Next Article in Journal
Study of Influence of Atmospheric Conditions on the Thermal Properties of Sleeping Bags
Next Article in Special Issue
Synergistic Effect of Cerium Oxide for Improving the Fire-Retardant, Mechanical and Ultraviolet-Blocking Properties of EVA/Magnesium Hydroxide Composites
Previous Article in Journal
Reliability Analysis of Critical Systems in A Fuel Booster Pump Using Advanced Simulation Techniques
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Surface Modification of Ammonium Polyphosphate for Enhancing Flame-Retardant Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane

1
Liaoning Provincial Key Laboratory for Preparation and Application of Special Functional Materials, Shenyang University of Chemical Technology, Shenyang 110142, China
2
Shenyang Research Institute of Industrial Technology for Advanced Coating Materials, Shenyang 110142, China
3
Zhejiang Ruico New Material Co., Ltd., Huzhou 313018, China
4
IMDEA Materials Institute, C/Eric Kandel, 2, Getafe, 28906 Madrid, Spain
5
Escuela Politécnica Superior, Universidad Francisco de Vitoria, Ctra. Pozuelo-Majadahonda Km 1800, Pozuelo de Alarcón, 28223 Madrid, Spain
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2022, 15(6), 1990; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061990
Submission received: 7 January 2022 / Revised: 7 February 2022 / Accepted: 3 March 2022 / Published: 8 March 2022

Abstract

:
Currently, the development of efficient and environmentally friendly flame-retardant thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) composite materials has caused extensive research. Ammonium polyphosphate (APP) is used as a general intumescent flame retardant to improve the flame retardancy of TPU. In this paper, we developed a functionalized APP flame retardant (APP-Cu@PDA). Adding only 5 wt% of APP-Cu@PDA into TPU can significantly improve the flame-retardant’s performance of the composite material, reflected by a high LOI value of 28% with a UL-94 test of V-0 rating. Compared with pure TPU, the peak heat release rate, total heat release, peak smoke release rate, and total smoke release were reduced by 82%, 25%, 50%, and 29%, respectively. The improvements on the flame-retardant properties of the TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA composites were due to the following explanations: Cu2+-chelated PDA has a certain catalytic effect on the carbonization process, which can promote the formation of complete carbon layers and hinder the transfer of heat and oxygen. In addition, after adding 5% APP-Cu@PDA, the tensile strength and elongation at the break of TPU composites did not decrease significantly. In summary, we developed a new flame-retardant APP-Cu@PDA, which has better flame-retardant properties than many reported TPU composites, and its preparation process is simple and environmentally friendly. This process can be applied to the industrial production of flame retardants in the future.

1. Introduction

As the most versatile engineering thermoplastic, thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) has excellent tensile strength, good shock absorption performance, high wear resistance, oil resistance, water resistance, and other excellent physical and chemical properties [1]. Because of its outstanding performance, TPU is widely used in the fields of medicine and health, cables and wires, electronics and aerospace, etc. [2]. However, TPU is flammable, which severely limits its application due to fire-resistance requirements. Therefore, research on improving flame retardancy and reducing the release of toxic gases and smoke of TPU has attracted a lot of attention [3,4,5]. In recent decades, many flame-retardant materials have been extensively studied. These studies mainly include halogenated flame retardants, metal hydroxides, and compounds containing phosphorus, nitrogen, and silicon. Among them, halogenated flame retardants have been used less due to environmental safety issues, and metal hydroxides can reach effective flame retardance only with large additions. Compared with the above two flame retardants, phosphorus, nitrogen, and silicon compounds have been widely studied for their environmental friendliness and low addition. As a halogen-free flame retardant, intumescent flame retardants (IFRs) have the advantages of low smoke and low toxicity and have become the most widely used flame retardant [6,7,8]. There are three main substances in the common IFR system: acid source (the dehydration catalyst for char formation), carbon source (the carbonization agent), and foaming agent (the blowing agent). Ammonium polyphosphate (APP) is usually used as an acid source and a gas source to form protective carbon layers [9,10]. Although APP can provide satisfactory flame-retardant effects on many materials, as an additive flame retardant, it is easy to have poor compatibility with the materials matrix [11]. According to previous reports, adding less than 10 wt% APP helped TPU obtain a V-0 rate in a UL-94 test. Unfortunately, it lost more than 50% of its elasticity at the same time [12]. Therefore, it is a very challenging task to develop an efficient method to improve the flame-retardant efficiency of APP.
It is reported that transition metal compounds can promote carbon formation in polymers during combustion [13]. Adding a small amount of transition metal compound and combining with other flame retardants can effectively improve flame-retardant efficiency. Chen et al. [14] combined nickel citrate with APP to improve the flame-retardant properties of TPU, which significantly improved the graphitization degree of char residue of TPU. In addition, it has been found that copper ions (Cu2+) have a certain effect of catalyzing the formation of carbon, which can promotes flame-retardant efficiency. For example, Jiang et al. [15] used melamine formaldehyde resin to coat formaldehyde polyvinyl alcohol fiber and used Cu2+ to synergize flame retardancy. The addition of Cu2+ can effectively improve residual carbon and significantly improve the flame-retardant properties of the fiber. Therefore, we considered that Cu2+ can be used as a synergistic agent to improve the flame-retardant efficiency of APP.
Dopamine is a biological neurotransmitter, which can form polydopamine (PDA) by self-polymerization in alkaline aqueous solutions [16]. PDA is widely used for the surface modification of different materials because of its strong adhesion to various surfaces. In addition, PDA can be used as a char-forming agent to modify APP [17]. More importantly, the surface of PDA has a large number of functional groups such as amino and hydroxyl groups, which can provide abundant metal-chelating sites [18]. Cu2+-chelated PDA has a strong catalytic carbonization ability [5,19]. More dense carbon layers can be obtained to inhibit the transfer of heat and oxygen to the polymer, thereby effectively improving the flame-retardant properties of the polymer [20].
In order to endow TPU with good flame-retardant properties, we prepared APP-Cu@PDA by using two-step methods and then applied it to TPU to study the effect on the flame-retardant properties of TPU/APP-Cu@PDA composites. It was expected that APP-Cu@PDA would improve the flame retardancy of TPU. In addition, the catalytic carbonization ability of Cu2+-chelated PDA in TPU composites will be investigated.

2. Experimental Section

2.1. Materials

TPU and APP were obtained from Shandong Huada New Chemical Materials Co., Ltd. Dopamine hydrochlonride (DOPA, ≥98.0%) was supplied by Shanghai Macklin Biochemical Co., Ltd. Tris (hydroxymethyl) amino-methane (Tris) and Cu2+ chloride dihydrate (CuCl2·2H2O, ≥99.0%) were purchased from Tianjin Damao Chemical Reagent Factory.

2.2. Synthesis of APP-Cu

Generally, a certain proportion of ethanol and water (800:50 in volume) was transferred into a three-neck flask. APP measuring 10 and 0.845 g CuCl2·2H2O (5 mmol) were added into the flask, respectively, and stirred for 4 h. Subsequently, the solution was centrifuged again and rinsed with ethanol at least 3 times. It was then dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C.

2.3. Synthesis of APP-Cu@PDA

The typical synthesis route of APP-Cu@PDA is provided in Scheme 1. First, APP-Cu (10 g) was added to 1000 mL of ethanol and sonicated for 30 min, and the above mixture was transferred into a three-necked flask. Tris 1.21 g measuring (10 mmol) and 1 g of dopamine (5 mmol) were dissolved in the mixture and stirred for 24 h. The reaction mixture was washed three times with ethanol, and the excess initial reactant was removed by centrifugation. Finally, the mixture was dried overnight in a vacuum oven at 60 °C to obtain APP-Cu@PDA particles.

2.4. Preparation of Flame-Retardant TPU Composites

The TPU were dried in a vacuum oven at 60 °C for 8 h. Then, they were mixed with different weight ratios of APP, APP-Cu, and APP-Cu@PDA, respectively, in an internal mixer, and the processing temperature was approximately 150 °C (Table 1). After mixing, the samples to be tested were compression-molded by using a hot-plate press at around 200 °C.

2.5. Measurements

Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) was used for recordings on a Nicolet MNGNA-IR560 (Artisan Technology Group, Austin, TX, USA) with a transition mode and a wave-number range between 400 cm1 and 4000 cm1. X-ray diffraction patterns (XRDs) were recorded on a D8 Advance X-ray diffractometer (Bruker, Karlsruhe, Germany) with Cu Kα radiation (λ = 0.154 nm). Thermogravimetric analysis (TGA) was recorded on an STA 449C thermal analyzer (Selb, Germany) with a heating rate of 10 °C/min in N2 atmosphere. X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (XPS) was conducted by by using a VG ESCALAB MK II spectrometer with Al Kα X-ray radiation at 10 kV and 10 mA. A scan by scanning electron microscope (SEM) was carried out on SEM JEOL JSM-6360LV (Japan) equipped with mapping images. Limiting oxygen index (LOI) measurements were carried out according to ASTM D2863–13 on samples with dimensions of 127.0 mm × 6.5 mm × 3.0 mm. A UL-94 vertical burning test was performed on samples with dimensions of 127.0 mm × 12.7 mm × 3.0 mm according to ASTMD380. A cone calorimeter test (CCT) was used to characterize the combustion behavior of samples with dimensions of 100.0 mm × 100.0 mm × 4.0 mm under a heat flux of 50 kW/m2 according to ISO 5660-1. Raman spectra were obtained by using a multichannel confocal spectrometer (HORIBA Scientific LabRAM HR Evolution, Kyoto, Japan) with a laser wavelength of 535 nm.

3. Results and Discussion

3.1. Structure of APP-Cu@PDA

As shown in Figure 1a, the FTIR spectra of APP, APP-Cu, and APP-Cu@PDA showed adsorption peaks at 3208 cm−1 and 1250 cm−1, which is assigned to N-H and PO bonds. After being modified by PDA, several new absorption peaks appeared. The adsorption vibration peak of 1605 cm−1 was attributed to its indole group [21]. The appearance of the new peak confirmed that PDA was successfully coated on the surface of APP-Cu. TGA was used to further characterize the structure of APP-Cu@PDA. Figure 1b showed the XRD patterns of APP (PDF#45-0002), APP-Cu, and APP-Cu@PDA. It can be clearly observed that the introduction of Cu and PDA into APP had almost no effect on the crystal structure of APP. TGA was used to evaluate the thermal degradation behavior of APP, APP-Cu, and APP-Cu@PDA. It can be observed from Figure 1c that the thermal stability of APP-Cu@PDA was lower than that of APP, which may be due to the large number of unstable organic structures on PDA [22].
XPS was used to analyze the element types and chemical states of APP-Cu@PDA. Figure 2a showed the measured spectrum of APP-Cu@PDA, revealing the presence of Cu, N, O, and C. The Cu 2p spectrum (Figure 2b) can be divided into two peaks where the binding energies of 954.7 and 953 eV correspond to Cu 2p1/2 and 934.1 and 932 eV correspond to Cu 2p3/2 [23]. The two main intensities (Figure 2c) of 400.7 and 398.8 eV deconvoluted from the N 1s peak were attributed to N-H and C-N, respectively, [24] proving that there are abundant amino groups on the surface of APP-Cu@PDA, which may promote the interaction between the filler and the TPU matrix. [20] In addition, the deconvolution of the O 1s peak in Figure 2d showed P-O-P (533.1 eV), C-OH (532.6 eV), and O-Cu (531.6 eV) signals, which proved the presence of PDA and indicated the coordination bonds between Cu2+ and catechol groups [25].
In order to further confirm PDA and Cu2+-modified APP, the obtained APP and APP-Cu@PDA materials were characterized by SEM to analyze their morphology and elemental composition. Figure 3a showed that the surface structure of APP was relatively smooth. After modification by Cu2+ and PDA, the surface became rough. The combination of SEM and mapping images of the selected area proved the existence of Cu2+, N, and O elements, indicating that Cu2+ and PDA were successfully coated on the surface of APP.

3.2. Thermal Degradation Behavior of TPU and TPU Composites

Under a nitrogen atmosphere, TGA and DTG were used to study the thermal stability of TPU and TPU composites (Figure 4), and the corresponding data were shown in Table 2. It can be observed from Table 2 that the initial degradation temperature 5 % weight loss of TPU/APP-Cu@PDA was lower than that of pure TPU. This may be due to the catalytic decomposition of APP-Cu@PDA and the introduction of a large number of organic functional groups on PDA [26]. It can be clearly observed from Figure 4 that the thermal stability of the composites with 5% APP had been significantly improved after 400 °C. The main reason was that the introduction of APP resulted in the formation of carbon layers at high temperatures, which inhibited the transfer of heat and oxygen to the substrate [27,28]. It was worth noting that char yields were 27.1% and 28.6% at 800 °C with the introduction of APP-Cu and APP-Cu@PDA, respectively, as compared with the pure TPU. It can be observed from the above results that the addition of PDA can improve the thermal stability of TPU composites. The main reason was that Cu2+-chelated PDA had a catalytic carbonization effect on the substrate, which improved the carbonization rate of TPU composites.

3.3. Combustion Behavior of TPU and TPU Composites

It can be observed from Figure 5 that the LOI of pure TPU was 19%. With the increase in flame-retardant loading, the LOI value gradually increases. In addition, the LOI value of adding different flame retardants (APP, APP-Cu, and APP-Cu@PDA) under the same addition amount was improved, and the LOI value of 5% APP-Cu@PDA can reach 28% higher than that of 5% APP (26.6%) and 5% APP-Cu (27.2%). The introduction of 5% APP-Cu@PDA increased the LOI value of composites by 9% compared with pure TPU. The higher LOI value of TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA may be due to the higher catalytic ability of Cu2+-chelated PDA [20]. Therefore, the introduction of APP-Cu@PDA can generate relatively dense carbon layers to protect the polymer matrix, thereby achieving a better flame-retardant effect. In the UL-94 test, pure TPU burns violently and drips when ignited, failing to pass the V-0 rating. When the amount of flame retardant reaches 5%, the UL-94 rating is V-0. Moreover, TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA stopped burning immediately after removing the flame, and the self-extinguishing ability was significantly improved.
In order to further study flame retardancy, CCT was carried out on pure TPU and TPU composites. The curves of heat release rate (HRR), total heat release (THR), smoke produce rate (SPR), total smoke produce (TSP), CO production, and CO2 production are shown in Figure 6 and Table 3. As shown in Figure 6a, pure TPU showed a sharp peak heat release rate (pHRR) at 1127 kW/m2 due to rapid combustion. For TPU/5%APP composites, pHRR had been reduced to 212 W/m2, mainly because APP can promote the dehydration and carbonization of polymers into carbon layers under thermal decomposition. After adding 5% APP-Cu@PDA, the pHRR of the composites further dropped to 196.3 kW/m2, which may be due to an increase in the formation of an expanded carbon layer [29]. The expanded carbon layer can act as a physical barrier to inhibit the transfer of heat and oxygen [22]. In addition, the THR of TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA composite is lower than that of both TPU/5%APP and TPU/5%APP-Cu composites. The reason may be that the carbon layer generated was denser after adding PDA [29].
Additionally, the smoke produced during combustion has always been considered as an important factor that directly results in suffocation. Therefore, for flame-retardant polymers, smoke suppression is very important. Figure 6c showed the SPR curve of pure TPU and TPU composites. It can be observed that the peak of SPR (pSPR) of pure TPU was 0.11 m2/s. After adding 5% APP, APP-Cu6, and APP-Cu@PDA, the pSPR values of the composites were significantly reduced to 0.05 m2/s. This was mainly due to the formation of protective carbon layers on the surface of the polymer matrix, which was difficult to eliminate via the emitted gas. Figure 6d showed the TSP curve of pure TPU and TPU composites. It can be observed that the introduction of Cu2+ and Cu2+-chelated PDA can further reduce the TSP value of the TPU composites compared with pure TPU, respectively. However, the slightly higher TSP of TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA composites is probably due to there being more organic functional groups on PDA, resulting in more gas released during the combustion process. In addition, compared with pure TPU, the CO and CO2 productions of TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA composites were significantly reduced (Figure 6e,f).

3.4. Char Layer Analysis

In order to further analyze the charring ability of APP-Cu@PDA after combustion, digital images of the outer surface of the carbon residue tested by a cone calorimeter were taken. As shown in Figure 7a, after adding 5% of APP, carbon residues were measured to be lower and the carbon layers on the outer surface were relatively fragile; thus, there were many large and dense holes on the top. After adding 5% APP-Cu (Figure 7b) and 5% of APP-Cu@PDA (Figure 7c), the amount of residual carbon increased significantly, and the holes in the outer surface carbon layer became smaller, which can inhibit the transfer of heat and oxygen. In addition, SEM images were used to observe the changes in the microstructure of carbon residues of different TPU composites. It can also be observed in Figure 7d–f that the carbon layers of the TPU composites with 5% of APP-Cu@PDA were mostly intact and compact, which further illustrates the catalytic carbonization ability of Cu2+-chelated PDA on TPU materials.
In addition, the resulting carbon residue after combustion was analyzed by Raman spectra (Figure 8). The Raman spectrum showed two representative peaks at 1348 and 1590 cm1, which belong to peak D and peak G, respectively. The ratio of D peak intensity to G peak intensity was used to judge the degree of graphitization of the carbon residue. The lower the value of ID/IG, the higher the degree of graphitization. The ID/IG values of TPU/5%APP, TPU/5%APP-Cu, and TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA were 3.3, 2.9, and 2.7, respectively. It was proved that TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA had the highest degree of graphitization [19].

3.5. Mechanical Properties

The mechanical properties of pure TPU and TPU composites are shown in Table 4. The results showed that the tensile strength (Ts) of pure TPU was 28.9 ± 2.3 MPa, and elongation at break (Eb) was 1310 ± 42%. The introduction of APP significantly reduced the Ts and Eb of TPU composites, which may be due to the stress concentration caused by the accumulation of APP in the TPU matrix, making the composites prone to cracks [30]. Furthermore, compared with TPU/5%APP, the Ts and Eb of TPU/5%APP-Cu increased by 25% and 12%, and the Ts and Eb of TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA increased by 43% and 37%. This may be due to the rigidity of the APP-Cu component and the strong interaction between the PDA and the TPU matrix in the APP-Cu@PDA component, which further improved compatibility with the matrix [20].

3.6. Proposed Fire-Retardant Mechanism

Based on the above results and analysis, we proposed the flame-retardant mechanism of APP-Cu@PDA in TPU composites shown in Scheme 2. Cu2+-chelated PDA had the ability to catalyze the carbonization of TPU in the condensed phase, making carbon layers denser. Moreover, dense carbon layers can act as a barrier, reducing the transfer of heat, fuel, and oxygen between the flame zone and the polymer matrix. The higher the strength of the carbon layer, the better the flame retardancy.
In addition, compared with other reported flame-retardant TPU composites (Table 5), the bio-based TPU/APP-Cu@PDA composites prepared in this paper use a simple and green synthetic route and have excellent flame-retardant effects. Therefore, the material is expected to be used as an environmentally friendly and efficient flame retardant in the industrial production of fireproof materials in the future.

4. Conclusions

In order to provide TPU with higher flame-retardant properties, bioinspired Cu2+-chelated PDA was used to coat the surface of APP to prepare TPU composites. The successful preparation of TPU/APP-Cu@PDA was proved by FTIR, XRD, XPS, and SEM analysis. In terms of flame-retardant testing, the LOI value of pure TPU was 19%, there were no ratings in UL-94, and pHRR was 1127.3 kW/m2. Compared with pure TPU, the LOI value of TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA was 28%, and the V-0 rating and pHRR were reduced to 196 kW/m2. The introduction of Cu2+ and PDA can further improve the flame-retardant efficiency of APP catalyzing carbonization. The SEM and Raman studies on residual carbon showed that Cu2+-chelated PDA improves the quality of carbon and has a higher degree of graphitization. These results indicated that APP-Cu@PDA can form dense carbon layers, which act as a physical barrier and inhibit the transfer of heat and oxygen. It was worth noting that APP-Cu@PDA is a non-toxic, smoke-suppressing, and highly effective flame retardant, and Cu2+-chelated PDA can be used to modify the surface of various other fillers, providing a method for the preparation of high-performance flame-retardant polymer composites.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, Z.W. and D.-Y.W.; formal analysis, Z.W., X.Y. and Y.J.; funding acquisition, N.W.; investigation, Z.W., Y.J. and J.Z.; methodology, Z.W. and D.-Y.W.; project administration, N.W.; writing—original draft, Z.W.; writing—review and editing, X.Y., W.F. and D.-Y.W.; data analysis, J.Z. and W.F. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant number 51973124; Technology for Producing Advanced Functional Mg-Based Chemicals, grant number 2020YFC1909302; Liao Ning Revitalization Talents Program, grant number XLYC2005002; “Jie Bang Gua Shuai” of Science and Technology Projects of Liaoning Province in 2021, grant number 2021JH1/10400091; and Shenyang Science and Technology Program—Major Key Core Technology Project, grant number 20-202-1-15.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data is contained within the article.

Acknowledgments

The authors sincerely appreciate all constructive and valuable comments and suggestions from the anonymous reviewers.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Liu, L.; Xu, Y.; He, Y.; Xu, M.; Shi, Z.; Hu, H.; Yang, Z.; Li, B. An effective mono-component intumescent flame retardant for the enhancement of water resistance and fire safety of thermoplastic polyurethane composites. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2019, 167, 146–156. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Jiang, Y.; Zhou, W.; Jiang, M.; Liu, P.; Xu, J. Flame retardant study of formalized polyvinyl alcohol fiber coated with melamine formaldehyde resins and the synergistic effect of copper ions. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 2017, 144, 331–343. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Wang, H.; Qiao, H.; Guo, J.; Sun, J.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Gu, X. Preparation of cobalt-based metal organic framework and its application as synergistic flame retardant in thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU). Compos. Eng. 2020, 182, 107498. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Kuang, S.; Jiao, C.; Li, S. Superior fire safety performances of chelates copper(II) salicylaldehyde complexes with intumescent flame retardant TPU. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2020, 31, 2884–2895. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Chen, X.; Chen, X.; Li, S.; Jiao, C. Copper metal-organic framework toward flame-retardant enhancement of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer composites based on ammonium polyphosphate. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 2829–2842. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Chen, S.; Li, J.; Zhu, Y.; Su, S. Roles of anion of polyoxometalate-based ionic liquids in properties of intumescent flame retardant polypropylene. RSC Adv. 2014, 4, 32902–32913. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Wang, J.; Guo, Y.; Zhao, S.; Huang, R.Y.; Kong, X.J. A novel intumescent flame retardant imparts high flame retardancy to epoxy resin. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 31, 932–940. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Lu, L.; Guo, N.; Qian, X.; Yang, S.; Wang, X.; Jin, J.; Shao, G. Thermal degradation and combustion behavior of intumescent flame-retardant polypropylene with novel phosphorus-based flame retardants. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2018, 135, 45962. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Tan, Y.; Shao, Z.B.; Chen, X.F.; Long, J.W.; Chen, L.; Wang, Y.Z. Novel Multifunctional Organic-Inorganic Hybrid Curing Agent with High Flame-Retardant Efficiency for Epoxy Resin. ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2015, 7, 17919–17928. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Xiao, D.; Li, Z.; Gohs, U.; Wagenknecht, U.; Voit, B.; Wang, D.-Y. Functionalized allylamine polyphosphate as a novel multifunctional highly efficient fire retardant for polypropylene. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 6309–6318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Horrocks, A.R. Developments in flame retardants for heat and fire resistant textiles—The role of char formation and intumescence. Polym. Degrad. Stab. 1996, 54, 143–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Zhang, J.; Wang, H.; Sun, W.; Zhang, Z.; Li, H.; Zhang, S.; Sun, J.; Gu, X. Surface modification on ammonium polyphosphate and its enhanced flame retardancy in thermoplastic polyurethane. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 2879–2886. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Liu, H.; Wu, H.; Song, Q.; Zhang, J.; Li, W.; Qu, H. Core/shell structure magnesium hydroxide@polyphosphate metal salt: Preparation and its performance on the flame retardancy for ethylene vinyl acetate copolymer. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 141, 1341–1350. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Chen, X.; Wang, K.; Gu, Y.; Jiao, C.; Liang, H.; Li, S. Influence of nickel citrate in flame retardant thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer composites based on ammonium polyphosphate. Express Polym. Lett. 2021, 15, 445–458. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Wan, L.; Deng, C.; Chen, H.; Zhao, Z.Y.; Huang, S.C.; Wei, W.C.; Yang, A.H.; Zhao, H.B.; Wang, Y.Z. Flame-retarded thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer: From organic materials to nanocomposites and new prospects. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 417, 129314. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Shanmugam, L.; Kazemi, E.; Rao, Z.; Lu, D.; Wang, X.; Wang, B.; Yang, L.; Yang, J. Enhanced Mode I fracture toughness of UHMWPE fabric/thermoplastic laminates with combined surface treatments of polydopamine and functionalized carbon nanotubes. Compos. Part B 2019, 178, 107450. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Cho, J.H.; Vasagar, V.; Shanmuganathan, K.; Jones, A.R.; Nazarenko, S.; Ellison, C.J. Bioinspired Catecholic Flame Retardant Nanocoating for Flexible Polyurethane Foams. Chem. Mater. 2015, 27, 6784–6790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Lin, Z.; Liu, L.; Wang, W.; Jia, L.; Shen, Y.; Zhang, X.; Ge, D.; Shi, W.; Sun, Y. The role and mechanism of polydopamine and cuttlefish ink melanin carrying copper ion nanoparticles in antibacterial properties and promoting wound healing. Biomater. Sci. 2021, 9, 5951–5964. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Zhang, L.; Wang, Q.; Jian, R.K.; Wang, D.Y. Bioinspired iron-loaded polydopamine nanospheres as green flame retardants for epoxy resin via free radical scavenging and catalytic charring. J. Mater. Chem. A 2020, 8, 2529–2538. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Li, Z.; Liu, L.; Jiménez González, A.; Wang, D.Y. Bioinspired polydopamine-induced assembly of ultrafine Fe(OH)3 nanoparticles on halloysite toward highly efficient fire retardancy of epoxy resin via an action of interfacial catalysis. Polym. Chem. 2017, 8, 3926–3936. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Zhu, S.; Wang, W.; Islam, Z.; Fu, Y.; Dong, Y. Polydopamine modified ammonium polyphosphate modified shape memory water-borne epoxy composites with photo-responsive flame retardant property. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2020, 138, 49696. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Bi, Q.; Yao, D.; Yin, G.Z.; You, J.; Liu, X.Q.; Wang, N.; Wang, D.Y. Surface engineering of magnesium hydroxide via bioinspired iron-loaded polydopamine as green and efficient strategy to epoxy composites with improved flame retardancy and reduced smoke release. React. Funct. Polym. 2020, 155, 104690. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Song, G.; Sun, Y.; Liu, T.; Zhang, X.; Zeng, Z.; Wang, R.; Li, P.; Li, C.; Jiang, G. Transdermal delivery of Cu-doped polydopamine using microneedles for photothermal and chemodynamic synergistic therapy against skin melanoma. Chem. Eng. J. 2021, 426, 130790. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, Y.; Zhang, X.; Li, A.; Li, M. Intumescent flame retardant-derived P,N co-doped porous carbon as an efficient electrocatalyst for the oxygen reduction reaction. Chem. Commun. 2015, 51, 14801–14804. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed]
  25. Shao, Z.B.; Cui, J.; Li, X.L.; Díaz Palencia, J.L.; Wang, D.Y. Chemically inorganic modified ammonium polyphosphate as eco-friendly flame retardant and its high fire safety for epoxy resin. Compos. Commun. 2021, 28, 100959. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wang, N.; Teng, H.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, J.; Li, L.; Zhang, J.; Fang, Q. Synthesis of a Carrageenan-Iron Complex and Its Effect on Flame Retardancy and Smoke Suppression for Waterborne Epoxy. Polymers 2019, 11, 1677. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [PubMed] [Green Version]
  27. Wang, W.; Chen, X.; Gu, Y.; Jiao, C. Synergistic fire safety effect between nano-CuO and ammonium polyphosphate in thermoplastic polyurethane elastomer. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2017, 131, 3175–3183. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Shao, Z.B.; Zhang, J.; Jian, R.K.; Sun, C.C.; Li, X.L.; Wang, D.Y. A strategy to construct multifunctional ammonium polyphosphate for epoxy resin with simultaneously high fire safety and mechanical properties. Composites Part A 2021, 149, 106529. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Zhang, L.; Li, Z.; Wang, D.Y. Polydopamine-assisted strategies for preparation of fire-safe polymeric materials: A review. Eur. Polym. J. 2020, 138, 109973. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Wang, S.; Shi, M.; Yang, W.; Yan, H.; Zhang, C.; An, Y.; Zhang, F. Experimental investigation of flame retardancy and mechanical properties of APP/EG/TPU multilayer composites prepared by microlayer coextrusion technology. J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 2021, 138, 50219. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Chen, X.; Wei, Z.; Wang, W.; Jiao, C. Properties of flame-retardant TPU based on para-aramid fiber modified with iron diethyl phosphinate. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2019, 30, 170–178. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  32. Jiao, C.; Li, M.; Chen, X.; Li, S. Flame retardancy and thermal decomposition behavior of TPU/chitosan composites. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2020, 31, 178–188. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Chen, X.; Zhang, X.; Zhang, X.; Jiao, C. Influence of isopropyl tris(dioctylphosphoryloxy) titanate for flame-retardant TPU based on oyster shell powder. J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 2019, 139, 197–206. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Chen, K.; Yang, D.; Shi, Y.; Feng, Y.; Fu, L.; Liu, C.; Chen, M.; Yang, F. Synergistic function of N-P-Cu containing supermolecular assembly networks in intumescent flame retardant thermoplastic polyurethane. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 4450–4463. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Xu, W.; Cheng, Z.; Zhong, D.; Qin, Z.; Zhou, N.; Li, W. Effect of two-dimensional zeolitic imidazolate frameworks-L on flame retardant property of thermoplastic polyurethane elastomers. Polym. Adv. Technol. 2021, 32, 2072–2081. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Li, H.; Meng, D.; Qi, P.; Sun, J.; Li, H.; Gu, X.; Zhang, S. Fabrication of a hybrid from metal organic framework and sepiolite (ZIF-8@SEP) for reducing the fire hazards in thermoplastic polyurethane. Appl. Clay Sci. 2022, 216, 106376. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Scheme 1. Scheme diagram of the preparation of APPCu@PDA.
Scheme 1. Scheme diagram of the preparation of APPCu@PDA.
Materials 15 01990 sch001
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) XRD patterns, and (c) TGA curves of APP, APP-Cu, and APP-Cu@PDA.
Figure 1. (a) FTIR spectra, (b) XRD patterns, and (c) TGA curves of APP, APP-Cu, and APP-Cu@PDA.
Materials 15 01990 g001
Figure 2. (a) XPS full spectra of APP-Cu@PDA, (b) Cu 2p, (c) N 1s, and (d) O 1s.
Figure 2. (a) XPS full spectra of APP-Cu@PDA, (b) Cu 2p, (c) N 1s, and (d) O 1s.
Materials 15 01990 g002
Figure 3. (a) SEM images of APP, (b) SEM images of APP-Cu@PDA, and mapping images of APP-Cu@PDA.
Figure 3. (a) SEM images of APP, (b) SEM images of APP-Cu@PDA, and mapping images of APP-Cu@PDA.
Materials 15 01990 g003
Figure 4. (a) TGA and (b) DTG curves of pure TPU and TPU composites under N2 at heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Figure 4. (a) TGA and (b) DTG curves of pure TPU and TPU composites under N2 at heating rate of 10 °C/min.
Materials 15 01990 g004
Figure 5. LOI and UL-94 results for TPU and TPU composites.
Figure 5. LOI and UL-94 results for TPU and TPU composites.
Materials 15 01990 g005
Figure 6. (a) HRR, (b) THR, (c) SPR, (d) TSP, (e) CO production, and (f) CO2 production curves of pure TPU and TPU composites.
Figure 6. (a) HRR, (b) THR, (c) SPR, (d) TSP, (e) CO production, and (f) CO2 production curves of pure TPU and TPU composites.
Materials 15 01990 g006
Figure 7. Digital images of chars from TPU/5%APP in top (a-1) and front (a-2) views, TPU/5%APP-Cu in top (b-1) and front (b-2) views and TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA in top (c-1) and front (c-2) views, and SEM images of exterior chars from (d) TPU/5%APP, (e) TPU/5%APP-Cu, and (f) TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA.
Figure 7. Digital images of chars from TPU/5%APP in top (a-1) and front (a-2) views, TPU/5%APP-Cu in top (b-1) and front (b-2) views and TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA in top (c-1) and front (c-2) views, and SEM images of exterior chars from (d) TPU/5%APP, (e) TPU/5%APP-Cu, and (f) TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA.
Materials 15 01990 g007
Figure 8. Raman spectra of residues for (a) TPU/5%APP, (b) TPU/5%APP-Cu, and (c) TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA.
Figure 8. Raman spectra of residues for (a) TPU/5%APP, (b) TPU/5%APP-Cu, and (c) TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA.
Materials 15 01990 g008
Scheme 2. Schematic diagram of the flame-retardant mechanism of TPU/APP-Cu@PDA composite.
Scheme 2. Schematic diagram of the flame-retardant mechanism of TPU/APP-Cu@PDA composite.
Materials 15 01990 sch002
Table 1. The formulations of TPU composites.
Table 1. The formulations of TPU composites.
Sample CodeTPU/gAPP/gAPP-Cu/gAPP-Cu@PDA/g
Pure TPU100///
TPU/3%APP973//
TPU/4%APP964//
TPU/5%APP955//
TPU/3%APP-Cu97/3/
TPU/4%APP-Cu96/4/
TPU/5%APP-Cu95/5/
TPU/3%APP-Cu@PDA97//3
TPU/4%APP-Cu@PDA96//4
TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA95//5
Table 2. TGA data for TPU and TPU composites.
Table 2. TGA data for TPU and TPU composites.
SampleT5wt% (°C)Tmax (°C)C800 (%)
Pure TPU2853519.4
TPU/5% APP27636924.8
TPU/5%APP-Cu27737927.1
TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA27937328.6
Note: T5wt% means temperature at 5 wt% mass weight, Tmax means temperature at the maximum degradation rate, and C800 means char yield at 800 °C.
Table 3. CCT data for TPU and TPU composites.
Table 3. CCT data for TPU and TPU composites.
SampleTTI
(s)
pHRR
(kW/m2)
THR
(MJ/m2)
pSPR
(m2/s)
TSP
(m2)
FPI
(s m2/kW)
Residue
(%)
Pure TPU271127101.10.1114.20.0248.5
TPU/5%APP2121277.20.0512.00.09918.3
TPU/5%APP-Cu2222784.00.059.50.09722.8
TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA2519675.70.0510.10.12723.0
Table 4. Tensile tests for pure TPU and TPU composites.
Table 4. Tensile tests for pure TPU and TPU composites.
SampleTs (MPa)Eb (%)
Pure TPU28.9 ± 2.31310 ± 42
TPU/5%APP20.0 ± 0.6991 ± 24
TPU/5%APP-Cu25.3 ± 0.31127 ± 71
TPU/5%APP-Cu@PDA28.6 ± 0.41361 ± 5
Table 5. Flame-retardant properties of TPU composites in the literature.
Table 5. Flame-retardant properties of TPU composites in the literature.
YearSampleBio-Based SupporterFRLOI Increase (%)pHRR Decrease (%)Ref.
2018TPU/para-aramid fiber-FeNOPara-aramid fiber-Fe11.857.6[31]
2019TPU/CSYESCS-65.9[32]
2019TPU/oyster shell powder/isopropyl tris(dioctylphosphoryloxy) titanateNOisopropyl tris(dioctylphosphoryloxy) titanate6.567.5[33]
2021TPU/SiAPP/MPCSNNOSiAPP/MPCSN2968.7[34]
2021TPU/Zn&Co-ZIF-LNOZn&Co-ZIF-L9.743.8[35]
2022TPU/8.0AHP/1.0ZIF-8@SEPNOZIF-8@SEP20.378.9[36]
2022TPU/APP-Cu@PDAYESAPP-Cu@PDA32.182.0This work
Publisher’s Note: MDPI stays neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Wang, Z.; Jiang, Y.; Yang, X.; Zhao, J.; Fu, W.; Wang, N.; Wang, D.-Y. Surface Modification of Ammonium Polyphosphate for Enhancing Flame-Retardant Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane. Materials 2022, 15, 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061990

AMA Style

Wang Z, Jiang Y, Yang X, Zhao J, Fu W, Wang N, Wang D-Y. Surface Modification of Ammonium Polyphosphate for Enhancing Flame-Retardant Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane. Materials. 2022; 15(6):1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061990

Chicago/Turabian Style

Wang, Zhiwen, Yan Jiang, Xiaomei Yang, Junhuan Zhao, Wanlu Fu, Na Wang, and De-Yi Wang. 2022. "Surface Modification of Ammonium Polyphosphate for Enhancing Flame-Retardant Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane" Materials 15, no. 6: 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061990

APA Style

Wang, Z., Jiang, Y., Yang, X., Zhao, J., Fu, W., Wang, N., & Wang, D. -Y. (2022). Surface Modification of Ammonium Polyphosphate for Enhancing Flame-Retardant Properties of Thermoplastic Polyurethane. Materials, 15(6), 1990. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15061990

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop