Next Article in Journal
State-of-the-Art Report: The Self-Healing Capability of Alkali-Activated Slag (AAS) Concrete
Next Article in Special Issue
The Effect of Fe Addition on the Curie Temperature and Magnetic Entropy of the Gd45Co50Al5 Amorphous Alloy
Previous Article in Journal
Mn2+ Luminescence in Ca9Zn1–xMnxNa(PO4)7 Solid Solution, 0 ≤ x ≤ 1
Previous Article in Special Issue
Correlation between Magnetocaloric Properties and Magnetic Exchange Interaction in Gd54Fe36B10−xSix Amorphous Alloys
 
 
Font Type:
Arial Georgia Verdana
Font Size:
Aa Aa Aa
Line Spacing:
Column Width:
Background:
Article

Excellent Magnetocaloric Performance of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) Metallic Glasses and Their Composite

1
Institute of Materials & Laboratory for Microstructure, Shanghai University, Shanghai 200072, China
2
Chongqing Key Laboratory of Photo-Electric Functional Materials, College of Physics and Electronic Engineering, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China
3
Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Micro and Nano Heat Fluid Flow Technology and Energy Application, School of Physical Science and Technology, Suzhou University of Science and Technology, Suzhou 215009, China
*
Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Materials 2023, 16(12), 4393; https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124393
Submission received: 13 May 2023 / Revised: 5 June 2023 / Accepted: 13 June 2023 / Published: 14 June 2023
(This article belongs to the Special Issue Advances in Amorphous Alloy)

Abstract

:
The novel Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) metallic glass (MG) ribbons were fabricated in this work. The compositional dependence of glass forming ability (GFA), magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of these ternary MGs, and the mechanism involved was investigated. The GFA and Curie temperature (Tc) of the MG ribbons were found to improve with the boron content, and the peak value of magnetic entropy change (−ΔSmpeak) reaches a maximum of 3.88 J/(kg × K) under 5 T when x = 6. Based on the three results, we designed an amorphous composite that exhibits a table-shape magnetic entropy change (−ΔSm) profile with a rather high average −ΔSm (−ΔSmaverage~3.29 J/(kg × K) under 5 T) from 282.5 K to 320 K, which makes it a potential candidate for the highly efficient refrigerant in a domestic magnetic refrigeration appliance.

1. Introduction

Recently, the demand for refrigeration has risen sharply because of the ongoing and extremely high-temperature weather. However, conventional refrigeration technology can make this problem worse due to the generation of ozone-depleting gases by refrigerants. A novel refrigeration technology, namely magnetic refrigeration (MR, which has the advantages of high efficiency, environmental friendliness, great stability and reliability, low noise, and easy miniaturization [1,2,3,4,5]), may be a better choice. The MR technology was first used by Gauque in 1933 to achieve ultra-low temperatures below 1 K and has been applied to the low and medium temperature regions up to now [6,7], although it is still in the research stage at high temperatures, especially for civil applications at room temperature. One of the key issues affecting the civil application of MR is the magnetocaloric effect (MCE) performance of refrigerants.
Although a large number of compounds with ultrahigh magnetic entropy change (−ΔSm) have been developed, their narrow working temperature ranges make them difficult to synthesize a composite material with a flattened −ΔSm curve [8,9,10,11], which is of great significance for the optimization of cooling efficiency in the Ericsson cycle [12]. Additionally, the presence of magnetic hysteresis and thermal hysteresis in these compounds prevents them from operating at high frequencies with fast response. On the contrary, the metallic glasses (MGs) that exhibit a broader −ΔSm peak (−ΔSmpeak) without magnetic hysteresis and thermal hysteresis are preferred, such as Gd-based and Fe-based MGs [13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. The tunable Curie temperature (Tc) in a wide range of composition adjustments is beneficial for constructing the flattened −ΔSm curve [15,16,17]. Furthermore, the advantages of outstanding mechanical, physical, and chemical properties can also ensure that MGs have a longer service life and numerous application scenarios [27,28]. For example, Zr-based or Ti-based MGs with both ultra-high strength and plasticity have made significant progress in key structural materials for military and aerospace equipment; Ca-based, Mg-based, or Fe-based MGs possess good biocompatibility and comprehensive mechanical properties and are expected to be used in artificial bones.
Compared with rare-earth (RE)-based MGs, Fe-based MGs show greater application value in civil aspects (such as magnetic refrigerators, air conditioners, wine cabinets, and so on) due to their lower cost and better glass forming ability (GFA), but the −ΔSmpeak of these Fe-based MGs is not as high as that of RE-based MGs [15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25,26]. Therefore, improving the −ΔSmpeak of the Fe-based MGs as much as possible is a top priority for the civil application of MR technology. Amongst these reported Fe-based MGs, Fe-Zr-B-based MG ribbons are the outstanding ones [15,16,17,18,23,24,25,26]. For example, the Fe-Zr-B ternary amorphous ribbons exhibited a −ΔSmpeak under 5 T of 2.75–3.34 J/(kg × K) at the Tc ranging from 271 K to 327 K [18,24]. By minor element substitution, the −ΔSmpeak under 5 T of the multicomponent Fe-Zr-B-based MG ribbons was increased to a maximum value of 3.55 J/(kg × K) at 336 K [26]. Unfortunately, the values of −ΔSmpeak in these Fe-Zr-B-based MG ribbons are still not as high for the practical application of MR. In our recent works, we found that Fe-La/Ce-B-based glassy ribbons show rather excellent MCE near room temperature, and the −ΔSmpeak under 5 T of Fe87Ce8B5 ribbon reaches 3.65 J/(kg × K) at 283 K, which is 12.3% higher than that of Fe87Zr8B5 metallic glass and exceeds the −ΔSmpeak of most other Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous alloys [29,30]. The large −ΔSmpeak of the Fe87Ce8B5 amorphous ribbon was attributed to the extra magnetic moment of the Ce atom, but the effect of Ce content on the −ΔSmpeak of the Fe-Ce-B MG ribbons and the involved mechanism is still unclear. The detailed investigation of the magnetic and magnetocaloric properties of the Fe-Ce-B ternary MG ribbons will be helpful for the clarification of the effects of the Ce content on the magnetic properties and MCE of the Fe-Ce-B MG ribbons and the further development of the multicomponent Fe-based amorphous alloys with better MCE near room temperature. As such, we prepared the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons using melt-spinning technology and systematically investigated the influences of boron on GFA, Tc and −ΔSmpeak of the three ribbons, as well as the mechanisms involved, in this paper. Finally, an amorphous composite with a flattened −ΔSm profile was designed according to the three samples.

2. Materials and Methods

The Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) alloy ingots were prepared by melting high-purity raw materials (≥99.9 at%) using a vacuum arc-melting furnace with the protection of Ar gas. Each ingot of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) master alloys was melted more than four times to ensure their compositional homogeneity. These ingots were remelted in a quartz tube again and sprayed onto the surface of a high-speed (~55 m/s) rotating copper roller to form the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons. The structure of these ribbons was characterized by a PANalytical X-ray diffractometer with Cu Kα radiation. The differential scanning calorimetry (DSC) traces were measured at a heating rate of 20 K/min on a Netzsch DSC 404C calorimeter to evaluate the GFA of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons. The magnetic measurements of the samples, including hysteresis loops, magnetization vs. temperature (M-T) curves, and isothermal magnetization (M-H) curves, were performed on a vibrating sample magnetometer (VSM), which is a module of 6000 Physical Property Measurement System (PPMS, Quantum Design).

3. Results and Discussion

Figure 1a shows the XRD patterns of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons. Only smooth diffraction humps between 40° and 50° and no obvious crystalline peaks were observed in these patterns, indicating the amorphous structure of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons. Figure 1b displays the DSC curves of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons. A weak glass transition endothermic hump before a sharp crystallization exothermic peak was found in each DSC curve, which further confirms the glassy characteristics of the three ribbons. From their DSC curves, we can obtain the thermal parameters, including the onset temperature of glass transition (Tgonset) and crystallization (Txonset), and liquidus temperature (Tl), of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) MG ribbons, as listed in Table 1. As a result, the reduced glass transition temperature (Trg = Tg/Tl) [31] and the parameter γ (=Tg/(Tg + Tl)) [32] can be calculated accordingly to estimate the GFA of these ribbons. The Trg and γ are about 0.451 and 0.354 for x = 5, 0.483 and 0.358 for x = 6, and 0.485 and 0.362 for x = 7, respectively. Both the Trg and γ increase with the increase of boron content, which indicates that the addition of boron can improve the GFA of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) MG ribbons.
The hysteresis loops at 180 K and 380 K of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) glassy ribbons were measured under the maximum field of 5 T, as shown in Figure 2a–c. All glassy ribbons are paramagnetic at 380 K and soft magnetic with near zero hystereses at 180 K, which suggests that these ribbons transform from ferromagnetism to paramagnetism between 180 K and 380 K. The saturation magnetizations (Ms) at 180 K of the three samples are about 129.4 Am2/kg, 143.2 Am2/kg, and 142.1 Am2/kg, respectively. The Ms first increases and then slightly decreases with the boron content. To determine the ferromagnetic–paramagnetic transition temperature of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) MG ribbons, we measured their M-T curves from 180 K to 380 K under 0.03 T after cooling these samples without any applied fields. As illustrated in the insets of Figure 2a–c, all M-T curves of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons show similar shapes, and Tc can be deduced to be ~283 K for x = 5, ~305 K for x = 6, and ~323 K for x = 7, respectively. It was found that Tc of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons almost linearly increases with the increase of boron content. The Curie temperature of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) glassy ribbons should also be decided by the interaction between Fe atoms because of only one electron in the 4f shell of the Ce atom. The monotonically increasing relationship between Tc and composition was also observed in the Fe-Zr-B ternary amorphous ribbons, which is believed to be due to the enhanced 3d–3d direct interaction between Fe atoms by the addition of boron [18,24]. In addition, the increase of boron content (namely the reduction of Ce content) will diminish the antiferromagnetic coupling between Ce and Fe atoms, which can dilute the direct interaction between Fe atoms [30] and, thus, result in the enhancement of 3d–3d interaction between Fe atoms.
The Arrott plots can be deduced from their isothermal magnetization curves (not present in the paper) to judge the types of magnetic transition in the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons, as illustrated in Figure 3a–c. The slope of each Arrott plot at every temperature is positive, without “S” or “C”-shaped feature, indicating that both the three alloys experience a second-order ferromagnetic–paramagnetic transition near their Tc [33].
In order to characterize MCE of the second-order phase transition Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons, the magnetic entropy change can be calculated by Maxwell equation [34]:
Δ S m ( T , H ) = S m ( T , H ) S m ( T , 0 ) = 0 H ( M T ) H dH
Figure 4a shows the temperature dependence of −∆Sm ((−∆Sm)-T curves) for the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons under the magnetic fields of 1.5 T and 5 T. The broadened distribution of each (−∆Sm)-T curve suggests the typical feature of second-order magnetic transition materials. The −ΔSmpeak under 1.5 T and 5 T of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons are summarized in Table 1. We can find that the value of −ΔSmpeak first increases and then decreases with the increase of boron content and reaches a maximum value of ~3.88 J/(kg × K) under 5 T at x = 6. The variation is the same as that in Ms. Although the B substitution for Ce can improve the 3d–3d interaction between Fe atoms, which is beneficial for the enhancement of −ΔSmpeak, the decrease of the Ce atom simultaneously reduces the total magnetic entropy of the alloy, thus resulting in the reduction of −ΔSmpeak, as the Ce atom also contributes to the magnetic entropy change [18,24,30]. It may be precisely the two opposing factors that lead to this variation in Ms and −ΔSmpeak. According to the −ΔSmpeak under various magnetic fields, the field dependence of −ΔSmpeak for the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons can be investigated by constructing the ln(−ΔSmpeak)-ln(H) plots, as shown in Figure 4b. Each set of point plots is linearly fitted well, and the slope (expressed by n) of the linear fitting is 0.756 for x = 5, 0.759 for x = 6, and 0.750 for x = 7, respectively. The values of n are consistent with that of other MGs [16,17,18,23,24,25,26,29,30] but slightly larger than the predicted value of the mean field model [35]. This deviation is mainly caused by local inhomogeneity in MGs because the presence of short-range ordered clusters in MGs leads to a magnetic transformation in a wide temperature range [17].
Figure 5a displays the −ΔSmpeak under 5 T of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons and some Fe-Zr-B-based MGs [15,16,17,18,23,24,25,26,36]. A positive correlation between −ΔSmpeak and Tc was observed in the Fe-Zr-B-based MGs, implying that the higher −ΔSmpeak can only be achieved at higher temperatures for the Fe-Zr-B-based MGs, which is very unfriendly for the application of magnetic refrigeration at room temperature. However, the novel Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons prepared in this work provide a better idea and exhibit better magnetocaloric performance than the Fe-Zr-B-based MGs. For example, the lowest −ΔSmpeak in these amorphous ribbons (~3.66 J/(kg × K) at 282.5 K for Fe87Ce8B5) is still 3.1% higher than the largest −ΔSmpeak in the Fe-Zr-B-based MGs (~3.55 J/(kg × K), while Tc reaches around 335 K [15,25]). The Fe87Ce7B6 ribbon with the largest −ΔSmpeak shows a value at least 9.3% higher than that of the Fe-Zr-B-based MGs. Additionally, the −ΔSmpeak of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons is much higher than that of the Fe-Zr-B-based MGs with the same Tc, which can be intuitively observed from Figure 5a.
On the other hand, the Tc of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons increases from 283 K to 323 K, which perfectly matches the temperature interval of a domestic magnetic refrigeration appliance. Therefore, we can construct an amorphous composite with a flattened −∆Sm profile that is the requirement of application in an Ericsson cycle according to the three ribbons [37]. The −∆Sm of the composite can be calculated as follows:
Δ S m ( composite ) = i = 1 , 2 , , n n   w i   ×   ( Δ S m ) i
where wi is the weight fraction of each component; the validity of Equation (2) has been verified in Ref. [38]. Therefore, by adjusting the weight fraction of these ribbons according to Equation (2), the amorphous composite was designed to be synthesized with 44% (wt.%) Fe87Ce8B5 + 3% (wt.%) Fe87Ce7B6 + 53% (wt.%) Fe87Ce6B7 amorphous ribbons. As shown in Figure 5b, the −∆Sm of the amorphous composite fluctuates with an average value of ~1.20 J/(kg × K) from 275 K to 315 K (∆Ttable = 40 K) under 1.5 T, and ~3.29 J/(kg × K) from 282.5 K to 320 K (∆Ttable = 37.5 K) under 5 T. Compared with the Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous composite materials, an amorphous hybrid with a larger average −∆Sm (−∆Smaverage) was achieved in this work [15,16,17]. In addition, the effective cooling capacity (RCeff = −∆Smaverage × ∆Ttable [39]) used to assess the actual cooling capacity of the Fe-Ce-B amorphous hybrid was calculated to be about 48.0 J/kg under 1.5 T and 123.4 J/kg under 5 T, both of which are also higher than those of the Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous composites with a similar ∆Ttable [15,17,39]. Furthermore, considering that the components of the amorphous composite do not contain radioactive elements, the Fe-Ce-B amorphous hybrid, thereby, shows a better application potential as highly efficient refrigerants in a domestic magnetic refrigeration appliance.

4. Conclusions

In summary, we successfully prepared the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons, and the influences of boron addition on their GFA, Tc, and −ΔSmpeak were systematically investigated. The main conclusions are as follows:
(i)
The Trg and γ indicate that the GFA of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) ribbons were increased with the addition of boron;
(ii)
All ribbons show soft magnetic properties with negligible coercivity at 180 K, and Tc of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons is ~283 K for x = 5, ~305 K for x = 6, and ~323 K for x = 7, respectively. The increased Tc with the addition of boron may be due to the enhanced 3d–3d interaction between Fe atoms induced by the increase of boron content and the reduction of Ce content;
(iii)
The −ΔSmpeak of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons first increases and subsequently decreases with the increase of boron content, which is supposed to be related to the competitive effect between the enhanced 3d–3d interaction by the addition of B content and the reduced total magnetic entropy by the decrease of Ce content;
(iv)
Both Arrott plots and the value of n at Tc suggest the typical second-order magnetic transition magnetocaloric behavior of the three ribbons. All the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons show rather excellent MCE than Fe-Zr-B-based metallic glasses.
Based on the above results, we designed an amorphous composite with a flattened (−ΔSm)-T curve by using 44% (wt.%) Fe87Ce8B5 + 3% (wt.%) Fe87Ce7B6 + 53% (wt.%) Fe87Ce6B7 ribbons. The high −∆Smaverage (~3.29 J/(kg × K)) and RCeff (~123.4 J/kg) from 282.5 K to 320 K under 5 T indicate that the hybrid is a promising candidate as a refrigerant applied in a domestic magnetic refrigeration appliance.

Author Contributions

Conceptualization, L.X., P.Y. and J.-L.Y.; methodology, D.D.; validation, Q.W. and B.-Z.T.; investigation, S.-H.Z., L.-Z.Z. and P.-J.W.; data curation, Q.W., S.-H.Z. and B.-Z.T.; writing—original draft preparation, S.-H.Z. and Q.W.; writing—review and editing, L.X.; funding acquisition, L.X. and P.Y. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript.

Funding

This research was funded by the National Natural Science Foundation of China, grant numbers 51871139, 52071196, and 52071043.

Institutional Review Board Statement

Not applicable.

Informed Consent Statement

Not applicable.

Data Availability Statement

Data sharing is not applicable.

Acknowledgments

This research was technically supported by the Center for Advanced Microanalysis of Shanghai University.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest in this work.

References

  1. Chaudhary, V.; Chen, X.; Ramanujan, R.V. Iron and manganese based magnetocaloric materials for near room temperature thermal management. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 100, 64–98. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  2. Bruck, E. Developments in magnetocaloric refrigeration. J. Phys. D. Appl. Phys. 2005, 38, R381–R391. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  3. de Oliveira, N.A.; von Ranke, P.J. Theoretical aspects of the magnetocaloric effect. Phys. Rep. 2010, 489, 89–159. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  4. Franco, V.; Blázquez, J.S.; Ipus, J.J.; Law, J.Y.; Moreno-Ramírez, L.M.; Conde, A. Magnetocaloric effect: From materials research to refrigeration devices. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2018, 93, 112–232. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  5. Gschneidner, K.A., Jr.; Pecharsky, V.K. Magnetocaloric Materials. Annu. Rev. Mater. Sci. 2000, 30, 387–429. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  6. Giauque, W.F.; Macdougall, D.P. Attainment of temperature below 1° absolute by demagnetization of Gd2(SO4)3·8H2O. Phys. Rev. 1933, 43, 768. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  7. Shen, B.G.; Sun, J.R.; Hu, F.X.; Zhang, H.W.; Cheng, Z.H. Recent Progress in Exploring Magnetocaloric Materials. Adv. Mater. 2009, 21, 4545–4564. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  8. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Tunable magnetic regenerator alloys with a giant magnetocaloric effect for magnetic refrigeration from ~20 to ~290 K. Appl. Phys. Lett. 1997, 70, 3299–3301. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  9. Pecharsky, V.K.; Gschneidner, K.A., Jr. Giant magnetocaloric effect in Gd5(Si2Ge2). Phys. Rev. Lett. 1997, 78, 4494–4497. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  10. Miao, X.F.; Wang, W.Y.; Liang, H.X.; Qian, F.J.; Cong, M.Q.; Zhang, Y.J.; Muhammad, A.; Tian, Z.J.; Xu, F. Printing (Mn,Fe)2(P,Si) magnetocaloric alloys for magnetic refrigeration applications. J. Mater. Sci. 2020, 55, 6660–6668. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  11. Pasquale, M.; Sasso, C.P.; Lewis, L.H.; Giudici, L.; Lograsso, T.; Schlagel, D. Magnetostructural transition and magnetocaloric effect in Ni55Mn20Ga25 single crystals. Phys. Rev. B 2005, 72, 094435. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef] [Green Version]
  12. Hashimoto, T.; Kuzuhara, T.; Sahashi, M.; Inomata, K.; Tomokiyo, A.; Yayama, H. New application of complex magnetic materials to the magnetic refrigerant in an Ericsson magnetic refrigerator. J. Appl. Phys. 1987, 62, 3873–3878. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  13. Xia, L.; Tang, M.B.; Chan, K.C.; Dong, Y.D. Large magnetic entropy change and adiabatic temperature rise of a Gd55Al20Co20Ni5 bulk metallic glass. J. Appl. Phys. 2014, 115, 223904. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  14. Bingham, N.S.; Wang, H.; Qin, F.; Peng, H.X.; Sun, J.F.; Franco, V.; Srikanth, H.; Phan, M.H. Excellent magnetocaloric properties of melt-extracted Gd-based amorphous microwires. Appl. Phys. Lett. 2012, 101, 102407. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  15. Chen, L.S.; Zhang, J.Z.; Wen, L.; Yu, P.; Xia, L. Outstanding magnetocaloric effect of Fe88-xZr8B4Smx (x=0, 1, 2, 3) amorphous alloys. Sci. China. Phys. Mech. Astron. 2018, 61, 056121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  16. Gan, L.H.; Ma, L.Y.; Tang, B.Z.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Effect of Co substitution on the glass forming ability and magnetocaloric effect of Fe88Zr8B4 amorphous alloys. Sci. China. Phys. Mech. Astron. 2017, 60, 076121. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  17. Peng, J.X.; Tang, B.Z.; Wang, Q.; Bai, C.; Wu, Y.; Chen, Q.X.; Li, D.M.; Ding, D.; Xia, L.; Guo, X.L.; et al. Effect of heavy rare-earth (Dy, Tb, Gd) addition on the glass-forming ability and magneto-caloric properties of Fe89Zr7B4 amorphous alloy. J. Alloys Compd. 2022, 925, 166707. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  18. Yu, P.; Zhang, J.Z.; Xia, L. Effect of boron on the magneto-caloric effect in Fe91-xZr9Bx (x = 3, 4, 5) amorphous alloys. J. Mater. Sci. 2017, 52, 13948–13955. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  19. Waske, A.; Schwarz, B.; Mattern, N.; Eckert, J. Magnetocaloric (Fe-B)-based amorphous alloys. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2013, 329, 101–104. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  20. Zhang, M.X.; Li, J.W.; Kong, F.L.; Liu, J. Magnetic properties and magnetocaloric effect of FeCrNbYB metallic glasses with high glass-forming ability. Intermetallics 2015, 59, 18–22. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  21. Caballero-Flores, R.; Franco, V.; Conde, A.; Kiss, L.F. Influence of Mn on the magnetocaloric effect of nanoperm-type alloys. J. Appl. Phys. 2010, 108, 073921. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  22. Min, S.G.; Kim, K.S.; Yu, S.C.; Lee, K.W. The magnetization behavior and magnetocaloric effect in amorphous Fe-Nb-B ribbons. Mater. Sci. Eng. A-Struct. Mater. Prop. Microstruct. Process. 2007, 449, 423–425. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  23. Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Tang, B.Z.; Ding, D.; Cui, L.; Xia, L. Effect of Mn Substitution Fe on the Formability and Magnetic Properties of Amorphous Fe88Zr8B4 Alloy. Metals 2021, 11, 1577. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  24. Wang, X.; Wang, Q.; Tang, B.Z.; Ding, D.; Cui, L.; Xia, L. Magnetic and Magneto-Caloric Properties of the Amorphous Fe92-xZr8Bx Ribbons. Materials 2020, 13, 5334. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  25. Wu, Y.B.; Wang, Q.; Tang, B.Z.; Pan, L.L.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Outstanding glass formability and magneto-caloric effect of a Fe85Co3Zr5B4Nb3 metallic glass. J. Non-Cryst. Solids 2021, 566, 120885. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  26. Yu, P.; Zhang, J.Z.; Xia, L. Fe87Zr7B4Co2 amorphous alloy with excellent magneto-caloric effect near room temperature. Intermetallics 2018, 95, 85–88. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  27. Li, H.X.; Lu, Z.C.; Wang, S.L.; Wu, Y.; Lu, Z.P. Fe-based bulk metallic glasses: Glass formation, fabrication, properties and applications. Prog. Mater. Sci. 2019, 103, 235–318. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  28. Inoue, A.; Takeuchi, A. Recent development and application products of bulk glassy alloys. Acta Mater. 2011, 59, 2243–2267. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  29. Wang, C.H.; Wang, Q.; Tang, B.Z.; Zhou, X.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Achieve good magneto-caloric response near the ambient temperature in a Fe86La7B5Ce2 amorphous ribbon. J. Magn. Magn. Mater. 2022, 547, 168954. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  30. Li, A.L.; Wang, Q.; Tang, B.Z.; Yu, P.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Magnetocaloric effect of the Fe87M8B5 (M = Zr, Ce) amorphous alloys. Mater. Sci. Eng. B-Adv. 2022, 286, 116033. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  31. Turnbull, D. Under what conditions can a glass be formed? Contemp. Phys. 1969, 10, 473–488. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  32. Lu, Z.P.; Liu, C.T. A new glass-forming ability criterion for bulk metallic glasses. Acta Mater. 2002, 50, 3501–3512. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  33. Banerjee, S.K. On a generalized approach to first and second order magnetic transitions. Phys. Lett. 1964, 12, 16–17. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  34. Hashimoto, T.; Numasawa, T.; Shino, M.; Okada, T. Magnetic refrigeration in the temperature range from 10 K to room temperature: The ferromagnetic refrigerants. Cryogenics 1981, 21, 647–653. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  35. Oesterreicher, H.; Parker, F.T. Magnetic cooling near Curie temperatures above 300 K. J. Appl. Phys. 1984, 55, 4334–4338. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  36. Zheng, X.N.; Wang, Q.; Yue, C.Y.; Li, A.L.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Achieving higher magnetic entropy change peak at lower temperature by minor Ti substitution for Zr in the Fe88Zr8B4 metallic glass. Mod. Phys. Lett. B 2023, 37, 2350032. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  37. Smaili, A.; Chahine, R. Composite materials for Ericsson-like magnetic refrigeration cycle. J. Appl. Phys. 1997, 81, 824. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  38. Ma, L.Y.; Gan, L.H.; Chan, K.C.; Ding, D.; Xia, L. Achieving a table-like magnetic entropy change across the ice point of water with tailorable temperature range in Gd-Co-based amorphous hybrids. J. Alloys Compd. 2017, 723, 197–200. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
  39. Álvarez, P.; Gorria, P.; Llamazares, J.L.S.; Blanco, J.A. Searching the conditions for a table-like shape of the magnetic entropy in magneto-caloric materials. J. Alloys Compd. 2013, 568, 98–101. [Google Scholar] [CrossRef]
Figure 1. (a) The XRD patterns of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) as-spun ribbons; (b) the DSC traces of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons at the heating rate of 20 K/min; the inset is the melting behaviors.
Figure 1. (a) The XRD patterns of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) as-spun ribbons; (b) the DSC traces of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons at the heating rate of 20 K/min; the inset is the melting behaviors.
Materials 16 04393 g001
Figure 2. The hysteresis loops of the (a) Fe87Ce8B5, (b) Fe87Ce7B6, and (c) Fe87Ce6B7 amorphous ribbons measured at 180 K and 380 K under 5 T; the insets are their M-T curves measured under 0.03 T.
Figure 2. The hysteresis loops of the (a) Fe87Ce8B5, (b) Fe87Ce7B6, and (c) Fe87Ce6B7 amorphous ribbons measured at 180 K and 380 K under 5 T; the insets are their M-T curves measured under 0.03 T.
Materials 16 04393 g002
Figure 3. The Arrott plots of the (a) Fe87Ce8B5, (b) Fe87Ce7B6, and (c) Fe87Ce6B7 amorphous ribbons.
Figure 3. The Arrott plots of the (a) Fe87Ce8B5, (b) Fe87Ce7B6, and (c) Fe87Ce6B7 amorphous ribbons.
Materials 16 04393 g003
Figure 4. (a) The (−ΔSm)-T curves of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons under 1.5 T and 5 T; (b) the ln(−ΔSmpeak) vs. ln(H) plots and their linear fittings of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons.
Figure 4. (a) The (−ΔSm)-T curves of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons under 1.5 T and 5 T; (b) the ln(−ΔSmpeak) vs. ln(H) plots and their linear fittings of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons.
Materials 16 04393 g004
Figure 5. (a) The −ΔSmpeak of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons and some Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous alloys under 5 T; (b) the flattened (−∆Sm)-T curves of the amorphous composite composed of the three amorphous ribbons under 1.5 T and 5 T.
Figure 5. (a) The −ΔSmpeak of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons and some Fe-Zr-B-based amorphous alloys under 5 T; (b) the flattened (−∆Sm)-T curves of the amorphous composite composed of the three amorphous ribbons under 1.5 T and 5 T.
Materials 16 04393 g005
Table 1. The thermal properties and magnetic properties of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons.
Table 1. The thermal properties and magnetic properties of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) amorphous ribbons.
CompositionTg (K)Tx (K)Tl (K)TrgγTc (K)
x = 565174114420.4510.354283
x = 669876714430.4830.358305
x = 770177714440.4850.362323
−ΔSmpeak (J/(kg × K))
1 T1.5 T2 T3 T4 T5 T
x = 51.081.481.842.493.093.66
x = 61.141.561.942.633.283.88
x = 71.121.521.892.563.173.75
Disclaimer/Publisher’s Note: The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of MDPI and/or the editor(s). MDPI and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

Share and Cite

MDPI and ACS Style

Zheng, S.-H.; Wang, Q.; Zhu, L.-Z.; Wang, P.-J.; Ding, D.; Tang, B.-Z.; Yu, P.; Yao, J.-L.; Xia, L. Excellent Magnetocaloric Performance of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) Metallic Glasses and Their Composite. Materials 2023, 16, 4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124393

AMA Style

Zheng S-H, Wang Q, Zhu L-Z, Wang P-J, Ding D, Tang B-Z, Yu P, Yao J-L, Xia L. Excellent Magnetocaloric Performance of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) Metallic Glasses and Their Composite. Materials. 2023; 16(12):4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124393

Chicago/Turabian Style

Zheng, Shu-Hui, Qiang Wang, Li-Ze Zhu, Peng-Jie Wang, Ding Ding, Ben-Zhen Tang, Peng Yu, Jin-Lei Yao, and Lei Xia. 2023. "Excellent Magnetocaloric Performance of the Fe87Ce13−xBx (x = 5, 6, 7) Metallic Glasses and Their Composite" Materials 16, no. 12: 4393. https://doi.org/10.3390/ma16124393

Note that from the first issue of 2016, this journal uses article numbers instead of page numbers. See further details here.

Article Metrics

Back to TopTop