Next Article in Journal
The Effect of Heat Source Path on Thermal Evolution during Electro-Gas Welding of Thick Steel Plates
Next Article in Special Issue
Experimental and Numerical Analysis on the Impact Wear Behavior of TP316H Steel
Previous Article in Journal
Plasmonically Enhanced Colloidal Quantum Dot/Graphene Doped Polymer Random Lasers
Previous Article in Special Issue
Electrical Contact Performance of Cu Alloy under Vibration Condition and Acetal Glue Environment
 
 
Article
Peer-Review Record

Impact Abrasive Wear Property of CrAlN/TiSiN Multilayer Coating at Elevated Temperatures

Materials 2022, 15(6), 2214; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062214
by Ying Luo 1,2,*, Yuanyuan Dong 2, Cong Xiao 2, Xiaotong Wang 2 and Hang Peng 2,*
Reviewer 1: Anonymous
Reviewer 2:
Materials 2022, 15(6), 2214; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma15062214
Submission received: 19 February 2022 / Revised: 11 March 2022 / Accepted: 11 March 2022 / Published: 17 March 2022

Round 1

Reviewer 1 Report

See the Enclosure

Comments for author File: Comments.pdf

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Reviewer 2 Report

The authors have discussed the abrasive wear properties of CrAlN/TiSiN multilayer and nano-multilayer coatings deposited via multi-arc PVD. The experimentation is nicely designed and the results are adequate to reach to the conclusion. The flow is good and therefore this work is advised for publication. Only a few minor corrections are required:

  1. Include the novelty statement in the introduction section.
  2. Is it a 2 target or multi-target coating system? What's the make?
  3. What were the bias voltages during multilayer and nano-multilayer coating deposition?
  4. Authors mention that the transition layer contains only CrN. According to EDS in fig 4b, the transition layer should contain both CrN and AlN. Can authors double check that and include EDS map of Al in both Fig 4a and 4c?
  5. In description of figs 13 and 14, the right terminology would be 'abrasion', not 'micro-cutting'. Same goes for conclusion section.
  6. line 303: it is not 'attracted', it should be 'attached'.

Author Response

Please see the attachment.

Author Response File: Author Response.pdf

Back to TopTop