstanceENO3/10ENO7/10BOR/10
Content (Mass %)
Amorphous phase70.0065.9066.90
Aluminum oxide chloride0.100.300.30
Cristobalite 1.300.90-
Quartz 0.601.301.00
Hatrurit5.403.904.60
Portlandite13.0015.8016.90
Ettringite1.002.101.10
Calcium carbonate8.6010.009.30
Table 11. Assignments of the major absorption bands of hydrated mixtures.
Table 11. Assignments of the major absorption bands of hydrated mixtures.
Wavenumber (cm−1)Assignment
3641, 3642ν (O-H) crystalline hydroxyl [81], e.g., portlandite (Ca(OH)2) [82]
3424–3553ν (H-O-H) in liquid water, chemisorption of water on the surface of molecules [83]
1617–1653ν2 (H-O-H) in water [84]
1426, 1384, 875–873ν (C=O) in CO32− compounds, calcite [85]
1095–1098ν3 (SO42−) ettringite
925–968ν3 (Si-O) in the C-S-H phase [86]
917–925ν4 (Si-O) in the C-S-H phase [86]
780–918δ (O-H) linked to Al3+ [81]
599–601ν (Al-O) in C3A [85]
520–523ν4 (Si-O) in C3S, β-C2S, C3A [87]
700–500ν (Fe-O, Al-O) in C4AF [88]
440–470ν4 (Si-O-Si) in the C-S-H phase [87]
Table 12. The basic material properties of tested mixtures.
Table 12. The basic material properties of tested mixtures.
Paste Bulk Density
(kg·m−3)
Specific Density
(kg·m−3)
Open Porosity
(%)
28 Days90 Days28 Days90 Days28 Days90 Days
RP1558 ± 221589 ± 222181 ± 262159 ± 2628.6 ± 0.626.4 ± 0.5
ENO3/51451 ± 201495 ± 212017 ± 242008 ± 2428.1 ± 0.625.5 ± 0.5
ENO3/101422 ± 201460 ± 202007 ± 241991 ± 2429.1 ± 0.626.7 ± 0.5
ENO3/151375 ± 191416 ± 201966 ± 241951 ± 2330.1 ± 0.627.4 ± 0.5
ENO3/201319 ± 191364 ± 191925 ± 231907 ± 2331.5 ± 0.628.5 ± 0.6
ENO7/51576 ± 221594 ± 222154 ± 262141 ± 2626.8 ± 0.525.5 ± 0.5
ENO7/101610 ± 231623 ± 232163 ± 262149 ± 2625.6 ± 0.524.4 ± 0.5
ENO7/151549 ± 221573 ± 222148 ± 262132 ± 2627.9 ± 0.626.3 ± 0.5
ENO7/201473 ± 21 1488 ± 212083 ± 25 2069 ± 2529.3 ± 0.628.1 ± 0.6
BOR/51492 ± 211517 ± 212078 ± 252072 ± 2528.2 ± 0.626.8 ± 0.5
BOR/101434 ± 20.11456 ± 202021 ± 242008 ± 2428.9 ± 0.627.5 ± 0.6
BOR/151411 ± 19.81425 ± 201996 ± 241981 ± 2429.3 ± 0.628.1 ± 0.6
BOR/201349 ± 18.91371 ± 191936 ± 231922 ± 2330.3 ± 0.628.7 ± 0.6
Table 13. Mechanical parameters of hardened pastes.
Table 13. Mechanical parameters of hardened pastes.
PasteFlexural Strength (MPa)Compressive Strength (MPa)SAI
(%)
Young’s Modulus
(GPa)
Days
28 90 28 90 2890 2890
RP7.3 ± 0.1 8.2 ± 0.152.3 ± 0.758.4 ± 0.8 --14.5 ± 0.216.7 ± 0.2
ENO3/57.5 ± 0.18.7 ± 0.152.5 ± 0.759.2 ± 0.8 100.4101.314.5 ± 0.217.1 ± 0.2
ENO3/107.2 ± 0.18.4 ± 0.150.0 ± 0.758.1 ± 0.895.699.514.2 ± 0.216.7 ± 0.2
ENO3/156.6 ± 0.17.8 ± 0.148.2 ± 0.754.7 ± 0.892.193.713.6 ± 0.215.1 ± 0.2
ENO3/206.0 ± 0.17.3 ± 0.143.1 ± 0.653.0 ± 0.782.490.812.1 ± 0.214.1 ± 0.2
ENO7/57.8 ± 0.19.0 ± 0.155.8 ± 0.860.6 ± 0.8106.7103.815.8 ± 0.217.2 ± 0.2
ENO7/108.4 ± 0.19.4 ± 0.159.4 ± 0.8 63.7 ± 0.9113.6109.116.8 ± 0.217.4 ± 0.2
ENO7/158.0 ± 0.18.5 ± 0.154.4 ± 0.858.4 ± 0.8104.0100.015.9 ± 0.217.0 ± 0.2
ENO7/206.9 ± 0.17.7 ± 0.150.2 ± 0.753.8 ± 0.896.092.114.0 ± 0.214.7 ± 0.2
BOR/57.6 ± 0.18.5 ± 0.152.6 ± 0.759.4 ± 0.8100.6101.714.9 ± 0.217.1 ± 0.2
BOR/107.4 ± 0.18.3 ± 0.152.3 ± 0.758.9 ± 0.8100.0100.914.7± 0.216.9 ± 0.2
BOR/157.0 ± 0.17.8 ± 0.150.4 ± 0.753.1 ± 0.796.490.914.3 ± 0.214.7 ± 0.2
BOR/206.7 ± 0.17.1 ± 0.148.6 ± 0.751.9 ± 0.792.988.913.70 ± 0.213.7 ± 0.2
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Pavlíková, M.; Rovnaníková, P.; Záleská, M.; Pavlík, Z. Diatomaceous Earth—Lightweight Pozzolanic Admixtures for Repair Mortars—Complex Chemical and Physical Assessment. Materials 2022, 15, 6881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196881

AMA Style

Pavlíková M, Rovnaníková P, Záleská M, Pavlík Z. Diatomaceous Earth—Lightweight Pozzolanic Admixtures for Repair Mortars—Complex Chemical and Physical Assessment. Materials. 2022; 15(19):6881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196881

Chicago/Turabian Style

Pavlíková, Milena, Pavla Rovnaníková, Martina Záleská, and Zbyšek Pavlík. 2022. "Diatomaceous Earth—Lightweight Pozzolanic Admixtures for Repair Mortars—Complex Chemical and Physical Assessment" Materials 15, no. 19: 6881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196881

APA Style

Pavlíková, M., Rovnaníková, P., Záleská, M., & Pavlík, Z. (2022). Diatomaceous Earth—Lightweight Pozzolanic Admixtures for Repair Mortars—Complex Chemical and Physical Assessment. Materials, 15(19), 6881. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15196881

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop