Next Article in Journal
Numerical Analysis on Fatigue Crack Growth at Negative and Positive Stress Ratios
Previous Article in Journal
Bandgap Engineering of Two-Dimensional Double Perovskite Cs4AgBiBr8/WSe2 Heterostructure from Indirect Bandgap to Direct Bandgap by Introducing Se Vacancy
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Novel Functional Soft Magnetic CoFe2O4/Fe Composites: Preparation, Characterization, and Low Core Loss

1
School of Physics and Electronics, Central South University, Changsha 410012, China
2
Department of Material and Chemistry Engineering, Pingxiang University, Pingxiang 337055, China
3
Jiangxi Xinke Environmental Protection Co., Ltd., Pingxiang 337000, China
4
State Key Laboratory of Powder Metallurgy, Central South University, Changsha 410083, China
*
Authors to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(10), 3665; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103665
Submission received: 17 March 2023 / Revised: 27 April 2023 / Accepted: 9 May 2023 / Published: 11 May 2023

Abstract

:
In this study, composites CoFe2O4/Fe were successfully synthesized by in situ oxidation, and their composition, structure, and magnetic properties have been investigated. According to the analysis of X-ray photoelectron spectrometry measure results, the cobalt ferrite insulating layer was completely coated on the surface of Fe powder particles. The evolution of the insulating layer during the annealing process has been discussed, which is correlated to effects on the magnetic properties of the composites CoFe2O4/Fe. The amplitude permeability of the composites reached a maximum of 110, and their frequency stability reached 170 kHz with a relatively low core loss of 253.6 W/kg. Therefore, the composites CoFe2O4/Fe has potential application in the field of integrated inductance and high-frequency motor, which is conducive to energy conservation and carbon reduction.

1. Introduction

Nowadays, the energy within a magnetic field is regulated by a magnetic core used in its electronic circuit in many modern devices (such as chargers, mobile phones, computers, electric vehicle powertrain systems, and so on). However, part of the energy is not used for work due to the loss of magnetic core, which is the main reason for the low efficiency of motors, transformers, and inductors [1]. In 2021, with the global sales of new pure electric vehicles of over 4.5 million and a staggering 340 million personal computers, even a minor reduction in the core loss, summed globally, would represent the huge energy conservation and carbon reduction of the whole society [2].
The Fe-based soft magnetic composites have received widespread concern due to their excellent magnetic properties, including high permeability, high electrical resistivity, and low core loss [3,4,5,6,7,8]. Among these properties, low core loss in a magnetic field is crucial for energy conservation and carbon reduction. Generally, the core loss includes eddy current loss and hysteresis loss. At high frequency, eddy current loss is the main factor causing core loss. Insulation coating on the particle surface to increase resistivity is the most direct and effective method to reduce the eddy current loss.
In recent years, more kinds of inorganic materials with insulative properties and ferromagnetic materials have been utilized as the coating layer to increase electrical resistivity because of their high thermal stability and resistivity. Inorganic materials, for example ZrO2, AlN, Al2O3, Cr2O3, TiO2, SiO2, MgO, and so on [9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16] and phosphates [17], are non-ferromagnetic, which decreases the saturation magnetization and the permeability of soft magnetic composites. Nevertheless, ferrite as an important ferromagnetic material has excellent performance, which is considered as an ideal insulating coating used in soft magnetic composites because of their high electric resistivity and low eddy current loss. Zhou et al. [18] prepared Mn-Zn ferrite (Mn0.7Zn0.3Fe2O4) nanoparticles via the chemical coprecipitation method, and the epoxy resin was developed to insulate Fe-6.5wt%Si powder. Unfortunately, the Mn-Zn and Ni-Zn ferrite nanoparticles in insulative layers could not be made a continuous layer around the powder surfaces, resulting in an increase of core loss. Therefore, the most critical factor to reduce the core loss is to prepare a uniform coating of the surface insulating layer in magnetic composites. As an advanced functional material, CoFe2O4 has been extensively investigated in multiple fields. Cao et al. [19] utilized CoFe2O4 to functionalized graphene sheets, enhancing the property of water pollution treatment. Gao et al. [20] adopted a “in-situ substitution” surface strategy to improve the catalytic activity of the CoFe2O4 by appropriately increasing the Co/Fe ratio. Meng et al. [21] prepared exchange coupled CoFe2O4/CoFe composites via in-situ hydrothermal reduction method, which enhanced the microwave absorption performance. In addition, CoFe2O4 has also been reported as a typical magnetic material. Wang et al. [22] synthesized three kinds of spinel ferrite nanocrystals MFe2O4 (M = Co, Ni, and Mn) by hydrothermal method. Magnetic measurements showed that all the samples obtained showed high saturation magnetization. The results indicate that the hydrothermal reaction time has a significant impact on the microstructure, morphology, and magnetic properties of the synthesized ferrite nanocrystals.
In this work, we have successfully prepared a uniform nano-CoFe2O4 layer coated on the surface of Fe powder though an in situ oxidation method, where the coating was directly generated by a chemical reaction with the Fe in the magnetic powder. Among spinel ferrites, CoFe2O4 is a ferromagnetic material with excellent mechanical, chemical, and thermal stability. However, to our knowledge, there are no research reports on using CoFe2O4 as the insulating layer of iron based soft magnetic composites. The evolution of the insulating layer influences the soft magnetic properties during annealing was investigated in detail. In addition, the obtained composites exhibited a low core loss of 253.6 W/kg with a large amplitude permeability, which is beneficial to energy conservation and carbon reduction in the field of high-frequency magnetic field application.

2. Materials and Methods

To obtain soft magnetic CoFe2O4/Fe composites, the reaction mechanism and the preparation process as shown in Figure 1 [23]. An in situ oxidation method was utilized to create a nano-CoFe2O4 insulative layer which was deposited on the surface of Fe powders. The Fe powders with an average diameter of 57 μm were synthesized via water atomization. CoCl2·6H2O (2.38 g and 0.01 mol) were mixed with 300 mL ammonia concentrations of 1.5 wt%, 2.5 wt%, and 3.5 wt% respectively, stir evenly and transfer the solutions to the reactor, then 100 g Fe powders were added to the above solution. The mixture was placed in a 500 mL autoclave and heated at 180 °C for 1 h to complete the oxidation reaction. After the oxidation reaction in situ, the obtained powder was washed with deionized water and ethanol three times before mixing with an epoxy-modified silicone resin (ESR) (2 wt%) dissolved in dimethyl benzene. The mixture was stirred with 300 r/min at 90 °C until complete evaporation of the solution. The toroidal powder cores with an outer diameter of 26.11 mm, an inner diameter of 18.00 mm, and a thickness of 4.80 mm were fabricated with cold pressure of 800 MPa. Subsequently, the cores pressed well were annealed for 1 h under an argon condition at the temperature in range of 450–600 °C.
The X-ray diffraction (XRD) patterns were measured in the 2θ rang of 10–90° at a scan speed of 0.1°/s with Advance D8 using Cu Kα radiation. The morphology and corresponding elemental analyses of samples after mounting were characterized by scanning electron microscopy (SEM) equipped with energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDS; Quanta 250 FEG, Boynton Beach, FL, USA). The surface morphology of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites particles was recorded on a Lorentz-transmission electron microscopy (TEM; JEM-2100F, Akishima, Japan). XPS analysis was characterized by an X-ray photoelectron spectrometry (XPS; ESCALAB250Xi), using Al Kα as x-ray source. The chemical structure analyzed by Fourier transform infrared (FTIR) was collected on Bruker VERTEX 70 FTIR spectroscopy (Billerica, MA, USA) with a frequency in the range of 400 to 4000 cm−1, and a sample to KBr ratio of 1:100. Raman studies with a 532 nm laser were measured from 100 to 1000 cm−1 using a Jobin Yvon France LABRAM Aramis Raman microscopy system. The thermogravimetry and differential scanning calorimetry (TG-DSC) was performed by a thermal analysis instrument of NETZSCH STA 449C (Selb, Germany), in which the samples were heated from room temperature to 700 °C under an Ar atmosphere in alumina crucibles at a rate of 10 °C/min. Magnetic hysteresis of powder sample measured at room temperature was achieved in a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM; Lake-shore 7400-s) in applied fields of −20,000 and 20,000 Oe at 25 °C. The amplitude permeability and core loss of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites were performed on an auto-testing system for magnetic materials (SY8258B-H/m) with a maximum applied induction of 50 mT within the frequency range of 10–170 kHz.

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 2 shows the XRD data with sample oxidized at different contents of NH3·H2O (1.5, 2.5, and 3.5 wt%). According to JCPDS Card No. 87-0721, the diffraction peaks at 2θ values of ca. 44.70°, 64.98°, and 82.30° were from the (110), (200) and (211) planes of the α-Fe phase. And unexpectedly, only peaks originating from the raw powders were detected without the observation of any peaks corresponding to the CoFe2O4 phase of the oxidized powders. The reason for this result may be that the amount of CoFe2O4 phase is too low to be detected by XRD.
Figure 3 shows the SEM micrograph with EDS results of the oxidized Fe powders. It can be seen that the surface of oxidized iron powder particles in the morphology under SEM is rough, indicating that there is an oxidation layer on the surface. The element of cobalt, iron, and oxygen from corresponding area could be seen obviously. This suggests that a CoFe2O4 layer was formed. Regarding the depth of analysis, a comparison of the strengths of the oxygen and iron peaks indicates that the content of CoFe2O4 is relatively low.
The corresponding EDS mapping of the oxidation layer was further used to confirm the chemical composition. Figure 4 shows the SEM image and the corresponding EDS spatial elemental mapping of Co, Fe, and O for the Fe powder coated with the insulating oxide layer. The EDS profile ulteriorly proved that Co, Fe, and O were uniformly deposited on the surface of the Fe powder particle, which is critical to ensure a relatively low eddy current loss of the soft magnetic composites.
To observe the thickness of the CoFe2O4 layer, the Lorentz transmission electron microscope morphology of oxidized powder particles was analyzed, as shown in Figure 5. The external grey layer was coated on the internal black part. The CoFe2O4 insulating layer was deposited on the surface of Fe particles with a thickness of approximately 45 nm.
XPS was measured to determine the oxidation states of the insulating layer on the oxidized powders. The XPS patterns of the oxidized Fe powders sputtered for 1000 s by Ar+ cation can be seen in Figure 6. High-resolution XPS spectra of the 2p peaks of Co and Fe are described in Figure 6a,b. The electron binding energy of the Co 2p level was measured: the Co 2p1/2 and 2p3/2 peaks were located at approximately 795.7 eV and 780.2 eV, respectively, along with characteristic shake-up satellite peaks identified at approximately 802.1 eV, and 785.5 eV, confirming the existence of Co2+ species [24]. The XPS Fe 2p spectrum exhibited two peaks corresponding to Fe 2p1/2 and Fe 2p3/2 located at approximately 724.4 eV and 711.1 eV, respectively, with a typical satellite peak at approximately 719.4 eV, which were assigned to Fe in the 3+ oxidation state [25]. The survey spectrum of oxidized powder is shown in Figure 6c, which indicate the existence of cobalt, iron, oxygen, and carbon. The analysis results of the XPS measurements further demonstrated that the insulating layer comprised with CoFe2O4.
A weak peak at 706.6 eV was observed for the sample oxidized by 1.5 wt% NH3·H2O, which corresponds to the Fe 2p3/2 binding energy in metallic Fe, indicating an incomplete CoFe2O4 insulating layer as shown in Figure 7. During the in situ oxidation process, the nano-CoFe2O4 layer will grow on the surface of the bare Fe. Figure 7d shows that a weak satellite peak at 719.4 eV was observed in the XPS spectrum, which corresponds to Fe3+. It is noteworthy that the intensity of satellite peak increases with the increase of reaction concentration.
The chemical functional groups of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites were performed by FT-IR spectroscopy in the range 400–4000 cm−1, as shown in Figure 8. The broad absorption bands were observed at 3437, 1637, 1379 and 1058 cm−1 due to the -OH, NH4+ and NH3 vibration, whose peaks are considered to be appeared due to H2O in the air and the adsorbed NH3 on the CoFe2O4/Fe composites [26,27]. From the spectrum, the absorption bands at 779 and 465 cm−1 were assigned to Fe-O stretching. Furthermore, the absorption peak at 572 cm−1 corresponded to the vibration of Co-O [28]. The above results further demonstrated the nano-CoFe2O4 layer was formed on the on the surface of the Fe powder.
Raman spectroscopy is an important characterization technique for investigating the vibrational motion of molecules. The Raman spectroscopy of the oxidized powder sample was shown in Figure 9. The characteristic peaks in the sample appeared as sharp peaks at 213 and 275 cm−1 and shoulder peaks appeared at 390, 481, 590, and 654 cm−1, which confirmed the formation of a CoFe2O4 cubic spinel ferrite [22]. Since the Raman peaks at approximately 590 cm−1 usually correspond to the nature of the tetrahedra in the spinel, the low-frequency mode of approximately 490 cm−1 is related to an octahedral structure [22].
According to the in-situ oxidation reaction mechanism and above measurement results, with the increase of ammonia concentration, OH and NH4+ in the solution increase, which makes the insulating coating thicker. Therefore, the reaction concentration will control the thickness of the insulating layer and thus affects the magnetic properties of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Figure 10 provides the variations of magnetization as a function of an applied magnetic field, as found by measuring samples of the Fe powders and those undergoing different reaction concentrations. The magnetic moment as a function of the magnetic field was measured over a range from −20,000 to 20,000 Oe at 25 °C. The values of saturated magnetization (Ms) were decreased sequentially from 207 to 203 emu/g with increasing ammonia concentration, because of the insulating CoFe2O4 layer with lower Ms [29]. The Ms values of the oxidized Fe powder are consistent with that of the raw powder (210 emu/g). This is attributed to the formation of the ferromagnetic CoFe2O4 coating by the in situ oxidation method for the prevention of magnetic dilution.
It is necessary to research the thermal stability of CoFe2O4/Fe composites to determine the annealing temperature. The TG-DSC curves were measured for the CoFe2O4/Fe composites powders on the NETZSCH STA 449C, as shown in Figure 11. It can be clearly seen that the mass was decreased at approximately 190 °C due to thermal degradation of the epoxy-modified silicone resin layer, which decomposed slowly with increasing temperature. The DSC curve exhibits an endothermic peak at 562 °C, which indicates that the CoFe2O4 began to decompose, leaving Fe2O3 [30].
In order to explore the surface phase transformation of CoFe2O4/Fe composites during annealing, the SEM micrographs and the element distribution of the polished surface of samples annealed in Ar atmosphere at various temperatures from 500 °C to 600 °C for 1 h were shown in Figure 12. After annealing at 500 °C, the surface of CoFe2O4/Fe composites was still covered with a complete and uniform insulating layer. However, the thickness of the insulating layer decreased or even disappeared with increasing annealing temperature. The insulating layer (dark part) of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites contained Fe, O, Co, and Si. The coating layer contained Si because ESR partially decomposed into SiO2. It is noteworthy that the comparison of the Si intensities at different annealing temperatures indicated that the ESR layer gradually decomposed with increasing temperature, which is consistent with the DSC analysis.
To study the evolution of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites during annealing, Figure 13 shows the XPS spectra taken from the samples after annealing at 500 °C, 550 °C and 600 °C for 1 h. The Fe 2p1/2 and Fe 2p3/2 peaks are located near 724.4 eV and 710.1 eV, respectively, with a more obvious satellite peak near 719.8 eV, indicating that the CoFe2O4 is exposed on the surface, which proves that the silicone resin coating of the samples annealed at 500 °C was partially decomposed. In addition, As shown in Figure 13b, a weak peak was surveyed near 706.5 eV, which corresponds to the Fe 2p3/2 peak of the metallic Fe, indicating that part of CoFe2O4 is reduced to Fe during annealing [25]. Figure 13c shows the samples annealed at 550 °C, the positions of Fe 2p1/2 peak and Fe 2p3/2 peak remain unchanged, but the satellite peak intensity corresponding to Fe3+ near 719.8 eV is significantly higher than the test results at 500 °C, indicating that the silicone resin is further decomposed and more CoFe2O4 is exposed to the particle surface. Moreover, the peak corresponding to metallic Fe near 706.5 eV is more obvious than that at 500 °C, illustrating that the amount of reduced Fe is further increased. For the samples annealed at 600 °C as shown in Figure 13d, the satellite peak of Fe2+ appeared near 715.7 eV indicating that Fe3+ was reduced to Fe2+. However, the peak intensity of metallic Fe at 706.5 eV is lower than that at 550 °C, indicating that the reduced Fe was oxidized. Therefore, it can be inferred that CoFe2O4 was reduced to FeO by Fe when the sample was annealed at 600 °C.
On the basis of DSC, SEM, EDS, and XPS test results, the evolution of the insulating layer during annealing can be inferred, and its schematic diagram is shown in Figure 14. With the annealing temperature reaching 200 °C, the silicone resin begins to decompose to form carbon, carbonyl, or other reducing groups on the particle surface, as shown in Figure 14b. When the temperature is further increased, the reducing group begins to react with CoFe2O4 to form Fe (Figure 14c). According to the XPS analysis results, the reaction temperature starts before 500 °C, and the reaction mainly occurs at the interface between CoFe2O4 and silicone resin. Annealing at a further raised temperature to 562 °C, the reduced Fe and Fe inside the particles will react with CoFe2O4 to form FeO. The reaction mainly occurs at the interface between Fe and CoFe2O4 and the interface between CoFe2O4 and silicone resin, as shown in Figure 14d.
Figure 15 shows the change in amplitude permeability (μa) of measurement frequency for CoFe2O4/Fe composites. The μa of CoFe2O4/Fe composites annealed at 450 and 500 °C exhibited good frequency stability in the range of 10 kHz to 170 kHz. However, when the annealing temperature was 550 °C, the μa of CoFe2O4/Fe composites was decreased slightly with increasing frequency, mainly due to degradation of the organic insulating layer. In particular, when the annealing temperature reached 600 °C, the μa decreased sharply with increasing frequency. This phenomenon can be explained by the influence of the organic and inorganic insulating layers. On the one hand, the further decomposition of the organic layer made the insulating layer incomplete. On the other hand, it is known that the inorganic nano-CoFe2O4 layer decomposed at elevated annealing temperatures, resulting in an incomplete CoFe2O4 insulation coating. In addition, the μa of CoFe2O4/Fe composites reached a maximum value of approximately 110 annealed at 500 °C.
Figure 16 shows the core loss (Ps) versus the frequency of CoFe2O4/Fe composites, which mainly composed of the hysteresis loss Ph and eddy current loss Pe, given by the following equation [31,32]:
P s = P h + P e = f H d B + C B 2 f 2 d 2 ρ
where “H” refers strength of the magnetic field, “B” refers the flux density, “f” refers the frequency, “d” refers the thickness, “C” refers the constant of proportionality, and “ρ” refers the resistivity.
The Ps of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites samples slightly decreased with annealing temperatures ranging from 450 to 500 °C. This mainly resulted from the reduced residual stresses and decreased coercivity caused by the annealing treatment, decreasing the hysteresis loss of Ps. The Ps was increased with the increasing temperature range from 500 to 550 °C, which was mainly caused by the further decomposition of organic coating leading to an increase in the eddy current loss. However, the Ps of the sample annealed at 600 °C sharply increased by 271% compared with the sample annealed at 500 °C. Because the nano-CoFe2O4 insulating layer would be damaged and could not completely coat the surface of Fe powders. The incomplete insulating layer can lead to increased eddy current loss in the CoFe2O4/Fe composites. Moreover, the core loss of the samples oxidized by different ammonia concentrations annealed at 500 °C, as shown in Figure 16d. The core loss exhibited evident decreasing trend depending on increasing ammonia concentration, resulting in a minimum value of 253.6 W/kg recorded at 100 kHz with a mass percentage of 2.5%. At the ammonia concentration of 1.5 wt%, the incomplete CoFe2O4 insulative layer was unable to provide a significant electrical resistivity for the CoFe2O4/Fe composites, giving rise to a large core loss. However, the ammonia concentration was increased to a content of 3.5 wt%, causing the growth of CoFe2O4. This would lead to a large hysteresis loss due to a large coercive force in the CoFe2O4 rather than in the Fe.
From what has been mentioned above, it can be found that the oxidized CoFe2O4 insulating layer on the iron powder surface in situ had excellent thermal stability and insulation properties, which can significantly reduce the eddy current loss of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites samples. Combined with the annealing temperature and ammonia concentration, 500 °C and 2.5 wt% were the optimal processes for obtaining good soft magnetic properties with a high amplitude permeability (approximately 110) and low core loss (253.6 W/kg, 50 mT 100 kHz) in the CoFe2O4/Fe composites.

4. Conclusions

In summary, CoFe2O4/Fe composites consisting of Fe powders coated with nano-CoFe2O4 insulating layers were produced by in situ oxidation and mixing with the ESR. It is proved through analyses of the test data by various instruments that the Fe powders were coated with a nano-CoFe2O4 insulating layer. The decomposition of CoFe2O4 to Fe2O3 occurred at an elevated annealing temperature of 562 °C from the DSC result. The magnetic properties of CoFe2O4/Fe composites and the evolution of the insulating layer during annealing were investigated. With optimized annealing, the CoFe2O4/Fe composites exhibited excellent advantages in amplitude permeability and core loss. The overall results of this study indicate that in situ oxidation and annealing treatment can be used to fabricate excellent amplitude permeability and low core loss Fe-based soft magnetic composites, which are conducive to energy conservation and carbon reduction.

Author Contributions

F.O. and S.L. conceived of the project and revised the whole manuscript. X.W., S.L. and X.X. designed the experiments and wrote the paper. S.L. and R.L. prepared Figure 1, Figure 2, Figure 3, Figure 4, Figure 5, Figure 6, Figure 7, Figure 8, Figure 9, Figure 10, Figure 11, Figure 12, Figure 13, Figure 14, Figure 15 and Figure 16. S.L. and X.X. provided the project support and revised the partial manuscript. All authors reviewed the manuscript. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This work was financially supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 51862030, No. 52073308).

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Shokrollahi, H.; Janghorban, K. Soft magnetic composite materials (SMCs). J. Mater. Process. Technol. 2007, 189, 1–12. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Sun, H.B.; Zhou, G.H.; Guo, Z.L.; Wang, C.; Wang, J.H.; Zong, C.B. Efficient synthesis of TiO2-coated layer for Fe-based soft magnetic composites and their regulation mechanism analysis on magnetic properties. J. Mater. Sci. Mater. Electron. 2022, 33, 13956–13967. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. Zhang, Q.; Zhang, W.; Peng, K. In-situ synthesis and magnetic properties of core-shell structured Fe/Fe3O4 composites. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 484, 418–423. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Li, S.G.; Liu, R.T.; Xiong, X. Preparation and characterization of carbonyl iron soft magnetic composites with magnesioferrite insulating coating layer. Trans. Nonferrous Met. Soc. China 2020, 30, 3067–3077. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Zhang, Z.; Chang, J.S.; Peng, X.L.; Li, J.; Yang, Y.T.; Xu, J.C.; Hong, B.; Jin, D.F.; Jin, H.X.; Wang, X.Q.; et al. Structural and magnetic properties of flaky FeSiB/Al2O3 soft magnetic composites with orientation of a magnetic field. J. Mater. Res. Technol. 2022, 18, 1381–1390. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  6. Ma, J.; Yuan, Y.B.; Zou, H.H.; Yang, B.; Zhou, B.H.; Yu, R.H. High-strength and corrosion-resistant Fe/Al2SiO5 soft magnetic composites fabricated by a nanoscale solid-reaction coating method. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 912, 165174. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Xia, C.; Peng, Y.D.; Yi, Y.; Deng, H.; Zhu, Y.Y.; Hu, G. The magnetic properties and microstructure of phosphated amorphous FeSiCr/silane soft magnetic composite. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 474, 424–433. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  8. Zhao, G.L.; Wu, C.; Yan, M. Evolution of the insulation matrix and influences on the magnetic performance of Fe soft magnetic composites during annealing. J. Alloys Compd. 2016, 685, 231–236. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Geng, K.; Xie, Y.; Xu, L.; Yan, B. Fe-Si/ZrO2 composites with core-shell structure and excellent magnetic properties prepared by mechanical milling and spark plasma sintering. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 718, 53–62. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Zhong, X.; Chen, J.; Wang, L.; Li, B.; Li, L. Properties of FeSiAl-based soft magnetic composites with AlN/Al2O3 and hybrid phosphate-silane insulation coatings. J. Alloys Compd. 2018, 735, 1603–1610. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Lei, J.; Zheng, J.W.; Zheng, H.D.; Qiao, L.; Ying, Y.; Cai, W.; Li, W.C.; Yu, J.; Lin, M.; Che, S.L. Effects of heat treatment and lubricant on magnetic properties of iron-based soft magnetic composites with Al2O3 insulating layer by one-pot synthesis method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 472, 7–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  12. Belcher, C.H.; Zheng, B.L.; MacDonald, B.E.; Langlois, E.D.; Lehman, B.; Pearce, C.; Delaney, R.; Apelian, D.; Lavernia, E.J.; Monson, T.C. The role of microstructural evolution during spark plasma sintering on the soft magnetic and electronic properties of a CoFe-Al2O3 soft magnetic composite. J. Mater. Sci. 2022, 57, 5518–5532. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Hsiang, H.I.; Fan, L.F.; Ho, K.T. Minor yttrium nitrate addition effect on FeSiCr alloy powder core electromagnetic properties. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 444, 1–6. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Luo, Z.G.; Fan, X.A.; Hu, W.T.; Luo, F.; Li, G.Q.; Li, Y.W.; Liu, X.; Wang, J. Controllable SiO2 insulating layer and magnetic properties for intergranular insulating Fe-6.5wt.%Si/SiO2 composites. Adv. Powder Technol. 2019, 30, 538–543. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Gao, Z.H.; Jia, J.X.; Zhao, Q.; Kong, H.; Wu, Z.Y.; Li, J.L. Determination of a quantitative relationship between deposition duration and magnetic performance of soft ferromagnetic composites via data-analysis and theoretical models. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2022, 549, 168891. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Zhou, B.; Dong, Y.Q.; Liu, L.; Chang, L.; Bi, F.Q.; Wang, X.M. Enhanced soft magnetic properties of the Fe-based amorphous powder cores with novel TiO2 insulation coating layer. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 474, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Chen, Z.H.; Liu, X.S.; Kan, X.C.; Wang, Z.; Zhu, R.W.; Yang, W.; Wu, Q.Y.; Shezad, M. Phosphate coatings evolution study and effects of ultrasonic on soft magnetic properties of FeSiAl by aqueous phosphoric acid solution passivation. J. Alloys Compd. 2019, 783, 434–440. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Zhou, M.M.; Han, Y.; Guan, W.W.; Han, S.J.; Meng, Q.S.; Xu, T.T.; Su, H.L.; Guo, X.; Zou, Z.Q.; Yang, F.Y.; et al. Magnetic properties and loss mechanism of Fe-6.5wt%Si powder core insulated with magnetic Mn-Zn ferrite nanoparticles. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 482, 148–154. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Li, N.W.; Zheng, M.B.; Chang, X.F.; Ji, G.B.; Lu, H.L.; Xue, L.P.; Pan, L.J.; Cao, J.M. Preparation of magnetic CoFe2O4-functionalized graphene sheets via a facile hydrothermal method and their adsorption properties. J. Solid State Chem. 2011, 184, 953–958. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Gao, L.L.; Deng, J.Q.; Li, T.; Qi, K.; Zhang, J.D.; Yi, Q. A facial strategy to efficiently improve catalytic performance of CoFe2O4 to peroxymonosulfate. J. Environ. Sci. 2022, 116, 1–13. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Bi, J.H.; Lin, C.C.; Lu, D.W.; Chen, A.; Meng, X.F. Exchange coupled CoFe2O4/CoFe composites for enhanced microwave absorption properties by in-situ hydrothermal reduction. J. Phys. Chem. Solids. 2022, 164, 110624. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Wang, W.; Ding, Z.; Zhao, X.R.; Wu, S.Z.; Li, F.; Yue, M.; Liu, J.P. Microstructure and magnetic properties of MFe2O4 (M = Co, Ni, and Mn) ferrite nanocrystals prepared using colloid mill and hydrothermal method. J. Appl. Phys. 2015, 117, 17A328. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Yu, S.H.; Yoshimura, M. Direct fabrication of ferrite MFe2O4 (M = Zn, Mg)/Fe composite thin films by soft solution processing. Chem. Mater. 2000, 12, 3805–3810. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Bennet, J.; Tholkappiyan, R.; Vishista, K.; Jaya, N.V.; Hamed, F. Attestation in selfpropagating combustion approach of spinel AFe2O4(A = Co, Mg and Mn) complexes bearing mixed oxidation states: Magnetostructural properties. Appl. Surf. Sci. 2016, 383, 113–125. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Naik, C.C.; Salker, A.V. Investigation of the effect of fractional In3+ ion substitution on the structural, magnetic, and dielectric properties of Co-Cu ferrite. J. Phys. Chem. Solids 2019, 133, 151–162. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Wu, Z.B.; Jiang, B.Q.; Liu, Y.; Wang, H.Q.; Jin, R.B. DRIFT study of manganese/titania-based catalysts for low-temperature selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2007, 41, 5812–5817. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Liu, F.D.; He, H.; Ding, Y.; Zhang, C.B. Effect of manganese substitution on the structure and activity of iron titanate catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NO with NH3. Appl. Catal. B Environ. 2009, 93, 3760–3769. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Zhou, G.Z.; Wang, Y.; Zhou, R.S.; Wang, C.Z.; Jin, Y.Q.; Qiu, J.; Hua, C.Y.; Cao, Y.Y. Synthesis of amino-functionalized bentonite/CoFe2O4@MnO2 magnetic recoverable nanoparticles for aqueous Cd2+ Removal. Sci. Total Environ. 2019, 682, 505–513. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Venturini, J.; Tonelli, A.M.; Wermuth, T.B.; Zampiva, R.Y.S.; Arcaro, S.; Viegas, A.D.C.; Bergmanna, C.P. Excess of cations in the sol-gel synthesis of cobalt ferrite (CoFe2O4): A pathway to switching the inversion degree of spinels. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2019, 482, 1–8. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Peng, Y.D.; Yi, Y.; Li, L.Y.; Ai, H.Y.; Wang, X.X.; Chen, L.L. Fe-based soft magnetic composites coated with NiZn ferrite prepared by a co-precipitation method. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2017, 428, 148–153. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Xiao, L.; Sun, Y.; Ding, C.; Yang, L.; Yu, L. Annealing effects on magnetic properties and strength of organic-silicon epoxy resin-coated soft magnetic composites. J. Mech. Eng. Sci. 2014, 228, 2049–2058. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Li, S.G.; Liu, R.T.; Xiong, X. Fe-based soft magnetic composites with high permeability and low core loss by in situ coating ZnFe2O4 layer. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 274–282. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of preparation process of soft magnetic CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of preparation process of soft magnetic CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Materials 16 03665 g001
Figure 2. XRD patterns under different reaction concentrations.
Figure 2. XRD patterns under different reaction concentrations.
Materials 16 03665 g002
Figure 3. SEM micrograph and EDS spectrum of oxidized Fe powder.
Figure 3. SEM micrograph and EDS spectrum of oxidized Fe powder.
Materials 16 03665 g003
Figure 4. SEM micrograph and EDS elemental distribution maps of the oxidized Fe powder prepared with 2.5 wt% NH3·H2O.
Figure 4. SEM micrograph and EDS elemental distribution maps of the oxidized Fe powder prepared with 2.5 wt% NH3·H2O.
Materials 16 03665 g004
Figure 5. TEM image of CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Figure 5. TEM image of CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Materials 16 03665 g005
Figure 6. High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) Co 2p and (b) Fe 2p peaks and (c) a full-scan spectrum of the Fe powder oxidized with 2.5 wt% NH3·H2O.
Figure 6. High-resolution XPS spectra of (a) Co 2p and (b) Fe 2p peaks and (c) a full-scan spectrum of the Fe powder oxidized with 2.5 wt% NH3·H2O.
Materials 16 03665 g006
Figure 7. XPS spectra of the Fe 2p peaks taken from the Fe powders undergone different reaction concentrations: (a) 1.5 wt%, (b) 2.5 wt%, (c) 3.5 wt%, (d) undergone different reaction concentrations.
Figure 7. XPS spectra of the Fe 2p peaks taken from the Fe powders undergone different reaction concentrations: (a) 1.5 wt%, (b) 2.5 wt%, (c) 3.5 wt%, (d) undergone different reaction concentrations.
Materials 16 03665 g007
Figure 8. FT-IR spectrum of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Figure 8. FT-IR spectrum of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Materials 16 03665 g008
Figure 9. Raman spectroscopy result for the oxidized Fe powder.
Figure 9. Raman spectroscopy result for the oxidized Fe powder.
Materials 16 03665 g009
Figure 10. VSM spectra at 25 °C of Fe and composite powders coated with nano-CoFe2O4 layer.
Figure 10. VSM spectra at 25 °C of Fe and composite powders coated with nano-CoFe2O4 layer.
Materials 16 03665 g010
Figure 11. TG-DSC curve of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Figure 11. TG-DSC curve of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites.
Materials 16 03665 g011
Figure 12. EDS diagram of the sample after annealing at (a) 500 °C, (b) 550 °C and (c) 600 °C.
Figure 12. EDS diagram of the sample after annealing at (a) 500 °C, (b) 550 °C and (c) 600 °C.
Materials 16 03665 g012
Figure 13. XPS spectra of the Fe 2p peaks taken from the (a) CoFe2O4/Fe composites and (b) those annealed at 500 °C, (c) 550 °C, and (d) 600 °C.
Figure 13. XPS spectra of the Fe 2p peaks taken from the (a) CoFe2O4/Fe composites and (b) those annealed at 500 °C, (c) 550 °C, and (d) 600 °C.
Materials 16 03665 g013
Figure 14. Schematic drawings illustrating the evolution of the CoFe2O4/ESR during annealing, showing (a) Fe powder coated with CoFe2O4/ESR, (b) ESR begins to decompose to form reductive group, (c) The reduced group reacts with CoFe2O4 to form Fe and (d) FeO formed by the reaction of CoFe2O4 with Fe.
Figure 14. Schematic drawings illustrating the evolution of the CoFe2O4/ESR during annealing, showing (a) Fe powder coated with CoFe2O4/ESR, (b) ESR begins to decompose to form reductive group, (c) The reduced group reacts with CoFe2O4 to form Fe and (d) FeO formed by the reaction of CoFe2O4 with Fe.
Materials 16 03665 g014
Figure 15. The amplitude permeability spectra for the CoFe2O4/Fe composites: (a) 1.5 wt%, (b) 2.5 wt%, (c) 3.5 wt%, and (d) annealed at 500 °C.
Figure 15. The amplitude permeability spectra for the CoFe2O4/Fe composites: (a) 1.5 wt%, (b) 2.5 wt%, (c) 3.5 wt%, and (d) annealed at 500 °C.
Materials 16 03665 g015
Figure 16. Core loss versus frequency of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites. (a) 1.5 wt%, (b) 2.5 wt%, (c) 3.5 wt%, and (d) annealed at 500 °C.
Figure 16. Core loss versus frequency of the CoFe2O4/Fe composites. (a) 1.5 wt%, (b) 2.5 wt%, (c) 3.5 wt%, and (d) annealed at 500 °C.
Materials 16 03665 g016
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Li, S.; Wang, X.; Ouyang, F.; Liu, R.; Xiong, X. Novel Functional Soft Magnetic CoFe2O4/Fe Composites: Preparation, Characterization, and Low Core Loss. Materials 2023, 16, 3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103665

AMA Style

Li S, Wang X, Ouyang F, Liu R, Xiong X. Novel Functional Soft Magnetic CoFe2O4/Fe Composites: Preparation, Characterization, and Low Core Loss. Materials. 2023; 16(10):3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103665

Chicago/Turabian Style

Li, Shigeng, Xianzhong Wang, Fangping Ouyang, Rutie Liu, and Xiang Xiong. 2023. "Novel Functional Soft Magnetic CoFe2O4/Fe Composites: Preparation, Characterization, and Low Core Loss" Materials 16, no. 10: 3665. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16103665

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop